At 09:22 AM 11/17/97 -0600, you wrote:
>> excellent PS/2 '87 era series that can be ripped apart with bare
>> hands except for motherboard and PSU screws.
>
>FWIW, my absolute favorite box of all time is the VAXstation 4000/60 or /96;
>you can get everything out of the box quickly with no tools. In contrast,
>it's only been in the last few years that I've gotten coordinated enough to
>keep from mutilating my knuckles every time I go into a VAXstation 2000...
I dunno if it's my favorite, but I do like the Mac IIci (intro'd in '89 --
almost 10 years) beacuse it too comes apart with no tools (mostly.)
My first computer, the Atari 600XL was great because the cartridge slot was
in exactly the right position to use it as a handle.
The one downside of the m100 is it had no handle, nor did it's little
slipcover. (And the RS blue case was too expensive -- then; I've got one
now.)
Any other thoughts on case designs? I still think the Lisa was beautiful,
and I'll have to check out the 3b1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
<Take that 800 mA pulse, and multiply it by the length of all the wires
<hooked to each drive line. What you end up with is a rather good radiator
<of high-frequency hash! Many machines housed the entire core assembly,
<including drivers, in a different box than the CPU for this reason.
<PDP-8/E's and -8/F's, where the memory does sit in the CPU box, have a
<special shielding card that segregates the memory from the rest of cards
<to keep this hash out of the CPU circuitry.
also to keep out of local TVs. Some of the core systems were boxed to keep
a constant temperature as ferrites are temerature sensitive.
Allison
<800mA to switch! Ouch! No wonder the PSU was so bulky.
Actually its 800ma per bit, the half select lines were some 400ma each
plus sense inhibit signals. A large memory could easily be in the several
tens of amps with all the surrounding logic. Typical power systems for code
machines were very robust and heavy.
<Truth. Trying to time right time to catch the bounce back and avoid
<the read pulse that is there on the sense wire. Yeah, it's read in
<serially fashion because that one wire is strung back and forth
<through all cores just once. You have to fashion the circuit to
<retore the orignal bits because the read process destroys the data.
Sensing the read data is fairly easy as it will occur in a fixed point
(all other things being constant) in time after the coincident
select pulse. Coincident selection takes half the total current needed
to switch the magnetic state of the core and divides it between two wires
of the matrix where the two coincide is the selected core and the resulting
magnetic field causes it to switch state. Writing is a matter of causing
it to switch to the reverse state.
ONE core in a larger array. Typical arrays are 16x16 or 64x64. A memory
typically would contain many arrays organized as 4096 by 12 or 4096 by 16
or wider and possibly larger. One such machine the MIT/Lincoln TX2 had
a main memory of 65536 38 bit words (2.5megabits).
\ /---inhibit wire
\|/
-----+----X SELECT wire
/|\
/ | \-----sense wire
y
--SELECTwire
This is a single bit of a core plane, the + could be a doughnut of ferrite
that can be magnetized in either direction depending on direction of
current. The sense wire as that is a serpentine single wire that goes
through each core. It's routing is such that for half the plane its
sense is reverse to suppress induced noise from the select wires. Some
planes use a forth wire threaded in the same way as an inhibit. Inhibit
is so a one or zero representation can be forced. So we can select a core
and read it's results and the selection process is in effect and erasure
meaning we have to put back data. Reading is done by selecting a core
using the X and Y select lines with thenough current to make the core
magnetic filed to change if it was previosly different. This
change or lack there of induces a current in the sense wire that we
can detect. If there is no change in the magnetic field there will be a
small pulse if there is a change in the field there will be a bigger pulse.
Comparators are used to compare that pulse to a known reference and if big
enough sends a pulse on to a latch (flipflop) to save that. Writing is
like reading we select a core with the currents reversed to force the
magnetization the other way, if we do not want to write we also force
current through the inhibit wire so that it counters the magnetic field of
the selection and inhibits the reversal.
Before more detail is given it's sufficient to say that a core memory
system is actually a goodly portion of the then current computers timing
and cost. I have only glossed over the reson core works and the logic
to do so is fairly involved as it requires sequential activities to occur
precisely every time and at the correct time.
Yes, core is destructive read out and the data read out must be stored
written back. Most CPUs of the time would do a read/modify/write to
take advantage of that. Living exampes of that include PDP-1 through
PDP-11, TI990 and I believe NOVA.
There is a whole class of logic that uses cores to propagate logic pulses
and even perform logical operations on combinations of pulses. Cores have
inherant memory from teh magnetization. There was a few computers built
to exploit that and had few active devices(transistors or tubes). They
are faster than relays but slower than tube or later transistor cicuits.
Allison
A whole lot, and all of it for $20!
Any info on these appreciated.
So, how close am I to building a 780? :)
PDP-8
M8320 BUS LOADS
M8315 KK8-A OMNIBUS CPU, 8/E INSTRUCTION SET
M8317 OPTION BOARD #2, MEM EXT & TIMESHARE, BOOTSTRAP, PWR FAIL
START
SOME UNNUMBVERED VAX NETWORK BOARD, INTERFACED TO A APOLLO.
M7769 KFQSA. (A SCSI adpater?)
UNKNOWN:
M8013 RLV11 DISK CONTROL
X2 M8014 RLV11 BUS CONTROL
EMULEX SC03
EMULEX TC12
X2 EMULEX CS02
DLV11-J (I know what THIS is!)
M7138 QBUS TO LASER PRINTER DMA INTERFACE MODULE
VAX 780:
X3 M8210 32K X 72BIT MOS RAM [MS780]
M8212 MS780-A MDT MEMORY DATA
M8218 KA780, SBI LOW BITS INTERFACE
M8226-C KA780, DEP, CPU DATA PATH E
M8227 KA780, CPU DATA PATH D
M8228 KA780, CPU DATA PATH C
M8229 KA780, CPU DATA PATH A
m8230 KA780, CEH CONDITION CODES, EXCPETIONS, HI BITS
M8231 KA780, ICL, INTERRUPT CONTROL, LOW BITS
M8232 KA780, CLK, CPU CLOCK
M8233 KU780, WCS, WRITABLE CONTROL STORE
M8234 KA780-A, PCS, PROM CONTROL STORE
M8236 KA780, CIB, CPU CONSOLE INTERFACE
M8238 KU780-A, 2K WCS
X2 M8270 DW780-A USI, UNIBUS ADAPTER SBI INTERFACE
X2 M8271 DW780-A, UNIBUS ADAPTER CONTROL
M8272 DW780-A UNIBUS ADAPTER MAP & DATA PATH
X2 M8273 DW780-A, UNIBUS ADAPTER ADDR
m9040 11780, TRM SBI TERMINATOR
VAX ???
L0007 11/750 MBA MASSBUS ADAPTER
X8 L0200 4MB MOS ARRAY [MS86]
X3 L0222 (MTM) MEM ARRAY TERMINAL BOARD [KA86]
L0224 SBI/A-BUS TERMINATOR [KA86]
X2 L0104 SBI INTERFACE FOR CI PORT
L0100 CI LINK INTERFACE
L0101 IPB (CI CONTROL STORE + PKT BUFF)
L0201 CONSOLE CONTROL KA86]
L0204 MBOX DATA PATH [KA86]
L0206 IBOX DATA PATH [KA86]
X2 L0207 IBOX CONTROL A [KA86]
L0208 IBOX INST BUFF [KA86]
L0212 SBIA SBI INTERFACE [KA86]
X2 L0214 IBOX CONTROL B [KA86]
L0215 CSA CONTROL STORE ARRAY [KA86]
L9200 MEM LOAD FOR 8600
Whew!
<Are there any obvious choices of better cores for a simple homemade
<core plane? I might try playing with steel 0-80 (and smaller) nuts
Permalloy was a common one and the size was generally 50 mils or smaller.
TX2 used this with 80mil od and 50 mil ID, it switch time was 1uS and
required 800ma to switch and yeilded 100mv if it switched. There was
no data given if it didn't switch but I'd bet 20mv would be believable.
Cycle time for a memory with cores like that would be 3-5us. The TX2
ran them at 5uS.
Other materials can be used but a good sharp B-H curve is desired and
saturable ferrites were used for the smaller 30-40 mil cores. Saturable
ferrites are used in power conversion in current designs so they exist.
There is a relationship between core size, material and speed.
<this weekend, but I doubt they'll be particularly good - probably it'll
<take a rather sizable current*turns product to magnetize these.
Turns are 1, and the current from some of the older stuff was around
400-800ma and the smaller later stuff in the 100-200ma region.
<Assuming I do find a readily available material that works, would others
<be interested in a write-up about building your own core memory plane?
<I'm envisioning circuitry to allow one to toggle in bits to various
<locations and read them out again. The logic driving it is likely
<to be simple TTL (maybe some 74LS138's or 74154's for X-Y decoders)
<plus some analog electronics for the drivers and sense/inhibit
<circuitry. If I'm clever enough, it'll be be doable with readily
<available (i.e. Radio Shack) parts.
This would be interesting. Additionally if it could be applied to some
of the core planes out there with ??? characteristics and origins it may
help. there was an article written back in the late 70s in BYTE on using
CC core memories.
FYI the TX2 used 64x64(4kbit) core planes for main memory to make a larger
256x256x38 bit memory. The fast memory(registers) were 64x19bits using two
cores per bit (bigger signal less noise). the array was 8x8 using 128
cores.
A small 8x8 or 16x16 array would be trivial to wire and drive. It's the
timing for the read pulse and keeing noise out of things that is twitchy.
Allison
> From: Philip.Belben(a)powertech.co.uk
> Subject: Re[2]: Talk Of Building A Computer...
(Don't react until you read this first part through:)
You can of course never build a real classic computer, by definition its
not a real classic unless its really old and was built by people who
were, at the time, working with state of the art components and
techniques. Part of the attraction of the old machines is that they
subtly document the skills, preconceptions and ignorance of their
designers and the prevailing conventional wisdom. Another part of the
attraction is to have a piece of equipment that has been in existence
for so long and still works.
So the best you could ever do is come close. Any attempt will be a
compromise of some sort, so an interesting question is how close is
close enough? The closest I think is to attempt to exactly recreate a
particular early machine. Chris Burton is doing this with the Manchester
SSEM and Tony Sale with the Colossus, both with significant help from
other folks in the Computer Conservation Society. I've seen them in
progress, they are both fabulously, meticulously accurate (as far as I
can tell) and very nearly as much fun as if the original machines still
existed. And despite all the help they are largely one-man projects, or
could have been, which shows that its actually possible to consider
doing it "right" by yourself if you have the time. Sort of like building
a boat or an airplane. People can do that.
All this having been said, I'm sure you feel as I do that it would be
fun to build a machine in the classic style but an exact recreation is
too much. So how authentic do you have to be? My point is this -
*** Its up to you ***.
Since any such project is necessarily a compromise, the exact tradeoffs
are not really important. Your project should reflect what you want from
it, other people's opinion doesn't matter unless its a group effort.
Here are a some projects I personnally find interesting:
1. A small Williams-tube memory. Designed and built from scratch using
6SN7's and a common 5" oscilloscope CRT like maybe a 5GP1.
(Chris has beaten me to this but it doesn't matter - for that matter,
Williams beat us both; the fun part is doing it yourself.)
2. A complete 32-bit CPU and memory in the classic style, an accumulator
machine, built in just 4 parts: a FPGA, DRAM, EPROM and clock. This is
easily possible with existing technology. It would also have a 2.5" IDE
disk drive for mass storage and a small printer and keyboard for user
I/O. It would be fun to do and would demonstrate the incredible
miniaturization of electronics when compared with my room sized IBM
7094.
3. Emulators for all my old machines, and machines I wish I had. This is
the only project I've actually made any progress on.
So do what you find most compelling.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are some thoughts on the current proposal (building a machine in
the classic style of a tube machine but with discrete transistors to be
more practical), some of these reinforce comments others have already
made:
Your main problem is not the logic, it is the memory. There is no old
memory that is anywhere near as easy to use as, say, SRAM. Your major
choices are core, magnetic drum/disk, or delay line. Core is going to be
a lot of work. Drum or disk will require expertise in mechanical
fabrication but is pretty attractive otherwise. Acoustic delay line (the
only kind with reasonable capacity) may be best but will require some
research and experimentation. I would recommend magnetostrictive wire
acoustic delay line memory if you can figure out how to build it and
don't mind having a very small memory.
About the logic, while very early tube circuits were strange using
multiple grids, in most tube computer circuits the actual logic was done
with diodes. The tubes then invert and drive the next stage. Flip-flops
were used for temporary state storage and sometimes for registers. A
very common computer tube in the US was the 5965 dual triode. To see
some IBM 705 circuit drawings (all but the inverter, which apparently
wasn't used much in this machine but was used in others such as the 709)
look at http://www.teleport.com/~prp/collect/705dwg/
The diode/tube logic translates very nicely into common early transistor
circuits such as RTL, RCTL and DTL.
For a project like this I would recommend building a serial accumulator
machine, one which works on one bit at a time and has a single
architecturally visible register, like the PDP-8. It will have much less
logic than a parallel or multiple register machine and will be very
classic. A serial CPU will be a good match with serial memory such as
drum or delay line memory. A good, pretty clean example is the Royal
McBee LGP-30. Better is the SWAC which had a very good clean minimal
architecture but was parallel, a serial version would be pretty easy.
Note that small tube machines like the LGP-30 and Bendix G-15 have only
around 300 tubes.
To get an idea of how big it would be, the Packard Bell PB250 (see
http://www.teleport.com/~prp/collect/mini.html ) is just what I've been
talking about - serial, transistors (RCTL) and delay line memory. It
takes up half a 19" rack, same as a PDP-8 but I think the logic is
physically less dense. About a quarter of the volume is taken up by the
memory.
Paul
At 05:56 AM 11/21/97 +0000, you wrote:
>Okay.... possibly keyboard, but probably HDD. I tried my current keyboard...
>it's a Windows 95, and I still got that error.
Try <http://www.searchlight.com/$WEBMSG.Read.SLBBS-R.3631.read> -- it's a
listing of the various POST (Power-On Self Test) error codes. (Or, do a
search at AltaVista (<http://altavista.digital.com/>) on <"power on self
test" and error> (with quotes, no <>'s.))
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
> > You mean, there's still another educational institution that uses VAX
> > Notes as a major means of mass communication?
> >
> > What's your mailer?
>
> One thing, Notes is kind of internal "newsgroups" that you can
> subscribe while as authorized users logged on there.
I know all about it. I'm required to use it daily, both for work and for
class. I was just surprised to hear of a fellow Notes-user.
> The vax email
> program that you write and reply to is PMDF and has POP3 server as
> well.
We have no POP server here (or we do, but we have no dialup PPP service,
so it's useless unless you're connected to the network). We use Dreams as
an interface to PMDF, which has its nice features.
> Also it has newsgroups reader on there but it's too clumsy and
> hard to use.
SLRN can be compiled under VMS (at least, 0.9.0.0 could be). I find it a
lot easier to use than NEWSRDR.
--
Ben Coakley http://www.math.grin.edu/~coakley coakley(a)ac.grin.edu
Station Manager, KDIC 88.5 FM CBEL: Xavier OH
It is good to rock. It is very good to rock wearing a big ass pumpkin on your
head. It is very, very good if that pumpkin is on fire. --Jessica Stern
<> > You mean, there's still another educational institution that uses VAX
<> > Notes as a major means of mass communication?
<I know all about it. I'm required to use it daily, both for work and for
<class. I was just surprised to hear of a fellow Notes-user.
<
<> The vax email
I have VAXnotes up and running on my collection of vaxen here. Trying to
workup CMUip slip or slirp.
What I like about Vaxnotes was you coul have public conferences or private
authorized people only conferences.
Allison
Thus wrote: <Robert M. (Bob) Donan E-mail: donan(a)utk.edu
<The Tandy TRS80 Model III, as delivered, did not come with a green
<screen. Either the machine has been upgraded (requiring a different
<video board) or it is not a Model III. I may be able to help you either
<way as I have been repairing Radio Shack computers since 1979. You
<could help me answer your questions by answering the following
<questions:
There were at the time several companies offering replacement CRTs to go
>from white to Green or amber. they were same tube different phosphor with
no other alterations required.
H19s and a few other terminals/systems were modified that was as well.
Robert, Did you work for tandy? I was up in PA when the TRS80 hit.
Allison
IT runs again, boots RT-11. The decision to stop screwing with it came
when I realized I didn't have any 18b RAM boards, and RSTS won't run in
64KW of core. (128KB). So, I'll have to get something lighter for it to
run if it's to be timesharing. Or get RAM. I may do that today.
All the RAM I have is 22b boards from the '44. My next project will be to
get that running, then maybe the VAX 750.
I just got my XT working!!! (My first classic) Well... not really
working... I get a "601 Error", and then it says "Press F1 To Resume" I
remember a similiar error w/my current computer... I replaced the
keyboard when all was done. Just for a little interesting bit, the
manufacturer of the chip (I forget the term) on the keyboard is
Zilog.... same neon light style logo as way back when. Well anyway, I
would like to thank Max, who sent me the processor that got it working,
(Sorry, tried to e-mail him, and got an error) and I would like to know
if anyone can help w/ the 601 error.
Thanks,
Tim D. Hotze
The Tandy TRS80 Model III, as delivered, did not come with a green
screen. Either the machine has been upgraded (requiring a different
video board) or it is not a Model III. I may be able to help you either
way as I have been repairing Radio Shack computers since 1979. You
could help me answer your questions by answering the following
questions:
1. Does the computer have a silver or cream coloured cabinet? If the
cabinet is silver in coulur, it is a Model III cabinet and the innards
may have been renewed. As the Model III and Model IV (non-gate array)
use the same footprint for their internal circuit boards and drive
towers, they are easily interchanged.
2. If the cabinet is cream couloured it is most likely a Model IV
gate-array.
Robert M. (Bob) Donan E-mail: donan(a)utk.edu
Graduate Teaching Associate
Department of Human Resource Development
The University of Tennessee
310 Jessie Harris
Knoxville, TN 37996-1900
(423) 974-2574 Department.
(423) 579-2808 Residence
Well, I managed to trash my e-mail and lose everything in my inbox. (1000+
messages) So, if anyone wrote to me recently, please resend it. Sorry!
Further, I am getting rid of my CRL account, so if you have my e-mail
address as <sinasohn(a)crl.com>, please change it to either
<sinasohn(a)ricochet.net> or <roger(a)sinasohn.com>. Thanks!
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
On Wed, 19 Nov 1997 06:42:28 GMT, Bill Richman inquired:
> [...] And does anyone have an Intecolor in their collection?
Yep. I've got an ISC 8001 with 24 kB of user memory, 48-line
option, dual 5 1/4" floppy drives, and ROM BASIC. It's a nice box.
______________________________________________________________________
| | |
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:carl.friend@stoneweb.com | |
| http://www.ultranet.com/~engelbrt/carl/museum/ | ICBM: N42:21 W71:46 |
|________________________________________________|_____________________|
I have an interestin quad-height board labelled Dilog CQ2010.
It has a 50-pin plug (Like a SCSI plug), and a few DIP switch blocks.
What is it? Anyone know?
Kevin McQuiggin wrote:
> Hi Tim:
>
> If you're going to try this, I'd suggest starting with something simple
> like an adder or a flip flop, or a register. You'd get an idea of what
> would be involved with a simple processor. But I think it would end up
> being pretty expensive.
[...]
Tim Hotze had written:
>Hello... some time ago, there was talk of building a computer, and now I
>think that I've got a (bad, possibly) idea. In the earlier half of this
>century, transistors weren't avaible... vaccum tubes... huge ones, but
>now, the transistor has made small ones possible. My point: If we were
>to take a tubed design, and re-build it with transistors, we could
>probably make it a decent size.
> So, what da ya think?
I think there is something even more fundamental here. Valves
(thermionic, in tubes) have quite different behaviour to trannies.
A JFET behaves fairly like a triode, but designs that use pentodes and
nonodes and things as multi-input gates are going to be very difficult
to translate.
Of course by the 1960s there were somve very nice valves around that
weren't available to the 1940s computer pioneers - the 7586 nuvistor
springs to mind: a very nice triode in a metal can about 1 inch tall
including pins, and less than half an inch in diameter. Can't remember
the spec, though. Such devices could make a valve machine quite a bit
smaller than Colossus, Eniac, Edsac, etc.
Or if you want to be way out, what about tubes with several valves in?
Things like double diode triodes are quite common, and someone even put
most of a radio set into one tube (passive components and all).
So how about making our own. A tube containing, say, a 4-bit D-type
latch? Make a few in that range and a valve computer becomes almost
manageable! Besides, the smaller it is, the faster you can make it...
Philip.
<The main memory of the DEUCE was built form mercury delay lines of 1024
<bits, and the 1024 bit shift register chip had just become available.
<The connection was obvious and we spent hours discussing the rebuilding
<a TTL version of DEUCE, for which he still had the logic diagrams. Alas
<the project was never completed but I have dreams of doing it one day.
With current parts the Turing machine could almost be practical/useful as
it would be easy to provide enough memory to simulate a very long tape
and enough speed to transverse it quickly.
It's been a long time since I've looked at that machine.
<Take the idea even further : the technology exists today to build most
<if not all first generations machines on a single chip. Indeed I wonder
<if an FPGA might not be able to be reconfigurable to build many of these
In most cases yes. Some are quite simple when reduced a logical
description. The PDP-8 has seen this treatment many times using the 6100.
6120 and even gate-arrays.
Allison
From: HOTZE <photze(a)batelco.com.bh>
<Hello... some time ago, there was talk of building a computer, and now I
<think that I've got a (bad, possibly) idea. In the earlier half of this
Not a bad idea but, it appears you have no technical concept of the extent
of it.
<century, transistors weren't avaible... vaccum tubes... huge ones, but
<now, the transistor has made small ones possible. My point: If we were
<to take a tubed design, and re-build it with transistors, we could
<probably make it a decent size.
< So, what da ya think?
The operating characteristics of tube and transistors are far enough apart
that circuit techniques applied to one donot apply well to the other.
The redesign would not be tivial
For most of the tube designs drum memory and mercury filled acoustic delay
lines were memory. a few used williams tubes. You would find that
difficult to duplicate.
To further make a point most of the early transistor designs were
evlotionary results of tube designs.
One of the first transistor designs was TX1 and TX2(early 50s, MIT/lincoln
labs) and theywere not small. Later ones in the 60s were PDP-1, Perkin
Elmer, CDC, to name a few and these were large as large machines(fast, big)
were the goal. The first small machines were the LINC and PDP-8.
Figure 5-10 thousand transistors and thousands of diodes, resistors,
capacitors. A foot print for a typical transistor -8 is aroung 20 square
feet plus access space.
The closest you could come and expect to complete on a singular basis would
be a to copy the archectecture of an older machine using ICs. It wouldn't
be the real thing, original peripherals would be hard to come by and there
may be a base of software if you elect to copy something like a PDP-8.
I'd do it as an engineering exercise and beacuse I happen to like certain
old archetectures. The result would not be a classic by any means.
Allison
From: Philip.Belben(a)powertech.co.uk
<So how about making our own. A tube containing, say, a 4-bit D-type
<latch? Make a few in that range and a valve computer becomes almost
<manageable! Besides, the smaller it is, the faster you can make it...
A four bit latch using valves would require not less than 8 triodes plus
buffers. Very hard to do in one envelope...
Also tubes had some characteristics that made it very hard to design fast
enough logic that distance(size) was a factor.
I have a few 7586 and 6ds4/6cw4 nuvistors and they are 0.8" tall and 0.45
dia and make really good rf amplifiers but slow switches.
Allison
<If you're going to try this, I'd suggest starting with something simple
<like an adder or a flip flop, or a register. You'd get an idea of what
<would be involved with a simple processor. But I think it would end up
<being pretty expensive.
I have some partial designs for transistor hardware. A flipflop design
used for the TX2 required 10 transistors, 22 resistors, 8 capacitors, two
inductors and three operating voltages. A register 8 bits wide would require
8 of these plus gating logic possibly doubling the number of components
needed. You can now see why early machines were register sparse.
FYI I have an article for a TIC-TAC-TOE computer using tubes and Neon lamps
and it required some nine 2d21 thyratron tubes and 190 neon lamps(serve as
gate logic mostly and two per box for display). This is a very limited
fixed logic machine and it required a lot.
Allison
HI, I'VE GOT A KAYPRO 10 AND IT'S BEEN A MILD CHALLENGE TO ENDEVOR TO
OPERATE.IF YOU COULD PART WITH THE OPERATING MANUALS I'D BE
BLESSED.THANKS BERNIE
There's a few slots up by the CPU labled MUD. I think I know what it
means. But I want to make sure. Does it mean Modified Unibus Device?
And does that mean DMA slot? And does that mean all the screwing with the
backplane I did was unneccesary?
HEATH Computer Enthusiasts:
In September I picked up a Western Union Telegraph Company Model 102
Teleprinter for our museum. It and a complete Heathkit Computer system
were the belongings of Charlie Eheman,K6ESN "K6 Every Saturday Night" of
San Diego. Charlie was a WWII Navy Chief Radioman; he passed away on August
20, 1997. His brother, Ed Eheman of Texas was in San Diego cleaning out
Charlies house.
I am looking for someone to actually put the Heathkit system to GOOD use;
in its day it was the "cat's meow." It is all in good shape with EXTENSIVE
documentation.
H9 Video display terminal
H10 Paper tape reader and perforator
H11 Digital computer (a DEC PDP11)
H14 Dot matrix printer
H19 Video display terminal
H27 Dual 8" Floppy Drive
Complete with cables and all manuals, builders notes, including the
programming courses, paper tape, 8" floppy disks, etc.
Don Robert House, N.S.E. NO JOB IS SO IMPORTANT
NADCOMM AND NO SERVICE IS SO URGENT-
3841 Reche Road THAT WE CANNOT TAKE TIME
Fallbrook, CA 92028-3810 TO PERFORM OUR WORK SAFELY.
e-mail: dhouse(a)abac.com BELL SYSTEM
http://www.hem.com/nadcomm
760-723-9959 Telephone
760-781-5161 Facsimile
ok, now that everyone's finished hashing out the 10 year rule...
I was going through some of my old junk and discovered the above mentioned
card. I need the utilities disk; i think it was called superpak or something
like that which had the clock driver, print spooler, and ramdisk setup. I
also have a copy of the super pak utilies disk user's guide if anyone wants
it. it's the first edition, as i am keeping the second edition that i also
got.
david
I would like a list of the items jrkeys(a)concentric.net
At 08:45 AM 11/19/97 +0000, you wrote:
>Found on comp.sys.tandy
>
> Greetings:
>
> I have acquired a pile of boxes from an estate sale. Numerous old
> computer pieces-parts that I thought might be of some value, but I
> don't know where to 'advertise' them -- and now they must go.
>
> Included are
> computers - TI & Radio Shack, some in perfect condition -- one is
> in a heavy steel case, RS keybd, could be home brew from misc
> parts but I can't tell, could it possibly be a stock TRS 80?
> software - cartridges & 5 1/4 floppies
> printers - are ribbons & print heads still available?
> ref books - old, specialized, probably junk
> monitors - USI, PI2, mono, unfamiliar connectors
> {also 2 non-computer antiques: 1) an old Associated Press
> linotype machine, with ribbons, very heavy. 2) 3M copier.}
> chips - small, many, stored in plastic tubes
> LNW Research products - look like large keybds but may be
> more than that -- one box is different as follows
>
> You should see this manual, it is beautiful. Yes, Virginia, there is
> such a thing as an Antique Computer. Wish it had a date in it; ref is
> made to a CA sales tax of 6%. "System Expansion for the TRS-80 [pc
> board & user manual] w/ serial RS232C / 20mA I/O
> floppy controller
> 32K bytes memory" (awesome)
> etc....
> Found a date. Guess! Answer to follow at signature.
>
> So please, somebody, send me a clue, what can I do.
> Anyone know an address where I can list these? Are old puters
> so plentiful as to not have any value as collector's items?
>
> Thanks much.
>
> ---mikey
>
> DON'T PEEK THE1ANSWER9IS8DON'T1PEEK
>
>
>
>Found on comp.sys.ti
>
>I have a couple TI99/4As, an expansion box with a disk drive and other
>stuff (very heavy), another disk drive, and some carts that a coworker
>was going to throw away. I live in Gilroy, CA and work in San Jose,
>CA. Anyone interested?
>
>Bostone1
>
>Bostone1(a)aol.com
>
>
<Speaking of Alpha's, is there any chance that I can put my own together? A
<agree... it's just plain stupid, and I hate Intel anyway... kind of like in
Sure, you can buy them used for prices that aren't all that expensive
compared to late model 486 or early p5s. The older ones are now some 4-5
years old. The OS for it will cost you. You have three choices that I
know of, OpenVMS (my favorite), Digital Unix, or NT. I don't know that
anyone has done a UNIX port outside of digital.
Allison
Hi all!
I?m afraid this computer is off-topic (dated 1988). Sorry.
An IBM 5363-I has recently been given to me, but I don?t know anything
at all about its internal architecture or capabilities. I only own the
Central Unit; no cables, no floppies, no tapes, no manuals, no
terminals.
* It has two 15-pin sub-d connectors in one expansion card. They seem to
be for attaching two serial terminals (syncronous? type 5250?)
* In another expansion board it has a 9-pin sub-d connector.
* There are too four twin-axial connectors.
Can anybody help me on this subject?
Thanks in advance.
--
Sergio Izquierdo Garcia
mailto:henrio@edu.tsai.es
At 08:45 AM 11/19/97 +0000, you wrote:
>Found on comp.sys.ti
>
>I have a couple TI99/4As, an expansion box with a disk drive and other
>stuff (very heavy), another disk drive, and some carts that a coworker
>was going to throw away. I live in Gilroy, CA and work in San Jose,
>CA. Anyone interested?
If only I had some way to get to the south bay on a weekday (or time on a
weekend)... Oh well, surely someone will save this...?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
At 11:40 AM 11/19/97 -0600, you wrote:
>> >Heck, if I was in somebody else's house I'd probably have my trusty
>> >Leatherman with me.
> ^^^^^^^^^^
>Well, I know it's a LART of some kind... What's a leatherman exactly?
One of the Village People... 8^)
Sorry -- couldn't resist. (Saw them in concert a year or so ago.) Anyway,
a Leatherman is a multi-tool -- pliers with various blades, saws,
screwdrivers, etc that fold into the handle. Whole thing folds up into an
innocuos little rectangle. Kind of a modern-day swiss-army knife.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
> It's going as long as we have newbies comes in, even happens on other
> newsgroups and in our notes on vax at my college. Sheesh!
You mean, there's still another educational institution that uses VAX
Notes as a major means of mass communication?
What's your mailer?
--
Ben Coakley http://www.math.grin.edu/~coakley coakley(a)ac.grin.edu
Station Manager, KDIC 88.5 FM CBEL: Xavier OH
It is good to rock. It is very good to rock wearing a big ass pumpkin on your
head. It is very, very good if that pumpkin is on fire. --Jessica Stern
I'm quite happy with the ten-year-plus-flexibility definition,
as described by Bill Whitson. Remember the sign-on message from
when you first subscribed? (Maybe it changes from time to time?
I'll include the one I got at the end of this.)
He specifically states that the main intent of the ten-year limit
is to avoid "discussion of technical problems with the standard PCs
and Macs, other than the really old stuff". Perfect. No WinDoze
d00dz begging for warez, but talk about fixing up the older critters
is explicitly 100% in-bounds. By the "not-heavy-handed" clause,
talk about the unusual not-yet-ten-year-old machine is okay too.
Unless you are insisting on discussing current PCs and Macs, or
want to be more restrictive, there is nothing that needs adjusting.
(I personally wouldn't mind ruling out all PC/Mac talk, but that's
just me, and I wouldn't actively push for that.)
Can we please drop this now?
Bill.
] NAQ (Never Asked Questions) 0.1
]
] What is it?
]
] This list is for the discussion of Classic Computers -
] primarily for those people who collect and restore
] old machines. It is brand new - no subscribers yet
] so sign up. The collection and restoration of computers
] is becoming a big enough hobby that I felt a need for
] a place to talk about it.
]
] What is a classic computer?
]
] Well that's hard to say but since I created the list I'll
] do it anyway. A classic computer is a machine that has not
] been produced for 10 years or more. It's an arbitrary
] definition but at least uncomplicated.
]
] What are the guidelines?
]
] The list is designed for discussion of collecting, restoring,
] and maintaining old computers. I'm not going to be heavy
] handed with restricting discussion. I'd just like it to be
] clear that the list is not the proper place for discussion
] of technical problems with the standard PCs and Macs (other
] than the really old stuff). Anyone can lurk - if you're
] going to post, just use your own good judgement.
]
] This IS NOT and will NEVER BE a list for discussion of "which
] computer is best?" and anyone who posts the ubiquitous "why
] don't you just go buy a PC you moron" will be immediately
] unsubbed.
]
] Beyond this - have fun! That what keeps us going with these
] old machines.
Are there any archaeologists in the house? Not being one myself,
I wouldn't be too surprised if some archaeological treasures had
been lost forever in the process of some enthusiastic 18th-century
archaeologist applying 18th-century state-of-the-art technology
to the study of some artifact. Maybe some singular fossil got
dissolved in acid in an attempt to determine its chemical
composition, where we could now pop the thing under an electron
microscope and learn about its cell-structure. (Of course, maybe
our electron microscope would do some damage that would prevent
later generations from bringing that thing back to life! Who
knows?) Had that guy just left the thing alone a couple centuries
ago, we might now be able to extract much more knowledge from it.
And/or, if we leave it alone now, it might be much more valuable
after a couple more centuries.
So, which will be more valuable a couple centuries down the road,
another set of used floppies plus easily-readable copies of the
software that was on them, or decayed but pristine floppies? I
think I know which will be rarer. And maybe, just maybe they'll
be able to read them even after the oxide coating has become so
much dust. (Anyone care to speculate on the technology to do that?)
I have the impression that museums generally collect things with
the goal of having them available as needed to extract knowledge
>from them; scientists often take samples, even destructively when
the utility is great. Are we in this group yet? Is there really
any knowledge to be gained from these, that is otherwise unavailable?
If we are pretending to be museums, should we have the same goals?
Personally, I am not a museum; there are only a handful of systems
I am interested in, and I want to keep them running, and even make
new hardware/software for them. But I might think twice about that
if I got a never-used never-even-opened system dropped in my lap.
Maybe I'd contact a real museum.
Enough talk. Back to hacking.
Cheers,
Bill.
At 12:41 11/19/97 +0000, ARD wrote:
>> where I'm at someone's house for dinner, and they say "Oh, BTW, my
>> computer's not working," and I didn't bring a screwdriver and they don't
>> own a #2 Phillips.
>
>And just what are you going to do when you've pulled the cover? Unless
>it's just a board/cable that needs reseating you're going to need some
>test equipment, a soldering iron, etc., anyway. I have _never_ been anywhere
>with that sort of equipment and not had a screwdriver with me.
>
>Heck, if I was in somebody else's house I'd probably have my trusty
>Leatherman with me.
Certainly I take your point, but the context here is one of unrivaled
banality. Your "just a board/cable that needs reseating" covers about 90%
of the "emergencies" of this type that come anywhere near me. Both 5.25
floppies and MFM hard disks have connectors that loosen spontaneously. IDE
"controllers" pop out of their sockets, for some reason. And there was
always the lady who thought her computer "didn't work" because the
connector to the hard disk LED had popped off -- even though that was all
that was wrong.
__________________________________________
Kip Crosby engine(a)chac.org
http://www.chac.org/index.html
Computer History Association of California
At 12:50 AM 11/19/97 GMT, you wrote:
>successful. I agree with Jeff in that the thing that makes most of
>the systems "special" to me is the fact that not everybody could just
>go down to the local Best Buy/Circuit City/Sears store, buy one, plug
>it in, and use it. It took some determination, some ingenuity, and a
I bought my Atari 600XL from Sears, and I would have to say that not
everybody at the time could have put that to use.
btw, the HP3000 has been produced for, what, 20+ years continuously, and
some of the various models are extremely collectible.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
At 08:50 PM 11/17/97 -0800, you wrote:
>Personally I think some of the cooliest designs are the 68k based Atari's.
>The perfect example is my Atari TT030. Couple the case design with TOS,
I had forgotten about the TT... Definitely cool. Don't have one, though.
Didn't they open up pretty easily?
>the ROM based windowed OS, and you've got a cool design. The only down
>sides are TOS's single task nature, and the mouse again.
But multi-tasking is available as an add-on.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
At 03:51 PM 11/18/97 -0600, you wrote:
[much interesting introduction snipped]
>In another area of the JCM, I've begun to collect ancient ASCII art
>from the 60s and 70s: Einstein, Spock, Snoopy, etc. I've written a
>more, and I'd like to record personal anecdotes about the creation
>of these old artworks. I'd also like to get an actual print sample
Hi! An anecdote for you... When I was in high school, one of our little
gang of computer hoodlums managed to come up with an ascii printout of a
naked woman. During lunch, we hung it up behind the pull-down projector
screen. When classes resumed, we were (naturally) giggling like mad about
how witty and clever we were to have not only obtained this delectable bit
of naughtiness, but also at outsmarting the teacher.
Well, he (the teacher) figured out something was up, and inquired about it.
Somehow he learned of our devilry and went over to check it out. Well,
rather than tearing it down and punishing us, dirty old man that he was, he
promptly rolled the screen up and left it hanging there for all to see!
Ah, to be young again...
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
I'd like to introduce myself to the list.
I maintain the somewhat imaginary "Jefferson Computer Museum" at
<http://www.threedee.com/jcm>, which has info about my several
Terak systems. The Terak was a PDP-11/03-based graphics workstation
circa 1978-85. My "Terak Museum" web page is the proud recipient of
the "Geek Site of the Day" award for October 16, 1996.
I also have historical info about the UCSD P-System, including an
emulator, source code and very early Pascal compilers. In the months
to come, I will add info about other systems I have, including a
Zilog MCZ Z-80 development system, CBM PET and NEC systems.
I've also been given permission by Claus Giloi to distribute the
C source to his Windows-based Altair and IMSAI emulators. If you haven't
seen this, it's a nifty graphical recreation, letting you click on
the toggle switches to drive the emulator and watch the LEDs blink.
In the years to come, I'd like to enhance it to include virtual
peripherals, or with inexpensive recreations like an opto paper
tape reader.
Recently, I've been researching the possibility of reviving old
audio cassette tape storage of computer data. With today's PC
audio digitizers and a little software, it should be possible to
decode and synthesize tapes in formats such as Tarbell tapes for
S-100 systems, 88-ACR, Commodore PET, VIC and C-64, Bell 103
recordings, etc. A software approach would have several
advantages: you don't need the original hardware, and it has
a better chance of restoring out-of-spec data.
A little digging revealed the "soundmodem", a driver for Linux and DOS
that is a software-based FSK modem that can handle 300 to 9600 baud
in real-time using a SoundBlaster as the digitizer / DSP. It is
used by ham radio operators.
To experiment, I digitized an old wobbly CBM PET tape and did a bit of
post-processing in contemporary sound software and it normalized the
volume quite well. I suspect with commercial audio software, one
could even invoke filters to remove print-through.
At 22 or 44 kHz mono 8-bit samples, there's certainly enough
headroom to distinguish these relatively slow-speed signals. I'm
sure with some formats, just watching the zero-crossing timing would
work. I wonder if this technique could be used to rescue old N-track
reel tapes that have become unreadable over the years, by intercepting,
digitizing, and post-processing the tape-head signal.
What would help the most is to get specifications for the old
standards. I don't have any documentation, although I'm digging through
the basement to find my old Kilobauds. I sent an e-mail
to Don Tarbell, who is apparently still on the Internet, but
no response so far. It would also help to see more samples!
If you have any old cassettes, please consider digitizing them
and sending them to me.
In another area of the JCM, I've begun to collect ancient ASCII art
>from the 60s and 70s: Einstein, Spock, Snoopy, etc. I've written a
program that converts teletype-style overstrike art into Adobe Illustrator
documents, which are easy to re-size and print on today's laser printers.
I have dozens of pictures from DECUS tapes, but I'm always looking for
more, and I'd like to record personal anecdotes about the creation
of these old artworks. I'd also like to get an actual print sample
of the entire printable font from an ASR-33 teletype, in order to
scan and convert it into an authentic Postscript bitmap font.
- John
At 12:48 11/19/97 +0000, you wrote:
>The Rainbow, Pro series and DECmate 2 are very easy to pull to bits,
>agreed. I once dismantled one on a train, much to the amazement of the
>people sitting near me.
ROTFL! Only you, Tony, or at the very least, you first among equals.
____________________________________________________________
Kip Crosby, honcho, mechanic and sole proprietor, Kip's Garage
http://www.kipsgarage.com: rumors, tech tips and philosophy for the trenches
Coming Spring '98: The Windows 98 Bible by Kip Crosby and Fred Davis!
<They're still going. Their modern stuff is not _as good_, but it's still
<very well built. Oh, and the electronic design is up to the same high
<standards.
there is some truth and a fair amount of fiction. Some of the older
stuff was overbuilt and it cost. The Barco had everything out front
for a reason, when was the last time you have to converge a new monitor?
Some of the older stuff that was a fairly common adjustment. Alos how
much of the stuff made before say 1983/4 would pass FCC/DOC/TUV RF
radiation requiments.
Some of those new cases that come off easy are even RF tight, no small
trick. Years ago it was box in box construction to get that. Some things
in racks are still expensive as the racks and the system then support
collectively have to be RF tight without being airtight.
In addition you pay for weight, in shipping, cost of materials and
sometimes time to produce.
Now for a reality check. The last generation of transistor computers were
fairly small. PDP-8, PDP12 being examples. All that quality. Well one
of the itelms in that are a plastic/ceramic packaged transistor used in
heaping piles. Electrically a decent enough device for the time and cheap
too. One little problem, the transistor die is glued to a ceramic pad
then wire bonds from the leads to the die and a drop of epoxy to enclose
the component. Problem, epoxy is not hermetic and the bonds go from the
affixed die to lead posts via they epoxy and as things heat and cool
sometimes the forces are great enough to lift the lead right off the die.
The result is transistors that work when cool and quit when warm. Needless
to say that case design would disappear after a few years. Why use it to
build a computer? Well in the 60s it would take say 10,000 of them and
the same part in a metal case was several times the price as in $0.25 VS
more than $1.00. It was the best option at that time.
An aside for the crazies like me. If a straight-8 were built using modern
surface mount transistors and components to the same electronic printset
and current multilayer board and packaging techniques it would shrink by a
factor of 5-10 without resorting to ICs not available at that time. The
only challenge would be the core memory (the raw cores would be hard to
find and expensive to assemble). Electronic packaging and construction
has undergone considerable advancement and is more than wrapping metal or
plastic around it.
Some items like the cheap screws were also common with a few altair kits
when MITS was having trouble. Or some of the other near vapor machines.
I may add that I can buy a minitower box with PS these days for well under
$100 but at the time of the altair the RAW cabinate from the vendor like
that one was well over $100 and you still had to cut holes in it and fill
it. I may add the Altair (8800) box was actually pretty flimsy compared
to IMSAI or the later Horizon, Vector MX or CompuPro boxes.
Allison
<in, regardless of how long it was produced. Were the others you
<mentioned all produced for more than 2 years running? Sometimes I
All of them were over two years. How about PDP-11s manufactured for
over 25years and the older members are easily 20+ years old yet some
members of the line are near impossible to find. Like Ford falcons they
were cranked out but that doesn't mean they still abound.
<"Really" think that the only place you'd find more attitude than in
<this group would be in a flock of "Valley Girls".
It's New York Girl to you!
Bottom line, despite some peoples wishes the owner of the list has set the
standard and it's reasonable enough to work well. Leave it alone.
Allison
From: bill_r(a)inetnebr.com (Bill Richman)
<How about making the rule something to the effect of "Systems older
<than 20 years, or which were actively produced for less than _x_ (2?)
<years running" ? Too complicated? At least it would cover almost all
<of the "unique" machines. If they were made for more than 2 years,
Really. Lets see the LINC was over twenty years ago and made for more
than two years. There are very few of them. Back then (64-66ish) a
couple dozen were a lot of any machine! It would also eliminate the
Altair, Imsai, KIM-1, PDP-8 and a few others.
It doesn't work.
Allison
At 09:04 11/18/97 +0000, you wrote:
>I've never understood this love of screwdriver-less cases. If I'm going to
>be fixing a computer I'm going to have a soldering station, scope, logic
>analyser, cutters, etc with me. So having a screwdriver set is no big deal
>either.
Wellll....I wouldn't mind a fastener that gave me the choice, like some
kind of knurled goodie with a screwdriver slot. That would cover the case
where I'm at someone's house for dinner, and they say "Oh, BTW, my
computer's not working," and I didn't bring a screwdriver and they don't
own a #2 Phillips.
__________________________________________
Kip Crosby engine(a)chac.org
http://www.chac.org/index.html
Computer History Association of California
At 01:39 PM 11/16/97 -0500, you wrote:
>OK, I am probably going to get yelled at...
>
>> Okay.... recently, there's been lots of "off-topic" stuff going on here
>> about computers... but I think that it's not "off-topic."
>
>In my opinion it is. There are lots of good, smart people on this list
>that can help everyone with modern(ish) equipment, but there are also lots
>of them on other lists and USENET.
I agree. I even think that there are better sources of info on the
day-to-day operation of things like an Atari ST or Falcon (which I have)
than here. If you want to know how to copy disks under CP/M, you'll be
better off in comp.os.cpm. Which is not to say that such a question would
necessarily be unwelcome, just not as well answered. Better might be
"Where/who should I ask about formatting CP/M disks?"
Mind you, I've answered PC questions posed to a Land Rover list (and
suffered through discussions of florists in Oregon and which guitars are the
best (I like Fenders, if I could afford one) on the same list.)
>> if you remember, in the "welcome" message, it
>> said that it was hard to state the definiton of a classic... but 10
>> years or older would do.
Well, 10 years is kinda arbitrary (and probably rather recent at this
point.) Still, gotta do it somehow. My personal guideline is
non-mainstream stuff (non-pc and non-mac) unless it's something really weird
(like the Outbound laptop or the IBM PC Radio.) Still, that keeps it to
>10yrs for almost everything except the occasional oddity.
I wouldn't, fer instance, bother mentioning the Sharp PC-7100's or Compaq
lunchbox here, even though they're probably 10yrs+ (Sharps for sure.)
(Except, of course, as part of a larger discussion on the history of
portable computers.)
In any case, as with any such list, the decision and definition really
belongs only to the list owner (Bill Whitson in this case) no matter how
much he might solicit or be affected by input from list members. (And, of
course, we all have the option of setting up our own DOS-PC-Collectors or
whatever list if we want.)
Personally, I'm not all that into DEC stuff (though a PDP 11/70 was my first
and I thought it was great) so I wouldn't mind seeing less VAXstationery
this or DECwindowshades that messages, but I wouldn't think of suggesting
that others not post them. I just delete them (sometimes even without
reading them -- Sorry!)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
Found on comp.sys.tandy
Greetings:
I have acquired a pile of boxes from an estate sale. Numerous old
computer pieces-parts that I thought might be of some value, but I
don't know where to 'advertise' them -- and now they must go.
Included are
computers - TI & Radio Shack, some in perfect condition -- one is
in a heavy steel case, RS keybd, could be home brew from misc
parts but I can't tell, could it possibly be a stock TRS 80?
software - cartridges & 5 1/4 floppies
printers - are ribbons & print heads still available?
ref books - old, specialized, probably junk
monitors - USI, PI2, mono, unfamiliar connectors
{also 2 non-computer antiques: 1) an old Associated Press
linotype machine, with ribbons, very heavy. 2) 3M copier.}
chips - small, many, stored in plastic tubes
LNW Research products - look like large keybds but may be
more than that -- one box is different as follows
You should see this manual, it is beautiful. Yes, Virginia, there is
such a thing as an Antique Computer. Wish it had a date in it; ref is
made to a CA sales tax of 6%. "System Expansion for the TRS-80 [pc
board & user manual] w/ serial RS232C / 20mA I/O
floppy controller
32K bytes memory" (awesome)
etc....
Found a date. Guess! Answer to follow at signature.
So please, somebody, send me a clue, what can I do.
Anyone know an address where I can list these? Are old puters
so plentiful as to not have any value as collector's items?
Thanks much.
---mikey
DON'T PEEK THE1ANSWER9IS8DON'T1PEEK
Found on comp.sys.ti
I have a couple TI99/4As, an expansion box with a disk drive and other
stuff (very heavy), another disk drive, and some carts that a coworker
was going to throw away. I live in Gilroy, CA and work in San Jose,
CA. Anyone interested?
Bostone1
Bostone1(a)aol.com
James Willing <jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com> wrote:
> While wandering around one of my favourite surplus gear haunts today, I cam
> across a couple of HP 1000 F series minicomputers. While they look neat, I
> know just about nothing about them. Anyone out there familiar enough with
> them to give me the 'infamous 25 words or less' speech on their significance?
They're real-time control systems, based around the 21MX processor
family (which succeeded the 2100 (ca. 1972) and 211[456] (ca. 1967))
and running one of several flavors of HP's RTE operating system.
I've never actually used them.
I worked on them for years.... You will still find them in Nuclear Power Plant control rooms,
all phases of automotive testing and even handling online ATM transactions. The E series was
even
used as a fast front end for Burroughs mainframes. Also lots of military applications.
The front panel/door drops down to show the memory backplane. The top three boards are the
two channel DMA, Memory Protect and MEM (Memory Expansion Controller). This was needed if you
wanted to use more than 32K of memory. The back backplane was for the I/O cards. Near the bottom
is the TBG (Time Base Generator). The Model 2117F had more slots and the hardware floating
point processor was a separate box. The more rare version had the Floating Point boards built
into
the top of the regular case. This meant a loss of memory and I/O slots....
These systems had all kinds of I/O available from paper tape puches/readers to mag tapes
to all kinds of hard disk drives, floppies, terminals, A/D, other instrumentation, etc.
Later they had SCSI and various proprietary and standard networking.
Lots of great memories :-)
At 06:20 PM 11/18/97 +0000, you wrote:
>the following info: (1) The definition is bendable, as circimsances dicatate,
>(2) The definition is pretty much fine as it is, but (3) (The BIG one) Many
Ultimately, the definition is up to Bill Whitson. If people start talking
about stuff he's not interested in, or that he doesn't feel to be the
provenance of this list, he'll a) warn people, b) unsubscribe people, or c)
shut the list down. So personally, because I certainly don't want b) or c)
to happen, and I'd rather a) didn't have to, I'll stick to the topics Bill
had in mind when creating this list. If I'm really desperate to talk about
which 486 motherboards are collectible, I'll start my own collect486 list.
>computers will NOT be significant classics... origionally, as has been pointed
>out, the "10 year" rule was to make sure that IBMs weren't included...
first the
I think it was set so as to avoid current/mainstream computer support
questions. (Which I'm sure most of the people on this list could answer,
but that's not why they've subscribed to this list.) The (admittedly
debateable) position that generic PC's are *not*
significant/collectible/etc. and thusly are not the provenance of this list
is a (IMO) welcome side effect.
(Note: some pc's *are* significant or collectible -- lots of portables, the
corner case one (packard bell?), monorails, Kip's Rose Hill PC (to Kip),
etc. -- they're just not the focus of this list.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
At 06:57 AM 11/18/97 -0800, you wrote:
>At 09:04 11/18/97 +0000, you wrote:
>>I've never understood this love of screwdriver-less cases. If I'm going to
>>be fixing a computer I'm going to have a soldering station, scope, logic
>>analyser, cutters, etc with me. So having a screwdriver set is no big deal
Another thought... I've not yet figured out how to squeeze >24 hours in a
day, and I've got about 54 hours worth of stuff to do every day, so anything
that saves a little time is welcome.
>where I'm at someone's house for dinner, and they say "Oh, BTW, my
>computer's not working," and I didn't bring a screwdriver and they don't
>own a #2 Phillips.
Some people (esp. on this list) may not realize it, but there are actually
hordes of people out there who go their entire lives without ever owning a
single screwdriver. Which is why I've got two in/on my laptop case, several
in my laptop "kit", and a swiss army knife with a flat sd, phillips sd,
pliers, and (8^) corkscrew.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
At 09:04 AM 11/18/97 +0000, you wrote:
>I've never understood this love of screwdriver-less cases. If I'm going to
>be fixing a computer I'm going to have a soldering station, scope, logic
>analyser, cutters, etc with me. So having a screwdriver set is no big deal
It's not so much for *fixing* as it is for *upgrading*. If you want to swap
in a new floppy drive or add memory or what-have-you, it's much easier on
some computers than others.
S-100's were great in some respects -- just lift the ears and the boards pop
right out. Or, drop 'em in the channels and they slide right in. The Mac
8500AV, on the other hand, requires nearly a complete disassembly just to
add some memory.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
What do you think of this...
I have a guy in Jacksonville FL with a Heathkit H11 system. CPU, dual 8"
disk drive unit, all software and manuals. Cost of shipping (to NY).
Is the H11 just a repackaged PDP-11?? What else can you tell me about
it?
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<rcini(a)msn.com>
- ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
- MCP Windows 95/Networking
At 14:02 11/18/97 -0800, Tim wrote:
>.... Some drives have even removed the
>drive select jumper options, forcing you to use the half-baked concept
>of a cable with a twist in the middle.
Half-baked, yet burned.
____________________________________________________________
Kip Crosby, honcho, mechanic and sole proprietor, Kip's Garage
http://www.kipsgarage.com: rumors, tech tips and philosophy for the trenches
Coming Spring '98: The Windows 98 Bible by Kip Crosby and Fred Davis!
> Age, also, alone, does not make a classic. I doubt that the standard
>run-of-the-mill '386 PeeCee will ever amount to anything except to,
>perhaps, archaeologists who dig one out of a landfill. There were too
>many of them made, and they were (are) regarded as "disposable". Look
>at the construction - modern machines aren't made to be repaired any
>more than a disposable cigarette lighter is made to be refilled. They
>burn out, you toss' em, and buy another one.
Well, not quite. You'll have a motherboard problem with Packard Bell, Compaq
and the like -- but many use "generic" motherboards; thus a Baby AT case
would fit anything from a 286 to a Pentium whatever (btw, shouldn't a P5 be
called a Pentium Pro Lite?)
Floppy disks, of course, have been standardized since the original PC, both
in interface and form factor; EIDE/SCSI for hard disks, IDE for CD-ROM's.
I upgrade PC's much of the time (probably sell 10 used systems/upgrades to 1
new system) and can tell you that upgrading _is_ viable in the PC world.
As I recall, there's a little app around someplace that allows you to put
whatever you want on the Wyse front panel display.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PG Manney [SMTP:manney@nwohio.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 1997 10:29 AM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: Re: New Definiton REQUIRED
>
> > another weird feature on Wyse 286 that can show time and
> >date, mhz display like 8mhz, 12mhz and backlighted! :)
>
> Hey, I just had one of those come in for repair! The hard drive table aldo
> has double digit numbers, something I've never seen before.
>
At 18:20 11/18/97 +0000, Hotze wrote:
>....pretty soon, we'll be getting in to a
>time where the words "IBM Compatible" are going to get replaced with "PC."
The
>fact is, there are just too darn many 386s to contemplate... we have a few
>options... (1) Allow only the first/last (IE Deskpro 386 first, I don't know
>about last)....
Nuh uh. ALR 386 first, Compaq second. The ALR 386 is one of the most
collectible of all Intel boxes.
__________________________________________
Kip Crosby engine(a)chac.org
http://www.chac.org/index.html
Computer History Association of California
I own two complete IBM 5100 systems.
My original machine was fully loaded with 64k and both APL and BASIC in
ROM. It also had the serial I/O card and I used to remotely access the
machine with an ASR33 teletype at 110(?) baud. With the proprietary
vertical market software plus the IBM software, I paid about $64,000 in
1975(?), or about a buck a byte.
The other, purchased ten years later for spares, has BASIC only and I
forget the amount of memory.
I also have the entire library of IBM software released for these
machines and all documentation including the service manuals.
I have two external tape drives and two printers as well and boxes and
boxes of tapes.
I wrote a fully-funcional word-processor in APL for use with the "Paper
Tiger"-series printers. I wrote over 100 user manuals on this machine
and output camera-ready copy.
If anyone out there needs any info or assistance with the 5100, perhaps
I can help.
--
Michael.
-----------------------------------------------+------------------------
Michael Gillespie | Voice/Fax 204.943.9000
President, Telecommunities Canada Inc. | michaelg(a)tc.ca
President, The Gray Research Group | michaelg(a)gray.mb.ca
Project Manager, Blue Sky Community Networks | michaelg(a)freenet.mb.ca
--- No good deed will go unpunished. ---- Standard Disclaimers Apply ---
From: HOTZE <photze(a)batelco.com.bh>
<computers will NOT be significant classics... origionally, as has been poin
<out, the "10 year" rule was to make sure that IBMs weren't included... firs
<IBM/PC, then the IBM XT, then the AT, and pretty soon, we'll be getting in
Where in the world did that come from? Since anything greater than 10 years
old would have been made in 1987 or before there is a whole class of PCs,
XTs, and even ATs that fit. However, 386s(barely), 486s and P5s do not.
Also I think the idea of the list was to not help me be a general "help me
fix my PC forum". it's a common problem that new PC oowners are everywhere
in every forums asking for help usually far from the topic and intent of the
list (comp.os.cpm come to mind). I don't mean help with a older XT or
PC but the "I just got a p6/233 and it doesn't...." stuff.
10 years, that's simple enough for most of us.
Allison
<From: HOTZE <photze(a)batelco.com.bh>
<(1) Are old/new Motherboards compatible (IE 300 Mhz now, 600 Mhz later)
I don't know or care. Likely not but there are reasons I say so.
<(2) Where on God's creation can the parts???? (As for the OS, I'll probably
take Linux, or NT, but I though there was translation software for x86
written...)
I can't solve your geography problem. Here in the USA Alphas are plentyful
as in western europe. The news groups have several a week for sale.
Yes there is DEC software for x86 emulation.
All you need to do is spend money as most all of it is current enough to
buy. It is far to new to even discuss it further here Alpha is a 90s
machine! By definition not eligible for status here till 2000+.
Allison
<> > latest thing to come down the 'pike - it's all ASICs, custom silicon,
<> > and surface mount stuff on wafer-thin boards. In short - not built
<> > to last. Nor is it designed to.
Surface mount offers compact and also better signal integrity for ultrafast
logic. There are many good reasons for surface mount that are in the realm
of quality improvement. Yes, it's take more skill to fix and some of the
parts are not easy to come by.
FYI in the industry there a few descriptions of part of the problem.
Good, fast, cheap, pick two.
Cost of repair exceeds value of unit. Fix/trash decision.
Many machine were made the way they were because technology of the time
balanced against cost were deciding factors.
Allison
There is a local (Silicon Valley) guy who has a model 6122 disk subsystem
with two packs. It has a capacity of 277MB and requires 3 phase power.
Included are also some shipping cases for the packs.
I believe that the subsystem weighs about 200-300 pounds. The dimensions
are approximately 20" x 48" x 30". It was used with a Data General
Eclipse S/140.
My understanding is that the unit can be had for the price of shipping
or for free you are willing to pick it up. I am willing to take care of
the labor for packing and shipping.
This unit will be scrapped soon if a home cannot be found for it.
--pec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Antique Computer Collection: http://www.wco.com/~pcoad/machines.html
> William Donzelli wrote:
>
> > says that they will last at least ten years. The best solution (other than
> > mylar punched tape) is probably the older WORM drives (not MOs!), as they
>
> Purely out of morbid curiosity, has anybody ever considered making Tyvek
> tape? The stuff is damned near impossible to tear and difficult even to
> stretch enough to lose data.
That is actually a very good idea. I shall dig out some tyvek samples and
cut some inch-wide strips for initial tests. If this is OK, I shall
contact the manufacturers. I'll post results here, but can't make any
promises as to timescale.
FWIW I kept some tyvek samples (from an office supplies catalogue) for use
as gasket paper on my car. Works a treat on things like carburettors, gear
levers, etc. Don't fancy trying it on cylinder heads, though...
Philip.
I need some 5 1/4" 10-sector floppies for my various "classic/antique"
machines. I thought that was what I was buying in a recent on-line
auction. What I ended up with was 16-sector floppies. I don't even
know what uses these; certainly nothing I have. Accordingly, I'm
offering to trade for 10-sector versions. These are Inmac DS,DD, 16
hard sector 5 1/4" disks with envelopes. Quantity 30 (3 boxes of 10).
Two boxes are still factory shrink-wrapped. The 3rd was until I
opened it to verify that I'd gotten the wrong thing; none were used.
Make a trade offer, or alternatively, does anyone know where and how
much I might be able to just *buy* some 10-sectors?
-Bill Richman
bill_r(a)inetnebr.com
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/bill_r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"When they took the fourth amendment, I was quiet because I didn't deal drugs.
When they took the sixth amendment, I was quiet because I was innocent.
When they took the second amendment, I was quiet because I didn't own a gun.
Now they've taken the first amendment, and I can say nothing about it."
-www.paranoia.com
>Ok, I still haven't been able to find out what's wrong with the LCD in my
>Tandy Model 100 (the rest of the machine works fine, as I was able to tell
>by blind-writing BASIC progs that beep the speaker).
Just type PRINT CHR$(7), which will process ASCII BEL (Control G).
>In a message dated 97-11-17 12:20:14 EST, HOTZE put forth:
>RE: the unix box, and the issue whether to power it up:
>back in the 1980s i collected beer cans and it was clearly established that
>cans were worth more if full, or emptied from the bottom so the drink tab was
>left undisturbed and full 6packs were the most valuable, so i say if it's
>left alone, it would be "worth" more. i have an unused ibm 5150 in the
>original box with the original cardboard shipping disks along with the
>original keyboard in its' box. they may not be worth a lot now, but will be
>eventually, especially with their boxes and documentation.
>david
I think we are forgetting one thing. Sure the 7300 would technically be
"worth" more still in the box, but there is a limit to what you'll be able
to actually get. You see these things very often for free (3B2's as well)
on the comp.sys.att newsgroup so what does that make it worth then?
I would have to vote for "just use it."
Any parts can be scavenged from PC's or usually for free on the ng.
LeS
At 04:38 PM 11/17/97 +0000, you wrote:
> EXACTLY!!!! There are people who collect baseball cards (Somehthing
which
> I DO NOT do) and leave them in the packaging.... they don't even know what
> cards are inside.... for all they know, the information could lead them to
I know a guy who has a collection of CA lottery tickets (the $1 scratch-off
tickets) that is complete (except one that he missed). One of each type,
unscratched. Sure, he could be missing out on $10k or something, but to
him, having the collection is worth more. (He also has a collection of
scratched ones.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
In a message dated 97-11-17 12:20:14 EST, HOTZE put forth:
> You see... that's the thing... I don't have anywhere to start but HERE.
I've
> really only been REALLY interested in the PC business since '93, and
> collecting classics since May... I don't have ANYTHING.... I don't know
> anybody (except all of you lovely people out there....), and so I need
> somewhere to start... IBMs seem to be what I'm good at (I program them now
> as
> a hobby, so I know x86) I would take an IBM/PC, or, if they're easy to
find,
>
> a PC jr.
well, gee, i have an extra pcjr and power supply laying around here... dont
know what shipping would be, however.
RE: the unix box, and the issue whether to power it up:
back in the 1980s i collected beer cans and it was clearly established that
cans were worth more if full, or emptied from the bottom so the drink tab was
left undisturbed and full 6packs were the most valuable, so i say if it's
left alone, it would be "worth" more. i have an unused ibm 5150 in the
original box with the original cardboard shipping disks along with the
original keyboard in its' box. they may not be worth a lot now, but will be
eventually, especially with their boxes and documentation.
david
Sirs,
I received your name from Bill Yakowenko.
I have a TRS-8080 Color Computer 2 with mod kit to solve the overheating
problem and memory upgrade. My system also includes a disk drive,
multi-pak interface, cassette recorder, x-pad graphics tablet, deluxe
joysticks, external serial/parallel port interface, X-10 light/appliance
controller, light pen, editor/assembler module and parts for an
experimenter's I/O port. I also have OS-9 and numerous other programs and
very much documentation including all original manuals. Finally, I have
many Color Computer magazines, including almost every issue of Color
Computer News.
I'm interested in finding this equipment a good home at extremely low or no
price other than postage.
I'm not sure what services you provide but if you post messages such as the
above would you please post this? Too, what is your website address?
Thanks,
David Fitts
<Could cut some canned trannys open that is touchy to light and fill
They all are!
2n5777 is a good photodarlington I've used a few.
<those sensors from dead mouses, you can use either IR LED or strong
<light. (YES! those light bulbs generate lot of IR).
At lower than optimum voltage the IR is very there! IR however penetrates
some paper tapes real well (if oil soaked better than white light!).
It's been years since I've built one but I could reproduce it in an
afternoon or two if need be.
Allison
At 13:29 11/15/97 -0500, you wrote:
>I don't think that indestructibility of the tape is the issue...the coating
>is the problem -- sliding across the head. What are you gonna bond to Tyvek?
No, no, no! Tyvek PUNCHED tape! Coat nothing! Build a carbide
punch-head.... Pull it through whippin' fast, like Colossus.
__________________________________________
Kip Crosby engine(a)chac.org
http://www.chac.org/index.html
Computer History Association of California
It sounds like your machine needs a good cleaning, the disk drive is not
reading the disk"maybe". I have four working commodore c64 computers,
and the drives need to be cleaned. Even more after laying around for a
long period of time. If your drive turns when you try to load something
it sounds like it could be a dirty drive.
It's not much to go on, but I have seen these small things stop folks in
their tracks. good luck, bad eye bill.
<Um, Linux 2.0.30 now have Alpha support, PPC, 68k (amiga), 386, Mips,
<Sparc, Ataris. Linux is Unix kind which you can source unix source
<code to it by freely available complier and make 'em.
I rememberd that after I sent the message. Old brain cells.
Allison
I would vote to leave it alone, as this is a real classic untouched. John
At 08:40 AM 11/16/97 -0800, you wrote:
>You know, I always hate these moral dilemmas...
>
>In the last few days the collection received an AT&T UNIX PC (aka 7300,
>3b1) in extremely good condition. It arrived with all of the original
>docs, software, and mouse. The docs were unwrapped , and the mouse was in
>its original foam packing. "Kind of nice when someone packs things away
>properly" I thought.
>
>Well, its been a bit busy around the garage the last couple of weeks, so I
>put the unit and its associated stuff on the shelf and covered it up for a
>time.
>
>Last night, while I was working on a notebook (yes, one of those 'modern'
>things) for one of my wife's friends, I decided to have another look at the
>UNIX PC while I was waiting for a disk scan to finish...
>
>Found a spot for it on the bench, made a cursory check of the unit (nothing
>loose, nothing rattling...) and powered it up. It hummed and beeped
>happily and started drawing little boxes on the screen as I recalled it
>doing when it was starting up...
>
>However, about 3-4 minutes and 4-5 lines of little boxes later, it starts
>to dawn on me that it should not be taking quite this long to get a prompt
>of some kind. So, I move the keyboard to have a look at the floppy drive
>(it hides behind the keyboard you see) and sure enough the machine is
>looking for a floppy.
>
>Fine... so, I grab the binder containing the software distribution, open it
>up...
>
>All of the disks are still sealed! At this point it starts to dawn on me,
>that this machine has never been run! A comment flashes back to mind; made
>by the person who gave me the machine... "My father bought it for his
>company, read the manuals and realized that he had no idea what he was
>doing..."
>
>I find myself wondering... Back around 1985 when this thing was released
>(and about $10k+), who could have afforded to buy one of these things, open
>the manuals, decide that they were in over their heads, and just put it on
>the shelf without even loading the software??? EEK!
>
>And so, the dilemma... do I open the disks and crank this critter up? Or
>just pack it all away as another classic 'artifact'? (or leave it until I
>have a fair amount of time to spend with it)
>
>No flame wars please, just the random philosophical question...
>
>-jim
>
>---
>jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
>The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
>Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
>
>
>
>
Along the same lines....
While digging through one of my boxes of stuff for a part I found a
partial S100 Jade Double density disk controller kit unassembled. Of
course I remember why I had it, the person that gave it to me back in
'82 wasn't up for the assembly task, raided it for parts and gave
me the remains. At the time I wasn't interested in getting a 1793 based
controller going as I was getting 765As for free and all the assistance
>from it's designers I could use. Well guess what. I'm 98% of the way
through assembling it. Then I have to assemble the source code as there
are no disks but lots of listings in the manuals. It's z80 based in that
it has its own CPU as a bus slave. Should be interesting to get going.
Oh, all the missing parts are from my collection and a few are date coded
before the board! It was all I had of some parts.
Allison
HOTZE <photze(a)batelco.com.bh> wrote:
> [...] if you remember, in the "welcome" message, it
> said that it was hard to state the definiton of a classic... but 10
> years or older would do. I do not wish to offend the owner, but they
> are one person, and they can make mistakes... and together, as a group,
> the chances of making an accurate definiton are smaller with us.
Right. Not too many people are going to agree on this. There's
probably a few people out there who think the Atari Portfolio is a
classic and I think it's under 10 years old. The IBM PC/AT is 13
years old now but I have difficulty thinking of it as a classic and I
really couldn't care less.
But the 10 year rule is simple and not without precedent (it's roughly
the way other things are judged "antique" -- if I remember correctly
the "magic number" is 100 years for furniture and housewares and 20
years for automobiles). That's why we have it, we know it's not
perfect but it does provide a clear cutoff.
(Aside to You Know Who You Are: knock it off, OK?)
> Possibly (out for MUCH revision...) is the definition "Any computer
> which has aged sufficently to be considered "outdated" by the computer
> market and has historic signifiance, OR is 10 years old or older." The
> one evedeint place that requires revsion is the "historical signifiacne"
Does it? The problem is that inside 10 years it's very difficult to
judge historical significance.
And just because it's older than 10 years doesn't make finding the
historical significance any easier. I'm hard pressed to think of what
was significant about the PC/AT, as near as I could tell at the time
it was put to work as a bigger faster IBM PC, still running all the
same old MS-DOS applications, still one at a time. And from
conversations I've had with folks who were doing Unix stuff on the
80286 then, they didn't think 80286 protected mode was progress w/r/t
the PDP-11.
Well, what did the PC/AT have that the PC/XT didn't? 1.2MB
minifloppies (although I saw those retrofit onto XT-class PCs), 16-bit
slots, a cascaded interrupt controller to handle the additional
interrupt request lines...and the A20 gate that let you get at another
little chunk of RAM up above the 1MB boundary while still in real
mode. Hmm. How many of these things do we consider historically
significant now, and how many will we still consider significant in 5,
10, 25, 50, 100 years?
-Frank McConnell
On Mon, 17 Nov 1997, Allison remarked to us:
> You have three choices [for an Alpha OS] that I know of, OpenVMS
> (my favorite), Digital Unix, or NT. I don't know that anyone has
> done a UNIX port outside of digital.
Linux has been successfully ported to the Alpha architecture.
______________________________________________________________________
| | |
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:carl.friend@stoneweb.com | |
| http://www.ultranet.com/~engelbrt/carl/museum/ | ICBM: N42:21 W71:46 |
|________________________________________________|_____________________|
Hey all. I think its about time I de-lurk and introduce myself.
My name is Bill, and I'm very interested in SwTPC and SSB stuff.
We had a couple SwTPC 6800 systems in my high school way back when,
and I'd love to see one again (or own one!).
After signing up for the Classic Computer Rescue Squad, I started
thinking, if a big old machine actually needed a rescue, what
would we do? I mean, maybe we should collect info on how big
these old things are, in terms of floor-space, tonnage, time to
dismantle, and so on. Then, when a rescue call comes in, we
could maybe decide if we can feasibly deal with it, and if anyone
actually wants the thing. If only three guys show up to dismantle
200 tons of vacuum tubes, it isn't gonna happen on-schedule. And
it's one thing to keep a mini in a corner, but not all of us can
arrange space for, say, a 360. So there are legitimate (if sad)
reasons that we might have to pass up a find.
Also, would it be good to have a rescue checklist? I can think
of a dozen things that might be good to do during a rescue, but
I'll bet I wouldn't think of half of it in the excitement of
rescue-day. I guess I'm volunteering to collect this, if you
all think it's a good idea and want to suggest things.
Okay, I'll close with the obligatory lists:
Want:
SwTPC 6800, CT-64, CT-VM, MF-68
EPROM burner
Have (willing to trade away):
DecScope terminal (ie: vt52), works
DecMate-III (don't yet know if it works)
Apple //c with monochrome monitor, some manuals, works
Radio Shack CoCo 2's, work
Defaced (ie: no faceplate) Amiga something-or-other,
with no monitor, keyboard, docs, or anything,
probably doesn't work
Have (and will keep!):
Radio Shack CoCo 1's and a CoCo 3, tech manual
IBM PC-XT clone
SwTPC S/09 (down with disk problems)
Lear-Seigler ADM-31 terminal (bought today!)
Of course, some of this stuff would have significant shipping costs
associated with it, unless you live nearby (central NC).
Cheers,
Bill.
<Also, a trackstar E for use with Tandy/IBM compatibles (Apple //e emulator
Trackstar 128
Funny I have one of them, haven't figured out what to do with it yet.
Not being an apple user it's an odd item in my collection.
Allison
> another weird feature on Wyse 286 that can show time and
>date, mhz display like 8mhz, 12mhz and backlighted! :)
Hey, I just had one of those come in for repair! The hard drive table aldo
has double digit numbers, something I've never seen before.
>Well, what did the PC/AT have that the PC/XT didn't? 1.2MB
>minifloppies (although I saw those retrofit onto XT-class PCs), 16-bit
>slots, a cascaded interrupt controller to handle the additional
>interrupt request lines...and the A20 gate that let you get at another
>little chunk of RAM up above the 1MB boundary while still in real
>mode.
...and the hard drive info in ROM.
But, you're right. The 286-386 jump was more significant than the 8088-286
jump, even though so of those 286 changes that you mentioned are still with
us that Pentiums are "AT" (not 386) class machines.
>Hey, for years one of the standard excuses for getting a home computer
>was "Hey, we can keep recipes on it". For that of course, you really
>want a membrane keyboard -- pasta sauce in a Keytronics is fatal.
I always _loved_ seeing the adverts of smiling Mom (no flour on her hands,
natch!) booting up the family PC to get her recipes. Some of those early
recipe programs would specify oddities such as "5/48 tsp chives".
>
>And _of course_ a similarly protected laptop belongs in the bathroom,
>when you're setting down to do some serious Usenet reading.
Hey, I used to program in the bath with my HP-71!
>And so, the dilemma... do I open the disks and crank this critter up? Or
>just pack it all away as another classic 'artifact'? (or leave it until I
>have a fair amount of time to spend with it)
Open it up -- play with it -- computers are meant to be _used_.
> Rainbow machine is very quirky demanding
> weird hardware and quirky disks in both format and hardsectored. :(
Bear in mind that from the perspective of us CP/M folks, demanding absolutely
rigid hardware compatibility is quirky...
> IBM produced
> excellent PS/2 '87 era series that can be ripped apart with bare
> hands except for motherboard and PSU screws.
FWIW, my absolute favorite box of all time is the VAXstation 4000/60 or /96;
you can get everything out of the box quickly with no tools. In contrast,
it's only been in the last few years that I've gotten coordinated enough to
keep from mutilating my knuckles every time I go into a VAXstation 2000...
Roger Ivie
ivie(a)cc.usu.edu
At 15:42 11/17/97 +0000, you wrote:
>This is what I like about the Zip IDE drives it's a right design like
>the floppy drive machism. But I wished Iomega sell one in SCSI
>version as well which means we have to press for it!
er....There are SCSI Zip drives, both int and ext. I've got an internal
here, use it to store the techno and ambient I listen to through an AWE32.
__________________________________________
Kip Crosby engine(a)chac.org
http://www.chac.org/index.html
Computer History Association of California
Allison wrote:
> <> acceptable OS. Although CP/M running native on a Pentium 133 is pretty
> <> cool, and fast! By collecting Non-PC's there a tons of OS's to play with
>
> CP/M-80 running on a 16mhz z180 is far more interesting. ;-)
Bear in mind:
- Z180s now do up to 33MHz
- The average 128Kx8 15 ns SRAM
- is fast enough to run at 33MHz with no wait states
- contains enough on-board logic to do address decoding in a simple
Z180 system
Sigh; I see ads in Circuit Cellar for folks that take 68HC12s in
surface-mount packages and mount them on an adapter board for folks that
want through-hole parts. Anyone know of someone doing the same thing with
either the Z182 (or, better yet, the Z195) or at least generic footprints
of the appropriate size?
Roger Ivie
ivie(a)cc.usu.edu
<A little bit of head banging and we realized that to read paper tape, all y
<need is a hand scanner, dark background, some kind of rig to hold the scann
<in position above a 1" channel and, well, programming as appropriate.
smashing ants with atomic cannon.
The simplest form of scanner is 9 photocells(photo transistor or diode)
lined up under the tape, light above and the 9th (sproket hole connectd to
the data available(or ack) of a parallel port such as the PC printer port.
Tape movement, pull by hand. should be good for 300->3000 char sec easily.
It's trivial hardware.
Program:
Copy LPT: file.tap
Done.
Allison
<being sold as "outdated". I know managers refusing to buy DEC Alpha's
<because the Intel Merced chip is supposed to be available in a couple
<of years - and the first Merced's will be only a bit slower than today's
<currently available Alpha's. Talk about being blown away by vapor...
Lessee, wait a few years to get what's available now. Excuse me I must
be missing something here as doesn't business have to go on in the mean
time??? Talk about pinning hopes on the sky.
This is straight out of the early micro years when products would be hyped
only for the company to go bust before anyone would see it or worse deliver
it years late and working poorly(sorta like WIN95!).
Allison
< What do we do with that example? Leave it packed away? Fire it
<up for the edification of the locals (worldwide)? This is a knotty
<question, and one that harks somewhat to the same question asked by
<those who restore, and fly, antique aircraft. If we fly it, there's
<always the possibility that we might have a failure and the example
<(artifact) may be destroyed - if we don't, we're ignoring the essential
<beauty and function of the design.
The classic example of this and a conter arguement is the BeeGee Racing
aircraft. It was considered a widowmaker, as it nearly or did kill most
of the pilots that flew it!. A replica was made and the plane has been
flying for several years at airshows and doing remarkable acrobatics...
guess what it hasn't killed the pilot. What was lost was that it took a
healty respect and some knowledge of design and flight to figure out that
it wasn't so much the plane as the pilots that were the problem and they
have learned about the flight characteristics of a plane that was deemed
unflyable. Not to mention seeing a piece of flying history debunked.
< I, offhand, am tempted to say "park the craft" and find another one
<that's a bit more beat up. Restore that one, and drive it to your
<heart's content. But save the "factory original" one - like an old
<Tucker.
With some exception cars and place can be preserved where some parts of
computers must be exercised or potentially fail. The other issue is
this may not even be a working example at this time.
It's one thing when it's the last one, another when there are more to see.
Allison
At 08:40 AM 11/16/97 -0800, James Willing wrote:
(AT&T 3B1 found...)
>However, about 3-4 minutes and 4-5 lines of little boxes later, it starts
>to dawn on me that it should not be taking quite this long to get a prompt
>of some kind. So, I move the keyboard to have a look at the floppy drive
>(it hides behind the keyboard you see) and sure enough the machine is
>looking for a floppy.
Is the hard disk spinning up? I purchased two "new" (in the box with
shrink-wrapped software) UNIX PCs about a year ago. One of the internal
hard disks (a Micropolis 20 MB 1/2 height ST-506 interface MFM unit) did
not spin up, presumably due to stiction or a relative thereof. The
computer with this disk exhibited the behavior that you describe. The
other machine started up a "Welcome to the UNIX PC" application that
prompted me to insert the first disk of the installation media. On the
systems that I have (1 MB RAM, 20 MB HD 7300s), the system software was not
preinstalled, presumably to allow the version of the OS that was shipped
with the machines to be changed easily.
If you have opened the media, try booting the machine with the diagnostic
disk. If this works, the hard disk is likely to be the culprit. As Ward
Griffiths mentioned, the 3B1 uses ST-506 interface MFM disks, but it can
only access 67 MB without hardware modifications. There are utilities on
the diagnostic disk that you can use to test, format, partition, and make
filesystems on the hard disk. If you can't get the hard disk working with
these utilities, replacing it isn't too difficult. The ST-251-1 in my UNIX
PC isn't original, but neither are the GNU utilities, csh, and Perl that I
have installed on it.
If you're fortunate enough to have the (somewhat rare) Ethernet card or the
(somewhat more rare) TCP/IP software for it, be sure to check out the 3B1
FAQ before putting it on a network. There are some major security holes,
especially in the windowing environment. Brian Stuart has a lot of good
information (and the comp.sys.3b1 FAQ) on the Web at
http://colossus.mathcs.rhodes.edu/~stuart/3b1/3b1.html .
>I find myself wondering... Back around 1985 when this thing was released
>(and about $10k+), who could have afforded to buy one of these things, open
>the manuals, decide that they were in over their heads, and just put it on
>the shelf without even loading the software??? EEK!
I purchased mine from a guy in Chicago who had a warehouse full of them,
new in the box. I doubt that many individuals buy computers and put them
away without using them (except for collectors), but many businesses like
to have spares on hand. Additionally, a lot of new "obsolete" machines get
written off and sold as scrap. I don't know, but I suspect that this was
the story of my machines.
If you would like to try the diagnostics without opening the software, let
me know, and I'll get you a copy of the diagnostics disk (from release 3.51).
--
Scott Ware s-ware(a)nwu.edu
Okay.... recently, there's been lots of "off-topic" stuff going on here
about computers... but I think that it's not "off-topic." In my mind,
there is no doubt that the early mass-produced CD-ROM drives (not the
origionals of 1984, but the ones that were made to be put into PCs, not
servers) are classic componets, even though many are of this decade.
In my opinion, the first 486 PCs (not servers) are classics... ones that
are still used, but classics... even though most of 'em were made in
like 1991-93... arguebly, early Pentiums (60, 66 Mhz) could be classics,
as they steped into a new era (superscaler arceticture) for the
mass-production market even though the Pentium chips wern't even on the
market until mid-1993... if you remember, in the "welcome" message, it
said that it was hard to state the definiton of a classic... but 10
years or older would do. I do not wish to offend the owner, but they
are one person, and they can make mistakes... and together, as a group,
the chances of making an accurate definiton are smaller with us.
Possibly (out for MUCH revision...) is the definition "Any computer
which has aged sufficently to be considered "outdated" by the computer
market and has historic signifiance, OR is 10 years old or older." The
one evedeint place that requires revsion is the "historical signifiacne"
but I'm not sure how to include that while still aknowladgeing the
presence of many of the best machines and componets that did indeed fail
in the process... but at least Wang's did eventually fall.... I can't
even rememeber all of the problems that they had...
Openly, innocently, and waiting for improvement (on my quote, not
the other stuff,),
Tim D. Hotze
On Sun, 16 Nov 1997 08:40:43 -0800, Mr. Willing made the following
comments:
> And so, the dilemma... do I open the disks and crank this critter up?
> Or just pack it all away as another classic 'artifact'? (or leave it
> until I have a fair amount of time to spend with it)
Pack it away, sealed up, and find another 3B1 to work on.
I know a chap "down under" who has a LINC-8 in its original ply-
wood crate stashed in a storage locker. The thing has not seen the
light of day since it came off the line in 1968. It is one of 142
ever built.
What do we do with that example? Leave it packed away? Fire it
up for the edification of the locals (worldwide)? This is a knotty
question, and one that harks somewhat to the same question asked by
those who restore, and fly, antique aircraft. If we fly it, there's
always the possibility that we might have a failure and the example
(artifact) may be destroyed - if we don't, we're ignoring the essential
beauty and function of the design.
I, offhand, am tempted to say "park the craft" and find another one
that's a bit more beat up. Restore that one, and drive it to your
heart's content. But save the "factory original" one - like an old
Tucker.
______________________________________________________________________
| | |
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:carl.friend@stoneweb.com | |
| http://www.ultranet.com/~engelbrt/carl/museum | ICBM: N42:22 W71:47 |
|________________________________________________|_____________________|
Thanks for the suggestions re: Powell's Bookstore. They had the book for
$60, a $23 savings over Amazon. Granted, it is a used copy, but if my used
books are a guide, I should get a quality book. Highly recommended store
for tech books. I'd like to visit it someday.
Also, for those interested, I finished my VIC-20 Kernel documentation
project. Right now, I have completely recompilable source code for the
Commodore VIC-20 kernel ROM. It took me over 2 years, part time, but it
works. Anyone who is interested in finding out more, send me a private
e-mail.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<rcini(a)msn.com>
- ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
- MCP Windows 95/Networking
<> The most amazing thing is being in a real computer room (i.e. dozens
<> of 14" drives) when the power suddenly goes *off*. The silence is
<> astonishing.
I was in a computer room at dec when a power failure hit. Imagine 30
RA81s and 82s plus two 8650s going silent. The lastime I heard that
deafining silence the engine on my plane stopped in the air! It's not the
loud but the sudden lack of it.
Allison
On Sun, 16 Nov 1997 11:59:57 -0600, "Uncle Roger" remarked in
our collective presence:
> As for me, there is currently [...] a Data General One & a Mac Plus
> in the dining room, [and a list to be envious of if you collect
> microcomputers!]
It looks like it's confession time here. The "no computers in the
dining room" is silly, at best. At this moment, I'm typing away on
my Linux box in the dining-room looking at least 10 computers, not
counting the micro I'm writing this on. There are another 4 in the
kitchen behind me, two of which have seen power this weekend. (6 of
the dining-room ones saw power over the weekend.)
Rules are made to be broken. Computers, of course, fit anywhere
you can find space for them. Even big ones. The bathroom, though,
is straight out. Too humid.
Before some wise-$@# decides to have at me for typing on a "modern"
machine, let me remind him that even I have to pay the electric utility
>from time to time.
______________________________________________________________________
| | |
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:carl.friend@stoneweb.com | |
| http://www.ultranet.com/~engelbrt/carl/museum | ICBM: N42:22 W71:47 |
|________________________________________________|_____________________|
On Sun, 16 Nov 1997 19:26:14, Mr. Hotze remarked to us:
> Possibly (out for MUCH revision...) is the definition "Any computer
> which has aged sufficently to be considered "outdated" by the computer
> market and has historic signifiance, OR is 10 years old or older."
Given the marketplace today for "commodity" computers, what you buy
today is, by definition, obsolete as there'll be something "better"
along tomorrow. In a word - "why bother?".
Age, also, alone, does not make a classic. I doubt that the standard
run-of-the-mill '386 PeeCee will ever amount to anything except to,
perhaps, archaeologists who dig one out of a landfill. There were too
many of them made, and they were (are) regarded as "disposable". Look
at the construction - modern machines aren't made to be repaired any
more than a disposable cigarette lighter is made to be refilled. They
burn out, you toss' em, and buy another one.
Such was not always the case. Pre-PeeCee, machines were usually
constructed very carefully. I don't doubt for a minute that engineers
in the early '60s envisioned their creations happily hummimg away
in the year 2000 - the boxes were built to last. Pop the hood on the
latest thing to come down the 'pike - it's all ASICs, custom silicon,
and surface mount stuff on wafer-thin boards. In short - not built
to last. Nor is it designed to.
That, of course, is just my opinion. And a cynical one, too.
______________________________________________________________________
| | |
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:carl.friend@stoneweb.com | |
| http://www.ultranet.com/~engelbrt/carl/museum | ICBM: N42:22 W71:47 |
|________________________________________________|_____________________|
<67MB stock, and no expansion was possible 67MB (1024 cyl by 8 head) was
<ever supported -- the users came up with ways to add a second and/or
<larger hard disk, but most of the components needed have long been
<discontinued.
disk maximum 1024x8x17 is easily twice (140) the 67mb!
A second drive should be a latter of connectors and cables, all still
available. Shouldn't be that much majik.
Allison