Just happened to come across an old post regarding the PCjr. Its
interesting that people still occasionally talk about it. I designed the
cartridge that you were talking about. It did reset the machine. This
was done to insure that the CPU didnt go into the weeds because of the
bus glitches. I (IBM got a patent on the little "L" reset tab on the
card edge. There is also a mechanism where the cartridge actually
replaced the on-board BIOS.
..gary
While packing up two minis in racks today, I noticed that one of the
switches on my PDP-8/S is broken. It appears that the little bits of
plastic on the handle that snaps into the metal (trunnions?) have snapped
off. I think I can repair it, but in case I can not, does anyone have a
white DEC switch, as found on PDP-8/Ss? It looks to be the same shape as
those found on PDP-8/Es.
The other mini, an Interdata 14, needs lots of the caps for the
incandescants, but finding any of those would be pure fantasy.
Anyway, thank you.
William Donzelli
william(a)ans.net
<95 run? I mean, could a C64 or VAX have modern computer features?
Well, VAX is a modern computer! It was/is 32bits when intels biggest was
still 8bits. So happens that the version I use happen to be over ten
years old but new ones are still being built.
Now what features would a modern computer have that a 1986 Microvax-II/GPX
doesn't? Windows(is 1280x1024 color enough), multiuser, networking and
maybe even speed. If anything I'm still waiting for the modern X86
powered boxen to aquire some of the attributes of the VAX (they do but
only when running NT or LINUX).
Could a C64 do that... YES and NO. The video graphics included in the C64
is far more limited and the 8bit CPU would certainly impact speed but
every modern feature is doable(and likely was originally done on the likes
of C64s, trs80s, compucolor, ti99/4 Etal). There are people running web
browswers, Email and IP on 6500 based machines. The latter proves that
the answer is yes in that to the performance limits of older machines
there is much that can be done.
<BTW, what do you use the Vaxen and so on for?
Mostly editing files and pretty printing them. It doesn't eat much
more power than a PC so why not. The OS(VMS) allows 36 character file
names (18.18), versions and journaling and deep heirarchal directories.
The versions is nice when editing as foo_file.text;1 when edited becomes
foo_file.text;2 and the ;1 version is still around is needed. Great for
coding.
Allison
What I wonder every so often is considering the examples set by
classic computers, how quickly, efficiently, and stabley could Windows
95 run? I mean, could a C64 or VAX have modern computer features?
BTW, what do you use the Vaxen and so on for?
>
>Hummmphf!
>
>I must be real retro then...486DX2/50, 8mb ram, 516mb disk, 1x cdrom,
>33.5 modem and no sound capability.
>
>I run Gcadd6, PADS, WP5.0 and 6.0 dos, winders3.1. Almost a classic
>and it does everything I need it to do and adaquately fast.
>
>BUT... My s100 z80 crate still sees several hours a day as do my
PDP-11s
>and the vaxen that always has one up full time. All provide useful
>capability and often surprizing speed when compared to the new GUI.
>
>Allison
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
If I know the problem with your Kaypro II, the red light by the disk
drives does not light up when it says "Please insert disk into Disk A".
I don't know why it happens, but a couple swift bashes on the top of the
computer will get the light on, and the drive will read the disk.
Sometimes it take 8-10 hard pounds on the top, but the light should go
on. I've been punching the top of my Kaypro II for over ten years, and
have caused no other problems by doing so.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Hummmphf!
I must be real retro then...486DX2/50, 8mb ram, 516mb disk, 1x cdrom,
33.5 modem and no sound capability.
I run Gcadd6, PADS, WP5.0 and 6.0 dos, winders3.1. Almost a classic
and it does everything I need it to do and adaquately fast.
BUT... My s100 z80 crate still sees several hours a day as do my PDP-11s
and the vaxen that always has one up full time. All provide useful
capability and often surprizing speed when compared to the new GUI.
Allison
I have FTP working... If you have interesting PDP-10 stuff, you can
FTP it up to 209.174.127.164 in /pub/pdp10. I have about 1.2GB to burn.
I'm still working my way up through DEC breauocracy to get permission to post
my KA-10 docs.
-------
I just bought a Northstar Advantage. I plugged it in and
turned it on. It ran fine for about 5 minutes after which it
locked up. I pressed the reset button, but nothing happened.
So, I opened the case and found a length of wire coming off of the
floppy drive rack. It appears to be grounded to the rack. A large
resistor is in series with teh wire and the other end was floating
free. Does anyone know where this wire might connect? It was
sliding around on the motherboard, I hope it didn't short anything.
Thanks...Win
--
Win Heagy
wheagy(a)erols.com
I just got a copy of IBM PC Xenix (MS's Xenix as distributed by IBM).
It is the Base Operating System V1.00 (1984), and it runs on the PC/AT.
There are two additional products in the IBM distribution:
Software Development System
Text Formatting System
If anyone has any of these two additional components and would like to
discuss giving/selling/trading, I would greatly appreciate hearing.
Thanks,
Dave
From: "Jeff Kaneko" <Jeff.Kaneko(a)ifrsys.com>
Subject: RE: IEEE-488 and Commodore (was: GP-IB)
>Pardon me if I ask a stupid question, but If they were going to
>implement a high-speed serial bus for the C64/VIC/1541's, why would
>they use a device that was primarily designed for PARALLEL
>operation?
For one thing Commodore OWNED MOS Technologies (one of Tramiels more
shrewder decisions after getting burned in the pocket calculator wars by
their then calculator chip supplier, Texas Instruments). So all of MOSs
chips were dirt cheap to Commodore. The 6520/6522 played multiple roles
in the PET/VIC/64 handling the keyboard, parallel port, etc. also the
PET's parallel user port was very popular among the experimenters and
having it on the VIC and 64 added to it's appeal (besides being cheap
and in COLOR with SOUND!)
>It seems that a 6850/6851 ACIA would have been much more appropriate,
>and would have not been such a software mess.
If that were the case it would be as easy to interface as an ATARI...
yuk. I am glad, with those two CIAs you can hook just about anything to
the computer (easily given the parallel port). If it didn't it may have
fared worse than thier competition.
00100010100100100101110010010010010010010010010010010010010
From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com>
Subject: RE: IEEE-488 and Commodore (was: GP-IB)
>If computer holy war zealots knew the story behind this Commodore debacle
>back in the 80's when the flames were at their highest temperatures, the
>anti-C64 contingent would have had a field day.
They did, ever hear the term "the lumbering hippo", that was a nickname
many gave the 1541 disk drive...
>Oh well, you gotta love it.
>PS. So the Commodore did suck after all ;)
You forget that the VIC and 64 had an advantage over the competition,
performance for a very low price. (albiet slower than necessary). Also
the 64 had other merits such as its graphics ability and incredible
sound... Every one rips the Commodores, but you have to remwmber who
was posting profits and who was going bankrupt in the 80s... the
nineties are a different matter I'm afraid.. :(
00100010100100100101110010010010010010010010010010010010010
From: Cord Coslor <archive(a)navix.net>
Subject: Weekend finds! (CPU's, Printers, Disk Drives, Software, etc.!!)
>*Commodore 128D computer. Mint condition CPU. No monitor, disk drives,
>cables, etc. What does it take... also what type of keyboard does it
>use?
Disk drive is built-in, uses either a composite or split-composite
(Svideo) for the 40 column mode and a TTL RGBI for the 80 column mode.
Can run in three modes, Commodore 64 Emulation (99.94% bug free...),
expanded '128' mode some 64 likeness but offers better BASIC and speed
as well as access to 80 column output, and last but not least, CP/M mode
runs latter CP/M versions and the built-in drive can read a variety of
forigen CP/M format disks...
The keyboard is a non-ascii encoded keyboard that is used on the
Commodore 128. The D version is the same but in a separate unit and a
coiled cable.
>*Imagewriter // printer for Apple
Very fast, even for today, can do multi-part and does COLOR! Good
utility printer, downside is that it uses a serial (RS-422) interface.
Still supported on Macs.
>*Commodore MPS 802
Decent text output (8-pin) but only 'one-character programmable
graphics'. (there were programs that would do hi-res dumps by
constantly redefining that character and reprinting it on the same line
till it was complete, a hi-res page would take HOURS!!!)
>*Vic 1525 Graphic Printer
(note, 1525 uses THIN paper not 9 1/2" form feed, a misunderstanding in
the design specs, they thought 8 1/2" wide WITH the carrier.)
yawn... either for printing speed or 7-pin graphics printing matrix - or
both... The 7-pin 1525 printhead design set back the printer industry
for a couple years with cheap parallel versions like the Shiekosha and
Gorilla Banana.
>*KoalaPad. I think for the Commodore computer. Does anyone have some
>more info on this? Maybe some software?
Should work on the Commodore VIC-20/64/128 and Atari Computers. My
favorite Koalapad program is Dancing Bear for the VIC-20 (64 version
sucks) It's claim to fame though is Koala Paint which defined the
multi-color graphics file format standard for the 64.
>*Commodore Model 1200 Model #1670
Very nice 1200 baud direct connect modem can be used on the VIC, 64,
128, and Plus/4 (though on the +4 you have to flip one switch or cut a
trace depending on the modem version) Uses Hayes type modem commands.
>*MasterType cart for the C-64
I bought that recently, a pretty cool typing aid!
>*Below the Root (???) game copy on disk for the Commodore 64.
IMHO one of THE BEST 64 games made, a graphics adventure with a solid
story that is non-violent, a wonderful game for the kids!!!! Based on
the Below the Root book triligy by Zylpha Keatly Snyder.
>*Aztec game original box, manual, and game disk for the Apple/Commodore.
Another quality Graphics Adventure, keep it for your library. Follow in
the footsteps of the missing Professor Forrester looking for Aztec
treasures.
>*Choplifter by Broderbund orginal game disk for the Apple (?)
A computer-to-videogame classic on it's original platform.
>* Vic-20 cartridges: Pin Ball, Omega Race, Jupiter Lander, Gorf, Radar
>Rat Race, Raid on Fort Knox, Avenger, Poker, Cosmic Cruncher, and Mole
>Attack In 8 cartridge storace holder.
There are some great ones: Omega Race (THE BEST translation I've seen is
the VIC-20 one), Radar Rat Race (like arcade Rally-X, the 64 version is
just a lame port of this fine VIC version), Cosmic Cruncher (what can I
say it's a Pac-Man variant with the Commodore logo as the main
character! COOL!), Mole Attack (a fun one for the 'little kids' bonk
the moles on the head, uses keyboard) The rest are pretty good too...
>Was it all worth my $150. :-)
VERY MUCH SO, take the stuff you don't want to VCF 2.0 and you will make
your money back I'm sure... (even at reasonable prices)
00100010100100100101110010010010010010010010010010010010010
From: "kroma" <kroma(a)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: C64 Modem issue
>I have a C-64c and a Commodore brand 1200 modem. Since I still haven't had
>a chance to resolve the problem with my 1541 disk drive, I'd like to
>explore using the modem a bit. Can it be done in BASIC? Meaning, can I
>issue certain BASIC commands to init the modem and dial out? It's been a
>while since I've messed with any Commie machine, and when I did, I couldn't
>afford the "luxury" of a 1200 baud modem. This may be something simple, and
>I'd appreciate any help, even a pointer to info on the internet.
The Modem 1200 uses a standard Hayes command set fortunately.
10 open 2,2,3,chr$(8)+chr$(0)
20 get a$:ifa$="" goto40
30 print#2,a$;
40 get#2,a$:print a$;:goto 20
I THINK that will give you enough to use the modem at 1200baud-8/n/1...
There was a program in an issue of BBS magazine that also supported
X-Modem downloading (in BASIC!), I'll try to find it.
00100010100100100101110010010010010010010010010010010010010
Subject: Re: GP-IB (was Re: Atari 8-bit Find)
At 12:09 AM 2/18/98 -0500, you wrote:
>At 08:52 PM 2/17/98 -0600, you wrote:
>
>>It's used by:
>>
>>Commodore Pets << *** capitalize PET, it is an acronym! ***
>>GRiD Compass
>>HP 3000
>>HP 1000 (I think)
>
>On a side note, the GRiD 15xx series also had an add-in pod that supported
>GPIB....
And for only a few hundred bucks you can buy a NEW IEEE-488 interface
card for your IBM or compatible PC... It is used ALOT in
scientific/electronic measuring devices, as well as plotters (HP mostly,
no wonder...)
--
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Visit our web page at: http://www.goldrush.com/~foxnhare/
Call our Commodore 64 BBS (Silicon Realms 300-2400 baud) at: (209)
754-1363
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
In a message dated 98-02-20 01:35:57 EST, you write:
<< PS/2e doesn't have a standard floppy drive connector nor does it have any
free non-PCMCIA slots (it has one slot that looks like MCA, and has what
looks like a 16-bit ISA riser card plugged into it, which then has the
4-slot PCMCIA box plugged into it!). I don't think there's another
machine quite like it.
>>
the 9533 has a standard 16bit isa slot, but the pcmcia adaptor fits there. you
can remove the adaptor though.
In a message dated 98-02-20 01:24:27 EST, Jason D put forth:
<< But the latest MCA based machine is currently in production are 700
series these days. Real reliable machine days in and out without >>
IBM discontinued MCA ~2 years ago. it's all pci/isa now to comply with that
pathetic pc97 specification. risc boxes still use MCA. someone at work gave me
a bunch of old software and 5.25 disks including a book on MCA explaining why
it was superior to the isa bus machines.
david
New Hampshire Computer Flea Market
?Bring your unwanted computer items to sell, and/or buy at bargain prices?
Someone may be looking for the computer hardware and software that you no
longer use. Sell those items at the Computer Flea Market on Sunday March
8 from 9 Am to 2 PM, at Daniels Hall, Rt 4, Nottingham, NH. This is an
excellent opportunity to turn your unwanted computer hardware & software,
MAC or PC, games, etc., into cash, or purchase at bargain prices. Also
just come to swap ideas with other local computer users.
Non-dealers - bring whatever you want to sell - no charge for display
space. Dealers are also welcome ($20.00 table charge, electricity
included). Admission for adults is $5.00. Free admission for children
under 12. Members of local computer groups receive $1.00 off of admission.
Join us at the flea market on the 2nd Sunday of each month starting March
8. Food & drink are available.
Dealers should reserve display space by e-mailing nhdirect(a)tiac.net or
calling 603 942-8525. Visit the Computer Flea Market web page at:
http://www.tiac.net/users/nhdirect/flea.html
Sponsored by S&D Associates
What is QDSS? Wait, let me guess...Quick Display SchlutzeStaffen?
Quantum Display Sub System? OK, I give up! What is it?
>
>[We don't need no steenking displays!]
>
>Ehehe... I expected a remark about QDSS or something here...
>-------
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Well, I can't download anything right now, but another small thing
like that is the NeoDesktop at www.newdealinc.com. It seems to
descend from GEOS. It won't fit on a floppy, but is cool anyway.
>To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
>Subject: Modern Minimalism (Was: Future Computing Trends)
>
>At 02:46 PM 2/20/98 PST, you wrote:
>
>>and ran it fine when it had 8MB. Visual Basic and IE4 (I don't use
>>it regulary, Opera at www.operasoftware.com is much better: 1MB
>>download!)
>
>If you think that's cool, you need to check out what they are doing
with QNX:
>
>http://www.qnx.com/iat/createdemo.html
>
>QNX is a very small micro-kernel OS that has the look of Windows 95,
has
>builtin TCP/IP networking, a notepad, a few other little doodads, and
to
>top it off, a fully functional HTML 3.2 compliant web browser. Also
>supports graphics modes up to 1024x768 in millions of colors.
>
>Okay, not amazing enough for you already? How about if I told you it
all
>ran off a 1.44mb floppy disk? Hmmmm? :)
>
>Everyone owes to themselves to go grab this FREE (yes, FREE) OS and try
it
>for themselves.
>
>
>-John Higginbotham-
>-limbo.netpath.net-
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Here's an interesting article from Byte magazine:
http://www.byte.com/art/9802/sec5/art1.htm
It talks about how computers are becoming obsolete the day you buy them
due to all the crazy new technologies being released into the market. My
observation is that anyone who chases technology and is always upgrading
to the latest and greatest is always going to have an "obsolete" computer.
The situation is not as bad as the article makes it out to be, not that
the article is actually saying the speed of new technology introductions
is a problem. But if people could be satisfied with what they have on
their desk, this issue of obsolescense would not be an issue at all.
In 1995 I bought a Pentium-90 system which I clocked up to 100Mhz. It
came with Windows 3.1 but I quickly upgraded to Win95. It originally had
16MB RAM (which I've since upgraded to 32M) and a 1GB HD. It has a 5.25"
and 3.5" floppy and a CD-ROM drive. I'll soon be adding another 540MB HD
I have lying around spare, and then a 1.7GB SCSI HD as soon as I find a
SCSI cable. It's slow by today's standard, but the damn thing works. I
use an old version of Microsoft Works (3.0) for my word processing and
spread sheeting; some people haven't even heard of Works! They only know
Word. But Works loads instantly, whereas Word takes it seems forever to
load which is why I don't use it. Plus its bloated and drags my system
down.
Which brings me to my point. The computers we collect are still so damn
useful! And this is not a new argument, but even though these old
machines don't have SVGA and EDO RAM and Ultra-SCSI and other new-fangled
fanciness, they still work! They can still process words, and crunch
numbers and hold information. And best of all, they play games MUCH more
fun than the current cache of cathartic creations; DOOM was novel when I
first played it, but every other incantation after it (DOOM II, QUAKE,
DUKE NUKEM, ETC) is the same game with a different "scenario" and
graphics, and that damn bobbing up and down makes me sick anyway!
Give me Choplifter, Rescue Raiders or Dino Eggs any day!
If you read the article carefully it gives a glimpse of the types of
machines that may be collectible in ten years or so. The article proposes
the dawn of the age of the "disposable" computer. This is totally
ridiculous. I cannot even relate to that mode of thinking. But on the
positive side, it means disgustingly cheap (and probably FREE) computers
10, 5, even 1(!) year(s) from now. More cheap PCs for us to run Linux on!
(Imagine having your own DLA [Distributed Linux Array] consisting of 16 or
more 300Mhz Pentium II PC, alls for just a song! You could break
government encryption with something like that :)
People these days with their 333Mhz Pentiums with 128MB RAM and 4GB
harddrives should shut the hell up and be happy.
Long live "obsolete" computers.
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer, Jackass
Coming Soon...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
Sam has inspired me to once again ask for anyone interested in the
preservation and maintenance of old computer equipment and history of
the same to contact me at email: marty(a)itgonline.com
I appreciate the response I've received so far. Most responses have
been from North Carolina and Pennsylvania, only two from the DC metro
area. Hopefully we can get some activities going.
Thanks-
Marty Mintzell
"Daniel A. Seagraves" <DSEAGRAV(a)toad.xkl.com> wrote:
>Remeber when I said today was class pictures? I'll be the one in the
>decsystem-10 shirt... :)
Daniel, you're just so darn cute. I know what you're up to:
you're trying to get these old greybeard DEC collectors to put you
in their will - sheesh, toad.xkl.com - Paul Allen included! :-)
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
I've never heard of a Datanumerics DL8A but judging from the
description would jump on it. Sounds intriquing to me. Ask the seller
what price would make them happy. You might be pleasantly surprised.
On several occasions when I have asked this question I've been given
the equipment free or at a nominal cost. Anyway, it sounds too worthy
to be passed up. If you don't want it I certainly do.
Marty Mintzell
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Info on Datanumerics
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 2/20/98 9:17 AM
I've been offered the following
Datanumerics DL8A. It is 8080 based,
comes in a 19" rack mount case, has 4k 600ns ram, 1 current loop (I
think) port, and obviously a full front panel.
I'm curious if anyone can provide any more information about this machine.
Obviously its an early one, but I couldn't find any mention of it on the
'web. Any suggestions as to scarcity and fair price would be welcome, too.
Cheers
Andrew
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9g for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Feb20.091753.1767.27868; Fri, 20 Feb 1998 09:17:54 -0500
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id GAA25265; Fri, 20 Feb 1998 06:08:14 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id GAA21898 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Fri, 20 Feb 1998
06:08:06 -0800
Received: from ren.globecomm.net (ren.globecomm.net [207.51.48.3])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
id GAA09073 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Fri, 20 Feb 1998 06:08:03
-0800
Received: from nostromo (modem028.ts52.comcen.com.au [203.56.244.28]) by
ren.globecomm.net (8.8.8/8.8.0) with SMTP id JAA02321 for
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Fri, 20 Feb 1998 09:08:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <001201bd3e08$d1aa47a0$1cf438cb@nostromo>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 01:06:50 +1100
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: "Andrew Davie" <adavie(a)mad.scientist.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Info on Datanumerics
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
This is to all Bay Area, Ca locals...
I'd like to start a vintage computer hackers group that would cover all of
the Bay Area. This will be open to anyone interested in our hobby.
Please e-mail me so that I can add your address to the mailing list. Even
if I already know you (ie. Frank, Doug, Paul, Roger, etc.) please send me
an e-mail so that I have your most current address.
I'll start filling you in with the details once I've collected everyone's
address.
Thanks!
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer, Jackass
Coming Soon...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
On Thu, 19 Feb 1998 17:58:47 +0100 (BST), Phil Beesley
<pb14(a)leicester.ac.uk> wrote:
>I think that you need to do a low level format on the IIGS to remove
>any hidden Macintosh partitioning data from the disk. You should be
>able to use this using the utilities on the GS/OS 6.0.1 installation
>disks. Formatting from the GS/OS Finder may not be sufficient.
>Phil
I finally got it working properly. I copied the GS disk utility to
another floppy and booted from it. I then totally wiped the disk and started
>from scratch. There must have been, as you said, some leftover info from the
old Mac that was attached to it.
Thanks everyone for your help.
-------------------------------------------------
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
- ClubWin Charter Member (6)
- MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
Captain Napalm <spc(a)armigeron.com> wrote:
> I attended an auction at Florida Atlantic University last year, hoping to
>pick up some nice computer equipment. There were a stack of HPs (68k based
>ones) for sale (that I had actually used years before at the university) in
>one pallet, the monitors were in another, and the keyboards in yet a third
>(my first complaint about the auction - the people running it didn't know
>the first thing about anything they were selling).
Sounds like the University of Wisconsin-Madison surplus sale, too.
In their zeal to sell, they separate all the systems: main units over
here, keyboards in that pile, monitors over there, software and docs
to the wind. So stupid. It if looks like a PC, it must be a PC.
And then the stuff they throw out because they don't understand it...
one day I picked up several $1500 video printers in the dumpster,
still working. A bunch of janitors promoted by the Peter Principle.
And this is just the dregs! So much property simply disappears before
it runs through the cloaca of UW-Surplus. My tax dollars at work.
State and UW employees get in early, too. Gads.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
I've been offered the following
Datanumerics DL8A. It is 8080 based,
comes in a 19" rack mount case, has 4k 600ns ram, 1 current loop (I
think) port, and obviously a full front panel.
I'm curious if anyone can provide any more information about this machine.
Obviously its an early one, but I couldn't find any mention of it on the
'web. Any suggestions as to scarcity and fair price would be welcome, too.
Cheers
Andrew
Check out this URL if you're in San Francisco; it's a list of thrift
stores in the City.
http://www.sfbayguardian.com/GuardianGuides/Superlists/SFthriftstores.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Yes, I checked. It is a multispeed. One of these days, when I have some
time (rofl) I'll take it apart and see if I can figure out what's wrong
with the HDD, which reports a 1701. One hopes these used a standard HDD?
> Is that Nec a MultiSpeed? I have an older model without the backlight
> and no hard drive.
>
> Joe
To whom it may concern:
I have a Zenith Z-433+ and recently upgraded memory to 16MB. I am currently getting an error when I boot which says 'memory not configured correctly'.
How do I get to CMOS (setup)?
How do I correct error in CMOS?
Thank-you in advance>
Phil Logan
plogan(a)scsn.net
In a message dated 2/19/98 9:23:55 PM Eastern Standard Time,
healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com writes:
<< I'm sure there must be some places doing mail order, however, it seems most
places can't even get DD 3.5" disks, and a lot of the Amiga and Atari
dealers are selling used ones. Now might be a good time to stock up on a
supply of HD floppies, especially 5.25" ones! >>
i think the overrated demise of 5.25 disks is way too premature. wally world
(walmart) still sells 5.25 disks, in both high and low density and at work, i
was looking through a catalog someone brought to work, and saw low density
5.25 disks for 19cents in lots of 100. i wouldnt worry about it yet.
david
I'm about to pick up an ATARI with 5 1/4" 1050 floppt drive,
but it will lack an OS and software. Can I use a standard DD 5 1/4"
drive (say an old shugart with the BIOS set to 360K) and use dd to
write an ATARI boot image file to this drive? I don't see why not,
but I'm not certain if the ATARI drives used some pecular hardware,
like the old mac 400k/800k variable speed drive incompatabilities.
If so, does anyone have a boot/OS image for this thing? And
where do I find old DD floppies these days?
Thanks!
J. Maynard Gelinas
I just picked up a //gs on the cheap but never was much of an Apple
guy. The machine appears to have some sort of problem (what is what I
am trying to determine). When the machine is powered, it gives a tone
sort of like a "tong",
then it polls the floppy and repeats the tone when it is finished. No
video appears on the screen at any time.
Anybody have hints or foreknowledge? ;)
Cheers,
Dan
To whom it may concern:
I have a Zenith Z-433+ and recently upgraded memory to 16MB. I am currently getting an error when I boot which says 'memory not configured correctly'.
How do I get to CMOS (setup)?
How do I correct error in CMOS?
Thank-you in advance>
Phil Logan
plogan(a)scsn.net
If you decide to buy an old IBM PS/2 and need tech support you can get
info from IBM's web site. I picked up a PS/2 Model 60 286 based pc
last year (which I used as barter for a complete IBM 16-64K PC and
Victor 9000 from a furniture dealer who wanted a word processor). The
system wouldn't boot due to a spent cmos battery so after replacing
the battery I found the reference (setup) diskette at IBM's web site,
downloaded it to a 3 1/2" floppy and was done with it. Go to
ibm.com/support and search under ps/2.
Marty
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: OOPs AT&Ts
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 2/19/98 3:15 PM
> At 08:54 PM 2/18/98 +0000, you wrote:
> >> At 11:11 PM 2/15/98 +0000, you wrote:
> >
> >> >Jason D.
> >>
> >> Still haven't been back to the place that had the pile of them. There
> >> were bunches at the hamfest though. Most were $75 to $100 (asking price).
> >
> >Joe,
> >
> >Ouch!
> >
> >What was the usual PS/2 models with this inflated asking prices
> >unless it has special reason for this?
> >
> >Let us know after thru these piles anyway.
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >Jason D.
> >
>
> The owner is a typical surplus store owner. He buys the stuff for $30
> a pallet load (20 to 30 machines), but wants an arm and a leg for each one.
> He'll scrap the stuff before selling it cheap. I went back down there
> yesterday to look at some HP's and found out he had pulled ALL the boards
> out of them and was still wanting $100 each for the empty boxes and power
> supplys. The owner was acting like a jerk so I didn't even ask about the
> PS-2s. I don't think they're anything special about the PS-2s but I'm not
> very familar with them so I don't know for sure.
Hee hee, I agree with you, that guy is jerk! :) Well, so good luck
with alterative place anyway and see how things goes. What do you
mean by what do you not familiar with PS-2s? I could help you to
ID?
Jason D.
>
> Joe
>
email: jpero(a)cgo.wave.ca
Pero, Jason D.
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9g for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Feb19.151548.1767.27718; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 15:15:49 -0500
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id KAA18771; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 10:57:32 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id KAA39528 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Feb 1998
10:57:26 -0800
Received: from mail.cgocable.net (mail.cgocable.net [24.226.1.11])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
id KAA13992 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 10:57:24
-0800
Received: from jpero.cgo.wave.ca (cgowave-33-17.cgocable.net [24.226.33.17])
by mail.cgocable.net (8.8.7/8.8.6) with SMTP id NAA27211
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 13:57:25 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199802191857.NAA27211(a)mail.cgocable.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 14:03:56 +0000
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: jpero(a)cgo.wave.ca
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: OOPs AT&Ts
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.16.19980219072323.4837c97c(a)intellistar.net>
References: <199802190148.UAA01293(a)mail.cgocable.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Hi everybody-
I've gotten another oddball computing object that I have no information
on. (like the Diablo 1340 hardcopy terminal I posted about last week.)
I've found a CPT 8525 system (out in the rain, but it doesn't look too
bad). It has an internal monitor, portrait orientation, and two
half-height 8" floppy drives. The keyboard is huge, with a whole section
of what appear to be word-processing-related keys. Opening the case (two
quarter-turn screws) reveals a somewhat modular layout. There are 4 cards
in a 5-slot cardcage: (1) 1771-based floppy controller, (2) 8080A-based
CPU, (3) unknown, probably I/O, and (4) 128k x 9 RAM (in 4116's). The
floppy drives are held in by thumbscrews. Two more bolts and the top
comes off. From here the CRT is visible. The power supply is underneath
the whole thing, and the keyboard connects through heavily shielded ribbon
cable.
Right now I'm waiting for it to dry out before I fire it up. If anybody
knows anything about this thing (or has even heard of it), I'd appreciate
the help. I also picked up a (wet) TI-99/4A expansion chassis and
Panasonic KX-D4910 portable data terminal with acoustic coupler or
direct-connect modem and thermal printer.
Richard Schauer
rws(a)ais.net
I have here a Maxtor XT-2190. That is an RD54, right? I have a uVAX 2000
I'd like to drop it in, but I can't get it to work, it doesn't want to
acknowledge the controller. It thinks it's drive 1, and if I try to lowlevel
format the drive at ID 1, it fails on the Mbb check. Ideas?
The computer did have an RD53 in it, that failed (bad sectors).
Failing that, can I put an ST251 or ST220 in there, hang a SCSI harddisk
>from the SCSI port, and boot the ST and mount /usr on the SCSI device?
I plan on running NetBSD on here.
-------
<From: "Daniel A. Seagraves" <DSEAGRAV(a)toad.xkl.com>
<
<How do I enable the console halt-on-break? Is there a switch on the CPU
<for that? It's the M8189 11/23+ CPU.
<-------
Remove the wire or jumper from J14. J14 is in the row of pins roughly
on the centerline of the board and is the fourth up from the card edge
fingers (the pin closest is J10).
Allison
From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com> wrote:
>They did, ever hear the term "the lumbering hippo", that was a nickname
>many gave the 1541 disk drive...
Dumpster diving at the then-recently closed offices of Amiga Corp.
in Los Gatos, I found several disassembled 1541s. Later I talked to
the engineer who'd thrown them out, and he described the 1541 as
the "best computer that CBM ever made." :-)
I distinctly remember a 1541-to-1541 disk copy taking about 40 minutes
when I first got my C-64, but later "fast loaders" reduced that.
The inane serial-to-parallel-to-serial business was no doubt due to
a desire to get things done quickly and with the least disruption of
existing ROM code and known-working applications migrating from the
PET to the VIC-20 and C-64.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
On 18 Feb 98 at 18:24, Richard A. Cini wrote:
> First, I know that this may sound silly, but where is the RESET key on the
> GS? My system came with what looks to be a Mac ADB keyboard. Is the RESET
> key the power key along the top, above the number keys?
Lots but not all Apple ADB keyboards work with the IIGS; if a
keyboard works, the Reset key will be the one somehwere at the top
of the board with the left pointing arrow icon. Anyway, it's the same
one that you'd use to start up a Mac with soft-power on.
> Back to the drive. I initialized the drive from within the GS/OS Finder
> (using the Disk | Initialize menu item). I did not specifically partition
> the disk, though. If you use the Apple Disk utility (that's probably not the
> exact name) that comes on the GS/OS disks, it shows no partitions, although
> it identifies the drive as ProDos.
>
> How exactly should I take to get this to work properly? I'm obviously
> missing a step somewhere.
I think that you need to do a low level format on the IIGS to remove
any hidden Macintosh partitioning data from the disk. You should be
able to use this using the utilities on the GS/OS 6.0.1 installation
disks. Formatting from the GS/OS Finder may not be sufficient.
Phil
**************************************************************
Phil Beesley -- Computer Officer -- Distributed Systems Suppport
University of Leicester
Tel (0)116 252-2231
E-Mail pb14(a)le.ac.uk
>> They did, ever hear the term "the lumbering hippo", that was a
nickname
>> many gave the 1541 disk drive...
I didn't think it was that slow
>Well, I always knew the 1541 drive sucked egregiously, speed wise. I
>mean, it was as bad as a cassette player...what was the point? Until
fast
>loaders came along. They made the 1541 as fast as any Apple drive with
a
>fast DOS. Then it was passable.
>
>But what was very cool about the 1541, I later learned, was that it had
>its own processor, and that you could upload a program into two drives,
>hook them to each other and have them copy disks automatically...very
>cool. Then when my friend gave me the program that played Daisy on the
>1541 (by this time I had my own C64) I was dazzled. I wrote a similar
>program for the Apple Disk ][ but the farts and grunts it made were
hardly
>comparable to the violin-like sqeaks that emanated from the 1541. Very
>cool.
I can't stay up late with an Apple //c, because it makes that awful
noise when trying to read a nonexistent disk!
>>
>> >PS. So the Commodore did suck after all ;)
It did, but I like it sooo much more than the Apple II, which is just
plain boring
>> performance for a very low price. (albiet slower than necessary).
Also
>> the 64 had other merits such as its graphics ability and incredible
>> sound... Every one rips the Commodores, but you have to remwmber who
>> was posting profits and who was going bankrupt in the 80s... the
>> nineties are a different matter I'm afraid.. :(
Exactly
>After I got over the computer-cock-war syndrome I did come to realize
what
>a cool machine the C64 was. I actually started to program on it and
>started experimenting with the sound. It could make the wildest
sounds.
>I wanted to port the Apple ROM Monitor to the C64 so that I'd have a
>decent Monitor with which to assemble machine code, but alas my C64
died
>on the carpet in front of my TV (thus beginning the C64 curse I've
fallen
>victim to), I guess from static electricity. They just didn't make
C64's
>to last I'm afraid. Thus my C64 programming soire was cut short.
I killed my C64 by trying to add a reset switch and attaching the wire
to the wrong power terminal. BTW, what IS the command to get into
Apple's monitor from DOS? I always forget...
>
>Ok, now that is just plain lame. Who the hell designs a printer and
>forgets about the tractor feed bands?
Don't forget some certain operating systems that are self incompatible
;-P
>
>Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer,
Jackass
>
> Coming Soon...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
> See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
At 08:52 PM 2/17/98 -0600, you wrote:
>It's used by:
>
>Commodore Pets
>GRiD Compass
>HP 3000
>HP 1000 (I think)
On a side note, the GRiD 15xx series also had an add-in pod that supported
GPIB. Fits in the battery compartment, passthrough for external power.
Speaking of which, anyone got any GRiD 15xx PODs they want to get rid of?
Also am still looking for an external floppy for my GRiD 1535exp (ooh, I
shouldn't have said that: It was made in 1989! Forget I said anything, I'll
just bring it up next year!)
-John Higginbotham-
-limbo.netpath.net-
Hello, for my personnal collection I'm searching for HP-16C, 33C, 34C, 67,
and/or 71B or all others HPs.
I have too a HP-41CX to swap for another machine.
Please respond me by mail.
Thx. Joel.
This is downright bad... :)
Today is class pictures. A few days ago, my parents (Remeber that thread?)
decided they wanted, of all things, a computer. My stepdad decided to see for
himself what was available online, rather than just listen to the TV.
(I think it's because he figured out he can automate a lot of his business
[Running a motorcycle shop] on it...) Anyway, they got a nice Pentium, with
a color printer and a scanner, and so they asked me to edit a few images
for them. So, we scan in his 2 grandsons, and a volkswagen bug, and combined
the 2 - they were dazzled. A few more interesting tricks - aged a picture
of them in front of an old car, etc. Anyway, they like the picture of the
volkswagen so much, they bought T-shirt transfer papers to print on. So, I
did that... I also got some time to play with said paper myself last night...
Remeber when I said today was class pictures? I'll be the one in the
decsystem-10 shirt... :)
I conjured up a T-shirt for myself! It has the decsystem-10 logo, stolen
>from the front of a TOPS-10 user manual, and underneath that is says
"If it's not 36 bits, you're not playing a full DEC."
(I know there should be a with in there, but there was no room on the xfer sheet)
-------
Filing the graphite slug on the ground worked like a charm. Thanks!
Also looking at the drive, it seems that the drive has an Apple-custom
logic board. There's probably no chance that the interface to the internal
controller card is standard. Bummer.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
============================================
> First, I know that this may sound silly, but where is the RESET key on the
>GS? My system came with what looks to be a Mac ADB keyboard. Is the RESET
>key the power key along the top, above the number keys?
>
That's the standard GS keyboard. I don't believe that true Mac keyboards
include a Reset key. Yes, the key above the numbers is the Reset key.
One other tidbit, the Option key can be used is also the solid-apple key.
-- Kirk
I used to service the AT&T 6300 which was an Olivetti machine. The
keyboard used a DB-9 connector and the power supply was unconventional
using spade lugs to secure the power cables. Does this sound like your
machine?
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Junk nite
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 2/19/98 8:17 AM
At 08:24 18/02/98 +1100, you wrote:
>Just curious if I should really keep this rather well designed computer
>Its an "Olivetti M24 Personal Computer".
Yes, the design was "original" (=completely different) for a X86-flavour
based machine;specially inside where the layout is spread on three
boards:CPU, VIDEO, 8 bit ISA.(have you openened it yet?)
Do you have the original keyboard also?
> I'd never seen an Olivetti before, which is why I saved it from the scap
heap. Now is >it scarce or nice enough to attempt to get running?
It depends on what you are looking for?
As "collectible" can be interesting because of its early solutions on
monitor power supply (1 plug with signal and DC-PS toghether) and its design.
Otherwise is another obsolete PC as many other of that age.
Ciao
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
§ Riccardo Romagnoli,collector of:CLASSIC COMPUTERS,TELETYPE UNITS,PHONE §
§ AND PHONECARDS I-47100 Forli'/Emilia-Romagna/Food Valley/ITALY §
§ Pager:DTMF PHONES=+39/16888(hear msg.and BEEP then 5130274*YOUR TEL.No.* §
§ where*=asterisk key | help visit http://www.tim.it/tldrin_eg/tlde03.html §
§ e-mail=chemif(a)mbox.queen.it §
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9g for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Feb19.081721.1767.27610; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 08:17:22 -0500
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id FAA08510; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 05:14:26 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id FAA29306 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Feb 1998
05:13:47 -0800
Received: from mbox.queen.it (mbox.queen.it [195.223.140.7])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
id FAA28895 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 05:13:39
-0800
Received: from async23-fo.queen.it (async23-fo.queen.it [194.184.164.33])
by mbox.queen.it (8.8.7/8.8.4) with SMTP
id OAA02799 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 14:17:15
+0100
Message-Id: <199802191317.OAA02799(a)mbox.queen.it>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 14:17:15 +0100
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: RICCARDO <chemif(a)mbox.queen.it>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Junk nite
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Sender: chemif(a)mbox.queen.it
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
A friend and I wrote a game for 6502 machines. Versions exist for BBC
B, Acorn Electron and C64. The load module in each case is 20k bytes.
I haven't got a full list of time taken to load - must do that sometime!
- but on the Commie 64 it was one minute on the 1541 and SEVEN minutes
on the tape (same tape system as PET, BTW - among other things, saved
everything twice.) The BBC disk system was much faster - but you only
got 100K or so on a disk, and a file had to occupy a contiguous chain of
blocks.
Philip.
At 08:24 18/02/98 +1100, you wrote:
>Just curious if I should really keep this rather well designed computer
>Its an "Olivetti M24 Personal Computer".
Yes, the design was "original" (=completely different) for a X86-flavour
based machine;specially inside where the layout is spread on three
boards:CPU, VIDEO, 8 bit ISA.(have you openened it yet?)
Do you have the original keyboard also?
> I'd never seen an Olivetti before, which is why I saved it from the scap
heap. Now is >it scarce or nice enough to attempt to get running?
It depends on what you are looking for?
As "collectible" can be interesting because of its early solutions on
monitor power supply (1 plug with signal and DC-PS toghether) and its design.
Otherwise is another obsolete PC as many other of that age.
Ciao
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
? Riccardo Romagnoli,collector of:CLASSIC COMPUTERS,TELETYPE UNITS,PHONE ?
? AND PHONECARDS I-47100 Forli'/Emilia-Romagna/Food Valley/ITALY ?
? Pager:DTMF PHONES=+39/16888(hear msg.and BEEP then 5130274*YOUR TEL.No.* ?
? where*=asterisk key | help visit http://www.tim.it/tldrin_eg/tlde03.html ?
? e-mail=chemif(a)mbox.queen.it ?
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Sam Ismail wrote (after Larry Anderson I think):
> > (note, 1525 uses THIN paper not 9 1/2" form feed, a misunderstanding in
> > the design specs, they thought 8 1/2" wide WITH the carrier.)
>
> Ok, now that is just plain lame. Who the hell designs a printer and
> forgets about the tractor feed bands?
Integral Data Systems, makers of the Prism and the Paper Tiger.
The Paper Tiger was rev 2. Rev 1 was this...thing...called
the BrighterWriter aka the IP-125 (text only) and IP-225 (with
bit-mapped graphics).
I used to have one. I can't remember what I did with it and don't
think I want to be reminded. It was really underwhelming and without
charm. Narrow paper path, lame tractors that didn't pull the paper
worth a darn, dain-bread graphics support (send a ^C I think to enter
graphics mode, then the characters you send go straight to the pins on
the print head -- one bit per pin, send another ^C to get out, and no
there was no way to escape ^C to send 0x03 to the pins).
At least it took the same ribbons that went in a model 33 Teletype.
-Frank McConnell
How often do these come up for sale? A Cray, about 6 or 7 years old,
apparntly, is being sold in Australia. They're asking $100,000, which
puts it a tad out of my range. :) However, if it isn't sold it will be
scrapped - I wonder if they will accept a couple of cartons of beer over
whatever the scrap offer is?
Anyone want it? :)
Adam.
Today I stopped at Goodwill and found a new unopened copy of A,T&T's ver
3.51 system software and four manuals for the Unix PC for $4. This after
getting UnixPC a few months back that was password protected and I could
not get in to the hard drive. Now I will get from storage and hope these
diskettes are still readable after 11 years sealed in plastic.
On Tue, 17 Feb 1998 09:07:43 -0800 (PST), Tim Shoppa
<shoppa(a)alph02.triumf.ca> wrote:
> >>What sort of packs? What commands were you issuing to read them?
> >>What OS did you try to read them from? What error message did you get
> >>when it failed?
>
> >They're RK05 packs, inserted in the DK2: device. I booted from DK0: with
> >RT-11 v.4 and used "dir dk2:" to read the disk directory. Although I
> >don't remember the specific error, it's something like "invalid >
>directory."
> Yep. As you've just discovered, the RSTS/E directory structure is
>different than RT-11's.
>You can still read raw blocks from the disk, though. Try doing
>a DUMP/TERM/RAD50 DK2: and you'll see the directory blocks, followed
>by data blocks, scrolling by.
I'll give this a try.
>Have you tried booting either of the RSTS/E packs?
No, but I'll give this a try, too. It seems that the diagnostics pack that
I have is unreadable also (that one is not labeled with the required
system).
Thanks!
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
============================================
On Tue, 17 Feb 1998 12:53:07 +0100 (BST), Phil Beesley
<pb14(a)leicester.ac.uk> wrote:
>>You say that the drive came from a Mac SE. Did you low level format
>>or re-partition the disk on the IIGS before installing GS/OS?
>>I share a drive between a IIGS and a couple of Macs, so the drive
>>has a ProDos partition and a couple of HFS ones too. Often the IIGS
>>barfs on startup when it comes across the APPLE_DRIVER43 partition
>>map; I find that a Command-Control-Reset sorts this out and the IIGS
>>boots normally.
First, I know that this may sound silly, but where is the RESET key on the
GS? My system came with what looks to be a Mac ADB keyboard. Is the RESET
key the power key along the top, above the number keys?
Back to the drive. I initialized the drive from within the GS/OS Finder
(using the Disk | Initialize menu item). I did not specifically partition
the disk, though. If you use the Apple Disk utility (that's probably not the
exact name) that comes on the GS/OS disks, it shows no partitions, although
it identifies the drive as ProDos.
How exactly should I take to get this to work properly? I'm obviously
missing a step somewhere.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
============================================
Um, I believe so (it's at the shop). I'll check.
> Manney,
>
> Is that Nec a MultiSpeed? I have an older model without the backlight
> and no hard drive.
>
> Joe
After some investigation via dejanews, I found that the thing uses
1.7 KW of electrcity. It weighs 1050 pounds. I subscribed to a mailing
list that deals with these things and ordered a catalog from
system3x.com
This was the extent of stuff I found. There was also info on starting
and logging into the machine, but I have a while to go until I can do
that. I emailed IBM for manuals.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Just to see if it worked, I showed up at SSI and turned the RL02 on. I'd
planned to spin up the pack I have to see if the drive was good. There
was a terminator on the OUT port of the drive, and nothing on the IN. I
haven't attached it to either PDP yet (I will be this weekend!). I got an
error light. So I pulled the manual I have for it, and it's not a diag manual,
just a user manual. It says one reason is a loss of clock. Does that clock
come from the host computer, or should I be able to spin it up without a host?
-------
Please don't tell me that there' something on the side opposite the
floppy drive that I need access to! BTW, how would I take the thing
apart to get to the PSU? Note that the CE side is against a wall.
Do you know how much the thing weighs? Is there a way to move it after
it's probably made dents in the floor, short of pyrotechnic charges?
What do you suppose is the heaviest part of it, after PSU and case?
>[Removing PSU for testing]
>That may not be possible. A Sys/34 PSU takes about 1/4 of the
machine's size -
>It's about 1/2 of the front section of the CPU box.
>There's additional parts to it in the rear section. Oh, and there's a
small
>red switch toward the top center of the non-CE panel side of the
machine, see
>that? It *HAS* to be on to power the machine up. It'll say "power
check"
>on the frontpanel if you don't. Oh, another thing: See the big LOAD
button
>on the frontpanel next to the FDD? You think that's to LOAD a floppy,
right?
>WRONG, read LOAD as RESET... (I found this out the WRONG way...)
>you push it to reload the O/S.
>-------
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I have a Micropolis Disk Storage Module Model No. 1023-II that I got 10 years ago with an Altair. I would like to get it running again. It is a 5.25-inch drive that looks very similiar to the ones used in early Vector Graphic S-100 systems. Does anyone have a manual or information about this drive?
Tom
At 02:27 AM 2/15/98 -0600, you wrote:
>Which reminds me: why didn't IEEE-488 ever become a big hit in the
>computer biz? It's been around since the 60's, is standard, has good
It's used by:
Commodore Pets
GRiD Compass
HP 3000
HP 1000 (I think)
Probably others...
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
> For one thing, what is the CE Panel? The thing is in a corner, with
> the end that has the floppy drive on it visible, as well as the side
Someone else has already given a far better reply than I could.
> that has a small power switch on it. I went down to Radio Shack, they
> only had 220-110 transformers that could handle up to 40 Watts. I have
> a hint this might not be enoug ;) Also, they had 110-220 transformers.
> Could I just wire one of those backwards and get the same result?
Possible but not a good performer. Step-down transformers are usually
wound for around 220-120V and allow for 10V or so of voltage drop.
You'd be lucky to get more than 200V out on any sort of load.
Also, 40VA is about 100 times too small :-( Try industrial equipment
suppliers - 1kVA, 3kVA, even 5kVA transformers should be obtainable.
And the bigger it is the less it'll suffer from voltage drop.
> Wouldn't it be easier to just wire two 110 volt plugs together like
> I was told I could try if I like "but I would far better notter"?
> IS this indeed like trying to move heat from a cold to a hot object?
Yes, insofar as it can be done, but don't just connect it up and expect
it to happen. And if you get it wrong you'll probably melt the cold
object, um, I mean wiring, not to mention causing a big flash and bang
and/or your death. The two sockets to which you'd have to connect are
almost certain not to be in the same room. If you really want to go
down this route, here are some things to think about:
First, use 3 pin plugs wherever possible - reversing the polarity of a
2 pin plug at any point during the following procedure could quite
literally be fatal.
One pin of every 110V socket in the house is a "neutral" pin - at
ground potential but not part of the ground connection. The other pin
of each socket is "live" at 110V to ground.
In each socket, identify the neutral pin if you can (a voltmeter
between power pin and ground _should_ do it - if you get 0V or
something silly like 40V on each side, you haven't found ground)
To evaluate a pair of sockets connect the voltmeter between the live
pin of one and the live pin of the other. You should get either 0V or
220V (+/- about 20V in each case). If you get 220V you _may_ be onto a
winner.
The final barrier is protection. Earth leakage protection (GFCI I
think it's called in the US) is almost universal. If the two circuits
are on the same GFCI relay, you're OK. If they are not, you're not.
The test is, connect an ordinary table lamp (or similar) between live
on one socket and neutral on the other. (Check with voltmeter first -
it should give 110V.) If the GFCI trips, you can't get 220V by this
method.
If the GFCI remains stable, you wire up a junction box that takes live
>from each socket plus ground from somewhere safe and feeds a 220V
socket.
Now, are you still thinking of using that method? If so, you shouldn't
be!
Seriously, I'd recommend extracting the PSU from the machine and opening
it up. You never know, it may be easily modifiable to 110V operation.
Alternatively, you may be able to substitute one or more 110V PSUs to
power the LV outputs in the same manner.
Finally, if the machine hasn't been powered up for a few years, you
should definitely remove the PSU, power it up with no more than light
bulbs on the outputs, and measure voltages.
Philip.
Here is a series of articles from the Memorybilia web page
(http://www.memorybilia.com) about the Cray's Tony Cole bought. Too bad
he's doing what he's doing, but then again, nobody drops $15,000 without
the intention of making it back.
This Cray has had its day
What was once the world's fastest computer is sold by Livermore Lab for
its scrap value
By Tom Abate
EXAMINER TECHNOLOGY WRITER
Call it a symbol of technology obsolescence, or a museum piece, perhaps.
But a Cray1 supercomputer, once the world's fastest computational device,
is now sitting in a South San Francisco warehouse, where it will either be
sold to a collector or get melted down to recover the five tons of copper
and gold inside.
Hayward businessman Tony Cole bought the supercomputer for $10,000 at a
surplus equipment auction at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. When
purchased new in the late 1970s, the Cray 1 cost $19,000,000, lab
officials said.
"We got our money's worth out of it," said Derrol Hammer, a purchasing
agent at the lab. "We ran that machine for over 10 years at 24 hours a
day."
But Hammer said it cost more that $35,000 a month to run the Cray 1, a
cylindrical machine that is 7 feet tall and 9 feet in diameter, and
requires its own electrical substation to provide it with power.
"A desktop workstation of the Sun type, or a Silicon Graphics workstation
that we can put on a desk, is a Cray 1 equivalent." Hammer said. "You can
buy a workstation for the monthly cost of maintenance" on the Cray 1.
So in 1990 Livermore pulled the plug on the aging supercomputer, and began
asking other government and university labs if they wanted the 10,000
pound digital dinosaur. When no takers surfaced, the lab auction off the
machine in February.
Enter Tony Cole, 29 founder of VIPC Computers, a 10-year-old Hayward firm
that salvages useful components or scrap metals from surplus machines.
Cole offered the highest of seven bids, and drove away on a flat-bed truck
with several tons of supercomputer and associated peripherals.
"We're sure to make our money back on the scrap value of the metal alone,"
Cole said. "There's at least $15,000 worth of gold in that thing."
Because it is an excellent conductor, gold was used to coat the edge
connectors on the more that 1,600 circuits cards that made up the Cray's
innards. Cole said each circuit card also contain about 2 pound of
valuable copper.
But rather than crush the machine for its metals, Cole would like to sell
it intact as a relic or the early supercomputer age. "The Cray system is
the granddaddy of all of them." Cole said. "I would like to sell it to
somebody like Bill Gates or Ross Perot. "It would make a great
center-piece."
But so far the Hayward entrepreneur has had trouble even giving the Cray
away. Gloria Chun Hoo of the Tech Museum of Innovation in San Jose said
Cole had offered to loan the machine to her institution, but the museum
thinks it is too heavy.
"We thought we could put in our lobby," she said. "But occasionally people
have evening receptions here, and we couldn't keep moving it out of the
way."
The Oakland Tribune, Wednesday April 14th. 1993
Lab sells its supercomputer at a bargain-for $10,000
After 10 years or use, the one-time $19 million machine was just too
outdated and costly to keep
By David Berkowitz
STAFF WRITER
Was it colossal government waste or just the price of staying in the
research game?
About 10 years ago, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory paid $19 million for a
Cray-1 supercomputer, then the fastest, most complex computer available in
the world.
In late February, the lab sold that same computer at auction-less a few
key propriety components-for $10,000 to Hayward computer reseller.
Tony Cole, 29, said he bought the machine figuring that at the very least
he could break it down and sell its gold and other metal parts for $16,000
to $20,000.
At best, Cole hopes to deal the 30-ton machine to a technology museum or
some domestic company able to foot the $100,000 to $500,000 tab of
restarting the now-obsolete machine.
Seven parties submitted sealed bids to buy the supercomputer at the
auction, a lab spokeswomen said.
"Normally you can't get hold of one of these, regardless of the age,
because of the nature of it." Said Cole, only the second private citizen
to buy a Cray-1.
Cray Research Inc. installed about 40 Cray-1s between 1976 and 1982, after
which it released the more Cray X-MP and the Cray-2, said Ron Rayome, an
analyst with Cray in San Ramon.
The computer was used to simulate physical events, such as airflow over an
airplane's wing or a missile's casing.
"The thing that made the Cray-1 unique was that it was products that
exhibited a clear superiority to any other previous technology," said Alan
Geller, a sales representative for Cray.
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, deeply entrenched in weapons research
during the Cold War era, considered the supercomputer crucial to its
design efforts.
For the lab, it wasn't a matter of paying $19 million for a machine that
would lose nearly all of its value in 10 years: it was a matter of getting
the most possible use from a top computer for $1.9 million a year, plus
maintenance cost, said Mike May, a former lab director.
"You don't really buy it with the idea of reselling it," said Gary
Dvorchak, an industry analyst with Hambrecht & Quist in San Francisco.
"Presumably, they got the full value they were looking for in terms of the
projects they were working on. There are things you can't do without a
supercomputer. That's why they're buying them."
"There's not much choice," agreed Bruce Kelly, a computer scientist at the
lab. "That's the price tag they put on those types of machines. And we
need the machine. They do large scientific calculations, real
number-floating point calculations. They do them very fast, and they can
do a lot of them."
Today, the lab uses newer versions of Cray supercomputer, including the
latest $30 million YMP-C-90, which is 100 times more powerful than the
Cray-1.
The Cray-1 that Cole bought was actually one or two the lab retired to a
warehouse in 1990 because the were outdated and too costly to maintain.
The other was sold three years ago.
Darrol Hammer, a technician who works with supercomputers, said the lab
was paying more than $30,000 a month to keep the Cray-1's running.
Meanwhile, he said many modern desktop computers were able to perform the
same functions as quickly and accurately as the Cray, he said.
"It just does not pay to keep something like that going." Hammer said.
"The power requirements on one of those is incredible."
Computer Currents Volume 10 Number 23, April 20, 1993
NEWS & INDUSTRY
SILICON VALLEY NEWS
"Look Honey, I Bought A Cray 1 Supercomputer!"
Tony Cole of Hayward, California says he is the first individual on record
to own a Cray Model 1 supercomputer. Though the supercomputer doesn't
work, Cole says the gold in it alone could be worth as much as $60,000.
Cole bought the Cray at a government auction held by Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory (Livermore, Calif.) in February of this year. Cole
says the Cray can be fixed, and he plans to sell it to the highest bidder.
It stands about seven feet high, weighs in at 20,000 pounds, and cost the
government an estimated $19 million new in 1976. Cole said he bid a binary
amount, $10,101.01, for the Cray in sealed bids accepted by Lawrence
Livermore, figuring the binary number would be lucky. He won the bid, but
it took a week for Livermore Labs to requisition a forklift big enough to
move the supercomputer the 100 feet to the dock where Cole could load it.
The Cray 1 was billed as the first "designer" computer with its
cylindrical shape and custom genuine leather upholstery. It took four
years for Seymours Cray to build the first Cray 1 when he started Cray
Research in 1972.
When the first Crays were delivered, they were the world's fastest
supercomputers, but only three were known to be still operational in 1991,
while others have become museum pieces.
The Cray 1 is cooled be liquid nitrogen, and offers 29 14-inch removable
media disk drives systems weighing in at 600 pounds each. The main
computer housing holds 20 panels with 2,800 printed circuit boards with
gold connectors. As for processing speed, Digital Equipment Corporation's
new 64-bits Alpha chip, 21064, offers the same processing speed as the
Cray 1.
Cole says while he could get his money back be selling the Cray for scrap
metal, he is hoping to get more. "Selling a Cray just to get gold out of
it would be like selling a Model-T Ford for the scrap iron," Cole said.
He's hoping Ross Perot or Bill Gates might be interested in having the
Cray for their offices. An old Cray employee has even contacted him to
offer to get the Cray working again. "I'm waiting to see what happens,"
Cole added.
Own a Piece of History Dept:
A couple of years ago, Tony Cole of Hayward, California, became the first
and only citizen to own a Cray-1 supercomputer. He bought it at an
auction, over the protest of the government. Apparently, the thing is
supposed to be sold to the military or who knows what other authorized
organizations. Anyway, Tony has taken the printed circuit boards (cards)
out of it and selling them enclosed between two thick slabs of Lucite as
collectors items, conversation pieces, or whatever you want to call them.
These are probably the only cards from a Cray-1 ever to be sold this way,
and there are fewer than thousand available. Each one is different,
two-sided, and cool looking. Each original card seems to have been mounted
on 1 1/2 pound copper plate.
Cole is selling them for $xxx.xx each plus $10.00 shipping fee (they
weight a lot). Each is about 8 by 10 inches. Grab a piece of history for
your desk or wall while you can. Tony can be contacted at Memorybilia
Computers, P. O. Box 25554, San Mateo, Ca 94402; 415 525-1212, Pager 415
377-7701. This is one unique and outstanding gift idea for the Techie.
Seriously cool.
A piece of history
TONY COLE IS A COMPUTER freak supercomputers that is. Fascinated with the
supercomputers that Lawrence Livermore Laboratory was using to test
weapons during the height of the Cold War, Cole bought a 10-ton Cray-1
computer at auction three years ago for $10,101.01. The government
originally paid $23 million for the supercomputer. But advances in
technology made it obsolete. At the time, Cole told Alameda Newspaper
Group he'd melt down it's gold content, sell it and put the Cray's hulk in
the San Jose Tech Museum of Innovation. Bill Gates, Microsoft's founder
and a history buff, told him to do the same thing. Cole quickly found out
that wouldn't work, thought, because his 10-ton baby was to heavy for the
museum's floors. THE OPEN SOLUTION: Cole founded Memorybilia Computers, a
Hayward company built around his Cray. He is breaking that discarded hunk
of machinery into parts, mounting it in acrylic and selling it as
historical art. Don't laugh. If you've ever visited a top Silicon Valley
firm, you know this stuff is everywhere. And Cole is sure tech-art's
popularity will continue that he's just bought three, later model
supercomputers from Cray itself for a lowly $5,000. The cost to own a
piece of technology history? About $200 to $250.
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer, Jackass
Coming Soon...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
No, it's OK... I'm happy with the web. After all, it's getting to be
classic, and is probably the future.
> >Atari BBS* instead. Mine was a 130XE with 384K ram (I did the upgrade
> >myself - had to run it with the cover off because of the heat), 4 1050
> >disk drives, and a single 2400b Codex modem. I was 13 years old, I don't
>
> ABACUS (the Atari Bay Area Computer Users Society) still runs it's BBS on
> an Atari 1040ST. (Though, to keep this off-topic, we're thinking of
moving
> to a linux box.)
A travesty !! Or do you mean minix. The Toronto Atari Federation
still uses FoRem on a TT. (still sucks) (The sys-op will get me for
that ! )
ciao larry
lwalkerN0spaM(a)interlog.com
Ward Donald Griffiths III <gram(a)cnct.com> wrote:
> Did the cops catch up with you after you caught up with him? Did he die
> slowly enough to encourage the rest of us to discourage the metal dealers?
We all start dying the moment we're born, how do you expect Sam to
slow that down?
Anyway, this thread got me thinking about a note I saw in comp.sys.super
a couple of weeks back. Here it is, cut'n'pasted from DejaNews. Just
some things for y'all to think about.
-Frank McConnell
--- cut here ---
Subject: Re: Thinking Machines...
From: eugene(a)george.arc.nasa.gov (Eugene N. Miya)
Date: 1998/02/04
Message-ID: <6b9dut$k445(a)news.arc.nasa.gov>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.super
In article <34de7adc.64515852(a)news-s02.ny.us.ibm.net>
abaddon(a)ibm.net (Michael Ross) writes:
>Several Cray beasts have found their way into museums, but I am
>unaware of any TMC machines that have been preserved - and I know of
>several that have been scrapped...
Several.
TCM has a CM-1, a CM-2, and a CM-5 by recollection.
Brewster Kahle has kept at least one in his basement (so told).
I have yet to attend one of his parties to examine it.
The fundamental problem appears to be a guy in Hollywood who has taken
to supply electronics as props for movie sets who is attempting to
corner the market. I can view a piece of the SAGE system, and I think
similar panels have been used on television like the Irwin Allen series
Time Tunnel.
>Does anyone know of any that may be got rid of in the near (or
>not-so-near) future? Preferably in Europe? Particularly the earlier
>CM-2 and CM-200 models (pre-sparc). Someone has got to make a point of
>saving one, and I would fancy the job ( It'll make a change from
>saving pdp-8's and DEC 10's :-)
>
>Come to think of it, if anyone knows any other serious boxes being got
>rid of, please let me know...
"That would be telling."
Oh, there are several people working on this. It depends on your intent.
I can tell you, you have "heavy-weight" competition. Saving this stuff
is a lot more expensive than most people realized.
And then there is Tony Cole.....
--- cut here ---
At 08:56 PM 2/17/98 -0500, you wrote:
>> Well, I personally doubt anyone will actually pay that amount since you
>> could get similar computing power from a contemporary PC for a fraction of
>> that price
>
>Umm, really...
>
>Even a low end EL would waste a hotshot PeeCee in a real world number
>crunch contest. A Pentium II (or Alpha, or UltraSPARC II) just can not
>keep up a good, sustained vector flow like a Cray. Getting a decent 100
>Mflops is very hard to do on a desktop system today, but not for a ca.
>1976 Cray-1. If this Cray for sale is a decent Y/MP type, it could
>probably sustain many hundreds of Mflops, perhaps into a Gflop.
>
>And then there is the issue of the memory bandwidth...
Seems to me I recall reading a bit of folklore where someone at Apple told
Cray that they had used their new Cray to help design their new Apple and
Cray replied that they had used an Apple to help design the Cray.
Cheers
Charlie Fox
PS... Sam, did you get your copy of the videotape?
>
>
>
>> Pardon me if I ask a stupid question, but If they were going to
>> implement a high-speed serial bus for the C64/VIC/1541's, why would
>> they use a device that was primarily designed for PARALLEL
>> operation?
>>
>> It seems that a 6850/6851 ACIA would have been much more appropriate,
>> and would have not been such a software mess.
>
> If computer holy war zealots knew the story behind this Commodore debacle
> back in the 80's when the flames were at their highest temperatures, the
> anti-C64 contingent would have had a field day.
Wouldn't they just!
It seems to me that if it's anything like the PET, they were using this
parallel chip for all sorts of functions - keyboard scanning for a start
- and they were trying to save a chip by putting the high speed serial
link onto the shift register function.
<rant> It doesn't take that much more time/effort/money to do it
properly.... <\rant>
Philip.
At 02:16 AM 2/15/98 -0600, you wrote:
>Portables also make good collectibles because they tend to have the best
>technology of their time, are integrated, and don't take a lot of space!
And as the 10-year mark gets further into the dregs of pc-sameness,
portables still offer a wealth of individuality.
Some more recent portables of note:
Atari Portfolio (1989)
Fujistu Poquet (1989)
Gateway Handbook (?)
Dauphin DTR1
Various GRiD's and GRiDPads
NCR Pen computers
Dolch Lunchboxes
Various ruggedized laptops
etc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 10:09 PM 2/13/98 -0500, you wrote:
>I've never HEARD of a disk exerciser.
>
>What on earth is one for? Pushups? Situps?
To get those oversized 8" disks down to a svelte 5.25"...
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
THUS FAR, I HAVE SEEN NO COMPUTERS THAT SUCK. (EXCEPT ONE'S BASED ON MS
OS'S)
APPLE II'S HAPPEN TO BE ONE OF THE LONGEST RANGING, AND STILL EVOLVING
"SPECIES" OF COMPUTERS
>
>>Oh well, you gotta love it.
>>
>>PS. So the Commodore did suck after all ;)
>
>yes, but not quite as sucky as Atari's and especially Apple II's! : P
>
>Les
>
>
>
At 09:29 PM 2/16/98, Joe wrote:
>At 01:35 PM 2/16/98 -0700, you wrote:
>>Joe:
>>
>>Do you have any software???
>
> Nope, none, notta, zip. Do you have any software or docs for the 3B2?
>I did find an old software archive for the 3B1 at Ohio State U. There is
>supposed to be an archive for the 3B2 but I couldn't find it.
>>
>>-Mike
Software is going to be near impossible to find. have you started up the
3B2 yet?
If the root password is changed, your going to be screwed without system disks.
Check comp.sys.att for 3B2 stuff. Haven't checked in in a while but when i did,
there were hard disks, more 3B2's, NIC's, etc. for sale all the time.
System disks
are going to be hard to find. I've got a set (only thru extreme luck) but
nobody's
getting 'em! AT&T might actually still sell the disks though you'd probably pay
$1,000 for them or some other silly amount.
les
< Geez! An original 5 Mb Seagate 506! I used to have a maintenance
<manual for it but I haven't seen it in at least 10 years. I also have a
I must have 5 or 6 ST506 and ST412s all good here most with low time.
< The squeal is probably coming from the ground strap on the bottom
<spindle. Try putting a bit of powered graphite on it and see if that
Common!
Allison
Also used by C3, Sperry and Unisys for the 48 workstation serial link under
CTOS/BTOS.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Rollins <rexstout(a)ptld.uswest.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: GP-IB (was Re: Atari 8-bit Find)
>
>>>Which reminds me: why didn't IEEE-488 ever become a big hit in the
>>>computer biz? It's been around since the 60's, is standard, has good
>
>Maybe because the cables are so expensive?
>
>>It's used by:
>>
>>Commodore Pets
>>GRiD Compass
>>HP 3000
>>HP 1000 (I think)
>>
>>Probably others...
>And don't forget the HP 9000... Actually, HP uses their own variant, called
>HP-IB. It's probably compatible with GP-IB, but I'm not sure. I have an
>8-bit ISA HP-IB controller around here somewhere, but nothing to use it
>with(at least not yet).
>
>-JR http://members.tripod.com/~jrollins/index.html - Computers
> http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Lair/1681/ - Star Trek
>
>
<Are these all water machines? There are some air-cooled versions that ar
<probably reasonable.
Water cooling isn't that bad. You could use heating compoents for
pumps if needed and heat extraction from the water could be a automotive
radiator with a blower to room air. Of cource the room temperature would
rise but for short term ops that would work.
<Yes, the 400 Hz would be a problem, almost as much as a cooling system (i
<one went with a water machine - probably too big of a headache).
Assuming you need 50kw, if it were say 10kw or less the scale of things
drops to more managable proportions.
Allison
<the only thing that could cause this would be the 6845 CRTC chip (IC2 on
<my schematic). The cursor signal is produced by that chip (at least in
Unlikely but possible. More likely is a memory address error. A stuck
address line will cause data to repeat 2*n times in the display memory.
<modes 0-6), and so if there was any problem later on, then at least the
<cursor would be in the right _phyical_ position, (and would presumably
<not line up with what you are typing). If the 6845 is socketed, then try
<reseating it (pull it out and push it back in again).
Same for other chips around it.
Allison
At 10:55 AM 2/17/98 +0000, you wrote:
>> ABACUS (the Atari Bay Area Computer Users Society) still runs it's BBS on
>> an Atari 1040ST. (Though, to keep this off-topic, we're thinking of moving
>> to a linux box.)
>
> A travesty !! Or do you mean minix. The Toronto Atari Federation
>still uses FoRem on a TT. (still sucks) (The sys-op will get me for
>that ! )
Well, Most of the club members have non-Atari modems... Why stick to only
Atari when there is an alternative that will do a better job of letting us
make the most of our Atari's? I see the BBS like a modem; doesn't need to
be an Atari to host Atari discussions.
In any case, it's kind of a moot point as ABACUS now supports Mac and PC
users. We decided that the true value in the club was the members. We
knew each other, and enjoy our company, and don't want to lose that just
because some have moved on to another platform. So now we do everything.
Something to think about as an alternative to letting a good club die out.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Here's a fellow looking for a good home for his MVII. Anyone?
-=-=- <snip> -=-=-
From: "Brett A. Farnam" <bfarnam(a)skantech.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec
Subject: Micro Vax II
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 19:59:49 -0500
Lines: 12
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.201.215.251
Message-ID: <34ea323c.0(a)news.Skantech.com>
Path:
Supernews70!Supernews73!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!streamer1.cleveland.iagnet.net!qual.net!iagnet.net!198.6.0.23!uunet!in4.uu.net!news.Skantech.com!208.201.215.251
Xref: Supernews70 comp.sys.dec:60608
To any one interested,
I have a MicroVax II that is nicely configured and licensced in my name.
I need to find a home for it. Any thoughts? I am willing to donate it
before it becomes trash. I have Open VMS with DEC Net, (2) RA90's, (1) TK
50, (1) TS 05 all in a standard DEC issue 48" cab.
Brett A. Farnam
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, SysOp,
The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fido 1:343/272)
kyrrin2 {at} wiz<ards> d[o]t n=e=t
"...No matter how hard we may wish otherwise, our science can only describe
an object, event, or living creature, in our own human terms. It cannot possibly
define any of them!..."
I just picked up an AppleII and 2 FDDs with a bunch of add-ons
at a local thrift store. The only Apple I have explored is my Mac+.
Anyone able to identify the cards ?
A Disk II interface card...... obvious.
Ram Module by Multiflex Tech Inc.....I imagine additional ram
Grapple+ Printer Interface......... Serial, Parallel ??
Multiflex Tech ...Long card with kludged cable to an RCA male
connector and another to a clothes-pin chip staddler labelled
AP TC/14. Two labelled chips "Firmware" and "Char. Gen." (imagine
this is a video card of some sort.)
Modem 80 card with 2 tel. jacks........... Baud-rate ?
CableTV kludge to a "SUP 'R' MOD CH.33 TV Interface Unit ??
External added-on connector 2x3 blade (like an AC outlet but with 3
pairs of smaller female recepticles in one unit) ??
It also has what I imagine is stock Ext. video (single RCA) and
cassette (2 mini-pin i/o )
Any help appreciated.
ciao larry
lwalkerN0spaM(a)interlog.com
Last fall, I bought a Model 100 which was fine, except the LCD
doesn't work. I thought I could fix it, but find I really have
no time to troubleshoot it . ..
I'm willing to resell it to anyone on this list for $10 + shipping,
send me e-mail if you're interested.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles P. Hobbs __ __ ____ ___ ___ ____
transit(a)primenet.com /__)/__) / / / / /_ /\ / /_ /
/ / \ / / / / /__ / \/ /___ /
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 1) Check the PSU in the 11/34 CPU. It's probably fine,
> > but you don't want to ruin all your boards
>
> How should I check the power supply? I know that many people here
> say you should always do this but with the small cheap micros I've
> picked up so far I haven't bothered.
Disconnect the PSU from the backplanes. Inspect it visually to make
sure there are no obvious uprooted components, cooked tracks, etc.
Connect dummy loads between the important supply rails and ground (I
think they are +5V +15V and -15V in a PDP - Can someone confirm this?
Do you need a load on the 20V rail as well?) and switch on. Measure the
voltages across the dummy loads.
Generally the 15V rails don't need to be loaded very heavily - a
resistor of 100 ohms rated at a few watts ought to do it. You ought to
try and draw several amps from the 5V rail - a 6V car headlamp bulb is
ideal. Light bulbs make good dummy loads in any case because you can
see if there is any current there...
Beyond that, there are plenty of PDP hackers on this list who can take
up the story at this point...
Philip.
PS I too will admit to not doing this nearly often enough...
Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com> wrote:
> The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (across the street from my
> neighborhood) auctioned off their Cray in 1993 and it was sold for $10,000
> to some oaf who said he could get lots of gold out of it and was thus very
> excited (there was a newspaper article about it). I was incensed, but oh
> well. I expect there will be similarly high bidding by the scrappers on
> this poor guy as well.
Hmm, Tony Cole? Seems he has put one on display at The Computer
Museum's History Center and is selling bits and pieces of others,
encased in Lucite as geek memorabilia. There was a story about this in
the San Jose Mercury a while back, which probably means that it's up
on their web site, hmm....
http://www.sjmercury.com/columnists/cassidy/docs/mc011898.htm
-Frank McConnell
I have a slightly wierd problem. Not sure if it is hardware or software.
Ok, I turn the 4p on with no floppy in the drive. It says:
The Floppy Disk Drive is not Ready. (in 3 languages, no less)
I put in the TRSDOS 6 system disk, the system appears to boot,
but the monitor looks like there is no sync. It is very fuzzy. I can type
in the date, and enter a command (dir :1), and the system appears to
do it.
Why does actually getting booted up cause the monitor to be unusable?
Trying other disks in the drive, if they are not system disks, causes other
messages to appear, perfectly readable.
Any ideas?
Kelly
Greets:
This weekend I had a great run of the swap meets, etc., in Wichita,
Kansas and came home with about 50 different machines, tons of software,
etc., etc. Anyway, there are two specific machines I would like to ask
about now, I will post further questions on several others in the
future.
First, I picked up an Epson HX-40 laptop-sized computer. On the front it
says MagicBox above the LCD screen. On the back there is a battery bay
as well as a rom chip bay, and it says Epson HX-40 Model # H401A. I
understand this machines runs off of program-specific rom chips. It has
a chip in the slot under the trap-door, and when I boot it, it comes up
to a pharmacetical company inventory, order, etc., menu. The machines
runs off of 4 AA batteries or a AC adapter. It really is a cute machine,
but I want to know more. In searching the web, I find 1 measly reference
to this machine... yes, 1 (or two), neither of which give any info. on
this machine. It is listed on a guys resume as having experience in
working with it. I do find a lot of information on the well-known Epson
HX-20 --- known as the 1st laptop computer. In finding pictures of that,
this one looks really similar. This one has ports labeled BCP and one
labeled SP on one side, and on the back is the cassette, seriel, and
RS-232C, printer, and power adaptor ports. There is also a 50-pin port
on the opposite side with no label. I guess what I am wondering is if
any of you have some more information on this little guy? No year can be
found on it, but I suspect early 1980s. Does anyone have any other
'chips' for it to insert other software into memory. Are these units
rare? Please let me know any information. If you're interested in it let
me know that to.
Next, I am curious about a Data General One laptop computer I picked up.
Specifically, I need to know what type of power supply it takes, as I
can't find that information anywhere. It says it is ms-dos based, but I
am wondering what dos would run on it. It has 2 3.5" disk drives (Epson
drives), and I am curious as to if it had a hard drive? It has a
full-screen, I would suppose monochrome? Could it display graphics,
etc.? Also, when was it made?
*any* information on the above two items most certainly are welcome, and
would be quite appreciated. Please let me know if you are interested in
getting either one of these as well.
I will post some more very unique items in the next couple of days that
I was lucky enough to get my grubby little hands on....
Thanks in advance,
CORD COSLOR
--
___________________________________________________
| Cord G. Coslor : archive(a)navix.net |\
| Deanna S. Wynn : deannasue(a)navix.net | |
|---------------------------------------------------| |
| http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/4395 | |
|---------------------------------------------------| |
| PO Box 308 - Peru, NE - 68421 - (402) 872- 3272 | |
|___________________________________________________| |
\____________________________________________________\|
How much sense does that make? Isn't it a bit like saying "You can
pay 100,000 for it, or you can pay 10, either is fine with us"? If it
doesn't weigh too much, ship it to the US, I'm sure there are more
customers here (I doubt I'll get much use from it, unless it runs
term and MS Word ;)
>How often do these come up for sale? A Cray, about 6 or 7 years old,
>apparntly, is being sold in Australia. They're asking $100,000, which
>puts it a tad out of my range. :) However, if it isn't sold it will be
>scrapped - I wonder if they will accept a couple of cartons of beer
over
>whatever the scrap offer is?
>
>Anyone want it? :)
>
>Adam.
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I pretty much knew it wouldn't work, but hoped that maybe it would
work just like a normal BIOS... anyway, does anyone have that circuit
cellar article? What is "inexpensive"?
>
>> I just downloaded the assembly source to a generic XT bios. It
compiles,
>> but I can't apparently run it from a command line, or boot off a
floppy
>> disk that has the thing rawritten on it.
>
>Um - what are you *expecting* it to do when you run it from the command
>line or from floppy disk?
>
>> Is there a way I COULD do it
>> without getting a ROM burner?
>
>Sure - there are adapters that let you put code into a small CMOS
static
>RAM with an adapter that fits on the ROM socket. One of Steve
Ciarcia's
>early Circuit Cellar articles in _BYTE_ shows how to do this. But if I
>were you I'd just build or buy an EPROM programmer - they're by no
means
>expensive.
>
>Tim.
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> I just downloaded the assembly source to a generic XT bios. It compiles,
> but I can't apparently run it from a command line, or boot off a floppy
> disk that has the thing rawritten on it.
A BIOS is linked to run at a preset address, usually F000 (64K Z80) or
F000:0000 (last 64KB segment on an 8086 in real mode). What I have done
when debugging a BIOS is to link it at a lower address (say, 8000:0000),
then load it into memory at that address with a debugger, set the CS segment
register to 8FFF (a true reset puts it at FFFF), then jump to 8FFF:0000
(simulating a reset to FFFF:0000). Since this is an XT I assume you will be
running in real mode, so address translation isn't a problem unless your
machine has some kind of additional address mapping logic.
Of course you can't run the debugger after that as the BIOS will trash all
your vectors. Be sure to modify the BIOS code to stop the memory sizing
test below segment 8000 or you will memory test right over your BIOS image.
Hope this helps, Jack Peacock
I just got an Apple ProFile hard drive. It seems to work, although I don't
have an interface card for it yet.
But, it squeaks. You know, like a water pump on a car before it blows
(that's the pump bearings, BTW). Does anyone have any check-out/maintenance
tips for this drive? The hard drive is labeled "Seagate model ST-506".
Thanks!
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
============================================
Just curious if I should really keep this rather well designed computer
Its an "Olivetti M24 Personal Computer". I'd never seen an Olivetti
before, which is why I saved it from the scap heap. Now is it scarce or
nice enough to attempt to get running? If not, it becomes my new post box -
rip out the drives and contents, sit it on top of a pole outside the house,
paint the house number on the monitor screen :) Should look good!
Also found, and free for a good home (cover my costs) a great condition box
set of Texas Instruments Professional Computer MS-DOS manuals. I don't but
thought somebody else might want them.
Andrew.
I just downloaded the assembly source to a generic XT bios. It compiles,
but I can't apparently run it from a command line, or boot off a floppy
disk that has the thing rawritten on it. Is there a way I COULD do it
without getting a ROM burner?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>I have a C-64c and a Commodore brand 1200 modem. Since I still haven't had
>a chance to resolve the problem with my 1541 disk drive, I'd like to
>explore using the modem a bit. Can it be done in BASIC? Meaning, can I
>issue certain BASIC commands to init the modem and dial out? It's been a
>while since I've messed with any Commie machine, and when I did, I couldn't
>afford the "luxury" of a 1200 baud modem. This may be something simple, and
>I'd appreciate any help, even a pointer to info on the internet.
>
I just got my hands on a Kaypro 4 in excellent condition, complete with
software and manuals. However, I cannot seem to get the internal 300 baud
modem working. I have two programs here with it, one is KERMIT for the
Kaypro II CP/M 2.2, and the other is Superterm Version 5. According to the
addendum with the machine, the version of Superterm that I have was
modified for use with the internal modem on the Kaypro 4, however I cannot
seem to get the modem to do anything. Would this modem accept AT commands?
and if not, what commands do I have to send to it in command mode? Any help
would be appreciated.
On a side note, anybody remember the Star Trek basic game? They just don't
make games like that anymore. I'm sitting here with Quake, QuakeII, and a
whole slew of other advanced 3D games on my pentium, but I cannot tear
myself away from playng Star Trek on the Kaypro! (getting my ass kicked,
can't aim the torpedo's worth a damn :)
UHOH! That means that I will have to move the thing! It's against the
wall! With three 74-pound terminals on it, no less! This machine ran
in 1980, when it was last used. Possibly, it has been eaten by the two-
foot long rats that live in our building. To restate what I previously
said, it needs a 220-v power source and I am trying to run it in an
area that only has 110-v plugs.
>[Previously, a load of questions...]
>The CE panel is the Customer Engineer panel. WHile facing the front of
the machine, take a step to your right. Turn left 90 degrees. Take
another step
>right. You should (Depending on your stride) be looking at a small
hinged cover
>about 12" high, on the left side of the machine. Open it. Inside is a
mess of
>switches and lights. This is the CE panel, similar to the frontpanel
of a PDP-11
>or similar mini. WHen the machine is running you can watch the LEDs
flash at
>you.
>
>I'm not sure on the voltage stuff...
>Is this machine running? Are you tyring to get it that way?
>-------
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
For one thing, what is the CE Panel? The thing is in a corner, with
the end that has the floppy drive on it visible, as well as the side
that has a small power switch on it. I went down to Radio Shack, they
only had 220-110 transformers that could handle up to 40 Watts. I have
a hint this might not be enoug ;) Also, they had 110-220 transformers.
Could I just wire one of those backwards and get the same result?
Wouldn't it be easier to just wire two 110 volt plugs together like
I was told I could try if I like "but I would far better notter"?
IS this indeed like trying to move heat from a cold to a hot object?
How many question marks can the listsevrer handle before crashing?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> > Possibly. But I'm not convinced. I seem to remember the biggest IBM
> > 3090 system drew about 250kW (I'll have to look that up too!). I
> > imagine a typical system might draw perhaps 50kW.
>
> That is probably for a typical installation. The actual processor is
> nowhere near that value (still enough to make the utility very happy,
> however). A big string of DASDs adds up very fast, especially the power
> sucking IBM disks (why is that? Really big motors)?
I don't know where the figure of 250kW came from. I cannot find it
anywhere.
I have found some figures, though, for indifidual 3090 processor units
_only_, dated 1986 and 1987. While I agree with you in principle,
William, you'll be surprised at some of these.
Figures are electricity consumption in kVA - an upper bound on kW, but
not a useful indicator - and heat output in Btu/h which I have converted
to kW, which should give a lower bound on electrical power requirements.
3090 Model kVA kW Heat
150 (1986) 32 23.2 kW
400 (top of range in 1986) 83.6 61.8 kW
400 with vector coprocessor 97.8 70.6 kW
120E (1987) 29.7 21.4 kW
150E (1987, replaces 150) 30.4 22.1 kW
400E (1987, replaces 400) 79.9 59.6 kW
600E (top of range in 1987) 95.6 71.5 kW
600E with all expansion 134.6 103.6 kW
Note 1986 figures were given with and without vector facility; 1987
figures were given as minimum and maximum values.
These figures are not even for a minimum system - you have to add disk
drives and that awful 400Hz motor generator set - which can consume up
to 7kW in itself.
So, as I said, a typical system based around, say, a model 200 might
consume 50kW, but even that needn't cripple you financially.
Philip.
From: Yowza! <yowza(a)yowza.com>
Subject: GP-IB (was Re: Atari 8-bit Find)
>On Sat, 14 Feb 1998, Larry Anderson & Diane Hare wrote:
>> Remember if you find a hint of something you are collecting at a thrift,
>> look around for other components (i.e. if you find a Commodore IEEE-488
>> cable start looking for PET/B-128 drives, printers, computers, tapes,
>> disks, manuals, etc.)
>Which reminds me: why didn't IEEE-488 ever become a big hit in the
>computer biz? It's been around since the 60's, is standard, has good
>performance, has IC support, can handle a bunch of devices, etc., but it
>became relagated to a niche of scientific instrument control for some
>reason.
Here is an interesting tidbit I found a year or so ago which partially
answers at least Commodore's part of the question:
**QUOTE**
From: brain(a)garnet.msen.com (Jim Brain)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
Subject: PC's as 64 HD's and the 6522 chip!
Date: 7 Apr 1994 13:48:35 GMT
Right after I posted about hooking a 6522 VIA up to a PC parallel port
to turn the PC into a "char-banger" instead of a "bit-banger", someone
posted that they had thought the 6522 had a problem with the shift
register. The poster also said that Jim Butterfield had alerted him and
others to it.
Well, I have been in correspondence with "The Commodore Man", so I
asked him
to elaborate on the topic. Here is the two responses:
> Yes, it's true. Although I didn't get official confirmation of this
>long after, when a Spectrum article quoted the designers.
> As you know, the first Commodore computers used the IEEE bus to connect to
>peripherals such as disk and printer. I understand that these were available
>only from one source: Belden cables. A couple of years into Commodore's
>computer career, Belden went out of stock on such cables (military contract?
>who knows?). In any case, Commodore were in quite a fix: they made
>computers and disk drives, but couldn't hook 'em together!
> So Tramiel issued the order: "On our next computer, get off that bus.
>Make it a cable anyone can manufacture". And so, starting with the VIC-20
>the serial bus was born. It was intended to be just as fast as the
>IEEE-488 it replaced.
> Technically, the idea was sound: the 6522 VIA chip has a "shift
>register" circuit that, if tickled with the right signals (data and clock)
>will cheerfully collect 8 bits of data without any help from the CPU.
>At that time, it would signal that it had a byte to be collected, and
>the processor would do so, using an automatic handshake built into the
>6522 to trigger the next incoming byte. Things worked in a similar way
>outgoing from the computer, too.
> We early PET/CBM freaks knew, from playing music, that there was something
>wrong with the 6522's shift register: it interfered with other functions.
>The rule was: turn off the music before you start the tape! (The shift
>register was a popular sound generator). But the Commodore engineers,
>who only made the chip, didn't know this. Until they got into final
>checkout of the VIC-20.
> By this time, the VIC-20 board was in manufacture. A new chip could
>be designed in a few months (yes, the silicon guys had application notes
>about the problem, long since), but it was TOO LATE!
> A major software rewrite had to take place that changed the VIC-20
>into a "bit-catcher" rather than a "character-catcher". It called for
>eight times as much work on the part of the CPU; and unlike the shift
>register plan, there was no timing/handshake slack time. The whole
>thing slowed down by a factor of approximately 5 to 6.
> There's more (the follow-on C64 catastrophe), but that's where it
>happened.
--Jim
And the saga continues ...
> When the 64 came out, the problem VIA 6522 chip had been
>replaced by the CIA 6526. This did not have the shift register problem
>which had caused trouble on the VIC-20, and at that time it would have
>been possible to restore plan 1, a fast serial bus. Note that this would
>have called for a redesign of the 1540 disk drive, which also used a VIA.
> As best I can estimate - and an article in the IEEE Spectrum magazine
>supports this - the matter was discussed within Commodore, and it was
>decided that VIC-20 compatibility was more important than disk speed.
>Perhaps the prospect of a 1541 redesign was an important part of the
>decision, since current inventories needed to be taken into account.
> But to keep the Commodore 64 as a "bit-banger", a new problem arose.
>The higher-resolution screen of the 64 (as compared to the VIC-20)
>could not be supported without stopping the CPU every once in a while.
>To be exact: Every 8 screen raster lines (each line of text), the CPU
>had to be put into a WAIT condition for 42 microseconds, so as to allow
>the next line of screen text and color nybbles to be swept into the chip.
>(More time would be needed if sprites were being used).
> But the bits were coming in on the serial bus faster than that: aD
>a bit would come in about every 20 microseconds! So the poor CPU, frozen
>for longer than that, would miss some serial bits completely!
> Commodore's solution was to slow down the serial bus even more.
>That's why the VIC-20 has a faster serial bus than the 64, even though
>the 64 was capable, technically, of running many times faster.
> Fast disk finally came into its own with the Commodore 128.
--Jim
Now someone also told me at one time that they had seen a fastloader
that
same someone said he thought it was odd that the author of the loader
had
credited Commodore with the routines. Well, I can hazard a guess that
the
routines were the ones they had wanted to put in the 6522, but had to
scrap
due to the 6522 problem. Now I have no idea what the problem is/was,
but
I am eager to find out. However, I rescind my plans to build something
around the 6522 until we find out what the problem is.
Jim "Just the Facts" Brain
**END QUOTE**
The 64 and VIC would have had a faster drive if it wern't for the
cables and the chip problems... Probably HP was doing major IEEE-488
sales and it was a strain on the cable manufactuer. IEEE-488 cables
nowadays run from $40-$90 new, of course it is a standard 'get' item on
my mental thrift store shopping list.
--
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Visit our web page at: http://www.goldrush.com/~foxnhare/
Call our Commodore 64 BBS (Silicon Realms 300-2400 baud) at: (209)
754-1363
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
On Mon, 16 Feb 1998 15:06:55 -0800 (PST), Tim Shoppa
<shoppa(a)alph02.triumf.ca> wrote:
>>What sort of packs? What commands were you issuing to read them? >>What
OS did you try to read them from? What error message did you get >>when it
failed?
They're RK05 packs, inserted in the DK2: device. I booted from DK0: with
RT-11 v.4 and used "dir dk2:" to read the disk directory. Although I don't
remember the specific error, it's something like "invalid directory."
> Can RSTS/E be used on an 11/34?
>>Most later versions support the 11/34, though some early versions (pre-
>>1977 or so) don't. RSTS/E tends to be quite picky about peripheral
>>configurations that it'll run on.
I have v.6 and v.7.
-------------------------------------------------
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
- ClubWin Charter Member (6)
- MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
On Mon, 16 Feb 1998 21:50:15 +0000, jpero(a)cgo.wave.ca wrote:
>> does that mean I could just plug one of my old ST-225's or other ST-506
>>type drives intoa ProFile card?
>>>Oh, you can. Still 5mb or 10mb. :)
>>>Remember, all older MFM, ESDI and some early SCSI drives always >>>need
annual or bi yearly LLF job.
Thanks for the info. Now all that I need is an interface card for my
///.
-------------------------------------------------
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
- ClubWin Charter Member (6)
- MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
On Sun, 15 Feb 1998 17:39:22 -0800, John Rollins <rexstout(a)ptld.uswest.net>
wrote:
>>Sounds like the ProFile card is just an ST-506 hard drive interface. A
>>ST-506 drive is REALLY old. I'm not an expert on the old hard
>>drives/interfaces, so I'll let someone else figure all that out, but I
>>can tell you that it is very old. Does the ProFile need a seperate power
>>cord (does it have it's own ps), or does it get power from the Apple II?
>>And if the ProFile is just an ST-506 interface, does that mean I could
>>just plug one of my old ST-225's or other ST-506 type drives intoa
>>ProFile card?
It's a self-contained drive unit that connects to an interface card on
the Apple // or /// with a 25-pin DB straight-pinned cable. It does have an
Astec power supply built-in. The interface cable to the drive itself reminds
me of a floppy cable (IDC edge connector to IDC header), but I didn't count
the conductors.
I'm assuming that it is a true ST-506 interface, but I don't know for
sure. I also haven't had the time to look the drive up in my ref. materials
to determine its capacity, etc., but I think that it's a 5mb drive.
-------------------------------------------------
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
- ClubWin Charter Member (6)
- MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
>>Several Cray beasts have found their way into museums, but I am
>>unaware of any TMC machines that have been preserved - and I know of
>>several that have been scrapped...
>
>Several.
>TCM has a CM-1, a CM-2, and a CM-5 by recollection.
In trying to find a home for the Convex I found a collector of
Supercomputers in Adelaide (where I live). He has the CM-2 and CM-5, as
well as something called an Encore Multimax, and is after the Cray but
isn't going to pay the $100,000 (Australian) that is being asked. :) It
looks like I have found a home for the Convex, if only I can work out how
to transport it here.
Adam.
John Higginbotham <higginbo(a)netpath.net> wrote:
>It would be Red Hat linux, and if there's a termcap for the m100, there's
>gotta be one for the c64.
Yes, I know circa 1985 I used the standard Unix termcaps for the M100
and the C-64 over 300 baud links.
>Do you know if anyone makes these cables and sells them? Or, barring that,
>any specific links to the assembly instructions?
Sure, some people on the net try to sell them, but they're easy to
wire if you can find the DIN connector. I did one in a few minutes
after digging for the DIN in the junk box. Worked the first time.
See <http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/cbm/transfer/1541-to-PC/> for more info.
I can't begin to tell you how easy and rewarding it can be to dig
around on the web, following one clue to another. If you entered
"x1541" or "1541 pc" in <http://www.hotbot.com> or any other
search engine, or <http://www.dejanews.com>, I'm sure you'd
quickly find dozens of references.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
In a message dated 98-02-16 21:27:14 EST, you write:
<< At 05:39 PM 2/15/98 -0800, you wrote:
>>But, it squeaks. You know, like a water pump on a car before it blows
If that's all that's wrong, try lubing the ground strap/ spindle juncture.
> does that mean I could just
>plug one of my old ST-225's or other ST-506 type drives intoa ProFile card?
Yes, As long as it has more cylinder and heads. You'll have to low level
format after you install it.
>>
hmmm, i have heard only a lisa (or is it an apple ///) that can only LLF a
profile?