Need any suggestions on repair of a PC monitor (SVGA).
It's a Dell and was working though it had a long warmup to full
intensity. Anyhow I turned it off and now it just chirps when
I turn it on. Before I bin it I'd like to see if its fixable... Ideas?
I generally dont do monitors and TVs because of the HV, dust and
abundance of sharp edges.
Allison
> I've never found a bullet-proof program for testing SIMMs under DOS or
> windows, so I keep a hard drive loaded up with Win95. If the system boots
> and I can run defrag (it being memory-intensive) then I ssume the SIMM is
> okay barring any heat-related problems which may only show up after the
SIMM
> gets hot.
>
> Anybody know of one?
I have a one, designed by Charles (?) Cook, and first
implemented by John Molnar, which I've reimplemented
for the Sol, some Z-80-based machines, and the 8051
embedded systems I've developed. But I never got around
to porting it to DOS...
Our Dell servers shipped with a program called "Dell
Diagnostics" which includes a comprehensive memory
test that can check for stuck bits, shorts between
address bits, short between address and data bits,
etc.
It complains when I run it on non-Dell equipment,
but usually works, and it's so far caught problems
nothing else would catch.
hth,
-dq
Mike Ford wrote:
> Now for a good question, any suggestions on what would make a good set of
> machines to use for SIMM testing?
>
> Now I use
>
> 30 pin, either a IIsi or a Q950 mac depending on speed of chips.
> 64 pin goes in a IIfx
Okay, you've got those covered.
> 72 pin I am wondering about, maybe a late 486 or early Pentium
> 72 pin Parity no idea
> 72 pin ECC maybe a PS/2 model 9595
>
> My thought is that some motherboards are very good at detecting the type of
> memory etc.
For testing 72-pin non-parity SIMMs I use a Soyo board which was one of the
last mass-produced 486 mobos. It will take up to a 486-133 CPU, and it will
run on one piece of FPM or EDO memory, so, unlike Pentium boards, you can
test a single piece. Additionally the boot box indicates whether the memory
is fast page or EDO.
I've never found a bullet-proof program for testing SIMMs under DOS or
windows, so I keep a hard drive loaded up with Win95. If the system boots
and I can run defrag (it being memory-intensive) then I assume the SIMM is
okay barring any heat-related problems which may only show up after the SIMM
gets hot.
Anybody know of one?
For 72-pin parity memory get an old Pentium board which requires the ninth
bit. I got mine from hitechcafe.com. The board cost $10 and a P-60 CPU was
$5. (Sorry, no onboard i/o or PCI bus).
ECC? Good luck ;>)
Glen Goodwin
0/0
Hello to all. I'd like to know what kind of expansion or options
could be attached to this machines:
PDP-11/23
----------
* KDF11-B 5014313C M8189/DIGITAL
* Q-BusMosMemory 5014500C M8067/DIGITAL
* DQ614S153040 Rev F/DILOG
* System Interface 11/03/ESI
* 808836-05 Rev K/Datasystems Design
There are 4 free slots. The system was fully functional
in an ESI lasertrimmer system for hybrid circuits that was
taken out of service 1 year ago.
By the moment I have no disk for it (maybe in a future). I'd like
to know if could be possible to put some class of disk or
diskette unit, even tape, eventually different of DEC stuff.
I suppose than this could be possible by some SCSI card,
but my experience with this is limited to the use of
emulators like Bob Supnik's or E-11.
Thanks for all. Best Regards.
Sergio
It was an Intercept jr., according to the auction.. Had 3 or 4 plug in cards
with it too.. Still not as cool as the PPS-4 development system that was on
Ebay a few weeks ago...
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
I already asked this on port-VAX, figured I'll try here, too.
Can anyone provide one of the following:
1). Confirmation or denial that the address jumpers on the TQK50 (M7546)
and the TQK70 (M7559) are laid out in the same pattern, bit-wise? In other
words, does each board share the same pattern for setting its address?
2). A jumper chart for the TQK70, or jumper setting info to set it to the
primary tape device address.
Thanks much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77 (Extra class as of June-2K)
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates to me that it would be
superior to what I have now..." (Gym Z. Quirk, aka Taki Kogoma).
On Dec 28, 10:12, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
> > I've never found a bullet-proof program for testing SIMMs under DOS or
> > windows,
[...]
> > Anybody know of one?
>
> I have a one, designed by Charles (?) Cook, and first
> implemented by John Molnar, which I've reimplemented
> for the Sol, some Z-80-based machines, and the 8051
> embedded systems I've developed. But I never got around
> to porting it to DOS...
>
> Our Dell servers shipped with a program called "Dell
> Diagnostics" which includes a comprehensive memory
> test that can check for stuck bits, shorts between
> address bits, short between address and data bits,
> etc.
>
> It complains when I run it on non-Dell equipment,
> but usually works, and it's so far caught problems
> nothing else would catch.
I don't know about Charles Cook, but the name John Molnar sounds vaguely
familiar. However, the best test I've ever found was one that runs in
linear time (ie twice as much memory takes twice as long to test; most
tests run in time dependant on some power of the size -- eg double the
size, triple the time, like a Galpat which depends on the square of the
size).
The test was devised and implemented by Suk and Reddy, and is described in
"A march test for functional faults in semiconductor random access
memories", published in IEEE Transactions on Computing Vol.C-30
No.12,December 1981. There were a whole lot of articles about memory
testing in the journals around that time, and there's a follow-up article
by Abadir and Reghbati, in Computing Surveys Vol.15 No.3, September 1983,
published by the ACM, which presents a kind of survey of methods.
This test will find stuck-at-zero, stuck-at-one, data coupling faults,
address coupling faults, data-address-coupling faults, and decoder faults.
It's pretty easy to implement, and *provided* each data bit is in a
separate IC, you can do all the bits in parallel. If not (eg if the RAMs
are 4-bit wide devices) then you need to do some manipulation to ensure
you're not affecting bits you don't want to -- a fact conveniently
forgotten by most RAM test implementors.
Anyway, Suk & Reddy's test is quite fast, and very easy to implement. I
did a Z80 version that tested the entire RAM in a bytewide array (so lots
of shifts and loops) without using any stack (what's the point in storing
data in the memory you think needs testing?), and it runs in just under six
seconds at 3.5MHz. If you had one bit per chip, obviously it would be much
more than 8 times faster (8 times because of parallelism and a further
factor of two or more by eliminating the shifts, some loops, and logical
ORs/ANDs used for masking individual bits).
The one thing most memory tests *won't* do is test for correct refresh
tolerance. You may also have trouble testing the parity fully unless you
can read/write the parity bits directly. Very few tests, by the way, will
detect pattern-sensitive faults. Luckily, these are very rare, and I've
only ever seen one true pattern-sensitive fault that wasn't a simple
coupling fault.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Duh!
You'd think that I'd mention a few little details
The system is Windoze 95 v400.0950 IIRC.
And thanks to KS for the URL, that's my next stop. Also, thanks Doug
for the Norton Ghost reference... I'll look into that too.
Cheers
John
Fellow CLASSICCMP'ers, I have reached a milestone. This message originates
>from my first qmail server ever based on a SPARCstation LX. I must say I
would have been completely lost, configuration-wise, had it not been for
the qmail setup how-to at the flounder site.
Thanks are also due to Chuck McManis for providing some sanity checks, and
especially for taking a few minutes out of Christmas day to field a
somewhat frantic phone call from my end.
I would also add that I was almost hopelessly lost with Sendmail, even
after reading parts of the O'Reilly book on it. qmail was much easier to
deal with, and I would not hesitate to suggest it to anyone putting up a
Unix mailserver.
Keep the peace(es).
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77 (Extra class as of June-2K)
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates to me that it would be
superior to what I have now..." (Gym Z. Quirk, aka Taki Kogoma).
> The subject (I think) is on topic, the hardware to which I'm refering is
> a little too new for us, but I'm gonna ask anyway.
>
> I have a Pentium I wintel box which I've had for nearly five years.
> It's 1.9 GB HD has been slowly developing bearing whine for the last
> several months. It is getting noticibly louder now and I'm sure this
> faithful old HD is nearing the end of it's earthly sojourn.
>
> My fantasy is that I can buy another IDE drive (of somewhat larger
> capacity) and just somehow copy the whole thing on the original down to
> the new one, without having to go thru the backup/restore/re-auth all the
> programs I've got on it. I have 8mm streaming tape backups of the system,
> but that's a pain.
Symantec's Ghost can do this. You didn't mention much else about the
system, i.e. running DOS or Windows, FAT16 or FAT32...
If you're running Windows and you've formetted the older drive as
FAT32, then you're in the ideal shape- you can clone your partition
to a new partition on the new drive and in its new form, it can be
as large as the disk.
However, if you're running DOS, and/or have the drive partition(s)
formatted as FAT16, you'll be limited to cloning the old drive's
paritions to partitions on the new drive that must top out at 2GB
(2047MB, actually). Additionally, the BIOS of the motherboard in
this PC may or may not be up-to-date enough to handle the large
sizes of newer IDE drives. A BIOS upgrade might help that. Also,
if you've got multiple FAT16 partitions, I'm not sure how things
will work on the second FAT16 partition if, in cloning, you grow
the first to the 2047MB limit.
I do this all the time, mostly to get around the problem of NT4
not installing on drives larger than just under 8GB.
hth,
-doug q
Please contact the original sender.
Reply-to: mtnaire(a)easilink.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 18:07:46 -0700
From: Robert Specht <mtnaire(a)easilink.com>
Subject: Kaypro 4/software for sale
I have heard about you from computer museums who
were kind enough to respond to my message:
I purchased a new Kaypro 4 system around 1983/84
while getting my 2nd college degree; I am ready to
sell it with original software and some manuals.
The computer has a modem port and includes a power
cable. There is also a Kaypro printer and
connection cord; the printer is usable (I'm using
it now to print off files before selling the
computer) but not in as good shape as the
computer. The printer takes ribbons that fit the
old IBM Selectric typewriters. There is an
unopened box of floppy disks and a few other blank
disks. Please let me know if you are interested
in this historic computer system, and at what
price. If you are not interested, I would welcome
suggested other buyers to contact.
The software consists of several floppy disks in
hard cases and includes:
CP/M version 2.2, S-Basic
Perfect Calc - Program/lessons
Microsoft Basic-80 (plus selected games)
Perfect Filer Working Diskette- Individual
Member Data Base
MicroPlan
Perfect Writer/Perfect Speller Working Diskete
- Edit Disk
Perfect Writer - Installation Disk \
Perfect Writer - Lessons Disk
A public domain utilites disk with a program
called "TYPWRYT" which allows
use of the keyboard like a typewriter
and the following MASTER disks:
Wordstar, The Word Plus
Perfect Filer - Individual Member Data
Base
Perfect Calc - Program/Lessons
CP/M v. 2.2, S-Basic
MicroPlan, C-Basic
Microsoft Basic-80
Perfect Writer - Lessons Disk
Perfect Speller
Perfect Writer - Installation Disk
The manuals include:
Perfect Calc
Perfect Filer
Wordstar
CP/M
and small handbooks:
Kapro The Word Plus
Letter Quality Printer User's Manual
Introduction to Software
Kaypro User's Guide (Read Me First)
The above manuals are all the Kaypro
publications. In addition, I have the following:
Understanding and Using dBase II by Rob
Krumm, Brady Communications
Company, Inc., copyright 1984 (ISBN
0-89303-916-0).
Thank you.
Ronnee-Sue Helzner, Utah
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
From: r. 'bear' stricklin <red(a)bears.org>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: Software for Northstar Advantage 8/16?
>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Rich Beaudry wrote:
>
>> Would anyone happen to have either Graphics/DOS or Graphics/BASIC for
this
>> machine? I have complete manuals for them, but no disks :-(
>
>I have some software for the Advantage, but I'll have to check the
>inventory after I get home this evening before I can say for sure
whether
>I have this particular software.
>
>> Also, I heard that the Northstars use hard-sectored 5.25" disks. Is
this
>> true?
>
>Yes, it is true. I'm nearly certain they were 10-sectored.
Based on the Advantage I have standard DD NS* 10 sector hard sector
and I think it will do DD/DS 80tr (DDQD) for 780k.
Allison
Hello all,
I have an Altos 580, but no docs or software for it. Someone sent me floppy
boot disk images, but I could not get them to work (likely some mistake on
my end). Upon power up, the floppy light goes on, and never goes off. It's
hard to tell if the floppy motor is spinning. The hard drive definitely
spins up, and sounds fine. A terminal connected to any port on the back
never shows any output. I have no idea if the thing is broken, and without
docs, I don't have the time or inclination to find out...
The unit is the "squashed hexagon" shape, with one internal 5.25" floppy,
and an internal 5.25" hard drive. Five serial ports on the back, labeled JA
through JE. Also other ports for what looks like an external hard drive....
I took the covers off, and aside from quite a bit of dust, there is no
damage. No apparent heat spots, missing chips, etc. It's possible the
floppy is just dust-clogged, but I haven't had time recently to clean it all
out.
If you want it, it's yours for what I have into it: US $20 plus shipping
costs. The unit is fairly heavy, so it might get expensive, depending on
where you are (I am located in north central Massachusetts, USA)... I am
willing to ship worldwide, and will quote shipping to anyone who is
interested. I am also willing to part it out, but will give first
preference to someone who wants the whole thing.
Thanks!
Rich B.
(I subscribe to the digest, so I can't reply immediately).
On Dec 26, 22:45, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> Pile #1 (12 chips, 8 big & 4 smaller):
> SEC KMM53616000AK-6
I don't know -- if you give me the IC numbers I might be able to tell.
> Pile #2 (12 chips, 8 big & 4 smaller):
> NEC
> MC- 428000A36BH-70
MC-428000A36BH-70 is NEC 8M x 36 (32MB with parity) fast page mode, 70ns.
Sure this isn't 16 x uPD4217400 and 8 x 424100?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>I stumbled across an intersil board with their PDP-8 clone chip on eBay
>recently (yesterday, I think). If you search for Intersil you may find
it.
>
>Dick
Which one?
6960 sampler with the basic 6100 chipset?
Intercept the 6100 SBC with expansion as embeeded or trainer?
PCM-12 system (development system aand boards)?
Allison
I'm guessing this is Off-Topic, since I think 72-pin SIMMs are newer than
10 years (not really sure). However, I've no idea where else to ask about
this.
A friend of mine just sent me a pile of RAM that he'd been given and
couldn't use. He was thinking the stuff was Parity, I'm not so sure. I
was hoping to be able to use the stuff to bump up the RAM in some of my VMS
boxes (Alpha's that require 72-pin True Parity RAM).
Pile #1 (12 chips, 8 big & 4 smaller):
SEC KMM53616000AK-6
KOREA 9632
Barcode
006-3301427
Pile #2 (12 chips, 8 big & 4 smaller):
NEC
MC- 428000A36BH-70
9350XE
Piles 3 & 4 defininitly aren't.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
I think there were at least a couple of people who wanted to know when I
would post the AEA PK-64 'PakRatt' on E-pay.
I have done so. It may be viewed through the following link. Bidding
starts at $5.00 + shipping, no reserve.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1204126528
Thanks much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77 (Extra class as of June-2K)
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates to me that it would be
superior to what I have now..." (Gym Z. Quirk, aka Taki Kogoma).
In a message dated 12/27/00 8:23:54 AM Central Standard Time,
jfoust(a)threedee.com writes:
> At 11:57 PM 12/26/00 -0800, Chuck McManis wrote:
> >This site
> ><http://www.sei-elbatex.ch/dynamic/html/spain/selco/inf13_4.htm>
> >Identifies the above SIMM as 64M (16M x 36) so it looks like it is
> >true parity but too many bits :-)
>
> I've always wished for a quick and easy way to type in
> a memory SIMM/DIMM number, and learn its specs. (Individual
> chip numbers on a PCB don't necessarily give the right
> answer, right?) Is there a web site like that somewhere?
>
no web site that I know of, but if you can get a copy of IBM's pc pocket
reference manual, that has some general guidelines on IDing memory. come to
think of it, i think the pocket ref guide is online somewhere, like IBM
germany but not sure...
On Dec 26, 23:57, Chuck McManis wrote:
> >Pile #2 (12 chips, 8 big & 4 smaller):
> >NEC
> >MC- 428000A36BH-70
> >9350XE
>
> This site:
> <http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Hills/1960/memorias.htm>
> Seems to indicate that these Simms are 16M (4MB x 36)
Except that Zane gave the type number off the SIMM, and this site gives the
IC types. Not the same thing!
> Whereas this site:
> <http://www.dsm-computer.de/eng/produkte/zubehoer.html>
> Has a similar number that is an 8M parity simm for a PS2.
Actually, it says 8M x 36, which is 32MB with parity :-)
Since Zane wrote that it's an NEC SIM with a date code of 1993, I looked it
up in the 1993 NEC databook :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Hello. I'm adquired recently one HP-9000 380 workstation. I'm
pending to receive it. I'd like to know some details about this
machine, or even an URL where I could get some info.
The workstation appears to be not used in anytime.
Thanks. Regards.
----------
Sergio Pedraja
Administracion de Sistemas
Division de Tecnologia
Caja Cantabria
Spain
----------
mailto: spedraja(a)casyc.es, spedraja(a)mail.ono.es
----------
I'll be driving cross country in a few days and would like to stop by some
thrift stores where i can find classic computers. Because of the weather I'll
be taking I-10 most of the way, from the east to the west coast. Could anyone
suggest some good spots? hopefully I can find something of interest. Thanks!
robert
On Dec 26, 7:23, LFessen106(a)aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 12/26/00 2:15:04 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> mikeford(a)socal.rr.com writes:
>
> > I looked in my keyboard bin and I have two SGI model 9500801 keyboards
in
> > pretty good condition, but no cables (that I noticed).
> >
>
> Do you think Sun KB cables would work?
I thought Sun cables were 8-pin miniDIN, not 6-pin?
> Actually, I could probably just make
> them as they use standard PS2 connectors... What do you think?
Yes, you could -- but don't use ordinary PS/2 ready-made cables as they
only have 4 or 5 pins connected, and the SGI systems use all six.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
In a message dated 12/26/00 2:15:04 AM Eastern Standard Time,
mikeford(a)socal.rr.com writes:
> I looked in my keyboard bin and I have two SGI model 9500801 keyboards in
> pretty good condition, but no cables (that I noticed).
>
Do you think Sun KB cables would work? Actually, I could probably just make
them as they use standard PS2 connectors... What do you think?
-Linc Fessenden
Top of my list is a copy of the PC Pocket Ref, neat pocket sized book with
tons of data on PC parts etc. This book has nice lists including most if
not all floppy drives, so I can make a mini-list with just the 3.5" 2.88MB
drives to hunt for.
On Dec 25, 18:23, Tony Duell wrote:
> > TT is DRV AC L and VV is RX DMA INTR L. These are the extra
connections
> > used by RX211 and RXV21 controllers, and I expect RX28 also uses RX DMA
> > INTR L.
>
> I don't think it doea.
>
> I believe that The RX8e card and the RX28 card are the same module -- an
> M8357.
They are the same -- I misread a diagram in the RX02 manual, which made me
think the M8357 working as an RX28 could do DMA transfers. It can't. Only
the RX211 and RXV21 use RX DMA INTR L.
I'v just pulled the printset of that card (which, alas, says
> nothing about the DB25 adapter), and the only pins shown on the schematic
> are
>
> D : RX RUN L
> H : RX INIT L
> J : RX ERROR L
> T : RX TRANSFER REQEUST L
> X : RX DONE L
> BB : RX DATA L
> FF : RX 12 BIT L
> RR : RX OUT L
> LL : RX SHIFT L
Interesting. I think where you wrote "H : RX INIT L", you mean "N". H is
a ground, and the RX02 printset clearly shows N as RX INIT L. That agrees
with the tracks I can see on the M7744.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
From: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis(a)mcmanis.com>
>At 12:12 AM 12/24/00 -0500, Allison wrote:
>>The battery will be dead in about 3-4 weeks of non power.
>
>Sigh, I guessed as much. As long as your up late, do you happen to know
the
With 8 uVAXen around the batteries are a known item. Also the PRO and
a few others used same battery. If you blast them run them through a few
charge/dischage cycles and they hold up fine. Not if there is much fuzz
on the outside then they have leaked and may have dried out, that is a
replace
case.
>pinout of the audio-out connector on an RRD43 drive? Its also a Toshiba
>model xm4101b
Never had one of data on it.
Allison
On Dec 24, 23:41, David Gesswein wrote:
> >From: pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com (Pete Turnbull)
>
> I tried booting the VT78
> from a RX02 in RX28 mode and it worked with a RX02 version of OS/8.
Useful to know - thanks!
> >Well, before I go that far, I might try to get 8" drives running on an
old
> >PC that has an XT controler which *should* do SD, I think. Can I use
> >something like PUTR to create a disk that way?
> >
> I think so if the floppy chip supports SD. I have not tried.
It might take a while to find a working permutation of PC/controller, but
that might be a viable solution for me.
> This is the pinout I got by buzzing out the adapter cable I made to go
> from the DB25 on my RX02 to the 40 pin cable from the RX8E.
> If the pinout was in a document I can't find it, I may of
> gotten the pinout by buzzing out the cable in the drive.
> Pins 10,11,23, and 24 are not connected in the cable from my VT78 but
> pin 25 is present. I don't remember why my adapter cable has
> extra pins connected.
>
> DB25 40 pin header
> 1 3 C
> 14 4 D
> 2 7 E
> 15 8 F
Um, by your numbering scheme, 7 and 8 are H and J, not E and F.
> 10 37 SS
> 23 38 TT
> 11 39 UU
> 24 40 VV
>
> 12,13,25 Not connected.
TT is DRV AC L and VV is RX DMA INTR L. These are the extra connections
used by RX211 and RXV21 controllers, and I expect RX28 also uses RX DMA
INTR L.
> 40 pin connector is numbered
>
> 1 (A) 39 (UU)
> 2 (B) 40 (VV)
ObNitpick: That's the reverse of the conventional numbering; Berg
connectors with letters have the red stripe at the A end, which is on the
left of the pin header (looking into the pins) while all other headers
which are numbered have pin 1 on the right.
Merry Christmas!
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Dec 24, 9:30, Mike wrote:
> I'm glad this thread came up. I have a WT/78. Is it the same machine as
> the VT/78? And also having a RX-02 and no interconnecting cable or
> software, I eagerly await the pinout specs too and have an outstanding
wish
> for software.
As far as I know, they're the same thing, just sold with different
operating software.
I'm now sure I don't have the floppies that "belonged" to mine. They may
be at a friend's place, but I won't be able to tell until after the
holidays. So, I guess I'll have to download some from David's site, but
before I do that, I'll have to figure out which PC with which floppy
controller can read/write my 8" drives, and before *that* there are several
other logistical problems to sort out. So it may be a while.
However, I did check the RX02 printset and the RX8E Maintenance Manual, and
I see that the RX8E (and RX28, RX11, and RXV11) only passes 9 signals to
the M7744 (which is the microprogrammed controller in the RX02). The RXV21
and RX211 use two more: the RX DMA and RX AC signals. These 9 signals
(with corresponding grounds) happen to be every second pair (pins A/B up to
PP/RR) along the Berg connector so it would be logical to assume that they
match the pairs, in order, connected to my D-connectors, which have exactly
18 pins fitted. I'll give it a try when I've cleared some more space.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
At 09:59 AM 12/25/00 -0500, you wrote:
>I do still have an original floppy containing a DOS client for AOL, and
>something a little earlier- AOL either used to call their server PC-LINK
>or PC-LINK was a seperate service offered by AOL to users of Tandy's
>DeskMate software.
AOL started out as Quantum Link or Q-Link and was for Commodore computers.
I still have the original BETA software on 5-1/4 for my VIC-20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gene(a)ehrich.com
gehrich(a)tampabay.rr.com
P.O. Box 3365 Spring Hill Florida 34611-3365
http://www.voicenet.com/~generic
Computer & Video Game Garage Sale
I do still have an original floppy containing a DOS client for AOL, and
something a little earlier- AOL either used to call their server PC-LINK
or PC-LINK was a seperate service offered by AOL to users of Tandy's
DeskMate software.
But a friend who was the early AOL adopter from whom I got these disks
told me that the reason he had to upgrade to a PC that was Windows-
capable was that AOl was discontinuing the DOS-mode service.
Whether DOS-mode meant text mode or not, I'm not sure.
As to the file collections, I was a CompuServe and BIX user
>from '85 to '87, and most of the CP/M stuff was the same, most
of the Mac stuff was the same, etc. I can think of one notable
exception that I preserved- source code for a threaded BIXMail
reader, written in DigiTalk's version of Smalltalk.
It was the forums that set the various services apart. I saved
tons of message traffic, but I lost most of it through platform
switches, crashes, early viruses, etc. I do still have some of
the BIX Smalltalk forum traffic saved.
What I wish I had were either printed or electronic sessions
>from my days as a user of Ward & Randy's BBS...
Regards,
-dq
> ----------
> From: Mark
> Reply To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2000 8:04 AM
> To: classiccmp
> Subject: Old online service file areas
>
> Hi,
>
> Are the file areas or forums of any of the old online services still
> accessible? I'm thinking of Compuserve, BIX, AOL and any others.
>
> They probably (used to) contain many files which would be useful for older
> computers, but which are not available on the internet.
>
> A brief visit to the Compuserve web site didn't turn up anything
> interesting.
> Have all the old file areas/forums been deleted? Is it still possible to
> access any of the online services using a text-based interface?
>
>
> This question arose from reading the document at
> http://www.dateq.net/ftp/CD-DRIVE/HITACHI/HIHELP.TXT
>
> That contains info on old Hitachi CD-ROM drives, including ones which use
> a
> proprietary interface. [Related to this, the most recent MS-DOS drivers
> for
> old Hitachi CD-ROM drives are available from Hitachi's USA BBS but not
> their
> web site. I uploaded the file to
> http://home.clara.net/markk/Hitachi/8bit.zip]
>
> Anyway, part of the HIHELP.TXT file reads:
> Filename: HIHELP.TXT
> Written Feb 93 REVISED 01Jan94 10Aug94
>
> For CIS distribution only - Permission required for publication
> elsewhere.
>
>
> So this file was originally available on Compuserve. Is it still there?
>
>
> -- Mark
>
At 09:59 AM 12/25/00 -0500, you wrote:
>I do still have an original floppy containing a DOS client for AOL, and
>something a little earlier- AOL either used to call their server PC-LINK
>or PC-LINK was a seperate service offered by AOL to users of Tandy's
>DeskMate software.
And before it was AOL, it was QuantumLink for the C-64. I believe I still
have one of the QuantumLink diskettes around somewhere.
Jeff
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power Computing PowerCurve, 288mhz G3, Mac OS 9
http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/lakes/6757
Home Of The TRS-80 Model 2000 FAQ
Just got in several pen based computers. They all seem to date from about
1995 so they are Off Topic but this is the best collectors group out there
for information
One is a Kalidor K2000, a very nice small ruggedized computer. I love it.
This one doesn't have its power supply so I have yet to get it to power up.
Does anyone know if the power connector is center positive or negative? It
says it needs DC 15V, 1.3A.
Any Websites? Software out there? I guess the company is out of business.
Does anyone know what happened to it. Who might have bought it.
There is also a Norand Pen*Key 6600 Windows that seems to be related to
Intermec, the bar code people. This one had it's charging base and powers up
as a DOS device. I couldn't find anything out about it but that there are new
versions 6642 still avaliable..This was in Intermec's site. Any others?
Software? It dates to 96 and I think has a i80486 for the processor.
There is also a Dauphin with a broken glass, maybe display. I haven't looked
at it yet. I found the Dauphin parts site.
The fourth was a Grid 2260 that I also have powered up. It is a little rough
but works. Boots to the password. Does anyone know how to get past it without
a boot diskette. I haven't looked yet for websites but I think Grid stuff
will be easier to find.
My Surplus dealer actually got in about 4 Grids, I just brought one of them
home to look at. I don't know what the others are but I suspect the same.
Since this is OT please contact me off line unless it is info that all would
be interested in.
Thanks for the help.
Paxton
Portland, OR
>From: pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com (Pete Turnbull)
>I assume that the difference between RX8E (= RXV11/RX11) mode, and RX28
>mode, is the denisty supported? ie, RX28 mode makes the drives behave as
>RX02 rather than RX01? Did'nt I read somewhere that some VT78s (or was it
> only DECmates?) can use RX02 mode?
>
For the PDP-8 it is mostly a software issue. I tried booting the VT78
>from a RX02 in RX28 mode and it worked with a RX02 version of OS/8.
>Well, before I go that far, I might try to get 8" drives running on an old
>PC that has an XT controler which *should* do SD, I think. Can I use
>something like PUTR to create a disk that way?
>
I think so if the floppy chip supports SD. I have not tried.
From: "Mike" <dogas(a)bellsouth.net>
>
>I'm glad this thread came up. I have a WT/78. Is it the same machine as
>the VT/78? And also having a RX-02 and no interconnecting cable or
>software, I eagerly await the pinout specs too and have an outstanding wish
>for software.
>
>From what I understand they were basically the same thing except the
ROM module that plugs on the back may support different things but I
am not really familiar with the models. WD was listed as a WS with
COS support. WS may only work with WPS. I didn't see a WT.
Do you have anything else to write to the RX02 from? If so you can
write my images, if not I can make you a copy, email me if needed. I will
buzz out the VT78 floppy cable.
This is the pinout I got by buzzing out the adapter cable I made to go
>from the DB25 on my RX02 to the 40 pin cable from the RX8E.
If the pinout was in a document I can't find it, I may of
gotten the pinout by buzzing out the cable in the drive.
Pins 10,11,23, and 24 are not connected in the cable from my VT78 but
pin 25 is present. I don't remember why my adapter cable has
extra pins connected.
DB25 40 pin header
1 3 C
14 4 D
2 7 E
15 8 F
3 11 M
16 12 N
4 15 S
17 16 T
5 19 W
18 20 X
6 25 CC
19 24 BB
7 27 EE
20 28 FF
8 31 KK
21 32 LL
9 35 PP
22 36 RR
10 37 SS
23 38 TT
11 39 UU
24 40 VV
12,13,25 Not connected.
40 pin connector is numbered
1 (A) 39 (UU)
2 (B) 40 (VV)
So long ago I had forgotten about doing it, I posted a message to this group
looking for information about Richard Didday and/or Matrix
Publishers/Dilithium Press. Just a few days ago, Richard e-mailed me out of
the blue, responding to that message. Either he's really been stuck in the
"Symbiosis Through Transmutation" device all this time, or he suddenly
started reading archives of this group and saw his name. In any case, he
has kindly given me permission to scan and post a sort of funky
computer-cartoon book of his that was published in 1976. I reduced the size
of the scans substantially to make for quicker web viewing, but if anyone
wants a full-sized (300 dpi) scanned copy, let me know. To view it on-line,
go to my "Historic Computer Publications" page at:
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/bill_r/historic_pubs.htm
and scroll all the way to the bottom. Let me know what you think!
-Bill Richman (bill_r(a)inetnebr.com)
Web Page: http://incolor.inetnebr.com/bill_r
Home of the COSMAC Elf Microcomputer Simulator, Fun with
Molten Metal, Orphaned Robots, and Technological Oddities.
>When I get the intermittent CPU problem on the 11/44 fixed, and find a
>UNIBUS SMD controller, can I just attach the CDC drive to the 11/44 and
>have it boot and go, or will I need to reconfigure something?
That all depends on the controller in both systems. I have Emulex and
Xylogics SMD controllers here and they are not interchangeable. Data is
written differently. I have used Emulex in both Unibus and Qbus systems and
they are compatible for data. System disks are another matter.
Dan
If you look at: ftp://zane.brouhaha.com/pub/dan/emulex_uc07_08/
you will find just about everything you need. The UC07/08 is the Qbus
version but the switch settings and firmware is the same for both. I have
several here and use them in my test beds.
If you need anything else from the manuals let me know and I will post them
as well.
If you upgrade your firmware to M or P it will support CD's as well. The
HEX files are there as well.
BTW: Thanks go to Zane for hosting this stuff for me.
Dan
>Another question to ask, I got an Unibus SCSI card, and I know that
>it can be configured as either a tape controller or a disk controller.
>Currently it is configured as a disk controller, but I would like
>to know which switch settings change it into a tape controller.
>
>There is are 2 switch banks on the card, one with 10 switches, and
>one with 4 switches, which is placed at the top. Furthermore, there
>are 4 jumpers which can be set/removed.
>
>BTW, the card is an Emulex UC17.
>
>It works perfectly, yesterday I did build RSX 4.6 onto an Iomega
>jazz drive. It only uses 600Mb out of the 1Gb though.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Ed
>
>--
>The Wanderer | Politici zijn gore oplichters.
>quapla(a)xs4all.nl | Europarlementariers:
>zakkenvullers
>http://www.xs4all.nl/~quapla | en neuspeuteraars.
>Unix Lives! windows95/98 is rommel! |
>'97 TL1000S | WEG MET DE TOLPOORTEN!!
Mike:
Could you contact me via private e-mail at: jeff.kaneko(a)juno.com?
Thanks!
Jeff
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
Hi,
Are the file areas or forums of any of the old online services still
accessible? I'm thinking of Compuserve, BIX, AOL and any others.
They probably (used to) contain many files which would be useful for older
computers, but which are not available on the internet.
A brief visit to the Compuserve web site didn't turn up anything interesting.
Have all the old file areas/forums been deleted? Is it still possible to
access any of the online services using a text-based interface?
This question arose from reading the document at
http://www.dateq.net/ftp/CD-DRIVE/HITACHI/HIHELP.TXT
That contains info on old Hitachi CD-ROM drives, including ones which use a
proprietary interface. [Related to this, the most recent MS-DOS drivers for
old Hitachi CD-ROM drives are available from Hitachi's USA BBS but not their
web site. I uploaded the file to http://home.clara.net/markk/Hitachi/8bit.zip]
Anyway, part of the HIHELP.TXT file reads:
Filename: HIHELP.TXT
Written Feb 93 REVISED 01Jan94 10Aug94
For CIS distribution only - Permission required for publication elsewhere.
So this file was originally available on Compuserve. Is it still there?
-- Mark
Does anyone know the approximate lifetime of the NiCd battery on a VAX when
it isn't turned on all the time? I've got several dead ones and it is
irritating to set the language and boot device every time. I've tried
"zapping" them, this brought one back but the other is quite dead. I've
almost have enough to put together one get pack from cells in the bad ones :-)
--Chuck
Hi
I am restoring a TRS80 model 2000 (1983), one of the rare machines to
use an actual 80186 Intel CPU.
I did not have the original keyboard. I have been told that an older
1000 keyboard (90 key type similar look to 4p keyboard) works fine as
long as you make an adapter cable.
I have the pin functions for the trs80 2000 5 pin din keyboard connector
but not for the other end...the 8 pin male connector on the old 1000
keyboard...
I looked and searched long and hard...all over...anybody got that?
I am at the point of opening up the keyboard and looking at the circuit
to figure out the pinout but I would like to avoid that...
Thanks
Claude
>Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 14:02:58 GMT
>From: pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com (Pete Turnbull)
>Subject: VT78 - lots of questions
>
>Is there anything in particular I should watch out for when I power it up?
>
This is an area of discussion. The full treatment is to inspect, reform big
electrolytic capacitors (put a current limited voltage on them for a while),
then separately test the power supply, then attempt to power up the cards.
The other is to visually inspect, apply power for a short while, and
if nothing bad happened apply power longer and try to run it.
>I don't have the RX01 drives that originally came with it, but I do have
>the connecting cable with a D-37 connector at the VT78 end and a DB-25 at
>the other end (only 18 pins fitted). I also have a set of RX02s in the
>adjacent rack, and I have the RX02 print set and manuals somewhere. I
>assume I can set the RX02 (M7044) switches appropriately, and use that with
>an appropriate adapter cable? Anyone know the relevant VT78 pinout?
>
My VT78 is running off of RX02's set to RX8E mode. They also have the
DB25 plug on the back which will connect directly to the VT78 cable. If
yours don't I should be able to dig up the pinout if you don't run across
it in one of the manuals.
>Documentation: all I can find that's even vaguely relevant is the DECscope
>User's manual, RX8/RX11 Floppy Disk System User's Manual, RX8/RX11 Floppy
>Disk System Maintenance Manual, the OS/8 Software Support Manual, and a
>FOCAL-GT/RT User's Manual. I have borrowed copies of the Small Computer
>Handbook (that's the one for 8/e, 8/f and 8/m) and the PDP8/a Minicomputer
>Handbook. I should have the RX02 User Manual somewhere too. What else am
>I going to need, that's downloadable from the net?
>
I have WPS, RX02 and OS/78, and COS manuals online. I have a complete VT78
printset but I have not scanned it yet.
http://www.pdp8.net/query_docs/query.shtml
What is FOCAL-GT/RT?
>I should have some 8" floppies, though I'm not sure what's on them because
>I've not actually found them yet :-) Is there anything I should try
>downloading from the net?
>
I have OS/78, COS and WPS images online, poke around in ftp://pdp8.net/images/
If you have a OS/8 variant on the floppy that may be able to use my disk
image dump and restore programs, dumprest.zip in
ftp://pdp8.net/software/
I have never actually tried to use it on the VT78, I write the images
>from the 8/E.
If you find you don't have any bootable floppies I can make you one.
My VT78 has gotten a little finicky, it sometimes needs a couple of power
cycles before it runs right. Yet another thing for the todo list.
David Gesswein
http://www.pdp8.net/ -- Old computers with blinkenlights
Hi,
Just within the 10-year rule, I have a Fujitsu M3191F2 flatbed scanner. Date
code on the label is 1990-08. A label on the underside refers to it as an
M3191C-IS. I guess this would have been pretty expensive when new. It has a
SCSI interface, resolution is 300dpi greyscale.
If anyone can assist with getting it to be recognised when connected to a PC
via Adaptec SCSI card, please let me know. Fujitsu were of no help, though a
German user manual is available on their web site.
Using the Adaptec diagnostic program, the scanner is recognised. However it is
not recognised under Win 95, even after rescanning the bus. On my Amiga it is
not recognised initially, but is after I rescan the bus.
I'd like to find a copy of the OEM manual for this scanner.
BTW, I have dumped the data from all four EPROMs in the scanner (three of
which were soldered directly to the board...).
-- Mark
At 08:07 PM 12/20/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Toad Computers (www.toad.net) sold a card for the PC that ran ST software.
>I think it was called the Gemulator.
I believe Toad is out of the Atari business now...the last time I checked
out their website, all of the Atari stuff had been removed. I've not been
up to their store in a number of years though. The 'closet' that housed
the 8-bit stuff was always pretty interesting to rummage through. I never
used Gemulator, which does sound correct for the name, but I did use the
8-bit emulator they sold.
Does Best Electronics still sell ST stuff? They were a bit pricey the
last time I looked, but they carried quite a bit. At the time when I had
only FIDO access they were the only place I could find a replacement ST/STE
keyboard for my MEGA.
Jeff
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power Computing PowerCurve, 288mhz G3, Mac OS 9
http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/lakes/6757
Home Of The TRS-80 Model 2000 FAQ
From: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis(a)mcmanis.com>
>Does anyone know the approximate lifetime of the NiCd battery on a VAX
when
>it isn't turned on all the time? I've got several dead ones and it is
The battery will be dead in about 3-4 weeks of non power. The problem
with the cells
is they develop internal shorts when sitting discharged. the trick of
blasting them
using a 100,000uf cap charged to 20-30V sometimes open those shorts.
Replacement is any 3nicad pack over 100mAH that can be fitted in the
available
space. Nicad lifetime in use or discharged varies all over the map.
Allison
On Dec 24, 1:58, Tony Duell wrote:
> > Now then, I've got an RL02 pack labeled RSX-11M, which I'm hoping
> > contains a complete RSX-11M distribution. If I can get an RL02
>
> I would doubt it. From what I remmeber, RSX11M 4.x was about 3 RL02 packs
or
> 5 RL01 packs, or 1 RK07 pack. 3.x might be a bit smaller, but it would be
> a squeeze to get it onto a single RL02, I think.
You can get a working system on one RL02, you can get a minimal working
system onto a pair of RX03s (double-sided RX02), you can just barely get a
bootable system onto a pair of RX02s (I've done all of the above).
However, the distribution comes on five RL02s, of which you need at least
two (maybe three, it's a long time since I did a SYSGEN) to build a working
system.
3.x is indeed smaller -- I've seen several systems with all the system
required on an RL01 and user data on a second one.
> > controller board for the 11/73, will there be any problem with just
> > connecting one of the SMD cables to the CDC drive and copying RSX-11M
The bootstrap will be different, and what you need to do will depend on
what your controller emulates -- it could be multiple RL02s, a few RK06s or
RK07s, or a couple of RM02s. Or possibly other things; it will depend on
the controller. Even if the boot block were the same (some drive types
shared the same boot block), you still need the driver and that probably
isn't present on a working RL02 pack unless the original system had both
types of drive. It might be on your 11/73's disks, if you have RSX on
there.
As for booting from "any PDP-11", no it will depend on how the system was
built. It will depend on the machine having at least as much memory as the
original, whether it was built "mapped" or "unmapped" (memory management),
and whether it was built for separate I&D space. Other differences will
probably generate error messages, but as far as I remember won't stop it
booting.
I'm sure someone else asked about this on the list a year or two ago; it
might be worth looking through the archive.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Oops! Almost forgot...
Amongst the available machines for my project, add the following (sorry...
one is about 1 year short of being a 'classic', and none of them are VAXen).
--Mid-90's vintage Pentium system, dual-CPU, 64MB RAM.
--Two NCR 3300 series MicroChannel/486 systems, at least 32MB RAM each.
--One NCR 3450 series MCA Dual-CPU 486 system, 64MB RAM.
--One IBM PS/2-90 series, 486/50, 32MB RAM.
Thanks much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77 (Extra class as of June-2K)
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates to me that it would be
superior to what I have now..." (Gym Z. Quirk, aka Taki Kogoma).
On Dec 23, 14:18, David Gesswein wrote:
> >From: pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com (Pete Turnbull)
> >Is there anything in particular I should watch out for when I power it
up?
> This is an area of discussion. The full treatment [...].
Well, I would do most of that anyway, but I wondered if there were any
particular gotchas. I assume not, so I'll just take normal care :-)
> >I don't have the RX01 drives [...] I also have a set of RX02s
> My VT78 is running off of RX02's set to RX8E mode. They also have the
> DB25 plug on the back which will connect directly to the VT78 cable. If
> yours don't I should be able to dig up the pinout if you don't run across
> it in one of the manuals.
I don't see a DB25, but Tony has said something similar, and I should be
able to hack an adaptor. Thanks for the tip about RX8E mode -- that's one
of the things I was wondering about.
I assume that the difference between RX8E (= RXV11/RX11) mode, and RX28
mode, is the denisty supported? ie, RX28 mode makes the drives behave as
RX02 rather than RX01? Did'nt I read somewhere that some VT78s (or was it
only DECmates?) can use RX02 mode?
> I have WPS, RX02 and OS/78, and COS manuals online. I have a complete
VT78
> printset but I have not scanned it yet.
> http://www.pdp8.net/query_docs/query.shtml
That's extremely helpful -- thanks! I knew you had several manuals but
I've not had time to browse yet.
> What is FOCAL-GT/RT?
All I know is what the front of the manual says: FOCAL-GT is a version of
FOCAL-11 extended to use a GT40 with graphics as well as a teletype. So in
fact, it's not relevant at all, as it's meant for an 11/05. It was a red
herring, sorry.
> >I should have some 8" floppies, though I'm not sure what's on them
because
> >I've not actually found them yet :-) Is there anything I should try
> >downloading from the net?
> >
> I have OS/78, COS and WPS images online, poke around in
ftp://pdp8.net/images/
Even better, since I've unpacked al the boxes and can't find any VT78
floppies. Lots of other things I forgot I had :-) but not those.
> If you have a OS/8 variant on the floppy that may be able to use my disk
> image dump and restore programs, dumprest.zip in
> ftp://pdp8.net/software/
> I have never actually tried to use it on the VT78, I write the images
> from the 8/E.
>
> If you find you don't have any bootable floppies I can make you one.
Well, before I go that far, I might try to get 8" drives running on an old
PC that has an XT controler which *should* do SD, I think. Can I use
something like PUTR to create a disk that way?
Thanks for the suggestions and help.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Dec 23, 17:27, Tony Duell wrote:
> I had to do almost the reverse -- my PDP8/e is a desktop system (I don't
> have a spare rack for it at the moment), and the RX01 drive is in the
> tabletop case. I had to make up the cable to link the DB25 on the back
> of that to the RX8e card in the PDP8.
The pins used in the DB25 (and the 37-way) are arranged at one end of the
connector, in such a way that I am wondering if they're arranged to be easy
to crimp a matching connector onto a ribbon cable. And I seem to remember
that only the alternate pairs of pins are used on the RX02's 40-way Berg.
Hmm, looking at the M7744 there seem to be 11 signal lines, so that idea's
not quite right. Time to dig out the print set, I think.
> AFAIK, you can set the DIP switches in an RX02 so that it behaves
> identically to the RX01. This shouldn't give any problems.
Yes, I've found the User Manual now, and it gives the DIP switch settings
for use with RXV21/RX211, RXV11/RX11/RX8E, and RX28.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Hi
I accumulted about 30+ compact macs in the recent months (128ks,512ks etc...).
I am in the process of restoring/fixing the most interesting ones...and keeping just maybe one of each model for my collection...
Really hate to throw this SE30 board in the garbage...
Just get a bunch of horizontal stripes.
Replaced all surface mount caps. Some had obviously leaked.
All ram good. Simm Rom good.
Putting board in other functionnal Se30 case still gives me horizontal stripes.
Next step is getting scope in there but I have no schematics.
Perhaps someone who has fixed a lot of these boards can point me to where most problems were.
Thanks for reading
Claude
Fellow compu-folks,
While I appreciate the advice given so far, NONE of it has addressed my
original question. Let me clarify a couple of things.
1). I already have a perfectly good hardware firewall/router in the form
of a Zyxel Prestige 312. I do NOT need to dedicate any other system to this
task.
2). My ORIGINAL question: Given the list of machines I posted earlier,
which system would be best suited to which function?
Here are my current thoughts on this.
Mail servers: Both SPARCClassics or a Classic and that accelerated IPX I
have.
(Future) Web server: The NEC RISCStation 2200. Plenty of headroom to grow
there.
The FTP/News box: One of the MicroVAX 3's. Lots of space up front for
large-capacity hard drives.
The maintenance node: That Motorola MVME147 tower.
Ok? Any counterpoints? Thanks much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77 (Extra class as of June-2K)
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates to me that it would be
superior to what I have now..." (Gym Z. Quirk, aka Taki Kogoma).
Fellow CLASSICCMP'ers and NetBSD Port-VAX'ers,
I've reached the point where I need to make some decisions, and I would
appreciate some insights from those who have obviously been computing since
before I figured out how to pull apart my first alarm clock. ;-)
I'm getting ready to create my own 'server farm' to place the
bluefeathertech.com domain on. My ultimate goal is to be dependent on Qwest
(or whoever my ISP ends up being in the long run) only for:
--The DSL line
--DNS support
--Usenet (and maybe not even that if I choose to set up a caching news
server locally).
I want to take responsibility for everything else, including:
--Two mail servers (primary and backup)
--A web server (already up and running since last summer)
--An FTP system that can do double-duty as a local caching Usenet server
with a LIMITED (less than 50) newsgroups (I don't have a terabyte storage
array). ;-)
--A "maintenance" server that can be dedicated to netbooting other
systems, if need be, and that will also serve as a central recording point
for logging from the other machines.
Everything will run a version of NetBSD as its OS. This is not negotiable.
With all this in mind, and considering I have numerous retired systems
available, I'm looking for suggestions on which platform to use for which
purpose. Here is what I have active now:
SPARC IPC (Local DNS, intranet only).
SPARCClassic, 32MB RAM, 1 gig disk -- Web server.
Here are the machines I have available that have yet to be put to use.
--SPARC IPX with the Weitek PowerSPARC upgrade CPU, 32MB RAM.
--At least one, possibly two more SPARCClassics, 32MB RAM each (both under
consideration for mail servers).
--NEC RISCServer 2200, dual CPUs, 64MB RAM (Under consideration for taking
over as web server at a future point).
--Two MicroVAX 3's, 32MB RAM each.
--DEC 3000/600 Alpha system, 128MB RAM (under consideration as a future
workstation).
--VAXServer 3100, 16MB RAM (can possibly go to 24).
--VAXStation 3100/M38, 16MB RAM (can possibly go to 24).
--ApplicationDEC dual-CPU 486 system, 16MB RAM.
--DEC 5000/200 MIPS box, RAM unknown.
--Motorola MVME147 tower system, RAM unknown (at least 8, possibly 16MB),
under consideration for the "maintenance" node mentioned earlier.
So..... which machine gets to do what? Any thoughts? I have enough SCSI
disks to give all the machines a minimum storage space of between 520MB-1
gig. I do have one 9-gig Seagate that I'm reserving for the FTP/Usenet box.
Thanks in advance.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77 (Extra class as of June-2K)
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates to me that it would be
superior to what I have now..." (Gym Z. Quirk, aka Taki Kogoma).
I've just got all my collection back out of storage and I'm hoping to get
my VT78 up and running after Christmas. It's not been used in about 10
years (before I got it), so obviously some care and testing is going to be
required first. And of course I have a "few" questions...
Is there anything in particular I should watch out for when I power it up?
I don't have the RX01 drives that originally came with it, but I do have
the connecting cable with a D-37 connector at the VT78 end and a DB-25 at
the other end (only 18 pins fitted). I also have a set of RX02s in the
adjacent rack, and I have the RX02 printset and manuals somewhere. I
assume I can set the RX02 (M7044) switches appropriately, and use that with
an appropriate adapter cable? Anyone know the relevant VT78 pinout?
Documentation: all I can find that's even vaguely relevant is the DECscope
User's manual, RX8/RX11 Floppy Disk System User's Manual, RX8/RX11 Floppy
Disk System Maintenance Manual, the OS/8 Software Support Manual, and a
FOCAL-GT/RT User's Manual. I have borrowed copies of the Small Computer
Handbook (that's the one for 8/e, 8/f and 8/m) and the PDP8/a Minicomputer
Handbook. I should have the RX02 User Manual somewhere too. What else am
I going to need, that's downloadable from the net?
I should have some 8" floppies, though I'm not sure what's on them becasuse
I've not actually found them yet :-) Is there anything I should try
downloading from the net?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
If you live in Austin several computers, printers, and monitors
are available for free. The location is just north of the intersection
of Burnet and Metric on Burnet. The stuff is located by the dumpster
behind the Compass Bank building. The computers are 386 and 486 and
were working when taken off line. The Monitors are VGA some are dim.
Most of the printers are in the dumpster. A few SCSI drives and cables
are also stacked by the dumpster. All are free if any thing is left
it will be trashed Sat afternoon. What you dont want can be taken to
Computer GoodWill on 183 or to "Computers-4Kids Thrift Store" on 2928
Manor Rd. in east Austin. The "Computers-4Kids" is also a good place
to pick up old computers.
Reuben
On Dec 22, 23:35, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> On Dec 22, 22:12, Chuck McManis wrote:
> >Personally if I were you I'd do my own DNS as well, especially if you're
> >going to be connected 24 x 7. So what you're doing is creating your own
> >"POP" (Point of Presence)
>
> I've got to agree here, while it's unlikely your ISP's DNS will fail,
> having your own should allow for faster access I would think.
I'm sure it will. If you don't want to run your own primary/secondary
yourself, at least run one on the mail server(s); it will make quite a
difference if you handle any volume of mail. That's why we run four:
primary, secondary, and one on each of staff and student mail servers.
> I see you've not mentioned a firewall, are you going to have all this
> sitting naked on the internet? I *STRONGLY* recommend a Firewall running
> OpenBSD!!!!!!!!!! Look at it this way, I'm a VMS type, not a BSD type,
and
> my firewall runs OpenBSD.
Definitely!
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net> said:
>"Nintendo floppy systems"
> A floppy system on a Nintendo? I've never heard of one. What were they
>used for? The only Nintendo devices that I've seen are the game machines
>and they use plug-in ROM cartridges.
In case this is not answered by the time I get the digest:
Before the NES, Nintendo developed a personal computer that (I believe)
only sold in Japan called the "FamiCom" or Family Computer.
It had a floppy disk system available for it. The drive was powered by
batteries and used a 3" yellow floppy that had the word NINTENDO embossed
on it. http://www.atarihq.com/tsr/fds/fds.html
Then the disk system was combined with the FamiCom to create the "Twin
FamiCom". http://www.atarihq.com/tsr/odd/scans/twinfamicom.html
I still have a couple FamiComs, a Twin FamiCom and a couple of the the
disk systems.
--Doug
===================================================
Doug Coward dcoward(a)pressstart.com (work)
Sr Software Engineer mranalog(a)home.com (home)
Press Start Inc. http://www.pressstart.com
Sunnyvale,CA
Visit the new Analog Computer Museum and History Center
at http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
===================================================
If anyone in the Minnetonka, Minnesota area is interested in the
possibility of an IBM Series/1 mainframe, please contact me privately. I
have a lead for you.
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
>On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Joe wrote:
> Some even reversed the +5 and +12vdc pin locations
>in the power connector. (Talk about a dirty trick!)
I did`nt check the pin location on a amstrad 3" externa
drive as I tried to install a 3.5" floppy drive in it.
Puff, the 3.5 floppy drive went up in smoke.
Jacob Dahl Pind
Public Pgp key available on request
--------------------------------------------------
= IF this computer is with us now... =
=...It must have been meant to come live with us.=
= (Belldandy - Goddess First class) =
--------------------------------------------------
Is anyone familar with the 3" floppy drives? Is that what these
"http://www.intellistar.net/~rigdonj/misc/3-inch.jpg" are? I pulled them
out of a Loral 1553 bus analyzer. As you can see from the photo, a standard
3.5" floppy disk is too large for them. Do these use the same interface as
the 3.5" drives? How many tracks do these support? Does anyone have a
couple of 3" disks that they're willing to part with?
Joe
On December 21, Aaron Nabil wrote:
> If I can offer advise, use the proxy system. Enter the amount maximum
> amount you are willing to pay. You have absolutely, irrevocably defused
> ANY danger of sniping.
If the item is commonly available through other sources, sure, I
agree. But lots of stuff on eBay isn't. Rare is the "one of a kind"
item, but if I see something that I've been looking for for years on
eBay, my definition of "maximum" is a very subjective thing...and may
have nothing to do with the "street value" of the item...it has more
to do with how badly I want it, and how much trouble I'd have to go
through to get it elsewhere.
A good example of this is classic computers. Despite living in an
area where there's either a three-letter agency or a DRMO warehouse on
every street corner, PDP stuff (for example) is VERY difficult to find
where I live. I'd pay several hundred bucks for a pdp11/34a in a
heartbeat on eBay. Why? Because I've been looking for one for a LONG
time and only recently got one locally by pure luck and the sharp eye
of a good friend. You guys who are swimming in them may think I'm
nuts...but you HAVE them. Get it?
In other words, two points...One, sniping is an essential technique for
non-mainstream items (in any category) on eBay, if your goal is to get
the item. Two, the definition of "non-mainstream" frequently differs
>from person to person.
-Dave McGuire
Hello all!
I'm a proud owner of two 102's and I just found a VT-100 (sans keyboard) and
all of them have the same cosmetic problem ie. they're yellow. Different
shades of yellow, one is mildly yellow, one is dark yellow etc.
So, can anyone tell what was the original color (of the case, in case you
didn't figure that out from my pretty poor English) in either approximated
terms ("eye blinding white") or in something like Pantone:)
I'd like to paint one of those VT's to get it as close as possible to the
original color (I know you were thinking about flames and stuff when you saw
the subject line. I did) I just don't know the correct shade.
Re: computers and movies
I think that Terminator II had a big bunch of HP 7925's blown up, they
were those dishwasher sized disk drives. And WarGames had a couple
of Televideo 950's (VT-100 like case but narrower). Does anyone know
anything about the vector graphics used for big screens in the war room ?
--
jht
I have at least 50 pounds of 486/ISA stuff, including a DX4/120, an
AMD 586/133, four motherboards, a chassis, about 20 1M memory modules,
sound cards, network cards, 4 VLB video cards (#9, C&T, Trident, etc,
several 2 meg), as well as some tape drives and a CD or two available to
whoever wants to pick them up in Santa Monica. You must take the whole
lot. No, not all of it is 10 years old. I'm just cleaning out the
closet, and my hands are just too scarred from dealing with VLB
insertion/extraction.
I know this is off-topic due to lack of age, but maybe since the
company no longer exists (<sigh>), maybe it can be sortof ontopic
Does anyone happen to know how compatible parts are between the
Digital Hinote VP (TS31D) and another Digital Hinote VP(-535, TS30G)?
I need to replace the battery, disk, cdrom and floppy for a TS30G
and I have the opportunity to buy a TS31D...
Thanks in advance...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg KB1FCA |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
On December 22, Aaron Nabil wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand how your "very subjective maximum" at all alters
> my assertion that using the proxy system entirely sidesteps the problem
> of snipers. I think it is safe to say that the "maximum you are willing
> to pay" is ALWAYS very subjective.
>
> How does bidding your maximum via the proxy system fail to defuse
> snipers just becuase the item is rare?
Because bidding via the proxy system means bidding your maximum ONCE.
Over the course of several days during an auction, due to new
information, new finds, other competing auctions etc etc, my "maximum"
may change from moment to moment.
Think of it as a cop-out...it's sometimes REALLY difficult to come
up with a good "maximum value" and stick to it. If I want something
badly enough, who knows!
-Dave McGuire
Fedron is great. I have been using it for years. You can find it at a copier
repair place. It works wonders with feed rollers but will dissolve some
plastics so you want to be careful.
Copier places buy it by the gallon. I just take a small bottle to them and
buy like 1/2 a pint. You want a glass bottle with a good seal, it is highly
volatile.
A little goes a long way. I use a cotton cloth, dip a corner in the bottle
and apply sparingly. Rotate the roller against the cloth. It works on inkjet
feed rollers along with laser printer feed rollers. It has been a long time
but I think I even used it on typewriter platen rollers, first cleaning them
with alcohol to strip the ink. I usually do it outside, I don't like solvents
in the house.
Fedron works very well. I have no idea who makes it.
Paxton
Portland, OR
On Dec 22, 0:03, Neil Cherry wrote:
> Mike Ford wrote:
> >
> > Any opinions on "rubber rejuvinent"? I want to give all my printers a
once
> > over during the holidays, and I've heard this stuff is just the ticket
for
> > lazy pickup rollers etc. Web searchs have shown a couple different
aerosol
> > products, but I think it also comes in bottles. Tomorrow I do some
local
> > hunting at a couple big electronics parts stores. Anybody have
experience,
> > or preferences?
>
> If you find something that works let me know my 550C has the same
problem.
In the printing industry, Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK) is used to deep-clean
ink rollers and "blankets" on offset litho machines. It's a powerful ink
solvent, and also causes rubber to swell very slightly, so it removes the
glaze you sometimes get, and lifts the dents you get in the blanket as a
result of a paper smash[1]. MEK works well on pickup rollers, and it
doesn't harm the ozone layer. However, like many solvents, it does
dissolve some common plastics (polystyrene, ABS, PVC, etc) and paint; it
also leaches the oils and fats from your skin, so don't wash in it :-) Not
for too long, anyway. It's also flammable. However, it's much safer than
benzene, xylol, etc. It's a relative of acetone (nail varnish remover) and
you can get it from print suppliers (they may call it something like
blanket rejuvenator, and charge extra), lab suppliers, etc. Put some on a
cloth and wipe the roller with it. I've used it on lots of printer
rollers, and the carriages of daisywheel and dotmatrix printers.
You don't really want to use anything that is a good solvent for rubber or
rubber cement as that will end up distorting the roller or making it gummy
and ultimately leave you worse off.
[1] In an offset litho press, the image is transferred from an image
"plate" -- a very thin sheet of metal or plastic wrapped round a large drum
-- to a rubber "blanket", also wrapped round a large drum. From there, the
image is transferred to the paper. If a sheet of paper gets crumpled in
the press, it makes dents in the blanket, which then fails to pick up ink
>from the plate in the low spots. This is called a "paper smash" or a
"blanket smash".
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
In a message dated 12/21/2000 6:54:03 PM Pacific Standard Time,
rigdonj(a)intellistar.net writes:
> I have to take a look at the CPU on this one but I'm pretty sure that
> these don't use the DEC CPU. The model that uses the DEC CPU is a Tek 8560
> or somrthing like that. I have one of them too but It's not here so I can't
> check the model number.
>
Joe is right. It is the 85XXs that used the DEC cards. I have had several of
both. The 8540, 8550 & 8560 were Tektronix Microcomputer Development Labs.
The 8540 hosted emulator/debugers and interfaced to VAX 780s. The 8560s were
more stand alone and had an 11/23 processor. The 8561 was the Software
Developing Unit and worked in combination with the integration emulator 85XX
unit and a logic analyzer.
To quote the 1984 Tek catalog, the 8561 had an 11/23 processor, 256K of Ram,
13.5 MB of HD, 1 Meg floppy (8"), 2 user ports and 2 printer ports. It could
be upgraded to 8 users, 35.6 Meg of HD and 1 Meg of ram. It ran TNIX.
The 8002 that Joe has is earlier and had been discontinued by '84.
When Tek had their big Ross Dove auction here I got a truckload of this
stuff. Includes were several 8002s and their associated Dual 8" floppy disk
drive units, 8003s? The cards in these reminded me of overgrown S100 cards
but they were tek's own. Stupidly I let my partner scrap them, not realizing
it is the first units that are the ones to save. These date to the late
1970s. It reminded me of a 12 slot? S100 buss machine. The cards were about
the same width but taller than S100 cards. I think the architecture was
different but I never investigated.
I am sorry, Joe, but I don't think I have anything left of that vintage, but
I sure remember them.
Paxton
Portland, OR
Mike Ford <mikeford(a)socal.rr.com> wrote:
> Any opinions on "rubber rejuvinent"? I want to give all my printers a once
> over during the holidays, and I've heard this stuff is just the ticket for
> lazy pickup rollers etc. Web searchs have shown a couple different aerosol
> products, but I think it also comes in bottles. Tomorrow I do some local
> hunting at a couple big electronics parts stores. Anybody have experience,
> or preferences?
Back in the 1980s the HP CEs used to carry a bottle of something
called Fedron that was very aromatic and good at making rubber
printer rollers just grabby enough to pull paper through.
It was so good I figure it caused the hole in the ozone layer
and that's why you can't find it any more.
Lately I've turned up (at Fry's, surprisingly enough) a 100ml bottle
of something differently aromatic called Rubber Renue. It's from
M. G. Chemicals <URL:http://www.mgchemicals.com> and is their catalog
number 408A-100ml. It seems to have made the rubber pads on the
supply reel fingers in one of my HP 88780 drives a bit more grabby
than they were, which was desired. I haven't tried it on printers
yet.
Fair warning, wherever you use this stuff will be pungent for a couple
of days if the ventilation isn't good. It doesn't smell bad to me but
your tastes may differ, and it's an eye/skin/lung irritant as well as
flammable. Chemical contents are claimed to be dimethylbenzene
(CAS#1330-20-7) and methyl salicylate (CAS#119-36-8).
-Frank McConnell
On December 21, healyzh(a)aracnet.com wrote:
> I believe there is a brand called something like "Rubber Renews It", our ex
> printer/plotter guy absolutly swore by the stuff. Unfortunatly he retired
> last week after about 21 years of doing the job, it was *scarry* how much he
> knew about printers!
I think it's "Rubber ReNu"...I saw that stuff work once, years
ago...it was amazing. Haven't been able to find it, though.
If anyone comes across a supplier, please let me know...I'd love to
add a bottle of that stuff to my bag of tricks.
-Dave McGuire
Sorry for the spam... I'm setting up a new firewall, and I'm having
trouble convincing sendmail.cf to do what I want.... Cross your
fingers...
clint
PS You'll only see this if it works, not the many trys that didn't
work :)
On December 19, Ernest wrote:
> I have a very low opinion of bid snipers. They're like the proverbial "bad
> apples" that spoil it for everyone. I believe that most new bidders on ebay
> go into it with honest intentions but they (like me) learn quickly that a
> last second bid sniper will likely ruin the joy for them. Bid sniping is a
...
I think you're missing the point...the notion of "it's not whether
you win or lose, it's how you play the game" is something that parents
say to their children to stop them from crying when they lose. It has
nothing to do with eBay.
For buyers, eBay is a venue for getting things that they want. For
sellers, it's a venue for getting rid of things they don't want. It's
not there for "enjoyment" or "fun" or anything of the sort. If
there's something on eBay that you want, the effort (and money) that
you expend to get it is determined by how badly you want the item.
It's really as simple as that.
Ernest, as a frequent sniper, I sincerely apologize to you on behalf
of other snipers for ruining your experiences. But please try to see
it from the other side...it's a means to an end, it's nothing
personal.
-Dave McGuire
On December 21, Tony Duell wrote:
> > Does anyone have one of these or is anyone familar with them? I just
>
> I have something similar.
>
> The box with the floppy drive(s) (or maybe a Micropolis 1200 hard disk in
> place of one of the floppies) is essentially a PDP11. There's a real DEC
> CPU card (normally an PDP11/03, sometimes an 11/23) CPU card in there,
> along with special Tektronix cards containing RAM, boot ROMs, disk
> controller, serial ports, etc. The backplane has one normal DEC Q-bus
> slot for the CPU and some Tektronix slots for the other cards.
What?? REALLY? Damn, I passed up one at a hamfest this past
summer. I really regret it now. That sounds like a really neat
system. I had no idea Tek embedded DEC processors in their
development systems.
-Dave McGuire
I'm trying to put together some pages on the VAX and have put them up under
my computers section
<http://www.mcmanis.com/chuck/computers>. One of the pages is a pricing
guide for VAXen :-) Now that should start an interesting discussion :-)
--Chuck
Does anyone have one of these or is anyone familar with them? I just
picked one up last week. I dug through my odds and ends and found a couple
of manuals for it and several boxs of TekDOS operating system disks with
the Z-80 assembler and software. I scanned a picture of the system from
one of the manuals at
"http://www.intellistar.net/~rigdonj/tek/tek8002.jpg". The two pieces that
I have are shown at the top right.
Joe
Hi
I posted free/trade DEC stuff not too long ago. I had a taker for a DEC
cdrom now I have a LA100 mainboard that will go in garbage soon if I get
no replies. No idea if it works. Complete and looks ok. I have no idea
if it's worth anything...not familiar with DEC stuff...
Free for shipping cost from Montreal, Canada. Expect $3-5US approx.
Claude
An unsolicited e-mail I received today:
>From: "evan stickney" <estickney(a)hotmail.com>
>To: jfoust(a)threedee.com
>Subject: vax
>Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:18:57 -0500
>
>Some DEC stuff I have for sale.
Dear Sirs;
We have the following items for sale in Central Ohio:
Digital LP26 printer
DEC writer
VAX 11/750
TU80 tape drive
RA60 disk unit/ RA 61 module
DF03 modem
VT125 terminal
(5) RA 60 disk media
23 DEC tape II cartridges
64 tape cartridges with DEC software titles
4 Hammermill Paper boxes of documentation
(27) B-300-600 ribbons
I realize some of these items are bulky or in excess of 300 lbs.
I will consider parting out larger units since many people just
need pieces to keep theirs running. Software/documentation
titles on request. I think that the tapes are good but have
no way of checking.
On Dec 21, 17:00, Sean Caron wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <LFessen106(a)aol.com>
> To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 4:09 PM
> Subject: Re: Old SGI's?!
>
>
> > << Hmm, I dunno about reputable, I called them to try and sell them
this
> > stupid
> > origin 200 I have an the guy was a total ass.. he asked me if the
stupid
> > thing was stolen.. what a moron
> > >>
> >
> > I looked at their "reasonable" prices.. *Not*.
> I guess it's all relative. Granted, SGI systems are workstations, and if
> you're
> looking to purchase stuff from a reseller, it's going to be rather
expensive
> any way you go, because they're generally geared to the sort of clientele
> that will purchase and pay larger amounts of money for workstations and
> workstation parts. It's hard to keep this in mind sometimes when we are
> so used to getting equipment for free or extremely cheaply, but sometimes
> there's that part that we just really don't have much choice for.
>
> I didn't mean to point anyone in the "wrong" direction. I was just
> suggesting
> them as they certainly have the parts, and I personally have had nothing
but
> positive experiences with them in the past.
I second Sean's point of view. I've dealt with Reputable, as have a few of
my friends, and we've always found them helpful. The prices are
reasonable, especially compared to others (including private sellers) in
the workstation market. If you don't like them, you could try negotiating.
Will, any reasonable reseller will check the provenance of something like
an O200 -- not the sort of thing you usually find privately owned.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
I just would like to say that I'm not saying that Reputable is necessarily a
bad place, only that my experience with them did not exactly make me happy.
I just don't appreciate people implying that I might have stolen a computer,
that's all...
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
On December 21, Sean Caron wrote:
> > I looked at their "reasonable" prices.. *Not*.
>
> I guess it's all relative. Granted, SGI systems are workstations, and if
> you're
> looking to purchase stuff from a reseller, it's going to be rather expensive
> any way you go, because they're generally geared to the sort of clientele
> that will purchase and pay larger amounts of money for workstations and
> workstation parts. It's hard to keep this in mind sometimes when we are
> so used to getting equipment for free or extremely cheaply, but sometimes
> there's that part that we just really don't have much choice for.
>
> I didn't mean to point anyone in the "wrong" direction. I was just
> suggesting
> them as they certainly have the parts, and I personally have had nothing but
> positive experiences with them in the past.
I second this voice of support for Greg at reputable.com. I've had
nothing but positive experiences with him as well, and his prices
*are* reasonable...if you keep in mind the fact that he is a RESELLER,
not a surplus organization or a college equipment dump, and he deals
with lots of large corporations.
It's like dealing with Black Box. You'll never get the best price
>from them...but when you're in a pinch, what you need will always be
on your doorstep before you wake up the next morning.
-Dave McGuire
Today I picked up a HP 3000 980/100 at auction for $45. Still have not
unloaded it yet need a way to get it off the van, they loaded it with a
forklift. I just have the cpu no monitor or keyboard. Anyone have
spec's on this unit.
John Keys
Perhaps a quickie for the classic 'calc types amongst us:
Just acquired a Frieden 132 Electronic Calculator, and while it appears to
function, the screen display is somewhat distorted. It appears to be
overscanning and a bit to the dim side.
So, any common POF on this one?
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
Note: the 'computergarage.org' domain is currently offline. The original
'Garage' site (URL above) is still out there and is currently being updated.
On Dec 21, 10:57, Mark Green wrote:
> On Dec 21, 12:27, LFessen106(a)aol.com wrote:
> > Neither one has a KB, Mouse or Monitor, and although a decent SVGA
works
> > fine, I can't for the life of me find the KB/Mouse for these anywhere
(they
> > have the ps2 style connector, but are *not* ps2 compatable).
Mark has answered that. All I will add is that (apart from the PS/2
keytboards and mice used on Indigo^2, Indy, O2, and later) keyboards for
different 4D machines and original Indigos differ only in the plug fitted.
You could try Greg Douglas at www.reputable.com or Doug Mashek (look in the
comp.sys.sgi.* newsgroups; you'll find them).
> > from one to the other? I read somewhere there was a prom command to
> > duplicate hard drives???
Not exactly. If the drives have *exactly the same* geometry (you can check
this by using the standalone fx command that may be included in partition
8) then you can use cp from the prom to copy the entire disk. Otherwise,
format (only if necessary!), label, and partition the drive (using fx,
either from the prom or IRIX) then do a mkfs on it, and finally you can use
tar to copy one filesystem to another. IRIX tar -- at least in 5.3 and
possibly in 4.0.x -- is smart enough to "do the right thing" for entries in
/dev.
> > Is there someone on the list willing to part with an old copy of Irix?
These
> > machines will only run up to 5.0.3 I think.
Up to 5.3; I don't think there is a 5.0.3. 5.3 came on CDs, so start
looking for a SCSI CD-ROM that can be fixed in hardware to do 512-byte
blocks. Older Toshibas are excellent for this. Some Apple, Sun and DEC
CD-ROM drives may work too -- there's a document at
ftp://viz.tamu.edu/pub/sgi about this (and lots more).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
<< Hmm, I dunno about reputable, I called them to try and sell them this
stupid
origin 200 I have an the guy was a total ass.. he asked me if the stupid
thing was stolen.. what a moron
>>
I looked at their "reasonable" prices.. *Not*.
On December 21, Eric J. Korpela wrote:
> > . I'd pay several hundred bucks for a pdp11/34a in a
> > heartbeat on eBay. Why? Because I've been looking for one for a LONG
> > time [...]
>
> I don't think this invalidates the point Aaron made. In fact it validates
> it. Enter several hundred bucks for your maximum and you won't have to
> snipe. If it goes above that, well, it was more than you were willing to
> pay. What's the problem? If you are disappointed you didn't get it, then
> you apparently didn't have your maximum set high enough.
You do have a point there, I must admit.
> That's usually not the goal of sniping. The goal of sniping is to get the
> item for less that you think others would be willing to pay. Then again
> if they really had entered their maximum, the technique wouldn't work. The
> problem is that most people really don't think through what their maximum is
> and are willing to change their "maximum" several times over the course of
> the week.
This is a VERY good point. If one is doing it for business, say,
buying and selling Ciscos, it's easy to attach a dollar figure to an
item. But when I do a search for "pdp* -plasma", it's sometimes
difficult to figure out how much money something is worth to me.
Often it even varies with my mood!
> I usually bid my maximum right away. I'm never disappointed because someone
> else was willing to pay more, because I am unwilling to pay more. Sniping
> really doesn't buy you anything but the satisfaction of knowing you've paid
> more than you were originally willing to.
I assume you mean "less"?
-Dave McGuire
Hmm, I dunno about reputable, I called them to try and sell them this stupid
origin 200 I have an the guy was a total ass.. he asked me if the stupid
thing was stolen.. what a moron
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Do you still have the TK50s for sale?
Ron Thompson
Calibration / Integration Specialist
EFW, Inc.
4700 Marine Creek Pkwy.
Fort Worth, TX 76179
rthompson(a)efw.com
On December 21, Ernest wrote:
> Oh, I know. Getting mugged isn't personal either, it's just a means to an
> end.
Oh good grief.
> ...and like every fantasy, most of learn at a young age that there will
> always be someone to ruin it for us. That's why snipping is self
> perpetuating -if you know that there's going to be a jerk at the end no
> matter what you do, the jerk might as well be you. Thus, the snipping
> continues.
Oh good grief, again.
Let me guess...do you actually BELIEVE that "it's not whether you
win or lose, it's how you play the game"??
The world is an unfair place. Either deal with it, or go see a
shrink. It's really as simple as that. I'm not going to give up my
favorite shopping venue because some idealistic fool wants to turn it
into some form of K-12 entertainment.
-Dave McGuire
On December 20, Doug Salot wrote:
> Personally, I find sniping inconvenient because to do it well requires
> third-party software -- it should be built into the system. But it's just
No it doesn't...all you need is a web browser. NOBODY'S
connectivity is so bad that you can't get a URL out on a TCP
connection in less than a few seconds...
-Dave McGuire
On December 21, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> But do the end justify the means? I have also found it an unpleasurable
> experience to lose something which I have put a bid on in some cases several
> weeks ago, only to be outbid at the very last minute, possibly when I'm at
> school or fast asleep. In a real-life auction, there are the three rounds in
> which you may increase your bid, giving everyone a fair chance. On Ebay, the
> auctions do instead go on for weeks, and jumping in at the very end of this
> time frame is really quite dishonest. Some play with their cards on the table,
> whereas the snipers literally rip the thing out of your hands. It's really
> annoying, and and example of very bad behaviour. Perhaps the reason why
> anarchy doesn't work very well.
While I do agree, and I admit that this is no excuse, I must point
out that a *lot* of people snipe. It boils down to this...if you want
a particular item, either snipe...or be sniped.
People need to stop comparing eBay to a "regular" or "real life" (what
exactly is "real life"?) auction. While eBay calls itself an
"auction", it is very different from what is traditionally known as an
auction. That's just the way it is. If you think this is a good
thing, so be it. If you think it ISN'T a good thing...well, don't use
it! As long as eBay has many happy buyers and many happy sellers (I
happen to be both!) it will do fine...and anything that has happy
followers will always have a group of people with sour grapes who do
nothing but complain about things.
-Dave McGuire
Can anyone tell me what kind of computers were in the movie "Colossus the
Forbin Project (1969)". I found a pointer and I vaguely remember the movie,
but I don't remember the computers. U.S. and Russia develop computers to
control nuclear weapons, the computers take over.
http://www.stanford.edu/~mgritter/colossus.html
Mike
mmccfadden(a)cmh.edu
On December 19, Jim Arnott wrote:
> Snipe software??? Available for a Mac? If so, where?
Uhh, ftp.netscape.com?
The only thing one needs for effective sniping is a web browser,
good connectivity, and perhaps an alarm clock.
Some tips, from one of the most effective snipers I know (ME!):
- Use the "sign in" feature...saves keystrokes when bidding.
- Use two windows side-by-side: one on the main auction page,
keep hitting "reload" to watch the countdown; one with a
pre-prepared bid ready to hit "place bid". Scroll this one
up a lot to minimize mouse movement distance to hit the button.
- If you think another sniper is watching, it doesn't hurt to have
another pre-prepared bid window ready to hit "place bid" but with
a higher amount. Keep it iconified and out of the way, but
keep it accessible.
- Bid odd amounts...not $150.00, but $156.56. Shift to the high side
of ones or cents. Often people will bid even amounts like
$150.00 or slightly higher like $150.01.
- Keep a running idea of network lag between you & eBay as you hit
"reload" on your main auction page watching the countdown. Use
this information when placing your bid.
- The faster your connectivity (actually its more the latency that
counts, but faster connectivity usually means lower-latency
connectivity) the better off you are. I usually shoot for the
last 3-4 seconds of the auction.
- Know the "deep pockets" bidders. People like "at90210",
"dimethyl", and "shirotori"...these folks have more money than
all of us put together, and have no qualms with spending it
to keep you from getting what you want if you piss them off.
Don't snipe the big spenders, or you'll never win an auction
again. It's as simple as that.
- Know who your friends are. If you find yourself constantly
coming up against the same person on stuff, send him or her
some email. Get to know the other person. Try to form some
sort of working relationship that facilitates communication
on a per-auction basis. Decide amongst yourselves who wants
or needs the item more. Concede once in a while. It's better
to have friends than enemies...and sometimes those friends
spot things that you may have missed.
Is sniping morally wrong? I dunno, ask a priest. Is it rude?
Definitely. But there are SO many people who do it, screw it. If you
snipe someone and can't live with yourself afterwards, then don't
snipe anymore. But if you're sick of BEING sniped, or of simply not
winning the auctions that you want to win, then go for it. It's a
cold, cruel world out there.
-Dave McGuire
> Anybody know where I can find a MACLISP reference manual?
>
> (BTW, In this case, MAC refers to Project MAC (Multiple
> Access Computer?), and not the cute little box from Cupertino).
I have a copy of Bernie Greenburg's MacLisp manual.
However, due to an on-going problem in which I sent my
DECsystem-10 Commands Manual to Eric Smith for copying,
and due to the fact that despite his best intentions,
I still have not received it back, I'm a bit reluctant
to let it out of my grasp for scanning.
I'd photocopy it, but it's already a third generation
copy, I think, so I'm not sure how well it would turn
out. I'll bring it in to the office and give it a try...
However, if anyone could get Eric Smith to actually
get me my DEC manual back, I'd feel a little safer in
letting it go.
Bear in mind I consider Eric to honest and forthright,
he's clearly just spreading himiself a little too thinly.
But when things like this happen in transactions with
people I meet in a public forum, I'm just unable to
bring myself to take a chance again... conditionally.
Regardless, if it looks like it will copy OK, I'll
just send you a copy.
Regards,
-doug q
The Pro 325, 350 and the 380s use the same case which is about 3 inches wider
than the Rainbows. The Pro series can be upgraded by just swapping the
Motherboards. They also have an interior upright cardcage for the accessory
cards. I think this is why they need the larger case.
In the Rainbow the accessory cards lay parallel and on top of the Motherboard.
Both use different floor stands that look alike but are different sizes.
Paxton
I can be 100% certain that my Pro 325 is in the large case (same length as
the desktop BA23 pretty much). And the Rainbow and Pro 350 that I have seen
were in the same size case.. I dunno if I saw a 380 or not, but if Emanuel
has one then I've seen it and it would live in the same case also... If
anyone has manuals and software for the 325 let me know, I have none and am
about to deepsix it due to frustration.
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
In case anyone has never heard this before:
http://vortex.com/rmf/daisy.ram
Bell Labs IBM 7094 Sings Daisy
Requires RealPlayer, which sucks horrifically.
***
Does anyone know of a way to download and save streaming RM files and then
convert them to another format?
***
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
I have a TU10 that has worked, generally, for the 10 years since I got
it. However, earlier this year it failed, with problems during the load
sequence.
I have traced the problem to failed (and nearly failed) vacuum
sensors. The two "fail safe" sensors at the bottom of the two columns had
both failed (I suspect because during operation they were always in a low
pressure state), and one of the other sensors near the bottom of one column
had also failed. I suspect at least one more failure is imminent.
(The test is easy: if you can suck air thru it, its bad. ;-) I suppose
there is some kind of diaphragm in there which gets a hole it in when it
breaks).
I was able to pull some from a DG tape drive, but clearly I need either
find a good supply of good ones, a supply of equivalents, or learn how to
repair the buggers (seems unlikely).
I have two different (presumably equivalent part numbers) for it:
The original part is:
Fairchild P/N PSF 100A
Another (probably replacement) is:
Micro Pneumatic Logic, P/N MPL 503. (These guys still exist! So I am
sending them an e-mail. But new ones are bound to be pricey).
Thanks in advance for any help.
Jay
---
Jay R. Jaeger The Computer Collection
cube1(a)home.com visit http://members.home.net/thecomputercollection