> Sorry, folks. I've been asking around about what a System/74 is. I looked,
> and it's really a System/34. Could someone tell me what they were for, how
> much they were sold for, what year they are, what they're worth now, etc,etc.
> Thanks.
I used a System'34 when I worked for IBM in 1985-86. It was old then -
late '70s?. I seem to remember about 224K of RAM, possibly 256MB of
hard disk.
There were a number of posts on this subject on this list in late
September - start with the thread on IBM 5120 on 18th.
I would be very sad to see such a system vanish - I have a certain
affection for it after discovering that I - the newest student - knew
more about system/34s than anyone else in the building (this wasn't much
- the building housed two marketing units).
If you - or someone - do manage to acquire this sys/34, I may have some
spare copies of one or two pocket quick reference guides I could send
you. I'm pretty sure I've got OCL pocket reference (about 1/2 inch
thick) and I may have the Assembler pocket reference.
Finally, where is this machine? If it is in England or Wales I might
consider acquiring it myself...
Philip.
Thanks for the tips! I had found something that I suspected was
an optical sensor, but wasn't too sure. And cleaning it out as best
I could didn't change anything. Of course, I couldn't get at the
thing very well. And, as Tony pointed out, common-sense wiring of
the thing would mean the problem couldn't have been just a dirty
lens.
The good news is that I have a working drive to compare against,
so tracing the problem shouldn't be that hard. Maybe this weekend...
] Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 10:28:14 +0000 (GMT)
] From: Tony Duell <ard(a)odin.phy.bris.ac.uk>
] Subject: Re: Qume?
]
] On Mon, 10 Nov 1997, Bill Yakowenko wrote:
blah, blah, blah...
]
Lots of useful bits deleted...
]
] ... It shouldn't be too hard to trace the signal from the
] phototransistor to the Trk00 pin through the logic chips, though.
You'd think so. The last time I tried fixing these drives (a couple
years ago) I was trying to work backwards from the select LED. Had
big problems tracing the circuit because the traces go under chips,
and often turn corners under there, so you can't see which ones go
where. And I was paranoid about using a continuity-checker for fear
of putting voltage someplace where it could do damage. (Was that
being excessive?)
On the other hand, it should be trivial to measure voltage of the Trk00
signal at the connector, and see if it was getting that far. Divide
and conquer - the first secret of debugging.
]
] -tony
] Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 09:05:15 -0800 (PST)
] From: Tim Shoppa <shoppa(a)alph02.triumf.ca>
] Subject: Re: Qume?
]
] > ...got service manuals?...
]
] I wish I did. What model do you have? I'm looking for manuals
] for the Qume Datatrack 8 (DSDD, full-height.)
They are DT/8's, full height, I think DSDD (a megabyte per floppy).
] But lacking a manual, you still can trace the circuitry by hand;
] it's all SSI TTL, discrete components, and a couple of simple
] analog chips.
Yup. Sounds easy. If I wasn't so @#!% paranoid with the meter.
]
] Tim. (shoppa(a)triumf.ca)
] Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 17:33:51 +0000 (GMT)
] From: Tony Duell <ard(a)odin.phy.bris.ac.uk>
] Subject: Re: Qume?
]
...
] Still blowing dust out of the sensor can't do any harm, and it's something
] that I'd do first anyway, as it can't help the problem.
]
Will try it again, disassembling the thing if necessary to get access.
]
] -tony
Thanks guys!
Bill.
I'm open for it, anyone else ?
At 11:14 PM 11/11/97 -0500, you wrote:
>I'd like to snag one of those as well. Any chance of doing some sort of
coordinated roadtrip with folks meeting in a central place for distribution?
>
>-- Tony Eros
> Digital Equipment Corporation
>
>----------
>From: John R. Keys Jr.[SMTP:jrkeys@concentric.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 1997 7:44 PM
>To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
>Subject: Re: FWD: FREE to good home: IBM RT 6150s
>
>If no one close want them I could drive from Minnesota to your home a
>meeting place close to the IL border one of these weekends before snow hits.
>John
>At 09:16 PM 11/10/97 -0500, you wrote:
>>Found the following on comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
>>Anybody near him wanna rescue these machines.
>>
>>I acquired one about a month ago here in Indiana, along
>>with a fairly complete set of books and disks. Mine has
>>two ESDI drives (300mb & 110mb) and loaded with
>>AIX 2.2. It's a tower case about 24" x 24" x 9".
>>If I remember the front panel says System 135.
>>
>>Mike Thompson
>>
>>==================================================
>>Subject: FREE to good home: IBM RT 6150s
>>From: Bill Bradford <mrbill(a)texas.net>
>>Date: Sun, Nov 9, 1997 20:52 EST
>>Message-id: <645pd8$cbc$1(a)news3.texas.net>
>>
>>I recently acquired this whole bunch, with the intention of getting
>>at least a couple of them reloaded and working; however, I've now
>>got plans to move soon, and cant afford to move these machines. I'd
>>like to see them go to a good home; so they're free to the first
>>person to come pick them up.
>>
>>System Configurations: (6 systems)
>> EAP processors (16mb RAM each)
>> dual ESDI hard drives (unknown size)
>> SIIG ISA-bus I/O cards
>> Graphic cards with 6153 mono monitors
>> Ethernet (AUI / 10base2) cards
>> ESDI controller cards
>>
>>The other system only has the HDs and ESDI controller card (no CPU card
>> or other cards). Also, one of the above systems is lacking the 1.2mb
>>floppy drive; it may be the same system that is lacking a CPU card.
>>
>>I beleive 3 or 4 of the machines also have tape drive controller
>>cards; and I have three external IBM QIC tape drives to go with them.
>>I've also got a 15" monochrome IBM monitor that has a DB9 data cable
>>connector.
>>
>>I've got some manuals (User's manual, problem determination guide, and
>>2-3 others) in the IBM binders.
>>
>>Systems are located in Austin, Texas. You'll need a good-sized pickup
>>truck or van to haul all of them away. If you're interested, let me know.
>>It sucks to let these go, but I cant afford to move them along with my
>>other computer equipment.
>>
>>I can be reached at mrbill(a)texas.net.
>>
>>--
>>Bill Bradford Sr. Systems Engineer ICQ: 1864511
>>mrbill(a)texas.net Texas Networking, Inc. http://www.texas.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Anybody know what it is? There's one up for grabs in OK, by US govt.
auction. Here's a URL; dork around with it to find related info:
http://www.drms.dla.mil/drmo/sales/misc/SY3AFB20377002A157-1.html
Looks pretty cool, but it's a thousand or two miles from here...
Bill.
Another lot up for bid. After this one, I'll stop. Honest.
Taken from http://www.drms.dla.mil/national/catalogs/318306CH.html .
As before, muck with the URL to find related info.
Cheers,
Bill.
| **********************************************************
| ITEMS 8 THRU 9 ARE LOCATED AT
| NWC CHINA LAKE NAVAL WEAPONS CENTER CODE 7, BLDG 1073
| CHINA LAKE, CA 93555-6001
| **********************************************************
| 9. AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT:
| Including: Apple Laser Writer printer, Digital
| Monitors, Printers, Terminals, Multiplexers, Computers,
| Keyboards and Power Controls, IBM Disk Drives and
| Terminals, etc.
| DEMIL CODE B
|
| CONTACT: SAMUEL J. BROWN PHONE: (760) 939-2502
| Inside - COB010208A,B,CN.
| Loose on pallets.
| Used - FAIR
| Total Cost - $150941.94
| Est Total Wt - 866 lbs.
| 1 LOT
|
| THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES APPLY:
| PART 05-I: Military Munitions List Items (MLI).
| PART 05-K: Munitions List and Strategic List Items
| (MLI/SLI) Compliance.
|
| END USE CERTIFICATE APPLIES AND MUST BE COMPLETED AND
| SUBMITTED WITH BIDS FOR THIS ITEM.
Hi Allison:
> <> Your best bet is the 1N914 silicon diode. The one your replacing is likel
> <> not germainium. 1n914s are available from many sources (even radio crap
> <> for a few cents a peice.
>
> Trust me they are not caps, the part someone described would come into
> common use about 5-8 years later! To tell if they are diodes an
> ohmeter(VOM) and check for resistance one way and open circuit the other.
> No resistance in either direction is a cap!
I spoke with a fellow who has a print set for the board, he indicated that
there are no diodes on the board at all. There are, however, quite a few
bypass caps shown on the schematic. My glass devices are all in parallel,
each associated to a particular, IC, and are grounded on the other lead.
I will have to remove an intact one to check resistance and determine what
they are.
Thanks for the reply,
Kevin
--
Kevin McQuiggin VE7ZD
mcquiggi(a)sfu.ca
At 05:45 PM 11/10/97 +0000, you wrote:
>> (i.e., not looked for) the software to do it. Can someone recommend a PC
>> program to read 5.25" (and 3.5"?) diskettes and make images of them?
>There is... look into the simtel site and d/l several of them to try
>out. Some are DOS, win3.x and win95.
>I prefer to archive all of my disks to that dos based imager.
I like DOS best too. I'll check it out. Thanks!
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
Sorry, folks. I've been asking around about what a System/74 is. I looked,
and it's really a System/34. Could someone tell me what they were for, how
much they were sold for, what year they are, what they're worth now, etc,etc.
Thanks.
By the way, I may be able to get my hands on those unidentified IBM network
cards, maybe I can get a couple or two. I'll also look if I can find a hub
for them. There are also some PS/2s (not for sale), which used to be attached
to the network, which is now ethernet. The PS/2s, however, have a weird cable
that looks like the monitor power cable. It has a box on the end, about 1" X
1", that has a ton of electrodes. What is that?
OK, so they weren't called that early on. But still, that's what
they're called now. What I really want is something small, but
powerful. (This classic is going to get USED) I have two schedule
programs; MS Schedule+ and a program called Sidekick 2.0, for DOS, made
in the early 90's. Compatibility would help. I also want something
that's not to hard to find, and I can get for less than a Palm Pilot. (A
lot less, if possible.)
Thanks for all of your assistance,
Tim D. Hotze
At 08:47 PM 11/10/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Now the $64 question. there was a tandy with a 80x4 or 80x8 I do remember
>it as it was one of the few with a decent line length.
Could that have been the WP-2? (m100-like word processor). I sure hope so,
'cause I could really use the $64... 8^)
(Not including later PC laptops of course)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
Earlier this week I wrote:
> I wonder. A few weeks ago I bought for L1 at a car boot sale a device
> called a Microscribe 320. (Made by a Welsh company, Microscribe Ltd.,
> but sold with a British Telecom badge.) This is a sub-notebook (7 in
> square) terminal with built in text editor, 32K battery backed RAM and
> 40 x 8 character display. Before you all jump on me, yes, I know it was
> built circa 1983. It is a very nice machine, the only thing wrong with
Further investigation shows that my estimate of 1983 was incorrect. The
design of the model 320 dates from around 1985, and mine appears to have
been built early in 1988.
Just to keep the record straight.
Philip.
At 07:07 PM 11/10/97 -0500, you wrote:
>>Actually, the 102 has the same size screen as the 100. Perhaps you're
>>thinking of the 200? The 200 is a clamshell design (iirc) with 24x80
>>screen. The 102 was simply a lighter, cheaper-to-make version of the 100.
>
>Wha? Whoa! Mmmmmm, noper. The 200's screen had only twice the real estate
>of the M100 -- it has a 40x16 screen. Yes it was a flip-top which was nice
Whups! Sorry. Us po' kids from the big city couldn't never afford none o'
dem fancy machineries. 8^) Don't know that I've ever seen a 200 (let alone
a 600) in the flesh. One of these days...
>(Get this -- the two halves are kept together during transit by *magnets*)
Hmmm...doesn't sound like such a great idea, but i guess since it doesn't
have a floppy drive...
P.S., has there been any messages on the m100 list? I've not gotten any
since you signed me up. Thanks!
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
I'm looking for the following book. Does anyone have it? Amazon wants $80+
for it (I think that it's more of a text book than anything else). Thanks!
Title: "An Introduction to the Intel Family of Microprocessors: A
Hands-on Approach to Utilizing the 8088 Microprocessor" by James L.
Antonakos. There are two publishing dates: 1992 and 1996.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
Charter ClubWin! Member
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
I'd like to snag one of those as well. Any chance of doing some sort of coordinated roadtrip with folks meeting in a central place for distribution?
-- Tony Eros
Digital Equipment Corporation
----------
From: John R. Keys Jr.[SMTP:jrkeys@concentric.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 1997 7:44 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: FWD: FREE to good home: IBM RT 6150s
If no one close want them I could drive from Minnesota to your home a
meeting place close to the IL border one of these weekends before snow hits.
John
At 09:16 PM 11/10/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Found the following on comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
>Anybody near him wanna rescue these machines.
>
>I acquired one about a month ago here in Indiana, along
>with a fairly complete set of books and disks. Mine has
>two ESDI drives (300mb & 110mb) and loaded with
>AIX 2.2. It's a tower case about 24" x 24" x 9".
>If I remember the front panel says System 135.
>
>Mike Thompson
>
>==================================================
>Subject: FREE to good home: IBM RT 6150s
>From: Bill Bradford <mrbill(a)texas.net>
>Date: Sun, Nov 9, 1997 20:52 EST
>Message-id: <645pd8$cbc$1(a)news3.texas.net>
>
>I recently acquired this whole bunch, with the intention of getting
>at least a couple of them reloaded and working; however, I've now
>got plans to move soon, and cant afford to move these machines. I'd
>like to see them go to a good home; so they're free to the first
>person to come pick them up.
>
>System Configurations: (6 systems)
> EAP processors (16mb RAM each)
> dual ESDI hard drives (unknown size)
> SIIG ISA-bus I/O cards
> Graphic cards with 6153 mono monitors
> Ethernet (AUI / 10base2) cards
> ESDI controller cards
>
>The other system only has the HDs and ESDI controller card (no CPU card
> or other cards). Also, one of the above systems is lacking the 1.2mb
>floppy drive; it may be the same system that is lacking a CPU card.
>
>I beleive 3 or 4 of the machines also have tape drive controller
>cards; and I have three external IBM QIC tape drives to go with them.
>I've also got a 15" monochrome IBM monitor that has a DB9 data cable
>connector.
>
>I've got some manuals (User's manual, problem determination guide, and
>2-3 others) in the IBM binders.
>
>Systems are located in Austin, Texas. You'll need a good-sized pickup
>truck or van to haul all of them away. If you're interested, let me know.
>It sucks to let these go, but I cant afford to move them along with my
>other computer equipment.
>
>I can be reached at mrbill(a)texas.net.
>
>--
>Bill Bradford Sr. Systems Engineer ICQ: 1864511
>mrbill(a)texas.net Texas Networking, Inc. http://www.texas.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Actually, i have a C1P model that is untested at the moment. I also have
plenty of documentation which I have loaned out for copying purposes. My
particular model is tan with brown sides.
david
In a message dated 97-11-07 12:32:24 EST, you write:
> Whoops.... Try Challenger
>
> =========================================================
> George L. Rachor george(a)racsys.rt.rain.com
> Beaverton, Oregon
>
> On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, George Rachor wrote:
>
> > Forgive me as I have just joined the list but it seems that most of the
> > computer collections noted online have missed my favorite machine.
> >
> > My first machine was an Ohio Scientific C2-4p. I do think my most
> > efficient programming was done in that 4K of RAM.
> >
> > I no longer have the original but do have a couple of it's brothers.
The
> > last of the series was painted white and had introduced color. To
> > complete my collection I'd love to find either a C4 or C8 machine
complete
> > with Disk subsystem and software. I refuse to believe that I've got the
> > only ones left.
> >
> > George Rachor
> >
<programs) and bank-switched RAM (up to 72K?). I thought the M102 had a
<40*8 display, and was simply a slimline M100 with a revised logic board
<(used surface mount chips?), etc.
<
<If that's incorrect, what is the size of the M102 display?
It was may memory that the 102 had 80x8.
Allison
Hi All:
I am working on a sick M8310 board from a PDP-8/f.
I've found and removed a broken diode. It has a glass housing and
resembles a germanium variety that I used to see often in my early days.
The board has over a dozen diodes, all are the same. The diodes are not
numbered but have three coloured bands: Orange, Black, Brown.
Not having a suitable reference, any '8 owners out there that can tell me
what kind of diode I should replace the broken one with?
Thanks,
Kevin
--
Kevin McQuiggin VE7ZD
mcquiggi(a)sfu.ca
FW to: ClassicCmp(a)u.washington.edu
CC: cyber(a)prismnet.com
Can anyone give the hard drives and enclosures this fellow has a good
home? The price is certainly right ($10 + shipping). What they are is two
enclosures, each with a pair of Miniscribe 4022's (16 MB each, formatted)
in them, and I've also been led to understand that the enclosures contain a
SCSI-to-MFM bridge board.
Please reply directly to the offerer. Thanks!
Attachment follows.
-=-=- <snip> -=-=-
>X-Sender: cyber(a)prismnet.com
>X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
>Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 15:28:02 -0600
>To: Bruce Lane <kyrrin2(a)wizards.net>
>From: Tom Ray <cyber(a)prismnet.com>
>Subject: Re: weird SCSI drives
>
>I'll take you up on that offer. I hate to throw things out. Anybody wants
>them, they can have both of them for the cost of shipping via USmail plus
>$10. if that's too much, let me know. Only thing is, I don't even know if
>the drives work.
>
>tom
>
>
>
>[snip]
>> In short, even if their box does contain a SCSI-to-MFM bridge board,
>>they're pretty useless for much of anything current. HOWEVER -- do NOT just
>>throw them out! Sell them (at no more than $20 for the whole thing) to
>>someone who can give them a good home, or donate them to whatever computer
>>charity is in your area.
>>
>> One other alternative is that I'm a member of a mailing list of folks that
>>collect "classic" (read: more than 10 years old) hardware/software. Those
>>drives might be just what some collector needs to get that old Osborne or
>>Altair of theirs going with a good hard drive. I can, if you'd like,
>>forward a 'for sale/trade' note to the list for you. If anyone's
>>interested, they'd contact you directly.
>>
>> Best of luck, no matter what happens.
>>
>>
>>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin2(a)wizards.net)
http://www.wizards.net/technoid
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
If no one close want them I could drive from Minnesota to your home a
meeting place close to the IL border one of these weekends before snow hits.
John
At 09:16 PM 11/10/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Found the following on comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
>Anybody near him wanna rescue these machines.
>
>I acquired one about a month ago here in Indiana, along
>with a fairly complete set of books and disks. Mine has
>two ESDI drives (300mb & 110mb) and loaded with
>AIX 2.2. It's a tower case about 24" x 24" x 9".
>If I remember the front panel says System 135.
>
>Mike Thompson
>
>==================================================
>Subject: FREE to good home: IBM RT 6150s
>From: Bill Bradford <mrbill(a)texas.net>
>Date: Sun, Nov 9, 1997 20:52 EST
>Message-id: <645pd8$cbc$1(a)news3.texas.net>
>
>I recently acquired this whole bunch, with the intention of getting
>at least a couple of them reloaded and working; however, I've now
>got plans to move soon, and cant afford to move these machines. I'd
>like to see them go to a good home; so they're free to the first
>person to come pick them up.
>
>System Configurations: (6 systems)
> EAP processors (16mb RAM each)
> dual ESDI hard drives (unknown size)
> SIIG ISA-bus I/O cards
> Graphic cards with 6153 mono monitors
> Ethernet (AUI / 10base2) cards
> ESDI controller cards
>
>The other system only has the HDs and ESDI controller card (no CPU card
> or other cards). Also, one of the above systems is lacking the 1.2mb
>floppy drive; it may be the same system that is lacking a CPU card.
>
>I beleive 3 or 4 of the machines also have tape drive controller
>cards; and I have three external IBM QIC tape drives to go with them.
>I've also got a 15" monochrome IBM monitor that has a DB9 data cable
>connector.
>
>I've got some manuals (User's manual, problem determination guide, and
>2-3 others) in the IBM binders.
>
>Systems are located in Austin, Texas. You'll need a good-sized pickup
>truck or van to haul all of them away. If you're interested, let me know.
>It sucks to let these go, but I cant afford to move them along with my
>other computer equipment.
>
>I can be reached at mrbill(a)texas.net.
>
>--
>Bill Bradford Sr. Systems Engineer ICQ: 1864511
>mrbill(a)texas.net Texas Networking, Inc. http://www.texas.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I spent a most enjoyable day today writing an emulator for the varian
620/i processor. I have a few questions about the handling of the
overflow flag if anyone can help.
Also does anyone have any software for the beastie?
What happend to the Varian computer division?
Regards,
--
Hans B. Pufal : <mailto:hansp@digiweb.com>
Comprehensive Computer Catalogue : <http://www.digiweb.com/~hansp/ccc/>
_-_-__-___--_-____-_--_-_-____--_---_-_---_--__--_--_--____---_--_--__--_
At 08:43 AM 11/9/97 -0600, you wrote:
>Here's a silly question, but one I've never understood:
Not that silly; but I'm afraid I don't recall the answer. 8^)
>Since some of the software for my "old" (first generation PC) computers
>is on 5 1/4" disks of dubious condition, I would like to make copies
I think the best way to do this is to make disk images. I know the Mac can
do this with Mac disks, and I'm sure the PC can too, but I've not found
(i.e., not looked for) the software to do it. Can someone recommend a PC
program to read 5.25" (and 3.5"?) diskettes and make images of them?
This, I think, is where syquest drives (and similar) come in *very* handy.
You can store the images on a removeable disk and not bother taking up fixed
disk space for them.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
Replaced the 1.5A breaker with a 20 (One of the origionals)
Now I have a 15, and a 20.
The other origional one is toast, the insides were banged up.
I reglued the handle to the 20.
About to try this drill again...
Got it!
It works!
Halts with BUS ERR 'cause I removed the RX controller! Now to take it in
the next room and attach devices...
Alright. It wasn't powering on because I left J3 unplugged.
When I plug in J5 (4-wire plug on the line power module) everything goes.
I can plug in everything else, and all I get is a relay click.
I found the easy way to play with these plugs is to set the BA11
upside-down on the table, and unmount the PSU so I can get access.
What is J5 for and what voltages are supposed to be there?
I have an oscope here, and I may be able to dig out a VOM...
It's obvious I switched wires or something in the line power module.
Visual inspection shows nothing obviously wrong...
On 10 Nov 97 at 18:15, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> >This really sounds like the monitor for an Apple IIgs. I have three
> >such monitors. (One isn't in very good shape and the other two are
> >in use.) I think there are some Macs that can use this monitor, but I'm
> >not positive. Make sure you are using analog RGB, not digital.
No standard Macintosh can use the Apple IIgs RGB monitor. The video
port on the Mac provides a signal with a horizontal scan rate of
about 35kHz -- this figure is for the Mac II; newer Macs may be
higher. The Apple IIgs monitor and system video port use a scan rate
of about 15.75kHz. Both IIgs and Mac systems provide analog signals.
> In my opinion the LC would have been the most likely to be able to use the
> monitor.
The LC and IIsi were the first (non compact) Macs to have video on
the main board and folks were pleased to note that, using the right
cable, it was possible to hook up to a standard grotty PC VGA
display. The pinouts are available in Apple's Tech Info library.
> I'd heard rumors that it would, but when you think about the fact
> that they'll all work with a Multisync monitor, doesn't really make sense.
Lots of older computers will work with the early Multisync monitors.
I've used the same Multisync on my IIgs and on a PC. I've run out of
D-connectors temporarily; when I've been shopping I'll sort out the
cables to attach the monitor to my (digital output) Apple III and to
an LC-series Mac.
Phil
**************************************************************
Phil Beesley -- Computer Officer -- Distributed Systems Suppport
University of Leicester
Tel (0)116 252-2231
E-Mail pb14(a)le.ac.uk
Okay, I narrowed it down some:
I unplugged everything except J3, the power switch.
I plugged in that edge connector to the line module, OK.
Power on: loud click, but the breakers held.
Next, I plugged in J5.
Power on: *CRACK!* Both breakers go.
The breaker on the powerstrip is holding though.
What is P5 for?
Just an FYI...
www.classifieds2000.com/cgi-cls/ad.exe?P1+C220+A0+R12409+Q101422074
Old Computer Various Dell,IBM, $15/OBO, Used
Description Lots of Samsung Amber monitors.Compaq 286 Deskpro,
Dell and IBM 286 Plus all the Commodore and Apple stuff
you could want Make Me An Offer!!
Seller Info For sale by private party
(713) 631-1545 [Day]
billbutl(a)swbell.net
Houston, Texas - Houston 77078
Post Date 09-NOV-97
Copyright ? 1996-97, Classifieds2000 Inc.
All rights reserved.
Send any comments, questions, or
suggestions
to comments(a)classifieds2000.com
Employment Opportunities
Disclaimer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)crl.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
<> I believe that there are some CPU chips now with 64-bit internal buses.
<> Any advance on 64?
<Well I believe the HP 85 had a HP propietary CPU with 64 bits internal
<running at 613 KHz
That was 64bits of internal storage and that is different from a 64bit
parallel CPU. Also 613khz is slow.
There are otehr 64bit cpus, some are in games and other embedded systems.
However the number of systems for general purpose computing using 64 bit
cpus are however few.
Allison
Found the following on comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
Anybody near him wanna rescue these machines.
I acquired one about a month ago here in Indiana, along
with a fairly complete set of books and disks. Mine has
two ESDI drives (300mb & 110mb) and loaded with
AIX 2.2. It's a tower case about 24" x 24" x 9".
If I remember the front panel says System 135.
Mike Thompson
==================================================
Subject: FREE to good home: IBM RT 6150s
From: Bill Bradford <mrbill(a)texas.net>
Date: Sun, Nov 9, 1997 20:52 EST
Message-id: <645pd8$cbc$1(a)news3.texas.net>
I recently acquired this whole bunch, with the intention of getting
at least a couple of them reloaded and working; however, I've now
got plans to move soon, and cant afford to move these machines. I'd
like to see them go to a good home; so they're free to the first
person to come pick them up.
System Configurations: (6 systems)
EAP processors (16mb RAM each)
dual ESDI hard drives (unknown size)
SIIG ISA-bus I/O cards
Graphic cards with 6153 mono monitors
Ethernet (AUI / 10base2) cards
ESDI controller cards
The other system only has the HDs and ESDI controller card (no CPU card
or other cards). Also, one of the above systems is lacking the 1.2mb
floppy drive; it may be the same system that is lacking a CPU card.
I beleive 3 or 4 of the machines also have tape drive controller
cards; and I have three external IBM QIC tape drives to go with them.
I've also got a 15" monochrome IBM monitor that has a DB9 data cable
connector.
I've got some manuals (User's manual, problem determination guide, and
2-3 others) in the IBM binders.
Systems are located in Austin, Texas. You'll need a good-sized pickup
truck or van to haul all of them away. If you're interested, let me know.
It sucks to let these go, but I cant afford to move them along with my
other computer equipment.
I can be reached at mrbill(a)texas.net.
--
Bill Bradford Sr. Systems Engineer ICQ: 1864511
mrbill(a)texas.net Texas Networking, Inc. http://www.texas.net
<and is very easy to read for a non-backlit screen, but 80x24's were still
<few years away... Tandy got close on the Tandy 600 with 80x16, but the
Yes 80x24 were a few year later but, 80x8 was PX8 (and others) and that
was like a year away(1984 the latest).
Now the $64 question. there was a tandy with a 80x4 or 80x8 I do remember
it as it was one of the few with a decent line length.
Allison
Oh yes, Tim (This could be a Tim-Tim conversation type thing!!!), that
would be very nice. Well let's see, I'd have to trade in the Honda for a
truck, ship it back to the US from Bahrain, drive down, and then come back.
Not my idea of fun. (Sorry, I didn't mean to sound hostile)
I've found 30 IBM 400 terminals for $1 a piece, in Western Massachusetts,
but no mainframe.
Anyway, I need systems, not parts (I need systems for the parts :-) .)
But if I get the systems, I'll get the parts. I can even use the most
"common" classics, I have a US postal address.
Ciao,
Tim D. Hotze
----------
From: Tim Shoppa <shoppa(a)alph02.triumf.ca>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Classic Computer Rescue Squad
Date: Thursday, November 06, 1997 9:44 PM
> Does anyone have any systems that they could sell me? Anything... all
I've
> got is an XT that dosn't work.
Sure. Come up here with a lift-gate truck and I'll sell you all the
Data General Novas, 14" disk drives, and 1/2" 9-track tape drives
that you could want.
Tim. (shoppa(a)triumf.ca)
Here's a silly question, but one I've never understood:
Why can't a high density 5 1/4" disk be formatted in a double density
drive? When I try, DOS returns a "Track 0 Bad" error message.
I thought that a HD disk would simply have a denser coating of magnetic
material applied evenly over the entire surface of the disk. I don't
see why this should cause problems for a DD drive. However, a few
questions come to mind. Is the magnetic coating of a different
sensitivity, resulting in a weaker signal for the heads to pick up? Is
the magnetic coating applied to the media in "tracks", causing problems
when a different TPI spec is attempted on the disk?
Since some of the software for my "old" (first generation PC) computers
is on 5 1/4" disks of dubious condition, I would like to make copies
onto new disks. Since HD disks are still readily available and cheap, I
thought this would be an ideal way to do so.
I also seem to have fried the 5 1/4" HD drive in my PC while sorting
through some old software. It seems a couple of disks had some dirt on
them which caused horrible screeching sounds when the disk was spinning,
and also deposited a very hard black coating on the heads. The only way
I could remove the deposits was to scratch it off with my fingernails
(alcohol would not touch it). However, I must have bumped the heads out
of alignment, because the drive won't read disks any longer.
My question is: can I plug a Double Density drive into the same
connector in my modern PC and use it for my old disks? I know I will
have to change my BIOS setting, but is there anything else I need to
consider?
Any input on the above would be much appreciated... thanks in advance!
Hope this isn't too far off topic.
Grant Zozman
gzozman(a)escape.ca
Spotted this, thought it might be of interest to someone...
>http://www.classifieds2000.com/cgi-cls/ad.exe?P1+C220+A0+R11595+Q8671010
>
> Old Computer CIE Systems 6680/20, $50/OBO, Used
>>
>> Description CIE 680/20 Unix-like workstation. 15 years
>> old. Regulus (Unix-like) OS. 2@ 8MB hard
>> drives. 0.5 MB RAM. 4-8 MHz clock speed.
>> Antique? Many manuals (several hundred
>> pages). 3 serial ports. Very large desktop
>> unit. Works OK. $50
>>
>> Seller Info For sale by private party
>>
>> (626) 796-5184 [Day]
>> (626) 796-5184 [Eve]
>> Pasadena, California - L.A. Area 91106
>>
>>
>> Post Date 30-OCT-97
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
The 100 is used and in demand overseas, it is used by reporters in the
jungles. They have a web site with address if anyone wants donate one.
At 04:49 PM 11/10/97 +0000, you wrote:
>
>
>On Mon, 10 Nov 1997 Philip.Belben(a)powertech.co.uk wrote:
>> On the subject of early laptops in general, I have heard much in praise
>> of the Tandy model 100, but I like the Epson HX20 which has everything
>> you could possibly want in a laptop except a decent sized screen!
>
>Hmmm... Having got both (and an Olivetti M10, Thorn Liberator, etc - no I
>don't collect portables), IMHO the keyboard on the HX20 has a much worse
>feel than that on the M100. I'd not want to type up anything long on the
>HX20, whereas I took my student lecture notes on the M100 (back when the
>M100 was almost current...)
>
>There is a video output option for the HX20. It plugs into the 'serial'
>connector (a 38400 baud RS232 link), which is also used for the TF20 disk
>drive. I beleive said video interface gave you CGA-like text and graphics.
>I've not seen one, however, but it would solve the small-screen problem,
>at least when using it at home/on your desk.
>
>Talking of the HX20, does anyone have a systems disk for the TF20 floppy
>drive? I've got the drive and the laptop, but no boot disk, which is a
>pity.
>
>
>>
>> Philip.
>>
>>
>
>-tony
>
>
>
>
Yes they made them (1984)and sold for $249.95. Powered by batteries and 6k
of ram. I have one in storage picked it up for $10 about 4 years ago.
At 03:09 AM 11/11/97 +1030, you wrote:
>A simple question - was the Texas Instruments Compact Computer - the CC-40
>- ever produced? I have some photos in a book here, and it looks neat, but
>I have never heard of them and have no idea if they are available
>second-hand.
>
>Adam.
>
>
>
>
> >> >....in my experience
> >> >with IBM network cards, if they're a round (i.e. BNC) connector,
> >> >they're probably the old "baseband" stuff that uses lots of coax
> >>cable >and a hub/amplifier, and work only with IBM PC-LAN Program
> >>and >NetBEUI....the number 2Mb/sec comes
> >> >to mind....
> >> Are we talking about Arcnet here? When I think 2Mb/sec, BNC
> >>connector, and 8-bit bus, I think Arcnet, but there may have been
> >others.... If the cards are _branded_ IBM, chances are well over
> >ten to one that they are
> >Token Ring. IBM never touched Arcnet, and was hesitant about
> >Ethernet. --
> >Ward Griffiths
>
> If any of those network cards ARE token-ring and have BNC connectors, I
> would love to buy a couple. I got an old Token ring MAU several years ago
> that has BNC ports and would like to try it out. Can't tell you how many
> people have flat out denied that Token Ring was ever carried over coax!
> But the existence of the MAU is proof enough that at one time it was done.
Wow. I must admit, I thought that token ring required too many wires
for co-ax. Or was the 4-wire connection replaced by coax in, coax out?
Seriously, if it's IBM and co-ax I'd guess at SNA (Systems Network
Architecture - the famous 3270 series terminals and related devices).
This was not a PC network architecture at all - it was a loads-of-
terminals-into-the-mainframe architecture - and the card would have come
with terminal emulator software.
BTW, did anyone discover what the IBM System/74 was? The description
sounded more like a system/34 to me, and I certainly never heard of the
74 when I worked at IBM.
Philip.
Okay, I found a plug I forgot to attach. I plugged it in, switched it on,
and the breakers went POP!
Nothing burned, no hot smell...
Time to start rechecking things!
At 12:04 PM 11/10/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Tandy improved the 100 with the 102 which has a lager screen.
Actually, the 102 has the same size screen as the 100. Perhaps you're
thinking of the 200? The 200 is a clamshell design (iirc) with 24x80
screen. The 102 was simply a lighter, cheaper-to-make version of the 100.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
Hotze asked:
>PS-Does anyone know where I can get old PC Mag issues? Or any other major
>magazine?
It's funny that you ask this. My wife's uncle just gave me issue #1 of
PC World and issues 2 and 3 of PC Magazine. I'd really like to get my hands
on PCMag issue #1! He also gave me a late-model original PC *with*
theexpansion box (which I understand is a relatively rare item).
Anyway, he was a sales rep for IBM for the PC product, and he kept all
sorts of stuff in his attic. I guess that every summer, his wife makes him
clean up a little more. I'd say go to garage sales, or put an add in the
local newspaper. There's a juy who advertises every month in Nuts & Volts,
that he collects pre-1980 equipment, mags, etc. Maybe try the same.
Anyway, who knows what else he has up there. I've asked him to save a
copy of the IBM songbook for me <g>.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<rcini(a)msn.com>
- ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
- MCP Windows 95/Networking
No reaction to the power whatsoever.
Yes, it is plugged in!
What did I do wrong? I got all the connections to the switches back in
order, it doesn't pop either breaker, just no reaction. Anything in
particular I could have missed? WHat's the result of getting that edge
connector on upside-down?
><Now for what Allison was waiting for - a mention of Honeywell :-) When
><FTS went bust, they sold the design of the series-86 to Honeywell-Bull,
><who marketed it as the Microsystem Executive. Needless to say it died
Can you describe the Microsystem Executive? I have a Honeywell Microsystem
6, but no details about it. It is about 2 feet high, by 1.5 feet deep and
1 foot wide, finished in black and white. (The plastic front and back is
black, while the metal case is white). It's a very big beast for a micro,
and runs but a single terminal.
Adam.
At 03:09 AM 11/11/97 +1030, you wrote:
>A simple question - was the Texas Instruments Compact Computer - the CC-40
>- ever produced? I have some photos in a book here, and it looks neat, but
Yep. I've got one.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
DOS or CP/M?
manney(a)nwohio.com
> I just bought a DEC Rainbow, does anyone have any idea where I can get a
>boot disk for it?
>
> Thanks
> Charlie Fox
>
>
>
>HP 75D with 9114 disk drive -- $25
>
>My questions concern this last one. The computer itself is about 5" deep
by
>10" wide by about an inch thick. It has room for three expansion modules
>(has two: "Barcode Reader" and "HP 75 I/O") and four connectors on the
rear.
>Two are in and out to the 9114, one is power (I'm pretty sure) but I'm not
>sure about the last. Perhaps input for the barcode wand?
What does the mystery connector look like?
manney(a)nwohio.com
I'm interested in the 386's...are they boards, or complete systems?
manney(a)nwohio.com
-----Original Message-----
From: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
To: Manney <Manney>
Date: Friday, November 07, 1997 3:48 PM
Subject: STuff
>I have a bunch of wyse 60 terminals, a couple of 386's, an old printer
>and various boards etc. Anyone interested.
>"Janet Paganelli" <info(a)msnyc.org>
>
>
<Now for what Allison was waiting for - a mention of Honeywell :-) When
<FTS went bust, they sold the design of the series-86 to Honeywell-Bull,
<who marketed it as the Microsystem Executive. Needless to say it died
Actually I'm far less interested with what Honeywell-Bull did with x86
chips and moreso with the predecessor computers. They made some big
machines at one time.
Allison
----------
+ From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com>
+ To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
+ Subject: Re: Classic Computer Rescue Squad
+ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 06:21:38 -0800 (PST)
+
+On Sun, 9 Nov 1997, William Donzelli wrote:
+
+> > > On Sat, 8 Nov 1997, William Donzelli wrote:
+> >
+> > > 500 years from now, if what I am trying to accomplish with the
Vintage
+> > > Computer Festival succeeds, the machines which were truly significant
from
+> > > a social context, meaning the ones which ran the banking system, the
+> > > airline system, government, etc. (in other words, the computers which
were
+> > > the foundation of modern society), will be the ones which we
remember, and
+> > > the Altair and others of its ilk will be merely novelties.
+> >
+> > I'd reign in your desire to pidgeonhole computers into "novelties" vs
+> > "socially significant" if I were you. Not only is EVERY piece of
hardware
+>
+> Next time you want to turn your flamethrower on, please aim at the right
+> person. You quoted me for something I did not say.
+>
+> William Donzelli
+> william(a)ans.net
+
+Mark,
+
+I take credit for the original posting. And you make some valid
+arguments. What I wrote wasn't meant to be taken as an abridgement of my
+total philosophy.
+
+There's been a problem around here lately of people taking single
+sentences from a message and blowing it out of proportion. I wish it
+would stop.
+
+Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
+Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer,
Jackass
+
+ Coming Soon...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
+ See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
+
+
Hi,
Yes, I agree, and I must confess that I sounded a bit more irritated than I
actually was! My point, as you note, was that we should consider all of
computing's heratige special...but of course, we do, or we wouldn't be
reading this list.
Sorry if I sounded a bit arrogant.....and thanks for the reply
Mark
At 04:36 PM 11/9/97 +0000, you wrote:
>OK. By the way, speaking of "sub-laptops", does anyone know what kind of models
>might be good for me? I just pretty much want to be able to take notes; etc.
>Windows CE is cheap enough for me, but they're keyboards aren't for REAL
people.
>Possibly an Apple Newton? Or are there any classics that have a keyboard large
>enough to type on(not two-finger typing.) ? Where can I get one of these Radio
>Shack 100's?
Good keyboards for taking notes:
Radio Shack Model 100/102
NEC PC8201A (M100, but some differences (or vice-versa?))
Epson HX-20 (Not as good, but adequate)
Cambridge Z88 (Never used one, but looks good.)
Radio Shack WP-2 (Word processor, similar to m100)
There are a couple of newer m100-type machines that can act as a keyboard
for a Mac or PC as well. And, of course, Apple's E-mate (or whatever it's
called.)
Or pick up a used '286-ish PC laptop. Generally decent machines, run DOS
(lots of available word processors), and cheap.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
At 02:38 PM 11/8/97 -0500, you wrote:
>So, what do you people think I should do when I just can't keep a computer
>much longer? I don't want to trash them, but things like XTs, 286s, etc? What
>can I do but throw them away when I have no room?
Where are you located? There are groups that will recondition them and
place them in schools. Groups like the Detwiler Foundation (huge) or the
Computer Recycling Project (tiny). I do the same for my girlfriend's school
with Mac's. There are also programs that teach kids about fixing them.
Lemme know if you need more info and I can dig it up. (I don't do much with
most of the groups because I'm able to scrounge the computers and fix them
myself.)
P.S., if anyone has older mac stuff (Mac II or newer) we can always use it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
A simple question - was the Texas Instruments Compact Computer - the CC-40
- ever produced? I have some photos in a book here, and it looks neat, but
I have never heard of them and have no idea if they are available
second-hand.
Adam.
Today, for the first time in years, I got my old SwTPC S/09 to boot.
(pause for applause to die down)
But success was not total; floppy drive 0 works fine, but drive 1
just retracts to track 0 and makes a buzzing/grinding noise. I'm
guessing that it wants to hit track 0 at the beginning of a seek,
can't tell that it has made it there, and is struggling to retract
past the legal limit.
So, is anybody out there familiar with the mechanics of Qume 8"
floppy drives? Is there a switch or optical sensor or something
that tells it when it is at track 0? Or, from the description, is
it possible/likely that this is an electrical failure, like a dead
chip? Anybody got a service manual for one of these critters?
Cheers,
Bill.
<> Sounds bogus. The small laptops using 8080 (actually 8085) were the tand
<> M-100s and there were also the Epson and NEC but none were before 1979.
Most of the early laptops were either 8085 or z80 as both required less
support chips than the 8080 (8080+8224+8228) as the 8080 chip set required
three voltages and lots of board space. the 8085 or z80 were single 5v
at lower power needs. the 6502 was also popular for the application.
<On the subject of early laptops in general, I have heard much in praise
<of the Tandy model 100, but I like the Epson HX20 which has everything
<you could possibly want in a laptop except a decent sized screen!
Tandy improved the 100 with the 102 which has a lager screen.
Allison
> < Another "cute" blurb, "CP/M-86 is the 16 bit version of the de facto
> <industry standard microcomputer operating system, CPM. Once a user
> <slips the 8-inch floppy containing CPM-86 into a (IBM) Displaywriter,
> <an entirely new world of data processing will open up on the typist's
> <desk." Sounds almost pornographic. ; ^ ))
>
> Call that a snapshot in time before the PC explosion.
I like it! I used a Displaywriter occasionally at IBM, but I never knew
it had an 8088/86 in it! I didn't even know you could get a general
purpose operating system for it. It was a very nice machine, and ran a
version of Displaywrite nicer than _any_ of the PC implementations. I'd
love to get one for my collection...
Well, there you are. A non-IBM-compatible with an 8088/86, and made by
IBM too!
I would add the FTS series-88 - a very strange British box with an 8088
in it, also running CP/M-86. An 8086 CPU card exists, but the machine
was soon replaced by the FTS Series-86. This machine was sold as the
"Non-compatible Compatible" - it ran a multi-tasking version of CP/M-86
called Concurrent DOS, sold by a company whose name escapes me, but
begins with P (Pegasus?). It ran Lotus-123 from an IBM disk with no
complaints, even drawing graphs on the (monochrome) screen. I must get
mine working sometime...
Now for what Allison was waiting for - a mention of Honeywell :-) When
FTS went bust, they sold the design of the series-86 to Honeywell-Bull,
who marketed it as the Microsystem Executive. Needless to say it died
:-(
Philip.
> <I've recently heard of someone who told me about an 8080 laptop from
> <someone who has been into computers longer than I have. He said that
> <there was a laptop... in the 1970's, that was smaller than the origional
> <Compaq. It was soupossed to only have a little RAM, and it was used by
> <journalists, who would connect with a modem an upload the files. Is
> <this true? If so, what on earth ever happened to these? (Does this
> <sound like something else... H/PC come to mind?
>
> Sounds bogus. The small laptops using 8080 (actually 8085) were the tandy
> M-100s and there were also the Epson and NEC but none were before 1979.
> I did a quick flip through my Kbaud and Byte for 76-80 and there were no
> adverts for anything laptop other than a hand terminal that used a 4bit
> part.
I wonder. A few weeks ago I bought for L1 at a car boot sale a device
called a Microscribe 320. (Made by a Welsh company, Microscribe Ltd.,
but sold with a British Telecom badge.) This is a sub-notebook (7 in
square) terminal with built in text editor, 32K battery backed RAM and
40 x 8 character display. Before you all jump on me, yes, I know it was
built circa 1983. It is a very nice machine, the only thing wrong with
it being the small keyboard. Fortunately I don't touch type - FWIW I
use the index and middle fingers of each hand and am as fast as most of
the touch typers I know who aren't professional typists.
The reason I am replying is that shortly after I posted about it here
(and had a brief conversation with Tony Duell about how to power it up)
I received an e-mail from one Adrian Godwin, who had seen my posting,
and who also had a microscribe, and wanted to compare notes. In the end
we concluded that his was an earlier model than mine (less RAM, smaller
screen). So when did these start being made? Was there an even earlier
model right back in the seventies?
I would also like to thank Adrian (if he is reading this) who, when he
obtained a Microscribe manual, and discovered it was for mine and not
his, sent me a copy for free. The world needs more people like this!
On the subject of early laptops in general, I have heard much in praise
of the Tandy model 100, but I like the Epson HX20 which has everything
you could possibly want in a laptop except a decent sized screen!
Philip.
On 9 Nov 97 at 22:54, SUPRDAVE(a)aol.com wrote:
> i need some help with an applecolor rgb monitor if anyone can.
> does anyone know any way of testing this monitor?
Apple have mastered the art of confusing names for monitors. The
"original" colour monitor you need for a Mac II series is called the
"AppleColor Hi-Resolution RGB Display"; for early Mac II series
particular adaptor cards are required for particular monitors, so
your adaptor card will not work with an A4 portrait display for
example. From about 1990 it was replaced by the "Macintosh 12" RGB
Display" which was smaller and lighter,
There is a similarly named rgb monitor designed for the Apple IIgs;
this is a 12" analog display very similar to the Macintosh
display. It works with a horizontal refresh rate of 15.75kHz -- half
that supplied by the IIcx video port.
> i have one in the
> silver-gray colour that matches my mac IIcx yet, i cannot seem to get any
> video on it. i have tried using both a laser128 and a //c's rgb output into
> the monitor, but the only thing i can get is a deep blue screen with stable
> vertical lines with the //c, and a moving blue bar with the laser128 although
> they both can do rgb output and i was using the same cable.
Isn't the output from the //c and the laser *digital* rgb, not
*analog* rgb? You can also be certain that Apple didn't use the same
pinouts for the //c and the Mac II series so your cable will be wrong.
> when i tested the
> monitor with my mac cx which has a 1 bit mono card, i did get video, but was
> difficult to read, and i got double images of the desktop. i've already tried
> every control accessable on the monitor too.
This sounds like the IIgs display to me. I'd hang on to it -- they
are very highly regarded -- until a IIgs system turns up...
Phil
**************************************************************
Phil Beesley -- Computer Officer -- Distributed Systems Suppport
University of Leicester
Tel (0)116 252-2231
E-Mail pb14(a)le.ac.uk
<> Does anybody but me remember the Byte cover (1976, I think) of a 4-bit
<> computer built from transistors, diodes, etc. and wire? (No boards or
<> anything). There was a followup picture in the magazine some months
<> later after the cat had knocked it off the desk.
the first BYTE cover was sept 1976 and there was never such article around
then. There are two I remember the first was a terminally simple machine
of extreme limitations that illustrated microprogramming (simple TTL) and
was very low parts count. The other in the Aug and Sept 1985 Bytes called
EGO and was a 16bit general purpose machine using mostly TTL SSI/MSI (74181
was the most complex part). <SSI small scale integration 7400, 7474 are
examples and MSI medium scale integration such as 74181 or complex
counters.>
Allison
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first--Invent the
Universe.
---Dr. Carl E. Sagan
----------
From: "Lawrence Walker" <lwalker(a)mail.interlog.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Classic Computer Rescue Squad
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 10:26:08 +0000
> On Sat, 8 Nov 1997, William Donzelli wrote:
> 500 years from now, if what I am trying to accomplish with the Vintage
> Computer Festival succeeds, the machines which were truly significant from
> a social context, meaning the ones which ran the banking system, the
> airline system, government, etc. (in other words, the computers which were
> the foundation of modern society), will be the ones which we remember, and
> the Altair and others of its ilk will be merely novelties.
I'd reign in your desire to pidgeonhole computers into "novelties" vs
"socially significant" if I were you. Not only is EVERY piece of hardware
and software a legacy of the history of computing, but those "novelty"
computers (the Commodores, the Altairs, the Apples) were more than just 8
bit precursors to the current wave of desktop technology...they were
inextricably linked to the social mileux for whom, and in whose time, they
were developed...a sign of the times as it were. Part of the mystique of
the "novelty" computers of which you speak is the very fact that the design
and function of the computer reflected a historic mindset, the widespread
dissemiation and embracing of the IDEA of computing within the masses of
society. It would be foolish and shortsighted to try to relegate certian
aspects of computing history as "novelty" vs "foundation of modern society".
I would remind you that some of the founders of the modern age of
computing, architects of those computers you would no doubt find "socially
significant", started out peeking and pokeing their way along an 8 bit
piece of silicon that shaped far more influential commodities than the
banking system or the stock market...it shaped their MINDS.
A little respect for the grass roots of the computing age is in order.
Mark Tosiello
("Soapbox mode off, Mr. Spock")
After a very poor start, my weekend ended up great - I picked up three
Apple IIc's (which I didn't want as I already have two) for $10, but they
came with some thirty manuals for most of the Apple II range (along with
the Osborne Executive) and a number of books on the Apple IIs. Thinking
this made for a good day, I was later given a Microbee with the
Computer-in-a-Book drive,and a Dick Smith System 80. The Microbee was an
Australian Z80 CP/M system, highly sucessful both as kits (as they
originally were) and complete systems, especially in schools. I had been
searching for one for a while, but had very little luck - everyone I knew
who had one was too attached to it to let it go. The System 80 was a
TRS-80 Model 1 clone, with some interesting modifications - most notably an
inbuilt tape deck. Another computer I had been specifically looking for.
:)
Anyway, as to my question. The System 80 works fine, but it seems it needs
a cable to connect to the monitor. The monitor uses a standard TV aerial
connector, but the computer has a DIN. Fortunately I found a technical
manual for the computer in one of my piles of manuals at home, and it lists
the pin outs - one +5 volt, one ground, and one video output. It also has a
diagram of the cable, and it seems it is just a plain cable with different
plugs at each end. Knowing nothing about electronics, it seems to me that
the TV plug has only two contacts, not three - anyone know how I make the
cable? Or know where I might find a replacment?
I'm sure this is a really stupid question but I am a mere programmer -
technical stuff is way out of my league.
Thanks heaps,
Adam.
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first--Invent the
Universe.
---Dr. Carl E. Sagan
----------
From: William Donzelli <william(a)ans.net>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Classic Computer Rescue Squad
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 23:21:21 -0500 (EST)
> > On Sat, 8 Nov 1997, William Donzelli wrote:
> I'd reign in your desire to pidgeonhole computers into "novelties" vs
> "socially significant" if I were you. Not only is EVERY piece of hardware
Next time you want to turn your flamethrower on, please aim at the right
person. You quoted me for something I did not say.
Damn software anyway.......would be nice if I learned to read, wouldn't it?
Public apology hereby humbly expressed to William Donzelli, for inexplicably
confusing him with the author of the quote to which I responded.
Again, my mistake!
Mark Tosiello
William Donzelli
william(a)ans.net
<I've recently heard of someone who told me about an 8080 laptop from
<someone who has been into computers longer than I have. He said that
<there was a laptop... in the 1970's, that was smaller than the origional
<Compaq. It was soupossed to only have a little RAM, and it was used by
<journalists, who would connect with a modem an upload the files. Is
<this true? If so, what on earth ever happened to these? (Does this
<sound like something else... H/PC come to mind?
Sounds bogus. The small laptops using 8080 (actually 8085) were the tandy
M-100s and there were also the Epson and NEC but none were before 1979.
I did a quick flip through my Kbaud and Byte for 76-80 and there were no
adverts for anything laptop other than a hand terminal that used a 4bit
part.
I happen to have a Epson geneva (PX8) but that was years later(1984).
Allison
<If any of those network cards ARE token-ring and have BNC connectors, I
highly likely as IBM was a strong proponent for token ring.
<would love to buy a couple. I got an old Token ring MAU several years ago
<that has BNC ports and would like to try it out. Can't tell you how many
<people have flat out denied that Token Ring was ever carried over coax!
<But the existence of the MAU is proof enough that at one time it was done.
Obviously they never saw any of the WANG system that used it as the default
interconnect to EVERYTHING even POS terminals!
Allison
Added a couple of things to my collection today:
Compaq 386 Lunchbox (comes up with a 1790 (iirc) Disk 0 error) -- $35
Data General One -- $20
2 SE/30 logic boards, new in Apple service boxes -- $10 (probably put these
on ebay.)
HP DDS Dat drive -- $25
HP 75D with 9114 disk drive -- $25
My questions concern this last one. The computer itself is about 5" deep by
10" wide by about an inch thick. It has room for three expansion modules
(has two: "Barcode Reader" and "HP 75 I/O") and four connectors on the rear.
Two are in and out to the 9114, one is power (I'm pretty sure) but I'm not
sure about the last. Perhaps input for the barcode wand?
Anyway, if anyone has *any* info about it, I'd love to hear from you. I
tried HP's site and all I got was that it's discontinued, not supported, and
replaced by a newer handheld or something. It was described as a "notebook
BASIC Computer", btw.
Thanks in advance!
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
At 09:11 AM 11/7/97 -0500, you wrote:
>I 'd like to commend and thank Matt Pritchard for shipping the Hard Drive
I'll second that! Thanks! (P.S., mine came in on Friday.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
<I thought that a HD disk would simply have a denser coating of magnetic
<material applied evenly over the entire surface of the disk. I don't
<see why this should cause problems for a DD drive. However, a few
<questions come to mind. Is the magnetic coating of a different
Corcivity, the amount of field needed to chage the magnetic state. the
HD media requires different field strength and it affects the ability to
record on the other media. Simply put the head, media and rotation rate
are specific and altering the parameters of one munge the other.
<Since some of the software for my "old" (first generation PC) computers
<is on 5 1/4" disks of dubious condition, I would like to make copies
<onto new disks. Since HD disks are still readily available and cheap, I
<thought this would be an ideal way to do so.
Reading from one and writing to another is ok bt the drive used should
match the media.
<My question is: can I plug a Double Density drive into the same
<connector in my modern PC and use it for my old disks? I know I will
<have to change my BIOS setting, but is there anything else I need to
<consider?
Maybe, depends on the controller installed and the version of dos.
Acopy of upgrading and repairing PCs <QUE publications> would be helpful
to you on this and other PC related problems.
Allison
i need some help with an applecolor rgb monitor if anyone can.
does anyone know any way of testing this monitor? i have one in the
silver-gray colour that matches my mac IIcx yet, i cannot seem to get any
video on it. i have tried using both a laser128 and a //c's rgb output into
the monitor, but the only thing i can get is a deep blue screen with stable
vertical lines with the //c, and a moving blue bar with the laser128 although
they both can do rgb output and i was using the same cable. when i tested the
monitor with my mac cx which has a 1 bit mono card, i did get video, but was
difficult to read, and i got double images of the desktop. i've already tried
every control accessable on the monitor too. unlike my vga monitors, this one
does not produce a raster screen when no video cable is connected. is there
anything else i can try short of round-filing the monitor?
david
Hi,
Well, I'm hoping someone can give me some advice on this, but thanks to
extensive use of DejaNews I've a bad feeling I know what the problem is.
Here is the boot sequence.
{Asks to select Language}
{Asks US or UK}
Performin normal system tests.
7..6..5..4..3..
Tests completed
Loading system software.
2..
?54 RETRY
2..
When it's coming up it sounds like the HD spins up, and then as soon as it
hits the "Loading system software" it sounds like it spins down.
Hi there
While searching for information on the Laser Computer(Video Technology
Computer Ltd) I came across your letters
I have a laser laptop LT321 which is in desprate nead of memory
If you have any information regarding the computer or the memory it would
be most helpful
Ian (uk)
In a message dated 97-11-08 09:01:35 EST, Alan Richards put forth:
>
> Does anyone have any ideas about this machine, specificaly I would like
to
> know how to break into the BASIC. On the Apple, I press CRTL and reset,
but
> this doesn't work on the Laser.
I have just the regular 128 and it basically should work and act the same as
a //c. The machine was supposedly 99% apple compatible, but I needed the 1%
compatibility when aol supported the apple ][ and it wouldnt work with my
laser! <control>-<reset> should work, but i've noticed you cannot do it too
quick. let go of the control key first, then reset. to get into the builtin
"control panel" to setup your ports, press <control>+"open apple"+<p> i
think that's what it is.
david
Hi All,
Despite the fact I haven't been able to get my VAXstation to boot, I
decided to take an inventory of what is in it. I've come up with one board
I'm not 100% sure as to what it is, it's a memory board, but what size?
The board in question is a "M7608-AP". I know what an -AA (2Mb) or -BA
(4Mb) are, but what is a -AP board? Oh, and yes I'm sure it said -AP not
-AA :^)
Thanks,
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| For Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
| For the collecting of Classic Computers with info on them. |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/museum.html |
Found this on the web, thought someone would be interested
Regards,
--
Hans B. Pufal : <mailto:hansp@digiweb.com>
Comprehensive Computer Catalogue : <http://www.digiweb.com/~hansp/ccc/>
_-_-__-___--_-____-_--_-_-____--_---_-_---_--__--_--_--____---_--_--__--_
<It had no RAM, clock, or anything, it was simply an ALU wired to 2 banks o
<4 switches, and a rotary switch configured to select one of the 8 or 16
<operations supported by the ALU. If I'd built it I'm sure I would've tired
<of 4 bit boolean operations pretty quickly.
<
<Kevin
But the step from that to a rudimentary computer was fairly short. What
was missing was the sequential(or microprogrammed) logic to get from
switches to Fetch an instruction from memory and Execute it. The simple
machine in Byte had the microprogrammed part of the system to do that
albeit crudely. What was significant was how few parts it took to do
that.
To make a point. The DEC RX01 and RX02 disk systems use a crude
microprogrammed computer to do all the disk formatting and control work.
The RX01 more specifically is easier to understand as the biggest chips
used are bipolar proms, 7489 (16x4 rams) and a 74181 alu chip. Its logic
contained on one board of 16"x6" and if the RX01 specific logic were left
out it would be 2/3rds that. It could be programmed to behave differently
and I have used the basic logic design to create other similar high speed
specialized controllers. the later rx02 is similar but they use the 2901
bit slice with is really a 16x4 ram, ALU and gating logic in one chip.
Oh, the alu is identical to the 74181. FYI: the RX01 controller has 5
basic microinstructions as it's all that were needed to implement the
needed programming. General purpose no, it didn't need to be It had to
be fast enough to run bits at 500khz.
Needless to say that Byte article I refer to would be of interest as it's
simple enough to explain and build with current components. I plan to dig
for it but I am not sure I still have it.
the latter 1985 article is more ambitious and most would have trouble
fabricating it as it's a fairly large number of chips (60-100 ttl).
The design would have to be revamped to use more common chips and then
simulated/breadboarded and tested for logic/timing errors. A PCboard
for it would be several cards and likely several hundred dollars for
the set in small quantity. Then there is programming as it's a unique
machine with no existant programming available. That means cross
assembler would be required to get initial code going for a basic monitor
program. the article is a worthwhile read as it does explain how a computer
is devloped and composed. It's in Byte September (VOL 10, number9) and
October (vol 10, number 10) and they are available from BYTE at $3.00 each.
I have no connection to byte other than having those on the shelf and
handy. I've used them to present on computer design.
Allison
At 00:21 11/10/97 +1030, you wrote:
>>OK. By the way, speaking of "sub-laptops", does anyone know what kind of
models
>>might be good for me? I just pretty much want to be able to take notes....
>>are there any classics that have a keyboard large
>>enough to type on(not two-finger typing.) ? Where can I get one of these
Radio
>>Shack 100's?
There is a great machine called the AlphaSmart Pro, which is an RS 100 with
a faster processor, PC and Mac data ports, etc. They're almost unheard of
because they're sold only through the educational channel, but you can buy
>from the manufacturer. I think it's $295.
If you have more money, want a real screen, and go for really gorgeous
looks, Apple has finally started selling the eMate to individuals --
basically it's a Newton with a screen and keyboard in one piece. It's $800
and only comes in jade-green.
If I had any real money I'd buy either of these tomorrow.
__________________________________________
Kip Crosby engine(a)chac.org
http://www.chac.org/index.html
Computer History Association of California
<From: "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com>
<OK, now I've got the HD plugged in and am hoping things will go better.
<Foolish me. Now it just sits there on "2". Doesn't even give me the "?54
<RETRY" message, it simply sounds like it starts to spin down the HD, and
<then immediatly spins it back up. It's been sitting like this for a while
<now. Nothing. Even the LED on the back says "2".
<
<Oh, at least I found out I've got an RD53-A HD. Is there any difference
<between a RD53 HD and a RD53-A HD, or are they the same thing?
Zane,
You have a bad RD53 like I said yesterday. The controller cannot/does not
command the drive to spin up/down as its an MFM drive. The cause for spin
down on RD53s is the head is not finding the servo track so it spins down
and retrys spinning up and finding the servo track. There is a fix for some
of them...
The problem on the Micropolus 1325s is the head meck when powered down
sits against a rubber bumper and gets stuck there as the rubber decays.
The result is the head can't move. Possible fix, open the HDA (yes take the
cover off) while running and move then head manually till it aquires the
servo, put the cover and backup to tape if there is an OS on it. I have one
drive where I put some sticky lable on the bumper to salvage the drive and
it's held up for six months so far. The bumper in located in the voice coil
positioner and is visible to the eye. The head arm sits agaisnt it when
powered down.
FYI: if you open it in a generally clean place ther is little risk of
contamination and even these "sealed" drives contain a internal air filter
to remove contaiminents.
Generally RD53s with spin down not reliable and should be replaced.
An RD53 is a microplus 1325 71mb MFM drive. For microvax use a RD54,
159mb MFM drive is more reliable an provides enough space. VMS will fit
on a RD53 if DECwindows and system libraries are not installed leaving
about 10mb free and makes for a cramped system. An RD54 will permit a
full VMS install and show have at least 20mb free making a very useable
system. A two drive system using a RD54 and an RD52(31mb), 53(71) or
RD54(159mb) for the second drive is a very good ssytem and can support
useful work.
FYII: A VS2000 (a tiny microvax) is handy as it contains rom code that
can format and/or verify MFM drives. They also make pretty good VMS or
Ultrix systems in their own right of they have at least 4mb of ram
installed.
Allison
<How would one go about getting the OS off of the CD onto the Vax? Sounds
<like my best bet is to try to get a SCSI controller for this puppy (at
<least I gather from my research that SCSI controllers are available). Any
<idea's on who sells such things, and for how much?
Two ways, RRD40 or RRD50. Any scsi controller you use must emulate a MSCP
device or the system will not know how to boot. The VMS cd is bootable.
The SCSI I'm using is a CMD C-200TM and it seems to work ok. The problem is
that an RRD40/50 CDrom will cost $100-200 and a SCSI controller will not be
cheap either.
method 2, get someone to cut a tape from the CD using their system.
<BTW if you've seen the last post I had about the HD not being connected,
<your couple of posts make me wonder if this wasn't done to get it to boot
<off of a network.
Possibly but, not likely. You can casue a net boot by setting the drive
offline from the front pannel and the boot roms will try the nest device
or you can do a >>>b QNA0: telling it to use the network adaptor if
installed(an M7504 or 7516). My guess is that the Microvax was gutted
for the disks as RD53s are generally small for them.
<Don't worry, I've no intention of letting loose of the manuals. I never
<let loose of manuals, unless it's something I've got multiples of. They'r
<great manuals from what I've seen, the Hardware Information manual is
<definitly well done. A little light in areas, but all in all very good.
If you have the hardware manuals you may not have the orange or grey wall.
What's that? The full VMS doc set is atleast 17 volumes of the 1.5-2"
looseleaf binder size and they are chock full of everything about the OS
and device programming info. Orange corrosponds to V4 and Grey is the V5.
Allison
<From CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu Sun Nov 9 18:18:51 1997
<Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0)
< id AA07454; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 13:23:39 -0500
<Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
< by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMT
< id KAA06738; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 10:19:54 -0800
<Received: from mx4.u.washington.edu (mx4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.5])
< by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMT
< id KAA20288 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Sun, 9 Nov
1997 10:
<Received: from rm-rstar.sfu.ca (root(a)rm-rstar.sfu.ca [142.58.120.21])
< by mx4.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
< id KAA07962 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Sun, 9 Nov 1997
10:19:07
<Received: from gumby.rfnet.sfu.ca (gumby.rfnet.sfu.ca [192.75.246.242]) by
< id KAA08925 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu> (from mcquiggi(a)sfu.ca); Sun
<Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19971109101851.02ff238c(a)ferrari.sfu.ca>
<Date: Sun, 09 Nov 1997 10:18:51 -0800
<Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
<Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
<Precedence: bulk
<From: Kevin McQuiggin <mcquiggi(a)sfu.ca>
<To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers" <classiccmp(a)u.washingto
<Subject: Re: VAXstation II, now different problem
<In-Reply-To: <199711091625.AA06623(a)world.std.com>
<Mime-Version: 1.0
<Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
<X-Sender: mcquiggi(a)ferrari.sfu.ca
<X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
<Status: R
<This RD53 spindown problem can also be caused by a spindle brake that does
<not retract fully when the drive is powered up! It rubs against the spindl
<and the drive shuts down. I fixed this by simply undoing the screw holding
<the brake solenoid and moving it back a little bit. My drive has been
<running for well over a year following this fix.
Worth checking for but spindown due to stuck head positioner is THE most
common problem with 1325 drives.
Allison
<From: HOTZE <photze(a)batelco.com.bh>
<That's what I said about 3 weeks ago. We should make a computer, possibly
<our own design, from common components. Was anyone here into processor
<engineering in the "early days", if so, I have a pretty good idea where (if
<want) we can get a board-maker for about $200, which might also be able to
<single-layer chips. Also, we could probably get our hands on some of Intel
<old stuff... they had a page for that on their site, but I forget where.
< We could use components that were marking points in history... a 5.25"
<floppy, for example.
Dear Hotze,
Your out of touch with the world. There are people already doing this.
It is doable though the price range for the boards varies alot depending
on size and quantity.
There is a chap in AUS that has the P112 a complete z180 system on a board
with floppy and serial ports that runs CP/m-80 like the wind.
You can build a system easy enough using available parts from mail order
houses like JAMCO or JDR. Possible CPUs (looking at latest catalog) are
6800, 6809, 68000, Z80, 8080, 8085, 8088 all of which are still very much
available along with the needed RAM, Eprom and TTL glue logic.
The parts thing, small quantites (10-100 pieces) of most ttl and micros
are not a problem but production quanities (1000s+) generally means going
for surface mount and modern pars to ASSURE parts availability. There is
not a lot of magic to taking a 6800 or z80 and making a system of it. The
real work is board layout and all the little details to get it in
production.
I can say this as a designer of some 20+ years that still does exactly this
kind of thing.
Copying an older processor design like say PDP-8 runs the risk of
copyrights and patents. Doing a scratch design means amassing support
for a common design and then there would be no code available as a unique
design. Cost to design vs return are problems as commitment for capital
to make it and kit the parts are sufficient to dismay most.
Allison
On 1997-11-09 classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu said to scottk5(a)ibm.net
>X-Sender: ward(a)news2.cnct.com
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
>Kip Crosby wrote:
>> At 03:34 11/8/97 GMT, you wrote:
>> >....in my experience
>> >with IBM network cards, if they're a round (i.e. BNC) connector,
>> >they're probably the old "baseband" stuff that uses lots of coax
>>cable >and a hub/amplifier, and work only with IBM PC-LAN Program
>>and >NetBEUI....the number 2Mb/sec comes
>> >to mind....
>> Are we talking about Arcnet here? When I think 2Mb/sec, BNC
>>connector, and 8-bit bus, I think Arcnet, but there may have been
>others.... If the cards are _branded_ IBM, chances are well over
>ten to one that they are
>Token Ring. IBM never touched Arcnet, and was hesitant about
>Ethernet. --
>Ward Griffiths
If any of those network cards ARE token-ring and have BNC connectors, I
would love to buy a couple. I got an old Token ring MAU several years ago
that has BNC ports and would like to try it out. Can't tell you how many
people have flat out denied that Token Ring was ever carried over coax!
But the existence of the MAU is proof enough that at one time it was done.
Kirk Scott
scottk5(a)ibm.net
Kirk Scott
dynasoar(a)mindspring.com
Net-Tamer V 1.09.2 - Test Drive
I got my Sun 3/50 working the other day (bad flyback transformer in the
monitor), but now I need a keyboard/mouse. I think that I need a "type 3"
keyboard and a mouse. Does anyone have a spare to sell?
Also, does anyone know the specs of the "shoebox" external hard drive?
TIA!
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<rcini(a)msn.com>
- ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
- MCP Windows 95/Networking
At 06:47 AM 11/9/97 +0000, you wrote:
>I've recently heard of someone who told me about an 8080 laptop from
>someone who has been into computers longer than I have. He said that
>there was a laptop... in the 1970's, that was smaller than the origional
>Compaq. It was soupossed to only have a little RAM, and it was used by
>journalists, who would connect with a modem an upload the files. Is
>this true? If so, what on earth ever happened to these? (Does this
>sound like something else... H/PC come to mind?
That would be the Radio Shack Model 100. 8085 processor, 8K-32K RAM, simple
text editor, basic, and comm pgm built in. See:
<http://www.m100.com/> Andy Diller's site
<http://www.the-dock.com/club100.html> Club 100
<http://home.northernway.net/~zmerch/signupform.html> Model 100 Mailing List
<http://acme.nug.net:80/~tmne/> Tri-Mike Network East
I love 'em myself. I'm working on an alphapaging program so I can use one
as a dedicated paging station. There are, btw, *still* a lot of journalists
who use them, especially in areas where reliability is important. (They
have no moving parts.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
>OK. By the way, speaking of "sub-laptops", does anyone know what kind of models
>might be good for me? I just pretty much want to be able to take notes; etc.
>Windows CE is cheap enough for me, but they're keyboards aren't for REAL
>people.
>Possibly an Apple Newton? Or are there any classics that have a keyboard large
>enough to type on(not two-finger typing.) ? Where can I get one of these Radio
>Shack 100's?
An alternative to the 100 is the Amstrad Notepad (NC-100), which I found to
be pretty good for notes, and is somewhat more recent. Not that recent,
though - it uses the Z80A.
Adam.
>>> I'm new at collecting classics. What is a VIC-20?
>>
>>The VIC-20 was Commodore's first computer...2K of RAM (I think), did
sounds
>>and color TV screen stuff.
>
>Actually it's far from thier first. There was several models of the PET,
Whoops! of course...and didn't they make a calculator or two?
>and another earlier one whose name escapes me (KIT?). Unexpanded it has a
>whopping 3583 bytes. I know for a fact it could be expanded to 16k, and I
>think there was eventually a larger one than that. The VIC-20 was my only
>computer from '82-'86 unfortunatly I gave it away in '90, and I finally got
>one to replace it today!
On Fri, 7 Nov 1997 18:23:51 -0800 (PST), Mr. Ismail remarked:
> Ok, first of all I'm pretty amazed at the 3rd grade level of
> mentality being demonstrated by the whiners complaining about my
> "foul" language.
You seem to hint that I was whining about the language, which is
simply not the case. The way one uses language states a lot about who
they are - and yes, sometimes this requires profanity. However, let's
save the "heavy language" for times when we really need it (like when
you drop a mini on your foot :-) ).
> Perhaps I should have been more specific and stated that from a
> mass-consumer marketing standpoint, the Nova is not significant.
In this case, the man has a valid point - from one perspective.
If one takes that perspective to an extreme, however, we find that
ENIAC wasn't relevant (only one ever built), none of the Zuse
machines amounted to anything, the ABC was meaningless, and the
IBM 360 was unimportant.
There's more to a machine that makes it historically important
than how many were sold or produced. Was the STRETCH important (a
half dozen or so)? How about the PDP-10 (under a thousand)? Mass
marketing is not the gauge of importance, especially in a social
context. Remember - the individuals who designed the machines that
_were_ mass marketed were brought up knowing about computers, and
those machines most certainly weren't mass-market devices.
> At any rate, why is there concern that the Nova will never be wanted
> until some newspaper runs an article on it? The argument is
> pointless.
Whether Novas are "wanted" is immaterial to the argument. Folks are
now virtually unaware of a piece of history, and an important one at
that. It's also a piece of history that's fast disappearing, which is
a rotten shame.
> So there's no market for it. Boo hoo.
Do multi-thousand dollar speculative prices on Altairs make them
more "historic" or "valuable" than a PDP-5 (predecessor of the -8)?
There's more to be calculated into a "value" than the current market
price, which all too frequently is out of line with reality.
> Nobody required Tim to take on 5000 lbs worth of stuff [...]
Nope. Nobody did. That's one of the reasons I have respect for
the man. He knows machines worth saving, and is willing to take the
time and (not incosiderable) effort to do so.
> If Tim was realistic he'd realize the practical implications involved
> in hauling a ton of equipment ANYWHERE on the continent, let alone
> across national borders.
He is realistic about it - I've chatted with him about it privately.
He realises fully what moving that amount of gear means. So do I and
another chap out East who are moving a good quarter-ton all the way
across a continent.
> If the majority of kids in America had a picture of a Nova tacked to
> their wall, the newspapers might have run a story on one.
Do you know who I'm speaking of? Hint: he designed one of the early
mass-market computers that you prize so highly.
> So Carl, why did you just mention the most popular of personal
> computers?
Put bluntly - shock value. I used that list as a calculated way of
getting folks' attention, and perhaps, just perhaps, of getting them
to "smell the coffee". To reiterate - it takes more to make a machine
important than how many copies were sold.
Cheers.
______________________________________________________________________
| | |
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:carl.friend@stoneweb.com | |
| http://www.ultranet.com/~engelbrt/carl/museum | ICBM: N42:22 W71:47 |
|________________________________________________|_____________________|
So, what do you people think I should do when I just can't keep a computer
much longer? I don't want to trash them, but things like XTs, 286s, etc? What
can I do but throw them away when I have no room?
Another question: does anyone have a logic board for a Mac Color Classic? I
know it's pretty new, but this is the only place I stand a chance of getting
one under $50. I found a Color Classic, and some moron smashed the display
and ripped out the logic board. I can use an external screen, but what about
the logic board?
A related matter: ROM for a Mac IIx?
<> The Nova will never be featured in the newspapers because it is not a
<> socially significant computer.
No more (or less) so than PDP-11s that it competed against.
<Ever read, say, _Soul of a New Machine_?
Good read, still have my copy!
Once upon a time there were many computer companies in Massachusetts
and during the life of the pdp-8, PDP-11 and the VAX there was Data General
trying to also carve a niche in the minicomputer market. This is
significant as most of action preceeds 1978. To put that in perspective
by '78 the altair was two years old and MITS starting to crumble, IMSI was
starting to peak, TRS-80 was new, AppleII was there as well, SS50 bus
machines were strong with SWTP and the new Smoke Signal Broadcasting
Company. The PC would be three years away.
<"socially significant computer" is, I'm not willing to let anything
<I consider to be significant go to the scrap metal dealers if I can
<avoid it.
Computers each and every have significance, some because of new concepts,
new markets or in a few cases the scams and swindles behind them! There
were many unremarkable computers made and many while noteable were really
junk!
Hey you forgot: SBCs <single board computers> are hardly ever noted here.
Most often they are simple minimum systems featuring the makers CPU or
chip sets. Some of note are the EVK68<ami-6800>, Motorola 6800D1, 6800D2,
National SC/MP<isp8a-500>, Cosmac ELF<1802>, INTEL SDK80<8080>, SDK85<8085>
and SDK88<8088>, IMSAI IMP48<8035>, Technico Super Starter<TI9900>, are
samples of what I mean<some I have>. Most of these were not expandable
to full systems and were really aimed at the hobbiest/engineer to show
off the chips or provide a working example to build off of. Others like
the IMP-48 were complete systems intended for control system use or for
one up embedded applications or quick prototypes.
If I could say one thing about all of the arguments...
Been there, done that! I even have a few of the t-shirts that are still
not rags yet. How many were at PCC'76 on the boardwalk?
Allison
If it's possible, could I take a IBM dot-matrix (or any other dot-matrix)?
By the way, I've tried all the computer retailers in my area, and they
don't have any classics. Any other places I should look?
Thanks,
Tim D. Hotze
----------
From: Zeus334(a)aol.com
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Old stuff
Date: Saturday, November 08, 1997 2:16 AM
In a certain supply room, there are in storage some computers of interest
to
me. There used to be some XTs and PCs, but they were given to a school. The
stuff that's still there:
A ton of printers, generally IBM dot-matrix
A ton of manuals and books, including manuals to Quattro-Pro, the manuals
to
some of the IBM printers, etc. Also, books on C and pascal
A few cartons of floppies, with the original disks to DOS 3.3, and a bunch
of
programs I have never heard of.
About 15 IBM network cards. I can't tell what they are, but they are brown
full- length eight bit things with round connectors on the back.
An IBM System/74, with three terminals.
I believe that the administration will part with all of these without much
difficulty. I could personally use the first 4 items. The System/74 is
about
the size of a closet, and I doubt I would find much use for it (If only I
had
room...)
I know nothing about it, and I would appreciate if you people would tell me
what the heck a System/74 is. It has a big floppy drive (14" or 8") built
in
to the front panel, mounted on its side.....
> So, what do you people think I should do when I just can't keep a computer
> much longer? I don't want to trash them, but things like XTs, 286s, etc? What
> can I do but throw them away when I have no room?
You can almost always find somebody who can use an extra computer.
Schools, non-profit organizations, somebody will want your old machines,
especially if you have a bit of software to go with them. If you don't
want 'em, give 'em away.
In fact, I seem to recall a group of Lisas (?) that some on the list were
interested in being donated to a school for developmentally disabled
children.
--
Ben Coakley http://www.math.grin.edu/~coakley coakley(a)ac.grin.edu
Station Manager, KDIC 88.5 FM CBEL: Xavier OH
It is good to rock. It is very good to rock wearing a big ass pumpkin on your
head. It is very, very good if that pumpkin is on fire. --Jessica Stern
On Sat, 8 Nov 1997 11:15:17 -0600 (CST), Mr. Seagraves was heard
to remark:
> We should build a computer from discrete components, just to operate
> one. And connect it to the Internet. Of course, we'd never finish
> in out lifetimes, and it would fill a room, but it would be awful
> cool!
I know, personally, of a chap in Germany who is, at this moment,
putting the finishing touches on a modern-day vacuum-tube computer.
I'm looking forward to seeing the designs and writing a simulator for
it so we may all have fun.
Computers aren't all _that_ hard to design and build! Just remember
that you don't _need_ all the instruction-set bloat that's so common
nowadays. Think RISC. Of course, before there was CISC/RISC there
was... well "RISC". The first time I heard of RISC the though that
popped into my mind was: "Finally! Back to basics!".
______________________________________________________________________
| | |
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:carl.friend@stoneweb.com | |
| http://www.ultranet.com/~engelbrt/carl/museum | ICBM: N42:22 W71:47 |
|________________________________________________|_____________________|
Speaking of reference manuals, does anyone have any information / insights
into a Visual Technologies Commuter? Manf in 1984, it uses two Intel chips
(8086 and 8088) with a plethora of RAM chips not to mention at least four
program subroutines. The manufacturer seems to have disowned this particular
unit since two people in their tech department have not heard of it.
Thanks in advance
Sam
Not yet a classic, but does anyone have a {spare} copy of the "Technical
Reference Personal Computer AT"? This is the tech ref guide for the original
IBM PC/AT, published by IBM (I'm guessing in a gray fabric binder).
TIA!
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<rcini(a)msn.com>
Charter ClubWin! Member
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
Hi All:
Here are some odds and ends available for offers and cost of shipping:
1. DG color monitor, model 6423, 15"
2. Sun 2/50 with 17" mono monitor
3. Sun 17" mono monitor
Please email me if you're interested. I'm in Vancouver, BC.
Kevin
---
Kevin McQuiggin VE7ZD
mcquiggi(a)sfu.ca
I've recently heard of someone who told me about an 8080 laptop from
someone who has been into computers longer than I have. He said that
there was a laptop... in the 1970's, that was smaller than the origional
Compaq. It was soupossed to only have a little RAM, and it was used by
journalists, who would connect with a modem an upload the files. Is
this true? If so, what on earth ever happened to these? (Does this
sound like something else... H/PC come to mind?
Hi,
I _THINK_ I found the problem that I was having. It appears that the HD
cables weren't attached, only the power (weird that). Just prior to this I
found out about the LED counter on the back of the unit and found that it
was sitting on "1" despite the fact the counter on the screen was "2".
According to the Hardware manual this means that the bootstrap device might
not contain bootable system software.
OK, now I've got the HD plugged in and am hoping things will go better.
Foolish me. Now it just sits there on "2". Doesn't even give me the "?54
RETRY" message, it simply sounds like it starts to spin down the HD, and
then immediatly spins it back up. It's been sitting like this for a while
now. Nothing. Even the LED on the back says "2".
Oh, at least I found out I've got an RD53-A HD. Is there any difference
between a RD53 HD and a RD53-A HD, or are they the same thing?
Anyone have any ideas on this? It's starting to look to me as if someone
pulled out the original HD to put in a machine that needed a good one.
Then they put the bad on in this machine, but for some reason took the time
to plug in the power.
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| For Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
| For the collecting of Classic Computers with info on them. |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/museum.html |
At 03:34 11/8/97 GMT, you wrote:
>....in my experience
>with IBM network cards, if they're a round (i.e. BNC) connector,
>they're probably the old "baseband" stuff that uses lots of coax cable
>and a hub/amplifier, and work only with IBM PC-LAN Program and
>NetBEUI....the number 2Mb/sec comes
>to mind....
Are we talking about Arcnet here? When I think 2Mb/sec, BNC connector, and
8-bit bus, I think Arcnet, but there may have been others....
____________________________________________________________
Kip Crosby, honcho, mechanic and sole proprietor, Kip's Garage
http://www.kipsgarage.com: rumors, tech tips and philosophy for the trenches
Coming Spring '98: The Windows 98 Bible by Kip Crosby and Fred Davis!
At 01:45 11/8/97 -0600, you wrote:
>HP 75D with 9114 disk drive -- $25
>....Anyway, if anyone has *any* info about it, I'd love to hear from you. I
>tried HP's site and all I got was that it's discontinued, not supported, and
>replaced by a newer handheld....
The 75D, demonstrating a logic rare in HP model numbers, is the immediate
successor of the 75C, often described as "HP's first fully portable
computer." They were, IIRC, made in Singapore and not anywhere near as
common as the later HP handhelds; this was one of those cases where HP saw
the light bulb before the customers did.
The 75x is not pricey, as you discovered, but not easy to find, and
undoubtedly significant.
__________________________________________
Kip Crosby engine(a)chac.org
http://www.chac.org/index.html
Computer History Association of California
<From: "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com>
<Loading system software.
< 2..
<?54 RETRY
< 2..
No device or bad media.
<When it's coming up it sounds like the HD spins up, and then as soon as it
<hits the "Loading system software" it sounds like it spins down.
Sounds like the rd54 or 53 has a case of spin down disease. Bad drive.
<thing. If I'm doing it correctly the only one that it seems to try to rea
<is 525993. Sounds like I'm out of luck.
Goddess knows whats on that tape. The number is a date code!
My guess is you have a bad drive and lots of media with nothing of value.
The uVAX-II can also boot off DECnet from another VMS or Ultrix host.
Allison
Hello, I was wondering if you knew where I could get
documentation for the old Altair 8800 system. Plans/kit
would be cool, too, but I don't really expect to find that.
thanks. :)
<It's an MCS8i, and it's based on the 8080 (40 pin ceramic DIP package -
<IIRC the 8008 has only 18 pins). The _CPU board_ carries a 1972 copyright
Yes the 8008 was 18 and the 8080 was 40. However the 8080 was not
available in 1972.
<date in the etch. Of course it could have been designed in 1972, and
<then sold later when the 8080 was produced, but it's still a pretty
<early design
The etch was likely not the copyright so much as the MCS8 written on it.
The MCS was their first shot boards for the 8008 and the 8080.
According to my research plus being in the industry during that time the
8008 was introduced in December 1971 and the 8080 was first sampled in
December 1973. Source, Intel literature I have. The 8080 was not even
operational in the lab during 1972. It's important to note that
significant qunatities of either were some 6 months later and very
expensive.
Additionally it was during 1973 (late summer) that Gary Kildall started
working on an operating system for the 8080 which was done mostly by cross
assemble and simulation and was run on the first die that was probed and
found functional.
Allison
<> That was 64bits of internal storage and that is different from a 64bit
<> parallel CPU. Also 613khz is slow.
<
<Not that slow. Depends what you do with the clock. Remember that a
<Motorola 6809 running at .8 Mhz (800 Khz) could always beat an Intel
<8088 running at 4.77 Mhz by at least 25% and usually 50% in tests I
<used.
It is when you compare it to contemporary 64bitters runiing at typical
clocks. The HP being aimed at calculator like apps didn't need speed.
As to the 6809 vs 8088 there is a big difference in how the clock is used
to time the cpu and how many clock cycles it takes to execute a given task.
The classic case is the 6502 at 2mhz against the 6800 at the same speed.
This is generally why I don't compare clocks. But 613khz is by most
respects slow, how slow is not relevent as for that application it was fast
enough.
Allison
Yes it has the side pins and based your other information it is a controller
unit. I getting orders for the boards now, but will be letting them go by
the end of this week. On the 14th or 15th I will start e-mail to all who
have asked for one. John
At 06:11 AM 11/6/97 -0500, you wrote:
>
>On Tue, 4 Nov 1997, John R. Keys Jr. wrote:
>
>> Hello to all
>> Had a pretty slow week last week only a few finds will later in week. Today
>> I got a box load of SYM-1's somewere betweeen 15 and 20 of them.
>
>That's exceptionally cool. When do you start taking orders? :)
>
>> I also got something called a IVS TRUMPCARD 500 by Interactive Video System
>> and have no idea what it is, any help out there ?
>
>Does it have a female 86-pin edge connector on it?
>
>>From the name I suspect it's a hard drive controller and RAM card for the
>Amiga 500. External. I base my guess on:
>
>1) "TrumpCard" - This was definitely the name of some hardcards for the
> A2000, and I think there were A500 models as well.
>
>2) "Interactive Video System" - With a name like that, there's a darn good
> chance the company was in the Amiga
> market.
>
>3) 500 - As in Amiga 500.
>
>Of course, as usual, I'm separated from my magazines so I can't go poking
>around looking. I think I'll have to move a representative sample into my
>room so that this situation is less likely in future.
>
>
>Doug Spence
>ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
>
>
>
I have a copy let me know what you need. John
At 08:06 AM 11/5/97 -0500, you wrote:
> Not yet a classic, but does anyone have a {spare} copy of the "Technical
>Reference Personal Computer AT"? This is the tech ref guide for the original
>IBM PC/AT, published by IBM (I'm guessing in a gray fabric binder).
>
> TIA!
>
>Rich Cini/WUGNET
><rcini(a)msn.com>
> Charter ClubWin! Member
> MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
>
>
>
>
>
>
>