i've never had a problem cracking macs. needless to say, dont even try to use
a screwdriver to seperate it at the seam; you'll only ruin the plastic!
the first way is to remove all the screws and lay the mac with the tube down
in your lap. put your hands around thebottom corners of the mac, and then use
your thumbs to push against the DB connectors back there. since you're
actually then pushing against the system board inside, that usually does it.
if that doesnt work, on to step 2.
for step 2, thread the top two screws in, but only a few turns. DO NOT tighten
them down! use your torx bit tool or whatever, and then push or lightly hammer
on your tool. by doing this, you're acutally applying pressure through the
loosened screws to the front half of the mac. that usually pops it loose. you
can apply the same technique to the bottom screws also. i've done this to all
compact macs except for the classic and cc models since i dont own one. hope i
explained it clearly.
david
In a message dated 98-06-27 21:57:49 EDT, john higganbotham put forth:
<< Also, seems that every compact mac I have messed with has already had the
case popped (according to the marks). What do I do if I come across a
virgin that's never been popped so to speak? Is it harder to get the case
off? >>
<ObCC-Q: What was the first microprocessor-based box to run Unix?
<
<ObCC-A: The Z8000-based Onyx C8002 in 1980.
I think that missed the unix V5 or V6 varients that ran on DEC LSI-11
and 11/23(later on).
Allison
Doug Yowza <yowza(a)yowza.com> wrote:
> Well, the DMV seems to have solved this problem -- I can never get my
> license plate stickers off, even after 10+ years :-)
Ha! I got an 8-year stack off mine late last year. Not because
the adhesive let go though, the reflective paint on the plate did!
But while I don't mind sticking that stuff on my license plates (after
all, they're DMV property), I don't think I'd want to use it directly
on artifacts! On storage bins/boxes, bags, and tags would be OK
though.
> And there's always good card stock tags and steel wire.
Good choice, though I've been using the ones with string (vs. wire) to
tag printed-circuit boards and some other things that look
susceptible.
> For the most part, I'm getting by
> now with cardboard boxes and magic markers, but that renders my barcode
> scanners useless, and it means that I usually stop short of writing the
> entire contents on the box (due to laziness).
Y'know, I've thought about barcode tagging a little bit, and I'm not
sure how it would help, besides saving me from keying an object's item
number to find the database record for this thing which I must be able
to at least see, after all I can scan its barcode tag, right?
> > OK, that said, the schema of my database looks something like this
> [...]
>
> Looks good. I'll probably steal this, if you don't mind.
No problem. If you have ideas for improvement feel free to share.
Right now I'm thinking about whether the "notes" field should be split
out into several note/memo fields for notes about relationships with
other items, condition, work needing to be done, and other miscellany.
That I lumped all this together in one note was part lack of knowledge
about how I was going to use the note field in practice, and part
architectural limitation of the in-ROM database software on the
100LX/200LX (which won't let you have more than one note field per
record).
> I'm a portable, wireless, and web zealot. I'll probably run the database
> on one of my home Linuxboxen, which I can talk to via various
> wireless-networked portables. (I have to admit that most of the wireless
> portables are non-classic, but one of them is an early NEC CP/M portable
> with a late 80's AirShare device.) This would free you from the memory
> constraints of your HP200LX. (Did I mention that I have some PCMCIA
> wireless LAN cards available for sale or trade?)
Memory constraints? Don't be fooled by that "2MB RAM" logo above the
screen, this 200LX has a 32MB RAMdisk daughterboard from Times2Tech.
It's like having a turbo PC/XT in the palm of my hand.
I'll give you points for using k00l technology to solve your problem,
but I don't think it'd work for me. Most of my collection is not
stored where I live, and between the storage locations, home, work,
and some of the places I go in pursuit of Stuff, I think it'd be hard
to pull off a "wireless LAN". They just aren't that local, nor are
they line-of-sight in any way, nor are they all inside coverage areas
excepting maybe cellphone coverage.
Not that I care much -- my solution is aimed at answering my
decaying-neuron questions, namely "have I got any of these?", "where
are they?", and "are they so screwed up that I should be looking for
another example?" As it happens it also will work pretty well for
answering "what's in this box?" because I've got the box's ID in the
location field, so can pull up all the records with a given box ID to
get my answer.
Well, it'd work that way if I actually had the inventory *done*.
That's the other part of the problem, I think I'm less than 1/5 there,
and what is done is in several pieces that correspond to various
points in the evolution of this thing. The further I go, the more
I learn.
-Frank McConnell
I'm trying to practice what I preach. I've written a book called
A Guide To Collecting Computers and Computer Collectibles:
History, Practice, and Technique. In it I recommend you should
define and refine your collection to help maximize the pleasure
you can obtain from it. Well I've decided to stick with my first
love - mainframes with big control panels - and sell the rest.
Sample of what you'll find in this message:
o Millionaire calculators
o Xerox Star
o MOS Technologies KIM-1
o Convergent Technologies Workslate
o Northern Telecom DV-1 telephone terminal
o IBM PC LAN software.
PLEASE SEND YOUR OFFERS AND QUESTIONS DIRECTLY
TO ME - NOT THROUGH THE LIST OR NEWSGROUP.
P.S. I thought the Classiccomp list would like to see the calculators
and telephones built into terminals also.
I have the following items for sale:
CALCULATORS
-----------------------
Burroughs huge, black, hand crank, wide platten,
9x9 keyboard, window between front edge
and keyboard, extra ribbon, Made in Canada
seems to work and in good condition
Egli, Hans, of Zurich Millionaires - one 16 digit (#1776) and one
20 digit (#2607)
good condition
Facit CI 13
working and in very good condition
Friden STW Automatic Calculator with plastic cover
no power cord, but in very good condition
Monroe 145, made in Western Germany
good condition
National model 750207, 67-HX-5"
huge, brown, hand crank
not working, but in very good condition
Remington Rand black, hand crank, wide platten
not working, but in good condition
HP HP-25 in original box and carrying case
owner's manual, applications programs
manual, quick reference guide, and ac
adapter
not working, but in very good condition
Olympia CD 71 in carrying case with instruction
booklet, ac adapter without plug to the
calculator
very good condition
TI TI 30 with carrying case
very good condition
TI TI Programmable 59 Solid State Software
lots of original keyboard templates,
Master Library Modules, magnetic storage
strips and read head cleaning strips, pocket
case for templates, modules, and strips
9 calculators, but only 2 battery packs
very good condition
COMPUTERS
---------------------
Apple III, 256K with monitor
the following is all original manuals,
diskettes, jackets, and boxes:
o System Software, SOS, Utilities, and
Emulation software and documentation.
o Universal Parallel Interface and
software driver, Visicalc sampler, Apple
Writer III, Business BASIC, Business
Graphics, System Demo, Maillist Manager,
Letter Quality Printer Demo
all in very good condition
Apple Lisa 2 in original box
only powered on twice
original brochures and demos
very good condition
Convergent Tech Workslate
original everything!
working, in mint condition
Data General One (2207)
all original accessories and
software:
o carrying case, AC adapter, battery
recharger, no name acoustic coupler
cups, expansion adapter, DOS 2.11,
Owner's Manual, Pocket Reference
works in very good condition
Dynalogic Hyperion 3032 - Agile OEM version
(also Bytec) the following is all original:
carrying case, Setup Guide, User
Guide, Technical Ref
Guide, Multiplan, In:Scribe, BASIC,
In-Touch, Aladin
working in very good condition
Epson QX-10 (Q701A)
no keyboard or monitor cables
loaded with Valdocs software and
user and developer documentation
in good condition
HP 150 Touch Screen PC w/9133D
very good condition
HP 150 Touch Screen PC w/9122D
and HP-IB cable
very good condition
HP Portable Plus
with original carrying case, AC
adapter, Owner's manual
IBM 5100 (C02), 5103 dot matrix printer
original carrying case (weighs 60lb!)
IBM 5100 binder containing:
o original sales literature
o original invoice
o BASIC manual
and 12 s/w or data tape cartridges
works, but keyboard has problems
very good condition
IBM PCjr
in large IBM attache case
includes original AC adapter,
TV Receiver VHF Terminal,
Operating Instruction manual,
and sampler diskette.
MOS Technology KIM-1
original everything!
in mint condition
Modular Micros Zorba (Gemini GC-200)
(div of Modcomp) works, very good condition
North Star Horizon
very good condition
Xerox Star (8010)
not working displays xxx msg
very good condition
Zenith ZFL-171-42 portable
original carrying case and
Owner's Manual, but copy of
DOS 2 boot diskette.
not working, in very good condition
TELEPHONES
----------------------
AT&T
very good condition
Bynamics PhonePad
original everything!
not working, in mint condition
IT&T InfoStation
very good condition
Northern Telecom Alex
good condition
Northern Telecom Displayphone
missing AC adapter
very good condition
Northern Telecom DV-1
mint condition
SOFTWARE
-------------------
Aldus PageMaker 1.2 for Mac
complete and original
good condition
Ann Arbor Softworks Full Paint
complete and original
good condition
Apple MacDraw
complete and original
good condition
IBM DOS 2.00 w/diskettes
good condition
IBM DOS 3.00 w/diskettes
good condition
IBM DOS 3.10 & 3.30
no diskettes
poor condition
IBM DOS 4.00 w/diskettes
unused
very good condition
IBM OS/2 Warp Version 3
w/diskettes and CD
unused
very good condition
IBM PC Local Area Network 1.10
complete and original
good condition
IBM PC Network Program 1.00
still shrink wrapped
very good condition
IBM PC Network Hardware Maintenance
and Service
complete and original
good condition
IBM PC 3270 Emulation 3.00
complete and original
good condition
IBM PC 3270 Emulation 2.00
original missing shelve
good condition
IBM PC/Host File Transfter and Terminal
Emulator 1.10
complete and original
good condition
IBM BASIC manuals
shrink wrapped
very good condition
IBM Pascal compiler
complete and original
good condition
IBM Guide to Operations 2.02
complete and original
good condition
IBM Technical Reference PC
very good condition
IBM Proprinter maintenance manuals
very good condition
idd MacDraft 1.2
complete and original
good condition
Symantec Grandview
complete and original
good condition
Vestronix Pro C
complete and original
good condition
Trilogy
complete and original
good condition
Xerox Ventura Publisher 2.0
complete and original...
all 19, 360K diskettes!
very good condition
Zenith Z-100 PC Service Guide
complete and original
good condition
Zenith Z-100 Disk-Based Diagnostics
complete and original
good condition
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Stumpf
kstumpf(a)unusual.on.ca
+1.519.744.2900 (EST/EDT GMT-5)
Hi, folks,
My PDP-11/44 has a power supply problem. Symptom: A rapid flashing of the
'DC ON' light, indicating (according to the users' guide) that one or more
DC voltages is not up to spec. The kicker is that I have nothing in the way
of service manual or maintenance print set.
I'm kind of puzzled about why the thing died. It's been functioning
perfectly well at St. Martins College for years, 24/7, without so much as a
burp. The only thing I can think of is that this continuous running had one
or more components stretched to their limit, and when I powered it on after
over a month of power off, it pushed it over the edge.
Anyway... I have no way of knowing even where to probe to see which
voltage died. Even if I did manage to find it, that fscking power supply's
about as complex as the CPU! If anyone's got service docs for the '44, and
can help me out with some copies, that would be just grand. I'd also be
open to troubleshooting via phone or E-mail.
If you've got spare parts, of course, that would be ideal. I could swap
modules until the bad one's isolated. ;-)
This is one I really want to get working. Please give me a hand if you
can. Thanks in advance.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net)
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
On Jun 27, 16:50, Hotze wrote:
> Most Windows CE devices are based on HP/NEC PA-RISC (IIRC)
> processors, or SGI MIPS processors.
Or Acorn/Digital StrongARM.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
I suppose SE30s and Mac IIs are 11 years old now! Yow. I still
think of antique computers as 8-bit micros- that's just my own
deluded sense of history.
I bought an SE30 w/ Ethernet recently for $80 through the net. The
owner showed up at my office one day recently and delivered it. The
next week I also bought a Mac IIx w/ 8 megs of RAM for $25 at a
Silicon Valley swap meet. A friend gave me a couple of Asante SCSI
<-> Ethernet adapters which can normally be had for around $20 on
eBay.
I hadn't figured out much useful to do with these slower machines
until... I found a very nice TCP/IP, etc packet monitor that runs on
these machines.
The "trial" version of this product (EtherPeek) is pretty hot in
itself and is worth checking out. The full version is...
unfortunately $700. I wish they'd sell the demo version with the
30-day time-bomb turned off for $100 as it's already more than what I
need to monitor my cable-modem connection. Oddly... the Win32
version of EtherPeek is just so-so...
I should add that in the case of SE30s, these things can sit on your
desk, won't get knocked off like a laptop and are available for less
than $100 with an ethernet card. This is an ideal niche machine for
a packet monitor!
http://www.aggroup.com - you have to download the app and then wait
for the password to be e-mailed to you.
----
There was an article in the May issue of Popular Home Automation
which piqued my interest in acquring these machines originally. It
was entitled, "What I Did With The Mac in the Closet" and features a
very vancy Macintosh/BSR controller system. This system can talk to
wireless speakers in every room in the house. After taking the
magazine home from the store where I found it, I realized this would
be a social faux-pas in my house and decided to nix the idea. The
software application that drives it is "XTension" by San Hill
Engineering. It might still be fun to play with since the
application is scriptable and can handle motion detectors and such.
The application looks pretty nice.
I wonder if the motion detectors would detect the squirrels I hear
are supposed to gather from time to time in my detached garage.
Hmm...
The only other application I tho't of for the older Macs is as a
dedicated Quick-cam machine. I must admit I use them for scanning in
pictures occasionally - waiting for the images to be converted to
JPEG is a hassle tho'.
Thomas
On Jun 27, 9:56, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> I think some drives, includeing the RZ23 have a jumper setting to spin
them
> up, and some PC controllers might do this for you.
Some of the RZ series do have a spin-up on power-up jumper, but the RZ23
isn't one of them :-( However, as someone else (Tim?) pointed out, most
workstation controllers or OSs (as opposed to PC controllers/OSs) will take
care of that. I have RZs on Acorn and SGI machines, but not, oddly, on any
of my DEC ones.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>> Bob was just a dumb program.
>
>Bob was touted by Microsoft as the way user interfaces would work from
>that point on. It was seen as a way to bring computers to mere consumers,
>and launched at CES with great fanfare IIRC.
What exactly is Bob? I've often see it mentioned, but never with any
background to what it actually does.
Thanks,
Tom
Sysop of Caesarville Online
Client software at: <http://home.earthlink.net/~tomowad/>
On Jun 27, 14:41, Hotze wrote:
> Would it be possible to have a control chip and a OS chip? You've got
the
> control chip, which contains address information on the OS chip, as well
as
> other EXTREMELY basic ssytem info. Then you've got the OS chip, which
> contains the OS. Because of the control chip, it could be as large as
you
> wanted it.
> I've also heard of a "Windows 98 on a chip" system, with 75MBPS
through
> put. Sounds like the first decent way to load Windows...
Well, you typically need 4 chips, since most ROMs are 8-bit wide, and most
current processors are 32-bit, but allowing a little poetic licence,
Windows on a chip is possible (and Windows CE is just that).
> PS-Did any computers have GUI's built in? I think that I recall that
> a Tandy did, but nothing else...
Amiga? Archimedes/RISC PC? Atari ST/MegaST? all those have the GUI in
ROM.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On 1998-06-27 classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu said:
cl{On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Don Maslin wrote:
cl{> Cannot help on the pinouts, but I think their monitor connector
cl{>was unique. You need to boot it with Wang disks. They are in PC
cl{>format, but the DOS is different. I have a set that I can copy
cl{>when you get video going.
cl{Great! I'll get various Kaypro stuff from you at the same time. ;)
cl{Do you know what the monitor connector looks like? The only
cl{possibilities are the DIN plugs on the back of the IBM Emulator
cl{card. Unless the monitor was some kind of terminal that attached
cl{to the serial port.
cl{The 8-pin DIN plug has a little symbol next to it which might
cl{represent a CRT. (It looks kind of like a pie slice.)
cl{> As I recall, the IBM Emulator board really hacks the WangDOS to
cl{>be more like PCDOS and it will then run many - but not all -
cl{PCDOS programs.
cl{Pretty big hack. A whole PC could fit on a card half that size. :)
cl{> Don't believe the D-subs on the back are for monitor and keyboard,
cl{>but it may be a different board than I ever saw.
cl{Well, I don't know where else to put a monitor. The Wang keyboard
cl{plugs into the 4-pin DIN socket connected to the machine's
cl{motherboard, I can only guess what the other things are for. I'm
cl{just scratching my head trying to figure out how to get a picture
cl{from the thing.
cl{> > The sticker on the side (top) of the machine says it's a PC-002,
cl{>but the > sticker on the back says it's a PC-P002.
cl{> >
cl{> > The keyboard has a lot of word processing functions on it.
cl{> That is what Wang really got established in.
cl{Too bad the keyboard doesn't have the greatest feel. And some of
cl{the keys are in the wrong places, but that's a holy war I don't
cl{want to get into. ;)
cl{> > Anyway, I haven't opened it up yet, or done anything with it
cl{>but look at > it. Disassembly looks like it might be difficult,
cl{>because I have to slip > the innards through the full length
cl{>metal sleeve. I won't be up to that > until my arms recover.
cl{>I've even got bruises and some kind of blood > blisters or
cl{something, from carrying that thing. :/ >
cl{> Stand it up on its face and lift the cover off. Everything
cl{>inside is in a heavy guage wire frame.
cl{Yeah, it took me a few minutes to figure it out, but it opened up
cl{easily once I decided to pull from the back instead of the front. :)
cl{> - don
cl{Doug Spence
cl{ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
cl{http://alcor.concordia.ca/~ds_spenc/
Hi
I used to have an old wang whith a 8086 cpu in it, it had a monotor whith
two cords coming out of it.
one was power and the other one was for the data, they both pluged into
the card whith two plugs on it.
the one I had used the round ps2 stile plug maybe a little bigger, like a
keyboard plug.
Pete
Net-Tamer V 1.11 - Registered
HOW DO YOU POUR *VARNISH* IN THE BACK OF A COMPUTER AND DON'T KNOW IT????
Just stuck my screwdriver in the back of that Mac 512, trying to open the
lid and remove a sorely jammed floppy. (No, I've already tried the little
button. It's jammed good.) Pull my screwdriver out - Minus the ending and
COVERED IN WET VARNISH! It's all over the place! These morons DUMPED A CAN
OF VARNISH in the computer, and didn't know about it!
It does power on though...
It comes up with the "insert a boot disk" icon.
-------
> 'The DMA address extension register is a 4*4 register file
>chip (74LS670) at location <U whatever>. It supplies the top 4 bits
>of the system 20 bit address during DMA cycles. Unlike the
>segmentation scheme used by the CPU, the extensions address is not a
>16 bit segment address which is added to the address from the DMA
>controller. Therefore, DMA operations cannot cross 64K boundaries',
I can half-understand that, but if you read those urban legends about a
guy calling tech support because the power went out in his block (I've
had personal experience - my mom thinks there is a significant
difference between a TV and monitor as far as cleaning solution is
concerned), I sometimes wonder how these people learn to walk :)
>
>Now remember the PERQ again, and think back to the start of this (long)
>thread. The PERQ happens to be the first commercial machine that would
>now be classed as a workstation. For that reason alone it should not be
>forgotten. But few people have ever heard of it (OK, not on this list
>since I do go on about it :-)), or seen one. Which comes back to the
>original point. Where should the average man in the street go to see
the
>machines that led up to the PC he's now using (I'll assume Windows, if
>only because it's the most common OS).
The average man in England might get your book, the average man in the
US doesn't have time. Most people just _don't have time_ to learn about
curiosities, especially when such complex, multidimensional concepts are
involved. And so many people already have learned to use their computers
mechanically (I just turned it on and it always loaded WordPerfect...)
that such knowledge would have nowhere to go. I've seen some of my
classmate have trouble understanding how muscles work, because they
_just do_. Also, the economic forces that partly drove this stuff could
never be understood by the naive American. To bring this long rambling
to a close, I don't think many people would understand such a history,
though that does not mean that we shouldn't try to make them ;)
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<Voice recognition?? This is still evolving and has just become viable i
<the last year or so. It works in a more than limited fashion, and is onl
Still evolving but usable systems are getting near 10 years old! I cite
DRAGON Dictate.
However user independent is far away.
<many different fields. MSX was a standard that was around for a time in
<Europe and Japan. Thankfully it didn't catch on in the U.S. or stick
<around, but like CP/M it kinda faded. Home automation is an evolving ar
MSX was replace like CPM with dos and winders.
Allison
I'm just wondering - what DO you use these machines for? I guess you
must have been doing it for a long time if you're using classics for it.
Also, I think you should at least have an inventory of the manuals, and
an inventory of each machine, ie
Apple //c
=1 computer
=1 monitor //c
=1 AC adapter
=1 'getting started' guide
etc, etc. That way, if you give the machine to someone, you won't leave
anything out.
>That could never work for me. I have a 'working' collection - machines
>are often being used for real-world tasks (I don't really have a
>non-classic computer), they're being investigated, hacked, tweaked,
>repaired,etc. So machines rarely stay in the same place for very long.
>
>And while I have shelf after shelf of manuals, many of them are open on
>my workbench, near this PC, etc. They're in _use_.
>
>-tony
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Can anyone point this guy in the direction of heaps of old computer
catalogs?
Reply-to: Ferock(a)aol.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 15:18:00 EDT
From: Ferock(a)aol.com
To: vcf(a)siconic.com
Subject: computer catalogs
I enjoyed reading your web page. I'm also interested in old computers and old
computer equipment. I collect old (1980-1990) computer catalogs. I'm
especially interested in Black Box and Amp catalogs. If you know anyone who
is interested in selling these items, I would greatly appreciate it if you
send me an e-mail. Thanks in advance.
Glenn
I guess I missed that one. Wasn't particularly useful, though versions
were used as Packard Bell's "Navigator" and a popular game called "Myst"
;)
>Bob was touted by Microsoft as the way user interfaces would work from
>that point on. It was seen as a way to bring computers to mere
consumers,
>and launched at CES with great fanfare IIRC.
>
If you use a keyboard. Imagine a touch screen keyboard that reconfigured
itself for your task, and had an enzyme coating that broke down your
skin oils to prevent stains (you'd have to take breaks, of course, to
prevent skin from drying out), like in Star Trek:The Next Generation.
It's farfetched, but I doubt we'll use mechanical keyboard forever.
>Touch screens make you take your hands off the keyboard and leave a
greasy
>mess on your screen while you try in vain to do high resolution tasks
with
>your low res finger.
Can you type while you're buried inside a router closet trying to check
network cables? I sure can't...
>Even in humans, voice recognition isn't great. That's why there are so
>many different words for "huh?". You'll always be able to communicate
>with your computer faster and more accurately with a keyboard.
Supercomputers are becoming less and less common because as things get
cheaper, it's no longer 'super' but 'high-power', and in two years,
'entry-level'. AI works best in parallel, so do simulations like the
ones India didn't want to stick to.
>The supercomputer tar pits are littered with the remains of parallel
>processing companies. They go fast only for a relatively small subset
of
>programs.
>
>-- Doug
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I LOVE that idea. Now, it'd need to be EPROM, especially nowadays with bug
fixes, a new version every other day of the week, etc. but still, it's a way
cool concept. Which computers did this?
Ciao,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Zane H. Healy <healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Friday, June 26, 1998 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: Mac Classic prob (was Macintoshes...)
>>> The Mac Classic contains a complete System 6 installation in ROM that
>>> you can boot from. Sorry but I don't have the docs handy, but I think
>>> if you press Command-Option-Shift-X on startup, it'll boot from the
>>> ROM. Another way that should work is Command-Option-Shift-Backspace --
>>
>>Actually, the keys to press are:
>>
>> Cmd-Option-X-O
>>
>>That's the letter O, not the number zero.
>
>Wow, it has the complete OS in ROM? I didn't know any of the Mac's did
>that. Are there any others or was this a one shot experiment that failed?
>The OS in ROM is the main thing I like about the Atari ST's.
>
> Zane
>| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
>| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
>| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
>+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
>| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
>| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
>| http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
Most of what you list are excellent things that are not yet finished.
They WILL catch on when they're done.
Bob was just a dumb program.
I find the touch screen comment unpleasant because I think touch screens
are the key to an easy-to-use interface. Voice recognition and p.p. are
in use and are gaining ground. What were bubbles, and why didn't they
catch on?
Ones you've missed? I think the Amiga caught on a lot less than it
should have, same with the Macintosh.
>BTW, I enjoy collecting over-hyped innovations that never quite
>caught on in the way they were supposed to: Bubbles. Pen-based
>computers. Touch screens. Wireless networks. Bob. MSX. Robots.
>AI. Home automation. The Z8000. The iAPX432. Parallel processing.
> Voice recognition.
>
>What did I miss?
>
>-- Doug
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Anybody know what a Tektronix 4211 is? Its got an RS-232C port on the
back, a DB-9 connector, two other db-25 ports, and some other connectors.
Its in a desktop case and is greyish in colour. Saw it in a surplus shop
so I don't have it in front of me to answer
questions.
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever onward.
September 26 & 27...Vintage Computer Festival 2
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
[Last web page update: 06/11/98]
>But seriously, while _I'd_ only want to write a book that's correct and
>complete (and therefore does document every last gate in the device), I
>guess few people would ever want to read it.
You could release it in pdf format on the internet with a $5 shareware
fee, or something. I'd certainly buy it, and I'm sure lots of other
people (such as the ones who subscribe to this list) would as well. The
information is invaluable.
Tom Owad
Sysop of Caesarville Online
Client software at: <http://home.earthlink.net/~tomowad/>
A piece of computer memorabilia well worth mounting on the wall or giving as a gift is a stack memory card from the UNIVAC computer. It is the LAST time the home of a bit of information could actually be seen - a tiny doughnut on a grid of wires.
See it at http://www.netw.com/~drfcline/univac.htm
>Now remember the PERQ again, and think back to the start of this (long)
>thread. The PERQ happens to be the first commercial machine that would
>now be classed as a workstation. For that reason alone it should not be
>forgotten. But few people have ever heard of it (OK, not on this list
>since I do go on about it :-)), or seen one. Which comes back to the
>original point. Where should the average man in the street go to see the
>machines that led up to the PC he's now using (I'll assume Windows, if
>only because it's the most common OS).
There's been a lot of talk of talk recently about preserving ROM
images and the like so that the machines will still be usable generations
>from now. But isn't the history of these machines and of how they were
designed just as important as the computer itself?
Who cares how much enjoyable it is to read, just so long as the
information exists.
Tom Owad (whom luckily, isn't knowledgable enough to write a book about
classic computers :-)
Sysop of Caesarville Online
Client software at: <http://home.earthlink.net/~tomowad/>
The problem being that we don't know most of that
>But isn't the history of these machines and of how they were
>designed just as important as the computer itself?
> Who cares how much enjoyable it is to read, just so long as the
>information exists.
>
>Tom Owad (whom luckily, isn't knowledgable enough to write a book about
>classic computers :-)
>
>Sysop of Caesarville Online
>Client software at: <http://home.earthlink.net/~tomowad/>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>Hi,
>
>I was wondering if there's a surefire way of telling if an IBM-PC has its
>original motherboard, without opening the case. I saw one at the
>Salvation Army today and was considering dragging it home (though I
>decided to take another machine instead).
>
>The machine did have a cassette port in the back, with a femal DIN
>connector. Is this attached to the motherboard?
Yes, it is.
>
>The machine also had a full complement of cards in its slots, with lots of
>ports coming out of it. And a 3.5" drive that was poorly fitted into the
>case.
The 3.5" drive requires a special controller card that I find rare. Snag it!
>
>I'm wondering if I should make a trip downtown sometime this weekend, with
>the car.
>
>
>Doug Spence
>ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
>http://alcor.concordia.ca/~ds_spenc/
>
>
Can't you also tell by the BIOS date?? I seem to remember that the original
PC had one of three BIOS dates: 4/24/81, 10/19/81, and 10/27/82. This in
combination with looking for a cassette port should be a good way to tell.
==================================
Rich Cini/WUGNET
- Charter ClubWin! Member (6)
- MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
- Collector of classic computers
<<========== Reply Separator ==========>>
Yep. I knew most of those. And SPARCs, PPC's, and, if you really want to
go on a limb, anything that runs Linux.
I was talking about processors, generally associated with UNIX, that
also run Windows CE devices.
Ciao,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, June 27, 1998 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: OS's In ROM's (was: Re: Mac Classic prob (was Macintoshes..
>
><A processor from a company who's highest-end products are UNIX based, and
><similiar version (IE in the same family, such as Pentium is in the x86
><family). Most Windows CE devices are based on HP/NEC PA-RISC (IIRC)
><processors, or SGI MIPS processors.
>
>Then Alpha, ARM, PDP-11, VAX, 680xx and sundry others are also since they
>all run unix.
>
>careful about retrorevisionist terminology...
>
>Allison
>
<Wasn't the i960 (the new Fast Ethernet chip) based on 432 archeticture?
< Ciao,
First of all the I960 is not a new eithernet chip it's off the high end
single chip micro end where the 8096 and 80860 lived.
432 based... not even close. The 432 was a data object oriented system
with a very unique bus. Aimed at ADA and Pascal type languages.
Allison
<A processor from a company who's highest-end products are UNIX based, and
<similiar version (IE in the same family, such as Pentium is in the x86
<family). Most Windows CE devices are based on HP/NEC PA-RISC (IIRC)
<processors, or SGI MIPS processors.
Then Alpha, ARM, PDP-11, VAX, 680xx and sundry others are also since they
all run unix.
careful about retrorevisionist terminology...
Allison
Wasn't the i960 (the new Fast Ethernet chip) based on 432 archeticture?
Ciao,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, June 27, 1998 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: Overhyped Innovations (was Re: OS's In ROM's (was: Re: Mac
Classic prob (was Macintoshes..
>
><I remember back in '98 when Doug Yowza wrote:
><> The Z8000. The iAPX432. Parallel processing. Voice recognition.
>< ^^^^^^^
><So you actually posess a 432 based machine? Impressive. I have only
><really heard about them in literature. Always sounded interesting.
>
>I have Intel docs for them. Old now, like early 80s.
>
>Allison
>
><competitor. Most Windows CE devices run off of UNIX-style processors, a
>
>What's a unix style processor?
>
>
>Allison
A processor from a company who's highest-end products are UNIX based, and a
similiar version (IE in the same family, such as Pentium is in the x86
family). Most Windows CE devices are based on HP/NEC PA-RISC (IIRC)
processors, or SGI MIPS processors.
Ciao,
Tim
>I've got two Digital RZ23 3.5" SCSI drives I'd like to find some more
>info on. I basically need the specs (cylinder, head, size, etc.) and
>jumper settings. Anyone got anything?
If you go to Seagate's website (www.seagate.com) you can find pages for
conner drives... it'll have graphics which show the positions of jumpers.
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry(a)zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg(a)world.std.com |
| Digital Equipment Corporation | |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
<I remember back in '98 when Doug Yowza wrote:
<> The Z8000. The iAPX432. Parallel processing. Voice recognition.
< ^^^^^^^
<So you actually posess a 432 based machine? Impressive. I have only
<really heard about them in literature. Always sounded interesting.
I have Intel docs for them. Old now, like early 80s.
Allison
<I've got two Digital RZ23 3.5" SCSI drives I'd like to find some more inf
<on. I basically need the specs (cylinder, head, size, etc.) and jumper
<settings. Anyone got anything?
The RZ23 (there are two different ones) are either 105 or 120mb SCSI
drives. The group of three(6pins, arranged 2x3) are the address.
Check the various vax archives for more specs.
Allison
<Would it be possible to have a control chip and a OS chip? You've got th
<control chip, which contains address information on the OS chip, as well
<other EXTREMELY basic ssytem info. Then you've got the OS chip, which
<contains the OS. Because of the control chip, it could be as large as yo
<wanted it.
Check out the IRMX-86 and the 8213x chips... beenthere done that about
12-14 years ago.
However in real life OS is software and control is CPU so that logical
partition is the norm for most CPUs. It's generally in RAM but as noted
there are plenty with bom based kernals and OSs.
Allison
<u have a GRiD Compass with bubble memory, you get an OS
<that acts like it's in ROM, but bubbles are writable.
Lessee here.
My supercrate s100 has CPM/BIOS/Monitor in rom. takes about 3sec to
selfcheck and boot.
I have an s100 crate with a 2mb write once romdisk of my design.
I also have a z80 system with an two intel BPK72 bubble memories on.
Each one give 128kb of space.
All easily predate the GRID.
Allison
Would it be possible to have a control chip and a OS chip? You've got the
control chip, which contains address information on the OS chip, as well as
other EXTREMELY basic ssytem info. Then you've got the OS chip, which
contains the OS. Because of the control chip, it could be as large as you
wanted it.
I've also heard of a "Windows 98 on a chip" system, with 75MBPS through
put. Sounds like the first decent way to load Windows...
Ciao,
Tim D. Hotze
PS-Did any computers have GUI's built in? I think that I recall that a
Tandy did, but nothing else...
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, June 27, 1998 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: OS's In ROM's (was: Re: Mac Classic prob (was Macintoshes...))
>On Jun 26, 21:15, Hotze wrote:
>> I LOVE that idea. Now, it'd need to be EPROM, especially nowadays with
>bug
>> fixes, a new version every other day of the week, etc. but still, it's a
>way
>> cool concept. Which computers did this?
>
>Acorn's RISC PC has the OS (RISC OS 3.7) in ROM, about 4MB IIRC. The
>original Archimedes range (1987) had RISC OS 2.0 in ROM (512K, IIRC).
> Usually they're mask ROMs or OTPROMs. The OS is structured as a series of
>about 80 relocatable modules, so if an upgrade is required, you load the
>relevant replacement module into RAM, and the kernel changes the links that
>point to it. Of course, changing the kernel module itself is a little more
>tricky, but it can be done -- the first RISC OS 2 upgrades had instructions
>on how to boot the system from a disk to load a new "utility module".
>
>--
>
>Pete Peter Turnbull
> Dept. of Computer Science
> University of York
On Jun 26, 23:31, Ward Donald Griffiths III wrote:
> Yes, LaTeX. Since it can actually be translated to other forms. A .PDF
> is more or less a bitmap picture of what used to be text and is usually
> unreadable -- Hell, last week at work I got an email with a .PDF
> attachment that included the icon where the document said "examine the
> attached bitmap" left over from its Word origin, but for some reason
> clicking on that icon in the .PDF doesn't bring up the full picture.
No, PDF is more-or-less PostScript. However, *some* PDF documents actually
include scanned images, which of course are usually bitmaps because the
creator didn't OCR them. Both PostScript and PDF files can contain text,
vector graphics, and bitmap graphics.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Jun 26, 21:15, Hotze wrote:
> I LOVE that idea. Now, it'd need to be EPROM, especially nowadays with
bug
> fixes, a new version every other day of the week, etc. but still, it's a
way
> cool concept. Which computers did this?
Acorn's RISC PC has the OS (RISC OS 3.7) in ROM, about 4MB IIRC. The
original Archimedes range (1987) had RISC OS 2.0 in ROM (512K, IIRC).
Usually they're mask ROMs or OTPROMs. The OS is structured as a series of
about 80 relocatable modules, so if an upgrade is required, you load the
relevant replacement module into RAM, and the kernel changes the links that
point to it. Of course, changing the kernel module itself is a little more
tricky, but it can be done -- the first RISC OS 2 upgrades had instructions
on how to boot the system from a disk to load a new "utility module".
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>I think cost had something to do with it, too.
Cost shouldn't have anything to do with innovation. It's really a bummer.
>BTW, I enjoy collecting over-hyped innovations that never quite caught on
>in the way they were supposed to: Bubbles. Pen-based computers. Touch
>screens. Wireless networks. Bob. MSX. Robots. AI. Home automation.
>The Z8000. The iAPX432. Parallel processing. Voice recognition.
Pen-based computers, although not a BOOMING success, have had a limited
success. Their gaining momentum, too. Robots? Once again, go into a
factory. You'll see them at work. BTW, how rare are Androbots? Wireless
networks? I've seen a fwe. But I'd like more tech behind them. Bob? He
was way cool. Then he died out. Too bad. AI is very much in a state of
recession, as early depressions in the 80's took all the hype out of it. I
say that we saw the last of current AI's with Deep Blue last year. They'll
come back, but not until 64-bit is standard. Voice recognitions much the
same as AI, but with a little more life, as it actually has some practical
applications that are already partially-functional.
>What did I miss?
Bunches of processors, lots of RAM designs, some cool hard disk systems, and
PC/TV integration.
>-- Doug
Tim D. Hotze
Come to think of it, ALL of the Windows CE devices have their OS in ROM.
*My* opinion is that for UNIX hardware, it's going to be UNIX's biggest
competitor. Most Windows CE devices run off of UNIX-style processors, as
that's the only way that they can get any speed inexpensively and with a
decent battery life.
Ciao,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Ward Donald Griffiths III <gram(a)cnct.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, June 27, 1998 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: OS's In ROM's (was: Re: Mac Classic prob (was Macintoshes..
>Doug Yowza wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Tom Owad wrote:
>>
>> > I belive Apple's Newtons have the OSes in ROM. They certainly do boot
>> > quickly and a chip swap is need to upgrade the OS.
>>
>> Later Newts, including the eMate, are flash upgradable. A quick boot
>> doesn't require a ROM OS, though. Windows is a slow booter even when
>> ROM'd, but battery-backed RAM gives many portables an instant boot even
>> with Windows.
>>
>> Of course, if you have a GRiD Compass with bubble memory, you get an OS
>> that acts like it's in ROM, but bubbles are writable.
>
>Yes, and bubbles rival floppies for speed. There's a _reason_ why
>that innovation didn't catch on.
>--
>Ward Griffiths
>They say that politics makes strange bedfellows.
>Of course, the main reason they cuddle up is to screw somebody else.
> Michael Flynn, _Rogue Star_
Doug Yowza <yowza(a)yowza.com> wrote:
> I'm pretty new to the collecting game, but I'm already having trouble
> keeping machines, parts, software, manuals, and releated stuff tractable.
> I've picked-up some barcode reading equipment with the idea that one day
> I'll encode the contents of all of my boxes, and tie it to all together
> with a database that include historical info, condition info, and other
> notes.
Doug, you live in a part of California that has a dry climate. How do
you propose to affix barcodes to boxes? Are they sticky labels? Have
you noticed that the sticky stuff turns brittle after a while (like,
say, three years or so), and the labels become susceptible to falling
off?
Not that I want to discourage you, you understand. Besides, the
inventory number is precious little of what I want to log, it
just wouldn't save me that much typing.
OK, that said, the schema of my database looks something like this
at present:
Number: an inventory item number.
Type: a one-word description of just what sort of object is
described by this record; types thus far are:
Ad (advertisement or marketing materials)
Article (magazine article or photocopy thereof)
Book (includes manuals)
HW (hardware)
LST (listing)
Papers
Part
Periodical (really should be "serial")
Pkg (package - generally packaging material or a complete
boxed package)
Refcard
Supplies
SW (software)
Title: title or brief description of object
Author: the author
Manufacturer: the manufacturer or publisher of the object.
Manufacture Date: manufacture or publishing date
ISBN: ISBN number
LCCN: Library of Congress Catalog Number
Model: model name/number
Part Number: manufacturer's part number
Version: version
Volume#Number: Volume#number for serials
Serial: manufacturer's serial number
Acquisition Date: date when I got it
Source: where I got it from
Location: where it is now (box ID or shelf location)
Home Location: where it normally lives
ToDo: flag: does this need work? (see notes)
Notes: free-form text notes, containing additional description,
relationship to other items, work that needs to be done
Dates are actually text fields, because most database software
has really Procrustean date handling that wants to make everything
fit its idea of a datestamp. The syntax I use goes like this:
yyyy[/mm[/dd]][~]
where [] surrounds optional text, yyyy is year, mm is month, dd
is day-of-month, and ~ means "approximate".
People's names are always in "Last, First" format.
...
I say the schema is "something like this" because it is changing,
again. I'm fooling around with New Software, actually several New
Softwares that are all several-years-old dBase-alikes that run on my
HP200LX palmtop. Prior to that it's been through several iterations,
most of which are still there because I haven't re-inventoried stuff,
done with Lotus 1-2-3 (one row per item) and the HP 100/200LX ROM'd
database software (which has a limit of 5000 records per database that
is past being a looming problem, hence me looking for new software).
And yes, some of the ways I do things (like having only one note field)
is due to architectural limitations of the previous software.
...
Oh yeah, and how do I label boxes? Well, I use those hinged-lid
plastic containers that you can get at Costco. They're sort of
transparent, so I just write the box numbers on 5x8" index cards with
a broad felt-tip marker and drop them in so I can see them through
the sides. No worries about labels falling off.
-Frank McConnell
In a message dated 98-06-26 21:30:20 EDT, you write:
<< 720K drives will work fine on the original drive controller AFTER you load
the driver file. I've done it dozens of times to connect my NEC
Multi-Speed drives to the PC. The only problem is that you can't boot from
them since the driver has to be loaded for them to work. I don't *think*
the 1.44 Mb drives will work on the controller though.
Joe >>
i've never needed a driver file in my case. for example, i have a few xt
models around here and when i need to install dos or copy files over from a
later computer with only a 3.5 drive, i just plug a 720k floppy into the drive
controller cable in place of the 360k drive and i'm off and running. i think i
could boot off the 720 drive also. you are correct in that 1.44 drives are not
supported, although i do have an adaptor card that will let hi density drives
work in an xt.
david
Hello, all:
I got a line on about 9 AIM65-based computer systems. These systems not
only include the AIM, but also a custom-made case, power supply, keyboard,
and miscellaneous related stuff. These would go for about $100 each + S/H.
These units are supposed to be new, being built for a specific project which
never got off the ground.
Those interested, e-mail me separately. Thanks!
==================================
Rich Cini/WUGNET
- Charter ClubWin! Member (6)
- MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
- Collector of classic computers
<<========== Reply Separator ==========>>
<operating systems in rom? that seems fairly popular. my atari portfolio h
<dos in rom as well as my tandy 100 has apps in rom. even the original 201
<PS1 had dos in rom.
Not to mention Epson PX-8 (and a few others) when CP/M OS in rom and
applications in roms (cartridges) as well.
Allison
I like system 6 much more than the later ones because I think it holds
truer to the theory of simplicity and ease-of-use. Try sticking a MacOS
8 system folder on a RAMdisk and boot off that! Will never work. System
6 you could do that on, I've tried. Another feature of System 6 was a
macro recorder which has been replaced by the more difficult
Applescript.
>I don't know of any other Macs with that feature either, and I'll bet
that
>there were none. It was a somewhat Spartan version (not as unpleasant
as
>a boot floppy, much less pleasant than a fancy hard-drive
installation).
>Now that Systems 7 and 8 have taken over, it probably would seem pretty
>barren. It sure is fast though! But none of your Finder preferences
get
>saved. (Where would they go?)
They could go to PRAM, but I guess they didn't. What's the tag?
>BTW, if you "Get Info" on the virtual hard drive, you'll see an amusing
>tag in the "Location" field.
>
>-- Derek
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Nasa Lewis has some old computer stuff up for bid, including a
couple PDP-11's and an IBM 7015 (whatever that is!). Here are
some URLs:
http://ltwebp.lerc.nasa.gov/980010detail.htmhttp://ltwebp.lerc.nasa.gov/sales.htm
A partial list follows. Note that there were several of some
of these items, and some of them had different notes attached.
Inspection day is Thursday, July 9th from 7:30 am to 3:00.
Bids will be opened Wednesday, July 15th at 1:00 pm. I don't
know if there is an earlier deadline for getting bids in. There
are other rules too (of course). See those web pages for more
info.
PROCESSOR, DIGITAL DATA
CONCURRENT COMPUTER 3250XP
600 # 30" X 45" X 50"
COMPUTER, MINI
IBM 7015
3'X2'X6' 300#
CONTROL, COMPUTER
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORP 4670
30"X24"X52" 400#
TAPE DRIVE UNIT
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORP 4674
30"X31"X52" 450#
DISK DRIVE UNIT
SEAGATE 47177701
COMPUTER, MINI
SOLBOURNE COMPUTER 5E900
4'X4'X6', 500 LBS.
TAPE DRIVE UNIT
TRIMM IND DA20V1R
PART OF T/N 1109700
COMPUTER, MICRO
CONCURRENT COMPUTER 6605
80 # 32 CHANNEL
PROCESSOR, DIGITAL DATA
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP MNC11DA
IN A RACK (30"X21"X42") 350#
INPUT MODULE
DIGITAL MNCDI
IN A RACK (30"X21"X42") 350#
OUTPUT MODULE
DIGITAL MNCDO
IN A RACK (30"X21"X42") 350#
CHASSIS, EXPANSION
CONCURRENT COMPUTER
20 # 16 CHANNELS
DISK DRIVE UNIT
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP RL01A
IN A RACK (30"X21"X42") 350#
DISK DRIVE UNIT
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP RL02
IN A RACK (30"X21"X42") 350#
COMPUTER, MINI
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 11-24XX
DISK DRIVE UNIT
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 70-12130
COMPUTER, MINI
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP PDP11/24
DISK DRIVE UNIT
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP RL02
27"X19"X11",60#, WON'T POWER UP
DISK DRIVE UNIT
IBM 3380
44"X32"X70" 325#
If only I had a basement, a truck, and a couple days of spare time...
Have fun!
Bill.
Sure, we'd all buy, at least in the interest of solidarity, but I'm not
sure how many others would. Either way, I don't know how many people are
alive now and able to access the 'net that have ever touched a PERQ
>You could release it in pdf format on the internet with a $5 shareware
>fee, or something. I'd certainly buy it, and I'm sure lots of other
>people (such as the ones who subscribe to this list) would as well.
The
>information is invaluable.
>
>Tom Owad
>
>Sysop of Caesarville Online
>Client software at: <http://home.earthlink.net/~tomowad/>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
William Donzelli <william(a)ans.net> wrote:
> > So...how did/do you read the 386i?
>
> A bad mistake.
I gather that is what Sun feels these days too. A while back I asked
a friend within Sun who has been able to find interesting stuff for me
>from time to time whether he could get certain information about the
386i[1], and that is about the answer I got: don't ask about the 386i,
no-one wants to remember.
> God only knows what they were thinking - the 68020 and 68030 machines were
> quite capable at the time.
Well, one view is that they were thinking with a different brain --
the 386i was a somewhere-in-Massachusetts creation, while the rest of
Sun is in (or slightly north of) Sillycon Valley and I've gathered
didn't pay much attention to the 386i.
Also (from looking at the manuals) I gather it would have made a
pretty nifty MS-DOS development environment for its day, being able to
boot MS-DOS in several independent virtual machines. I'll have to
play with that someday and see how well it really works.
> Wasn't the i386 pretty much a failure by the time the Sun-4s came out.
I don't think so. In fact I think it came out pretty much
concurrently with, or maybe even shortly after the early Sun-4s -- it
only ever ran its peculiar version of SunOS 4.0.x. That's why I used
to think of it as Sun hedging its bets on the future.
-Frank McConnell
[1] Someone wanted to port Linux to it. No, I don't understand why,
there are plenty of i386s in the world to run Linux, and besides the
Sun 386i and the appropriate SunOS really sort of go together IMO.
But I figured I would inquire anyway, one can never have too much
documentation.
-----Original Message-----
From: Art Carlson <xnospamx(a)netrix.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
Date: Saturday, June 13, 1998 10:50 AM
Subject: Free Morrow S-100 CP/M Systems
>*** DO NOT AUTOREPLY ***
>
> I have two Morrow S-100 systems complete with drives, manuals, and
>disks, which I will give to a good home. They do not include terminals.
> The catch is that they are located in Northwest Montana, and I will
>not pack or ship them, they would have to be picked up here.
> E-mail me with any serious inquiries.
>SPAM BLOCK replace xnospamx in the address with acarlson
> Art Carlson
>
William Donzelli <william(a)ans.net> wrote:
> Actually, the 88000 was killed off because Sun went with the SPARCs for
> their next generation of machines, the Sun-4 series.
So...how did/do you read the 386i? Back then, I read it as Sun
hedging its bets against a total victory by Intel in the CPU Wars of
the late 1980s: they could sell Motorola, Intel, and SPARC today
(today being then, not now) and promise to be around tomorrow no
matter what the CPU of tomorrow looked like.
-Frank McConnell
> The 320H is a decent machine (unlike the 220 dog), but lacks a ethernet
> port. Like most RS/6000s, it has screaming floating point, and can use XGA
> (a bit more tube freindly than other workstations).
[Pause while I get up from my desk and go and look at our RS/6000s]
Hey! You're right! Our 320 machines (320E, upgraded from 320 something
else I think, equivalent to 320H) have ethernet on a microchannel card.
That shouldn't be too hard to find...
We've had our 320s for six years or more, our 375 for four or five. We
are thinking of getting something faster but it's hard to match the FP
performance on anything modern. With luck, when (if) we do, I'll get
the old ones. FWIW the fastest FP we found in our sort of price range
was the RS/6000 model 397. The last of the POWER RISC machines, much
faster than the Power PC RS/6000s...
But I fear we're a bit off topic here...
Philip.
some guy at work knew i enjoyed collecting old stuff so he contacted me and
gave me all this:
15 apple scsi peripheral cables, 7 that were never opened
3 //e enhancement kits. 1 in original packaging. also some loose chips thrown
in with the rest of the junk i got.
localtalk locking connector kit. <?>
2 ext 80 col card 1 in original packaging never opened.
1 imagewriter 2 /lq localtalk option
2 mouse //e 1 never opened
//gs mem exp card
2 supr serial card 1 never opened
1 mouse //e
workstation card never opened <!>
6 apple 256k mem exp upgrade kits. only 1 was opened.
microtek language card
unidisk 5.25 controller
undisk 3.5 controller
many user manuals for apple // and mac some never opened
tandy dcm3 modem
2 ext 80 col card
1 scsi cable extender
grappler card
ibm 2.88 floppy drive. has standard form factor unlike ps2 2.88 floppy.
proprinter ribbons
ps2 mouse never used in box
ps2 tape backup for qic80 tapes with matching install b and c kits
appleshare pc program
future domain isa scsi card
2 ps2 4meg kits never used
1 16meg ecc mem
1 box of 10 2meg upgrade kits. never used!
mca 16/4 token ring nic
mca 2-8 meg mem expansion card
11 boca 512/1meg svga isa video cards never used
apple tutorial disks never used.
also a few other minor things i cant remember.
everything above remain in their original boxes
im cancelling a fishing trip to go back to his house tonight and pick up some
more things. he used to either work for skool system or was with a servicer
involved with skools which is where this probably all came from. i'll update
when i get the other goodies. unfortunately, no lisa stuff, although it cant
hurt to ask. i'll probably keep most of this although i bet i could make a
killing hyping it up for sale on ebay... 8-(
david
Hi,
I was wondering if there's a surefire way of telling if an IBM-PC has its
original motherboard, without opening the case. I saw one at the
Salvation Army today and was considering dragging it home (though I
decided to take another machine instead).
The machine did have a cassette port in the back, with a femal DIN
connector. Is this attached to the motherboard?
The machine also had a full complement of cards in its slots, with lots of
ports coming out of it. And a 3.5" drive that was poorly fitted into the
case.
I'm wondering if I should make a trip downtown sometime this weekend, with
the car.
Doug Spence
ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
http://alcor.concordia.ca/~ds_spenc/
Sounds cool. Many of the greatest design concepts are stopped... not
because of bugs, not because of tiredness of developers, but because of the
only thing obstructing innovation: Money.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: George Currie <g(a)kurico.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Friday, June 26, 1998 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: NeXT cubes or slabs.
Actually they (NeXT) had started work on a dual Motorola 88000 machines
before NeXT dropped out of the hardware biz. Some former NeXT hardware
guys went on to form a company called FirePower to design PREP?, CHRP?
compliant PPC computers. They released a few but were then bought by
Motorola and of course we all know what happened to
PREP/CHRP/WhatEVER.
George
Not to mention the HP-110 Portables . . .
> operating systems in rom? that seems fairly popular. my atari portfolio has
> dos in rom as well as my tandy 100 has apps in rom. even the original 2011 IBM
> PS1 had dos in rom.
>
> david
>
> In a message dated 98-06-26 14:22:44 EDT, you write:
>
> << I LOVE that idea. Now, it'd need to be EPROM, especially nowadays with bug
> fixes, a new version every other day of the week, etc. but still, it's a way
> cool concept. Which computers did this?
> Ciao, >>
>
>
>
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Disclaimer: |
| |
| These opinions are entirely my own, and in no way reflect the |
| policies or opinions of my employer. |
| |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
On Thu, 25 Jun 1998, Uncle Roger <sinasohn(a)ricochet.net> wrote:
] Picked up a cartridge for the Coco t'other day, and I'm not sure what it
] is. It says "Cat. No. 26-3129" and "Color Computer Controller" on it. Has
] the card-edge connector where it plugs in, then another, smaller one on the
] back end. My guess is it's a floppy controller?
Here is a URL for you:
http://members.tripod.com/~qtv/index-7.html
It lists Radio Shack items and catalog numbers. According to that,
what you've got is a "Color Thinline Disk #0 Kit 349.95". I suppose
that part number was for the entire kit, drive and controller both.
Bill.
operating systems in rom? that seems fairly popular. my atari portfolio has
dos in rom as well as my tandy 100 has apps in rom. even the original 2011 IBM
PS1 had dos in rom.
david
In a message dated 98-06-26 14:22:44 EDT, you write:
<< I LOVE that idea. Now, it'd need to be EPROM, especially nowadays with bug
fixes, a new version every other day of the week, etc. but still, it's a way
cool concept. Which computers did this?
Ciao, >>
If you ask me, CHRP was worthless, like the rest of the Apple cloning
program. In the end, not a soul made a cent off that whole thing, and
many people were stuck with machines that didn't have warranty /
support. Lastly, what's so good about a DB25 serial port on a Mac
anyway? Now USB is good. Could NeXTs run any non-NeXT software?
>Sounds cool. Many of the greatest design concepts are stopped... not
>because of bugs, not because of tiredness of developers, but because of
the
>only thing obstructing innovation: Money.
>
>Tim
>Actually they (NeXT) had started work on a dual Motorola 88000 machines
>before NeXT dropped out of the hardware biz. Some former NeXT hardware
>guys went on to form a company called FirePower to design PREP?, CHRP?
>compliant PPC computers. They released a few but were then bought by
>Motorola and of course we all know what happened to
>PREP/CHRP/WhatEVER.
>
>George
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I've got a TRS-80 Model I that MOSTLY works (I typed in a program to fill
the screen with characters and the screen did fill up) except for the
video synchronization.
Characters lean to the right, and the display moves all over the screen.
Usually the motion is quickly to the left while also moving upward, though
sometimes it stabalizes and just moves upward.
Is there an adjustment to control this somewhere?
The machine is in beautiful physical shape - it looks unused. There's
even a sticker still on it that is stuck to the expansion port's trapdoor
and sticks also to the machine's case. And the warrantee seal hasn't been
broken yet.
Doug Spence
ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
http://alcor.concordia.ca/~ds_spenc/
>The latter (Sam Goldberger) is in Mill Valley, California. I think
>Deep Space is in New Mexico. There used to be some guy on the east
>coast but he seems to have disappeared... odd since he seemed to have
>most of the CIA inventory.
And what, prey tell, is so odd about that? ;-)
>Since I'm an Openstep developer, in my mind they aren't really
>antiques... though the CPU clock rates are low by todays standards
>they still perform very well for day-to-day use because the software
>(OS, application framework and display mode) layers were engineered
>very efficiently. The platform is just barely ten years old and
>still very modern if not futuristic.
Yep. I actually think that Apple could appeal more to the design market by
releasing a new PPC based NeXT. That would give the platform a significant
boost. Especially becasue I've heard that Apple's going to be making
$500-$1500 devices. PPC NeXTs could sell for well over $5-$10, even for a
lower-end one.
>The "PrinterWorks" I believe, still sells laserprinters for them.
>With these, you can essentially turn a NeXT Cube or station into a
>Win 95/NT printing engine via Samba networking, have it run your web
>server, and use it to run many applications that would make both
>Windows and plain old Unix jealous if they were jealous kinds of
>Operating Systems.
Sounds cool. But getting more and more off topic...
>If all else fails, there's also comp.sys.next.marketplace, where
>everyone is trying to sell what they have right now.
ALL RIGHT!!! There's a NeXT in my future!
>Collectable items include extra DSP memory, the ancient ISDN modem
>that worked through the DSP port, Ariel Digital Microphones, Digital
>Ears [a Digital Sound I/O system].
DSP Memory? DUDE!!!
>Also... the 20 " monitors were _beautiful_ to work nexst to. Before
>I sold mine I always felt like I was almost living inside my NeXT.
>But they are oh so heavy!
Well, it could have been inside of a titanium alloy casing...
>Cubes are ultra-ergonomic. The cases very somewhat depending on
>when they were made. I like the cases the early 68030 machines...
>they had less ventilation I think but they looked cooler... more
>metalic somehow.
No kidding. That's the big catch to NeXT's. The looks. Once you see one,
you can't really sleep easy until one's inside of your house.
Ciao,
Tim D. Hotze
GOD this is a long thread!
>Well, considering the reason that I started collection computers 12
>years ago was so that people would have the chance to use >frontpanels,
paper tape, punched cards etc in he future, I might do >that sometime.
Problem is it would take a lot of work, and I doubt if >anyone would buy
it.
>
>-tony
Why not? The Soul of a New Machine, Insanely Great, and Hackers seemed
to do just fine, to name a few. I don't mean an encyclopedia, but a
bunch of stories about the design of stuff (i.e. a chapter on how
Multics was made, a chapter on how the Apple arose, a chapter on where
the ENIAC came from,etc.). It seems that people can only read things
like this if they are made about people rather than, "The idea began
slowly to take shape that instead of using a two-stage adder it would be
easier to use a shift register. This was to come up later when..."
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>> >So, what to use ? Writable CDs ? They have only a guaranteed
>> I suggest real CD-ROMs
> Do you believe that there will still be working CD-ROM drives in
> 20 or 30 years time? Remember they contain custom chips as well...
Jep, I think there will still be (new) compatible drives
in consumer price range - and I bet that there are for shure
still new drives in the 'professional' price range in 20 years
>from now. I don't think the drive is the problem, new medias
are maybe a lot more difficult to aquire - try to buy _new_
_manufactured_ 8" disks - everyting you get as 'new' is at least
6 years old.
> And storage systems change. When was the last time you saw a working
> Syquest 10Mbyte drive (note, the 2 on my shelf don't count, as they need
> minor repairs...)
No, never had one, but what about 10 MB Bernouli Drives from Iomega ?
I still have a unit of two in working condition - now 15 years old.
>> What is the problem with EPROMs? Why not just put them in styrofoam?
> The problem is that the data is held by an electrostatic charge on a
> floating gate in the chip. It's a capacitor, really, and like all
> capacitors it slowly discharges. Now, the time constant may be 10 years
> or 20 years, or whatever, but it's still going to discharge.
? depending on the tecnology.
> And chips - all chips - fail. If (say) the bondout wire on one of the
> data pins falls off, there's no easy way to repair it.
Yes, but a lot less and later than magnetic medias.
> Oh, and putting chips in styrofoam is the quickest way to damage them
> from static. And although the damage may not be noticeable at the time,
> the chip might fail 1 month later, or whatever.
:)
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
> > I just found a discarded Packard Bell 486 (I almost left it because the
> > case looked like a 286's). I don't know why you all dislike those things
> > so much, this case is very good. Anyway, when the machine boots, the ROM
> > displays a "Packard Bell" graphic, complete with a 3-second fade-in (if
> > only people paid so much attention to _useful_ stuff). Underneath, it
> > displays, "America grew up listening to us. It still does." Now, this is
> > my question. What does this mean? When was this company founded, and
> > what was their original product?
>
> Packard-Bell, as you see it, is simply not the company it used to be. As
> with so many American company names, someone bought the name.
<Some Defence-Related stuff PB did in the 1950's SNIPed>
> I have no idea what happened to Packard-Bell. They may still be around,
> doing defense work, or they may have been swallowed up. The Packard-Bells
> at CompUSA, however, are simply not related.
The way I seen it, P-B may have been a defence contractor during WWII
and later, but their main claim to fame was that for decades, they
were one of the biggest manufacturers of Broadcast radios, and
Television Sets.
I know for a fact they were making TV's (of the humongous console
variety in vogue at the time) in the early 70's because I remember an
inane TV commercial for it. In the 50's and 60's there were some
other major players that manufactured TV's (they actually *made* the
stuff): Admiral (my grandmother had one), Motorola, GE, RCA and
Zenith. Others were: Pilot, Curtis-Mathes (still around, I think),
Hofmann, Westinghouse and a whole bunch of other minor players.
Then the Japanese arrived (en force) in the mid 70's, and the next
thing we knew thousands of americans were out of work, and no
Televisions (or Computer monitors, for that matter) were made
domestically. Packard-Bell was one of these victims.
I don't know who is behind the resurrection of the P-B brandname. I
suspect they wanted to appeal to baby-boomers who fondly remember
watching 'Hopalong', 'Cisco' or 'Bonanza' on their parents' Packard
Bell console TV.
Jeff
>
> By the way, Packard-Bell has nothing to do with HP.
>
> William Donzelli
> william(a)ans.net
>
>
>
>
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Disclaimer: |
| |
| These opinions are entirely my own, and in no way reflect the |
| policies or opinions of my employer. |
| |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
Actually the slabs are very common in the U.S evidently because of
the contract NeXT had with the CIA. Cubes aren't that much rarer...
just more expensive. Two places where you can go for NeXT equipment
are:
http://www.deepspacetech.comhttp://www.orb.com
The latter (Sam Goldberger) is in Mill Valley, California. I think
Deep Space is in New Mexico. There used to be some guy on the east
coast but he seems to have disappeared... odd since he seemed to have
most of the CIA inventory. I seem to remember his warehouse lease
expired and he had some kind of blowout sale last year!
Since I'm an Openstep developer, in my mind they aren't really
antiques... though the CPU clock rates are low by todays standards
they still perform very well for day-to-day use because the software
(OS, application framework and display mode) layers were engineered
very efficiently. The platform is just barely ten years old and
still very modern if not futuristic.
The "PrinterWorks" I believe, still sells laserprinters for them.
With these, you can essentially turn a NeXT Cube or station into a
Win 95/NT printing engine via Samba networking, have it run your web
server, and use it to run many applications that would make both
Windows and plain old Unix jealous if they were jealous kinds of
Operating Systems.
If all else fails, there's also comp.sys.next.marketplace, where
everyone is trying to sell what they have right now.
Collectable items include extra DSP memory, the ancient ISDN modem
that worked through the DSP port, Ariel Digital Microphones, Digital
Ears [a Digital Sound I/O system].
Also... the 20 " monitors were _beautiful_ to work nexst to. Before
I sold mine I always felt like I was almost living inside my NeXT.
But they are oh so heavy!
Cubes are ultra-ergonomic. The cases very somewhat depending on
when they were made. I like the cases the early 68030 machines...
they had less ventilation I think but they looked cooler... more
metalic somehow.
thomas100(a)home.com
Heads up, 9-track users! RE-PC, a local (Seattle/Tukwila, two locations)
used computer place I work with has turned up yet -another- pair of M4 Data
9914R 9-track tape drives. Specs can be found at www.m4data.com.
The 9914 is built like the proverbial tank. It is actuall a dual-interface
device. Leave the SCSI card in, and it is standard SCSI-1 with a 768K
buffer. Pull the SCSI card out, and uncover the edge connectors on the
back, and it becomes a standard Pertec interface unit. Only one interface
may be used at one time; you cannot have both simultaneously.
One -really- nice feature of the 9914's, besides how robustly they're
built, is that they're quad-density. They will handle any standard density
of 9-track tape from 800 (NRZI) to 6250 (GCR). They're front-loading,
horizontal mount, and feature a very reliable vacuum-driven autoloading
system. Stick the reel in, close the door, and wait about twenty seconds.
The 9914 is still manufactured, and supported by M4 Data. Documentation,
parts and firmware updates are still available if you can live with some of
M4's prices. I've inspected both drives and they look to be in good shape.
One looks like it took a minor impact to the rear quarter, as the card cage
cover had bent corners (believe me, that's not going to bother a 9914!).
Other than that, they look great.
If you're interested, contact RE-PC in Tukwila directly: (206) 575-8737.
Ask for Eric and tell him I referred you. The last 9914 in good shape went
for $165 (a steal considering that these monsters still go for around
$7,000 from M4), and I expect the others will be about the same (probably
less for the one that's slightly dinged).
Take a friend with you when you go. These drives are not light! I can lift
one by myself, but it's not a fun experience. The back end is the heaviest
as that's where the power transformer is.
I've already grabbed three of the beasties. It's time to share the wealth.
Enjoy!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net)
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
Hi. For those who care, from the 27th to the 8th of July, I'll be out of
contact. In the mean time, I can be reached at worldsfate(a)geocities.com ,
and that should get to me after the 8th. This eMail address is getting
disconnected. I'm unsubscribing from the list until I can get a faster POP
account. Maybe a Hotmail/web based eMail one would work. Anyway, does
anyone know an ISP in Washington, DC that could get me hooked up QUICK, from
a handheld and only for about a month?
Ciao,
Tim D. Hotze
Dave -
Your timing is good for asking about a ProcTech tape archive. I've been
working with another Sol owner and will soon have a CUTS programs CD-ROM
(just use a portable CD-ROM player in place of the cassette player) with as
much of the original software as it's been possible to find (TARG, BASIC5,
TREK80, FOCAL, PILOT, etc.). I also have a tape from Proteus, the ProcTech
users group, which I can send you immediately. Email me you address and
I'll pop it in the mail.
Bob Stek
On 25 Jun 98 at 21:38, SUPRDAVE(a)aol.com wrote:
> Ive got a IIcx that ive tricked out with 5meg, mono display, two external
> drives, syquest 44 meg drive and the apple cd300 drive and a radius rocket
> accelerator with 8 meg. unfortunately, the rocket accelerator locks up the
> machine on the second reboot. disabling it lets the mac work at original
> speed. can anyone provide suggestions? the rocket seems to be temperamental,
> from what i can see.
David,
You are about to discover how temperamental the Rocket really can
be...
I dare say you know that Radius still have the latest
RocketWare software and a brief FAQ available on their ftp site.
There's another utility there called "lift-off" that checks the
configuration of the host Mac for timing senstitive cards that may
conflict with the Rocket.
Have you tried knocking up a minimal system floppy (eg disk tools for
System 7.0 with the RocketWare extension added) and thried booting
>from that?
Phil
**************************************************************
Phil Beesley -- Computer Officer -- Distributed Systems Suppport
University of Leicester
Tel (0)116 252-2231
E-Mail pb14(a)le.ac.uk
>
>I was wondering if there's a surefire way of telling if an IBM-PC has its
>original motherboard, without opening the case. I saw one at the
>Salvation Army today and was considering dragging it home (though I
>decided to take another machine instead).
>
>The machine did have a cassette port in the back, with a femal DIN
>connector. Is this attached to the motherboard?
Yes it is. So it sounds like it's original.
There were 2 motherboards, a 16-64k and a 64-256k. The former was the
original one. The latter has a B in a circle stamped on the back plate.
On 25 Jun 98 at 23:22, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> Wow, it has the complete OS in ROM? I didn't know any of the Mac's did
> that. Are there any others or was this a one shot experiment that failed?
> The OS in ROM is the main thing I like about the Atari ST's.
ISTR that Apple were looking at a diskless Mac project -- the sort
of thing that would interest education. The Classic was available as
a hard diskless model according to the manual but I've never seen
one. Of course the diskless idea would never have worked very well
as there was nowhere to install extensions/INITs and the diskless
Classic was stuck on System 6.0.x and there was no ethernet
capability.
(An aside: Sonic Systems later developed The Diskless Mac (TDM) which
used a boot PROM on an ethernet card to attach to an AppleShare
server where a System image was stored. This worked with System 7 but
the hardware range was limited.)
Phil
**************************************************************
Phil Beesley -- Computer Officer -- Distributed Systems Suppport
University of Leicester
Tel (0)116 252-2231
E-Mail pb14(a)le.ac.uk
I have made contact with an individual who has
what he describes as an Altair 8800 which is
in an "Attache" case made by Icom in 1976. Would
appreciate any information about this "Attache".
Is it a very desirable thing. Were very many produced, etc?
It has MITS
boards (CPU, IO, disk controller) and power suppy.
He wants to trade it to me for an Imsai 8800.
Would that be a good trade on my part?
Thanks,
Bob
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Please forgive if this is an inappropriate way to subscribe and it
goes onto your mailing list.
I'm not sure whether this server knows to add me or if I need to
make contact with a specific individual before I am subscribed.
I've been looking around this list for what must be years!
Thomas Pfaff
thomas100(a)home.com
Trs-80 Model 4 lover
At 07:44 PM 6/18/98 -0700, Bruce Lane wrote:
> Where did you get the idea that tape is so fragile? I'd wager the ones you
>encountered were either of very poor quality or were stored under adverse
>conditions (high heat, high humidity, etc).
A side note: I've got VHS tapes that are 10-12 years old and still look the
same when played. I find that most tapes fail with heavy use, not age
deterioration.
-
- john higginbotham ____________________________
- webmaster www.pntprinting.com -
- limbo limbo.netpath.net -
Megan Gentry wrote:
> >BTW - another question -- when the Mac Classic boots, it shows the
> >smiley disk and I hear the internal HD working. The screen goes >light
> grey with a pointer on it. This is displayed for a few seconds >and
> then I get the 'Welcome to Macintosh' screen. This remains this >way
> for as much as 10 minutes (I didn't wait longer). Is this >normal?
The Mac Classic contains a complete System 6 installation in ROM that
you can boot from. Sorry but I don't have the docs handy, but I think
if you press Command-Option-Shift-X on startup, it'll boot from the
ROM. Another way that should work is Command-Option-Shift-Backspace --
this key combination should work on any SCSI capable Mac to supress
booting from the default SCSI boot device.
Once you've booted, you'll need to scrounge a copy of Disk First Aid
or a third party utility to check the hard disk. Do you have system
install disks etc for the machine?
Phil
**************************************************************
Phil Beesley -- Computer Officer -- Distributed Systems Suppport
University of Leicester
Tel (0)116 252-2231
E-Mail pb14(a)le.ac.uk
>>> It can't be as bad as the Science Museum in London, surely. I was there
>>> earlier this week, and what a _joke_!!!
>> I never been there - hmm maybe I should tak a weekend - is
>> there a Website to get the opening hours ?
> Well, IMHO, it's worth the admission charge (\pounds 6.50 (!)) if you're
> interested in things other than classic computers. But it's not worth it
> for the computers alone.
> I've been interested in clocks for about 25 years or more, so seeing a
> Synchronome working (even if the description wasn't that good) was worth
> it. Ditto for a lot of the other clocks (going back many centuries) -
> most of them are ticking away...
> Alas they've added some of those 'interactive' experiments. While a good
> idea in theory, I'm not sure they should be combined with collections of
> historical scientific instruments, etc. The groups of people interested
> in the two displays would have virtually no intersection IMHO.
Hmm. The Deutsches Museum is a 'hands-on'/'interactive') museum
since the first years, and the combination of historic displays
and learning works fine - at least for me.
>> Ok, the 2002 wouldn't be exactly the machine for continous
>> display in action, but even if it is just as static display,
> No, but fire it up from time to time to show it in operation. Even just 1
> or 2 days a year. Announce the days in advance and the hackers can come
> along and see a real machine in operation
>> this one time running test ist the best verification that the
>> static display is _complete_.
>> (In fact, the critical part of the 2002 is the storage drum -
>> even back in time when it was new, every power up and down
>> had to be guarded by tecnicans - hmm but even here, since
>> the drum is a closed device, one could replace it (invisible)
>> by a modern electronic emulation... just thinking)
> Oh, back the heads off the drum and replace it with a set of RAMs and
> counters :-). Keep the drum turning, and demonstrate the machine with
> more modern memory (at least for day-to-day operation).
Exactly my idea of a display ...
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
Aha, y'all thought I was being cute with the subject... 8^)
I re-watched BttF II the other night, and noticed that in the window of the
shop where Marty buys the sports almanac was an interesting item, an
"antique computer". (A mac Plus-ish machine.) I'm not sure exactly what
year II came out (about '87-88?) but that was pretty insightful, I think.
('Course, they were pretty cool movies anyway.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
I HAVE SEVERAL COMPUTER AUTOMATION ALPHA-16 MINICOMPUTERS... THEY HAVE
CORE MEMORY AND NO PARTICULAR MICRO-PROC CHIP BUT A WHOLE BOARD OF CHIPS
FOR THAT FUNCTION... THESE ARE 16 BIT COPUTERS MADE IN THE EARLY
70'S... ANYONE INTERESTED??? I ALSO HAVE SOME 8" FLOPPIES...
LAAG(a)PACBELL.NET
Heads up for Lisa owners. Saw this on Obsolete Comps.
DO NOT E-MAIL ME. CONTACT THE ADDRESSEE BELOW !
Michael Getsey <getsey(a)ix.netcom.com>
St. Louis, MO USA - Wednesday, June 24, 1998 at 03:24:39
Have three 5.25 inch, double sided, double density disks for Apple III PC.
I used these for a COBOL class I had at The Citadel. Disks are Apple III
E-Z Pieces Boot Disc, Compiler, and Utilities. I believe I was using them
on an Apple Lisa at the time ( 1983 ).
They're free for the asking. Send me your "snail mail" address, and they're
yours!
lwalker(a)interlog.com
Picked up a cartridge for the Coco t'other day, and I'm not sure what it
is. It says "Cat. No. 26-3129" and "Color Computer Controller" on it. Has
the card-edge connector where it plugs in, then another, smaller one on the
back end. My guess is it's a floppy controller?
Also, does anyone know what happened to Roger Merchberger? Seems to have
disappeared.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
>Care to name some cool
>technology that wasn't driven by capitalism?
OK! the usage of fire, the processing of most materials (iron, copper,
wood, stone, etc.). In fact, if you say that capitalism is only present
when it's called capitalism, then most technologies. All simple
machines. The scale. The boat. Most things achieved by the military such
as the computer (yes, they were partly bombing Japan for economic
reasons, but that's a little farfetched). All nuclear equipment was
engineered separately in the USSR. Had enough yet? The printing press.
The castle. The book. Writing.
At any rate, I'm not saying Capitalism is BAD, I'm just saying it
doesn't promote ingenuity, which is true for many other governments.
>- John
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
To the person looking for a Mac keyboard and mouse...
Before you start getting that 'ol 512 ready to rumble most of the internet
software you want to learn about will NOT work on it (save for an older
(really older) mac terminal like Red Ryder via a provider's UNIX shell
account). Best to go with the SE and the ADB route and get an appropriate
mouse and keyboard to get on the net. (though you can get up to web browsing
with an SE but without such niceities as pictures and such.) Then such things
as PPP, TCP/IP, etc apply. Though You should ask for something like a color
LC, Performa, or centris class as they would also let you work with Open
Transport file system along with the old system under 7+. :)
============
To the person regarding IDE drives on a Mac 636...
At 12:53 PM 6/25/98 PDT, Max Eskin wrote:
>
>Here's one: Capitalism, the abode of stupidity, is the crematorium of
>ingenuity and creativity. Just off the top of my head.
Yuck. You don't know me very well, do you? :-) I'm going to
send out the classiccmp libertarian goon squad, who will persuade
you to think otherwise. (Non-violently, of course.)
It's capitalism and lust for money, power, and members of an
attractive gender orientation that drives any sort of start-up,
including Commodore and Amiga Corp. Care to name some cool
technology that wasn't driven by capitalism?
- John
On 25 Jun 98 at 5:43, John Higginbotham wrote:
> >Mac IIx - 68030?
> >Mac IIfx
> >Mac IIvx (iirc)
You've missed out the IIvi as well. For information about Mac specs,
there's a great free utility called GURU from Newer Technology at
http://www.newertech.com
> I'm not sure about the IIvx either, but I do have a Mac IIx sitting here.
> Main difference was just a little boost on the proc speed over the Mac II.
The Mac II is a fairly lame 68020 system (no fpu, no pmmu) while the
IIX (same as IIcx but different form) is a very usable 68030.
> Question: Will any nubus card work in any mac with a nubus slot? (I'm
> talking standard form, one piece card, not the little two piece connected
> jobbies found on the SI/LC etc.)
Yes/No. Size can be a problem. Older cards were often full size and
won't fit in a IIsi or later system.
Hi res graphics cards from people like SuperMac, Radius,
RasterOps etc were always temperamental and are often reliant on OS
versions and card ROMs. It is unlikely for example that a graphics
card from a 68030 would work in a NuBus equipped PowerMac. Lots of
people ditched quite expensive graphics cards because the
manufacturers demand(ed) so much for ROM upgrades.
Accelerator cards, which tend to be full size, can cause timing
problems (eg Radius Rocket which is incompatible with AROSE, the
system software that arbitrates between NuBus slots!).
Ethernet cards would be a safe bet but the rarer stuff (GPIB, video
image grabbers etc) would guarantee interesting times...
Phil
**************************************************************
Phil Beesley -- Computer Officer -- Distributed Systems Suppport
University of Leicester
Tel (0)116 252-2231
E-Mail pb14(a)le.ac.uk
> R. Stricklin (kjaeros) wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, Jeff Kaneko wrote:
> >
> > > OKay, so what happened to the source for CTIX? Did it vanish? Who
> > > does it belong to? WHo do you think I belongs to?
> >
> > I think it belongs to Unisys. They own the trademark, anyway (through
> > their acquisition of Convergent).
>
> That is the legal situation. I know where I last _saw_ a copy of the
> source for version 3.51 for the Unix PC (and a copy of the source for
> what would have been next, equivalent to SysVR3) , never made it to
> SQA), but I haven't been able to contact him in a couple of years of
^^^
What's his name? Where does he live? We can try 4-11.
> trying. (CTIX for the regular machines _did_ reach SysVR3 in
> production, but that was after the Unix PC was history).
> --
> Ward Griffiths
> They say that politics makes strange bedfellows.
> Of course, the main reason they cuddle up is to screw somebody else.
> Michael Flynn, _Rogue Star_
Jeff
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Disclaimer: |
| |
| These opinions are entirely my own, and in no way reflect the |
| policies or opinions of my employer. |
| |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
Ive got a IIcx that ive tricked out with 5meg, mono display, two external
drives, syquest 44 meg drive and the apple cd300 drive and a radius rocket
accelerator with 8 meg. unfortunately, the rocket accelerator locks up the
machine on the second reboot. disabling it lets the mac work at original
speed. can anyone provide suggestions? the rocket seems to be temperamental,
>from what i can see.
david
Off to Montreal for a week.. Figured I'd temporarily un-subscribe for
that period, so SPRYNET doesn't get uptight about the size of my
mailbox.... I should be back around 4 July.....
Will
At 11:11 AM 6/22/98 -0700, you wrote:
>>Robotron is also a video game ca. 1981-2 (Williams, iirc) that was
[...]
>>each other. Other, similar games included Sinistar (no relation, and don't
>>even go there) and one whose name I forgot that had to do with spiders and
>What do you mean, there's no relation? They are both William's titles...and
Whups... Sorry. I occassionally get sensitive about my last name, and
when I was younger, I was the butt of a lot of jokes centered around my
name and that game. (Sinasohn, Sinistar.)
>Sinistar is the addition of 2 SRAMs, a different interface board (for dual
>joysticks), blitter clipper circuit and an additional sound board for
Robotron also had dual joysticks, so perhaps that was the same on both games?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
>Also, does anyone know what happened to Roger Merchberger? Seems to have
>disappeared.
You can find him on the M100 mailing list.
Francois
-------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the Sanctuary at: http://www.pclink.com/fauradon
I just found a discarded Packard Bell 486 (I almost left it because the
case looked like a 286's). I don't know why you all dislike those things
so much, this case is very good. Anyway, when the machine boots, the ROM
displays a "Packard Bell" graphic, complete with a 3-second fade-in (if
only people paid so much attention to _useful_ stuff). Underneath, it
displays, "America grew up listening to us. It still does." Now, this is
my question. What does this mean? When was this company founded, and
what was their original product?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I got unsubscribed from ClassicCmp somehow. Can someone forward me the
last two days worth or tell me where I can get it?
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever onward.
September 26 & 27...Vintage Computer Festival 2
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
[Last web page update: 06/11/98]
FYI, this guy has some multiple-gang EPROM programmers available. Contact
him directly (Mikeooo1(a)aol.com).
<PASTE>
The Gangpro S I have will enable you to burn up to 32 chips at a time
and
covers hundreds of device types.Its features are way too numerous to go into
but its replacement is selling for over $6000.I am looking for $300 for
it.The
Gangpro8 will do 8 at a time and covers most device types also. It is self
contained where as the "S" can hook up thru a 232 cable with a PC. The one
you'll probably be most interested in is an EP-2A-88 by Optimal Technolgy
which requires a "personality module" for the eprom type you wish to
program
and will program 4 at a time. I have such modules for 2716's and 2532's
only.I
am looking for $45 for that one.
</PASTE>
Rich Cini/WUGNET <nospam_rcini(a)msn.com>
- ClubWin! Charter Member
- MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
- Preserver of "classic" computers
<<<< ========== reply separator ========== >>>>>
>>>Since we were recently discussing the first computer, I wondered, if
>>>the Zuse was "first", then what is the ENIAC famous for?
>>It's main use was calculating ballistics tables for artillery. If
>>anyone really cares, I could explain it in detail - but it's pretty
>>boring stuff.
> For one thing, why is it generally considered to be the first computer?
Maybe a very simple thing - since after the war ther was only the
Brit/US developents known to the (Brit/US) Scientists, they just
didn't know (like von Neuman is always credited for the idea of
a seperation of memory and CPU - but in fact Zuse had published
this idea 7 years earlyer).
It's a bit like one woman, in Florida, asked me around 1992
if I'm from West Germany, East Germany or new Germany *rotfl*
Missing information.
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
At 11:04 AM 6/25/98 -0700, you wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Jun 1998, Allison J Parent wrote:
>
>> <I've also learned that the printed circuit boards were 2-sided, but had n
>> <plated-thru holes. This may have caused problems to IC solder connections
>> <making reliability problems. I don't know if this would make buyers aband
>> <them making the numbers larger or smaller than otherwise.
>>
>> Not a problem. The trick was to solder both sides ot use through wires
>> as needed. It made the board much cheaper and buildable by home brewers.
>
>And that approach is cheaper and easier than the tubular rivet that
>preceded plated through holes - if you could even find such today :)
>
Yes, using wires as jumpers is good too. I'm amazed in TV sets, stereos,
etc. most all the printed circuit boards are one sided. The problem
I saw was with the actual IC pins. Sockets would make it worse.
If you don't plan ahead, there might be not enough lead to solder
to on the component side of some disk capacitors (resistors mounted
on end?), etc.
-Dave
<I've also learned that the printed circuit boards were 2-sided, but had n
<plated-thru holes. This may have caused problems to IC solder connections
<making reliability problems. I don't know if this would make buyers aband
<them making the numbers larger or smaller than otherwise.
Not a problem. The trick was to solder both sides ot use through wires
as needed. It made the board much cheaper and buildable by home brewers.
Allison
Since we were recently discussing the first computer, I wondered, if the
Zuse was "first", then what is the ENIAC famous for? Also, has anyone
seen any kind of in-depth description of either? I mean, what exactly
could the ENIAC do? Has anyone seen diagrams?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>>Since we were recently discussing the first computer, I wondered, if
>>the Zuse was "first", then what is the ENIAC famous for?
>
>It's main use was calculating ballistics tables for artillery. If
>anyone really cares, I could explain it in detail - but it's pretty
>boring stuff.
For one thing, why is it generally considered to be the first computer?
Secondly, what kind of calculation did this involve? Was it a table in
the computer or did it involve an equation? What order equation?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com