OK.. because I'm moving to Georgetown, Guyana, I'm using this e-mail
address to keep in contact while I'm moving. So, until June, the other one
will still be active, but in the mean time, try to send messages to
photze(a)batelco.com.bh and worldsfate(a)geocities.com .
I'm not subscribed to this list with this e-mail address, but I'll get
ClassicCmp with the other one.
Ciao,
Tim D. Hotze
---------------------------------------------------
*Tim D. Hotze Co-Founder, The Review Guide *
*http://members.theglobe.com/ReviewGuide/index.htm*
*Panel Member, The Ultimate Web Host List *
---------------------------------------------------
This is really for Sam, but I think it's worth posting to the list.
> The first speaker has been confirmed for VCF2 this September.
Does this mean you have firm dates yet? I'd like to book flights, time
off work, etc. as soon as I can...
> David Rutland was an engineer on a lesser known but very significant
> computer dedicated in 1950 called the SWAC (National Bureau of Standards
> Western Automatic Computer).
Sounds fun!
It occurs to me that I gave a small talk on the Tek 4050 series last
autumn (fall). I'd like to come to the VCF, and I could probably bring
my 4052 and some demo programs, and give an adapted version of the talk
(either in a scheduled slot or probably more suitably on a demo stand
with the machine).
Finally, Sam, could you put me on the VCF mailing list, please. I tried
to subscribe from the web page but we've just migrated to Lusedoze Not
Tolerable and Internut Exploder, with the result that I couldn't get it
to work...
Philip.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Philip Belben <><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Bloedem Volke unverstaendlich treiben wir des Lebens Spiel.
Grade das, was unabwendlich fruchtet unserm Spott als Ziel.
Magst es Kinder-Rache nennen an des Daseins tiefem Ernst;
Wirst das Leben besser kennen, wenn du uns verstehen lernst.
Poem by Christian Morgenstern - Message by Philip.Belben(a)powertech.co.uk
<> I do not think the Cray-1s used 10K ECL - I believe they were custom pa
<> and were faster (10K gates have a delay around 2 nS). Only four types o
<> chips were used in the whole beast - I think two were OR/NOR gates, one
<> was a flip-flop, and the other RAM.
Thay may have been custom but the "generation" of ECL is 10k and that
refer to parts but also a performance level.
Allison
I can't remember who mentioned they had a 1611A without probes, but I
checked it out in the lab today.
The pod with the ZIF socket and Z80 clip does have a little "stuff" in it,
but the "ordinary" microprobes are simply buffered by a little box
containing a pair of 8T37 buffers and a few decoupling capacitors. This
box is connected by a plain ribbon cable to a connector on the 1611A. If
you need to know the connections/layout, I'm sure it would be easy to
reverse-engineer.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
At 11:08 AM 4/24/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Kip, is that magazine online anywhere? I haven't heard of it myself.
>
>Sounds like you are refering us to a rather interesting read!
Try <http://www.chac.org/>. It's the official publication of the Computer
History Assn of California. I'm pretty sure it is on-line (though I
haven't actually checked myself.)
>Anybody who's got a better handle on the present population of minis and
>mainframes still in service want to give an opinion on this?
Well, I'm currently working with Long's Drugs (pharmacy chain in the
western US). They have 352 (353 this weekend) stores and each one has an
HP 3000 in it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
If this is the same University of Washington that hosts classiccmp... it's
likely that Bill Whitson would have gotten them before any of us even had a
crack at 'em. Possibly before the surplus people even got 'em, so there
would be no record... vaguely, I mean VAGUELY I remember something about him
getting Teraks... but I could have been dreaming.
Tim D. Hotze
-----Original Message-----
From: John Foust <jfoust(a)threedee.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, April 29, 1998 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: University of Washington surplus sale?
>I wrote:
>>I found a somewhat stale lead (last November) on three or four
>>Terak computers that were sold at the monthly University of Washington
>>surplus sale. Is there anyone on the list familiar with this sale?
>
>And then several people posted "tell me more". All I know is
>I found a mention via a search engine of three Teraks that were
>about to be tossed to their surplus center, and when I called
>the surplus center (University Surplus Property Warehouse, 206-685-1573)
>they said they auction 60-70 pallets of computers each month, so
>they had no recollection of these Teraks. Someone in the UW area
>must've got them! I hope they're not dumpstered. I also hold a
>slim hope that they weren't sold, and are still for sale.
>
>See my web site for an image of a Terak. Find them and send
>them to me. :-)
>
>- John
>Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
>
I wrote:
>I found a somewhat stale lead (last November) on three or four
>Terak computers that were sold at the monthly University of Washington
>surplus sale. Is there anyone on the list familiar with this sale?
And then several people posted "tell me more". All I know is
I found a mention via a search engine of three Teraks that were
about to be tossed to their surplus center, and when I called
the surplus center (University Surplus Property Warehouse, 206-685-1573)
they said they auction 60-70 pallets of computers each month, so
they had no recollection of these Teraks. Someone in the UW area
must've got them! I hope they're not dumpstered. I also hold a
slim hope that they weren't sold, and are still for sale.
See my web site for an image of a Terak. Find them and send
them to me. :-)
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
Doug Yowza <yowza(a)yowza.com> writes:
> PING xkleten.paulallen.com (204.202.80.66): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 204.202.80.66: icmp_seq=0 ttl=37 time=114.4 ms
Hmm, last night (before I wrote that) I was having difficulty resolving
the host name. This morning it seems to be OK.
> I don't have an account there (Mr. Allen ignored my request (I guess he is
> pretty smart after all)), but telnet seems to work fine.
I didn't bother to ask when I saw the announcement -- no time to dink
with it then and no good idea what I would do with it except log in and
look around. Well, I guess I've found a solution to that latter part,
now if I could just do something about the former.
-Frank McConnell
OK.. Manney has one, but hasn't gotten back to me on it yet. So anyway,
here's the deal: I'm moving this summer, and so I need to stay online.
(Yes, NEED, as I'm a panel member for http://www.webhostlist.com , so I NEED
to stay connected.)
So anyway, what I need is a laptop, or a hand held, that has TCP/IP
stacks and a graphical interface for it (so that could be a 386 or later, or
a newton, Mac, or anything else...)
Oh, and this is intended to be a REALLY low cost thingy...
Tim D. Hotze
Hi. After getting a new M Board for my XT and a load of cards, I found that
my Power Supply's now completely dead. So, where to I start? No fan, moves
a turn or two, I know that the power connections good.
Thanks,
Tim D. Hotze
"Daniel A. Seagraves" <DSEAGRAV(a)toad.xkl.com> wrote:
> I can't seem to get ahold of it anymore, was it decomissioned or something?
Hmm. Did you find out anything more about this?
I found a copy of _Introduction to DECSYSTEM-20 Assembly Language
Programming_ (by Ralph E. Gorin, 1981, published by Digital Press,
ISBN 0-932376-12-6) and was thinking that this was good timing because
I might actually be able to do the homework on, well, something like a
-10. In my dreams^H^H^H^H^H^Hcopious free time, of course.
Other books found:
_Man and the Computer_, John G. Kemeny, 1972, Scribners,
SBN 684-13043-2
_PCC's Reference Book of Personal and Home Computing_,
Dwight McCabe (ed.), 1977, PCC, ISBN 0-918790-02-6
_Varian Data 620/i System Reference Manual_, Rev C, March 1969
_The BYTE Book of Pascal_, Blaise W. Liffick (ed.), 1979,
BYTE Books, ISBN 0-07-037823-1
_An Introduction to Algorithmic Methods Using the MAD Language_,
Alan B. Marcovitz and Earl J. Schweppe, 1966, Macmillan, LCCN
66-27676
_The APL Handbook of Techniques_, compiled by DP Scientific Marketing,
1978, IBM S320-5996-0
IBM Proprinter Technical Reference, April 1985, p/n 6328947
_Computer Graphics Techniques and Applications_, R. D. Parslow,
R. W. Prowse, R. Elliot Green (eds.), 1969, Plenum, LCCN 68-58992
_Intel Microcomputer Systems Data Book_, 1977
-Frank McConnell
I seem to recall reading somewhere (BYTE ~1985 ?) that Soviet made CPUs
(6502 clones?) were so poorly maid that they individually came with a
list of which instuctions worked and which didn't. Also seem to recall
an article on the soviet Apple ][ clone of the time (CPU on a large
daughterboard, pirated ROM, cost approx US $20,000)
-Matt Pritchard
Graphics Engine and Optimization Specialist
MS Age of Empires & Age of Empires ][
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hotze [SMTP:photze@batelco.com.bh]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 1998 12:15 PM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: The PC's Soviet?
>
> OK... I was talking to a Ukranian programmer, who told me that in 1968
> the
> PC was invented, not far from where he worked in Ukrane. Now, that's
> 4
> years before the microprocessor, but is it possible?
> And this guy might be dilusional, he's VERY communist, but then
> again,
> at base, so am I, but with a democratic twist. Anyway, what's the
> story
> behind this?
> Thanks,
>
> Tim D. Hotze
At 04:41 AM 4/22/98 -0400, you wrote:
>
>On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Joe wrote:
>
>> >Also seem to recall
>> >an article on the soviet Apple ][ clone of the time (CPU on a large
>> >daughterboard, pirated ROM, cost approx US $20,000)
>>
>> I remember that article. The entire motherboard was pirated! Not just
>> the ROM. The tops of the ICs had been ground off to hide the fact that they
>> were US made parts.
>
>How do we know that the $20,000 wasn't the cost of shipping the pirate
>motherboards to the Soviet Union from Canada, via Cuba? ;)
>
>Was it not the same in the States, with regards to Apple clones, as it was
>in Canada in the early 80s?
Sure it was. The Franklins were probably the best known Apple rip-offs
^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H er ah, clones. At least until Apple sued them and
Franklin had to actually design their own machines.
>So the Soviets pirated the Apple ][, who didn't?
But you missed the point. No other >COUNTRY< tried to pass off a pirated
machine as their own. In fact, most cloners (pirates?) bragged about their
similarity to the original machine, the Soviets claimed that their machine
was an original design. To top it all off, they didn't even have the good
sense to change the copywrite notice!
>Maybe I should start collecting Apple clones, seeing as I see them more
>frequently than actual Apples (clones were more affordable).
That would probably be a pretty big collection just by itself!
Joe
<From: Doug Yowza <yowza(a)yowza.com>
<and is populated rather sparsely by chips with date codes from '80 and
<'81. The chips seem to be from Fairchild primarily (the 32 F10470's loo
<like they might be RAM). From Mr. Cole's "limited edition" markings, I
<gather that there were 400 of these boards in his Cray-1.
The Cray-1 was ECL-10k fast for it's time but low density and rams for
that technology were 1 or 4k ECL bipolar. ECL had several
characteristics, FAST, high power consumption and low density. The
copper plate worked with a cooling system to conduct the heat away as
that machine was impossible to air cool and remain that small. Why
small? Conductors propagate singnals at 1nS a foot and a cable of several
feet actually represented a significant delay to the overall sheme of
things inside.
A note: The other commonly known and slightly more recent ECL machine
was the DEC VAX9000, built using ECL-100k built on custom air cooled
hybrids. It also consumed power in great quantities and had special
cooling considerations.
<Any idea how much RAM is on the board? Can I interface the board to my
<Sinclair ZX-81 to create the world's most perverse hybrid?
Your could but the interface would be more than the two combined and it
would eat an amazing amount of power.
Allison
The DHV 11 manual and the programming card have both been claimed. Given
that the hardware is on hold, that completes this run of freebies.
Thanks to all for your interest.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net)
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
I've acquired a Amiga 1000 with monitor, mouse, scsi sidecar that try's
to boot up, but after booting kickstart, it asks for the Workbench 1.2
disk. My disk seems to be defective because the drive cycles and the
picture of the workbench disk comes back up. Does anyone out there have
a copy?
James
Is the reason those old radio/phonograph boxes are not being thrown
away is that noone notice the cover and thinks it's just a pretty
dresser w/o drawers :)? Also hideaway sewing machines.
I do see many of them in thrift stores, though. It was a good idea,
to keep technology invisible. Now, it's the other way around.
Cover EVERYthing with black and beige boxes.
Of course, the System/36 (I think, maybe not) was built into a desk.
And then there were the teletypes (are the ones that are mostly used
as examples of teletypes ASR-33?), printers, etc.
>> S/360s are very rare (thousands made, maybe a dozen left).
>
>So the moral of the story is that manufacturers should build furniture
>into their computer systems, so when the computer is obsolete, the
system
>will live on as furniture. :-)
>
>-- Doug
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I found this on E-bay. The minimum bid is $45. If you think this is too
much (I do!!), you can contact the owner and see if he'll take less if it
doesn't sell. The URL is
"http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=12277630".
Description
GRID 8088 XT Laptop. Rugged Construction. 720k FDD, No HDD, 512k Mem,
SER/PAR, Plasma Screen, AC Adapter Module substitutes battery. Works
Perfectly. Good for diagnostics, automotive, marine, etc. Excellent
condition. Buyer prepays with money order or check and pays shipping.
Joe
On Apr 26, 19:19, Olminkhof wrote:
> Subject: Logic State Analyser
> I have been rearranging my storage area and uncovered a HP 1611A Logic
> State Analyser fitted with a Z80 option that I picked up a few years ago.
>
> I have no idea what one would do with this. Should I cherish it? Play
with
> it?
> Does one need the specific manual or are these generic and perhaps
> explained in standard texts?
>
> There are a number of plugin points for various types of probes, none of
> which I have off course. It powers up fine though.
AFAIR the ordinary probes are just micro-hooks on single wires, which plug
into a little distribution box on the end of a ribbon cable.
It's quite a nice analyser, so "play with it" gets my vote. It was also
quite popular, so I expect you could find manuals if you look/ask around.
I'm sure we have some 1611s or 1610s in the labs. If you want me to take
a look at them next week, shout. There's also a description of both
models, and several examples of use, in John Lenk's book "How To
Troubleshoot And Repair Microcomputers" -- which IMHO isn't a very good
book, but there seem to be lots of old copies of it about, and in
libraries.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Interesting. I was in the library today, and I happened to glance
on the back of a VT-220 they had. I thought it was video, because of
the icon, but then I said to my friend, "Cool! It can do ethernet!"
>of collisions and other strange things. Looked like one of the
computers
>on it had gone crazy and was jabbering, but turning off one machine at
a
>time didn't help things.
>
>OK, time to grab a 'scope. What on earth was that? It looks like
>composite video. It _is_ composite video. OK, time to trace the cable.
>You guessed it. Some luser had plugged a spare t-piece on the thinwire
>segment onto the back of a VT220.
>
>I can't remember what LART I used ;-)
>
>
>> Jack Peacock
>>
>
>-tony
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
[Stopping thinnet with a 3270 card...]
I once heard of a manager of some sort plugging thinnet into the back
of a VT220 (?It was VTsomething...?) video-out port. Seems he thought
it was one of those network computer deals...
VT220s had a video out BNC connector. You could drive a monitor with
it, but wasn't very useful plugged into a coax Ethernet cable.
Jack Peacock
I found a somewhat stale lead (last November) on three or four
Terak computers that were sold at the monthly University of Washington
surplus sale. Is there anyone on the list familiar with this sale?
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
For anyone that's interested or just tired of the ads for them, all the
previously advertised test equipment has been spoken for. Thanks for
putting up with the messages.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Blakeman
RB Custom Services / Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake(a)bbtel.com or rhblake(a)bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
ICQ UIN #1714857
AOL Instant Messenger "RHBLAKEMAN"
* Parts/Service/Upgrades and more for MOST Computers*
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Allison wrote:
>The Cray-1 was ECL-10k fast for it's time but low density and rams for
>that technology were 1 or 4k ECL bipolar. ECL had several
>characteristics, FAST, high power consumption and low density.
Excuse my ignorance, what does ECL stand for?
Hans
<I once heard of a manager of some sort plugging thinnet into the back
<of a VT220 (?It was VTsomething...?) video-out port. Seems he thought
<it was one of those network computer deals...
<[Networked computers will be OK. It means all the terminals get run fro
< some large computer off somewhere else. Does this sound familiar?
Yes, happend at DEC sometimes. DEC had VAXmate (AT class) machine that
was netbootable and could do file sharing via eithernet. There were also
X-terminals (DECmindows) that used the net for both the hookup and loading
operating software.
Allison
<>The Cray-1 was ECL-10k fast for it's time but low density and rams for
<>that technology were 1 or 4k ECL bipolar. ECL had several
<>characteristics, FAST, high power consumption and low density.
<
<Excuse my ignorance, what does ECL stand for?
ECL or emitter coupled logic is a form is bipolar logic that operates
at low levels and is non saturating. Non saturating is where the active
devices are neither fully off or fully on. Logic levels are referenced
to a bias level so translation to MOS/CMOS/TTL is required. The reason
for doing non-saturated logic is speed, transistors have a problem like
tubes of charge storage making them harder to turn on or off and reducing
speed. Generally speaking from the late '60s through the '80s ECL managed
to be a factor of 5-20 times faster than the prevailing logic system(RTL,
DTL, TTL) until sub-micron CMOS started to get under 10ns. The last ECL
parts I looked at(years ago) were sub 1nS and could be clocked faster than
1000mhz. An example of the speed difference is 1974 the fastest TTL
divide by 10 (7490) was maybe 35mhz, ECL divide by 10 was 500mhz.
Allison
"Max Eskin" <maxeskin(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> Today, I received the MCA network card Russ Blakeman sent me.
> Unfortunately, it is called a "3270". I am afraid that it's not a
> real net card, but a 3270 emulator.It has a BNC connector on the
> back. The driver is called "3270 Driver Revision B".
> Can I use this thing with ethernet?
Yes, for certain sorts of useful. You plug the BNC T onto the back of
the card, and it stops all communication on that thin-net segment. At
least that's my experience with such devices. (They told me it was an
Ethernet card. I didn't believe them but they insisted, so I shrugged
and plugged the cable in. It took about five minutes for the
folks hollering from the other lab room to find me.)
If you want an MCA Ethernet card, look for one with both a BNC
connector and a 15-pin D (AUI) connector. Maybe an RJ45 too but
I don't recall seeing many MCA cards that had all three connectors.
-Frank McConnell
If nobody wants the Kaypro PeeCee, I suppose I could pull all of the cards
out for interested parties and ship them. If, however, someone wants the
machine whole, obviously it will be kept whole.
William Donzelli
william(a)ans.net
Today, I received the MCA network card Russ Blakeman sent me.
Unfortunately, it is called a "3270". I am afraid that it's not a
real net card, but a 3270 emulator.It has a BNC connector on the
back. The driver is called "3270 Driver Revision B".
Can I use this thing with ethernet?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<Unfortunately, it is called a "3270". I am afraid that it's not a
<real net card, but a 3270 emulator.It has a BNC connector on the
<back. The driver is called "3270 Driver Revision B".
<Can I use this thing with ethernet?
Nope!
Allison
<From: Jack Peacock <peacock(a)simconv.com>
<SDS (S.D. Sales) made an S-100 similar to the Teletek, except it could
<be configured as either a bus master main Z80 CPU card or a slave card.
The SDS was only one board, TelTEK actually had three different ones for
slave or master use. The master board also had an FDC on it.
<In master mode it had a memory manager, I think the full 24 bits. In
<slave mode the on-board 64KB of RAM could be memory mapped on a 64K
Yep. Nice board too! Got to try out the proto and it was fast!
<boundary anywhere in the full 24-bit S-100 address space. It had a
<serial port (maybe 2, SIO or DART?) and a SASI port, the early
<predecessor of SCSI.
I had SIO (two serial ports) and a parallel printer port.
Don't remember SASI on that but it did have 765 FDC that could be used
for 8/5.25/3.5" floppies.
<It didn't have much in the way of software support for the slave mode,
<so I haven't done anything with it. My ambition is to make it a Z80
<co-processor card in a Concurrent DOS system 80286 system.
There wasn't much other that configuring it with MP/M as a slave.
Allison
I had never seen that Toshiba chip before. The 2716 was just a guess
based on the part number. I'd guess that it's 200ns RAM. Is it a 2kw
chip?
The Toshiba part was a regular 2016/6116 2KBx8 static RAM. Same pinout
as the 2716 except for the additional WR* line. IIRC there were LP (low
power CMOS) versions too, various speed grades.
SDS (S.D. Sales) made an S-100 similar to the Teletek, except it could
be configured as either a bus master main Z80 CPU card or a slave card.
In master mode it had a memory manager, I think the full 24 bits. In
slave mode the on-board 64KB of RAM could be memory mapped on a 64K
boundary anywhere in the full 24-bit S-100 address space. It had a
serial port (maybe 2, SIO or DART?) and a SASI port, the early
predecessor of SCSI.
It didn't have much in the way of software support for the slave mode,
so I haven't done anything with it. My ambition is to make it a Z80
co-processor card in a Concurrent DOS system 80286 system.
Jack Peacock
On Apr 27, 18:33, Tony Duell wrote:
> Pete Turnbull wrote:
> > AFAIR the ordinary probes are just micro-hooks on single wires, which
> > plug into a little distribution box on the end of a ribbon cable.
>
> Are you _sure_? Every logic analyser that I have ever worked with has
> quite a bit of circuitry in the 'pod'.
That's possible, but the probes themselves definitely are just wires with
clips (albeit a beautifully made version). I'll take a look this week.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Apr 27, 13:04, emanuel stiebler wrote:
> You don't have a kind of this art about a pdp11/53 (KDJ11-D/S, M7554,
> 50-1670-02) ?
Sorry, I've used one (once, briefly) but I don't have any docs apart from
what's in the Field Guide that Tim keeps on sunsite.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Sun, 26 Apr 1998 11:18:49 -0400, allisonp(a)world.std.com (Allison J
Parent) wrote:
>There are a couple of blank sockets, and a TMM2016P-2 memory chip (a
2716??)...
>>First off 2016 is a byte wide ram.
I had never seen that Toshiba chip before. The 2716 was just a guess
based on the part number. I'd guess that it's 200ns RAM. Is it a 2kw chip?
>>I sounds like someone stripped the card.
Actually, of 63 chips, only the 16 RAM chips, a 24-pin socket next to
the uP, and two 16-pin chips near the PIO and CTC chips are empty.
>>The SBC-1 was a complete Z80cpu(4 or 6mhz)/64kram/eprom/IO card it was
designed to >>be used as a slave to the Systemaster cpu card. The 2016 was
used to create a FIFO so >>that block IO could be used to communicate with
it. The only thing it lacked to be a complete >>S100 cp/m system on a board
was disk IO. The system master card had all that
>>and FDC as well.
Do you have any schematics or other info on this board?
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
============================================
>> I don't remember ever seeing a desktop PC coming from them. Anybody know
>> how rare this box is? Sounds like a keeper.
>
>That is exactly why I really do not want to junk the thing. Now any of you
>could have the thing for a song, but it just is quite large to ship (the
>shipping bill would probably be five times what the thing is worth!).
>Unless someone _really_ ($$$) wants it, I really do not want to ship it.
>
>Just about eveything else is unclaimed. Am I the only person on the list
>with an IBM 5103 printer (yes, it is the mate for the 5100)?
>
>William Donzelli
>Carmel, NY
>william(a)ans.net
>
I think yes, you are the only person with a 5103 printer. I have a 5100
but no printer. Didn't know until your message that they even made one!
So I guess I don't need the ribbons...yet...
However--
I am interested in this --
(1) Computer Wharehouse Store catalog, Spring-Summer 1977. SWTPC! Imsai!
Kim-1! $1200 floppy drives! A slice from the "good old days" of the micro.
The pages are a bit yellow, but in good shape. The cover is also nice, but
the previous owner scribbled his name on the top.
-- if it's still available.
--Larry
Well thanks for letting me put the things I had up here on the list.
I've sold or traded both the Kontron logic analyzer pair and the Tek
7612D digitizer.
I still have a single channel 10mhz RCA solid state scope in great
(looks new, works new) shape with manual. It's a model WO-535A and is
>from approx 1975 time period. I need $100 for this to fund a few odd
projects such as buying a Snappy 3 video capture.
Please contact me by direct email.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Blakeman
RB Custom Services / Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake(a)bbtel.com or rhblake(a)bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
ICQ UIN #1714857
AOL Instant Messenger "RHBLAKEMAN"
* Parts/Service/Upgrades and more for MOST Computers*
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I have a book that hasn't even been used here that may be of interest to
those of you into vitual programming on a PC.
The title is "Playing God - Creating Virtual Worlds With REND386" by the
Bernie Rohl and published by the Waite Group. Includes a still-sealed
3.5" disk fullof source code for C++ and other neat looking things. Made
to run on a 386SX to a Pentium machine with VGA, 4mb RAM and a hard
disk. It says it's an intermediate level book.
The cover price on this glossy softcover with disk is $29.95. Anyone
interested in it? You can have it for $15 which includes mailing within
the continental 48 states.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Blakeman
RB Custom Services / Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake(a)bbtel.com or rhblake(a)bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
ICQ UIN #1714857
AOL Instant Messenger "RHBLAKEMAN"
* Parts/Service/Upgrades and more for MOST Computers*
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Now this is interesting---Perseus Development Corporation developed a new
version of their SurveySolutions for the TRS-80 Model I. 4K required, but
as always, more is better.
The date of the release is suspicious (April 1, 1998) but still, it is
interesting and the source code is available. The web page is at
http://www.perseus.com/trs-80/
-spc (Neat, even if it is somewhat of a joke ... )
Hi Pete,
----------
> From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: q-bus M7551 q22 mos memory
> Date: Monday, April 27, 1998 12:20 PM
>
> Typed it in, copied (more or less) from the microPDP11 Maintenance
Manual.
> The blame for the crude ASCII art is all mine, though.
BLAME !?!?!
Its great.
You don't have a kind of this art about a pdp11/53 (KDJ11-D/S, M7554,
50-1670-02) ?
thanks,
emanuel
Well, it looks like were have been outbid. Oh well, at least the machine
is going somewhere good (and I think I know where).
William Donzelli
william(a)ans.net
On Apr 27, 9:25, emanuel stiebler wrote:
> P.S. Where you got it ? Or you typed it in ?
Typed it in, copied (more or less) from the microPDP11 Maintenance Manual.
The blame for the crude ASCII art is all mine, though.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Hi, Emanuael.
> no. i have a Revison D. Part Number 5-17547-01-D1-P2. 2 MByte DRAM.
Lookes
> like a Revsion C, i'm only missing (not really) the battery backup
options
> W1, W3.
That's useful to know -- thanks!
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
OK... here's the current scoop. Sam Ismail has claimed the DEC networking
book and the Microsystems handbook. I still have available the DHV11
technical manual, the Everex manual, and the DEC programming card.
The remainder of the hardware is on hold pending a possible taker. Thanks
to all those who responded.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net)
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
It seems to be all in the very preliminary stages, but time is running
out...
Does anyone on the list have space for a large (two-rack) Multiflow Trace
machine? One has popped up, and it seems that RCS/RI has a big interest in
it, but we might run out of time before we can set up a mover. A cormer of
a garage might be nice for just a short time, just in case the machine's
current owner needs the thing out of the San Diego place on short notice.
If RCS/RI just can not pull this off, does anyone want the thing?
William Donzelli
william(a)ans.net
Hi Pete,
second one,
----------
> From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: q-bus M7551 q22 mos memory
> Date: Monday, April 27, 1998 7:41 AM
>
> There are 2 layouts, Revision A and Revision C.
no. i have a Revison D. Part Number 5-17547-01-D1-P2. 2 MByte DRAM. Lookes
like a Revsion C, i'm only missing (not really) the battery backup options
W1, W3.
cheers,
emanuel.
P.S. Great painting !!!
Ok, since I intend to use this thing to work on computer related gear older
than 10 years old (my 083 card sorter for example), I'm proclaiming this
inquiry off-limits for random flamage! B^}
Does anyone out there have info (like the tube/switch charts) for an EICO
Model 635 portable tube tester? I've picked up one that is in very good
shape, but is otherwise useless without the charts for switch settings.
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
I'll be having fun friday...
I get to go argue with a professional junk guy over a KS-10. The company that
owns it wanted it melted down, to protect some confidential data they had on it.
SO, I'm gonna say "None of your data is on the CPU, just the disk packs,
so he can have the packs. There." The drives are 2 RP06es. (Yes, I know I
need 3-phase. Mark says he knows where to get an RM80 or two. Is there
any way around having to have 3-phase for the RPs? I was told they fail every
other 10 minutes, is it even worth it?) It did run TOPS-20, but I'm chasing
after ITS tapes for it. Even if I don't end up getting it, I may get the CPU
cards and backpanels, and then I know someone who has the rest of a KS.
Failing that, if the junk guy gets everything, I know someone else who has
a whole KS, but no operating system. So, one way or another, we're gonna get
a running ITS installation out of this...
Am I supposed to be this nervous?
I've never had to actually argue with a junk guy over a machine, in front of
a buncha suits... (Division heads or something. The actual company is QUITE
large... *hint* *hint*...)
-------
Hi Pete ...
----------
> From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: q-bus M7551 q22 mos memory
> Date: Monday, April 27, 1998 7:41 AM
>
> On Apr 26, 11:36, emanuel stiebler wrote:
>
> > does anybody have a description of the jumpers & dil-switches ?
>
> Sure. The DIL switches are small rectangular objects about 0.4" x 0.7"
> and the jumpers... (Sorry, I can rarely resist that :-))
THIS WAS A GOOD ONE. ROFL...
thanks,
emanuel
P.S. Where you got it ? Or you typed it in ?
>Does anybody have a MINDSET computer? I vaguely recall these as the first
>multimedia PC from the early 80's. I just found a stereo module for one,
>and now I'm in search of the rest of one :-)
>
You can't have mine.
MINDSET was about as you recall. It built in 1984 as a super-multimedia
80186-based PC-compatible (well, mostly-compatible, anyway.) For 1984,
the graphics were superb and it had (IIRC) a video-in connection so you
can use the computer as a character generator/paintbox. I think it was
packed with a low-end cousin to the Time Arts Lumena paint program and
was THE machine for graphic artists. Remember, this was a year and a half
before the Amiga - which, whene IT came out, pretty much took over
Mindset's market.
The Mindset has a unique and quite beautiful white bi-level case design.
So pretty in fact that the Museum of Modern Art put one in their design
collection - the first computer placed in their collections.
Much of the hardware was proprietary - weird memory modules and it also
accepted plug in progrram cartridges.
Mindset didn't last too long as a company. They DID build a second model,
an AT-based machine in charcoal gray. I've seen it once and never read
anything about it
I found my original Mindset last year, complete with a couple of
expansion RAM modules, the boot disks and the paint cartridge.
Like I said, it's gorgeous and you can't have it. Nyah. But - I might
make you a deal on the stereo module!
--Larry
On Apr 26, 11:36, emanuel stiebler wrote:
> does anybody have a description of the jumpers & dil-switches ?
Sure. The DIL switches are small rectangular objects about 0.4" x 0.7"
and the jumpers... (Sorry, I can rarely resist that :-))
I think this is what you want:
There are 2 layouts, Revision A and Revision C.
___ ___
| \__________________||______________________||___________________/ |
| 5017547A1 o |
| R o-o W5| |
| P o-o o-o |
| N o-o W6 |
| M o-o |
| oA |
| o |
| __oB |
| | |1 |
| SW1 | | o W1 |
| | | o |
| M7551-AA |___|6 o W2 |
| MSV11-QA oK |
| REV.A o |
| oL |
| ___ |
| | |1 |
| SW2 | | |
| | | |
| |___|6 |
| |
| o |
| C | D |
| o-o |
| +5V o-o-o |
| o-o J H |
|_ _|| _|| _|| | _|
| | | | | | | o +5VB |
|______________| |______________| |______________| |______________|
___ ___
| \__________________||______________________||___________________/ |
| 5017547-01-C1 |
| J11,9,7,5 |
| J10,8,6,4 |
| |
| J3 J2 J1 |
| ___ |
| | |1 |
| M7551-xA SW2 | | |
| MSV11-Qx | | |
| REV.C |___|6 |
| |
| where x = A = 1MB ___ |
| x = B = 2MB | |1 |
| x = C = 4MB SW1 | | |
| | | |
| |___|6 |
| |
| |
| o o |
| +-o o-+ |
| W3 | o o | W1 |
| +-o o-+ |
| J17,16,15 J14,13,12 |
| |
|_ _|| _|| _|| _|
| | | | | | | |
|______________| |______________| |______________| |______________|
Address switches:
Start Address End Address
Board No SW1 SW2 SW2
Version in system 4 5 6 4 5
MSV11-QA 1 0 0 0 1 1
2 1 1 1 0 1
3 0 1 1 1 0
4 1 0 1 0 0
MSV11-QB 1 0 0 0 1 1
2 0 1 1 0 0
MSV11-QC 1 0 0 0 0 0
0=ON, 1=OFF
SW2-1, -2, -3 and SW1-1, -2, -3 are all ON.
SW1-6 is not used.
CSR Address:
Rev.A jumpers R,P,N,M all IN
Rev.C jumper J4-J5, J6-J7, J8-J9, J10-J11 AND then:
Board No
in system CSR addr
1 17772100
2 17772102
3 17772104
4 17772106
The other Rev.A jumpers are:
W1 IN block mode enabled
W6 IN Manufacturing test (do not remove)
B IN CSR selection enabled
C IN Manufacturing test (do not remove)
H IN enable parity error detection
L IN 22-bit addressing selected
+5V/+5VB do not use, this module does NOT support
battery-backup option
The other Rev.C jumpers are:
J1-J2 IN Manufacturing test (do not remove)
J13-J14 IN on -QA Select 64K RAMs
OUT on -QB,-QC
J15-J16 IN on -QA Select 64K RAMs
OUT on -QB,-QC
J12-J13 IN on -QB,-QC Select 256K RAMs
OUT on -QA
J16-J17 IN on -QB,-QC Select 256K RAMs
OUT on -QA
W1,W3 IN Battery backup option setting
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Questions:
Does anyone haveSolddering For an idiot projects... something to do with
electronics and soldering
Or for that matter PCB Projects, for an idiot (as above) such as me.
Wanted:
PC-DOS 1.x or MS DOS 1.x/2.x for and XT, with a failing HDD.
Anyone?
Thanks,
Tim D. Hotze
Anyone interested in this? I know the guy and he's a very decent person
so you don't have to worry about "getting the wrong thing" I think it's
free anyway. Contact Jeff by driect email at either jarrod95(a)juno.com or
jarrod95(a)jadeinc.com
--------------------------------------------
Jeff Young <jarrod95(a)juno.com>
Columbus, Ohio USA - Sunday, April 26, 1998 at 19:21:49
Any one interested in an Old IBM PCX3 with monitor, and another
computer and all we can find on it is System
1800, also have a Mono monitor, ADC. Contact me or they are going
to the recyle bin.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Blakeman
RB Custom Services / Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake(a)bbtel.com or rhblake(a)bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
ICQ UIN #1714857
AOL Instant Messenger "RHBLAKEMAN"
* Parts/Service/Upgrades and more for MOST Computers*
--------------------------------------------------------------------
>How about the CAI system that CDC had (I can't remember the
name off hand
>at the moment - I think my brain is broken - I couldn't even
remember the
>brand name of some wine I wanted to buy yesterday... Will
chewing on a
>floppy disk or two improve things :-). From my limited exposure
it's likely
>that the CDC thingy :-) had a browser style interface.
>
I saw a CDC demo of that once circa 1974, as I recall it was
called "Plato", used a nice orange plasma display, limited
animation, astronomical price. CDC had grandiose plans it would
be used in schools, like every high school in the country could
afford a $2 million CDC 6600 to support it. Kinda sad actually,
once Cray left CDC they didn't have a clue as to what to do
afterwards, the big iron Cyber 6000s went nowhere, the company
wound up running payroll services (the remnants of CDC are now
known as Ceridian, a batch payroll services company).
Jack Peacock
Time to clean out at least part of my garage, especially in light of the
new arrivals. All offerings are freebies, though it would be nice if I
could get -something- in trade. ;-)
Please bear in mind two things.
1). I cannot ship anything other than the books. The disk and tape drives
are too darn big and heavy, and would require specialized packaging in any
case.
2). Dave Jenner has first pick since he E-mailed me this morning before I
posted the list. I'll post an update if he wants any of the stuff.
With that in mind, I have the following to offer:
1). HP 7974 9-track vertical tape drive, with all mounting hardware. 1600
BPI, Pertec interface, supplied with the hardware to convert it (if
desired) to a GPIB interface. Excellent condition, powers up and loads
fine, have not actually tested it with a working system.
2). (Definitely a freebie!) 83-84 vintage System Industries SMD disk
drive. Spins up, makes lots of noise, don't know if it works. Comes with
mounting rails.
3). Cipher 880 tape drive, dual-density (1600/3200). Condition: Who knows?
Freebie.
4). Books! I've got spare copies of:
DEC's 'Microsystems Handbook' for 1985
DEC's 'Introduction to Minicomputer Networks' vintage 1974
Everex 'Step 386' owner's manual
DEC PDP11 'Programming Card' quick-reference, vintage July 1975
DEC DHV11 Technical Manual.
Any takers?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net)
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
<Anyone (finger points at Allison) have any stories about them? It looked
<fairly serious.
Bill gave the particulars on it, band printer like the want stuff RCSRI
has 300LPM and could slew paper fast enough to empty a box fast.
The hood gas shocks would dry out and somtimes people would get a finger
bit or their head konked good.
Bill likely remembers Pat Pattenden or Paul Howard as those guys were
the old timers with those.
Allison
Doug Yowza <yowza(a)yowza.com> wrote:
> I don't remember ever seeing a desktop PC coming from them. Anybody know
> how rare this box is? Sounds like a keeper.
Yup, they made desktop PC-compatibles for a while. I remember a
dealer in College Park, MD selling them (Software'n'Things if anyone
else out there remembers them; to the best of my knowledge they aren't
operating under that name anymore if at all).
One of the big selling points was that they were upgradable by virtue
of the passive backplane. Buy an XT-compatible now, later on you can
upgrade to an AT-compatible just by swapping the CPU card for the '286
flavor.
BTW Doug, is that your face I saw gazing up at me from this morning's
San Jose Mercury News? If not, there's some guy calling himself
Doug Salot who has some stuff in his collection that's an awful lot
like things you've mentioned on this list.
-Frank McConnell
Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com> wrote:
> Yes they were dot matrix. I always equated line printers with dot matrix
> printers. Is there a difference?
When someone says Line Printer I think of something with the type
on a chain (or a drum) and the ribbon in front of the paper, and then a
bunch of hammers behind the paper. When the right character is in
front of the right position, the printer fires the hammer for that
position and pushes the paper up against the ribbon and chain/drum.
But the real definition is in how much data you have to send to the
printer to get it printing. If you have to give it a full line to get
it going then it's a line printer. If you only have to give it a
character to make it print then it isn't.
-Frank McConnell
>Unless the Z80 option includes a pod that attaches to a Z80, then you
Is this "pod" something that clamps over an installed CPU? There is a test
socket for something like this. May attach to an edge connector at the back
marked "Microprocessor Probe".
Dave Jenner has bowed out on all items in the list I posted. Sam has
claimed the DEC books. The programming card and Everex book are still
available, as are all the hardware items.
Caveat emptor!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net)
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
Sam Ismail has claimed the books I'd offered. The other items are still
available.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net)
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
Hi,
----------
> From: J. Maynard Gelinas <maynard(a)jmg.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: WANTED: MC68[34]0 programmers reference manual
> Date: Sunday, April 26, 1998 10:02 AM
>
> Hey folks,
>
> While I've got a 68000/08/10/ book, I'm in need of some
> documentation for the 68881 which comes built in to the 68030.
this was new to me ;-))
serious: 68881 is a co-pro for 68020
68882 is a co-pro for 68030
most parts of a 68881 are built in 68040
68030 has the MMU built in (not all types !!)
> I checked at Quantum books (next to MIT - _THE_ place to check
> around here) among several other technical book stores.
> Unfortunately, I can't seem to find it for sale
> anywhere... seems like the 68k like has really died the hard
> death. Soooo, if anyone has an extra copy they're interested
> in selling please contact me.
check the motorola semiconductor webpage. You should find all information
you need there.
cheers,
emanuel
Had a pretty good week getting more items for the museum, from ebay I go
Newton messagepad model H1000 with all the manuals, stickers, video, and
other items that came with it when new; a Magic Mike II Robot from 1984
model-8; from ebay a Mac Portable with carrying case not working at this
time, put in new batteries and still nothing;two items I got at police
auction Saturday Mac PowerBook Duo230 and Duo Dock, and A US Robotics pilot
5000 missing a few item but powers on these are not 10 years old yet but I
got them anyway as they will be someday;HP 4940A Transmission Impairment
unit, SUN 3/50 loaded; HP98785A monitor not tested ($5); early Mac mouse
M0100; Mac Plus manuals;HP 150 model 45611A; Apple RGB model A9M0308 used
with IIe or IIgs a odd shaped model; Time-Life The Personal Computer book
with lots of nice pictures of classic units; also their Computer Basics
book; HP 100/Personal Card file manual; HP 150 Terminal Users guide; HP
Personal Computer Owners guide; IBM PC an Introduction by Larry Joel
Goldstein and Martin Goldstein 1984; Making the Most of Your ZX81 by Tim
Hartnell 1981; The ZX81 Companion by Robert Maunder 1981; 49 Explossive
Games fo the ZX81 by Tim Hartnell 1981; Microcomputer Experimentation with
the Intel SDK-85 by Lance Leventhal and Colin Walsh 1980;Socrates KB not
tested yet; AT&T 6300 mono monitor; a complete set of manuals for the 6300;
Commodore Buyers guide; Atari Logo reference manual; MAI systen cartridges;
Daynafile guide and diskettes; Timex Sinclair 1016 memory module; Sinclair
ZX81 basic programming manual; Commodore 1541C users guide; Sorates voice
cartridge users manual 1988; Upgrading and repairing PC's by QUE 1988;
HP87; and many other items that do not meet the 10 year rule but the prices
were right get them now and hold until they do. Well that's my short list
so Keep Computing John
<> I missed a few... D11, T11, 68030, HP Saturn, 7811 (if we're counting
<> embedded chips that we've never programmed :-)), 8x305, Z8, probably
<I didn't quite mean that :-) I was just interested to note that some
<micros that were once well-known aren't well-represented in your list, o
<Allison's, or mine. Only one occurrence of the 9900, no F8, only one
<Cosmac, ... Perhaps three people is just too small a sample to show al
<of the ones that faded from popularity (and maybe nobody else here is
<interested :-)) Not a lot of DSPs either, though of course they're more
<"modern".
Well the F8 while known was not hobbiest fodder being aimed at embedded
systems. Same can eb said for z8. The 9900 as I refer to it was not the
TI99/4a(have those too) but a Technico SBC, due to a lack of TI support it
was not that popular. However the TI99/4a is still quite popular.
Others I've worked with 78pg11(uCOM78) were aimed at embedded
applications. I might add that my time as a product engineer at NEC in
the early '80s had me designing in that part as well as supporting it
along with ucom4 and ucom75 4bit micros.
The RCA1802 was sort of a square egg. It had popularity for a short
while. People lost interest after that, partly as RCA discontinued
it by the mid 80s. Also because it was slow and had a relatively
poor(primitive) instruction set and a total lack of high level languages
other than tinybasic.
The advent of more complete systems like apple and trs80 and decreasing
prices helped focus the market on two key players 6502 and z80 and it
would remain that way until the 68000 and 8088(x86) would displace them.
Allison
Hey folks,
While I've got a 68000/08/10/ book, I'm in need of some
documentation for the 68881 which comes built in to the 68030.
I checked at Quantum books (next to MIT - _THE_ place to check
around here) among several other technical book stores.
Unfortunately, I can't seem to find it for sale
anywhere... seems like the 68k like has really died the hard
death. Soooo, if anyone has an extra copy they're interested
in selling please contact me.
Thanks!
--jmg
John Foust said:
>I just got 21 rolls of original yellow Teletype 1" tape from
>someone on the RTTY mailing list for the cost of shipping, and I
>promised to share the wealth, so ...
Well, do you know if it's oiled or unoiled? I'm not sure but I think I
may need the oiled. I need to ask someone. My wife says that this tape I
have has the distinct smell of machine oil. It should make the punch block
last longer.
I was just going to order a 1/4 case from Western Numerical Control
(http://www.westnc.com/paptape.html). That's 7 rolls for $33.00, in
all kinds of colors. And they are close by in Grass Valley,CA.
I also want to ask them about the toxicity of paper tape. (My two
sheppards think everything is a toy for them to fight over.)
=========================================
Doug Coward dcoward(a)pressstart.com
Senior Software Engineer
Press Start Inc.
Sunnyvale,CA
Curator
Museum of Personal Computing Machinery
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/museum
=========================================
< Does anyone have info on a Teletek SBC-1 Z80-based single-board
<computer? Copyright is 1981. It's loaded except for RAM (from what I can
<see). It has a Z80 CPU, PIO, SIO, and CTC. There are a couple of blank
<sockets, and a TMM2016P-2 memory chip (a 2716??). It appears to be built
<a S-100 card.
First off 2016 is a byte wide ram. I sounds like someone stripped the
card. The SBC-1 was a complete Z80cpu(4 or 6mhz)/64kram/eprom/IO card
it was designed to be used as a slave to the Systemaster cpu card. The
2016 was used to create a FIFO so that block IO coul be used to
communicate with it. the only thing it lacked to be a complete S100
cp/m system on a board was disk IO. The system master card had all that
and FDC as well.
Allison
<Were they DOT MATRIX? I'll bet they're not big old noisy line printers u
<they're sound covered and about 4 feet tall.
LA120 was dot matrix and it's fame was the longest running DEC produced
printer. Reason for that, it could do 8part carbons! IT was considered
teh best vax hard copy console.
Allison
On Apr 25, 18:02, Tony Duell wrote:
> I missed a few... D11, T11, 68030, HP Saturn, 7811 (if we're counting
> embedded chips that we've never programmed :-)), 8x305, Z8, probably
other
> 650x and 680x chips embedded in things. Can I count the CPU array chips
> in a DAP, please <grin>.
>
> > However, what's surprising about these lists is not what's there, but
> > what's missing.
>
> What do you think I should have included? I may just have forgotten I
> used it...
I didn't quite mean that :-) I was just interested to note that some
micros that were once well-known aren't well-represented in your list, or
Allison's, or mine. Only one occurrence of the 9900, no F8, only one
Cosmac, ... Perhaps three people is just too small a sample to show all
of the ones that faded from popularity (and maybe nobody else here is
interested :-)) Not a lot of DSPs either, though of course they're more
"modern".
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
I have been rearranging my storage area and uncovered a HP 1611A Logic State
Analyser fitted with a Z80 option that I picked up a few years ago.
I have no idea what one would do with this. Should I cherish it? Play with
it?
Does one need the specific manual or are these generic and perhaps explained
in standard texts?
There are a number of plugin points for various types of probes, none of
which I have off course. It powers up fine though.
Indeed, what a haul (at least if you're into DEC stuff).
Thanks to the kindly folk at St. Martin's College about 40 miles south of
me, I am now the proud owner of:
* A PDP-11/44 and its rack...
* A Fujitsu 'Eagle' drive (and it's weight!)
* A Cipher 880 front-loader tape drive...
* Numerous distribution tapes for several versions of RSTS/E, including
one for ver. 9.7(!)...
* Various bits of documentation. Unfortunately, not a lot on RSTS itself
(much of it got trashed along with the -- get this -- distribution kit for
RSTS 10! Dang, I was pissed when I heard about that...)
And, thanks to my friends at RE-PC, I have also acquired a pair of M4 Data
model 9914 9-track SCSI tape drives. These are neat boxes! Quad density
(800/1600/3200/6250), autoloading, neat front panel with alphanumeric
display, etc.
It's been a busy weekend. Now, if you'll pardon me, I need to go collapse
and snore my brains out. ;-)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net)
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
...mostly because I do not want to throw the stuff out/scrap it...
(1) Miniscribe 8425SA drive, removed from a Mac Plus. I assume it works
still, but do not quote me on that. It seemed to power up fine just a
few minutes ago. The Mac was in very poor condition, so
that got scrapped.
(1) Kaypro 81-045-02 PeeCee. This appears to be their version of the XT
(oh, joy), but unlike most clones, is a little better built. It uses no
motherboard, just a passive backplane with a CPU card. This one has a 20
meg Seagate drive and a Samsung (yuck!) CGA tube. It works, and has only
DOS 5.0 on it. The nice thing about this is that most of the chips are
socketed!
(5) Ink ribbons for the IBM 5103 printer. Still sealed, these come with a
goofy plastic glove for the CE. OK, so there are probably not even five
5103s left in the world...
(1) Computer Wharehouse Store catalog, Spring-Summer 1977. SWTPC! Imsai!
Kim-1! $1200 floppy drives! A slice from the "good old days" of the micro.
The pages are a bit yellow, but in good shape. The cover is also nice, but
the previous owner scribbled his name on the top.
Really, if _anyone_ wants any of this stuff, speak up and make a SILLY
offer. I will ship anything but the Kaypro (I could deliver it to RCS/RI
in Providence, RI, however). Trades are good for the stuff as well. Not
first come first serve - I will decide "winners" in a day or two, just to
give those with restricted or slow email a chance.
William Donzelli
Carmel, NY 10512
william(a)ans.net
Hello, all:
Does anyone have info on a Teletek SBC-1 Z80-based single-board
computer? Copyright is 1981. It's loaded except for RAM (from what I can
see). It has a Z80 CPU, PIO, SIO, and CTC. There are a couple of blank
sockets, and a TMM2016P-2 memory chip (a 2716??). It appears to be built on
a S-100 card.
Thanks!
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
============================================
Dear sir`s.
I want to move a harddisk from a PCXT to a PCAT and add it to the
existing harddisk in my PCAT. Do you know how that can be done?
With kind regards.
Joaki Kjellander.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
The first speaker has been confirmed for VCF2 this September.
David Rutland was an engineer on a lesser known but very significant
computer dedicated in 1950 called the SWAC (National Bureau of Standards
Western Automatic Computer).
You can check out his bio on the Vintage Computer Festival web page:
http://www.siconic.com/vcf
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't blame me...I voted for Satan.
Coming in September...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
[Last web page update: 04/25/98]
On Apr 25, 1:39, Tony Duell wrote:
> Allison wrote:
> > I have: 1802, SC/MP, 6800, 6809, NEC D78PG11, 8748/9, 8751, 8080/8085,
> > z80, z180, z280, z8002, z8001, 808x, 8018x, 80286, 80386, 80486 and the
> > micro version of minis 6100(pdp-8), 6120(PDP-8+EMA) TI9900, PDP11(T-11,
> > F11, J-11).
> Let's see how I do :
>
> Ones I have : (possibly embedded, but I've designed machines round a
> number of these...)
>
> SC/MP, 8008, 8080, 1802, 8085, Z80, 64180, 8086, 8088, 80286, 80386,
80486,
> 68000, 68010, 68020, 68040, T212 (or maybe T225), T425, T801, T805,
> PIC16C84, PIC17C42, F11, J11, 6502, 6809, 6800, 6803, 4040, 8048 (and
> 8035), 8051 (and 8031, 8032), ARM2, ARM3, R2000, 6120, Z8001, 32016, 2901
> etc (does that count), 3001 etc (ditto), and doubtless more that I've
> forgotten...
I can't beat that...
8008, 8085, 8088, 8086, 80186, 80286, 80386, 80486, V20, Z80, Z8, Z8001
(but in foam, not a system), 6502, 65C12, 6800, 6809 (in foam), 68HC11,
8032, 8035, 8048, 68000, 68010, 68020, assorted PICs, ARM2, ARM3, R4600,
Sparc, 2901, D11, F11, T11, J11, 6100, and probably a few embedded "things"
and others I've forgotten, but I wouldn't claim to have programmed all of
them.
However, what's surprising about these lists is not what's there, but
what's missing.
What's a 3001, BTW?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
At 09:50 PM 4/24/98 -0500, you wrote:
>On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Zane H. Healy wrote:
>
[snippies]
>
>What makes you think the Evil Empire is behind this? Did Microsoft buy
>Wang recently? If not, they'll get hit with the same suit.
>
[s]
>-- Doug
Have a look at http://www.mozilla.org/.
<> Allison wrote:
<> > I have: 1802, SC/MP, 6800, 6809, NEC D78PG11, 8748/9, 8751, 8080/8085
<> > z80, z180, z280, z8002, z8001, 808x, 8018x, 80286, 80386, 80486 and t
<> > micro version of minis 6100(pdp-8), 6120(PDP-8+EMA) TI9900, PDP11(T-1
<> > F11, J-11).
By and large including the 8008 and VAX I've programmed and designed with
all. The key thing is I have working examples of all but the 8008.
Drat, I forgot the NEC unique 4 bitters the uCOM4 and ucom75 series
designed them into and programmed them as well.
<What's a 3001, BTW?
3001 is an intel bit slice (2 bits per).
Allison
<I have an Intel Component Data Catalogue from about 1978 that still lists
<as being available then. A 4 bit microprocessor wouldn't have been very
<useful in a computer so might we find them as controllers in washing
<machines, microwaves and the like?
They were used for calculator like and control systems. The word width
does not determine it's usefulness as a computer though it greately
affects speed.
Allison
The highly sought after Commodore 1581 (3 1/2") drive is worth anywhere from
$50. - $80. depending upon condition (power supply included). Post a
message as to it's availability in comp.sys.cbm, and you'll have all kinds
of offers.
Cliff Gregory
cgregory(a)lrbcg.com
-----Original Message-----
From: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
To: Cgregory <Cgregory>
Date: Friday, April 24, 1998 10:15 PM
Subject: C64 3 1/2" drive
>
>Just turned up a Commodore 3 1/2" drive -- didn't know they existed! Anyone
>interested?
>
>Also, some strange thing with 4 hand held units with 4 buttons each, which
>plugs into the joystick port. No software.
>
>manney(a)lrbcg.com
>
>
>
>Showoff :-) No 8008? I always wanted a 4004 (anyone listening out there,
I have an Intel Component Data Catalogue from about 1978 that still lists it
as being available then. A 4 bit microprocessor wouldn't have been very
useful in a computer so might we find them as controllers in washing
machines, microwaves and the like?
At 09:50 PM 24-04-98 -0500, Doug Yowza wrote:
>It sounds like the Wang patent basically covers rendering formatted
>information on a terminal that was acquired via a remote connection. So,
>what was the closest thing to a Web browser before 1993? GRiD fan that I
>am, I vote for the 1982 GRiD/OS and remote GRiDCentral. GRiD/OS had a
>form and menu based OS interface and actions were based on the file type
>and extension. GRiDCentral (and the LAN-based GRiDServer) basically
>distributed this menu-based filesystem over a remote connection.
How about the CAI system that CDC had (I can't remember the name off hand
at the moment - I think my brain is broken - I couldn't even remember the
brand name of some wine I wanted to buy yesterday... Will chewing on a
floppy disk or two improve things :-). From my limited exposure it's likely
that the CDC thingy :-) had a browser style interface.
Huw Davies | e-mail: Huw.Davies(a)latrobe.edu.au
Information Technology Services | Phone: +61 3 9479 1550 Fax: +61 3 9479
1999
La Trobe University | "My Alfa keeps me poor in a monetary
Melbourne Australia 3083 | sense, but rich in so many other ways"
On Apr 24, 21:50, Doug Yowza wrote:
> Subject: About the Wang '669 patent
> On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Zane H. Healy wrote:
>
> > If you haven't seen the news yet, I found out thanks to
http://slashdot.org
> > , Microsoft is pulling one of their dirtiest stunts ever in their
attempt
> > to destroy Netscape. If anyone doesn't think Microsoft is evil this
should
> > convince them, unless they are niave enough to think Microsoft isn't
behind
> > this!
>
> What makes you think the Evil Empire is behind this? Did Microsoft buy
> Wang recently? If not, they'll get hit with the same suit.
They "formed a partnership" which, amongst other things, involved the
exchange of some $90,000,000.
> It sounds like the Wang patent basically covers rendering formatted
> information on a terminal that was acquired via a remote connection. So,
> what was the closest thing to a Web browser before 1993? GRiD fan that I
> am, I vote for the 1982 GRiD/OS and remote GRiDCentral. GRiD/OS had a
> form and menu based OS interface and actions were based on the file type
> and extension. GRiDCentral (and the LAN-based GRiDServer) basically
> distributed this menu-based filesystem over a remote connection.
The Wang patent relates to videotex terminals, exactly the stuff that
British Telecom developed in the 1970s and pushed hard (as PRESTEL) in the
early 80s. Prestel was organised a little like an ISP, with various "IP"s
(information providers) renting space in which they creating "frames" of
text and (chunky) graphics which were accessible by modem. IPs could
sublet space, too, so individuals could rent just a single frame if they
wanted.
In 1982 PRESTEL launched a service called Micronet800, which used thousands
of pages on PRESTEL servers to store microcomputer related news, software,
etc, and started selling software to enable home micros to dial up and
display/load/save these pages. Actually, stuff for micros had been around
on PRESTEL before that, but spring 1982 was when it took off. I got my
software and modem that summer. Most of the modems were simple devices
built in to an acoustic coupler, fondly known as agnostic complicators.
PRESTEL itself didn't make use of file extensions, but obviously some of
the micro systesm that accessed it did. CP/M has always based certain
actions on file types and extensions, for example. It did use menus of
links, and the links between frames, could be quite arbitrary (and
tangled!) just like the web. There was even a command to go back one or
more frames, and there were "response" frames and a mail system and ...
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
As far as commonality of old machines goes, most airports have
old machines. Public libraries do as well. The boston public
library just replaced some Vaxen with Alpha machines. I couldn't
get them to tell me what they did with the old stuff.
In general, I would say that the amount of old machines is greater
than a given reasonable estimate (ie there's always one more).
Also, I'm wondering how many simple cash registers will have to be
taken out of service.
>
>Hmmm... And Sam, you have an interesting thought. But I wonder actually
how
>many old systems you refer to are actually are still in use?
>
>Anybody who's got a better handle on the present population of minis
and
>mainframes still in service want to give an opinion on this?
>
>One drawback for me (maybe others here too): my wife will kill me if I
drag
>home a second or third big-iron machine ;-) We just moved into a new
house
>and I can say for sure that we are only _half-moved_ at the moment. The
>other stuff yet to move is my collections, library, workshop, tools,
>equipment, parts, stuff, etc, etc, etc.. I am tired and sore already.
>Thank heaven the old and new house are only about a mile apart!
>
>At 14:05 23-04-98 -0700, Kip wrote:
>>At 09:27 4/23/98 -0700, Sam wrote:
>>>I'm sure this is not even an original thought, but the Year 2000
presents
>>>a special opportunity for collectors like us.
>>
>>See ANALYTICAL ENGINE Volume 1, Number 2, October 1993 ;-) If we
think
>>we've got a space crisis NOW....
>>__________________________________________
>>Kip Crosby engine(a)chac.org
>> http://www.chac.org/index.html
>>Computer History Association of California
>>
>Christian Fandt, Electronic/Electrical Historian
>Jamestown, NY USA
>Member of Antique Wireless Association
> URL: http://www.ggw.org/freenet/a/awa/
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
< :> I have: 1802, SC/MP, 6800, 6809, NEC D78PG11, 8748/9, 8751,
< :>8080/8085, z80, z180, z280, z8002, z8001, 808x, 8018x, 80286,
< :>80386, 80486 and the micro version of minis 6100(pdp-8),
< :>6120(PDP-8+EMA) TI9900, PDP11(T-11, F11, J-11).
<
< :Showoff :-) No 8008? I always wanted a 4004 (anyone listening out
< :there, that's a hint) and an SC/MP. Anybody remember Fairchild F8's
The 8008 doesn't count as it's not operational. I only have the cpu card
out of my first design. ;-) Same for the 2901/2911 based hardware and the
29116 board.
I also have an ADVICE, thats a VAX (78032 chip) on a board for in circuit
emulation. I keep forgetting it. Strange board!
F8/3870 yes, never desgned with it but I had to know it to compete.
Allison
Pardon my forwarding this from the "Team Amiga" mailing list, but I figure
some people here might find this very interesting.
Zane
>Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 00:54:25 -0400 (EDT)
>To: <teamamiga(a)thule.no>
>From: Dave Haynie <dhaynie(a)jersey.net>
>Subject: Re: Commodore 900
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Sender: owner-teamamiga(a)thule.no
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: teamamiga(a)thule.no
>
>On Thu, 23 Apr 1998 23:55:49 +0500, amorel <amorel(a)xs4all.nl> jammed all
>night, and by sunrise was overheard remarking:
>
>>> When Commodore Holland went bust, there stuff got sold to different
>> traders. At a fair in Nov. 1995, in Holland(HCC beurs) I bought an
>> interesting machine, called the Commodore 900.
>
>Cool! I would love to have one of those.
>
>The C900 was the Commodore "next generation" machine, before we bought
>Amiga. It had unfortunately been through a few different design teams
>before it really worked. I never worked on it -- I was on the C128 at
>the time. George Robbins and Bob Welland really got it going; the same
>guys who created the A500 architecture. The C900 was about ready to ship
>when we bought the Amiga. Commodore was hurtin' then -- we had been
>through four rounds of layoffs, the only time it got worse was in later
>'93/early '94 when they bought the farm. C= put everything behind the
>Amiga -- emotionally, in retrospect, the right thing to do. But I can't
>help but wonder if the C900 might not have gone gangbusters, especially
>in Europe. At the time, the only megapixel UNIX workstations came from
>Sun and Apollo...
>
>> The machine is a Unix workstation.
>
>It actually ran Coherent, a UNIX clone from Mark-Williams.
>
>> Inside there is a shitload of electronics. At least there's no room for
>> a lot more, like extension cards.
>
>Actually, it did take expansion cards, but kind of a novel design --
>they stacked, one on top of the other. If you've ever seen PC/104 cards,
>you'll get the idea. The 8563 chip, the 80 column chip in the C128, was
>originally designed as a "dumb terminal" display chip for the C900.
>Apparently, the idea was to have this chip, and a 6502 or some-such, and
>an RS-232 chip (like the 6551), togther in a character-based monitor,
>for cheap multiuser systems built up around the C900. There was also a
>blitter based graphics card (the built-in monochrome display has no
>blitter), with a Welland-done blitter (a bit more sophisticated in some
>places than the Amiga, for example, like AAA, it would work in real
>pixel coordinates, rather than offset/modulo).
>
>> The motherboard has Zilog 16 bit CPU (16 bit version of the Z80?)
>
>The Z8000. It wasn't a 16-bit version of the Z-80, but something new. It
>wasn't quite as cool as the 68000, since the model was definitely
>16-bit. But much better than the 8086/8088 of the time.
>
>> and one which might be scsi and more.
>
>The DMA chip on the A2090/A2090A controllers for the Amiga, was
>originally designed for this system.
>
>> The great thing is, it even works! :-)
>
>Cool!
>
>> Anyway, has anyone any info about this?
>
>You know pretty much what I know. I don't know if there's anything else,
>I can ask around, see if George has any details. Gimme a direct mail if
>you'd like to continue offline.
>
>> Until now I have not had any sign of anyone on internet who knows
>> about this.
>
>Rarer than the A3000+, I suspect. A definite collector's item.
>
>Dave Haynie | V.P. Technology, PIOS Computer | http://www.pios.de
>Be Dev #2024 | DMX2000 Powered! | Amiga 2000, 3000, 4000, PIOS One
> Buy my house! Take the tour at http://www.jersey.net/~dhaynie
>
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| For Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
| For the collecting of Classic Computers with info on them. |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/museum.html |
What really came to my mind was an ancient McDonalds thing I saw
once. They were 50's style rounded video monitors, awful text.
They looked like something from "Brazil". I was wondering how those
would tolerate it. Also, those UPS hand-held things
>
>> In general, I would say that the amount of old machines is greater
>> than a given reasonable estimate (ie there's always one more).
>> Also, I'm wondering how many simple cash registers will have to be
>> taken out of service.
>
>The _simple_ cash registers will keep plugging along doing what they
>do best. As far as I can tell, they're not particularly sensitive
>to what century they're in. The complex fancy new-fangled registers
>are a whole nother story -- anybody know what types of systems are
>most used at the other end of the cables attached to the laser
>bar-code readers? Not an industry I've dealt with much except as a
>consumer. (I know damned well there are a few NCR registers still
>in service from the 19th century -- they should make the transition
>to the 21st without a hickup.)
>--
>Ward Griffiths
>They say that politics makes strange bedfellows.
>Of course, the main reason they cuddle up is to screw somebody else.
> Michael Flynn, _Rogue Star_
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Just turned up a Commodore 3 1/2" drive -- didn't know they existed! Anyone
interested?
Also, some strange thing with 4 hand held units with 4 buttons each, which
plugs into the joystick port. No software.
manney(a)lrbcg.com
On Apr 24, 19:55, Bob Withers wrote:
The original poster stated that he was passing a NULL POINTER to strcpy.
You replied that it should be OK to copy from a NUL STRING. I understand
the difference and was trying to casually point out that you were not
addressing the question asked. Sorry if I ruffled some feathers.
You didn't. I just normally write in that tone of voice (if you see what I
mean :-)) -- and I hadn't quite thought it through.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Somebody's been reading that LA Times article again...
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ismail [mailto:dastar@wco.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 1998 12:54 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Osborne 1 for $1000?
Anyone want to buy an Osborne 1 for $1000? Didn't think so. However, if
you're interested in trying to talk this guy down to reality, I have the
contact info.
Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Don't blame me...I voted for Satan.
Coming in September...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
[Last web page update: 04/23/98]
On Apr 24, 20:32, Captain Napalm wrote:
> It was thus said that the Great Pete Turnbull once stated:
> > Yes, but that's not what I wrote. A null string is an empty string (no
> > characters). A NUL string would be a string with a single ASCII NUL
> > character in it
> And what I was talking about was NULL pointers, which strcpy() doesn't
> like.
>
> -spc (and it's a NULL POINTER that strtok() will return, not a NULL
> string.)
Oops. Too much gin in the tonic water tonight.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
The original poster stated that he was passing a NULL POINTER to strcpy. You replied that it should be OK to copy from a NUL STRING. I understand the difference and was trying to casually point out that you were not addressing the question asked. Sorry if I ruffled some feathers.
Bob
----------
From: Pete Turnbull[SMTP:pete@dunnington.u-net.com]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 1998 7:39 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: [getting old punched cards read]
On Apr 24, 17:10, Bob Withers wrote:
> There's a big difference between a NUL string and a NULL pointer.
Yes, but that's not what I wrote. A null string is an empty string (no
characters). A NUL string would be a string with a single ASCII NUL
character in it -- and rather hard to manipulate in C, since NULs mark the
ends. Nevertheless, they do exist, though that wasn't what I was talking
about.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Anyone want to buy an Osborne 1 for $1000? Didn't think so. However, if
you're interested in trying to talk this guy down to reality, I have the
contact info.
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't blame me...I voted for Satan.
Coming in September...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
[Last web page update: 04/23/98]
On Apr 23, 14:33, Allison J Parent wrote:
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: Replies to various threads
>
> <> The PDP-11 architecture has only 7 GP registers (since you can't
really
> <> the PC for just anything) but that's good for the times, and they
reall
> <> are interchangable, so I'd be willing to argue that it wins on that.
> <
> <I'm glad somebody agrees with me on that! IMHO the concept of a GP
> <register is a RISC sort of thing. And, Allison, if you think RISC
> <should be register-rich, I claim the PDP11 was for its date, and
> <certainly was compared to micros of the 1970s.
>
> Compared to maybe 6800 or 6502, the 8080 had 4 16bit registers (bc, de,
> hl, sp). The z80 added a second set and IX/IY. But that was only one
> aspect.
But you can't easily use both sets of registers at the same time (yes, I
know we sometimes do, but it's a fiddle) and the Z80 is very much a
single-accumulator type of beast. And as for IX and IY ;-)
The original design of the 6502, incidentally, was that all of zero-page be
treated as registers. They just happen to be external to the chip, which
wasn't completely unknown elsewhere in those days. So in that sense it is
possibly the most register-rich design of the era -- but the registers are
hardly general-purpose, and the 6502 is also a single-accumulator design.
> On the instructions RISC systems of the time and even later didn't have
> the addressing modes and often had a distinct register load and store
> instruction. The best example of that difference was an ADD (R1),@(r2)+.
> Now compare that to the DG Nova and it is of a stark difference.
If you count all the ways you can index with registers, MIPS processors
have quite a few addressing modes. Not all are used very often, though.
> Of all the micros in my collection, none are RISC save for the PDP-8 and
> 6502 which in my mind come close.
The 6502 has a certain elegance of instruction set. Quite a different
philosophy to the Z80, in many ways, but I like them both. We used to say
that you had to learn how to use the 6502, and when you did, the code was
neat, but on a Z80, you just had to decide what you wanted an instruction
to do, and then pick the one that did that. Exaggeration, of course.
> I have: 1802, SC/MP, 6800, 6809, NEC D78PG11, 8748/9, 8751, 8080/8085,
> z80, z180, z280, z8002, z8001, 808x, 8018x, 80286, 80386, 80486 and the
> micro version of minis 6100(pdp-8), 6120(PDP-8+EMA) TI9900, PDP11(T-11,
> F11, J-11).
Showoff :-) No 8008? I always wanted a 4004 (anyone listening out there,
that's a hint) and an SC/MP. Anybody remember Fairchild F8's?
> Now something with a MIPS chip, ARM, sparc or some such would be a great
> addition of a real RISC processor.
Well, I've got all of those, and my favourite is the ARM. I've had to
write MIPS assembler, and it's not great fun.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Apr 24, 12:38, Paul E Coad wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Captain Napalm wrote:
> > It was thus said that the Great Pete Turnbull once stated:
> > >
> > > On Apr 24, 1:35, Captain Napalm wrote:
> > > > strcpy() (at least on my compiler) will crash if any of the
> > > > parameters are NULL pointers,
> > >
> > > That's a compiler (or library, actually) bug. You should be able to
> > > copy a null string.
> >
> > Well, I've tried it across four platforms and five compilers
> > (Linux/GCC, Solaris/native and GCC, AIX/native and HPUX/native) and
> > three of the five core dumped.
> >
> The ANSI standard is not completely silent on the matter, but does not
> define the behavior.
>
> "Each of the following statements applies unless explicitly stated
> otherwise in the detailed descriptions that follow. If an argument
> to a function has an invalid value (such as a value outside of the
> domain of the function, or a pointer outside the address space of
> the program or a null pointer), the behavior is undefined."
Well, whether I think that's sensible or not ('cos I think you ought to be
able to copy a null string), if ANSI says it's undefined, then it's not a
bug. I take it back. And thanks for checking, which I was too lazy to do
:-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Apr 24, 17:10, Bob Withers wrote:
> There's a big difference between a NUL string and a NULL pointer.
Yes, but that's not what I wrote. A null string is an empty string (no
characters). A NUL string would be a string with a single ASCII NUL
character in it -- and rather hard to manipulate in C, since NULs mark the
ends. Nevertheless, they do exist, though that wasn't what I was talking
about.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Apr 24, 11:53, Don Maslin wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Pete Turnbull wrote:
> > On Apr 24, 15:38, Hotze wrote:
> > > Reply to the spammers,
> >
> > Not often a good idea, since the consensus seems to be that responses
> > merely confirm that the address they used is (still) valid.
>
> True! However, in some cases e-mail with a copy of the spam or UCE to
> the postmaster of the ISP has been productive. In the case of known spam
> centers though, it is likely a BIG mistake.
Yes, I should perhaps have mentioned mailing to postmaster@... or abuse@...
as several responsible ISPs do follow these things up. I've had two very
positive responses from sysadmins, one of whom tracked a spammer who was
spoofing via his system, and one from a large ISP. In both cases, the
culprit lost their account. It's worth looking at all the "Received: from
..." headers in such cases.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York