On Sep 10, 14:30, John Rollins wrote:
> >Those would be DEC MMJ ports...
>
> What's an MMJ?
It stands for Modified Modular Jack. DEC took a standard RJ12 plug and
moved the position of the latch off to one side.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Like most of you, I sat around most of Tuesday watching/listening
to the news, but mostly being unable to concentrate on work.
I needed to do something, so I created a small graphic (I'm definitely
not a graphic designer, but I got the proportions reasonably correct)
of a US flag at half mast and will be using it on my web sites as a
remembrance of today's tragedy. If you'd like to do the same:
http://www.webhighrise.com/halfmast.jpg
While IBM, HP, Dec, Intel, Microsoft, and a cast of thousands have
been duking it out for the past 31-3/4 years, UNIX time() (ref: man 3 time)
has been steadily plodding along and has quietly ticked past 1 billion seconds
within the last day or so.
>So... what are the most outstanding examples of classic systems whose
>timekeeping mechanisms have withstood the passage of time (including any
>that would have if they were still running today)?
Big Ben in London? :-p
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
That hits home.
I had a some email exchanges with Tim a couple of years
ago when I discovered his site and sorted through some of
the disk images he had online.
A great guy, and truly a great loss.
At 09:42 PM 9/11/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Today Tim Olmstead passed away from a battle with cancer.
>A great loss.
>
>For those less familiar with his efforts for the classic computer
>community the _Unofficial CP/M Web_ site is his effort.
>
>For me I lost a friend and someone that shared the love of a system
>he could totally understand to the very hardware and bits that made
>it run.
>
>Allison
>
>
>
In a message dated 09/11/2001 14:25:22, you wrote:
>I think he is in Florida with Dave Mcguire and Brian Hechinger rescuing some
>
>machines.
>
> Zach
yes, they are due back today or tomorrow - hopefully tomorrow.
To all of you over there:
I can?t describe what I felt when having heard those bad news an seen the
first pictures... Tears are in my and many German eyes feeling with everyone
injured or the people who have lost relatives or friends... As my English is
not very good I?m not going to try to say more. Words are missings for those
feelings...
Thomas
(from Germany)
In a message dated 9/11/2001 11:18:39 AM Central Daylight Time,
DAW(a)yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu writes:
>
> >>
>> Of course the intelligence community is busy evacuating their buildings so
>> it can't be reached. How they're going to do their jobs is another
>> mystery.
>>
>>
>>
>
> You do know that they have a second HQ hidden in a mountain somewhere...
>
yea, my brother said mount weather's going to get used now...
The second plane was confirmed to be a 767, not a 737...
Please contact the Red Cross to donate blood...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Chad Fernandez [mailto:fernande@internet1.net]
! Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:00 AM
! To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
! Subject: Re: OT: World Trade crash...
!
!
! How big is a 737? I didn't think an airplane would do that much
! damage. The Empire State building has been hit before, by accident,
! although, it prpbably wasn't a direct hit.
!
! I see it on TV, However. I'm stunned, really.
!
! Chad Fernandez
! Michigan, USA
!
! David Woyciesjes wrote:
! >
! > I take it you all heard about the two 737s (?) hitting the
! world trade
! > buildings...
! > one was possibly a hijacked airliner... each hit a seperate tower, I
! > believe...
! >
! > --- David A Woyciesjes
! > --- C & IS Support Specialist
! > --- Yale University Press
! > --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
! > --- (203) 432-0953
! > --- ICQ # - 905818
!
Dan (the moderator) is right. All of our prayers go to all those involved
and hurt...
Let's keep the mailing lists on topic now.
I'll keep updating this page as I can.
http://pages.cthome.net/squeege/wtrade/updates.html
Hit refresh every once in a while...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:Expresso@snip.net]
! Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:00 PM
! To: AlphaNT Mailing List
! Subject: [alphant] Moderator note
!
!
!
! OK, folks, we know what the main details are: One World
! Trade Center tower is
! completely gone, the other is at least half gone
!
! David Woiciesjes up at Yale University Press is
! maintaining a low-bandwidth
! text site with up-to-the-minute info:
! http://pages.cthome.net/squeege/wtrade/updates.html
!
! Let's use the lists for what it's for, OK?
!
! God Bless,
! Dan
!
!
! [DAW(a)yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu] This is a posting from the
! AlphaNT Mailing List. To unsubscribe, forward this message
! (Including these lines) to:
! <unsub-AlphaNT(a)lyris.sunbelt-software.com>. List Charter and
! FAQ at: <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/alphant-list_charter.htm>
!
> Yuck,
> I am already seeing mild racism from people that I run into on the
> street, aimed towards people of middle eastern descent (hey look! theres a
> terrorist, etc.), this is a tradgedy, and I am not looking forward to how
> this country reacts.
I encountered a woman with her head covered, as the Muslim women
>from the Balkans wear... I smiled and nodded my head, an attempt
at demonstrating that at least some Americans retain their civility
during such trying times as these...
-dq
> >I asked about PL/I not being included in the Hobbyist licensing program and
> >was told that was because Compaq no longer owns PL/I. I guess APL isn't in
> >the Hobbyist license set as that hasn't been a deliverable for a long time.
> >Does anyone know when it was last included in the ConDist sets? If so I
> >can look for it. I have several year's worth of ConDist CDs but have lost
> >the paperwork that listed the included products.
>
> The first disk of every ConDist has the all paperwork on it as postscript
> and text files. You can print it out again if you lose it :-) I believe the
> '94 and '96 ConDists both have APL on them.
Yes, but having someone point to the set saves me having to go through all
my sets looking at the first CD. I'll check my '96 set.
> >Of course a PAK generator solves the problem of missing PAKs quite nicely.
>
> Yes it does, however I am dearly afraid that with HP and Compaq doing the
> dance that the lore of such things will be permanently lost at some point.
> If Compaq would just say "screw it, the next time someone requests a
> license give them a non-expiring one." my heart would rest easier...
Do you mean you are worried the Hobbyist program will go away?
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
This is from Sridhar...
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Absurdly Obtuse [mailto:vance@ikickass.org]
! Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:17 PM
! To: David Woyciesjes
! Cc: NetBSD/Vax Mail List (E-mail); NetBSD/Sparc Mail List (E-mail)
! Subject: RE: Sridhar?
!
!
!
! I worked for some years for 3DG in the World Trade Center. I
! left about a
! year ago to join IBM. I have lost friends and colleagues
! there, that I
! know, love, and respect. I lost my former secretary.
! Luckily the office
! hadn't started up operations for the day yet, so the majority
! of the staff
! wasn't there. My brother was in the World Trade Center a
! mere two hours
! before the attack. He was back in midtown at that time. He
! is fine. My
! cousin works at 112 Wall St., and he's also fine. I count my
! blessings.
! I pray for the souls of my absent friends.
!
! Peace... Sridhar
!
! On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, David Woyciesjes wrote:
!
! > ! -----Original Message-----
! > ! From: Sellam Ismail [mailto:foo@siconic.com]
! > !
! > ! Sridhar I believe worked in a financial capacity somewhere in
! > ! Manhattan.
! > ! I hope I'm wrong. Has anyone heard from him or know if he's OK?
! > !
! > ! I realize it's probably impossible to get any sort of
! > ! communications in or
! > ! out of that part of the city right now.
!
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Taliban Regime ambassador on Pakistan has said that they
don't have any relation with this terrorist act.
He told too that Bin Laden it's not implied in the attack.
Yasir Arafat, in absolute shock state, has manifested its
condenation of the attack and its solidarity with the american people.
Hundreds of Palestinians are celebrating the attack in the streets
of the Occupied Territories in Palestina/Israel.
France are in National Emergency State.
Spain has reunited its basic crisis cabinet, compound by the
Security Minister, the Defense Minister and the Prime Minister
Cabinet Minister.
One political analyst here speaks about the impossible capacity
of any Medium Orient organization about organize one thing like
this.
I appoint, by my side, that this matter is equal to the end of the
movie "The Fight Club" of David Fincher. And has one strange
smell to anti-globalization, appoints another analyst.
That's what we know about the matter here in Spain.
All my condolences to all the victims, sincerely. Like we know
well in my country, ANY terrorism is ansolutely SHIT.
Regards
Sergio
Sridhar I believe worked in a financial capacity somewhere in Manhattan.
I hope I'm wrong. Has anyone heard from him or know if he's OK?
I realize it's probably impossible to get any sort of communications in or
out of that part of the city right now.
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Sellam Ismail [mailto:foo@siconic.com]
!
! Sridhar I believe worked in a financial capacity somewhere in
! Manhattan.
! I hope I'm wrong. Has anyone heard from him or know if he's OK?
!
! I realize it's probably impossible to get any sort of
! communications in or
! out of that part of the city right now.
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
"Bob Stek" <r.stek(a)snet.net> said:
> If it provides motivation for one of you hardware types with nothing
> better to do, I'd lend my support to requesting an add-in card which
> could handle the 10 and 16 hole 5.25" disks and the 32 hole 8 inchers as
> well (I have a lot of ProcTech Helios disks).
I'm confused (which happens often).
Isn't this one of the reasons we keep these old
machines running.
If I need to read a 10 sector N* disk, I setup
a Horizon with a laptop as the terminal. And then
using the N* monitor I load a group of blocks from
the disk into memory and then dump that memory to
the terminal with logging turned on. Dumping 32K
at a time, it takes several dumps before I have the
whole disk, but it's a whole lot easier then building
a special controller.
Just one lazy man's solution.
--Doug
=========================================
Doug Coward
@ home in Poulsbo, WA
Analog Computer Online Museum and History Center
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
=========================================
> >Looks like it hit sideways on edge, taking out that side of the building. a
> >B24 hit the ESB, not that much damage.
>
> Yeah I knew the ESB was hit quite some time ago, A B24 sounds right. I
> imagine a B24 would be much smaller.
The plane that hit the Empire State Building was a B-25, which is smaller
than a B-24.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
I do believe it is for the fire sprinkler system. But I'm sure someone else
knows better...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Chad Fernandez [mailto:fernande@internet1.net]
! Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:42 PM
! To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
! Subject: Re: OT: World Trade crash...
!
!
! What do they have water tanks on top for? Is that a standard
! thing with
! sky scrapers? Is it for fire fighting, or is it just part of the
! running water system of the buildings?
!
! I'm from West Michigan and we don't have very many tall buildings.
!
! Chad Fernandez
! Michigan, USA
!
! Carlos Murillo wrote:
!
! > I think that the fire finished both towers. When the water
! tanks on top
! > of both towers spilled inside those superheated infernos,
! > the buildings collapsed.
! >
! > carlos.
!
On Sep 11, 7:17, Paul Williams wrote:
> Pete Turnbull wrote:
> > I'd be interested to know which VT100 ROMs you have
> > The standard VT100 ROMs are 031 (or 061), 032, 033, and 034, but
> > there are lots of variants.
>
> 061, 032, 033, 034, exactly as the FMPS says.
>
> > I have images (and original ROMs) of 061, 032, 033, 034 but I'd
> > like to get any others to add to the archive.
>
> They're not online, Pete!
No, they're not, because they're copyrighted. But I'll make them available
to you.
Aside: there was a short discussion a while ago about DEC and copyright
and copies and what DEC still sold. I can't remember the conclusion. What
was the concensus? And does DEC still sell these ROMs?
> I would like a copy of those, please, because
> there is a guy on comp.sys.dec who is planning a VT100 front-end to Bob
> Supnik's SIMH (thread called "Need VT100 Expert"). I would also like a
> copy of the chargen ROM, 23018E2-00, if you've got it.
On mine (which is actually a VT131) it's soldered directly to the board,
and I'm disinclined to take it off at the moment.
> Would you like a copy of the VT320 ROM? I've got that handy.
Yes please :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Of course the intelligence community is busy evacuating their buildings so
it can't be reached. How they're going to do their jobs is another mystery.
You do know that they have a second HQ hidden in a mountain somewhere...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu <mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu>
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
And Camp David, no structures hit, though. THey missed thier target..
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: LFessen106(a)aol.com [mailto:LFessen106@aol.com]
! Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:34 AM
! To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
! Subject: Re: World Trade crash...
!
!
! In a message dated 9/11/01 10:19:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
! edick(a)idcomm.com writes:
!
! > Yes ... Dubya must have REALLY pissed someone off! Reports
! are that these
! > were
! > specific attacks, and that there was also an apparently
! intentional crash
! on
! > a
! > helipad near the Pentagon ... <sigh> You'd think they'd
! get closer than
! > that
! > ...
! >
! > Dick
!
! For those of you with friends and loved ones in these areas
! my heart and
! prayers are with you. At 10:40am here on the east coast
! there have been 4
! attacks so far. The world trade center twice, the pentagon,
! and the state
! dept bldg in washington.
!
! -Linc Fessenden
!
! In The Beginning there was nothing, which exploded - Yeah right...
!
! Calculating in binary code is as easy as 01,10,11.
!
!
Yeah I agree wholeheartedly - just a tactless comment.
I know everyone here in the UK will join me in sending our best wishes to everyone in the States both directly or indirectly involved. We're all absolutely stunned and sickened :(
Shaun
> In a message dated 9/11/2001 9:19:47 AM Central Daylight Time,
> edick(a)idcomm.com writes:
>
>
> > Yes ... Dubya must have REALLY pissed someone off! Reports are that these
> > were
> > specific attacks, and that there was also an apparently intentional crash
> > on a
> > helipad near the Pentagon ... <sigh> You'd think they'd get closer than
> > that
> > ...
> >
> > Dick
> >
>
> oh yea, that's a really nice thing to say....
Refresh this page, I add news as I get it...
http://pages.cthome.net/squeege/wtrade/updates.html
My main sources are my local radio, 99.1 WPLR (New Haven CT, clasic rock,
www.wplr.com), who is reading the AP wire and monitoring CNN, ABC, MSNBC,
and other big networks...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
That was shot down by the USAF before it reached its target.
I think that the Pennsylvania one was also shot down.
At 11:27 AM 9/11/01 -0400, you wrote:
>And Camp David, no structures hit, though. THey missed thier target..
>
>--- David A Woyciesjes
>--- C & IS Support Specialist
>--- Yale University Press
>--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
>--- (203) 432-0953
>--- ICQ # - 905818
--------------------------------------------------------------
Carlos E. Murillo-Sanchez carlos_murillo(a)nospammers.ieee.org
In a message dated 9/11/2001 9:19:47 AM Central Daylight Time,
edick(a)idcomm.com writes:
> Yes ... Dubya must have REALLY pissed someone off! Reports are that these
> were
> specific attacks, and that there was also an apparently intentional crash
> on a
> helipad near the Pentagon ... <sigh> You'd think they'd get closer than
> that
> ...
>
> Dick
>
oh yea, that's a really nice thing to say....
Both towers down now!!
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: stb [mailto:stb@scides.canberra.edu.au]
! Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:30 AM
! To: Mac-NT Mailing List
! Subject: [mac-nt] Re: OT: World Trade crash updates...
!
!
! Absolutely incredible.
!
! any list members involved ?
!
! Jees 2nd tower just collapsed.....
!
!
! Stef
!
!
! [DAW(a)yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu] This is a posting from the
! Mac-NT Mailing List. To unsubscribe, forward this message
! (Including these lines) to
! <unsub-mac-nt(a)lyris.sunbelt-software.com>. List Charter and
! FAQ at:
! http://www.sunbelt-software.com/mac-nt-list_charter.htm
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/mac-nt-list_charter.htm>
Pentagon too... what's next?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Woyciesjes [mailto:DAW@yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:23 AM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org (E-mail)
> Subject: OT: World Trade crash...
> Importance: High
>
>
> I take it you all heard about the two 737s (?) hitting the world trade
> buildings...
> one was possibly a hijacked airliner... each hit a seperate tower, I
> believe...
>
> --- David A Woyciesjes
> --- C & IS Support Specialist
> --- Yale University Press
> --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
> --- (203) 432-0953
> --- ICQ # - 905818
>
Jim Battle wrote:
> At 02:16 PM 9/10/01 -0700, you wrote:
> excess. The KA655 TM
> >that is on the DFWCUG site appears from the PDF to be 100
> DPI/8 bit (note
> >that's 800 bits per inch net and the result is harder to
I don't know where 100dpi/8-bit came from -
its 600dpi/1-bit (apart from maybe one or two pages
which are 600dpi/8-bit). I don't know how
to persuade Acrobat to tell me what the
underlying resolution is, but I expect it's
possible!
> I agree that 300 dpi @ 1bpp is superior for text and line art
> than 100 dpi
> @ 8bpp, but I think your math is askew. You need to compare
> the # of bits
> per sq in, not inch. So 100 dpi @ 8bpp is 10KB/in^2, while
> 300 dpi @ 1bpp
> is 11.25 KB/in^2. For text and line art, though, the 1bpp image will
> compress a lot better.
I make 600dpi/1-bit to be a smidgen under 44KB/sq-in.
This is an A4 scan (of a photocopy of an original
which is less than A4 in all dimensions IIRC) so
thats 8.5x11.5in i.e. anything less than ~4MB/page
is compression kicking in! I think the pages
average something like 300KB/page.
I get PDF direct from the scanner but I don't think
it does G4 compression. If anyone has a tool which will
take in a PDF and spit out a G4-compressed PDF,
I'd be very interested. I think I've seen people
claim that 300dpi/1-bit scans run at about 60KB/page
so I assume that G4 compression would bring these
documents down to about 250KB/page (15-20% smaller).
Of course, "perfect" OCR would knock it down
a good deal more than that!
Antonio
>
> And if, for some reason, you want to scan line art and text
> in gray scale,
> 4bpp is plenty enough. Use 8bpp only for continuous-tone images.
Possibly true (although almost every page
that I use 8-bit for does have a photo
of some gubbin or other). But the scanner
spits out 1-bit or 8-bit and there are not
that many knobs available for tweaking.
Antonio
Jim Tuck wrote:
> To convert to PDF, I normally use ABBYY FineReader 5.0, a
> very nice bit of OCR software. It preserves layout well, does
> near-font conversion of readables, and includes images of
> whatever is questionable.
>From my pov, the most interesting question
is how close to 100% correct conversion
does it manage to do? Give an A4 (or US Letter)
page full of text, how many errors (i.e. incorrect
letter or punctuation mark) would you expect to
see after proof-reading manually? (Questionable
usages where the character is inserted as an
image don't really count since there is no
"loss" of information ... they don't help
reduce the size either though).
Does it take PDF wrapped around TIFF as an input?
Antonio
For me, it's usually Kofax Imagecontrols for capture, destripe,
deskew, and char rebuild. (I happen to have a nice Fujitsu high-
speed document scanner with Kofax accelerator). I have used
Photoshop and a series of filters to do the same thing, albeit
slower. Gimp works just as well as PS.
Photoshop on Macs, Kofax on NT, and Gimp on *nix.
To convert to PDF, I normally use ABBYY FineReader 5.0, a
very nice bit of OCR software. It preserves layout well, does
near-font conversion of readables, and includes images of
whatever is questionable.
I have also used tif2ps and ps2pdf on *nix, operating on the
source tiff. This is usually best if I want near-perfect PDFs
>from the source images.
I'll be honest; I don't have that much demand for PDF. Most
of my work product is either plain ASCII text or multipage TIFF.
I'll do an odd PDF once every few months for Marketing, that's
it. Other people could comment much better on PDF
conversion.
Jim
On Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:21 AM, Bruce Ray
[SMTP:bkr@WildHareComputers.com] wrote:
> Jim
>
> ...so what tools do you find adequate/appropriate for scanning
> manuals,
> "cleaning" them up, and converting to Adobe .pdf format... and on
> what
> platform(s)..
>
> Bruce
On Sep 10, 23:26, Paul Williams wrote:
> I'm looking at dumping the ROMs from a VT100 board, but I'm having
> trouble finding pinouts of the ROMs.
>
> The VT100 FMPS says that locations E40, E45, E52 and E56 on the basic
> board are 8316E 2Kx8 ROMs. However, the schematics don't show the
> designations for all 24 pins. The online Chip Directory doesn't contain
> the pinout for the 8316 either.
>
> My PROM Programmer will handle 2716 EPROMs, which the Chip Dir. does
> contain a pinout for, and looks compatible with the 8316. I'd be tempted
> to try dumping one of them, were it not for the fact that E45 on my
> board is actually labelled "AM9218CPC", the pinout for which is also
> absent from the Chip Dir.
>
> Could anyone please tell me definitively whether the 8316, 9218 and 2716
> are pin-compatible?
Nearly, providing you're referring to the 5-volt-only 2716. The polarity
of the chip selects is mask-programmable on the 8316. I don't know which
way DEC used for the VT100, but the way they usually did it was CS1 and CS2
(pins 18 and 20) active-low with CS3 active high (pin 21, Vpp on a 2716,
which is usually at +5V for reading). The alternative is CS1, CS2, and CS3
all active-low.
So if you are reading DEC 8316's on a programmer, set it for 2716, and if
it reads as if empty, bend out pin 21 and ground it.
I'd be interested to know which VT100 ROMs you have, since I collect such
things. The number that matters is something like 23-031E2 (23- means ROM,
031 is the code number, and E2 means 16K bit). The standard VT100 ROMs are
031 (or 061), 032, 033, and 034, but there are lots of variants. I have
images (and original ROMs) of 061, 032, 033, 034 but I'd like to get any
others to add to the archive.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Chuck McManis wrote:
> This topic has gone over the list a few times, from
> experience, the "best"
> scans are 600 DPI black and white compressed into PDF files.
No problem here.
> The KA655 TM that is on the DFWCUG
> site appears from the PDF to be 100
> DPI/8 bit (note
> that's 800 bits per inch net and the result is harder to
> read)
The KA655 TM was done at 600dpi ... the source,
however, was a none-too-good photocopy.
Remember that Acrobat will display however
you tell it to and fit-to-page on a 17"
monitor looks quite different to the same
on a 19" or 21" monitor. Try fit-to-width
and see if that helps.
> scanning this manual to my list. They don't appear to have
> come up with a
> 'standard' for their scans. That would help too.
I suspect that if they mandated a standard
then they might put off people who might
otherwise contribute (and I still say
that any scan is always better than no scan!).
The scans just need to be good enough to
be able to be OCRd perfectly 10 years from
now (once someone gets around to writing
OCR software that works almost perfectly
rather than the current crop which seems
to fail most of the time).
Antonio
I work in digital imaging for part of my living, and do work for a
number of
archival projects as well.
600dpi@1bpp is insane. 300dpi is usually fine, if there is a prob
increase the
image depth.
Jim
On Monday, September 10, 2001 5:17 PM, Chuck McManis
[SMTP:cmcmanis@netapp.com] wrote:
>
>
> This topic has gone over the list a few times, from experience, the
> "best"
> scans are 600 DPI black and white compressed into PDF files. This
> achieves
> exactly what is needed, get the data without a lot of excess. The
> KA655 TM
> that is on the DFWCUG site appears from the PDF to be 100 DPI/8 bit
> (note
> that's 800 bits per inch net and the result is harder to read) I'll
> add
> scanning this manual to my list. They don't appear to have come up
> with a
> 'standard' for their scans. That would help too.
>
> --Chuck
>
> Thanks, dq. I have seen that doc, but it speaks mainly of the
> 3.5 drive, which had several enhancements not available on the
> 5.25 drive. Was the Apple ][ controller sufficiently similar to
> the IIgs and progeny that this documentation is appropriate for
> it also? I've never heard the Apple ][ controller chip referred
> to as 'IWM' -- is that my ignorance, or was the chip renamed, or
> are they (maybe slightly) different beasts?
It's my understanding that the single-chip Integrated WOZ Machine
replaced and duplicated the function of the discrete-component-based
equivalent on the Apple II family...
FWIW, the Lisa 1 and the very first non-production Macs used a strange
5.25 inch floppy known as the Twiggy Drive... I can show you photos
of Macs that had been retrofitted for the 3.5 inch drives, but those
drives are visible through huge 5.25 inch gaping holes...
So while I can't say with certainty, I doubt the original circuit
has any capability not duplicated in the IWM chips.
Regards,
-dq
Sorry but your wrong.
Here in the USA IEEE-488/GPIB cards are considered industrial
interfaces and command premium prices. I bought one for a
control system and paid $399US!! That was for a cheaper non-dma
slow GPIB.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Louis Schulman <louiss(a)gate.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: IEEE-488 interface and Commodore Pet
>On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:55:38 +0100 (BST), Tony Duell wrote:
>
>#> > I don't know if the Brain Box supplied software only works
>#> > with their card or any card.
>#>
>#> The card claims to be compatible with the IBM IEEE card,
>#
>#Which IBM IEEE card? There are at least 2, and they are totally
>#different. I was given an IBM IEEE488 card which uses a pair of 9914
>#chips (one for data transfer, one to send commands, I think). The one
in
>#the O&A Techref is based round a NEC 7210 chip.
>
>The information I received from Brain Boxes is that their card uses the
NEC 7210 chip. They still have some
>of these cards in stock, although they are no longer in production.
They sent me a very helpful e-mail. The
>only problem is that they want 320 pounds for one card.
>
>Well, I don't know what things cost in Britain, but out-of-production
DOS-based ISA cards generally don't
>sell for US $540. Usually, it is more like US $5, maybe new US $50.
So, I don't think I will be doing any
>business with Brain Boxes.
>
>Louis
>
> Chuck McManis wrote:
>
> something up for me. Where exactly has the DFWCUG ever indicated
that scans
>sent to them will be made available to others? If you go to their
home page
><http://www.dfwcug.org> there is no mention of it, there are no
links to
>any scans in their "resources" section, there is nothing at all to
indicate
>such things will ever become available.
I'm guessing you never read John Wisniewski's
post in one (or more) DECnotes conferences
on the Easynet where he announced the
project - several years ago now!
I've sent them about 6 CDs worth of stuff
(like the uVAX 2K Tech manual and the
KA655 tech manual and the TU58 user guide that
appeared over the weekend) so it certainly
looks to me as though if you send them scans,
they'll make them available. A goodly
chunk of the stuff has never been through
my hands so either others are sending
ready made scans (which they have asked for)
or they have scanned manuals themselves
which others have sent to them (one of the
status messages indicated that they have
500lbs of docs waiting to be scanned).
AFAIK they had Digital's blessing to
do this (John was openly soliciting
information within Digital).
Don't take my word for it - scan that 11/730
docset and see if it appears or not - the
11/780 one seems to have made it!
>Actually a much better link is this one:
><http://208.190.133.201/decimages/moremanuals.htm>
OK - I see the problem now.
I pointed Bill at a bunch of places
when he announced decdocs.org -
it's a nice easy URL and I can remember
it without having to search (or organise!)
my bookmarks.
From there you hit the DFWCUG link
and end up at http://montagar.com/~patj/dec/hcps.htm .
If you go via the DFWCUG site at http://www.dfwcug.org/,
hit the Cheshire cat link near the bottom.
I cannot find their "mission statement" anywhere
there (I'm sure it used to be there!) but a
quick search turns up an update:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Patrick+Jankowiak&hl=en&safe=off&rnum=48&selm=3A6AA429.5241E8F5%40worldnet.att.net
>However, someone decided to scan some of the manuals as low
resolution 8
>bit grey scale (what a waste of someone's scanning time!)
Maybe, I usually resort to greyscale for pages with
photographs or fine detail that B&W seems to miss.
Greyscale is better than nothing !
Antonio
In california that was :
orbit% ./bday
Time to roll is Sat Sep 8 18:46:40 2001
orbit% cat bday.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
int
main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
unsigned long now;
now = 1000000000L;
printf("Time to roll is %s\n", ctime(&now));
exit(0);
}
orbit%
At 02:36 PM 9/10/01, you wrote:
>While IBM, HP, Dec, Intel, Microsoft, and a cast of thousands have
>been duking it out for the past 31-3/4 years, UNIX time() (ref: man 3 time)
>has been steadily plodding along and has quietly ticked past 1 billion seconds
>within the last day or so.
I'm looking at dumping the ROMs from a VT100 board, but I'm having
trouble finding pinouts of the ROMs.
The VT100 FMPS says that locations E40, E45, E52 and E56 on the basic
board are 8316E 2Kx8 ROMs. However, the schematics don't show the
designations for all 24 pins. The online Chip Directory doesn't contain
the pinout for the 8316 either.
My PROM Programmer will handle 2716 EPROMs, which the Chip Dir. does
contain a pinout for, and looks compatible with the 8316. I'd be tempted
to try dumping one of them, were it not for the fact that E45 on my
board is actually labelled "AM9218CPC", the pinout for which is also
absent from the Chip Dir.
Could anyone please tell me definitively whether the 8316, 9218 and 2716
are pin-compatible?
Cheers,
Paul
Doing it for N* and any other IE: multiple hard sector formats would be a
challenge
as the structure of the data differed greatly and also the timing. Also
most of the
hard sector controllers were uniquely dumb. By that I mean they depended
on the
CPU (even the lowly 8080) to do a great amount of the work. for example
stepping
the head in or out was usually done by setting a direction bit and timing
out a step
pulse(s) as needed. Sector read and write were assisted at the byte
level with a
usually simple FM/MFM/M2FM encode decode and a shift register plus a
simple
sync recognizer. Of course all of them went about it differently with
variations
abounding.
Me I'd do a ISA to S100 adaptor and write code... ah foo it's easier to
use a
real ns* and far more productive.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Stek <r.stek(a)snet.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: Vector 3/Teledisk
>FWIW, I did once correspond with the Catweasel guy and he said it would
>do N* 10-hole hard-sectored disks, but he had never had a request or
>seen a N* disk. I was supposed to send him some samples but never got a
>round tuit.
>
>And don't forget, it has already been done - the Microsolutions
>MatchPoint card allows your PC to read N* disks. Of course, just try to
>find one!
>
>If it provides motivation for one of you hardware types with nothing
>better to do, I'd lend my support to requesting an add-in card which
>could handle the 10 and 16 hole 5.25" disks and the 32 hole 8 inchers as
>well (I have a lot of ProcTech Helios disks).
>
>Bob Stek
>Saver of Lost Sols
>
>
>
The are several strings embedded in the dos bot in command.com
and IBMdos. The bios was uniquely IBM and not a copy.
Also there are embedded characters in the code like:
code....
move a,h
ret
DB "D"
modecode...
push D
RET
DB "R"
and so on, it's spread out a bit.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Cini, Richard <RCini(a)congressfinancial.com>
To: ClassCompList (E-mail) <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:18 AM
Subject: DOS 1.0 copyright string
>Hello, all:
>
> I was able to get my hands on the two DOS 1.0 disks. So, I spent a
>few minutes with Sourcer and a good hex editor in search of the DR
copyright
>notice. I didn't find it.
>
> Maybe I misunderstood the timing of the message, but I thought that
>the 1.0 version of DOS contained copyright information from Digital
Research
>and when IBM found out, they compelled MS to expunge it, resulting in
the
>1.1 version.
>
> The file dates are as follows:
>
>c:\>dir a:
> Volume in drive A is 3COM53_D1
> Volume Serial Number is 11DC-3A5E
>
> Directory of A:\
>
>07/23/81 12:00a 1,920 IBMBIO.COM ***
>08/04/81 12:00a 3,231 COMMAND.COM ***
>08/13/81 12:00a 6,400 IBMDOS.COM ***
>09/10/01 09:28a 66,235 COMMAND.LST
>09/10/01 09:27a 4,374 IBMBIO.SDF
>09/10/01 09:28a 143,874 IBMDOS.LST
>09/10/01 09:28a 16,231 IBMDOS.SDF
>09/10/01 09:27a 25,780 IBMBIO.LST
>09/10/01 09:28a 10,141 COMMAND.SDF
> 9 File(s) 278,186 bytes
> 1,177,088 bytes free
>
> The files are all dated before the PC's release. I find it
>interesting that the file date for DOS proper was one week before the PC
>announcement. Microsoft tweaking until the last minute.
>
> IBMBIO contains only a revision mark and no copyright notice. IBMDOS
>contains a header common to all versions of DOS ("M;S<>=~KRAA") and no
>copyright notice. COMMAND contains a copyright message which is the one
>probably displayed upon execution:
>
> The IBM Personal Computer DOS
> Version 1.00
> (C)Copyright IBM Corp 1981
> Licensed Material - Program Property of IBM
>
> So, where did I go wrong??
>
>Rich
>
>
>==========================
>Richard A. Cini, Jr.
>Congress Financial Corporation
>1133 Avenue of the Americas
>30th Floor
>New York, NY 10036
>(212) 545-4402
>(212) 840-6259 (facsimile)
>
> This topic has gone over the list a few times, from experience, the "best"
> scans are 600 DPI black and white compressed into PDF files. This achieves
> exactly what is needed, get the data without a lot of excess. The KA655 TM
I know in my case the max I can manage is 300dpi optical, but that will
produce a usable document as long as it doesn't include circuit diagrams.
Zane
This topic has gone over the list a few times, from experience, the "best"
scans are 600 DPI black and white compressed into PDF files. This achieves
exactly what is needed, get the data without a lot of excess. The KA655 TM
that is on the DFWCUG site appears from the PDF to be 100 DPI/8 bit (note
that's 800 bits per inch net and the result is harder to read) I'll add
scanning this manual to my list. They don't appear to have come up with a
'standard' for their scans. That would help too.
--Chuck
At 01:01 PM 9/10/01, you wrote:
> > However, someone decided to scan some of the manuals as low
> > resolution 8 bit grey scale (what a waste of someone's scanning time!)
>
>Do you mean low or high resolution? There's no need for 48 or even 16
>bit for anything not continuous tone. I got three manuals from DFWCUG
>and am very happy with the quality. Perhaps they could look into more
>efficient compression, though.
>
>John A.
Hey guys, (and gals)
Help! : )
I'm trying to find documentation to help get my 11/780 fully operational.
The PDP-11/03 starts the internal self-test, but fails right before
actually reading the 8" floppy.
There was a diagnostic guide on E-Bay that I really wanted, and bid a
pretty decent amount on, but it seems someone else needed that document
more than I did. Oh well......
If anyone has spare or unused documentation for the VAX 11/780, please let
me know. This is needed to get my 780 back to operation. If you want links
to a site showing my 780 for proof that I indeed have one, let me know. I
realize that some don't want to give up stuff to those who will just turn
around and E-Bay it.
- Matthew Sell
Matthew Sell
Programmer
On Time Support, Inc.
www.ontimesupport.com
(281) 296-6066
Join the Metrology Software discussion group METLIST!
http://www.ontimesupport.com/cgi-bin/mojo/mojo.cgi
"One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promotional Ad
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
Many thanks for this tagline to a fellow RGVAC'er...
Hi,
Is anyone is interested in a free,
working Micro 3000 XE (desktop size Classic
HP 3000), complete with disks, tape drive
... and is willing to pick it up (or pay to have it picked up),
please contact me soon.
Disk drives: HP 7958, and HP 7936.
Tape drive: HP 35401 (9144 cartridge tape auto changer)
MPE Version is V-Delta 5.
It's in Lebanon, New Jersey, off of Route 78.
thanks,
Stan
(cc: Gunther, who knows someone driving to New Jersey soon :)
Stan Sieler sieler(a)allegro.com
www.allegro.com/sieler/wanted/index.htmlwww.allegro.com/sieler
> Chuck McManis wrote:
>
>Something to note is that the VMS licenses from the Hobbyist
program will
>work on VMS 5.x and beyond, they will _not_ work on VMS 4.x (the
LMF
>changed significantly between 4.x and 5.x). However, since most
"classic"
The most significant change being that it
sprang into existence with V5.0 :-)
Before that VAX/VMS, DECnet and Clustering
(and some other SIPs I forget) were enabled
or enhanced using patches. I *think* that
these patches were being collected in
order to be made available on some future
Freeware CD but I may be wrong about that.
Antonio
> Matthew Sell wrote:
>
>I'm trying to find documentation to help get my 11/780 fully
operational.
As of last weekend you'll find a set of
six technical manuals over at:
http://208.190.133.201/decimages/moremanuals.htm
They're all technical manuals rather than user
guides and maintenance guides but that's
all I was sent. The HW user guide may well
be on its way sometime ... if it turns up
I'll scan it and let you know.
I've seen people on this list state before now
that they have the printsets so maybe they'll
appear one day.
>There was a diagnostic guide on E-Bay that I really wanted, and bid
a
>pretty decent amount on, but it seems someone else needed that
document
>more than I did. Oh well......
Eighty odd dollars! You could try the seller to
see if it was a duplicate and/or you could try
the buyer to see if he can either help out
or scan it for you.
>me know. This is needed to get my 780 back to operation. If you
want links
>to a site showing my 780 for proof that I indeed have one, let me
know. I
Links would be nice anyway ... I for one
would like to see a VAX-11/780 again!
Antonio
> ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk wrote:
>
>The book you _must_ get is 'The Art of Electronics' by Paul
Horowitz and
>Winfield Hill.
Seconded and thirded :-)
I also like A Practical Introduction to
Electronic Circuits by Martin Hartley Jones.
Electronics for Engineers by Ahmed and Spreadbury
is quite good too.
Antonio
Hello, all:
I was able to get my hands on the two DOS 1.0 disks. So, I spent a
few minutes with Sourcer and a good hex editor in search of the DR copyright
notice. I didn't find it.
Maybe I misunderstood the timing of the message, but I thought that
the 1.0 version of DOS contained copyright information from Digital Research
and when IBM found out, they compelled MS to expunge it, resulting in the
1.1 version.
The file dates are as follows:
c:\>dir a:
Volume in drive A is 3COM53_D1
Volume Serial Number is 11DC-3A5E
Directory of A:\
07/23/81 12:00a 1,920 IBMBIO.COM ***
08/04/81 12:00a 3,231 COMMAND.COM ***
08/13/81 12:00a 6,400 IBMDOS.COM ***
09/10/01 09:28a 66,235 COMMAND.LST
09/10/01 09:27a 4,374 IBMBIO.SDF
09/10/01 09:28a 143,874 IBMDOS.LST
09/10/01 09:28a 16,231 IBMDOS.SDF
09/10/01 09:27a 25,780 IBMBIO.LST
09/10/01 09:28a 10,141 COMMAND.SDF
9 File(s) 278,186 bytes
1,177,088 bytes free
The files are all dated before the PC's release. I find it
interesting that the file date for DOS proper was one week before the PC
announcement. Microsoft tweaking until the last minute.
IBMBIO contains only a revision mark and no copyright notice. IBMDOS
contains a header common to all versions of DOS ("M;S<>=~KRAA") and no
copyright notice. COMMAND contains a copyright message which is the one
probably displayed upon execution:
The IBM Personal Computer DOS
Version 1.00
(C)Copyright IBM Corp 1981
Licensed Material - Program Property of IBM
So, where did I go wrong??
Rich
==========================
Richard A. Cini, Jr.
Congress Financial Corporation
1133 Avenue of the Americas
30th Floor
New York, NY 10036
(212) 545-4402
(212) 840-6259 (facsimile)
I'd like to get some recommendations from the list for a good introductory
electronics book for my 14 year-old son. He's interested in building an
intercom system (and other circuits) that he got off the Web, and I would
like something for him to read that will give him a good understanding of
how the circuit works. (For example, it uses the primary windings of a
120V:12V transformer as a coil.) TIA.
FWIW, I did once correspond with the Catweasel guy and he said it would
do N* 10-hole hard-sectored disks, but he had never had a request or
seen a N* disk. I was supposed to send him some samples but never got a
round tuit.
And don't forget, it has already been done - the Microsolutions
MatchPoint card allows your PC to read N* disks. Of course, just try to
find one!
If it provides motivation for one of you hardware types with nothing
better to do, I'd lend my support to requesting an add-in card which
could handle the 10 and 16 hole 5.25" disks and the 32 hole 8 inchers as
well (I have a lot of ProcTech Helios disks).
Bob Stek
Saver of Lost Sols
> >>Hello-
> >>I have been pursuuing the OpenVMS license and media for
> >>about 6 months with no success.
> >>i.e.
> >>http://www.openvms.compaq.com/openvms/freeware/
> >>http://www.montagar.com/dfwlug/openvms-faq.html
> >>I have an AlphaStation 200/233 that I would like to install
> >>OpenVMS to.
> >>Do you have any ideas on how I get a copy through legal
> >>or hobbiest channels?
>
>
> Something to note is that the VMS licenses from the Hobbyist program will
> work on VMS 5.x and beyond, they will _not_ work on VMS 4.x (the LMF
> changed significantly between 4.x and 5.x). However, since most "classic"
> folks will want to use VMS 5.5x (all MicroVAXen before the 4000 series) or
> 6.x (includes the 4000s) that should be fine. Also the older ConDists sell
> for reasonable amounts on Ebay. Further, there is nothing particularly
> "special" about the ConDist and they can be copied using a modern CD burner
> on a PC using an image copy and work just fine (this was how I got my first
> ConDist)
LMF was introduced with VMS 5.0. Before that the licenses were actuall patch
files.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
It's been a wet week in Stockholm, but nevertheless, thanks to the waste
management of the technical university, we've managed to scrounge together
some interesting pieces.
A lot of HP things, mainly HIL mice and keyboards, much to my joy, since I can
now use my 9000/380. But what does a HIL ID module do?
We also found a more or less complete 9000/425 system (no hard drives, but a
monitor and two tape drives which were buried too deep for us to get at).
Then we found an Apple II clone by Copam, which I've previously thought was
just a soul-less PC clone manufacturer. Now it turns out that they were once a
soul-less Apple clone manufacturer as well. =)
The unit is called the Base-64A, which sounds supiciously like a MIME
encoding, and it's got a floppy drive, too.
The Base-64 was perched atop some old cabinet with a lot of rain in it and
warning labels about the Winchester drive, which is a hulking full-height
fourteen-inch unit. I found a card outside the cabinet which looked like a
full- height QBus card. It's got two AMD 2901s, which is a bit-slice
processor. Another (half-height) card was left inside the cabinet, it, too,
featuring a pair of 2901s.
Because we were already loaded, and because of the rain and the size of the
thing, we decided to leave it behind, but I took the card I'd found with me
for further identification.
The card and the cabinet are made by Plessey Peripheral Systems, and my quick
research indicates that this is some PDP-11 (or should it be an LSI-11?)
clone.
Will those two cards we found really suffice for a functioning system? Four
2901s should only add up to four bits according to my calculations...
There was a lot of old terminals there as well, but I've got enough of those
already. It was rather interesting to see an old Tandberg terminal of ours,
though, only branded with the Norsk Data label andfeaturing an orange colour
scheme instead of Tandberg's brown/beige. I suppose it's been hooked up to
some Nord mini once upon a time.
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
"Computer games don't affect kids, I mean if Pac Man affected us as kids, we'd
all be running around in darkened rooms, munching pills and listening to
repetitive music."
David McMinn
I was successful in finding not only a 4052 with 4662 multipen plotter and
4631 hard copy unit (lots of internet searching) - but also a 4054 on EBAY!
I got the 4052 working after repairing the tape drive board and cleaning the
tape heads.
The 4631 needed new paper and one of the toothed belts - got both and it
works fine.
The 4054 repair consisted of replacing one of the 16k bit DRAMs!
I have also added two Tektronix 4041 GPIB controllers with one line LED
displays and built in thermal printers.
I now have quite a collection of 4050 and 4041 series tapes - some with my
old programs from the late 70's in the USAF, some including the Tek System
Tapes and some game tapes, also some of the 4052 cartridges.
Sorry, at this point I'm interested in keeping my collection. Contact me
direct if you are interested in any tapes, though.
Monty McGraw
Spring, TX (near Houston)
In a message dated 9/10/01 2:02:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
sieler(a)allegro.com writes:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone is interested in a free,
> working Micro 3000 XE (desktop size Classic
> HP 3000), complete with disks, tape drive
> ... and is willing to pick it up (or pay to have it picked up),
> please contact me soon.
>
> Disk drives: HP 7958, and HP 7936.
> Tape drive: HP 35401 (9144 cartridge tape auto changer)
> MPE Version is V-Delta 5.
>
> It's in Lebanon, New Jersey, off of Route 78.
>
> thanks,
>
> Stan
I would be interested possibly. I dont know a thing about them though. I
live right off of 78 in Easton PA.
-Linc Fessenden
In The Beginning there was nothing, which exploded - Yeah right...
Calculating in binary code is as easy as 01,10,11.
On September 5, Absurdly Obtuse wrote:
> > In 1998 the book, A Guide to Collecting Computers and Computer Collectibles:
> > History, Technique, and Practice was published. An abridged edition is now
> > available at: www.unusual.on.ca/guidecollectcomputer
> >
> > Your comments are invited as are any hints where I might find a complete
> > 370/165 or 168. I'm forever hoping.
>
> What kind of systems are these? I will keep my eyes open. If you are
> talking IBM big-iron, that can be arranged. *evil grin*
I saw a 370/168 once. I'd swear it was the single largest computer
I've ever seen. The building it was in had a disk drive *floor*.
I had to use bleach on that underwear.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
> > you should really dump the license PAK's and print them out!
>
> I don't get this. Isn't this like walking up to a combination lock
> and saying "SHOW COMBINATION". Shouldn't be possible,
> should it?
No, this isn't the same. These are licenses, not locks. If anyone is
curious, the command is "LICENSE ISSUE xxx", and issuing the license
disables it, so you have to "LICENSE ENABLE xxx" to reenable. Also,
I'd recommend using the /OUTPUT qualifier if you are going to print
the licenses and using both /OUTPUT and /PROCEDURE if you want a copy
that you can easily reload later.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
On September 10, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> research indicates that this is some PDP-11 (or should it be an LSI-11?)
> clone.
> Will those two cards we found really suffice for a functioning system? Four
> 2901s should only add up to four bits according to my calculations...
The 2901 is four bits wide.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
> Hello, all:
>
> I was able to get my hands on the two DOS 1.0 disks. So, I spent a
> few minutes with Sourcer and a good hex editor in search of the DR copyright
> notice. I didn't find it.
>
> Maybe I misunderstood the timing of the message, but I thought that
> the 1.0 version of DOS contained copyright information from Digital Research
> and when IBM found out, they compelled MS to expunge it, resulting in the
> 1.1 version.
My recollection (often wrong) was that there was a sequence of code
(load register, move to another register, do a call, etc) that was
taken verbatim from CP/M and used in DOS; not an ASCII string containing
a copyright notice.
Regards,
-doug q
Surely someone in CA can help rescue this system. Info below (I got
this @ my pdp11.org address). Please email Kristina directly.
pdp11/34 with rsts/e software up for grabs
Hello,
I have a pdp11/34 with rsts/e software up for grabs. It was my fathers, Bill
Ramsey, and it needs a good home since he passed away. There are
modems,books, software, tape decks, peripherial equiptment (monitors and
computers) and spare PCB's. Just give us a call at 661-944-9550 or email us
back at kaesplace(a)aol.com. We are located in Littlerock,CA. Thank you for
your time.
Sincerly,
Kristina Roberts
Hello Bill, the PDP11 and associated components roughly occupies the
equivilant of 3 refrigerators. There is the main unit, about 8ft tall and
width of a filing cabinet, the isolation transformers, the same width and 5ft
tall, and then a dozen or so boxes of software, spare boards and literature,
as well as a printer and the monitor, plus 2 remote processors. You may be
able to get it all into a pickup truck with a large capacity bed. We live in
Southern california 60 miles NE of L.A.
regards Charles and Kristina Roberts.
--
Bill Bradford
mrbill(a)mrbill.net
Austin, TX
> > No, this isn't the same. These are licenses, not locks.
>
> No argument from me. I've been checking the document
> archives and I used to know this, but how do you display
> the system ID? There was a GetSYI parameter or some
> such... I imagine the number can be displayed from the
> console as well without an OS booted or even present.
>
> And... is this a number that Encompass will accept?
Do you mean the hardware ID? If so, either enter the serial
number or you can make one up.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
! I've brought in consultants offering to do everything from a
! similar temporary fix to a complete re-wire.... but there's
! no acknowledgement on the part of said former supervisor
! who is also the closet thing we have to a comptroller that we
! actually have a problem. He said to drop it until I could
! PROVE the wiring wss the problem, and however that might be
! done would likely require resources I don't have.
Sounds like you need to borrow cable testing equipment, and show him the
results of your cables, compared to the results of a building wired
properly...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
A version of 2.9BSD UNIX which runs on a PDP-11/23 with MSCP hard drives is
now available at:
http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/PDP-11/Distributions/ucb/2.9BSD-MSCP/
I tested this on a PDP-11/23 consisting of a KDF11-A CPU, 256 Kb RAM,
Andromeda UCD11, SLU card, and a 20 megabyte Seagate ST-225 hard drive. UNIX
can be recompiled on this machine.
Support for loading 2.9BSD via VTserver from a PC is also included.
You have to have a UNIX license before you can access the files. You can get
this for free starting here: http://minnie.tuhs.org/PUPS/
--
Jonathan Engdahl???????????????? Rockwell Automation
Principal Research Engineer????? 24800 Tungsten Road
Advanced Technology????????????? Euclid, OH 44117, USA
Euclid Labs????????????????????? engdahl(a)cle.ab.com 216-266-6409
> > >Of course a PAK generator solves the problem of missing PAKs
> > quite nicely.
> >
> > Yes it does, however I am dearly afraid that with HP and
> > Compaq doing the
> > dance that the lore of such things will be permanently lost
> > at some point.
>
> AFAIK, the PAKGEN program that third parties
> were allowed to purchase would only
> generate PAKs in the name of that
> third party. So simply having PAKGEN
> would not allow you to generate DEC PAKs!
True, and PAKGEN was only available to run on a VAX, not an
Alpha, so you had to keep a VAX around.
> OTOH several people reverse-engineered
> the PAK checksum and at least one
> company were selling a PAKGEN-like service
> until they were "leaned on".
Reverse engineering is what most people did. I know of one
company still selling a PAK generator, but like PAKGEN it
only lets you generate PAKs for your own products.
Was the company that was stopped selling a PAK generator or
were they selling generated PAKs? If they were selling a
PAK generator I don't see how they could be stopped.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
In a message dated 9/9/01 11:21:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
gunther(a)aurora.regenstrief.org writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have a contact who needs to get rid of a VAX 11/750 and an
> 11/730 real soon and they are in Sommerset County, New Jersey.
> A picker-upper would be preferred. There is also an HP 3000/48.
> Let me know who wants them and can pick up. If there is contention,
> I think one should try sharing, so let me know which one you
> really really badly want if you have to choose.
Please let me know. Would love to get a hold of a 750 :-) I can find homes
for the others as well if nobody else shows an interest here. I am also
fairly close by in eastern PA.
-Linc Fessenden
In The Beginning there was nothing, which exploded - Yeah right...
Calculating in binary code is as easy as 01,10,11.
Chuck McManis wrote:
> At 10:41 AM 9/8/01 -0500, Eric wrote:
> >Of course a PAK generator solves the problem of missing PAKs
> quite nicely.
>
> Yes it does, however I am dearly afraid that with HP and
> Compaq doing the
> dance that the lore of such things will be permanently lost
> at some point.
AFAIK, the PAKGEN program that third parties
were allowed to purchase would only
generate PAKs in the name of that
third party. So simply having PAKGEN
would not allow you to generate DEC PAKs!
OTOH several people reverse-engineered
the PAK checksum and at least one
company were selling a PAKGEN-like service
until they were "leaned on".
Antonio
Chuck McManis wrote:
> A VAXServer 3100/M48 (yet another one I didn't have
> yet.) with all the option cards (multi-serial, DMF32,
> etc)
I don't think a DMF-32 will even physically
fit in a VAXserver/VAXstation 3100: it's a UNIBUS
card! You probably have a DSH32 and/or DST32.
> A bunch of manuals, including the VT103 users guide
> and a bunch of VAX 11/730 manuals (including the CPU
> technical manual!)
It would be nice to see this scanned and made
available (especially the VAX-11/730 stuff).
Antonio
>I have a contact who needs to get rid of a VAX 11/750 and an
>11/730 real soon and they are in Sommerset County, New Jersey.
>A picker-upper would be preferred. There is also an HP 3000/48.
>Let me know who wants them and can pick up. If there is contention,
>I think one should try sharing, so let me know which one you
>really really badly want if you have to choose.
I am in NJ, and am always interested in playing with computers and
computer parts. If no one else wants them, I would be happy to pick them
up and play (um, are they free?). But I have to admit, I don't know what
to do with either, so I would only take them if it was me or the dumpster.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Not really,
Since the combination is keyed and limited to that sytem
(or systems) it's intended for. they are also partially
encrypted and that part has the "key".
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: John Allain <allain(a)panix.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Sunday, September 09, 2001 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: recent acquisitions for the House of VAX
>> you should really dump the license PAK's and print them out!
>
>I don't get this. Isn't this like walking up to a combination lock
>and saying "SHOW COMBINATION". Shouldn't be possible,
>should it?
>
>John A.
>
Didn't Fujitsu just (within the last week) exit the hard disk market? Or
was it just desktop (IDE) drives?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Master of all that Sucks [mailto:vance@ikickass.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:48 PM
> To: Glenatacme(a)aol.com
> Cc: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Fujitsu drives (was Re: Service does still exist....)
>
>
>
> Well, it usually the large-capacity (4.5+ GB) older
> workstation drives.
> One good way to find out is to ask Fujitsu. It's the path I normally
> take.
>
> Peace... Sridhar
>
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2001 Glenatacme(a)aol.com wrote:
>
> > More information about this, please? If I find a Fujitsu
> drive how can I
> > tell if the lifetime warranty applies to that drive?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Glen
> > 0/0
> >
>
When is someone going to recreate the
I [heart]
d|i|g|i|t|a|l
bumper sticker?
I had one of those on my rear bumper until
I junked the car about 10 years ago. It was
just too hard to cut it out of the bumper.
--Doug
=========================================
Doug Coward
@ home in Poulsbo, WA
Analog Computer Online Museum and History Center
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
=========================================
Posted 2 Kingston 286 type memory cards, 2 Kingston 386 memory cards and 3
Arco IDE controllers...use ebay's search for my auctions with the seller's
username of "rhblake" to see them.
Sorry for the OT but I know there plenty of people with NCR and IBM
microchannel machines that want these things - I'm doing a major reduction
in "stuff" and there will be machines, cards, drives, etc from now until
around the first of 2002...
At 10:34 AM 8/28/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I have the following TI stuff available. Please see my previous note about
>Apple II stuff for all terms/conditions....
>
>TI RF Modulator -- Qty. 5, untested, $2.00 EACH
I would like to have the TI modulators.
If not already spoken for how much for postage and where do I send the check?
P.O. Box 3365, Spring Hill Florida 34611-3365
> I've found that the 37 pin connector on the back of the VAXServer 3100 is a
> DECNet connector. Depending on the pigtail it connects to either a V35 plug
> (big square thing) or a DB25 that connected to a DEC synchronous modem.
It sounds like a synchronous serial adapter that can be used for DECnet, not
a DECnet-only adapter.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
> At 12:51 PM 9/8/01 -0500, Eric wrote:
> >Do you mean you are worried the Hobbyist program will go away?
> >Eric Dittman
>
> No, I _know_ the Hobbyist program will go away. People like HP and Compaq
> are starting to layoff people who they actually still have a use for in
> order to cut costs. What's the ROI on the Hobbyist program? Zilch! So it
> gives them some good press but it also causes their operations folks to get
> calls from folks who are trying to find spares for machines they never
> heard of. So they will kill it, I just hope they give out lifetime PAKs
> before they do.
Compaq authorizes the Hobbyist program, but they don't do much else. They
don't pay to maintain the program, they don't give away the distributions,
they don't provide the PAKs. I don't think the Hobbyist program costs
Compaq more than a minimal amount.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
I've found that the 37 pin connector on the back of the VAXServer 3100 is a
DECNet connector. Depending on the pigtail it connects to either a V35 plug
(big square thing) or a DB25 that connected to a DEC synchronous modem.
--Chuck
> >> Yes it does, however I am dearly afraid that with HP and Compaq doing the
> >> dance that the lore of such things will be permanently lost at some point.
> >> If Compaq would just say "screw it, the next time someone requests a
> >> license give them a non-expiring one." my heart would rest easier...
> >
> >Do you mean you are worried the Hobbyist program will go away?
>
> I've been worried about it for several years. What ticks me off is you can
> buy a Hobbyist package from Compaq for Tru64, and it has non-expiring
> packs, and CD's. Why can't they do that for OpenVMS? I'd gladly pay
> $200-300 for that! Which is a lot more than the $99 for Tru64. The real
> joke being the Tru64 hobbyist shipped for the first couple weeks with an
> OpenVMS Condist bundled in (someone made a major mistake)! Unfortunatly I
> wasn't lucky enough to get one, but a friend did.
I was one of the lucky ones to get the OpenVMS ConDist after ordering the
Tru64 Hobbyist package. The package wasn't just the ConDist, it also
included PAKs. The package was for people in the developer's program.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
On Sep 8, 13:51, Louis Schulman wrote:
> I have done some research, and since this subject seems to only interest
me, I will respond to myself.
> I see no alternate but to appeal to my British brethren regarding any
such card they may find in
> their travels. Tony, Pete, et al, I beseech you! To each of you I say,
"Hast thou a response?"
Not a very helpful one, I'm afraid. I actually visited Brain Boxes not
long after they moved to Wavertree Technology Park, and at that time they
had a respectable portfolio of IEEE-488 devices, and I noticed a few PETs
and other machines around. That was over ten years ago and even then they
were looking at other product areas. I've never had any contact with them
since, so unless you can get any response from them direct, I haven't any
suggestions.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> I got a great bunch of artifacts recently from an ex-Digit (DEC Employee)
> who was finally not going to use his VAX for anything else any more.
They are a good source of interesting stuff. I got Autocad for VMS that
way.
> These included:
> A set a PAKs that rivals the Hobbyist offering
> and exceeds it in that it has a PL/I and APL PAK.
I asked about PL/I not being included in the Hobbyist licensing program and
was told that was because Compaq no longer owns PL/I. I guess APL isn't in
the Hobbyist license set as that hasn't been a deliverable for a long time.
Does anyone know when it was last included in the ConDist sets? If so I
can look for it. I have several year's worth of ConDist CDs but have lost
the paperwork that listed the included products.
Of course a PAK generator solves the problem of missing PAKs quite nicely.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
> Have you brought up an interim fix - either clip the ties and support the
> cat5 bundle off the conduits? OR untie it, wrap the bundles with common
> aluminum foil (yeah it works) and then retie them using looser cable ties?
> Might be a nice way to pick up a few extra bucks on a weekend and make them
> happy at the same time.
I've brought in consultants offering to do everything from a
similar temporary fix to a complete re-wire.... but there's
no acknowledgement on the part of said former supervisor
who is also the closet thing we have to a comptroller that we
actually have a problem. He said to drop it until I could
PROVE the wiring wss the problem, and however that might be
done would likely require resources I don't have.
Said former supervisor and the 30% co-owner make all final
determinations as to what $$$ can be spent purely on cash-flow
and profitability... ideas such as IT-spending-as-investment
are total anathema.
Most IT spending gets done during the end-of-year-write-it-
off-as-supplies spending orgy.
-dq
>A) Anybody know anything about the company that marketed these, as I don't
>want to intentionally break any copyright laws; but with no info on the
>internet & the extreme possibility of the company no longer existing, does
>anyone think I'll be in trouble with the law WRT copyright laws? I'm mainly
>just using the original as a pattern for (1) the signal names & pinouts,
>and (2) the dimensions of the connectors & pins (I didn't have anything
>else that had the ground pegs on either side of the connector).
If you are redesigning for YOUR use only, then at least in the US, there
is no copyright problem any which way (it falls under Fair Use).
>The designs (when they get closer to completion) I will have on my website
>for free, but if I make several cards and someone else is dumb^H^H^H^H bold
>enough to purchase one I would sell them for a small profit...
This is where you can get in trouble. If you make your mods available to
the public (even if for free), you can be seen as infringing upon the
owners rights. However, if the company has gone out of business, you
probably wont get in any trouble. But do NOT confuse out of business with
public domain, they are not one in the same, just because the company is
out of business or isn't selling the item any more, does NOT mean that
the item is public domain. They still have the rights to it, and can
choose how and where it can be made available. I personally still don't
think you will have a problem, but you will most likely technically be
breaking the law.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
OK, maybe it's not...
I found the power supply. No smoke or flames. Not much of anything.
The green LED turns on when I plug in the power, but the entire
thing(including my power cube) goes dead when I plug in the monitor.
It might need a special monitor. It DOES, however, respond to the
keyboard. Caps, num and scroll locks all function and those lights
blink twice when the power is turned on and then it bleeps at me. I
guess the next step is to plug a printer into it and see what
happens, but I probably won't get around to digging out a parallel
printer until next week.
BTW, my power supply is getting worse. The 7.5v setting puts out
12.5, and the 12v setting puts out 22!!! Ouch! I'm thinking it's time
to get another one. Or better, make one. A nice regulated supply. I
don't think it harmed the box though, since it has a voltage
regulator right inside.
--
/------------------------------------\
| http://jrollins.tripod.com/ |
| KD7BCY kd7bcy(a)teleport.com |
\------------------------------------/
The Digital logo does not use any known font because it was hand drawn
by a graphic artist. It looks very similar to the Helvetica/Univers
"Swiss" type fonts but is not identical to any of them. As someone else
has noted there is a PostScript version of the logo. IIRC it was
produced by digitising a large film master which revealed some
interesting things - for example, the two i characters aren't
identical. For producing print copy before the age of PostScript
Digital used dry transfer sheets that were custom made in a variety of
sizes.
I'm afraid that I cannot help on the other font(s) used in the pdp logos
and on cabinet panels.
jb - London, UK
> >From what I've been told, the system was designed by Tony Pepin. This is
> >kind of neat for me since at one time I owned (and may still, I'm not sure
> >*grin*) a Model I that had his name, address and phone # engraved on the
> >case. (I also owned a Model I that at one time was the personal machine
> >of the editor of 80 US Micro - that was pretty cool too. *laughs*)
>
> That's cool...it's always neat to know any specific history
> of a machine like that. One of my Model 2000's was gotten from Roy
> Soltoff of Misosys. He had bought it to get into software
> development for the 2000 but then ended up never using it when the
> market never materialized.
Indeed. I am fortunate to have the Dennis Bathory-Kitsz's personal
LNW-80.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
I think I forgot to announce the webpage here a month or so when I did it
up. Anyway I've just updated it to reflect that beta's of simh 2.7 are
available now, AND more importantly that a ITS distribution is now
available! It can be accessed at
http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/pdp10emu.html
The webpage details where to get an emulator (including links to Windows
binaries), the installation documents for your OS of choice (TOPS-10,
TOPS-20, or ITS), your OS of choice (well, at least the versions that are
supported), and any doc's that are available online for the OS.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
From: Jim Tuck <technos(a)nerdland.org>
>D'ya know if they ever fixed the mid-bitstream problem that was common
>early with the
>Trash and later with the Atari and their MPI over cassette interface? I
>had one of the
>Atari setups, nice so long as you were only using it like a multi-cable
>PtP setup.
Yes. One fix for the cload TRS80 problem was an internal counter based
oneshot that would clear the RS flop at the ttl end of the CLOAD read
hardware.
The interface depended on the transistion detector being reset by
software
and sometimes that didnt happen and it would get lost.
The other problem was if you were doing back to back (cpu to cpu) CLOAD
CSAVE the clock on one could be way off and after a minute or so of
data transfer the recieving system would get behind.
Allison
My community is having a mass tag sale around me so
kinda getting into the spirit.
Free for Postage else TOSS!
Bubbl-tec Bubbl-Machine literature pack.
Sheets for DEC LSI-11, SBC-80, Multibus Bubble memory
Wyse Literature
Pages on the WY-30,50,60,85,99GT terminals
AT&T 6386 WGS sales specifications card.
Four Best offers takes:
DEC "Microcomputer Processors" 1978-79
Reference manual on the LSI-11. Softbound, 250 or so pages.
John A.
There's a few computer related items
on my lawn too to test the waters.
On Friday, September 07, 2001 11:19 PM, Megan [SMTP:mbg@world.std.com]
wrote:
>
> If this goes through, it means I will have worked for three
> separate companies in five years time, and not had to move
> my office once...
>
> Megan Gentry
I've worked for five in just over three. Granted, I've moved my cube,
but that was
solely motivated by my ambition to gradually get
1) Closer to a coffee pot
2) A window
3) A convenient exit for those 'late days'.
through exploiting my co-workers temporary vacancies, and not because I
had to.
Jim
Well several of my replys were rejected by classicomp email system
so here they all are together... :^)
Ethan Dicks wrote:
> --- Ron Hudson <rhudson(a)cnonline.net> wrote:
>
>> I was going to write a simulator for Bell Labs "Cardiac" (cardboard
>> slide the slides and move bits be the cpu your self) computer, but
>> all I
>> can find is the Instruction Set...
>
>
> Do you _have_ a CARDIAC? Do you want one?
>
> -ethan
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
I don't have one, but the instruction set was listed
on the Internet once or twice, 0,input ... What I
don't have is the "Wireing" that graphic on the "cpu" side
that controlls operation, and there are part that change
with the instructions. Yes I would like a cardiac, any
donations? (will trade for C coded emulator :^)
[ will code for toys?? ] )
I went on to "design" the 8 bit machine described because
cardiac won't handle character data, only 3 digit numbers.
I also wanted to make use of the a whole 8 bits, and have
each instruction use only 8 bits (well some of them do read
the next byte via indirect of the PC) Also I think the flag
testing at for each instruction is um clever, what do you
think.
will repost instruction set if desired.
I really wanted some of you to look over the instruction
set and theory to see if I was obvously missing somthing.
Reply to Zane... Thanks for the pointer to the TOPS-10 emulator
I will see what I can do with it...
I've got some copies of DOS. I know, I know. Does anyone want them?
I've got PC-DOS 3.0 in the original IBM slipcase
I've got two copies of MS-DOS 5, one is still shrinkwrapped
I think I have PC-DOS 3.2
anyway they are available for postage or free if you come to sunnyvale to
get them.
--Chuck
For those of you in Portland, OR, the Wacky Willy's on NW Vaughn St.
has a LOT of cool stuff. A bunch of Macs and PC's(including several
large Compaq servers with either 486 or 586 and lots of HD's... Might
go back and get one myself for $100) and TONS of furniture of the odd
kind. Seems that OHSU has turned the place into their new dumping
grounds. Sadly, the Macs were all missing the hard drive, and most of
the PC's have either been wiped or stripped of drives also. Lots of
Compaqs!
Anyway, I picked up some odd parts as well as an Epson HX-20 with an
expansion unit and micro-cassette drive cartridge and a cute plastic
carrying case. I should be able to figure it out easily, and my PX-8
finally has a companion!
The item that really stumps me appears to be a terminal of some sort.
It's in a very small box (6x8x1) and has a Z180 in it, next to a
large(160 pin) unmarked chip. It has VGA video, DIN-5 keyboard,
parallel printer, and two RJ-style(6 pins, and an offset clip) COM
ports. It needs a small headphone plug for power with 12v, so I need
to dig out my crappy universal power supply and see what blows
up(I've noticed that it tends to put out a few extra volts... 12v
setting is usually 18v with no load and closer to 13-15 with small
loads) The only markings are on the edge of the board and on the
EPROMs. The board says "01000117 REV.01 MAGPIE SSPC" and the EPROMs
say "6086 7/6 1600 EL 0" and "EL 1" for the next chip. As soon as I
can find my power wart I'll post an update about the size of the
flames spitting out of it ;-) (NOOooooo! Come back magic smoke!!!)
--
/------------------------------------\
| http://jrollins.tripod.com/ |
| KD7BCY kd7bcy(a)teleport.com |
\------------------------------------/
Hi!
Thanks to the generosity of one list member, I now have a VCB02 boardset
to play around with. Unfortunately, I don't have the bulkhead panel for
it. Does anyone know what the connector and pinout was for this?
On a related note, can the cable used to hook up a
keyboard/mouse/monitor on a VAXstation 2000 also be used to connect a
keyboard/mouse/monitor to the VCB02 subsystem? It sounds like they're
pretty much identical.
Thanks,
Sean
--
Sean Caron http://www.diablonet.net
scaron(a)engin.umich.edu root(a)diablonet.net
On Friday, September 07, 2001 7:04 PM, Jeff Hellige
[SMTP:jhellige@earthlink.net] wrote:
> saving stuff from the slave machines. It worked pretty well though.
> Anyone know just what additional stuff was needed to do it?
>
> Jeff
I played with one of these early on.
To load and save files from the slaves? There was just a little
third-party bit of 'repeater'
software that tried to emulate a CLOAD. Couldn't do anything other than
save, tho.
The hardware itself was just a pair of RC pairs and a single transistor
amp. Think there
was some TTL glue, but I can't see it as being terribly important.
D'ya know if they ever fixed the mid-bitstream problem that was common
early with the
Trash and later with the Atari and their MPI over cassette interface? I
had one of the
Atari setups, nice so long as you were only using it like a multi-cable
PtP setup.
Jim.
> From: Russ Blakeman <rhblakeman(a)kih.net>
> I never have a problem with the business line of HP PCs' (Kayak, Brio and
> Vectra) - the Pavilion line keeps me going with warranty repairs at $65
per
> inshop repair and $30 per "exchange unit".
I was specifically referring to the Pavilions. The Vectras were especially
well-made.
> I only get one of every 50 or 60
> owners that have the Compaq owner's attitude about HP's machines.
Not too sure what you're saying here.
> If you contact customer support at HP they can either ship a free restore
> set if it's under warranty and you tell them it's there but not loading.
If
> you've lost it, in or out of warranty, they can sell you a replacemant if
> you supply the unit serial number.
Problem is the customers often won't wait. We're famous for <=
2-day-turnaround ;>)
> Packard Bell wasn't bad near the end of their reign of terror. They got
real
> too late and were already on a downward spiral fast towards earth.
Yeah, their P-II boxes were *almost* standard ATX.
> I don't know why anyone feels the HP restore is bloated...it's all
> MicroSteal for the most part. All windows 98, NT, ME and 2k stuff is huge
> and you need a broadband connection to download it. I just popped $20 for
> the Win NT 4.0 service pack 6.0a rather than sit for 2 days downloading
it.
I never download any MS stuff.
I'm referring to the device drivers for goodies like the Riptide
sound/modem combo. The drivers posted at hp.com are > 9MB. The *real* fun
begins when, after the download, the installation program pukes up a
message: "Cannot find original driver files -- update terminated" or
something to that effect. Why aren't the originals available on their
site??? And what sort of code, exactly, is in a > 14 MB video driver???
When I was writing C for a living, if I had ever produced an executable --
never mind a device driver -- which occupied 14 MB of disk space I would
have been sent packing. Sheesh.
Glen
0/0