Since I have never seen the 8800BT, I'm sure it is rare, at least he says a
number of times that this stuff is RARE. Shipping and handling including
insurance is only $100 plus the winning bid. However, it does have some
good photos of the unit.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=35408024
Reading an article, it's not really a hoax. It's a partnership of
crackpots.
THOUGHT: "T=C * A * I(Squared)"
Yeah, right! Get with the '90s! We don't analyze human thought with
equations any more!
>>In addition to inventing the GUI, the IBM PC, Sun Workstations and
Apples,
>>as well as several CPUs, he's created a "computer science"
organization
>>and nominated himself for Computer Scientist of the Year!
>> http://www.acsa.net/1996b2.html
>>
>
>Since he's such an important figure in the history of computers, I
think we
>should invite him to be the keynote speaker at next year's VCF...
>
>R.
>
>--
>
>
>
>Warbaby
>The WebSite. The Domain. The Empire.
>http://www.warbaby.com
>
>The MonkeyPool
>WebSite Content Development
>http://www.monkeypool.com
>
>
> Once you get the nose on, the rest is just makeup.
>
>
>
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
After being frustrated trying to view some of the pinouts posted on the
web with lynx (everyone using frames/tables/etc), I have created a
shell-user-friendly pinout directory on my web server. I've got ~75 of 200
(give or take) up so far, and I'll be working on it for the next couple of
weeks.
http://www.prinsol.com/pinouts/
If you have the time and the giving spirit overcomes you, please share any
that you find missing. Especially those from scarce/rare/unusual machines
that might help someone who rescues one with no available documentation.
And for God's sake, please let me know if I screwed up on any of these,
before someone trusts my addled transcriptions and blows something up!
Related, but a little more selfish, could someone give me the pinout for
the HP-IB port?
Aaron
A couple of quick snags from the local thrift:
Wyse-60 terminal, no keyboard: $4.95
"Programming in Assembly: Macro-11", E. Sowell: $.50
Someone posted a couple of days ago that they got some Wyse keyboards?
Anyone have an extra for the model 60 that I just got that they would part
with for a few $$$?
Aaron
At 09:23 PM 10/12/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Would someone please check out accpc.com/home0.html#About, and enlighten
>some of us "historically challenged" individuals as to how much of their
>"history" is possibly truth vs. B.S.?
They claim they had a windowing product in late '73/early '74 which is
supposedly long before the Alto -- But I thought the Alto was earlier than
that?
I dunno for sure, but it sure sounds like a bunch of BS to me.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 08:22 PM 10/12/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Does anyone on this list collect software, and if so, what is considered
>desireable software to collect?
Only in the form of Vic-20 carts (which I ended up doing simply because I
found the big box of carts I had accumulated in the mid-80's.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Not to be bitching; but my email program; Microsoft Outlook, can't handle
HTML messages; thus I get an attached text object that is very, very hard to
decypher - on every single message from Marvin. (and others). Is it too
much to ask for people to send plaintext?
-Matt Pritchard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Pritchard [SMTP:MPritchard@EnsembleStudios.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 2:41 PM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: RE: Commodore "PET 2001-8" Vintage Computer
>
> Am I the only person who can't read messages made up of tons of HTML junk?
>
> -Matt Pritchard
> Graphics Engine and Optimization Specialist
> MS Age of Empires & Age of Empires ][
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marvin [SMTP:marvin@rain.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 12:55 PM
> > To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> > Subject: Commodore "PET 2001-8" Vintage Computer
> >
> > This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
> > Service. To view the original message content, open the attached
> > message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to
> > disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original
> > character set. << File: message.txt >>
Right, I know other can. For me I just don't have an option to change.
(This is my work e-mail; does eudora interface with exchange server and have
a compatible scheduler?)
-Matt Pritchard
(10 yard penalty; going off topic)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: van lincoln [SMTP:vlincoln@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 10:48 AM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: RE: Commodore "PET 2001-8" Vintage Computer
>
> I can read it. I use eudora light.
> van
>
>
>
>
>
> At 02:41 PM 10/13/98 -0500, you wrote:
> >Am I the only person who can't read messages made up of tons of HTML
> junk?
> >
> >-Matt Pritchard
> >Graphics Engine and Optimization Specialist
> >MS Age of Empires & Age of Empires ][
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Marvin [SMTP:marvin@rain.org]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 12:55 PM
> >> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> >> Subject: Commodore "PET 2001-8" Vintage Computer
> >>
> >> This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
> >> Service. To view the original message content, open the attached
> >> message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to
> >> disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original
> >> character set. << File: message.txt >>
> >
> >
< Since I have never seen the 8800BT, I'm sure it is rare, at least he say
< number of times that this stuff is RARE. Shipping and handling includin
< insurance is only $100 plus the winning bid. However, it does have som
< good photos of the unit.
Marvin,
Please stop with the HTML, reduce it to text for this forum.
MITS 8800BT is the turnkey (front pannel less) version of the 8800B
and fairly common. The PERTEC labeled version is scarcer.
Allison
Mine has MITS on the front panel and Pertec on the serial number tag.
Pictures at http://www.geocities.com/~compcloset/MITSAltair8800bt.htm
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: allisonp(a)world.std.com [mailto:allisonp@world.std.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 3:09 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: MITS Altair 8800BT Computer (RARE!!!)
< Since I have never seen the 8800BT, I'm sure it is rare, at least he say
< number of times that this stuff is RARE. Shipping and handling includin
< insurance is only $100 plus the winning bid. However, it does have som
< good photos of the unit.
Marvin,
Please stop with the HTML, reduce it to text for this forum.
MITS 8800BT is the turnkey (front pannel less) version of the 8800B
and fairly common. The PERTEC labeled version is scarcer.
Allison
It doesn't appear to be in this version (Outlook 97). That's what I get
for not upgrading to the latest, most bloated, and buggiest beta software.
(I'm still running version 3 of my browser too!)
-Matt P
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kai Kaltenbach [SMTP:kaikal@MICROSOFT.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 4:45 PM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: RE: Commodore "PET 2001-8" Vintage Computer
>
> If you're running Outlook, do Tools.Options/Mail Format, choose Rich Text
> from the drop-down list box instead of HTML.
>
> Kai
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Pritchard [mailto:MPritchard@EnsembleStudios.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 2:34 PM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: RE: Commodore "PET 2001-8" Vintage Computer
>
>
> Right, I know other can. For me I just don't have an option to change.
> (This is my work e-mail; does eudora interface with exchange server and
> have
> a compatible scheduler?)
>
> -Matt Pritchard
> (10 yard penalty; going off topic)
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: van lincoln [SMTP:vlincoln@earthlink.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 10:48 AM
> > To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> > Subject: RE: Commodore "PET 2001-8" Vintage Computer
> >
> > I can read it. I use eudora light.
> > van
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 02:41 PM 10/13/98 -0500, you wrote:
> > >Am I the only person who can't read messages made up of tons of HTML
> > junk?
> > >
> > >-Matt Pritchard
> > >Graphics Engine and Optimization Specialist
> > >MS Age of Empires & Age of Empires ][
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Marvin [SMTP:marvin@rain.org]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 12:55 PM
> > >> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> > >> Subject: Commodore "PET 2001-8" Vintage Computer
> > >>
> > >> This message uses a character set that is not supported by the
> Internet
> > >> Service. To view the original message content, open the attached
> > >> message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment
> to
> > >> disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original
> > >> character set. << File: message.txt >>
> > >
> > >
If you're running Outlook, do Tools.Options/Mail Format, choose Rich Text
>from the drop-down list box instead of HTML.
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Pritchard [mailto:MPritchard@EnsembleStudios.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 2:34 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: RE: Commodore "PET 2001-8" Vintage Computer
Right, I know other can. For me I just don't have an option to change.
(This is my work e-mail; does eudora interface with exchange server and have
a compatible scheduler?)
-Matt Pritchard
(10 yard penalty; going off topic)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: van lincoln [SMTP:vlincoln@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 10:48 AM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: RE: Commodore "PET 2001-8" Vintage Computer
>
> I can read it. I use eudora light.
> van
>
>
>
>
>
> At 02:41 PM 10/13/98 -0500, you wrote:
> >Am I the only person who can't read messages made up of tons of HTML
> junk?
> >
> >-Matt Pritchard
> >Graphics Engine and Optimization Specialist
> >MS Age of Empires & Age of Empires ][
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Marvin [SMTP:marvin@rain.org]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 12:55 PM
> >> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> >> Subject: Commodore "PET 2001-8" Vintage Computer
> >>
> >> This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
> >> Service. To view the original message content, open the attached
> >> message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to
> >> disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original
> >> character set. << File: message.txt >>
> >
> >
Am I the only person who can't read messages made up of tons of HTML junk?
-Matt Pritchard
Graphics Engine and Optimization Specialist
MS Age of Empires & Age of Empires ][
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marvin [SMTP:marvin@rain.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 12:55 PM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: Commodore "PET 2001-8" Vintage Computer
>
> This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
> Service. To view the original message content, open the attached
> message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to
> disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original
> character set. << File: message.txt >>
My dad recently came accros some intresting stuff at a county auction.
I wasn't there or he would have baught more stuff :-) but however he did
find some keyboards that look like they came from a terminal and a
computer. Does WYSE ring a bell to anyone? But the biggest enigma is an
IBM 4224 printer which from the diagram on the back look like it was
made for some sort of LAN, but not ethernet. The plug it would take
would be about an inch in diameter. This was previously used by the
board of elections and in that case was probably was wired in some sort
of esotaric network. The other puzzel is an ethernet card that is
deffentatily not 10 years old but just bear with me. The face plate
already is a dead give away that it is not made for a PC. The other
thing is that the interface to the computer uses a plug that has 3 rows
of 32 pins. Could any one tell me wat this interface is, and what I
could do to adapt this to be used by a PC's serial poart? Another find
was in the tons of IBM formated disks I found an original wang floppy
disk but without the orginal format :-( Thats all for now.
I know this is getting WAY off-topic, but to get it slightly back
on-topic....
If you would happen to barf on your , say, C64, would it damage any of the
traces on the motherboard or the keyboard?
<sorry - couldn't resist:)>
--
-Jason
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#-1730318
----------
> From: Cameron Kaiser <ckaiser(a)oa.ptloma.edu>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: dishwasher + mainboards
> Date: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 10:05 AM
>
> ::Last time I vomitted, some of that stomach acid came up exactly the
same
> ::path as it would have to go down if I drank it.
>
> Your stomach also does not contain *just* dilute HCl. You're also barfing
up
> a buffered solution (all the electrolytes in the food you eat), a gunk of
> mucus (I can't believe I'm writing this before breakfast) which further
> retards acid action, and food which usually is slightly alkaline itself.
> Moreover, the pH 3 in your stomach is needed only to activate enzymes
like
> trypsin and pepsin from their inert state. It's not like your entire
stomach
> is a bubbling pit of acid; most of the catalytic activity is performed by
the
> enzymes, or else you would break things like proteins into inorganic or
> elemental compounds instead of the amino acids and monosaccharides you
need.
>
> --
> -------------------------- personal page:
http://calvin.ptloma.edu/~spectre/ --
> Cameron Kaiser Information Technology Services Database
Programmer
> Point Loma Nazarene University Fax: +1 619
849 2581
> ckaiser(a)ptloma.edu Phone: +1 619
849 2539
> -- FORTUNE: You learn from your mistakes. Today will be very educational.
-----
Francois said:
>>#19 is the hardest to find.
>How about the demo cart #2? Is that a har to find Item?
I was speaking about the "regular" cartridges.
>And I've managed to collect all of the regular cartridges, except
>for #26, in the boxes with instructions.
>#19 is the hardest to find.
I really don't have any interest in the Demo carts because they
are so popular. I do have a prototype of football but that came
with some other carts.
Phil Clayton said:
>.How about the RCA Studio II machine ?
> Have you ever seen one of these machines ?
I have one. Not because I found it, but because it was given
to me. Other than that I have not seen another.
>Check this site out: http://newton.physics.arizona.edu/~hart/vgh/main.html
I wish I have the time to put up nice pictures like this. Great
page.
>As far as I know the Fairchild F8 microprocessor was not used in >any
other applications, however the RCA 1802 microprocessor.....
I did get a chance to do some F8 programming about 1982 at AMF's
Electronics Research Lab. I had to modify the code in a rowing
machine. They added a clip for the ear lobe that measured your
heart rate. I used a 3870 because I could try out new code by
inserting a new EPROM on to the processor. I did burn out one of the 3870s
and I stuck a white ceramic 1702 on top and made it
into a tie clip to remind me. That was the only processor I have
every destroyed. And I still have it today.
As for the instruction set, the only thing I remember is that
the ACC was always trashed on a return from subroutine. I think
the processor use it to pull the return address from the stack.
What was the question?
=========================================
Doug Coward
Press Start Inc.
Sunnyvale,CA
=========================================
> There was a huge burst of interest on the Apple2 newsgroups last
> year in the original Ultima's, with the first Ultima in the original
> packaging with all the pieces fetching up to $300.
>
Wow. Well, don't I feel smart, then, for picking up a copy at a thrift
store for $1.99 a few years ago. It didn't have the coins but was otherwise
complete -- and the coins weren't worth $298.01, in my opinion.
Buying things over the Internet is a mixed blessing.
> Sellam Alternate e-mail:
> dastar(a)siconic.com
>
Paul Kearns
paulk(a)microsoft.com
> This was put up on ebay and the auction will close about 7 hours from now
> (at about 6:00 p.m. pst). Currently there has only been one bid on it at
> the opening bid of $575.
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=34347085
Oh Oh - way expensive - At this price I already start to
think about selling some of my PET/CBMs.
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
The chief advantage of any kind of history is, IMHO, to reach the
understanding of how similar the past is to the present. This applies to
computer history as well. Only people who are familiar with it know that
the computers we use today (except uncommon parallel and analog
computers) are based on Von Neumann's theories more than 30 years ago.
There is no real advancement. There is multiplication of matrices by a
scalar value...
There is nothing new under the sun, as a very old book says.
>As mor as I learn about this 'dark ages' as less dark they
>apear. Not even very different from before or after (especialy
>not differentfrom now ).
>
>Gruss
>H.
>
>--
>Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
>HRK
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Ouch! I couldn't do that! I have lots of old software, most of which I
have the urge to discard, but hope to put it to good use in a display of
some sort.
> However when a school dumped all their teaching software for
>Commodore and Apple computers, I picked it all up
>since I didn't want it going to the dump. This stuff is dated in the
>middle 80's. I tend to segregate any original Apple or Commodore
Educational software is definitely part of Apple's history.There are
lots of crappy games and word processors for Apple and Commodore,which
are really quite uninteresting. I tend to pass up most.
>
>As Sam said, some of the classic games and productivity software are
worth
>keeping. But what about the rest?
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Who wouldn't be? With on maps, once the coast is not visible, you're on
your own!
>It is true that sailors in those days were leery of sailing too far
>from coast -- because there was no way to determine longitude until
>accurate clocks were developed many years later.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>>In addition to inventing the GUI, the IBM PC, Sun Workstations and Apples,
>>as well as several CPUs, he's created a "computer science" organization
>>and nominated himself for Computer Scientist of the Year!
>> http://www.acsa.net/1996b2.html
> Since he's such an important figure in the history of computers, I think we
> should invite him to be the keynote speaker at next year's VCF...
> R.
Great idea.
Saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaam - get up, and try to catch
him - a speaker of this format might be your #1 for VCF 3.0
(And for shure I will attend it - woooha!).
Gruss
H.
Serious: He might be a real good choice to get a 'new' vision.
(And we still have no fun part for the first day :)
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
Mine was more like the mechanism of either a TRS-80 drive, or an IBM Tandon
drive. The heads were connected to a horizontal stepper by a thin metal
sheet.
--
-Jason
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#-1730318
----------
> From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: Picture up (RE: Microsci HAVAC)
> Date: Monday, October 12, 1998 4:00 PM
>
> > BTW: I used to have a Disk II, and the heads were positioned by a
stepper
> > motor, and didn't have any "spiral-grooved disc" anywhere in the entire
> > unit.
>
> Odd... I've got a number of Disk II's here, and every one has a stepper
> motor under the chassis with a disk on the spindle of it above the
> chassis. There's a spiral groove in the disk and a little lug on the head
> assembly that fits into the groove. The stepper motor turns the disk and
> thus moves the heads.
>
> Maybe there are several versions of the Disk II
>
> -tony
> < >> My question is why did everything go to Hell between 300BC and 0AD? H
> < >> you believe the earth was flat? Where did this idea come from
> < > Wasn't that around the time of the burning of the 'library' in
> < > Alexandria?
> < In fact, did anybody belive this, or is it just a
> < urban legend ?
> I think it is ascribed to the dark ages, roughly 700-1400AD Europe.
:))
> The polical power of the church was strong then and science was nearly
> exitinct.
Science ? Just define science - AFAIK they had a lot of
scientific research - just more in a way a 'bit' different.
Their approach ist just alien for us today. And in fact, the
church at this time wasn't anti-science they promoted research
and payed a whole lot of money to support researchers. But
like every big institution they are a bit slow when it comes
to new ideas (Ever tried to launch a project based on a complete
new idea ?). Even if you advance to the time of Galileo, the
force behind the bann have just been some 'fellows' out of
sheer envy.
As mor as I learn about this 'dark ages' as less dark they
apear. Not even very different from before or after (especialy
not differentfrom now ).
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
> < The Odyssey^2 had an Intel 8048 with a 512 byte BIOS, 128 bytes of RAM
> < (don't recall the chip) and the video (& sound) was driven by the Intel
> < chip - the only application the chip was ever used in; (trivia - multipl
> < 8244's could be hooked together with the output of one (slave/master mod
>
> The part I believe is a programmed 8044 RUPI. the 8044 is a 8051 core
> with a slave interface and a SDLC controller. 8051s could be serially
> connected via their 9bit serial port (also present on the RUPI). It would
>
> be the first place of comparison. Intel DId this with the 8041/2 in the
> form of printer controller, 8278 (keyboard and display driver), also the
> GPIB controller (8291) and the well known 8042 AT keybord controller found
>
> in AT and X86 systems.
>
> Allison
>
>
-----------------
Nope. Trust me on this; I've got the docs. and the story of it's
development from an Intel person responsible for it. Some parts of the
silicon may be similar, but it was designed from the ground up as a video
display chip for some sort of consumer electronics. My point was that it
wound up being used is just this one application (the Maganvox
Odyssey^2/Phillips G7000) and never made available through other channels.
I was just pointing out that the 8244 has some capabilites that were not
used in that application.
What I find so attractive about it (and all the stuff that era), is that it
respresents a window in time where the basic foundation blocks for todays
stuff (which we take practically for granted) was developed; and the
limitations they had to work under (i.e. not practical to have enough memory
for a direct bit mapped display, the state of chip fabrication and design,
etc) which were unique to that time. I comapre it _alot_ to the automobile
industry between 1898 and 1914. Do you guys have any idea how many car
compaines sprang up (and faded away)?
-Matt Pritchard
Graphics Engine and Optimization Specialist
MS Age of Empires & Age of Empires ][
< The Odyssey^2 had an Intel 8048 with a 512 byte BIOS, 128 bytes of RAM
< (don't recall the chip) and the video (& sound) was driven by the Intel
< chip - the only application the chip was ever used in; (trivia - multipl
< 8244's could be hooked together with the output of one (slave/master mod
The part I believe is a programmed 8044 RUPI. the 8044 is a 8051 core
with a slave interface and a SDLC controller. 8051s could be serially
connected via their 9bit serial port (also present on the RUPI). It would
be the first place of comparison. Intel DId this with the 8041/2 in the
form of printer controller, 8278 (keyboard and display driver), also the
GPIB controller (8291) and the well known 8042 AT keybord controller found
in AT and X86 systems.
Allison
Have y'all heard American Computer Company? They claim to have alien
technology that's going to enable them to come out with a chip that holds
90 gigs. Uh-huh....
http://accpc.com/tcapdisplay.htm
90 GB of Solid State Storage on a Single Wafer!
An original Semiconductor Device based upon J-S Dielectric-Junction
Electron-Bond-Species Manipulation Semiconductors arranged
in a High Density Ultra High Speed Integrated Quantum Junction Array
I particularly like the Electron Bond Species Manipulation bit.
R.
--
Warbaby
The WebSite. The Domain. The Empire.
http://www.warbaby.com
The MonkeyPool
WebSite Content Development
http://www.monkeypool.com
Once you get the nose on, the rest is just makeup.
>> My question is why did everything go to Hell between 300BC and 0AD? How could
>> you believe the earth was flat? Where did this idea come from?
>> Paxton
> Wasn't that around the time of the burning of the 'library' in
> Alexandria?
> Chuck
In fact, did anybody belive this, or is it just a
urban legend ?
:)
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
What's important to note is how much $200, $300, or $2600 in 1977 would buy
us today. Factoring in inflation, what would that be equivalent to today?
-Matt Pritchard
Graphics Engine and Optimization Specialist
MS Age of Empires & Age of Empires ][
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Clayton [SMTP:handyman@sprintmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 1998 10:41 AM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: 16K RAM was 300 bucks in 1977
>
>
> In 1980 I moved into a Commodore Pet with a single IEEE Floppy drive, this
> was like heaven, A
> nice clear green 9 inch monochrome monitor, no more cassette tapes, 32K
> RAM, what more could a
> person want.. Well OK, add a Printer another $700.00, and a 300 baud modem
> $200.00.. And at
> about $2600.00 I had a dream machine.. Phil...
>
The Democarts, (both of them) and #19 are very hard to find. From talking
with other collectors, the democarts appear to be slightly more common.
Personally, I have a Channel F, Boxed Channel F II, and 23 of the 28 carts;
but I don't have #19, or either of the Democarts.
There was also a picture of a keyboard controller (K-1) on the box for
Channel F II. Perhaps a prototype exists for it.
As I recall the F8 was a microcontroller in the same vein as the 8048; but
that it multiplexed it's address and data lines; allowing for fewer
connectors on the cartridges. I think it also had 64 bytes of internal RAM;
organized as set of registers (sorta) which probably means that there was no
ram in the system.
I suspect the Channel F R&D effort was a rather small one; I had a chance to
learn about the R&D effort behind the Magnavox Odyssey^2, and discovered
that there was only a handful of people behind it doing the actual
development (one guy wrote half the game library) and that it had very poor
support from management at magnavox. All throughout the history of it, from
1978 to 1983, they were always told "this will be the last stuff you do for
the O^2, then we pull the plug" and each time they'll sell out the latest
run of carts/systems and be given a reprieve. management finally became
serious about it in 1983 just in time for the video game crash.
The Odyssey^2 had an Intel 8048 with a 512 byte BIOS, 128 bytes of RAM
(don't recall the chip) and the video (& sound) was driven by the Intel 8244
chip - the only application the chip was ever used in; (trivia - multiple
8244's could be hooked together with the output of one (slave/master mode)
being fed into the next one. Intel shows no reference to the chip or any
mention of it in their archives, but I have the story on it from the horse's
mouth (and the data sheets :) )
Somewhere, way way back in my archives, I have a copy of a post from someone
who claimed to work at Farichild way back when (and knew about the channel
F). I should try and dig it up someday to see if he could be tracked down.
-Matt Pritchard
Graphics Engine and Optimization Specialist
MS Age of Empires & Age of Empires ][
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francois [SMTP:fauradon@pclink.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 1998 9:11 PM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: Re: Fairchild Channel F units
>
> >#19 is the hardest to find.
>
>
> How about the demo cart #2? Is that a har to find Item?
>
> Francois
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit the desperately in need of update
> Sanctuary at: http://www.pclink.com/fauradon
< >> My question is why did everything go to Hell between 300BC and 0AD? H
< >> you believe the earth was flat? Where did this idea come from
<
< > Wasn't that around the time of the burning of the 'library' in
< > Alexandria?
<
< In fact, did anybody belive this, or is it just a
< urban legend ?
I think it is ascribed to the dark ages, roughly 700-1400AD Europe.
The polical power of the church was strong then and science was nearly
exitinct.
Allison
The CC-40 was real. I have one.
Dav Vandenbroucke
Economist
U.S. Dept. HUD
david_a._vandenbroucke(a)hud.gov
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu> AT INTERNET on 10/11/98 02:47:22 AM
To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu AT INTERNET@CCMAILDOM
cc: (bcc: David A. Vandenbroucke/PDR/HHQ/HUD)
Subject: Re: Vaporware (and not) from '83 CES
> Unless I have my capacitors crossed, some dishwashing agents are
> chlorine-based, and H20 <=> OH- + H+; mix a free Cl- ion in and you have
> hydrochloric acid.
>
Well, I think they make it safe enough not to turn to hydrochloric acid (I
hope). Considering that people do put plastic dishes in the dishwasher,
and most have plastic drains and pumps. If we had dishwashing soap turning
to HCl all the time, a lot of people would have a big mess on their hands
(and soap companies would probably have a lot of lawsuits).
--
-Jason
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#-1730318
I worked for a company once as a service tech fixing CPT Word Processing
systems. When PC based word processing started to become popular (mid
'80s), CPT bridged the gap between their longtime standalone word
processing units and desktop PCs by using Wyse PC clones (the ones with
the blue backlit LCD display on them). They primarily consisted of a
clone style case with an expansion board. The CPU board plugged into the
expansion board like an add-on card and was primarily an entire 286 or
386 computer on a card. The keyboard connector was an RJ-11 with an
optional DIN adaptor for conventional keyboards. The other card
typically found in the system was a bridgeboard which was an entire CPT
system on a card with a monochrome video out. The 2 cards talked to each
other and became a full computer with built in CPT word processing
simultaneosly running along with a DOS/windows based environment. The
monitor was a portrait style page white display. The on screen display
could be split to show DOS on top and CPT on the bottom or made to show
a full screen CPT system as the CPT systems were originally designed.
Many govornment agencys used these systems to bridge their own
transition from dedicated word processing systems to PCs.
Jeff Salzman
>> > computer. Does WYSE ring a bell to anyone? But the biggest enigma is an
>>
>> Wyse terminals are fairly well-known, and I think they sold a PC clone at
>> one point.
>
>Actually several PC clones from 8088 up through at least the 80386. IIRC
>some of the later ones were quite stylish with diagonally-mounted LCDs
>(date, time, etc.).
>
>The later PCs and terminals used an RJ-11 (phone) connector for the
>keyboard cable. AS I recall, though, it was easily adaptable to an IBM
>AT connector. I believe the keyboards were interchangable between the PCs
>and terminals.
>
In a message dated 98-10-13 03:37:16 EDT, you write:
<< is true that sailors in those days were leery of sailing too far
from coast -- because there was no way to determine longitude until
accurate clocks were developed many years later.
>>
We know now that the Egyptians knew the 25,000 mile figure around 700 BC and
possibly much earlier. Recently they pulled a brass differential geared device
that may be an astronomical calculator from a wreck in the Mediterainian that
dates back to 300 - 400 BC. I bet the device is older yet, it is hard to
carbon date brass.
They recently discovered settlements on the south coast of Chile that date
back 30,000 yrs. I believe that there was regular but infrequent trade &
travel between Egypt and South America 4000 years ago. My question is which
way did they go, the long way, via China, the Bearing Straits and down the
west coast of the Americas; or did they go the short way, which is from the
westernmost tip of Africa straight across the Atlantic. This distance is is
shorter than the length of the Mediterainian. If you were able to calculate
the distance one had traveled by going the long way (I think this was done
first); I would think that the short way would become obvious.
To get back to classic computers, I bet this brass device is one of the first
computers, if differential geared devices count.
My question is why did everything go to Hell between 300BC and 0AD? How could
you believe the earth was flat? Where did this idea come from?
Paxton
< I don't recall keybounce being a problem with Level I BASIC -- it
< reared its ugly head after the upgrade to Level II.
Correct. L1 basic had a good keyscan routine. LII basic it got mucked
up in the interest of speed.
Allison
< the infamous grooved disk? is there anything wrong with that design? loo
< fairly clever and reliable. i havent seen any wear problems with the 20+
< disk drives i have. the only minor issue is adjusting the head stop for
< all you have to do is sight a little dot on the grooved disk (apple call
< cam) with the little metal cam follower and make adjustments as needed.
The biggest is the follower could slip out of the groove requiring manual
intervention. They were also very slow step rates 30-40ms! I also found
that there was enough mechanical hysteresis plagueing them to affect media
portability.
Allison
> From: Uncle Roger <sinasohn(a)ricochet.net>
> Subject: Re: Corrections to trivia
>
> At 09:51 PM 10/7/98 -0700, you wrote:
> >Intel came out the winners; they wanted it the most. But it would have
> >happened with or without them. You had the 6800, the 6502 and a whole
> >slew of others. The computers built around those processors were just as
> >relevant and would have happened anyway.
>
> I will admit up front that I don't know everything, and I am not an EE
> (dropped out of community college) but it seems to me that Intel hadn't won
> anything until ~81 when IBM came out with their PC. Until then, the Z80
> and 6502 were as dominant (if not more so) than the 8080/8085?
I'd believe that: Z80 (CP/M) 6502 (Apple).
> In fact, I'll go so far as to suggest that perhaps if IBM had gone with,
> say, the z8000, Intel would not be anywhere near as big as it is?
>
> It seems to me that what really got the "cheap computer revolution" going
> was the Z80 (CP/M, TRS-80, etc.) and the 6502 (Atari, Commodore, Apple II).
> Because no matter what the tech-heads are doing in their garages, nothing
> is a revolution until you can buy it at Sears.
One of the driving forces behind the prevelance of non-Intel micros in the 70s
was that Intel processors were expensive (actually they still are!). I think
the 8080 was about $200 when MOS started selling 6502s for under $40. Of
course with that Intel lowered thier prices (to about $100 or so). Not to say
that the Z80, 6502 and others were bad CPUs, it's just that Intel was not
looking for the hobbiest/home market at all, and if it wern't for a big
business name (IBM) behind it it would still be looking for a 'killer box'
(like 'killer app' is to software) to be used in.
And IBM was known for the safe route, proven chips and designs, (no innovation
made cloning alot easier) and Intel had the name and a good track record among
business machine microprocessors.
--
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Larry Anderson - Sysop of Silicon Realms BBS (300-2400bd) (209) 754-1363
Visit my Commodore 8-Bit web page at:
http://www.goldrush.com/~foxnhare/commodore.html
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
> Then again, even today, people seem to think that Europe and Asia are
> separate continents, even with vastly better maps and roads and rails
> crossing the border between them in many places.
They are, at least in the same way as Europe ans Africa.
Gruss
H.
BTW: is there _any_ African Computer known ? Maybe Kits or other
Homebrew from SA or even a 'real' homecomputer/Bussinessystem ?
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
I'd like to thank everybody who gave me info on the PC Jr. I got it
going late last week. It turns out it needs two power supplies for the
cpu. Apparently the people who owned it before me had it upgraded and the
upgrade requires it's own power. I saw the second power plug, but it
wasn't marked and I didn't think of it needing a second supply. Anyway, it
runs like a top now. All of the info was greatly appreciated.
Aaron
I was cleaning out the garage and came across my one real documentation
treasure, the doc binder for my Cipher F880 tape drive. The nifty thing is
that they put all of the schematics, engineering data (including a price
breakdown of every individual component), and mechanical diagrams (lots of
blowups) in there too.
Does anyone have a pressing need for this documentation? I won't give up
the original, but if someone expresses some real interest I could scan it
in and post it on a web server or something. It's a lot of material, but
it's interesting that they give so much detailed technical information in
there. I'll get around to it eventually anyway, just for archival
purposes...
Aaron
Hey, I've got a couple of E&L MMD-2's here. These are neat little
8080 educational SBC's. Hex keypad, "function" keypad, 7-segment
LED's, and three sets of 8 LED's for I/O ports 0, 1, 2. Includes
a cassette interface, bus expansion connector, serial interface,
and even an EPROM programmer for 2708/2716's. Most impressive!
But I didn't get any sort of manuals with them. I've figured
out most of the obvious stuff, but it would be nice to know the
format expected by the "load" function, the meaning of a few
unlabelled switches/jumpers, the meaning of "BRL HI" and "BRL LO",
and so on.
Anybody remember these things?
Thanks,
Bill.
PS. These things seem to be using the word "pop" to mean "burn",
as in "popping an EPROM". Was this a widespread usage? I've
heard the words "burn", "blow", and "program" used this way,
but "pop" is new to me.
I can't believe I am doing this much research on a computer I have already
sold, but it is interesting.
I found the Havac (that is it's name) in the "what's New?" column in Byte,
May, 1984.
It is an Apple work-alike and they also call it a transportable Computer. It
uses the 6502 processor and a 164K 5 1/4" floppy. 64K of ram and 8K of rom
and has high res color graphics. The manufacturer claims that over a 1000
Apple II programs will run on it. It is supposed to have printer, serial and
Game ports beside the external floppy connector. It's suggested list was $850.
I couldn't find an advertisement though, only the announcement.
the good news is that I found a couple of boot disks in my archives which I
will send to Kai.
Paxton
Actually, I don't think the apple was the standard multi-colored apple. I
think it was just red (If I remember correctly). It had the black face,
with the front flip-down latch/door, and it had a metal enclosure.
However, thinking back, I think it had a P/S in it (I no longer have it,
because it wouldn't work with anything). I'm not sure about the P/S, but I
do remember a round cord coming out of it.
--
-Jason
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#-1730318
----------
> From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)ncal.verio.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: Picture up (RE: Microsci HAVAC)
> Date: Monday, October 12, 1998 8:53 PM
>
> And you are sure this was a full-height, Apple manufactured, metal
> enclosure, black face plate with the colorful apple logo, Disk ][?
>
> Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
> Ever onward.
>
> Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 09/21/98]
>
< So, is Columbus less important because the Vikings reached the Americas
< before him? Or is it only important that most of the lasting effects
< descend from Columbus?
since I'm not a student of this general branch of history I can't comment
accuractly. It would seem to me the big differnece was the wave of
colonization that resulted.
Better put, the vikings were here. Columbus told the world two things,
it's not flat and there are great riches in the east. Somewhere in ther
is the difference in those explorations goals.
< Yes this is OT, but it mirrors one of the recent arguments on ClassicCmp
< and it could be argued either way because both arguments have validity.
< It comes down to what the individual thinks is 'important'.
True. The consideration is not the indiviual importance of any item but
it's impact on the collective picture. What is significant is the picture
was in some respects a collection of snapshots in time without continuity
or context. There were/are pieces missing from the puzzle and it would
be nice to fill them in. For example; Two of the oldest computing models
Harvard and Von Neuman date back to the first machines yet they influence
machines still. To make the picture complete we also need to know if
there are other models and what they are.
An aside to this is while Intel is currently the apparent successful
leader en masse we still don't know how it will play over time yet to
come. There have been near reversals in the past and it would only take
the next design leap to change the current course. Also the industry is
only 30 years old in a century where we are still developing fundemental
technologies.
My example for that is in the late 70s and early '80s everyone said that
16bit CPUs would wipe the 8bitters away. It sorta did, but not to the
projected extent. There would be a wave of 8bitters like the Kaypro,
ampro, SB180 to name a few in the 84-86 window and later. The 16 bit
machine really didn't reflect enough of an improvement as the next level
needed more. I'd say Apple knew (tripped on) this when they did the jump
>from 6502 to 68000 (internally 32bit). It would be 32 bit cpus that would
have the real impact. I expect that while Merced and Alpha are having an
impact we have yet to see the next significant impactor. While we are
going much faster, the way we compute is still logically similar to some
very old machines.
Allison
>#19 is the hardest to find.
How about the demo cart #2? Is that a har to find Item?
Francois
-------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the desperately in need of update
Sanctuary at: http://www.pclink.com/fauradon
jeez,. if anyone needs a 64, ive got 3 i want to get rid of. i'm apple ][
biased. =D
In a message dated 10/12/98 8:37:42 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
eric(a)brouhaha.com writes:
> Jim Strickland <jim(a)calico.litterbox.com> writes:
> > Well, I reassembled the 64, after cutting a manilla file folder to
replace
> > the paper between the metal shield on the back and the back of the board.
> ...
> > So okay, where DO I get a replacement keyboard for this thing? Also a
> case
> > in nicer condition would be nice. This one had a keyboard cover hinge
> > permanently cemented to the top.
>
> It would be much easier just to find an entire 64 in good condition. Keep
> the one you have now for spare parts.
the infamous grooved disk? is there anything wrong with that design? looks
fairly clever and reliable. i havent seen any wear problems with the 20+ apple
disk drives i have. the only minor issue is adjusting the head stop for which
all you have to do is sight a little dot on the grooved disk (apple calls it a
cam) with the little metal cam follower and make adjustments as needed.
david
In a message dated 10/12/98 7:46:36 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
cisin(a)xenosoft.com writes:
> The FIRST drives for the Apple ][ used a Shugart mechanism with the
> infamous grooved disk. I have no idea what they might have used later.
Picked this thing up at Wacky Willy's in Portland, OR for $5 with a floppy
drive(actually two 5.25" drives in a case with a PS). Not quite sure what
to think of it. It says ATR8000 SWP Microcomputer Products on the front,
lighted power switch on front, and on the back we have two 13-pin Molex
connectors marked Peripheral Out and Computer In, and three edge-connectors
marked RS-232, Printer and Floppy Drive. Inside it says Software
Publisher's ATR8000, and has a Z80 CPU, a WDC floppy IC and a VERY small
amount of RAM... They assumed it was an Atari of some sort, as they
recently got an 800 and 800XL. Does anyone have any idea what the ATR 8000
is?
BTW, if you need some Univac disk packs(don't remember the numbers on it)
they have two at WW's. Kinda expensive, they say they sell the platters
seperatly to artists @$10 each. With 4 or 5 platters in each pack, you
either need to shell out almost $50 or be good at convincing them that it's
not worth that much(and it's not easy, I've tried before). BTW, it's at the
Vaughn St. location, at the end of the Fremont bridge(US30 exit, then the
Vaughn St exit from the exit ramp...).
--------------------------------------------------------------
| http://members.tripod.com/~jrollins/index.html - Computers |
| http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Lair/1681/ - Star Trek |
| orham(a)qth.net list admin KD7BCY |
| ham-mac(a)qth.net Portland, OR |
--------------------------------------------------------------
I maintain my stance that 'microprocessor' is a term used by the
public and media to refer to a series of technical developments, that
are not well considered before calling them microprocessors. In
short, there is no way to define a microprocessor in the technical
sense. TI's 1979 book Understanding Microprocessors defines it as:
A digital integrated unit (or a set of IC's) that contains the
digital functions necessary to be a CPU. It "processes" information
and controls and keeps the system working in harmony as it responds to
the step by step program that the CPU follows.
Nice and circular :)
>what a "microprocessor" is. In fact, the Arabs and the Israelis will
>never have peace until the definition of a microprocessor is agreed
upon
>once and for all (oh yeah, and what "the first" means too).
>
>Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Ever onward.
>
> Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 09/21/98]
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
At 04:36 PM 10/12/98 -0800, you wrote:
>Picked this thing up at Wacky Willy's in Portland, OR for $5 with a floppy
>drive(actually two 5.25" drives in a case with a PS). Not quite sure what
>to think of it. It says ATR8000 SWP Microcomputer Products on the front,
>lighted power switch on front, and on the back we have two 13-pin Molex
>connectors marked Peripheral Out and Computer In, and three edge-connectors
That is a (iirc) CP/M(?) box for an atari 800. I believe it plugs into the
800 (or other 8-bit atari) and the atari is the terminal for the CP/M
Machine. Pretty amazing device. (Pretty amazing that I recognized the
name! 8^)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
In a message dated 10/12/98 6:18:47 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
jim(a)calico.litterbox.com writes:
hope you scraped your dishes clean before you ran them through! lol.
Hehe - actually I ran it with a load of dishes. :)
> --
< Your esophagus, on the other hand, might object to your drinking HCl (de
< on how dilute, I guess).
Actually a fairly powerful acid is the citric acid in lemons and limes
that people can and do eat/drink. Most pharmaceuticals use citric,
hydrocloric and some preps even nitric acid to get a the required PH.
This is really way off track for cleaning boards unless they have been hit
with a strong alkli (leaking nicads!), in which case a good dousing with
vinegar (acetic acid) or lemon juice (citric acid) will neutralize that.
Anyhow the PH and total acidity of a dishwasher unless useing something
strange is fairly mild. Electrolytic corrosion (usually from ionic
solutions and dissimilar metals) is prevented by quickly drying the board
either with mild heat or forced air. Unless your water is bad (unsafe
to drink) it is likely fine for washing a board.
I've done this to 10-15 qbus cards, a Micronta DVM, and several s100 cards
with the expected result, clean. I do it on boards I'll have to work on
as it's less messy and in one case it cleared a short!
FYI: I used to service marine radios when I lived on LI,NY and the
procedure for dunked electronics was toss it in a barrel of clean water
ASAP to get the salt out. This is repeated with several barrels of clean
water to get all of the salt. Then the equipment is than opended, cleaned
and repaired as needed (speakers, microphones, buzzers, enclosed coils).
Generally speaking potable water is ok, mud worse (abrasive), salt
is real nasty.
Allison
Did the Unidisk look anything like the Disk II? OR could it have been
possible that the drive mechanism was replaced in mine?
--
-Jason
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#-1730318
----------
> From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)ncal.verio.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: Picture up (RE: Microsci HAVAC)
> Date: Monday, October 12, 1998 6:52 PM
>
> On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Tony Duell wrote:
>
> > Odd... I've got a number of Disk II's here, and every one has a stepper
> > motor under the chassis with a disk on the spindle of it above the
> > chassis. There's a spiral groove in the disk and a little lug on the
head
> > assembly that fits into the groove. The stepper motor turns the disk
and
> > thus moves the heads.
> >
> > Maybe there are several versions of the Disk II
>
> There is only one Disk ][. As mentioned before, the newer units were
> first called the Unidisk and then later simply 'Apple 5.25" Drive'.
>
> Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
> Ever onward.
>
> Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 09/21/98]
>
Um, I don't care what anybody says, but that disk drive does NOT look like
anything similar to an Apple Disk II.
BTW: I used to have a Disk II, and the heads were positioned by a stepper
motor, and didn't have any "spiral-grooved disc" anywhere in the entire
unit.
--
-Jason
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#-1730318
----------
> From: Kai Kaltenbach <kaikal(a)MICROSOFT.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Picture up (RE: Microsci HAVAC)
> Date: Sunday, October 11, 1998 10:34 PM
>
> OK, I snapped a quick shot of the HAVAC, it's not the greatest picture
but
> it'll do :)
>
> http://www.geocities.com/~compcloset/MicrosciHavac.htm
>
> Kai
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Ismail [mailto:dastar@ncal.verio.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 11, 1998 6:42 PM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: Re: Microsci HAVAC
>
>
> On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Kai Kaltenbach wrote:
>
> > This weekend I picked up this wacky little 6502 computer called the
> Microsci
> > HAVAC. Has anyone else ever seen one of these, or better yet, does
anyone
> > have a boot disk for it?
>
> Sounds neat. Can you supply us with a GIF?
>
> > The HAVAC has the weirdest floppy drive I've ever seen. It has a
> > center-mounted clamp lever, and the head positioning is done via a
> > spiral-grooved disc!
>
> The Apple Disk ][ used the same mechanism.
>
> Sellam Alternate e-mail:
> dastar(a)siconic.com
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> Ever onward.
>
> Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 09/21/98]
But since most working implementations of an 8088 (the only one I
have the databook for) require additional ICs, I'm wondering if it
could truly be called a single-chip CPU. I mean, this thing needs
chips for the clock line (8284, this says). It needs more chips
for accessing RAM, and it needs RAM. Why do you say it's single chip?
I think the only way to determine if it's a microprocessor is to
look in the company's literature. If they call it an arithmetic logic
unit, it's not a microprocessor.
>failed to produce a working single-chip CPU before Intel.
>
>TI had a design, but it didn't prove to be manufacturable.
>
>Even if not everyone here agrees that being on a single chip is a
necessary
>condition for something to be called a microprocessor, to the best of
my
>knowledge no one disagrees with the claim that Intel as the first to
make
>a single-chip CPU.
>
>Eric
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
At 06:06 PM 10/9/98 -0800, you wrote:
>Does anyone remember the cost of internet access/online time via Compuserve
>in the 80s ? I need to give a comparison of today's cost of sending a
>graphics file.
I seem to remember it as something like $12/hour for 300/1200bps and
$24/hour for 2400bps.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
> Okay, I just ran the mainboard to my 64 through the dishwasher. Does anyone
> know what the material between the metal noise shield and the board is,
Paper
> and why it expanded during dishwashing?
soaking wet ?
> And if it will shrink again as it
> cools and dries? I didn't run the thing through the dry cycle either.
Use strong, cool air to blow the water away. I always
use compressed air from a supply for pneumatic tools.
Blowing the water away instead of drying avoids stains
>from calcium and other dispensed materials (Well, Munich
water is _very_ 'strong' :).
> It is VERY clean... :)
:))
> If it works after this I'll probably have to track down a replacement
> keyboard. THEN throw the whole thing in a ziplock bag and keep it until I
> figure out what to do with it. :)
Wooah - a Ziplock Bag ? Together with the energy cost
for your dishwasher this tripples the value of the C64
board :)
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
ckaiser(a)oa.ptloma.edu hath spoke:
< Good think you didn't run it through the dry cycle, or chips like the PL
< might short out (very sensitive to heat).
The dry cycle is ok if the temperature is under 180f, too hot and it
can over heat parts. I prefer the oven at 160-180f as it's drier
and a bit faster. A blast of compressed air is also good for getting
water out from under parts to hasten drying.
The PALS while temperature sensitive and no more so than any of the LSI
on the board.
< Are you sure the soap wouldn't have hurt the solder or board traces,
< though?
Your kidding? Soap will not hurt the solder or the boards. How do you
think assembled boards are cleaned commercially?
Allison
>Xref: world alt.sys.pdp8:4263
>Path: world!blanket.mitre.org!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!206.191.82.231!rockie.attcanada.net!attcanada!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.225!attworldnet!newsadm
>From: david.razler(a)worldnet.att.net (David M. Razler)
>Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp8
>Subject: DEC Rainbows going up for sale
>Date: 11 Oct 1998 16:10:15 GMT
>Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services
>Lines: 20
>Message-ID: <3621d6f7.30336552(a)netnews.worldnet.att.net>
>Reply-To: david.razler(a)worldnet.att.net
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.68.22.131
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452
If all goes well, my employer, The Press of Atlantic City, will be selling off
an almost unlimited stock of working DEC Rainbows in 1st Q '99 (and, boy will
I be glad to get something "modern" like a 486 on my desk.)
Anyway, in addition to being collectors items in their own right, they have
the same basic mechanical and electrical components as the DECMates. Word I'm
getting is they'll go for cheap to anyone looking to keep them alive or in
need of parts, at or just over scrap value.
Also up for grabs will be at least one major PDP-11 system.
I'll keep the list posted with the latest news including when and how to order
your own PC-Clone and DECMate repair kit.
dmr
David M. Razler
david.razler(a)worldnet.att.net
What was the original price of this thing, and to whom was it
marketed?
> FWIW, I've listed an older version of SCO Unix up on Haggle. The URL
is:
>
> http://www.haggle.com/cgi/getitem.cgi?id=201787290
>
> Caveat emptor!
>
>
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
>(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net) (Web:
>http://table.jps.net/~kyrrin)
>SysOp: The Dragon's Cave (Fido 1:343/272, 253-639-9905)
>"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own
>human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> http://www.geocities.com/~compcloset/MicrosciHavac.htm
>Um, I don't care what anybody says, but that disk drive does NOT look like
>anything similar to an Apple Disk II.
I agree - the door doesn't look anything at all like a Disk II.
>BTW: I used to have a Disk II, and the heads were positioned by a stepper
>motor, and didn't have any "spiral-grooved disc" anywhere in the entire
>unit.
I've had several dozen Disk II's, and they all had stepper motors with
spiral grooved disks. Many, many drives were based around the SA390
and 400 mechanics, and some of them look quite dissimilar from the outside
despite the fact that their internal mechanics are very similar.
Kai - you mention on your web page that when you turn the machine on you
go into a boot ROM monitor. What are the prompts like? Any copyright
notices? Menus? Any "obvious" commands?
Tim.
Since I shut down the at home/on site business here and went to work as
an ISS/CSS at a local corporation I need to do some cleaning out of
excess here. I have many, many machines from 8088 through 80386DX that I
can make a reasonable deal with someone on (not as cheap as an unknown
condition thrift shop sale though) for mostly main units (you add the KB
and monitor in may cases) but I have a few setups that are complete such
as a 5150 PC that does have a 5151 monitor and original keyboard.
PS/2's out the bung hole, Dells and AT&T's, etc. Many will have to be
dug through when someone inquires about the condition and what it
includes but 99% are in great condition other than minor wear and tear.
I'm always looking for odds and ends for my machines here such as
drives, cards, modems, etc as well as electronics test equipment for my
bench. If you have something to trade rather than cash (which is my
favorite, as is many other's) then let me know and we can go from there.
Please email me direct so this isn't a problem with the list. I hate
putting this on here but the people on this list seem to appreciate good
sturdy hardware and see the actual value and use for it rather than
seeing a pile of scrap with gold retrieval possibilities.
Russ Blakeman
Harned, KY 40144
> It doesn't have to be a strong solution; even a weak solution of HCl is
> fine for human skin but will corrode metal.
>
> Still, only some do. Probably most are ionic detergents (sodium dodecyl
> sulfate, sodium lauryl sulfate) but you never know, especially with rinse
> agents.
Just gotta be sure you pull the board before the rinse cycle :-). Then
it's usually best to rinse it with distilled water.
--
-Jason
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#-1730318
i third it
In a message dated 98-10-08 13:10:59 EDT, you write:
<< I second your opinion Sam.
Marty
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: What was the first Unix micro?
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 10/7/98 11:42 PM
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Ward Donald Griffiths III wrote:
> OK, I'm getting tired of the arguments about who made the first
> microprocessor. Fine. Maybe God did -- it's called DNA and as an
> atheist I don't grant credit to anybody.
Oh, ok. God forbid we discuss computer history on this list, Ward. We'll
just go away now so you can fill up the list with your pointless one-line
replies.
Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Ever onward.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 09/21/98]
>>
The thing is, people bought their earlier products when IBM won in
its battle with NCR. When IBM began to make computers, it was already
well estblished in the business world. Do people mean a product with
good ergonomics or with easy repairs in mind as marketing? That plays
a role, though it has nothing to do with the quality of the product
or its innovativeness.
>> I would be very flattered that you attribute:
>> * 40 years of corporate stability to marketing
>> * extensive manufacturing capability to marketing
>> * cash reserves to sustain development to marketing
>> * vast R+D resources to marketing
>> * world-class documentation to marketing
>> * world-wide customer support to marketing
>> * a simply immense infrastructure ... to marketing!
>
>Do you think they would have any of the above if nobody ever bought any
of
>their products?
>
>Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Ever onward.
>
> Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 09/21/98]
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Doug Spence <ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca> said:
>Speaking of which... how common are the Channel Fs? I picked up several
>cartridges for one some time ago, but I've never seen the actual unit.
>I've only seen ads for them in old magazines.
>
I see one about every two years. I have 3, 2 of which are in boxes.
And I've managed to collect all of the regular cartridges, except
for #26, in the boxes with instructions.
#19 is the hardest to find.
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/museum/mvfair.htm
There was a second system (System II) that I believe was
produced by the company that bought the rights to Channel F from
Fairchild. The big differences in the two systems was that the
original had a dark plexiglas cover over the controller storage
compartment and the controllers were hard wired into the unit.
It was the first home video game system to use programmed
cartridges, but I think the cool thing about the Channel F was
it 4 axis controller.
=========================================
Doug Coward
Press Start Inc.
Sunnyvale,CA
=========================================
You can also get photocopies of most of the Sam's Computerfacts by calling them and asking for one. If they have an old copy in stock, they'll copy it and send it to you for $20. I got Computerfacts for the C64 and C128 this way.
Tony
--
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998 02:12:00 Innfogra wrote:
>Hi;
>I have just listed on ebay a group of Sams Computerfacts that I have had some
>interest in from people on the classic computer list.
>
>They are for:
>
>Computers - Osborne OCC1 & OCC1A, TRS-80 Models 3 and 4, Epson QX-10, Franklin
>Ace 1000, Atari 800XL, IBM PC & AT, AT&T 6300, Leading Edge D
>
>Monitors - IBM 5151 and 5153, Amdek Color-I and the Video-300
>
>Printers - Okidata Microlines 82A and 92, Apple A90303, NEC PC-8023A-N, NEC
>PC-8025A, IBM 5152-002, Epsons MX-80 IIIF/T, FX-80, FX-100, MX-100, RX-80,
>FX-286e, Star Geminis 10X and 15X
>
>These can be searched for by the keyword "Computerfact" (Singular context
>please).
>
>I also listed a factory Toshiba T 1100 plus laptop maintenance Manual.
>All of these are under Computer/hardware/books.
>Paxton
>
>p.S. Please direct questions toi Whoagiii(a)aol.com.
>
-----== Sent via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/ Easy access to 50,000+ discussion forums
The title pretty much says it all...
Having (finally) added a LISA to the collection, I'm looking for a copy of
the Sun Remarketing book on the LISA/Mac XL.
Anyone out there have one that they could be parted from, or induced to
feed thru a copier/scanner?
...and yes, I've seen the one on eBay... it's getting real expensive
already (sigh)
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
>>The mention in this thread of a Kyocera-labeled product intrigues me,
>>as I'd never heard of such at the edge of the Pacific I was on then.
> The Kyocera KC-85 is well known, although not too common. The case is
> shaped more like the NEC, but it has the keyboard of the m100.
> P.S., come to VCF 3.0 and see all the variations (hopefully!) and check out
> the talk I'm going to do (hopefully!) on the history of all these machines.
> (If anyone has any info, history, or anecdotes, please get in touch!)
I have the technical Reference, DOS manual and BASIC I/O Manuals
for the NEC 8201A - interested ?
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
>>> Just so everyone knows, Hayes has filed for Bankruptcy..
>>Again?
> When was the last time?
I think 3 or 4 years ago.
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
< No, those running MS software are doing so mostly because MS was
< the only game in town way back when... not hard to be 'best' when
< you're the only one... also not hard to be 'worst'...
Back to the original topic some. History. MS was not the only game
in town. DRI, later Novell, now Caldara offered CPM86 and it decendants
such as CCPM and DRDOS until MS crushed them. Caldara is still at it
with Opendos (DRdos decendant).
< Personally, I avoid MS-anything like the plague... I have a linux
< system which has been up for more than a week straight... running
< W95, I'm lucking if I *don't* have to reboot several times a day
< either because the system has simply crashed, or wedged itself...
I'm no fan of MS but I run a ton of CADD, FPGA and cross assemblers
unavailable for Linux or freeBSD. The system that I must run it on
is MSdos6.22/WIN3.1 that generally has an up time of months between
reboots. The last down time was for a fan replacement. I've never run
w95, but I've seen systems that can achieve that as well. My other half
has a laptop for work that seems to be solid enough. None of the
MS OSs are great products, they work ok though and when the system is
configured with stable hardware and software. I've also found that
linix or freeBSD tends to beat the daylights out of hardware and find
even minor problems that seem to get by under MSdos/win but cause it
to crash intermittently. Most of the complaints I've heard of MS
dos/winders can be leveled at Linux or other unice as well. My pet
peave is that most of the PC unice are limited about what hardware
they run on and like win95 also will not be happy with a minimal 8meg
of ram.
Now what has this to do with old hardware. Unix has been around for
some time, some 25-30 years. It's still not the generalized platform
for applications software. I find that good low cost CADD tools are
non-existant and most require Xwinders which is a memory hog and yet
another potentially cranky item. So until I can find a good CADD,
schematic capture, PCB routing, XAble and Xilinx FPGA package for PC
unice for under a few hundred $$$ MS wins. That defined the market.
Allison
< If it was 1983 then definitely try DOS 3.3. It would be REALLY COOL if
< that thing turned out to be an Apple //e clone. I can't imagine what el
< would be using a 6502 at around that time (besides already established
< designs...most new designs were coming out with 8088's by that time and
< the 6502 was thought to be an oddity of the past).
This is bogus. 1983 was not the end of the line for 8bitters yet. The
8088 was still gathering steam but far from a full head. the 8bit world
would have another two years or so to peak. The Franklin ACE1200 in the
may'83 Microsystems is only one example.
The PC may have launched in 81... but it wasn't the defacto force quite
yet in 1983.. or 86. If anything I'd call that the processor wars eara
with 80186, 80286, 64180, 65816, 16032, 68000 to name a few all jockying
for the next better runner. While that was going on new z80 and 6502
systems were emerging that were smaller, cheaper, faster to capitalize
on the existing and still growing software base.
Allison
> "Hans Franke" <franke(a)sbs.de> wrote:
>> Yes, but as a rule, mainframes and most minis catch undefined
>> opcodes in a special exeption.
> That's only a 'rule' for recent machines. Most of the early ones didn't.
> When IBM was developing the 1401 emulation for the 360/30, they discovered
> that many customers were in fact using and dependent on undefined behaviors
> of the 1401. They had to emulate a lot of things that were never documented.
Now, thats what I call early.
Of course you are right. I did only think back to the 60's
technologie (/360 is the earlyest Mainframe system I ever
programmed).
> References:
> _The Mythical Man Month_ by Brooks,
> _Computer Architecture: Concepts and Evolution_ by Brooks and Blaauw,
> _IBM's 360 and Early 370 Systems_ by Pugh, Johnson, and Palmer
Thank you
Hans
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
Micro-SCI made a line of Apple II and III compatable disk drives in the early
80s. I bet they made an Apple clone wannabee. Try apple dos 3.2 or 3.2. You
could have gotten a copy of that too in my whse this weekend.
Micro-SCI was a division of Standum Controlls, Inc. in Santa Anna, CA. This
came out of their ad in a March, 1983 Byte.
Hi;
I have just listed on ebay a group of Sams Computerfacts that I have had some
interest in from people on the classic computer list.
They are for:
Computers - Osborne OCC1 & OCC1A, TRS-80 Models 3 and 4, Epson QX-10, Franklin
Ace 1000, Atari 800XL, IBM PC & AT, AT&T 6300, Leading Edge D
Monitors - IBM 5151 and 5153, Amdek Color-I and the Video-300
Printers - Okidata Microlines 82A and 92, Apple A90303, NEC PC-8023A-N, NEC
PC-8025A, IBM 5152-002, Epsons MX-80 IIIF/T, FX-80, FX-100, MX-100, RX-80,
FX-286e, Star Geminis 10X and 15X
These can be searched for by the keyword "Computerfact" (Singular context
please).
I also listed a factory Toshiba T 1100 plus laptop maintenance Manual.
All of these are under Computer/hardware/books.
Paxton
p.S. Please direct questions toi Whoagiii(a)aol.com.
Damn, you're right, that was the same as the early SA400's. This one isn't
built nearly as solid, though, and the clamp mechanism is driven by
strings(!) that run over pulleys just like an old radio tuner mechanism.
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: James Willing [mailto:jimw@agora.rdrop.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 1998 9:10 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: Microsci HAVAC
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Kai Kaltenbach wrote:
> This weekend I picked up this wacky little 6502 computer called the
Microsci
> HAVAC. Has anyone else ever seen one of these, or better yet, does anyone
> have a boot disk for it?
>
> The HAVAC has the weirdest floppy drive I've ever seen. It has a
> center-mounted clamp lever, and the head positioning is done via a
> spiral-grooved disc!
Well... while I am not familiar with the 'HAVAC', to find a more common
use of the "spiral grooved disc" for head positioning, just look in any
Apple II disk drive! (the early ones, not the 'DuoDiscs')
That was the standard early Shugart 5.25 inch disk positioner mechanism.
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
The IBM 4224 is a 200 to 400 CPS dot matrix printer (usually 18 pin) for use
on IBM networks. It sounds like you have the Twinax interface, about 1" in
diameter, screw connector, with two pin holes. It is not usable on anything
but a twinax network. I bellieve that IBM made 3 versions of varieing speeds
in two interfaces. The second interface is a BNC Coax for the 3270 systems.
While the networks are over 10 yrs old I doubt the printer is.
Paxton
This weekend I picked up this wacky little 6502 computer called the Microsci
HAVAC. Has anyone else ever seen one of these, or better yet, does anyone
have a boot disk for it?
The HAVAC has the weirdest floppy drive I've ever seen. It has a
center-mounted clamp lever, and the head positioning is done via a
spiral-grooved disc!
The machine is about 16" deep, 10" wide, 8" tall, with the floppy drive in
the center front (there is no door on the drive, just a slot and the funny
lever -- no eject mechanism either, just pull the disc out manually). There
is a small external keyboard about 10" by 13", no numeric pad, connects via
a D-sub connector. On the back of the system unit, there are serial,
"printer" (parallel?), 2nd floppy, and RCA video output connectors.
I fired it up, and it displayed a HAVAC logo, ROM version 1.3, then the
expected "no disk" error. I examined the system board, which is dated 1983,
and has a 6502 CPU. There is no info anywhere on the net about this
machine, that I can find.
Any info appreciated,
thanks
Kai
< The HAVAC has the weirdest floppy drive I've ever seen. It has a
< center-mounted clamp lever, and the head positioning is done via a
< spiral-grooved disc!
Sounds like the shugart sa400 series.
Allison
< Unless I have my capacitors crossed, some dishwashing agents are
< chlorine-based, and H20 <=> OH- + H+; mix a free Cl- ion in and you hav
< hydrochloric acid.
Which is why most are not CL- based. I thin their majik is a sodium ion.
Allison
>First, I didn't pick the example of Microsoft. Microsoft and IBM were
>held up as examples of success through marketing when this thread
>started, remember? Are you using a Microsoft product? I thought so.
>Now, think real hard: was Microsoft lucky to get you to use their
>software? No? Did you use their software because they were determined?
>No? Did they convince you to use their software by playing "Start me
>up!" real loud? No?
No, those running MS software are doing so mostly because MS was
the only game in town way back when... not hard to be 'best' when
you're the only one... also not hard to be 'worst'...
Personally, I avoid MS-anything like the plague... I have a linux
system which has been up for more than a week straight... running
W95, I'm lucking if I *don't* have to reboot several times a day
either because the system has simply crashed, or wedged itself...
Megan
OK, I snapped a quick shot of the HAVAC, it's not the greatest picture but
it'll do :)
http://www.geocities.com/~compcloset/MicrosciHavac.htm
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ismail [mailto:dastar@ncal.verio.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 1998 6:42 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: Microsci HAVAC
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Kai Kaltenbach wrote:
> This weekend I picked up this wacky little 6502 computer called the
Microsci
> HAVAC. Has anyone else ever seen one of these, or better yet, does anyone
> have a boot disk for it?
Sounds neat. Can you supply us with a GIF?
> The HAVAC has the weirdest floppy drive I've ever seen. It has a
> center-mounted clamp lever, and the head positioning is done via a
> spiral-grooved disc!
The Apple Disk ][ used the same mechanism.
Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Ever onward.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 09/21/98]
>> The HAVAC has the weirdest floppy drive I've ever seen. It has a
>> center-mounted clamp lever, and the head positioning is done via a
>> spiral-grooved disc!
>The Apple Disk ][ used the same mechanism.
And they're both derivatives of the Shugart SA390.
Tim.
At 09:51 PM 10/7/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Intel came out the winners; they wanted it the most. But it would have
>happened with or without them. You had the 6800, the 6502 and a whole
>slew of others. The computers built around those processors were just as
>relevant and would have happened anyway.
I will admit up front that I don't know everything, and I am not an EE
(dropped out of community college) but it seems to me that Intel hadn't won
anything until ~81 when IBM came out with their PC. Until then, the Z80
and 6502 were as dominant (if not more so) than the 8080/8085?
In fact, I'll go so far as to suggest that perhaps if IBM had gone with,
say, the z8000, Intel would not be anywhere near as big as it is?
It seems to me that what really got the "cheap computer revolution" going
was the Z80 (CP/M, TRS-80, etc.) and the 6502 (Atari, Commodore, Apple II).
Because no matter what the tech-heads are doing in their garages, nothing
is a revolution until you can buy it at Sears.
There is a similar situation with digital recording -- it's been around and
available for eons, but mostly was only available to those with lots of $$$
(big studios/record companies) or tech-heads. Now, with the
soundblaster/CD-R combo and some software (which, if it isn't available as
shareware, I would be extremely surprised!) anyone can cut a full-digital
(DDD) CD at home.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
I think that the amount of marketing necessary is related to the
quality and value of the product itself. After all, if a computer
is reeealy good, only a simple demonstration is necessary and it will
be bought. If the product is nothing new, then $150m will be spent
making it successfull.
>>
>> > Perhaps I'm cynical, ...
>> > But I maintain that what determines the course of the industry is
NOT the
>> > quality of the technology, but the marketing. How else do you
explain
>> > the successes of IBM, MS, etc.? Surely not due to their superior
>> > quality?!?
>>
>> No, not the "M" word! We just had a "marketing" thread and the term
was
>> tossed around like it was this magical thing that was responsible for
>> everything that couldn't be explained by technical merit.
>
>It doesn't explain everything, but you'd be a fool to think marketing
is
>not responsible for at least 50% of a product's success (and that's
being
>conservative).
>
>> First of all, IBM can hardly be called successful. *In spite* of all
the
>> "marketing" they did, Taiwanese with no marketing at all were able to
>> completely erode their PC market share.
>
>Let me get this straight...you're saying IBM can hardly be called
>successful? This must be a typo.
>
I have seen several who think IBM is a failure. Once, I was at a
computer store with another person, getting a computer repaired.
THe other person asked the tech 'So, do you think Apple will survive?'
The answer was quick: 'Sure, IBM survived, didn't it?' I asked her
what she meant. She said, 'Well, their entire PS/2 line was killed
off'. For one thing, the PS/2 shows that with great marketing and
technology, a product can still fail. Secondly, it would appear that
in most people's minds, everything before the PC is a haze.
>where they did today.
>
>Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Ever onward.
>
> Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 09/21/98]
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>> < So, is Columbus less important because the Vikings reached the
Americas
>> < before him? Or is it only important that most of the lasting
effects
>> < descend from Columbus?
>
>Columbus is a superb analogy for this thread! Not that the results
>necessarily match, but that MANY related issues are also present.
>
>Columbus is the "canonical" discoverer, in spite of the Vikings, or
even
>the previously existing "colonists" who had been living there for a
LONG
>time ever since coming over the Bering straits?
Well, that 'canonicity' of this is beginning to change.
>Likewise, the Intel 4004 is the "canonical" first microprocessor, in
>spite of other previous units that might or might not meet various
>definitions.
Unlike the columbus question, most people neither know nor care who
made the first microprocessor or what serial number it was. Just
about every m.p. is considered first by _someone_.
>> . . .
>> Better put, the vikings were here. Columbus told the world two
things,
>> it's not flat and there are great riches in the east. Somewhere in
ther
>> is the difference in those explorations goals.
>
>Since FEW have ever heard anything about this other than TOTAL BS in
school,
>it bears looking at some of the distortions. What is taught in school
is
>even less accurate than would be a history of computers by MS, IBM,
>Intel, or Apple. In line with the use of it as an analogy, it is
useful
>to look at how distorted it has become, and realize that the same thing
>happens quite quickly in fields such as ours.
It happens in all fields. It will always happen. We're doing it now.
There is nothing new under the sun.
>but quite costly.
>
>Columbus did NOT tell the world that it wasn't flat. By the time of
>Columbus, that was well known and accepted by all educated people. The
>only ones who still thought that it was flat are now paying dollars per
>minute for telephone psychic readings. Although there were some fears
of
>dangers, sailing off the edge was NOT taken seriously as a possibility
by
>anybody with any education.
As a matter of fact, the Romans knew that the world was round. The
knowledge was lost for about 8 centuries.
>it was just too far going that way. Even the diameter and
circumference
>of the earth had been reasonably accurately computed (showing that the
>shortest route to the Indies was still to the east).
>
>But Columbus had an inaccurate, wrong, crackpot theory that the earth
was
>about one third the size that had been calculated. Thus, he was
convinced
>that it WOULD be shorter going west. There are a lot of other issues
>involved with his funding, etc.
Never knew that. All progress is made by unreasonable men...
>He set off, and lo and behold, encountered land somewhere near to where
>the Indies would have been if he had been right about his 1/3 size
theory.
>
>BTW, his very first recorded words about the existing inhabitants were:
>"a good source for slaves".
>
>> An aside to this is while Intel is currently the apparent successful
>> leader en masse we still don't know how it will play over time yet to
>> come. There have been near reversals in the past and it would only
take
>> the next design leap to change the current course. Also the industry
is
>> only 30 years old in a century where we are still developing
fundemental
>> technologies.
>
>Perhaps I'm cynical, ...
>But I maintain that what determines the course of the industry is NOT
the
>quality of the technology, but the marketing. How else do you explain
>the successes of IBM, MS, etc.? Surely not due to their superior
>quality?!?
Well, IBM really had very little competition. DEC and Data General
were quite successful too. But, since IBM was already around making
typewriters and card punchers, it was already firmly established in
the market. Did NCR ever venture into mainframes and minis, BTW? I
have seen a nicely designed AT clone of theirs.
>
>And progressive improvement in hardware ...
Only among people who submit to marketing and not quality.
>Fred Cisin cisin(a)xenosoft.com
>XenoSoft http://www.xenosoft.com
>2210 Sixth St. (510) 644-9366
>Berkeley, CA 94710-2219
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
On Oct 11, 10:46, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> Subject: Re: RQDX2 & 3 jumpers
> Bruce Lane spoke:
> > I've posted jumper and cabling details of the RQDX2 and RQDX3 to my
web
> Great! This answers some of my questions. Now to show what an ingrate I
> am, does anyone have any info on the following jumpers:
>
> W12..W17
These set the starting "logical unit number" for board, as a binary number
(W12=LSB, W17+MSB). If you have multiple RQDXn boards, you'd typcally set
the second card to start with LUN 4, the third with LUN 8, etc. Jumper out
= 0, jumper in = 1.
> W23 -- I think this is for what kind of cabinet that the card is
in.
No, it controls the HEADSEL 3 and REDUCWRTI signals. W23 has 4 posts
numbeerd 1..4. Factory setting is 1-2 jumpered on early firmware, 1-2 and
3-4 for version 2 firmware (ROMs 23-243E5/23-244E5) or later.
Alternatively, you can jumper 2-3, which has the effect of connecting
HEADSEL 3 to pin 9 of J1, and REDUCWRTI to pin 22. That allows you to use
hard drives with more than 8 heads.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
FWIW, I've listed an older version of SCO Unix up on Haggle. The URL is:
http://www.haggle.com/cgi/getitem.cgi?id=201787290
Caveat emptor!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net) (Web:
http://table.jps.net/~kyrrin)
SysOp: The Dragon's Cave (Fido 1:343/272, 253-639-9905)
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
I've posted jumper and cabling details of the RQDX2 and RQDX3 to my web
site. With apologies for the lousy navigational interface (no Next/Previous
keying yet), anyone who needs to can find it at:
http://table.jps.net/~kyrrin
Follow the link tagged 'TechLinks' and scroll down near the bottom of the
page. The info is in multiple .GIF files.
Enjoy!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net) (Web:
http://table.jps.net/~kyrrin)
SysOp: The Dragon's Cave (Fido 1:343/272, 253-639-9905)
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
<Okay, I just ran the mainboard to my 64 through the dishwasher. Does an
< know what the material between the metal noise shield and the board is,
< why it expanded during dishwashing? And if it will shrink again as it
< cools and dries? I didn't run the thing through the dry cycle either.
Fishpaper as some call it. It's a thick stiff paper put ther to prevent
shorts. If you put it in with the shield in place you will have to remove
it and dry it, maybe replacing the paper. A useable replacement is manila
(72 or144lb card stock).
< It is VERY clean... :)
You still have to dry it out well!
Allison
Guys:
Are there any of you out there looking for these beasts?
I know somebody who's got a 5120 and a 5126.
He's asking $50 each (too high in my opinion), but the
price ought to be negotiable.
I know he also has at least one power brick,
and an NOS portable battery charger (M0275).
Send me personal e-mail if there is any interest.
Jeff
___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Just passing this on.... Reply to the fellow who wrote the orig. NG message!
Found this in comp.sys.hp.hardware:
>From: Alec Gagne <alec(a)eclipsesystems.com>
>Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp.mpe,comp.sys.hp.hardware,comp.sys.hp
>Subject: FREE HP3000
>Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 01:14:27 -0700
>
>Free, to a good home!
>
> HP3000 Series 37 Mini Computer
> Series 37 CPU
> 1 Meg RAM
> 7 Ports (6 ATP and 1 ADCC)
> 2 HP7945 55 MB Disk Drives
> 3 HPIB cables
> 1 HP9144 1/4 inch Tape Drive w/about 10 tapes.
> 1 HP Cabinet with internal rails
> 1 HP2392A 14 inch Terminal & Keyboard
>
> ( About the size of a Full Tower PC but twice as thick )
>
>The machine loads to MPE V-Delta-5 (Version G.B3.05) operating system
>I have the an original OS load tape.
>
>Everything is in GOOD condition, and it runs! I used it as a
>development machine for writing COBOL code up until last year.
>
>I tried to sell it, but nobody was interested. The computer junk
>dealers will "take it off my hands" for scrap. I would rather give
>it away to someone/anyone who needs it/wants it or just wants to
>learn about it, than have it scapped for parts.
>
>The only loop hole is you have to come pick it up. It is heavy and
>expensive to ship, and I don't particularly want to haul it down to
>the UPS office.
>
>I am in San Jose California.
>First come first serve, limited quantity (1).
>
>
>Regards
>
>Alec
>
>
>--
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
> Eclipse Systems -- Business & Public Sector Solutions Since 1989
> P.O. Box 53435 San Jose, California 95153 USA (408) 362-1651
> http://www.eclipsesystems.com
>
> Provider of CrimeStar -- http://www.CrimeStar.net
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
Happy HP collecting!
--Chris
-- --
Christian Fandt, Electronic/Electrical Historian
Jamestown, NY USA cfandt(a)netsync.net
Member of Antique Wireless Association
URL: http://www.ggw.org/freenet/a/awa/
Hi
I could pick one up for you if you want, there's on that has been around a
thrift store here for some time now. They want $25 for it but I can
negotiate.
Francois
-------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the desperately in need of update
Sanctuary at: http://www.pclink.com/fauradon
>Speaking of which... how common are the Channel Fs? I picked up several
>cartridges for one some time ago, but I've never seen the actual unit.
>I've only seen ads for them in old magazines.
>
>--
>Doug Spence
>ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
>http://alcor.concordia.ca/~ds_spenc/
>
>
< > Micral, Mark-8, Scelbi 8H were the first wave. I don't know of any 40
< > micros other than the MCS-4, but I doubt it was especially cheap or wi
< > available compared to some of the others, and compared especially to t
< > computers that came before.
<
< Ok, I can add the Kenbak-1 to your list and it would be just as irreleva
< as the three you just listed. You just named three computers that barel
Ok then how about mords/modules manufactured and sold with 8008s on them
like the Control Logic L series (there weren't the only ones) for use in
industrial controls. Their cost was not that far off the mark when
compared to an altair with 4k and a PIO.
< We would have had microprocessor-based computers on our desktop today.
< The trend was definitely heading in that direction. Intel merely was i
< the right place at the right time. There still would have been a Lee
< Felsenstein, a Steve Wozniak and a Ray Holt.
And a slew of others. Altair was not a big bang, it was however a
marker or milestone that had to happen if not to MITS then some one else.
I would also contend that if at least two other vendors didn't jump on
S100 in less than 6 months the Altair would be far more obscure.
< I'm not saying it could have, I'm saying it WAS and IS. The F14 CADC
< happened (independently and prior to the 4004). That is a fact. The
< AMI7200 and AMI7300 happened. That is a fact. Several other
< microprocessors from several other companies happened. That is a fact.
< Even if Intel had never existed, we STILL would have had the microcomput
< revolution of around 1975, and today we would have microprocessor-based
< computers on our desks and in our pockets. To speculate otherwise woul
< be absurd.
The CADC itself was of little direct impact as we never saw it. The
processing, design steps and process experience however were critical to
whoever made them as they gained valuable foundry experience and could
apply that to the next product. Also, since Ray Holt didn't do it alone
there wer a slew of people that also gained experience they could apply
to thing like calculator chips and maybe even the 4004. This makes it
easier to create the next product and also possible to do it less
expensively.
< them. I don't have the Nina, the Pinta or the Santa Maria in my
< collection, so Columbus never "discovered America". I don't have an
Technically he didn't. He discoverd the Caribian islands. BUT, by not
falling off the flat earth and finding something out there others would
come and actually touch the Amrican contenents.
< Apollo rocket in my collection, so America never made it to the moon.
Still, it's possible to go and see one. FYI: the rocket was Saturn, the
command module was known as Apollo .
< You seem to have this idea that Intel deliberately acted to create the
< microcomputer industry, that they had this grand master scheme that woul
< culminate in the Altair 8800. This is simply not the case. Intel did
< provide training and support to companies to use the 4004 in their
< applications, but where is your evidence that they knew this would lead
< cheap computers?
Their advert in November 1971 electronic news. A quote:
A micro-programable computer on a chip!
Intel Introduced an integreated CPU complete with a 4-but
parallel adder, sixteen 4-bit registers, an accumulator
and a push down stack on one chip. It is one of a family
of four new ICs which comprize the MCS-4 Micro
computer system - the first system to bring you the
power and flexibility of a dedicate general-purpose
computer at low cost in as few as two dual in-line
packages.
Seems they were aimed squarely at the low cost market. They would
introduce the 8008 and 8080 in the same ways.
< The 4004 was just the first in the succession of many microprocessors fr
< many manufacturers. Why did the Mark-8 and Scelbi 8H designers choose t
< 8008? Who knows. What compelling evidence do you have that shows Inte
< intended for the 8008 to end up in those computers? An equally importan
< question is what computers did the other microprocessors being develope
< at the time end up in? They had to have gone into something. Just
< because you don't have those in your collection, does not mean they wer
< not built.
Likely for the same reson I used the 8008 the first time. Intel was
visible and advertized. When I helped pick the 8008 in late '72 I could
point to a working board (MCS-8) and docs to help us newbies. We used
what we knew about and at 200$US each they weren't cheap at all but it
was better than 200 pieces of TTL that had to be wired and tested.
So the Mark-8 Etal had the precedence of visible advertizing, Docs and
availability.
An aside , the docs part was not lost on moto! You could get the 6800
cheap enough and for 25$ more you could get a thick volume of hardware
and software knowlege that made using it easy.
< What I'm trying to say is that this revolution would have happened with
< without Intel, and assigning them all the credit for creating this
< industry, or making it possible, or even influencing it is credit not
< entirely deserved.
What is missed and not mentioned is the small details. INTEL created the
4004 becuase they didn't want another fixed function calculator chip for
only one vendor. This ment they could mass make it and sell to everyone
with higher profit. The 4004 was significant as it had a hardware return
address stack. There are things there that did seperate the micro
computers that would result from the minicomputers that were before.
< > importance of the 4004. LSI was just a means to an end: cheap compute
< > How much did the F14's computer cost, BTW?
<
< I want to say less than $100 per computer but I think it was actually le
< than $100 per chip. Still, that would put it at $600 at the most for th
< whole system (6 chips total in the F14 CADC).
Some perspective... in mil spec design, construction and testing made
it likely several thousand $$$. Even if it were 10k$ per it was cheap
compared to available processors of the time and none fit in that form
factor.
Also the 4004 was *relatively* cheap but the amortized development cost
were still significant and have to be include to be fair.
< > 4004 was the Big Bang; that the dust from that explosion still bears t
< > Intel imprint is interesting, but that's a different topic.
<
< And I am still arguing that the 4004 was NOT the big bang. I don't wan
< to put my thumb (at this point) on which Intel product it was. But it m
< not in fact even be an Intel product. It very well may be a combinatio
< of products from multiple vendors. I haven't seen any conclusive
< arguments to support the 4004 as being the big bang that started the
< microcomputer revolution. It was a pop, just like the CADC was a pop.
I'd say there is some reality there. The big bangs were those that would
hit the media and cause ripples down the line.
Using that line of thought... the CPU chip was not the big bang but the
catalyst for the explosion. IE: Altair was not significant due to the
8080 but that it was first of class and more importantly COPIED. Name
one other machine/bus before ALTAIR that would be copied widely and
competitively within one year of introduction!?!
I will add that I doubt Intel saw it as a serious opportunity to sell
chips until after the Pop'tronics cover hit the stands. Reason it would
be little while before the hobby (we were called that) market would be
taken seriously and semiconductor vendors would see the potential of the
early edge of the personal computer/ small desktop computer industry.
That got DEC, IBM and DGs attention though none were sure of what to make
of it. The fact of it was by 1978 there was no question that there wer
more microcomputers (or various types) than all of IBM, DEC and DGs output
to date!
It was the Volkswagons of the computer industry. Tin Lizzie, Ha!
Allison
New computers announced at the 1983 CES:
Vaporware? Please respond if you KNOW any of these exist for SURE.
- Panasonic JR-200 (I think this may exist)
- Sanyo PCH20/PHC25 (Z80, 4K/16K, $99/$199)
- STM Pied Piper (CP/M portable, 64K, $1295)
- TI 99/2 (Supposedly $100, including 4.2K RAM)
- TI CC-40 (Compact Computer 40, laptop like Epson HX-20, 4 AA cells, 31
character LCD display, $249)
- Unisonic Futura 8300 (Z80, 2K, Sinclair BASIC, $90)
- Video Technology VZ200 (Z80, 4K, MS BASIC, $99)
Not Vaporware
- Jupiter Ace
- Mattel Aquarius
- Spectravideo SV-318
- Timex Sinclair 2000
By the way, has anyone actually seen an TI 99/4 (not 4a)?
Kai