Same deal, contact the person offering this, not me. I think I translated
the dimensions correctly, blasted MS! Another example of where Eudora
couldn't read the garbage MS OE spewed. He included a scan of the cover
that I can forward to anyone that wants it, it's got a little more info,
I'm on a fast line, so forwarding it isn't a problem for me.
Zane
From: "J. Darren Peterson" <jdarren(a)ala.net>
I'd like to find a home for this book instead of trashing it. I'll send it
to anyone for the cost of shipping.
Penril Corporation 300/1200 Data Modem
Operations Manual, December 1982
The manual is 8.5-inches x 11-inches in size, .5-inch thick, soft cover, in
very good condition, and has five sections and two appendices. The sections
are (1) Introduction, (2) Installation, (3) Operating Instructions, (4)
Maintenance, and (5) Fault Isolation and Diagnostic Tests. The appendices
are (1) Selectable Options Descriptions and (2) Functional Notes.
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
Last month at the Cal Poly Pomona hamfest I noticed one of the hams had a
sign on the back of his car "Teletype 33 forsale", never found him at his
spot though for any details, and the spot watcher didn't know anything.
3rd Saturday of the month, TODAY, is the hamfest at Cal Poly Pomona in
soCal. I will be on a short leash, arriving a little after 7, and scheduled
to be shot if I am not gone shortly after 9 am. Look for a big nerd with a
bucket, stupid hat is optional (mine, not yours).
Hello, all:
I've posted the schematics and the beginnings of a kernel tonight. The c
ode is not to a point where I can simulate it yet, but I have the reset, NMI
, and IRQ routines done, as well as necessary modifications to Chris Ward's
ACIA and Dallas RTC code.
Please look at the schematics. There are 9 PDF files containing the 8 sc
hematics and a component mask. I appologize in advance for using PDFs for sc
hematics, but I've found that it's easier to print from EDWin to the PDF Wri
ter driver and then to the printer than directly to the printer itself.
See if there is anything glaring that I've missed. At this point, the My
6502 feature set is "frozen", but I'm open to circuit optimization ideas. I'
ve gotten the board down to 6.5" x 7.5". When you look at it, you'll see tha
t it's stuffed.
Enjoy it and let me know what you think.
Rich
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW1
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
<================ reply separator =================>
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000 16:09:39 Joe wrote:
> >>Jerome,
> >>
> >> What are you going to use the MO drive on? Just curious. I have a
> >>SMO-501 also. It's SLOW!! The transfer rate and access time are WORSE
> >>than a floppy drive.
> >
> >They weren't that slow.
>
> Mine is. The access time is something close to 100ms. The transfer rate
> is about 2/3 that of a floppy drive.
There is probably something wrong with your drive or disks. Try cleaning
the surface of your disks, and if that doesn't help you might want to clean
the drive lens. For this you can either obtain the appropriate lens cleaning
cartridge (I can find the part number for this if necessary), or disassemble
the drive to expose the lens and clean it manually. Using a cleaning cartridge
is be less risky. If your disks are old, low-level format them after
cleaning.
>From memory, the (read) data transfer rate of my SMO-S501-11 drive with 600MB
media is about 600K/sec; similar to a quad-speed CD-ROM.
To put the access time into perspective, it is similar to that of a modern
DVD-RAM drive.
-- Mark
There's a tool made specifically for attaching ICD connectors that costs
only $15-16. That's quite a bit less than what the fixe-grips cost.
They're a parallel-jawed arrangement made of cleverly formed black sheet
metal with a yellow plastic seat that fits in the jaws, hinged at the end,
like a nutcracker, and which works MUCH better, faster, and more easily than
a vise, plier, even a parallel-jawed pair, as they're usually too small.
That seat is almost perfect, but it has a relief for the index tab in the
middle of the odd-numbered side of most IDC connectors, but it won't take
the ones with two such tabs. I've never seen one of these blister-packed
wonders cost more than $19.95, and bought mine for $15 or so.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: John Wilson <wilson(a)dbit.dbit.com>
To: classiccmp <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Friday, February 18, 2000 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: scroungers -- a new chalenge
>On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 06:00:51PM -0700, Clint Wolff (VAX collector)
wrote:
>> IDC cables are pretty easy to crimp with a panavise, or bench vise and
>> nylon jaws.
>
>Or a "duckbill" vice grip, available at welding supply shops and some auto
>parts shops. Works nicely, and not too strong... A vice is OK but you
>have to be really careful to listen for the clicks, the first one is the
>connector seating, the second one is the connector shattering!
>
>John Wilson
>D Bit
-----Original Message-----
From: John Wilson <wilson(a)dbit.dbit.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Friday, February 18, 2000 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: WTB: 5 1/4" Magneto Optical Cartridges
>On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 10:56:44AM -0500, John B wrote:
>> If you had said DECTape drives then I probably would have taken you up on
>> it. I can *now* truly appreciate why many dec engineers, field service,
and
>> prior dec employees all call them junk. Many have been guilty of using
>> Luttig's name in vane... now, me too!
>>
>> I wonder if TU56s float?
>
>What do you mean? Just because they break down a lot and have an ECO list
a
>mile long? Doesn't matter!
Doesn't matter? People generally rate an old piece of equipment by the way
it performed.. Most tape drives in the late 1960's were *not* that bad.
> They're one of the coolest peripherals around
>anyway! It's amazing the lengths DEC went to, to have a cheap removable
>medium that only *slightly* pre-dated floppy disks.
They made DECTape type drives since '62.. (555), TU55, then (after one would
*think* they would get it right)... the TU56.
> But then again they had
>no choice... My only complaint is that the TC11 backplane has a
full-height
>bracket on only one side, if you take it out of the rack then the two
halves
>of the other side of the backplane is being held together by the wire wrap
>wire alone. Solution -- don't ever take it out of the rack!
That was not a blunder - it was a feature. DEC *knew* the drives were
horrible so it only seemed fair to implement an upgrade strategy for the
customer. One too many breakdowns... customer pulls the left side of the
TC11 down and... presto! customer now has a valid reason to replace the
entire tape system.
I am working on a TC11 this very minute :-( I have a few to restore
> And only DEC
>would make a pretty lights 'n switches control panel and then hide it
behind
>a black block-out panel.
DEC did a good job creating flashing light panels ... but, how many times
did DEC want to light up a customers computer room with ENDZ, PAR, and other
fault lights? This is the *only* lightbulb status panel they ever hid,
wasn't it?
>
>Anyway I promise you TU56s don't float, not by a long shot!
I know many DEC customers tried. Some also tried extreme heat or pressure...
or both! ;-)
I really feel sorry for the field service guy now... to take abuse from a
customer looking over his shoulder while trying to repair *another* bad
DECTape drive...
BTW: Do you have a TC11 _working_ ?
john
PDP-8 and other rare mini computers
http://www.pdp8.com
>
>John Wilson
>D Bit
>
--- CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com wrote:
> >> I just found a "Software Results Corporation" Unibus board...
>
> > Cool.
>
> Even cooler that you know all about it :-).
There aren't many people in the world who know more than I (at this point,
probably nobody ;-) I never expected anyone to ever want to use this stuff
ever again.
> > Out of perverse curiosity, what's the S/N?
>
> SN 1245, Rev 3.0.
I almost certainly made that board. I started there around 700-800. I even
seem to remember that particular one. When I get around to snarfing up the
backup tapes and sticking them on CD, I'll be sure to look that one up. It
really does ring a bell. We only made that model up to around 1300-1400, IIRC
(yes, starting at "1"; I still have some working Rev 1 boards with double
digit serial numbers).
The dates of the chips do _not_ reflect the manufacturing date, BTW. At one
point, we had several *years* supplies of certain ICs due to aggressive
overbuying by our comptroller to avoid the shortages that plagued us in the
early days. It's why we had *tubes* of 50256 DRAMs that bought at $80 per chip
that didn't get used until the price had fallen to $35 per chip. :-( Some
of those same chips later ended up in my Amiga when I salvaged an engineering
prototype from the dumpster. I know which ones they are by the hand-drawn
"U number" identifying labels still stuck to the tops.
> >I have all the software, firmware, schematics, wire-wrap prototypes...
>
> In that case, would anyone else on the list want to grab it?
I haven't exactly agreed to post this stuff. It's a massive clot of MACRO,
68K assembler and C code that while not exactly commercially viable would be
a major pain on my part to package up to be useful to anyone. As an employee,
it took me weeks on the clock to get things to the point where I could build
the software from scratch. Also, the C compiler used by the COMBOARD-I
products is *not* VAX-C, it's Whitesmith's C and AFAIK I don't have the power
to grant those licenses (SRC did, but the corporation dissolved years ago).
We never ported our older products to VAX-C, only the newer Qbus and VAX-BI
products. There was no point - the customer received binaries and _we_ had
no problem using a 12-year-old compiler for 12-year-old code. It was ancient
tools, but to the final days, I could incorporate changes to the source and
have a new production tree ready to ship in 5 hours of disk thrashing (from
typing *one* build command, I might add!)
In short, it's possibly of archeological use, but unless you *really* want
to speak Bisync to some IBM hardware with VMS 4.5 - 5.4, I don't know how
useful any of it would be. There is source code for PDP-11 products, but
I am even less confident of being able to even make a working binary
distribution tape. I _have_ all the stuff but I haven't done a single thing
with it since 1994. The original Unibus board is historically fascinating,
but not very extensible. There's a later Unibus board, the COMBOARD-II,
that has an entirely different and incompatible DMA interface (transparent
to the user because those details are hidden in the driver) with 128K of
4164 DRAMs, but the same printer interface and COM5025. For me, at least,
our final products, the COMBOARD-Q (Qbus w/Z8530 Dual SIO and 512K RAM)
or the COMBOARD-BI (10Mhz 68010, BI interface, 2Mb RAM and Z8530) are the
ones most likely to be turned into something interesting. Unfortunately,
the worlds supply of available Q-boards (as we called them in-house) is
approximately two, and one of *those* was removed from the walls of the trade
show booth, and is lacking in the basic ECOs to be operational. I have
crates of COMBOARD-I and COMBOARD-II models, but I do not have a working
test bed since my DWBUA BI-to-Unibus adapter board smoked. :-( The VAX 8300
works just fine, but I have no way to test Unibus boards beyond basic boot
functions in a PDP-11 test bed (with that Fluke 9010 that's been mentioned
in the other thread).
Sorry to rain on your parade, but given the freeze-dried nature of the
software, you'd have to present a pretty convincing argument for me to
divert the tens of hours it would take to whip up something useful and
even then, you'd need at least another COMBOARD and modem-eliminator to
do as much as demonstrate it (we used to use two COMBOARDs, of any variety,
to move files between VAXen - SRC never evolved to using any sort of modern
LAN technology like Ethernet - we had point-to-point Bisync links, at cost,
between any machines we cared to have).
> >Unless I am seriously misinformed, this board was the first single-board
> >DMA device for the Unibus.
>
> The RL11 and RX211 both date from 1978 or so and do DMA from a single Unibus
> slot. Seeing how the date on this 68000 board is 1982, does this mean that
> a predecessor to this board was being made in 1978 or earlier?
Well... The PCB you have is Rev 3. The Rev 1 boards are dated 1979, and the
initial prototype originally had a .6" wide socket for the XC68000 processor
because it was designed from the preliminary spec sheets from Motorola. It
was quite a surprise to the COMBOARD-I designers when they learned that the
chip was 1" wide! What may have happened is that the COMBOARD-I was designed
before the RL11 or RX211 were available to the public, creating the external
appearance that they were first. I am pretty certain that SRC had dual-height
grant cards before DEC did because we had our own part number for them. The
older, tiny DEC cards were GC727 cards and we called ours the "GC747" card
because it was bigger (like Boeing airplanes). I've described the GC747 on
the list before - the PCB itself had a built-in curved T-handle at the top
and was stencilled in red with a face of a dinosaur and was called the
"Grantasaurus Rex". It even made an appearance in a photo in "The DEC
Professional", but there's no way I could cite issue and page numbers.
As soon as I get my flatbed scanner back from loan, I'll slap it and the
COMBOARD line on it and make some scans for the Field Guide. I at least have
time to do that.
I did find the "COMBOARD PROGRAMMER'S AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL" and the
"COMBOARD HARDWARE SELF-INSTALLATION SUPPLIMENT" guides (35 double-sided
pages, combined). I'd pass them along for the cost of duplicating/shipping.
I could scan them, too, if anyone _really_ wanted to put third-party docs
up on a web page.
Trivia note: COMBOARDs met VAXen when a customer of DEC who was also a
customer of Software Results Corp declined to buy a VAX unless it could
talk to the IBM mainframe as well as the PDP-11 he already had. Because
DEC wanted to migrate their customer base, one of the founders of Software
Results went to Maynard to port the software. I'm told that he used
VAX-11/780 S/N 6 for his efforts, a DEC in-house sales demo machine. Our
hero was apparently puzzled that the sales staff was upset that he kept
crashing the machine during driver development *while they were attempting
customer demos*
On most of our boards, there was our 800 number for service - 1-800-SRC-DATA.
Up until a couple of years ago, it rang to my home office number. I finally
disconnected it when I had no more paying customers and was tired of getting
billed for other people calling the wrong number.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
"Has anyone else got one other than Al and Jeff?"
Yes, there are a bunch of arcade game collectors that have them.
"Has anyone ever tried to built the probe for one?"
Not that I know of. The probes always get separated from the
units (along with the docs and pods). The probes are going for
big bucks on eBay ($75-$100). Popular pods (6502,6809,Z80,68K)
sell pretty high there as well. Of course, what this stuff
sells for on eBay is LOW compared to what the used test equipment
scalpers want for them ($250 and up for pods).
9010s are very useful when you're trying to debug embedded hardware
(like video game boards) that have no I/O
"Has anyone ever tried to repair the tape drive
capstans on them?"
They are Braemar mini-data cassette drives, you may still be able
to get parts from them, and cassettes (which are NOT the same as
mini dictation cassettes)
Steve Robertson <steverob(a)hotoffice.com> wrote:
> Since it's not too far away, I was thinking about grabbing the
> system. So, can I use my 3000/42 FOS tapes to reinstall the OS on
> the 37?
Stan Sieler got me to re-read one of my manuals. I'm still not sure
what it looks like on the tape, but it looks like a bootable tape can
contain multiple WCS loads for different models of CPU and still
support the models that have microcode in ROM. So this can work,
if the /37 microcode is in its place on the FOS tape, and I think
that's pretty likely for a (probably mass-produced) FOS tape.
-Frank McConnell
PDP-8 and other rare mini computers
http://www.pdp8.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis(a)mcmanis.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, February 17, 2000 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: WTB: 5 1/4" Magneto Optical Cartridges
>At 11:16 AM 2/17/00 -0500, John B wrote:
>>I am looking to buy one again now. I would like to back up all this dec
>>software on them. I know the data won't be lost if it goes on one of those
>>drives. I feel bad now because I chucked it in the garbage a couple of
years
>>ago.... It had a carrying case and 12 platters :-(
>
>I'll trade you a couple of MO drives for a PDP 11/20 with 8K of core :-)
>--Chuck
>
Cute Chuck! I got quite a bit of interest for a "straight-11".. more than I
thought. I know you indicated interest in one. When I know how many I will
have total (first week in March) then I will set aside a couple for list
members.. No idea what to trade or how much yet.
But.............................
If you had said DECTape drives then I probably would have taken you up on
it. I can *now* truly appreciate why many dec engineers, field service, and
prior dec employees all call them junk. Many have been guilty of using
Luttig's name in vane... now, me too!
I wonder if TU56s float?
john
PDP-8 and other rare mini computers
http://www.pdp8.com
>
>Looking at the tape, I see that the words "END OF FILE BAS65.PTP"
>are punched at the end of the tape in sort of pseudo dot-matrix
>characters. Does the "PTP" extension tell us anything?
"Paper TaPe" in DEC-ese.
> Looking at
>the start of the tape:
>"MICRO-SOFT BAS65.PTP [2601,1260] 29-JUL-77 15:27:58"
That makes sense, Microsoft was cross-assembling on PDP-10's at
the time, and [2601,1260] would be the PPN code for an account.
For the first couple of years Microsoft was using the hyphenated
form.
>Looking through the first few feet of "real data"...
>
>No high bits, the first few bytes are:
>00111011 x3b ';' (was hoping for the start of an assembly comment)
>00110010 x32 '2' (nope, looks like some sort of hex...)
>00110000 x30 '0'
>01000001 x41 'A'
>00110000 x30 '0'
>00110000 x30 '0'
>00110000 x30 '0'
>00110011 x33 '3'
>00111001 x39 '9'
>01000001 x41 'A'
That makes some sense, "20" is the 6502 opcode for a JSR (jump to
subroutine). The next two bytes are presumably the subroutine's
address, and "39" is the 6502 opcode for an AND abolute,Y instruction.
Tim.
The best dumpster I ever hit was a ComputerLand in San Mateo when they went
out of business in the early 90s. I went to their going out of business sale
and realized they would have lots of leftovers. After the sale I filled my
Honda car two nights in a row, spending about 3 to 4 hrs a night burrowing
>from one end of their dumpster to the other.
The second night I had so much jammed into the Honda there was barely room
for me. The passenger seat was so full it towered over me as I was driving. I
barely made it back over the bridge to Hayward, where I was staying. I had to
use one hand to keep the stuff from collapsing on me. All PC stuff of course.
After they realized that someone was dumpster diving they broke every card
they put in.
>From 1990 to 1992 I regularly checked Microware's Beaverton, OR dumpster.
They were a major west coast distributor until they had financial trouble
>from expanding too fast. Ross-Dove held a huge liquidation auction which had
some very good trash. I pulled quite a few brand new motherboards, cards and
hard drives in boxes from that dumpster.
Also in the early 90s Mentor Graphics was liquidating lots of Apollo 100,
300, 400 and 600 boxes. I pulled a bunch of circuit cards and software from
the dumpster at their auxiliary storage. It was so interesting I started
checking their main plant until security chased me away.
My recommendation is to check computer businesses going out of business.
Computer manufacturers going out of business or downsizing are also good.
Check the major auctions like Ross Dove that happen in your area. Computer
distributors often have good dumpsters also.
My favorite story though is one of my scrapper friends. He had some Chinese
buyers visiting him. They had gone through his yard in Bend and were on their
way to Portland. Cruising through the industrial area of Albany he spotted a
dumpster full of good scrap wire. While he wanted to look he wasn't sure of
how these Chinese businessmen would take it. He decided what the hell and
pulled his truck up beside the dumpster. Needless to say the Chinese were the
first on top of the dumpster happily yarding the scrap into the truck. They
were having a great time until the local police showed up and made them put
all the wire back in the dumpster. I bet it made for great stories back home.
Dumpster diving is lots of fun. Especially if you just dive in.
Paxton
>I assume you used sealed lead-acid batteries?
>
>-Mike
Yep, I uesd the exact type of batteries ("Cyclon" 2V, 5.0 Ah cells) that
were originally in it. They are new cells. I am tempted to believe that the
AC Adaptor/Charger has gone south on me.
____________________________________________________________
David Vohs, Digital Archaeologist & Computer Historian.
Computer Collection:
"Triumph": Commodore 64C, 1802, Double FDD, GeoRAM 512, Okimate 20.
"Leela": Macintosh 128 (Plus upgrade), Nova SCSI HDD, Imagewriter II.
"Delorean": TI-99/4A.
"Monolith": Apple Macintosh Portable.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
On Tuesday, February 15, 2000 11:29 PM, Joe [SMTP:rigdonj@intellistar.net] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I spotted a HP 3000 system 37 today in a scrap place. It has two HP 7963
> drives and a bunch of other stuff that I don't recognize. Can anyone tell
> me something about them?
>
Question for the HP gurus:
Since it's not too far away, I was thinking about grabbing the system. So, can I use my 3000/42 FOS tapes to reinstall the OS on the 37?
Thanks.
Steve Robertson - <steverob(a)hotoffice.com>
>> I just found a "Software Results Corporation" Unibus
>> (hex-height) board with an array of 32 2114 memory chips and
>> a big fat 68000 chip on it. There's a COM5025 (UART?) and two
>> 40-pin headers on the edge.
>Yup. Cool.
Even cooler that you know all about it :-).
> Out of perverse curiosity, what's the S/N? I can eventually
>look it up and tell you who used to own it. I might have even been the
>guy that pulled the parts from inventory and tested the finished product.
SN 1245, Rev 3.0. There's a handwritten "O" before the "CBD-X31"
designation on the board.
>I have all the software, firmware, schematics, wire-wrap prototypes,
>*everything* for them. Unless you want to speak 3780 or HASP to some other
>device from your Unibus PDP-11 or VAX, that board is useless.
In that case, would anyone else on the list want to grab it?
>Unless I am seriously misinformed, this board was the first single-board
>DMA device for the Unibus.
The RL11 and RX211 both date from 1978 or so and do DMA from a single Unibus
slot. Seeing how the date on this 68000 board is 1982, does this mean that
a predecessor to this board was being made in 1978 or earlier?
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
--- Al Kossow <aek(a)spies.com> wrote:
> "Has anyone else got one other than Al and Jeff?"
>
> Yes, there are a bunch of arcade game collectors that have them.
Me.
> "Has anyone ever tried to built the probe for one?"
No.
> Not that I know of. The probes always get separated from the
> units (along with the docs and pods). The probes are going for
> big bucks on eBay ($75-$100). Popular pods (6502,6809,Z80,68K)
> sell pretty high there as well.
I have only the 68000 pod. I'd *love* to land a 6502 pod. I would get
some serious use. Mine came from Software Results Corp. (see other
thread) and was used for testing COMBOARDs.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
--- CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I just found a "Software Results Corporation" Unibus
> (hex-height) board with an array of 32 2114 memory chips and
> a big fat 68000 chip on it. There's a COM5025 (UART?) and two
> 40-pin headers on the edge.
Yup. Cool. Out of perverse curiosity, what's the S/N? I can eventually
look it up and tell you who used to own it. I might have even been the
guy that pulled the parts from inventory and tested the finished product.
> Date codes are from early 1984,
> and there's a surprising amount of 54LS (and no 74LS) logic on the
> board, leading me to think that this may have been intended for the
> military market.
Nope... the company got tired of snooping down bad chips. The boards were
a couple of grand, customer cost, so MIL-SPEC chips were not a horrible
cut into the profit margin and were, at the time, individually tested. It
saved enough on labor to be worth the expense.
> Is this, by any chance, a coprocessor type board, or is it a
> "master" CPU?
It is an intellegent synchronous serial card with onboard line-printer
capability. On a RSTS/E system, you could avoid spooling jobs through
the system line printer queue, saving many CPU cycles. We used to hang
LA-180's right off of the printer port or sell a printer adapter for
Dataproducts interfaced printers.
> Am I imagining things, or has "Software Results Corporation"
> been mentioned on this list recently?
Yes. I was hired there in 1984 and eventually bought the name and rights
to the software/hardware/customer list and provided service between 1993
and 1995 to all the customers who bought them in the 1980s (by 1990 sales
were effectively non-existant except for upgrades). Coincidentally, SRC
was the company that took out the full page back ad on "CPU Wars", now
on the web at http://www.e-pix.com/CPUWARS/cpuwars.html
I have all the software, firmware, schematics, wire-wrap prototypes,
*everything* for them. Unless you want to speak 3780 or HASP to some other
device from your Unibus PDP-11 or VAX, that board is useless. The dual 6309
PROMs are only smart enough to feed more complicated programs through a CSR
window into the 16K of SRAM. Even simple diagnostics are downloaded at
runtime,
character by character. In its protocol emulation mode, it uses 16-bit DMA to
feed buffers back and forth.
Unless I am seriously misinformed, this board was the first single-board
DMA device for the Unibus. Software Results pioneered the removal of the
NPR jumper to allow such things to work (prior to this, DMA devices were
one _backplane_ that broke grant between the input and output Unibus cables).
We had to ship dual-height grant cards to accomodate the absence of the board
when it was removed for diagnostic or repair purposes.
More trivia: this board uses SRAM because of two early DRAM problems. Intel
RAM was having higher than expected single bit errors (thought at first to
be cosmic rays, but later proven to be stray alpha particles emitted from
the minute quantities of radioactive materials in the ceramic packages).
Additionally, the first batch of 68K CPU chips (my old boss still has XC68000
S/N 424, yes, there is a serial number engraved on the lid) had microcode
glitches that caused longer than advertised bus cycles. For those designers
that borrowed/copied/migrated existing Z-80 refresh schemes, the outages were
long enough to interfere in some cases, causing catastrophic memory loss. SRC
went with 2114s for reliability.
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
<What do you think of them? Has anyone ever tried to repair the tape drive
<capstans on them? Has anyone ever tried to built the probe for one? BTW
<these date from around 1981 and are powered by Z-80s so they're on-topic.
Simple fix. Scrape off the black goo or orange goo. then use a little
superglue to anchor some plastic or rubber tubing over the metal hub to
get the original diameter (some error is acceptable). I do this on TU58s
all the time.
Allison
If anyone wants this utility, I can put a copy on my highgate machine for general access.
Kevin
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000 13:58:04 EST classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org wrote:
> "Richard A. Cini, Jr." <rcini(a)msn.com> asked:
>
> > Is there a DOS or Windows utility similar to the Unix TOUCH utility??
>
> Borland included TOUCH with their Turbo Pascal and Turbo C packages.
>
> Also there was a version available thru PC Magazine, created circa 1988
> by Michael J. Mefford. If your like most, you probably got some floppies
> full of utilities that PCMag was always putting out.
>
> Here is the syntax for the PCMag version:
>
> TOUCH filespec [/D date] [/T time]
> date = month-day-year
> time = hour[:minutes[:seconds]]
> Default is system date and time.
>
> Mike
Hi folks,
I just found a "Software Results Corporation" Unibus
(hex-height) board with an array of 32 2114 memory chips and
a big fat 68000 chip on it. There's a COM5025 (UART?) and two
40-pin headers on the edge. Date codes are from early 1984,
and there's a surprising amount of 54LS (and no 74LS) logic on the
board, leading me to think that this may have been intended for the
military market.
Is this, by any chance, a coprocessor type board, or is it a
"master" CPU?
Am I imagining things, or has "Software Results Corporation"
been mentioned on this list recently?
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Here's another question...does anyone have a pointer to the source code for
a 6502-based BASIC interpreter that's ROMable?
Rich
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW1
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
<================ reply separator =================>
Hi Group:
I have four TK50 tape drives available as surplus. All were working spares from a local DEC installation. I already have too many and have to get rid of these.
Here's the deal. A nominal amount (US$10 ea), and you pay shipping.
Please email me directly if you're interested in one or more.
Kevin
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000 18:29:59 +0000 (GMT) classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org wrote:
> A word of warning for anyone trying to use the code that was below on a PC.
> Firstly the PCjr serial port is at 0x2F8 (==COM2 on most PCs). Secondly,
> and more importantly, the master clock fed to the chip in the PCjr is
> different to that used in PCs (and PC/XTs, PC/ATs, etc). Therefore you'll
> need to recalculate the baud rate divisors if you want to use it on a PC.
I calculated the divisors in the program by hand, extrapolating from the values given in the technical reference for standard, higher baud rates.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, February 17, 2000 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: WTB: 5 1/4" Magneto Optical Cartridges
>Jerome,
>
> What are you going to use the MO drive on? Just curious. I have a
>SMO-501 also. It's SLOW!! The transfer rate and access time are WORSE than
>a floppy drive.
They weren't that slow. We got some Beta units at the leg. for our Mac
platform. I used one as my *primary* drive for years. Was nice as I could
swap my development platters (MPW versions, other test junk) instantly. I
never lost data and they were very reliable... more reliable than the hard
drives at the time!
I am looking to buy one again now. I would like to back up all this dec
software on them. I know the data won't be lost if it goes on one of those
drives. I feel bad now because I chucked it in the garbage a couple of years
ago.... It had a carrying case and 12 platters :-(
john
PDP-8 and other rare mini computers
http://www.pdp8.com
IBM developed the front loading 2315 disc drive in the 60's, and is the
basis for Diablo 31, Wanco, Pertec, HP 7900, and DEC RK05 2.5Mb single
platter removable disc drives.
>Pertec Blue, I would suspect someone would want them for their Altair 8800b's
No, these aren't floppy drives.
I know.. take a look at the Pertec adds in Byte in the early 80's, and there
should be pictures of these drives in configurations with late MITS systems
after MITS was bought by Pertec.
Plessey also sold Pertec drives with their clone of the RK-11 disc controller.
"Richard A. Cini, Jr." <rcini(a)msn.com> asked:
> Is there a DOS or Windows utility similar to the Unix TOUCH utility??
Borland included TOUCH with their Turbo Pascal and Turbo C packages.
Also there was a version available thru PC Magazine, created circa 1988
by Michael J. Mefford. If your like most, you probably got some floppies
full of utilities that PCMag was always putting out.
Here is the syntax for the PCMag version:
TOUCH filespec [/D date] [/T time]
date = month-day-year
time = hour[:minutes[:seconds]]
Default is system date and time.
Mike
"J.-P. Hofer" <hofer(a)wgh.ch> wrote:
> I am looking for technical information about a SCSI harddisk
> DEC DSP3210S.
> Does anyone have some details about jumper settings, capacity and
> other specifications ?
Physical-Log. Modes
UNFORMAT WIDTH PLs CYLS CYLS INTERFACE AVG. CACHE PIO
MODEL NUMBER FORMAT'D HGT. HDs PRCP HDs REC.METH. TK-TK RPM DMA
HA. S/T L-ZN S/T COMMENTS AND ADITIONAL INFO. REV
=============================================================================
2688.0MB 3.50 8 3045 SCSI-2F 10ms 1024KB
2148.0MB 41.4 16 NONE (1,7)RLL 1.0ms 5,400
DSP3210 VC MZ AUTO R/S ECC, 59-119 SECTORS/TRACK
_____________________________________________________________________________
Steve Robertson <steverob(a)hotoffice.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 15, 2000 11:29 PM, Joe [SMTP:rigdonj@intellistar.net] wrote:
> > I spotted a HP 3000 system 37 today in a scrap place. It has two HP 7963
>
> Question for the HP gurus:
>
> Since it's not too far away, I was thinking about grabbing the
> system. So, can I use my 3000/42 FOS tapes to reinstall the OS on
> the 37?
Good question. I'm not sure. The 37 has writable control store and
so when it boots from tape I think it will want to find a WCS image
in the SYSDUMP prefix on the tape. Would the 42 FOS tapes have that
WCS image?
I suspect there need to be at least two different types of MPE V/E FOS
tapes to boot all 3000s supporting MPE V/E: one for 37s (and maybe for
the various Micro 3000s -- do they use the same microinstructions and
WCS images?), one for 64?/68/70s, and maybe one for the non-WCS 3000s.
-Frank McConnell
Hello, all:
Is there a DOS or Windows utility similar to the Unix TOUCH utility??
Rich
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW1
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
<================ reply separator =================>
On Tuesday, February 08, 2000 7:33 PM, Stan Sieler [SMTP:ss@allegro.com]
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you have a Classic HP 3000 (any two-digit model #),
> and if you received the "Y2K Safe" release of MPE recently,
> and if you haven't installed it yet,
> I have some notes that you should find interesting.
>
> (If you didn't get your Y2K Safe MPE V (which was free!),
> email Allan Hertling at allan_hertling(a)hp.com)
>
>
Thanks for the info Stan,
I sent an email to Allan asking about the upgrade and he was EXTREMELY
helpful. My system (HP 3000/42 Classic) did not have any patches applied
for a very long time so, he's gonna send the whole package. The best part
is it's absolutely FREE!
All in all, HP has been extremely helpful in providing upgrades for my 3000
and 9000s.
Steve Robertson - <steverob(a)hotoffice.com>
A friend of mine and I had about a dozen of those SMO-501's back in about
'89 or '90. We cleaned and upgraded them. Their performance on a PC of
that era was comparable to the previous generation of PC-based SCSI hard
disks. It was not impressive, but it wasn't terribly slow. We had so much
trouble keeping them at $1k each that I never used one myself at all. They
were just too valuable to keep. From what I remember, their performance was
more or less comparable to my Iomega 8" Bernoulli Boxes, though they were
MUCH larger in capacity.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, February 17, 2000 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: WTB: 5 1/4" Magneto Optical Cartridges
>Jerome,
>
> What are you going to use the MO drive on? Just curious. I have a
>SMO-501 also. It's SLOW!! The transfer rate and access time are WORSE than
>a floppy drive.
>
> Joe
>
>At 03:10 PM 2/16/00 -0500, you wrote:
>>I am looking for a source for the 600 Mbyte magneto optical
>>5 1/4" cartridges with 512 byte per sector. Tim Shoppa
>>has mentioned in the past that he might know where I can
>>find some. Does anyone else? These will be used in a
>>SONY SMO S-501 5 1/4" magneto optical disk drive.
>>
>>I have checked eBay, but they are usually sold as is?
>>
>>Sincerely yours,
>>
>>Jerome Fine
>>
>>
>
I am looking for a source for the 600 Mbyte magneto optical
5 1/4" cartridges with 512 byte per sector. Tim Shoppa
has mentioned in the past that he might know where I can
find some. Does anyone else? These will be used in a
SONY SMO S-501 5 1/4" magneto optical disk drive.
I have checked eBay, but they are usually sold as is?
Sincerely yours,
Jerome Fine
On 2000-02-16 classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org said to kees.stravers(a)iae.nl
cl>Hi Gang:
cl>Further to this discussion of 5 bit characters on a DL11, this was
cl>also possible on the PCjr. I wrote a BASIC send/receive RTTY
cl>program for the PCjr in 1985. It used an esoteric mode of the
cl>particular serial chip on the PCjr, to support 5 data bits and 1.5
cl>stop bits. The DTR pin of the serial port was used to toggle the
cl>radio from transmit to receive. My modem was homebrew, built around
cl>an XR2211 (IIRC) chip. I still have the modem buried in the
cl>crawlspace somewhere.
This was also possible with the serial port of a regular PC. I have been
running a RTTY BBS on 144 MHz for 10 years, based on a TRS-80 Model I
program I ported to the PC and extended. My program even had an interface
to the nearest packet radio BBS, so RTTY users could exchange mail with
packet users, and later the system could also communicate in CW (morse
code) so you could send emails without having a computer. But nobody uses
RTTY anymore, and even CW is on the decline, so I have taken the BBS down,
no more users.
Kees
--
Kees Stravers - Geldrop, The Netherlands - kees.stravers(a)iae.nl
http://www.iae.nl/users/pb0aia/ My home page
http://www.vaxarchive.org/ Info on old DEC VAX computers
Net-Tamer V 1.08.1 - Registered
Ack! I said:
>dahdidit dit dahdahdidah dididit didahdahdahdah dahdidah dit
>didahdidahdit dahdidah.
And of course it should be dahdahdidit dididit, d?mmit!
Shows you how long ago I've played with my radios!
Wouter "Where's QS1 anyway" ZS1KE
--- John Wilson <wilson(a)dbit.dbit.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 06:44:14PM +0000, Tony Duell wrote:
> > Hmmm.. I've tried to learn morse several times, and failed every single
> > time. I don't know why, but it just doesn't seem to 'click' with me.
>
> Well, having an actual use for it makes it a lot easier to remember. My
> best friend and I learned Morse code in 6th grade so that we could pass
> notes in class that no one could understand. Naturally that later fizzled,
> the 7th grade teacher was a ham and the 8th grade teacher was a radio
> operator in the Norwegian underground in WW2, so much for that idea!
My younger brother did that as a kid, too. The teacher tapped back "cut it
out" when they tried it during a test.
> I *always* wanted to do that, I actually bought a DUP11 years ago for this
> purpose but never dug up documentation on it until recently. You'd need to
> build some kind of external clock (PLL really I guess) that synchronized to
> the bit transitions of AX.25, shouldn't be a very big deal though.
My knowledge of sync serial comes from years of working with third party
devices on DEC equipment, but here goes... If the DUP-11 has a COM5025
serial chip on it then what it's expecting is something like a "standard"
bit-rate on its input connector. With the right cable, I'd expect to
feed it clocking through pins 15 and 17 on a DB-25 at EIA levels (+/- 12VDC).
We used to have racks of "modem eliminators" that were effectively null-modem
devices that would provide clocks to DTE equipment on both sides. There were
typically various options to set as well, bit rate being chief among them.
Most of ours were set to between 9600 and 56Kbps with a couple set to 64kpbs
and one to 128kbps for reproducing environments of our European customers.
Sync serial has no start bits, no stop bits, just bits. With protocols like
SDLC, there's a "flag byte" of 0x7E (0111 1110) that the receiving hardware
uses to determine the start and stop of a packet. One efficiency of sync
hardware is you aren't trasmitting 10 bits to communicate 8. The downside
is extra hardware on both ends and slightly more expensive cables to send
it all.
If I'm confusing the DUP-11 with other DEC cards that use the COM5025, sorry.
The original Software Results Corp. COMBOARD used that chip because it was
identical to whatever Qbus card we used to use when we were shipping the
HASPBOX (a PDP-11 with sync serial and a DPV-11 to communicate via parallel
to a PDP-11/70 or VAX-11/7xx).
> Stupid question: what comes out of the other side of a ham TNC these days?
> It used to be Bell 202 modem tones at 1200 baud HDX, over an FM voice signal,
> it *can't* still be that easy though can it?
In the 2 meter band in the U.S., at least, Hams are restricted to 1200 baud.
AFAIK, it is that simple. There are "pocket TNCs" that are little more than
audio modulator circuits that depend on the CPU in your PeeCee to produce
a valid AX.25 bitstream. I've seen it work with an HP-95LX - "pocket packet".
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
Found this fellow advertising in a ham radio group. I've given him some
correction on that, and offered to forward what he has to the list.
I'm no DigiData expert, but he tells me that the driver software that
comes with the drive is DOS-based. This tells me it's either SCSI or Pertec
(SCSI most likely), and decent SCSI 9-trackers are rare.
He's in Durham, NC, and I doubt he'd be looking for a mint on this thing.
Whoever wants a crack at this, please contact him directly.
-=-=- <break> -=-=-
>>For Sale, best offer:
>>
>>9-track tape drive, rack-mount
>>Digidata Corp, model 1749-86-4-120-FD-UL
>>w/ software, 8-10"reels, 6-8" reels
>>in good working condition
"Chris Slacke" <drivetime(a)mindspring.com>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
The Merlin assembler for the Apple II came with a demo program that would
disassemble the Applesoft BASIC ROMs, with comments. I can provide this
disassembly to you.
I think Microsoft sold their 6502 BASIC to Commodore, complete with source
code. Commodore was then able to change the code as needed for their
various 6502 computers.
----------
> From: Richard A. Cini, Jr. <rcini(a)msn.com>
> To: ClassCompList <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Source code for BASIC
> Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 08:42 PM
>
> Here's another question...does anyone have a pointer to the source code
for
> a 6502-based BASIC interpreter that's ROMable?
Jerome,
Well if you need 1.3 GB ones, I have 90-something, mostly used but a few are
new... all are rewriteable MO disks, all are HP
Will J
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
--- "Shawn T. Rutledge" <rutledge(a)cx47646-a.phnx1.az.home.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 04:31:51PM -0800, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> > In the 2 meter band in the U.S., at least, Hams are restricted to 1200
> baud.
>
> No, not exactly. But we are limited to the same bandwidth as an FM
> voice channel, so there is a practical limit. 9600 baud fits into the
> permissible deviation well enough and is commonly used on 2 meters.
I guess things changed when I wasn't looking. Thanks for the update.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
Finally got my Mac Portable battery rebuilt, the thing runs great! But I
think I have a problem. Whenever I check the "Battery" DA or the battery
gauge on the menu bar, the batteries never seem to be charged up more than
half way. Anybody got any ideas?
____________________________________________________________
David Vohs, Digital Archaeologist & Computer Historian.
Computer Collection:
"Triumph": Commodore 64C, 1802, Double FDD, GeoRam 512, Okimate 20.
"Leela": Macintosh 128 (Plus upgrade), Nova SCSI HDD, Imagewriter II.
"Delorean": TI-99/4A.
"Monolith": Apple Macintosh Portable.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<My earliest Intel SBC's have room for 4 24-pin EPROMs, each of which can
<hold 4K, and, if you use a jumpering arrangement derived from the schemati
<rather than from the manual, you can use the 8K parts from MOT. That give
<you 32KB. Isn't that enough to support a customized version of the BASIC
I have 8k rom Basic (actually about 7.25k in size) from Netronics for the
8085 SBC. That was very complete Microsoft Basic-80 cassette basic.
It reqired 1k of ram for the most minimal of programs. IO was vis the SBCs
2k monitor rom.
Another good basic with FP is LLL basic, about 5k (of 8080 code) with
floats.
32k would be Ms disk basic + most of CPM! So size is not an issue.
Often most SBC users only need integer math plus control strutures so they
can run things.
<wouldn't you? There are some public-domain CP/M-compatible I/O handlers
<which use some of the CP/M i/o calls. Naturally, it's a lot of work, but
<you can do it, given you have the source code.
You can fit CPM with BIOS in 8k easily (CCP-2k, BDOS-3.5k, Bios 2.5k)!
If your really lazy yu only need ram to copy it to from a rom so a boot
device is not required.
I have a little SBC I did that has two 32k ram (000-F7FFh), 2k Eprom at
F800 and several IO ports that runs SPM via romdisk (27010 x2 on a 8255
parallel port device). Everything runs from ram. If storage is needed
I have a bit of bios code that routes drive B: to the serial port and a
host system fakes a disk. It's on a 6x4" card no SMT and common stuff
using 8085 running at 5mhz. Everything but the bios is stock code and
the bios is nothing fancy (nearly textbook actually).
Allison
<If someone's looking for a BASIC to run on their SBC, I think I'd go
<with one of the Tiny BASIC's out there myself that comes with sources.
<Oak.oakland.edu or another good old Simtel mirror would be a good place
<to start a search.
MSbasic is ok but there were better. Personally the PTbasic and NS* were
better featured for their size.
the dunfields.com site has a few small Basics as well to look at.
Allison
Yes, that's true, but it's through no action or inaction (I hesitate to say
"fault") of you're own that you're all still in one piece.
I'd agree that allowing the masses the freedom to kill or maim themselves or
others is probably sound Darwin theory, the fact that people, despite their
poor judgement are left to boast about having survived despite the cited
obviously imprudent actions is adequate evidence that sound judgement isn't
a requirement for survival. The fact that my two boys, neither of whom was
either taught or allowed to engage in such actions are still around also
serves to point that out.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Christopher Finney <af-list(a)wfi-inc.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, February 10, 2000 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: Dumpster stories!
>
>
>On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, John Wilson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 06:35:26PM -0000, Eric Smith wrote:
>> > I suppose people are going to think I'm a jerk for saying such a thing,
>> > but IMNSHO the tragedy here isn't that the kids were killed, but that
>> > they hadn't been taught not to do such things.
>>
>> I agree... My parents covered all this stuff -- they told us not to dig
inside
>> snowbanks because a plow might come, we all wore seat belts way before
there
>> was a law (bicycle helmets too), our parents strictly enforced what we
could
>
>Never a bicycle helmet, threw heavy rocks on the ice to see if it would
>break (then made the biggest kid go out there first), built forts in
>snowplow drifts, threw rocks at bees nests, climbed high trees, had B-B
>gun fights, etc. Had enough money to buy bottle rockets and firecrackers.
>Made lawn-chair pipe bombs with pyrodex. So did all of my friends.
>
>We're still alive, and each of us still have 10 fingers and two eyes
>apiece.
>
No, I don't get the point.
The TINY BASIC with which I worked back in the mid-'70's required more ascii
because it was necessary to build the features normally contained in the
"full-up" version.
If one were to have access to the source code for the interpreter, one could
then migrate various function classes to external libraries which would be
incorporated into the ROM set only if they were needed. If you didn't need
the FP library or the high-precision math library, or the file I/O library,
you'd simply leave it out. However, it's MUCH easier to add enough ROM code
space by using a couple already present sockets, if you do need string
processing or floating point functions, it's MUCH easier to use them within
the framework of BASIC than to roll-yer-own implementation of a public
domain FP package. If you put the ascii basic code in one ROM and put the
interpreter in another, it makes a big difference whether you use TINY basic
rather than a product like MSBasic v5.11.
TINY is OK for some applications, but it doesn't do a lot of the nie things
the "real" basic does. That's why you have to use more code to build the
functions. If you use them often, these little functions can become large
and burdensome. The BASIC source, meaning the stuff you write and feed to
the interpreter, is often MUCH easier to fit into a small system's ROM for a
given task than the equivalent TINY BASIC implementation simply because it's
less verbose than Tiny BASIC code for the same task. YMMV, of course, but
IF you write an interface to an LCD so that PRINT uses it, just being able
enter '?' as a token already saves space. Of course, if you happened to
have a tokenizer for the basic, or, for that matter, TINY BASIC, you'll save
space. Unfortunately, I've never had a tokenized TINY BASIC.
That, basically, (no pun intended) is the reason a REAL source for a REAL
basic interpreter would be interesting. After all, that's one of the
features that's made FORTH as popular as it is.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com <CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: Source code for BASIC
>>Just exactly why would you recommend a TINY BASIC as opposed to a full-up
>>interpreter? Most SBC's support huge amounts of RAM, far in excess of
what
>>the basic interpreter should require.
>
>Heck, we can get SBC's of just a few square inches with a Pentium Pro, 128
>Mbytes of RAM, SVGA output, and a hard drive interface, why not just
install
>Windows NT on the SBC so you can run the latest and greatest Visual
BASIC++++?
>
>Well, I took your argument there a little too far, but I hope you get the
>point: Use the tools appropriate to the job. And for most SBC
applications,
>the floating point capabilities and libraries as well as the file I/O
>facilities of a "full-up" BASIC are overkill. OTOH most Tiny Basic
>implementations are perfect for the bit-banging and input/output that a
>SBC is often called upon to do.
>
>(And yes, I know of other cases where Windows NT and 128 Mbytes of RAM on
>the SBC are appropriate, but I don't think any of us want to go down that
>road!)
>
>--
> Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
> Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
> 7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
> Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>
>Just exactly why would you recommend a TINY BASIC as opposed to a full-up
>interpreter? Most SBC's support huge amounts of RAM, far in excess of what
>the basic interpreter should require.
Heck, we can get SBC's of just a few square inches with a Pentium Pro, 128
Mbytes of RAM, SVGA output, and a hard drive interface, why not just install
Windows NT on the SBC so you can run the latest and greatest Visual BASIC++++?
Well, I took your argument there a little too far, but I hope you get the
point: Use the tools appropriate to the job. And for most SBC applications,
the floating point capabilities and libraries as well as the file I/O
facilities of a "full-up" BASIC are overkill. OTOH most Tiny Basic
implementations are perfect for the bit-banging and input/output that a
SBC is often called upon to do.
(And yes, I know of other cases where Windows NT and 128 Mbytes of RAM on
the SBC are appropriate, but I don't think any of us want to go down that
road!)
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Just exactly why would you recommend a TINY BASIC as opposed to a full-up
interpreter? Most SBC's support huge amounts of RAM, far in excess of what
the basic interpreter should require.
My earliest Intel SBC's have room for 4 24-pin EPROMs, each of which can
hold 4K, and, if you use a jumpering arrangement derived from the schematic
rather than from the manual, you can use the 8K parts from MOT. That gives
you 32KB. Isn't that enough to support a customized version of the BASIC
interpreter in addition to the required driver code? You do have to modify
the I/O hooks to fit into your SBC, but you'd have to do that anyway,
wouldn't you? There are some public-domain CP/M-compatible I/O handlers
which use some of the CP/M i/o calls. Naturally, it's a lot of work, but
you can do it, given you have the source code.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com <CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 11:48 AM
Subject: RE: Source code for BASIC
>>Tim Shoppa mentioned having some early MS source on AFC.
>>What exactly do you have, Tim?
>
>I've got MBASIC 5.11 sources. This is relatively late in
>MBASIC's life (about the time it was being ported to the 8086) but there
>are comments in there referring back to 1975.
>
>I've also got home-grown disassemblies of several other Microsoft products
from
>the late 1970's, though these are hardly "official".
>
>If someone's looking for a BASIC to run on their SBC, I think I'd go
>with one of the Tiny BASIC's out there myself that comes with sources.
>Oak.oakland.edu or another good old Simtel mirror would be a good place
>to start a search.
>
>--
> Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
> Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
> 7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
> Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>
On February 16, Mark Tapley wrote:
> Howdy. I'm utterly inactive but I do actually have (had? I'd better
> check, may have expired) technician KB6UOH.
> My wife was listening to me struggling to work up to 5 WPM code,
> using our Mac Plus (am I on-topic now?) as a random code generator. She
> thought it sounded kind of neat, tried it out, and was doing 10 WPM in a
> few days. (grrrr!). On the way down to the test I taught her Ohm's law and
> a few frequencies and talked her into taking the test. She took clean code
> (and the volunteers there were begging her to try out the general code
> test) and squeaked by the multiple-choice stuff and got license KB6UOI
> (awww, how sweet, consecutive numbers...).
> Now if we'd just get a radio and get on the air.....
She thought CW sounded neat? Does she have a sister? ;)
-Dave McGuire
So . . . where did this set of MBASIC v5.11 sources turn up for you to snag?
Are the associated files available?
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com <CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 11:48 AM
Subject: RE: Source code for BASIC
>>Tim Shoppa mentioned having some early MS source on AFC.
>>What exactly do you have, Tim?
>
>I've got MBASIC 5.11 sources. This is relatively late in
>MBASIC's life (about the time it was being ported to the 8086) but there
>are comments in there referring back to 1975.
>
>I've also got home-grown disassemblies of several other Microsoft products
from
>the late 1970's, though these are hardly "official".
>
>If someone's looking for a BASIC to run on their SBC, I think I'd go
>with one of the Tiny BASIC's out there myself that comes with sources.
>Oak.oakland.edu or another good old Simtel mirror would be a good place
>to start a search.
>
>--
> Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
> Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
> 7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
> Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>
>Tim Shoppa mentioned having some early MS source on AFC.
>What exactly do you have, Tim?
I've got MBASIC 5.11 sources. This is relatively late in
MBASIC's life (about the time it was being ported to the 8086) but there
are comments in there referring back to 1975.
I've also got home-grown disassemblies of several other Microsoft products from
the late 1970's, though these are hardly "official".
If someone's looking for a BASIC to run on their SBC, I think I'd go
with one of the Tiny BASIC's out there myself that comes with sources.
Oak.oakland.edu or another good old Simtel mirror would be a good place
to start a search.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
"> I just acquired Microsoft 8K basic in ROM for OSI on paper
> tape.
Tim Shoppa mentioned having some early MS source on AFC.
What exactly do you have, Tim?
"
On a related note, I've got source code here to some (many? most?) of the early Microsoft products -
you know, things like MBASIC, etc., that say at the top:
.TITLE BASIC Mpu 8080/8085/Z80/8086 (5.11) Bill Gates/Paul Allen
INCLUDE BASIC.MAC
;SUBTTL VERSION 5.11 -- NOT MANY FEATURES TO GO
;COPYRIGHT 1975 BILL GATES AND PAUL ALLEN
;BILL GATES WROTE A LOT OF STUFF
;PAUL ALLEN WROTE OTHER STUFF AND FAST CODE
;MONTE DAVIDOFF WROTE THE MATH PACKAGE
;ORIGINALLY WRITTEN ON THE PDP-10 FROM
;FEBRUARY 9 TO APRIL 9 1975
"
Though I could have missed it, I don't recall that it is/was ever the policy
of Microsoft, through any of its customers, to distribute the source of its
BASIC compiler. That would be a really handy thing to have, since one could
then hack it into shape for embedded use, thereby competing with Microsoft's
own products.
If anyone has SOURCE code for Microsoft's BASIC interpreter, I'd be very
interested to know about it.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Sudbrink <bill(a)chipware.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 8:42 AM
Subject: RE: Source code for BASIC
>I just acquired Microsoft 8K basic in ROM for OSI on paper
>tape. I currently have no facility to read it, so I don't
>know if it is source or object. The tape seems to be in
>good shape (doesn't seem to be fragile) so it should be
>good for a few passes through a reader. I'll let you know.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>> [mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Richard A. Cini,
>> Jr.
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 8:43 PM
>> To: ClassCompList
>> Subject: Source code for BASIC
>>
>>
>> Here's another question...does anyone have a pointer to the
>> source code for
>> a 6502-based BASIC interpreter that's ROMable?
>>
>> Rich
>>
>> [ Rich Cini/WUGNET
>> [ ClubWin!/CW1
>> [ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
>> [ Collector of "classic" computers
>> [ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
>> <================ reply separator =================>
>>
>>
>>
Hello,
I am looking for technical information about a SCSI harddisk
DEC DSP3210S.
Does anyone have some details about jumper settings, capacity and
other specifications ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
--
Jean-Pierre Hofer
hofer(a)wgh.ch
_______________________________________________________________________
Appareils scientifiques Hofer / Wissenschaftliche Ger?te Hofer
Case postale 3126
CH - 8021 Z?rich Phone + 41 1 251 07 31
Suisse / Switzerland E-mail wgh(a)wgh.ch
_______________________________________________________________________
Hams,
Howdy. I'm utterly inactive but I do actually have (had? I'd better
check, may have expired) technician KB6UOH.
My wife was listening to me struggling to work up to 5 WPM code,
using our Mac Plus (am I on-topic now?) as a random code generator. She
thought it sounded kind of neat, tried it out, and was doing 10 WPM in a
few days. (grrrr!). On the way down to the test I taught her Ohm's law and
a few frequencies and talked her into taking the test. She took clean code
(and the volunteers there were begging her to try out the general code
test) and squeaked by the multiple-choice stuff and got license KB6UOI
(awww, how sweet, consecutive numbers...).
Now if we'd just get a radio and get on the air.....
- Mark
John Lawson <jpl15(a)netcom.com> wrote:
> PS: How many Listmembers are also Hams? I know of at least ten or
> so of us... dah-dit dah-dit dah dah dit-dah..... QRZ?
Mike Cheponis <mac(a)Wireless.Com> wrote:
> Isn't is amazing? Two trailing-edge hobbies: ham radio and collecting
> old computers. Coincidence? ;-)
Coincidence? Nah! It's due to an ionized packrat gene.
Mike Thompson
KA9JWZ (Technician), 1982
Commercial Radiotelephone License, 1970
>PS: How many Listmembers are also Hams? I know of at least ten or
>so of us... dah-dit dah-dit dah dah dit-dah..... QRZ?
dahdidit dit dahdahdidah dididit didahdahdahdah dahdidah dit
didahdidahdit dahdidah.
:-)
W
I use them on 11/73's with all switches off.
Dan
Subject: DEC M7551 question
>I recently acquired a DEC M7551 (4Mb memory) board for my 11/23+. I
>installed the board, but the system traps while doing the power-on memory
>test. Unfortunately, I don't have any documentation for the board and I'm
>not sure if I have the jumpers/switches set correctly. It could be that the
>board is just dead, but I'd like make sure before I give up. If someone
>could forward me the settings, it would be greatly appreciated.
>
>Thanks,
>Bill King
Hey, I tried to mail you an image of ATT Unix SVR2 foundation disk 1 but I
keep getting "undeliverable" error messages. I emailed you once yesterday,
and it seemed to go through OK but I'm not sure if it made it or not. I had
to get creative with it.
Is there a problem with your email?
Send me an email and I'll try to "Reply" to it again, and see if it works.
Also, with the Teledisk program and a zipped copy of the disk image, the
email is about 500k. Is that a problem?
Ernest
--- Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com> wrote:
> I doubt, somehow, that you could classify what's in the ROMs in an ATARI or
> COMMODORE as source code.
No, but there's reverse-engineered source at
ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/cbm/src/pet/basic.zip
And it has already demonstrated to be ROMable.
The problem is that any 6502 BASIC I have ever
worked with is very hardware and firmware
dependent. It is, however, a place to start.
If this proves insufficient, I can probably
dredge up some stuff off of an official C=
Assembler disk I got from them in 1982 to
develop for the C-64. I know there's some
source code there; I forget what it covers.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
Hello, all:
I'm not too familiar with HTML, but I'm guessing that this question is e
asy to answer.
What's the code to open a new browser window when someone clicks on a li
nk? I want a new window to open with the requested page as the open document
.
Thanks.
Rich
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW1
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
<================ reply separator =================>
I do remember Dick Bash, KL7??? who started the whole licencing uproar. I
think he finally got his tech licence pulled for some silly reason.
Yes, I love them boat anchors too. Hollow state technology with the warm
glow of filaments is so nostalgic.
I personally will have a boat anchor station set up. Drake 2B and a Central
Electronics 100V transmitter tied into a Johnson Desk Kilowatt. I heven
have the Ranger exciter to run it as a KW plate modulated if necessary (now
illegal). Yes, I do have rice boxes as well, but there is no challenge to
those. But they are nice mobile.
I challenge all of you out there to get a ham licence, no code or even the 5
wpm. The 5 wpm is no barrier -- anyone can learn that in a few weeks a
couple nights a week. C U on the bands . . .
Gary Hildebrand
WA7KKP .__ ._ __... _._ _._ .__. ._.
collector of old General Electric Progress Line radios
and anything else that glows in the dark
I doubt, somehow, that you could classify what's in the ROMs in an ATARI or
COMMODORE as source code.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Kaiser <ckaiser(a)oa.ptloma.edu>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: Source code for BASIC
>::Here's another question...does anyone have a pointer to the source code
for
>::a 6502-based BASIC interpreter that's ROMable?
>
>Why, look in every Commodore, Apple II, or Atari! :-P
>
>(But if that's unsatisfactory, I'd be interested, too.)
>
>--
>-------------------- personal page:
http://calvin.flactem.com:3001/~spectre/ --
> Cameron Kaiser * Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)ptloma.edu
>-- I used to miss my dad, but then my aim
improved. ---------------------------
Hello, fellow OM's
yes, I are a ham too, but don't send the code stuff. Now that the FCC had
deregulated things, the majority of hams will NOT know Morse Code.
didididahdidah
CB radio has now infiltrated our ranks -- but us scrungers live on in
cyberspace, or is that at a virtual hamfest where people still build things
. . .
Gary Hildebrand WA7KKP
licenced 32 years this June
That might be the case, except that my recollection of the "standard" MAXTOR
drives were pretty much all 15 Mbit drives. Later they may have gone
faster, though. My 4380's and 8760's are all 15 Mbit drives.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Lane <kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: Maxtor xt8760 drives
>At 18:54 15-02-2000 -0700, you wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Anybody here knows, what the difference is between the xt-8760E and
>>xt-8760EF version ?
>
> I would guess that E is standard ESDI (10 MHz) and EF means 'Fast' (15 or
>higher).
>
> Then again, that's a guess. Maybe someone else knows better...?
>
>
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
>http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
>Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
>"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
>own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
Hello fellow hams and others,
Besides having a ham licence, I also had a First Class Radiotelephone, until
the FCC deregulated that as well back in 1985. Now it is just a General
Radiotelephone licence, which is required only in a handful of
circumstances. And then try to get one today!! The exam is given under a
similar structure as the ham licence VEC program, but not the same. And it
costs $100+ for an attempt.
It's too bad the FCC ran short of money and had to curtail a lot of its
activities. Now I just call then the Gettysburg Address.
Gary Hildebrand
On February 15, John Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 12:12:57PM -0800, John Lawson wrote:
> > PS: How many Listmembers are also Hams? I know of at least ten or
> > so of us... dah-dit dah-dit dah dah dit-dah..... QRZ?
>
> I'll bet it's a pretty high percentage...
Probably so. I'm formerly KA2UZK, expired, but hoping to re-test
and renew this spring.
-Dave McGuire
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 18:00:55 -0500 John Wilson <wilson(a)dbit.dbit.com>
writes:
>Hmm, what was the name of that guy who decided that having a ham
>license w/o bothering to learn anything first was some kind of god-given
>right, so he started using the freedom of information act to find out
the
>answers to the FCC tests and published them in books? I hope something
bad
>happened to him by now...
I think someone hit him with the Wouff-hong.
Jeff
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
--- Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com> wrote:
> Yes the restructure made code a requirement for general and extra only and
> the tech is expanded. If I can pony up at least 5wpm I plan to go for the
> general, if not the tech as I can pass the technical elements in my sleep
> and the rules aren't all that bad.
I'm personally looking forward to the new rules - I got a "know code"
technician in 1992 and plan to bump myself up to at least general since
I already have the 5 wpm. I'd been wanting to get a ticket for a while,
my father was one in the '50s, but he let his lapse. The final straw
was the depletion of the "N8" call sign - I got N8TVD, as I said earlier.
My younger brother got N8YKN. AFAIK, techs around here get "KC8" calls now.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
QRZ
Jeff KH6JJN (GENERAL since 1977)
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 12:12:57 -0800 (PST) John Lawson <jpl15(a)netcom.com>
writes:
> PS: How many Listmembers are also Hams? I know of at least ten or
> so of us... dah-dit dah-dit dah dah dit-dah..... QRZ?
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
Does anyone know how to connect an ASR-33 Teletype to a DG Nova 2? Also, does anyone know the communications settings for the Nova 2? I have a ADM-3A Terminal, and according to a book that came with my Nova, my particular machine was host to one.
Thanks,
Owen
Hi Gang:
The power supply in my Sun 4/110 is acting up. The problem appears to be
with the line filter just ahead of the power supply proper.
Anyone else have a 4/110 on the list? I'd like to correspond to try to fix
the problem.
Thanks,
Kevin
==========================================================
Sgt. Kevin McQuiggin, Vancouver Police Department
E-Comm Project (604) 215-5095; Cell: (604) 868-0544
Email: mcquiggi(a)sfu.ca
Hello, all:
I assure all of you that my intentions for an automatic window are honor
able! No porno at all (although I hear that it's a lucrative site to run :-)
)
Here's what I don't like. On my site, when you click the link for the My
6502 project, you wind up having two navigation columns on the left hand sid
e. I think that it looks funny. So, I wanted to have that link open up in an
other browser window.
Thanks for the help.
Rich
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW1
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
<================ reply separator =================>
> Not Ham. Commercial Radiotelephone, used to do the two way radio racket
<
<So what did you do? Analog *and* digital, I'm impressed!
Yes! I've worked on the first high speed mobile data terminal amoung other
things. Try doing 3125baud in 1974 over a voice bandwidth channel (uhf
repeater) with a CM2100 as the system for mobile rounting and comms. Back
then the MOdat (motorola was running at 600baud and channel interference
was killing transmissions before they ended). Built the repeater too
mostly out of U44 and similar chassis with a pair of 4cx250s for final
to get 1000 ERP from a 10db stationmaster on 474.975 (5mhz split).
<I got the "general" radiotelephone ticket (used to be called "2nd class") o
<the first testing day after they eliminated 1st class and changed the rule
<(hmm, this would be early 1980s), but never got a radio job or otherwise
I've had mine since '69, First with with televison and Microwave. I was a
certified geek/nerd/techno way back when. Fired their mind at the fed
as I wanted the Rt license and at my age (noxious HS kid) they figured I
was a novice or maybe shooting for the ham. Had my father cheering me on
as he had to sit the whole day. My mother though it highly inappropriate.
<had any practical use for it. I was really proud of getting a low serial
<as a result of the rule change, but then I was late renewing it and lost
<the low #, went from PG-1-7 to PG-1-18665, I felt like such an idiot!!!
Ouch. My number, PG-1-67xx, that replaced the older license number when
they went to the for life system. Back in 73 almost signed on with a
friends 85ft sloop that went to the Med as sparks. Captains signature
on the back would have been a trip. It was something you do for fun as I
was making more at work. Should have taken the ride.
<Of course now they last for life anyway. The exam took me several tries t
<pass, it was *much* harder than the ham exams. But I got lucky, even afte
<the rules change the Boston FCC office was still using old tests (the one
<finally passed was dated 1968) which covered tubes but not transistors, goo
<thing because my books were old too and didn't cover transistors well at al
It was tough. I studied for weeks to get ready and did all elements in
one day (NYC federal building). I did use mine for the radio biz and
when I applied to college it was part of the leverage I used to get some
of the courses dropped. I figured that was worth most of the 17 credits
I beat them out of. Back then the First was as close to certified tech
or operating engineer as you could get and not have to go to school. I
still carry the pocket card as I fly and thats
my radio license as well.
Allison
<In response to the reply about hams not needing to know Morse code anymore
<that is not correct except for the new Technician entry level class; all
<others need only 5 WPM though.
Yes the restructure made code a requirement for general and extra only and
the tech is expanded. If I can pony up at least 5wpm I plan to go for the
general, if not the tech as I can pass the technical elements in my sleep
and the rules aren't all that bad.
Allison
> I got the "general" radiotelephone ticket (used to be called "2nd class")
on
> the first testing day after they eliminated 1st class and changed the
rules
> (hmm, this would be early 1980s), but never got a radio job or otherwise
> had any practical use for it.
I earned my first class license in 1975. Never got a job in the industry
so, I let it lapse. Still have the certificate laying around here ...
somewhere...
Steve Robertson - <steverob(a)hotoffice.com>
On February 15, Gary Hildebrand wrote:
> yes, I are a ham too, but don't send the code stuff. Now that the FCC had
> deregulated things, the majority of hams will NOT know Morse Code.
Hey...all hope is not lost, there. I know *I* really enjoy CW; I
can't imagine I'm the only one. It's fun, and that will never change!
-Dave McGuire
I'm a ham, have been licenced since 1977.
I'm VE7ZD, ex VE7CPT.
Active on HF (CW, SSB, RTTY), VHF, UHF (FM, SSB, Moonbounce, packet, satellites).
73,
Kevin
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 12:12:57 -0800 (PST) John Lawson <jpl15(a)netcom.com> writes:
> PS: How many Listmembers are also Hams? I know of at least ten or
> so of us... dah-dit dah-dit dah dah dit-dah..... QRZ?
73 de Kees PB0AIA from JO21SK (That's the southern part of The Netherlands).
Do I get a QSL card now? hi, or :-) confusing which symbols to use now!
--
Kees Stravers - Geldrop, The Netherlands - kees.stravers(a)iae.nl
http://www.iae.nl/users/pb0aia/ My home page
http://www.vaxarchive.org/ Info on old DEC VAX computers
Net-Tamer V 1.08.1 - Registered
--- John Lawson <jpl15(a)netcom.com> wrote:
> John KB6SCO
>
>
> PS: How many Listmembers are also Hams? I know of at least ten or
> so of us... dah-dit dah-dit dah dah dit-dah..... QRZ?
Ethan Dicks - N8TVD
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
Got the following yesterday, and since I'm not in need of any he OK'd me
sending this to the list. Please contact the original author, not me, if
interested.
Zane
From: "J. Darren Peterson" <jdarren(a)ala.net>
>I've got three PDP boards new (unopened) in box. The vendor label says
>M9312 , but on each box that part number has been scratched through and
>the number M9301 written over it. Either way, you can have them for the
>cost of shipping if you want. Let me know.
>
>J. Darren
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
>I recently acquired a DEC M7551 (4Mb memory) board for my 11/23+. I
>installed the board, but the system traps while doing the power-on memory
>test. Unfortunately, I don't have any documentation for the board and I'm
>not sure if I have the jumpers/switches set correctly. It could be that the
>board is just dead, but I'd like make sure before I give up. If someone
>could forward me the settings, it would be greatly appreciated.
Are you sure it's a 4 Mbyte (M7551-CA) board? If it's a 2 Mbyte (-BA)
or a 1 Mbyte (-AA) board then it's very possible that it's jumpered
for some other starting location than zero. And your CPU self-test
is expecting memory starting at zero.
If you can get to ODT ("@" prompt), try doing some examines of various
locations, i.e. "0/", etc., and see if you get anything.
If the board isn't responding at "0/", try higher addresses and see if
it's living there.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>Nah, gotta use the current buzzwords: eHamfest.
The web page that becomes the front door to this eHamfest can dynamically
scramble the anchors to each of the ventor pages kinda creating a random
walk through the sales floor from our browsers... oops, nevermind
;)
Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
In a message dated 2/15/00 00:26:40 Central Standard Time, donm(a)cts.com
writes:
> >
> > < I visited a surplus dealer today and picked up an external hard drive
> > <case that he was throwing out. The case has a Seagate 225 drive in it
with
> > <some kind of Western Digital interface card. The card has MFM
connection
> o
> > <one end and a 50 pin header on the other. The header is connected to a
> > <cable that had a SCSI type plug on it. Does anyone know if the card is a
> > <SCSI to MFM interface or what?
> >
> > Well St225 is MFM so the card is either a host to MFM bridge or
SCSI(SASI)
> > to MFM bridge.
> >
> > The real answer is a part number on the card like WD1002-HDO (host
> interface
> > number). Someone else may be able to confrm if the SHD is SASI or at
that
>
> > time early SCSI.
>
> TheRef45A says that it is SASI to ST-412.
>
> - don
>
Most of the early Heath/Zenith Hard Drive set ups manufactured by after
market suppliers used the XEBEC controllers on the hard drives and interfaced
to an SCSI card in the computer. The 50 pin female header connected to a 50
pin male header on the SCSI card in my H-89's. There were other schemes, one
involving a Western Digital PC controller mounted on the ST-225 and an
interface decoder card on the left buss in the H-89. I would bet that the HD
described was interfaced to an SCSI card though.
Just my .02 worth. YMMV
Mike
I recently acquired a DEC M7551 (4Mb memory) board for my 11/23+. I
installed the board, but the system traps while doing the power-on memory
test. Unfortunately, I don't have any documentation for the board and I'm
not sure if I have the jumpers/switches set correctly. It could be that the
board is just dead, but I'd like make sure before I give up. If someone
could forward me the settings, it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Bill King
Hello, ladies and gents out there
I have found good stuff in the dollar bin at Computer Renaissance:
2 working monitors for my Amiga and a Tandberg 525meg tape backup
Price: $1.00 per
And I don't get dirty or smelly in the process.
And I also recommend going to hamfests -- amateur radio fleamarkets. Quite
a few guys get this stuff and try to peddle it for a couple bucks. My
favorite line is -- How badly do you want to take this boatanchor home??
At one hamfest I found 19 used DSDD 3.5" drives for $30. These are the
standard Amiga drive, but useless anywhere else.
Get snooping out there -- the used market is drying up fast due to the low
low cost of new stuff.
Gary Hildebrand
Amigaphile
WA7KKP
scrounger 1st Class
Not too sre as I don't memorize but there is acrapload of info and ideas up at
http://www.htmlhelp.com that you might be interested in. Opening another window
>from that one huh? Sounds like you're building a porno site (grin)
>Hello, all:
>
> I'm not too familiar with HTML, but I'm guessing that this question is
e
>asy to answer.
>
> What's the code to open a new browser window when someone clicks on a li
>nk? I want a new window to open with the requested page as the open document
>.
>
>Thanks.
>Rich
>
>[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
>[ ClubWin!/CW1
>[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
>[ Collector of "classic" computers
>[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
><================ reply separator =================>
>
>
>
>
This board is a SASI board made primarily to tap into the market grown
around the XEBEC and OMTI boards. ADAPTEC somewhat later came out with a
series (40xx) which later pretty much owned the market. They were all more
or less similar, but none were "real" SCSI, in that (A) they didn't cave a
firmly established common command set, and (b) they didn't use all of the
soon-to-become-standard SCSI signals, certainly not entirely in the same
way. By the time the standard was accepted, it was mostly the ADAPTEC
feature set that won out.
Nevertheless, Joe, you'll find that card can help you quite a little with
putting a hard disk in place on your old CP/M systems. This can be helped
along with a "back-end-driver" which installs itself under CP/M as an
autocommand. This sits above the BIOS, hence uses a 2-k lower system than
it would without it, but makes your SCSI hardware portable from one system
to another. That's pretty handy in itself.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Maslin <donm(a)cts.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, February 14, 2000 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: Western Digital WD 1002S-SHD card ???
>
>
>On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Allison J Parent wrote:
>
>>
>> < I visited a surplus dealer today and picked up an external hard drive
>> <case that he was throwing out. The case has a Seagate 225 drive in it
with
>> <some kind of Western Digital interface card. The card has MFM connection
o
>> <one end and a 50 pin header on the other. The header is connected to a
>> <cable that had a SCSI type plug on it. Does anyone know if the card is a
>> <SCSI to MFM interface or what?
>>
>> Well St225 is MFM so the card is either a host to MFM bridge or
SCSI(SASI)
>> to MFM bridge.
>>
>> The real answer is a part number on the card like WD1002-HDO (host
interface
>> number). Someone else may be able to confrm if the SHD is SASI or at
that
>> time early SCSI.
>
>TheRef45A says that it is SASI to ST-412.
>
> - don
>
>> Allison
>>
>>
>
HI,
I found four DEC memory modules in a lab drawer the other day. No markings
that make sense to me but possibly to someone else:
On the PCB side 1: Side 1 50-20612-01 Rev A01 LPWR BE3-0
On side 1 in screen print: 27391 6868-3 (placed in the order: LPWR 27391
BE3-0 6868-3)
On the PCB side 2: Side 2
There are nine memory chips on each side, type HM514100AS8, plus a 74F541D.
4 Mbits per chip? 8 Mbyte plus parity per module?
Dimension 111.81 mm * 28.00 mm
Available for freight (from Sweden) plus what the receiver feel thay are
worth.
Thomas
< I visited a surplus dealer today and picked up an external hard drive
<case that he was throwing out. The case has a Seagate 225 drive in it with
<some kind of Western Digital interface card. The card has MFM connection o
<one end and a 50 pin header on the other. The header is connected to a
<cable that had a SCSI type plug on it. Does anyone know if the card is a
<SCSI to MFM interface or what?
Well St225 is MFM so the card is either a host to MFM bridge or SCSI(SASI)
to MFM bridge.
The real answer is a part number on the card like WD1002-HDO (host interface
number). Someone else may be able to confrm if the SHD is SASI or at that
time early SCSI.
Allison
(somewhat off topic... only 5 or 6 years old and a PC at that :-)
Well as I mentioned in that screenphone thread I bought an IBM 730T.
There are lots of them on ebay right now at prices which make me wish I'd
not bought that ill-fated DTR-1. This is a tablet type pen-based computer
which has 8 megs RAM built-in, 3 PCMCIA slots and 1 RAM card slot which
collectively take up the space of 2 type-III slots. So if you put in a
hard drive you have 1 type-II slot and 1 RAM slot free. (I don't know
if the RAM slot is what is known as type-I, but the pins are arranged
differently and it takes a DRAM card... I'm hoping those cards are
interchangeable regardless of manufacturer but I'm not sure. IBM intended
a 4 or 8 meg card to go in there.) When you turn it on, there is no
BIOS setup screen that I have found, it just immediately proceeds to load
DOS off the 105 meg hard drive that came with it. Mine came with nothing
other than command.com loaded on it so I have no way of putting other software
on right now. Floppies for them are rare and expensive. I tried borrowing
a coworker's laptop last night to transfer software to the hard drive, but
I couldn't make it show up in any of WinNT, FreeDOS or Linux. So I will
have to either buy a floppy or a PCMCIA card drive for a desktop PC I guess.
I want to try and put Linux on it and get X working with the pen. So if
any of you have any of the following for sale or trade:
PCMCIA hard drive with more of DOS installed so I can use intersvr at least
or Linux
a clever substitute for that
PCMCIA slot for a PC
floppy for the 730T
other ideas on how I can try to install Linux
... let me know. I have quite a significant pile of junk^H^H^H^Htrading
stock. Hmmm, matter of fact I think I'm going to go add a list of stuff
to my home page right now because it's accumulating fast and I need to
start losing some.
I don't know even if I get Linux onto it, if the fact that DOS boots without
any card services being installed, implies that Linux will also see the
hard drive as an ordinary one or if I'm going to have to build a kernel that
has the PCMCIA support compiled in rather than as modules. I'm beginning to
wonder if the hard drive itself is special. Since there is no BIOS setup
could I get it to boot from a different sized drive... and maybe also
this accounts for why the hard drive didn't look normal to the other OS's.
--
_______ http://www.bigfoot.com/~ecloud
(_ | |_) ecloud(a)bigfoot.com finger rutledge(a)cx47646-a.phnx1.az.home.com
__) | | \__________________________________________________________________
--- "Charles P. Hobbs" <transit(a)primenet.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Gary Hildebrand wrote:
> > At one hamfest I found 19 used DSDD 3.5" drives for $30. These are the
> > standard Amiga drive, but useless anywhere else.
>
> Was that $30 for the *lot*? Geez, I've seen these drives go for $30
> *each*. . .
That _is_ a good price if it was for the lot. If anyone is looking for
a similar item, I have a box of Sony MP-F11W-72 drives, 720K DSDD 3.5"
floppies for various Tandy boxes, including the Tandy 1000. One catch: they
don't have a power connector. They draw power over the 34-pin data cable.
Typically, floppies have grounds on the odd pins; this one scopes out thusly...
1 NC (uninstalled jumper at RJ1 (GND) and R1 (?))
3 NC (uninstalled jumper at RJ3 (GND)) (FAQ claims +5VDC)
5-11 +5VDC
13-19 GND
29,31 NC (uninstalled jumper at RJ7 (GND)) (FAQ claims +12VDC)
33 NC (FAQ claims +12VDC)
(cf. the Tandy 1000 FAQ - http://www.oldskool.org/~tvdog/1kfaq.html#II.C )
There is a space for a power connector, but it is not installed. If you feel
like migrating a connector from a dead floppy, it's doable, but for non-Tandy
use, a modified cable might be the better solution.
I got these from the Dayton Hamfest in a "you want one, you take the box"
deal from the local Radio Shack guys that used to have a great booth in
the white tent in the corner of the flea market. I will never use more
than one or two of them. Now's your chance to stock up on bizarre Tandy
drives.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
All,
At the Texas Thrift Store in San Antonio, loop 410 just south of
Ingram, I found:
AT&T 6300 and Xerox box - these two looked identical except different
color schemes. Both $6.95, "as-is" and the Xerox says "works". Xerox
claimed to be made in Italy, I didn't check AT&T.
Apple IIGS - mmmm...$13.95? I didn't write it down. "as-is"
Franklin Ace 100? - ... $6.95?? "as-is".
All boxes were seperated from monitors, keyboards, cables, manuals,
software - bare boxes only. I did not spot any such peripherals which
looked at all related to any of the above, but didn't look very hard.
If anyone is interested, email me offline and I'll buy, pack, ship,
and let you know how much it cost to do all three. Hopefully, you'll then
send me a check for that amount...
- Mark
PS are announcements like this of value to anyone? Should I continue them?
Move them to the auction-announce list? Comments offline preferred, online
OK if they are of general interest.
> On another list, a public library is considering disposing of the
> following: "AT&T Sequent, WYSE terminals, router, bridges, hubs, printers,
> UPS etc" and is interested in trying to determine the "value" of this
> equipment. They're asking for a "bluebook" showing the values of old
> computers and such (I don't think such a beast exists, but. .. )
More realistic than any single "bluebook" would be to call up dealers
in such equipment and see what they're willing to offer.
The classic place to begin such a search is in a long-standing
minicomputer rag called _Processor_. They're mostly PC-clone ads these
days, but they still have a few pages dedicated to DEC and Data General
equipment, and there are certainly many outfits in there that'll be
interested in quality (i.e. not PC-clone) terminals, network equipment,
printers, etc.
See http://www.processor.com/ for their on-line presence. It's expanding,
though it's still not nearly as good as the actual printed edition.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
In a message dated 2/13/2000 9:26:32 PM Pacific Standard Time,
transit(a)primenet.com writes:
> er list, a public library is considering disposing of the
> following: "AT&T Sequent, WYSE terminals, router, bridges, hubs, printers,
> UPS , etc." and is interested in trying to determine the "value" of this
> equipment. They're asking for a "bluebook" showing the values of old
> computers and such (I don't think such a beast exists, but. .. )
>
Actually there is a computer blue book. It might cover the Wyse terminals
but it is more PC based. It has some mini stuff but I doubt the Sequent,
routers, bridges UPS etc. Pawn shops use it to evaluate what they will loan
on equipment. They are published by Orion Research Corp. in Durango
Colorado. It is published yearly and cost about $150. It is actually blue
colored.
I could help evaluate it if they want to contact me off list. I suspect they
would be shocked at the actual valuation. Of course it depends on the age of
the equipment.
It might be a candidate for a rescue though. Is anyone on the list running a
Sequent.
Paxton
Can anybody direct me to one (or a few) good websites or ftp boards that
have software for 68k-based Macs (one that has Smooth Talker, & a
Stylewriter II driver would be nice).
____________________________________________________________
David Vohs, Digital Archaeologist & Computer Historian.
Computer Collection:
"Triumph": Commodore 64C, 1802, Double FDD, GeoRam 512, Okimate 20.
"Leela": Macintosh 128 (Plus upgrade), Nova SCSI HDD, Imagewriter II.
"Delorean": TI-99/4A.
"Monolith": Apple Macintosh Portable.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
> ... Mike Haas came down from jacksonville and we went to the first day of
>the Orlando hamfest. Mike scored big time! No less than 6 different TRS
>computers. Several are like new and in their original boxs with all the
>books. He also bought several other interesting toys!
>
It was fun! A boxed coco2 and mc-10, and letsee... a model 4, a model 1
L1, a model 1 L2, a Holmes Expansion Interface, 2 disks, a light pen, and ;)
the plug&power controller with docs and cassette software. Non Radioshack
stuff included a prettily outfitted Atari Portfolio, a Covox voice master
again for the atari I hope, an Epson hx-20, and ;))) an Applied Microsystems
diagnostic cpu emulator with a 6809 pod and documentation.
I drove back down there later Sunday and didn't see anything more than I had
on Friday, and am in some respects glad. This haul will take awile to
assimilate....
Cheers!
- Mike: dogas(a)leading.net