Gone are three 486 clones that have been languishing in my garage for
nearly a year. They were traded for: an Apple Lisa 2, an Osborne
Executive, and a Northstar Horizon. The Lisa and Osborne have boot
disks and other software, and so far seem to work well. I also got a
Profile hard drive with the Lisa, but I haven't tried to hook it up
yet... I haven't messed with the Horizon at all, but it looks to be in
good shape, with CPU, ram, disk and i/o cards installed, along with a
couple of diskettes in the drives that might boot it, not sure yet.
I'll holler for help if this gives me trouble whenever I get to it,
though I do have huge collection of manuals for it that I had picked up
in anticipation of this day ;) Additionally, the guy I got all this
stuff from tossed in about a dozen cartridges for the TI-99 and Coco3
that I didn't already have. Happy happy joy joy.
--
mor(a)crl.com
http://www.crl.com/~mor/
At 10:04 PM 3/18/98 -0800, you wrote:
>The SyJet is very nice, but runs VERY Hot.
Mine is warm, but definitely not what I'd call hot.
>guess would be the Publishing industry still uses them quite a bit since
>it's usually in Mac catalogs and stores I see the carts for sale. Of
About 10 years ago, I too invested heavily in 44mb Syquest carts. The
reason I did, is because one of my clients at the time (a major graphics
arts firm (logos for the Olympics, Microslut, etc.)) was buying them the
way most high-tech companies buy diskettes: buy a couple of cases of them
and put them on the shelf for employees to come and grab a handful. And
they *used* them. All day long, and often all night too.
The syquests were also very popular with the Atari ST crowd too. Somewhere
around here (in *that* pile, I think) is an Atari branded cartridge.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
"James Redin" <jredin(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
> I've found that the ANITA from Sumlock Comptometer of England (1963) is
> usually regarded as the first electronic calculator [1]. However, recently
> I found an article about Heinz Nixdorf of Germany in the LEXICON's History
> of Computing (CD-ROM) which indicates that he built several models of
> electronic calculators back in 1954 (Models ES12 and ES24).
At the risk of suggesting the obvious, have you contacted
the Heinz Nixdorf Museumforum? They have a web site at
http://www.hnf.de/ and one of the pages contains a list of
contact addresses. However, you will either need to read
German or have good luck with the translator at
http://www.altavista.digital.com/ (which is of limited use
on HNF's site because some of the text is embedded in images).
-Frank McConnell
At 04:14 AM 3/21/98 -0600, you wrote:
>On Sat, 21 Mar 1998, Benjamin M Coakley wrote:
>
>> Speaking of which, there's an HP41C at a thrift store near me. Anyone
>> want it? Is it at all interesting?
>
>It's only the best calculator ever made. Grab it quick, you won't regret
>it. It's programmable, can be expanded with RAM and ROM cartridges, and
>there's a whole bunch of cool little peripherals you can hook up to it.
>And I think it even does arithmetic.
Only Reverse Polish Arithmetic! :-)
Joe
all 80286 ps2 models ran at 10mhz. wait states differed.
david
In a message dated 98-03-21 13:42:20 EST, you write:
<< <Let me think... The 286 chip was available in 10MHz and 12MHz IIRC, mayb
<another speed too. I can't remember which speed the 50/50Z was.
The installed chips are 10mhz but that does not mean it ran that fast.
<Don't you love the way the case comes apart, and that little tool
<underneath the speaker to help take the rest of it apart? Defintley my
They do come apart nice.
But everything is oddball compared to the rest of my systems (s100, CPM
and DEC based).
Allison
>>
In a message dated 98-03-21 12:45:44 EST, you write:
<< Someone was throwing away a box of five shrinkwrapped ones like this.
I grabbed one and opened it, the rest I gently obsucred but they
might be gone. As I understand, this is an emulator for a 3270
terminal. Is it of any use to me without a System/370? Also, there
was a box with four or five shrinkwrapped apckages of IBM DOS 3.30.
Assuming anything is still there, does anyone want any of this?
>>
i might have something similar. i was given 5 shrinkwrap copies of ibm pc
3270 emulation program version 1.22
i opened one to see what it's like and the rest are upopened. not much use
though. i wouldnt mind a never opened package of dos3.3 to add to my
collection of never-used ibm software.
david
In a message dated 98-03-21 12:30:13 EST, you write:
<< Personally, I dislike PS/2s because they are almost impossible to
upgrade due to the weird specs. But, there was a time when I would do
almost anything for one. By the way, I found two weird systems at my
school. One is the "Writing System" which looks like a PS/2, and we
have a bunch of "Eduquest" systems, which are now all in the supply
room. >>
ps2 models arent really that hard to upgrade. the difficulty only comes when
someone attempts to upgrade it way beyond its capabilites. certain 95xx models
have used dx4/100 cpu also. eduquest systems are/were one piece mac-like
systems designed for school use. proprietary design, but so easy to work on.
some even had dos in rom.
david
In a message dated 98-03-21 11:33:13 EST, you write:
<< OK... could it allow for me to write in C? (Or any other languages in
particular) What are the chances of finding another 64K RAM upgrade to
boost it to the max 128KB?
Thanks again, >>
there were certain 128k ram cards for the ][+ and similar but i dont think
programs could use the extra memory. early versions of appleworks could be
patched to use it and dos 3.3 could use the mem as a virtual disk. the pocket
rocket's memory cannot be upgraded.
At 01:21 AM 3/21/98 -0600, you wrote:
>
>I know people collect calculators, but I just can't imagine how it can
>bring the same kind of satisfaction as computer collecting. You can't
>really hack a calculator. They don't lend themselves very well to
>restoration efforts. They can't do many tricks. And few of them have any
>sort of personality
Have you ever tried a HP 41? How does up to 961 external devices of
nearly every descrptions grab you? That's just one of the capabilities of
the HP-41 using the HP-IL interface. I currently have a 41 running a HP
logic analyzer!
(OK, I'll admit that HP tries pretty hard in this
>area).
They did a good job too :-)
>
>Has anybody ventured a definition of computer that allows us to weed out
>mere calculators? How about:
>
>* must be programmable
>* must be general purpose
>* must have alphanumeric input capabilites
>* must have alphanumeric display capabilites
The HP-41, 71, 75 and all the newer ones fit this description.
>
>Unfortunately, this would mean that an Altair isn't a computer until you
>add a terminal, but it keeps those pesky HP-65's out of the group.
>
>-- Doug
Joe
I'm new to the list and missed the original posting about the Friden delay
line. Can somebody forward to me the messages that have been crossed in
regards to the Friden calculator or tell me where can I search for old
postings?
Thanks!
James Redin
----------
> From: Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: Delay lines
> Date: Friday, March 20, 1998 11:27 PM
>
>
> <Exactly. In the particular case of the Friden it was called a supersonic
> <delay line, although I've never been sure why.
>
> acoustic delay lines, they propagate bits translated to mechanical
> impulses at the speed of sound in a solid. The resulting delay is
> long enough to use ans a shift register to store bits.
>
> Allison
>
Hmmm,
The Goodwill pickings were bad. I only found one C128 and two
1571 drives, plus a 1084 composite monitor. The store manager wanted
$25 for _each_ item ($100 total?? BAH!). The C128 had several broken
keys, the Disk drives looked in pretty bad shape, so the only thing of
interest was the monitor. I took it. I also got some cables: a TTL
RGB cablefor the 128, A standard "monitor" cable and what looks to be
a drive cable (hey, they were willing to bundle it in for me).
So, the question is: can I use the 'split' composite cable for a
C64 with an Atari 800? By 'split' I refer to split chroma and
intensity signals... I know that the 1084 monitor can handle this, and
I know that the Atari outputs this format just like a C=64, but I
_don't_ know if the pinouts are the same between the two. Can anyone
help?
Thanks!
J. Maynard Gelinas
Sorry to go on and on about PC stuff, but I do need help.
I got a copy of Harvard Graphics 2.01 for DOS. I'm not sure if it
was my fault or not, but I damaged Program Disk 1. Scandisk reports
that cluster 0 is damaged and the disk cannot be fixed. I can view
the directory of the disk (5.25"), but the files are inaccessible.
Could someone either tell me how to fix this disk or send me another
one? (diskimages would do_)
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<Let me think... The 286 chip was available in 10MHz and 12MHz IIRC, mayb
<another speed too. I can't remember which speed the 50/50Z was.
The installed chips are 10mhz but that does not mean it ran that fast.
<Don't you love the way the case comes apart, and that little tool
<underneath the speaker to help take the rest of it apart? Defintley my
They do come apart nice.
But everything is oddball compared to the rest of my systems (s100, CPM
and DEC based).
Allison
Hello Frank,
> maybe the definitions of computer/calculator are not exact; the Mk8 is
> stated as "first electronic desktop calculator" in
> "Bueromaschinen-Kompass", an annual handbook giving an overview on the
> market.
> I guess, what quilifies the Anita is the fact that it used Nixie-tubes
for
> displaying the results. A book, written 1960, titled "Electronic
> number-calculators" describes the display of results as the largest
> problem, the author had no idea of a practical solution (but describes
> every other technology used these days: core-Memory, delay-lines, tubes,
> even diodes and transistors).
> Regards,
> Frank Boehm
Yesterday I subscribed to a new list (Discussion re-collecting of classic
computers) hoping to get more info on the Nixdorf machines. The first
messages that came across were an ongoing discussion on the boundaries
between calculators and computers. It was very interesting for me. One of
the entries stated:
"Granted, these points are primarily moot, for the definition of a computer
as to be used on this list would need to be defined by Mr. Bill Whitson,
the (still) owner of this list.
>* must be programmable
>* must be general purpose
>* must have alphanumeric input capabilities
>* must have alphanumeric display capabilities."
Of course many current calculators would be considered computers under
these terms, however, we need to consider the context or frame of reference
for this definition. The list is oriented to "Classic computers" and
therefore the boundaries are relevant to the early computer/calculator
technology.
On the other hand, the fact that the ANITA would qualify for the first
electronic calculator because it was the first one with Nixie-tubes display
is not very clear either. Remember that the first pocket calculator, the
"Cal-Tech" from TI and its off-spring the Canon "Pocketronic" used a
thermal printer to display the results.
I would say that the terms above stated leads to a clear cut between
Computers/Calculators.
Now the real question should be:
Does anybody know if the ES 12 and ES 24 electronic calculators developed
by Nixdorf in 1953, were programmable and/or had alphanumeric input/display
capabilities?
Regards,
James Redin
http://www.dotpoint.com/xnumber
Pictures are worth 1000 words - my earlier text post didn't elicit any
responses... maybe one of you can ID this board (or more particularly, the
type of system) from the pictures. Two pics available; large and small.
The connector shows the single "pin" on this side, and multiple separate
pins on
the reverse.
http://www.comcen.com.au/~adavie/weird/boardbig.jpg [250K]
http://www.comcen.com.au/~adavie/weird/boardsmall.jpg [95K]
Betcha can't!
A
Apologies for the earlier post with the incorrect URL - don't you wish,
sometimes, that you could send a chase-up email to kill your earlier one?!!
Someone was throwing away a box of five shrinkwrapped ones like this.
I grabbed one and opened it, the rest I gently obsucred but they
might be gone. As I understand, this is an emulator for a 3270
terminal. Is it of any use to me without a System/370? Also, there
was a box with four or five shrinkwrapped apckages of IBM DOS 3.30.
Assuming anything is still there, does anyone want any of this?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Personally, I dislike PS/2s because they are almost impossible to
upgrade due to the weird specs. But, there was a time when I would do
almost anything for one. By the way, I found two weird systems at my
school. One is the "Writing System" which looks like a PS/2, and we
have a bunch of "Eduquest" systems, which are now all in the supply
room.
>they can serve as spares for the rest of my systems. That and I'm not
>really into collecting PCs.
>
>Allison
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<Depends. My 50Z has an ESDI drive(and IIRC they shipped with that, too),
<but any PS/2 drive with that connetor should work. What it is is that IB
<added an HD controller to the HD's main board, so that connector is an MC
<interface.
No the drive only has one board. That plugs into the board in the mca
bus. looks like the drive has minimal electronics on it and the board in
the mca is the edsi or mfm controller.
<no FD/HD/RAM. I'm thinking of using one as a terminal or something, putti
<in an ethernet card with a boot ROM or something wierd like that. The oth
One has a ni card, single BNC so I suspect eithernet.
Allison
<>* must be programmable
This would exclude many millions of MCUs based on chips like 8048,
8051, z80, I960, 80186/8, and several dozen more in embedded applications
like engine control, navigation, aircraft flyby wire systems or even some
calcs. This would include PDP-8s, pdp-11s and whatever else burried in
CNCs, MRIs and transportation control systems.
<>* must be general purpose
In the above cases the computer or microcomputer is running a dedicated
application from ROM or loaded from other media on power up. So they are
not general purpose in that case. Would this eliminate the PDP-8s used
by BART as computers?
<>* must have alphanumeric input capabilites
See above cases again consider the possible range of inputs. The input
could be barcode reader, thermal or position sensors or off a network from
other computers.
<>* must have alphanumeric display capabilites
Consider the above and the possible outputs. The result may be generating
engine spark timing, alarm output, opening a cuircit breaker, notifying
another computer.
Calculators as differentiated from mechanical adders, differentiated from
fixed program computers. The difference can be the application more so
than implementation. I tend to look to see if there is control or
branching on condition to see if we are talking calc, programmable calc
or more general computer. BUT by doing that do we have to look at the
user interface level or the internal implmentation level?
Allison
OK... could it allow for me to write in C? (Or any other languages in
particular) What are the chances of finding another 64K RAM upgrade to
boost it to the max 128KB?
Thanks again,
Tim D. Hotze
>pocket rocket is applied engineering's equivalent to apple's language card.
>it's very small, and doesnt require a cable to the motherboard like earlier
>models did.
>
>david
I remember reading a Byte article that told how to build a computer that
used a variant of the Z80 by Hatichi (I think that's how you spell it).
The computer was about the size of a lunch box. Apparently I have misplaced
that particular issue an was wondering if any one had it and was willing to
tell me where I could find the printed circuit board and the boot disks or at
least send me the art work and the parts list for this particular beast.
On 1998-03-20 classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu said to lisard(a)zetnet.co.uk
:I was just aquired two PS/2 model 50s. Normally I don't collect
:older PC system but they are interesting.
hmm. that resolves one question - if you've asked this, allison, then we
must be safe to ask something along the same lines...
a few weeks ago now, we picked up an ncr 286 machine with colour monitor
and wonderful keyboard. model number is not obvious, but the case is
flat, about 2" high (the height of a half-height disk drive) and about
the size of a small paving slab; internally, the machine is very odd,
with a backplane architecture, two daughterboards mounted on two boards
in that backplane, and *no* expansion capacity (no free slots). sayeth
the computer that it is a "class 3278 model 0129" machine. our question:
it says on boot-up that it is "running at low speed", which is 6MHz -
how do we get it to run a high speed? there is a switch on the lower
main board that does apparently nothing, and a jumper next to it. we
can't get further into the machine as we don't have the screwdriver...
(it looks like a philips' head, but the slots are too small. what do we
need?) or is it software switched?
--
Communa (together) we remember... we'll see you falling
you know soft spoken changes nothing to sing within her...
Pictures are worth 1000 words - my earlier text post didn't elicit any
responses... maybe one of you can ID this board (or more particularly, the
type of system) from the pictures. Two pics available; large and small.
The
connector shows the single "pin" on this side, and multiple separate pins on
the reverse.
http://www.comcen.com.au/~weird/boardbig.jpg [250K]
http://www.comcen.com.au/~weird/boardsmall.jpg [95K]
Betcha can't!
A
On 1998-03-19 classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu said to lisard(a)zetnet.co.uk
:Question:
:Is Bill using a TRS-80 here? I think I see 64 cols per line
:formatting, hmmmmmmmmmm...........
or alternatively, he could have a block editor running under forth and
be posting from there... ;>
--
Communa (together) we remember... we'll see you falling
you know soft spoken changes nothing to sing within her...
> > But the calculator collectors have their own lists, don't they?
>
> True... I'm not thinking of spamming this list with pocket calculator
> questions or anything like that. I'd just not object to the odd thread on
> them, particularly if they were historically significant (the HP9100...),
> technically interesting, or whatever.
Speaking of which, there's an HP41C at a thrift store near me. Anyone
want it? Is it at all interesting?
(Sorry, Allison. I thought my last message was going to the list, and
not to you privately.)
--
Ben Coakley http://www.math.grin.edu/~coakley coakley(a)ac.grin.edu
Station Manager, KDIC 88.5 FM CBEL: Xavier OH
Wow, this is global. -Mtn Goats
I finally got around to archiving what ROMs I could find in my old
SideCar, and I have a few questions. I know the comp.sys.amiga.hardware
would probably be a better place to ask, but I'm going to ask here anyway.
:) [The SideCar, for those that don't know, is basically an XT clone that
attaches to the side of an Amiga 1000, whos display normally appears in a
window or on a separate 'screen' on the Amiga display.]
I didn't completely disassemble the SideCar, I only took the cover off and
poked around a little.
I got my SideCar 'third-hand' and never had the manual for it. I never
played with the dip switches or jumpers in it. Does anyone know what all
the dip switches are for? There's a bank of eight of them, and another of
four. Currently the 8 are: OFF, ON, ON, OFF, ON, OFF, OFF, ON. The set
of 4 are all OFF.
I checked through memory with DEBUG and located the BIOS code as well as
the stuff the Amiga sends to the PC side via the dual-port RAM. I don't
know how big the BIOS is supposed to be. It looks like it's in two
chunks, of about 4K and 8K. The first section of this code lies at F4000
and goes to about F4Cxx, followed by a bunch of FF's, then at F6000 is a
solid 8K chunk of code, including copyright messages from Commodore
Electronics Ltd. and Phoenix Software Associates Ltd.
Would all of this be in a 16K chunk in the EPROM at location U22 on the
motherboard? It's a 48-pin EPROM with a sticker on it that reads
"380619-02" and "Hydra BIOS 2.05".
Under the daughterboard and the hard drive (I replaced the floppy drive
with an ST-296N in 1991 or so) where I couldn't really see very well, were
at least two other 48-pin chips, at U39 and U40. The only number I could
see was "8621" on the one at position U40. I know that's not a lot of
information, but does anyone know what those are? I'm just interested in
how the SideCar performs its magic.
I looked into the RAM area from E0000-F3FFF which is the shared RAM, and I
was surprised to see some stuff in there from the Amiga side that I don't
think should have been there. After the PC.boot file stuff that was
loaded into the PC side by the Amiga at startup, there was the "info"
program from the Amiga shell. Executing something else on the Amiga side
cleared that area out, and executing "info" again (from ARP 1.3, not the
real AmigaDOS) put the info code back in there. Also, some
filenames from directories on the Amiga side showed up in there. What's
going on?
The SideCar controls the hard drive for the Amiga. Does the Amiga get
the data from the HD through this memory area?
I've never been able to get AREAD/AWRITE to function. They always GURU.
I got the files from a BridgeBoard distribution... do I need special ones
for the SideCar?
Now, the main reason I actually opened the SideCar up: I installed a
Seagate SL-02 SCSI controller when I installed the hard drive. It
conflicted with the floppy controller in the SideCar, and in order to have
floppies and hard drive running at the same time, I had to disable the
floppy controller on the SCSI card. I did this by putting masking tape
over each pin on the card in turn, booting up the Amiga and the PC side,
and recording the results. I eventually decided, from these results, to
tape over 7 of the pins on the SCSI controller card, and this has worked
perfectly since.
I don't know how the pins are numbered, but below is an ASCII graphic
representation. :) The 5th, 6th, 10th, 18th, 19th, 22nd, and 26th pins
are taped over, on the left hand side of the card, reading from front to
back.
xx x xx x x |
===============================|
|o
I hadn't recorded this anywhere, and I was a bit worried that the tape
would be drying out and falling off and making my SideCar go crazy, but
everything was OK. And now it's recorded somewhere. :)
Oh, one other thing. The first part of the boot message is as follows:
Commodore Hydra BIOS Rev. 2.05 - Test Release -
Copyright (C) 1985 by Commodore Electronics Ltd.
Copyright (C) 1984,1985 by Phoenix Software Associates Ltd.
All Rights Reserved.
The serial number is under 1000. I'm wondering how common the A1060
SideCar is, and if anyone has one that doesn't boot up with the "Test
Release" message.
The motherboard says:
FAB 380517-01 Rev.4
ASSY NO. 380604-01 Rev.7
?1986 COMMODORE
SIDECAR MAINBOARD
Are there earlier or later revisions out there?
Doug Spence
ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
;-) Clearing the snow from my glasses, I saw Doug Yowza typed:
>On Sat, 21 Mar 1998, Roger Merchberger wrote:
>
>> The absolute definition of a computer as I remember
>> it goes thusly:
>>
>> "An instrument which can perform arithmatic and logical functions without
>> the aid of a human."
>
>That's too ambiguous to me. All computers require the aid of a human at
>some point. What's the diff if I pay Bill Gates to program mine or if I
>work the slides on my slide rule?
The difference is: there's no enter key on a slide rule.
You can enter a program into a computer, and once it begins executing it
may not require human interference until it has completed. If said program
includes both arithmatic and logical functions between the pressing of the
enter key and the output, it would fit the definition of a computer.
>As for me, whenever I see little chicklet keys on a calculator, that's
>enough for me to say it's not a computer :-)
Ah, then you have an anti-Tandy bent, eh? For the chicklet keys on my
CoCo1's preclude it from your definition??? ;-) (And, to continue along
this nasty bend in the road, the membrane-only keyboards of the Timex
Sinclair 1000 and Tandy's MC-10 make them akin to a microwave oven? ;-)
I guess I see a lot more computers than you do!
Just my $0.02USD ($0.026CDN),
"Merch"
--
Roger Merchberger | If at first you don't succeed,
Owner, MerchWare | nuclear warhead disarmament should
zmerch(a)northernway.net | *not* be your first career choice.
Ahhh, finally I had a day that was free enough of other obligations that I
could sit down and tinker with some of my old toys.
The machines I played with today: Amiga 1000 with SideCar, Tandy 1000EX,
Atari 800XL, Kaypro II and 2, TeleVideo TPC-I, 'A.M.A. LCD Portable' (286
luggable with LCD screen). I also had time to inspect a few pieces of
junk I don't know anything about, that had been collecting dust on
shelves.
Anyway, it's great to have time to relax and tinker and post. I'll put
specific comments and queries in appropriately titled messages.
Doug Spence
ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
At 01:21 3/21/98 -0600, Doug wrote:
>Has anybody ventured a definition of computer that allows us to weed out
>mere calculators? How about:
>
>* must be programmable
>* must be general purpose
>* must have alphanumeric input capabilites
>* must have alphanumeric display capabilites
You can even throw in "must have stored-program memory" and, bingo, an
HP9100 is a computer.
__________________________________________
Kip Crosby engine(a)chac.org
http://www.chac.org/index.html
Computer History Association of California
;-) Clearing the snow from my glasses, I saw Doug Yowza typed:
>On Sat, 21 Mar 1998, Roger Merchberger wrote:
>
>> The absolute definition of a computer as I remember
>> it goes thusly:
>>
>> "An instrument which can perform arithmatic and logical functions without
>> the aid of a human."
>
>That's too ambiguous to me. All computers require the aid of a human at
>some point. What's the diff if I pay Bill Gates to program mine or if I
>work the slides on my slide rule?
The difference is: there's no enter key on a slide rule.
You can enter a program into a computer, and once it begins executing it
may not require human interference until it has completed. If said program
includes both arithmetic and logical functions between the pressing of the
enter key and the output, it would fit the definition of a computer.
>As for me, whenever I see little chicklet keys on a calculator, that's
>enough for me to say it's not a computer :-)
Ah, then you have an anti-Tandy bent, he? For the chicklet keys on my
CoCo1's preclude it from your definition??? ;-) (And, to continue along
this nasty bend in the road, the membrane-only keyboards of the Timex
Sinclair 1000 and Tandy's MC-10 make them akin to a microwave oven? ;-)
I guess I see a lot more computers than you do!
Just my $0.02USD ($0.026CDN),
"Merch"
--
Roger Merchberger | If at first you don't succeed,
Owner, MerchWare | nuclear warhead disarmament should
zmerch(a)northernway.net | *not* be your first career choice.
Dear friends,
I love computers indeed, but behind calculators are almost 400 years of
history, so there is a lot of very interesting material to learn and
research.
Regards,
James Redin
http://www.dotpoint.com/xnumber
The X-Number World of Calculators
----------
> From: Doug Yowza <yowza(a)yowza.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: Delay lines
> Date: Friday, March 20, 1998 11:21 PM
>
> On Fri, 20 Mar 1998, Kip Crosby wrote:
>
> > >> But the calculator collectors have their own lists, don't they?
> > >
> > >True... I'd just not object to the odd thread on [calculators]
> > >particularly if they were historically significant (the HP9100...),
> > >technically interesting, or whatever.
> >
> > Hear, hear! Especially since many so-called calculators were built by
> > manufacturers not, for whatever reason, prepared to admit they were
> > building computers -- with IBM and HP springing to mind at once.
>
> I know people collect calculators, but I just can't imagine how it can
> bring the same kind of satisfaction as computer collecting. You can't
> really hack a calculator. They don't lend themselves very well to
> restoration efforts. They can't do many tricks. And few of them have
any
> sort of personality (OK, I'll admit that HP tries pretty hard in this
> area).
>
> Has anybody ventured a definition of computer that allows us to weed out
> mere calculators? How about:
>
> * must be programmable
> * must be general purpose
> * must have alphanumeric input capabilites
> * must have alphanumeric display capabilites
>
> Unfortunately, this would mean that an Altair isn't a computer until you
> add a terminal, but it keeps those pesky HP-65's out of the group.
>
> -- Doug
>
;-) Clearing the snow from my glasses, I saw Doug Yowza typed:
>I know people collect calculators, but I just can't imagine how it can
>bring the same kind of satisfaction as computer collecting. You can't
>really hack a calculator. They don't lend themselves very well to
>restoration efforts. They can't do many tricks. And few of them have any
>sort of personality (OK, I'll admit that HP tries pretty hard in this
>area).
Uh, and what about that "grey area" of programmable calcs? Not only do they
have personality...
1) my trusty Casio programmable calc of 12 years ago that started me thru
college, may it R.I.P. is wholly program code compatible with my new(er)
9700 (icon-based screen, 32K RAM)...
2) The TI-59 had not only magnetic card storage, but also a ROM-card
library, (at least) one of which was a ROM of games... including an
interesting football simulation.
but in most (if not all) definitions of a computer, they fit.
>Has anybody ventured a definition of computer that allows us to weed out
>mere calculators? How about:
Why? As you seem to be less interested in calcs, it seems many on this list
may be as interested, and if they do fit the definition of a computer, why
can't they be included? The absolute definition of a computer as I remember
it goes thusly:
"An instrument which can perform arithmatic and logical functions without
the aid of a human."
Which to me would:
exclude sliderules (tho the thread on here I found *very* interesting and
enjoyed),
include mechanical / analog computers,
(to me) exclude basic / 4-function calcs (some folks think carrying &
single-memory storage encompass logical functions... I disagree)
include programmable calcs... (heavens, my Casio calc has more memory than
my Tandy 200... Goodness!)
Granted, these points are primarily moot, for the definition of a computer
as to be used on this list would need to be defined by Mr. Bill Whitson,
the (still) owner of this list.
>* must be programmable
>* must be general purpose
>* must have alphanumeric input capabilites
>* must have alphanumeric display capabilites
My New Casio fits all these descriptions (but is not 10 years old), my old
Casio fits all and is old too, and (with a slight stretch for input) so
does my TI-59.
>Unfortunately, this would mean that an Altair isn't a computer until you
>add a terminal, but it keeps those pesky HP-65's out of the group.
By your definition, adding a terminal to an altair would not turn it into a
computer... for the computer is only performing I/O on an RS-232. The
terminal is doing the displaying. To fit your definition, you would need to
add a dedicated keyboard & video board to said Altair...
So, you've successfully excluded Altairs, but included Casio calculators...
Or is this just an HP vendetta???? :-)
Just my (awkward) views...
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--
Roger Merchberger | If at first you don't succeed,
Owner, MerchWare | nuclear warhead disarmament should
zmerch(a)northernway.net | *not* be your first career choice.
Because they are sufficiently off the path of my interests I may trade
both of them off. They look pretty neat but, I have no spares and
they can serve as spares for the rest of my systems. That and I'm not
really into collecting PCs.
Allison
<Exactly. In the particular case of the Friden it was called a supersonic
<delay line, although I've never been sure why.
acoustic delay lines, they propagate bits translated to mechanical
impulses at the speed of sound in a solid. The resulting delay is
long enough to use ans a shift register to store bits.
Allison
> Videotext never really caught on in the US except on cable TV as a
> non-interactive display. I believe there are still a few videotext services
> piggybacking on satellite channels. They transmit on one of the unused scan
> lines at the top of the picture, similar to closed captioning for the deaf.
>
> To my knowledge the only truly successful videotext implementation
> was the french minitel telephone directory.
data piggy-backed on TV signals, using several lines in the blanking interval,
is called viewdata.
data presented in the same screen format as viewdata, but interactively, over a
phone line, is called videotext.
Collectively, videotex = videotext + viewdata.
The original standards were for 25 lines of 40 columns, in 8 colours.
Characters can have attributes like "flashing" or "hidden" (for quizzes), and
there are rudimentary graphics using a 2x6 mosaic pattern in each character
cell.
There are several not-quite-compatible viewdata standards, some of which offer
much higher resolution and colour range (the German Bilschirmtext system BTX
does this). AFAIK, all the videotext systesm, at least in Europe, are the
same, and the BBC and UK independent TV companies all use it for news,
programme listings, etc, as do a lot of the european satellite TV channels.
UK's PRESTEL, Germany's BTX, France's Minitel, all use slightly different
forms. Lots of UK travel agents use a private PRESTEL-compatible system, and at
least a couple of banks and building societies here use the same standard for
home banking. A few UK bulletin boards used to use the same format, and I
think one or two still do, for nostalgic reasons. You can get two or three
host systems to run on machines like BBC Micros. There's a web page somewhere
devoted to this old stuff, but I can't remember the URL (if anyone really wants
it, I'll look). There are BTX and Minitel emulators for X-windows, and I have
a PRESTEL terminal emulator package for X-windows (works well but still needs a
bit of tidying up) which AFAIK is the only free PRESTEL-compatible one for unix
systems.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
<Now I'm going to consider voltage wrt the machine ground i.e. the bottom
<of the transformer winding, not the tap.
Also on NS* there is an option to not make the metal chassis DC grond to
the logic. So ground must be the backplane ground.
I suspect Tony has a possible solution, miswiring of the secondary.
<I don't know where you are in the UK (can I conclude from your machine
<name that you are near Peterborough?), but if you think I can be of any
<help, please e-mail me. I have some generic S100 docs (although nothing
<N* specific - if you get anything, I'd be interested in seeing it), and a
I have a full set of NS* docs but I happen to be on the wrong side of the
pond. The PS schematic is pretty trivial. Tony had the design of the
+/- 16v correct.
If you open the power supply up to see the transformer leads 2,3 and 6 are
conneted to ground and common. For the +/-16 leads 5 and 7 go to the
bridge rectifier. For the +8 leads 1 and 4 go to the really big diodes
mounted on the L-shaped bracket.
The 8900uf cap should have -16 to -22v across it and the 11000uf cap +16
to 22v. The largest 180,000uf cap should have +8-10v.
Allison
I remember hearing a trick about soaking a printer ribbon with WD-40 to revive
it. YMMV of course.
david
In a message dated 98-03-20 20:03:00 EST, you write:
<< I recently picked up a time/date stamper from the trash. It is a
box with a slot, and when a paper is inserted, the paper is stamped.
The first year on the stamping drum is 1951, so I assume that's when
it was made. It uses a cloth ribbon for ink. How do I reink it? Also,
the stamping has impressed the numbers into the rubber platen. How
do I get rid of that? >>
Dear friends,
I'm recollecting information for an article I will write about the
transition of electro-mechanical calculators to electronic calculators
during the 60's.
I've found that the ANITA from Sumlock Comptometer of England (1963) is
usually regarded as the first electronic calculator [1]. However, recently
I found an article about Heinz Nixdorf of Germany in the LEXICON's History
of Computing (CD-ROM) which indicates that he built several models of
electronic calculators back in 1954 (Models ES12 and ES24).
I haven't been able to obtain more information on these calculators. I
suppose this is because Nixdorf moved soon onto the computers technology
(eventually joining with Siemens).
As a reference, I posted a copy of the Nixdorf article in my web site at
the following address:
http://www.dotpoint.com/xnumber/chistory.htm
Information about the Anita can be found at:
http://www.dotpoint.com/xnumber
SECTION: VINTAGE CALCULATORS --> ELECTRONIC --> ALBUM --> Anita
Any information on this subject will be appreciated.
Regards,
James Redin
-----------------------
[1] Bruce Flamm, "The World's First Electronic Calculator - Who Made It?"
The International Calculator Collector - Fall 1996, Issue #14.
I recently picked up a time/date stamper from the trash. It is a
box with a slot, and when a paper is inserted, the paper is stamped.
The first year on the stamping drum is 1951, so I assume that's when
it was made. It uses a cloth ribbon for ink. How do I reink it? Also,
the stamping has impressed the numbers into the rubber platen. How
do I get rid of that?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<the trackstar was made years ago in the late 1980s. in fact, radio shack
<to have it in the catalog for sale! you might want to check out ebay.com
<they did have some of these cards for ~$20 about two months ago. it's a f
<length isa card that you plug a standard disk ][ into. dont know about vi
<though. supposedly they were quite compatible and one could run just abou
<anything on that card.
I have one of these. A Diamond Trackstar 128k, has two 65c02s and 128k of
ram. It can use the standard 360k drives and the apple ones as well.
What I don't have for it is the software. Looks really neat and useful.
I don't know if it would work in anything later than an XTclass machine
and without software it's hard to determine that.
Allison
<Now that's where an IMSAI front panel really paid off. You put
<in the card, stored an FF in the first location, the panel
<display show EF instead...bingo, the RAM on D4 is bad (or more
<likely a bent pin or upside down in socket).
Or run NSdos and use the ramtest program. Another solution is load a
monitor into known memory and fill ram with 00 or ffh to detect stuck
bits.
Allison
"Daniel A. Seagraves" <DSEAGRAV(a)toad.xkl.com> wrote:
>BTW, That's *NOT* a mail bomb. He asked for it. I've been ^Qing thru all
>that crap all morning, and I'm sick of it. He wasted a lot of my time, so
>I'll waste a few of his. Besides, it's only about... *clicky click* 39 meg.
Daniel, mail bombs, real or implied, are a childish act. They accomplish
nothing except annoyance and can cause loss of other important mail by
any user on the involved systems. It's as effective as insulting your
computer when your program has a bug.
I thought the public posting of private messages was quite egregious, too,
but Daniel didn't do that.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
<From: Simon Coombs <simon(a)nenevr.demon.co.uk>
<Subject: Northstar S100 compatability
<Does anyone have any idea what sort of RAM cards the Horizon likes to
<play with? My system already has an (albeit flakey) RAM-16 card, and I
<have the remains of an old Godbout Econoram-II card, sans about half its
<chips. I have *no* idea whether this card was ever used with the N*.
Ram16 or ram17, any 8k/16k/64k static ram cards all work and may of the
dynmaic ram cards that have local (on card refresh). The NS* was pretty
clean so most memory bords worked well. The econoram-11 and the ram16
both work. The ram16 should be easy to fix it's static and uses 2kx8
parts.
<retired gracefully. I think that the PSU could do with some adjustment,
<too; if anyone in the UK has schematics for any of these bits, and would
Northstar* PSU requires adjustment???? The Horizon used three terminal
FIXED REGULATORS. Unless you mean 120v/240v wiring of the mains
transformer.
Allison
At 07:43 21/03/98 +1100, you wrote:
>When I talked to the designer of the Mattel videotext system, I was confused
>and mentiioned this piggybacking on TV signals in the blank area, and he was
>kinda amused that I would confuse videotext with TELEtext. Videotext had
>dedicated phone numbers your system would ring up. Teletext was piggybacked
>on TV signals.
Yes, they are two different services.
Here in Italy the Videotext service is called "VIDEOTEL" and works using the
Teletel/Prestel standard with speed 75/1200 baud.
The Teletext service broadcasted from RAI is called "TELEVIDEO":the signal
is inserted in the TV frames and can be seen with a decoder. The
informations are divided in pages (capacity abt. 990 per TV channel)
regarding many topics: from weather forecasts to news, tv programs schedule,
and other info that can be recalled with the remote control.
Some broadcasters uses it as an economic "one way" data transmission
(Telesoftware). With a special pc-board connected directly with the TV
antenna, is possible to download
files transmitted as multiple pages (E.G. the price updates for the the
pharmacies).
Ciao
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
? Riccardo Romagnoli,collector of:CLASSIC COMPUTERS,TELETYPE UNITS,PHONE ?
? AND PHONECARDS I-47100 Forli'/Emilia-Romagna/Food Valley/ITALY ?
? Pager:DTMF PHONES=+39/16888(hear msg.and BEEP then 5130274*YOUR TEL.No.* ?
? where*=asterisk key | help visit http://www.tim.it/tldrin_eg/tlde03.html ?
? e-mail=chemif(a)mbox.queen.it ?
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
> Videotext never really caught on in the US except on cable TV as a
>non-interactive display. I believe there are still a few videotext
services
>piggybacking on satellite channels. They transmit on one of the unused
scan
>lines at the top of the picture, similar to closed captioning for the deaf.
When I talked to the designer of the Mattel videotext system, I was confused
and mentiioned this piggybacking on TV signals in the blank area, and he was
kinda amused that I would confuse videotext with TELEtext. Videotext had
dedicated phone numbers your system would ring up. Teletext was piggybacked
on TV signals. He called videotext a precursor to the internet (and also
stated that he doesn't use the 'net because you have to pay for things you
want, and it's not got much useful on it anyway - I wonder how long since
he's used it?!!)
Cheers
A
OK, I'm lucky enough to have prototypes of a videotext system using the
Mattel Aquarius computer. I have hardware, and more importantly software,
manuals, and some videotext specs. I've got the things the guys used to
design their hardware - that is, the low level detail. I also have some 25
year old printouts of videotext screens. Rather neat. Contact me if you
want copies, basically at cost - or I will dig out particular information
gratis.
Cheers
A
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Peacock <peacock(a)simconv.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, March 21, 1998 5:20 AM
Subject: Re: information
Turlough O'Brien wrote:
"videotext" but there is little to no information available on the
net about "Videotext" or in the libraries.I would greatly appreciate it if
you could send me some informatin on the subject.
(This is from memory and unreliable) There was a proposed standard
for North America called NAPLPS, for videotext presentation. I believe it
was sponsored by Philips. If someone has a complete collection of BYTE
magazines, I recall there was an issue devoted to videotext, circa 1981.
The one clever feature of NAPLPS was that the graphics were based on
floating point coordinates. Because screen sizes and resolutions would
vary, positioning and sizing graphics was a problem. NAPLPS used a
coordinate system where the width and height of the screen ranged from 0 to
1. For instance, to place a pixel in the center, you referenced coordinates
(0.5, 0.5).
Videotext never really caught on in the US except on cable TV as a
non-interactive display. I believe there are still a few videotext services
piggybacking on satellite channels. They transmit on one of the unused scan
lines at the top of the picture, similar to closed captioning for the deaf.
To my knowledge the only truly successful videotext implementation
was the french minitel telephone directory.
Hope this gives you a place to start.
Jack Peacock
This plea for PDP items was on the "Obsolete Computer Helpline" today
and form the traffic lately I'm sure someone could contact this person
to give him some pointers by direct email.
>Steve Hogan <SHogan7080(a)aol.com>
>Nottingham, UK - Friday, March 20, 1998 at 03:27:29
>
> HELP
>
> I am looking for a source of spares for Digital PDP 11 computers.
>
> In particular, and Disk Controller and Disk Formatter cards
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Blakeman
RB Custom Services / Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 / Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake(a)bbtel.com or rhblake(a)bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
* Parts/Service/Upgrades and more for MOST Computers*
--------------------------------------------------------------------
>Hmm; I'm glad to hear that the N* isn't *too* fussy about the
memory
>cards it plays with - it makes the job of finding spares a
whole lot easier!
>
>Regards repairs to the existing boards, I may well end up
admitting
>defeat in the short term - if it's a duff 4027 chip, I'm
stuffed -
>there's 32 of 'em to choose from!
>
Now that's where an IMSAI front panel really paid off. You put
in the card, stored an FF in the first location, the panel
display show EF instead...bingo, the RAM on D4 is bad (or more
likely a bent pin or upside down in socket).
Jack Peacock
>Well, the mains transformer is wired OK; it happily takes the
240V in and
>spits out something (?) like 8VAC, 16VAC and respectively. The
16VAC then
>goes through what I assume is a bridge rectifier, and out comes
approx.
>+32VDC and -32VDC. The snag *is* that it's meant to be
supplying 16, not
>32v! The 8v rail, fortunately, is fine.
Are you sure you measured from the right ground? I have never
seen a bridge rectifier that would take 16VAC going in, then
provide +/-32VDC coming out the DC side. Connect your ground
lead to pin 50 on the S-100 bus (the rightmost side, pins 50 and
100 are signal/power ground). You should see +8VDC (roughly) on
bus pin 1/51, +16VDC on pin 2 (or 52, I forget which, don't have
a schematic in front of me), and -16Vdc on pin 52 (or pin 2).
If you still show +/-32VDC, look at the transformer, something's
wrong there (you would have a 120V xfrmr instead of a 240V one).
Jack Peacock
The list is, more or less, on topic, and I've taken this oppertuinity to ask
a question: My Apple ][ has a Language card called a "Pocket Rocket". Now,
what does this do? Does it let me write in such languages as Pascal, C, or,
on my ][+, Integer BASIC? Also, is RAM expansion avaible to increase RAM to
128K (As I've heard that it could go to...)
Thanks,
Tim D. Hotze
<Out of interest, what would a N* want with 256K anyway? Presumably,
<whatever OS it is running is pretty hefty stuff!
It ran NSdos which was pretty lightweight. and didn't care much about
how much ram there was. It was possible to run multiuser NSdos.
CP/M was commonly ported to it and 2.2 could be banked if you weren't
faint of hear and CPM-3 was designed for banked operation. MPM was a
multiuser cpm that also could use banked ram while running multiple
users.
Mine has 128k in it at current, running CP/M-2 banked.
Allison
"Richard A. Cini" <rcini(a)email.msn.com>
> Here's my idea. Why can't we contact those vendors that are still in
>{corporate} existence and who at one time produced interesting and useful
>hardware or software (examples would be MicroSolutions, or CentralPoint),
>and try to purchase, for nominal $$$, the rights to produce and distribute
>these goods in small quantities.
Because as soon as they think there's a buck to be made, the price
will become prohibitive. :-)
There's some hope for classic computers from the Catweasel people.
In their FAQ, they admit knowledge of eight-inch drives, and would
be willing to add support for them and their disk formats if someone
loaned them a drive and some disks. The problem? They're in Germany.
Andrew De Quincey <adq(a)tardis.ed.ac.uk> recently posted some messages
to various Usenet classic groups regarding a project where he's
capturing the bit-level signals from a drive, and using a Java
program to decode it to higher levels of representation.
I've been improving my ANSI C tools for getting directories and
bursting disk image files for UCSD Pascal and RT-11. Right now
they work on logical-order disk images, but I want to improve them to
read physical-sector-order images, as well as Anadisk's extra
eight-byte sector-header format. Sadly, Anadisk doesn't work under
a WinNT command shell, I have to boot back to DOS.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
Uncle Roger <sinasohn(a)ricochet.net> wrote:
>Sorry for the on-topic post, but, I just wanted to let folks know that
>there is a guy (Ward(?) Shrake) who is archiving Vic-20 cartridges.
>This sort of serious, practical preservation is definitely to be commended.
What is he doing to address the question of copyright? Might not some
of these titles be owned by someone?
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
First, you should appeal to these thrift shops to use a pencil. Some
thrift shops I haunt will pencil in the price on the inside cover,
then to thwart repricers, pencil it in again on a different page.
I've never had any luck removing grease pencil and have ended up
smearing it. I suggest you look up the Library of Congress on the web
and email them for advice if they have nothing listed for book
preservation.
Marty Mintzell
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Cleaning up classic books
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 3/19/98 7:42 PM
Many of the old computer books I get from thrift stores have the price of
the book written in grease pencil on the inside cover of the book. I'd
like to remove this safely. Can someone point me to the right place to
find this sort of information? Thanks.
Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer,
Jackass
Coming Soon...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Mar19.194222.1767.33023; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 19:42:23 -0500
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id QAA11739; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:35:56 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id QAA17044 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Mar 1998
16:35:50 -0800
Received: from shell.wco.com (root(a)shell.wco.com [199.4.94.16])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
id QAA08101 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:35:49
-0800
Received: from shell (dastar@shell [199.4.94.16])
by shell.wco.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/WCO-18jul97) with SMTP id QAA28027
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:35:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980319163413.10428C-100000@shell>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:35:40 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Cleaning up classic books
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Classic Computer Discussion <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
X-Sender: dastar@shell
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
<One guy had list of stuff for sale or trades recently within last
<week or so and was asking for those 8228 chips.
<1 x AMD 8284A
<1 x Fujitsu 8284A
<3 x Nec 8284AD
8284 .NEQ 8228. The 8284/A is specific to 8088/v20 and 8228 is specific
to 8080.
<MC857P, dated '71 of 18th week.
uRTL or DTL (utilogic) , real slow and real old. Generally simple gates or
maybe a dual flipflop.
Allison
I am a student in Trinity college Dublin,Ireland.I have been assigned a project on "videotext" but there is little to no information available on the net about "Videotext" or in the libraries.I would greatly appreciate it if you could send me some informatin on the subject.
Yours sincerly
Turlough O'Brien.
turloughobrien(a)tinet.ie
I second Uncle Roger's comments. Ward is a great guy and is doing the
Vic-20 community a great service. I have also contributed to the archiving
and CD project. BTW, the URL is http://members.aol.com/wshrake/index.htm
Cliff Gregory
cgregory(a)lrbcg.com
-----Original Message-----
From: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
To: Cgregory <Cgregory>
Date: Friday, March 20, 1998 1:55 AM
Subject: Vic-20 heads-up
>
>Sorry for the on-topic post, but, I just wanted to let folks know that
>there is a guy (Ward(?) Shrake) who is archiving Vic-20 cartridges. He has
>a list posted on the web (and of course, I don't have URL here on the
>train) and is actually taking images of the cartridge ROM's for a CD-ROM
>(as well as scanning pictures of the labels and such.)
>
>If anyone is really interested, e-mail me and I'll dig up the URL where
>he's got a list of all the cartridges that were available. (If you have
>one that's not on the list, please let him know!)
>
>I'm proud to say that I did have one that wasn't on the list (Fun with
>Music, by Epyx) and am sending it, along with another (apparently
>incredibly rare) cart (Dot Gobbler) for him to take images of.
>
>This sort of serious, practical preservation is definitely to be commended.
>
>(I remember staying up late and playing one of the text adventures on a
>Vic-20 with a friend of mine. His first introduction to computers. I was
>happy to be able to offer him a new experience, since he had provided me
>with so many.)
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
>
>Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
>roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
>Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
>San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
>
>
Sorry for the on-topic post, but, I just wanted to let folks know that
there is a guy (Ward(?) Shrake) who is archiving Vic-20 cartridges. He has
a list posted on the web (and of course, I don't have URL here on the
train) and is actually taking images of the cartridge ROM's for a CD-ROM
(as well as scanning pictures of the labels and such.)
If anyone is really interested, e-mail me and I'll dig up the URL where
he's got a list of all the cartridges that were available. (If you have
one that's not on the list, please let him know!)
I'm proud to say that I did have one that wasn't on the list (Fun with
Music, by Epyx) and am sending it, along with another (apparently
incredibly rare) cart (Dot Gobbler) for him to take images of.
This sort of serious, practical preservation is definitely to be commended.
(I remember staying up late and playing one of the text adventures on a
Vic-20 with a friend of mine. His first introduction to computers. I was
happy to be able to offer him a new experience, since he had provided me
with so many.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
<Guys, everyone should have this book by Scott Mueller, "Upgrading and
<Repairing PCs". Tis' have good INFO on most PS/2, PS/1 and some late
<IBM boxens including the PC, XT and AT in all types, convertible,
<5155 portable.
I have that book and it's leaving me guessing on some of this.
<Not in this sense. Correctly stated, in IBM's words: for this 50
<series uses either MFM/RLL card that plugs into that MCA bus or the
<IDE MCA hd and pass thru card called IDE (MCA IDE) on Interposer
<Card.
It must be the mfm/rll as the card in the MCA bus is fairly busy and the
drive is sparse.
<BTW, got a spare working 1.44 FDD for that 50 series? All I have is
<this battle damaged naked 50Z board with CPU and rom with stand up
<floppy adaper. Or better yet, any luck finding a spare PS/2 with
<386 or better boxen?
I have no desire to get into MCA bus or for that fact PS/2 or machines of
that era. Older ISA I have but that's it other than the more current 386
and 486 box to run mail, linux and gcadd. I may trade off these ps/2s.
Allison
Turlough O'Brien wrote:
"videotext" but there is little to no information available on the net about "Videotext" or in the libraries.I would greatly appreciate it if you could send me some informatin on the subject.
(This is from memory and unreliable) There was a proposed standard for North America called NAPLPS, for videotext presentation. I believe it was sponsored by Philips. If someone has a complete collection of BYTE magazines, I recall there was an issue devoted to videotext, circa 1981. The one clever feature of NAPLPS was that the graphics were based on floating point coordinates. Because screen sizes and resolutions would vary, positioning and sizing graphics was a problem. NAPLPS used a coordinate system where the width and height of the screen ranged from 0 to 1. For instance, to place a pixel in the center, you referenced coordinates (0.5, 0.5).
Videotext never really caught on in the US except on cable TV as a non-interactive display. I believe there are still a few videotext services piggybacking on satellite channels. They transmit on one of the unused scan lines at the top of the picture, similar to closed captioning for the deaf.
To my knowledge the only truly successful videotext implementation was the french minitel telephone directory.
Hope this gives you a place to start.
Jack Peacock
Well all the last couple weeks have 50/50 as my sources stsrt to have less
and less computer items. But I did some of the following Mac IIfx, Mac
IIsi, Mac IIci (all for $15 each); all were loaded with software and worked
fine no kb's or mice with them just the boxes. A couple of servers one Dell
and the Compaq but not 10 years old yet for $10 each with no memory or hard
drives. A NeXt black laser printer for $15, NEC MultiSpeed EL with power
brick and manuals $20 at Goodwill. COMQuest PC for .80, IIc mono monitor
and stand .80, Apple IIc free no power supply with it. Atari newstyle 2600
.80,Mac 512k model M0001E will not power on .80, IBM 6156-003 Portable Disk
Drive unit,Pitney Bowes in AT style case with black 3.5 FD $10 not tested
yet, and todays finds have not been listed yet in the computer so I can't
tell you what all I got but my pickup was full. Yes I got 2 IBM 5494's
anyone know something about them ?? Thanks and keep computing John
Simon, how timely of you. I just acquired a NorthStar Horizon
yesterday which uses four 64KB memory boards (parity). Each board has
four 9 chip rows of 16KB dram. I haven't got the documentation for
this machine yet, the previous owner has it in storage with software
as well (he claims) and said he might have it for me by next week.
I'll let you know more details when I get the docs.
Marty Mintzell
marty(a)itgonline.com
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Northstar S100 compatability
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 3/19/98 3:50 PM
Hi there, guys. I've been lurking on this list for a good long while now,
and some of the recent talk of Northstar crates actually prompted me to
dig one out that I had aquired a good few years ago and promptly forgotten
about...!
Does anyone have any idea what sort of RAM cards the Horizon likes to
play with? My system already has an (albeit flakey) RAM-16 card, and I
have the remains of an old Godbout Econoram-II card, sans about half its
chips. I have *no* idea whether this card was ever used with the N*.
The machine is not in great condition, bless it; it seems to have been
robbed of a couple of voltage regulators at some point in the past, and
the full-height 5.25 drives are, I fear, past their best, and shall be
retired gracefully. I think that the PSU could do with some adjustment,
too; if anyone in the UK has schematics for any of these bits, and would
be willing to make copies in exchange for money or eternal gratitude,
please let me know!
Still, despite it's problems, I suppose I should at least be grateful
that I have at least found a manufacturer of hard-sectored diskettes! [1]
Thanks.
Simon.
--
Simon Coombs simon(a)nenevr.demon.co.uk
Don't stand on ceremony; just bow low. CP/M - The once and future O/S!
[1] Or, at least, they still were as of Jul 97.
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Mar19.155025.1767.32971; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 15:50:25 -0500
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id MAA05533; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:33:18 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id MAA21170 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Mar 1998
12:32:48 -0800
Received: from post.mail.demon.net (post-10.mail.demon.net [193.195.0.154])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with SMTP
id MAA12994 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:32:47
-0800
Received: from nenevr.demon.co.uk ([158.152.207.39]) by post.mail.demon.net
id aa1021057; 19 Mar 98 20:01 GMT
Received: (from simon@localhost) by nenevr.demon.co.uk (8.6.9/v3.2) id
TAA13790; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 19:45:08 GMT
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9803191910.A13753-0100000(a)nenevr.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 19:45:08 +0000
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Simon Coombs <simon(a)nenevr.demon.co.uk>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Northstar S100 compatability
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
I have 2 EAX6GPSC-499R cards and a FT-60 tape drive. I have just cleaned
up the tape drive (the interior tape mechanism is marked Archive model
#9050B) and have yet to try it as I need a tape.
I also have the software to run the board and drive and they appear to work.
Thanks for the info on the type of tape needed.
I have three sets fo jumpers
{kk(on), hh(off), ff(off), jj(off), q24(on), 45mb(on)}
{3(on), 4(on), 5(on), 6(on), 7(on), 8(on), 9(off), 10(on)}
{RR(off), IRQ 1thru3(3 on), DRQ 1thru3(1 on), DACK(?) 1thru3(1 on)}
Doug Rea
----------
From: Max Eskin[SMTP:maxeskin@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 1998 9:40 AM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: Arrrgh! Micro$h*t again...
>What's wrong with COBOL?
The OBOL part.
<Well, the mains transformer is wired OK; it happily takes the 240V in and
<spits out something (?) like 8VAC, 16VAC and respectively. The 16VAC then
<goes through what I assume is a bridge rectifier, and out comes approx.
<+32VDC and -32VDC. The snag *is* that it's meant to be supplying 16, not
<32v! The 8v rail, fortunately, is fine.
Fix that! That 32v is way to high and will snuff the regulators used
for +/-12v. I would expact something closer to 22v DC. Also the caps
used would be stressed if subjected to that for an extended time. It
sounds like the power is wired wrong.
<Methinks that the previous owner may have been a little naughty with the
<wiring; but I'm not confidant enough with electronics to play with it
<too much. This is one machine I don't want to risk blowing up! :)
Sounds that way. Get help from someone on your side of the pond if your
in over your head as that's a fine machine. With 64k of ram and software
it's still pretty useful. At least mine still earns it's keep.
Allison
Jeesh folks,
I'm really sorry about this. It may take some time for your local
DNS servers to update their cache. Until that time the Admin at my remote
ISP (the guys maintaining my DNS records), have set up a sendmail
virtusertable to forward mail from their local mail server (see
www.sendmail.org if this is greek to you). OK, so if any bounce messages
wound up on the mailing list it should stop now....
J. Maynard Gelinas
Folks,
I'm in an mx record tangle with my primary nameserver (which of
course, I don't admin). If you can get your nameserver to kill the TTL on
it's cache you'll get me, otherwise it's going to bounce until the TTL
ends. I've unsub'd from classiccmp to prevent any bounces (I assume there
were bounces <*cringe*>?). Will subscribe back once this is straightened
out....
J. Maynard Gelinas
On the list, Don was talking about the MicroSolutions MatchPoint card,
which, with its associated software, permitted reading and writing Apple
disks on a standard PC drive, and another hardware item I can 't remember at
this time.
Here's my idea. Why can't we contact those vendors that are still in
{corporate} existence and who at one time produced interesting and useful
hardware or software (examples would be MicroSolutions, or CentralPoint),
and try to purchase, for nominal $$$, the rights to produce and distribute
these goods in small quantities.
Although it would take some of the sport out of trying to locate a
MatchPoint card, for example, it would enable us to produce these tools for
ourselves, thus becoming self-sufficient in a way.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
============================================
At 02:55 PM 3/18/98 -0800, you wrote:
>> I encourage you to organize as you desire, by whatever
>> means you can agree on if you haven't already done so.
[...]
>Ok fine. Until I'm able to take over ClassicCmp completely, we can put a
>few issues to a vote. I thought we already decided a couple months back
[...]
>It's a mailing list for the discussion of classic computers. Topics center
>on collection, restoration, and operation. It is also an appropriate place
>for stories and reminiscences of classic computers. Lofty discussions
I actually stopped to notice how many e-mails I got yesterday. Over 300.
Here's what I'm going to do.
I'm going to ignore all the off-topic BS (including the off-topic stuff
about being off-topic and and the off-topic cat-fighting) and all the
suggested changes and alternates and so on.
I will continue reading whatever comes in from
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu> and will (occassionally) post messages (maybe
even including the occasional off-topic one) to
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu> as if none of this had ever happened.
Those that are unhappy are welcome to go off and start something new. Who
knows, somewhere down the road, I might subscribe to your
list/chatroom/website/whatever as well.
Those that want to keep on whining, are welcome to do so. I'll delete your
messages and somehow manage to go about my business without committing
suicide.
Those that want to talk about classic computers, great. I'll read your
messages (even the bloody cax ones! 8^) and might even have something to
contribute.
So, if you liked it the way it was (and don't let Bill fool you, he's been
doing a great job) just sit back, ignore it, and the nonsense will
eventually blow over.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
This is old news. The ATARI newsgroups have been full of this
for the last couple of weeks, so I'm sure most folks here know about
it. However, Hasbro recently came out with an announcement stating
that they are going to re-release old games such as Centipede just
like they rereleased an updated 'Frogger.'
A core ATARI constituancy still exists who would like Hasbro
to update the ST hardware line. With clone European makers _still_
manufacturing ST compatible machines, and Gateway 2000's purchase of
the Amiga line, one might think this could be a profitable move for
Hasbro. Looks like they don't see it that way howver.
What a shame. Both *BSD and Linux run on this hardware line
and I _really_ want a decent alternative to PC hardware available
which is also designed with <*cough*> games in mind (hey, I may be an
adult but I still like videogames!) Maybe a letter writing campaign
to Hasbro could help change their mind? Anyone else here fond of the
old ATARI computer line and share my enthusiasm?
J. Maynard Gelinas
Found on usenet - I assume that 40 years old makes them on topic ;-)
(Sorry about the delay, message bounced twice because I couldn't type the
address properly)
On Tue, 17 Mar 1998 15:38:39 -0500, in comp.misc "John H. Lindsay"
<lindsay-j(a)rmc.ca> wrote:
>I'm in the process of trying to retire, and I have a collection
>of computer manuals that go back to the I.B.M. 650 and 1620
>in the mid-late 1950's and run to, say, 10 years ago. This
>stuff is History, and it shouldn't be thrown out. It needs a
>good home - a computer archive, library, or museum,
>Canadian preferred, but if one doesn't materialize, I'll consider
>other possibilities.
>
>Ideas, suggestions or recommendations, anyone ?
>
>--
>John H. Lindsay lindsay-j(a)rmc.ca
>Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
>ROYAL MILITARY COLLEGE OF CANADA
>P O BOX 17000 STN FORCES
>KINGSTON ON K7K 7B4 CANADA
>
>Phone: (613) 541-6000--1--6419
>Fax: (613) 541-6584
I have a problem with an Atari 1030 modem. While I can receive
everything correct on the Atari modem I am not able to receive anything
transmitted from it to another computer correctly. All I get from the
Atari modem is binary garbage. Can anyone help me? BTW dose anyone have
any spare Atari cables remember they have 13 pins. On another note I've
noticed that flea markets are a pretty good place to find classic
computers.
Many of the old computer books I get from thrift stores have the price of
the book written in grease pencil on the inside cover of the book. I'd
like to remove this safely. Can someone point me to the right place to
find this sort of information? Thanks.
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer, Jackass
Coming Soon...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
I have to admit that I'm flame virgin, but it looks like fun so I'll
give it a shot.
I can't believe so many on the ClassicCmp List don't subscribe to
the digest! That was the first thing I did.(Change over to the digest)
I can't be sorting through 40-50 messages to find the work related one
that need to be answered right away. And frankly, collecting computers
is a hobby for me, one of many, and this is not the only digest I
subscribe to.(Even though it's the one that takes most of my mail reading
time.)
Yesterday's digest came in SIX parts. In the last year thats nearly the
record. Page after page of the same e-mail quoted again and agin.
BUT I'm not complaining, instead I suggest that MAYBE the
ClassicCmp List should default to digest when subscribing. I think
that a digest allows people the time to think out their responses.
Many of you are the CP/M-List, this is a good example. You may have
to wait 24 hours for a response, but usually it a very thoughtful one.
And I think its because (as I remember) CP/M-L defaulted to digest
and it just become a slower paced discussion.
Also with a digest there is no reason to quote someone in entirety
(You just read the other message). You do have to cut and paste, so
you're more selective.
It true than I'm sometimes 24 hours late on a computer for sale. But
then again everybody want to auction off their computers anymore.
Well that my humble opinion.
=========================================
Doug Coward dcoward(a)pressstart.com
Senior Software Engineer
Press Start Inc.
Sunnyvale,CA
Curator
Museum of Personal Computing Machinery
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/museum
=========================================
There's a person on the Obsolete Computer Helpline at
http://ncsc.dni.us/fun/user/tcc/cmuseum/helpline/helpline.htm
that writes the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Anybody looking for some IBM mainframe equipment?
Let me know what item you're looking for.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
mailto:mkoch@mw.mediaone.net is his email contact address. No name
other than "Mike" was posted. I thought that maybe someone in the list
might be interested....
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Blakeman
RB Custom Services / Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 / Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake(a)bbtel.com or rhblake(a)bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
* Parts/Service/Upgrades and more for MOST Computers*
--------------------------------------------------------------------
On 1998-03-18 classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu said to lisard(a)zetnet.co.uk
:> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 23:56:43 GMT
:> yep, they're quick disks. and they probably belong in the same
:>bucket as sinclair's microdrive and phi mag's floopy tape (anyone
:>else remember this one?) - nice tries that just couldn't keep up,
:>either in cost, capacity or genericity.
:Re: phi mag's floppy tape: Didn't this resemble that old
:TRS-80 hack the 'stringy floppy'? I used to have one of those when
:I was a kid (the TRS-80 Stringy Floppy before I could afford a real
:5 1/4" drive), and still remember it fondly. It was a pretty cool
:little unit.
ditto the sinclair microdrives, which were about the size of an old 50p
piece (oh, erm... about one and a half times a quarter?) and stored 100k
in a ql. they were 2 track, 1/16" tapes - does anyone know the magnetic
format in which they stored data? was one track datat and one track
clock, or...? they were *sooo* cute :> it's just a shame they were also
rather unreliable. most qls have disk drives and ours is soon to acquire
one.
--
Communa (together) we remember... we'll see you falling
you know soft spoken changes nothing to sing within her...
Marty wrote:
> very interested in learning about the history of the company
itself. I
> read everything I can find on early microcomputer companies
and find
> it fascinating reading.
Northstar got its start, I think in late 1976, with one of the
first affordable and reliable floppy disk systems for S-100s.
It used the then brand new 5.25" floppy disk Shugart had just
started making, matched to an S-100 controller board. Up to
that time all the floppy systems were based on 8" floppies,
which went for, oh, around $1000-$1500 for a drive (and weren't
very reliable either). The NS drive was very cheap in
comparison, I think around $500, but bets of all you just put it
in the box and it worked, very rare for S-100 machines in that
timeframe.
The drive was single density, single sided, hard sectored with
10 sectors of 256 bytes each, total around 90KB. Paltry
compared to the 243KB on an 8" drive, but infinitely better than
a Tarbell cassette interface. The drive came with a crude
operating system (CP/M didn't work right away because of
hardware problems with the boot ROM on the NS controller) and
Basic. Eventually Lifeboat got a version of CP/M working with
the drive.
After the floppy subsystem, NS came out with a unique S-100
floating point coprocessor board. This was actually a sort of
bit slice state machine that did BCD arithmetic. A very clever
design but somewhat difficult to use. It was fast for it's
time. The only software that used it (to my knowledge) was the
NS basic and I think one of the CBASIC or PASCAL compilers
(Sorcim?).
NS made enough from their floppy systems that they started
making whole machines, the Horizon and later the Advantage. As
with all the S-100 companies, PC's killed them off.
Jack Peacock
Well, pretty soon you're all going to get sick of
hearing from me, so this will be the last listop
stuff I post for a couple days.
I read back through a couple weeks of archive and
I'm still letting thst digest. For the time being,
I've decided not to make any decisions ;)
It seems a little common sense and courtesy would
go a long way in bringing this list back on track.
I'm not so sure that hard-core officiating would
make any difference. It would probably just spawn
arguments defending the honor and freedom of
listmembers (heads up aspiring list operators -
that's a lesson I learned the hard way).
Even when I was actively moderating this list, all
I looked at was whether or not subjects were about
classic computers or not. If it goes a little off
track, all right. If that continues for too long,
a polite message to the parties involved usually
retires the thread to private mail. If you think
about what you're going to post to the list for
a minute or two, you'll know whether or not it
will be well received. Spend that time.
This list is for recreation. You should be on it
because you think classic computers are fun. All
of you are people with a common recreational
interest - there's no reason to get nasty with
each other. If you don't like certain people or
topics, just delete them and focus on what you
like. If you can't find anything you like, maybe
this is not the list for you.
I'm getting off my soapbox now. Thanks to all who
have sent me their input. Keep it coming. I will
lecture you more next week ;)
--------------------------------------------------------
Bill Whitson bcw(a)u.washington.edu
Network Administrator (425) 352-5209
University of Washington - Bothell Help Desk: 2-5275
Allison, thanks for the reply. I am hoping to get full docs from the
previous owner (which should answer most technical questions) but am
very interested in learning about the history of the company itself. I
read everything I can find on early microcomputer companies and find
it fascinating reading.
Thanks again-
Marty Mintzell
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Re[2]: On Flames and Mailing lists, and a bit about
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 3/19/98 5:30 PM
< Vintage computer: I just became the custodian of a NorthStar Horizon
< sporting four (count 'em) massive 64KB ram boards. Giving breath to
< those memory boards is a four port serial board, a floppy controller
< driving a 5 1/4" full height floppy drive, and a ST-506 interface hard
< drive controller driving a hdd which I don't as yet have identified.
< Of course it is powered by a Z-80A workhorse. This baby also sports a
< lovely brushed aluminum front panel and I believe is one of the later
They are good workhorse s100 machines.
< production model Horizons as it has a red led on the front panel (the
< Horizons I've seen in the old Byte Magazines from the late 1970's
< don't have an led pictured).
They all did, only the proto didn't.
< Does anybody have any details on the history of NorthStar? I would
< appreciate any ideas on where I might reseach their history.
I built mine in early 1978 and it's celebrating it's 20th year! What do
you need to know. Northstar* is long gone. The hardware refuses to die.
Allison
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Mar19.173055.1767.32996; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 17:30:56 -0500
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id OAA01985; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 14:24:48 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id OAA42646 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Mar 1998
14:23:19 -0800
Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
id OAA03305 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 14:23:16
-0800
Received: from world.std.com by europe.std.com (8.7.6/BZS-8-1.0)
id RAA13386; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 17:23:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: by world.std.com (TheWorld/Spike-2.0)
id AA06520; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 17:23:14 -0500
Message-Id: <199803192223.AA06520(a)world.std.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 17:23:14 -0500
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: allisonp(a)world.std.com (Allison J Parent)
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: On Flames and Mailing lists, and a bit about
computer
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Hi,
Can one of the vaxheads help me with this one....
I have a 3100 who's monitor just died and I want to use a terminal emulator for it until I replace the monitor (should be here in a few days). I know that I have to change one of the dip switches inside but which??? And what's the pinout of the serial printer port (that *is* also the terminal output, right?) ???
I'd kill to get my hands on some original documentation/manuals for either my 3100's or 3200.
BTW, the 3100 in question is a 38.
Thanks,
Aaron
< Vintage computer: I just became the custodian of a NorthStar Horizon
< sporting four (count 'em) massive 64KB ram boards. Giving breath to
< those memory boards is a four port serial board, a floppy controller
< driving a 5 1/4" full height floppy drive, and a ST-506 interface hard
< drive controller driving a hdd which I don't as yet have identified.
< Of course it is powered by a Z-80A workhorse. This baby also sports a
< lovely brushed aluminum front panel and I believe is one of the later
They are good workhorse s100 machines.
< production model Horizons as it has a red led on the front panel (the
< Horizons I've seen in the old Byte Magazines from the late 1970's
< don't have an led pictured).
They all did, only the proto didn't.
< Does anybody have any details on the history of NorthStar? I would
< appreciate any ideas on where I might reseach their history.
I built mine in early 1978 and it's celebrating it's 20th year! What do
you need to know. Northstar* is long gone. The hardware refuses to die.
Allison
Let's all take a minute to digest a new daily affirmation/mantra:
Vintage computers....
Vintage computers....
Vintage computers....
Vintage computers....
Vintage computer: I just became the custodian of a NorthStar Horizon
sporting four (count 'em) massive 64KB ram boards. Giving breath to
those memory boards is a four port serial board, a floppy controller
driving a 5 1/4" full height floppy drive, and a ST-506 interface hard
drive controller driving a hdd which I don't as yet have identified.
Of course it is powered by a Z-80A workhorse. This baby also sports a
lovely brushed aluminum front panel and I believe is one of the later
production model Horizons as it has a red led on the front panel (the
Horizons I've seen in the old Byte Magazines from the late 1970's
don't have an led pictured).
Does anybody have any details on the history of NorthStar? I would
appreciate any ideas on where I might reseach their history.
Thanks-
Marty
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: On Flames and Mailing lists, and a bit about computers
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 3/19/98 3:19 PM
Here we go again......you'll never learn from past experience, will you?
enrico
Jack Peacock wrote:
>
> Enrico Tedeschi wrote:
> >I feel that ANY rule in ANY organization is wrong.
> >
> >In the case of mailing lists or newsgroups if messages are off
> topic than
> >either the senders are not answered OR the recipients who do
> not agree move
> >away from that list or newsgroup. There no need to police and
> policing: they
> >should be self adjusting. History has proved time and time
> again that
> >centralized and fascist societies do not last long and do come
> to and end
> >(often abruptedly).
>
> Good heavens, another libertarian anarchist. It's people like
> you who build computers in your garage instead of accepting that
> only billion dollar corporations have the resources to build
> computer products. Where would Bill Gates be today if he
> believed in ideals like that? Why, he'd be worth billions of
> dollars....hmm....wait a second, that didn't come out right.
> Jack Peacock
--
========================================================
Enrico Tedeschi, 54 Easthill Drive, Brighton BN41 2FD, UK
Tel/fax(+01273) 701650 (24 hours) and 0498 692465 (mobile)
please visit my website at: <http://www.brighton-uk.com>
========================================================
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Mar19.151936.1767.32963; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 15:19:36 -0500
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id MAA19677; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:06:26 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id MAA33526 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Mar 1998
12:06:08 -0800
Received: from andromeda.ndirect.co.uk (andromeda.ndirect.co.uk
[194.74.254.17])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
id MAA08134 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:06:06
-0800
Received: from ndirect.co.uk (th-pm01-62.ndirect.co.uk [195.7.225.126]) by
andromeda.ndirect.co.uk (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA07413 for
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 20:06:01 GMT
Message-Id: <35117ADB.AAF0B296(a)ndirect.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 20:06:58 +0000
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Enrico Tedeschi <e.tedeschi(a)ndirect.co.uk>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: On Flames and Mailing lists, and a bit about computers
References: <00e101bd5369$84f3bec0$14ac31cf(a)jack.simconv.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Enrico Tedeschi wrote:
>I feel that ANY rule in ANY organization is wrong.
>
>In the case of mailing lists or newsgroups if messages are off
topic than
>either the senders are not answered OR the recipients who do
not agree move
>away from that list or newsgroup. There no need to police and
policing: they
>should be self adjusting. History has proved time and time
again that
>centralized and fascist societies do not last long and do come
to and end
>(often abruptedly).
Good heavens, another libertarian anarchist. It's people like
you who build computers in your garage instead of accepting that
only billion dollar corporations have the resources to build
computer products. Where would Bill Gates be today if he
believed in ideals like that? Why, he'd be worth billions of
dollars....hmm....wait a second, that didn't come out right.
Jack Peacock
I'm surprised that it took so little time for this list to get to this
point. Another list I'm on took about two years for it to reach critical
mass before it exploded into three additional mailing lists, all covering
the same topic (with the result of many hurt feelings, a list that only
lasted about six months before it imploded, with the original list still
going strong).
As I said to Sam in some private mail I sent to him:
I'm not sure what can be done, but if the topic of a mailing list is
held too tightly, eventually it'll die (like one of the mailing list
I host now, although there are some other reasons for that as well)
as there is little or nothing new being added.
...
I don't want to seem overly pessimistic, and yes, perhaps the topics
have drifted off a bit too much, but actions like yours (and I'm not
trying to blame or pin anything on you, this is just my observations
from about 5 years of being on several mailing lists (almost all of
them high volume)) tend to do more harm over time than good, by
splitting the community up, causing confusion, ill feelings and
political overtones.
And yet it continues (and Sam, in your reply to the above you appear sane
and rational, yet your diatribes on the list show a completely different
side, and one that isn't very flattering).
Bill may "own" the current list, but that still doesn't prevent anyone
>from starting up a new list dedicated to the same topic, only time and
resources. And perhaps against my better judgment, I'm doing such a thing
(Lord help me), and so let it be. If Sam feels that he can run a list
better than Bill, or even I, then he is certainly free to start his own and
see who signs up. Much like I am doing now.
It's there. If no one subscribes and this list continues to flurish, so
be it. If, on the other hand, my list takes off and this one dies, so be
it. Currently, the only person subscribed is me. I'm not going to add
people, it's up to you.
To subscribe, send a message to classiccomp-request(a)lists.armigeron.com
with a subject line of 'subscribe' (you might want to put this on the first
line of the body as well). That's it. You'll then recieve a welcome
message describing the rules and regulations of the list, as well as the
unsubscribe rules. If you don't like the rules, we can talk, or you can
walk.
Simple, eh?
-spc (We shall see ... )
Joe Thiemann <jthiemann(a)castleton.com> wrote:
>A private news server is a Bad Thing for those of us sitting at
>work with a firewall inbetween ourselves and the net. I do not think I
>will have much success convincing the firewall admins to allow news
>traffic to go through.
You're behind a firewall that doesn't let you read news? Why do your
admins let you read mail - why, you could read a *virus* by accident! :-)
Russ Blakeman <rhblake(a)bbtel.com>
>Good idea in a way but my days back as a SysOp on my own private Fidonet BBS
>shows these closed areas/news servers to be VERY boring.
I've been on Compuserve since the early 80s, and I tend to like their
style of management. The forum managers tend to rule with a very light
hand, in the style of a good bartender. (Another factor I believe
helped raise the quality of patron was CIS's $/hour fees. :-)
Sam wrote:
>Ok fine. Until I'm able to take over ClassicCmp completely, we can put a
>few issues to a vote.
Huh? "Supporters of democracy deserve to get it, good and hard."
Please, Sam, it's within your ken to set up and administer a mailing
list, and you can even moderate it, which will probably take more
than an hour a day, and people will complain when you don't do it
fast enough. Sound like fun yet? Life being what it is, you'll
probably revert to the "sit back and let the flames die on their own"
approach to list management, which works pretty well, considering
the alternatives.
Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> After all, I've been talking about Weller soldering
>irons, HP LogicDarts (which are far too new to be called classics),
>ASR33's (which, although old, are not computers), etc.
I'm sorry. I had no idea that my questions about the ASR-33 would
be considered off-topic by anyone. My 70s computer experiences
were nearly defined by I/O through these beasts, and they were
certainly a popular interface for DEC and S-100 era computers,
so I thought they were supremely on-topic!
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
Hi there, guys. I've been lurking on this list for a good long while now,
and some of the recent talk of Northstar crates actually prompted me to
dig one out that I had aquired a good few years ago and promptly forgotten
about...!
Does anyone have any idea what sort of RAM cards the Horizon likes to
play with? My system already has an (albeit flakey) RAM-16 card, and I
have the remains of an old Godbout Econoram-II card, sans about half its
chips. I have *no* idea whether this card was ever used with the N*.
The machine is not in great condition, bless it; it seems to have been
robbed of a couple of voltage regulators at some point in the past, and
the full-height 5.25 drives are, I fear, past their best, and shall be
retired gracefully. I think that the PSU could do with some adjustment,
too; if anyone in the UK has schematics for any of these bits, and would
be willing to make copies in exchange for money or eternal gratitude,
please let me know!
Still, despite it's problems, I suppose I should at least be grateful
that I have at least found a manufacturer of hard-sectored diskettes! [1]
Thanks.
Simon.
--
Simon Coombs simon(a)nenevr.demon.co.uk
Don't stand on ceremony; just bow low. CP/M - The once and future O/S!
[1] Or, at least, they still were as of Jul 97.
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 10:41:49 -0700
> From: Jack Harper <jharper(a)bs2000.com>
> To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
> Subject: Symbolics 3650..
>
> Question - I very recently obtained a Symbolics 3650 lisp machine -- along
> with six large boxes of associated 'stuff'. With luck, I hope to get this
> beast back to life -- it apparently worked prior to being shipped to me (by
> truck) but I obviously expect some problems. Does anyone on the List have
> any experience or have any available spare parts or documentation -- or,
> most important, actual experience with Symbolics lisp machines???
I also have a big Symbolics and supposedly some documentation, but I
haven't opened any of the boxes so I don't know whats there. I don't
have any experience with these machines and don't expect to be able to
try mine any time soon, but other than that would be happy to share
experiences. I also have contacts in a shop that ran them fairly
recently, but they are a startup (of sorts) so don't have spare time to
hold our hands.
Corresponded with a fellow who has a complete listing of LISP 1.5, we
talked about how to get it into machine readable form so it could run on
a 7090 emulator. Definitely something I'd like to see happen. If you run
across any LISP on 7-track tape I can read it.
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 14:12:28 -0500 (EST)
> From: William Donzelli <william(a)ans.net>
> To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
> Subject: Toobs!
>
> I now have sitting on my desk six modules from an IBM 700 series
> mainframe, destined for the Mill at RCS/RI. Of course, six modules does
> not make a computer, but I think we should at least try them out, just to
> see how badly they perform.
If they are from a 704, 705 or 709 or ancillary equipment I may have
module diagrams. Look for a 4-digit number rubber stamped on the metal
on the tube side, also there may be a 6-digit part number. To get an
idea of what machine they might be from list the tube types. For
instance, the higher performance 704/709 modules used mostly 5965's in
the processor. Also look at the parts on the sides, logic modules have
resistors and lots of diodes and maybe a few inductors. Other modules
will have few or no diodes. One common module from card equipment has a
small double row of core memory in the middle near the connector.
Paul Pierce
http://www.teleport.com/~prp/collect/
If I send any of you messages, I would expect that they
will be held in confidentiality. I will certainly give
the list a chance to input before making any decisions.
If I wished to communicate to everyone, I would post to
the list.
--------------------------------------------------------
Bill Whitson bcw(a)u.washington.edu
Network Administrator (425) 352-5209
University of Washington - Bothell Help Desk: 2-5275
Yesterday I began talking to people about taking over list
functions. The response has been amazing and overwhelming.
Before making any decisions, I am going to go over the
list archives and attempt to read the list for a week or
two to get a feel for what's going on. If you have strong
feelings about how the list should be run, or by whom it
should be run, please e-mail me directly.
--------------------------------------------------------
Bill Whitson bcw(a)u.washington.edu
Network Administrator (425) 352-5209
University of Washington - Bothell Help Desk: 2-5275
:::cautiously leaving bomb shelter in order to post:::
back in the 1980s, i came across a book that also had a design for a robot dog
but i think this was a different book. it was built around a 8085A and 8155
support chips, totally wire wrapped and included schematics for building a
programmer to program the robot dog itself. i never did get around tuit, but
would have been fun to build. why didnt robots catch on as big as computers
did? i remember robots were the thing back in the 1980s like the web is now
but never really gained critical mass. there were a few models made, ( hero 1
and 2, rb5x, et al) but nothing really caught on.
::returning to bomb shelter, continuing to delete 97% of classiccmp messages
for the moment:::
In a message dated 98-03-18 21:28:38 EST, you write:
<< > >I have here a book from the Philips Technical Library called 'Practical
> >Robot Circuits' published in 1960. The first half of this book contains
> >the design for a robot 'dog' using essentially an analogue control
> system
> >(mostly amplifiers and comparators) to process the signals from various
> >sensors (photocells, microphones, thermistors, etc). The outputs of the
> What can this "dog" do? Does it have any kind of interesting
> abilities?
Not a lot. To keep it simple there's no 'learning by experience' (the
book does mention this in passing) or large memory stores (using only
valves and relays, that's not suprising). Looking quickly at the book I
can find :
1) Detecting/following a light source (turning its 'head' towards it,
moving towards it).
2) Detecting a sequence of 2 tones (its 'name') and coming towards the
sound source
3) Detecting that it's walked into something and backing off.
4) Detecting a hot object ('food'), turning its 'head' towards it,
licking it.
5) Using a sonar (accoustical radar) system to detect objects and avoid them
OK, trivial compared to what can be done with even a PIC microcontroller.
But I'd still like to make one one day....
>>
I just acquired a couple of Osborne 1's and one of the two of them has a
Drive C: in it. I got some docs with the boxes but nothing describing
this exciting little add-on. I've scoured the classic computer mailing
list archives and I've found a previous question (from may of last year)
on just this topic, unfortunately nobody really knew anything then. Any
help or pointers would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers and thanks,
Dan
ps -- I'm currently in dire need of a CRT for a TRS-80 Model 12.
At 04:12 AM 3/19/98 GMT, Bill Richman wrote:
>How many do you need? I've got about 15 that aren't doing anything
>important. I bought two of the SQ drives when they first came out,
>sank a bundle into the cartridges, and then they flaked out on me.
>One drive had some kind of head crash and started eating cartridges,
>and the other one just ceased to function. Frankly, I was not
>impressed. Perhaps their new products are better. Do you know of any
>way to re-format a SQ disk that has been bulk-erased? I had this
>bright idea several years ago that maybe just completely clearing the
>disks by bulk-erasing would be a good thing. I'm thinking now that I
>obliterated some factory tracks that the drive can't reproduce.
>Ideas?
To tell you the truth, I don't know the first thing about these drives. I just
got one for free a whilke ago and was really just wondering if the damn thing
worked or not.
I'll let you know what i find out tho...
Les
At 12:48 PM 3/17/98 -0600, you wrote:
>be asked again - What are the top ten hotspots for finding old
>equipment?
In no particular order:
Friends and Family (and the companies they work for)
Thrift shops
Garage Sales
Dumpsters
Surplus dealers
Internet (this list, especially)
hamfests/swapmeets/fleamarkets
classified ads
typewriter/office equipment repair businesses
Okay, that's only nine. Sorry.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Jack Harper <jharper(a)bs2000.com> wrote:
>Question - I very recently obtained a Symbolics 3650 lisp machine -- along
>with six large boxes of associated 'stuff'.
> Does anyone on the List have
>any experience or have any available spare parts or documentation -- or,
>most important, actual experience with Symbolics lisp machines???
I know of them from the computer graphics market. (I'd love to get
one, if you have two. :-) I think the 3D modeling / rendering
software was sold off to various other companies (Triple-I / Autologic)
and these days at least the concept of a Lisp-based modeler can
be found at www.nichimen.com .
The symbolics.com domain is still registered, and by reading between
the lines of some messages I found, I think it's owned by some
Symbolics enthusiasts or employees in Princeton Junction, NJ.
There is/was apparently a related newsgroup or mailing list. Go to
www.dejanews.com and search "info.slug" (with the quotes). I found
a message that said that Symbolics had laid off its last three
employees just this past January, and that the lawyers are
fighting over the assets.
Good start on your Lisp history page. I have one for UCSD Pascal.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
I've got a spare SQ 555 as well as about a dozen carts that I'd
be willing to let go... a trade for something nifty would be great!
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
Hi, folks,
Like most of the list subscribers, I'm a scrounge. To this end, I've
placed on my web page listings of electronics and computer-related surplus
stores and swap meets in Washington and (northern, Bay Area) California.
Oregon (Portland and Vicinity) will be added as soon as I can swing a
survey trip there.
Hoping these listings may be of use to at least a couple of you, the URL is:
http://www2.jps.net/~kyrrin
Or...
http://table.jps.net/~kyrrin
Enjoy...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net)
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."