--- "Charles P. Hobbs" <transit(a)primenet.com> wrote:
> I first heard about the Amiga in 1984 (it was called "Lorraine" back then
> and not quite ready).
I ran across one in 1985 at Ohio State. fresh out of the crate. I knew I
wanted one.
> I eventually got an A1000 in 1987, and used it until 1993.
I got my A1000 in 1986 and an 8-bit ISA adapter called The Wedge in 1987
to attach a WD-WX-1 w/ST225 disk - 20Mb for $500; it beat the $1000 that
a "real" disk was going for. I later went from using The Wedge to using
the "Golden Gate II" card in my A3000 for Ethernet - it's a Zorro<->ISA
bridge card to let you use IBM cards with Unix and AmigaDOS. Eventually,
I bought the design and made a bunch of them under the name "GG2 Bus+".
> At that time, I thought about getting an A3000 w/Emplant (so I could
> run Mac DTP programs), but decided on a Mac LC III instead. . .
I went with the A3000/A-Max route - Localtalk for the Amiga and I could
hook my computer right up to a Mac-compatible laserprinter. It's still
set up at my right elbow, but I don't use it much anymore :-( I've gone
>from M$ Word on an emulated Mac to M$ Word on a Windoze box. Foo. This
is not progress.
I just went to our Amiga club's December meeting/party... a dozen people. At
one point, AmiCON, the third registered Amiga user group in the U.S., had over
300 members. It was a real world example of how far the Amiga has faded away.
If there are any Amiga users out there who are still using their machines for
"useful work", I still make the "GG2 Bus+" card. It comes with Ethernet, IDE,
serial and printer drivers and is *very* well supported under BSD-flavors of
Unix on the Amiga. Write me off the list for details.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
Hello,
I am looking for specifications of the old V.23 protocol, or general
informations about this.
Would someone know some hints ?
Thanks.
--
J.-P. Hofer
hofer(a)wgh.ch
__________________________________________________________________
Jean-Pierre Hofer Telephone : + 41 1 251 07 31
Ingenieur-conseil
Case postale 3126 E-mail : hofer(a)wgh.ch
CH - 8021 Zuerich
__________________________________________________________________
--- John B <dylanb(a)sympatico.ca> wrote:
> >--- John B <dylanb(a)sympatico.ca> wrote:
> >> BTW: Has anyone heard of a PDP-8/A500 ??? what is that?
> >
> >I wrote:
> >It happens to be the first model I ever laid hands on... KK8A, KM8A, DKC8AA
> >(the standard -8/a stuff), 12-slot box (the 20-slot box was for stuff like
> >the PDP-8/a 620). I am pretty sure (it's been a while) that the -8/a 500
> >has a core-capable power supply.
>
> I was told this mini was filled with core memory, has a bunch of RK05 packs,
> an rx01 and another thing they called a "panel box"- expander?
Well - that confirms the PSU question. I don't know what a "panel box" might
be, but it was possible to hook an older ONMIBUS cabinet to an -8/a with a
pair of cables that superficially resembled UNIBUS cables.
Want to sell the RK8E? I have a couple of drives, but I'd need at least one
16-sector pack, preferably a couple. I don't really need any hex-height
OMNIBUS core; I've got a KT8-A and a 128Kw MOS board. I'm still looking for
a programmers console, BTW.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
This reporter is looking for vintage computer geeks in San Diego to
interview.
Please respond directly to <shorsley(a)kpbs.org>.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 10:20:27 -0800
From: Scott Horsley <shorsley(a)kpbs.org>
To: vcf(a)vintage.org
Hi. I'm a radio reporter working on a story about vintage computer users.
If you know of any in the San Diego area who'd like to be interviewed about
their vintage machines, please have them contact me at shorsley(a)kpbs.org,
or by phone at 619/594-8130.
Thanks.
Sellam International Man of Intrigue and Danger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for a six in a pile of nines...
VCF East? VCF Europe!? YOU BETCHA!!
Stay tuned for more information
or contact me to find out how you can participate
http://www.vintage.org
On Dec 6, 18:21, Jean-Pierre Hofer wrote:
> I am looking for specifications of the old V.23 protocol, or general
> informations about this.
It's a CCITT modem standard for half-duplex asynchronous communication at
600 or 1200 baud (one direction, on the forward channel) with a 75 baud
back channel. Because the back channel is not just used for signalling, it
somtimes used to be called "asymmetric duplex". It's an FSK system, the
forward channel uses 1300Hz/1700Hz tones for 600 baud, or 1300Hz/2100Hz
tones for 1200 baud; the back channel uses 390Hz/450Hz. The lower
frequency is used for MARK and the higher for SPACE.
The standard also specifies the answer tone frequency (2100Hz) and some
timing but I can't remember the details.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
--- Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> wrote:
> > I recently got my hands on a classic DEC LA-180 RO...
I didn't know the LA180 ever came with a keyboard. My knowledge of the LA180
is that it was badged "DECprinter I" and came with a 40-pin parallel interface.
> You need a KL8-E or the like, not an LC8-E. The LC8-E is a parallel
> interface, and the LA180 is a serial device.
I have the OMNIBUS card for the LA180; I'd check the handle number, but I'm
not where it is. It is most assuredly a parallel device. Perhaps you are
thinking of the LA120? It was badged "DECwriter III". It _was_ serial, with
a four-digit LED display by the keyboard for set-up and status info.
I got my first LA180 because Newman Computer Exchange sent me a ticket for
free shipping on my next order. I figured that an LA180 was the heaviest
thing I would ever want from them. The printer came in handy a couple of
years later when I was doing PDP-11 contract work in my basement - PDP-11/23,
RLV11, LPV11 and a bunch of my old PDP-8 peripherals. Made my living for
nearly two years off that stuff. Out-of-pocket expense in 1988: $300 for
the PDP-11 (salvage from my day job), $100 for the RLV11 (used from a
reseller).
Very cost effective to me.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
I can't help commenting on this: I was a big Amiga computers
fan, I used them for a long time, they felt like an interersing
alternative to the PC/DOS/Windows hegemony. I believed they had a
superior technological background. But as the years went by, I had to
recognize that it was no longer a fact, and that the PC/Linux
combination advanced at a much higher rate, than the Amiga, that
basically remained still, both in hardware and software terms.
I can't help feeling nostalgic for reading posts about Amiga
computers in this Classical Computers mailing list...
Cheers,
--
*** Rodrigo Martins de Matos Ventura <yoda(a)isr.ist.utl.pt>
*** Web page: http://www.isr.ist.utl.pt/~yoda
*** Teaching Assistant and MSc Student at ISR:
*** Instituto de Sistemas e Robotica, Polo de Lisboa
*** Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa, PORTUGAL
*** PGP fingerprint = 0119 AD13 9EEE 264A 3F10 31D3 89B3 C6C4 60C6 4585
I am looking for the following items. (Get ready, this is going to be a
pretty varied list!)
----Pictures of Computers----
Commodore Hyperion (looks like a Dynalogic Hyperion, & could be the same
thing?)
TI-99/7 (Proposed, but never released. May never have entered the prototype
stage.)
TI-99/4B (not a typo! See above comment.)
Commodore PC-5 (Predecessor of the [in]famous PC-10 series, no other
information known.)
Commodore TOI (also known to be called the Commodore 8033 or the Color PET.)
----Software----
If somebody could provide me with cpoies of the following software, , e-mail
me ASAP!
SmoothTalker, from First Byte, for Macintosh (on an 800K disk only!)
Elite for Commodore 64.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Ethan Dicks <ethan_dicks(a)yahoo.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, December 06, 1999 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: Everyone here should read this.. I thought I'd seen everything.
>
>
>--- John B <dylanb(a)sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> BTW: Has anyone heard of a PDP-8/A500 ??? what is that?
>
>It happens to be the first model I ever laid hands on... KK8A, KM8A, DKC8AA
>(the standard -8/a stuff), 12-slot box (the 20-slot box was for stuff like
>the PDP-8/a 620). I am pretty sure (it's been a while) that the -8/a 500
>has a core-capable power supply. Lower stuff, like the -8/a 320, could
only
>take MOS memory (MS8C, et al.)
>
>I've only ever seen the 12-slot PDP-8/a boxes myself, but a couple of
>flavors of them.
I was told this mini was filled with core memory, has a bunch of RK05 packs,
an rx01 and another thing they called a "panel box"- expander?
>
>-ethan
>
>
>=====
>Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
>Please send all replies to
>
> erd(a)iname.com
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place.
>Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
>
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, December 06, 1999 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: Scrap value of machines (was Re: ebay feedback)
>It's pretty obvious, then, isn't it, that the place to be is on their side
>rather than bidding against them? Even if you have to pay a little more or
I wish that would work but *most* of them don't care if you are going to put
down a few thousand on a mini. (notice the few thousand now)... They deal in
volume and don't care what you are looking for.. well, at least the big
guys.
>work a little more, it's better to be in a position to call the guy up on a
>free morning and ask whether he's got anything new that you'd like to look
>at, isn't it?
>
This works with smaller scrappers but they rare;y get the juicy stuff. I
like a scrapper that goes into an old factory and levels it. The big
scrappers get cool toys all the time.
>Dick
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Christian Fandt <cfandt(a)netsync.net>
>To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
><classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
>Date: Monday, December 06, 1999 9:07 AM
>Subject: Re: Scrap value of machines (was Re: ebay feedback)
>
>
>>Upon the date 12:58 AM 12/6/99 -0800, Mike Ford said something like:
>>>>Where can you find out what the gold/aluminum/steel value of a
>>>>computer at? The obvious solution is to know what a scrapper is
>>>>willing to pay, and add $10 to your bid. A scrapper will never
>>>>spend more to buy something than it is worth, a collector will.
>>>
>>>Not a good assumption. A scrapper might be willing to spend whatever it
>>>took to make you never get a winning bid and just go away.
>>
>>Yes, an appropriate correlation is that if they can crush computers
(before
>>shredding the carcass) then they can cru$h you.
>>
>>Their profits drop corresponding with losses of bids so they're going to
>>spend extra in the short term to protect their profits in the long term.
>>
>>Regards, Chris
>>-- --
>>Christian Fandt, Electronic/Electrical Historian
>>Jamestown, NY USA cfandt(a)netsync.net
>> Member of Antique Wireless Association
>> URL: http://www.antiquewireless.org/
>
>
--- John B <dylanb(a)sympatico.ca> wrote:
> BTW: Has anyone heard of a PDP-8/A500 ??? what is that?
It happens to be the first model I ever laid hands on... KK8A, KM8A, DKC8AA
(the standard -8/a stuff), 12-slot box (the 20-slot box was for stuff like
the PDP-8/a 620). I am pretty sure (it's been a while) that the -8/a 500
has a core-capable power supply. Lower stuff, like the -8/a 320, could only
take MOS memory (MS8C, et al.)
I've only ever seen the 12-slot PDP-8/a boxes myself, but a couple of
flavors of them.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
I went through the same exercise after finding that their connector was
different from the "standard" dot martix displays they listed, or some other
obvious deviation from the norm. I got nowhere. I checked with GRID, since
they were still alive then, and, likewise, got nowhere.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Arfon Gryffydd <arfonrg(a)texas.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, December 06, 1999 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: Any GRID experts out there?
>>I bought this thing to use as a display for a test intstrument I was
>>developing as a mental masturbation exercise, but quickly went back to a
CRT
>>after running into trouble getting any kind of definitive interface spec.
I
>>might still use it for something some day if the data comes my way, but
I'm
>>really not looking for more projects.
>>
>>Have you got any interface specifications for this beastie, or do you know
>>where they might be available?
>
>
>I contacted several offices of Hitachi because at the time, I thought my
>GRiD was irrepairable. I can tell you that after spending many corporate
>dollars (for my personal project (Thanks, LiteOn!)), if Hitachi has specs
>on that beastie, they are not releasing them. I contacted the division
>that handles those displays and though I called them repeatedly, they never
>returned any of my calls.
>
>If you can ever find the spec.s, I would sure like a copy!
>
>A
>----------------------------------------
> Tired of Micro$oft???
>
> Move up to a REAL OS...
>######__ __ ____ __ __ _ __ #
>#####/ / / / / __ | / / / / | |/ /##
>####/ / / / / / / / / / / / | /###
>###/ /__ / / / / / / / /_/ / / |####
>##/____/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_____/ /_/|_|####
># ######
> ("LINUX" for those of you
> without fixed-width fonts)
>----------------------------------------
>Be a Slacker! http://www.slackware.com
>
>Slackware Mailing List:
>http://www.digitalslackers.net/linux/list.html
--- Rick Bensene <rickb(a)bensene.com> wrote:
> Hello, all,
>
> I recently got my hands on a classic DEC LA-180 RO (receive
> only) printer.
> There's a second board, that connects to the main electronics
> board via a ribbon cable. This board has an old AY5-1013 UART
> chip, and a bunch more TTL on it, and appears to be a serial
> interface.
Ah. This paragraph wasn't copied in the other message I just replied to...
I've never seen this option, but, with something like this in place, that
explains the questions about serial.
> I want to try to connect this up to my PDP8/e system as print device.
> The LC8-E card has a Berg connector that is identical to the Berg
> connector on the printer electronics board of the LA-180.
Check which pins are in use. DEC used the 40-pin Berg connector in just about
everything.
> I'm wondering if the 'parallel' interface of the LA-180 is compatible
> with the LC8-E card...
It's a pretty simple interface. According to the 1978 Microcomputer Handbook,
the parallel out on the DKC8AA can be used to drive an LA180 with two caveats:
the data is inverted, and the IOP instructions are different. Electrically,
though, they are compatible. It's little more than 8-bits, a couple of
handshake lines and a couple of status lines.
> ...I don't have printsets for the
> LC8-E card, so I don't know the pinout of the connector for the
> printer, nor do I have any information at all on the LA-180 in
> terms of the 'parallel' port interface of the printer.
I don't have any prints on my ONMIBUS LA180 parallel card, but I do have
prints for the LA180 (and the DKC8AA)
> Obviously, I'm not going to just plug it in and see what happens :-)
If all is TTL, nothing *bad* should happen, but your caution is reasonable.
> Anyone out there know if this will work? If so, is a special
> cable needed, or will a 'straight through' cable work?
*If* the LC8-E is the LA180 parallel interface, a straight cable is what
you want. I'd check the handle number of my own card, but I can't do that
until tomorrow night.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
Yes, it's about that size. (One can interpret the "size" in quite a number
of ways.)
I bought this thing to use as a display for a test intstrument I was
developing as a mental masturbation exercise, but quickly went back to a CRT
after running into trouble getting any kind of definitive interface spec. I
might still use it for something some day if the data comes my way, but I'm
really not looking for more projects.
Have you got any interface specifications for this beastie, or do you know
where they might be available?
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Arfon Gryffydd <arfonrg(a)texas.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, December 06, 1999 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Any GRID experts out there?
>It sounds like my GRiD 1530 display... Made by hitachi... two slider pots
>(on the sides)... Monochrome... Dose it have about a 10.5" (diagonal)
>display area???
>
>At 09:08 AM 12/4/1999 -0700, you wrote:
>>This thing has got to be at least 10 years old, but, here goes . . . I was
>>scrounging through some boxes in my basement this morning . . . and found
a
>>flat-panel display module, probably monochrome, with the label LM758CXAGNR
>>and the HITACHI brand name emblazoned on it. It has a couple of slide
pots
>>hanging from it, each bearing the name GRID in its silkscreen.
>>
>>Is any of you folks familiar enough with devices of this type or familar
>>enough with GRID to steer me onto some information about how one might use
>>this display panel for something useful?
>>
>>thanx
>>
>>Dick
>>
>>
>>
>----------------------------------------
> Tired of Micro$oft???
>
> Move up to a REAL OS...
>######__ __ ____ __ __ _ __ #
>#####/ / / / / __ | / / / / | |/ /##
>####/ / / / / / / / / / / / | /###
>###/ /__ / / / / / / / /_/ / / |####
>##/____/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_____/ /_/|_|####
># ######
> ("LINUX" for those of you
> without fixed-width fonts)
>----------------------------------------
>Be a Slacker! http://www.slackware.com
>
>Slackware Mailing List:
>http://www.digitalslackers.net/linux/list.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis(a)mcmanis.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Friday, December 03, 1999 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: Everyone here should read this.. I thought I'd seen everything.
>As with anything, the higher your are the more you see.
>
>To someone who just sits down in my office and sees the PDP-8/E sitting on
>my shelf (sometimes running, sometimes not :-) it seems *impossible* to
>find a PDP-8. Then when you start looking you find the fringes of the
>"surplus" marketplace where things appear from time to time. Then you find
Speaking of which.. it looks like I have some read trips before XMAS. I have
a couple of PDP-8As, some 8es, (6 in all I think).. Only reason I am
travelling rather than shipping is because every unit has 32K of
core..hmmmmmm.core...., some with RK05s and the rest with RX01/2s..
These units are getting harder to find.. I am really working the scrappers
and factories.... looks like I might not reach my goal of 120
PDP-8(s-plural) by next fall... but I am flying out to Mr. Gold on
Wednesday/Thursday.
BTW: Has anyone heard of a PDP-8/A500 ??? what is that?
>the liquidators, then you find the scrappers. And then, in John's case, you
>find one *huge* scrapper.
>
>The key is that now we know about them we may be able to save some stuff.
>
Things are looking good.. just a little slow to start.
PDP-8 and other rare mini computers
http://www.pdp8.com
>--Chuck
>
>
PDP-8 and other rare mini computers
http://www.pdp8.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, December 04, 1999 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: Tube experts! - I T WORKS!
>>
>> ITS WORKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>Excellent....!!
>
>> Special thanks to Tony's idea of hooking up an isolation transformer
(6.3V
>> but rated to 3000V)..
>>
>> Okay, I did some of Christians tests and I found that the Transformer
indeed
>> was arching into the main supply. (I won two of these scopes on EBay).
>>
>> Here is the funny part.. I rarely go into surplus stores but tonight I
made
>> an exception. I told the guy at the counter what my problem was and he
had a
>> box full of 6.3Volt isolation transformers rated to 3000KV
>
>I wish I had access to suprlus stores like that. The few I know over here
>have bits of battered transistor radios and not much else.
I ship stuff to the UK all the time. If you have something you are in
desparate need of (like that transformer).. please email me. If I see it I
can pick it up and ship it.
>
>> HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH.. I could not believe it. I bought a few and tried one
out.
>> The scope now has a perfect trace. On XY the dot is crisp and very
stable. I
>> have to align the scope.. but will do so after I get all brand new tubes
in
>> it.
>
>A word of warning. There is _NO POINT_ in replacing all the valves in a
>Tektronix 'scope -- most of them will be fine even after many years of
>use (as an example, my 555 has had only a couple of valves replaced since
>new). You _will_ cause problems if you replace valves indiscriminatately.
>And you will have to do a full calibration (which is not as easy as it
>looks). Some valves are probably 'Tektronix Tested Tubes', which are
>essentially selected or matched ones. Replace those with ordinary valves
>and you'll have a long day ahead of you trying to make it meet the specs.
>
Okay.. (my lack of tube knowledge talking)... a TV repair guy I know who use
to do a lot of tube work told me tubes only last a couple of years. I did
not want to have to recalibrate this scope everytime a tube drops out. Also,
I will be reselling quite a few of the tubescopes with PDP-8s and don't want
the scopes going south a month after they get them. I've ordered the spare
but first I'll see how long the scope will last with the ones it has now.
Are there particular tubes that will go regularly and should I replace
those?
>The best thing to do is to run through the calibration making as few
>adjustments as possible. If some adjustment won't set up properly, then
>debug the circuit. Don't necessarily replace the valve, which may well
>_not_ be the problem (I've actually replaced more transistors than valves
>in old Tektronix 500-series over the years!).
>
This one has 4 transistors in it. I am checking the caps right now.
>Oh, and don't trust valve testers either. Certainly not simple 'emission
>testers', which certainly won't show how a valve will perform in the
>circuit. But even a mutual conductance tester, like my Avo Mk 4 won't
>necessarily tell you how the valve will work under the conditions used in
>the 'scope. The best test for a valve in one of these units is 'Does the
>stage perform correctly'.
>
Yes.
>So, buy spares if you want to, but don't replace parts unnecessarily.
>
Okay.
>
>> The only reason I don't like tubes is because they are very flakey in old
>> mini computers.. From what I have heard from people who use to support
them
>> every power cycles was a nightmare. I am trying to stick to minis that
can
>
>This may well have been true when you have a _lot_ of valves. But I can
>assure you it's much less of a problem in these 'scopes...
>
>>
Okay.
>> I know.. What scares the hell out of me is I am hooking this thing up to
my
>> 8/S.. I am going to put some highvoltage diodes between the 8/S,8I and
the
>> scope to make sure if the scope goes bananas I don't blow a few hundred
>> transistors in the minis.
>
>Reminds me of what can happen when the CRT in an HP9100 develops an
>internal short. It blows transistors all over one of the deflection
>boards, and then applies about 220V to the outputs from the processor
>chassis. This generally wipes out a number of diodes on the gating board,
>and if you're unlucky kills some transistors on a flip-flop board, some
>transistors on the ROM address decoder, etc.
>
My point exactly.. there is no way I am going to let anything over +-10V hit
the PDP-8s(plural)
>> http://www.vacuumtubes.com/ has all the tubes in stock (all new in the
>> box).. It is costing me over $300 for three sets of the tubes though :-(
>>
>> 6DJ8 Amperex tubes are over $30 each :-(
>
>Any reason that you think they're defective? Other than they're old
>(which is no good reason!).
>
No, they work fine. I just don't want to have to recalibrate the scope every
time one decides to die.
If that's not an issue then I will leave them alone.
john
--
http://www.pdp8.com/
>-tony
>
>
It's pretty obvious, then, isn't it, that the place to be is on their side
rather than bidding against them? Even if you have to pay a little more or
work a little more, it's better to be in a position to call the guy up on a
free morning and ask whether he's got anything new that you'd like to look
at, isn't it?
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Fandt <cfandt(a)netsync.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, December 06, 1999 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: Scrap value of machines (was Re: ebay feedback)
>Upon the date 12:58 AM 12/6/99 -0800, Mike Ford said something like:
>>>Where can you find out what the gold/aluminum/steel value of a
>>>computer at? The obvious solution is to know what a scrapper is
>>>willing to pay, and add $10 to your bid. A scrapper will never
>>>spend more to buy something than it is worth, a collector will.
>>
>>Not a good assumption. A scrapper might be willing to spend whatever it
>>took to make you never get a winning bid and just go away.
>
>Yes, an appropriate correlation is that if they can crush computers (before
>shredding the carcass) then they can cru$h you.
>
>Their profits drop corresponding with losses of bids so they're going to
>spend extra in the short term to protect their profits in the long term.
>
>Regards, Chris
>-- --
>Christian Fandt, Electronic/Electrical Historian
>Jamestown, NY USA cfandt(a)netsync.net
> Member of Antique Wireless Association
> URL: http://www.antiquewireless.org/
Two things. First, if the person who acquired a Sun 1 last summer could
contact me, I have a set of unused and probably in the shrinkwrap set
of SunOS 1.1 manuals that they might be interested in.
Also, I might be able to get some old HP documentation. 9000 series 200/300
if i recall (and primarily for 200). These are the old HP's with 5.25"
floppy drives that we had back in the early 80's in the computer science
department. The problem is, there is a lot of this HP doc, but its all
in the sub-basement, and its rather difficult to justify getting a key
to gain access to the sub-basement. There is a chance I will get getting the
key once more, because we're trying to have a new phone line pulled through
conduit down there.
I also have a pair of IBM DOS 3.3 in shrinkwrap. These are in the standard
book/slipcase style, and say they come with both 5.25" and 3.5" disks.
There were also copies of TopView and some IBM network software in the
same condition as the DOS, ie, book/slipcase, and shrinkwrapped. Still
in the sub-basement though.
For myself, I now have 12 wide, and 2 narrow 'placeholders' or whatever
you call them, for 19" DEC racks. You know what I mean, those black with
yellowish edges placeholders for filling in the spots on the 19" rack
that are currently empty... *Big Grin*
I'm always open to trade offers...
-Lawrence LeMay
While I'm at it...
I've got a DecMate III that doesn't want to play. On power
up, it displays "32" at the center of the screen. I've got
WPS diskettes, and if they are in the disk drive it seems to
glance at them, but still just shows "32" on the screen.
If I unplug the keyboard and boot, then it shows "48".
Sounds to me like a bitmask; missing keyboard is the "16"
bit.
Can anyone tell me what the "32" means? If it is a bitmask,
can you also tell the meanings of the other bits?
Please cc: the answer directly to me, as I've temporarily
unsubscribed.
Thanks!
Bill.
I've got a line on an NCR tower in Miami FL. If you are
interested in picking up or paying shipping, let me know.
Please e-mail to me directly, as I've temporarily unsubscribed
(can't handle the volume).
Cheers,
Bill.
This thing has got to be at least 10 years old, but, here goes . . . I was
scrounging through some boxes in my basement this morning . . . and found a
flat-panel display module, probably monochrome, with the label LM758CXAGNR
and the HITACHI brand name emblazoned on it. It has a couple of slide pots
hanging from it, each bearing the name GRID in its silkscreen.
Is any of you folks familiar enough with devices of this type or familar
enough with GRID to steer me onto some information about how one might use
this display panel for something useful?
thanx
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis(a)mcmanis.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, December 02, 1999 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: Everyone here should read this.. I thought I'd seen everything.
>>FWIW: If he's under an "assured destruct" contract, and you're buying from
>>him,
>>then you both can be in a lot of hot water if the wrong people find out.
>
>OTHOH I have gotten things that were scrapped under "assured destruct"
>contracts because the definition of "destruct" is "cannot be reconstituted
>to work in the original application." under those terms taking the PDP-8/M
>out of a machine tool "destroys" the machine tool because without its brain
>it won't work anymore. But the PDP-8 still does :-)
>
Thanks for that info Chuck.
Most of the minis/boards I am pulling out I will try and restrict to
University/Factory systems. I don't want to get in any trouble... but.. How
the heck does he know which system should be destroyed or not?? (If you saw
the place you would understand).
If I do get the nerve to purchase a *huge* supercomputer from him (if it
comes from a manufacturer) then I really can't resell it...
>--Chuck
>
>
<Okay.. (my lack of tube knowledge talking)... a TV repair guy I know who us
<to do a lot of tube work told me tubes only last a couple of years. I did
In TVs where the tubes are low end and not always run at their best
operating points that may be true. In Qualtity test equipment that is
rarely the case.
<not want to have to recalibrate this scope everytime a tube drops out. Also
<I will be reselling quite a few of the tubescopes with PDP-8s and don't wan
Mechanical shock and power cycling tends to ruin tubes faster. Generally
tubes have good lifetimes and can be considered reliable (excluding the
effects of heat on surrounding parts) .
<the scopes going south a month after they get them. I've ordered the spare
<but first I'll see how long the scope will last with the ones it has now.
Best to leave be unless there is a direct indication one may be soft.
Don't forget with the exception of open filements or shorts from mechanical
shock tubes tend to fail slowly and soft.
<This one has 4 transistors in it. I am checking the caps right now.
Good idea s those (caps) do fail.
<>> The only reason I don't like tubes is because they are very flakey in ol
<>> mini computers.. From what I have heard from people who use to support
<them
<>> every power cycles was a nightmare. I am trying to stick to minis that
That is true, usually they get filiment failures and those are easy to
spot. Power cycles tend to accelerate that. then again I had a tube
organ (some 80+ tubes) and only had one failure in 8 years.
<>> 8/S.. I am going to put some highvoltage diodes between the 8/S,8I and
<>> scope to make sure if the scope goes bananas I don't blow a few hundred
<>> transistors in the minis.
???? Why? The scope is an enclosed system that would be hard pressed to
emit high voltages back into the system it's hooked to. It's not like the
HP9100 in that respect. For the RM503 to do that the HV lead would have to
fall on one of the input lines! As I remember the series 8 Display scopes
were driven off a pair of D/As and some single bit output to blank the
beam. If you have something different I'd like to hear about that.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Fandt <cfandt(a)netsync.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, December 05, 1999 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: Tube experts! - I T WORKS!
>Upon the date 02:16 PM 12/5/99 -0500, John B said something like:
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
> -- snip --
>>>???? Why? The scope is an enclosed system that would be hard pressed to
>>>emit high voltages back into the system it's hooked to. It's not like
the
>>>HP9100 in that respect. For the RM503 to do that the HV lead would have
to
>>>fall on one of the input lines! As I remember the series 8 Display
scopes
>>>were driven off a pair of D/As and some single bit output to blank the
>>>beam. If you have something different I'd like to hear about that.
>
>I agree with Allison. Without knowing exactly the mods done by DEC that you
>mention below, I'm still assuming the output of the D/As is connected right
>into the SO-239 style front panel input connectors. In that case, the input
>circuitry is isolated from any HV. The inputs go directly to the vertical
>and horizontal amplifier tube grids (the 6DJ8's) after passing thru their
>respective attenuator switch assemblies.
>
They did not hook up to the front panel inputs. They used 3 connectors on
the back of the scope (x,y,z). All went into the amplifiers (except for Z of
course).
>>
>>Three D/As. 1 12 bit for x, 1 12 bit for y, and 1 3 bit for intensity.
When
>>the transformer went in this RM503 it raised the regular voltages
throughout
>>the scope to 500+ volts... in some places over 1000. That was present
right
>
>Ouch. I hope bypass capacitors and some coupling caps haven't had their
>dielectric damaged. Most of the ceramic caps and poly caps have ratings of
>500 and 600 volts DC respectively and 1KV is pushing or exceeding their
>surge voltage rating.
>
No, I tested it for very short times. I don't bother cycling power when I
see stuff like that.
>>through to the input. I am protecting the D/A converters as I don't need
the
>>PDPs taking major beatings in the future. All the supplies inside the
scope
>>(-100,100,250,85,-3000 were going nuts). The other RM503 I have has the
same
>>problem. I am going to put an isolation transformer on every RM503,RM560
>>scope I get to solve the problem ahead of time.
>
>The other one has same problem? Interesting coincidence or possibly a
>common failure mode of this scope. I *was* going to put a benchtop style
>503 on my 'hunt for' list as it looks to be an excellent X-Y scope for my
>bench but I'll do some further thinking on that I guess.
>
Yes it does. But don't worry... I like this 503 and with an isolation
transformer inside that problem will never happen again.
>>
>>The 8 Display controllers have the intensity option :-) (for spacewars of
>>course). The AX08 (XR option) and the 34D (standard) had a 3 bit intensity
>>D/A output for the scope. The RM503s were modified by DEC for intensity
>>control.
>
>That manual you said you have, is it from DEC or Tek? I'm curious about the
Both, one from Tek and the LAB-8/34D interface manual from dec.
>mods. If you have a vanilla Tek manual like I have you can see that there
>are a pair of binding posts on the back of the unit which may be labeled
>"CRT GRID" and "GND." The GRID connection goes directly to the CRT grid
>through a 0.001 mfd capacitor.
>
>Now if DEC has done some fancy stuff to the 'scope by intrusively
>interfacing the PDP8 display controller directly to the deflection
>amplifier circuits in some manner then yes, I'd be leery of potential
>damage to the PDP circuits. Same for the intensity modulation (aka Z-axis
>modulation) circuit.
>
Yes they did... and I will do the same with some isolation added.
This scope is surprisingly stable... I just finished building a flip chip
tester and will be populating the 34D tonight... I hope it *lights* up.
john
http://www.pdp8.com/
>Regards, Chris
>-- --
>Christian Fandt, Electronic/Electrical Historian
>Jamestown, NY USA cfandt(a)netsync.net
> Member of Antique Wireless Association
> URL: http://www.antiquewireless.org/
>
It's rather comical.. poor thing.. The 8/s wasn't exactly a super computer
but it is having a little difficulty printing a line of 32 characters (5X7
bits). I can read the text but by the time it finishes drawing the end of
the line, the first few characters start disappearing. I will try and post
some pictures over the next couple of days. It is pretty cool to see this
unit draw on an oscilloscope.
I will try some video games (some were written for the 8/s) and post some
pictures of that as well.
john
PDP-8 and other rare mini computers
http://www.pdp8.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Ford <mikeford(a)socal.rr.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, December 06, 1999 4:09 AM
Subject: Re: Tube experts! - I T WORKS!
>>> The tube newsgroup recently has been talking about buying old scopes
just
>>> to harvest the tubes. When you get a good look at what good quality
tubes
>>
>>Is it just me, or is this as distasteful as scrapping classic computers
>>for gold? Old 'scopes have a perfectly good use already -- to display
>>waveforms
>
>I have a Dumont 304a I tried to get $10 for without success. Pulling the
>tubes will increase the value nicely. Its just like the 1130, if nobody is
>willing to pay some premium over the value of the gold, then nobody wants
>it very much.
>
>
>
-----Original Message-----
From: Innfogra(a)aol.com <Innfogra(a)aol.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, December 05, 1999 2:03 PM
Subject: ebay feedback
>In a message dated 12/5/1999 10:22:16 AM Pacific Standard Time,
>rigdonj(a)intellistar.net writes:
>
>> >
>> >Can you list negative feedback for a person even if you had no dealings
>> >with them???
>>
>No you can't anymore. If you detect or suspect fraud then anyone can report
>that to Safe Harbor, the customer service department. I have done that, and
>like keeping up with spares, if you have a good reason for suspicions you
>should report it.
>
>The old adage still holds, "If it is too good to be true then it generally
>isn't." Some frauds are easy to detect.
>
>The "IBM MF' guy is just stupid. I bet his item gets no bids. Stupid people
>don't deserve a response.
>
>The DEC card in France. I don't think I would send cash up front to him.
>However he could just be a low budget person, this may be just fine. Scrap
>value on that card is about $8.00 in todays market.
>
David Winter (the guy in France) has bid on some of my items and always paid
quickly. He seems to collect boards but does not buy entire systems.
>I don't think any IBM 1130 is worth more than a couple of hundred in scrap
by
>the way. I suspect less than that.
>
Then I guess the scrappers will be outbidding you..... The larger 1960 mini
computers had a lot more gold in them than the '70s models as the gold was
plated thicker in the '60s. The 1130 (from what I can remember) has more
than $100US in aluminum in it (just cpu + printer). I don't know what the
gold content is.. (I'll find out.. I know a company that does).. BTW I just
lost an IBM 360 to a gold scrapper [bid more than me]. Some of the metal
scrappers I know never bothered to look at gold content.. what's scaring the
hell out of me are these guys that know to the penny what they can extract
out of it and generally bid a lot higher than most.
john
PDP-8 and other rare mini computers
http://www.pdp8.com
>Paxton
>
In a message dated 12/4/1999 10:05:36 PM Pacific Standard Time,
mrdos(a)swbell.net writes:
> would take it seriously. It's really not a bad idea, and I'm sure our fellow
> collectors would go for it. We really need an organization to preserve old
> computers. I go to scrap yards and see classic machines ripped apart all
the
> ti
While I like the idea of an organization to preserve old computers I suspect
there are already several. This list actually works well for rescues.
The biggest problem is that the scrappers are rarely computer literate. If
they are they are already selling on ebay and the Internet. Most scrappers
are metals oriented. Even if they are recyclers the bottom line is the value
of the metals. Volume is the problem, you must scrap or get buried in it.
The best answer is to make friends with a scrapper. Anyone who will pay twice
the scrap value consistently will be a welcome customer. In the long run you
may get systems set aside for you to look at. Ask for particular brands or
items but don't become a pest. They need to know what you are looking for.
Check on a regular basis. Don't ask them to call you unless you are willing
to offer significant money. They are busy and you are not a major part of
their business.
I bet there are enough people on the list to cover the major scrappers in
each city. If each person adopted one we could flood this list with
equipment. And probably dump enough on ebay to depress prices.
I am adopting one here in Portland. And that brings up paper tape punches. He
has a REMEX paper tape punch and reader set. It is shrink wrapped on a pallet
and I have not had a chance to look at it yet. He wants $250 but may be open
to offers. He sells a lot of stuff to Western Numerical Controls. They are
old and extremely heavy, I would say late 70s but that is a guess. If anyone
is interested please email me off the list.
Paxton
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Fandt <cfandt(a)netsync.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, December 05, 1999 9:07 PM
Subject: Gold price was: Re: ebay feedback
>Upon the date 01:07 PM 12/5/99 -0500, John B said something like:
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Innfogra(a)aol.com <Innfogra(a)aol.com>
>
> -- snip --
>>>I don't think any IBM 1130 is worth more than a couple of hundred in
scrap
>>by
>>>the way. I suspect less than that.
>>>
>>
>>Then I guess the scrappers will be outbidding you..... The larger 1960
mini
>>computers had a lot more gold in them than the '70s models as the gold was
>>plated thicker in the '60s. The 1130 (from what I can remember) has more
>>than $100US in aluminum in it (just cpu + printer). I don't know what the
>>gold content is.. (I'll find out.. I know a company that does).. BTW I
just
>
>Gold was a lot cheaper per ounce back in those days compared to now even
>when considering inflation. US$35 an ounce I think I recall in the late
>60's/early 70's before it really shot up in price. Was up to US$700 or so
>for a short time a couple of decades ago. Around US$300 per ounce now I
>think. So it would be probable to find connectors, circuit card
>connections, etc. with a heavier layer of gold on a 60's-vintage machine
>like the 1130. Also, there was a whole *heap* more connections in such a
>machine vs. the highly integrated mainframes/minis of rather recent times.
>This gives a better perspective of what those scrappers will pay for a
>machine. But $4K for an 1130 as John reported hearing still seems high.
>Other really precious metals inside of it? Platinum? Goo-gobs of silver (at
>about US$3 an ounce)?
I thought he was out of his tree when he told me what he was paying for the
mainframes. I didn't believe it until I saw a fax on a piece of equipment in
the warehouse which showed he bid $8000 on an IBM 30 series mainframe (water
cooled) THAT WAS ONLY THE CPU!. He had other bids on the other parts. He
looks at each piece, puts a price on it and then totals it on the bottom. I
believe he said the Hitachi supers used Platinum [not sure, he did mention
one metal other than silver or gold).
BTW: The sick &*^*&*(^ offered to buy the two Fujitsus I have coming in for
a decent $$$ due to gold content. He also asked me if I was interested in
selling any of my 1960's minis for gold as well. As I will probably be
sending the Vax 6000 I get to him (hey! I can't pull minis out of him
without sending some...), I will ask him to quote me on:
Fujitsu Super computer (I'll list the items as I saw them on his fax).
The Vax 6000/610 with drives, etc...
An IBM360
and a PDP-8/S
I want to know what kind of $$$ he is actually going to offer. I do get a
lot of sites willing to accept $1-3K for *many systems* but I hate to
compete with this kind of company without knowing what I should be offering.
>
>>lost an IBM 360 to a gold scrapper [bid more than me]. Some of the metal
>>scrappers I know never bothered to look at gold content.. what's scaring
the
>>hell out of me are these guys that know to the penny what they can extract
>>out of it and generally bid a lot higher than most.
>
>Sounds like they have a network or something in which they describe (or
>boast about) what they've salvaged.
>
This guy did 13 million pounds last year. I am sure he knows how much $$$ in
metal is in ever mini/mainframe/super computer on the planet.. He even knows
the contents for Apple IIcs [don't laugh.. he had a skid full of them] and
IBM PS/2 XXX series.
john
http://www.pdp8.com/
>Regards, Chris
>-- --
>Christian Fandt, Electronic/Electrical Historian
>Jamestown, NY USA cfandt(a)netsync.net
> Member of Antique Wireless Association
> URL: http://www.antiquewireless.org/
>
>I was going thru some drives and tapes yesterday while trying to
>resurrect my MVII and came across a v4.7 distribution I din't know I
>had. This leads me to ask, one, if the person looking for same a few
>days back (Enrico?) found one. And a second, stupid question. Stupid
>because most of you probably know the answer. But as a PDP11 type
>relatively new to the VAXworld I'd like to know what is the
>difference/Is there a difference between VMS, MicroVMS? The tape I found
>is labeled MicroVMS v4.7 bin.
In the late V4 days, there were two kinds of VMS distribution kits:
"full VMS", as you would install on a 11/730, 11/750, or 11/780, or
8600, or..., and there was "MicroVMS", which is what you put on your
Microvax I or II.
"MicroVMS" distribution kits were on huge stacks of floppies (RX50 or RX33
depending on what flavor you needed) and TK50 carts.
MicroVMS is a "trimmed-down" VMS distribution, with the parts that
aren't necessary (like Big-VAX support) or aren't usable on a Microvax
(like the RSX-compatibility mode stuff) taken out.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Hi, Dave and the list,
It occurred to me tonight that my comments to the list regarding the moron
posting some old PC as a mainframe on E-bay could have been misinterpreted
where AOL was concerned.
When I mentioned that the guy's posting from an AOL address 'wasn't likely
to help,' I was merely referring to the popular stereotype that many
techies I've met seem to have regarding AOL users.
This stereotype holds that most AOL users have no clue about how
computers, or any type of electronics, do what they do, can barely find the
power switch unassisted, and that they wouldn't know a mainframe from a
toaster oven.
My comments were in reference to the fact that anyone even the slightest
bit hardware-literate would likely be suspicious of the auction because it
was posted using an AOL contact address.
Now, my own view is that this stereotype is a big bunch of meadow muffins.
You are living proof of that. AOL may not be my provider of choice, but
that doesn't mean that others will see it that way. I try not to make a
judgment call one way or another until I've actually seen free-form
questions or writings from the user in question.
Translation: No offense meant. I was merely making an observation based on
popular stereotypes.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
For the benefit of the various HP hunters, there will be an auction in
San Diego on Saturday, Dec 11th at 10 AM. Site is at 9389 Dowdy Drive
off Miramar Road. Inspection Thurs 2PM-8PM and Sat 8 AM until start of
auction.
Equipment is purportedly from Pacific Bell Concord CA facility. Over
30 HP 9000 controllers as well as Digital controllers and drives,
Gandalf controllers ...
Contact A-1 Auction Liquidators
858-689-2324 Voice
858-689-2334 Fax
- don
-----Original Message-----
From: Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, December 05, 1999 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: Tube experts! - I T WORKS!
><Okay.. (my lack of tube knowledge talking)... a TV repair guy I know who
us
><to do a lot of tube work told me tubes only last a couple of years. I did
>
>In TVs where the tubes are low end and not always run at their best
>operating points that may be true. In Qualtity test equipment that is
>rarely the case.
>
><not want to have to recalibrate this scope everytime a tube drops out.
Also
><I will be reselling quite a few of the tubescopes with PDP-8s and don't
wan
>
>Mechanical shock and power cycling tends to ruin tubes faster. Generally
>tubes have good lifetimes and can be considered reliable (excluding the
>effects of heat on surrounding parts) .
>
><the scopes going south a month after they get them. I've ordered the spare
><but first I'll see how long the scope will last with the ones it has now.
>
>Best to leave be unless there is a direct indication one may be soft.
>Don't forget with the exception of open filements or shorts from mechanical
>shock tubes tend to fail slowly and soft.
>
><This one has 4 transistors in it. I am checking the caps right now.
>
>Good idea s those (caps) do fail.
>
><>> The only reason I don't like tubes is because they are very flakey in
ol
><>> mini computers.. From what I have heard from people who use to support
><them
><>> every power cycles was a nightmare. I am trying to stick to minis that
>
>That is true, usually they get filiment failures and those are easy to
>spot. Power cycles tend to accelerate that. then again I had a tube
>organ (some 80+ tubes) and only had one failure in 8 years.
>
><>> 8/S.. I am going to put some highvoltage diodes between the 8/S,8I and
><>> scope to make sure if the scope goes bananas I don't blow a few hundred
><>> transistors in the minis.
>
>???? Why? The scope is an enclosed system that would be hard pressed to
>emit high voltages back into the system it's hooked to. It's not like the
>HP9100 in that respect. For the RM503 to do that the HV lead would have to
>fall on one of the input lines! As I remember the series 8 Display scopes
>were driven off a pair of D/As and some single bit output to blank the
>beam. If you have something different I'd like to hear about that.
Three D/As. 1 12 bit for x, 1 12 bit for y, and 1 3 bit for intensity. When
the transformer went in this RM503 it raised the regular voltages throughout
the scope to 500+ volts... in some places over 1000. That was present right
through to the input. I am protecting the D/A converters as I don't need the
PDPs taking major beatings in the future. All the supplies inside the scope
(-100,100,250,85,-3000 were going nuts). The other RM503 I have has the same
problem. I am going to put an isolation transformer on every RM503,RM560
scope I get to solve the problem ahead of time.
The 8 Display controllers have the intensity option :-) (for spacewars of
course). The AX08 (XR option) and the 34D (standard) had a 3 bit intensity
D/A output for the scope. The RM503s were modified by DEC for intensity
control.
john
PDP-8 and other rare mini computers
http://www.pdp8.com
>
>Allison
>
>
>
In a message dated 12/5/99 2:53:59 PM Eastern Standard Time,
Glenatacme(a)aol.com writes:
> Bruce Lane wrote:
>
> In a message dated 12/05/1999 12:08:55 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com writes:
>
> > The guy's an absolute moron, as is clearly evidenced
> > by his poor spelling. The fact that he's posting from an AOL address,
and
> > that he has no feedback listed whatsoever, won't help either.
>
> Umm, just out of curiosity, why do you consider an AOL address "unhelpful?"
>
> Glen Goodwin
> 0/0
well, its a very old and popular stereotype that aolosers are very new to
computers and dont have a clue as to what the big picture is.
DB Young coming in 2000: www.nothingtodo.org !
--> this message printed on recycled disk space
view the computers of yesteryear at
http://members.aol.com/suprdave/classiccmp/museum.htm
(now accepting donations!)
-----Original Message-----
From: Clint Wolff (VAX collector) <vaxman(a)uswest.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, December 05, 1999 10:38 PM
Subject: Scrap value of machines (was Re: ebay feedback)
>
>
>
>On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, John B wrote:
>
>>
>> David Winter (the guy in France) has bid on some of my items and always
paid
>> quickly. He seems to collect boards but does not buy entire systems.
>>
>> >I don't think any IBM 1130 is worth more than a couple of hundred in
scrap
>> by
>> >the way. I suspect less than that.
>> >
>>
>> Then I guess the scrappers will be outbidding you..... The larger 1960
mini
>> computers had a lot more gold in them than the '70s models as the gold
was
>> plated thicker in the '60s. The 1130 (from what I can remember) has more
>> than $100US in aluminum in it (just cpu + printer). I don't know what the
>> gold content is.. (I'll find out.. I know a company that does).. BTW I
just
>> lost an IBM 360 to a gold scrapper [bid more than me]. Some of the metal
>> scrappers I know never bothered to look at gold content.. what's scaring
the
>> hell out of me are these guys that know to the penny what they can
extract
>> out of it and generally bid a lot higher than most.
>>
>
>Where can you find out what the gold/aluminum/steel value of a
>computer at? The obvious solution is to know what a scrapper is
>willing to pay, and add $10 to your bid. A scrapper will never
>spend more to buy something than it is worth, a collector will.
The problem is: *some* minis/mainframes his company is willing to pay more
for than it is worth in it's unrestored condition. Ie: What can I resell a
Fujitsu super computer for, restored??? Unfortunately, it looks like it's
worth more in gold. I can justify paying higher dollars for 1950/60s minis
but I won't pay $8000 for something that is 7 years old.
Please remember this is "profit talking"... Maybe there might be someone who
*really* wants a Fujitsu... but are they willing to compete with a scrapper
at $8K? I am lucky in that I still have a lot of paper mills/factories he is
not into yet so I can grab huge racks of minis for a couple thousand.
Gotta hand it to the *sneaky* guy.. He even offered to go to the sites I
purchase from to pick up and deliver what I want and pick up what I don't...
and I am sure to add his name to the bidders list :-(
john
http://www.pdp8.com/
>
>Clint
>
>
>
>The best answer is to make friends with a scrapper. Anyone who will pay
>twice the scrap value consistently will be a welcome customer. In the
>long run you may get systems set aside for you to look at. Ask for
>particular brands or items but don't become a pest. They need to know
>what you are looking for. Check on a regular basis. Don't ask them to
>call you unless you are willing to offer significant money. They are busy
>and you are not a major part of their business.
I like the idea... my only question is, Where does one find such a
scrapper? Is it as simple as checking the Yellow Pages under Scrapper
or metal recovery? How do you know they deal with computers without
calling? I'd hate to get off to a bad start with one...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
I strongly advise against sockets. The height and the added capacitance
tends to affect array behavour.
Also Some sockets are more trouble than bad memory.
Allison
I have placed a Convergent Technologies WorkSlate system on eBay under
Computers: Vintage #214549606
I believe this is a complete system. Starts at $200
Bruce Lane wrote:
In a message dated 12/05/1999 12:08:55 AM Eastern Standard Time,
kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com writes:
> The guy's an absolute moron, as is clearly evidenced
> by his poor spelling. The fact that he's posting from an AOL address, and
> that he has no feedback listed whatsoever, won't help either.
Umm, just out of curiosity, why do you consider an AOL address "unhelpful?"
Glen Goodwin
0/0
In a message dated 12/5/1999 10:22:16 AM Pacific Standard Time,
rigdonj(a)intellistar.net writes:
> >
> >Can you list negative feedback for a person even if you had no dealings
> >with them???
>
No you can't anymore. If you detect or suspect fraud then anyone can report
that to Safe Harbor, the customer service department. I have done that, and
like keeping up with spares, if you have a good reason for suspicions you
should report it.
The old adage still holds, "If it is too good to be true then it generally
isn't." Some frauds are easy to detect.
The "IBM MF' guy is just stupid. I bet his item gets no bids. Stupid people
don't deserve a response.
The DEC card in France. I don't think I would send cash up front to him.
However he could just be a low budget person, this may be just fine. Scrap
value on that card is about $8.00 in todays market.
I don't think any IBM 1130 is worth more than a couple of hundred in scrap by
the way. I suspect less than that.
Paxton
<* I'd really like to add a 3.5-inch diskette drive (RX26? RX33 ?)
RX23
< I've not had any luck searching for used RX?? drives on the net
< (plus I'd need the bezel, mounting bracket, etc). Suggestions
< on where I should be looking instead ??? <Thanks !->
The reson for that is you need either the SCSIfied version or the earlier
plain 3.5" with a SCSI bridge board. Both will be hard to find.
<* I bought a 3rd party SCSI CD-ROM (Pioneer DR-506S 32x) and have
< it in an external enclosure. I have the 2048/512-byte per block
There are plenty of SCSI Cdroms that work fine.
< Curiously, if I attach the same drive & cable to an Alpha 600au
< workstation running OpenVMS 7.1-h2, the drive works fine. Hence
< I suspect that the OpenVMS 7.2 SCSI driver on the VAX is somehow
< to blame ... anyone know of any patches(?), or SCSI CD-ROM drivers
I did SCSI Cdrom load of the 7.2kit on my 3100 using a sony unit I had
laying around. Works just fine. May be a drive interface problem like
termination or cabling.
Allison
Has anyone done a succesful install of the later RA drives into the
BA123 enclosure? I recently picked up a pair of RA73s with the idea of
installing them in my MVII, actually now upgraded to MVIII+.
I've got the correct cabling for the controller side but have been
unable to locate the cables (or part numbers) for the drive end. Any
assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Nick
I have just started to look at this problem but I don't like it already.
Here we go:
If I load a RIM paper tape into my 8I using (single step) it loads in fine.
If I load in a RIM paper tape into my 8I running (no manual steps).. the
data loaded is garbage , and may not even be in the right place.
If I toggle in a program to test the "all 1s" paper tape it passes (both
single step and running)
If I toggle in a program to test the "all 0s" paper tape it passes (both
single step and running)
If I toggle in a *larger* program to read a "1s and 0s paper tape" it passes
(both single step and running). [this is ones and zeros alternating]
I have checked the strobe line with my scope at it appears normal.
I have checked and re-aligned the paper tape reader and data coming out of
it (in step mode) is okay.
My next move will be to try and load 32 bytes from the paper tape reader
into core (not the RIM loader, my own quick program).
and
Write a quick program to write various numbers to core and make sure the are
written correctly.
There are no other devices connected.
It could be the data is improperly strobed at high speed (adjacent holes on
either side of the actual byte being read in are allowing enough light
through to trigger the photo detector).
I have the gain up quite a bit to strobe the feed hole.... but not enough to
screw up the above three tests.
Any suggestions????????????????
john
Hi --
I'm the original owner of a VAXstation 4000 model 60 which is still
going strong with OpenVMS 7.2 (thanks to the DECUS hobbyist program)
... but I'm having a little trouble keeping up with the trailing edge
of technology on two fronts:
* I'd really like to add a 3.5-inch diskette drive (RX26? RX33 ?)
to this system. I recently discovered both the GNU "MTOOLS" and
Madgoat "PCX" software pacakges for VMS (which read/write MS-DOS
disk formats ... MTOOLS will also read/write DOS files from an
external SCSI 100Mb ZIP-drive connected to a VAX), but usually it
would be much more convenient to use 3.5-inch diskettes (which
is a common demonator among almost all PCs) rather than ZIP-100s.
I've not had any luck searching for used RX?? drives on the net
(plus I'd need the bezel, mounting bracket, etc). Suggestions
on where I should be looking instead ??? <Thanks !->
* I bought a 3rd party SCSI CD-ROM (Pioneer DR-506S 32x) and have
it in an external enclosure. I have the 2048/512-byte per block
jumper on the drive "off" for 512-bytes per block. The drive is
visible and reported properly from the console firmware, before
booting to VMS, there are no SCSI-id conflicts, and my SCSI cable
lengths are short. But when I attempt to mount a disk under VMS
7.2, a "medium offline" error message is returned.
Curiously, if I attach the same drive & cable to an Alpha 600au
workstation running OpenVMS 7.1-h2, the drive works fine. Hence
I suspect that the OpenVMS 7.2 SCSI driver on the VAX is somehow
to blame ... anyone know of any patches(?), or SCSI CD-ROM drivers
from earlier VMS/VAX versions which might work ? Or what about
exchanging the Pioneer DR-506S CD-ROM for some other 3rd party
(i.e., affordable) SCSI drive which folks have used successfully
with OpenVMS/VAX 7.2 ? Any suggestions would be appreciated.
A few months back I'd put this question to the folks at "Accorn
Software" who'd written a software utility/driver "MODISK" to
enable older versions of OpenVMS/VAX to operate 3rd party CD-ROM
drives ... but their product isn't supported (doesn't run) under
OpenVMS versions 7.0 and beyond ... they didn't think it needed,
as this functionality "should" now be part of the baseline OS.
Anyway, I'd appreciate hearing from anyone with ideas on these items.
Thanks much,
-- Jim McCarthy
jkmccarthy(a)pacbell.net
>> Does anyone have a copy of the Basic source for Super StarTrek? It's
>>included in the book "BASIC Computer Games" by David H. Ahl (Creative
>>Computing).
>>
>> I probably won't win the eOverPay auction, so I'm trying to search out a
>>copy of the game, since AFAIK, it's the only program of interest in book
>>anyway.
>Sure, I've got it, it's on one of the four 8" floppies that Creative
>Computing was selling in 1977 or so with all the "BASIC Computer
>Games" on them.
>
>If you want to see the original floppies and documentation cards, check
>out
>
> http://www.trailing-edge.com/www/flop1.jpg
> http://www.trailing-edge.com/www/flop2.jpg
> http://www.trailing-edge.com/www/sheet1a.gif
> http://www.trailing-edge.com/www/sheet2a.gif
And for the source code listing (as opposed to Tokenized .BAS file),
see
http://www.trailing-edge.com/www/startrek.txt
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
I was going thru some drives and tapes yesterday while trying to
resurrect my MVII and came across a v4.7 distribution I din't know I
had. This leads me to ask, one, if the person looking for same a few
days back (Enrico?) found one. And a second, stupid question. Stupid
because most of you probably know the answer. But as a PDP11 type
relatively new to the VAXworld I'd like to know what is the
difference/Is there a difference between VMS, MicroVMS? The tape I found
is labeled MicroVMS v4.7 bin.
Both of my Qbus machines are down right now so I cant verify this tape.
If there is still the need for this maybe someone in the Houston area on
list can check it out.
Nick
>> Does anyone have a copy of the Basic source for Super StarTrek? It's
>>included in the book "BASIC Computer Games" by David H. Ahl (Creative
>>Computing).
>>
>> I probably won't win the eOverPay auction, so I'm trying to search out a
>>copy of the game, since AFAIK, it's the only program of interest in book
>>anyway.
>Sure, I've got it, it's on one of the four 8" floppies that Creative
>Computing was selling in 1977 or so with all the "BASIC Computer
>Games" on them.
>
>If you want to see the original floppies and documentation cards, check
>out
>
> http://www.trailing-edge.com/www/flop1.jpg
> http://www.trailing-edge.com/www/flop2.jpg
> http://www.trailing-edge.com/www/sheet1a.gif
> http://www.trailing-edge.com/www/sheet2a.gif
And here's the actual game in progress - running on my S-100 crate
>from the above 8" floppies:
CompuPro Systems
56K CP/M 2.2H
A>BASIC52 STARTREK
BASIC-80 Rev. 5.2
[CP/M Version]
Copyright 1977, 78, 79, 80 (C) by Microsoft
Created: 14-Jul-80
24134 Bytes free
YOUR ORDERS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
--------------------------
DESTROY THE 19 KLINGON WARSHIPS WHICH HAVE INVADED
THE GALAXY BEFORE THEY CAN ATTACK FEDERATION HEADQUARTERS
ON STARDATE 2428. THIS GIVES YOU 28 DAYS. THERE ARE
3 STARBASES IN THE GALAXY FOR RESUPPLYING YOUR SHIP.
ARE YOU READY TO ACCEPT COMMAND ('N' FOR INSTRUCTIONS)?Y
YOUR MISSION BEGINS WITH YOUR STARSHIP LOCATED
IN THE GALACTIC QUADRANT, 'CAPELLA I'.
COMMAND? LRS
LONG RANGE SCAN FOR QUADRANT 2, 6
-------------------
| 008 | 105 | 007 |
-------------------
| 003 | 003 | 101 |
-------------------
| 008 | 003 | 007 |
-------------------
COMMAND? SRS
+--1---2---3---4---5---6---7---8-+
1 | | 1 STARDATE 2400.0
2 | * | 2 CONDITION GREEN
3 | | 3 QUADRANT 2, 6
4 | | 4 SECTOR 7, 7
5 | | 5 PHOTON TORPEDOES 10
6 | * * | 6 TOTAL ENERGY 2950
7 | <E> | 7 SHIELDS 1000
8 | | 8 KLINGONS REMAINING 19
+--1---2---3---4---5---6---7---8-+
COMMAND? NAV
COURSE (0-9)? 1
WARP FACTOR (0-8)? .2
NOW ENTERING DENEB III QUADRANT . . .
COMBAT AREA CONDITION RED
+--1---2---3---4---5---6---7---8-+
1 | | 1 STARDATE 2401.0
2 | | 2 CONDITION *RED*
3 | +K+ | 3 QUADRANT 2, 7
4 | | 4 SECTOR 7, 1
5 | | 5 PHOTON TORPEDOES 10
6 | | 6 TOTAL ENERGY 2938
7 | <E> | 7 SHIELDS 1000
8 | * | 8 KLINGONS REMAINING 19
+--1---2---3---4---5---6---7---8-+
COMMAND? PHA
PHASERS LOCKED ON TARGET; ENERGY AVAILABLE = 1938 UNITS
NUMBER OF UNITS TO FIRE? 350
121 UNIT HIT ON KLINGON AT SECTOR 3, 7.
(SENSORS SHOW 115.412 UNITS REMAINING)
42 UNIT HIT ON ENTERPRISE FROM SECTOR 3, 7.
<SHIELDS DOWN TO 958 UNITS>
COMMAND? PHA
PHASERS LOCKED ON TARGET; ENERGY AVAILABLE = 1588 UNITS
NUMBER OF UNITS TO FIRE? 350
117 UNIT HIT ON KLINGON AT SECTOR 3, 7.
*** KLINGON DESTROYED ***
COMMAND?
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Merchberger <zmerch(a)30below.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, December 04, 1999 11:27 PM
Subject: This guy needs a *LART*... :-/
>Check out this ebay auction under Computers:Mainframe...
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=210172793
>
>What an absolute, unadulterated jerk.
>
>Can you list negative feedback for a person even if you had no dealings
>with them???
>
Only if you are the high bidder on one of his items.. Otherwise it has to be
neutral.
john
PDP-8 and other rare mini computers
http://www.pdp8.com
>Growling mad,
>Roger "Merch" Merchberger
>--
>Roger "Merch" Merchberger --- sysadmin, Iceberg Computers
>Recycling is good, right??? Ok, so I'll recycle an old .sig.
>
>If at first you don't succeed, nuclear warhead
>disarmament should *not* be your first career choice.
>
-----Original Message-----
From: Innfogra(a)aol.com <Innfogra(a)aol.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, December 05, 1999 3:28 AM
Subject: Adopt a scrapper and paper tape punches.
>In a message dated 12/4/1999 10:05:36 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>mrdos(a)swbell.net writes:
>
>> would take it seriously. It's really not a bad idea, and I'm sure our
fellow
>> collectors would go for it. We really need an organization to preserve
old
>> computers. I go to scrap yards and see classic machines ripped apart all
>the
>> ti
>While I like the idea of an organization to preserve old computers I
suspect
>there are already several. This list actually works well for rescues.
>
>The biggest problem is that the scrappers are rarely computer literate. If
>they are they are already selling on ebay and the Internet. Most scrappers
Some might have kept core memory and stuff like that but for the most part
these guys don't have time to play on EBay.. The volume is so high they
can't afford the time. Gold content (and other metals) are high so all they
have to do is keep stripping the stuff down.
>are metals oriented. Even if they are recyclers the bottom line is the
value
>of the metals. Volume is the problem, you must scrap or get buried in it.
>
>The best answer is to make friends with a scrapper. Anyone who will pay
twice
>the scrap value consistently will be a welcome customer. In the long run
you
Scrap value to a gold reclaimer is *alot*more than you think. The place I
visited routinely offers $8-10K for IBM 30 series. (water cooled CPU)... As
a lot of the older minis have less gold I can get them for a lor less. If an
IBM 360 comes up be prepared that there is a lot of gold in that machine and
it will cost a lot of money. Don't forget, they won't accept "scrap price",
they will want "raw materials" price... and for some large super
computers/large mainframes that can be quite expensive.
>may get systems set aside for you to look at. Ask for particular brands or
>items but don't become a pest. They need to know what you are looking for.
They don't care. The don't understand the stuff. They just know IBM1130 =
pay $4K as scrap, get $7 in raw materials back.
>Check on a regular basis. Don't ask them to call you unless you are willing
>to offer significant money. They are busy and you are not a major part of
>their business.
>
They won't call. (maybe smaller ones might). The guy I just visited was soo
busy I had to wait in line to ask simple questions.
>I bet there are enough people on the list to cover the major scrappers in
>each city. If each person adopted one we could flood this list with
>equipment. And probably dump enough on ebay to depress prices.
john
PDP-8 and other rare mini computers
http://www.pdp8.com
>
>I am adopting one here in Portland. And that brings up paper tape punches.
He
>has a REMEX paper tape punch and reader set. It is shrink wrapped on a
pallet
>and I have not had a chance to look at it yet. He wants $250 but may be
open
>to offers. He sells a lot of stuff to Western Numerical Controls. They are
>old and extremely heavy, I would say late 70s but that is a guess. If
anyone
>is interested please email me off the list.
>
>Paxton
>
>
I have a dec rainbow system and a similar looking word processor machine and
some software taking up space. Keyboard, monitor, LA 50 printer, etc.
Located in New Hampshire.
Please reply privately if interested. I will be off the mail list.
balloon711(a)aol.com
Hi everyone
As some on the list may know, I'm mad-keen on Russian calculating devices.
I've pretty much concentrated on calculators (please see my award-winning
site listed in my .sig), but my many agents occasionally offer computers,
too. Typically I don't buy (computers are not my main line of interest) -
but in this case I'm scouting around for a buyer. The reason: read on.
One of the rarest Russian calculators is the MK-47. It's a magnetic card
reading machine - so the rumour goes. None have been seen in captivity.
Some 6 months back, one of my agents (from whom I've previously purchased
several rare machines) told me that he had an MK-47 for me. I was quite
excited. More correctly, his grandmother had found one, and she was to
bring it to him the next day. So, I waited for news. And waited. And
waited.
About a month later, a short email from my agent (Alex) tells me that he has
been in hospital, and will be there for the next few weeks. And
furthermore, he hasn't seen the calculator yet because his grandmother is
ill and in (another) hospital, too. Of course I told him to forget about
the machine for now, and get well ASAP.
Around this time my personal life was thrown into turmoil when my (5yo)
daughter became gravely ill and spent several days in hospital
(complications of chicken pox, and drinking skin lotion, for the curious).
So, I wasn't particularly thinking about calculators, either.
Anyway, a few weeks pass, and I get news from Alex's father (Alex is still
in hospital) that Alex's grandmother's house has burned to the ground. You
can guess where the calculator was. Still, this is about a house, and
that's tragic. A calculator is just an old machine. At this stage, I was
beginning to think the machine was jinxed anyway.
Alex contacted me later (through his father) to tell me that the fire which
burned down his grandmoter's house STARTED in the house of the man who gave
her the MK-47 calculator in the first place. Spooky.
A few days later, Alex's MOTHER contacted me with the sad news that Alex's
grandmother had died, and that Alex's father had had a heart attack when he
found out. So, Alex is in hospital, Alex's father is in hospital, and
Alex's grandmother has died.
Here we are, a few weeks after that. Today Alex told me he is out of
hospital. His father is still in hospital, but in less-serious condition.
And Alex is on the prowl again (for calculators and computers). As you
might understand (if you've stuck with me so far), things have been
incredibly stressful for his family - and more to the point - incredibly
expensive. Alex needs some extra funds to pay for the medical costs, and
here's where I come in.
As I said, I've done trades with Alex before, and found him not only
reliable, friendly and honest - but incredibly good at finding rare and
unusual things. Right now, however, Alex has a few vintage soviet home
computers for sale. I've told him about you guys [collectors], and he's
asked me to contact you on his behalf.
Could anybody interested in exploring the purchase of soviet computers from
Alex please contact me by direct email (adavie(a)mad.scientist.com). I have
some pictures and details of machines that he has - and will be happy to act
as an intermediary - or put you directly in contact with Alex. I have done
many, many transactions to Russia, so can offer advice and suggestions
regarding transfer of money and computers.
OK, that's about all I have to write. This is probably the best opportunity
many on the list will get to obtain some interesting machines. And
remember, Alex is a champion at finding unusual/rare stuff.
Cheers
A
--
Andrew Davie adavie(a)mad.scientist.com // adavie(a)comcen.com.au //
adavie(a)bde.com.au
Museum of Soviet Calculators http://members.xoom.com/adavie/soviet.html
Slide Rule Trading Post http://www.comcen.com.au/~adavie/slide/
I actually thought of that once, but thought I was about the only one who
would take it seriously. It's really not a bad idea, and I'm sure our fellow
collectors would go for it. We really need an organization to preserve old
computers. I go to scrap yards and see classic machines ripped apart all the
time. Computers are a big part of everyone's lives now, and just like
anything else that changes our society that much, (the printing press, for
example) they need to protected. I hoped someone else would have the same
idea I did. I really think it is a great idea, worth considering, at the
least.
>Well, maybe we should start a National Computer Preservation Historical
>Society, and then once we have a couple hundred members (should take all
>of 1 hour...) then we start sending letters to our representatives asking
>them to write a bill similar to whatever empowers the people that preserve
>historical buildings and landmarks.
>
>Of course, real influence comes with a historical society that has been in
>existance for many years, but of course you have to start sometime ;)
>
>-Lawrence LeMay
Why get all upset over such an inane offering. The guy is obviously an
idiot and so is anyone who'd pay for such a piece of junk.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Merchberger <zmerch(a)30below.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, December 04, 1999 9:31 PM
Subject: This guy needs a *LART*... :-/
>Check out this ebay auction under Computers:Mainframe...
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=210172793
>
>What an absolute, unadulterated jerk.
>
>Can you list negative feedback for a person even if you had no dealings
>with them???
>
>Growling mad,
>Roger "Merch" Merchberger
>--
>Roger "Merch" Merchberger --- sysadmin, Iceberg Computers
>Recycling is good, right??? Ok, so I'll recycle an old .sig.
>
>If at first you don't succeed, nuclear warhead
>disarmament should *not* be your first career choice.
<1) There are lots of resources out there featuring VAX information; you mig
<look at the NetBSD/vax port website (http://www.netbsd.org/Ports), the VAXa
<(http://vaxarchive.org), and Hamster's Digital Resources site, which can be
<http://www.telnet.hu/hamster/dr.
Yes many of them are excellent!
<2) I don't believe there is any sort of hobbyist distribution of Ultrix, ho
Ultrix was never released and I suspect never will. My guess is it has a
lot of the ATT/BSD code that was encumbered.
<3) All microVAX systems use some variety of serial terminal for a system co
<(although I believe it has to be VT100 compatible, so I'm not sure how usef
<ADM terminal will be). VAXstation systems are the ones that use monitors a
<consoles, however it is possible to get them to run over a serial console a
<using a few different methods depending on which model you have.
For those that don't have a video console the terminal only has to be
serial 9600/8/n/1 and supports Xon/Xoff meaning most anything works though
some aren't pretty. The terminal can be hard copy such as the LA100KSR.
Allison
I wrote:
> > sites for the small computers I collect. Unfortunately there are groups
in
> > the US which oppose this activity -- not because any of the program
> authors
> > are objecting at this late date -- but because these groups propose that
> > *any* form of emulation, or use of *alien* hardware, to run, store, or
> > transfer these programs is illegal and should be stopped.
Derek Peschel inquired:
> That's a broad claim. Do you have any details about who those groups are?
Yes. Some retrogamers I know have a group called CLEAR, which favors
emulation. You can find them at:
http://dialspace.dial.pipex.com/town/estate/dh69/clear/
For a look at the IDSA -- who oppose emulation -- check out:
http://www.idsa.com/piracy.html
Glen Goodwin
0/0
Dear list members:
I know you are going to hate me for this but circumstances force me to
maximize my income.
I have listed my last Processor Technologies Saul 20 on ebay. I know many of
you were interested. I have also listed a Morrow Micro Decision and a Quantum
2080 8 inch MFM hard drive that can be used with many older systems.
My last Quantum sold for $20. Not everything goes for big bucks.
My ebay name is innfosale. Please note the two Ns in the name.
This URL should bring up my list:
http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=ViewListedItems&u…
id=innfosale&include=0&since=-1&sort=2&rows=25
For those that are interested, you might bookmark the list. I will be selling
more classic computers, S100 and DEC cards, drives, HP, in the future. If you
notice I rarely use reserve bids, preferring to let the market set the price.
I am good at finding equipment.
Many thanks to all for the stories and help on the list. I love reading it
even when I've been gone two weeks and come back to 1000 messages.
Paxton
IT IS ALIVE!!!!
I confess, I cheated, BUT MY PDP-8/M LIVES!!!! AND it has 8K of Core!
On the down side I now have two 4K core stacks that need repaired.
It's so cool, I now have it running the initial operating checks on pg. 2-7
of the Processor Maintenance Manual. Blinken lights are so cool!
IT IS ALIVE!!!!
Now excuse me while I go find some rope to tie myself to my chair so I'll
quit bouncing!
IT IS ALIVE!!!!
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
I don't like tubes. My experience with tubes is *very limited*. I have had a
few crash courses over the past few years......
Okay, I bought the Tek RM503 for my PDP-8/S. When I turned it on I heard
some terrible noises and found the power supply voltages were all over the
place (way off , like 10V was 500 etc..).
This scope uses a primary transformer to supply the 6.3V to most of the
tubes and has a separate winding for 6.3V for the CRT heater. Off this
transformer another winding fed to a voltage doubler and then to an
oscillator with another transformer to create a wide range of voltages. (12V
to -3000).
Picture this... the -3000 volts is fed right into the CRT heater (which
happens to be directly coupled with the primary transformer). I have been
able to locate the problem somewhat. If I remove the -3000 volt line between
the HV rectifier tube and the CRT itself then the scope works fine! All
waveforms are proper and the power supply works great (no picture of
course).
It can be a few things... I am hoping someone here who use to work on tube
units might be able to tell me which problem below it most likely is:
#1) A bad HV rectifier tube causing the HV to come back to the second
transformer which would put a few thousand volts back into the secondary
winding taps causing high voltage everywhere.
#2) Bad insulation on the primary transformer secondary "crt heater" winding
which jumps over to the other winding that happens to be the main
powersupply winding (125V X 2)
#3) The -3000 volt wire is closely tied to the other low voltage wires. Is
insulation breakdown possible due to a crack?
My next step will be to take a reading on the primary transformer (first
transformer, secondary winding [doubled winding]) and see if thousands of
volts are there... That might help determine if there is an insulation
breakdown but from what I can tell when the -3000V is hooked up every
voltage goes crazy.
I am going to bed.. Hopefully I wake up to a great answer ;-)
john
PDP-8 and other rare mini computers
http://www.pdp8.com
Q1: Can anyone tell me the two tone that make up dial tone?
Q2: What's the ring voltage (p-p) and frequency? 90Vpp? 10cyc?
Q3: What's the off hook and on hook line Voltage? 9VDC and 45VDC?
----------------------------------------
Tired of Micro$oft???
Move up to a REAL OS...
######__ __ ____ __ __ _ __ #
#####/ / / / / __ | / / / / | |/ /##
####/ / / / / / / / / / / / | /###
###/ /__ / / / / / / / /_/ / / |####
##/____/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_____/ /_/|_|####
# ######
("LINUX" for those of you
without fixed-width fonts)
----------------------------------------
Be a Slacker! http://www.slackware.com
Slackware Mailing List:
http://www.digitalslackers.net/linux/list.html
Please reply directly to <sellam(a)siconic.com>.
Hello.
I'm trying to fix an Atari 130XE that has a memory problem. It
automatically boots into the self test and shows bad RAM after block 17
(ie. blocks 1-17 are indicated to be good by the self test).
Is there a web site somewhere that has a repair FAQ available for the
Atari XE series?
Please reply directly to <sellam(a)siconic.com> if you can help. Thanks!
Sellam International Man of Intrigue and Danger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for a six in a pile of nines...
VCF East? VCF Europe!? YOU BETCHA!!
Stay tuned for more information
or contact me to find out how you can participate
http://www.vintage.org
Well, to respond to a few of those VAX-related questions as best I can... :)
1) There are lots of resources out there featuring VAX information; you might want to
look at the NetBSD/vax port website (http://www.netbsd.org/Ports), the VAXarchive
(http://vaxarchive.org), and Hamster's Digital Resources site, which can be found at
http://www.telnet.hu/hamster/dr.
2) I don't believe there is any sort of hobbyist distribution of Ultrix, however you
can run the hobbyist distribution of OpenVMS (http://www.montagar.com/hobbyist), or
if you're interested in a UNIX, NetBSD is available for a number of VAXen.
3) All microVAX systems use some variety of serial terminal for a system console
(although I believe it has to be VT100 compatible, so I'm not sure how useful that
ADM terminal will be). VAXstation systems are the ones that use monitors as
consoles, however it is possible to get them to run over a serial console as well
using a few different methods depending on which model you have.
Hope this is helpful :)
-Sean Caron (root(a)diablonet.net)
Decided to make a thrift run today and in addition to getting an IBM L40SX
last week, got this stuff today:
complete amstrad pc6400hd even got the owners manual. good shape too
C128 in box plus 1024 monitor and the 1530 tape unit in box as well as a 1571
drive in box and about 400 disks of software as well as all cables.
an atari 400 box filled with about 350 never used 5.25 floppies.
total price not including the L40 was $7.
whilst rooting around in the junk for sale, i met a guy who was a
(presumably) IBM CE back in the old days and spoke of servicing plugboards
and paper tape and such. he also worked on IBM selectrics. from what he was
saying, he has some old Freiden calculators or some sort. he didnt know much
of current pc stuff, but told some fascinating stories of the old technology
in the short time we spoke.
DB Young coming in 2000: www.nothingtodo.org !
--> this message printed on recycled disk space
view the computers of yesteryear at
http://members.aol.com/suprdave/classiccmp/museum.htm
(now accepting donations!)
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
>I believe it might me a development system for the 8008 or the 8080
>(Intallec 8i IIRC).
I think so too. The Intellec 4 is featured in the back of the MCS-4 4004
manual and states that it is "ideal for prototyping MCS 4 Systems". The
MCS-8 manual dosent however mention the Intellec 8.
- Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
SRAM boards (that is what these are, isn't it?) are usually simple enough to
troubleshoot that you can get by with just a 'scope and an hour or so of
time, depending on how inclined you are to work on the hardware. Each RAM
device will have a write strobe, a select strobe, (maybe a separate enable
as well) and some data inputs and outputs. Because it's a 16K board, I
assume you have 4kx1 or 1kx4 SRAMs. (similar to 2147 or 2148 types,
respectively) The 1Kx4 parts have common I/O, and both types are 18-pin
DIPs.
These 16K boards use 2147's don't they? Does your diagnostic (whatever it
is) tell you which bit is failing? If it can't read the bits, perhaps it's
a (1) a failed decoder or (2) it's a failed data bus buffer, or (3) it's a
roached address buffer. The only apparent alternative would be a failed
RAM. It does smack of a failed on-board decoder, however, since only the
one 4K block is failing. If you can't read/write even a single bit in that
4K block of RAM, it's undoubedly a buffer or a decoder. If only one bit
fails, it's probably not a decoder, but then the RAM itself is suspect.
Since the failure is in the "middle" of your board, it's probably not
difficult to compose a loop which cycles through the ram board in 1K blocks,
doing a write to one location in each 1K block, first the lsb, then
left-shift and do it again, etc. This enables you to trace the device
select, and write strobes through the circuit. A 16K board in a 64K memory
map ought to be pretty simple to decode. There should be jumpers/switches
to select which 16K block in the memory map the board occupies, and there
should be a 2-line to 4-line decoder to select the individual bytes of
memory. If the organization is as 16 pairs of the 2148-types, then there's
probably either a 4 line-16 line decoder (e.g. 74154) or a pair of 2-to-8
types (e.g. 74138) to select a byte of RAM for each memory cycle.
Assuming you have the equipment at your disposal, you can determine whether
each RAM device is receiving the write and select strobes at the correct
times, and likewise, whether they get their enable and select when being
read. IF those are both correct, you then write a loop which writes all
zeroes to the rams and then having finished writing the zeroes, cycles
infinitely on reading them back. You then look to see where the zeroes no
longera appear as zeroes, bit by bit, until you have it narrowed down to one
data bit and replace the device which isn't transmitting the zero. If they
all transmit zeroes OK, then you write all ones out to the ram board and
then look for where the zeroes coming from the ram are no longer zeroes.
It's not a bad idea to monitor the write operation as well to see that the
data makes it TO the RAM in the correct sense, inasmuch as the S-100 has
separate in and out busses.
This whole process, aside from the associated repair shouldn't take too long
and will fix the problem once you isolate and replace the failing component.
If, however, you're determined simply to move the failing block of memory to
the top where it's easy to ingore, you can switch decoder outputs by tracing
back from the failing block of RAM to the decoder and then cutting the
traces and soldering on the jumpers which will accomplish what you want.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Noel <Mike-Noel(a)GCI.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Friday, December 03, 1999 10:21 AM
Subject: Processor Technology S100 memory boards
>I'm looking for manuals for Processor Technology 16KRA and 32KRA
>S100 memory boards.
>
>I've a SOL-20 with 1 of each, and the 16KRA has a bad 4k block so I'm
>trying to (1) figure out how to reconfig the cards so the bad memory is
>at the end instead of the middle, and/or (2) figure out how to fix the
>bad card.
>
>Anyone able to xerox their manual(s) for me?
>
>Thanks
Hello, all:
Does anyone have a copy of the Basic source for Super StarTrek? It's
included in the book "BASIC Computer Games" by David H. Ahl (Creative
Computing).
I probably won't win the eOverPay auction, so I'm trying to search out a
copy of the game, since AFAIK, it's the only program of interest in book
anyway.
Thanks.
Rich
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW1
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
<---------------------------- reply separator
I remember seeing the promotions for this in conjunction with 8048
development back in the late '70's though I doubt it was exclusively for the
8048. I may have a manual or something lying about, though, now that I want
it, I'll probably have a devil of a time finding the thing even though I've
stumbled over it several times in the past month.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, December 04, 1999 9:44 AM
Subject: Intel Intellec 8 computer?????
>Hi,
>
> Can anyone tell me more about what this is?
>
> Joe
>
Hi Gang:
Well an 11/60 is going to the scrappers on Monday here in Vancouver. It's
at an acquaintance's house, he got it and never got around to getting it
set up in his basement.
I can't take it due to lack of storage space. Too bad, it's complete,
although it's been stored in a garage and not powered up for about 10
years.
I am, however, going to save the CPU cards, any other cards, and the
backplanes. I will also try to save anything else that can be readily
removed from the machine.
I did try to find a taker for this beast, as you'll recall from the lists,
but unfortunately it's been almost a year and the potential takers have
not been able to get around to picking it up. He cannot wait anymore and
has arranged for a scrap metal dealer to pick it up this Monday.
This is a sad situation, but at least I'll be able to save some of the
machine. I'll post to the lists with my results.
Kevin
--
Kevin McQuiggin VE7ZD
mcquiggi(a)sfu.ca
Hey all
I have an Apple StyleWriter M8000 black and white inkjet printer to
GIVE AWAY for the cost of shipping, if anyone is interested let me know.
thanx
Chris
Ok... I don't know about the rest of you, but I've about had it up to my
eyeballs with the soulless morons who keep spamming CLASSICCMP.
I just sent off an E-mail to Derek Peschel asking...
1). That the list be configured to accept DIRECT (unscreened) postings
ONLY from subscribers.
2). That I be permitted to volunteer to screen all non-subscriber postings
before either (a), passing them on (and if they have even the slightest
connection to subjects on CLASSICCMP, be assured that they would get passed
on promptly), or (b), tossing them in the bit bucket.
Since I seem to be the most experienced spam-fighter in the group (and I'm
open for challenge on that), #2 made sense. It would allow me to trace back
and LART spammers without their crap ever being seen by the list members.
If you have any thoughts on this one way or another, please address them
to Derek (dpeschel(a)u.washington.edu) with a CC to me.
Thanks!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
--- Roger Ivie <IVIE(a)cc.usu.edu> wrote:
> Aha! Another VAXBI survivor!
And I've got the mounds of leftover crap to prove it!
> The company I used to work for did a quad IEEE-488 interface...
What an odd thing to make. That's a *lot* of instruments in a small amount
of space (owing to cable-length limitations).
> ...(imagine a Z80 looking up user-space addresses
> in the page table. Fun!)
Our drivers were a little different - first, all of our products were 68000-
based. Second, we used 1/4th of the address space as shared memory to the
VAX as a DMA cycle. Imagine this if you will... accessing 18 or 22 bits of
68K address space would return (or modify) the contents of a real physical
memory location in the VAX. I have used one of our Qbus boards and a Fluke
ICE tester to check LSI-11 DRAM chips... It works something like this...
o Plug into a BA11-N an 11/03 CPU with a row of 4096 DRAMs socketed, a
DL11-E, a COMBOARD-Q with the CPU removed and the Fluke plugged into
the CPU socket.
o Power on the BA11-N, then use ODT to flip a bit in the COMBOARD-Q CSR to
enable DMA cycles (safety measure on our part)
o Set up the Fluke to test 4K of memory in the "shared memory" quadrant of
the 68K address space.
o Check the results.
I used this arrangement to test 4Kx1 DRAMs for my Z-80-based GORF machine. I
have a DRAM tester for 64K and 256K chips, but it only tests single-supply
parts.
> We sold about a hundred or so IEEE-488 interfaces.
As far as I'm concerned, 100 is a handful. My old company made more than ten
times as many Unibus cards as that.
I think I get one inquiry per year about our old sync products; nothing
serious. Who needs to move sync data over 3780, HASP or SNA to or from
a VAX these days that doesn't already have a way to do it?
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
I dug out some old vacuum-tube-type computer boards I have had in storage
since I bought them surplus in the 1970's. If anyone can take a look and
tell me what they might have come from, I would very much appreciate it.
They are on the link below:
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/bill_r/unidentified_technological_artif.htm
-Bill Richman (bill_r(a)inetnebr.com)
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/bill_r - Home of the COSMAC Elf Microcomputer
Simulator, Fun with Molten Metal, Orphaned Robots, and Technological Oddities.
Dear Ken Peck,
We understand that you will be de-installing VAX-6500 somewhere in month of June.
We are interested to know its config, version of O/S & the software residing on it.
We also be interested to know the cost and other details such as date of purchase & licences of it.
If the config suites our requirement we can discuss the other aspects later.
Please provide the information to us lastest by 6th December1999 ie. Monday.
Thanks & Regards.
S.GUNJAL
OK, I confess it's been almost a day since I worked on my PDP-8/m. I
discovered that I appear to have, what looks to me at least to be, a very
serious problem. I thought that one of the LED's for showing the address
was out, been that way for at least a couple days. Then yesterday morning
I put it on the table I've been using when I'm working on it, and another
LED was out. Another address LED, but the one for the second bit, in other
words set it to address 0002 and it looks like you're at 0000, grrrr!
So I pulled the front off and discovered that the solder connections have
apparently gone bad. I reheated the solder, and added a little. That
fixed it for shortly longer than it took to get the front back on. The two
LEDs are back out.
Even more frustrating, checking out E46 on the G227 with my new TDS-220
Oscilliscope it looks as if everything is just fine. Yet the other day
when I checked it with the logic probe it wasn't (still have the same
problems with memory though). Probably better explain this, I'm seeing
'pulses' on the outputs that correspond to those on the E39 chip, in other
words one chip is doing the xxx0 - xxx3 and the other the xxx4 - xxx7,
which I wasn't seeing before. Still I really should recheck the results
with both the Logic Probe, AND the Oscilliscope.
So, I'm starting to wonder if I don't have some fairly serious problems
with the solder joints in this system. What is the best way to check for
this, and fix any problems that I find.
In any case I obviously need to get a decent soldering iron, the el-cheapo
Radio Shack one I've got is as old as some of the parts in the PDP-8! If
nothing else I need a decent tip.
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
If everyone forwards the offending email to < abuse(a)hotmail.com > they'll
certainly claim it's a forged address unless it's real, in which case
they'll close his account immediately. They're a popular forged source,
though.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Fandt <cfandt(a)netsync.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Friday, December 03, 1999 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: Do You Have a Yen to be a Millionaire!
>Upon the date 03:21 PM 12/3/99 +0000, yen111opp(a)hotmail.com said something
>like:
>
> -- Snip rudely sent HTML --
>
>Well, at least they put a postal mailing address in this message. Maybe
>same outfit Bruce? Or has Hotmail become a 'hotbed' of spamming? I've got a
>yen to for certain not see them again ):-(
>
>--Chris
>-- --
Since there was significant interest in these scans (and to avoid hogging
our link to the net and incuring the wrath of my spouse) I have uploaded
the three pages of Ahl's book containing Super Star Trek to
www.litterbox.com/jim
Like the page says, they're quite large - around 2 megs each - in the intersts
of being OCR-able. (scanned at 300dpi) My page is very vanilla html, so
any old browser should work, including lynx.
--
Jim Strickland
jim(a)DIESPAMMERSCUMcalico.litterbox.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
BeOS Powered!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would be interested also.
>===== Original Message From classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu =====
>Would the person who originally requested the David Ahl BASIC source for
>super star trek please e-mail me again? I've misplaced your e-mail. I have
>the scans ready to send. (actually, if anyone else wants copies of these
>scans, let me know and I'll mail them to you too. If there's enough interest
>I'll just stick them on my web page.
>
>--
>Jim Strickland
>jim(a)DIESPAMMERSCUMcalico.litterbox.com
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> BeOS Powered!
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Dec 3, 20:19, Joe wrote:
> >I have a spool (1 lb?) sitting behind me of 96 SN silver solder, wasn't
> >"too" expensive and melts with a slightly hotter tip in my weller.
>
> That's the same kind of stuff that they sell here for soldering copper
> water pipes. NO LEAD ALLOWED! The last time I checked it costs about
> $16/pound. That's cheaper than good electrical solder.
Same here, at least for new installations. There are regulations about the
flux, too, I beleive.
> You have to watch out for any solder and make sure it's for electrical
> work. There are many other kinds of solder and many (most?) of them have
> acid fluxs. You can use it on electrical stuff but you'll be replacing
> everything in about six months!
Yes, most fluxes apart from rosin are at least mildly acidic, including
some electrical types -- you just have to ensure you wash them off properly
(and soon).
> That's an interesting idea. But I certain that you'd have to heat the
> joint to the melting pont of the old solder before this stuff would alloy
> with it. If that's the case then you could just take the part off then
and
> not go through all the rest of the procedure. I've mixed various lead
> alloys for casting bullets and you have to heat the mix to the melting
> point of the element with the highest melting point before they will all
> melt and alloy together. This is true even if the alloy has a lower MP
than
> the individual elements.
Curiously, that's not always the case, especially if you consider surface
effects. Solder actually sticks to a metal surface by forming a very thin
layer of an alloy with it. In effect, the solder dissolves the other metal
very slightly. That's partly why a copper soldering iron bit gradually
wears away even if you keep it well tinned, and partly why thin plain
copper cable that has tinned ends is weakest just at the point where the
tinning ends (the solder leaches away a tiny amount of copper, leaving the
wire slightly thinner just at the junction).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
I sent a reply to that, but it didn't seem to hit the list.
printout on thermal paper.
kelly
In a message dated 12/3/99 6:47:50 PM Central Standard Time,
healyzh(a)aracnet.com writes:
> No, he's serious. I got a reply from him. The thing is one of us
> misunderstood what was being refered to, and I'm honestly not sure which of
> us misunderstood. I thought he was refering to OCRing papertape, he's
> talking about OCRing a printout of the source. The question is, is Kelly
> talking about a printout, or papertape?
>
> Zane
>
>
On Dec 3, 18:57, Allison J Parent wrote:
>
> <Dunno. But those DEC drives are rebadged Connors, and the Connor norm
was
>
> Only some are. Some are Seagate and others are DEC unique design. I
> believe the RZ56 is micropolus. However the one I'm holding does not say
> that.
My mistake :-( I know DEC bought drives from almost every manufacturer at
one time or another, but for some reason I thought the RZ56 was a Connor.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
-----Original Message-----
From: Zane H. Healy <healyzh(a)aracnet.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Friday, December 03, 1999 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: Basic Source for Super Star Trek
>You have OCR software for paper tape?
>
> Zane
>
Zane, He's kidding!!!!.. We tend to call that device an "optical paper tape
reader".. If you don't want to send it to the UK then I can help you out.
john
>>If you sent me a paper copy, I would be willing to scan it and run through
my
>>OCR software.
>>
>>john
>>
>>On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 09:51:41AM -0500, KFergason(a)aol.com wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a copy, on paper, of the HP2000F version.
>>>
>>> sttr1.bas
>>>
>>> Kelly
>>>
>>>
>>> In a message dated Wed, 1 Dec 1999 9:56:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, Al
>>>Kossow <aek(a)spies.com> writes:
>>>
>>> > "I do have the
>>> > original SPACWR.BAS (Mike Mayfield, converted by David Ahl, I think)
>>>if you
>>> > want that..."
>>> >
>>> > it would be nice to find the original HP2000 version somewhere. The
copy
>>> > that Jeff Moffatt has on the HP2100 page looks like a bad read.
>| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
>| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
>| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
>+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
>| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
>| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
>| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
>
>>> You're right. I meant to add that the solder that I'm using is a very
>>> low temperature solder with silver in it. 500 or 600 degrees would be too
>>> cold for standard solder. I love this silver stuff, it expensive but it
>>
>>Eh? Silver solder is certainly very nice, flows well, bonds to a lot of
>>metals,
>>etc., but isn't it usually _higher_ melting point? Conventional solder
> I don't know what the exact MP of this stuff is but my iron (Weller EC
>3000) is set to less than 600d and it melts and flows well at that
>temperature. I don't know if the temperature control is accurate or not
>though. This is 2% silver.
What is the rest of the solder? Tin, lead, something else?
"Silver solder" is an extremely vague term, covering everything from
special low melting point Indium-Silver alloys to 2% Silver/tin/lead
solders to brazing, depending on the context it is used in.
The indium-rich solders are *really* neat stuff, if you ever get a
chance to work with them. Melting temperatures down to near room temperature
are available, as well as entire series of solder alloys with graduated
melting temperatures for building up intricate assemblies. And many indium
solders will even wet and stick to *glass*.
Expensive stuff, as well!
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>RD54 is Maxtor2190, look that up.
The RD53 is a Micropolis 1325 with a fumper installed in the empty R7
location.
>Now, heres the nasty part. Of the RD52/3/4 disks there are Quantum,
>Micropolus and MAXTOR drives non DEC branded. They are the same. They
>are also different! The NON-DEC supplied are not formatted to match the
>RQDX2/3 controllers. So if you find some D540s, you may also have to
>format them... you likely don't have diags to do that. So even with a
>pile of them your still not ahead.
>
>Solution: prevail on someone that bas a Qbus PDP-11 with diags that can
>format the drive.
Also they will have to be done manually IE: do not try to use the automatic
option.
I do it frequently for commercial customers. Often enough for me to
dedicate a BA123 primarily that use.
Dan
<Dunno. But those DEC drives are rebadged Connors, and the Connor norm was
Only some are. Some are Seagate and others are DEC unique design. I
believe the RZ56 is micropolus. However the one I'm holding does not say
that.
Allison
On Dec 3, 16:35, CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com wrote:
> The indium-rich solders are *really* neat stuff, if you ever get a
> chance to work with them. Melting temperatures down to near room
temperature
> are available, as well as entire series of solder alloys with graduated
> melting temperatures for building up intricate assemblies. And many
indium
> solders will even wet and stick to *glass*.
Yes, you just reminded me of a visit years ago to an optical works owned by
a friend's father. How do you mount an unfinished non-circular glass lens
in a lathe (of sorts) to finish it? Answer: you take some LMP alloy such
as you describe, melt it in a short cylindical mould, float the lens on
top, let it cool, and mount the cylinder with glass attached in the lathe
chuck. To remove the alloy later, place it in a warm water bath.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Ok,
Well I suppose I will add my odd collections to the list:
First off, old computers, naturally.
I also collect stamps, with a particular emphasis on revenue stamps
I collect old documents with revenue stamps on them. This is why I have
around 40 or so 1860's mortgages, all of them have revenue stamps on them.
Along the same lines, I have an 1885 license to sell manufactured tobacco.
I also collect various mediums for recording sound. I have a CD player,
cassette deck, several turntables, a Rio, multiple reel to reel tape players
(one of which is run by vacuum tubes), and a few 8 track decks. No wax
cylinder player yet, unfortunately.
I also have, as my secondary refridgerator, a 1952 westinghouse frostfree
refridgerator, which still works great. I've started collecting vacuum tubes
as well. I also collect classic cars, to which end I have a 1967 Plymouth
Barracuda and a 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass S. I also would like to get a couple
of old tractors at some point. I also have a whole bunch of random car parts
which don't go to any car I have ever owned (my honeywell lineprinter is
sitting on a stack of Corvair rims in my garage). I'm sure I collect other
weird stuff, but thats all I can think of currently.. oh wait, coins also.
Will J
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I couldn't agree more. I can't stand people who will gladly destroy a
computer as classic as an IBM 1130 for the gold. There are some things that
are more important than money. (To us, anyway.)
>Maybe its just my personal sensitive spot, but cutting up a IBM 1130 for
>gold makes me what to flay somebody.
>
>
> You're right. I meant to add that the solder that I'm using is a very
> low temperature solder with silver in it. 500 or 600 degrees would be too
> cold for standard solder. I love this silver stuff, it expensive but it
> flows beautifully. Most of the stuff that I work on is tiny so a one ounce
> roll will last for a couple of years.
Eh? Silver solder is certainly very nice, flows well, bonds to a lot of metals,
etc., but isn't it usually _higher_ melting point? Conventional solder melts at
around 450 F, I think. (Anyone have the exact figure?), silver solder typically
at 600.
Philip.
This E-mail message is private and confidential and should only be read
by those to whom it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, copying, reproduction, modification or
publication of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please delete
the message from your computer and destroy any copies.
This message is not intended to be relied upon by any person without
subsequent written confirmation of its contents. This company therefore
disclaims all responsibility and accepts no liability of any kind which
may arise from any person acting, or refraining from acting, upon the
contents of the message without having had subsequent written
confirmation.
If you have received this communication in error, or if any problems
occur in transmission please notify us immediately by telephone on
+44 (0)2476 425474
On Dec 3, 16:11, Truthan,Larry wrote:
> My Point would be that the ABSENCE of option jumpers on pin headers
usually
> defaulted to immediate start.
> If you see an option jumper on the RZ56 other than SCSI ID. Would it
hurt
> to pull it?
Dunno. But those DEC drives are rebadged Connors, and the Connor norm was
to have link-present = auto-spinup. For example, on an RZ25, which is the
only one I know for sure DEC didn't disable the option on, you fit a jumper
on J6 position 2 to enable auto-spinup.
I also know this doesn't work for RZ23s or RZ24s.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
I have a 1986 IBM laptop computer that I am interested in selling.
Purchased by requirement from Harvard Business School. Please contact me
with your offers.
On Dec 3, 16:08, Carlos Murillo-Sanchez wrote:
> Tony Duell wrote:
> > Another warning. There's a stuff called 'silver solder' used by
> > engineers. This is _NOT_ the same stuff at all -- it's high melting
point
> > (you can use it on small steam engine boilers, etc). I'm not sure it
even
> > contains silver.
>
> I believe it does contain silver indeed. It is _very_ expensive.
> And you need acethylene+O2 in order to use it.
Not usually; the whole point of most silver solders is that they have a low
melting point compared to, say, brazing alloys, and can be used with a
butane or propane torch in air.
The cadmium-free ones, though, are used because they don't adversely affect
other materials (eg titanium) and they have rather higher melting points,
similar to brazing alloy or even higher.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Dec 3, 18:45, Tony Duell wrote:
> That silver-loaded solder is great stuff. I have a reel that I use for
> SMD work and for repairs on Tektronix 500 series (which use silver-plated
> ceramic terminal strips). It was expensive, but it lasts a _long_ time.
>
> Another warning. There's a stuff called 'silver solder' used by
> engineers. This is _NOT_ the same stuff at all -- it's high melting point
> (you can use it on small steam engine boilers, etc). I'm not sure it even
> contains silver.
Oh yes it does :-) "silver-loaded" solder only contains tiny amounts of
silver (about 2%) but "silver solder" usually contains more silver than any
other constituent. EasyFlo is 60% silver, and most are between 30% and 65%
silver. The cadmium-free versions contain more than most: Ag19 is 85%
silver, 15% manganese. So the book says, anyway, I've never felt the need
to put anything that expensive in a blowtorch flame :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Dear John:
If you still have the DEC LA36 Decwriter II please advise. I need one
desperately. My last one "died" and I need it for an old computer system. I
am in Illinois, but my sons live in southern CA. They could coordinate taking
it off you hands. I look forward to you reply
Thanks
BOB
PSYCEDILLO(a)aol.com
I have a copy, on paper, of the HP2000F version.
sttr1.bas
Kelly
In a message dated Wed, 1 Dec 1999 9:56:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, Al Kossow <aek(a)spies.com> writes:
> "I do have the
> original SPACWR.BAS (Mike Mayfield, converted by David Ahl, I think) if you
> want that..."
>
> it would be nice to find the original HP2000 version somewhere. The copy
> that Jeff Moffatt has on the HP2100 page looks like a bad read.
Zane,
Do you stay with DEC OEM Model NUMBER on replacement?
What utilities exist to help identify drives to a MicroVAX?
Can I "dummy" some CYL/SPT/Hd count and hand it to the MicroVax and have the
OS Come in later and claim its an RD5? something provided the figures match?
Like, Whats the difference between a Quantum Q-540 and a DEC RD52?
Since Allison Parent mentioned that the RD52 was a Q-540, I have looked it
up in "The Hard Disk Technical Guide" by Micro-House. All the details are
there.
If I were to Find a Micropolis or CDC drive that fit some larger DEC
equivalent on CYL/SPT/Heads MFM ST506 RPM etc what would stop me from
generating a workable drive profile?
Anyone done this?
-----Original Message-----
From: Zane H. Healy [mailto:healyzh@aracnet.com]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 1999 4:18 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: VMS 4.7 was VAXstation 3100 history (Was ... different)
>> > On a philosophical side, what do you guys do, preserve both hardware
>> > and original software or upgrade the software? On my 3100/M38 I took
>> > out the original RZ24 with 5.?, put an old IBM disk and installed 7.2.
>
>My view is that I'd never overwrite an original distribution kit -- I'd
>preserve it and probably back it up. But I may well install a newer
>version of the OS (given suitable licenses) on the machine. I'd attempt
>to back up what was already there first, though. That's because I _use_
>these old machines. For a museum exhibit, as you said, you want to have
>contemporary software.
I've been known to pull the hard drive that came with the machine, and use
a different harddrive. Did this with the VAXstation 3100/30 I've got.
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
Thanks for the thread.
I have I Plessy 6700 PDP 11/24 work-alike, But its native drive is SCSI.
I will Check into alternate controllers / formatters.
DEC Model numbering is greek to me
Sincerely
Larry Truthan
Yeah, sure, folks have been doing this for about a decade and a half.
See, in particular,
ftp://ftp.spc.edu/third-party-disks.txt
At a minimum, before getting any further, you're going to need some
way to format arbitrary MFM drives to what the DEC controllers will
expect for a low-level format, either a VS2000 with its built-in
console formatter, or one of the DEC XXDP formatters (ZRQB for the
RQDX2, ZRQC for the RQDX3) and a PDP-11 to run them on.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>It has been suggested that there might be a jumper to tell it to spin up
>automatically. Does anyone here know if that is the case, and if so,
>where it is?
As an alternative to my previous suggestion, I've seen frequent mention
over the past decade or so in the DEC-related newsgroups to a program
called "RZSPINUP". Whether this can be pressed into service under NetBSD,
I don't know. (I was under the impression that RZSPINUP ran on a DOS-based
PC-clone.)
See, for example,
http://www.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/qs.xp?ST=PS&svcclass=dnyr&QRY=rzspinup&defau…
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927