I found a few minutes of free time and snapped a few shots of the Card
Reader I got on Sunday with my digital camera. I've got the start of a web
page up for it at the following URL:
http://zane.brouhaha.com/healyzh/C302.html
Beware the five pic's are 640x480 or smaller, so take a while to load.
Also it will probably take a few seconds for the connection to wake up.
Apparently my DSL line 'dozes' when not being used.
I still don't know anything about it other than it's a 'Peripheral
Dynamics' Model C302 Card Reader made in May of '72. The picture at the
bottom of the page shows the empty slot that I would suspect is used to
interface it with a computer.
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
Today I got VAXServer 4000-200 with another tower unit labeled R215F, both
for $10. I told the server does not work anyone know what else I need to
power this unit up ? I have no manuals, kb or anything else for it. Thanks
John I'm not sure of it's age as per the 10 year rule.
I was recently told that DEC sold an RSX-11M emulator that run as a process
on VMS for people who had old RSX code they wanted to run. Is this true?
And if so is it part of the hobbiest license?
--Chuck
I charged up the Epson HX-20 that I bought on Sunday, and it doesn't
seem to like me. The screen flickers out after a minute or so of use.
This seems to indicate a bad battery, but this hypothesis does not
appear to be borne out by lab tests.
Therefore, a lab report:
PURPOSE:
To determine if the battery pack from subject computer is
defective.
APPARATUS:
Battery pack in question (4xsubC, 4.8V)
Fluke 73-III handheld multimeter
Hewlett-Packard 6060B DC electronic load
Miscellaneous cables
47-ohm and 100-ohm resistors
PROCEDURE:
1. Measure open-circuit voltage of battery. Reading is 5.16
VDC.
2. Wire battery directly to load. Power on. Display reads
5.14 VDC, 0.03 A. Load is set as follows:
Range 6.0000 A
Input Off (htf do you turn it on?)
Short On (same)
Tran Off
Freq 1000
Slew .50000
Duty cycle 50.0
Mode Current
3. Dial in current at assorted amperages. Results:
Current Actual
requested (A) current (A) Voltage (VDC)
0.000 0.03 5.14
0.100 0.11 5.09
0.150 0.16 5.08
0.200 0.21 5.06
0.250 0.26 5.04
0.500 0.52 4.98
1.000 1.00 4.98
0.000 0.01 5.09
4. Try some resistance values.
Resistance (O) Current (A) Voltage (VDC)
5000 -0.01 5.11
1000 -0.01 5.11
500 -0.01 5.11
100 0.03 5.11
50 0.08 5.09
25 0.18 5.04
10 0.48 4.98
5 0.97 4.89
5. Connect a resistor across the battery terminals, and measure
the current.
Resistor: 100 ohms (spec)
102.3 ohms (measured)
Current: 47.3 mA
Resistor: 47 ohms (spec)
46.3 ohms (measured)
Current: 98.0 mA
CONCLUSION:
This battery pack doesn't look too defective, although I really
don't know too much about what the characteristics of a
functioning pack are.
Could someone who knows these things tell me if this pack is indeed
okay, as these tests seem to indicate, or if it is indeed bad?
--
Brad Ackerman N1MNB "...faced with the men and women who bring home
bsa3(a)cornell.edu the pork, voters almost always re-elect them."
http://skaro.pair.com/ -- _The Economist_, 31 Oct 1998
<#1 Jobs and Wozniak were actually working at Atari when they designed the
<Apple 1 (and was the resource for most of the parts they used), in fact, i
<was the revenues from Jobs' project Breakout that financed the trip to
That must have been later after HP!
<#2 IBM came to Microsoft looking for an operating system for the IBM PC,
<not the other way around. Microsoft originally sent IBM to Gary Kildall
<(developer of CP/M) who refused to meet with them. IBM returned to Gates
<who, in turn, bought the OS from Kildall himself for $50K and then license
<it back to IBM. These facts were totally inaccurate in the film.
Way off.
First Kildall didn't take the IBM meeting seriously and his wife working
with layers could net get to agreement on nodisclosure that IBM wanted.
Gary didn't refuse to meet with IBM, they "dropped in" and it was not
convenient.
Second Gates bought Qdos (a lofing of CPM1.3, that was copyright infringed)
>from Seattle Computer for $50k and granted a unlimited license back to them.
He would later reneg on the deal. The copyright problem would result in
the rapid design by virgins and issue of the buggy MSDOS/PCDOS V2.
<#3 Bill's hair was never that blonde.
In 1978 when I met him at PCC78 it was light but very dirty blonde!
Allison
Aren't those 6520's just weak-kneed versions of the 6821? I haven't ever
had cause to use a 6520 and I though it was more or less the same in an
identical pinout as the 6821 (maybe the 6521).
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Dwight Elvey <elvey(a)hal.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, June 23, 1999 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: Quest ELF was Top 150 .....
>Philip.Belben(a)pgen.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ethan Dicks wrote:
>>
>> > Now, my junk box is *much* deeper. I could probably assemble an entire
>> > PET PCB and Amiga PCB, just from spares. Thankfully, I don't have to.
>>
>>
>> You mean you actually have spare 6520 chips? How many can you send me
and how
>> much do you want? I have at least one dead one in one of my PETS.
>>
>> Philip.
>
>Hi Philip
> You can buy 6520A's from Jameco. Part number 43246 at $3.75us for
>1-9 and $2.95us for 10+ ( 2.95 was a sale price and may have gone up
>some). You can even deal through the net ( www.jameco.com ).
>Take care
>Dwight
>
>PS
> Of course you could always give me your PET.
>I would give it a good home ;)
>
On Jun 23, 12:22, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> --- Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > What is the (practical) difference between a 6520 and a 6821? They look
> > to be very similar devices IIRC.
>
> I do not know. I do, however, have an abundance of 6821 chips.
As far as I know, there is no practical difference. They are supposed to
be equivalents.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Jun 23, 14:53, Philip.Belben(a)pgen.com wrote:
> Ethan Dicks wrote:
>
> > Now, my junk box is *much* deeper. I could probably assemble an entire
> > PET PCB and Amiga PCB, just from spares. Thankfully, I don't have to.
> You mean you actually have spare 6520 chips? How many can you send me
and how
> much do you want? I have at least one dead one in one of my PETS.
They're not hard to get: Rockwell still make 6520s (or at least, suppliers
here still list them), and Hitachi and SGS-Thomson make 6821s, which are
exact replacements (the 68A21 is slighlty faster at 1.5MHz and the 68B21 is
2MHz, but that won't matter). You can get them from Farnell in the UK.
We always used to replace the 6520s with 6820s or 6821s if they failed, as
the 682x seemed to be more robust.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Hi. A while back I was talking with Rodger on the list about the
(appearant) abundance of GridPad 1910's that he was selling.... did th
message t osend money float by me, or are we all still in waiting? And
come to think of it, I haven't seen any messages from Rodger recently...
thanks
Tim
On Jun 23, 20:30, Lawrence LeMay wrote:
> Subject: card edge connectors
> I'm looking to buy several card edge connectors, preferrably with solder
> ends. I'm not exactly sure of the size of the connector though.
>
> Its a 10x2 connector, and the width of each connector&space appears to
> be a tiny bit more than 1.5 times the same measurements from a IBM XT
> expansion card. IE, putting the edge connectors together, 3 connectors
and
> gap spaces on a XT board are almost the same as 2 connectors and gap
> spaces on the connector I need to purchase.
>
> Any ideas of the proper name for what i'm looking for is, and maybe a
> source that I could obtain these from, will be appreciated. I'm
rebuilding
> 20+ year old Terak keyboards, and this will help complete the project.
Sounds like a connector with a 0.156" pitch, which is a standard pitch made
by several companies. Any reasonable electronic supplier should have them.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
I'm looking to buy several card edge connectors, preferrably with solder
ends. I'm not exactly sure of the size of the connector though.
Its a 10x2 connector, and the width of each connector&space appears to
be a tiny bit more than 1.5 times the same measurements from a IBM XT
expansion card. IE, putting the edge connectors together, 3 connectors and
gap spaces on a XT board are almost the same as 2 connectors and gap
spaces on the connector I need to purchase.
Any ideas of the proper name for what i'm looking for is, and maybe a
source that I could obtain these from, will be appreciated. I'm rebuilding
20+ year old Terak keyboards, and this will help complete the project.
-Lawrence LeMay
lemay(a)cs.umn.edu
Ethan Dicks wrote:
> Now, my junk box is *much* deeper. I could probably assemble an entire
> PET PCB and Amiga PCB, just from spares. Thankfully, I don't have to.
You mean you actually have spare 6520 chips? How many can you send me and how
much do you want? I have at least one dead one in one of my PETS.
Philip.
>>>>> "Tony" == Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk> writes:
Tony> I have a daybreak. To confirm it's the same machine, it's a
Tony> brown tower case with 5 card slots on the back. From the
Tony> left (looking at the back), they are :
Tony> Memory/video Spare (memory expansion?) Mesa Processor Board
Tony> I/O Processor Board Spare (Optional I/O)
Tony> To the right of those there's a fold-down door with the PSU
Tony> and hard disk behind it. The floppy drive (and tape streamer
Tony> on my machine) are separate boxes that stack on top of the
Tony> main tower.
I have all slots full, I cannot confirm the order right now,
but it seems right to me. In my unit, the PSU e ontop the harddisk,
and there are three fans on the bottom of the case, that slide just
like a rack (I guess it's even numbered after all the other boards),
after a couple of screws have been removed.
Tony> I also have a monitor - a big (Samtron?) monochrome
Tony> thing. What I don't have is the keyboard or mouse. The
Tony> keyboard plugs into the 5 pin DIN socket on the monitor
Tony> base, the mouse, I believe, plugs into the keyboard.
Hum, one of the boards of my unit, the one with the floppy
interface, ethernet, and serial ports, has a DB9 conector labeled
keyboard. But I found a couple of extra lines in the DB15 monitor
connector besides video and sync signals...
Tony> I am told that hardwre documentation and especially
Tony> schematics for this machine are impossible to obtain. When I
Tony> have time, I'll attack my machine with a logic analyser and
Tony> try to figure out something about it. But that won't happen
Tony> soon, I'm afraid.
Thanks for the info anyway.
Cheers,
--
*** Rodrigo Martins de Matos Ventura <yoda(a)isr.ist.utl.pt>
*** Teaching Assistant and MSc. Student at ISR:
*** Instituto de Sistemas e Robotica, Polo de Lisboa
*** Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa, Portugal
*** PGP Public Key available on my homepage:
*** http://www.isr.ist.utl.pt/~yoda
*** Key fingerprint = 0C 0A 25 58 46 CF 14 99 CF 9C AF 9E 10 02 BB 2A
>I'm looking to buy several card edge connectors, preferrably with solder
>ends. I'm not exactly sure of the size of the connector though.
>
>Its a 10x2 connector, and the width of each connector&space appears to
>be a tiny bit more than 1.5 times the same measurements from a IBM XT
>expansion card. IE, putting the edge connectors together, 3 connectors and
>gap spaces on a XT board are almost the same as 2 connectors and gap
>spaces on the connector I need to purchase.
Common pitches for card edge connectors are 0.1", 0.125", 0.156", and
0.24". The ISA-bus connector is 0.1" pitch, so I'm willing to bet you
want a 0.156" pitch card edge connector.
>Any ideas of the proper name for what i'm looking for is, and maybe a
>source that I could obtain these from, will be appreciated. I'm rebuilding
>20+ year old Terak keyboards, and this will help complete the project.
You're lucky that you're in the same state with one of the best
distributors for card edge connectors, Digikey. Go to http://www.digikey.com/
and you'll find that EDAC and Sullins make edge connectors like what
you want, with your choice of solder tail or solder eyelet terminations.
For your use, it sounds like you want to put wires on the edge connectors,
so I'm guessing that you want the solder eyelet termination, in which case
you want EDAC 305-020-520-202, Digikey EDC307200-ND, which will cost
you exactly $1.98.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
If you compare the pin spacing with that of the classic 44-pin edge
connector, you may find it's the same, based on what you wrote. I'd guess
it's 0.15625" spacing. There are really only three typical spacings from
the old days: 5/32", 1/8", and 1/10".
The S-100 used 1/8" while the ISA Bus connectors used 0.100. The old
KIM-Bus was 5/32".
Is that the info you needed?
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence LeMay <lemay(a)cs.umn.edu>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, June 23, 1999 2:36 PM
Subject: card edge connectors
>I'm looking to buy several card edge connectors, preferrably with solder
>ends. I'm not exactly sure of the size of the connector though.
>
>Its a 10x2 connector, and the width of each connector&space appears to
>be a tiny bit more than 1.5 times the same measurements from a IBM XT
>expansion card. IE, putting the edge connectors together, 3 connectors and
>gap spaces on a XT board are almost the same as 2 connectors and gap
>spaces on the connector I need to purchase.
>
>Any ideas of the proper name for what i'm looking for is, and maybe a
>source that I could obtain these from, will be appreciated. I'm rebuilding
>20+ year old Terak keyboards, and this will help complete the project.
>
>-Lawrence LeMay
> lemay(a)cs.umn.edu
--- Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> What is the (practical) difference between a 6520 and a 6821? They look
> to be very similar devices IIRC.
I do not know. I do, however, have an abundance of 6821 chips.
-ethan
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
<I can grab a big Compro (model:?) computer that the junk guys says is a
<S100 computer. it includes two 8" drives.
What model? They had at least 4 or 5.
<Anyone know anything about this box?
Generic question generic answer.... Yes!
Allison
> Ah yes. Active use of Rax's theory in computing collecting. I have multiple
> instances of empirical proof of it's validity. Wonder what I would need to draw
> an Apple 1 to me.
>
CASH!
Steve Robertson - <steverob(a)hotoffice.com>
In a message dated 6/22/99 1:06:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk writes:
>
> > Anyone know of a company/person who fixes/refurbishes/aligns floppy
drives?
>
> > I need some old floppies worked on.
>
Try
ABC Drives 818-885-7157
ITS 800-342-Disk they also do 8" floppies and Pertec
I can find more if these don't help.
Paxton
Perhaps not a true acid test, but one that reassures me as to its veracity.
I loaded FOCAL-8 tonight from tape via the '33s reader, then typed in one
of the example programs from the programming in Focal pamphlet that found
the intersection of two functions and then "plotted" them using ASCII
graphics. It all worked as expected so I'm officially declaring this setup
revived. I also found a kind soul on the greenkeys list who will re-ink
ASR-33 ribbons so I will have something of a supply of those. All in all I
am quite pleased and it should make for a _much_ better VCF display running
Focal than it did last year just running the memory test!
--Chuck
<http://www.play.com/news/062199-2.html>
Paul was one of the founders of the First Amiga User Group in the
mid-80s in San Jose. He soon became part of NewTek, makers of the
prescient DigiView video digitizer for the Amiga, and the video
manipulation device the Video Toaster.
Paul left NewTek with several other employees to form Play several
years ago, who made the Snappy video digitizer for PCs, and the
Trinity video effects device.
- John
>What DEC module would be the Q-Bus controller for a TS05 (9-track) tape
>drive? I just aquired a drive and I'd like to give it a spin.
For Q-bus:
M7196 TSV05 Q TSV05 controller for Q/Q22 bus
For Unibus:
M7455 TSU05 U TSU05 controller
Since the TS05 interface is just a minor variation on Pertec Formatted,
*most* generic Pertec formatted formatters (i.e. Dilog DQ132, Emulex
QT13, etc.) will work.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
--- Philip.Belben(a)pgen.com wrote:
>
>
> Ethan Dicks wrote:
> You mean you actually have spare 6520 chips? How many can you send me and
> how much do you want? I have at least one dead one in one of my PETS.
I will have to look. I bought a former Commodore dealer when they went
bankrupt in 1992. I do have a tacklebox full of PET parts. I have no
idea what a 6520 is worth these days. They used to sell for between $5
and $10 when I had to replace one in the old days.
-ethan
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This is not really on topic, since I failed to find any classic computers,
but...
I just got pointed towards qxl.com, "Europe's biggest on-line auction".
It was (a) very short of stuff for sale; (b) expensive; (c) devoid of anything I
might have considered buying.
Has anyone on this list _ever_ bought _anything_ useful and/or at a sensible
price from QXL?
Or had I better just look at the US on-line auctions and pay the transatlantic
shipping?
Philip.
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.
Power Technology Centre, Ratcliffe-on-Soar,
Nottingham, NG11 0EE, UK
Tel: +44 (0)115 936 2000
http://www.powertech.co.uk
**********************************************************************
--- Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com> wrote:
After I wrote:
> >I just bought the bare [Quest Elf] board.
>
> It was available as a kit but rarely did I ever buy the kit if I could get
> the bare board. I had (and still have) a very deep junk box.
In high school, I had enough of a junk box to build most of the Elf with
scrounged parts (I did screw up and stick in some 4001's instead of the
4011's the first time I assembled the Elf. It didn't work so well ;-)
Now, my junk box is *much* deeper. I could probably assemble an entire
PET PCB and Amiga PCB, just from spares. Thankfully, I don't have to.
-ethan
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
That was the traffic signal control system they wrote software for before
they got the MITS contract. They mumble its name briefly in the dialogue.
"TrafficNet" or something, I forget.
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: LordTyran [mailto:a2k@one.net]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 1999 5:18 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: WTF?
I'm watching Pirates of Silicon Valley on TNT right now (yes, I'm so lame
I have my computer in front of the television) and Bill Gates is working
on a box... the dialogue infers that it is supposed to by an Altair,
but it's just a big box with four blinking lights (alternates - 2 red,
2 green) and reading paper tape.... next scene he's working on a PDP-8/?
(I I think, but I'm not up on my PDPs... not so much working on it as
having the machine open on his table... no soldering iron, manuals,
cards... I could have made the scene a lot better with the stuff in my
basement...)
Oh well.
Kevin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
"It's you isn't it? THE BASTARD OPERATOR FROM HELL!"
"In the flesh, on the phone and in your account..."
-- BOFH #3
<I don't doubt that it was possible to build quite a good computer from the
<board selection that the CompuPro line had, at one time or another. I
<bought about ten combinations they recommended, however, and not a one of
Try this,
STD Compupro s100 crate.
CPU-Z Z80
Ram17
MPX-1
DISK1
DISK3
InterfacerII
Runs killer, no repairs needed depite the boards last being powered in '92.
<Once there was a standard, I don't believe that any other single
I could never figure it out. If anything after working with Multibus,
Qbus and Omnibus s100 was pure anarchy though somewhat tolerent of bizzare
variations.
<manufacturer did more to undermine the standard than CompuPro. Their board
<were not all claimed "compliant" to the standard and even those about whic
<that claim was made often had little footnotes disclaiming certain things
<and indicting where they felt their board didn't comply precisely. Since
<that set a model for others, even if they didn't originate the practice,
Based on the manuals I have (fairly complete) and expereince they were
pushing IEE696 and no question their interpretation was somewhat off.
Then again my NS*, Computime and CCS systems don't come close either.
IEEE spec was pretty late in the game and was influenced more by the
intel cpu timings (8085 and 8086 series).
<non-compliant boards were proliferated throughout the S-100 world, spreadin
<non-interoperability throughout. This lead people to throw up their hands
It was already there, that was what IEE696 was supposed to fix long after
the barn emptied and burned. Like none of the Teltek (or Konan) cards
work in NS* crates due to some lines being grounded and the expectation of
address mirroring on IO.
<at the prospect of continuing to use S-100 systems in favor of the
<relatively risk-free SBC's which were becoming VERY popular, e.g. Ferguson
<Big Board, Ampro, et. al. and offered CP/M standard media compatibility at
<the disk level and all the basic features built-in.
That part I can't agree with more. S100 interoperability was at best
terrible and generally systems integration was a true challenge. My
Ampro and SB180 systems are compact, fast and worked (and still do) as
advertized! Bus based systems are flexible, but without well established
standards it can be tough to make them work with third party boards.
My qbus and multibus experience also shows with a good solid specification
it's still possible to produce a third party board that is marginal.
<The IEEE Std.696 board scheme couldn't survive if it wasn't sincerely
<implemented.
True.. it required lot of stuff including timing specs that most Z80s
didn't meet. It's worst fault was the adption was near the end of the
S100s life span when there were already a flooded market of non conforming
boards. While I was a user and adopted it S100 was a terrible bus!
Allison
I don't doubt that it was possible to build quite a good computer from the
board selection that the CompuPro line had, at one time or another. I
bought about ten combinations they recommended, however, and not a one of
them worked, so I sent them back. I still have a couple of their
motherboards in various cardcages. I will say one thing against the
CompuPro line, though, and I doubt it can be denied.
Once there was a standard, I don't believe that any other single
manufacturer did more to undermine the standard than CompuPro. Their boards
were not all claimed "compliant" to the standard and even those about which
that claim was made often had little footnotes disclaiming certain things
and indicting where they felt their board didn't comply precisely. Since
that set a model for others, even if they didn't originate the practice,
because they were at the bottom of the price scale, their non-standard and
non-compliant boards were proliferated throughout the S-100 world, spreading
non-interoperability throughout. This lead people to throw up their hands
at the prospect of continuing to use S-100 systems in favor of the
relatively risk-free SBC's which were becoming VERY popular, e.g. Ferguson
Big Board, Ampro, et. al. and offered CP/M standard media compatibility at
the disk level and all the basic features built-in.
The IEEE Std.696 board scheme couldn't survive if it wasn't sincerely
implemented.
(now I'll get off my soapbox . . .)
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: Compro, S100 & 8" drives
><That's a risky proposition. CompuPro produced some of the best but much o
><the worst S-100 hardware ever made. It seems that Bill Godbout would buy
><couple of boxcar loads of j-k flipflops and the next 5 boards his guys
><produced would be made from them. Nobody cared if they worked. People
><bought them because they were cheap. Interoperability was never a concern
><for Godbout. If it worked with ONE of their other boards, that was good
><enough.
>
>I have two systems and spares for two more and am using some of them in
>other systems, all work. From some 10 systems I aquired and parted out to
>several here. Those 10 systems ran a small company and I know their
history
>and the original owner would also argue they were solid. Generally the
>later IEE696 complient boards are very good and my experience over 20 years
>says they were one of the better vendors. HOWEVER::: The 696 complient
>boards often did not work in systems that were way off the spec or were
>pre696. My ALTAIR and the NS* systems are amoung them for the most part.
>the NS* mis uses a few lines so the timings are off and a few liknes are
>ground that would be otherwise assigned. Standard S100 problem till about
>'83-84ish.
>
>The most interesting and scarce bord they did was the MPX-1 an IO
>processing slave. I'm running one with a DISK-1 and DISK-3 in a z80
>system to offload the IO (most of the bios) and it's really a sweet deal.
>
>Allison
>
One other item, aside from speed to be considered when using this part, is
the current it will sink. The LS variety was slower, basically because it
used a slower technology. The 8T97 used essentially the same technology
internally as the SCHOTTKY parts the various vendors sold, but it had
stiffer outputs, i.e. could sink/source more current. Almost any part which
was as fast and would source/sink as much current, will generally bring
about the same behavior in the rest of the circuit. If the edges become too
steep, as you might see in the form of too much ringing or
overshoot/undershoot, soldering little 1/8-watt resistors in series with the
outputs will help. I'd say start with 47 ohms and go as far to the smaller
side of that as you like. Fairchild actually made a version of their
"F-series" logic with 33-ohm resistors built in to minimize problems from
both ground bounce and output edges being too steep. One other thing that
helps somewhat is to solder a small (<.001uF) high-frequency cap between
power and ground on the IC, straight across the back. The leads are long,
but it will maintain enough local storage to help with the ground bounce.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, June 21, 1999 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: N8T97N IC, what is it?
>>
>> Jim:
>>
>> The 8T97 was also recently discontinued by Jameco.
>>
>> How does the propogation delay compare to the LS367? Tony said that
the
>> 8T97 has an 8us delay. ISTR that the reason to use the 8T97 was that it
had
>> a shorter delay.
>
>
>Yes, you're right. The same Signetics data book lists the 74LS367 as
>having a typical propagation delay of 10ns. Incidentally, if I claimed
>8us for the 8T97, that was a typo, I meant 8ns, of course.
>
>Anyway, the 74F367 (I looked in the Philips databook) claims a typical
>delay of 5ns, so that should easily replace the 8T97 (provided decoupling
>an layout is OK - these FAST chips like to cause ground-bounce, etc).
>
>
>-tony
>
<That's a risky proposition. CompuPro produced some of the best but much o
<the worst S-100 hardware ever made. It seems that Bill Godbout would buy
<couple of boxcar loads of j-k flipflops and the next 5 boards his guys
<produced would be made from them. Nobody cared if they worked. People
<bought them because they were cheap. Interoperability was never a concern
<for Godbout. If it worked with ONE of their other boards, that was good
<enough.
I have two systems and spares for two more and am using some of them in
other systems, all work. From some 10 systems I aquired and parted out to
several here. Those 10 systems ran a small company and I know their history
and the original owner would also argue they were solid. Generally the
later IEE696 complient boards are very good and my experience over 20 years
says they were one of the better vendors. HOWEVER::: The 696 complient
boards often did not work in systems that were way off the spec or were
pre696. My ALTAIR and the NS* systems are amoung them for the most part.
the NS* mis uses a few lines so the timings are off and a few liknes are
ground that would be otherwise assigned. Standard S100 problem till about
'83-84ish.
The most interesting and scarce bord they did was the MPX-1 an IO
processing slave. I'm running one with a DISK-1 and DISK-3 in a z80
system to offload the IO (most of the bios) and it's really a sweet deal.
Allison
Sellam doesn't like the movie because he's an early Apple devotee, and the
movie portrays Steve Jobs as an acid-dropping, drug-pushing, commune-living,
personal-conviction-abandoning, illegitimate-daughter-fathering,
beyond-workaholic, universally-disliked-yet-adored, employee-abusing,
god-complex-nurturing, business-disrupting idiot whom one expects to have
his employees drink hemlock-laden Kool-Aid at any moment.
Oh, and Wozniak is portrayed as a small, fuzzy bunny.
Does that about sum it up?
Kai
p.s. the Microsoft contingent gets off rather lightly by comparison, with
Bill Gates shown as merely a shrewd, somewhat ruthless, absent-minded
businessman with personal hygiene issues. Paul Allen is indistinguishable
>from Wozniak in the film, just standing in the background of shots, and has
about 30 seconds of screen time. Steve Ballmer, however, is played by
Krusty the Klown from the Simpsons.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sellam Ismail [mailto:dastar@ncal.verio.com]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 11:33 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: That awful show on TNT
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Tony Duell wrote:
> > I'm virtually apoplectic about this garbage that some of you may watched
> > tonight on TV (I certainly did NOT watch it).
>
> For the benefit of those of us who don't get American TV, could you
> please explain what this programme (show?) was and what it got wrong?
Its a "story" (fictional) about the early days of Apple vs. Microsoft. I
don't even want to talk about it really. Just know it was horrible in
every way possible.
If anyone dares to pipe up and say they actually liked it I swear to you I
will unleash such a torrent of rage upon thee so please don't. Keep it to
yourself for your own good.
Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 05/25/99]
<I just bought the bare board. I may have mis-remembered the price. I
<know I got the CPU chip and 1822 RAMs from Hughes-Peters here in Columbus.
<also got the RCA VIP docs from them, too, when a friend cleaned out his fil
<cabinet.
It was available as a kit but rarely did I ever buy the kit if I could get
the bare board. I had (and still have) a very deep junk box.
Allison
Anyone know of a company/person who fixes/refurbishes/aligns floppy drives?
I need some old floppys worked on.
How about hard disc repair shops?
----------------------------------------
Tired of Micro$oft???
Move up to a REAL OS...
######__ __ ____ __ __ _ __ #
#####/ / / / / __ | / / / / | |/ /##
####/ / / / / / / / / / / / | /###
###/ /__ / / / / / / / /_/ / / |####
##/____/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_____/ /_/|_|####
# ######
("LINUX" for those of you
without fixed-width fonts)
----------------------------------------
Be a Slacker! http://www.slackware.com
Slackware Mailing List:
http://www.digitalslackers.net/linux/list.html
Hello, can anyone provide me with the voltages for the motherboard
connector of a Panasonic Businessmate (286) PSU? On the floppy
connectors, I assume that the red it +12V, the 2 blacks are GND, and the
yellow is +5?
Thanks,
Kevin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"It's you isn't it? THE BASTARD OPERATOR FROM HELL!"
"In the flesh, on the phone and in your account..."
-- BOFH #3
This coming Saturday, 26th June 99, will be another in an endless
series of TRW Ham Radio and Electronics Swap Meets.. at the TRW
Plant in El Segundo, CA, from 7:30 to 11:00 am. The meet is held on
the last saturday of every month, no matter what.
From the 405 (San Diego) freeway, take the Rosecrans exit and go
west 1 mile to Aviation. Turn left (south) on Aviation [under the
Metrolink bridge] and go down about four blocks. The TRW facility
will be on your right, and the Meet is held in the southernmost
parking lots.
I will be in spaces J21 and J23, if anyone wishes to come by and
heckle me in person.
If someone has an item or two to sell, let me know via private
e-mail and Arrangements will be made.
Due to Ham Field Day activities, no brunch or will be held after
the meet this time. *Next* month, however....
Cheers
John
In a message dated 6/20/99 11:36:32 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
dastar(a)ncal.verio.com writes:
> I'm virtually apoplectic about this garbage that some of you may watched
> tonight on TV (I certainly did NOT watch it).
>
> If the facts and how they are perceived in the public's mind weren't
> already distorted enough, this show totally trivializes the recent history
> of computing. They would not do this with the Holocaust or Vietnam, so
> how dare they create such a blatantly falsified story?
>
> It will take years to undo the misconceptions and outright falsehoods this
> show has promoted.
was it really that bad? I wasnt able to view it. Please give some examples of
what was wrong with the show.
Despite your best efforts to keep me from helping you by dissing Microsoft
in your help request :), here is the solution to your problem from the MS
KnowledgeBase
(http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q191/0/64.asp)
Kai
Error Messages When Running TCP/IP-Based Utilities or Programs[win95x]
ID: Q191064 CREATED: 06-AUG-1998 MODIFIED: 28-MAY-1999
WINDOWS:95
WINDOWS
PUBLIC | kberrmsg kbtool win95
\* Security : PUBLIC
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
The information in this article applies to:
- Microsoft Windows 95
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
SYMPTOMS
========
You may experience the following symptoms when you attempt to use a
Transmission
Control Protocol/Internet Protocol-based (TCP/IP-based) utility or program:
- When you attempt to use the Winipcfg utility, you receive the following
error
message:
Fatal Error! Cannot read IP configuration.
- When you attempt to ping a Web site name or TCP/IP address using the Ping
utility, you receive either of the following error messages:
- Bad IP address <Web address>
- PING: transmit failed, error code 10091
- When you attempt to load a Web page using Internet Explorer, you receive
the
following error message:
Internet Explorer cannot open the Internet site <Web address>. A
connection with the server could not be established.
- When you try to uninstall Microsoft Personal Web Server 4.0, you receive
the
following error message:
WINSOCK2 is required to run this setup utility. Please click OK to exit
setup.
CAUSE
=====
This behavior can occur if you attempt to uninstall the Winsock 2.0 update
for
Windows 95, but it is not uninstalled completely.
RESOLUTION
==========
To resolve this behavior, follow these steps:
1. Click Start, point to Programs, and then click MS-DOS Prompt.
2. At the command prompt, type the following commands, pressing ENTER after
each
command
cd\<windows>\ws2bakup
ws2bakup.bat
exit
where <windows> is the folder in which Windows is installed.
NOTE: If you are prompted to abort, retry, or fail the operation, press
A.
This causes the Ws2bakup.bat to continue restoring up all the necessary
files.
NOTE: If you receive sharing violation error messages when you run the
Ws2bakup.bat file, continue with step 3.
3. Click Start, click Shut Down, click "Restart in MS-DOS mode," and then
click
OK.
4. Repeat step 2.
NOTE: If you receive error messages when you run the Ws2bakup.bat file
stating
that some programs cannot be run outside of Windows 95, disregard them.
MORE INFORMATION
================
For more information about the Winsock 2.0 update for Windows 95, please see
the
following article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
Q182108 Availability of Windows Sockets 2.0 for Windows 95
Additional query words: wsock
======================================================================
Keywords : kberrmsg kbtool win95
Version : WINDOWS:95
Platform : WINDOWS
Issue type : kbprb
\* Edit Status : Published
\* Tech Status : Reviewed
-----Original Message-----
From: Sellam Ismail [mailto:dastar@ncal.verio.com]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 11:15 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: OT: Desperate for immediate help with Win95 IP stack
I would normally not post such a lame question to this list but I need
help desparately and don't have time to go wading through a haystack for a
needle. Its bad enough I have to keep re-visiting this problem of windows
deciding to kill itself every few months for the joy of it.
My IP stack is hosed on my Win95 machine. When I try to ping any host I
get "Transmit failed, error code 10091". If I try to run WINIPCFG I get
"Fatal error: cannot read IP configuration".
Since MS is fucked and doesn't have any sort of technical documentation
anywhere useful that would list these errors I must now try to go
searching for what this bullshit means. Unless you already have the
answer?
This started to happen after I had to re-install windows over the existing
install, because it all of a sudden started coming up with a "Windows
exception" during boot and would not boot any further.
TIA.
Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 05/25/99]
Hi. I got a Xeros workstation recently, probably a Daybreak. I
was able to hack the monitor a bit and connect it, but I'm totally
puzzled by the keyboard. Does anyone has any info about Daybreak
hardware (ou Xerox ws. hardware in general), namely pinouts, etc. I'm
really in need for that kind of info.
Thanks,
Cheers,
--
*** Rodrigo Martins de Matos Ventura <yoda(a)isr.ist.utl.pt>
*** Teaching Assistant and MSc. Student at ISR:
*** Instituto de Sistemas e Robotica, Polo de Lisboa
*** Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa, Portugal
*** PGP Public Key available on my homepage:
*** http://www.isr.ist.utl.pt/~yoda
*** Key fingerprint = 0C 0A 25 58 46 CF 14 99 CF 9C AF 9E 10 02 BB 2A
> On the chance that someone else here might be interested, the
> arcade video game song classics Pacman Fever, etc. have now
> been released on CD. Check out:
>
> http://www.bucknergarcia.com
>
> Now maybe I'll replace my vinyl copy.
You throwing out the vinyl version? I'll take it! :-)
(seriously, I buy vinyl whenever possible, but I'd mainly rather buy secondhand
than pay new CD price for something like that.)
More seriously, I checked out the URL you gave, and it says "the 8 songs from
the vinyl version" but doesn't say what they are!
Does it contain the Space Invaders song? That's the only video game song I
remember hearing...
Philip.
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.
Power Technology Centre, Ratcliffe-on-Soar,
Nottingham, NG11 0EE, UK
Tel: +44 (0)115 936 2000
http://www.powertech.co.uk
**********************************************************************
That's a risky proposition. CompuPro produced some of the best but much of
the worst S-100 hardware ever made. It seems that Bill Godbout would buy a
couple of boxcar loads of j-k flipflops and the next 5 boards his guys
produced would be made from them. Nobody cared if they worked. People
bought them because they were cheap. Interoperability was never a concern
for Godbout. If it worked with ONE of their other boards, that was good
enough.
Dick (owner of lots of Godbout's hardware -and some even works!)
-----Original Message-----
From: Arfon Gryffydd <arfonrg(a)texas.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 8:38 AM
Subject: Compro, S100 & 8" drives
>I can grab a big Compro (model:?) computer that the junk guys says is a
>S100 computer. it includes two 8" drives.
>
>Anyone know anything about this box?
>----------------------------------------
> Tired of Micro$oft???
>
> Move up to a REAL OS...
>######__ __ ____ __ __ _ __ #
>#####/ / / / / __ | / / / / | |/ /##
>####/ / / / / / / / / / / / | /###
>###/ /__ / / / / / / / /_/ / / |####
>##/____/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_____/ /_/|_|####
># ######
> ("LINUX" for those of you
> without fixed-width fonts)
>----------------------------------------
>Be a Slacker! http://www.slackware.com
>
>Slackware Mailing List:
>http://www.digitalslackers.net/linux/list.html
I would normally not post such a lame question to this list but I need
help desparately and don't have time to go wading through a haystack for a
needle. Its bad enough I have to keep re-visiting this problem of windows
deciding to kill itself every few months for the joy of it.
My IP stack is hosed on my Win95 machine. When I try to ping any host I
get "Transmit failed, error code 10091". If I try to run WINIPCFG I get
"Fatal error: cannot read IP configuration".
Since MS is fucked and doesn't have any sort of technical documentation
anywhere useful that would list these errors I must now try to go
searching for what this bullshit means. Unless you already have the
answer?
This started to happen after I had to re-install windows over the existing
install, because it all of a sudden started coming up with a "Windows
exception" during boot and would not boot any further.
TIA.
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 05/25/99]
On the chance that someone else here might be interested, the
arcade video game song classics Pacman Fever, etc. have now
been released on CD. Check out:
http://www.bucknergarcia.com
Now maybe I'll replace my vinyl copy.
-----
David Williams - Computer Packrat
dlw(a)trailingedge.com
http://www.trailingedge.com
One of these beasts is available for the price of shipping (from zip 97339)
if someone responds to be by Thursday (6/24/1999). Please save this guy
>from the scrap heap. A short (two or three foot) cable is included, though
the power cable is missing. (Connectors appear to be 37 pin D-sub (DC37?)
at both ends.
Guestimate weight is about 20 pounds. Check your preferred method of
shipping.
No media.
Only one, so first-come, first-served.
Gary
I sold mine to a local guy last week for $300. The last one on eBay about
three weeks back went for $565.
good luck!
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom howe <howet(a)ohsu.edu>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 3:23 AM
Subject: MITS ALTAIR 8-inch Floppy Auction
Hello:
I put an original 8-inch floppy drive for the Altair on Ebay. Go to this URL
to see a picture of the unit and to place a bid:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120678854
--Tom
>Wait a minute.... You can order out of print manuals from Compaq? How
>much, and who do you contact? This sounds even more interesting than the
>pair I've got!
You call 1-800-DIGITAL, give them the part number (often EK-xxxxx-UG
or -MM or whatever), and they'll tell you about availability. Not
everything is available, but a fair amount of stuff from the 60's
and 70's is available as kind-of nicely Xeroxed copies of the originals.
Some of the copies are from microfiche and aren't so nice. It's hard
to tell beforehand how nice the copy you end up getting will look!
If you don't know the part number, a very handy tool is the DAS
(Digital Assisted Services) searchable catalog, at
http://www.digital.com/info/DAS-Catalog/dassearch.htm
For example, I typed in "RX0" and it came back with these part numbers
and prices:
H771-A Pow Supply RX01 (RX11) 60 Hz $276.00
M7726-00 RX01 Controller $405.00
M7727-00 RX01 R/W Control $152.00
M7846-00 RX01 Unibus $426.00
M8029-00 RXV21, Q-bus RX02 Interface $381.00
M8256-00 RX211 Unibus RX02 Interface $518.00
EK-ORX01-MM RX01/08/11 Maintenance Manual $ 84.00
EK-ORX01-OP RX8/RX11 RX01 Floppy Disk Sys $ 21.00
EK-ORX02-UG RX02 Floppy Disk System Users $ 21.00
EK-RX012-PS RX01/RX02 Pocket Serivce Guide $ 42.00
Now clearly not all the RX01/02 parts that ever existed are in
the above list, but it's a start. And it also shows you how DEC
manual part numbers are often constructed; "-MM" is Maintenance
Manual, "-UG" is User's Guide, "-PS" is the Pocket Service Guide,
etc.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Does anyone have a copy of the "IBM PC Network Technical Reference Manual"
(c. 1984) that they could part with / copy/scan a few pages out of for me?
I'm trying to write an RPL loader daemon and can't seem to figure out a
few things about the protocol. (I'm trying to boot an IBM 8227, which is
not-so-classic as the above book is.)
Also, does anyone know of something (besides LANtastic, which I can't get
to work), that will speak such an old thing as IBM "FIND/FOUND" RPL?
Thanks
af
---
Adam Fritzler
{ mid(a)auk.cx, afritz(a)iname.com}
http://www.auk.cx/~mid/
"Behold the power of cheese." -- National Dairy Council
>I just got a box of doc's today in the mail, and I'm totally fascinated by
>two of them. They're nicely done copies!?!? They have semi-heavy cream
>coloured covers with the actual cover xeroxed onto them, and the pages are
>xeroxes, but the right size. They're bound with the spiral plastic things.
>Does anyone know what the story is with these? Are these copies that DEC
>made, or did a 3rd party go to this much trouble?
If you order out-of-print manuals from DEC (err, Compaq) today, they
run Xeroxes off from originals - there's a special name for the facility
they use to do this, but I can't remember it at the moment. The
resulting document sounds very much like what you're describing.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>I can grab a big Compro (model:?) computer that the junk guys says is a
>S100 computer. it includes two 8" drives.
>
>Anyone know anything about this box?
I'm willing to bet they mean Compupro. Yes, they made a multitude of S-100
systems. One of the most common was their 8085/8088 combo system, as
displayed with 8" drives in the Smithsonian.
Compupro is a well-respected S-100/IEEE-696 manufacturer
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Sam,
The 100xx errors returned by WinSock are generally the Berkeley errno
values with 10000 added to them. This one has no Berkeley equivalent. The
information I have on it is:
The WinSock implementation cannot function at this time because the
underlaying system it uses to provide network services is currently
unavailable.
o Check that WINSOCK.DLL is in the current path.
o Check that WINSOCK.DLL is from the same vendor as the underlaying
protocol stack.
o Check that all WinSock components are installed and configured.
Not much I know but maybe it will be of some help.
Regards,
Bob
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
Bob Withers Two things are infinite: the
universe and
bwit(a)pobox.com human stupidity, and I'm not sure
about
http://www.pobox.com/~bwit the universe. - Albert Einstein
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
----- BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK -----
Version 3.1 http://www.geekcode.com
GCS d- s: a+ C++ UO++ P L++ E--- W++ N++ o-- w++
O M V- PS PE Y+ PGP t+ 5 X++ r* tv+ b++ DI++ D--- G
e++ h--- r+++ y+++
----- END GEEK CODE BLOCK -----
On Tuesday, June 22, 1999 1:15 AM, Sellam Ismail
[SMTP:dastar@ncal.verio.com] wrote:
>
> I would normally not post such a lame question to this list but I need
> help desparately and don't have time to go wading through a haystack for
a
> needle. Its bad enough I have to keep re-visiting this problem of
windows
> deciding to kill itself every few months for the joy of it.
>
> My IP stack is hosed on my Win95 machine. When I try to ping any host I
> get "Transmit failed, error code 10091". If I try to run WINIPCFG I get
> "Fatal error: cannot read IP configuration".
>
> Since MS is fucked and doesn't have any sort of technical documentation
> anywhere useful that would list these errors I must now try to go
> searching for what this bullshit means. Unless you already have the
> answer?
>
> This started to happen after I had to re-install windows over the
existing
> install, because it all of a sudden started coming up with a "Windows
> exception" during boot and would not boot any further.
>
> TIA.
>
> Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
>
> Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 05/25/99]
>
Just wanted to let everyone know in case they ever have to deal with this
obnoxious bug that I found the solution on MS's support website. I did a
search on the error code and got back two articles, the first of which
detailed a procedure for fixing the problem, which had something to do
with WinSock 2.0. I guess the lesson to be learned here is that, to their
credit, what MS lacks in obvious documentation they make up for on their
website at least.
Sorry for the off-topic crap.
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 05/25/99]
I'm virtually apoplectic about this garbage that some of you may watched
tonight on TV (I certainly did NOT watch it).
If the facts and how they are perceived in the public's mind weren't
already distorted enough, this show totally trivializes the recent history
of computing. They would not do this with the Holocaust or Vietnam, so
how dare they create such a blatantly falsified story?
It will take years to undo the misconceptions and outright falsehoods this
show has promoted.
I'm truly outraged.
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 05/25/99]
According to "Dealers of Lightning - Xerox PARC and the Dawn of the Computer Age" it was the Alto.
Bob
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Withers Two things are infinite: the universe and
bwit(a)pobox.com human stupidity, and I'm not sure about
http://www.pobox.com/~bwit the universe. - Albert Einstein
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK -----
Version 3.1 http://www.geekcode.com
GCS d- s: a+ C++ UO++ P L++ E--- W++ N++ o-- w++
O M V- PS PE Y+ PGP t+ 5 X++ r* tv+ b++ DI++ D--- G
e++ h--- r+++ y+++
----- END GEEK CODE BLOCK -----
On Sunday, June 20, 1999 10:14 PM, Glenatacme(a)aol.com [SMTP:Glenatacme@aol.com] wrote:
> In a message dated 6/20/99 10:06:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> rcini(a)email.msn.com writes:
>
> > I just finished watching "Pirates of Silicon Valley" on TNT, an
> > interesting interpretation of the dynamics between Apple and Microsoft from
> > 1975 to 1997.
> >
> > Here's the question -- what was the name of the computer at Xerox that
> > Steve Jobs "modeled" the Lisa/Mac after? Was it the Alto or the Star?
>
> Definitely it was the Star. My ex worked at Xerox from '85 through '87.
> Some details in "Pirates" were, um, a little "inaccurate," but they got one
> thing right -- there were a lot of really pissed off people at Xerox when the
> Apple GUI hit the streets.
>
> Glen Goodwin
> 0/0
I'm watching Pirates of Silicon Valley on TNT right now (yes, I'm so lame
I have my computer in front of the television) and Bill Gates is working
on a box... the dialogue infers that it is supposed to by an Altair,
but it's just a big box with four blinking lights (alternates - 2 red,
2 green) and reading paper tape.... next scene he's working on a PDP-8/?
(I I think, but I'm not up on my PDPs... not so much working on it as
having the machine open on his table... no soldering iron, manuals,
cards... I could have made the scene a lot better with the stuff in my
basement...)
Oh well.
Kevin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"It's you isn't it? THE BASTARD OPERATOR FROM HELL!"
"In the flesh, on the phone and in your account..."
-- BOFH #3
<Yes, you're right. The same Signetics data book lists the 74LS367 as
<having a typical propagation delay of 10ns. Incidentally, if I claimed
<8us for the 8T97, that was a typo, I meant 8ns, of course.
<
<Anyway, the 74F367 (I looked in the Philips databook) claims a typical
<delay of 5ns, so that should easily replace the 8T97 (provided decoupling
<an layout is OK - these FAST chips like to cause ground-bounce, etc).
At that time the difference of 2-4nS was insignificant relative to CPU
timing and memory timing. At the time the 8t97 was vogue memories were
fast at 250nS and typically 450ns was the norm for Eproms. I freely
swapped 8t97s with '367s based on availability. Also as time wore on the
8t97 would disappear and the '367 would get faster. Moot point in general
then.
Allison
<$14.95". I looked through all the 1979 BYTEs and I saw the board for sale
<but I didn't see a $99 original ELF kit. The Super ELF kit was $106.95. My
<only Quest catalog is for 1982 and I didn't see the board or the kit in it
Wrong mag... should have been looking in Popular Electonics, maybe Kbaud.
One of the truths of the late 70s and early 80s was BYTE was only one of
the hourde!
Allison
--- Doug Coward <dcoward(a)pressstart.com> wrote:
> Ethan Dicks <ethan_dicks(a)yahoo.com> said:
> >I have a Quest Elf that I built from a kit as a kid...
> OK, I stand corrected. I know you and I talked about this before.
Right.
> But I never could find an advertisement for the Quest ELF. But with a date,
> I finally found it. The print in their ad is so small I could read this ad
> 20 times and not see this one little line that says "original ELF kit board
> $14.95".
Maybe that was the price. It's been so long, I forget. I remember that I
could afford it and not a full-blown Elf II or whatever was common by then.
> I looked through all the 1979 BYTEs and I saw the board for sale
> but I didn't see a $99 original ELF kit.
That came later, I think. Try around 1980 or 1981.
> The Super ELF kit was $106.95. My only Quest catalog is for 1982 and
> I didn't see the board or the kit in it.
I think it was gone by then. By 1982, I had a C-64 (w/1540!) I was getting
paid to program.
> But I'll look again tonight. And I'll dig out BYTE for 80 and 81.
Good place to look. I have a crate of those, too. Some did not survive
a basement flood at my mother's place. :-(
> How's the ELF99 coming?
No progress lately. I got stumped at the layout phase and have had zero
time to devote to it in the past six months. I've been working on my
farm when I'm not pushing bits to pay for the farm. I have some I/O chips
and other parts, a schematic captured in OrCAD and no idea how to get a valid
netlist from OrCAD Capture into OrCAD layout. I can do the tutorials from the
rat's-nests, but I can't get my schematics (even a 2-chip TTL test) to
generate a file that will give me part silhouettes and a rat's-nest.
> allisonp(a)world.std.com (Allison J Parent) said:
> > Quest Electornics, ELF as per the PE article. I have one.
>
> Was your ELF a full kit or just a bare board when you bought it?
I just bought the bare board. I may have mis-remembered the price. I
know I got the CPU chip and 1822 RAMs from Hughes-Peters here in Columbus. I
also got the RCA VIP docs from them, too, when a friend cleaned out his file
cabinet.
> And I guess this is as good a time as any to ask if anyone has a
> booklet called "Programs for the COSMAC ELF: GRAPHICS" by Paul C.
> Moews. I have the other two ": INTERPRETERS" and ": MUSIC and GAMES"
> that I can copy for a copy of ": GRAPHICS".
Never seen it, sorry.
-ethan
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Me neither. I have a WANG WLTC that I'm supposed to send him and need his
address, but he hasn't answered any of the emails...
///--->>>
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Kaiser <ckaiser(a)oa.ptloma.edu>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Montag, 21. Juni 1999 16:04
Subject: Re: GridPad 1910 sales?
>::Hi. A while back I was talking with Rodger on the list about the
>::(appearant) abundance of GridPad 1910's that he was selling.... did th
>::message t osend money float by me, or are we all still in waiting? And
>::come to think of it, I haven't seen any messages from Rodger recently...
>
>Nor I. I sent him a couple of "anyone home?" mails which didn't bounce, but
>I hadn't heard any reply, either.
>
>--
>-------------------------- personal page:
http://calvin.ptloma.edu/~spectre/ --
>Cameron Kaiser Database Programmer/Administrative
Computing
>Point Loma Nazarene University Fax: +1 619 849
2581
>ckaiser(a)ptloma.edu Phone: +1 619 849
2539
>-- It is a tremendous Mitzvah to be happy always! -- Reb.
Nachman -------------
>
I picked up some cards that say "Dual Port RAM" that have a number of these
ICs on them. They all have 1979 and 1980 date codes on them and the
letters SA or SB. Anyone know what they are? I can't find them in any of
my IC references.
Joe
Ethan Dicks <ethan_dicks(a)yahoo.com> said:
>I have a Quest Elf that I built from a kit as a kid. It was the Popular
>Science design, pre-1861 video chip. It has a speaker, a Q LED, 8 toggle
>switches for data, DMA/EF4 pushbutton, RUN/LOAD/MEMPROT toggles and the
>original TIL311 latching hex displays. My PCB is rev 2.1, 1979. I bought
>just the PCB and assembly plans for $35 around 1980. The entire kit was
>available for $99.
OK, I stand corrected. I know you and I talked about this before. But I
never could find an advertisement for the Quest ELF. But with a date,
I finally found it. The print in their ad is so small I could read this ad
20 times and not see this one little line that says "original ELF kit board
$14.95". I looked through all the 1979 BYTEs and I saw the board for sale
but I didn't see a $99 original ELF kit. The Super ELF kit was $106.95. My
only Quest catalog is for 1982 and I didn't see the board or the kit in it.
But I'll look again tonight. And I'll dig out BYTE for 80 and 81.
How's the ELF99 coming?
allisonp(a)world.std.com (Allison J Parent) said:
> Quest Electornics, ELF as per the PE article. I have one.
Was your ELF a full kit or just a bare board when you bought it?
And I guess this is as good a time as any to ask if anyone has a
booklet called "Programs for the COSMAC ELF: GRAPHICS" by Paul C.
Moews. I have the other two ": INTERPRETERS" and ": MUSIC and GAMES"
that I can copy for a copy of ": GRAPHICS".
Thanks,
--Doug
===================================================
Doug Coward dcoward(a)pressstart.com (work)
Sr Software Engineer mranalog(a)home.com (home)
Press Start Inc. http://www.pressstart.com
Sunnyvale,CA
Visit the new Analog Computer Museum and History Center
at http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
===================================================
I have a MITS HDC enclosure which has surfaced after some time in "the heap" which has all the original markings, and paint, along with 20+ years' scuffs and scrapes, but which has no controller electronics, nor do I believe it ever had any. This baby has a multi-slot 100-pin (not S-100) bacplane and a (+5, +12 ?) linear power supply inside. No connector panel and no cover for the cardcage. It might make a nice enclosure for a bridge controller + drive combo.
Any offers?
Dick
The last I heard from Roger he said it was going to be a while before he was ready. I haven't seen anything else.
Bob
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Withers Two things are infinite: the universe and
bwit(a)pobox.com human stupidity, and I'm not sure about
http://www.pobox.com/~bwit the universe. - Albert Einstein
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK -----
Version 3.1 http://www.geekcode.com
GCS d- s: a+ C++ UO++ P L++ E--- W++ N++ o-- w++
O M V- PS PE Y+ PGP t+ 5 X++ r* tv+ b++ DI++ D--- G
e++ h--- r+++ y+++
----- END GEEK CODE BLOCK -----
On Monday, June 21, 1999 4:37 PM, Tim Hotze [SMTP:review@RyansPC.ryanspc.com] wrote:
> Hi. A while back I was talking with Rodger on the list about the
> (appearant) abundance of GridPad 1910's that he was selling.... did th
> message t osend money float by me, or are we all still in waiting? And
> come to think of it, I haven't seen any messages from Rodger recently...
>
> thanks
>
> Tim
>
Hello, all:
I decided to fiddle around with my Mac Portable again, after a few
months of it sitting in a closet. My unit, non-backlit, has a row or two of
bad pixels. If anyone has a non-working Portable with a good screen, let me
know.
Thanks.
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW7
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/pdp11/
<---------------------------- reply separator
I just got a box of doc's today in the mail, and I'm totally fascinated by
two of them. They're nicely done copies!?!? They have semi-heavy cream
coloured covers with the actual cover xeroxed onto them, and the pages are
xeroxes, but the right size. They're bound with the spiral plastic things.
Does anyone know what the story is with these? Are these copies that DEC
made, or did a 3rd party go to this much trouble?
I do have one copy of "Introduction to Programming" that is spiral bound,
but it was printed and bound that way. These are most definitly xeroxes.
Way Cool!
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
In Pirates of Silicon Valley last night (let's not get into the movie
please), they trundled by an Apple Lisa 1 on a cart.
Where the heck did they get a Lisa 1? They're rare as hen's teeth! They
certainly didn't get it from Apple, given the movie's treatment of Steve
Jobs (let's not get into the movie please...)
Has anyone actually seen a Lisa 1 in person, or knows anyone who has one?
Kai
Pays to stay away from the tip shops for a while :-)
Today I got:
Three Dick Smith VZ200's plus tape drives, joysticks, manuals & a bit of
software, another CBM 1571 & a 1541-II, a CBM 1802 monitor, a CBM 1701
amber monitor (been looking for one of these & something I've been
looking for, an Apple //c (it even works!), although the case is rather
shabby. As well as the usual collection of books, tapes & disks for the
64......
cheers,
Lance
Hi,
Some time ago, I thought I read that someone on this list has a list of DEC
part numbers (and presumably what each part number is for). If anyone does,
can they please contact me? I want to know which DEC computers would be
compatible with some 80-pin 4MB SIMMs that I have. (The SIMMs have this on the
PCB: 5019144-01 A1P2)
-- Mark
Well, in a somewhat anti-climatic moment I hooked up the ASR-33 to my
PDP-8/e, switched on the 8/e, then switched on the tty to "line" and got
the expected idle hum. I keyed in the "simple test" that is in the
maintenence book which simply echos the keyboard to the printer, and that
worked, and then keyed in the "real" test which was to take the character
and add 1 to it and then echo it. (A DEC engineer explained to me that this
test actually proved the character typed went through the ALU versus a
M8650 with a short that just connected tx to rx). Everything worked as
expected. Now to get my paper tapes to run through it and boot Focal or
PAL8 the old fashioned way.
--Chuck
Hmm, no, the picture of the Lisa on their web site is a Lisa 2.
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence LeMay [mailto:lemay@cs.umn.edu]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 2:04 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: Where the heck did they get the Lisa 1?
They got it from The Computer Museum of America. I was just at their web
site today, and saw all sorts of references to the movie, plus I recall
that they said the Apple I they have at the museum is actually just
a mockup that was made for the movie.
http://www.computer-museum.org/
-Lawrence LeMay
> In Pirates of Silicon Valley last night (let's not get into the movie
> please), they trundled by an Apple Lisa 1 on a cart.
>
> Where the heck did they get a Lisa 1? They're rare as hen's teeth! They
> certainly didn't get it from Apple, given the movie's treatment of Steve
> Jobs (let's not get into the movie please...)
>
> Has anyone actually seen a Lisa 1 in person, or knows anyone who has one?
>
> Kai
>
On Jun 21, 17:53, Philip.Belben(a)pgen.com wrote:
> I too like the PET.
> But I don't like the 8032SK or its 8296 descendant.
I agree with that. Actually, I didn't like any of the big-screen PETs.
Out of proportion to my eyes.
> Lots of people sing the praise of the SGI Personal Iris descendant that
looks
> like two blue plastic wedges that don't quite make a cuboid when placed
> together. But I thought that was naff, as we say over here.
That's an Indy workstation.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
> Has anyone ever put together a list of handsomely designed computers?
> Not great runners, not powerful, but just aesthetically pleasing? My
> impression is that there probably are not all that many, and that the
> first machines to exclude from such a list are the iMac grotesques.
I have seen some of the replies to this, and rather than join in the argument,
I'll just make some suggestions.
I too like the PET.
But I don't like the 8032SK or its 8296 descendant. (I always maintained that
SK stood for Silly Kasing). Yes, it's not bad to look at, and was one of the
first curvy machines, but the keyboard plug that always falls out at the worst
moment spoils it totally for me.
Lots of people sing the praise of the SGI Personal Iris descendant that looks
like two blue plastic wedges that don't quite make a cuboid when placed
together. But I thought that was naff, as we say over here.
We had some machines (PC clones) at work a few years ago which were square with
one corner cut off. You put them in the corner of one of those desks with
curved fronts, with the cut-off corner towards you, and find that the latter has
floppy drives etc. in it. But I can't remember the manufacturer. I thought it
was a nice (visual) design, but boring machines.
Philip.
PS I like the original Mac better (visually) than any subsequent Mac)
Getting into work after the weekend, I find that Kai has been compiling a little
list...
> Here's the first draft at a list of the Top 150 Collectible Microcomputers
> (from the U.S.A.). I would have gone for Top 100 but there are just too
> many great machines, and 200 is too many.
>
> It's currently at 133 items. Some related models are combined as one, even
> though they are rather different... other similar models are kept separate.
> This is basically just because I personally feel they rate their own
> separate listing, feel free to disagree.
>
> Please add items! Items on the list should meet the following categories:
>
> 1) Collectible Microcomputer (yes, I know the H-11 is on here as an
> "honorary" micro)
> 3) Sold in the USA
> 4) Available from a manufacturer (not just plans in a magazine)
Why criterion 3? (What was 2, by the way?)
If you want "from the USA" wouldn't it be better to specify designed and/or
manufactured there? To use your analogy from another post, you would define the
top Italian sports cars as designed/built in Italy, not just those sold there.
My view is that the US is so dominant in microcomputers, that your restriction
excludes interesting machines without a significant reduction in the quantity of
entrants...
***************************************
Still, I have a few to add:
Tektronix 4051. Not many around. First micro to be designed starting with
graphics and then going on to processor.
(since I like the 4050 series, I might put the 4054A on a list of top
non-micros...)
IBM 6150. This was the RT-PC. IBM's first RISC box; IBM's first Workstation;
and (to make sure it qualifies) it was sold under a variety of names, including
"6150 Microcomputer"
Vectrex. A home computer with vector graphics. May not be a wonderful design,
but funnnnnn concept!
I think someone has already mentioned the Victor (we called it the Sirius, but
that's another matter)
***************************************
I also would like to condense the list in places.
Tandy model 4P should be on the same line as model 3/4, especially if you put
all 3 Coco machines on a single line.
Do you need quite that many Apple IIs?
***************************************
After this it's minor quibbles:
You commented elsewhere that the PET 4032/8032 was in as "PET gets a sensible
keyboard and goes for business" or words to that effect. This happened with the
2001-8B (-16B and -32B) and their renumbered equivalents, 3008, 3016, 3032. I'd
put the PET 2001-8 on one line; 2001-B, -N and -K, 3000, 4000 on the next and
8032, 8096, 8296 on a third - the 80 column PETs.
HP85 - how about the 86 or 87? Or the 75? Or even the 71? Why that one and no
other?
Still, it's an interesting list. Keep up the good work!
Philip.
I just picked up an Anderson Jacobson (Model: AJ1235) acoustic/direct
coupled modem. Anyone have any information on this?
QUESTION #1:
The front panel has a slide switch that is labled "Disconnect" and has ON
and OFF positions.
There is also a momentary push button labled "connect".
Now, I assume that the "Disconnect" switch is to pick-up and release the
phone line when the direct coupled plugs are used but, what does the
"Connect" button do?
QUESTION #2:
There is a 300/1200 baud switch. all of the acoustic modems I have ever
used only ran at 300 or slower. Can you run 1200 baud over an acoustic
coupled modem?
QUESTION #3:
The place I bought this at has a few more. Anyone interested?
----------------------------------------
Tired of Micro$oft???
Move up to a REAL OS...
######__ __ ____ __ __ _ __ #
#####/ / / / / __ | / / / / | |/ /##
####/ / / / / / / / / / / / | /###
###/ /__ / / / / / / / /_/ / / |####
##/____/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_____/ /_/|_|####
# ######
("LINUX" for those of you
without fixed-width fonts)
----------------------------------------
Be a Slacker! http://www.slackware.com
Slackware Mailing List:
http://www.digitalslackers.net/linux/list.html
I'm looking for a MAS-20 hard drive for the Amiga made by Microbotics.
Does anyone have one they'd like to sell or trade?
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 05/25/99]
A possible rescue, of what sounds like an interestingly outfitted system,
especially if you are into video.
Replies to the original poster please...
-jim
---
jimw(a)computergarage.org
The Computer Garage - http://www.computergarage.org
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
>>> Coming soon to www.computergarage.org - the CBBS/NW on-line archives
>>> Coming to VCF III (2-3 October 1999) - CBBS/NW live!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 14:45:00 GMT
From: cdknet(a)my-deja.com
Reply-To: larry(a)nobots_cdknet.com.UUCP
To: Info-PDP11(a)transarc.com
Subject: PDP 11/23 System to go (Long Island, NY)
I have an 11/23 system that needs a new home. It is actually a complete
IMAGES system as sold by CGL,Inc. way back in the the early eighties.
It runs a legit flavor of UNIX off an RL02 diskpack. The bundle consists
of three wheel-around racks and a few loose items. Rack #1 is the CPU
and two mounted RL02 drives. Rack #2 contains (3) Genisco frame buffers
and power supplies. Rack #3 contains a video patch panel, sync
generator, RGB->NTSC video encoder, NTSC->RGB video decoder and a video
digitizer.
In addition, there is a VT100 terminal, a large graphics tablet, a third
unmounted RL02 drive and a cabinet rack with over a dozen RL02
diskpacks.
At this time I would prefer to unload the system as a package rather
than break out individual components.
Interested parties must be prepared to move system. I will not ship.
For more information please reply via email by removing the letters
"nobots_" from this address: larry(a)nobots_cdknet.com
-larry
<Has anyone ever put together a list of handsomely designed computers?
<Not great runners, not powerful, but just aesthetically pleasing? My
<impression is that there probably are not all that many, and that the
<first machines to exclude from such a list are the iMac grotesques.
Hummm. Well I think form and function are related.
My thoughts would suggest...
NorthStar* Horizon (wood cover) as a simple but pleasing to the eye design.
Kaypro Toteables, very functional and simple.
DEC BA123 based machines for simple styling and good mechanical/thermal
engineering.
Epson PX-8 laptop. small package for its time but not industrial looking.
TRS80, TI99, Commodore C64/C128 for evolving the wedge design to the limit.
Others, PDP-10 (KA10), PDP12
Allison
HI,
-----Original Message-----
From: Ram Meenakshisundaram <rmeenaks(a)olf.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, June 17, 1999 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: id this transputer tram
>Tony Duell wrote:
>
>> I don't know this one - my experience of transputers is restricted to
>> genuine INMOS TRAMs and homebrew boards. Of course a 50 pin IDC could be
>> a number of things...
>>
>> My first question is what chips are on the board (on both sides...) Any
>> large chips apart from the T8?
>
>I was mistaken it is a T225 chip and apparently it might be a SCSI Tram.
>However, I don't see any NCR scsi chip or any other chip that might be SCSI
>related. The only other chip I see is a chip from Logic. I wonder if that
>is the SCSI controller.
If that is a "LOGIC" it could be a scsi controller. Logic made a 5380
compatible/and better controller to the ncr5380. You should see the number
somewhere on this chip "5380" or similar.
have fun,
emanuel
Kai's original Top 150 list had the AT&T Unix PC 7300 on it.
I passed one of these up in a junkyard a few months ago. It looked a bit too
much like a terminal and I didn't know anything about it.
Did I do wrong?
My decision was a little swayed by the fact that I powered it up without
looking and something went bang. It was then that I saw the 110v sticker on
the bottom. We have 240v around here!
>Apple Macintosh 512K Through SE
>Apple Macintosh Portable
>AT&T Unix PC / 3B2 / 7300
>Atari 400
>Atari 800
Greetings to all,
I was wondering does anybody have a keyboard to fit either of these
computers (a Sanyo MBC 555 or a IBM 5150 XT) and would like to sell it?
Robert Patton II
Lakewood, WA
Today, I found a mint Epson HX-20 at the MIT hamfest. All the
original packaging and manuals, and only $15. It doesn't have a tape
drive or expansion module, but it's cool nonetheless.
Anyone know where to find software or monitor documentation for this
thing?
--
Brad Ackerman N1MNB "...faced with the men and women who bring home
bsa3(a)cornell.edu the pork, voters almost always re-elect them."
http://skaro.pair.com/ -- _The Economist_, 31 Oct 1998
In a message dated 6/20/99 10:32:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
cmcmanis(a)mcmanis.com writes:
> The computers built by PARC were:
> ALTO - this was a prototype microcode loadable machine
> with CDC disk pack attached. Generally credited to
> be the machine that was running the software that
> inspired the Mac and later windows (Charles went to
> work for Microsoft from PARC)
> ALTO II - Was Xeroxes attempt to manufacture the Alto as a
> product. (they weren't very successful)
> DANDELION - Officialy the Xerox 8010 Workstation. Which ran
> a set of applications called "Star" or "The Star
> Document Processing System"
> DORADO - ECL version of the "D-machine" architecture that
> was the machine that ran Smalltalk really quickly.
>
> Both the Alto and the Dandelion also ran XDE (called "tahoe") which was the
> "Xerox Development Environment" and it ran on top of an operating system
> called "Pilot".
>
> This first-hand from the Network Services Architect for the Office Systems
> Business Unit in Palo Alto, who also happens to be my wife of nearly 16
> years.
Well, maybe my ex was wrong . . . again . . . ;>)
Glen Goodwin
0/0
In a message dated 6/20/99 10:06:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
rcini(a)email.msn.com writes:
> I just finished watching "Pirates of Silicon Valley" on TNT, an
> interesting interpretation of the dynamics between Apple and Microsoft from
> 1975 to 1997.
>
> Here's the question -- what was the name of the computer at Xerox that
> Steve Jobs "modeled" the Lisa/Mac after? Was it the Alto or the Star?
Definitely it was the Star. My ex worked at Xerox from '85 through '87.
Some details in "Pirates" were, um, a little "inaccurate," but they got one
thing right -- there were a lot of really pissed off people at Xerox when the
Apple GUI hit the streets.
Glen Goodwin
0/0
Hello, all:
I just finished watching "Pirates of Silicon Valley" on TNT, an
interesting interpretation of the dynamics between Apple and Microsoft from
1975 to 1997.
Here's the question -- what was the name of the computer at Xerox that
Steve Jobs "modeled" the Lisa/Mac after? Was it the Alto or the Star?
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW7
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/pdp11/
<---------------------------- reply separator
Hmmm, now this doesn't look particularly good.
I manually pushed the carriage to the right and it worked. (ie the pawl
re-engaged.) Then I typed for a while and then it stopped spacing in the
middle of the page. Manually push it one character space and it works again.
By observing the mechanism, I can see that there is one position of the
spacing ratchet that doesn't seem to allow for spacing. It could be a
broken tooth but I can't tell from looking at it from the side. Another
interesting tidbit is that when I hit "return" the carraige _stops_ at that
tooth, even if this means stopping mid page!
Now a damaged tooth could be used to explain the first behavior but not the
second I don't believe. The cardboard/spacer thing is still in there and it
doesn't seem to harm anything so I still can't tell if it is supposed to be
there or not.
I have a complete (but dirty) typing unit available as an organ donor if I
can deduce the cause of the trouble.
--Chuck
Spacing Ratchet shown on page 75, part number is 181077 for the gear at the
bottom of the spacing ratchet, it apparently attaches with two bolts, the
carraige stops when the feed pawl is lined up with one of the two bolt
heads on the top.
Hi Kevin,
At 17:52 19/06/99 -0400, you wrote:
>I got a few fun bits from the Milford Amateur Radio Club Hamfest today...
>Kevin
I have a question for you and the other EU subscriber (in future hopefully
will ask the same to U.S. subscriber):
What is the Bigger/Better HAMFEST relating to RETROCOMPUTING swap/trade in
your country?
Here in Italy I think is in PORDENONE (30/04 -> 02/05)
Is Friedrichshafen the biggest HAMFEST in Germany (or even the biggest in EU?)?
And what about France, England, Portugal, etc.?
I'm tryng to organize a "RETRO-EXPEDITION" from Italy to Friedrichshafen,
and would like to receive infos on this and other EU Hamfest.
Thanks .
Riccardo Romagnoli
<chemif(a)mbox.queen.it>
I-47100 Forl?
I'd spotted the rack Jim mentioned yesterday in my wanderings before he
posted about it here, and today I decided to go pick it up. Good thing I
did, as I was out in front of the store, pulling the drives out of it so it
would be easier to handle, I got to talking to this old guy. We got to
talking about old computers, and it turned out he had a card reader he
didn't want/need any more.
So I went over and picked it up. It's a nice small unit, that can easily
sit on top of a desk. The only problem is I'm not sure how to interface it
to anything. It was made by "Peripheral Dynamics Inc", and is a Model C302
manufactured in May of 1972.
I think you're supposed to interface it by plugging some sort of card into
a connector in the back of it. Unfortuantly he didn't know where the
manual is, or if he still has it. Does anyone know how to hook one of
these up to anything? Ideally I'd like to be able to attach it to a Unibus
system or a PC.
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
I have available for the C64:
Micro Subtraction (Hayden) (Disk only)
Kids on Keys (Spinnaker)
10 Little Robots (no disk -- box & instr only)
Anyone want then for shipping and a couple of bucks?
P Manney
"...We must all give an account of ourselves to God."
Thousands of discounted photo items at http://www.hmcltd.net/pgphoto
Hello everyone, I'm bringing back to life a "LT33" (aka a DEC modified
ASR-33 teletype) and out of the gate I've got an issue.
When I switch on, into "local" mode, I get continuous "nul" typing. The
mechanism is doing the typing dance and its trying to type NUL. Where to
start? I've got the prints and am going to check out the keyboard area for
now, perhaps it has a clue.
I'm guessing it is either stuck in 'here is' mode, the keyboard is sending
infinite nuls, or something else :-)
--Chuck
From: "Merle K. Peirce" <at258(a)osfn.org>
<<My impression is that there probably are not all that many, and that the
first machines to exclude from such a list are the iMac grotesques. I would
offer just a very few for initial consideration:
Epson QX-10
Apricot
Honeywell DPS-6
Olivetti ETV-300
IBM PS/2 towers>>
These machines were all attractive computers and I like your idea about
discussing boxes just on good looks, but what's with this "grotesque" stuff
in reference to the iMac? I happen to think they look rather nice. Have you
ever seen a Lear Siegler ADM 5 terminal? I have one and it's cool. The iMac
looks a lot like it in terms of curves. Just because you don't particularly
like something doesn't mean it has to be "grotesque" or "gross" or some other
childish adjective. Best,
David Greelish
Classic Computing Press
www.classiccomputing.com
>> And don't forget the HP 200 LX with the Nokia cell phone that Simon used
>> in The Saint.
>That movie was horribly forgettable. I must've tuned it out at the point
>where he pulled this out.
I laughed all the way through the movie. The cold fusion secret tucked
into her underwear? Her cold fusion speech? Hilarious! And what's-his-name
doing the German guy? I was rolling on the floor!
Tim.
A few days ago, I was in a local used electronics/Junque (only
high-class stuff here :-)) and found a rackmount case with PS, SCSI
cables, and three devices for five bucks. Took it home, blew the dust
out, and found I'd gotten a Exabyte 8mm tape that worked perfectly with
my VAXCluster (once I'd reseated the cards, blew the dust out and ran a
cleaning tape through it), an Archive 160 meg QIC drive (have no use for
this, anyone want it?) and a 5.25 in floppy with what claims to be an
NCR SCSI intereface bolted to it. It's this last I need info on.
This interface board is the same size as the drive; at one end is the
power plug (it appears to be powered independently of the floppy) and
the SCSI header. The other end has a 34 pin header with a standard cable
going back to the 34-pin edge connector on the floppy. Has an NCR 5380
and an Intel 85272 as the main chips, with a lot of glue, as well as a
80188 CPU with ROM. There are two switch pack, one 4-pos, one 8-pos.
The 4-pos pack has the first three positions labeled FT and the last
position is labeled EXT PF.
The 8-position pack has the last three switches labeled ID (almost
certainly the SCSI address). Anyway, anyone ever seen one of these
before? I'm a little scared to just plug it in; I've seen lots of tape
drives but this is the only SCSI floppy I've ever seen, and I want to
take good care of it :-). Any info greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
Dann Lunsford
As far as aesthetic appeal goes, to my taste absolutely nothing beats
a Cray-2 !! Next would be the CDC 3000 series with its tinted glass panels,
next the Cray-1. (Ranking according to my personal taste, of course).
There are quite a few more aesthetically interesting
supercomputers; maybe if you spend so many millions of US$
(and in particular since buying supercomputers is or has been mostly a
prestige matter) aesthetically pleasing design can be expected.
John G. Zabolitzky
<> A RCA COSMAC 1802 is a microprocessor, right? And I still
<> have not find any evidence that there was a kit for the ELF,
<> the Popular Electronics ELF was just plans in a magazine.
<> You could say "ELF II/Super ELF".
Quest Electornics, ELF as per the PE article. I have one.
Allison
--- KFergason(a)aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 6/20/99 12:26:19 AM Central Daylight Time,
> mranalog(a)home.com writes:
>
> > > 4) Available from a manufacturer (not just plans in a magazine)
> > > RCA COSMAC 1802 / ELF / Super ELF
> >
> > A RCA COSMAC 1802 is a microprocessor, right?
Right.
> > And I still have not find any evidence that there was a kit for the ELF,
> > the Popular Electronics ELF was just plans in a magazine.
I have a Quest Elf that I built from a kit as a kid. It was the Popular
Science design, pre-1861 video chip. It has a speaker, a Q LED, 8 toggle
switches for data, DMA/EF4 pushbutton, RUN/LOAD/MEMPROT toggles and the
original TIL311 latching hex displays. My PCB is rev 2.1, 1979. I bought
just the PCB and assembly plans for $35 around 1980. The entire kit was
available for $99.
> > You could say "ELF II/Super ELF".
The Elf II was a different manufacturer, Netronics, IIRC. Quest made the Elf
and Super ELF.
> It should probably say RCA COSMAC VIP, as I have several of them.
Right. An entirely different beast - keypad, ROM, 1861 video, I/O expansion
slot, up to 4Kb on the board, system expansion slot, cassette interface. I
have one, too.
-ethan
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Thanks to all the folks who replied with suggestions and advice on my 7900A
drive!
I had previously written:
>>He said I could use any 14" disk media that was the right
>>thickness. Can't remember if it was 50 mils or 75 mils. I
>>think it's the same as the RK05. I'll find out the mils number
>>tonight when I compare my 7900 cartridge with my 7905/6
>>one.
The 7900A platters are 50mils. So that I can keep an eye out for cartridges
that I could steal the media out of, does anyone know which commonly
available cartriges use a 50mil 14" platter? I thought the 75mil platters
were much more common, but don't know for sure.
Thanks in advance!
Jay West