<The PDP11 (at least every PDP11 that I've used) addresses memory by
<bytes. OK, a 16 bit word, like an instruction, does have to lie on at an
<even address, but the 16 bit address that a program generates (before
<translation by the MMU) addresses one of 64K _bytes_
True but, if the memory contained nothig but instructions and addresses
32KW is the limit. Only data or IO is addressed as bytes. This would
seem a trivial item it makes a difference in terms of the total number of
instructions in any given amount of ram. This is more important when
applied to machines with I&D space where the byte addressability can be
exploited for buffers and the like.
<The I/O page (certainly on Unibus PDP11's) is 4 K _words_ long. Without
<an MMU you have 28kW memory, 4kW I/O
Some versions and OS vaiations allowed a 2KW IO space. I've run RT-11
that way.
<Wit hthe MMU enabled you can have 64k Bytes (32 k Words) of memory mapped
<in. In fact you generally don't map the I/O page into user processes,
<since you don't want user processes accessing device registers.
True but then people ahve to understand that the MMU design seperates user
space from system space.
<Even if you have the MMU it's a lot simpler if your program fits into 32
<kW (or 28kW if you want access to the I/O space). Otherwise you have to
<do something like using a software interrupt to change the MMU to a
<different mode.
I tried to keep it simple.
<Unless page K1-11 of my PDP11/44 printset is wrong, the PDP11/44 has 22 b
<addressing. The PDP11/45 does, indeed, only have 18 bit, alas...
With the exception of the 11/70 I thought most of the unibus machines were
limited to 18bits, for some devices that can be a limit. My interaction
with U-bus machines is limited to the 11/70 and a 11/34 all my PDP11 time
is with Q-bus (11/03, falcon, 11/23, 11/23A, 11/23b, 11/73) which has
sufficient enough variation to track.
Allison
< Allison, this was private email, but I figure this may be
OOPs, though I did check the header as classiccmp...?
< like the 11/23 and 11/73 line should run this BSD variant as
< well... what I want to know is, did the kernel fit into 64K in
< one segment, or did they spread the kernel across segment
< bounderies? If so, how?
The kernel never fit in 64kb as the pdp11 is word addressed also the MMU
operates on 4kb pages. Also the top 4kbytes are IO space. So the idea of
the kernel fitting in 64k is not relevent. The real question was did it
fit in the 11/44 or 45 who only had 256k (18bit addresses) space. The
11/23 and later Qbus machines were Q22 (4mb address space). The larger
space means more available ram that can be used without resorting to
swapping (or at least less frequently).
Also PDP11s come in two other flavors, those with I&D space and those
without. The 11/23 and 11/34 are those without. The 44, 45, 70, 73,
83 and others have I&D which means that Instructions and Data spaces can
be seperate doubling the amount of memory available. Added to that is
user and system space (memory protection between processes). So it's
possible for a PDP11 to actaully address four distinct areas of memory
that are non-overlapping and all 64k in size. Practical considerations
limit it to less than that but it's nearly so and likely they would
overlap as well.
< I mean, I could see overlays (in the kernel... blech!), but I
< don't remember the 11 supporting long long jumps... and address
< value was 16 bits, period. Still, I was never great at 11
True of all segmented address machines. The larger 256k or 4mb space is
broken into pages of which up to 8 are mapped into the 16bit address
space. To do a long jump what is really done is the cpu remapped the
needed page into logical space and does a 16bit jump to that page.
The top 4 bits determine what page register is addressed and the contents
of that register is appended to the lower 12 bit to form the larger
address needed to manage a 4mb space.
It takes 8 MMU registers and uses the content of the reg plus the 16bit
address to form an address in physical space.
< assembly. Could someone here give a good detailed account of
< PDP-11 segment mapping support? Could my stack and register
< values be retained and follow while moving from segment to
< segment? And how the hell did you tell the memory manager you
< wanted to pop to another segment, anyway?
yes! A detailed discussion would wear out my fingers typing it.
Sufficient that it was able to address more than 64k and while different
than the 8088 or 286 in both cases the 16 bit address space was extended
by argumenting the basic addressing and not extending the basic register
set.
I'm currently building a system using the z80 cousin called the z280 that
can address 16mb of ram and the basic addressing is still 64k argumented
by a MMU.
Allison
> I seem to remember early Ethernet interface VAX quad cards
> being around 1.5Mbps... not sure if it was think ether, vampire
> tap stuff... This would have been before ethernet was turned
> into a 'standard.' One guy I know has one of these hanging
That is a DMC-11. It was an early networking card before Ethernet. It
was point to point, 4 wire coax, synchronous serial at something around
1.5Mbps. The DMC-11 had an onboard bit slice processor (might have been
a Signetics 8X305, not sure) to handle the packet assembly/disassembly.
BTW the KMC-11 was a generic DMC-11 that was user programmable, if you
wanted to roll your own protocols. I used a pair of DMC-11s in 1977 to
network two PDP-11/34s with an early version of DECnet. I don't recall
that DEC had any multi-drop type network interface at that time, except
maybe for X.25 PADs.
< Alright, so what we have is the last 4KW used up for stack
< space, register mapping, and IO mapping. I would guess the
and also boot proms. Default boot on PDP11 is 173000Q. The first
page is where all the vectors for the interrupts and traps are.
< MMU... do I have it right? Even on a machine with a full
< 22bits of address lines on the backplane, like an 11/73, the
< CPU still only has a 16bit address space. The faq doesn't make
< it terribly clear what happens if you want to open up any
< arbitrary window.
Think of the 4mb (q22) as linear physical space. At any time the CPU/MMU
can allocate contigious or scattered blocks of that space as logical
physical space. To do a "long jump" a local jump to a system space is
done, memory management code is run and then a jump to the now available
code (in logical space) is done. One of the background jobs would be to
swap out old segments that are unused to make room for current processes
and swap them back if the non current process should wake up.
The cpu is always in logical 16bit space but the windows (multiple)
can be moved around.
An ascii graphic would show the CPU 16bit space as several blocks
mapped to multiple blocks scattered in a larger space. The cpu
literally never leaves the range of a 16bit space but instead trade
out chunks of it for different ones out of an available pool. You never
actually jump put of logical space only shuffle what physical memory is
part of that space.
Allison
who bloody cares?! people, deal with your own problems; I dont want to hear
about them on the list. I have enough to deal with myself!
david, back to deleting stupid messages <again>
In a message dated 98-04-10 17:47:45 EDT, you write:
<< Without comment
enrico
Anonymous wrote:
>
> Are you a fucking idiot, Limey? Cut the damn crying on the mailing list or
you might just open a message one day and have your whole machine become
instantly erased...Not a threat, a promise.
--
========================================================
Enrico Tedeschi, 54 Easthill Drive, Brighton BN41 2FD, UK
Tel/fax(+01273) 701650 (24 hours) and 0498 692465 (mobile)
please visit my website at: <http://www.brighton-uk.com>
========================================================
On Apr 10, 21:13, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> Subject: gcc for VAX VMS
> This touches on yesterdays VS2000 discusion. Somehow I got lucky today and
> found a pointer to a VAX version of gcc at
> ftp://ftp.cco.caltech.edu/pub/rankin/ of course I'm still trying to find a
> VAX VMS version of tar and gzip so I can install it.
Take a look at
http://www.openvms.digital.com/openvms/freeware/cd.html
Near the bottom of the page you'll find the "Tools" section, which includes
zip, unzip, gzip, and vmstar. Unzip, gunzip, and vms tar are also on Digital's
ftp site. There's a pointer at
http://www.digital.com/info/vms-freeware.html
or ftp directly from ftp://ftp.digital.com/pub/VMS/vmstar-vax.exe
Now, can someone remind me of the URL for VMS hobby licensing so I can do
something about my MicroVAX?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
now, back to something on topic...
picked up an unenhanced //e system for $10. a bit dirty from no use and a
broken shift key, but powers up fine. came with 2 floppies, monchrome display
which needs the contrast control cleaned and the ever popular system saver.
this one has a hayes micromodem //e whereas the ][+ i got last week had a
micromodem II. besides the way they connect to the phone line, are there any
major differences? i presume both are still 300bps.
david
On Apr 11, 14:11, J. Maynard Gelinas wrote:
> Alright, so what we have is the last 4KW used up for stack
> space, register mapping, and IO mapping. I would guess the
> first 4KW were used up by the boot prom and monitor, which
> leaves about 12KW for an application jump table and
> initialization, the rest for memory mapped windows to the
> MMU... do I have it right?
I'm not sure how you did the arithmetic :-) 4KW (8KB) is used for the "I/O
Page" which *includes* the boot PROMs. Stack can be anywhere.
> QUOTE:
> 0 000 000 001 ddd ddd -- JMP JuMP
>
> Loads the destination address into the PC, thus effecting an
> unconditional jump.
> Why is the jump destination address only six bits long?
> Jeesh, I hope I'm not asking the obvious....
Because the DDD DDD specifies a register (1 of 8) and address mode (1 of 8) to
use. So, you'll often see something like JMP @#0173000, which is represented
in two words 000137,173000. In this example, the address mode is 3
(auto-increment deferred, deferred = indirect) and the register to use is R7,
which is the PC.
So it means "jump to the address given in the word the PC points to". In other
words, that's how you code an absolute jump. The reason for the auto-increment
is that that mode is the general way of getting immediate data, and in the
general case you do need to increment the PC after the read (think about MOV
R0, @#0173000, opcode 010037,173000 which stores R0 in 173000).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Yeah, but could such a thing be done on Linux/UNIX OS's? I'm guessing that
you would need a NT server... and I don't like NT servers. I actually had a
NT and Linux server running on the exact same machine, at different times.
NT was harder to handle, and had more crashes just when I needed it most,
with many requests. Also, I had to reboot it 8 times to get it set up with
my video card, but not other cards, altogether, it took 16 reboots, compared
to 1 with Linux. My NT 5.0 beta is showing some signs of hope, but I'll
need a lot more before trusting NT with a hobby list as important as this
one.
Just my 0.02
Tim D. Hotze
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard A. Cini <rcini(a)email.msn.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, April 11, 1998 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: Thoughts about a Classiccmp private newsgroup
>On Fri, 10 Apr 1998 09:49:03 -0700 (PDT), Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com>
wrote:
>
>On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Richard A. Cini wrote:
>
>> Anyway, as part of my Microsoft beta testing, I belong to a small
>group
>> of "elite" testers. Called ClubWin!, we have a private administrative
>> newsgroup that requires a login name and password. Having a ClassicCmp
>> newsgroup would provide a threaded conversation capability. We could also
>> hang an e-mail gateway off of the news server to provide e-mail messages
>for
>> those who can't or want to use a newsgroup.
>
>
>>>Give us more details, Richard.
>
> Well, since I wasn't the one who implemented the news server, I'm only
>guessing as to its implementation. You can probably hang a NNTP (news)
>server off of any Internet-accessible server. The news server has its own
IP
>address. Bill Whitson could create one off of the ClassicCmp server at
>UofWA, or anyone else here with a free IP address and the approval of the
>bosses. You could then also provide an e-mail gateway the news server so
>that those who want the newsgroup activity by e-mail can get it.
>
> Authentication is either anonymous or login required. Each of us is
>given a login name and password (like rcini and 12345678), which will be
>required to logon. From there, your newsreader takes over.
>
>Rich Cini/WUGNET
> <nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
> ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
> MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
>============================================
>
>
>
>
Hi Pete,
----------
> From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: gcc for VAX VMS
> Date: Saturday, April 11, 1998 8:33 AM
>
> does DECUS do in other countries? There must be lots of peopel like us
who
> keep old 11s and VAXen running.
probably they don't use VMS ... ;-))
but serious, i think they expanding this Hobbiist thing to other countries.
one day ....
cheers,
emanuel
Wait a second, ARE there private newsgroups on this topic? I thought
it was just an idea everyone proposed but never did...
>
>At 08:49 AM 4/10/98 -0400, you wrote:
>> Scanning today''s messages gave me an idea. I don't know if this
has
>>been discussed before, but I don't remember it being discussed.
>
>It has. It comes up every now and then on every mailing list. What
>usually happens is that those who want a newsgroup go off a create a
>newsgroup, and the ones who can't access or don't like newsgroups stick
to
>the e-mail list, and the real die-hards follow both, cross-posting
stuff
>all the time.
>
>> ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
> ^
>I am not a number, I am a free man!
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
O-
>
>Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
>roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen
know."
>Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
>San Francisco, California
http://www.sinasohn.com/
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
On Apr 11, 17:06, Hotze wrote:
> Subject: Re: Thoughts about a Classiccmp private newsgroup
> Yeah, but could such a thing be done on Linux/UNIX OS's? I'm guessing that
> you would need a NT server...
You can run the INN server under linux (or other UNIXes), and it supports
authorisation. I'd expect that the real problem is finding the extra space to
store the newsgroup files. At present, I don't think the list takes up much
file space, since the postings aren't archived (AFAIK).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Hi Pete,
----------
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: gcc for VAX VMS
> Date: Saturday, April 11, 1998 4:54 AM
>
> Now, can someone remind me of the URL for VMS hobby licensing so I can do
> something about my MicroVAX?
>
have a look at:
http://www.montagar.com/hobbyist/register.html
cheers,
emanuel
On Apr 11, 8:30, emanuel stiebler wrote:
> > From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
> > Now, can someone remind me of the URL for VMS hobby licensing so I can do
> > something about my MicroVAX?
>
> http://www.montagar.com/hobbyist/register.html
> P.S. You have to be a DECUS member for this, ....
Thanks! I also see that it only covers a few countries -- not including the
UK, where I am. I let my UK DECUS membership lapse, when they started charging
considerable (at least, from a student's point of view) amounts of money for
annual membership and vast amounts of money for software from the library.
It's not like in the States, where there's a no-charge Basic Membership. What
does DECUS do in other countries? There must be lots of peopel like us who
keep old 11s and VAXen running.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Hi Pete,
----------
> From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: gcc for VAX VMS
> Date: Saturday, April 11, 1998 4:54 AM
>
>
> Now, can someone remind me of the URL for VMS hobby licensing so I can do
> something about my MicroVAX?
please have a look at:
http://www.montagar.com/hobbyist/register.html
cheers,
emanuel
P.S. You have to be a DECUS member for this, ....
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998 09:49:03 -0700 (PDT), Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com> wrote:
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Richard A. Cini wrote:
> Anyway, as part of my Microsoft beta testing, I belong to a small
group
> of "elite" testers. Called ClubWin!, we have a private administrative
> newsgroup that requires a login name and password. Having a ClassicCmp
> newsgroup would provide a threaded conversation capability. We could also
> hang an e-mail gateway off of the news server to provide e-mail messages
for
> those who can't or want to use a newsgroup.
>>Give us more details, Richard.
Well, since I wasn't the one who implemented the news server, I'm only
guessing as to its implementation. You can probably hang a NNTP (news)
server off of any Internet-accessible server. The news server has its own IP
address. Bill Whitson could create one off of the ClassicCmp server at
UofWA, or anyone else here with a free IP address and the approval of the
bosses. You could then also provide an e-mail gateway the news server so
that those who want the newsgroup activity by e-mail can get it.
Authentication is either anonymous or login required. Each of us is
given a login name and password (like rcini and 12345678), which will be
required to logon. From there, your newsreader takes over.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
============================================
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998 09:43:19 -0700 (PDT), Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com> wrote:
>>Even if everyone could agree on this it would last for about 1 week and
>>then go back to status quo. I really don't mind the ads. They are not
>>excessive, they are reaching a good market where there is a win-win (the
>>seller gets some money and space back and the buyer gets first crack at
>>cool stuff), and they are more on topic than the drivel that has been
>>plaguing us for the last four weeks or so.
Whether or not it would go back would depend on our level of commitment.
I don't think that it is burdensome lately, because some are concentrating
on slinging mud, but it would be nice to have them all in one place.
Reference so to speak.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
============================================
I had looked in jameco's catalog before, and the prices seem rather high! $25
for a single mathco is outrageous. i remember they did/do sell system boards
that arent necessarily state of the art for 2-3 times a "normal" price. do
they still sell apple parts? mouser electronics (if still around) might have
parts cheaper.
In a message dated 98-04-11 06:13:39 EDT, you write:
<< >I realize that this may not quite reach the 10year mark, but not many
>people deal with even this old of hardware. (Is there a group out there
>for "obsolete" yet non-yet-classic hardware?)
10 years? Yes. The 80386 was designed in 1985, so the 387 couldn't be to
much later than that.
>I need to find somewhere to get many i387 chips. (I currently need about
>15 to 20 of them.) Anyone know the best place to start looking?
The EXACT place to look is Jameco, at http://www.jameco.com . In their
newest catalog, they list the 80387 (unter Integrated circuts and then under
Math Coprocessors), they have: (prices for the 10-99 range)
80387-33 $25.95
80387-40 $29.95
80387-16SX $34.95
"""""""""20"" $39.95
"""""""""25"" $44.95
I can give part #'s if you're interested.
Hope this helps,
Tim D. Hotze
>>
>I realize that this may not quite reach the 10year mark, but not many
>people deal with even this old of hardware. (Is there a group out there
>for "obsolete" yet non-yet-classic hardware?)
10 years? Yes. The 80386 was designed in 1985, so the 387 couldn't be to
much later than that.
>I need to find somewhere to get many i387 chips. (I currently need about
>15 to 20 of them.) Anyone know the best place to start looking?
The EXACT place to look is Jameco, at http://www.jameco.com . In their
newest catalog, they list the 80387 (unter Integrated circuts and then under
Math Coprocessors), they have: (prices for the 10-99 range)
80387-33 $25.95
80387-40 $29.95
80387-16SX $34.95
"""""""""20"" $39.95
"""""""""25"" $44.95
I can give part #'s if you're interested.
Hope this helps,
Tim D. Hotze
Without comment
enrico
Anonymous wrote:
>
> Are you a fucking idiot, Limey? Cut the damn crying on the mailing list or you might just open a message one day and have your whole machine become instantly erased...Not a threat, a promise.
--
========================================================
Enrico Tedeschi, 54 Easthill Drive, Brighton BN41 2FD, UK
Tel/fax(+01273) 701650 (24 hours) and 0498 692465 (mobile)
please visit my website at: <http://www.brighton-uk.com>
========================================================
At 08:18 PM 4/9/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>around and use the PC as a disk drive "server" for the C64, VIC20 and C128?
>>And that is only one thought.
>
>I believe that's already been done.
I know it's been done for 8-bit Atari's. (I've seen a 1200xl with built-in
hard-drive, using a pentium with big HD and CD as a peripheral...)
(Talk to Bob Wooley of the San Leandro Computer Club, San Leandro, CA.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
> They are not CPU upgradable, but you can add expansion
> memory out to 16MB, an 8 port async serial board (thats the big DB
> connector that doesn't go anywhere) and a sync serial port.
Sorry, the big DB that doesn't go anywhere is used to add another MFM
hard disk. It contains the control and data signals for the second drive.
I've not seen the 8-port option, but I believe it plugs in place of the
color graphics board.
> The SCSI port was only supported for the TKZ50 tape drive, an
> old 95MB DLT type drive, although I think there was a 3rd party SCSI
> disk driver from Trimarchi (now out of business).
Gerhard Moeller (I believe that's his name) has hacked over the SCSI driver
for the MicroVAX 3100 to bring it up on the 2000. I've used the driver under
VMS 7.1 to speak to a tape drive (this gives me a nice little package to take on
travel; a 2000 with an RD32 and a TZ30). Since it's a full-up SCSI port driver,
it can be used to support anything VMS knows how to talk to; disks, tapes,
etc. I've heard of one fellow who is using a 2000 to burn CDs.
I suggest looking around on dejanews for discussion of Moeller's driver.
> The VAXstation had a
> graphics display for a non-standard monitor.
All 2000s include a monochrome display built into the motherboard. It is also
possible to add on a color display. Rumor has it that it is not impossible
to use both displays simultaneously, but I've never tried it (my color
monitors have died over the years).
Roger Ivie
ivie(a)cc.usu.edu
Nephew has acquired a Telex 181-GP dot matrix printer. I've looked on the
net, and it looks like Telex is all but gone. Any idea where I might find
documentation on this unit? I'm assuming it emulates a 5152, like almost
every other DM made in the 80's.
Kind of ironic, as we had a huge Telex facility here in Tulsa for years.
--
David Wollmann |
dwollmann(a)ibmhelp.com | Support for legacy IBM products.
DST ibmhelp.com Technical Support | Data, document and file conversion for IBM
http://www.ibmhelp.com/ | legacy file and media formats.
I recently acquired a Morrow Designs Pivot Model 2522 - Special,
serial number 31-0001488. Both the model number and serial number are
hand written on the manufacturer plate on the rear of this pc. It has
dual 5 1/4 " floppy drives and 640k memory. The memory board is
labelled Morrow Zenith.This is an interesting portable having a rom
monitor for the built-in modem, what appears to be a built-in
calculator (haven't been able to get the calculator button to do
anything). Date can be changed in the monitor by pressing a button
also. Boots MS-DOS fine.
I read in Stan Veit's book that Zenith licensed this technology from
Morrow. Does anyone have any further info on this unit or better yet a
operation manual?
Thanks-
Marty Mintzell
Today I bought three portable PCs marked "Rabbit 286". They're about
the size of a large lunch box and have a keyboard that fastens against one
side. When you remove the keyboard it uncovers a gas plasma screen. There
are slots for two 3.5 drives on the right hand side and a door on the left
side. Opening the door exposes the back of several expansion card slots.
There's a label on the bottom that says "Chicony Electronics Co.", "Model
286G-A", "Gas Plasma Display" and "640H x 400W Dots". One almost works, one
is dead and the third one is somewhere in between. Does anyone know
anything about these? I'm wondering if it's possible to put a small 386 or
486 mother board in these.
Joe
That's exactly where I got it from. Now, I was just thinking that in 1973,
that would be a huge space, the size (or larger) than hard drives! So you
could transmit your entire hard drive in a second, barring server stuff and
hard drive speed. It sounded strange to me. ;-)
Ciao,
Tim D. Hotze
-----Original Message-----
From: James Willing <jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, April 11, 1998 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: You've got to be pulling my chain... (Ethernet)
>On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Tony Duell wrote:
>
>> >
>> > Sorry, but this seems crazy to me. Was Ethernet invented in 1973? Was
it
>> > 10MBps then?
>>
>> I somehow doubt it!
>
>>From the tagline of Bob Metcalfe's regular column in Infoworld...
> (this should explain all...)
>
>"Technology pundit Bob Metcalfe invented Ethernet in 1973 and founded 3Com
>in 1979, and today he specializes in the Internet..."
>
>...and just in case that does not work for you, I have a copy of the
>original joint specification document buried in the archives somewhere.
>B^}
>
>-jim
>---
>jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
>The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
>Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
>
<Dunno when the 8X305 came out. I've seen them, and got the data sheets,
<but never used one.
Well after the 2901! it's far more complex. It was preceded by the 8x300
and the 3x305 was somthing like 1979-81.
Allison
At 09:35 AM 4/10/98 -0700, you wrote:
>> As to whether prices on eBay represent what experienced, knowledgeable
>> collectors will pay, that's another story.
>
>Exactly my point. I'd rather base valuations on what experienced,
>knowledgeable collectors will pay. People who have a better idea of how
My point too. There's a big difference in "market value" and "collector
value". (Don't believe me, buy a "collectible" plate sometime, or coins
>from a TV shopping channel.) Market value is what the average idiot will
pay, at auction or elsewhere. Collector value is what an informed
collector will pay, based on rarity, significance, etc.
I've got books on disney, hot wheels/corgi/dinky/matchbox/etc., glassware,
collectible board games, and so on (used to be in the business, kinda) and
I am often amazed at what things sell for, at auction, at antique shows, in
stores, as well as at garage sales, flea markets, and so on. Heck, Hake's
is one of the biggest value setters in the US of pricing on Disney,
politicals, advertising, and so on stuff, but still, a lot of collectors
(me included) think their prices are inflated. Market value versus
collector value.
>> That's a tough call. Do you sell it to someone who will use it and
>> appreciate it for what you paid for it, or do you put it on eBay so you can
>> pay the property taxes? I haven't got an answer to that one yet.
>
>I do...sell it to me :)
Ah, but... Say I'm a newbie to the group (and don't take this
personally!), how do I know that if I sell you my //c LCD screen for $20, I
won't see it listed on eBay next week with a starting bid of $400?
And even though I know you wouldn't do that, I still not that easy. As an
example, I've got two SE/30 motherboards, brand new, in the Apple Service
boxes. I know some people here expressed interest in them, so I should
probably offer them here, cheaply. The problem is, they're actually part
of the Mac stuff allocated to my girlfriend's school. If I sold them on
eBay, I might get enough to buy a complete, working IIci system to put into
the classroom for the kids to use. What do I do?
And even if they weren't going to the school, I wasn't able to take my dad
and niece to Disneyland this year because I can't afford it. If I sold
them on eBay, that would pay for part of a cheap trip to Dland.
Like I said, tough call.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Here's an idea...
How about making Friday the "classifieds section" day? You know, like
the local newspaper. Although classifieds appear in newspspers daily, it
seems that one day has many more than the others.
This would reduce the daily FS/T traffic, but still enable people to
trade stuff. I see ClassicCmp as a great resource, not only for information
not available elsewhere, but also for physical equipment and software which
is obviously no longer made or supported by the manufacturer.
I also think that those on this list should give (and be given) first
crack at something that one of us has for sale. We all know eachother, have
dealth with eachother previously, and for the most part, know that "the
check is good."
Trading should continue, but maybe it should be aggregated and done on
one day. Maybe Monday's the right day...maybe Friday. I don't know.
Just my $0.02.
Happy Holidays to all.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
============================================
At 08:49 AM 4/10/98 -0400, you wrote:
> Scanning today''s messages gave me an idea. I don't know if this has
>been discussed before, but I don't remember it being discussed.
It has. It comes up every now and then on every mailing list. What
usually happens is that those who want a newsgroup go off a create a
newsgroup, and the ones who can't access or don't like newsgroups stick to
the e-mail list, and the real die-hards follow both, cross-posting stuff
all the time.
> ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
^
I am not a number, I am a free man!
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
> From: Tony Duell [mailto:ard@p850ug1.demon.co.uk]
>
> Actually, it's all discrete TTL chips (74S181 ALUs, 74161's for the
> program counter, etc). The KMC11 and DMR11 (a later version
That's right 'ls181, a crude bit slice ALU. I remember there was a way
to download microcode directly, the RSX driver supported it. None of
those cool 2900 series slices were around yet, maybe even the 8x305 was
still on the drawing board. I still have the AMD 2901 design book,
heavy going but it tells you everything you ever want to know about
building a CPU from scratch. I don't suppose anyone has some kind of
system built from 2901 bit slices? Roll your own microcoded instruction
sets?
Jack Peacock
Allison, this was private email, but I figure this may be
actually of interest to the group. There's nothing here
personal, or insulting anyway...
OK. So Allison says the HEX bus 11/44 ran a BSD variant with
networking. I would guess a Q-BUS CPU with memory management
like the 11/23 and 11/73 line should run this BSD variant as
well... what I want to know is, did the kernel fit into 64K in
one segment, or did they spread the kernel across segment
bounderies? If so, how?
I mean, I could see overlays (in the kernel... blech!), but I
don't remember the 11 supporting long long jumps... and address
value was 16 bits, period. Still, I was never great at 11
assembly. Could someone here give a good detailed account of
PDP-11 segment mapping support? Could my stack and register
values be retained and follow while moving from segment to
segment? And how the hell did you tell the memory manager you
wanted to pop to another segment, anyway?
The curious want to know....
--jmg
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 17:40:32 -0400
> From: allisonp(a)world.std.com (Allison J Parent)
> To: maynard(a)jmg.com
> Subject: Re: You've got to be pulling my chain... (Ethernet)
>
>
> < I find it tough to believe that a BSD kernel with networking
> < fit into the 64K memory segments of the PDP11... The copy of
> < Venix I ran on my 11/23 didn't support networking and the
> < kernel most _definately_ fit into only one segment.
>
> Venix didn't, but IP and friends was developed on PDP11s! It definately
> fit and was run on 11/44s and the like so it would fit on an 11/23. That's
> not to say there wasn't whole lto a swapping goin on.
>
> Allison
>
>
OK, This is mildly on topic. My monitor is an HP 1097C, making
it at least 10 years old. However, I am using it with a modern PC, so
that's where the 'on topic' issue gets a little iffy. I'm sure there
are plenty of people here who can answer this question. A pointer to
a FAQ would be most welcome.
These old monitors are Fixed frequency, unlike our modern
monitors which multisync. The 1097C supports only a 78.125 khz
Horizontal Scan Rate and a 72hz Vertical Refresh Rate. Now a couple
of years ago I foolishly bought one of those cards by Mirage
(www.mirage-mmc.com) which is supposed to be a 'fixed freq video
card'. Actually, it's an OEM Diamond card, basically an S3/968 video
processor with an IBM 52x RAMDAC - ala Diamond Stealth VRAM. The
fixed Freq hacks are basically a resistor (and a jumper selection) to
drive sync over green, and a homebrew PROM to skew the VESA
frequencies for several video and text modes.
It works, but Mirage hasn't been too helpful with getting a
variety of XFree86 modelines, even though they claim to support Linux
and XFree86. They give out _one_ modeline for 1280 x 1024, which they
swiped from the XFree86 distribution in 'Monitors.txt'. For Windows
and Dos, they give out a video driver which seems to work just fine.
It will even display 320x200 full screen (Quake works great in DOS!),
and boots to a functional 80x24 col text mode. How the hell do they
do this?
Here is how I'm calculating my video modes based in the
XFree86VideoModes HOWTO (found in every Redhat 5 distribution):
Dot Clock Per Second
Total Horizontal Pixels Per Line = --------------------------
Horizontal Scanning Rate
Since my refresh rate must be at 72hz to sync with the HP1097C:
Dot Clock
Refresh Rate = -------------------------------------------------
Horizontal Frame Length * Vertical Frame Length
So, it's really more constructive to think of this as how many
pixels _total_ do I need to display in order to get a 72 hz vertical
scan rate with any arbitrary dot clock? In this case I need
Dot Clock
Total Pixels Per Frame (HFLxVFL) = -------------
Refresh Rate
Since I know my Horizontal Pixels Per Line, I can use this to
determine the number of vertical lines which will support a 72 hz
refresh rate.... hmmm, this is where things get sticky. We'll start
with a DCL of 10Mhz...
10Mhz Dot Clock
128 Horizontal Pixels = -----------------------------
78125 hz Vertical Scan Rate
10 Mhz Dot Clock
138888 Total Pixels = ---------------------------
72 hz Refresh Rate
138888.88 Pixels
1085 Vertical Lines Per Frame = -----------------------
128 Horizontal Pixels
Sheesh! A (total) screen resolution of 128H x 1085V? What about
a 20 Mhz dot clock? Well, after graphing the results I quickly
observed this:
S |
T C |
o R R | 128H 256H 384H 512H 640H 1728H **
T E E | x x x x x x
A E S | 1085V 1085V 1085V 1085V 1085V 1085V
L N |
|
DCL ----+------+-------+-------+-------+------- [...] ----+-----
10 20 30 40 50 135
(** Perfect for a usful screen resolution of 1280x1024)
So, based on this, I cannot get small or talored screen
resolutions unless I am willing to accept wide borders and strange
resolutions. Yet my card works....It does _not_ display this
behavior... so I suspect my thinking is to blame. Will someone please
correct me?
Apologies if you consider this post off topic...
J. Maynard Gelinas
> From: allisonp(a)world.std.com [mailto:allisonp@world.std.com]
>
> 802.. eithernet was always 10mbit/s. The 1.5mhz stuff was
> arcnet. They
> are similar in that they are both bus topology using CSMA/CD
> arbitration.
>
Not quite. Arcnet was not a CSMA/CD but token passing, more in common
with Token Ring rather than Ethernet. Arcnet used a bus, but a token
was passed along to each node and that node sent a packet only when it
got the token. Whenever a new node came online the rest of the nodes
would reconfigure and start the token over again. Collisions only
occured when new nodes came on line the first time. IIRC it was
Datapoint that first came up with Arcnet for their multi-user terminals.
For a small number of static nodes the Arcnet throughput was actually
quite good. Whereas ethernet is probabilistic for access, token passing
is deterministic in that you are guaranteed a slice of bandwidth to
every node. At a minimum you always had roughly 1/n of available
bandwidth, where n was the number of nodes. Arcnet degraded in a linear
fashion as nodes were added, but Ethernet degradation can approach
geometric rates, as anyone knows when they see that collision light on
the UTP hub go on solid.
Also, Arcnet was 2.5Mbps. The original version used coax (not Ethernet
thinwire! I think it was RG-92?) into hubs, later versions went to
twisted pair. There was a 20Mbps follow-up from SMC (the primary chip
maker for Arcnet) but it never caught on.
Arcnet was a common networking standard for S-100 systems in the early
to mid 80s, using MP/M and CP/NET from Digital Research. I think it was
one of the first network transports supported by NetWare too.
Jack Peacock
Sam, you have to understand that if people don't feel comfortable
asking questions on this list, even if they are irrelevant, they
won't ask anything at all. You can't intimidate people if you want
them to deal with you.
In response to the original question: the isolinear chips are
supposed to be holographic memory, which is in the works, and will
allow terabytes of storage in several cubic centimeters, just like
on the Enterprise. The nanites have an advanced version of modern
nanomachinery. I would think that .5 micron hard drives are easier
in this case. As for the ancient storage, I think that was magnetic.
Interestingly enough, the classic trek had almost nothing in the way
of computers, though there were plenty of them out there in the '60s
>"REALLY".
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Hotze wrote:
>
>> Sorry, but this has been bugging me for quite some time. In Star
Trek, they
>> use "Isolinear" based memory circuts to store information in both the
short
>> and long term. So, from the looks of it, it's some kind of crystal,
and can
>> transmit it's data very quickly, and with no moving parts, so I'm
guessing
>> that it's similiar to today's RAM. Now, for the hard part: It can
hold
>> entire encyclopedia's in tiny amounts. In one episiode, they had
nanites,
>> little robot-bugs that could hold "gigabytes of information," and
were
>> microscopic. Furthermore, in some episodes, they find Chodak and
T'Kon
>> ruins, between 900,000 to 700,000 years old, with half or more of the
data
>> intact.
>> Was crystaline storage ever attempted like this? Is it possible?
>> Feasable?
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tim D. Hotze
>>
>>
>
>
>Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Don't blame me...I voted for Satan.
>
> Coming in September...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
> See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
> [Last web page update: 04/08/98]
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Not to beat a dead horse, but I believe Tim's question was relevant. I
read about optical storage using holography well over ten years ago
but am unaware of its present use or status. This may not strictly
qualify as classic computer subject matter but shouldn't we give a 12
year-old a break? Tim should be commended and encouraged for his
interest in computer science and preservation, not hen-pecked over the
fact that he related his question to a Star Trak episode.
Keep asking questions Tim and don't let anybody intimidate you into
silence.
Marty Mintzell
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Is this possible? (Storage) (Off-topic?)
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 4/10/98 2:09 PM
Star Trek is a television show.
Do you really think that this question is appropriate?
Two words... alt.startrek
van
>Sorry, but this has been bugging me for quite some time. In Star Trek, they
>use "Isolinear" based memory circuts to store information in both the short
>and long term. So, from the looks of it, it's some kind of crystal, and can
>transmit it's data very quickly, and with no moving parts, so I'm guessing
>that it's similiar to today's RAM. Now, for the hard part: It can hold
>entire encyclopedia's in tiny amounts. In one episiode, they had nanites,
>little robot-bugs that could hold "gigabytes of information," and were
>microscopic. Furthermore, in some episodes, they find Chodak and T'Kon
>ruins, between 900,000 to 700,000 years old, with half or more of the data
>intact.
> Was crystaline storage ever attempted like this? Is it possible?
>Feasable?
> Thanks,
>
>Tim D. Hotze
.........................................................................
@
/
/ Shift Lever
(D)/
\===================================== @ ================ Floor Plan ===
BNL |- - -Phase Shifter- - - -|--/ Get Wired!
- ------------]=[]@----------------------@ 415.276.4979
Trans- ] ]](A) Toll Free 1.888.208.6655 (B) ? (C) Rear Connection
mission ]]]]]]]]]]]]Driveshaft]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
] ]]
71 ------------] web superstation of the stars...
van burnham http://www.futuraworld.com
production manager
wired 520 third street fourth floor san francisco ca 94107 united states
.........................................................................
for immediate emergency wireless access send email to van-page(a)wired.com
van(a)wired.com van(a)futuraworld.com pingpong(a)spy.net vanburnham(a)aol.com
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Apr10.140909.1767.36428; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 14:09:15 -0400
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id LAA18051; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 11:03:44 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id LAA63546 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998
11:03:35 -0700
Received: from wired.com (get.wired.com [204.62.131.5])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
id LAA04060 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 11:03:34
-0700
Received: from [206.221.206.170] (wrs.wired.com [206.221.206.170])
by wired.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA15918
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 11:01:03 -0700
Message-Id: <v03110700b1540e831ecb(a)[206.221.206.170]>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 11:14:44 -0700
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Van Burnham <van(a)wired.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Is this possible? (Storage) (Off-topic?)
In-Reply-To: <001001bd64a0$934d3ee0$3167bcc1@hotze>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Sender: van(a)pophost.wired.com
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
At 01:07 AM 4/9/98 -0700, you wrote:
>I agree. Ebay is definitely NOT indicative of "actual market value". Its
>all based on scarcity, and scarcity varies from area to area around the
>country and the world. Someone thinking they got a great deal on a
>complete C64 system for $25 got ripped off since I can pick up something
>similar locally for less than $10.
Well, "actual market value" is exactly what eBay is -- the value of an
object (i.e., what it sells for) on the open market. Ya can't get much
more open than eBay, what with it's internationalism.
As to whether prices on eBay represent what experienced, knowledgeable
collectors will pay, that's another story.
And lastly, yes, values are determined in large part by scarcity. Here in
San Francisco, a postcard with a picture of the Golden Gate Bridge will
cost me 25 cents (or so). In New York, I'd probably have to pay a bit more
for one, and still more if I were in, say, Ayr, Scotland.
Here in the SF area, a lot of computers are readily available, and
affordable. This is a very technically aware locale, and a lot of the
people here were early-adopters of computer technology (unlike, say, parts
of Pennsylvania that are primarily Amish.) So they'll be cheaper here than
elsewhere. So people in PA can either pay higher prices there, buy over
the net (including eBay), or hop a plane to SF.
As a side note, it always makes me laugh when at antique shows when I see
some item for sale for $15 that I know can be bought at Disneyland, brand
new, for $3. But people pay those prices, because not everyone goes to
DLand every year.
>Ugh! Don't do that! Sell it to someone who would appreciate and
>actually use it (like me! :)
That's a tough call. Do you sell it to someone who will use it and
appreciate it for what you paid for it, or do you put it on eBay so you can
pay the property taxes? I haven't got an answer to that one yet.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Well, it really depends. After asking my self, I said "No." Then, after
contemplating it, and asking again, I have to say "Yes." First of all, it
deals with the preservation of data, something that collecters must be
knowledgable about, especially if they have origional/interesting software.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Friday, April 10, 1998 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: Is this possible? (Storage) (Off-topic?)
>
>This is a Star Trek question and has absolutely no place on this
>discussion.
>
>When posting a message to ClassicCmp, ask yourself this question: "Does
>this REALLY have ANYTHING to do with old computers?" After you answer it
>to yourself, ask it again, but this time put extra emphasis on the word
>"REALLY".
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Hotze wrote:
>
>> Sorry, but this has been bugging me for quite some time. In Star Trek,
they
>> use "Isolinear" based memory circuts to store information in both the
short
>> and long term. So, from the looks of it, it's some kind of crystal, and
can
>> transmit it's data very quickly, and with no moving parts, so I'm
guessing
>> that it's similiar to today's RAM. Now, for the hard part: It can hold
>> entire encyclopedia's in tiny amounts. In one episiode, they had
nanites,
>> little robot-bugs that could hold "gigabytes of information," and were
>> microscopic. Furthermore, in some episodes, they find Chodak and T'Kon
>> ruins, between 900,000 to 700,000 years old, with half or more of the
data
>> intact.
>> Was crystaline storage ever attempted like this? Is it possible?
>> Feasable?
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tim D. Hotze
>>
>>
>
>
>Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>Don't blame me...I voted for Satan.
>
> Coming in September...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
> See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
> [Last web page update: 04/08/98]
>
Amen, Sam. Enrico, please use discretion in these issues. Personal
issues should stay between individuals, not aired on the list. Tell us
about your classic computer collection. I'm eager to hear about it.
Marty Mintzell
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: TRS-80 Model 4 (128k) for sale
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 4/8/98 3:22 PM
A real gentle-man!
enrico
Sam Ismail wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Enrico Tedeschi wrote:
>
> > You are demontrating AGAIN that you don't care about other people feelings
and
> > problems. You are NOT in charge of policing this mailgroup. If you don't
want
> > to see this sort messages anymore help me to fix my problem.
>
> I'm not going to help you do shit. This is YOUR problem. This is NOT the
> problem of classiccmp! Therefore, DON'T POST YOUR PROBLEMS ON CLASSICCMP!
> I don't post how much of an ass I think you are, so don't post your
> personal crap either! And you'd better bet that when I do take over the
> list, I'll make sure YOU are on the list of moderated members since you
> have proven time and time again that you can't police yourself. So show
> some restraint and respect and KEEP YOUR GARBAGE IN PRIVATE E-MAIL PLEASE!
>
> Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't blame me...I voted for Satan.
>
> Coming Soon...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
> See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
--
========================================================
Enrico Tedeschi, 54 Easthill Drive, Brighton BN41 2FD, UK
Tel/fax(+01273) 701650 (24 hours) and 0498 692465 (mobile)
please visit my website at: <http://www.brighton-uk.com>
========================================================
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Apr08.152223.1767.36036; Wed, 08 Apr 1998 15:22:26 -0400
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id MAA28636; Wed, 8 Apr 1998 12:09:33 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id MAA24588 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Wed, 8 Apr 1998
12:09:23 -0700
Received: from andromeda.ndirect.co.uk (andromeda.ndirect.co.uk
[194.74.254.17])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
id MAA27472 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Wed, 8 Apr 1998 12:09:21
-0700
Received: from ndirect.co.uk (th-pm01-62.ndirect.co.uk [195.7.225.126]) by
andromeda.ndirect.co.uk (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA31705 for
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Wed, 8 Apr 1998 20:09:19 +0100
Message-Id: <352BD991.37692194(a)ndirect.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 20:10:01 +0000
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Enrico Tedeschi <e.tedeschi(a)ndirect.co.uk>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: TRS-80 Model 4 (128k) for sale
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980407113208.29252B-100000@shell>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
I am pretty sure that the TI itself works. I plugged in a commodore
5-pin monitor cable. The video pinouts differ, I guess, but the audio
worked. It beeped when I turned it on, and booped whenever I pressed
a key. I checked the modulator box cable, and it's fine. Also, the
box is getting power. Still, the little led on it does not light up,
and ISDN (It Still Does Nothing).
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>This is a Star Trek question and has absolutely no place on this
>discussion.
>
<snip>
>
>On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Hotze wrote:
<snip>
>> microscopic. Furthermore, in some episodes, they find Chodak and T'Kon
>> ruins, between 900,000 to 700,000 years old, with half or more of the
data
>> intact.
I think 700,000 years old qualifies as being over the ten year mark :-)
-- Kirk
I love the ads, anytime. I don't care how classic equipment is offered
up just as long as it is being made available. I don't have any
problem with commercialism either.
Marty
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Re.: How about a weekly FS/T list? (was Sale postings to
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 4/10/98 12:50 PM
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Richard A. Cini wrote:
> How about making Friday the "classifieds section" day? You know, like
> the local newspaper. Although classifieds appear in newspspers daily, it
> seems that one day has many more than the others.
>
> This would reduce the daily FS/T traffic, but still enable people to
> trade stuff. I see ClassicCmp as a great resource, not only for information
> not available elsewhere, but also for physical equipment and software which
> is obviously no longer made or supported by the manufacturer.
Even if everyone could agree on this it would last for about 1 week and
then go back to status quo. I really don't mind the ads. They are not
excessive, they are reaching a good market where there is a win-win (the
seller gets some money and space back and the buyer gets first crack at
cool stuff), and they are more on topic than the drivel that has been
plaguing us for the last four weeks or so.
Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't blame me...I voted for Satan.
Coming in September...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
[Last web page update: 04/08/98]
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Apr10.125015.1767.36399; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 12:50:16 -0400
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id JAA12125; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 09:43:37 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id JAA63678 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998
09:43:28 -0700
Received: from shell.wco.com (root(a)shell.wco.com [199.4.94.16])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
id JAA26839 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 09:43:26
-0700
Received: from shell (dastar@shell [199.4.94.16])
by shell.wco.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/WCO-18jul97) with SMTP id JAA14087
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 09:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980410094013.8124C-100000@shell>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 09:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Re.: How about a weekly FS/T list? (was Sale postings to
Classiccmp)
In-Reply-To: <005501bd6480$ddf42b40$6521a7cd@bothell>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
X-Sender: dastar@shell
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Scanning today''s messages gave me an idea. I don't know if this has
been discussed before, but I don't remember it being discussed.
It's sometimes hard to follow the list with all of the quoted-replies;
maybe tracking deep-threaded messages is just not my strong suit :-)
Anyway, as part of my Microsoft beta testing, I belong to a small group
of "elite" testers. Called ClubWin!, we have a private administrative
newsgroup that requires a login name and password. Having a ClassicCmp
newsgroup would provide a threaded conversation capability. We could also
hang an e-mail gateway off of the news server to provide e-mail messages for
those who can't or want to use a newsgroup.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
============================================
Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com> wrote:
>Very true. You euro-doods could make a killing on us stupid Americans if
>you started auctioning off easy to find Sinclairs, Orics and Thompsons on
>Ebay. The only obstacle to overcome would be shipping, but I'm sure a
>little creative direct advertising towards us could overcome that concern.
So what does it cost to send a standard shipping container from London
to San Francisco on a slow boat? With a container a month, you could
stock an esoteric used computer store, bi-directionally.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
Ten-plus years ago, I was given an opportunity to scrap a Burroughs
machine of some kind. I don't think it was still running, and it
was the size of a small refrigerator. I pulled the interesting
chips and disassembled the open-air hard disk unit. It was covered in
a clear sheet plastic frame, sealed with snaps or Velcro, and
the 14" platters spun in the air like a turntable. I still have
the two platters on the wall.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
In a message dated 98-04-10 02:14:22 EDT, you write:
<< At 06:29 PM 4/8/98 -0400, you wrote:
>> That might depend on whether you're selling or buying, Kai :-).
A *very* valid comment.
>> More seriously, has anyone here actually conducted a transaction
>> through Ebay? Did the highest bidder actually make payment in
>> a timely manner, if you were selling? >>
just had a friend of mine email me to tell me he saw a mac128 go for $330 on
ebay. idiots overbid themselves. ebay is a good indicator of old computer
prices? i think not!
On 1998-04-08 classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu said to lisard(a)zetnet.co.uk
:You might if you had been had by someone in this list. If the man
:is a con, I think I am doing a public service here trying to stop
:him to strike again with somebody else.
the email below was private. why did you post a public response? that is
a breach of netiquette - which makes you look every bit as clueless as
cord intimated.
we'll ring you to complain in future.
everyone else: apologies, but we felt we should point this out.
:enrico
:lisard@zetnet.co.uk wrote:
:> On 1998-04-07 classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu said to lisard@zetnet.
:>co.uk :Warning! You might get something different from what
:>you have :bidded for. I did.
:> keep your bitching private. nobody else gives a toss.
:> --
:> Communa (together) we remember... we'll see you
:>falling you know soft spoken changes nothing to sing
:within her...
:--
:========================================================
:Enrico Tedeschi, 54 Easthill Drive, Brighton BN41 2FD, UK
:Tel/fax(+01273) 701650 (24 hours) and 0498 692465 (mobile)
:please visit my website at: <http://www.brighton-uk.com>
:========================================================
--
Communa (together) we remember... we'll see you falling
you know soft spoken changes nothing to sing within her...
At 06:29 PM 4/8/98 -0400, you wrote:
>> That might depend on whether you're selling or buying, Kai :-).
A *very* valid comment.
>> More seriously, has anyone here actually conducted a transaction
>> through Ebay? Did the highest bidder actually make payment in
>> a timely manner, if you were selling?
I have both bought and sold (mostly bought, though) through eBay. Mostly
Classic Computers, Donald Duck stuff, and Miniature Land Rovers. Had one
problem once, when the guy ignored me for a while, then eventually claimed
to have previously sold the stuff I bid on. Never had a problem with a
payment.
Generally, stuff is well packaged, though one time, I bought a TI99/4A in
the original box, and it arrived -- in the original box, covered with duct
tape. I was heartbroken. I explained to the guy that I had been
interested in the box as much as the computer, and he offered to refund my
money. (I didn't take him up on the offer, just wanted to prevent it from
happening to someone else.)
For comparison, I once ordered a Donald Duck nutcracker (new) from the
Disney catalog. The 6"x6"x12" nutcracker box came in a 2'x1'x3' box, with
a few sheets of tissue paper, neatly folded on the bottom of the box. I
was *not* happy.
The feedback system on ebay seems to work pretty well, I think. I feel
pretty comfortable buying and selling there.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Ive had this posted in the past but these are really getting in my way:
*Tektronix 7612D programmable digitizer (scope w/o a screen) with two
7A16A plugins. No manuals or cables but it appears to be in terrific
shape otherwise. $150 plus shipping or will consider trades.
*Kontron KLA64 64 channel logic analyser - 2 complete units, cables,
manuals, covers, software, etc. They also have an optional unit
installed internally. Includes Axiom video printer. All items go as a
package - $325 plus shipping. Sorry no trades and will not separate.
Total weight about 160 lbs for everything.
Can email detailed info to those interested. I bought these in an
auction lot and the above pricing is what I have into them. I bought the
auction lot to primarily obtain a digital oscilloscope for my shop but
the above items are R&D oriented and realy have no use in my repair
shop. Both are still supported by repair, calibration and parts outfits
as well as the manufacturers. I have sources for the manual for the Tek
7612D and plugins as well so you don't need to be concerrned that you'll
not be able to work it without a manual. The manuals for the Kontrons is
very detailed and is from setup and use to parts and adjustment.
I'm trying to be as discrete as possible about posting these and I'm
sure some people are tired of seeing it come back up but there are new
people to the list that may not know of them and possibly be interested.
Please reply direct to me, not to the list.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Blakeman
RB Custom Services / Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake(a)bbtel.com or rhblake(a)bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
ICQ # 1714857
* Parts/Service/Upgrades and more for MOST Computers*
--------------------------------------------------------------------
< Cool. I have one of these (a uVAX2000) but the harddrive is going on i
<(I think something is loose inside and rattling around).
Maybe the power cord to the disk?
<> They can take RX33(1.2mb)
<> floppy and or any MFM drive like RD31(20mb st225), RD32(40mb st251),
<> RD52(quantum D540 31mb), RD53 (micropolus1325 71mb) or RD54(maxtor 2990
<> 159mb).
<
< I have seveal MFM drives here, but what are the Seagate equivilents to
<RD line? I have an ST-4051, ST-251, ST-277r-1, ST-4038 and one unknown o
<(made by Mitsubishi, has at least 4 heads and 904 cylinders and the only
<marking I see is TKS 56704).
The st251 is an rd32. The rest I don't know.
It can format drives too! the command is test70.
< Finding information about the Seagates isn't hard (as Seagate has all t
<information on their web site) but I'm curious as to the equivilents to t
<RD line.
I listed the rd#, the maufacturer and the model.
< Do you know offhand if that comes with a development system (say, a C
<compiler? Or even just headers?)
VMS is fairly loaded, editors, MACRO32, BASIC, DCL(the command line
language is as complex as some of the 8bit basics!), various language
libraries (C, Fortran, Macro). DECwindows is part of the OS as is
DECnet. Also DECwindows server, latserver and software to manage
the system, accounts, networks.
VMS as supplied is a complete working OS and environment and anything but
minimal in the pieces supplied. I've done entire network projects using
nothing but DCL scripts!
The first software to download for VMS is CMUip (I think the cdrom has it)
so that IP connections can managed). I'm sure there are suitable C
compilers in the free/shareware domain.
Most people have little knowledge of what VMS is. It's a multiuser,
multitasking OS designed for robust applications with high security.
What isn't mentioned is it's also a user enviornment, development
system and a aplications platform all rolled into one. It also has
the advantage of 20 years of development history with V7.1 being current
but any version between 5.4 and 6.1 covered under the hobby license. I
run 5.4 and 5.5 as it's as good as any and they are all good.
An advantage for the non unix user is DCL is like DOS command lines to
the user and most of the basic facilities are similar though richer
featured.
Allison
In a message dated 4/8/98 9:48:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time, marvin(a)rain.org
writes:
<< Joe wrote:
> The one thing that does piss me off is when people sell stuff on one of
> the high cost services like E-bay but place ads for it here. But I must
> admit that I've done it too.
I would disagree with this as part of the continuing education in any
collectable field is having some idea of what the market value is, and ebay
certainly provides some guidance in that regard! >>
Well, i'd be willing to argue that. i dont think i would consider ebay to set
current market prices for anything. i have a friend who uses it, and he said
it's great for the seller if one is selling anything quasi-rare or semi-
unusual as the manic bidders want to outdo themselves and drive the prices way
up. he said i should sell my apple //c lcd screen on ebay as he said one went
for almost $400. besides, i have seen prices there fluctuate wildly anyway.
david
> I'd like to find (or build) CP/M for my only S-100 box (you know, the one
> with the Ithaca Audio CPU card). I have a BASIC boot disk for the
> machine, and I believe I can read/write the 5.25" floppy from my PC
> (via 22disk), but I have no idea what's involved in finding or building a
> CBIOS for this box and where the boot sector on the floppy is.
The documentation for CP/M 2.2 is online at the unofficial CP/M web site.
See http://cdl.uta.edu/cpm/download/manuals/cpm22/index.html. You are
interested in Chapter 6 and most of the appendices.
Roger Ivie
ivie(a)cc.usu.edu
At 07:40 PM 4/9/98 -0500, you wrote:
>
>WIREHEAD'S CRAZY THOUGHT FOR THE DAY
>
>Using old 386 and 486 computers and their parallel ports to replace
>missing peripherals from true retrocomputing systems. Hmmm...
>
>I wonder if a 386, for example, with a properly programmed parallel port
>could emulate...say...a disk drive with a particular interface that you
>can't find anymore.
>
>Interesting thought?
>
>Anthony Clifton - Wirehead
I'd bet you could do it pretty easily with a bare-bones Linux install (why
compile any more than you need to?). In that case you'd have access to
oodles and oodles of working source code for examples.
I'm still dreaming about xfacing an old IBM punched card reader with a PC
running Linux. If I can ever find one that's working and for which I can
scrounge CE docs.
--
David Wollmann |
dwollmann(a)ibmhelp.com | Support for legacy IBM products.
DST ibmhelp.com Technical Support | Data, document and file conversion for IBM
http://www.ibmhelp.com/ | legacy file and media formats.
\
<(MicroVAX 2000). They are not CPU upgradable, but you can add expansion
<memory out to 16MB, an 8 port async serial board (thats the big DB
They max out at 14mb due to hardware mapping. As little as 4 meg is very
useable and 8mb or more makes a fine system.
<connector that doesn't go anywhere) and a sync serial port. Standard
The DB25 is a coms port with handshaking and modem controls.
Allison
Today, I found two things in the trash. One is a VCR that eats tapes.
Please e-mail me privately if you know what to do about that. The
other is a TI99/4A with all of the packaging, but without the main
manual, and any cartridges it might have come with. I will still go
back tomorrow and check to make sure I didn't leave anything. Anyway,
do I HAVE to have a cartridge to power it up? When I turn it on with
the enormous TV switchbox, the TV shows nothing but snow. I flip all
of the switches, but none fix the problem. Also, the little light on
the TV switchbox doesn't turn on. Suggestions? Also, was there a
word processor or something for it? Could someone send me a cartridge
or two?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>If you want it bad enough everything is possible.
>I do belive it is our duty to perform these tasks. An x1541 cable allows
you
>to connect a commodore disk drive to a PC why not make it the other way
>around and use the PC as a disk drive "server" for the C64, VIC20 and C128?
>And that is only one thought.
I believe that's already been done.
-- Kirk
Hi Soe,
< I went to a thrift store today and found something called a VaxStation
<2000. Does anyone know what it is? I *think* the model number on it is
<1410F-A. It's a box about 12 x 12" and 10" thick and has a handle on th
VS2000 aka baby vax. Nice machines using the first generation micorvax
chip. They can be found with up to 14mb of ram but 6-12mb are typical
and only 4meg needed to run VMS or Ultrix. They can take RX33(1.2mb)
floppy and or any MFM drive like RD31(20mb st225), RD32(40mb st251),
RD52(quantum D540 31mb), RD53 (micropolus1325 71mb) or RD54(maxtor 2990
159mb). There is a scsi bus but the rom boot only knows an oddball tk50
off that. The base machine did hires(1280x1024) video to a 19in mono
monitor and there was color too. By shorting pins 8,9 of the db9 port
you could connect a terminal instead. VMS is available via hobby license
and is a very robust and sophisticated operating system and will fit on
a single RD54 or can be made to fit in an RD53 without decwindows. There
is a fair amount of free software for VMS as well.
Also most have 10b2 eithernet unless someone robbed the lance card.
I have three of them, I call them a half cubic foot vax. The taller ones
have a base that addes expansion connectors for a like sized box that can
hone another MFM disk, floppy or TK50 tape.
Generally speaking I find them for free to maybe 15$ as they are on par
with slower 386s meaning they run all the VAX software but it's only .9
vups. Despite that I've used one to serve several users and notes
conferences (like a newsgroup). Their upside is that the power needs
are only 160w at 110v and they are small.
Allison
And then CNN would show UN jeeps pulling dozens of PCs with shotgun
holes from soggy trenches in rwanda...
>
> Or you could install linux on them and donate them to 3rd world
> countries as mail/usenet uucp machines for individual
> villages. This is a _useful_ and humane thing to do!
>
>--jmg
>
>> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1998 16:00:30 -0400 (EDT)
>> From: Captain Napalm <spc(a)armigeron.com>
>> To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
>> Subject: Re: Wirehead Update
>>
>> It was thus said that the Great Zane H. Healy once stated:
>> >
>> > >The other thing I need to do is find uses for the pile of 386 and
486
>> > >boxes in my garage. It's 6 feet wide and 4 feet tall, neatly
stacked.
>>
>> Well, you could install Linux/Beowulf on them and get supercomputer
>> performance, then rent space on them. Beowulf is clustering software
for
>> Linux developed at NASA and freely available. It's been used in
several
>> other labs with great results (from what I hear).
>>
>> Check out http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/beowulf/ for more
information.
>>
>> > Of course the smartalick answer that came to mind was to turn them
on end,
>> > get some cement, and build a shed useing them instead of bricks :^)
>>
>> Of course there's always that.
>>
>> -spc (Or set up a massively parallel web server and rent space out
on it)
>>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
On Apr 9, 13:59, Bill/Carolyn Pechter wrote:
> I head crashed an RK05 at DEC Princeton running RT11 on the finance 11/70
> during a PM once. The head hit a 1/4 inch bulge in the disk platter
Many years ago I worked in a high school that had some PDP-8s, one of which had
a pair of RK05s and a collection of packs of dubious heritage. One of the
parents was a DEC engineer, and volunteered to service the drives and check the
packs. Two he condemned, on the grounds that using them might well damage the
drive, but one in particular apparently passed his inspection, except that it
rattled when it was picked up. Since this was the system pack, he was asked
about this. He re-affirmed that it was OK, but agreed to open it up for a look.
Out fell a Number 8 1" long woodscrew... but the pack was still worked fine.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Hi. Does anyone know what happened to him? Did he unsubscribe? I've tried
to contact him privately, but with no luck. I didn't get an error message,
however.
Thanks,
Tim D. Hotze
A uVAX 2000 is a single board uVAX II with onboard peripherals. DEC
sold them as workstations (VAXstation 2000) or as a small server
(MicroVAX 2000). They are not CPU upgradable, but you can add expansion
memory out to 16MB, an 8 port async serial board (thats the big DB
connector that doesn't go anywhere) and a sync serial port. Standard
was the MFM interface for a Micropolis 1325 (RD53) or Maxstor 2190 disk
(RD54). The SCSI port was only supported for the TKZ50 tape drive, an
old 95MB DLT type drive, although I think there was a 3rd party SCSI
disk driver from Trimarchi (now out of business). The VAXstation had a
graphics display for a non-standard monitor.
Jack Peacock
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe [mailto:rigdonj@intellistar.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 1998 9:41 AM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: what is a Vax Station 2000?
>
>
> I went to a trift store today and found something called a
> VaxStation
> 2000. Does anyone know what it is? I *think* the model
> number on it is VS
> 1410F-A. It's a box about 12 x 12" and 10" thick and has a
> handle on the
> front. It looks about like one of the small coolers that
> holds a six pack
> of your favorite refreshments. It has a bunch of connectors
> on the back
> includeing a BNC connector (LAN?) and SCSI connector and a
> large DB style
> connector with 4 rows of pin sockets.
>
I went to a trift store today and found something called a VaxStation
2000. Does anyone know what it is? I *think* the model number on it is VS
1410F-A. It's a box about 12 x 12" and 10" thick and has a handle on the
front. It looks about like one of the small coolers that holds a six pack
of your favorite refreshments. It has a bunch of connectors on the back
includeing a BNC connector (LAN?) and SCSI connector and a large DB style
connector with 4 rows of pin sockets.
Since Bill is absent, I'll presume to speak for him and the rest of us
founding members. You'll notice that the name of the list, same as its
charter, is "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers", not
"preservation" although that is something we are all concerned with.
Webster's defines "collect" in this sense as "to collect objects", which
implicitly requires their acquisition! Blatantly commercial advertisements
are not allowed, but collector for-sale ads are explicitly part of this
newsgroup and are welcomed.
Not only that, but offering items on Ebay instead of on this list, opens
them up to the speculative investor masses and creates much higher prices
than trading among collectors would produce. Trust me, it's much better to
have them advertised here than on Ebay.
Kai
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Davie [SMTP:adavie@mad.scientist.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 1998 6:11 AM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: my objection to recent postings
>
> I object to the use of the Classic Computer mailing list for advertising
> for-sale items on an ongoing basis for profit. I consider the use of this
> list in this way akin to dropping advertising leaflets in my mailbox, or
> ringing me up and asking if I want to buy insurance.
> Surely, the newsgroups and eBay, etc., are an appropriate place for
> regular
> sales?
> A mailing list dealing with the preservation of classic computers is not.
> Cheers
> A
Andrew Davie scribed...
>I object to the use of the Classic Computer mailing list for advertising
>for-sale items on an ongoing basis for profit. I consider the use of this
>list in this way akin to dropping advertising leaflets in my mailbox, or
>ringing me up and asking if I want to buy insurance.
I'm going to assume that you're referring to Russ Blakeman's posts (please
forgive me if this is inaccurate), and possibly to the postings of
'classic' systems in need of rescuing.
My take on this is that I'm sorry you feel that way. For my part, I'm darn
glad to have someone posting to the list who seems to have a steady stream
of older gear available, and pretty decent prices to boot.
There's still plenty of good information to be had in the list. The few
'For Sale' postings I've seen from Russ and others (Jim Willing for another
example) have, if anything, increased the value of CLASSICCMP for me. Also,
as I recall, CLASSICCMP's charter allows for the posting of such blurbs as
long as what's being advertised is computer-related and of 'Classic'
(greater than ten years old) vintage.
As for systems needing rescue, darn few people who post that they're
getting rid of systems to comp.sys.dec or comp.sys.dec.micro even know this
list exists. I will always forward such notes, if I happen to see them,
over to the list server. I know that doing so has resulted in at least a
couple of rescues that might otherwise have ended up with the scrappers.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net)
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
<Dang...I was at a local scrap yard (they bust things down and sell the di
<materials) and there was an Altair faceplate (smashed up and unuseable) l
<in the top of the bin of steel. I wonder if the person that "donated" it
<scrapper knew what he or she had before they did this terrible
Whats scarier is the altair with the excepion of the board and transformer
was 90% aluminum, especially the front panel.
Allison
At 10:54 AM 4/7/98 -0600, you wrote:
>I have a NOS SwTPc 6800 MP-A CPU board. This was the first SS-50
[...]
>Here's the wrinkle: It's an unbuilt, BARE board. Given the somewhat
>historic nature of this article, what would you do? Build it as
>originally designed (most of the parts are still available), or
>leave the board blank, as is?
As with the Mac someone asked about, my answer is leave it as is; you can
always build it later. Sure, assemble all the parts while they're still
available, but don't do it until necessary.
P.S., I still need your new address.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Kai Kaltenbach <kaikal(a)MICROSOFT.com> wrote:
>Not only that, but offering items on Ebay instead of on this list, opens
>them up to the speculative investor masses and creates much higher prices
>than trading among collectors would produce. Trust me, it's much better to
>have them advertised here than on Ebay.
Yes, absolutely. For the first 30 seconds, it seemed like online
auctions would be a great way to pick up discontinued items at a
good price, but the high quality of information and easy availability
drove prices up. Good for sellers, bad for cheapskate buyers.
I find the online "auctions" drive prices for conventional PC stuff
exactly to the average retail price, or sometimes even above that.
As I wrote on 2/23:
>Regarding the three Altair machines that were recently posted
>to the net auction at ebay.com - they went from $1525 to $2025.
>Mind you, these weren't complete systems. The software, extra
>drives, etc. were auctioned separately.
I was in contact with the guy who sold these before he submitted
them to ebay. For a moment, I thought I had a line on a good deal:
a well-off surgeon / ham / computer junk had died and his family
didn't know what to do with the multiple garages of stuff. For
the computers, they turned to the one computer-head nephew, who
was smart enough to know the value of the machines as well as how
to get the highest price - which I wholeheartedly but sadly supported. :-)
Van Burnham <van(a)wired.com> wrote:
>van burnham http://www.futuraworld.com
>production manager
>wired 520 third street fourth floor san francisco ca 94107 united
>states
Oh, no. Now we know we're cool, if Wired is watching. :-)
That'll do wonders for prices if we get on the "Wired/Tired" list.
As for list fragmentation, I'm tempted to reconfigure my extranet
news server to support a prototype handful of classic computer
news groups, just to see what happens. Private news servers make
so much more sense than mailing lists. How many people are on this
mailing list?
Greg Troutman <mor(a)crl.com> wrote:
>Me too! After thousands of shipping transactions, I now discourage
>would be shippers from using UPS and going with USPS.
After thousands of UPS shipments, I say the opposite: the Sloth Office
drives me crazy. They don't crush, they simple *lose*. Damage is
most often a function of packaging materials. Don't re-use boxes
unless they're in great shape. Be sure the box and packing materials
match the mass and CG of the item inside. Yes, both UPS and USPS
toss the box to the back of the truck and pile other boxes on top.
Be prepared.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
Come on guys, give it a rest. Half the postings in the last 30 hours or so
have been some stupid argument about posting evil capitalist for sale ads
on the list. Compare the total size of this drivel with the size of the
ads. Talk about computers, OK?
--
David Wollmann |
dwollmann(a)ibmhelp.com | Support for legacy IBM products.
DST ibmhelp.com Technical Support | Data, document and file conversion for IBM
http://www.ibmhelp.com/ | legacy file and media formats.
Hi Zane,
----------
> From: Zane H. Healy <healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: DEC RRD-40 CD-ROM
> Date: Wednesday, April 08, 1998 12:53 AM
>
> OK, I'm stumped. What are the switch setting for the 4-switch DIP switch
> on the back of a RRD-40 drive? I managed to come up with a working
> configuration, but how safe is SCSI address 0 under VMS? I know the
> Hobbyist CD at least boots through the hardware search in Standalone
backup
> (didn't have time to install tonite). Also what's the 4th switch for?
if you have only four of them, should be parity. on the RRD-42 you have
five of them, the fifth switching the 512/2048 bytes mode.
I'm not sure about the rrd40, but hope it helps...
cheers,
emanuel
First the Mindset PC...
I just received 2 Mindset PCs, one in the original boxes. I plan on
testing the one in the original boxes and then storing it away. The
other I plan on using. Here is what I know about these so far. They
were 80186 based. Base unit came with 64K RAM, 32K for programs and
32K for video and 32K of ROM. It included 2 ROM/NVRAM cartridge
ports up front. The expansion unit plugged into the top of the
base unit and raised the RAM to 256K and added 2 360K floppy drives.
In place of slots, the system has 6 cartridge ports in the back, 3 in
the base and 3 in the expansion unit. Things like RS-232 ports,
parallel ports, etc came in cartridges which slid into these ports.
It also included a mouse. It had enhanced graphic features (for the
time) driven by some special chips I believe. Connections in the
back provide for RGB, Composite and TV hook-ups as well as Audio
connections. And a cool graphics program called Lumena which
included some animation capabilities. I understand there was some
sort of genlocking capability as well. It almost appears that
this was the "Amiga" of the Intel world. I'll know more after I've
had a chance to do more than unpack and power up the system.
I would like to know if anyone else here has one of these or any info
for them. I have the Disk Operating System Manual and the Mindset
Operation Guide but no real hardware refs. I'd be interested in any
info on the hardware itself or software, carts, etc.
Now for the Fortune 32:16...
I've had two different models of these for a while now but without
the Fortune terminal. These are 68000 Unix based systems and it
appears that you need special keys on the terminal to cleanly startup
and shutdown the system. I have been travelling and need to look
into this a little better. Anyway, if anyone has one of these
terminals they would like to pass on or could find out what code
sequence the special keys send so I could re-program my terminals I'd
really appreciate it.
Thanks.
-----
David Williams - Computer Packrat
dlw(a)trailingedge.com
http://www.trailingedge.com
Hi,
>>> One was donated to me a while ago after standing unused in a garage for
>>> a few years - apparently it was working when it went into store.
>>> However, nowadays if I put the system disk into the drive it seeks the
>>> heads, spins a couple of times, then all goes silent.
>>
>>Start out by opening the case and reseating all the boards in the
>>cardcage. I seem to recall that there's quite a few boards in there,
>>using 43 way edge connectors. Then check the PSU outputs - a good place
>>to do that is at the 8" drive DC connectors, as at least that pinout is
>>standard.
I seem to remember that the PSU outputs were good - at least everything
was as it should be at the drive connectors. The machine's in storage
about 200 miles away from me at the moment, so unfortunately I can't
check (one day I will get a place with a bit of space!!!)
I never stripped the machine down and rebuilt it though.
>>BTW, if you don't have the key needed to open the back of the machine,
>>either pick the lock (it's a trivial wafer tumbler one) or flip the
>>machine sideways and unscrew the plates on the bottom. That will release
>>the back cover. The rest of the case then comes off.
Heh heh, yup - I remember doing exactly that...
>>> There's no cursor or anything on the monitor, but having never seen the
>>> machine working myself I don't know if it should display anything at all
>>> before a successful boot completes.
>>
>>Have you got the monitor cabled up correctly? There's a 10 way (?) ribbon
>>cable _and_ a mains lead to connect.
The monitor is getting HT power to the tube OK, and from what I remember
the ribbon cable would only plug in the back of the system unit one way
round, so that should be ok. It bothers me that there's no cursor or
anything on the screen, but I don't know if there should be - chances
are good that what little ROM this machine has would contain just enough
to boot from disk and nothing else.
It's a shame that the disks I have aren't known to be good - I have 2 or
3 system disks but all of them give the same results - disk seeks and
spins on power up and then all goes quiet.
let me know when you get your Diamond running! :)
cheers
Jules
>And more importantly, personal e-mail should stay between individuals that
>the e-mail is communicated to, and not made public without consent. This
>posting of private messages to the mailing list that some people have
>taken to doing is <snip>, and I swear the next time someone
>does this I will go medieval on their <snip>.
On this issue, I have to agree with Sam. I mean, personal issues are not
what we're talking about here. This is the ClassicCmp mailing list, there's
an entire alt.psychology section of Usenet. Use it for personal
issues/problems. Also, private messages are PRIVATE. If they were meant
for the group to read, then they should have been sent there in the first
place. Only publisize messages when it's ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.
>Have some fucken integrity.
This is what I disagree with. We're all reasonable. Now, you're going to
complain about all of us being toddlers, but before you do, think of this.
There are impressionalbe children on this list, myself being one of them.
If you have a problem, treat it like a gentleman. We're all civilized
enough to let people have their say. Make opinions pleasant for everyone to
read. There's no reason to resort to profanity to expres emotions, or, more
often then not, not expressing them.
Tim D. Hotze
> > I am afraid most of it is based (obviously) on British and
> European computers.
>
> Why 'obviously'? I'm also a UK collector, but I think I've
> got more US
> machines than UK/european ones. In fact, when you move towards bigger
> iron (minis/workstations/mainframes) you almost certainly end
> up with mainly
> US machines.
>
I learn something new almost every day on this list...Today I learned
that computers were actually made in Europe and not just in the U.S.
Now if someone would just explain why anyone would want to collect a
euro-computer?
Jack "tongue planted firmly in his US-centric cheek" Peacock
I object to the use of the Classic Computer mailing list for advertising
for-sale items on an ongoing basis for profit. I consider the use of this
list in this way akin to dropping advertising leaflets in my mailbox, or
ringing me up and asking if I want to buy insurance.
Surely, the newsgroups and eBay, etc., are an appropriate place for regular
sales?
A mailing list dealing with the preservation of classic computers is not.
Cheers
A
At 17:23 08/04/98 -0700, Jack wrote:
>I learn something new almost every day on this list...Today I learned
>that computers were actually made in Europe and not just in the U.S.
>Now if someone would just explain why anyone would want to collect a
>euro-computer?
> Jack "tongue planted firmly in his US-centric cheek" Peacock
Hmm,"The tongue goes where the tooth hurts"
Riccardo
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
? Riccardo Romagnoli,collector of:CLASSIC COMPUTERS,TELETYPE UNITS,PHONES ?
? AND PHONECARDS I-47100 Forli'/Emilia-Romagna/Food Valley/ITALY ?
? Pager(DTMF PHONES)=+39/16888(hear msg.and BEEP then 5130274*YOUR TEL.No.* ?
? where*=asterisk key |4 help visit http://www.tim.it/tldrin_eg/tlde03.html ?
? e-mail=chemif(a)mbox.queen.it ?
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Van Burnham <van(a)wired.com> wrote:
> ps...Upon reading the thread regarding the justification in
> maintaining "modifications" made to a 128K Mac, I was reminded of a
> nightmare I witnessed at a vids auction. It appears someone had
> decided that it would be considerably more "state-of-the-art" to play
> something new instead of a slow-ass game called Computer Space...and
> proceeded to destroy the original board and monitor casing in order to
> convert the sleek fiberglass metalflake cabinet to play Pac-Man
> instead. I don't see why defacing a classic Mac (or "Frankentosh" as
> they say) should be regarded as any less horriffic. Am I totally off
> here? Anyone?
No, you're just mostly off.
The 128K Mac in question was one that had been upgraded with
contemporary modifications during its useful service life, with the
intention of making it do its thing, only better. It wasn't defaced,
it was enhanced, with things that were designed for just that purpose,
by someone using it for its intended purpose. And at its core it's
the same 128K Mac.
Gutting a 128K Mac to fit an SE/30's works inside would be stretching
this notion of "enhancement" a bit more than I'm comfortable with,
because so far as I know Mac users didn't do that sort of thing and
that sure isn't what SE/30 works were designed for. (But I'm not a
Mac guy and maybe someone did do this back then.)
And if I knew of someone planning to do something like what you
describe to a Computer Space machine today, well...I think that
stretches this notion past the point of fatigue. I'd certainly
encourage him away from such a course of action. What would I have
done in, say, 1982 though? I don't know, I might have even helped do
it, though I really don't think I'd have seen any point to it even
then.
Now, that said, the goals of collectors don't necessarily have much to
do with the goals of the computer's contemporary users. Original
unmodified 128K Macs will probably be of more interest to some,
because they were The First Macintoshes (available for public sale,
anyway), and being first does have a certain cachet. And the fact
that many of their original users felt the need for such upgrades has
made unmodified 128K Macs that much rarer today.
-Frank McConnell
A real gentle-man!
enrico
Sam Ismail wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Enrico Tedeschi wrote:
>
> > You are demontrating AGAIN that you don't care about other people feelings and
> > problems. You are NOT in charge of policing this mailgroup. If you don't want
> > to see this sort messages anymore help me to fix my problem.
>
> I'm not going to help you do shit. This is YOUR problem. This is NOT the
> problem of classiccmp! Therefore, DON'T POST YOUR PROBLEMS ON CLASSICCMP!
> I don't post how much of an ass I think you are, so don't post your
> personal crap either! And you'd better bet that when I do take over the
> list, I'll make sure YOU are on the list of moderated members since you
> have proven time and time again that you can't police yourself. So show
> some restraint and respect and KEEP YOUR GARBAGE IN PRIVATE E-MAIL PLEASE!
>
> Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't blame me...I voted for Satan.
>
> Coming Soon...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
> See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
--
========================================================
Enrico Tedeschi, 54 Easthill Drive, Brighton BN41 2FD, UK
Tel/fax(+01273) 701650 (24 hours) and 0498 692465 (mobile)
please visit my website at: <http://www.brighton-uk.com>
========================================================
Charles A. Davis wrote:
> It's also pertinent _what_ is being offered for sale, Complete and
> operational systems, will probably do great on one of the 'aution'
> sites. Random repair pieces, odd boards, documentation, weird
It seems to me if the "for sale" was restricted to 10 years or older
there would be no place for spam related "hot PII price list" stuff. I
have never received a single spam price list listing a uVAX I, an IMSAI
chassis, or a big price break on 16KB static RAM boards. Keep the For
Sale mail, but how about labeling it with the "FS:" prefix in the
subject so those who object can filter it out? I for one watch for the
occasional odd S-100 card, where else am I going to see that kind of
stuff?
Jack Peacock
Russ and list
I admit to a bad mail day.
The bickering between Enrico and Cord, was another area where TWICE I wrote
a reply to the list and successfully staid my hand. I thought some were
using the list as a profit making exercise, and I apologise for this error.
I would still like to see prices kept private and simply "contact me if
you're interested", but of course that is a matter of personal preference.
I think we can close this thread, no?
A
I'm supposed to be playing with Windows NT Server now... (BLEAH!)
But the hardware guys are playing around, and they won't build my server. They have all the parts. So, I started scrounging around myslef...
Found a 486DX4/100, 16 meg or RAM, etc...
But a proper case was nowhere to be found!
So I got me a cardboard box and some masking tape...
:)
I showed the result to our upstream admin, and we was laughing so hard we has almost crying...
It's SERVER IN A BOX!
(If you can call it that...)
My boss says it's OK as long as I power it off when I leave, so it doesn't
catch fire.
-------
>> I'm supposed to be playing with Windows NT Server now... (BLEAH!)
> You GOT it, Seagraves. Seriously.
>
> In Yuk factor, this NT really take the cake. Took my boss months to
> learn and setup a NT server and 1,000's of reboots, each changes even
> one requires reboot. And a one dead PC too and few cards blown
> along with few boards that NT hates! I think I might able master
> Linux with good docs in very significent shorter time with more
> changes between fewer reboots.
We're being migrated to Windows Not Tolerable tomorrow, here at Power
Tech. Wish me luck, or pray for me to any god you think might answer...
Philip.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Philip Belben <><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Bloedem Volke unverstaendlich treiben wir des Lebens Spiel.
Grade das, was unabwendlich fruchtet unserm Spott als Ziel.
Magst es Kinder-Rache nennen an des Daseins tiefem Ernst;
Wirst das Leben besser kennen, wenn du uns verstehen lernst.
Poem by Christian Morgenstern - Message by Philip.Belben(a)powertech.co.uk
PS I like the server in a box! Keep up the good work! P.
I have a GOB of manuals with software in 5.25" (and one 3.5") disks for
an IBM System 36. Here's a list of what's involved...
(D) denotes disks (N) notebook/looseleaf (W) wirebound (V) Vinyl
Folder
Small format books:
1) PC Support/36 technical reference, IBM SC21-9097-3 (N)
2) IBM System/36 Procedures and Commands Summary SC21-9024-2 (W)
SC21-9024-5 (W)
3) Getting Started with System/36 PC, SC21-9267-0 by SRA (D) (V)
Large format books:
1) 5364 System Unit Maint Info, System/36, SY31-9020-1 & 9027-0 (D)
(N)
2) Preparing to Install Your System 5364, IBM S/36 PC, SC21-9084-0 (D)
(N)
Setting Up Your Computer 5364, IBM S/36 PC, SA21-9505-0
Guide To Optional Equipment 5364, IBM S/36 PC, GX21-9817-1
3) Book Set - IBM S/36 PC System Support Prgramming, Configuration &
Sort ZC21-9148 (N)
4) Book Set - IBM S/36 PC Communications Features, Feature 6047,
ZC21-9155 (N) (D)
5) Book Set - IBM S/36 PC System Support Programming, 5727-SS6 Messages,
ZC21-9149 (N)
6) Book Set - IBM S/36 PC System Support Programming, 5727-SS6,
Operating Security,
ZC21-9147 (N)
7) Book Set - IBM S/36 PC Utilities, 5727-UT6, SDA/SEU/DFU, ZC21-9197
(N)
8) Book Set - IBM S/36 PC Utilities, 5727-UT6, WSU/Messages, ZC21-9198
9) Disk Set - IBM S/36 PC System Support Programming, 5727-SS6,
Diskettes, ZC21-9150
(N)(D) (40 +)
ALSO included: AST 5251/11 - IBM PC to System 34/36/38 Computer
Communications outfit. New, unused, in the box. Includes PC and
S/34/36/38 5.25 and 8" disks as well as the cable and interface unit for
the PC.
So there it is....The total weight of all the binders, pages, disks,
disk holders, etc is roughly 50 lbs. The 5251/11 enhanced S34/36/38 set
which is another 10 lbs. Can be packed in separate cartons or in one 60
lb box. One box is cheaper to ship, of course.
How much? $100 plus shipping for ALL the books and 5251/11 outfit plus
shipping. I've had a few serious inquiries but no definitive answer back
and I need the space. I paid $90 for this stuff myself so I'm making a
few bucks basically to cover my gas in running it to the shipping point
and my material in packing them. I don't mind getting this stuff to
redistribute to people that need it as I know this stuff is getting hard
to find. Otherwise you know where it would go.
First one to contact me and actually send a money order (after contact)
gets them. I'll need your zip code to figure shipping fees when you
contact me.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Blakeman
RB Custom Services / Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake(a)bbtel.com or rhblake(a)bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
ICQ # 1714857
* Parts/Service/Upgrades and more for MOST Computers*
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi All,
Has anyone had any experience with a Diamond D5 wordprocessor? Has
anyone even *heard* of such a beast?
One was donated to me a while ago after standing unused in a garage for
a few years - apparently it was working when it went into store.
However, nowadays if I put the system disk into the drive it seeks the
heads, spins a couple of times, then all goes silent.
There's no cursor or anything on the monitor, but having never seen the
machine working myself I don't know if it should display anything at all
before a successful boot completes.
Basically I'm after more information before I can seriously start
thinking about getting this thing going. Obviously I don't even know if
the system disks are still good, let alone what sort of hardware faults
exist inside...
thanks for *any* help with this thing!!
cheers
Jules
I have just bought an almost-new condition fully kitted out Dick Smith
System 80 - this was an Australian-sold clone of the TRS-80.
The system consists of a console with included tape player, an S-100
expansion box and two 200K 5.25" floppy drives. The receipt dated September
1982 was in one of the boxes (all original packing) along with all
connectors. The expansion box contains an extra 32K RAM (total 48K) and
connecting cables to the main system, the two drives (each one a separate
stock item, one "Disk 0" and the other "Disk 1") and to a Centronics
printer.
Price asked in a charity shop was $10 each for the two big boxes and $5 each
for the two drives. Not too bad, and you can't argue too much when the money
is going to a good cause! But absolutely no documentation.
The basic system works OK. What I want to know is how to connect up the
expansion box to the main box and the drives. The connecting cables are
standard flat multi-strand cable with the Pin 1 side marked in red. But
which is Pin 1 at the connection blocks? I don't want to kill this
beautifully clean unit by connecting it up backwards! If someone could tell
me which end of each of the connection blocks on the back of the console, on
the S-100 box and on the disk drives is the Pin 1 end, I would be grateful.
Phil
You might if you had been had by someone in this list. If the man is a con, I
think I am doing a public service here trying to stop him to strike again with
somebody else.
Thank you
enrico
lisard(a)zetnet.co.uk wrote:
>
> On 1998-04-07 classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu said to lisard(a)zetnet.co.uk
> :Warning! You might get something different from what you have
> :bidded for. I did.
>
> keep your bitching private. nobody else gives a toss.
> --
> Communa (together) we remember... we'll see you falling
> you know soft spoken changes nothing to sing within her...
--
========================================================
Enrico Tedeschi, 54 Easthill Drive, Brighton BN41 2FD, UK
Tel/fax(+01273) 701650 (24 hours) and 0498 692465 (mobile)
please visit my website at: <http://www.brighton-uk.com>
========================================================
This came off a web classifieds page:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
IBM SYSTEM/36 MODEL 5360, $100/OBO, Used
Description
MIDRANGE COMPUTER FULLY FUNCTIONAL WITH 5225 MODEL 2
PRINTER
For sale by private party
(718) 863-9651
fma
bronx, New York 10462
--
mor(a)crl.com
http://www.crl.com/~mor/
OK, I'm stumped. What are the switch setting for the 4-switch DIP switch
on the back of a RRD-40 drive? I managed to come up with a working
configuration, but how safe is SCSI address 0 under VMS? I know the
Hobbyist CD at least boots through the hardware search in Standalone backup
(didn't have time to install tonite). Also what's the 4th switch for?
Thanks,
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| For Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
| For the collecting of Classic Computers with info on them. |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/museum.html |
I would note that I have already claimed these items, about a week ago, but
the Olivetti things are still available. Thanks, Sam, for the heads-up.
Cheers
A
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, April 08, 1998 3:55 PM
Subject: (fwd) Obsolete computers looking for a home! (fwd)
>
>For you blokes down under.
>
>
>Plus, I have a number of Olivetti M24, M28, & M280 systems
>to get rid off, same deal.
For you blokes down under.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: R.Alphey(a)forestry.unimelb.edu.au (Russell J. Alphey)
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm,aus.computers
Subject: Obsolete computers looking for a home!
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 05:34:46 GMT
Organization: School of Forestry, University of Melbourne
It's time to clean up the spare room...
These computers are available, free to a good home. Note
that they are all in Melbourne, Australia. Shipping at
new owner's cost! :)
1. Labtam CP/M system, with 8086 processor board add-in.
Single 8" drive, with built-in monitor.
2. Micromation multiuser CP/M system. Has 4 processor boards,
plus serial terminals. 20 Mb hard drive, dual 8" drives, QIC-24
tape unit.
3. 2* ??? CP/M systems, monitors have WOODEN sides! Come with
processor unit, plus 2 * DISCUS 8" drives.
All systems come with boot disks.
Plus, I have a number of Olivetti M24, M28, & M280 systems
to get rid off, same deal.
Contact me by email to arrange something. I'm not going to
wait too long before "dumping" these machines...
R.
R.Alphey(a)forestry.unimelb.edu.au
-- end of forwarded message --
--
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't blame me...I voted for Satan.
Coming Soon...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
At 01:04 AM 4/7/98 -0500, you wrote:
>I've held onto machines that I would've happily given away except for the
>time involved to go through the stuff on the hard disk and clean it up.
[...]
>What the world needs is a painless one button backup-and-clean program.
Or a belief that they can turn the machine over to a reputable
collector/museum who will do it for them.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 01:25 AM 4/7/98 -0500, you wrote:
>> Except, that people may feel it's easier (and/or safer) to just destroy the
>> machine than it is to try and make sure no one can read their data. What
>
>It's rarely done, most people aren't that superstitious of electronic
machines.
Perhaps not in the past, but now that the average village idiot is using
quicken and tax programs... They may not have used Dad's imsai, but they
don't know that his old tax returns aren't in that old box.
>> I agree that people should be responsible for their own data, but I also
>> feel that we, as collectors, need to hold ourselves to a higher standard,
>> so that people will feel comfortable giving us their old machines.
>
>If they actually gave us the machines. Most times they're swapped or sold
cheaply.
Whether or not they give them for free or for $, they have to feel
comfortable doing it, or they won't do it.
>Bad similarity...no one is paying you for confidentiality.
Okay, surely you know someone to whom you don't tell anything personal
because you know it'll be all over the office/neighborhood/local news
within the hour. If people don't believe they can turn over their
computers without having to worry about their tax returns showing up on the
internet, they won't do it.
>> Most of the people here probably know how to wipe a hard drive so it can't
>> be read. (My best guess is a low-level format, then fill it with worthless
>> data? Good thing I have nothing to hide!) But the average AOL user
>> doesn't. When Grandpa passes on, you don't want the grandkids trashing all
>And many have had to use level 3 read/write data destruction if they've
worked for
>the government. If the goverment is required to insure a clean machine to the
>point of even installing a new hard disk prior to public sale, why should the
>average Joe be protected in his or her sloppy handling of their private
matters.
>If you get right down to it they risk public viewing just by installing
anything
>on the hard disk and connecting to the net.
I'm not advocating responsibility for the user's sake. If you care about
the neighbors seeing you nekkid, pull down the damn shades. The reason I
advocate it is because I don't want my neighbors boarding up their windows
because they don't know if pulling down the shades is enough.
I don't want people trashing significant machines because they heard about
someone who knew someone who had a friend who heard about someone who gave
a computer to a collector, and then those quickcam pics of the wife au
naturel (that he thought he deleted) ended up on the 'net. Whether or not
its true, and whether or not someone has pics like that, doesn't matter.
The technoidiots will trash machines rather than take any risks.
Don't believe me? Ever heard of the Good Times virus?
>Not more of the one, but a picture or two of each machine. I realize
you're just
>working on the site but a picture really makes the site interesting to
those not
>familiar with the machines. A prefect example is the dual drive on a
Rainbow. How
>many people can even grasp the thought of putting a floppy in right way in
one
>slot, upside down in the other?
I'm working on that. I've got 6 rolls of film to go to Price Club this
week. Then I have to scan them, edit/crop/resize them, build a list of the
pics (with dimensions and captions), come up with some snappy text, look
for some links, and dig up the specs of the machine so I can build the web
page. Whew. Don't worry, I'll get there. 8^)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
>qty. 1 - Compaq Deskpro 386/20e - $20.00
>
>qty. 1 - Compaq Deskpro 433i - $30.00
OK... are either of these spoken for? Do you know the stats for these? How
much RAM, HDD (if any) space, disk drives, etc, and does that include a
monitor? (And, if you can find it, what is the video card, etc.)
Thanks,
Tim D. Hotze
<Well, I'm just thinking odd thoughts right now(specifically about
<converting a CB radio I have to the 10m amateur band), but if you can
If you need a hand I can help with that.
<figure out all the output voltages that the computer uses, than it
<shouldn't be too hard to either build several power supplies to handle th
<large amounts of power it needs, or perhaps re-wind the main power
<transformers(or just replace them with somethign that has the same output
<Which brings me to another thought, what IS the output voltage of the pow
<supply/transformer(s)? And of course, if the hard(and floppy) drive motor
<need 220v, you can also look for replacement motors that run on 110v.
<That's what I'm going to need to do for my Series/1.
Not that trivial as the system has a fair amount of pwer sequencing and
power good logic tied to the front panel and power system. besides where
to you find a 110Vac to 5V@ 30+amps floating around. That and any fans
and motors that may use 220v. THere is a lack of data on that and no way
to power it to determine if thats is the case.
Allison
This was on the Obsolete Computer helpline and I just knew someone here
could write this person to help...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lucien stevens <lust(a)village.uunet.be>
belgium - Tuesday, April 07, 1998 at 15:52:57
i have a dec pdp11/53
can someone tell me how to connect an ascii terminal or a pc with a
terminal program to make the pdp11 work.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Blakeman
RB Custom Services / Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake(a)bbtel.com or rhblake(a)bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
ICQ # 1714857
* Parts/Service/Upgrades and more for MOST Computers*
--------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Maynard Gelinas [mailto:maynard@jmg.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 1998 2:06 PM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: Re: NOS Bare Boards: What to do?
>
> BTW: anyone remember a BYTE article on the SwTPC sometime in
> '78 regarding a very eary voice recognition and voice synth system
> connected to house controls? I seem to remember that the upshot of it
> was that it didn't work well and the poor author wound up showing off
> his undershorts because the system misrecognized a command and opened
> up the garage door at an inopportune time.... Maybe it was a Kilobaud
> issue???? I'm pretty hazy on this, but I remember it made a big
> impression on me as a kid.
Yes I remember the article (it was humor) because a friend asked if I
could build the same thing for him. I think it was Popular Electronics,
there were no tech details so I'm sure it wasn't BYTE or KILOBAUD.
Anyway, I was skeptical that it was real so I told my friend to contact
the author before I took any of his money. My friend contacted the
author for details. The author admitted he had embellished the
capabilities and the article was more fiction than fact, although
theoretically possible to do at the time.
Jack Peacock
I got to meet Max today and see the S34.
Nice machine is fair condition. His problem is that it's wired for 208
and from what I could observe all the transformer primaries are limited
to the 200V range (208/220/240). Can some one up on S34s confirm that?
All the power comes from three feroresonant transformers (CVTs) which
explains the 580v warning (across the resonating capacitor).
It would seem the only way to power it off 117v line is tansformer
of the 1000-2000va size. I suspect the smaller will work as this
machine while complete is not "loaded". It's biggest disk is an
internal 69mb 8" with what appears to be a DC spindle. Anyhow for
power it expects a single phase 208 L-L connection so a auto transformer
may do it.
It's been a while since I've seens linear regulators or possibly low
voltage switchers of this size.
Allison
<> > My favorite graph on the data sheet is "Number of pins remaining
<> > vs. number of socket insertions". (Wasn't this originally published
<> > in an April 1 issue of _Electronics_ in the 70's?)
<>
<> And the Vff .vs. Iff graph, complete with burn-out just after 6.3V....
<
<I wonder what fraction of new EE graduates today would recognize the
<significance of 6.3 VAC?
or 12.6vac or historically 12.6,12.6,12.6,35,50 (all Vac).
Allison