I can buy or trade but I would prefer to trade. I have a large
collection of S-100 cards and some other goodies to work a trade
with. If it has the CUTTER ROM, all the better. If not, I can
burn a 2708 (and I'll probably post a "Wanted: CUTTER ROM dump"
message).
Thanks,
Bill Sudbrink
I have to assume then that the software that ran on the 3*'s was a later development then the stuff that ran on the Televideo Personal Mini series (80286 based). Dubbed Infoshare, which was an OEM release of early Netware (and I am looking for it). Other boxes that come to mind are the Northstar Dimension (80186), and an Altos box. Not sure what they ran though. There was a PM/286 too, which ran a later version of Infoshare IINM.
?Anyone familiar w/the Burroughs '286 boxes that also weren't MS-DOS based?
?Sorry didn't mean to *help* hijack the thread. That is a very interesting piece. The peculiar 68k stuff is far and away the rarer birds though, sadly snifful.
regardless, and be sure I am no expert on semiconductor manufacturing, I'd be surprised to find out that all 8088's were CMOS after a certain date. The 80c88's were used mostly in small laptops, no? (small being anything smaller then that Zenith big honker, w/the shocking blue display. It used a *real* 8088 IINM). A CMOS version would be slower and more prone to damage from static electricity. And it would require less power. Off the top of my head I can't think of any desktops that used them, but I may have actually ran into 1 or 2 in my travels.
?But I am glad you managed to answer your own question Jimbo :)
--- On Thu, 2/12/09, Jim Leonard <trixter at oldskool.org> wrote:
From: Jim Leonard <trixter at oldskool.org>
Subject: Re: 8088 vs. 80c88
To: General at mail.mobygames.com, "On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2009, 2:49 PM
Jim Leonard wrote:
> So a simple routine to try to identify the 8088 vs. the 80c88 would look something like:
>
>???mov? ???cx,2? ? ? ? ? ? ; test if following instruction will be
>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???; repeated twice.
>???db? ? ? 0F3h,26h,0ACh???; rep es: lodsb
>???jcxz? ? Yes? ? ? ? ? ???; intel non-CMOS chips do not care of rep
>???jmp? ???Nope? ? ? ? ? ? ; before segment prefix override, NEC and
>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???; CMOS-tech ones does.
It turns out my information is bad.? The bug only asserts itself when an interrupt occurs during the REP.? Buggy CPUs don't continue; later ones do.? So to fix my detection code, I will increase the count in cx to something much longer, probably f000.
-- Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org)? ? ? ? ? ? http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project:? ? ? ? ???http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at? ???http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/
Dr. Dobbs was pretty cool... up until the IBM PC came out and
dominated everything. By the mid 80's all the Dr. Dobbs articles
were the-latest-TSR-to-do-something-in-MSDOS and it wasn't really
worth the effort for me to even look for something interesting
in it. That may have marked my turning point towards classic
computing, in fact :-).
Tim.
-- "james" <james at jdfogg.com> wrote:
>> Here are some pics of a Novell file server circa 1987.
>> http://bitsavers.org/pdf/novell/68k_file_server
>>
>> Was wondering if anyone had documentation or software for
>> this. I had some of the external dual drive scsi boxes for
>> these at one point.
>
>
>This reminds me of a similar oddity I used to support years
>ago. 3Com made a server, and an OS called 3+ Open. As I
>recall, it was an OS/2 - LAN Manager derivative.
Ah yes, the era of the 3Server is forever seared into my
brain; my first *real* job in the computer business involved
the care and feeding of several generations of these beasties.
The Original 3Server (about the same vintage as the Novell
unit pictured earlier) used an 80188 and a heavily modified
version of MS-DOS. It used an early SCSI implementation,
which was closer to SASI, to attach MFM disks and QIC tapes
via Adaptec bridge boards.
Because there were neither video nor ISA bus, there was more
room for contiguous DOS memory; something over 700k, which
pertty cool at the time. They originally were equipped with
30MB drives, but then the 3Server70 had an 80Mb (unformatted)
unit by Vertex.
These early boxes had the (optional) QIC tape in an external
box; the 3Server3 introduced in 1986 (IIRC) had disk and tape
in one box; in addition the 3Server3 could be interfaced with
appletalk, and also sported the then-new LIM memory used to
speed up the operating system.
These 80188 systems all used either 3+Share or EtherSeries
NOS's for basic drive sharing. IN addition, 3+Mail, 3+Route
(for routing e-mail between sites), 3+Backup and other network
applications were supported under the 3+Share NOS (in <1Mb
RAM).
These were followed by the 3S400 & 3S500 machines, which are
not interesing as they are little more than stock ISA 80386
machines running at 16MHz. These guys could run 3+Share, or
3+Open (a.k.a. OS/2 LanMan as pointed out above). ISTR that
they added TCP/IP late in that products life.
Then Novell took over the world and all of the above 'stuff'
died in obscurity.
It was at this point where I learned in my life that I had a
knack for picking losers.
I need a stiff drink now . . . .
____________________________________________________________
Wasting money? Stop, now. Click here for top online coupon websites.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/PnY6rw3g7mjTpd5rxcCErbhdwKhlKnl…
I've been reading the now increasingly mistitled thread on alignment disks, and it's gotten me thinking. What IS required to make alignment disks? I've always aligned malfunctioning floppy drives "the wrong way", using a known good disk - or an original software disk. On the Commodore 64 (and most systems, really), you can get the drives working well enough like this, but as others have pointed out, it's not the "right way". I just don't have any alignment disks. "Good enough" is much better than "not at all", and I don't mess with the drive alignment unless I have to. I'd love to be able to align drives properly though. And that requires an alignment disk.
There are different kinds of alignment disks too - analog and digital, ones that are intended to be used with a special program on a particular computer, and those intended to be used with a scope.
With today's modern machining technology, it should definitely be possible to create a system to write new alignment disks. Starting with a standard floppy drive, you could replace the stepper drive with something more precise and controllable. Then, you have to somehow accurately calibrate this whole thing. Is there a document out there that describes the track layout of a standard (say, 5 1/4" 48tpi, 40 track) diskette? There has to be a spec, one that describes exactly the distance between tracks, the width of a track, and the distance from the center hub to the beginning of the first track. If you had that information, and precision measurement tools, one could set up and calibrate the drive to spec.
Then, of course, there needs to be a controller for the thing, a computer interface to control the precise positioning of the head, as well as being able to read/write to the disk.
It's possible. It's beyond the equipment and tools at my disposal, but it's definitely doable for a hobbyist who has access to a machine shop and good tools.
Anyone out there a machinist? :)
-Ian
've got two of these systems. One is working, one may have a bad
PSU. Very cool-looking clone of the Sparc in a large tower/deskside
case. Yours to pick up in the Chicago area (60074.) Shipping would
be tough; these are heavy. I've also got a bunch goodies including
the special Solaris distro for Fujitsu and some manuals.
Come 'n' get 'em!
--
silent700.blogspot.com
Retrocomputing and collecting in the Chicago area:
http://chiclassiccomp.org
Hi folks. Does anyone have an electronic copy of the manual for
the Fujitsu M2312 SMD drive? I need to configure two of them for use
on an Emulex SC72 controller and I need to know how to set the DIP
switches.
Lacking an electronic copy, does anyone have a paper copy, and if
so, would you be willing to scan or type in the relevant pages?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
Today my wife and daughter were at Goodwill and found a Atari Portfolio in the box with a working Portfolio in it, a 32MB memory card, smart parallel interface, and a file manager/tutorial card with all the manuals/papers for everything. Cost was only $1 plus tax. That got me a few other goodies too. Life is good.
John K.
To Bill Maddox: Your ISP is using an outdated DNSBL that is blocking all
ip addresses (see http://dnsbl.invaluement.com/tqmcube/)
Please send me your mailing address and I'll get the guide out to you
asap. Just paypal me the amount shown on the postage meter sticker when
it arrives.
tnx.
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
(slowly working through some boxes...)
DEC VT102 Video Terminal Users Guide. Pub #EK-VT102-UG-003
219 pages.
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
Soft Sector magazine, Sept 1986.
This mag is dedicated to the Sanyo Personal Computer.
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
For the cost of postage:
TK50 Subsystem User's Guide. Pub #EK-OTK50-UG-004
LN03 Programmer's Reference Manual. Pub #EK-OLN03-RM-001
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
Hello all,
Please, no flames if you don't consider an Ultra 30 a "classic
computer". :-) At 300 MHz, it's not terribly recent either.
My system is a Sun Ultra 30, 300 MHz, 1.7 GB RAM and a 16 GB hard
disk. Trying to install Solaris 10 10/08. The initial installation
reboots after having copied Solaris to the hard disk and the machine
freezes at the line "creating new dsa pair"... I've given it a few
hours on several occasions with no success.
Note that NetBSD works just fine on this system and that I encountered
the same DSA key problem with Solaris 10 4/08. Also, I had had
significant trouble installing NetBSD initially because of defective
memory (the system would freeze at "boot cdrom" until I removed the
offending items). Once the problem with the memory was resolved, the
NetBSD installation worked perfectly and I presume that the remaining
sticks are fine. Finally "boot -k" (after the Solaris installation
has copied Solaris to the hard disk) yields no further details.
- Alex
> I'd like to try and get as much of that as possible on Bitsavers;
> what is the usual process for doing that? I don't have a scanner handy
> and I really don't have the time to manually scan 1000+ pages of docs.
Either loans in chunks to be scanned at CHM, or I have loaner scanner systems
that can be sent there.
> I get the impression
> that there is NO effort by any official archive to collect manuals and
> such
Stanford Library special collections have the Ampex and Apple archives,
which contain manuals.
The Charles Babbage Institute at the University of Minnesota as well as
the institution I work for (The Computer History Museum) have extensive
manual collections. Test equipment is out of the scope of CBI or CHM's
collecting scope, though.
> test equipment seems to be a poorly covered area in the museum
> and archive world.
But seems to be getting coverage from private collectors and some companies
(like Agilent).
If there were significant numbers of people from universities at this conference,
you should have noticed that they have problems enough trying to fund the archiving
of the contents that their own institutions, without actively collecting on
the outside.
This reminds me of a friend from years ago that was a fan of steam traction engines.
No "official" institution collected documentation on them, but there were preservation
organizations that kept their own archives. The problem, of course, is if the society
is disbanded without a long-term recipient for the material collected.
I am happy to report that my large S-100 collection is going to a single
person, both to expand his own collection and for eventual sale to other
collectors. [sigh!] If only I had another 400 sq ft and another 40
hours/week.
Thanks to everyone who responded with some good ideas (and requests!). The
important thing to me is that it is all going to someone who will not be
cutting off connectors to melt down for gold! I'm sure that he will let
list members know what he has available in the next few months.
Bob Stek
Former Saver of Lost Sols
> Hmm. Yeah, I've never heard of Nicolet either. Interesting find!
In the early 80's the company I worked for had a very neat little
portable audio-range FFT spectrum analyzer called the
"Mini-Ubiquitous". Always wanted one.
In '92 the USAF transferred me to Dayton OH (home of Mendelson's
Surplus) and they had one sitting in the pile of instruments for quite
some time... but they wanted $400 for it.
So they are hardly "ubiquitous" since I've only spotted two :)
-Charles
ps anyway I acquired an HP 3580A for $100 at the Hamvention which was
an easy fix...
anyone know where I can get some decent knobs for it?
Larry,
>From the info you gave and the info I have, I offer the following.
You need a "CP / M boot disk", not an MS-DOS boot disk for the Kaypro 2X -
either 2.2H or 2.2G. CP / M.
Your mainboard shoud be an 81-294 [underneath board usually under serial
port] and the ROM version should be 81-292-A - white label on the about 1" size
chip at U47.
But since you have a Turbo upgrade, the chip may have just a Turbo
designation. Any manufacturer designation and revision / year, etc. could also be
important.
Also check what the U43 chip label is - usually again a white label on a 1"
size chip.
There is also a Kaypro 2X / MTC version.
How do you really know it is a 2X - cover designation, back plate
designation, etc.?
These are all common questions many ask and many of us answer as best we can
>from the info you give and the info we have
All the best and keep us informed of your progress.
We like to keep "vintage" computers running and in "good homes!"
==========================================================================
In a message dated 2/11/2009 9:42:16 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
laptoplarry at gmail.com writes:
Frank,
Thank you for the information!
My original plan is/was to retrieve my Compaq Portable (my wife buried it in
a closet) to create a boot disk...only to find that I could not
locate the MS-DOS boot disk for the Compaq?!?!
While in the closet, I also retrieved a MacPlus that booted A-OK from a
removable hard drive...except I could not find the mouse!
Mac no mouse = no go...
So, I have no 5.25 360K drive available to create a boot disk for either the
Compaq or the Kaypro :-(
I'm now wondering if I can find a SCSI 5.25 low density drive to attach to
the portable hard drive of the MAC to create a boot disk for the Compaq.
>From the Compaq's DOS I'd be able to create the boot disk for the Kaypro
using the usual tools.
Of course, I'd have to locate a mouse appropriate for the MAC...
I guess the ideal thing would be to find a drive and controller for my
"modern" machine.
I'll check out the leads you gave me. Hopefully some kind soul will send me
a bootable Kaypro disk and/or a MS-DOS disk on 5.25 360K media.
Hey! Ain't this fun!
-Larry
...
--
This is not an automated signature. I type this in to the bottom of every
message.
Larry,
Go to _www.vintage-computer.com_ (http://www.vintage-computer.com) and do
a
search on that topic.
Also, contact "Sharkonwheels" there - again do a search - he posts a lot.
He is into the Kaypros "after" 1983 versions - i.e. the "2X's", I am into
the 1983 versions.
Looks like it may have been upgraded with the Turbo.
I believe such upgrades are still available for the post 1983 versions -
Advent might be a search word to use. Shark will know. He even sells
modified
Kaypros of that era.
Getting the right boot disk for the specific Kaypro you have is critical -
many do not understand this - today you need Windows - there are not very
many
main options.
Kaypro had about 15 - 20 different versions before they went bankrupt.
Also, in those hectic times, many "unofficial' modifications were made that
may
not have been documented, by Kaypro and previous owners of such computers.
Modifications and upgrades were very common in order to try to keep them
running efficiently, until the inevitable change to windows, after we all
invested so much in those systems, especially our time!
Sometimes you just have to take the top off and look around, especially at
chips at U43 and U47.
Please post your results on that site so others can benefit.
You can check my site out - _www.kayprosts.org_ (http://www.kayprosts.org)
-
under the folder "special" for a draft of my book on computers of that era
and a 2008 Kaypro calendar I did - lots of pictures of my 6 1983 Kaypros
modified to Kaypro " 8 ' 's.
All the best.
Frank
**************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy
Awards. AOL Music takes you there.
(http://music.aol.com/grammys?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000002)