Hello, all:
I'd like to try to get my Mac 512k, Apple //gs, and IW-II talking
together. I have all of the LocalTalk (PhoneNet style) hardware connected to
the respective units. However, this is the first time that I'm attempting
any form of networking on my Apples, so I really don't know where I'm going.
I know that you have to identify one of the serial ports as LocalTalk.
I've done this in the //gs Control Panel, and I think that I've done this on
the Fat Mac, but what am I supposed to see? How do I know that it works?
Thanks again.
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW7
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/pdp11/
<================ reply separator =================>
Available --
FolderBolt (Kent Marsh, Ltd) Shrink Wrapped
Blue Max (Qualitas) for 386, PS/2 and Win 3.0
LapTrack (Timeslips Corp), includes Timeslips III (Sticker on the front
saying "System 7 Compatible". Shrink Wrapped.
As usual, make an offer...eBay prices most welcome.
manney(a)hmcltd.net
In einer eMail vom 13.01.1999 07:49:30, schreiben Sie:
<<
John G. Zabolitzky wrote:
> 6 bit characters were quite the standard BEFORE /360 days, say for
> CDC 6600, CDC 7600 (the most powerful computers from mid-60s until
> the appearance of the CRAY-1 machines, forerunners of the Cyber 170
series),
> or IBM 7030, IBM 7090, IBM 7094 say, back in the '60s.
> They were not called bytes, and could not be addressed directly;
> there were 36 bit or 60 bit words, and shift / logical instructions used
for
> character manipulation. In fact this is probably the origin for the
> six character namelength limit in FORTRAN IV : 6 chars x 6 bits = 36 bit
word.
Eric Smith wrote:
All generally correct except for the 7030 (Stretch). Stretch used
variable-length fields from 1 to 64 bits, and its native character set used 8
bits. The integer arithmetic instructions, however, were specificially
designed to be useful on character data types from 4 to 8 bits.
http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/retrocomputing/stretch/
>>
It seems I got these IBM model numbers confused. I think I meant the
7040 (and of course we can go back to the earlier tube computers, 704 and
709).
Eric, you seem to have quite some info on the Stretch; do you have any
source of (original or other doc) on this or the other early IBM computers ?
There is of course the book by Bashe et al, but I find it difficult to
locate more info.
John G. Zabolitzky
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999 Chuck McManis <cmcmanis(a)mcmanis.com> wrote:
<snip>
>As this list is full of folks who've dealt with the 'ravages of time' on
>their collections, I was looking for things to protect against.
My first thought was the pulling the battery, but someone mentioned that.
That leads to another notion that I don't recall anybody mentioning.
Assuming we solve all the 'ravages of time' issues, then we need to think
about another issue. As an ornery question, should we not pack along with
the machine a stone tablet? Engraved on the tablet is the following:
"This computer and operating system are not Y2.1K compliant!"
With no battery, the machine is going to present the date prompt. What
will happen when they enter '1-04-2100'?
On Mon 18 Jan 1999 20:40:35 Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net> wrote:
> Aren't zebras bar-coded ponys?
> Not even signing my name!
My wife wants to know then what skunks are.
Mike
I'm trying to contact one of our (past?) list members who used to hang out
here. Have any of you folks in California heard where Buck is now (aka
William Buckley)?
He was rather interested in a bunch of DEC gear that I have in my garage
for his museum he said he was putting together. We had been emailing each
other up 'til middle of December but now I don't get any replies. My email
doesn't bounce ("Buck Savage" <hhacker(a)gte.net>).
I need to move this DEC stuff ASAP.
Thanks for all your help gang!
Regards, Chris
-- --
Christian Fandt, Electronic/Electrical Historian
Jamestown, NY USA cfandt(a)netsync.net
Member of Antique Wireless Association
URL: http://www.ggw.org/freenet/a/awa/
It was definitely aluminum. The paint was chipping off in a few places, and
it definitely weighed a good pound or more than my Tandy 1800. Could it
have been a model that GRiD made for another company (as the label on the
bottom stated)?
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug <doug(a)blinkenlights.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, January 19, 1999 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: GRID LAPTOP
>Pass! Those are not TRuE GRiDs! And they have plastic cases, AFAIK.
>Some later GRiD-labeled products were not made by GRiD, including the one
>you've mentioned. Others include the 2390 (designed by GRiD, made by
>Casio), and the 2050 (made by Samsung, I think).
>
>-- Doug
>
>
I remember once seeing a GRiD 386 laptop that looked _exactly_ like a Tandy
3800, but was made of the aluminum alloy, was white, and said on the top
case that it was Panasonic (I think. The top cover was labeled with
something other than GRiD or Tandy). The bottom label said "manufactured
for {Company X} by GRiD".
Anyone ever hear of something like this? I was going to pick one up, but
they wanted $300 for one.
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug <doug(a)blinkenlights.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, January 19, 1999 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: GRID LAPTOP
>On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, Marty wrote:
>
>> Were all the Grids in a metal case with bubble memory?
>
>No, only the earlier Compass and Compass II models, but there were several
>different models. (And the metal case is a magnesium alloy.)
>
>-- Doug
>
>
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: GRID LAPTOP
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 1/19/99 5:56 PM
At 04:30 PM 1/19/99 -0500, you wrote:
> While out junking at lunch I met a gent who said he has a Grid Laptop
> with a metal case (he said this model went to the moon) and uses
> bubble memory. He said he'd entertain selling it but I've no idea what
> to offer. Any ideas on what to offer or any info on this laptop? I'd
> appreciate and info.
Could be any one of several models. If it really uses Bubble Memory, it's
probably a Compass (model 11xx). That, I'd pay a bit of money for, maybe
as much as $50 if it's working. More likely, it's a GRiDCase and maybe
worth $20 at most. If, on the other hand, it's a Convertible (2260 or
2270), you're talking real money again; I'd pay $100 for a 2270.
>>The one that was used on the shuttle (I don't think the shuttle ever
>>landed on the moon?) was (iirc) the GRiDPad 19xx, see my other message
>>about those.
All those years of killing brain cells are finally catching up to me.
It's been a rough day and I wasn't thinking. Thanks for the info. I
don't really need another pc but you know how that goes....
If it turns out to be a 1535 (or other model with both the Gas Plasma
screen and battery power), let Derek Peschel know; he's been looking for
one for a while. (I have been trying to find one unsuccessfully for him.)
Aside from the bubble memory and the magnesium case, btw, the Compass was
the first of the clamshell style computers. Beat the Gavilan by half a
year at least.
(And no, the Gavilan wasn't the second clamshell either.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1999Jan19.175615.1767.93725; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 17:56:16 -0500
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with SMTP
id OAA16070; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:52:46 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.1+UW98.09) with ESMTP id OAA2
4602
for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:52:40 -0800
Received: from uxl.longs.com (uxl.longs.com [199.108.9.10])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.2+UW99.01/8.9.2+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA31
551
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:52:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sinasohn ([10.24.180.117]) by axh.longs.com
(Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with SMTP id AAAFFA4
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>;
Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:50:14 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.16.19990119145248.2a7f1538(a)ricochet.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:53:14 -0800
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Uncle Roger <sinasohn(a)ricochet.net>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: GRID LAPTOP
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Sender: sinasohn(a)ricochet.net
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Were all the Grids in a metal case with bubble memory?
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: GRID LAPTOP
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 1/19/99 4:53 PM
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, Marty wrote:
> While out junking at lunch I met a gent who said he has a Grid Laptop
> with a metal case (he said this model went to the moon) and uses
> bubble memory. He said he'd entertain selling it but I've no idea what
> to offer. Any ideas on what to offer or any info on this laptop? I'd
> appreciate and info.
The first GRiD was made in 1982, and I don't think we've been to the moon
since a bit before that. However, several models of GRiDs were used in
the space shuttle. Find out which model it is, first. The early models
are pretty hard to find (I think less than 10,000 were made).
If you're thinking of paying Real Money (TM), let me sell you one of mine!
-- Doug
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1999Jan19.165321.1767.93695; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:53:22 -0500
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with SMTP
id NAA03303; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:50:59 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.1+UW98.09) with ESMTP id NAA1
2986
for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:50:51 -0800
Received: from genco.haggle.com (IDENT:doug@genco.haggle.com [209.49.57.4])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.2+UW99.01/8.9.2+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA27
201
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:50:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (doug@localhost)
by genco.haggle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA26623
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:50:40 -0500
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.95.990119164647.22135D-100000(a)genco.haggle.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:50:40 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Doug <doug(a)blinkenlights.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: GRID LAPTOP
In-Reply-To: <1999Jan19.162855.1767.182582(a)smtp.itgonline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
X-Sender: doug(a)genco.haggle.com
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
At 02:09 PM 1/17/99 -0400, you wrote:
>> The school system's inabaility to deal with anything other
>> than the mean (which they insist on defining) is one of the
>> primary reasons home schooling has really taken off the last
>> few years.
>
>It's worse than that. It's not even the mean anymore. It's the
>lowest student.
Um, no. The teachers at my girlfriend's school (and all the schools she
works with) spend many (unpaid) hours every year planning the classes so as
to accomodate the differing needs of all their students. Things like
slower 1st graders are combined with advanced kindergartners so that
they're best able to meet the needs of all the kids.
There are many reasons why kids these days are not being educated as well
as they should be. Perhaps some of the blame belongs to the "System" --
any bureaucracy can thwart the best efforts of the dedicated -- and there
are indeed some people who should not be teachers.
BUT, Much of the problem, if not most, however, should be placed squarely
on the shoulders of those at fault: The parents[1]. (Aka voters.) No one
likes to think they've screwed up their own kids and done a crappy job as a
parent, so they blame the teachers. The politicians don't want to insult
the voters, so they blame the teachers too, and add to the bureaucracy.
Meanwhile, you have underpaid teachers, buying their own supplies, working
12 hour days, trying to teach kids whose parents proclaim "I AM NOT A
TEACHER!" on the kid's homework, and tell their kids that if someone does
something they don't like, they should hit them.
I've done some teaching back when I was young and stupid. I got smart and
gave it up because a) it's way too much work to do it right, b) it pays
pretty crappy, and c) kids are a PITA. Give it a try, and then come back
and tell me it's the teacher's fault.
[1] If you read to your kids every day, spend your non-working time taking
them to museums, plays, camping, etc., work with them on what they're
interested in, even if it means giving up watching football, spending time
with your friends, and so on, then this doesn't apply to you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
I have a line on quite a few GRiDPad 19xx computers. These are the
keyboardless slates sometimes called "post-it" computers, due to the ease
of just sticking them on a wall or anywhere convenient. I believe they
were also used on the shuttle at one point. They are DOS machines, 8088 I
believe.
These machines appear to be in pretty decent shape, with nice cases. The
ones I saw were 1910's, but there may be some 1900 or other, similar models
in the bunch. They are untested, and I don't know if they come with pens
or not.
I think I can get them for $15-20 each. Shipping in the US would probably
be around $3-5. Figure less than $25 total. (I will seriously try to get
them for less, and I won't be making anything on these.) If there is
interest, I'll pursue it further; if not, I'll grab a couple for myself and
let the rest go whereever they want.
Please reply off-list! (We don't need a zillion "I want one!" messages
spewing all over the 'net.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Come across something in the basement. Working on making it mine.
It's a 6" rack labeled "[Bell logo] DIMENSION". Has a serial port and lots
of trunk connectors. Is this a telco switch?
-------
>> A recent program on Stonehenge on the Discovery channel said the RAF
wanted to
>> level Stonehenge with explosives, but the person who owned the land they
were
>> on refused to let them. *boggle* Is it just me, or does all this
suggest
>> that in the 1930s and early 40s good maps were much harder to come by
than
>
> A lot of it was propaganda to the British public to convince them how
> important the war was....
>
> Of course there were maps. Ordnance Survey maps were originally produced
> for military use (hence the name), but nowadays are available just about
> anywhere in the UK (most bookshops keep at least the local ones). During
> the war they were probably impossible to obtain, but before the war,
trivial.
>
> And you can bet they had got them in Germany as well. After all, the
> British certainly had German maps.
Yes, the Germans had good maps of Britain. At Bletchley I say on display a
German map of the UK 132kV electrical grid, as it was in 1938...
> The other thing that worries me is that Stonehenge is not the best
> landmark in that area. Salisbury Cathedral's spire is probably a lot
> easier to see from a distance.
Unique. But not so distinctive. Stonehenge is obviously Stonehenge.
Salisbury Cathedral is random_large_church_with_tall_spire. Seriously, if
I emerged from cloud somewhere in the South of England, and saw Stonehenge,
I'd know exactly where I was. If I emerged and saw Salisbury, I could
probably work it out, but it would be a lot harder.
But the original report - that Stonehenge was flattened - looks like a
clear case of local telling tall story to American tourist...
Philip.
> There were comments that the Dead Sea scrools were on parchment rather
> than paper. True. There are Egyptian papyri that are older than the
> Dead Sea scrolls (some retaining quite a bit of color).
To be pedantic, also not paper. They dried the reeds and glued strips
together, rather than pulping them. No acid in the treatment for a
start...
Now, as for what the best paper is, not far from my parents' they still
make paper by hand at Wookey Hole Mill. Originally set up to recycle
cloth, they now import raw cotton from the US (recycled cloth contains too
much artificial fibre). But the treatment for the rags was to boil them up
in caustic soda (NaOH), not acid...
I think linen (flax) fibres make pretty good paper. Manila (?sp) fibres
make strong envelopes.
How about printing on Tyvek? That stuff's pretty indestructible.
> And yes, there's the chiselled stone media. If somebody can get me a
> good source for affordable media, I'll start work on a printer (I
> think the headstone folks have some items that could be built into a
> prototype).
I don't know whether you can get the stuff in the US, but in the UK slate
was used extensively as a roofing material until quite recently (you can
still get new slates, but most new buildings use modern composite materials
in roof tiles). Most building salvage places will sell you secondhand
roofing slates by the box. Not suitable for chiselling, though - better to
use some sort of grinding tip on a miniature hand drill.
Another suggestion. The Mormons claim their scripture was preserved on
metal plates (metal foil?) for well over 2000 years. You could ask for
specifications - alas, the originals have mysteriously vanished...
Philip.
Sorry I forgot the CPU runs at 8MHZ and it looks like any other laptop from
the outside.
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: 19 January 1999 12:21
Subject: Re: Sanyo 16LT
>At 09:30 PM 1/18/99 -0000, you wrote:
>>I have recently aquired the above notepad computer I wonder if anyone has
>any
>
>
> I used a Sanyo for years and used to keep up with their stuff but I've
>never heard of one. How old is it? Can you post a picture?
>
> Joe
>
>
>
The Sanyo 16LT is a black laptop with two floppies 640K memory it has no ram
no harddisk an LCD display a parallel, RGB and serial ports I believe it
has a 300Kbits modem, however I have no software or satisfactory OS
although I have one floppy with what I believe is part of dos 3.3 and 4
others which is part of an office suite package called SMART. What I
really need is some software which is designed to run with limited memory
>from floppies. Of course a manual would be ideal.
Thanks
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: 19 January 1999 12:21
Subject: Re: Sanyo 16LT
>At 09:30 PM 1/18/99 -0000, you wrote:
>>I have recently aquired the above notepad computer I wonder if anyone has
>any
>
>
> I used a Sanyo for years and used to keep up with their stuff but I've
>never heard of one. How old is it? Can you post a picture?
>
> Joe
>
>
>
Hi, I got this e-mail address off an Atari Portfolio web site. It didn't
really say much about Dinosaur SIG or what it is, but I thought I'd see if
this address was still valid and if you have any idea where to get memory
cards for an old Atari Portfolio.
Thanks,
Lonny
(619)651-0382
At 04:19 PM 1/18/99 -0800, Sam Ismail wrote:
>
>I guess I'm just an optimist, thinking that 100 years from now we'll be
>living in a society like in Star Trek: The Next Generation, where you just
>ask the computer a question and it (usually) has all the answers.
You mean, like a mailing list?
- John
Marvin <marvin(a)rain.org> said:
>Last night I was given (what I think is) another computer labeled Nicolet
>Model XF44. It has two 5 1/4" floppies on the front along with a few other
>controls/indicators labeled STORE, RECORD, RECALL, UNPROTECT, RECORD SEGMENT
>UP/DOWN, and AUTOCYCLE. The size is about 4" high, 17" wide, and probably
>20" deep. Anyone know what this is? Thanks.
Marvin,
This sounds a lot like one that I have, need two?
Any way, it seem to be diskette storage for a Nicolet
Model 4094 Digital Storage Oscilloscope.
It's listed here: http://www.naptech.com/catLAOS1.htm
=========================================
Doug Coward dcoward(a)pressstart.com
Senior Software Engineer http://www.best.com/~dcoward
Press Start Inc. http://www.pressstart.com
Sunnyvale,CA
Curator
Museum of Personal Computing Machinery
at http://www.best.com/~dcoward/museum
=========================================
Many people have experienced problems when replying to messages sent in HTML
as Outlook replies using the format of the original. I'm not sure if this is
the same for Outlook Express 5, but in version 4.72 go to the Tools menu and
select Options. The options menu should appear. Click on Send and, second
>from the bottom will be a tick box saying "Reply to message using format in
which they were sent." Deselect this and click APPLY. Now as long as you
have set all outgoing mails to be sent in text you will avoid flame wars
>from angry CC subscribers. :)
--
Gareth Knight
Amiga Interactive Guide | ICQ No. 24185856
http://welcome.to/aig | "Shine on your star"
I have recently aquired the above notepad computer I wonder if anyone has any details on the machine and where I might obtain software which will run off floppy etc.
Regards
Rob Gillibrand
>I've been going through some of my manuals, and in looking at the
>Macro-11 manuals it looks as if they're pretty much written with the
>intention of being used with any of the DEC OS's. Is Macro-11 pretty
>much the same across the various platforms or what?
>If so, what makes a program written in Macro-11 a RT-11 program instead
>of a RSX-11M program other, than the way that it is linked?
Let me answer the second question first, since it will be part of the
answer for the first question.
Each of the PDP-11 OSes have programmed requests/system calls/whatever,
which perform the operations for the user which are specific to that
OS.
A pure MACRO-11 program might have nothing in it which ties it to
a given OS.
But generally, programs are written for a specific OS, since you'll
probably want to do I/O or get certain info from the OS itself.
For example, RT-11 has programmed requests. These are EMTs which,
when executed, cause entry to the OS, which expects the arguments
for the function to be structured in a certain way and located in
certain places (for example the stack).
The various calls like .DATE, .READC, .MRKT, etc... are actually
macros which are defined in some sort of system macro definition
file, which is automatically included during the assembly process.
For RT-11, this is the file SYSMAC.SML, located on the system
volume, SY: In later releases of RT, there was also a much more
complete structure definition file, SYSTEM.MLB, which could be used
to reliably define structures used by RT-11.
RSX and RSTS have their own set of macros defined which expand into
code which ultimately execute and EMT, which is processed in a certain
way by those OSes.
Now, given that answer -- MACRO-11 is conditionalized in such a way that
it can be built to issue those calls appropriate for the system you are
building it for. MACRO-11 on RT-11 issues RT-11 programmed requests
to read from the source file and write to the object file. MACRO-11 on
RSX-11 issues RSX-11 system calls, etc...
The heart of MACRO is the same regardless of which system, but the
peripheral routines do what is appropriate for the given OS, and they
are governed by conditionals.
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
*Former MACRO-11 maintainer*
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
Now that Nathan Mates is no longer maintaining the Apple II FAQ, who is?
I just wanted to update the local copies of some of my FAQs.
Actually, doesn't MIT act as a master archive? Anyone have that URL?
Thanks!
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW7
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/pdp11/
<================ reply separator =================>
I've been going through some of my manuals, and in looking at the Macro-11
manuals it looks as if they're pretty much written with the intention of
being used with any of the DEC OS's. Is Macro-11 pretty much the same
across the various platforms or what?
If so, what makes a program written in Macro-11 a RT-11 program instead of
a RSX-11M program other, than the way that it is linked?
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
"Kirk Davis" <kbd(a)ndx.net> wrote:
>Hi all - I'm new to the mailing list and have just started
>collecting various pieces of retro computer paraphernalia. Had
>some fun today at the local salvage yard prying open a VAX 8800
>looking for interesting bits.
Hi... and "ouch"... prying one open?
>Did manage to get the console. Various people have told me that
>this is most likely a PRO350 or PRO380 (PDP!!!!). Looking inside it's
>got a RD52 and a set of floppies along with the associated controller
>cards and the main board. It appears to be in good shape - when I
>turn on the power, it goes though it's self test and appears to boot
>from the hard disk.
Do you see the 'DIGITAL' logo during the boot process? (Did you get
the monitor and keyboard?)
>1. What are my options are far as os'? I'm told that it most likely
>has a subset of RT11 on the drive. Is this my only option or is it
>possible to install other PDP11 based os' on this system?
If it is off a Vax system, it will probably have a special board in
it for use in controlling that system. You won't need it. It will
also probably be running P/OS, not RT11, although you can get an
RT-11 to run on it.
There is also Venix, a unix-look-similar... You can also run a
version of TSX+ on it (TSX is layered on RT-11, so you would need
RT-11 first).
>2. The back panel has a serial port and a monitor port (along with
>what appears to be a printer and AUI network port). There is no
>direct keyboard input that I can see. I connected a serial terminal
>to the system and tried various baud rates and parity selections
>(300-19200, 8-n-1 & 7-e,1) and have been unable to get the system to
>respond. I'd assume some sort of signon banner at boot but since this
>was a dedicated console for a vax it's limited to the output only on
>the other monitor port? Maybe someone can enlighten me....
You'll need a monitor and keyboard, attached to the appropriate
connectors. The AUI port is only usable if you have a DECNA
ethernet adapter card in the machine. The communications port has
modem control. The printer port can be used as a debug console (if
the cable has pins 9 and 20 connected) and then runs at (I think)
4800 baud. This port is at the standard console address for a pdp-11,
but it doesn't have the same interrupt structure.
But the monitor and keyboard are required, since that is the boot
console. Without them, you won't be able to run anything.
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
<I am just curious if anyone else is keeping semiconductor data sheets and
<data books from the early days? In checking though some stuff that was
<going to the recycler, I found a bunch of 70s and early 80s data sheets an
<put them into the car. Additionally, there were a bunch of the early 80s
<Intel data books that I will be looking at later.
Over the years I've kept a large number of databooks and sheets for parts I
used or related to. I still consider it a resource that I can pull out a
RCA transmitting tube manual or RCA transistor manual!
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Jay West <jlwest(a)tseinc.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: Honeywell Bull
>Again, I don't have Honeywell knowledge, but didn't they create a division
>called Honeywell Bull Information Systems, and rebadged multiple systems
>under that name?
>
>My only knowledge of this comes from my General Automation days. When their
>Motorola based line was loosing market share to the Unix crowd, they
>introduced a server called a Honeywell Bull (blue/green nameplate I think)?
Navy blue background, white "Bull", and a green tree, sort of like the one
on the newer Zenith Data Systems logo?
>That system I know for sure was an RS6000. Perhaps HBIS rebadged more than
>just the RS6000. Sounds like it anywho...
>
The AP-M sort of looks like a souped-up NEC APC III (a bit bigger, but same
basic case design).
///--->>>
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
At 04:18 PM 1/18/99 -0500, you wrote:
>> Don't discard it or destroy it -- they are probably not all that easy to
>> get, and I can imagine that one or more folks on this list might be
>> interested in it.
>
>Yes!
>
Then make an offer for it or else it gets chopped for the 8" floppy
drive and the nice box. I'm interested in HP & S100 stuff so I'll swap for
anything along those lines.
Joe
My brother-in-law has found a Visual Technology Commuter
"portable" at a local thrift. It's operational and runs
PC-DOS 3.10, for which its previous owner thoughtfully
included a boot diskette.
This machine has an LCD display, and two 1/2 height
black face 5.25" floppy drives and 512K of RAM. Despite
a diligent internet search, this is all we know.
Does anyone here have any fond memories and/or pointers
to more information on this machine?
Thanks!
Michael Passer
mwp(a)acm.org
I mentioned that it was a 286-10 -- that's what QAPlus says. No where on
the board can I find a 286 processor. It has an ISA bus, and runs a OEM'd
version of DOS 3.3. It also has a software-driven Turbo setting.
///--->>>
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason (the General) <roblwill(a)usaor.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: Honeywell Bull
>Maybe that's the mainframe that goes with a computer that I found! <g>
>Doubt it, though.
>
>I just got a Honeywell Bull AP/M from a flea market for $1.
>
>Anyone have any info on this thing? From what I can tell, it's a 286-10,
AT
>compatible, and has a 20MB HD ST-225 behind a translucent plate (sort of
>like an AT&T 6300, but gray) under the 1.2MB floppy. It also has a spot of
>a "full-height" 3.5" floppy (as high as a half-height 5" floppy).
>
>ThAnX,
>
>///--->>>
> -Jason Willgruber
> (roblwill(a)usaor.net)
> ICQ#: 1730318
><http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tom Owad <owad(a)caesarville.net>
>To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
><classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
>Date: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 1:04 PM
>Subject: Honeywell Bull
>
>
>>I have an opportunity to acquire a Honeywell Bull mainframe, free of
>>charge. I don't have many details on it, but I'm told the computer is
>>about 4x3x2 feet and supported 30 terminals. Any opinions on whether or
>>not this is a computer worth saving, and if it is worth the space it will
>>take up?
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>Tom Owad
>>
>
>
<< >> > But where can you find a drive that can read a sheep?
>>
>> You mean you've not come across baa-code readers :-) >>
you must be feeling sheepish after that one-liner!
Maybe that's the mainframe that goes with a computer that I found! <g>
Doubt it, though.
I just got a Honeywell Bull AP/M from a flea market for $1.
Anyone have any info on this thing? From what I can tell, it's a 286-10, AT
compatible, and has a 20MB HD ST-225 behind a translucent plate (sort of
like an AT&T 6300, but gray) under the 1.2MB floppy. It also has a spot of
a "full-height" 3.5" floppy (as high as a half-height 5" floppy).
ThAnX,
///--->>>
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Owad <owad(a)caesarville.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 1:04 PM
Subject: Honeywell Bull
>I have an opportunity to acquire a Honeywell Bull mainframe, free of
>charge. I don't have many details on it, but I'm told the computer is
>about 4x3x2 feet and supported 30 terminals. Any opinions on whether or
>not this is a computer worth saving, and if it is worth the space it will
>take up?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Tom Owad
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Adrien K. Verbrugghen" <adverb(a)halcyon.com>
Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp11
Subject: vt220
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 08:59:58 -0800
I have several vt220/kbd sets which I need to dispose of - anyone
want them?
Seattle area.
-A.
-- end of forwarded message --
Email Adrien directly please 8-)
BC
From: John Foust <jfoust(a)threedee.com>
>It looks like one of their founders or primary programmers
>is now at an embedded OS company as seen at
><http://www.gensw.com/PAGES/ABOUT/STEVEJ.HTM>.
Thanks John, I got some emailing to do...
- MIke: dogas(a)leading.net
Without going into a lot of extraneous detail.. I am on several
comittees and groups etc., involved in the restoration and
preservation of films, sound tracks, and video media.
All the high-techsolutions notwithstanding, one of the long-term
archival methods is still an optically-recorded signal on stablized
mylar or estar-based photographic film of some kind. With the
proper care in processing the film life is forcast to be in excess
of 500 years, and all that is required to 'read' it is a light
source and a photo-responsive device.. plus the algorithms to
recover the intelligence from the data stream. In the case of
purely analog info, an audio amp, speaker, (and knowing the
language) are the only recovery criteria. Data is a little more
complex, but hopefully in 2100 somebody will be able to translate.
Unless we've managed to reduce ourselves to cave-man status once again.
;}
Cheerz
John
On 18 Jan 1999 Eric Smith wrote:
>Note that there are three important considerations to long-term data storage:
>...
>2) A suitable mechanism for the data recovery has to exist, or be
> constructed. Sufficient technical specifications of the media format
> has to be preserved to allow the preservation or construction of the
> mechanism.
>...
>The second consideration may actually require the use of media that is not
>optimal for the first consideration. For instance, other forms of optical
>WORM discs might have better longevity than CDR, but the technical
>specifications are not as readily available.
Full description of the media is available, at least for several "standard"
types of WORM disk; see e.g. http://www.ecma.ch/
-- Mark
More information on the VAX 6000 at Bermans in California (408) 955-7908
This is a VAX 6000/330, sitting next to it is a TU81 Plus tape drive
mounted above an RA-82. All in the "low" grey/white DEC cabinets (two
cabinets total). Sitting on top of the TU81Plus are two boxes, one marked
VAXStation 4000 - 60 and one marked BA42A, the latter has a SCSI connector
so I presume it is the disk for the VAXstation. They are _not_ in this
week's auction so I don't know what happened there.
If you're interested call them, not me :-)
--Chuck
Can anyone help this guy?
A
-----Original Message-----
From: Reddzz(a)aol.com [mailto:Reddzz@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 1999 6:45 AM
To: adavie(a)mad.scientist.com
Subject: Dos 2.11
I have a Zenith Z120. Model ZWG-121-32. I, Not knowing what I had, loaded
dos
3.3. I did not make a backup copy of the original dos. I need dos 2.11 so
I
can boot up the system & get it up & running again. If you cannot help me
please respond as well so I can continue my search. If you know someone
that
could possibly help please forward this e-mail to them or get back with me.
Thanks for your help in advance.
Respectfully,
Jim Hill
>
>I went computer scrounging today and found a brief case style tool box
with some kind on IBM tester in it. I have so idea what it is but it has
an 8" floppy disk drive in it! I got the floppy disk too. It has a NICE
handset with a 4 line LED display and a full keyboard attached by a cable.
There's also a lot of strange looking connectors and adapters with it. The
main box has an "IPL" button and three connectors labeled "PIO", "S LOOP"
and "R LOOP". The quick reference chart only calls it a "MD". There's a
tag on it that says "TYPE 910x 002". Anyone know what it is and what it's
for?
>
> Joe
I powered up the THING today. It says it's a Stand Alone Terminal
Exorciser, PN 08309930, date 01/84. It passes the self test and brings up a
menu that lets you select 327X Tutorial, 327X BSC, SDLC/SNA or R-LOOP.
Selecting the R-LOOP option brings up another menu for 8775 Device or 3276
Device. That's as far as I can get in the menu, after that it asks for a CU
address or will autoscan for it but of course there's nothing connected so
it doesn't find what ever it's looking for. Does anyone know any more
about it?
Joe
>> Personally a VMS node suits my liking.
>>
>Mine too, but I haven't gotten all the parts for my VaxStation 3100 yet.
>
I have a few 3100-30's here for spares. What parts do you need?
Dan
>>The main difference is the power consumption. The CMOS version takes a
>>much lower supply current (even when selected).
>>
>>There may also be differences in the access time (but fast enough CMOS
>>EPROMs exist) and the programming algorithm (but that only matters to the
>>programmer).
>>
>>They are essentially pin/function compatible.
>
> Erm, correct me if I'm wrong ('cause I may very well be) but at least in
> comparison with 4xxx CMOS vs. 74xx TTL, not only do the require less
power
> to do their job, but they can also *provide* less power on their outputs
to
> other chips' inputs, right?
Hmm. You're comparing CMOS with TTL. The traditional EPROMs are not TTL
but NMOS - very similar components (at the transistor level) to CMOS, but
fewer different sorts available. NMOS uses enhancement mode FETS and
depletion mode FETS of N-channel polarity. CMOS uses enhancement mode FETS
of both sorts. In theory, depletion mode FETS could be fabricated by the
CMOS process, but I've never heard of it being done except perhaps for
NMOS-compatible outputs etc.
So I don't envisage a difficulty here. The newer designs of CMOS parts
should compensate for any inherent disadvantages with CMOS technology.
Philip.
On Jan 17, 19:01, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> Subject: Re: OT? On Programming (was: Re: Computers for children)
> Pete Turnbul wrote:
> ::I'd guess elm (which is what pine was originally based on) is smaller,
> ::sleeker, and simpler. Not a bad thing...
> My original choice of elm was basically because you got to pick from:
>
> * cat $MAIL
> * mailx
> * elm
cat?? You don't use dd? ;-)
> Hmm, let me think ... uh ... let's try elm.
Sounds like a reasonable choice :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
But, when you consider things, most people wouldn't have seen what we
consider a "hard drive" for probably 40-50 years, if not more. By that
time, computers will probably be the size of, if not smaller than a 1999
hard drive. The computer in the time capsule will probably seem like the
ENIAC does to those who are accustomed to today's compact desktops and
laptops.
I just thought of something else: Is a modern, voice-coil-driven (heads)
hard drive even alignable? The old drives with the stepper were, but they
usually operated on the principle of a floppy drive (in the way the heads
moved, at least). In a modern drive, if the heads would somehow "un-align",
all you would normally have done is get the data rescued, reformat the
drive, and put everything back on, or, what *most* (not necessarily people
on this list) people would do, is just get the data rescued (if their job,
or life, depended on what was on the drive), trash the mis-aligned drive,
buy a new one, and re-install everything.
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)ncal.verio.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, January 17, 1999 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: Disasters and Recovery
>
>We're talking 100 years here. Computers didn't even exist in 1899, and
>now you can wear one on a ring. I think aligning a 1999 hard drive, a
>physical item that is still very visible by the naked eye, will be among
>the more mundane tasks in 2099.
>
>Of course, the point is pretty much moot anyway.
>
>Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>Always being hassled by the man.
>
> Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 01/15/99]
>
>
Slightly related to the subject of reading CD's in 100 years:
On one of their recent space probes, NASA put a DVD (just the disk, in a
little pocket on the outside of the probe, possibly with a plaque of some
kind but probably no directions on reading).
I suspect DVD's are much more complex than CD's. I would trust a CD on a
space probe more than I would trust a DVD. The records on Voyager (both
Voyagers, I guess) -- which include styli and playing directions -- strike
me as a MUCH better idea.
-- Derek
>> I find this proposition very doubtful at best, although I don't have any
>> solid figures for EPROM data retention. You seem to be suggesting a
>> linear relationship between elapsed time and the number of bits that
remain
>> good. The actual curve is an inverse exponential (if memory serves).
>
> Wow! That would imply some sort of self-catalyzed reaction, and I'd be
> very interested in hearing how that works!
Eh? No it wouldn't. Never mind the mechanism, do a thought experiment.
Sorry Hans, I mean a Gedankenexperiment :-)
Assume you have a memory technology for which you expect half the bits to
get zapped in 20 years.
In another 20 years, half the bits will get zapped - but it won't be
selectively all the others. On average, expect half the remaining (intact)
bits to get zapped, and half the already zapped bits to get zapped. So
you're left with a quarter. And so on.
20 years is thus the half-life of an exponential decay.
Now with technologies like EPROM it's a bit more complicated, because the
zapping of bits is not a random (Poisson) process but depends on a decay of
charge within the device. But you get the idea (I hope).
Philip.
check this out:
http://www.anchordesk.com/a/adt0118nk/2997
Doesn't do much about $8500 commodore's, but
I could see it being an issue for collectors, especially
in light of the copyright article that I mentioned last night.
There are obvious issues about reselling last year's
copyrighted software, especially if you're not careful to
comply with the legal requirements (like you destroy all
of your copies if you transfer ownership). But what
about 15-20 year software? I guess legally the requirements
are the same depending on what the original licensing
contract agreement stated.
Jon
Anyone remember/use (read as: have a spare copy for...) of Wendin's OS
Toolkit. A pc release circa 88 that gave you some building blocks to roll
your own os?
Thanksly
- Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
I have a couple of internal memory expansion boards for the DEC
Pro-350. They have 128KB of memory (64Kbit chips). These work
in 350s and probably in 380s, too. You can desolder the 64Kbit
chips and put (sockets with) 256Kbit chips on them, solder in two
jumpers, and they become 512KB memory expansion boards (which work
for sure on the 380 and maybe on the 350).
(Note: This board does not plug into the expansion connectors,
but does plug directly in to the mother board.)
If you want one let me know. They're free, but if I get more
requests than I have boards, I'll give preference to anyone with
something to trade.
Dave
There was a very interesting article that appearred in the NY times last
week about publishing copyrighted materials on the web.
I thought it was apropos given the list members that have volunteered
to publish old manuals and such on their web sites. The focus of the
ariticle is not on technical specs but there are analogies even though
the issues are not identical. As we know sometimes technical materials
are not released under the guise of limiting the copyright holders liability.
Or releasing the documents somehow reduces a competitive advantage.
Or the fear that release somehow implies a warranty or guarantee of
support.
The article argues against a recent change to retroactively
extend the period of copyright. And is being brought by a
collaboration of folks many who publish previously copyrighted,
and now public domain material on the web.
It is recent news, but it affect documentation that clearly falls into
our area of interest.
I have not included it here because it is a little long. If anyone wants
to see it contact me and I'll forward you a copy in e-mail (I don't have
a site to post it on, anyone want to volunteer?).
Jon
At 07:57 PM 1/17/1999 -0800, you wrote:
>On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, Doug wrote:
>
>> > Paper will last longer than anything we've been discussing so far (save
>>
>> Where did you get that idea? Paper will disolve in just about any
>> solvent, including water, and is subject to tearing. Again, if we're
>> talking about preservation in controlled environments, a CD-ROM kicks
>> paper's butt.
>
>What are you talking about? The whole aversion to using CD's was the fact
>that they have a theoretical shelf life of only 50-100 years. Like I
>said, the Dead Sea scrolls lasted more than two millenia without much
>thought going into how to preserve them. And here you are talking about
>going thru the trouble of filling a chamber with inert gasses to promote
>preservation. Unless your line of thinking is to fill the chamber with
>water just to give paper a challenge.
>
>Paper has passed the test of time. You can go into antique book shops and
>find volumes hundreds of years old that are still very readable and very
>intact.
>
>CDs, on the other hand, have only been with us a couple decades.
>
>> What makes some of today's technology fragile is simply the density, or
>> equivalenty, the lack of redundancy in a given area. A plain old EPROM
>> should be fine for 100 years if you include 100 copies of the information
>> within it.
>
>100 copies on what? 100 other EPROMs? On CD? Or encoded on paper?
>
>Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>Always being hassled by the man.
>
> Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 01/15/99]
>
>
I still have people trying (without much success) to get video transferred
off their 1970 vintage 1/2 inch reels.
On the other hand I have several Edison cylinders from the early 1900's
that are still playable, although not exactly "hi-fi".
Cheers
Charlie Fox
Charlie Fox
Charles E. Fox
Chas E. Fox Video Productions
793 Argyle Rd. Windsor N8Y 3J8 Ont. Canada
email foxvideo(a)wincom.net Homepage http://www.wincom.net/foxvideo
At 04:18 PM 1/17/1999 -0800, you wrote:
>On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, Tony Duell wrote:
>
>>
>
>How about we start sending all our precious data into space via radio
>waves towards some big celestial body (like one of Jupiter's moons) so
>that in X years it will bounce back and we can then retrieve it
>(hopefully intact thanks to some keen error correction protocol). Of
>course you'd have to send it on such a trajectory that both the
>transmission and bounced data stream are not obscured by some other object
>(like that pesky moon!)
>
>Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>Always being hassled by the man.
>
> Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 01/15/99]
>
>
The picture that comes to mind is all this data heading out into space to
be recovered by some advanced alien intellegence at a far galaxy, who then
have a look at Windows and decide Earth is populated by a very uncivilized
race and forthwith declare war.
(Think I could sell this as a pilot for a program to replace the X-Files?)
Cheers
Charlie Fox
Charles E. Fox
Chas E. Fox Video Productions
793 Argyle Rd. Windsor N8Y 3J8 Ont. Canada
email foxvideo(a)wincom.net Homepage http://www.wincom.net/foxvideo
At 07:15 PM 1/15/99 +1, you wrote:
>> > BTW: Are there some people collecting merchandise/advertizeing
>> > gimicks of the computer age ?
[...]
>Well, not exactly what I asked (but glad about every saved flyer).
>My question was more about all the other stuff - T-Shirts, umbrellas,
>tie needls, watches, keyholder, cups, .....
Well... There are advertising collectibles, and I'm sure they go after
computer stuff too (the ones that go for newer stuff.)
My brother (the ElderPutz) collects such things (one of his hobbies is
going to conventions/trade shows to get all the freebies) and after I got
into the business decided he wanted to be too (not being good at anything
else either) so he fancies himself a techie and thus has a lot of high-tech
ad stuff. He's now a tech writer and has finally been able to hold down a
job for more than 18months. Anyway, if you want to, you can contact the
jerk at <psinasohn(a)siebel.com>.
(If it sounds like I don't like him, a big part of the reason is that he's
decided that Oakland is too far away from San Francisco for him to visit
his dad. For referenec, The VCF in Santa Clara is three times as far away
>from SF. Can't even be bothered to call. (And those that were at VCF got
a chance to meet my dad -- not the most spry fellow, but a nice guy.))
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)ncal.verio.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, January 17, 1999 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: Disasters and Recovery
>On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, Doug wrote:
>
>> > Paper will last longer than anything we've been discussing so far (save
>>
>> Where did you get that idea? Paper will disolve in just about any
>> solvent, including water, and is subject to tearing. Again, if we're
>> talking about preservation in controlled environments, a CD-ROM kicks
>> paper's butt.
>
>What are you talking about? The whole aversion to using CD's was the fact
>that they have a theoretical shelf life of only 50-100 years. Like I
>said, the Dead Sea scrolls lasted more than two millenia without much
>thought going into how to preserve them. And here you are talking about
>going thru the trouble of filling a chamber with inert gasses to promote
>preservation. Unless your line of thinking is to fill the chamber with
>water just to give paper a challenge.
>
But - The dead sea scrolls were on parchment, not paper, weren't they?
>Paper has passed the test of time. You can go into antique book shops and
>find volumes hundreds of years old that are still very readable and very
>intact.
>
>CDs, on the other hand, have only been with us a couple decades.
>
>> What makes some of today's technology fragile is simply the density, or
>> equivalenty, the lack of redundancy in a given area. A plain old EPROM
>> should be fine for 100 years if you include 100 copies of the information
>> within it.
>
>100 copies on what? 100 other EPROMs? On CD? Or encoded on paper?
>
Or was that 100 copies of the same information in the single EPROM?
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
>I dont know RT-11 (yet.) and am looking forward to the experience. But
>before that happens the seller wants to purge some sensitive employee
>files on the system. Can someone tell me how to tell him to 1) move
>through the directory structure, and 2) how to delete specific files (
>some that span partitions 0 - du4 according to him ), and...
On RT-11, as with many OSes, deletion of a file simply updates the
directory in some way to indicate that the file is deleted. In some OSes,
it might mean removal of the directory entry which pointed to the data on
disk (or the list of pointers to retrieve the info). In some, it may be
to mark the directory entry as a deleted file.
In the case of RT-11, it marks the disk space taken up by the file to be
'free'. But until another file is written over that data, it remains,
and can be retrieved.
What they can do, however, is to delete all those files which they don't
want anyone to have access to, and then to 'SQUEEZE' the disk volume.
The squeeze process is similar to what Windoze does when it defragments
a disk volume, only RT-11 files are not fragmented - they exist as
contiguous files. But the files are all moved to the beginning of the
disk (low block numbers) with all the free space consolidated to the
end of the disk (higher block numbers). This will result in at least
those deleted files which existed between others being overwritten
with files being moved. The only problem might be a deleted file at
the end of the volume (or if the quantity of deleted files are sufficient
that the moved files don't adequately cover the deleted ones). It
should be possible to write a very short program which will determine
the last block used on the (squeezed) volume, and to write null blocks
to all disk blocks from there to the end of the volume.
Finally, RT-11 files cannot span RT-11 disk partitions. An RT-11
file can only exist in the partition in which it is defined. It is
possible, however, for a user application to make use of the system
library routines which allow full access to an MSCP disk -- in which
case doing the squeeze won't help.
What you may want to suggest to him is to
1) Delete all sensitive files from all disk partitions
2) Squeeze all disk partitions.
3) backup all disk partitions (on a file, not device, basis)
4) FORMAT all disk partitions (RT-11 Format doesn't really
do a low-level format except for specific devices, and
MSCP disks are not one that it will do -- with the
exception of RX33 diskettes)
5) Restore the backed-up files to all partitions.
6) Release the hardware to you... :-)
>Where can I find a good source of RT-11 info?
Not counting the documentation which can be purchased for it...
right here is a good place... :-)
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
I have hard back copy of VAX-11 Assembly Language Programming written by
Sara Baase and published by Prentice Hall. If anyone wants it, E-mail me
directly.
Joe
On Jan 16, 10:42, George Rachor wrote:
> Subject: Apricot F10
> Spotted a curious find last night...
>
> It was labeled Apricot F10.
>
> It was narrow and had a minidisk slot in the front. In the back it had
> what looked like a rca jack (Video?), a parallel port (Centronics) a nine
> pin(serial) and something like a DB25.
>
> I suspect this is an expansion unit for the apricot line as I saw no
> obvious keyboard port unless it was the DB-25...
I don't think it's an expansion unit; I'm pretty sure it's a complete
computer, except that it's not complete in this case :-) It sounds very
like an F1, so perhaps the connections are similar.
On the back of an F1, there's a 25-pin D serial port, a 9-pin D colour
monitor connector, an RCA jack mono (composite video) monitor socket,
centronics parallel port on the bottom, and a pair of power connectors
higher up. The main power socket is an IEC style, and there's a 12V power
input for use with an Apricot mono monitor as well. The keyboard
connection on an F1 is by an infrared link. There's an IR sensor on the
front, and a fibre optic connector as well, for situations where the
sensor picks up too much interference.
Perhaps the F10 also has an unusual keyboard connection on the front?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Possibly. I still don't like to endorse a company that built a computer
that the display exploded in my face (sort of - it shattered and started
leaking LCD juice everywhere-during use). It was new. The model line only
lasted about 6 months.
The best bet would probably include a computer in a tower case, with a
flat-panel display, eliminating the hazards of the pressure in a CRT.
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Russ Blakeman <rhblake(a)bigfoot.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, January 17, 1999 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Disasters and Recovery
>While gateways, Dells, GRiDs and others would be good, I have a 4 yr old
Toshi
>that's never needed more than a battery and it's seen some rough use. It
may be
>that you've gotten a blemish or a used one that was treated badly before
you got
>it.
>
Just a though:
Build a computer with 2 CD-ROMs, a hard disk, and a floppy (and whatever
else you decide to throw in there - maybe even a DVD). Configure one of the
CD-ROMS as the primary master, and the HD as the primary slave. Write the
OS/boot files to a CD/R disk, and have it boot of the CD-ROM (provided that
the CD-ROM drive will still spin up. And surely, a CD-ROM drive would be
much easier to repair than hard disk, and no alignment would be necessary,
thus eliminating another problem.
Another solution may be to deep-freeze the whole mess, and put it into
"suspended animation". I'm not sure how it would work with magnetic media
or bearings / lubricants, but it does wonders with rubber. My grandmother
had a rubber band from 1956 (around that time) in her freezer holding a
cover on a fruitcake (no joke). Last year she finally decided to trash the
fruitcake. She let it thaw (to keep the container), and when the rubber
band had defrosted, it was as pliable and stretchy as if it had been brand
new (to a point).
Of course, you would need to leave specific instructions on how to defrost
the system, leaving it in a climate-controlled room, slowly raising the
temperature degree-by degree, as to not have any disasters, such as the CRT
imploding from sudden temp changes. Better yet, throw in a flat-panel LCD
display. Near the end of 1999, they should be a bit more affordable.
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
On Jan 17, 8:12, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> Subject: Re: OT? On Programming (was: Re: Computers for children)
> ::> I'd hate to hear what you have to say about Elm, which is my
favourite
> ::> mailer. :-)
> ::
> ::Mine too. But it badly needs to be updated to support metamail and
mime
> ::message creation from within elm and support stuff like pgp.
>
> Actually, it does. PL25 ME39 (which comes in the Debian dist, ask me for
the
> tarball) supports in-process attachments and PGP. And PL25, which is
> commonly available, supports MIME through metamail.
I've had almost zero exposure to elm, so I'm not in much of a position to
comment -- not that that always stops me :-)
I'd guess elm (which is what pine was originally based on) is smaller,
sleeker, and simpler. Not a bad thing...
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
If you want something to last 100 years, DONT't leave a Toshiba. I've got
one, and it won't even last one year without breaking. I've had it for
three years, and it's been in the repair shop 10 times, all because of
product defects.
The best would probably be one of the new Gateway laptops (can't remember
the model). It also has a magnesium housing.
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
Ya know - the people at GRiD seem to have had a good idea about the
magnesium casing...It just didn't catch on quick enough.
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug <doug(a)blinkenlights.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, January 17, 1999 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: Disasters and Recovery
>On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, Chuck McManis wrote:
>
>> One of the reasons I want to have a completely spec'd Pentium class
>> computer is to create an archive that will survive a reasonable amount of
>> time (100 years in a time capsule).
>
>Don't leave them a clunky desktop box, leave them something like a sleek
>Toshiba Portege 3010 (3lb notebook in magnesium case) along with a solar
>cell so they can fire the thing up when they pull it out of the capsule.
>
>Remove all batteries, of course.
>
>-- Doug
>
>
Hi,
----------
> From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: thoughts on UNIX and older systems
> Date: Sunday, January 17, 1999 9:18 AM
>
> Sure, they're not going
> to be secure enough for defense work,
Most systems aren't. Not "only" the ones stated before.
cheers,
emu
At 04:57 PM 1/16/99 +0000, Tony wrote:
>[H19]
>
>> Yes, I found the manual and there is both an encoder AND a ROM. Seems sort
>> of redundant, can only guess why. Many years ago the encoder chip died in
>> mine, and I first tried the generic version of the chip, most likely a GI
>
>Ouch... Something to watch for if mine ever dies...
Or the generic replacement was bad, and the Heath one was good, also the generic
part? The 2 bad parts are long gone, so I cannot retest them.
>
>> part. It didn't work, ended up ordering a replacement from Heathkit which
>> did work.
>
>Didn't work at all, or gave you the wrong characters? If the latter, then
>maybe reprogramming the ROM would sort it out.
The first (original) had no strobe output, so appeared dead. The generic one
I don't remember now, but even so, had no provision to program EPROM's then.
Later a built a single board Z-80 computer that could copy, edit (HEX) and
program 2716's, 2732's and 2764's. It used the H19 as its terminal.
Am trying to remember what I used to program its monitor EPROM..."you need
to program a EPROM with routines to get your EPROM programmer to run..." I
think I found someone with a Cromemco system that could.
-Dave
> From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Subject: Re: victor 9000 (also called Sirius) (fwd)
> >
> > Here's someone in Belgium wanting to get rid of a Victor 9000. It was an
> > early 80's 8086-based machine that came out before the PC but eventually
> > was PC-compatible. It was actually a much better machine than the PC and
> > had many interesting innovations, but we all know the story.
>
> Strange machine. It's what you get if you take the CPU from a PC (8088),
> add Mac-style variable-speed drives (but 5.25") with a Commodore-like
> controller, and then stick on an Apricot-like video system.
Keep in mind this was one of Chuck Peddle's creations (along with the 6502 and
Commodore PET).
>
> Interesting features include the sound system (a synchronous serial chip
> driving a CODEC chip) which also has a sound input connector, the 2 3-bit
> DACs to control monitor brightness and contrast in software, the user
> port (a complete 6522 less one pin wired to a 50 pin header inside), the
> centronics printer port that can be turned into a GPIB port in software,
> the drives/controller, etc.
>
Sounds cool, maybe one day I'll get one. :)
OT HELP REQUEST:
I've got a Quantum XP34300 hard drive that is giving me grief.
It is getting power, it spins up, but it is not being recognized by the
SCSI adaptor. I've switched it to a different system with a different
adaptor and the same thing happens.
On the system its connected to now with a BusLogic adaptor, I switched on
the Send Start option and it kicked the drive into operation, but only
once. And when the OS loaded (I'm just running DOS) the drives in the
drive table showed up as F: and G: but when I accessed F: there were no
files (there should be a ton) and when I tried to access G: the computer
froze. After that, the drive stopped responding altogether again.
Since I have two of these drives my next thought is to swap the logic
board on the good one with the flaky one as I really need the data off the
flaky one.
Any ideas?
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Always being hassled by the man.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 01/15/99]
On Saturday, January 16, 1999 3:29 PM, Chuck McManis [SMTP:cmcmanis@freegate.com] wrote:
> At 06:36 AM 1/16/99 -0500, you wrote:
> >ObCC: Around 1980 or so, I knew somebody with a license plate that said
> >"Unix: Live Free or Die". Was this issued by Bell Labs? And who has one
> >they'd like to sell?
>
> The New Hampshire vanity plate (state motto "Live Free or Die") UNIX was
> registered to Bill Shannon who worked at Sun (still does actually). Some
> vendor did some fake plates for one of the Uniforum conferences but I don't
> know if Bill got any royalties :-)
I think the vendor that issued these fake plates was DEC.
Bob
On Jan 17, 5:10, Ward Donald Griffiths III wrote:
> I've tried editing my pinerc repeatedly, it always seems to be reset
> the next time I log in.
One of the features of pine is that there can be several configuration
files, including a system-wide one that contains settings which a user can
override in ~/.pinerc, and a separate system-wide one which ~/.pinerc
*won't* override. The intent is that a sysadmin can set defaults in the
first (usually /usr/local/lib/pine.conf), and set fixed values in the
second (usually /usr/local/lib/pine.conf.fixed) -- the sorts of things that
users shouldn't meddle with, like the name of the server, the mail domain,
the operating-dir (which restricts the part of the file structure users can
access) or whether they're allowed to forge cancel messages. It sounds
like your ISP has a somewhat overzealous sysadmin; perhaps they just copied
every setting into pine.conf.fixed.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
> Well, my parents were told by the local school _not_ to teach me to read,
> or to handle numbers as 'you won't do it the right way'. Fortunately they
> ignored this (it was too late anyway - I was already reading), and taught
> me the good old-fashioned way. Guess what? I never had any problems
> learning things, unlike some kids....
AAAAugh! You had a narrow escape. The arrogance of educators talking
about "the right way" to teach a child, when theories as to what this is
seem to change every three years, is amazing. I recall in 1975 (I think -
I was only about 8 at the time) we knew a retired teacher who sometimes did
supply work for a local school. She was given a remedial class to look
after, and started teaching them by traditional methods. Result, in a few
weeks they were ahead of the main class. Our retired friend quite
reasonably asked why the school couldn't adopt such methods as a matter of
course, and apparently they were "not allowed to". She could get away with
it since she was retired and not a permanent employee, or something.
I heard a story similar to yours from a friend (Tony - did you ever meet
ACAW1?) at university (last heard of doing a PhD in the history of German).
He told me that it is a commonly held belief in Germany that there is no
point in teaching a child to read until it is 6 years old - the age of
starting school in Germany - since children younger than that lack the
necessary development (unspecified). Apparently his German friends were
always amazed to discover that his parents, wanting him out of mischief at
age {nearly 4}, and unable to get him a school place until {nearly 5},
taught him to read. Any comments from our Geman readers? How prevalent is
this myth?
Two shorter comments to finish.
I too have heard that playing music to very small children (age <2) helps
them develop intelligence. The music has to be of the sort that takes some
thought to listen to, of course. Mozart, Beethoven etc. are good choices,
as are some of the better-thought-out pop styles, but minimal music or
thud-thud-thud pop music are probably not. (Sorry, as a mainly classical
listener, I don't know the correct terms for the pop music styles)
And finally a saying attributed to the Jesuit order: Give us a child till
he's 6 years old and we have him for life.
Philip.
I know this is OT but it's too good to miss!
Joe
>
>They have finally been released! For anyone not familiar with the Darwin
>Award: it's an annual honor given to the person who provided the universal
>human gene pool the biggest service by getting killed in the most
>extraordinarily stupid way. As always, competition this year has been keen
>again. Some candidates appear to have trained their whole lives for this
>event!
>
>1998 DARWIN AWARD CANDIDATES:
> 1. In September in Detroit, a 41-year-old man got stuck and drowned in
>two feet of water after squeezing head first through an 18-inch-wide sewer
>grate to retrieve his car keys.
> 2. In October, a 49-year-old San Francisco stockbroker, who "totally
>zoned when he ran," according to his wife, accidentally jogged off a
>200-foot-high cliff on his daily run.
> 3. Buxton, NC: A man died on a beach when an 8-foot-deep hole he had
>dug into the sand caved in as he sat inside it. Beachgoers said Daniel
>Jones, 21, dug the hole for fun, or protection from the wind, and had been
>sitting in a beach chair at the bottom Thursday afternoon when it collapsed,
>burying him beneath 5 feet of sand. People on the beach on the outer banks,
>used their hands and shovels, trying to claw their way to Jones, a resident
>of Woodbridge, VA, but could not reach him. It took rescue workers using
>heavy equipment almost an hour to free him while about 200 people looked on.
>Jones was pronounced dead at a hospital.
> 4. In February, Santiago Alvarado, 24, was killed in Lompoc, CA, as he
>fell face-first through the ceiling of a bicycle shop he was burglarizing.
>Death was caused when the long flashlight he had placed in his mouth (to
>keep his hands free) rammed into the base of his skull as he hit the floor.
> 5. According to police in Dahlonega, GA, ROTC cadet Nick Berrena, 20,
>was stabbed to death in January by fellow cadet Jeffrey Hoffman, 23, who was
>trying to prove that a knife could not penetrate the flakvest Berrena was
>wearing.
> 6. Sylvester Briddell, Jr., 26, was killed in February in Selbyville,
>DE, as he won a bet with friends who said he would not put a revolver loaded
>with four bullets into his mouth and pull the trigger.
> 7. In February, according to police in Windsor, Ontario, Daniel Kolta,
>27, and Randy Taylor, 33, died in a head-on collision, thus earning a tie in
>the game of chicken they were playing with their snowmobiles.
> 8. In September, a 7-year-old boy fell off a 100-foot-high bluff near
>Ozark, AR, after he lost his grip swinging on a cross that marked the spot
>where another person had fallen to his death in 1990.
>
>1998 DARWIN AWARD HONORABLE MENTIONS:
> 1. In Guthrie, OK, in October, Jason Heck tried to kill a millipede
>with a shot from his 22-caliber rifle, but the bullet ricocheted off a rock
>near the hole and hit pal Antonio Martinez in the head, fracturing his
>skull.
> 2. In Elyria, OH, in October, Martyn Eskins, attempting to clean out
>cobwebs in his basement, declined to use a broom in favor of a propane torch
>and caused a fire that burned the first and second floors of his house.
> 3. Paul Stiller, 47, was hospitalized in Andover Township, NJ, in
>September, and his wife Bonnie was also injured, by a quarter-stick of
>dynamite that blew up in their car. While driving around at 2 AM, the bored
>couple lit the dynamite and tried to toss it out the window to see what
>would happen, but they apparently failed to notice that the window was
>closed.
> 4. Taking "Amateur Night" Too Far: In Betulia, Colombia, an annual
>festival in November includes five days of amateur bullfighting. This year
>no bull was killed, but dozens of matadors were injured including one gored
>in the head and one Bobbittized. Said one participant, "It's just one bull
>against [a town of] a thousand morons."
>
>SOME MORE ALSO RANS:
> 1. Four people were injured in a string of related bizarre accidents.
>Sherry Moeller was admitted with a head wound caused by flying masonry, Tim
>Vegas was diagnosed with a mild case of whiplash and contusions on his
>chest, arms and face, Bryan Corcoran suffered torn gum tissue, and Pamela
>Klesick's first two fingers of her right hand had been bitten off. Moeller
>had just dropped her husband off for his first day of work and, in addition
>to a good-bye kiss, she flashed her breasts at him. "I'm still not sure why
>I did it," she said later "I was really close to the car, so I didn't think
>anyone would see. Besides, it couldn't have been for more than two
>seconds." However, cab driver Vegas did see and lost control of his cab,
>running over the curb and into the corner of the Johnson Medical Building.
>Inside, Klesick, a dental technician,was cleaning Corcoran's teeth. The
>crash of the cab against the building made her jump, tearing Corcoran's gums
>with a cleaning pick. In shock, he bit down, severing two fingers from
>Klesick's hand. Moeller's wound was caused by a falling piece of the
>medical building.
> 2. Taos, NM: A woman went to a poison control center after eating
>three birth-control vaginal inserts. Her English was so bad she had to draw
>a picture describing how she believed she had poisoned herself. A translator
>arrived shortly thereafter and confirmed the doctors' suspicions. Marie
>Valishnokov thought the inserts were some kind of candy or gum, being unable
>to read the foil wrappers. After the third one, she realized something was
>wrong when her throat and mouth began to fill with a sour-tasting foam. She
>ran for the Poison Control Center, only a few blocks away where doctors were
>able to flush the foam from her mouth, throat and stomach with no ill
>effects.
> 3. La Grange, GA: Attorney Antonio Mendoza was released from a trauma
>center after having a cell phone removed from his rectum. "My dog drags the
>thing all over the house," he said later. "He must have dragged it into the
>shower. I slipped on the tile, tripped against the dog and sat down right
>on the thing." The extraction took more than three hours due to the fact
>that the cover to Mr. Mendoza's phone had opened during insertion. "He was
>a real trooper during the entire episode," said Dr. Dennis Crobe. "Tony
>just cracked jokes and really seemed to be enjoying himself. Three times
>during the extraction his phone rang and each time, he made jokes about it
>that just had us rolling on the floor. By the time we finished, we really
>did expect to find an answering machine in there."
> 4. Tacoma, WA: Kerry Bingham, had been drinking with several friends
>when one of them said they knew a person who had bungee-jumped from the
>Tacoma Narrows Bridge in the middle of traffic. The conversation grew more
>heated and at least 10 men trooped along the walkway of the bridge at 4:30
>am. Upon arrival at the midpoint of the bridge they discovered that no one
>had brought the bungee rope. Bingham, who had continued drinking,
>volunteered and pointed out that a coil of lineman's cable lay nearby. One
>end of the cable was secured around Bingham's leg and the other end was tied
>to the bridge. His fall lasted 40 feet before the cable tightened and tore
>his foot off at the ankle. Miraculously, he survived his fall into the icy
>river water and was rescued by two nearby fishermen. "All I can say," said
>Bingham, "is that God was watching out for me on that night. There's just
>no other explanation for it." Bingham's foot was never located.
> 5. Bremerton, WA: Christopher Coulter and his wife, Emily, were
>engaging in bondage games when Christopher suggested spreading peanut butter
>on his genitals and letting Rudy, their Irish Setter, lick them clean.
>Sadly, Rudy lost control and began tearing at Christopher's penis and
>testicles. Rudy refused to obey commands and a panicked Emily threw a
>half-gallon bottle of perfume at the dog. The bottle broke, covering the
>dog and Christopher with perfume. Startled, Rudy leaped back, tearing away
>the penis. While trying to get her unconscious husband in the car to take
>him to the hospital, Emily fell twice, injuring her wrist and ankle.
>Christopher's penis was in a styrofoam ice cooler. "Chris is just plain
>lucky," said the surgeon who spent eight hours reattaching the penis.
>"Believe it or not, the perfume turned out to be very fortuitous. The high
>alcohol content, which must have been excruciatingly painful, helped
>sterilize the wound. Also, aside from it being removed, the damage caused
>by the dog's teeth to the penis per se is minimal. It's really a very
>stringy piece of flesh. Mr. Coulter stands an excellent chance of regaining
>the use of his limb because of this." Washington Animal Control has no plans
>to seize Rudy.
>
>AND THE WINNER:
>Paderborn, Germany: Overzealous zookeeper, Friedrich Riesfeldt, fed his
>constipated elephant, Stefan, 22 doses of animal laxative and more than a
>bushel of berries, figs and prunes before the plugged-up pachyderm finally
>let fly and suffocated the keeper under 200 pounds of poop! Investigators
>say ill-fated Friedrich, 46, was attempting to give the ailing elephant an
>olive-oil enema when the relieved beast unloaded on him like a dump truck
>full of mud. "The sheer force of the elephant's unexpected defecation
>knocked Mr. Riesfeldt to the ground, where he struck his head on a rock and
>lay unconscious as the elephant continued to evacuate his bowels on top of
>him," said flabbergasted Paderborn police detective Erik Dern. "With no one
>there to help him, he lay under all that dung for at least an hour before a
>watchman came along, and during that time he suffocated. It seems to be
>just one of those freak accidents that happen."
>
>
<None. I haven't seen an NT box up for months at a time without
<a reboot due to something trivial like a network change that can be done
<with a Unix box without a reboot.
Well I have. Current up time for the three NT 3.51 servers I live with
at work is over 6months. We do however have things like memory leaks from
Cold Fusion's OBDC driver that forces the running of a batch job every night
to shut that down and restart the one peice. Often the OS gets blamed for
cranky apps.
<> We're switching to Linux at work only because there's more software
<> available, and we have more knowledge available for Linux than BSD.
<
<Sounds reasonable... I've been using FreeBSD with 6+ months
<uptime on web servers (only rebooted because of equipment moves in the lab)
This thread is interesting to me (though OT for Classiccmp) as I plan to
introduce a FreeBSD(or linux, slakware, redhat or debian) and not haveing
much unix expereince it's an interest to me.
Personally a VMS node suits my liking.
Allison
<> > FreeBSD = Cathedral development
<> > Linux = Bazaar development
<> >
<> > Read "The Cathedral and the Bazaar" by Eric Raymond to understand what
<> > mean.
Organized with scheduled releases and maintainers vs ad hoc team with
frequent builds. is this what were talking about?
Also Freebsd is linked to the BSD school of thought VS other more radical
factions. From the playing I've done the differences are insignificant
and either works assuming it supports the hardware. What's more significant
is that linux has Attracted third party vendors producing products that run
in that environment.
<The analogy was only intended to indicate that DOS survived and CP/M
<basically did not.
To a point that is true but CP/M really didn't die. It mutated and DOS
was the result. Also while dos was developing we had MPM, DRdos and CCP/M
to name a few. To date DOS As far as I know does not have the CCPM
multitasking. If there is an analogy CPM supported more different
platforms than DOS.
Allison
On Jan 15, 18:00, Max Eskin wrote:
> Besides for this example, what do you feel is wrong with PINE? What do
you
> prefer? I would like to know since I'm an inexperienced Linux user, and
> this is on-topic since PINE is over 10 years old.
Mostly that it has a very broken idea of how to handle dates; it insists on
parsing the date in the "From" line in order to validate it, and gets upset
if it can't. When things go wrong, it has a habit of believing that two
messages are in fact one (the one with the unparsable date being
concatenated to the preceeding one).
I also fail to see why pine, alone amongst the dozens(?) of mail programs
around, has to have a control message at the top of a mailbox: a message
which confuses anyone who subsequently uses another mailer; which gets
moved to a different place if another mailer re-sorts the mailbox (making
the control message useless to pine, which inserts another copy and
actually displays the old one); and which typically gets removed by any
POP3 server that accesses the mailbox for a remote user (so pine has to
replace it again).
It has a crazy insistence on having certain terminal capabilities in order
to work... and refuses to run if they are not detected, despite the fact
that it actually contains code to get round many of the things it claims to
need (such as clear-to-end-of-line). There are also some bugs to do with
clearing lines on terminals with a minimal set of capabilities -- notably
when going backwards and forwards from the setup and addressbook menus.
It's possible to get pine into a state where the display is unusable until
you quit, reset the display (usually scrolling a screenful is enough,
though) and restarting.
It doesn't let you add headers other than a small set of pre-defined ones,
which are sometimes necessary -- though beginners might not need to do
that.
IMNSHO, a mail program and a news program are two different things -- and
pine's news capabilities are pretty poor.
And, of course, it's BIG. Compare the size of a pine executable to the
size of other MUAs on the same platform.
It *does* have some nice features -- but for me, both as a user and a
sysadmin, they're far outweighed by the shortcomings.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
<This is definitely off-topic (who was that said I was single-minded?) but
<for a fine example of bletcherousness, try the source to the pine mailer
<(here also known as pain, or Pain In Neck Email). Find the 70K source fil
that proves any tool is a hammer. I've written good code using BASIC but
for the most part the early BASICs were weak in string and file handling
so they were not the first choice for a lot of things. Also the early
BASICs didn't have local variables and recursive routines were a PITA
as a result. Add to that most were interpreted (slow) so fast IO was out
of the question. I forced me to go to PASCAL (via UCSD p-SYSTEM) and that
was a real eye opener as I started looking at the PASCAL code and writing
assembler to look like that. C was interesting as it was efficient for
machine level things but I still find it criptic. Along the way there was
also algol, PL/M(PL/i) and some stabs at FOCAL. Forth(and PostScript) was
amoung the stack languages and I like them for some things. There were the
hybrid basic C-basic, E-basic and S-basic, they offered some fo the features
of Pcascal and C in the familiar Basic form. But when I'm working with 8085
or Z80s assembler just usually happens.
Allison
All this noise about the younger OSes (Linux, FreeBSD)
got me thinking. I vaccilate between amused and annoyed
over the bickering between the Linux and FreeBSD contingents.
That kind of thing is part of the reason Windoze owns as
much of the matket as it does. I realize nobody could
predict the way it would take off, but when MS first started
to own the desktop, the *users* of UNIX should have started
cooperating. But instead, they went along with the vendor
factions, and Windoze won.
Yeah, I know, it was somewhat inevitable. But I don't think
it would have been quite as bad as it is. So learn from
history. Feel free to argue in private, but in public, I'd
push the overall UNIX-like OS, with just a recommendation.
Of course, it's a good feeling to even have the option.
Because 10 - 12 years ago, what were your UNIX options, if
you weren't the government or a university?
1) You could buy expensive hardware that ran a UNIX variant.
2) You bought a workstation from Sun or Apollo - still not cheap.
3) If you were lucky, you got one of the few Cromemcos or
Perkin-Elmer desktops, that ran UNIX. But they weren't
much less expensive than the Sun, Apollo, etc workstations.
(Fortune's desktops were in the workstation price range.)
4) If you were really lucky, you found a good deal on a used
PDP from someone with a UNIX license who forgot to wipe the
disks or tapes - but then you were illegal.
5) You bought Minix. Minix was cheap, and you got source, but
it was really meant to be a teaching tool. It was well done,
but extremely limited. (Nevertheless, Tanenbaum's _Operating
Systems Design and Implementation_ is still an excellent book.)
6) If you were *really* lucky, you got a good deal on a working
workstation.
Just out of curiosity, does anyone have a Perkin-Elmer desktop
running Linux? IIRC, it was pretty much a straight port of
whatever was current from bell Labs at the time - or maybe an
older version.
-Miles
Well, I remember the teacher telling me that he found the computer in his
basement, and just brought it to the school to show the kids how the
computers used to be when you had to program them, and you didn't just stick
in a disk and turn it on. Apparently, I was the only one (well, there was
one other person) that was interested in it.
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, January 16, 1999 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone have an extra IBM 5155 laying around??
>Right... That makes sense....
>
>I still wonder if a cheap clone floppy controller or drive (whichever was
>needed) wouldn't have been cheaper/easier than putting a 5150 board in
>there. I assume that 5150 came out of a PC, so why didn't he use the
>controller or drive from that machine. A full-height drive kludged on
>externally would have worked and been a lot nicer than a cassette-based
>machine.
>
>Of course fixing the original parts probably wouldn't have been too hard
>either, but then a lot of people seem to be frightened by a simple
>schematic...
>
>-tony
>
>
Hi!
Want to sell one of the Convertibles? It doesn't matter that there's no
power supply, or even if it works or not. I collect old laptops, and the
Convertible is one of the ones that I don't have.
ThAnX,
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Marvin <marvin(a)rain.org>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, January 16, 1999 2:03 PM
Subject: Todays Finds
>I got a call on the radio from another ham checking out garage sales, and
he
>told me about a Unix machine. When I went over, the machine turned out to
>be an IBM RT with docs and disks! There was also a Compucorp 675 that I
was
>told was a dedicated word processor (no docs.) The guy wanted $15 for the
>RT and was giving away the Compucorp so I gave him $20 *after* I told him I
>have so many machines I don't usually buy them, and we had a nice talk. He
>will see if there are any docs for it and he will be talking to others that
>have been in the business since the late '70s and early '80s. Went to the
>club station where I was given a Mac IIvx (OT? as I have no idea what era
it
>is from.) Another guy had just visited the local scrap yard and gave me 3
>IBM Convertibles w/ no power supplies. All in all, not a bad day!
>
>Anyone know anything about the Compucorp 675?
>
At 06:23 PM 1/15/99 -0500, you wrote:
>> Texas Instruments Compact Computer 40. This is a lot like the TRS-80
>> PC-4 in appearance, but a bit bigger. It has BASIC in ROM and a
>> connector for cartridges. Is there anything actually useful for this?
>> THe keyboards too small to do any actual word processing.
>
>I have one of these too. TI supposedly made a thermal printer, an RS-232
>interace, and a 70KB tape drive, which would plug in to the six-pin BERG
>connector on the back, next to the power jack. I use it as a programmable
>scientific calculator.
>
The thermal printer and RS-232 interface were both produced, but not in
large numbers. They're hard to find. A few pieces of cartidge software (or
as TI liked to call it, "Solid State Software") were produced, AFAIK, but
also not in large numbers. I've never seen any in six years of looking.
The tape drive, called a "Wafertape" drive, was pretty much vapourware.
There were a few prototype units sold, but it was never in full production,
because TI couldn't get the bugs worked out. The box for my CC-40 has a
sticker attached that says "Tape drive not available". The lack of
secondary storage pretty much doomed the CC-40 as a computer; it never
caught on.
I think there was an article in the book "The Best of 99'er Magazine" on
how to build a cable to connect a CC-40 to a TI-99/4A. I also used mine as
a programmable calculator.
Cheers.
Mark.
>
>
Oops...
That last message wasn't supposed to be posted to the list.
Sorry...
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
Well, I think the only card that was in it was the video card (HD and floppy
controllers had been removed). The first slot (closest to the side of the
case) on the XT and PC motherboards do match up. I think for the cassette
port, he just drilled a hole in the case, or cut something. I'm not too
sure how he did it, because it's been 5 years since I've seen it.
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, January 16, 1999 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone have an extra IBM 5155 laying around??
>
>Ouch... That takes a lot of metal-bashing to (a) make a hole for the
>cassette connector) and (b) get the 5 slots on the PC motherboard to
>attempt to line up with suitable holes in the case. No thanks... It would
>have been a lot less work to fix that floppy....
>
>-tony
>
>
<> 5) You bought Minix. Minix was cheap, and you got source, but
<> it was really meant to be a teaching tool. It was well done,
<> but extremely limited. (Nevertheless, Tanenbaum's _Operating
<> Systems Design and Implementation_ is still an excellent book.)
<
<Minix 1.3 was very limited. V1.5 was better.
2.0 is better still and MINIX-vmd is supposed to be hot.
I finally picked up the book/cd at Boarders for $53.
Allison
> I don't know where you heard that but its nonsense.
>
> FreeBSD = Cathedral development
> Linux = Bazaar development
>
> Read "The Cathedral and the Bazaar" by Eric Raymond to understand what I
> mean.
Oh, so you're saying that Linux will defeat FreeBSD solely because of its
possibly superior development model. So, where does the DOS\CP/M comparison
come from?
Does anyone want/need OS2 2.00.1 ? I have quite a few sets of these I set
aside in a box many years ago.
Also, if anyone needs any of the stuff that came with the IBM Valuepoint 33Mhz
DX systems (user guides, etc) I have plenty of sets of those too. Most
of this stuff is still in shrinkwrap.
-Lawrence LeMay
lemay(a)cs.umn.edu
My teacher had replaced the XT motherboard with a 5150 board when the HD and
floppies quit, so that ROM BASIC could be used with the cassette port.
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, January 16, 1999 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: Anyone have an extra IBM 5155 laying around??
>> I'm not necessarily concerned about originally, just as long as the
monitor,
>> P/S, and keyboard work, and it's in fairly good condition ( I have a
bunch
>> of parts). I'm basically looking for it for sentimental value, since a
5155
>> was the first IBM-compatible computer that I used. It was in the
elementary
>> school that I went to, and neither the floppies or HD worked, so all it
ran
>> was ROM BASIC, and saved the programs on cassette. Since I had an old
>
>This bothers me. The 5155 (I have one, although not up for grabs) uses an
>XT motherboard, and AFAIK it never had a cassette port. Yes, there was
>ROM basic, but no way to save from it. The only way you could have used a
>cassette would be if somebody had designed an expansion card that grabbed
>INT15 (I think) and implemented the cassette port. If that card ever
>existed, then I want one!
>
>There never was an official IBM hard disk, but plenty of people put a
>short-length controller card in the machine together with a half-height
>hard drive.
>
>-tony
>
>
Here's someone in Belgium wanting to get rid of a Victor 9000. It was an
early 80's 8086-based machine that came out before the PC but eventually
was PC-compatible. It was actually a much better machine than the PC and
had many interesting innovations, but we all know the story.
Please respond to the owner directly.
Reply-to: phonelinks(a)skynet.be
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:03:26 +0100
From: Fabrizio Franzi' <phonelinks(a)skynet.be>
Subject: victor 9000 (also called Sirius)
Hello, I wonder if anyone would anybody have an interest in a "new" Victor
9000. 256KRAM, 2 double-speed 1.2 MB 5 1/4" FDs, monochrome screen,
qwerty keyboard. Used to run cp/m 86 and ms-dos 2.0. I'm in Belgium
(Brussels)
--
kind regards
Fabrizio Franzì
---------------------------------------------
e-mail: phonelinks(a)skynet.be
voice: +32 2 347 2566
gsm: +32 75 474775
fax: +32 2 372 2258 or +32 2 347 2471
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)verio.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Always being hassled by the man.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details
[Last web site update: 01/15/99]
And this one too:
pdp 11/34
Monday, 02-Nov-98 15:45:05
Message:
193.74.7.181 writes:
I have a complete pdp11/34 with removable hardddisks puncher reader
deckpack rk05f rk05j
deckpack 28 .attention its a very old one buth he is complete.it's
in belgium
david_evi(a)hotmail.com
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Always being hassled by the man.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 01/15/99]
Found this on a web-site:
Radio Shack TRS80 model 12 brand new, sealed box
Tuesday, 03-Nov-98 09:06:02
Message:
205.188.193.39 writes:
Brand new, in un-opened sealed box,
Radio Shack TRS80 Model 12 microcomputer
for sale, also used ones available.
E-mail or call to 773-935-7080 ext. 205
Attn: Darius Augustine
Darius Augustine Tel: 773-935-7080 ext. 205
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Always being hassled by the man.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 01/15/99]
At 11:37 PM 1/14/99 -0800, you wrote:
>I've never seen a "BY" modifier although I wouldn't doubt that some BASIC
>could have been designed with it. But are you sure you didn't mean
>"STEP"?
Okay, so I've been doing COBOL too long... 8^) Yes, in BASIC it's STEP.
Same idea as COBOL's BY option. (In COBOL it would be PERFORM VARYING
variable BY inc FROM start UNTIL variable IS GREATER THAN end (I think --
it's not a common usage of the Perform verb.))
>and while loops (I rarely use for's), but C really suffers from a lack of
>a general error trapping mechanism that one can invoke to break out of
>loops as required. Sometimes I think goto's are the answer but I can
>never find an appropriate way to implement it.
errflag := 0 /* is it := in C to assign a value? */
DO WHILE variable < end AND errflag = 0 {
do stuff
variable++ /* I think that increments a variable */
IF error THEN
errflag := 1
ENDIF
LOOP
IF errflag = 1 THEN
do error processing
ENDIF
No, I'm not a C programmer (nor do I play one on TV).
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
On Jan 16, 8:22, Ward Donald Griffiths III wrote:
> Subject: Re: Merced - and the ol' Unix story (was Re: OT, but info
needed
> Doug wrote:
>
> > ObCC: Around 1980 or so, I knew somebody with a license plate that said
> > "Unix: Live Free or Die". Was this issued by Bell Labs? And who has
one
> > they'd like to sell?
>
> That was DEC, when they were first plugging Ultrix.
DEC may have done so, but they originally came from Armando Stettner, one
of the early Unix developers, at one of the unix conferences. I don't
think Ultrix goes quite as far back as 1980?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Jan 15, 20:37, jpero(a)cgocable.net wrote:
> Subject: Re: Commodore 1541 on ebay for $8500.00
> Date sent: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 17:35:25 -0800
> Send reply to: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
> From: "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh(a)aracnet.com>
> To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: Commodore 1541 on ebay for $8500.00
>
> > Hey, that's impressive. By default my e-mail program which can handle
this
> > garbage displayed a blank screen. Simply put people, _PLEASE_ use
plain
> > text. I'm quoting the garbage so you can see the garbage you're
sending.
> > 34 lines of crap for 1 line of message, that's MicroSlop for you.
> >
> > Zane
>
> Now I don't waste on this and they get killed on sight unread.
>
> Jason D.
That's exactly what I do, and I suspect that many other readers do the
same. It's not even good HTML -- with all those font and colour
requirements that many systems couldn't honour. Like Zane, I use a mail
reader that can handle MIME, but it often fails on the bad HTML and/or
screwy MIME-types that some messages contain.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>Erm, are you speaking mailer as in mail *client* or mail *server*. If mail
>client, there should be a setting that states "Never send HTML."
Mailer client. A pre-pre-release version of Outlook Express 5.
There is such a setting, but it gets ignored (apparently) when replying to
an HTML message.
Feel free to keep beating this dead horse. I'm sure everyone else on this
list cares. A lot.
- Joe
Hi!
Does anyone have, or know where I can get an IBM 5155 Portable computer?
I'm not necessarily concerned about originally, just as long as the monitor,
P/S, and keyboard work, and it's in fairly good condition ( I have a bunch
of parts). I'm basically looking for it for sentimental value, since a 5155
was the first IBM-compatible computer that I used. It was in the elementary
school that I went to, and neither the floppies or HD worked, so all it ran
was ROM BASIC, and saved the programs on cassette. Since I had an old
TRS-80, I was fairly familiar with BASIC, and wrote approx. a whole
cassette-full of programs on the thing during study halls, free periods,
etc.
When I was talking to my teacher over the summer, the subject of the 5155
came up, and I ended up asking him if he would find out if the school would
want to sell it. Well, the next year, I asked the teacher about it, and he
said that the school told him that I could have it. The only problem was
that over the summer, it had been "lost". Big surprise when they never
found it.
Anyway... If anyone has one that they'd like to sell/trade, please email me.
I have various XT parts, a 386 full-AT motherboard (upgrade for the 5170
M/B), and an old desktop case.
ThAnX,
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
At 06:54 PM 1/15/99 +0000, Tony wrote:
>> 3 other bits. Much easier to "fix" than the MOS encoder chip, if that chip
>> was programmed for a custom matrix, such as the Heath H19 terminal.
>
>I have the H19 schematics here (well, actually the Z90 schematics, but
>AFAIK the 'terminal' part of that computer is a H19), and I'm suprised
>that the encoder is custom. There's a ROM between the data outputs of the
>keyboard encoder and the data lines of the terminal processor. I would
>have thought that would have handled the translation for the custom matrix.
>
>If they did use a custom version of the encoder chip, then what on earth
>is that ROM doing there?
>
Yes, I found the manual and there is both an encoder AND a ROM. Seems sort
of redundant, can only guess why. Many years ago the encoder chip died in
mine, and I first tried the generic version of the chip, most likely a GI
part. It didn't work, ended up ordering a replacement from Heathkit which
did work.
Also found that leaving the hinged case cracked open helped with the
cooling, the metal flange/heatsink on the pc board gets quite hot.
Never upgraded mine to a computer- Z89 or such. Thought at the time there
was a neat graphics add on for it as well.
-Dave