Hi
Finally picked up a TRS80 mod III for a realistic price. The first home
computer I used when I was 15-16. It feels great...
Works 100%, bright no-burn tube, 48k. Except for little bit of silver
finish off front of keyboard, this unit is perfect.
But, it's a no floppy system...
I am looking for the floppy disk kit (including floppy mounting bracket
if possible) or just a controller or even the controller schematic for a
mod III or IV...Would probably install external floppies to keep case in
original shape rather then make-up a mounting bracket for the drives if
I cant find one...
Thanks for reading
Claude
If anyone is interested, I have an HP 85 available. It works
intermittently - it's nothing that re-seating the chips in their sockets
fixes! The printer works - don't know about the tape drive. I can pack it,
but you will need to pay shipping (and promise to send me your next 'extra'
Altair <g>). I can also throw in a new roll of thermal paper (besides the
remainder of what is in the unit). I'm near Hartford, CT. email me
privately with any bribes.
Bob Stek
Saver of Lost Sols
From: J Forbes <jforbes(a)primenet.com>
>It had been sitting outside, and was not in very good
>condition...but I pulled the display board out, and it seems to
>be usefull (see link above for a pic). If you want to drive
>Nixies from a TTL BCD signal, just score some 74141 type
>devices, they were made for the task!
I would also comment that there is a great deal of test equipment
that use nixies that with maintence last for many years. My Yasu
350mhz counter is still going and it's 26 years old. Nixies have a
good life. However 74141s are getting scarce.
>basement, and found a Motorola 6802, 1982 vintage. I wonder if
>it's usefull?
Why not. I just finished an ELF (using nwer parts) and my
CDP1802 chip from 1979 is still good.
Allison
Does anybody have any experience hooking a TRS-80 Model 100 up to a Mac
to exchange files? I have the serial cable and the null modem adapter
and I've tried both ClarisWorks and ZTerm, but I just can't get the two
to talk.
Can anybody offer advice?
Thanks,
Tom
Applefritter
www.applefritter.com
Maybe DHL is flying Junkers Ju-52's or C-47's or maybe even Ford Tri-motors?
Bizarre...
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
From: Kevin Schoedel <schoedel(a)kw.igs.net>
>Sorry, I didn't express myself clearly. In Chuck's machine the
>displayed value comes from a 12 line I/O bus. He could build two
>different display devices to attach to the bus: one for everyday use,
>with LEDs and bcd-to-7-segment decoders, and one special occasions,
>with decoders and drivers and sockets for the nixie tubes that he
>borrows from whatever machine they otherwise belong to.
You can but nixies are a pita to drive. Of era lamping would be
bulb per bit. cheaper too.
>Yes, he could make 4xx an encoded operation (like pdp8 operate
>instructions) such that 400 happens to perform a clear. Or he could
>make 4xx load the accumulator with 0xx, so that 400 is again a clear;
>this may fit the spirit of the design better. In either case he need
>not disclose the extra features at first :-)
Exactly. Or the feature could be enabled/disables using a OPR like
instruction.
>Yes. But since I'm doing a pure 8-bit machine, including 8-bit memory
>address, it's *already* limited significantly. I do currently have one
>unassigned opcode, so I could add an I/O instruction if it turns out I
>have enough board space. More likely I'll just move on to design #2,
>where I can hide complexity in microcode.
You'll find it doesnt hide. The features grow to increase complexity. ;)
>
>Yes, I'm still considering something like that, though I'd probably
>keep it simpler, and just leave the PC in the accumulator: PC->AC,
>MA->PC. I know this probably seems absurdly stripped down to anyone who
>already knows what they're doing, but I don't, so I want to keep the
>control very, very basic, to reduce the chance of serious errors.
Not an unreasonable way. Worth considering as it has good
register economy.
>I think you're right. I know my current addressing scheme is too
>complicated, and I no longer know why I've been so reluctant to give up
>page 0 addressing.
With say n-bit word and n-bit indirect address page 0 is more
efficient but not required. What it does do for short words like
8bit it eats a bit that could be an address.
>Do you have any comment on PC-page (upper bits from
>PC, lower bits from instruction) versus PC-relative (PC + lower bits
>from instruction, either sign extended or not)?
Both work. If you're using an indirect address (like PDP-8) then go
with PC-page as it much simpler. PC-relative is ok but requires an
adder (or more gating to reuse the only adder).
If there is one trick to keeping things simple, the fewer paths and
gating of things will help simplify.
Allison
From: Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com>
>
>I don't have documentation, so I'm not disputing that, but this
>makes me very curious. How is it that the RX8-E card (M8357) can deal
>with any of:
>
>1) RX01
>2) RX02 in RX01 mode
>3) RX02 in RX02 mode
The board has dual interface modes. The RX02 has multiple modes
as well. The best way to no results is to try a RX02 in a Qbus box
with RX01 controller. Made that error once, wasted a lot of time
even though it hurt nothing.
>From the standpoint of building a machine from the ttl ground up
the RX01 drive controller is a great example of what can be done
with little.
Instruction set is:
WBS (wait, branch, stall IO)
DO (do pulse, xx,xxxx bits)
JMP (to field X)
CBR (conditional branch)
It's mildly horizontally code and also verticle coded.
Uses 74181 (x2) for the 8bit alu and a pair of 7489s
for registers. instruction word is 8bits. Ran fast
enough to decode/encode FDC data in real time.
Allison
From: Kevin Schoedel <schoedel(a)kw.igs.net>
>Neat. I occasionally spend a little time working toward building myself
a
>simple processor. My priorities are rather different, though; I want to
>make the 'moving parts' visible as far down as is practical and
>affordable (which for me will probably mean SSI TTL, except for the
>memory), rather than to make the programming model simple.
In the end buildability means a simple machine, not always a
simple programming model.
>Could one build "nixie tube emulators", for instance using seven-segment
>LEDs, and then borrow real ones from some other device for special
>occasions?
No. Nixie is one of 10 output (highvoltage very low current) and
7Segment
is different in every other way. For an era machine 7 segment using
incandescent lamps would be valid!
>
>>4 - CLEAR
>> Reset the accumulator (and flags).
>> Example: 400 - clears the state of the machine.
>> Note: This seems a waste of a major opcode.
>
>I've tentatively decided that I'll go for a store-and-clear operation, ?
>la EDSAC and PDP8, since, in the few sample programs I tried, the value
>in the accumulator was still needed after fewer than half the stores.
>This might conflict with your goal of simplicity, but on the other hand,
>the question of how to retain (regain) the accumulator after a store
>might make a good 'Exercise 1'.
PDP-8 or the PDP-5 are a good example of minimal but useful instruction
sets.
PDP-8 savethe AC and store is done one of two ways. You can use the MQ
but that requies three locations.
SWP
DCA N
SWP
The tighter version is also compatable across all the PDP 5/8 series.
CLL
DCA N
TAD N
Three words still but doesn't use a register that may not exist.
>Alternatively you could clear with a STORE,SUB pair, at the cost of a
>scratch location.
You could have a microcoded bit that if set clears the AC. Depends
on the number of bits you have to use.
>>7 - READ
>
>After several partial designs than included IN and OUT operations, I
>decided to punt I/O almost completely. In my current plans, one
operation
>can take the switch register as source, and the accumulator lights
>(and/or other lights) are the only output.
Limts the machine significantly.
>>9 - CALL
>
>I have provisionally punted the CALL, too, as a separate operation;
>instead, the same operation that can load the switch register into the
>accumulator can similarly load the PC. Unfortunately my current design
>requires the PC to then be adjusted explicitly in the subroutine.
Look at how PDP-5/8 and other did it. Since memory was a universal
store the first location of the JMS is the subroutine return address.
That give a very simple implmentation but a real Jump to Suroutine.
JMS SUB1
Breaks down to
PC-> SUB1, SUB1->PC, PC+1->, fetch PC
makes for simple state logic.
>I'm still at the stage of designing and "building" fragments in a
>simulator, since I have no real experience; I keep making things too
>complicated, and then backtracking to simply again. (And I don't work on
>it very often.) My current plan is roughly an 8-bit,
>stripped-down-PDP8-ish architecture:
Suggestion:
Eliminate the ISZ from the PDP8 ops and make IOT and ISZ in to
INPUT(to ac) and OUTPUT(from AC). Keep indirect addressing
and drop page 0 addressing.
AND
TAD
DCA
JMP
JMS
OPR (skips, shifts, clears, misc ops)
INP
OUT
three bit opcode, one bit for indirect address and 4bits for in
page address. Direct addressing 256 bytes using indirect
addressing.
>Any bits in the instruction may of course end up complemented depending
>on the nature of available gates :-) I want to hard-wire this one; if I
>eventually finish it, next will come a 16-bit (or perhaps 12- or 18- or
>24- bit) device with a more sophisticated instruction set and wide dumb
>microcode in EEPROMs.
Sounds like fun.
>One is an 8-bit processor, built from TTL on an 8"x14" prototyping
board,
>with point-to-point soldered wire. The ALU is a pair of 74181s, and
seems
>to use 7475s for the registers. There are five sets of 8 LEDs -- memory
>address register, program counter, instruction register, memory, and
A good design to look at for simplicity and also to illustrate 8bit
machine
that could become the microcoded core of something bigger check out
the controller used in the RX01. It had all the basic elements and was
really simple. A variation of the disign was used in the LA120 printer.
>A somewhat related 'thing' I picked up last week is some sort of logic
>trainer. In a clear plastic frame about 12" x 20" x 6" thick, it has six
>*huge* flip-flops (built with power transistors) each with a pair of
>output lamps, a jumper area for "programming", and input in the form of
a
>telephone-style dial. (I assume people here know what a telephone dial
is
>:-) Haven't traced this one out yet either, but at its scale it won't
be
>hard.
Aint seen one of those for years. Memory serves there were only a
few FFs and verly little other logic.
Allison
From: David Gesswein <djg(a)drs-esg.com>
>I haven't spent too much time looking at the interface but most of the
>smarts are in the drive and serial communication is used to send
>commands to it. I have a bunch of information on the RX01, the RX02
should
>be similar.
Do look. the two are very different.
>The cable I made to hook my 8 to the DB25 on the RX02 has 22 wires in
it, I
>don't remember how many are grounds.
Every other one. same for RX01. Different signals though.
Allison
>> > slight difference in PUSHF & POPF
>> > has ENTER and LEAVE instructions
>> >
>> > Anyone else remember anything else?
>
>I believe that the NEC V40 was a drop in (enhanced) replacement
>for it.
> - don
It was similar but not drop in.
>> Has two *really* fast DMA channels. It was used alot in embedded
DEC TK50 drive used it. Also the TKQ50 inteface did as well.
Allison
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
>Why limit yourself to 8-32 bits, though? What's wrong with 4 bit
>machines, 64 bit machines, etc :-). I have a few of the former (mostly
as
>embedded systems in measuring instruments). Can't hink of anything I've
>got wit a wider-than-32 bit data path, but I certainly wouldn't refuse
>such a machine...
Yes, 10, 18, 24 bits are some of the more interesting of the oldies.
I've found with builing or at least designing on paper that unless you
want to do an existing machine there is little reason to do what
others have. Sizes like 8 and 24 bits are very useful but 4bits
can make the ALU core very simple without ruling out complex
capability (though slow).
The other direction is control oriented machines that are programable
but otherwise specific.
Allison
From: Thomas P. Copley <tcopley(a)best.com>
>This 8800 is for sale by the first owners. It has the original
>switches that are a rare variation--the switch handles are the
>flattened "paddle" type as used on the 8800b instead of the "bat
>handle" type usually used on 8800s. It includes a MITS 1K RAM board.
>The original manual is not included, but is available for an extra,
>negotiable price.
The switches that were flattend were of the later rev bump, not the very
first version. They are essentailly the same part but higher cost
(8cents then @ quan 10+).
What people forget is there was the 8800, 8800A and 8800B. The A revbump
was about a 8months to a year out from first release and had a several
desperatly needed fixes.
I know I have the early version (SN the 200range) and have built at least
three others including an 8800B with friends back then.
Allison
>
>I'm looking for a way to access a RX0? drive from a PC! I'd like to
>archive all the 8" floppies that came with my '780 (including some
>CPM/68K distributions) for long-term preservation.
>
>Anybody done anything like this? I'm still looking for the pinout
>of the 10? pin ribbon cable that comes out of the dual floppy box.
>
>clint
>
I took the approach of writing a program for the PDP-8 to dump the
data out the serial port so I could capture (and restore) the disk images
on a PC. If you have an pdp-8 the program dumps the floppies in 8 bit
mode so 11 floppies will be correctly dumped also.
ftp://ftp.pdp8.net/software/dumprest.zip
I haven't spent too much time looking at the interface but most of the
smarts are in the drive and serial communication is used to send
commands to it. I have a bunch of information on the RX01, the RX02 should
be similar.
http://www.pdp8.net/pdp8cgi/query_docs/query.pl?Search=rx0&stype=Partial+Wo…
Or if that excessivly long link doesn't work search for rx0 at
http://www.pdp8.net/pdp8cgi/query_docs/query.pl
If you need more I can see if I have more information I haven't scanned,
email me with what you are needing.
The cable I made to hook my 8 to the DB25 on the RX02 has 22 wires in it, I
don't remember how many are grounds.
David Gesswein
http://www.pdp8.net/ -- Old computers with blinkenlights
This note is from http://www.multicians.org/
What a debt we all owe to Multics! Long live Multics! (1965-2000)
-Mike
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A Letter from Prof. Corbats (10/30/00)
Dear Multicians,
It is hard to believe that the last instance of Multics hardware is about to
be extinquished. But of course the influence of Multics has probably achieved
immortality through the admirable evolution of Unix and more recently Linux.
I have often wondered why we so stubbornly worked so hard to make the system
survive. My own take on it is that we were young and wanted to make a dent in
the psyche of the industry which in those bad old days was incredibly
shortsighted. And I think we did. With the creation and persistence of
working systems, Multics became a paradigm for a comprehensive solution to a
host of system problems that even today are not fully addressed in many
systems. In no particular order, some of the key ideas I think of are: a
hierarchal file system, system backup policies, rings and memory protection,
symmetric multiprocessing, paging and memory management, dynamic linking,
access control, and a full character set.
I can think of two reasons Multics survived so long. One was its malleability
and evolvability which I attribute to the use of a higher level language
(despite PL/1!), the major effort to organize and maintain the system with
functional modularity, and the avoidance of cute or obscure names in
modules. And the second reason was the idealistic zeal of all the Multicians
who worked so hard on a system they believed in.
And I think we also owe a special debt of gratitude to the original
triumvirate of Bob Fano, Ed David and John Weil who had the guts to start it
all, to John Couleur and Ted Glaser for their courage in messing with the
hardware when the system was nothing but silly putty, and to Elliott Organick
who told the world what we were up to.
With fond memories,
Corby
From: Douglas Quebbeman <dhquebbeman(a)theestopinalgroup.com>
>> An 80_1_86? Really. I guess I was never aware that there was one
like
>> that ever made. I always thought they jumped from the 8086 to the
80286
>CPU.
>>
>> Do you have any stats on this little baby?
>
>Same as the 8086/8086 except:
>
> slight difference in PUSHF & POPF
> has ENTER and LEAVE instructions
>
>Anyone else remember anything else?
Extended set of IO instructions as well. (V20 had
instruction set differences but, they were different!)
The major difference was the presence of on chip
colock gen, DMA controller (non 8237 compatable),
interrupt logic (not totally 8259 compatable). As a result
any PC made with it was a bit different. Fast parts went
to 12mhz and were also developed in CMOS.
The 186 was 16bit wide bus like 8086 and 188 was like
the 8088 with 8bit busses.
The embedded controller market liked it.
Allison
For VCF next year I'm home brewing a digital computer. The goal is to
produce something akin to a CARDIAC that could be used by interested students.
This is what I have so far, comments/criticisms/suggestions are welcome:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000 12:12:07 -0500 Douglas Quebbeman
<dhquebbeman(a)theestopinalgroup.com> writes:
> > >I am restoring a TRS80 model 2000 (1983), one of the rare machines
> to
> > >use an actual 80186 Intel CPU.
> >
> > An 80_1_86? Really. I guess I was never aware that there was one
> like
> > that ever made. I always thought they jumped from the 8086 to the
> 80286
> CPU.
> >
> > Do you have any stats on this little baby?
>
> Same as the 8086/8086 except:
>
> slight difference in PUSHF & POPF
> has ENTER and LEAVE instructions
>
> Anyone else remember anything else?
Has two *really* fast DMA channels. It was used alot in embedded
applications where you hade to move a lot of data really fast.
Frequently found on SCSI disk controllers (among other things).
The MAD-186 by MAD computers was a PC 'sorta compatible', I used
to have (it was re-badged by TELEX). It used an 80186.
The 3Com 3Server3 was another computer (well, okay, fileserver)
that ran a modified MS-DOS (2.x, IIRC), had embedded SCSI (actually
SASI), ethernet, and serial/parallel interfaces. It also used
the 80186.
Jeff
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
This 8800 is for sale by the first owners. It has the original
switches that are a rare variation--the switch handles are the
flattened "paddle" type as used on the 8800b instead of the "bat
handle" type usually used on 8800s. It includes a MITS 1K RAM board.
The original manual is not included, but is available for an extra,
negotiable price.
See its Ebay auction at:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=491031767
The current bid is $1,725.00 and the reserve has been met. Bidding closes
Sunday night.
I am located in Berkeley, California. Questions are welcome.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas P. Copley E-mail: tcopley(a)best.com
Hi
Just taught I would let you know I am reading this : Design of Real Time
Computer Systems (1967 J.Martin)found in a thrift store for $2 and it
fascinating - at least for me...
Just facinated by the photos and the concepts in there...I was 3 at that
time (1967) never used computers before I was about 15-16 (model III I
am still hunting for one...)
Will just have to scan some of these photos for my vintage computer
collection web site. I don't have machines from that era but some of
these pics are just great!!!
Since I have so much space left in my basement (already use 2/3 - I love
my wife...) I seem to have now made the very reasonnable decision to
extended my vintage computer collection to old books, magazines and
manuals...I might have develloped some kind of mental illeness now, I
recently mentionned "need more space for computer collection" as a
reason to my wife to justify getting a larger house...
Claude
From: Clint Wolff (VAX collector) <vaxman(a)uswest.net>
>I'm looking for a way to access a RX0? drive from a PC! I'd like to
>archive all the 8" floppies that came with my '780 (including some
>CPM/68K distributions) for long-term preservation.
RX01 is SSSD and most pc controllers are problematic with that
mostly due to cost cutting. Mest best would be a machine with
wd36c65 based chip (with both clocks available) as it can do all
rates. You will have to create you own driver for the SSSD.
I do it all the time with my CP/M crate (native 8" SSSD support).
The varios other 8" formats that did get used may require a
WD1771/and/or/WD1793 based controller (very non PC) to read
the possible and sometimes oddball formats used.
RX02 is a truly unique format and only RX02 (or the few clones)
actually can read that (you must have a PDP-8, PDP-11 or VAX
in other words) as most are Omnibus, Unibus or Qbus.
>Anybody done anything like this? I'm still looking for the pinout
>of the 10? pin ribbon cable that comes out of the dual floppy box.
10???? more like 40 for either rx02 or rx01.
Allison
Two analog computer theads at once. COOOL!
Don said:
> And rather smaller and lighter than the Navy's Mark 1A (analog) fire
> control computer which did a rather precise job of laying 2000# 16"
> - - and smaller - projectiles to the desired location.
For those that are saying "What's a Mk.1?" - my Ford Instrument page:
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog/fordsperry.htm
For more information - The Mark 1 Fire Control Computer:
http://www.warships1.com/W-Tech/tech-056.htm
--Doug
===================================================
Doug Coward dcoward(a)pressstart.com (work)
Sr Software Engineer mranalog(a)home.com (home)
Press Start Inc. http://www.pressstart.com
Sunnyvale,CA
Visit the new Analog Computer Museum and History Center
at http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
===================================================
> >I am restoring a TRS80 model 2000 (1983), one of the rare machines to
> >use an actual 80186 Intel CPU.
>
> An 80_1_86? Really. I guess I was never aware that there was one like
> that ever made. I always thought they jumped from the 8086 to the 80286
CPU.
>
> Do you have any stats on this little baby?
Same as the 8086/8086 except:
slight difference in PUSHF & POPF
has ENTER and LEAVE instructions
Anyone else remember anything else?
-dq
From: Claude <claudew(a)sprint.ca>
>I am restoring a TRS80 model 2000 (1983), one of the rare machines to
>use an actual 80186 Intel CPU.
Correction and nit, RARE PCs to use 80186. They were widely used for
other non PC systems. It was a 8086 with onchip clock gen, memory
selects and DMA. Excellent for embeeded uses that were formally
808x, 8224a, 8288.
Allison
From: Phil Budne <phil(a)ultimate.com>
>I've always wanted to do the same sort of thing for RX02's; fool my
>RXV211 into thinking a PC at the other end of the ribbon cable is a
>pair of RX02's. It seems feasible using just a parallel port;
>despite the width of the ribbon cable, it doesn't carry many signals.
Why must it be a parallel port? a M8250 serial would work too though
a new "RX" driver to talk to it would be needed. Also the RX01
controller
is serial not parallel so that could be used in a different way. In the
end
any IO can be used if you create a driver to fake a known device.
Allison
I have an old famicon game system that is PAL-compliant.
Other than a PAL/NTSC converter or PAL TV is there any way of
hooking this up. ?
I do have a kaleidoscopic collection of monitors as well as
several VCR tape decks and a JDH Videomate external VGA/TV
adapter which allows me to use my NEC multisync as an all-
purpose viewer. It has an H-Phase pot whose response on the
monitor is a shift to the side of the display and otherwise not
causing any picture distortion. I recall on my Atari there were
programs that shifted from 60mhz to 50mhz and allowed you to
play PAL formatted games, but in this case there is no computer
intervention with the JDH. It is a straight-thru switch.
I don't consider this OT since the PAL/NTSC is a problem for all
collectors who are internationally-connected in this media.
ciao larry
Reply to:
lgwalker(a)look.ca
All this talk of the Tandy 1000/2000 reminds me; does anyone have a boot
disk for this beast?
Also what are the internals drives, DS 40 Track or 96?
I intend on putting the DOS in ROM (flash) so I can use it as a terminal
at the very least. I may also build a LAN interface with an NE2000 clone.
Of course this means upgrading to a new DOS but I think I can get
freedos working on it.
--
Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry ncherry(a)home.net
http://members.home.net/ncherry (Text only)
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/lightsey/52 (Graphics)
http://linuxha.sourceforge.net/ (SourceForge)
During the recent flame war, I was reminded that I have a hardcover book,
"Basics of Analog Computers" by T. D. Truit and A.E. Rogers, 1960, Rider
Publishers, in exeptional condition with dust cover. Although it would go
for hundreds of dollars on eBay (I wish!) I thought I would offer it here in
hopes of ingratiating myself to some fellow list member for a favor as yet
to be determined. (BTW, there is a punched card in it used as a bookmark
that would fetch $10-$20 alone on eBay <g>).
So, here's the deal - I will send the book for shipping costs to the best
37-words-or-less reason for why you want / deserve / would-kill-for this
classic, antique, vintage, pre-Altair, pre-S-100, pre-Intel, pre-historic
tome on analog computers, beautifully illustrated (seriously) with
pen-and-ink drawings on about every other page. Submit your entries to the
list by midnight November 10, 2000. Decision of the judge is final. All
entries become the property of everyone else. Contestants must be 18 months
or older. Offer not valid in Minot, N.D. or to relatives or employees
therein. Allow 8 weeks for delivery. Notary sojac.
Bob Stek
Saver of Lost Sols
> All this talk of the Tandy 1000/2000 reminds me; does anyone
> have a boot disk for this beast?
I have two sets of MS-DOS & MS-BASIC for the T2000.
Currently, I don't have time to set up the machine
to do any duplication, but maybe around Christmas
(setting up means finding space to put it, etc).
Claude needs a set of copies; if anyone other than
Neil needs them, drop me a line and I'll see what
I can do as winter sets in.
-dq
I would also make the point that it isn't programmable.. The Mark I was
programmable, though it lacked the ability to store programs.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
--- Lawrence Walker <lgwalker(a)look.ca> wrote:
> I do have a 7100/66 AV. My biggest problem is that none of my
> VCRs has S control inputs only RCA jacks and I haven't found a
> source for the proper plugs...
Speaking of Mac video, I'm getting a 6100 from my youngest brother
(as soon as I can get over to his house to pick it up) and it apparently
has a funky connector that requires some sort of pod to break out
regular video signals/connectors. This Mac does not have said pod/cable.
Where can I get one? (presumable for less than what Apple would charge
for a new one - this is a $20 computer).
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/
Frank Fink is more the welcome to the bombsight, just send me the B-17. ;p
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
At 10:46 AM 11/10/00 -0500, you wrote:
>I think that is one of a very few that uses a square high-density jack on
>the machine? You should be able to get a cable to a standard Mac monitor
>or to an SVGA from MacWorld.
Yes, the 6100 uses the 45 pin connector that was to be used with thier 14"
multimedia monitor that never took off. Adapters for both VGA and
Mac-style connectors are readily available. Even on eBay, they tend to go
for between $15 and $19 generally. Now if it's a 6100/AV, it will have a
standard Mac connecotr on the AV card, along with the S-video in/out jacks.
Take care
Jeff
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power Computing PowerCurve, 288mhz G3, Mac OS 9
http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/lakes/6757
Home Of The TRS-80 Model 2000 FAQ
Has anyone ever heard of some software for the Mac called "Guide for
the Macintosh" by Office Workstations Ltd., circa 1980s? Anyone actually
have it?
If so, please let me know. Thanks!
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
> >It's not stretching it at all to consider the Norden to
> >be an analog computer. I'm not really sure how it could
> >be considered to be otherwise.
>
>
> IBM had a Norden in its (internal only) computer museum,
> so that helps support the claim of it being an (analog)
> computer.
IIRC, Frank Fink has a few of these, and he told me he's
always looking for more...
-dq
While the Norden bombsight was smaller, etc., it would be stretching it by a
large degree to compare it to a computer.. I'm fairly certain Allison was
referring to the Mark I...
Will J
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
I've always wanted to do the same sort of thing for RX02's; fool my
RXV211 into thinking a PC at the other end of the ribbon cable is a
pair of RX02's. It seems feasible using just a parallel port;
despite the width of the ribbon cable, it doesn't carry many signals.
Tom Stepleton is the guy running this project -- I lent him my Lisa for his
work. Here's a wrap-up summary he sent me on the project just before he
returned the system to me.
-- Tony
----------------------
Here's a summary of what I've done. Addressing the unreliability of
the
wiring in the last attempt, I completely rewired the prototyping
board and
switched to a single 84-pin MAX 7000 chip and adapter instead of the
Altera experimentation board used in class. Physically speaking, the
circuit is complete.
I was able to get the circuit to succesfully dupe the Lisa into
believing
that there really was a ProFile attached to the port. Unfortunately,
there
is really no interim step between that and full functionality. I
came a
long way, but I didn't make it. Here's what I managed to do:
Linux side:
On a machine borrowed from Professor Maxwell, I installed a
secondary
Linux kernel - version 2.4.0-test4 - which provides the latest
facilities
for manipulating the parallel port from a userland program (read
more at
http://people.redhat.com/twaugh/parport/html/parportguide.html).
This is
a really neat driver, incidentally, although it is still in
development.
Using this driver, I created MrProfile, a rudimentary ProFile
emulation
program. MrProfile currently responds to interrupts generated by the
adapter, but all calls to read() extract zero bytes of data from the
port. Whether this is due to poor programming, the driver, or a
malprogrammed board is not yet clear.
Adapter side:
Using what I learned in making the program to fake a ProFile's
existence,
I completely reprogrammed the full-featured version of the adapter
circuit. The philosophy behind the device's role has not changed
much from
before, but the code has been altered quite a bit to suit the whims
of
Altera.
What happens:
Activity on the Lisa side causes the adapter to alert the PC with an
interrupt. The PC fails to read any data from the parallel port; the
adapter sits waiting for something to happen, and the Lisa
eventually
times out. There are three reasons for why this is happening, now
that
poor connectivity has been ruled out (via multimeter):
metastability,
flaws in parallel port driver, and poor assumptions about the EPP
parallel
port standard. I don't think it's the first, because the problem is
always
the same. I feel it's about even odds between the second and third
choices.
The future:
I'm not giving up, but the likelihood that I'll be able to put real
work
into it this fall is not all that great. Just in case the hardware
has
been programmed correctly, I'm taking the prototype board home to my
two
Lisas there (hope this is OK, Bruce), where I'll try getting it to
work
with an old Pentium 90. Even if the hardware is slightly faulty, the
low-level programming capability of the parallel port driver
suggests that
I will be able to get around it. However, if I've made an error on
the
Lisa side, I'll be out of luck. I'll see what options I have and
then make
decisions. I'll also turn over all of my code to the folks on the
Lisa and
Lisa Emulator mailing lists at sunder.net and see if they can offer
any
tips.
> ----------
> From: John Lewczyk[SMTP:jlewczyk@his.com]
> Reply To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:16 PM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Lisa Profile Drive emulation on a PC
>
> There was someone trying to interface a Lisa to a PC, making the PC act
> like a
> Profile drive. That college class project didn't get completed, but there
> is a
> bunch of info on the project, the Profile and Lisa parallel port at:
> http://www.cs.swarthmore.edu/~tom/cs23/final/
>
> I thought that this was a terrific project, as Profile drives are become
> rarer
> and they will probably all break down before the Lisa's do. Making a PC
> act
> like a Profile is a great solution. Unfortunately, I have never received
> a
> response from the folks at swarthmore college and suspect the project is
> abandoned. :-(
>
> Anyone know what happened to the project, or are there others who have
> done
> this? I worry about my profile drives dying before my Lisa and would love
> to
> have a PC as a backup. If no one (is doing/has done) this, I may take my
> own
> shot at it.
>
> John
> jlewczyk(a)his.com
>
From: Jerome Fine <jhfine(a)idirect.com>
>
>I thought that you said the CE (Circus Engineer) did NOT recognize it??
>
>Did you really mean to say:
>
>"The CE that did NOT recognize it however didn't fare as well. ;)" ???
Actaully I wrote what I ment but I like your version as both were true.
The CE that got bounced, suffered. The next one had a dog on his hands.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerome Fine <jhfine(a)idirect.com>
>Jerome Fine replies:
>
>I had to read it 5 times before I realized that the "cab" and the
>"HSC thingie" were the same. Subtle. Very good. I had a
>much better laugh as a result. More at myself, of course.
The CE that did recognize it however didn't fare as well. ;)
Allison
From: Mike Ford <mikeford(a)socal.rr.com>
>>> While the Norden bombsight was smaller, etc., it would be stretching
it
>>>by a
>>> large degree to compare it to a computer.. I'm fairly certain Allison
was
>>> referring to the Mark I...
>>
>>It's not stretching it at all to consider the Norden to be an analog
>>computer. I'm not really sure how it could be considered to be
otherwise.
>
>Its a single purpose device. Computers tend to be flexible. I would call
it
>more of a calculator, or really a mechanical compensator.
Really wrong. First calculator is a fixed program computer (mechanical
or otherwise) And the lack of programability would certainly be
significant
for a large class of machines as to their status.
We have machines (electronic, electrical, mechanical, water, air,
whatever)
that can:
Perform repeated steps (cams, timers)
Perfom compensating controls (servos, thermostats)
Perform a calcuation based on several variables
Subgroup fixed program (calculators)
Subgroup programable
by wires, jumpers, cams, gears, relays, roms
(calculators, embedded computers)
Variable program ("true computers", programable
calculators)
See the linkage, as soon as the system takes on multiple variables and
procudes
a results based on them we are doing calculation... Computing is just a
different
name.
Oh, the example I posted was written with Norden Bombsight, Mark-1A and
most any other tool used to calculate ballistic trajectories.
Allison
Does anyone happen to have a list of what the various layered product PAKs
in the OpenVMS Hobbyist program go to? I'm specifically wanting to know
what the SQL-DEV PAK is for, but am interested in the rest if anyone has
such a list.
Zane
On Nov 8, 18:07, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> If I remember correctly, the format difference between PAL and NTSC lies
not
> only in the difference in the vertical refresh rate but also in that the
> NTSC format is based on 525 horizontal scans per frame, while PAL uses
625.
> I'm not at all sure about whether PAL interlaces in the same way as NTSC
> does it, and, in fact, I'm not sure that they do that at all.
One is a consequence of the other. The most obvious difference between PAL
and NTSC is the use of different vertical scan rates (50Hz vs 60Hz) but
they use the same horizontal scan rate (15.something kHz), so if you do the
arithmetic, you'll see why they use different numbers of scan lines (625 vs
525). They both use interleave; so the number of full frames is 25 per
second or 30 per second. They also differ in the way they encode colour
information. The basic scheme is similar but the subcarrier frequencies
differ, and in the case of PAL, there is a "colour burst" of pure
subcarrier at the start of every line. This allows the circuitry to
synchronise better. Also, the colour signal is 180deg different in phase
on every second line (hence the name, Phased Alternate Line) which makes it
a little more stable.
In the context of broadcast TV, they also use diffent audio subcarriers (in
fact, there are several PAL variants, used in different countries. They're
called PAL/G, PAL/K, PAL/I, etc).
The net result is that you can often use a PAL display instead of an NTSC
one or vice-versa, but you would expect to lose the colour and sound. You
might possibly have to tweak the vertical hold to get a steady picture.
Since the sync pulses are encoded in the same way, any monitor or TV
should lock on to the horizontal signal perfectly, but the vertical might
be beyond the range of the sync circuit (it's usually OK in practice,
though).
I bet Tony knows more about this than I do.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
> > An older elector mechanical device did this for a different
> problem.
> >
> > Given variables: speed over surface,
> > altitude,
> > gravity,
> > an objects drag
> >
> > Problem: At what time do you release an object to hit a
> > predetermined spot.
> >
> > Hint: it was top secret in the early 1940s.
>
> And I would like to see an accurate simulation of one. I've seen
> the real thing, but being fastened to a metal post set into a concrete
> floor, it wasn't in operable condition. Not to mention that none of the
> dials were labeled, undoubtedly because the functions of each were also
> top secret at the time it was manufactured.
I think I've seen a photo of this, with Vannevar Bush standing over it,
looking at it.
-dq
>Ever since the late 60's, very large simulations of power
>grids were being performed on analog computers for the purposes of
>contingency analysis and dynamic stability assessment. These
>special-purpose analog computers filled entired rooms and sometimes
>had thousands of dynamic states (one integrator per dynamic state).
Exactly!
An older elector mechanical device did this for a different problem.
Given variables: speed over surface,
altitude,
gravity,
an objects drag
Problem: At what time do you release an object to hit a
predetermined spot.
Hint: it was top secret in the early 1940s.
Allison
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2000 15:07:20 -0600 Bill Richman
> <bill_r(a)inetnebr.com> wrote:
> > Our mainframe guys recently got rid of some big hard drive chassis,
> > and in the process of cleaning up they were going to thow away (!) a
> > couple of little Memorex/Termiflex one-handed terminals that I've
> > lusted after ever since I saw the service engineer using them. I
> > think they're a 1 or 2-line LED dot-matrix display, and
> they have some
> > form of "chording" keyboard on the front.
>
> Sounds like the old Microwriter, or even the original chord
> keyboard that Doug Engelbart used with the mouse.
>
> I'd love to see a picture of one of these, to get some idea
> of how the chording works. I have a couple of Microwriters:
There are two photos of Doug's chord keyset in issue #4 of
MacWorld. If you can't find a copy, let me know, I'll see if
I can remeber to bring it in to the orifice and scan it for
you.
-dq
From: Bill Pechter <pechter(a)pechter.dyndns.org>
>The only problem with CSSE is they made it so easy to work on the DEC
>stuff Field Service management began hiring the clueless to work cheap
>and they lost a lot of the clued folks to people who changed the board
>with the RED led lit. One day they worked on VT220's the next they
>were promoted to your VAX cluster!
Management... They took the work and tried to understand it. Field
Circus
management was a bunch of ex-bag carriers that felt they were the best
and the rest were dumb. The end result is that first you couldn't find
people that knew what a scope was and you still had to fix it due to
committed response time. The latter often led to get a body there,
NOW, I dont care who.
Allison
From: Jerome Fine <jhfine(a)idirect.com>
>I was told that while working on an 11/34A, one fellow from DEC
>Field Circus blew all the boards in the backplane when he removed
>the memory - seems that he forgot to turn off the power!!
My favorite is a Field Circus CE arrives at site and while walking
through the room he picks a likely cab to lay his stuff on. Then
proceeds to ask where is this HSC thingie. Rumor has it the
manager of the site was seen escorting the CE out the door
with great vigor.
Allison
Our mainframe guys recently got rid of some big hard drive chassis,
and in the process of cleaning up they were going to thow away (!) a
couple of little Memorex/Termiflex one-handed terminals that I've
lusted after ever since I saw the service engineer using them. I
think they're a 1 or 2-line LED dot-matrix display, and they have some
form of "chording" keyboard on the front. They terminate in a 9 pin
female DIN-like connector with some kind of twist-lock. I believe
they're RS-232, but was wondering if anyone could supply a pinout.
They also came with a cable with the same connector (also female) on
one end and a male DB-25 on the other, which is marked "RS-232 Modem
Interface". I'm guessing that you could plug in either one of these
terminals or a modem to the same connector on the disk controller. I
can always figure out the pin-out from that cable and give it a try,
but I'd like to make sure I'm not missing something vital (like a
TTL-to-RS232 adapter) that they might require, before I hook one up
wrong and fry it. (I know, I could open one of them up and see what
the cable connects to, but I'm being lazy. Besides, this way I get to
brag about them... ;-)
Bill Richman
bill_r(a)inetnebr.com
http://incolor.inetnebr.com
Home of Fun with Molten Metal, technological
oddities, and the original COSMAC Elf
computer simulator!
I recently acquired a Workslate and matching printer in excellent
condition - still a pretty cool looking unit. The guy I got them from
thought it ran CP/M, but it uses a 6803 with its own proprietary 'OS.' The
manuals make no mention of the specs for the (missing) wall warts. Does
anyone have a Workslate with the power supplies? Since both units use 4 AA,
alkaline or nicads, I guess it's not too critical. Also, knowing the
polarity would be helpful.
Thanks.
Bob Stek
Saver of Lost Sols
ip500 <ip500(a)home.com> wrote:
> Anyone have any data on this beast? Catalog sheet or tech sheet would
> be ideal. It talks to the outside world via HPIB cable.
It's approximately an HP9144 cartridge-tape drive with an autochanger.
-Frank McConnell
"Mark Gregory" <gregorym(a)cadvision.com> said:
> If the captions on the pictures (very nice, by the way) are correct, this
Yes, they are terrific. Gene, tell us where this simulator is located.
> simulator isn't an analog computer at all by the definition I'm familiar
> with. It uses tubes and relays, which are discrete digital components
Well others here have covered your misconception about tubes. But relays
are also an important part of an analog computer. Relays can be used to
connect and disconnect special circuits like weather, hazards, malfunctions.
Relays are also used on every integrator to set that integrator back to
it's initial conditions when the computer is reset.
What tells me that it's analog is:
* The fact that it has to stablize for 7 days
* The main output is plotting boards
* All of the panel meters I see
* The operator's panel is just switches and knobs
* "relay/tube" modules are just too big to be logic circuits.
* Aircraft simulators need the true parallel processing of an analog computer.
(Up until the early 70's)
* I really don't see anything that suggests digital components anywhere in
these pictures.
Thanks for the pictures Gene. Where I work in Sunnyvale is right on the
approach for NAS Moffett field. P3s fly over all the time.
--Doug
===================================================
Doug Coward dcoward(a)pressstart.com (work)
Sr Software Engineer mranalog(a)home.com (home)
Press Start Inc. http://www.pressstart.com
Sunnyvale,CA
Visit the new Analog Computer Museum and History Center
at http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
===================================================
Bob said:
> ...."Basics of Analog Computers" by T. D. Truit and A.E. Rogers, ......
> to the best 37-words-or-less reason for why you want ...... pre-historic
> tome on analog computers, beautifully illustrated (seriously) with
> pen-and-ink drawings on about every other page. Submit your entries to the
> list by midnight November 10, 2000.........
I have this book highlighted on my reading list of analog computer
books as
"the best book I have seen for someone new to analog computers".
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog/readlist.htm
Most books on analog computing use tons of mathematical equations to
illustrate
a concept because they are aimed only at engineers. This book explains
these
concepts simply with wonderful drawings and a minimum of mathematics. I
love
reading it so much that I have one copy at work and one copy at home.
But hey,
that's just me. :)
--Doug
=========================================
Doug Coward
Press Start Inc.
Sunnyvale,CA
=========================================
> On Nov 7, 16:09, Hans Franke wrote:
>
> > Not completely. There _are_ 2 KB kits around - as you may remember,
> > the ZX81 board was to be used with either two 2114 (1KB)or one
> > 6116(2KB).
Man, I'd like to get my hands on a 2 KB ZX-81 kit! ;>) To my knowledge, no
ZX-81, kit or otherwise, shipped with 2 KB RAM, even though the boards could
support it. The Timex TS1000 came standard with 2 KB.
Glen
0/0
--- ajp166 <ajp166(a)bellatlantic.net> wrote:
> An older elector mechanical device did this for a different problem.
>
> Given variables: speed over surface,
> altitude,
> gravity,
> an objects drag
>
> Problem: At what time do you release an object to hit a
> predetermined spot.
>
> Hint: it was top secret in the early 1940s.
I would expect this is the Norden Bomb Sight (as made famous to my generation
on "Hogan's Heroes" :-)
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/
Now that I'm dusting off the RK05j for my Qbus systems, I'm interested
once again in attempting to finally hook a RK drive off of a PDP-8. I
have an RL8A and RK8E and a bunch of standard stuff, but I've never had
the chance to round out the collection.
So... are there any RK8Es that aren't nailed down?
Thanks,
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/
From: Mark Gregory <gregorym(a)cadvision.com>
>Well this has certainly been an informative (and eye-opening) thread for
me.
>I had no idea that analogue computers were as common and as long-lived
as
>they were.
That last word should be not WERE but, ARE. They still are used.
> In the only "History of Computation" course that was included in
>my Comp Sci program, analogue computers were treated only incidentally,
with
>the implication that development ceased with the advent of digital
computers
>(whether electro-mechanical or electronic) in the mid 1940s. In that
course
>and in other computing histories I've read, analogue computers seem to
be an
>unfairly neglected topic.
They were not always thought of as computers, hence the neglect. Think
servo
systems and they come back as those very non digital systems. They may
have been part of a larger mixed system like a attitude control system in
a
missle or autopilot for an airplane. The systems encompassed in the
analog
computers are around us still.
Allison
From: Don Maslin <donm(a)cts.com>
>particular, I recall reading about a '60ish project by one of Britain's
>Formula One makers to use a computer to control a F1-machine driving
>around an actual circuit in lieu of the driver. As I recall the story,
>it did not make it beyond the second turn. However, an analogue
>computer handled the task quite well. Apocryphal? ???
this confuses the ideas of precision, accuracy and speed with
complexity.
Digital is absolute accuracy IE: 0101=5 and for a given machine any
variation
is error.
Analog, is mushy on accuracy, 5 Volts at some output is "approximate".
Digital to process data for a complex equation in real time has to
collect
it perform operations on it and output it. These occur at some rate that
is
fixed by hardware. The more complex the task the lower the total
Throughput will be. Also there is latentcy, time from input to processed
output, more complex means longer for a fixed speed.
Analog, assuming a fixed slew rate for the op-amps used the system
throughput IE: a change in input means near immediate change in
output that will be complete in some "setteling time". That time even
for
slow op-amps is quite fast and usually in microseconds.
Also analog does not mean the output cant be absolute (IF Vin or Fin
exceeds N (some rate) then turn relay on).
I've done some really neat things using pots realys and motors with
only limited use of amplifying devices to trans late the pots output
to something that can drive a motor. This is classic servo systems
stuff and the fundemental circuit is the Wheatstone bridge for systems
like this. If you add nonlinear devices like LOG taper pots(variable
resistors) and gears and cams you can get reactions that can mimic
things like non linear actions. The idea of balance is employed.
This kind of automation was as common as flies and widely
seen though often as simple devices.
There is another group of machines that fall dead smack in the middle
of the analog and the digital. These were the early preprocessing
boxes that might take 8 channles of analog telemetry data and
reduce it to stored data based on time, sensor and relative value
or even as a histogram. While these machines would have counters,
registers and some even core or drum(disk) they were at best not
programable and most didn't even qualify as hardwired program
(elementary state machine).
Just a few points about early computer differences.
Allison
This should just make the 10 year rule...it had a service sticker on it
>from 1988. Cool, robotic magazine fed tape drive that holds 8 of the
DC600A 1/4" tape cassettes and autofeeds them into the drive. All of my
old HP reference stuff lists mass storage gear under 79xx series rather
than this 35401A business
Anyone have any data on this beast? Catalog sheet or tech sheet would
be ideal. It talks to the outside world via HPIB cable.
Thanks, Craig
Hi guys,
I am sure I am very late in your discussion.
Right now I am using the HP 9872 plotter and I need another piece.
Could u tell me where I can find a HP 9872 plotter.
Thanks a lot
Sumeet
> >I should have mentioned that Multics also was closely tied
> >to a 36-bit word size... a re-implementation could probably
> >get around this, but a port would be difficult...
> >
> >However, a port would work for an emulator, where you'd have
> >control of all aspects of the target architecture.
>
> Well.... Then How about one of the following Chips? Itanium, Alpha,
> PA-RISC, or UltraSparc? Would a 64-bit computer be able to
> handle running a 36-bit OS?
Certainly... in fact, this topic generated some heat.
It's my contention that being bottom-feeder commodity equipment,
the Intel line would be more cost-effective than an Alpha. But
that's irrelevantif you've got a box of surplus Alpha chips
lying around. And the IA64 won't quite be bottom-feeder commidity
for a year or two, at least. ;-)
> On the emulator side there are definitly 36-bit systems emulated on 32-bit
> chips, and even on 16-bit systems (at least IIRC, the 68000 is a 16-bit
> chip).
I'm still waiting to get my hands on one of these mythical PDP-10
emulators... I want my own DECSYSTEM-10, even if it's really
running on an old Mac.
regards,
-dq
Hi. Can anyone read a 9-track tape? I have a tape I'd like to
read, but I have no tape drive for those tapes. I was wondering if
anyone in europe could read it for me.
Cheers,
--
*** Rodrigo Martins de Matos Ventura <yoda(a)isr.ist.utl.pt>
*** Web page: http://www.isr.ist.utl.pt/~yoda
*** Teaching Assistant and PhD Student at ISR:
*** Instituto de Sistemas e Robotica, Polo de Lisboa
*** Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa, PORTUGAL
*** PGP fingerprint = 0119 AD13 9EEE 264A 3F10 31D3 89B3 C6C4 60C6 4585
I got these items in a batch of other surplus items and
I'm trying to determine their use or value. If anyone
on this list is interested, please send a note, or off
to eBay they go.
See http://www.threedee.com/optics/ for pictures and more
detailed descriptions.
One is a HP A3406A Fibre Channel Host Adapter. I wasn't able
to find this part number on HP/Aligent's web site, and it
produced few other web hits. This a HP-HSC card, as used
in today's K-series of servers. It can sustain 1/4 gigabit
rates.
Another item is a HP 83441B SONET SDH reference receiver.
Is this used in testing very high speed optical networking
equipment? It supports 622 Mbps SONET OC-12 and SDH and STM-4.
It has fiber input on one end and RF output on the other.
Another interesting item is a 28-pin DIP that appears to
be a 20 mw semiconductor laser. This is an XMT1300-1.2,
an optical driver for Fibre Channel (FC-0). An optical
fiber emerges from one end and terminates in a standard
pigtail fiber connector. It is a 20 milliwatt, Class 3b
semiconductor laser, probably GaAs, centered at 1300 nm.
It was made in 1991, so I felt close enough to the 10-year
rule to post. :-)
It was made by BT&D Technologies (British Telecom + Dupont)
in 1991, now part of Agilent Technologies, a Hewlett-Packard
company. It is one of their "logic to light" transmitters.
- John
From: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis(a)mcmanis.com>
>Well, I've got to give a toast to the folks in DEC Engineering, it may
be
>that they had to deal with Field Circus screwing things up, but I for
one
>really appreciate that DEC used keyed connectors, and appropriate
cables,
>and sturdy hardware. I'm also glad that whomever designed the TQK70 did
so
>such that plugging it in backwards in the Q-bus does it no apparent
harm. I
Thank you from myself and all the other CSSE engineers. Those little
details
were part of requirements for serviceability that came from the Field
Service
side of the house and implemented in best technology by engineering.
Brief DEC history about the group that was often known as product
prevention.
Customer Support Systems Engineering (CSSE) was an engineering arm that
came into being back in the late 70s when DEC started to see more volume
then quality. One of the first processes created by Field Circus was
FA&T
(factory assemble and test) was the starting point. The field and FA&T
feedback went far in the 80s to eliminate the unreachable screws, scope
required to setup, special tools and too many similar connectors.
Allison
On Nov 7, 16:09, Hans Franke wrote:
> Not completely. There _are_ 2 KB kits around - as you may remember,
> the ZX81 board was to be used with either two 2114 (1KB)or one
> 6116(2KB).
Not exactly; originally, it was a 2 x 2114 or 1 x 4118. Most UK ZX81s have
a 4118, though some users did replace the 4118 with a 6116. I've never
seen one originally fitted with a 6116, only upgrades (and I've seen a lot
of ZX81s -- the workshop I was in at the time used to fix them by the
bucketload).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
From: John Lawson <jpl15(a)panix.com>
>meter, in real time. This may sound cumbersome today, but consider in
>that in the mid fifties, digital computers were very, very expensive,
>fairly rare, and every single problem required much analysis and coding,
It would be 1979 before there was DSP fast enough to do a FIR filter
digially for audio frequencies, Analog had been doing that for 30+ years.
> PS: Anyone *really* interested in getting into analog computing might
do
>well to consider scarfing up a Heathkit EC-1 when possible.. they are
>simple, small and portable, and have easily replaceable tubes, and
having
>(IIRC) 9 opamps, one can get quite elaborate with them.
One could duplicate it using modern analog opamps and still solve the
same problems. The best one I remember solved a bouncing ball, for
varying gravity and rebound rates and "drew it" on an O'scope face.
It was a Popular Electronics (maybe RE) design. Still very buildable.
It's often forgotten that there were different op-amp designs that
allowed
things like four quadrant multiplcation, LOG and ANTILOG amps, CLIPPING,
SUM, DIFFERNCE, ABSOLUTE VALUE when combined allow solutions
of great speed with good accuracy.
Allison
From: Bill Bradford <mrbill(a)mrbill.net>
>> %SYSTEM-I-MOUNTVER, R7VEFG$DIA0: is offline. Mount verification in
progress.
>> After that I get a red line on the drive indicator and anything I on
the
>> console never returns.
>> Any ideas?
I have used varios drives that can handle the 512byte sectoring and they
work fine.
I have two Tohsiba XM3201B and a XM3501B that works fine for VMS. So
there
are other drives that do work.
Allison
Sold a pair of old Jensen speakers to a guy in Korea the other day and
am shipping them via DHL Worldwide. They have refused to accept the
items until I come up with a "gauss reading" for the magnetic field????
Anyone ever heard of such a thing? I did a fair bit of research and
found their maximum allowable reading is ".00525" but no one at DHL has
a clue what that means. I'm assuming it is a measurement in gauss at
some prescribed distance from the package. On average the strength of
most high powered speaker magnets is in the range of 10,000 to 15,000
gauss,
but that is measured at the voice coil [in the center of the field]. The
field would decrease [as the square or maybe even the cube] of the
distance.
Stumped,
Craig
A while back I posted a message and mentioned a problem with the drives
unmounting. Well here is the message:
%SYSTEM-I-MOUNTVER, R7VEFG$DIA0: is offline. Mount verification in progress.
After that I get a red line on the drive indicator and anything I on the
console never returns.
Any ideas?
--
Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry ncherry(a)home.net
http://members.home.net/ncherry (Text only)
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/lightsey/52 (Graphics)
http://linuxha.sourceforge.net/ (SourceForge)
I am relatively new to the VAX world, but I have already established that
the very same
thing was done to my MicroVAX by the previous owner...
I have heaps of questions for the guy, but regretfully I inherited it from a
deceased estate :-(
What else was done as part of the MicroVAX II -> 3 upgrade?
James
> I have a MicroVAX II which has been upgraded to a
> MicroVAX 3. I say MicroVAX 3 because that is what
> is on the upgrade decal and the DEC instruction
> booklet refers to the upgrade as a Microvax 3. Are
> there MicroVAX III decals out there, is the
> MicroVAX 3 decal unusual, or are both common?
>
> Doug.
>
On a recent surplus hunt, I picked up an Anderson Jacobson
ADC 300 baud acoustic coupler modem for $1. What a beauty - it's
in a wooden box with a flip-top lid and a brushed aluminum
interior panel. It has two DB-25 connectors, but one is used
to feed *in* the AC power (!). I haven't disassembled it yet.
I did a quick web search and one turns up in Megan Gentry's
collection. How old is this? It's serial number 759.
- John
From: Bob Brown <bbrown(a)harper.cc.il.us>
>I see that the RZ25 is not supported to install the openvms 7.2 system
to
Dont tell my system that. It is supported.
>(from the hobbyist cd)..would that explain the numerous parity errors
that
>I get when I try to install to an RZ25? (or is my RZ25 probably
toast)...
You either have the jumpers wrong or a bad drive (missing terminator?).
Allison
From: DOUG PEKSA - COMPG <PeksaDO(a)Cardiff.ac.uk>
>is on the upgrade decal and the DEC instruction
>booklet refers to the upgrade as a Microvax 3. Are
>there MicroVAX III decals out there, is the
>MicroVAX 3 decal unusual, or are both common?
No, not unusual.Standard FS kits usually have all sorts of
docs and rebadging material.
What often happend was that someone would upgrade
by attrition of another system or by ordering just what was
required. With that you could have an assortment of markings.
Allison
Hi
With all this talk about RS6000 servers, I would like to say I have a
320H 7012 type that has almost gone to the dumpster in the last two
major basement cleanings I have done.
It was removed from service and brought here. I booted it several times
with the old AIX on there and everything was working. Plan was to put
Linux on there...but then i learned it's not available...I pulled the 2
SCSI drives from it and never re-installed them.
It was working last time I re-started it (3 months ago) with a Wyse 60
connected to the great modu10 serial connector (had to build an adapter
plug - thanks IBM) using the diag/boot floppy disks for it that I
have...
No keyboard...no monitor...MCA arch...80Megs Ram, floppy, Token Ring
network card, something I was told was a Sabine accel. video card (?),
scsi card.
I have no use or space for this.
I would like to give it away or maybe at least get something in
exchange...I collect micros from the 197x-198x...current wish list
includes : trs80 mod III, NExT, Atari 800 or CP/M systems or anything
else interesting...I am NOT looking for $$$ for this...I don't have the
time to bother seeling it on epay, I am not even signed up to sell or
buy on epay...
One hitch : I am in Montreal, Canada.
So if you dont want the whole thing (29 pounds on my people scale) or I
can always just ship some boards, or whatever...I you need more info or
pics, just email...I am not too familliar with the R6000 machines...
Thanks
Claude
claudew(a)sprint.ca
Contact the person below, not me.
- John
:
:::
:
:::
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: pppmjs <pppmjs(a)yahoo.com>
Subject: An Old Computer
To: jfoust(a)threedee.com
:
:
Hi there-
I found your link thru a site on Computer museums.
I have a functional NEC Advanced Personal Computer
(APC) (1983) It runs with 2 - 8" floppies. Believe to
have been built to run/assist by BridgePort CNC
machines. Operating system is Dos 2.1 Have operating
manuals & guides. (Got it to boot, but didn't get no
further, as I'm not sure what some of the disks are.)
I need to possibly get something out of this
system...say $125-$150,or more if it's possibly a rare
find(?), if in fact it's worth anything, I really
don't know, but believe it would be.
If your interested or know of someone that may be,
please reply back.
Thanks for your time
Michael Salomaki
pppmjs(a)yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
Well, I've got to give a toast to the folks in DEC Engineering, it may be
that they had to deal with Field Circus screwing things up, but I for one
really appreciate that DEC used keyed connectors, and appropriate cables,
and sturdy hardware. I'm also glad that whomever designed the TQK70 did so
such that plugging it in backwards in the Q-bus does it no apparent harm. I
reassembled a VAXServer3400 after cleaning it and got the dreaded "E" in
the display, after careful diagnosis (with the power on!) I noticed the
TQK70's chips were on the wrong side of the board! (Is there any good way
other than lying on the floor on your side to insert things into a BA213?)
Powered off, pulled board, crossed myself and re-inserted it correctly.
Voila, system boots and tape works fine. Cheers!
--Chuck
> Does anyone know if I can substitute
> a keyboard and mouse from an early Mac?
> (the ones with the non-adb keyboards
> and db9-connector mice). I don't mind
> hacking the connectors, if someone can
> give me the pinout info. As far as I
> can tell, the lisa uses some sort of
> mini-db9 for the mouse, and a 1/4"
> headphone-jack for the keyboard (weird!)
Mouse: yes
Keyboard: no
However...
Somewhere out there, there's fairly complete
info on the Lisa hardware. It should include
details, if not on the keyboard itself, on the
interface to the keyboard. From that, you might
be able to modify a spare Mac keyboard to work
until you can find a Lisa replacement.
Worse case, you'll have to use a microcontroller
to convert between the two interfaces, requiring
some custom work on your part.
-dq
I bought this CP/M laptop on eBay a couple of weeks ago for $9.99, with
another $13.70 for shipping and handling.
The laptop is in great condition, as described, well packed, and arrived
intact. The batteries are even OK and hold a decent charge.
I've done this eBay thing long enough to be able to read between the
lines and was fairly certain that it would not boot from the disk drive.
If it was able to, it would have said so in the listing. Sometimes what
is not said is as important as what is said.
It is now running great. I found two problems, the first caused the
second. The power connector for the floppy drive was on backwards.
What this means is that the +12 volt and +5 volt power lines were
swapped. The +5 applied to the +12 circuitry won't usually cause any
damage, but the +12 on the +5 will and did. The floppy was unable to
seek because there was no power to the head stepper motor because there
was no power to the stepper motor controller IC. Q1 ( I think it is a
small SCR, since its three legs are marked S, G and D) which
switches/regulates power to the stepper IC seems inop. When I short the
S and G leads, the controller IC gets +5V, the stepper motor works and
the floppy drive functions. The Bondwell now will boot, format and copy
disks. The only markings on Q1, TO-92'ish, are A854 (date code or
2SA854?) and S G D. I think this device is in the circuit to save
power; perhaps when the floppy is not selected, the head stepper is left
to float free. Correct me if I'm wrong about this. The floppy is an
early 720K DSDD (even though the Bondwell is only SSDD) Epson SMD-180B.
Question #1. Does anyone have schematics for this drive?
Also, I tried to build a custom disk definition for the Bondwell 2 for
22disk v1.44. I used Anadisk to evaluate the Bondwell floppy format,
and it says the floppies are single-sided, 18 sector, 256 byte sector
size, and the interleave is 2 to 1, i.e. 0,9,1,10,2,11,etc. I made one
freshly formatted floppy on the Bondwell and only put dump.asm and
dump.com on it (I also sysgenned it and made it bootable). Using
Anadisk, I can see the directory, and the 2-1 skew that Anadisk reports
allows me to read dump.asm in its correct order. However, the disk
definition that I built for 22disk doesn't work. I can read the
directory and I can copy the files to DOS, but they appear as if the
interleave is incorrect, since dump.asm is jumbled on 256 byte
boundaries. The entire file _is_ present. I didn't have any more time
last night to check and see just _how_ it is jumbled.
Question #2. Does anyone have the disk definition for 22disk for the
Bondwell 2?
Bill
I happened across a Lisa 2 (Model A6SB100)
this past weekend...Seems to be in fair
(restorable) shape. The nicads on the
I/O board are corroded, but that's easy
to fix. Unfortunately, the Keyboard
and mouse are missing.
Does anyone know if I can substitute
a keyboard and mouse from an early Mac?
(the ones with the non-adb keyboards
and db9-connector mice). I don't mind
hacking the connectors, if someone can
give me the pinout info. As far as I
can tell, the lisa uses some sort of
mini-db9 for the mouse, and a 1/4"
headphone-jack for the keyboard (weird!)
If this isn't possible, I'd appreciate
any hints as to where I might find a
lisa keyboard/mouse (be nice now! :-)
This critter also came with an Apple Profile
(model A9M0005) external hard disk that
seems to attach via a db-25 cable (to
the lisa's parallel port?) I noticed
that one of the pins on the lisa's
parallel port connector(db-25 female)is
blocked with epoxy (probably to prevent
people from connecting a serial cable
to it). Can I simply use a straight-through
db25 cable (with the blocked pin removed)
to connect the profile to the lisa, or
did apple use some sort of proprietary
wiring scheme?
-Thanks!
-al
-acorda(a)1bigred.com
Gene,
I was scanning some other stuff and found an ad for the H-89 in the Dec
1980 issue of Byte magazine. I scanned it and posted it at
"www.intellistar.net/~rigdonj/misc/h89.jpg" in case you want to see it. I
have haven't edited it or changed the image size or anything so it's big. I
also have a scan of the full page that it was on if you want it. It's at
"www.intellistar.net/~rigdonj/1980byte/page 258.jpg".
I'll scan the Heathkit catalog when I get a chance.
Joe
At 07:13 PM 10/27/00 -0700, you wrote:
>> >putting all the manuals online as PDF files. Is there any interest in
>> >this? All the searching I've done on the net for H-8/11/88/89 info has
>> >turned up a pitiful lack of info. If you've got anything you'd like to
>> >see on a dedicated Heathkit computer page, please let me know.
>>
>>
>> Cool Gene. I have an old Heathkit catalog that lists the H-89. If you
>> like, I'll scan it and you can add it to your website.
>>
>That would be great Joe! It would give me an idea of what was available
>for the machine, and what parts & docs I have to chase down. :)
>
>g.
>
>
>
In a message dated 10/07/2000 3:06:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
vcf(a)siconic.com writes:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/13785.html
Talk about shoddy journalism! The Z80A included in these kits is certainly
*not* a "1 MHz" processor, and the kits -- like all ZX81s -- have only 1 KB
RAM onboard, not 2 KB as stated in the article.
Also, this piece claims that the kits were obtained from Timex when in fact
they were not. They were sold to Zebra by Sinclair Research USA when
Sinclair discontinued sales in the USA.
> These guys are a bunch of clowns. They used to be selling these for
> $29.95 until the eBay phenomenon hit. Then they jacked up the price to
> $99.95. I guess they must be selling these at that price because they
> haven't backed it down.
Zebra raised the price incrementally, from $29.95 to $39.95 to $49.95, then a
big jump to $99.95. The *big* increase occurred when Zebra sold a
substantial portion of their inventory to Chris Cowley, head of Grok
Developments (mentioned in the above article). Cowley has to sell the kits
for over $100 US in order to cover the cost of the kits plus freight and
import duties, plus his profit. So, Zebra just jacked up the US price to
match.
Price fixing, anyone?
BTW, back in March I was on the phone with Stewart Newfeld, head of Zebra,
and he mentioned some unusual high-res graphics boards that he had. We
settled on quantity and price, and I sent my payment. Everything arrived
except the HRG boards, but a note in the box stated that they would forward
them "as soon as possible." To date they haven't delivered, won't return my
e-mails or phone calls, and still owe me $60 worth of merchandise.
> Is an unassembled ZX-81 kit worth $99.95 to me? Hell no.
Especially since the kits sold by Zebra do not include the original Sinclair
BASIC manual or original assembly instructions (instructions are included --
they're just not the original issue). Additionally, Zebra themselves sell
these kits on Ebay for $50 - $70 all the time.
Clowns, indeed.
Glen
0/0
Hey folks,
Rummagng through my pile of stuff - came across this...
SBC80/10 Single Board Computer (Intel)
I have both the Hardware Reference Manual and the PCB that goes with it.
(I believe that it's a Multi-Bus I card form factor.)
It looks like it is complete... some missing chips on the parallel I/O
(I think that these are just MC1488's or MC1489's), and some PROMs.
It has a monitor PROM plugged in, so should come up as-is.
I also have another board that I stored with this one... looks like a
memory board... the part number on it is...
16Kx8/450 RAM Module.
------
Is there any interest in this?
Regards,
James Jackson
At 10:52 PM 10/27/00 -0400, you wrote:
>I just went through this.
I've been through it many times. :-)
>The Montagar site has all you need but the docs that come with the cd are
>dense and not very explanatory.
Hah! This is an understatement. I was really only successful/comfortable
when I got one of the ConDist sets and used those docs.
>Here is what you need to do.
{edited for brevity]
Another way to say this is to give the general algorithm. If you can boot
the media you will probably come up in standalone backup. The magic then is
to type:
$ BACKUP/IMAGE/VERIFY [src]VMSxxx.B/save_set [dst]
Since I'm precluded from using HTML to express this a bit more clearly,
allow me to elucidate on the variable parts:
[src] and [dst] are device specifiers. Before you booted your VAX you had
to do a 'show device' to see what devices it knew about, the src device is
the CD-ROM (usually DKAxxx or DKBxxx on a VaxStation/Microvax, but will
usually be DUAx or DUBx if you are booting from a MSCP type SCSI
controller) If you're using tape then the device will be something like
MUA0 or MKA0 etc.
The filename VMSxxx.B changes only based on the version of VMS, so VMS 7.2
is VMS072.B whereas VMS 5.5 is VMS055.B.
You should use the switch /VERIFY so that you know the disk is good before
booting it.
You must use the switch /IMAGE because you are copying over the complete
disk (no formatting, fdisking, or anything else usually needed)
You must use the switch /SAVE_SET to tell backup that you're restoring from
a saveset.
Once this command finishes you can now halt and boot from the [dst] drive
and the first part of VMS will come up.
>Don't bother with the registration dialogs at this point, just answer that
>you don't want to right now. The dialogs did not work for me but the
>command-line reg did just fine.
This was true for me until I figured out what fields went with what. Note
that in the PAK shown below:
>$! Usage of this licenses consistutes agreement with all terms of this
>Hobbyist $! License Agreement
>$!
>$ LICENSE REGISTER VAX-VMS -
> /ACTIVITY=A -
> /AUTHORIZATION=DECUS-USA-freeman-154786 -
> /DATE=27-OCT-2001 -
> /HARDWARE_ID=cz409027NS -
> /ISSUER=DECUS -
> /OPTIONS=(NO_SHARE) -
> /PRODUCER=DEC -
> /TERMINATION=27-OCT-2001 -
> /UNITS=0 -
> /CHECKSUM=1-QAGH-DECE-FPED-KMHI
The date and termination date are the same. (Actually this is probably a
valid PAK :-) This threw me off for a while. Note that you can use the
layered products on _all_ your VAXen with the same PAKs so you don't need
to get them more than once (and if you ask for them again you will get the
same ones you got the first time.)
Typically what I do at this point (registering PAKs) is to register the
VAX-VMS PAK and the UCX PAK. Note that TCP-IP is on the Montagar disk. Once
you log in as system you can then install TCP/IP using:
@SYS$UPDATE:VMSINSTALL TCPIP_VAX050 [src]:[TCPIP_VAX050.KIT]
And then run TCPIP$CONFIG once TCPIP is loaded. Now with that running and
FTP enabled, you can ftp over the rest of the layered software PAKS (they
are sent as a DCL script) and type:
$ @LAYERED.COM
(use whatever name you put it in as)
And it will install licenses for everything. [important note: make sure you
delete the UCX license out of the full set since if you don't you will get
a "duplicate" and the script will stop.]
>Nothing will happen, you will get a prompt. This is good and means that
>the product is now registered. If it complains then you missed a character
>or something.
After registering a PAK manually you should type:
$ LICEN LOAD VAX-VMS
to insure it is loaded.
Anyway, I've done this about a dozen times now so its getting to be fairly
familiar :-)
--Chuck
> [Mythical PDP-10 emulator?]
>
> Mine's not mythical - It just doesn't work yet.
Sorry, Daniel- the stress level's been up this week.
Once it's working to your (initial?) satisfaction,
how do you plan deployment and/or availability?
-dq
I have a MicroVAX II which has been upgraded to a
MicroVAX 3. I say MicroVAX 3 because that is what
is on the upgrade decal and the DEC instruction
booklet refers to the upgrade as a Microvax 3. Are
there MicroVAX III decals out there, is the
MicroVAX 3 decal unusual, or are both common?
Doug.
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 13:32:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu>
Subject: Re: RS6000 memory boards
Enrico Badella <enrico.badella(a)softstar.it> wrote:
>> Yesterday I saved two IBM RS6000 server; one 7013/59H and one 7013/530H.
...
>> should I just junk the whole things and just save the four SCSI disks?
>
Then Cameron Kaiser <spectre(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu> said:
>That's what I would do. The old RS6K servers are quite tough to find support
>for ... Keep the disks for something that can really use 'em.
>
>However, if you still want to take a whack at it, sometimes people are
>selling equipment on comp.unix.aix. The prices can be quite confiscatory,
>though.
Whoa, there. Sitting in my office, still looking dark and forlorn,
is a PowerStation 320 (Type 7012). A large part of its forlornness is due
to its having had its mouse and keyboard "liberated" at some point in its
life. The ugly part is it doesn't need just any PS/2 KB and 3-button mouse,
but a special IBM one. (Thanks to Philip Belben
<Philip.Belben(a)powertech.co.uk> for this clue. Philip, I still have not had
time to seriously attack this machine.) Enrico, I don't know that I can pay
to ship them from Italy to San Antonio, Texas but if your machines include
those and you can't find a European stockpile to add those to, please
contact me. Please *don't* junk those parts!
If the machines you are talking about contain MCA Ethernet cards,
the same applies to them, and again I might be interested in trying to get
them shipped to Texas.
Cameron, thanks for the newsgroup pointer, it's in my read list now.
Anyone else with spare RS6K keyboards and mice taking up some of
their valuable storage space, I think I can help you. :-)
- Mark
PS my last messagee appeared twice. My apologies; I can't figure out how I
did that. If it happens again, somebody please send a clue?
I've got about 20 TK50 tapes that are available for no cost. The catch is
that they are in Sunnyvale CA and if you can't come pick them up then
you'll need to pay postage to your address. These tapes have been bulk
erased and can be used in either the TK50 (95MB) or the TK70 (295MB) tape
drive, the caveat is that if you initialize one on a TK50 drive, then the
TK70 will read it but not write it, if you initialize it on the TK70 drive
then the TK50 won't be able to read it. I refer you back to the archives to
refresh your memory that magnetically the specs for CompacTape I and
CompacTape II are identical.
--Chuck
Hi,
AFIK there is no substitute for the Lisa keyboard. However I'm told that
the mouse used on the early Macs will work on the Lisa. I think the plug on
the Lisa mouse has some plastic pins that are missing on the Mac mouse and
the plus has a slightly different shape.
Joe
At 04:33 PM 11/6/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>I happened across a Lisa 2 (Model A6SB100)
>this past weekend...Seems to be in fair
>(restorable) shape. The nicads on the
>I/O board are corroded, but that's easy
>to fix. Unfortunately, the Keyboard
>and mouse are missing.
>
>Does anyone know if I can substitute
>a keyboard and mouse from an early Mac?
>(the ones with the non-adb keyboards
>and db9-connector mice). I don't mind
>hacking the connectors, if someone can
>give me the pinout info. As far as I
>can tell, the lisa uses some sort of
>mini-db9 for the mouse, and a 1/4"
>headphone-jack for the keyboard (weird!)
>
>If this isn't possible, I'd appreciate
>any hints as to where I might find a
>lisa keyboard/mouse (be nice now! :-)
>
>This critter also came with an Apple Profile
>(model A9M0005) external hard disk that
>seems to attach via a db-25 cable (to
>the lisa's parallel port?) I noticed
>that one of the pins on the lisa's
>parallel port connector(db-25 female)is
>blocked with epoxy (probably to prevent
>people from connecting a serial cable
>to it). Can I simply use a straight-through
>db25 cable (with the blocked pin removed)
>to connect the profile to the lisa, or
>did apple use some sort of proprietary
>wiring scheme?
>
>-Thanks!
>
>-al
>-acorda(a)1bigred.com
>
>
>
Just recently IBM anounced their new series of (real) mainframes.
now called zServer(running zOS and zWhatever). They are supposed
to be the follow up architecture of the /390 ISA and will add 64
Bit Software to the /390 world ... And here comes my problem: I
can't imagine any way to enhance the /370 (/390) ISA to do such
tricks at all without loosing compatibility. It would require a
complete new 'mode', almost like Intel had with 16 vs 32 Bit on
the 80386, Mode switching an tons of incompatibilities - it took
almost 20 years to move the mainframe world from 24 to 31 Bit
addressing (and 24 Bit mode is still required for some apps and
modules) - and we are talking just about the valid bits of an
address word (allwas 32 Bit since the 60s) - introducing new
operations and data formats (or at least the usage of known but
rarely supported double word size registers) is quite a different
task.
So what I'm searchin are informations about the new ISA.
Any info is apreciated. And yes, I tried to ask IBM, (last
attempt today in persona at their 'booth' at the SYSTEMS)
but there is no info available.
I know this is off topic, since the z900 isn't even for sale
by now, but getting information is not only hard becaus IBM
doen't offer it, but because the people who know what a /370
ISA is are vanishing .... so any help is apreciated.
Gruss
H.
--
VCF Europa 2.0 am 28./29. April 2001 in Muenchen
http://www.vintage.org/vcfehttp://www.homecomputer.de/vcfe
Thanks everyone who sent me offers and information on the computer. I
think it will be destined for sale on eBay where I can let the market
set the price..... the offers were so far ranging that I feel that it
would be the best way to sell it and a search revealed three others
that had sold there recently. I'll include a copy of email I sent to
several who were interested in it's actual condition after I had a
chance to look it over. I brought it home last night and checked it
all over as mentioned below. I hope to have it placed on eBay this
weekend unless I break down and sell it to a reasonable offer off the
net or at a ham/computer fest I'm attending on Sunday. There is a pic
of the computer at http://www.vbe.com/~badger/bc/ec1a.jpg
Again..... thanks for your interest and all the information. de Mike
Melland, W9WIS
<copy>
Last night I took the EC-1 and the other instruments I purchased at
the surplus sale home. I cleaned up the EC-1 and checked the tubes,
caps and all the circuits. I applied a little Caig Deoxit and with a
bit of time and care and was able to free up all the potentiometers
that were stiff or frozen. It appears to have been a factory built
version that was sold to the college...... very nicely built and laid
out.
The cabinet has a few small scratches... easily touched up... no dings
or dents. The rubber feet are still in place on the bottom. Inside,
while quite dusty when I received it has been cleaned up and is very
nice. Tubes and Caps and all wiring and pots check out fine. After
checking things over it went onto my isolated variac and was slowly
powered up..... lit up fine, adjusted B+ voltage.. was still right on
the money. Used the manual to set it up and adjust the individual amp
balance, all three ranges on each amp (100,10,1) balanced just fine.
Everything seems to work and adjust properly at this time so I assume
it's quite usable. The manual I have for it is an operation
manual..... apparently there is a construction manual that would have
come with it if it was a kit version as well. Also has three of those
little clear plugin units with a cap and a precision resistor....
On November 4, THETechnoid(a)home.com wrote:
> I checked the line voltage on the outlet and found it right at 250-253vac
> without a load. This circuit is rated at 30AMP, the machine's breaker is
> rated at 20AMP, and the machine is supposed to pull a max 8amp on the line
> making all things reasonable.
>
> So why no power-on? Nothing spins, no lights on the front-panel, nothing
> but the first-stage of the power supply humming slightly.
You mentioned safetey interlocks...Maybe there's a panel interlock
that got jiggled during the move? Try removing and re-seating every
outside panel that you can find.
Have you tried connecting a console terminal to it yet? This may be
way off (I don't know anything about S36 hardware) but an acquaintance
of mine once beat his head against a wall for two days trying to power
up a VAX 8700. As it turns out, you do this by typing a command on
the console processor (a DEC Pro machine) which he hadn't connected
yet.
And...remember the "power-off" command in newer Sun OBP ROMs? A
favorite joke around here is 'why can't I type "power-on" to turn it
back on!!' ...but on newer Alpha machines (DS10, etc), you *CAN*.
There's a PIC17C44 processor in there handling console operations that
has its own little power supply. You can power-cycle the meat of the
machine from a [potentially remote] console port.
-Dave McGuire
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 12:54:39 -0600
From:Michael Melland <badger(a)vbe.com>
To: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis(a)mcmanis.com>
Chuck McManis wrote:
> No, this is disingenuous at best. You really meant to say that none
of the
> offers matched what you saw someone get on Ebay and your greed took
over.
> Not surprisingly it is exceptionally rude to "offer something for
sale" and
> then to actually not sell it. Had you an ounce of integrity you
would have
> sold it to whomever sent you the "best offer."
Chuck,
Better read my original post again:
> I have a Heathkit EC-1 Educational Analog Computer with original
> manual I'd like to sell. The computer is in unknown functional
> condition (I don't know if it works right or not) but it looks
pretty
> good. I'd guess I'd have to sell it as unworking. All the parts
are
> there but some of the knobs are "stiff". This EC-1 was in storage
> since the 1970's ...... it was with some electronic test equipment I
> purchased at a surplus sale at a college.
>
> If you have an idea of it's worth .... either to a collector or as a
> parts unit please email me at badger(a)vbe.com
What I asked for I got...... an estimate of its worth. I did not say
that I
was accepting bids.... they just came in.... If I had stated that I'd
sell it
to the high bidder I would have, but that's not what I asked for.....
what I did
receive is a number of very informative posts with value estimates and
suggestions for places to offer it for sale..... eBay was the most
suggested
venue. I really don't care how it sells or if it sells..... it's just
"surplus"
to me. I'm not into collecting computers..... now if it were
electronic test
equipment or communications gear that's another story.
>From my perspective I was asking for help in assaying the value of
this piece I wanted to sell. I do appreciate the offers to purchase
(most) and especially those persons that sent me information on the
EC-1 and warned me that I might receive low ball offers from my post.
Some were... and had I not received replies from several very helpful
individuals I'd probably provided someone with real "steal" . I didn't
send angry email to those who made an offer that some would (not I)
perceive as trying to take advantage of my ignorance. In retrospect
after looking at the title of my post it should have said "Value of
EC-1 wanted"..... sorry if this was confusing. If you are still
bitching about selling it to the one making the best offer..... go to
eBay and bid along with those who may know it's value. At any rate
the your generous offer of $100 was far from the highest I received.
Mike Melland
All of these puns concerning mental DECay made me think of a post I
saw on COMP.SYS.TANDY last week. Excuse the length, but I thought
some of you might find it amusing.
>
>This sounds like a variation on the Motorolla HCF (Halt & Catch Fire)
>instruction legend.
>
>bill
>
Ah, yes. Here is the original document I downloaded from a BBS in the
80's....
* * * * *
THE COCO RUMOR MILL
IT HAS BEEN RUMORED THAT TANDY (MOTOROLA) IS WORKING ON A COCO III
COMPUTER TO BE RELEASED SHORTLY. AT PRESENT THE ONLY ADVANCE INFORMATION
AVAILABLE IS THAT A NEW MICROPROCESSOR WILL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE UNIT--
THE 6813!
OUR RESEARCH STAFF HAS BEEN ABLE TO UNCOVER A LIST OF NEW OPCODES THAT
DISTINGUISH THE 6813 AS A BREAKTHROUGH IN COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY.
THE LIST IS PRESENTED HERE FOR YOUR INFORMATION.
ABBA - PLAY SWEDISH ROCK
ADGB - ADD GARBAGE
BAD - BARK AT DOG
BBL - BRANCH ON BURNED OUT LIGHT
BAH - BRANCH AND HANG
BFEI - BEG FOR EXPANSION INTERFACE
BLI - BRANCH AND LOOP INFINITE
BPB - BRANCH ON PROGRAM BUG
BPO - BRANCH IF POWER OFF
BPM - BEGIN PIRATE MODE
BRN - BURN UP SAM CHIP
CFP - CALL FOR PROGRAMMER
CLD - TRY TO COOL DOWN SAM CHIP
CMS - CATCH MOUSE
CNP - CALL NATIONAL PARTS
CPB - CREATE PROGRAM BUG
CPM - CORRECT PROGRAM MANUAL
CRN - CONVERT TO ROMAN NUMERALS
CSD - CREATE STATIC DISCHARGE
DAO - DIVIDE AND OVERFLOW
DEVO - START NEW WAVE (SINE)
EIP - ERASE IF PIRATED
ERS - ERASE READ-ONLY STORAGE
ETOY - EMULATE ZX-81
HFA - HIRE FROM ATARI
HCF - HALT AND CATCH FIRE
HFC - HIDE FROM CHILDREN
HFP - HIDE FROM PINTO
HIC - HELP INTEL CHIP
IAD - ILLOGICAL AND
IBM - INTERUPT BAD MNEMONICS
IOR - ILLOGICAL OR
JOF - JUMP ON FLOOR
JOM - JUMP ON MOTOROLA
JOT - JUMP OFF TABLE
JTZ - JUMP TO ZAXXON PROGRAM
KAL - FLY OVER RUSSIA
MDB - MULTIPLY AND DROP BITS
MWK - MULTIPLY WORK
NOPE - REFUSE TO DO ANYTHING
OCD - OPEN COMMODE-DOOR
PAS - PRINT AND SMEAR
PIP - PULVERIZE INTERFACE PERIPHERAL
PSD - PERFORM SAFETY DANCE
RBT - READ AND BREAK TAPE
REST - RELAX FOR 12 CYCLES
RPM - READ PROGRAMMER'S MIND
RRT - RECORD AND RIP TAPE
RTR - REFUSE TO RUN
RTM - RETURN TO MOTOROLA
RTT - RETURN TO TANDY
RSD - READ AND SCRAMBLE DATA
RWD - REWIND DISK
SINK - SINK INTO I.C. SOCKET
SRZ - SUBTRACT AND RESET TO ZERO
SSD - SEEK AND SCRATCH DISK
STD - STOP TURNING DISK
STI - SELL T.I. STOCK
TLK - START SPEECH SYNTHESIS
TPR - TEAR PAPER
TRS - TRASH ('TRISS') PROGRAM
WED - WRITE AND ERASE DATA
WID - WRITE INVALID DATA
WOJ - WEAR OUT JOYSTICK
XBRA - GOTO ZOO
XIO - EXECUTE INVALID OP CODE
XOR - EXECUTE OPERATOR
XPR - EXECUTE PROGRAMMER
BESIDES HAVING THE ABOVE USER FRIENDLY OPCODES THE 6813 WILL ALSO HAVE
161 EASY TO REMEMBER ADDRESSING MODES!
P.S. THERE IS NO WORD FROM TANDY AS TO WHEN WE MIGHT EXPECT THESE
IMPROVEMENTS (THEYARE STILL TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT A 6809 IS!). PERHAPS
IN THE NEXT COMPUTER CATALOGUE.
--
Power Computing PowerCurve, 400mhz G3, Mac OS 9.0.4
Collector of Classic Microcomputers and Video Game Systems:
http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/lakes/6757
I'm on the lookout for a couple of VAX items:
VAX 4000/90 (preferred) or a VAX 4000/60
KA68x or a KA69x CPU to round out the "house of VAX"
I've got a couple of VAXes I could trade if someone was looking to round
out their VAX collection:
MicroVAX II (BA23 or BA123 cabinet)
VAXStation 3100/M76 in a BA42 type cabinet
Various vaxish Q-bus boards.
PDP-11/03 board set. (KDF11, DRJ11, etc)
I'm always interested in things for PDP-8's, but high on my wishlist are
the cable for an RK8E to the RK05, a couple of RK05 packs (one with OS/8 on
it would be dandy :-) and those pesky top connectors that connect core
stacks, CPUs, etc.
In the PDP-11 space anything to add mass storage to my PDP-11/34 like an
RK11-D or RL11 interface.
Also available for trading: a CompuPro Z80 CPU (S100) manual and perhaps
the "Inside CP/M" and Garetz S-100 bus books ae well.
--Chuck
--- Seth wrote:
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 02:09:27PM -0500, Marion Bates wrote:
> Any idea about the Mystery Switch?
This is the "Magic / More Magic" switch. Leave the switch in the
"More Magic" position.
--- end of quote ---
LOL. It did remind me of that story. :)
If there's anyone on this list who doesn't know that tale, ask for a retelling. It's good.
-- MB
--- Gene Buckle <geneb(a)deltasoft.com> wrote:
> > I am being offered this computer.
>
> I used to have an 8250. The 8350 is (TMK) a dual CPU 8250.
Right. I have an 8300, dual 8200 CPUs.
> It's a VAXBI bus system and it's a lot of fun to play with. It will require
> at least two 30A 110v circuits to run it.
My 8300 is on one 30A Hubbel twist-n-loc I installed in my basement. It
powers the CPU, a single RA81 and an MBA ESDI-to-SDI box (2.1Gb). I always
power on the RA81 *first*, then let it settle, before firing up the other
boxes (due to the surge current of the RA81 HDA).
Fun little box. Watch out for the KDB50 - I never met one that wasn't
finiky.
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/
Hi,
I'm interested in getting a MOS Technologies KIM-1, Synertek SYM-1
or a Rockwell AIM-65. Has anyone got one for sale (preferably in the
UK)?
Thanks.
--
Phil.
philpem(a)bigfoot.com
http://www.philpem.f9.co.uk/