>> But these are prety tough compared to traditional magnetig
>> medias (and after All, a Zip is just a high class diskette).
>
>>> Air filters? Ha! They have nothing but a shutter on the cartridge and a door
>>> flap on the drive. Absolute rubbish. It's miraculous that they work even for
>>> a few weeks.
>> Same has been said on 8" FD: These will be damaged within hours
>> when the head engraves any particle ... But they worked well
>> and all FD technologies thereafter.
>> And on the other hand - in what way poor iomega could
>> gain this amount of money, other than selling cheap
>> tech at monopol prices.
> I've had good results from Iomega hardware and media ever since the
> days of the 10 Mb 8" drives that backed up the data on a Tandy 6000
> Xenix system.
I remember these - nice piece of HW, I had two running without
any problem on an IBM-XT.
> The decision to go with the Zip over the Syquest
> EZ135 wasn't much of a contest. [1] A lot of my customers at the
> end of the Eighties had serious problems with their Syquest drives
Never had these - since the 44MB drives for the Atari
I've been using syquests all the time without any
hassle or breakdown. I had almost any type they
offered.
> and [2] somebody wrote a device driver for the parallel Zip-100 for
> Linux and I felt no need to add a SCSI interface to my notebooks.
:) I use SCSI on all my computers (if possible) starting
>from my Apple ][+ in 1984, so this is no issue at all.
> I've even gotten a Zip drive to work with a Tandy 1000 by making an
> adapter for the edge card printer connector on that machine. If I
> was a _real programmer_ myself, I guess I'd have figured out how to
> connect it to my Tandy Z-80 and 68000 equipment.
Nice idea - Has anyone a (generic) ATA implementation for
the Z80 and drivers for MS-DOS filesystem under CP/M ?
This could be worth do develop.
Gruss
hans
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
< I believe Allison has a model 50Z (a 286 also) running Windows for her s
< The PC/XT class may be junkers for them though.
It does run win3.1 just fine and 3.11 as well but, Netscape is out of the
question. The problem is with only 1mb of ram you swap like mad for some
apps and others can't load enough of their resident portion to execute.
My machine only has 1mb of ram. While 2mb would help it would still
fall short in the ram derby as most apps want 4-8mb at least.
I'd advise that anything 386/8mb and above would be the minima for being
able to run most desireable packages. Even a lowly 386sx/16 would be
faster than any 286 and adding memory is a lot easier. It has more to do
with expandability and availability.
Oh, I've seen a 386DX/33 with 64k cache, 16mb ram running W95 and it's
slow but very useable. More ram is needed to avoid slow swapping. It
sounds wacky but with 386s around here bing free or nearly so they are a
resource that is underrated.
FYI: a 386 runs linux very well but for educational use (computer science
type stuff) MINIX is desireable as it's smaller and runs real well in
2-4mb on small (40mb) hard disks using any system from 8088 and up. It's
loadable from a dozen floppies. Using even a lowly 386sx/16 it seems
to fly. I have not had success using it on a 286(most any) but it's
supposed to work so likely my lack of expertize with the OS is more the
problem.
It's really a compatability and availability thing. Most XT class
machines are really most useful for control apps and simple programing.
The ISA-8 bit bus and their low cost make them good for hacking. The
286 class machines are good for cusp apps where in the right use they
may fit in a modern network. Generally both suffer from lack of speed,
not enough ram (286s) and sometimes lack the ubiquious 3.5"/1.44 floppy.
The very early 386s suffer from incompatability by using SIPPs for ram
or other oddities and bizzare BIOSs. Still they may be usable. I've
found that 386 machines that use SIMMs (most are 30 pin), 3.5" drives
and IDE (or adaptable for same) with VGA or bettter to be generally
useful where a PII or 486 would fit with allowance for speed. The
latter is good as here I'm inclined to swap around IDE hard drives
and if it boots/ runs on a 486 I've never had trouble with it
booting/running on a 386 system. The latter being important in a
classroom enviornment where you want every one to be able to do the
same thing the same way(and get the results at the same time!).
Allison
If you're interested in that kind of thing, there were three clear TI
calculators that just sold on E-OverPay.
Joe
At 02:20 PM 11/9/98 -0600, you wrote:
>On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, Hans Franke wrote:
>
>> > 4) clear pilot
>>
>> Huh ? never heared of.
>
>Some Pilot aficionado recently told me that Palm also made a clear version
>which I think they sold to developers at a developers conference. (There
>are a lot of ex-Newton guys at Palm; maybe it was their idea :-) Anyway,
>take a popular machine and make a "special issue", and you've got an
>instant collecible.
>
>> (And add the REX)
>
>I only listed machines which I thought would become very collectible. The
>REX will be collectible by niche collectors like me and you, but it
>doesn't have enough popular mythology behind it to ever bring big bucks.
>(Yes, I have one.)
>
>-- Doug
>
>
Thanks Alex. I have one of these calculators and have been looking for
info on it.
Marty
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: CompuCorp "Micro Computer"
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 11/12/98 4:54 PM
Hey List,
I just put a short article with some photographs of the
guts of a couple of CompuCorp "Micro Computer" (at least
that's what _they_ called them) calculators on my
web site. They might weigh 3 1/2 pounds but some folks
call them pocket calculators. There's a 4-chip processor
boards inside, along with Intel 2102 RAM, and 24K bits
of ROM. Late 1972-early 1973 vintage.
The article is linked off of both my "desktop" and "pocket"
calculator pages on my web site.
Alex Knight
Calculator History & Technology Archive Web Page
http://aknight.home.mindspring.com/calc.htm
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Nov12.165451.1767.77342; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:54:52 -0500
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with SMTP
id NAA21673; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 13:52:30 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with ESMTP
id NAA33488 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Thu, 12 Nov 1998
13:52:10 -0800
Received: from camel8.mindspring.com (camel8.mindspring.com [207.69.200.58])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.1+UW98.09) with ESMTP id NAA26
484
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 13:52:09 -0800
Received: from nrtpq79.rtp.bnr.ca (user-38ldb79.dialup.mindspring.com
[209.86.172.233])
by camel8.mindspring.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA17110
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:52:07 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.2.32.19981112163603.00697a14(a)mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:36:03 -0500
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Alex Knight <aknight(a)mindspring.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: CompuCorp "Micro Computer"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Sender: aknight(a)mindspring.com
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Hey List,
I just put a short article with some photographs of the
guts of a couple of CompuCorp "Micro Computer" (at least
that's what _they_ called them) calculators on my
web site. They might weigh 3 1/2 pounds but some folks
call them pocket calculators. There's a 4-chip processor
boards inside, along with Intel 2102 RAM, and 24K bits
of ROM. Late 1972-early 1973 vintage.
The article is linked off of both my "desktop" and "pocket"
calculator pages on my web site.
Alex Knight
Calculator History & Technology Archive Web Page
http://aknight.home.mindspring.com/calc.htm
Can anyone tell me if the 8010 Stars used Quantum 2080 8" hard drives.
I have been sorting the whse and ran across 3 of these. My memory says they
were removed from working 8010s but at my age I find my memory is faulty.
Paxton
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: This is totally off topic
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 11/12/98 2:37 PM
> On 9 Nov 98 at 22:09, Bob Wood wrote:
>
> > Only because of his post to this list and
> > with only an email address to go on I was able to
> > make contact with the owner of these macines.
[...]
> > To make a long story short, I was able to purchase
> > seven of the thirteen machines at a fraction of their
> > value.
> >>Great ! I'm glad you're still here despite the puritanical critics. I
> >>>consider you a resource like so many others on this remarkable
> >>mail-list. If I ever get down to Fla. I'd love to see your
> >>collection even if all your Altairs are sold. :^))
> I second Larry's opinion. Good for you Bob. You get a lead and follow
> it up, do some leg work and get rewarded. That's how I've picked up
> much of the equipment I have.
>>Hear! Hear! Not only is this list good for information, but it can be
>>exploited for profit too! I think your'e jealous of Bob. I am too. I wish
I had found all those Altairs. Hey! A vintage arcade game would be nice
also.
>>I'm sure that Bob's revelation that he was able to use information from
>>this list to find items "at a fraction of their value" couldn't
>>possibly have a chilling effect on the free flow of information here.
>>It's not like we assume that we're among like-minded collectors or
>>anything. One man's trash is another's treasure. The seller got rid of
'junk' taking up space then got money, Bob got some great additions to
his collection and makes a profit to boot. Sounds like a great ending to
me. I see nothing wrong with making money while furthering your hobby.
>>BTW, anybody know where there might be a dusty Picaso lying around
>>someplace?
Try the Louvre in Paris, I'm certain you'll find several works by
Piccaso.
Marty
-- Doug
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Nov12.143712.1767.77301; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 14:37:16 -0500
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with SMTP
id LAA26157; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 11:35:07 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with ESMTP
id LAA20574 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Thu, 12 Nov 1998
11:34:59 -0800
Received: from behemoth.host4u.net (behemoth.host4u.net [209.150.128.29])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.1+UW98.09) with ESMTP id LAA13
702
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 11:34:54 -0800
Received: from localhost (yowza@localhost)
by behemoth.host4u.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA10717
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 13:34:50 -0600
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.95.981112132256.5800B-100000(a)behemoth.host4u.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 13:34:47 -0600 (CST)
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Doug Yowza <yowza(a)yowza.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: This is totally off topic
In-Reply-To: <1998Nov12.085653.1767.158865(a)smtp.itgonline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
X-Sender: yowza(a)behemoth.host4u.net
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
I think my wife was planning on selling her 200mb drive, which is capable of
reading 88 and 44mb carts as well.
-Matt Pritchard
Graphics Engine and Optimization Specialist
MS Age of Empires & Age of Empires ][
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mbg(a)world.std.com [SMTP:mbg@world.std.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 1998 11:53 AM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: Have cartridges, need drive...
>
>
> I've found a cache of Syquest 88mb cartridges... rather than
> throw them out, I'd like to try to use them. Anyone have an
> 88mb drive they are otherwise discarding, or one they are
> planning on selling? Please contact me...
>
> Megan Gentry
> Former RT-11 Developer
>
> +--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
> | Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
> | Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
> | Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
> | 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
> | Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
> | (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
> +--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: This is totally off topic
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 11/12/98 5:10 AM
On 9 Nov 98 at 22:09, Bob Wood wrote:
> Yes it is totally off topic but I would be remiss
> if I did not say THANK YOU to whoever it was who
> posted.
>
> Three weeks ago a post came across this list which
> which stated that someone was wanting to sell thirteen
> old arcade machines. The poster further stated that
> he was posting this message only because he thought
> these might be computer games.
>
> Only because of his post to this list and
> with only an email address to go on I was able to
> make contact with the owner of these macines.
>
> I learned that these were all priceless turn of the
> century era penny arcade machines that had been
> used at Disneyland in Anaheim and later at Disney World
> in Orlando. I further learned that
> they were going to be sold in an obscure auction in
> Florida (I am in Florida) three days later.
>
> To make a long story short, I was able to purchase
> seven of the thirteen machines at a fraction of their
> value.
>
> The surfacing of these thirteen pieces is one of
> the most significant finds of this type item in the
> last ten years.
> I have been collecting coin operated antiques for
> twenty five years. This is the first time in all
> those years that I have ever had an opportunity
> to buy even one example of this type item. Because
> someone posted the message to this list I now
> am proudly in possesson of seven of them.
>
> THANKYOU, whoever you were.
>
> Bob Wood
>
>>Great ! I'm glad you're still here despite the puritanical critics. I
>>>consider you a resource like so many others on this remarkable
>>mail-list. If I ever get down to Fla. I'd love to see your
>>collection even if all your Altairs are sold. :^))
>>ciao larry
>>lwalker(a)interlog.com
I second Larry's opinion. Good for you Bob. You get a lead and follow
it up, do some leg work and get rewarded. That's how I've picked up
much of the equipment I have.
Marty
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Nov12.051056.1767.77146; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 05:10:56 -0500
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with SMTP
id CAA20411; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 02:08:55 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with ESMTP
id CAA38150 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Thu, 12 Nov 1998
02:08:51 -0800
Received: from smtp.interlog.com (root(a)smtp.interlog.com [207.34.202.37])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.1+UW98.09) with ESMTP id CAA03
414
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 02:08:51 -0800
Received: from 209-20-0-127.dialin.interlog.com
(209-20-0-127.dialin.interlog.com [209.20.0.127])
by smtp.interlog.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id FAA27195;
Thu, 12 Nov 1998 05:08:44 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199811121008.FAA27195(a)smtp.interlog.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 06:03:18 +0000
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: "Lawrence Walker" <lwalker(a)mail.interlog.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: This is totally off topic
In-Reply-To: <19981110060915.29070.qmail(a)hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-To: "Bob Wood" <altair8800(a)hotmail.com>, classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
At 08:30 PM 11/8/98 -0800, you wrote:
> I couldn't get a Lisa for under $2000, but I could find a D-machine for
> less than a tenth of that.
If you hear of a d-machine for sale, *please* let me know. I, and several
others around here, would definitely like to get ours up and running, and I
need (at the least) a hard drive and cables.
(But man, am I *stoked* about having it! 8^)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
I've found a cache of Syquest 88mb cartridges... rather than
throw them out, I'd like to try to use them. Anyone have an
88mb drive they are otherwise discarding, or one they are
planning on selling? Please contact me...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
< I've even gotten a Zip drive to work with a Tandy 1000 by making an
< adapter for the edge card printer connector on that machine. If I
< was a _real programmer_ myself, I guess I'd have figured out how to
< connect it to my Tandy Z-80 and 68000 equipment.
The Syquest I have is a parallel port version but the drive internal is
IDE. I'd love to figure out how to do parallel port driver for CPM
hardware (I'd create a Bidirectional port as it's simple). The laternat
is a IDE interface as that's been done and is relatively easy other than
writing the bios.
Allison
< Another project in the tapes is an 'OS' based on a Byte book called
< 'Threaded Interpretive Languages' - just curious what opionions
< are out there about FORTH as an 8-bit os. It seemed like just
< the right balance of control - not as terse as assembly, and
< not as handcuff'd as BASIC.
Forth is a good language for 8bit cpus. It also suffers from a
love/hate thing. People either love it or hate it. The Walnut Creek
CDrom had several versions of Forth on it including FIG Forth.
< APL? Is there a Tiny-C available somewhere?
I have Tiny-c Interpreter manual and listings for both PDP-11 and 8080.
You would ahve to resolve copyright issues as it's not public domain.
It was inexpensive and sources provided but otherwise standard copyright.
FYI: it was supplied in many formats
Another language was BASEX and that was also a Paperbytes book. It was a
cross between asm and basic. It's features were compiled, fast, compact
and sources provided. The version I have ran under NS*dos.
Allison
Here's a stretch. Is there anyone on the list that has a Mini Moog or
other vintage analogue synthesizer they would like to trade or sell?
If so or if you just want to rant at me for this OT post, please email
me privately.
Thanks,
Marty
email marty(a)itgonline.com
At 09:31 AM 11/11/98 -0800, you wrote:
>I frequently get given 286 and 386 computers as well as hearing about people
[...]
>A couple of places I have found: people who need word processing, but can't
>afford a computer; elementary school classrooms where the district either
>won't or can't buy computers for them; some "rescue mission" type places
The problem with these solutions is either that you need to take the time
to set them up and test them and do some training, or the organization
does. If they have such system in place, then great. If they have a
techie that volunteers, wonderful, but to just dump a bunch of '286's on a
school or shelter will only serve to eat up needed storage space.
I work with my girlfriend's school to keep a bunch of older macs running
and usable. Every summer, I lug them home so they don't get stolen, and
every fall I lug them back, test them, and get them set up. If you have
an older Mac (or even a newer mac!) that you want to get rid of, by all
means, let me know.
But we're not set up to handle PC's at the moment -- I don't have the time
to set them up/test them/train the teachers, we don't have software for
them, and there's no one else at the school who could do anything with them.
So, while I'm all in favor of the concept, I have to say that in practice,
it doesn't always work out as it should. You may find yourself doing a lot
of work that you don't have time for, or the organization may thank you
profusely as they shove them out the back door into the dumpster.
Old tech is very useful, if you know what to do with it. The mainstream
computer industry (ChumpUSA, TV Shows, AOL, etc.) does not provide that
support. Without it, old tech is worthless.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Ok, the customized 4K Altair BASIC lives as a 3 minute track on
an audio CD (still trying to make a backup of the original cassette
format to go with the short boot loader - that's trickier), and
working on getting an 8K Altair BASIC on fresh media (need that
to run a REAL Startrek).
Another project in the tapes is an 'OS' based on a Byte book called
'Threaded Interpretive Languages' - just curious what opionions
are out there about FORTH as an 8-bit os. It seemed like just
the right balance of control - not as terse as assembly, and
not as handcuff'd as BASIC.
What other 8-bit languages/os's were there? What ever happened to
APL? Is there a Tiny-C available somewhere?
Chuck
cswiger(a)widomaker.com
At 12:36 PM 11/11/98 PST, you wrote:
>Word processing is best. I really don't recommend giving computers to
>schools because the teachers are often incompetent, and the computers
>will often sit doing nothing. A better solution is to give them to
Not incompetent. Untrained. You try getting 30 kids to sit quietly, let
alone teach them to read, and see how well you do. Try managing a class so
that the kids don't go wild when one of the kids pukes or wets his pants,
and so that a kid with a speech impediment or burn scars isn't made fun of.
Try teaching kids that violence is not a solution and selling drugs is not
a viable career path, when they routinely see people killed and their whole
family lives in a one room apartment.
I've tried it, I've seen it done, and believe you me, anything you can do
with a computer is a *piece of cake* compared to teaching.
Teachers are not incompetent. They may be untrained in the use of older
computers, but they are not incompetent. Why not take some time and teach
them how to use them? Dig up some software that will run on them that they
can use in the classroom. Volunteer to help set up their classrooms or
type up lesson plans, so they have the *time* to learn how to work an
antiquated computer. Show up at 7am and leave at 6pm like they do and see
how much energy you have for playing with computers.
For the last 8 or 9 years, I have been dating a woman who is probably the
best educator in the bay area, if not the state. I have seen the hoops
teachers have to go through, the work they do, and the abuse they take so
that they can help the kids that are entrusted to them. I have seen
parents who beat their kids, who write, in big red letters on the kid's
homework, that they are not the kid's teacher and that the work is too hard
for their kid, who don't bother showing up to care for their kids, let
alone get them to school.
Teachers are not incompetent. They may be overworked, underpaid, looked
down upon, subject to ridiculous expectations, forced to conform to a rigid
system when dealing with individual children with separate and distinct
needs, but they are not incompetent.
Max, I hate to put it this way, but you're a kid. You don't know what
you're talking about. Generally, it's not a problem, but in this case,
you've said something that is not only blatently untrue, but very hurtful
as well.
Perhaps you have had problems with your teachers -- How much of that was
your fault? Perhaps the teachers haven't been able to focus solely on what
you want to learn -- you're not the only kid in the class, and the other
kids have just as much right to be there as you do. Perhaps you think the
teachers haven't done enough for you -- but have you stopped to see how
much they really do? (Including the hours they put in at school and
elsewhere, and how much of their personal money they spend on you?)
Sorry for the EduRant, but too often, teachers are blamed for the problems
we as a society create, and it pisses me off.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 09:42 AM 11/12/98 -0500, cswiger wrote:
>
>Another project in the tapes is an 'OS' based on a Byte book called
>'Threaded Interpretive Languages' - just curious what opionions
>are out there about FORTH as an 8-bit os. It seemed like just
>the right balance of control - not as terse as assembly, and
>not as handcuff'd as BASIC.
I've got that book, and once used it to write a TIL for the C-64.
- John
Phil,
Where are you located? How much did they want for it?
Thanks,
Jon
------------------------------------------------
>Saw the most bazare IBM Electronic Wordprocessor/Typewriter at a local Thrift
>today.
>A Big Electronic IBM Typewriter (Ball Type), attached to a Hugh Mag Card
>reader, its
>a floor unit that must weigh 100lbs.. Apparently stores letters in its memory
>and then can store
>it contents on on some sort of magnetic striped card.. This thing is large
>enough to house a
>minicomputer in it, but is nothing but is nothing more than a memory storage
>device..
>The cable that attaches the two units (Typewriter & Floor unit) must be 1 inch
>thick and
>about 10 foot long... Must be one of the first electronic typewriters IBM
>produced with
>actual storage.. Anyone want it ? A real collectors item...
>
>
>
>
>> The basic concept would be to simply sample the MFM (or RLL) channel
>> code at somewhere around 50 MHz as it is being written, and store the
>> data on the ATA drive. The interface would keep one track buffered in
>> RAM. Whenever the host requests a head change or seek, the buffer would
>> be written to the ATA drive (if it is dirty), and reloaded with the data
>> for the new track.
>> This would require a much larger ATA drive than the original drive it is
>> emulating, 102K bytes per track. To emulate a Maxtor 2190, this requires a 2G
>> ATA drive. You could even emulate drives larger than that by emulating more
>> cylinders.
> This is an intriguing concept. But would it be any more difficult to
> decode the data being written by the MFM controller and written digitally
> on the IDE drive to improve efficiency? Would this make reading the data
> back difficult?
No, anything you need is just imense CPU power. Recalculate
the bytes from the MFM stream and store it on a different
drive (that must be local, not visible to the Host). And
backwards generate the MFM data from the ATA data. Timing
bit arsh if you want to do it in real time, but since a
local CPU is already usefull for disk (ATA) controll and
conferting (can also be done by hardware) there could
also be some 256 Meg of mem for building/editing the MFM
stream and transmit it later (when ready).
And since w hafe the room of a full or half height drive
available, it could be put in replacement for the original
drive.
Gruss
hans
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
>> I stumbled on this site a while back and a few on the list may be
>> interested. Postings of want to buy and sell of "classic" type systems.
>> I have not had any response from the post I put there several months back -
>> Looking for DEC equipment but others may have better luck.
>> http://www.xs4all.nl/~rimmer/guest.htm
> Were you aware of the fact that the listed site is in the Netherlands? Just
> curious as unless you specify US shipping only you may be greeted by replies
> from former Soviet block countries as I have on other Euro sales sites.
Same on eBay or anywhere else - the net doesn't end at the
borders of states (maybe but China and North Korea). If you
insit on special rules, like only cash, no sale to white men,
or only within a special county, you have to post it.
> Seems Czechs, Romanians, East Germans
East Germans ? Geee - did you miss some years ? They have
nowadays the newer PCs :)
> and all the like are just anxious as can be to
> get US technology, old or new and in many cases without regard for shipping
> costs.
This time is gone since years - when it comes to PC tech,
Taiwan ships as fast as they get payed - no matter who is
ordering.
> I'm not sure enough myself of customs laws of present day to go through
> all of that but I know at one time there were heavy restrictions on exports of
> hardware and software.
There are sill a lot of US enforced restrictions about
computer parts (And the US government still tryes to
pressure other countries to maintain similar rules),
but in fact they never have been a hurdle at all. They
just liftet the price (like any other law that tries
to forbid people to get what they want).
As a matter of fact, all this regulations just hit
the US economy more than any other.
As long as it is about the EU, there are no more import
taxes or special rules regarding computer parts. They
droped all EU taxes and most of the regional import
taxes on computers - So if something contains electronic
parts - just try to find some way to declare it as computer
parts.
Gruss
Hans
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
-----Original Message-----
From: David Williams <dlw(a)neosoft.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, 12 November 1998 16:36
Subject: Re: Unknown Apple // card images ref
Haven't tried that. I don't expect it to do much of anything but I'll give
it a shot
and let you know what happens. I still think it is a modem but I
can't imagine why it would have so many components.
Is there an AM7910 or 7911 chip on there?
That would peg it as a 300/1200-75 modem. (V21/V23)
That was one of the common chips used.
Geoff Roberts
Computer Systems Manager
Saint Marks College
Port Pirie South Australia.
My ICQ# is 1970476
Ph. 61-411-623-978 (Mobile)
61-8-8633-0619 (Home)
61-8-8633-8834 (Work-Direct)
61-8-8633-0104 (Fax)
Earlier there was a discussion of what PC stuff might be collectable and
valuable.
The other day I ran across an original Columbia PC. This one is a good
collectable. It was as it came from the factory with the original Floppy and
Hard drive. It also had the original keyboard with it. It was very clean and
had not been abused. It worked. In my 1983 Bytes they were asking $5000 for
it. I paid $6 at goodwill with the intention of putting it on ebay just to see
what it will bring. I am retireing from collecting but if I were going top sit
on a piece of equipment this would be a good example. My reasons in order of
priority: 1) first popular clone, 2) all the original -parts (including
screws), 3) Clean with no scratches, the type on the keyboard showed no wear,
4) Works (not essential - i bought it without testing it - $6 is not a great
gamble), 5) Rareity - Most of these go directly to scrap and have for years.
However it will be many more years before it is truly valuable, but I bet it
will be!
Paxton
I ran into a computer at a thrift store today called an AcerStation. It
was a thin machine, clearly designed to be a network client. I think
it's AT-class. The interesting thing is that when I booted it, the empty
floppy drive whirred as usual, then it said something along the lines of
its not being connected to a network and press any key to reboot. Is
this thing network bootable? I've never heard of a PC that could do
this.
Also: Could someone tell me the model number of the original NEC
Multisync? NEC's site has nothing about it, and I want to know if that's
it at the thrift store. Could someone also confirm that it can do VGA
modes?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Yes it is totally off topic but I would be remiss
if I did not say THANK YOU to whoever it was who
posted.
Three weeks ago a post came across this list which
which stated that someone was wanting to sell thirteen
old arcade machines. The poster further stated that
he was posting this message only because he thought
these might be computer games.
Only because of his post to this list and
with only an email address to go on I was able to
make contact with the owner of these macines.
I learned that these were all priceless turn of the
century era penny arcade machines that had been
used at Disneyland in Anaheim and later at Disney World
in Orlando. I further learned that
they were going to be sold in an obscure auction in
Florida (I am in Florida) three days later.
To make a long story short, I was able to purchase
seven of the thirteen machines at a fraction of their
value.
The surfacing of these thirteen pieces is one of
the most significant finds of this type item in the
last ten years.
I have been collecting coin operated antiques for
twenty five years. This is the first time in all
those years that I have ever had an opportunity
to buy even one example of this type item. Because
someone posted the message to this list I now
am proudly in possesson of seven of them.
THANKYOU, whoever you were.
Bob Wood
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Hello To whom this may concern,
I was referred to your e-mail.
The reason I'm writing is because over the last year when different
people have found out that I had an old "Apple II C" computer that had all
original components such as, keyboard(model# A254101), Unidisk 3.5
drive(model# A2M2053) , monitor(model# G-090S) and even has an old Image
Writer II printer and all the components of the system were clean and in
excellent working order. They asked excitedly if I was interested in
selling it and even made unsolicited offers (some a helluva lot higher than
others). Offers that caused me enough surprise to exclaim " You gotta be
joking !".
I'm curious about the true value of this Apple II system now because I
have a new system . I would truly appreciate any and all information that
you could provide.
Thank you for your time and consideration and I'll be looking forward to
your response.
With Best Regards
Christopher J. Perron
>On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Max Eskin wrote:
>
>> Also: Could someone tell me the model number of the original NEC
>> Multisync? NEC's site has nothing about it, and I want to know if that's
>> it at the thrift store. Could someone also confirm that it can do VGA
>> modes?
>
>Depends on what you mean by NEC Multisync. A number of models have been
>mentioned in response to your original request. I believe Dan Burrow's
>summary corresponds to the NEC Multisync II. Not the 2A or other members
>of the "2" series or 3's or higher. Note the Roman numeral. Says
>"Multisync II" right on the front.
I was quoting from the manual for the JC1401P3A for what it is worth. It
also has all the pin outs for both analog and digital along with other
related stuff. My scanner is down right now but I could FAX it if someone
wants.
Dan
>This is the one with the 9-pin D-sub and is the only one I am aware of
>that will sync 15.5KHz analog which is sub VGA video for Atari ST, Amiga
>and Apple IIgs.
>
>The model number is JC 1402 HMA. It will do 640x480 VGA interlaced or
>non-interlaced. It can step to 800x600 but someone mentioned it was
>pretty poor and I believe part of the reason is it is interlace only.
>
>It also, as Dan points out, has TTL capabilities. I haven't made use of
>that aspect. I have used it on built-in Macintosh video and some Nubus
>cards that are theoretically VGA friendly but produce sync on green
>(green screen?) and just otherwise don't work with normal VGA. If it is
>indeed a "II" model, I'd say jump at the opportunity. The dot pitch isn't
>great at .31 but it is sharp enough. The key though is the fact that it
>is the Rosetta stone of monitors and it is worth having in your toolbox.
>
>For monitor reference you might try the following:
>
>http://www.telalink.net/~griffin/mondata.html
>
>which is a straight 120K or so listing of every model.
>
>Or use:
>
>http://www.telalink.net/~griffin/monitor.html
>
>for a search engine.
>
>I believe the above addresses are currently correct. I think any
>reference to nashville.net is an older location. At the current moment, I
>believe nashville will correctly alias to telalink.
>
>The information is sparse. Changes are made from time to time, so I guess
>they are trying to maintain it with limited staff time. The database is
>always worth a look when dealing with an unknown monitor, but no promises.
>
>
>
> -- Stephen Dauphin
>
I've been thinking about designing an interface card to replace ST-506
>interface drives with ATA (IDE) drives. It's getting hard to find
>Maxtor 2190s at a decent price, and I'm not sure how many more years it
>will be possible to keep them running at all.
>
>The basic concept would be to simply sample the MFM (or RLL) channel
>code at somewhere around 50 MHz as it is being written, and store the
>data on the ATA drive. The interface would keep one track buffered in
>RAM. Whenever the host requests a head change or seek, the buffer would
>be written to the ATA drive (if it is dirty), and reloaded with the data
>for the new track.
>
>This would require a much larger ATA drive than the original drive it is
>emulating, 102K bytes per track. To emulate a Maxtor 2190, this requires a
2G
>ATA drive. You could even emulate drives larger than that by emulating
more
>cylinders.
>
>The tricky part is that it might be necessary for the simulated drive
>to mimic the effect that write precompensation in the host's controller
>is intended to circumvent.
>
>
>
Such a card already exists- I saw someone selling one on the Obsolete
Computer Helpline.
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
< I could've sworn you spoke rather higher of it about a year
< ago...anyway, I guess I can now understand why it is chosen as the best
< example of Bill Gates' work :) but why is it always discussed (on Trimph
< of the Nerds, for example) in terms of early personal software? Is it
< that this was the best program for the Altair?
The later versions were fairly stable and useful. Keep in mind at that
time software was scarce (prior to 1977) so I tended to live with some
things. It was landmark code in and one of its founders is a billionair
now so it's remarkable. Keep inmind Triumph of the nerds was
retrorevisonist history. Looking back is not the same as remembering the
frustration of having actually used it.
Allison
For me, a personal computer is defined as any computer that I own and
operate. If I could find a SYS/360 or SYS370, or Sigma/7 or Sigma/9 or
a CDC 7600/6600/etc or a DPS/9, or ... ( well, you get the idea), I would
consider such a computer a personal computer. Any body know where
I can get one of these behemoths?
William R. Buckley
-----Original Message-----
From: Zane H. Healy <healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, November 01, 1998 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: PDP-11/44 boot prompt
>>Sorry, I meant home personal computers. PDPs, IMSAIs, various
>>development systems don't count. Satisfied?
>
>Ah, but on this list, and most definitly in my home, PDP's, IMSAI's, etc.
>are home personal computers :^)
>
>Besides Allison mentioned the IBM PC with ROM BASIC, and I've used a Zenith
>Z248 (a 286) with a ROM Monitor that you can drop into, both of these are
>definitly not developement machines. My NeXT slab had a ROM based monitor,
>and the PowerMac I'm typing this on can be dropped into the debugger at any
>time by hitting the proper key sequence.
>
> Zane
>| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
>| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
>| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
>+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
>| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
>| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
>| http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
Hello, all:
Here's what was posted tonight (there's not much more that I have
scanned, so tomorrow should be it :-))
- R650x Family Datasheet/Rockwell
- 6581 SID datasheet
- 6567 VIC-II
- 6522 VIA
Enjoy.
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW7
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/pdp11/
<================ reply separator =================>
interesting card! certainly has a lot of components on it. have you a chance
to test it yet. you could try to put it in slot 5 for instance and then do a
PR#5 or IN#5 to see if anything happens.
david
In a message dated 11/10/98 5:56:27 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
dlw(a)trailingedge.com writes:
> Ok, here are the images of that unknown Apple // card which I
> believe to be a modem. If someone knows for sure and can tell me
> how to hook up the phone line as well as doc/software, please drop
> me a line.
>
> Images can be found at:
>
> http://www.trailingedge.com/~dlw/comp/images/a2card1.jpg
> http://www.trailingedge.com/~dlw/comp/images/a2card2.jpg
>
> Thanks for any help.
> Sam Ismail wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 10 Nov 1998 Philip.Belben(a)pgen.com wrote:
>>
>> > Person who said check continuity between centre pin of socket and
ground on
>> > the machine. That tells you if it _is_ connected to the ground plane.
Sam
>> > wanted to know if it _should be_ connected - i.e. he seems to be
adapting a
>> > machine for which he has no PSU to work with a PSU he has.
>>
>> Exactly.
>>
>
> I'm sorry guys that my answer wasn't good enough. I thought I answered
> the question. I will take more time to read messages in the future to be
> sure I understand what a person is asking for. Unfortunately
> communication is one sided and there is no immediate feedback to clarify
> things. If I could see the circuit in question I would have given a more
> intelligent answer. Also it would be nice for you to quote what I
> actually said and not what someone said I said. :(
Oh dear, Alan. I assure you there was no intention of causing offence.
I took Sam's "Exactly" as referring to the last sentence of my paragraph.
My description was "exactly" what he was doing.
I had envisaged Sam as having a power supply with a plug on the end, and
wanting to know how to wire up a socket in the machine. Later posts
suggest that your test would have told Sam what he needed to know, so if it
makes any difference, I apologise for my hasty criticism of your
suggestion.
But please bear in mind (you're new to the list aren't you?) that on
Classiccmp, we all treat the other subscribers as old friends, and seldom
stand on ceremony. Remarks like those above are not intended personally.
Philip.
At 11:59 AM 11/11/98 PST, you wrote:
>the iMac looks cute, but it is no friendlier than any other mac. It has
[...]
>I have no idea why the iMac is more likely to bring in a new layer of users
[...]
>the iMac offers a blue box in a black and beige world
That's exactly why. The iMac tries to say "Computers are no longer strange
boxes with blinkenlights that are scary and ugly. They are friendly, cute,
pyrex-and-kenmore appliances for the average home. They look good, and
don't have to be hidden under the desk with lots of wires running
everywhere." All it needs is a bud vase and you've got the computer
version of the new beetle. A kinder, gentler computer.
Sony tried to do it with their name -- people are quite happy with a Sony
stereo, so why not a Sony computer? But Stereos are still to complicated
for many people; they just don't think that way. Going back a little
further, someone pointed out that the Lisa was very similar to -- if not
modelled after -- the old IBM tubes, keeping that geek-ish-ness going,
despite the GUI.
The iMac "offers a blue box in a black and beige world."
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
>There is a point at which a lower price has a negative
>effect on sales. People don't take it seriously. As Allison
>pointed out, there were cheaper BASICs available. Why did
>anyone want Microsoft's?
Using a slightly different - and, indeed, almost invisible -
marketing strategy, millions of copies of Microsoft BASIC
were sold - one inside each and every Apple ][+, ][e, and //c,
for example.
>I'm sure Bill was smart enough to realize that gaining
>1,000 customers at $50 leads to quite different administrative
>and tech support requirements than 100 customers at $500 each.
>And who knows how many copies were sold?
MBASIC was also commonly bundled with many of the popular
CP/M boxes of the late 70's/early 80's. This is probably
a couple million more copies.
Tim.
Anyone have any more info for this guy?
>From: Rick Holbrook <110003.627(a)compuserve.com>
>Subject: NEC Starlet Computer
>
>I am a portable computer buff myself, and have a number of old ones. One I
>am particularly interested in is the NEC Starlet. I have the documentation
>for the built-in Wordstar and Calcstar, but lack the documentation for the
>communications and database software. I am also interested in obtaining
>more hardware such as an external disk drive, and a plug in monitor
>interface. If you can help me out with any of these in particular the
>documentation, please advise.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Rick Holbrook
>8904 E. Blake
>Wichita KS 67207
>(316) 684-1403
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
< I find power interlocks a pain, particularly on covers held down by scre
< (AFAIK many safety rules don't apply if you need a tool to gain access).
Most are their for two reasons on DEC hardware. One, so you don't pull
a card with power applied, instant fried system. The other is many of the
systems are air cooled and the cooling is not effective if the door is
open, running for extended period at elevated temperatures is a path
to lower reliability or worse.
In the alpha server that chip pumps out a lot of BTUs and cooling is
good karma.
Allison
--- Phil Clayton wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to make a boot disk for the MAC SE..
There are two hard drives on my MAC SE, lots of stuff there,
but I don't know how or what to look for to make a boot or operating
disk..
Is there a directory like DOS or somthing on the hard drive..?
Can someone help...?
Phil....
--- end of quote ---
If there's no directory (folder) on either hard drive called "System Folder," then they won't boot. If there IS such a folder and they still don't boot, then system files may be missing or damaged. At the bare minimum, a Mac needs a System Folder containing two files, "System" and "Finder." Realistically, you need some other stuff too, but under system software earlier than 7, that should be enough to boot the machine. Likewise, a floppy disk with that folder and those two files will also start up the SE.
I think that Apple has old system software available from their ftp site (my school's public fileserver has versions up through 7.1, therefore those systems are probably freely available from Apple). You would probably want to download disk images for system version 6.0.5 or 6.0.8 (there should be four 800k disks), make floppies out of them, then boot with the "System Tools" disk and run the installer. It will make whichever hard drive you choose be a bootable volume. The "System Tools" and "Utilities 1" diskettes are both bootable -- Utils 1 has Disk First Aid for basic diagnostics and directory repairs, and HDSC Setup for initializing or formatting a hard disk. You can also make a bootable hard drive by drag-copying the system folder from one of the floppies to your hard drive, but it's better to use the installer so you get all the goodies and doodads beyond the minimum system.
If you can't find disk images, I can email or ftp them to you.
-- MB
It really depends where you are. Here in Boston, a largely academic
city, 386 computers are very easily available and anyone who wants one
can get it. In less populated places this might be more useful. BTW, a
lot of 386 machines have very interesting cards and drives. Be sure to
raid them before giving them to a user.
>I frequently get given 286 and 386 computers as well as hearing about
>people that are just throwing them away. Does anyone else on this
>list try to find homes for these things, or know of homes? It seems
>such as waste to throw out perfectly good computers just because they
>don't run the current rage of the day.
Word processing is best. I really don't recommend giving computers to
schools because the teachers are often incompetent, and the computers
will often sit doing nothing. A better solution is to give them to
individuals that don't have computers.
>A couple of places I have found: people who need word processing, but
>can't afford a computer; elementary school classrooms where the
>district either won't or can't buy computers for them; some "rescue
>mission" type places where basic training is provided.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
-4 years old, and living in the USSR. I don't agree that VC++ is
necessarily seven decimal places cheaper, since not all of the files in
VC++ are part of the program, or even made by microsoft. I would say
that the total amount of code written just for VC++ 5.0 and on the CD is
more like 25 MB.
>Max, how old were you in 1978? :-) Let's see, $150 in 1978 would be
>at least $500 in today's dollars, maybe 12 cents a hand-crafted byte.
>Today's Visual C 5.0 is about 131 megs installed at about $500, or
>about seven decimal places in the less expensive direction.
But many more people would still buy it. Plus, organizations that didn't
want to pirate stuff but wanted to use BASIC.
>
>Pish-posh. In 1978, we're talking about a bunch of scroungy ex-
>or current- ham radio operators who'd cross the street to pick up
>two pennies on the sidewalk.
I am not generally aware of the software in those bins, and am
consistently surprised by things that used to cost about $70 only a
couple of years ago. But, CompUSA reeks, and so does the discount bin :)
>Even today, why do people routinely pirate software that can be had
>for $20 in the CompUSA discount bin?
>
>- John
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I could've sworn you spoke rather higher of it about a year
ago...anyway, I guess I can now understand why it is chosen as the best
example of Bill Gates' work :) but why is it always discussed (on Trimph
of the Nerds, for example) in terms of early personal software? Is it
that this was the best program for the Altair?
>The early BASIC he did was buggy as hell too. The first version that
>was semi OK for 8k basic was 3.51.
>
>Allison
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I picked them because they're typicall known as hobbyist buses.
>Interesting that you picked those 2 buses. The S100 bus is really the
>8080 CPU bus with a few changes and ISA (at least the 8 bit part) is
the
>8088 CPU bus with, again, a few changes. They're almost Processor
Direct
>buses themselves.
>-tony
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Interesting. On an IBM 5150-descendant, I have (accidentaly) found that
it's possible to do almost anything without causing damage. This
includes card swapping, dropping screws, and other things with a live
system.
>Most are their for two reasons on DEC hardware. One, so you don't
>pull a card with power applied, instant fried system.
>Allison
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This is sort of getting off topic, but here is my final thought on this:
the iMac looks cute, but it is no friendlier than any other mac. It has
the same software, and very similar hardware. I don't think modern macs
are very friendly because they suffer from the same problems as windows-
lots of crud tacked on to an inadequate base. I have no idea why the
iMac is more likely to bring in a new layer of users than (say) the Sony
VAIO or one of the Toshiba systems. Sure, they're dung, but so is the
iMac when it's been stared at for a year.
As has been said before, while the original Mac offered a GUI for fairly
little in a fairly GUI-free world with Apple's name behind it, the iMac
offers a blue box in a black and beige world with a much weaker Apple
behind it.
>The iMac will change (or at least attempt to change) computing by
>bringing in a whole new layer of users -- ones that even the cheapy
>clone PC's couldn't attract. Similar to the ones that were attracted
>to the original Mac, but less adventuresome.
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
O-
>
>Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
>roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen
know."
>Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
>San Francisco, California
http://www.sinasohn.com/
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> >I have recently obtained a machine that when carried resembles a sewing
> >machine in a carry case, marked Compaq Portable. It has a built in CRT
> >and is evidentally an 8088 or 8086 machine judging by the 8 bit slots.
> >
> >Anyone have any info on it, and is there any collectability to these?
As has already been pointed out, these are not rare - but I gotta add,
they sure are well built. Mine has only had a shorted tantalum cap on
the mobo and a new hard disk - but otherwise quite robust, lots of
metal and gold, plastic doesn't show much age, etc.
It's one of those worth more to me than I could ever sell it for.
I use it just for the parallel port out to experiements (stepper
motor control, etc)
Kudos to Compaq for making PC's that are built to last.
CHuck
cswiger(a)widomaker.com
John:
> Sam:
>>Absolutely. I agree 100%. If he had priced it in the range that a
>>hobbyist could afford, and proportionate to the cost of the system ($500
>>for the kit?) then people would buy it. Its nothing to throw down $25 or
>>$50 if you're getting a manual and support with that.
> Pish-posh. In 1978, we're talking about a bunch of scroungy ex-
> or current- ham radio operators who'd cross the street to pick up
> two pennies on the sidewalk. Even today, why do people routinely
> pirate software that can be had for $20 in the CompUSA discount bin?
Shure, you never get 100% sales, but with a lower price,
the number of people buying will increase. Not only from
people not pirating, but also a lot among people who wouldn't
had the chance to copy and didn't buy because of the price.
Software is still not eatable (or drinkable) and people
don't NEED all the soft they are buying and copying. THis
just prevents them from paying a unreasonable price.
In fact, before the build in (Microsoft) Basic of my
Apple ][+ I never owned a Basic. Shure, I thought
about it, and was able to use it (tried HP Basic),
but there was no real need to pay money for a language.
I could do anything I want in Assembly. In fact it
took a long time until I found some usefull things
to do with HLLs other than Macro-Assm (Still today
most of my programming is in Assm).
All this moarning, crieing and juggling about piracy
realy misses the point. High prices could only be
reached if there is a return of this cost to the buyer
thru usage of the software.
Gruss
Hans
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
> It occurs to me that if the listserver should be shut down at this location,
> we *really* should have a list of members to inform them of the new
> location. Does anyone have a list? Hopefully, things will remain as they
> are, but it never hurts to be prepared.
Why ?
Just send a Mail to the list with the new address (think a
fall back is already installed @nut.net) and all members
will get it - using a members list and do this manual, would
not give a diference.
Gruss
hans
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
I ran some service calls on Columbia pc's around 1987. As I was raised
in the Washington, DC suburbs (Silver Spring, Maryland) and had been
to Columbia, Maryland (which is located halfway between Washington and
Baltimore many times, I was surprised when reading the documentation
of the pc which stated it was made in Columbia, Maryland. Several
years later I needed to order a replacement motherboard and discovered
they had moved to Florida.
Marty
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Collectable PCs
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 11/9/98 4:10 PM
Innfogra(a)aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/9/98 8:37:45 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> Marty(a)itgonline.com writes:
>
> << Does your Columbia list it as having been made in Columbia, Maryland?
> I believe their early pc's were made in Columbia, Maryland, later they
> moved to Florida.
> >>
> I will look. I didn't know that. Thanks for the info. i will let you know
when
> I find out.
> Paxton
I have 3 Columbia portable XT's.. Didn't know they were made in Florida.
Could be why there seem to be so many in the thrift stores down here in
Florida..
I have never been able to find anything on the internet about these
machines, looked everywhere and nothing found..
If anyone has any web sites with info on them, or knows some history on
them sure would like to hear from you...
Phil...
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Nov09.161030.1767.76473; Mon, 09 Nov 1998 16:10:30 -0500
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with SMTP
id NAA17730; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 13:08:14 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with ESMTP
id NAA50904 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Mon, 9 Nov 1998
13:08:00 -0800
Received: from raven.prod.itd.earthlink.net (raven.prod.itd.earthlink.net
[209.178.63.9])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.1+UW98.09) with ESMTP id NAA04
536
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 13:07:59 -0800
Received: from server (ip53.fort-myers3.fl.pub-ip.psi.net [38.30.206.53])
by raven.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA05623
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 13:07:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <36475A0B.54F3(a)pop.a001.sprintmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1998 16:09:31 -0500
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Phil Clayton <handyman(a)sprintmail.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Collectable PCs
References: <a009459f.36475602(a)aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
< Ooh. I don't have anything from DDJ or Kilobaud. What issues?
I'd have to dig them out to get the dates. Likely around 1978-79.
< > I also have a copy of quest tiny Basic, hex dump, paper tape and it's
< > manual.
<
< How big is tiny BASIC? How did you communicate with it? A terminal
< over a 1854 UART?
It's 2k (fits in a 2716), romable and was sold that way as well. IO
in the version I have expects UT4 (monitor) or the equivelent. UT4 uses
EF4 and Q to do bit serial to tty.
Oh, I bought it because it was cheap ($10 in 1978) and never used it!
I was having more fun running small stuff in asm.
Allison
< It's all a matter of time, place and comparison. What was DEC charging
< for a box, OS and BASIC at the time?
An 8E with basic, enough core and tty would likely be about 14-18k maybe
less. Used it could be in the under $3000 range in '77.
In 1972 I was offered a pdp-8I with he works(TTY, RS08, DECTAPE, 32k core)
for a mere $10,000 operating! It was a bit steep for me but a new
chevy truck then was $3300.
< >Absolutely. I agree 100%. If he had priced it in the range that a
< >hobbyist could afford, and proportionate to the cost of the system ($50
< >for the kit?) then people would buy it. Its nothing to throw down $25
< >$50 if you're getting a manual and support with that.
<
< Pish-posh. In 1978, we're talking about a bunch of scroungy ex-
< or current- ham radio operators who'd cross the street to pick up
< two pennies on the sidewalk. Even today, why do people routinely
< pirate software that can be had for $20 in the CompUSA discount bin?
That characterization was at best inaccurate. The members of LICA (LI
computing ASSOC) were less than 25% hams, many(60%) were professionals in
the industry (mostly large iron). Most were techs and hard wroking slobs
that the price of a KIM-1 was stiff for them and $350 for Basic was
several weeks pay.
Allison
< I have broken out the box box 'o 1802 stuff. In it are:
I don't have the VIP but I have the manuals for one. I also have the
articles from Popular Electronics, DDJ and Kilobaud.
I also have the basic DOCS for the 1802.
COS/MOS Memories, Microprocessors, and support systems 1979. This
includes data and schematics for the CDP18S6xx series modules.
MPM201 User manual for the RCA CDP1802 CPSMAC Microprocessor.
MPM203 Evaluation kit manual for the RCA CDP1802 COSMAC Microprocessor
(1976)
MPM206 Binary Aritmetic subroutines for RCA cosmac Microprocessors
I also have a copy of quest tiny Basic, hex dump, paper tape and it's
manual.
Allison
> < I have broken out the box box 'o 1802 stuff. In it are:
> I also have the basic DOCS for the 1802.
The 1802 data sheets are still available from Harris.
New, and PDFied. Also for most of the pheripheral parts.
> MPM206 Binary Aritmetic subroutines for RCA cosmac Microprocessors
> I also have a copy of quest tiny Basic, hex dump, paper tape and it's
> manual.
These two ar e very interesting.
Servus
Hans
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
> On Tue, 10 Nov 1998, Doug Yowza wrote:
> In 1970 a college art prof told me that "multimedia" is 2 or more Koda
> Carousel projectors plus a sound track. In response to questions he d
> insist that no substitutions were permitted.
How pandatic of him. When I was in school a few years before that
multimedia was sound, pictures in the form of Video, Still pictures,
moving pictures, lights and maybe action! The concept of the time was
hit as many senses as was possible.
Allison
< Absolutely. I agree 100%. If he had priced it in the range that a
< hobbyist could afford, and proportionate to the cost of the system ($500
< for the kit?) then people would buy it. Its nothing to throw down $25 o
< $50 if you're getting a manual and support with that.
The KIT was $500, but that only got you the box and a CPU. Ram was
expensive then and the IO was either serial, tape, or parallel so you
also needed a TTY or CRT(I used CT1024). Still BASIC for MITS prices
was ok but as Billy's price it was out of reach.
FYI at the time of the article (early '75) a system with 32k of ram,
cassette and serial IO would be over $3500! The 8800 was cheap, but
not that cheap. Three years later (early 1978) that price would have
dropped to 1500 or less due to the lower cost of memory boards and the
lower cost of the system itself. The Disk system would be around late
'76 early 77 with software to lag behind it.
In 1977 you could get languages, for far less than $100 and many offered
features that MSbasic did not have. Examples of this were PT basic, Focal
and NS* disk BASIC. Also Tiny basic was published along with a little
later LLL8k Basic as examples of free software with sources available.
That trend nearly killed MS and did put a few others under. It was very
hard to make a buck on paper tape or cassette based software. Affordable
disk systems opened up the market and made it a serious force for applied
software.
Allison
< > < > for a intersil 6100 (12 bit pdp-8) based system.
< > <
<
< Do tell.
A small potload of them for the Intersil sampler, there was an article
in Microcomputing December 1979 (P54), also the intersil data books and
schematics for some of the board level porducts and app notes.
Also several megabytes of PDP-8 software and a DECMATEIII to run it on.
< That wasn't memory mapping. The 1861 DMA'ed the video data out.
No, that was how it transfered the data to the CRT (it would read memory
with DMA and serialize it add sync and all). the User would write data
to the memory map that was display memory to change the pattern on the
screen. That makes it memory mapped. the fact that it used DMA was a
simplification of the hardware.
< I saw one at the Computer Museum of America, but I don't think it is
< available.
There are still a bunch around. They only made maybe 20-30,000 of the
8E/8A series.
< Well... they _were_ nice and bright. Ah, the countless hours I spent
< staring at those ember-bright dots, counting toggle pulses in my head
< to fix a one-byte bug.
First thing I added was four more to latch the address.
< Ob1802Trivia - don't execute the one "missing" instruction, 0x68. ISTR
< that the CPU went berserk and whomped memory randomly.
Well, all of the 6Xh instructions manipulate the X register directly or
indirectly.
60 inc X R(X)+1->R(X) ! memory pointer pointed to by R(X) is
! incremented
What's significant is the operation is a dummy output but since having
the N lines with 000 on them was a nop all it does is increment the
pointer.
61->67 out M(R(X)) ->BUS; R(X)+1 -> R(X)
Effectively output a byte pointed to by R(X) to the device and increment
R(X). The N lines will have a value of 1->7 depending on opcode.
69->6F input BUS -> M(R(X)); BUS -> D
Now... the cosmac uses the high bit of the N register to signal internall
that the instruction is a input so....
68 inpGarbage BUS -> M(R(X)); BUS -> D
In this case bus content is undefined so you just trashed the accumulator
(D) and the memory pointed to by R(X).
On my system due to the pullups on the bus and all that meant a FFh was
loaded every time. Handy way to stuff a -1.
The COSMAC is a real simple machine and it's behavour is very predictable
with one general exception... The CMOS process in the late 70s had
horrendous propagation delays and the timing of the chip was very variable
with voltage. So at very fast clocks the timing on some signals could
have a negative setup at one voltage and a positive setup if the voltage
was higher. I know of few people that ever ran successfully at the rated
maximum. At moderate speeds it was easy to use.
Allison
< and deluging the market with bad software. The only problem is, everyon
< said "OK, Bill. Here's my checking account. Don't worry about fixing the
< kinda gives your software 'character'."
The early BASIC he did was buggy as hell too. The first version that
was semi OK for 8k basic was 3.51.
Allison
< At the time, MITS had an absolutely miserable 4K dynamic memory board.
< This was one of the few ways that they could entice folks to buy it.
The 88MCD was poor, the S4K slightly better and neither would work with
z80s without being severely hacked! I had three of each and they were
all junk. Why three of each... at one point S4Ks were offered less rams
to anyone that had 88MCDs at a ok price. I was able to make them
acceptably reliable by pulling the Drams and putting in compatable
static parts (NEC uPD410). The board layout still stank and the
general noise level on the bus didn't help. Up grading the bus to
a WAMCO or compupro with terminations helped. Replacing the whole
machine with a NS* Horizon was a vast step forward.
Allison
Fred:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 1998, Doug Yowza wrote:
>> The term "multimedia" was known -- I remember suffering through some bad
>> performance art back then. And the MindSet PC (1984) was positioned as
a
>> graphics and sound machine to differentiate it from IBM, but the Amiga
did
>> a better job (I bought mine to play with computer music).
>
> In 1970 a college art prof told me that "multimedia" is 2 or more Kodak
> Carousel projectors plus a sound track. In response to questions he did
> insist that no substitutions were permitted.
>
> In 1979 I used the cassette relay of a TRS-80 model 1 to advance slides
> on a Carousel. But it was only one. I've never had a "multimedia"
system.
>
> Has "multimedia" changed since then :-?
:-) At the camera club to which I belong, a presentation with 2 carousel
projectors and a sound track is called "an AV", presumably meaning
audio-visual.
A friend recently gave me a good description of multimedia: "... the use of
two or more media that don't go well together. If they did, they wouldn't
be multimedia, but form a new medium, like cinema (film + sound)"
Your prof sounds like an ultra-conservative don out of touch with the
world. I encountered similar at [high? Age 16] school - the German
teacher (i.e. he taut the language, not came from Germany) who didn't admit
the existence of the verb programmieren.
> Now all of the hype is "3D". I have used some 3D illusion systems, such
> as StereoGraphics. But all of the "3D" stuff that is being hyped is on
> purely two dimensional video monitors. What's going on?
>
> Can anyone explain to me in what way a processor is "3D"??
I don't know how a processor can be 3d, though a transputer array (or
similar) could easily be 3D. A 3D graphics system on a purely 2D display
is AFAIK one with functions like shading, hidden line removal, etc. that
you need to display 2D views of virtual 3D objects.
Philip.
> Bill Gates, in his "Open Letter to Hobbyists" mentioned earlier, tells
And for those who don't have the issue of BYTE that this appeared in,
here's the letter. Note the "old" address in New Mexico, and the
hyphenated version of "Micro-Soft":
AN OPEN LETTER TO HOBBYISTS
February 3, 1976
By William Henry Gates III
An Open Letter to Hobbyists
To me, the most critical thing in the hobby market right now is the lack of
good software courses, books and software itself. Without good software
and an owner who understands programming, a hobby computer is wasted.
Will quality software be written for the hobby market?
Almost a year ago, Paul Allen and myself, expecting the hobby market to
expand, hired Monte Davidoff and developed Altair BASIC. Though the
initial work took only two months, the three of us have spent most of the
last year documenting, improving and adding features to BASIC. Now we
have 4K, 8K, EXTENDED, ROM and DISK BASIC. The value of the
computer time we have used exceeds $40,000.
The feedback we have gotten from the hundreds of people who say they
are using BASIC has all been positive. Two surprising things are apparent,
however, 1) Most of these "users" never bought BASIC (less than 10% of
all Altair owners have bought BASIC), and 2) The amount of royalties we
have received from sales to hobbyists makes the time spent on Altair
BASIC worth less than $2 an hour.
Why is this? As the majority of hobbyists must be aware, most of you
steal your software. Hardware must be paid for, but software is some
to share. Who cares if the people who worked on it get paid?
Is this fair? One thing you don't do by stealing software is get back at
MITS for some problem you may have had. MITS doesn't make money
selling software. The royalty paid to us, the manual, the tape and the
overhead make it a break-even operation. One thing you do do is prevent
good software from being written. Who can afford to do professional
work for nothing? What hobbyist can put 3-man years into programming,
finding all bugs, documenting his product and distribute for free? The fact
is, no one besides us has invested a lot of money in hobby software. We
have written 6800 BASIC, and are writing 8080 APL and 6800 APL, but
there is very little incentive to make this software available to hobbyists.
Most directly, the thing you do is theft.
What about the guys who re-sell Altair BASIC, aren't they making
money on hobby software? Yes, but those who have been reported to us
may lose in the end. They are the ones who give hobbyists a bad name, and
should be kicked out of any club meeting they show up at.
I would appreciate letters from any one who wants to pay up, or has a
suggestion or comment. Just write to me at 1180 Alvarado SE, #114,
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108. Nothing would please me more than
being able to hire ten programmers and deluge the hobby market with
good software.
Bill Gates
General Partner, Micro-Soft
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
which came first, this compaq model, or the IBM 5155?
> >I have recently obtained a machine that when carried resembles a sewing
> >machine in a carry case, marked Compaq Portable. It has a built in CRT
> >and is evidentally an 8088 or 8086 machine judging by the 8 bit slots.
> >
> >Anyone have any info on it, and is there any collectability to these?
< > What's wrong with 2114s? I've used them in a lot of projects and produ
< > and they fine if a x4 orginization is handy. I have 24 of them in use
< > for a intersil 6100 (12 bit pdp-8) based system.
<
< Any schematics? ;-)
Yep!
< I've seen schematics, and it's not the 6845 end of things that daunts me
< it's the 1802 end, trying to adapt a 6800/6502 bus interface to the mor
< limited 1802 interface implementation. Effectively it's the difference
< between memory mapped I/O and non-memory mapped I/O thaat have got me.
Memory mapped IO on the 1802 was trivial to do and could be used to good
advantage (1861 used it for the display).
< Coincidentally, I purchased a PDP-8/L at 16 for the princely sum of $35
Had an 8e years ago and gave it away, looking for another.
< Still, the latch required +5.0VDC, the only part with a tight power
< requirement.
The latch was not fussy about power, the led portion was power hog.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, November 10, 1998 8:51 PM
Subject: Power interlocks (was Re: [OT] Alphaserver Oops!)
<<<snip!>>>
>I'd suggest defeating interlocks only if you are *sure* you know what
>you're doing, not if you *think* you know. In the case of the Alphaserver
>that was cited in the earlier email, it is clear that the person opening
the
>machine did NOT know what was inside it, and it would have been entirely
>inappropriate to defeat the interlock.
Sam: (It was Sam, wasn't it?)
>
> If I have a center negative power supply (the diagram shows that the
> negative is in the center of the connector) does that mean the center of
> the connector on the device to be powered should be connected to the
> ground plane?
Tony:
> One of Vonada's Laws is 'There is no such thing as ground'. This has 2
> distinct meanings, BTW, both of them applicable to classic computers. The
> first (and the one we need here) is that voltmeters have 2 probes and you
> can take the reference where you like. The other is that a ground
> connection has impedance, so all the points you thought were ground may
> in fact be at different voltages.
>
> Anyway, that said, it is common in most systems to have the ground plane
> at the -ve supply voltage. Exceptions are most ECL systems (which run off
> a -5.2V supply, and thus the +ve side of the supply goes to the ground
> plane), some discrete transistor machines (the HP9100's main supply rail
> is at -15V wrt the ground plane), and probably others.
>
> But in 99% of TTL machines (and things using TTL-compatible
> microprocessors, etc), the ground plane is, indeed, -ve.
I've forgotten who else attempted to answer the question - Tony's was by
far the best reply - but one or two things need clearing up.
Person who said check continuity between centre pin of socket and ground on
the machine. That tells you if it _is_ connected to the ground plane. Sam
wanted to know if it _should be_ connected - i.e. he seems to be adapting a
machine for which he has no PSU to work with a PSU he has.
Person who talked about safety earthing. All true, but I think the
question was about the ground plane within the machine, and whether it
should be connected to the negative supply rail, not whether the machine
needs to be earthed.
Tony: Agreed 99%. But there are one or two exceptions as you imply -
wasn't it you who eold me about the machine which regulates the negative
rail with a -5V regulator and makes that the ground? The positive rail is
then +5V and the unregulated negative is around -5V for serial ports and
things.
If the supply you are using is a regulated 5V supply, then + and -
terminals go to +5V rail and ground plane respectively.
If it is not, try and trace supply rails back to a regulator. It should
then be possible to work out which way the regulation is done.
But as Tony says, in 99% of machines the answer is yes. If you tell us
what the machine is, there will probably be someone on the list who can
tell you how to wire it up.
Philip.
At 03:07 PM 11/9/98 PST, you wrote:
>significance, I doubt it will be remembered any better than many other
>machines. It seems hard for me to imagine the iMac or any other
>technologically vanilla modern computer will ever end up in a museum.
So the IBM PC was hot stuff? I don't think so. It sold, and will be
remembered, because it was IBM's stamp of approval on the (then) latest
round of "Computers will change the way you do business." Back then, the
theory was "nobody ever got fired for buying IBM" and so it was that even
though it was "technologically vanilla", the PC sold and made a serious
impact.
Likewise, many of the other very collectible or desireable computers are
much less technologically innovative than they are socially (computer-wise)
important.
[From another message]
>Even if we ignore that the plain G3 systems would likely have been
>enough? I heard that Apple sold out of their new G3s even before the
>iMac came out. All of the detail to which you refer will be forgotten
The iMac is cute. It is friendly, something Grandma's are more likely to
feel comfortable with than your standard PC. It is something that the
upscale will be happy to have in their home -- you know, those weird people
who have exactly three magazines (and nothing else) on their coffee table
and don't have dozens of cables running (visibly!) through their homes, the
way we do. Richard Fish (of Ally McBeal) had one in his apartment.
BMW's are not exceptional cars. They're fine, much like many others
available on the market. But all the yuppies want them, because they're
beemers. The iMac is the same.
And for that, it will be remembered and, eventually, collected.
>in 15 years. By historic, I mean of the magnitude of the original
>macintosh, or the PC XT, or Apple II, or Altair, or C64, and others.
>These truly changed the face of computing, unlike the iMac.
The iMac will change (or at least attempt to change) computing by bringing
in a whole new layer of users -- ones that even the cheapy clone PC's
couldn't attract. Similar to the ones that were attracted to the original
Mac, but less adventuresome.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 05:56 PM 11/8/98 EST, you wrote:
>on a piece of equipment this would be a good example. My reasons in order of
>priority: 1) first popular clone, 2) all the original -parts (including
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Exsqueeze me? Um... Don't think it qualifies as "popular" at all, and I
have to question the "first" part as well.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 01:35 PM 11/2/98 -0600, you wrote:
>Take a look at this on C/Net
>http://cnet.com/Resources/Topdownloads/PC/Result/Download/0,162,57820,00.ht…
I use Arachne a lot -- I do all my web dev in a DOS Text Editor, and then
(if I'm not running Windows at the moment) use Arachne to Preview it.
Works great, except that the latest version (that I have) builds a couple
of directories whereever you happen to be, so I wrote a perl pgm and batch
file to jump to the Arachne directory and load the web page from there.
Anyway, I haven't used it to go on-line, but it apparently can.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 09:46 PM 11/9/98 PST, you wrote:
>>Maybe, but zero feedback isn't realy a thing to rate -
>
>You are right in your assertion that feedback for someone
>who is a bidder makes little difference. However, for
Well, I disagree... It's perhaps not as important for bidders as it is for
sellers, but it is still important. I have had sellers ship stuff right
away instead of waiting for my check to clear because I have a decent
feedback rating. I do the same when I sell; if the high bidder has decent
feedback, I'll ship right away.
>items. This happened because I have a perfect feedback
>profile and that alone results in higher bids. I have seen
I don't know that I would bid higher based on feedback, but maybe I bid on
different stuff. (I did once not bid seriously because the seller had a
feedback of 1, posted by a user from the same domain with a feedback of 0.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 07:22 AM 11/10/98 -0500, cswiger wrote:
>
>>From the February '76 Computer Notes:
>
>8K BASIC - $200
> w/ purchase - $75
Puts the "bundle Windows with all your boxes or else" tactic in a
new light, doesn't it? :-)
- John
Hello, all:
Here's what was posted to my ClassicCmp site tonight:
- remaining parts of R6500 Programming manuals
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW7
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/pdp11/
<================ reply separator =================>
I'd be interested in one, too. I'd consider a bare board for about $40 with
a parts sources listing (particularly for the hard-to-get parts).
Modern component substitutions would be acceptable I think.
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW7
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/pdp11/
<================ reply separator =================>
If someone is interested is any of this my wife works in Chapel Hill and
could bring it home and I can box and ship it. Please just check with me
before comitting her - she doesn't know she has been conned yet.
Dan Burrows
336-376-0468
dburrows(a)netpath.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Russ Blakeman <rhblake(a)bigfoot.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, November 10, 1998 5:23 PM
Subject: XPOST: Adoptables and fairly cheapo machines available - NC
>This is a new post on the Obsolete Computer Helpline that I thought
>someone may have an interest in. Write to Mike Smith, not me, on these
>items.
>------------------------------
>
>Michael M. Smith <snuggemsnospam(a)nospam.bearwolf.com>
>Cary, NC USA - Tuesday, November 10, 1998 at 10:44:04
>
> (Remove the nospams when you reply)
>
> It's time to clean house. I have numerous machines that need to
>find homes, for reasonable prices. How
> reasonable? Make an offer. Not interested in making any money off
>these, as most were given to me or
> purchased for a small fee that I've gotten my money's worth out of
>from tinkering.
>
> 1. A TI-99/4A computer with speech synth, power adapter, RF
>adapter, cassette program recorder with cables,
> many software packages with most in original boxes (The software,
>not the machine) Its the black and chrome
> model, and everything works perfectly. Oh, and it has the joysticks
>with it too. Not sure how well they work.
>
> 2. Kaypro 1 luggable. Powers up and tries to boot, but no system
>disk available. See TRS-80 entry, its disks
> might work.
>
> 3. Kaypro 4 luggable. Same as above.
>
> 4. Atari 5200 game system. Trackball controller, Atari 2600
>adapter, three 5200 joysticks, one 2600-compatible
> joystick, several cartridges. Trackball and joysticks could use
>some cleaning, can't get them all to work right.
>
> 5. TRS-80 Model 4. Manuals, disks, extra programming books, even a
>copy of Zaxxon...Looks awful in b&w
> though. The B drive is a little flaky, might need cleaning, might
>need more. It has TRS-DOS and CP/M 2.2 so
> these disks might work with the Kaypros mentioned above.
>
> 6. Atari 800XL with two 1050 disk drives, the 410 tape recorder,
>and a "Big Blue" thermal roll printer. Several
> manuals and disks and cartridges. Not in the best of shape, is
>quite dirty. One of the 1050 drives is in its original
> packaging. Not sure if this works.
>
> Interested adopters need to be in the RTP area of North Carolina
>(Raleigh, Durham, Chapel-Hill) as I am not
> willing to ship these items. Any questions regarding specific
>cartridges may be addressed to me. Thanks, and help
> me get rid of this clutter! Some really interesting items for a
>computer museum.
>
> I also have an IBM PS/2 model 35sx with 16MB of RAM and a 420MB IDE
>hard drive (It's an IDE and ISA
> model) that I might let out for adoption too, but will have to ask
>$30 to recoup the cost of the RAM and the
> harddrive I put in it.
>
> Thanks again! Mike
>
> One expansion slot (I don't know what kind, but =
>it allowed for a video card so you could drive a second display, =
>and a commonly-found configuration is an SE driving a giant =
>grayscale two-page display).
It's a PDS (Processor Direct Slot). As the name implies, a way to
connect something directly to the processor. This means that the card
that can be plugged in depends on the processor, and also that designing
such a card isn't as pleasant as for ISA or S-100 or others.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
< > Entended BASIC - $350
< > w/ purchase - $150
<
< Sheesh! No wonder nobody paid for the stuff. These are bloated prices
< especially in 1976 dollars.
And at current prices a system with enough ram to run extended basic would
set you back at least $2000 and that does not include IO or terminal. One
caveat, you had to purchase the Altair from MITS and the minimum amount
of ram needed to run the package from them too.
FYI: in 1977 you could buy a chevy pickup for $6500 to put that price in
perspective.
The Processor Technology, Digital Group (later TDL) and other folks
were turning out software by the pound. It was cheap, good and available.
IT was the Gates debacal and people like PCC (AKA Doctor Dobbs) that
started the free software revolution and a legacy of so 20,000 free or
copyleft programs for the 8080/z80 families alone, likely as much for
6502 based systems.
Allison
>Were you aware of the fact that the listed site is in the Netherlands?
Yes and I also noted a some US listings and there are several European
posters on this list.
Dan
John Foust <jfoust(a)threedee.com> wrote
>>There's no reason for him to surrender the copyright; we could
>>merely ask for permission to redistribute. I think the PR aspect
>>would be a two-edged sword, though - the open source movement
>>would have a field day with the notion that Gates finally came
>>around and now allows free distribution of one of his products,
>>yet I'm sure Microsoft's PR agency could get some mileage from
>his benevolence to the classic computer community.
From what I've heard, this redistribution idea has made its way around
Microsoft (several times) and suffered bit rot. The potential revenues (zero
or cost of duplication) outweighed the internal costs. I still pitch the
idea to my MS contact occasionally, though.
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW7
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/pdp11/
<================ reply separator =================>
Today, for no good reason, our AlphaServer starts making a funny noise.
Sounds like something trapped in the fan, but as long as the box doesn't
go down, we're safe. It's our main server.
So, being the way I am, I decide on a little surgery with the power on.
This is the 1st mistake.
So, I open the cover to the disks. (THis is an AS 4/266) Lotta dust in there,
gotta blow it out! Reward: Dust in eyes. Lotta fun.
Then I spot a little tab toward the top of the case. "Top Cover Latch"
Aha! Here's what we're after! So, I unlatch it, and pull the lid off.
*CLICK!* Whirrrrrrrrr.... *silence*
Seems there's a power interlock in the top cover!
Oops.
-------
Can someone help this guy identify the HP boards he has in his collection?
Please reply to the requestor.
Reply-to: nelske(a)earthlink.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 07:19:03 -0800
From: Kevin Nelson <nelske(a)earthlink.net>
This is a four board assembly with each board numbered slightly different. The
boards are numbered;
(A) 5087-1008 D-1117-22
(B) 5087-1002 E-1117-22
(C) 5087-1003 D-1003-22
(D) 5087-1004 D-1117-22
and all have hand written
M11148
73-21-044
The M11148 is the serial number.
The total assembly contains 139,264 cores.
Thanks for the help.
Kevin Nelson
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)verio.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Always being hassled by the man.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details
[Last web page update: 11/02/98]
At 12:25 PM 11/10/98 -0800, Sam wrote:
>Sheesh! No wonder nobody paid for the stuff. These are bloated prices,
>especially in 1976 dollars.
The funny thing is, in 1978 I attended a trade show/conference called
PerComp '78 in Long Beach California looking for an 8K BASIC for my Digital
Group Z80 system. I talked to Bill, who was there selling BASIC at these
ridiculous (to me) prices. He told me that Micro-soft didn't have a version
of BASIC for my system. He went further however, and suggested that if I
wanted to come work for him he would pay me with the royalties generated by
the sale of my version.
Needless to say I figured anyone who was trying to sell BASIC (which I
figured I could write on my own in about 3 months) for more than a third
what I paid for my complete computer was not going to be around long enough
for me to collect any royalties...
--Chuck
This is the world's first clone of the 5150. It is also the world's
first Compaq. You have judged all of the specs correctly. It should be
selling for $100,000 on eBay, because it is at least as important as the
Altair. After all, this launched the IBM PC-Compatible revolution. I
would say this is definitely a must in any computer museum. However,
these aren't generally considered valuable. Go figure.
>I have recently obtained a machine that when carried resembles a sewing
>machine in a carry case, marked Compaq Portable. It has a built in CRT
>and is evidentally an 8088 or 8086 machine judging by the 8 bit slots.
>
>Anyone have any info on it, and is there any collectability to these?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Seeing that there is little on the net about the Exidy Sorcerer, I've
started to put together my own. So far I've only begun to HTMLize
some of my Sorcerer docs. Currently I have almost completed the
intro manual which shipped with the system. Just have the last
chapter and the appendix to do. Plan on placing other doc and info
here as well. I'll also be placing a chronicle of my attempt at
building a new expansion box for this system. If anyone has
anything they would like to contribute, let me know and we can
work out something to get a copy up.
You can find it at:
http://www.trailingedge.com/exidy
-----
David Williams - Computer Packrat
dlw(a)trailingedge.com
http://www.trailingedge.com
At 00:46 10/11/98 -0500, Ethan Dicks <erd(a)infinet.com> wrote:
>> > The problem with replicating the SuperElf is the keyboard. I have no
>> > idea where to get that chip from (74941?), nor an inexpensive source
>> > for that many pushbuttons (including some latching ones).
[Snip]
>If you'd seen the Elf-II schematic, I don't think you would have responded
>that way. I was never suggesting cannibalizing AT keyboards. They are
>entirely unsuitable. The original Elf-II has a keypad built up from
>individual pushbutton key switches, including several ones that latch
>up and down for LOAD, RUN and MEM PROT. The hex digits are latched
>through a (then) standard keyboard encoder chip.
[Snip]
>I was suggesting finding modern parts from a distributor of new or
>recycled (surplused) parts. I further suggested that modern replacements
>could run as much as $2 or $3 per switch (20 switches - 0 to F, R, L, P
>and I).
As far as the keyboard encoder chip goes, you wouldn't be thinking of the
74922 would you? It's a 16 key keyboard encoder chip designed, as I
remember, to encode a 4 x 4 key matrix. Or perhaps the 74923, a 20 key
keyboard encoder (which uses a 5 x 4 key matrix). If some of the non-hex
keys latch the 74922 would be more suitable, because I'm pretty sure both
these chips can only recognise one key being pressed at a time.
Anyway, according to the Australian edition of the Farnell catalogue, both
these chips are still available. Farnell wants $A20.48 each for the 74C922
and $A20.52 each for the 74C923 (plus 22% sales tax) in quantities less
than 25, and $A14.11 each for the 74C922 and $A14.37 each for the 74C923
(plus tax) in quantities between 25 and 100. However, Farnell is usually
the most expensive place to buy components, so I'm sure you'll be able to
find them somewhere cheaper (for example, an Australian company called
Altronics stocks the 74C922 for $A12.95 each in quantities less than ten,
and $A12.50 each for ten or more *including tax*).
As far as the keys go, the momentary action (i.e. to 0-F) keys shouldn't be
a problem. PCB mount NO push buttons (I think they're called D6 type)
switches are available for $A1 each in small quantities. Alternatively you
could use a hex keypad. Farnell lists one for $A14.72 (plus tax) in small
quantities, so once again I'm sure you could find one even cheaper. That
would only leave four of the relatively expensive latching switches to buy.
Depending on the price, I'd probably be interested in one of these little
machines too.
Regards,
| Scott McLauchlan |E-Mail: scott(a)cts.canberra.edu.au |
| Network Services Team |Phone : +61 2 6201 5544 (Ext.5544)|
| Client Services Division |Post : University of Canberra, |
| University of Canberra, AUSTRALIA | ACT, 2601, AUSTRALIA. |
Oh, now I understand why you were disagreeing with me! Another debate
over pedantics...if I go by this, my original statement is hereby
revised to 'The iMac is not historic'
>Err, no, I was saying that "historic" does not mean "revolutionary".
>History reports impactful events more than innovative events.
I don't think that the iMac is associated with saving Apple at all. If
anyone in the future is familiar enough with the iMac to think it saved
Apple, I would expect that the fact it is just a symptom of Steve Jobs'
marketing abilities and nothing interesting in itself or even more
desirable in any way than any other G3 will also be known.
>The iMac will be seen as historic if it saves Apple (and that is yet to
be
>seen). And it will have a nice chunk of Jobs mythology behind it as
well,
>which sure doesn't hurt.
>
>-- Doug
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>>
>>Thanks to Kai's generosity I finally fulfilled my lifelong quest to
obtain
>>a SoftStrip reader at the VCF. I am complete.
>>
> Naw... you are only complete when you find a copy of the software to
> generate the Causin bar codes (yes, they did actually sell it!) and start
> archiving your software on reams of paper!
>
> ...and when you find it, I want a copy too!
>
> -jim
Eh? What's going on here? Is the barcode format not documented?
If it is, should be trivial to write software to generate barcodes
If it ain't, why is this system so desirable?
Philip.
< > I happen to have a few tubes of both 2101 and 5101(cmos).
<
< Lucky you. I have a couple of 1822 (CMOS RCA part) and a few 2101's.
< have not yet found a source of 50 to 100 256x4 2101-compatible SRAMs.
< I do have a pile of 2114's, but I'd rather use something else.
Those 2102s and 5101s are also 20 years old! I got them a while back.
What's wrong with 2114s? I've used them in a lot of projects and products
and they fine if a x4 orginization is handy. I have 24 of them in use
for a intersil 6100 (12 bit pdp-8) based system.
< I, too, have the VIP docs. We should compare offline to see if one has
< something the other does not.
Sure. I also have UT4 monitor rom.
< Back in those days, I built the TVT-6 but never powered it up because I
< never got my hands on a video monitor. I was just a kid, and a $75 to
< $150 device might as well have been $75,000 or $150,000 for as little
< as I had.
By then I'd gotten in to the semiconductor industry and things like
monitors and the like were less a problem. All that means is I'm older
than you. ;)
< The 1854 is still in production by Harris. I do not think that the 186
< is available, but it is the "correct" chip to use with the 1802. Anythi
the 1861 was useless by my standard unless you wanted to play low res
graphic games. At the time I was building up a system to run Basic or
better.
< else, like a 6845, would be _way_ too much work to be worth the effort.
Not really.
< There is a 1871 keyboard encoder that is still in production. I even
< have a small tube. Perhaps that could be a drop-in replacement on an
< Elf-II replica. I'll visit the Harris web page and peruse the data shee
I don't think so.
< I was clearly never in your league, but then, I was just a snot nosed
< kid with bigger dreams than my pocket book allowed for. At 16, I had
< an Elf and a PET and was always pushing them to do more.
At 16 the PDP-8 was just announced and running some $20k a copy.
< That would work. I always wanted a CMOS replacement for the TIL311 disp
< so that I could power it off of a lantern battery for virtually forever
< It was the one TTL part on the Quest design.
The led was the power hog, the latch/decoder was only a fraction of that.
Allison
> One thing you do do is prevent
> good software from being written. Who can afford to do professional
> work for nothing? What hobbyist can put 3-man years into
>programming, finding all bugs, documenting his product and distribute
>for free?
It is interesting that nowadays, many computer hobbyists release the
source, and don't expect to make a whole lot of money from their
products, not only in relation to GNU, but many independent writers of
freeware. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with what Bill Gates is
saying, just strikes me as a little curious. How much did a copy of
BASIC cost, anyway?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Actually, I included a copy of the software with Sam's SoftStrip reader :)
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: James Willing [mailto:jimw@agora.rdrop.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 1998 9:27 AM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: Kilobaud Magazine
At 09:06 AM 11/7/98 -0800, Sellam wrote:
>
>Then of course there was the Causin SoftStrip reader. The Apple magazine
>Nibble (among others) used to print strips about 5/8" wide that you could
>cut out and run through the reader to load the published programs into
>your computer instead of typing in listings.
>
>Thanks to Kai's generosity I finally fulfilled my lifelong quest to obtain
>a SoftStrip reader at the VCF. I am complete.
Naw... you are only complete when you find a copy of the software to
generate the Causin bar codes (yes, they did actually sell it!) and start
archiving your software on reams of paper!
...and when you find it, I want a copy too!
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
>>Maybe, but zero feedback isn't realy a thing to rate -
>>I did a lot of eBay transactions within the last year
>>(>20) and have still a feedback of Zero - I don't care.
> You are right in your assertion that feedback for someone
> who is a bidder makes little difference. However, for
> a seller (like myself) it is extremely important.
> For example, I just had two auctions end tonight in which
> my bids for both of the items were about double that
> of what is usually realized on ebay for the same identical
> items. This happened because I have a perfect feedback
> profile and that alone results in higher bids. I have seen
> it time and again. My advice to anyone who wishes to sell
> repeatedly on eBay is to do whatever it takes to protect
> your feedback profile. In my case, it means a policy
> of satisfaction or money refunded (and I have rarely
> been asked to grant a refund).
Hard to belive for me. Ok, I can only take myself
as example, and a Feedback couldn't change the bid
in any way. If I want an item I will bid as far as
I belive it is worth. An all negative feedback could
maybe avoide bidding at, but this hasn't happen 'till
now. The way Auctions are described shows way more
about the personality then any feedback - especialy
when taking in account that americans tend to praise
anything that just works out ordinary in bight colours.
I also stumbled within the last year across more
than one seller with a positive feedback, witch
turned out to be a real troll later on.
Gruss
Hans
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
> If we don't find a list owner at u of washington, I can host the list on my
> home unix machine.
Did I miss something ?
Isn't the list running well without ?
Never touch a running system.
Gruss
Hans
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
>> Of course, since the iMac has little historical significance, I doubt it
> Say what?! Jobs leaves Apple, Apple dies, Jobs rides his white horse back
> to Apple, saves Apple with the iMac. What do you want, a big red sign
> that says "COLLECT ME, I'M HISTORIC"?
Maybe I have just a twisted idea of development, but
>from my perceptions all this 'new' apple stuff was
already on the line before Mr. Jobs turned his horse
(And everything he had in his saddle bags has already
been scraped - Unix ? Raphsody ? Pah! Actualy even
MacOS X will be just a new MacOS release - at least
folowing the last informations).
Gruss
hans
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
At 09:12 PM 11/9/98 -0600, Doug Yowza wrote:
>I've taken the bold step of setting up a new list. Feel free to
>subscribe, but I don't think it would be a good idea to abandon the old
>list until it ceases to exist.
So what's your policy on list management? Light or invisible hand, or
whips and paddles and excommunication for misbehavior? :-)
- John
>> If we don't find a list owner at u of washington, I can host the list on
my
>> home unix machine.
>
> Did I miss something ?
> Isn't the list running well without ?
> Never touch a running system.
Hans,
Not so much running as freewheeling. The other day I thought mail problems
here might have cut me off, so I sent a QUERY CLASSICCMP request to the
list server. It said,
List CLASSICCMP is locked by owner bskiver(a)u.washington.edu. No
list-specific requests can be processed
at this time. For further information please contact bcw(a)u.washington.edu
bskiver(a)u.washington.edu .
So I can't even ask about it, much less do anything. Others have been
having similar problems.
Philip.
Man I have so much to catch up on after being sick. Well, I picked
up an Apple //e, nothing special about that except it had LOTS of
boards installed. Most //e I find have the 64K/80 col card and the
disk controller and that's it.
One of these cards has me stumped. It looks like it may be a
modem but I have no idea where the phone connection might be.
Well, I have a small idea. It is a two board set up with a good
sized daughter board connected to the main card. The daughter
board is label with Microcom. That and the speaker and the note
about FCC Ringer Equivalence lead me to think modem. There are
16 dip switchs along the top of the main card. I'll take a picture
and place it on my site tomorrow. If anyone could ID it and maybe
help with doc or software I'd appriciate it.
This same system also had an AE Z-80 Plus card. Anyone have
the version of CP/M for that? Or doc?
And finally, there was a PCPI APPLI-CARD. This appears to be
another CP/M card. It contains a Z-80B and it's own bank of
memory. Anyone have info it and the CP/M for it too? Never heard
of two Z-80 cards in one system.
Thanks.
-----
David Williams - Computer Packrat
dlw(a)trailingedge.com
http://www.trailingedge.com
Yes, there are still some around. A fellow is advertising an Apple II in
the Windsor paper this morning, asking price--$ 600.00!
Regards
Charlie Fox
Charles E. Fox
Chas E. Fox Video Productions
email foxvideo(a)wincom.net Homepage http://www.wincom.net/foxvideo
Phil,
The stock SE was a 68000 with 800K floppy, 1MB RAM and a 20MB hard drive. I
believe they were expandable on the mother board to 4MB by replacing the 4
256K SIMMs with 4 1Meg SIMMs (30 pin).
There was also a SE30 which had a 1.44Meg floppy and a 68030 CPU.
Regards,
Bob
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
Bob Withers
Bob.Withers(a)MCI.com Age is a horrible price to
MCI Worldcom pay for maturity.
Richardson, Texas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Clayton [SMTP:handyman@sprintmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 09, 1998 10:38 AM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: Thrift store finds
>
> Found a nice Macintosh SE computer at my local Goodwill today.
> Complete with 2 external boxes, one a CMS SCSI hard drive 90 MB,
> The other a MacDirect SCSI Hard Drive 60MB..
> Nice Expanded keyboard and mouse, and all cables..
> Powers up just fine..
> I know nothing about these machines, as they passed me up in the 80's..
> So I guess its time I get to learn about them..
> Anyone know anything about the SE series ?
> Speed, processors, memory ?
> Phil...