> >Also, not every programmer produced from personal computing is a bad
> >programmer. I've seen quite a number of such people that should be
> >forbidden from ever invoking a text editor, but we're not all that way.
> >I may not have a lot of field experience (I'm not even out of college
> >yet), but I'm a damn good programmer.
>
> As Iggy mentioned a bit ago, Demo programmers still practice
> assembler. I would imagine that there are quite a few talented
> programmers in that field.
I do not mind that programmers vote Democratic...
Seriously, what's a demo programmer? A programmer who writes
only demo software? As in mock-ups? Prototypes?
And I hate to pick nits, but no one can "practice assembler"
anymore than they can "practice compiler".
They _write_ assembly language; if it must be shortened, it
should be to "assembly", not "assembler".
But if I'm stumbling into a British usage vs. American usage,
please forgive me, I pick nits, but prefer not to be an errant
pedant.
And I would not consider people writing in assembly language
to be at the bottom rungs, at least not by virture of the
language they're using. In fact, I am locally renknowned as
one of if not the best assembly language programmer available
(again, locally). Too bad the demand has dried up.
Regards,
-dq
Spotted a TRS-80 CoCo of some kind in the rehab centre at Loma Linda
University. It apparently was (is?) used for EMG testing to check peripheral
nerve impulses.
Also, from the MCA reissue of Steely Dan's "Gaucho", in the liner notes:
"That's when the business with the computer started. Roger Nichols had this
toy -- we thought of it as a toy -- but one day he came to work and told us
that the toy had become a man ... who, in the absence of a useable track after
a zillion tries with 'real bands' could nicely simulate the most elusive
elements of the basic track that we would need to bring our little song into
the world, i.e., drums and maybe a simple keyboard part of some sort, and
that's all. Because, once we had that -- the toy, the man, the track-- we
could do all the rest with little or no problemo, thank you very much.
Unfortunately, at this primitive stage of the evolution of the computer and
its requisite software, even the most minute event had to be programmed in
the gnarly and unforgiving 8085 assembly language, in which all relevant
parameters had to be described in its baffling hexagesimal [sic -- guess
they were too stoned to count properly ;-)] base system, which ultimately
became the only language Roger Nichols spoke or understood, at least for
a time ... And so was born the era of sampled drums and sequenced music --
'the birth of the cruel' as we now call it. History, read it and weep."
(Don Fagen [lead vocals] and Walter Becker)
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- Work harder! Millions on welfare depend on you! ----------------------------
Hi,
I know a place where they're selling a TANDEM CYCLONE mainframe:
* Description: Clycone Mainframe Computer Cabinets with
Himalaya K series Disk drives. Data Files and hard drives
have been removed.
* MFG: TANDEM
* Model: CYCLONE
* Condition: Used - Good
* Size: 24x24x50
* Weight: 700
* Year of Manufacture: 1993
it's in Kansas City, MO. Starting bid is $50, increment $50,
reserve not yet met :-(. 8 days to go. No, it's not ebay.
Don't bid against each other. I'm not interested myself, neither
in the computer nor in the sale of it. Just thought it may be
a good deal.
Let me know if you're interested.
cheers,
-Gunther
--
Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D. gschadow(a)regenstrief.org
Medical Information Scientist Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
Adjunct Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Medicine
tel:1(317)630-7960 http://aurora.regenstrief.org
> It will work fine as long as it's an older Mac. Most of your
>PPC based Mac's, especially those running OS 8.6 and newer, have
>trouble with the 400k and 800k formats.
I have had some formating problems on PPC macs and 800k disk. The format
seems to work, but the disk is usually unreadable in an older 800k drive
(1.4mb drives seem ok). Reading and writing to a preformatted 800k disk
has never been a problem. So I either format a disk in an older non PPC
machine, or I also have a blank 800k disk image that I can copy to a
disk, that always seems to work fine (the image was created off a disk
that was formatted on a non PPC mac).
400k is a totally different issue. A: I believe the drives themselves may
be incapable of working with 400k, but more importantly B: starting with
OS 8.0 (I think it was 8.0), MFS file support was dropped. No MFS, no
400k disks. 800k disks use HFS so there isn't a problem there.
Of course, I keep a handy dandy LC kicking around for just this very
issue (the LC connects nicely to my ethernet network, and runs 7.1 so it
will read and write 400, 800, 1.4mb, DOS and ProDOS disks, giving me
access to all of the above on my iMac).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Hello all,
I never thought I'd say this here, but then I also never thought I'd see
what I saw on 09/11... My ICOM Attache is up for auction on eBay.
It is an "Auction for America" item, which means that I do not see a single
penny of proceeds. I have elected for the winning bid to be donated to the
September 11th Fund.
The Attache is NOT complete, so see the description and pictures for more
details... It does include some documentation and schematics
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1278512829
It was hard to give this up, but it was a cakewalk compared to what others
have lost.
Bidding was already up to $202.50 this morning, but I hope someone will go
higher...
Also, some of you might consider doing the same. I didn't have a spare $202
in cash, but I did have this computer to donate the proceeds...
Rich B.
On September 24, Chad Fernandez wrote:
> I used to have a terminal like the one in the picture. I had it before
> I knew much about computers. Mid to late 80s, I think. I found it in a
> trash dump, on a farm, while my dad and I were putting up a tree stand,
> on some property owned by the father, of a lady at church. I wish I
> still had it, at least then I could document exactly what it was.
Hmm...They look like Lear-Siegler ADM-3A terminals to me...
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
> So what's everyone think about the newest merger, between HP
> and Compaq?
It sure explains why Compaq killed Alpha.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
>I just acquired an Apple IIgs (thanks Rich!) and am anxious to try it out. I
>have downloaded the system software from the Apple site but an unsure how to
>go about making 800K disks for use on the IIgs as none of my local computer
>stores stock 800K floppies. Is it possible to cover over the hole that tells
>the drive that it is a HD disk and format it as an 800K disk? Will the 800K
>drive on the IIgs be able to read it? Or do I have to find a source for real
>800K media?
I have used HDs as DDs before (specifically on the Mac, so it is relivant
to your situation, as it is dealing with going from 1.4 to 800 or 400k).
I can tell you that it does work, but not reliably. The data seems to
fail over time, not so much length of time, but read/write time.
Unfortuantly, the length varies greatly (and seems format dependant, not
disk dependant). Sometimes they work for a dozen or so uses, other times
they might work for 100 or so. Once they start to fail, reformatting them
seems to refresh the usability. I have learned that it simply isn't
reliable enough except to use for short term temporary work.
HOWEVER, the good news is, MEI Micro still seems to sell DD disks. They
only sell them in a 500 pack for $50, which is kind of a bummer, but at
least they can be bought. You can find them on MEI's web site (but not in
their print catalog) at http://www.mei-microcenter.com. I have used their
floppy disks in the past and have never had any problems with them. Last
time I bought their disks, I believe they were actually generic labeled
Sony's, but that was some years ago, and I would guess they get their's
>from lowest cost suppliers, so that might have changed by now.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Got an email from someone saying he saw my OSI C1P in my online collection
and he's got 4 of them in various configurations he will be sending to me. I
can't wait to see what I've got. Would be cool if they had disk drives and
such. I think they are all basic C1P models though.
On 2001-09-22 classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org said to kees.stravers(a)iae.nl
>Does anyone have any recommendations on software (preferably free)
>for archiving old DOS floppies? What I'd like to do is to be able
>to make disk images of all (okay, maybe just 'many') of the old DOS
>floppies I have so that if they disks get trashed or the bits fall
>off I can remake 'em.
The DISKCOPY command from DRDOS 6 and 7 can do this, e.g.
DISKCOPY A: C:\FLOPPY.IMG and the other way around works too of course.
The DRDOS DISKCOPY command exe file also works under msdos.
Kees
--
kees.stravers(a)iae.nl
http://home.iae.nl/users/pb0aia/http://www.vaxarchive.org
Net-Tamer V 1.08.1 - Registered
On Sep 14, 19:03, Jonathan Engdahl wrote:
[ Pete wrote : ]
> > Why not burn it into (EP)ROM? 64K for the opcode jump table fits in a
> > 27512, you maybe want about the same again for the code, and that
> > would fit
> > in some devices used for BIOS ROMs these days. Or put it on a SIMM or
> > DIMM.
> That actually was my first idea. That way, the hacked PC would be almost
> indistinguishable from a real PDP-11. The hard drive would contain an
exact
> image of a PDP-11 disk, with no underlay of PC-ish partitioning.
>
> But I'm not sure how much ROM space is available on modern PC mainboards.
Does it matter very much? There's at least 64K bytes for the BIOS ROM and
often twice that or more. Besides, that's why I suggested a SIMM or DIMM.
What I had in mind was a bootstrap in the "BIOS" ROM socket and an EPROM
or two on a home-made SIMM/DIMM with the main code.
> You can probably tell my x86 coding skills are really rusty. Most of my
x86
> programming has been either on an 80188 (many years ago) or in C. But,
you
> get the idea.
Mine are worse :-) 80x86 is one of the few common architectures I've never
written any amount of assembly language for.
> Lots of detail unresolved: condition codes, for example. My suggestion,
> forget about them until you get to a branch instruction. Use the native
x86
> condition codes. The architectures are probably sufficiently similar. In
the
> example above you might have to insert "and bx,bx" or whatever the x86
> equivalent is after the MOV to set the condition codes PDP-11 style. (I
> think MOV sets the N and Z flag, right?)
Sets N and Z according to the value left in the destination, clears V,
leaves C unaffected.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hello,
A friend of mine recently offered to get me a Zilog System 8000 system
that he says is currently acting as a plant stand. Does anyone have any
information on these systems, and if it is not a larger machine (I am
interested in workstation and mini class machines), would anyone have an
interest in this box?
Zach
On September 23, Russ Blakeman wrote:
> Just for those who aren't aware of the proper uses and display of the US
> flag in this moment of everyone just having to display it lately, here's a
> well done resource for reference. This is a guideline made from US Public
> Law 93-344 and done in a layman's format so it's easy to grasp and use. It
> might even be a good idea for local newspapers to print a variation of this
> once to inform people that don't know that they may be "doing it wrong"
>
> http://www.state.wi.us/agencies/dva/museum/flaguse.html
For those who think our government isn't overstaffed and overflowing
with people who have too much free time on their hands...this should
erase all doubt once and for all.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
Gordon:
I use two tools. 2FILE/2FLOPPY, a freeware utility from PC Magazine
and written in the early 90's.
Alternatively, I use Microsoft's READIMG/WRITIMG programs. The
Microsoft programs I don't believe are available publicly -- I got them from
one of the early Chicago beta CDs I think.
I'm sure that there are other more modern utilities available on
shareware.com or download.com.
Rich
==========================
Richard A. Cini, Jr.
Congress Financial Corporation
1133 Avenue of the Americas
30th Floor
New York, NY 10036
(212) 545-4402
(212) 840-6259 (facsimile)
-----Original Message-----
From: Gordon Zaft [mailto:zaft@azstarnet.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 5:52 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Archiving floppies?
Does anyone have any recommendations on software (preferably free)
for
archiving old DOS floppies? What I'd like to do is to be able to make disk
images of all (okay, maybe just 'many') of the old DOS floppies I have so
that if they disks get trashed or the bits fall off I can remake 'em. I'm
assuming I'd probably be making these archives from a Windoze box although
DOS or even FreeBSD or Linux is a possibility.
Thanks in advance.
GZ
Michael B. Brutman wrote:
> For copyprotected diskettes I'm using Teledisk, although I don't
> trust it entirely. Teledisk is also good for damaged diskettes,
I stopped trusting TD once I found that it would
not restore 5-1/4" 360k floppies on my machine -
if only I'd found out before archiving 50-odd
of them that way. It seemed OK with the 3-1/2"
floppies, but I'd stopped trusting it by then!
> which the raw binary formats can't handle. (The damage looks like
> copy protection.) The downside to teledisk is the portability ...
> I'll need a DOS machine forever to read the data. I don't have this
> problem with the raw binary images.
Exactly. I'd prefer a program that was able
to cope with any MS-DOS floppy and had
a documented "image" format. I'm still
looking, although the DR-DOS DISKCOPY is
probably what I will use once I
start again.
Antonio
I want to run a TI calculator emulator on my Windows computer. I need a
rom image for the specific calculator I want to emulate to do that.
You're supposed to download the rom from your own calculator. My main
reason for wanting to run the emulator, However, is to try out one of
TI's newer calculators BEFORE I buy one. I have an 85, but I'd like to
try out a 86, or a 92/92Plus.
Do any of you already run emulators and have a rom image you could send?
Chad Fernandez
Michigan, USA
On September 23, Zach Malone wrote:
> A friend of mine recently offered to get me a Zilog System 8000 system
> that he says is currently acting as a plant stand. Does anyone have any
> information on these systems, and if it is not a larger machine (I am
> interested in workstation and mini class machines), would anyone have an
> interest in this box?
I ran one for years. Whaddya wanna know?
If you don't take it, I certainly will. I regret having sold mine
about 10-12 years ago.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
On September 23, Chad Fernandez wrote:
> Why? You think we shouldn't have guidelines for the flag? It's not
> like the flag police are going to come and inspect your flag.
That's not the problem. The problem is the fact that we PAID some
idiot suit to come up with this crock.
I've always maintained that people like this (with too much free time
and the need to look like they're "doing something") need some REAL
problems to deal with. Now that they've GOT some real problems, the
idiots who can't figure out what to do are just going to make even
bigger asses of themselves.
-Dave
PS - No, I'm actually in a great mood today.
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
For DOS floppies, I make a disk image and store the files to zip.
The disk image is in case I missed anything, or if the diskette
is bootable. The zip file is for normal file manipulation. With
CD-ROM space so cheap, why not do both?
The particular archiver I use is dd under linux, or fdimage, loaddskf,
or any other archiver that makes a binary image of the diskette.
No compression or meta data ... I can tell what type of disk it was
by the resulting size, and I can compress with zip or gzip.
The raw binary images are mountable under Linux.
For copyprotected diskettes I'm using Teledisk, although I don't
trust it entirely. Teledisk is also good for damaged diskettes,
which the raw binary formats can't handle. (The damage looks like
copy protection.) The downside to teledisk is the portability ...
I'll need a DOS machine forever to read the data. I don't have this
problem with the raw binary images.
Has anybody used CopyIIPC and Snatchit? That's supposed to work too.
It's an old pirating technique, but it is applicable to archiving
copyprotected disks.
I've updated the panels page at the House of VAX
<http://www.mcmanis.com/chuck/computers/vaxen/>
(about 1/3 down the page is the link to the panels)
to include the VAX 4000/300,400,500,... panel. So if you're wondering what
the things do on this panel here is a handy reference.
--Chuck
All you Tekkies out there...
I just pulled my old Tektronix 4051 out of the garage (no I don't want to
sell it), plugged it in, turned it on and ... and ... and ...
Well all the lights lit, the memory CRT bloomed, and that was that.
Screen wouldn't clear and the machine wouldn't respond to any keystrokes.
It's frozen...
Well it worked fine when I put it in storage and I was wondering if anyone
had any experience getting these to work after years without juice?
I seem to recall that the machine goes through a self-test on power
up: the "busy" and "i/o" lights light and after a few seconds they go out
and a square cursor appears on the screen. Does anyone remember what the
self-test looks for? I'm thinking it may try to trigger the tape to rewind
and wait for the results. I don't know why any electronic part would fail
after years of storage but would seem likely that a tape drive motor might
seize up and stop the machine from completing its test.
It would be an easy matter to free up a motor and a more difficult matter
to diagnose a parts failure. Any ideas before I take the thing apart?
Thanks in advance...
Nick
Nicholas Gessler
gessler(a)ucla.edu
Box 706, 22148 Monte Vista Drive
Topanga, CA 90290-0706
310.455.1630 (home office)
310.825.4728 (UCLA office)
310.825.7428 (UCLA fax)
Special Projects, UCLA Center for Digital Humanities
Founding Co-Director, UCLA Center for Social Complexity (a.k.a. Center for
Computational Social Science)
Founding Co-Director, UCLA Social Interfaces & Networks / Advanced
Programmable Simulations & Environments (SINAPSE)
Instructor, Geography, Computational Geography Track: Simulations,
Cartography, Artificial Culture
In preparation - "Artificial Culture - Experiments in Synthetic Anthropology."
Web Portal:
http://www.bol.ucla.edu/~gessler
Just for those who aren't aware of the proper uses and display of the US
flag in this moment of everyone just having to display it lately, here's a
well done resource for reference. This is a guideline made from US Public
Law 93-344 and done in a layman's format so it's easy to grasp and use. It
might even be a good idea for local newspapers to print a variation of this
once to inform people that don't know that they may be "doing it wrong"
http://www.state.wi.us/agencies/dva/museum/flaguse.html
Went to the Columbia (Maryland) ARA hamfest this
morning. By far, the most successful, in vintage
computer terms, hamfest I've ever been to.
Arrived at 6am. Dark... Walked around through
the little bit of fog, squinting at the tailgating
stuff already out. Silly me, forgot to bring a
flashlight. Talked to some people and got a line,
maybe two, on an ASR 33. As the sky gradually
brightened, made my first score, a box of S-100
cards and motherboards. The guy wanted $20. I was
so amazed to find anything that interesting that
I forgot to haggle and handed him a twenty. Next
I found a large pile of 50 pin twisted pair rainbow
wire (perfect for 8 inch floppy cables) for $1.
It quickly got lighter and the fog burned off. Now
I could see the following of classiccmp interest
(all of which I passed on):
A pile of 20 or so Commodore 64s with a sign "2 for $5"
A large collection of SGI boxes, Indigos, etc.
A large collection of Sun boxes and monitors.
A number of Atari boxes of various makes.
A table with 10 or so old Mac boxes and a Next slab.
A couple of CoCos.
A lot of tailgaters were still setting up, but it was
8:30 and I had to leave. On my way out, a flash of
"S-100 blue" caught my eye. In an unattended box
labeled "project enclosures, $5 for the box, slip money
in drivers side window" was a really nice, clean NorthStar
5 1/4" disk enclosure with power supply, but no drive. I
didn't need all the other Radio Shack style project boxes
that were also in the box, so I just took the N* box and
put $2 in the window.
I hope some other CC'ers made it to this one, I'll
definitely be back next year.
1) Power on the machine.
2) Wait approximately ten minutes.
3) Press 'reset'.
4) Wait a further thirty seconds.
5) Type <CTRL>-V on the console keyboard. The machine should beep.
6) Type '1' to set the video system to 70 Hz sync or '2' for 60 Hz.
additionally, the default mode for the serial console (which the system
will automatically use if there is no keyboard plugged in at power-on) is:
9600-E-7-1
Good luck. Hopefully this will help somebody get his Aviion going.
ok
r.
On September 19, Chuck McManis wrote:
> So does anyone have a preferred way in which they organize all the many
> hundreds of bits of stuff you need when you are keeping older computers alive?
For storing stuff in boxes...I avoid cardboard nowadays...I've been
replacing them with those plastic "tubs" that one can purchase at
discount stores. They last longer, are waterproof, and more
stackable. They've also considerably cut down on the dust level in
the house.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
I'm looking for parts to repair a dead? eMate 300. The screen is basically
cracked in half! Fortunately, the rest of the unit is intact. For those who
don't know what one is, this is basically a Newton-based laptop and a very
nice little machine. I'm scoping around for parts but was wondering if
someone had a dead one with an intact LCD they might be willing to part with.
Ironically, it was damaged in a classroom demonstration of how difficult to
break it was. The professor nailed it the first time. :-/
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- In memory of Howard Caine --------------------------------------------------
On September 19, jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de wrote:
> BTW a stupid question: What is a 8700? Is it SBI based like the
> 11/78[05] and 86[05]0, or is it XMI / VAXBI like the 85x0 or 6k VAXen?
> I asume that a 8700 is a 8600 in a biger enclosure?
The 8700 and the 8600 are very different machines. The 8700 uses
VAXBI, and is mounted in a chasiss similar in size to that of the
8600. I don't think there's any XMI in there.
Incidentally, the 8700 can be turned into an 8800 by plugging a
second CPU card set into the machine.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
On Sep 22, 13:11, Roger Merchberger wrote:
> I did mention that I was primarily a softee-ware guy -- and when
> dealing with chips I have a tendency to think of them *as software* --
> like: if you try to write to a ROM, what happens? Nothing. (duh...)
Well, not unless you use "more interesting" voltages :-)
> I
> looked at the chip specs for the demux, and you have inputs & outputs...
In
> my mind (at first), your suggestion was "ramming 5V down an output port"
> and sometimes I have to stop & think that "those ports are just a bunch
of
> gates jammed together on a chip to serve one purpose" and doing stuff
like
> that is not a "Bad Thing (TM)." :-)
> My board isn't a "complete" board -- it's to be designed to make
> experimenting much easier by having flexible on-board address decoding,
and
> (at least for my purposes) I want "one address per switch", so I'm not
sure
> if the MUX suggestion is what I want. As of right now (but I'm still
> researching CoCo memory maps) I'm looking to have an 8K ROM socket at the
> "normal" location ($C000-DFFF) w/jumper as to whether or not it will
> auto-start (jumpering the Cart signal to the Q line) and I'm looking at
> having the address decoding for my I/O ports at $FF50-3 & $FF60-3, but if
I
> want *just* $FF51 & $FF53 to be decoded & $FF50 & $FF52 to be ignored, I
> want to be able to switch them individually.
> (Originally, my design was just going to have 1 address decoded from each
> "bank", but then I realized that if I wanted to interface "most anything"
> like a PIA, UART or a FDC that it wouldn't work.)
Let's see if I'm interpreting this correctly. I think you want to be able
to decode addresses, but sometimes you want to be able to provide (let's
say) two "enable" outputs, each active for a separate group of addresses
(maybe two different ranges of four addresses each), and sometimes you want
to be able to provide more finely selected enables (maybe responding to
only one address in each range).
I can see why you'd want to that if one day you are using a UART that needs
four addresses and another time you use a a PIO or VIA that needs 8 or 16
addresses.
A couple of ideas that come to mind are using a PROM or PAL to do the
decoding. A PAL or GAL would probably operate faster than a PROM, but it
might be easier to program a PROM (depending on how used you are to
building tables for PROMs, logic rules for PALs, and what programming tolls
you have access to).
For example, suppose you have a PROM with 8 address and 4 data outputs.
You could fill it with data such that certain data outputs were at the
appropriate "active" level if (and only if) 6 of the address lines were in
a certain state, ie were driven with a certain address(es). By tailoring
the data appropriately, you could arrange it so that the outputs took
account of all 6 address bits, or just (say) four). The other two address
bits I'd use as a function selector: if both are low, the output is active
for a range of addresses (only 4 bits significant); if one is high, respond
to the first two addresses in the range; if the other is high, respond to
the upper part of the range; if both high, respond only to the highest
single address in the range. Or something like that, to suit the job in
hand.
Depending on the exact requirement, you might still be able to do this with
a MUX or two. A multiplexer is a very useful general-purpose logic
element, widely used as a circuit building block, not just for the obvious
"if the clock phase is high, select the refresh/video addresses; if low,
select the CPU addresses" sort of operation.
> For anyone here who does their own hardware designing, what software do
you
> use? I've tried "Protel 99 SE" and CircuitMaker 6 (student version) --
and
> a few others, and I must say that I'm not keen on most anything I've
tried
> compared to "good ol' AutoCad".
I use an assortment. Often I use the drawing package from RISC OS on one
of my Acorn machines. From time to time I've used 'pcb' on a Unix system.
> Oh, I've found a really good site to purchase all manners of circuit
board
> "stuff" w/really good prices, too:
> http://www.web-tronics.com/printed-circuit-board-supplies.html
That's encouraging. Completely home-made PCBs seem to be a relativley rare
occurrence in the US, at least compared to here. Over here, almost every
secondary school, college, and university makes PCBs and there are still
magazines publishing designs which enthusiasts photocopy onto film (OHP
acetates, aka viewgraph foils for you colonials) and then apply to
photoresist copperclad board. In the USA, as far as I can see, most people
tend to pass the artwork or plotfiles to professional PCB houses to be made
up. Lots of people do that here too (I'd probably not try to etch my own
board for a really densely packed device using PGAs, for example) but
there's still a strong tradition of using your own ferric chloride (not in
the wife's best stainless steel sink, though).
While there's nothing at all wrong with either method, I'd caution anyone
trying it, that layout software (or dry transfers) tends to be suited to
one or the other but not both. For the professional house, you are more
likely to want nice round pads and not too many different sizes. You can
use thin tracks, and pads with fairly small margins of copper round the
holes. However, for truly homemade, handetched boards, there's usually
more variation in the quality of the image transferred to the board, so
very fine tracks are not such a good idea. Moreover, they won't normally
have plated-through holes, so it's wise to use larger pads which won't come
unstuck too easily -- often oval pads for ICs, which have a relatively
large copper area yet are still narrow enough to leave a gap to get tracks
between the pins. Lots of PCB layput software isn't capable of doing
anything other than simple round (or square or symmetric octagonal) pads
and is therefore much less useful for home-etched PCBs.
No offence intended Roger, but I think your IC pads on the CoCo board are
smaller than I'd personally be happy with for a home-etched and -drilled
board without plated holes. (See
http://www.dunnington.u-net.com/tmp/coco_pcb.jpg for a modified fragment)
BTW, did you notice the tracks going through the pins on pins 13 and 14 of
the leftmost LS244?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I finally found a cable and monitor for my VAXstation II/GPX!
I haul it home then notice the label on the cable is BC23J not the
BC18Z I was expecting.
Is the BC23J just a newer version of the BC18Z? Or did my 3100 just
get a colour monitor?
I also picked up a DEC Multia today with Schematics!
Collector of Vintage Computers (www.ncf.ca/~ba600)
Hi,
I recently acquired a couple of Central Point Deluxe Option Boards with v5.4
of the software, plus manuals. (I haven't tested either card yet though.)
This card allows protected and wierd-format disks to be read and written using
a standard PC floppy drive. The supplied software supports Mac and Amiga
disks as well as Apple II and Commodore. I guess the hardware is functionally
similar to the Catweasel ISA card.
Anyway, relating to that a few points:
- If anyone needs disk images of the software (3?" 720K or 5?" 360K), I can
upload them. My disks have not been written to since new.
- What was the last version of the software? I read a newsgroup posting from
1997 that mentioned versions 5.5 and 6.0.
- What differences are there between the Option Board and Deluxe Option
Board? Looking at a picture in an eBay auction listing, the Option Board
card appears to use quite a few discrete (TTL?) ICs, whereas the Deluxe
card (or at least, the cards I have), uses an ASIC made by Toshiba. Does
the ASIC simply replicate the discrete ICs, or contain extra functionality?
- Has anyone reverse-engineered the hardware? Only the discrete-IC version
would be feasible, I guess. In combination with disassembling the software,
that should provide sufficient info to allow new software that accesses the
Option Board to be written.
- Has anyone reverse-engineered the disk image file format used by the
software? I know someone has written a program to convert image files
created from Apple II disks to plain disk images for use with Apple
emulators; see http://www.ece.nwu.edu/~cbachmann/apple.html
There is a description of some of the file format on that page.
- Ideally, I'd like to contact someone who was involved with the development
of either the hardware or software; maybe they could provide info on how it
works.
- On a similar note, what was the last version of Central Point's Copy II PC
software? That program could be used to copy some protected PC disks
without needing extra hardware.
-- Mark
On September 22, Gordon Zaft wrote:
> Does anyone have any recommendations on software (preferably free) for
> archiving old DOS floppies? What I'd like to do is to be able to make disk
> images of all (okay, maybe just 'many') of the old DOS floppies I have so
> that if they disks get trashed or the bits fall off I can remake 'em. I'm
> assuming I'd probably be making these archives from a Windoze box although
> DOS or even FreeBSD or Linux is a possibility.
I'd just dd(1) them from to a file, gzip them, and save the disk
images.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
As a favor to the Alameda County Computer Resource Center in Oakland,
California, who is hosting the VCF Archives as well as the upcoming VCF
5.0 (still to be rescheduled) I'm announcing their relatively new retail
venture, Aftermath Technologies.
Basically, anything they have in their warehouse is up for sale. They've
taken pictures of a whole lot of stuff and have thrown them up on their
website. Some of it is priced, most of it is "make an offer". They've
got everything under the sun: all kinds of computers, peripherals, hard
drives, disk drives, monitors, keyboards, mice, routers, hubs, chassis,
printers, modems, scanners, cables, connectors, phones, VCRs, video
equipment, books, manuals, software, random crap...
Most of it is modern or semi-modern. Some of it is classic (lots of Apple
][s, TRS-80s, older Macs, etc). There's also lots of eclectic stuff in
there too. These folks get in truckloads of gear every week. What
doesn't get placed in schools and charities or sold gets shipped off to
China for recycling.
Your patronage contributes to a very good cause! Anything you buy will
help them carry on their mission to refurbish old computers that get
donated to schools and charities. Help educate the next generation!
The URL is http://www.aftermathtechnologies.com. Make sure to check out
the "Featured Items" catalog, as there are some gems in there.
Don't be scared by the high pricing of some stuff. They just don't know
what to ask for most of it. I tried to help them price some of the
classic stuff but the changes have apparently not made it to the website
yet.
So go and DIG!!! There is lots and lots of stuff. If you are looking for
just past modern PC or Mac bits then this is the place to go buy it from.
http://www.aftermathtechnologies.com/
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
From: Iggy Drougge <optimus(a)canit.se>
>Now, I've got three functioning VMS 5.5 disks. And we've got a MicroVAX
3100
>without system disks. Would it be possible to just connect one of my
spare
>disks to the SCSI bus on the ?VAX or would the system crash and burn
when it
>couldn't find any graphics hardware and perhaps not the exact same
peripheral
>systems (these are disks from a VAXstation 3100, so they're close
relatives)?
Should not be a problem as I've dont it here.
The better way is to start from a working system with a drive that is
blank
(for use in the target vax) and invoking VMSbuild to create a copy of VMS
on the target disk. Then that target disk can be booted and proceed as
if it was a regular VMSinstall. We used this trick years ago to put VMS
on RD54s to install on new microvaxen (MV-II) faster than using TK50
ot MOP.
Allison
From: Bob Shannon <bshannon(a)tiac.net>
>
>I understand your confusion here, but in this case there already is
something
>defined as microcode. Simply adding another layer of complexity does
not change
>the underlaying microcode that runs directly on the hardware, its still
the microcode
>of the engine. This underlaying microcode still implements the
instruction set of
>the physical CPU hardware.
Because what your calling a microcoded engine is really running as your
microcode
something that used to be called macrocoding. IE: your "microcode"
engine a Pentium
understands yet another lower level code (internal pentium microcode).
In the end what you have been decribing is emulation. If your pentium
drove hardware
that was <registers and ALU> say 36 bits wide and ran code to drive it as
say a KL-10A
then the pentium would be a fully macrocoded microengine.
It's does not say a Pentium running dedicated code to emulate any machine
in such
a way as to hide the pentium completely is not a useful device.
The terminology of microcomputers was laid down a long time ago and if
you change meanings or the application of said meanings you invoke
confusion.
Allison
The book: "Computer Organization & Design, The Hardware/Software Interface",
by David A. Patterson and John L. Hennessy is a pretty thorough modern book.
I don't know where to find a bit-slice design book these days.
--tom
At 09:18 AM 9/21/01 +0100, you wrote:
>Tony Duell wrote:
>
>> I've not come across it, but if it stops with registers and
>> the ALU, I don't think I'd call it a 'good book'.
>>
>> A CPU can be divided into 2 parts. The Data Path (registers, ALU, the
>> multiplexers between them, etc) and the Control (instruction decoder,
>> microcode + sequencer, condition logic, etc)
>
>True, I don't recall covering much in the way of control logic - only
>very basic stuff like telling the ALU whether to add or subtract, plus
>implementing a few flags like zero and carry. Once we got to that stage
>they threw us at the 29xx series to look at microcoding, which was all
>the rage at the time.
>
>Unfortunately I've lost most of my college notes now, I guess I've moved
>too many times :-/ I've been looking for a replacement for the Thewlis
>book - can you recommend any which cover CPU logic from the basics of
>how to build registers out of gates up to instruction fetching & decoding?
>I'm also very keen to get hold of a book covering the bitslice processors
>(29xx), any ideas? I can't imagine there's anything left in print now, but
>with an author/title or ISBN I might be able to track down a second-hand
>copy.
>
>-al
>
>
Contact me via DIRECT EMAIL on these...
Here's some hard to find cables for IBM PS/2 and RS/6000 systems for SCSI
external hookup. All are high quality black, like new, except for the first
batch of 1 ft cables that are beige:
1 ft Centronics 50male to Centronics 50 male "jumpers" - great for case to
case stringers. $3.99 each, have 24 of them.
3 ft mini-centronics 68 male to high-density 50 male (clip type) $6.99 each,
have 4.
5 ft mini-centronics 68 male to high-density 50 male (clip type) $14.99
each, have 11
3 ft mini-centronics 68 male to standard Centronics 50 male - $6.99 each,
have 7
5 ft mini-centronics 68 maile to standard Centronics 50 male - $14.99 each,
have 10
10 ft mini-centronics 68 male to high density 68 male (screw type) $21.99
each, have 3.
The above does NOT include shipping. I don't charge for slamming it in a box
and taking it to the post office either, just the rounded postage (regular
or priority) with delivery confirmation. Shipping is from zip 42726 in KY.
I may also work out pickups for locals in the evenings/weekends if desired.
Right now I *will* ship to USA, APO/FPO and Canada but will ship to others
if I don't get stuck doing a ton of paperwork. US funds only, can take money
orders or Paypal. Paypal ships out the same/next day as payment is made.
Money orders when it's recieved.
Now the kicker - I'm posting any not spoken for (serious buyer only) on ebay
on 9/27 for the general PS2 and RS6000 crowd to have a shot at. Anyone that
has me hold one/some for them MUST make payment in reasonable time, say a
week to 1 days after they have me hold some for them. If they stand me up
I'll just put those cables on ebay later on but they certainly will be
remembered for future offerings and I'm just getting started with the
opening of my stash of IBM stuff.
On Sep 15, 14:42, Roger Merchberger wrote:
> My idea: A 2-4 decoder/demux. tied to A0 & A1, with the outputs going to
> one side of a SPDT DIP switch, the other side of the switch pulled to +5,
> then all four of the switch outputs going into a 4-input AND gate. That
> way, you could switch any of the four addresses on or off, so that you'd
> have access to more than one memory location for CE/ to implement UARTS &
> stuff that require more than one address to function. (It can be done
> easily without the switches -- I could use a jumper block without
> heartburn, but the switches would look neater, and wouldn't have the
chance
> for floating inputs/outputs...)
In other words, this:
_____
____ +5V - ---| \
_____ | - ---| & \_____
| |__ _ o - ---| /
A0 ------| 2 |__ _ ----o----------------|____/
| to |__ _ o
A1 ------| 4 |_________|
|_____|
Wouldn't this be easier and do the same thing?
____ +5V
|
\ 4 x 1k0 pullup
/ _____
_____ \ - ---| \
| |__ _ / - ---| & \_____
A0 ------| 2 |__ _ | - ---| /
| to |__ _ ----o----------------|____/
A1 ------| 4 |_________o
|_____|
I've just seen Tony's reply, and his suggestion using a MUX would have been
my next suggestion too. It's also easier to extend to more address bits
(fewer switches required).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Press: [2nd][Mode][Alpha][S]. Then press any key except [ENTER], if you
dont
want to erase calculator memory.
Krzysztof
"Blair J. Miller" wrote:
> It's been so long since I've dealt with these things... how do I get
the ROM
> version again?
>
> Blair
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Krzysztof Strzecha" <strzecha(a)kis.p.lodz.pl>
> To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 11:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Anybody have a rom image of a modern TI graphing
calculator?
>
> > "Blair J. Miller" wrote:
> >
> > > I have an 86 if you want me to create a ROM image of it... but
you'll
> > have
> > > to instruct me on how to do it... I have the serial link cable.
> > >
> > > Blair
> > >
> >
> > Hi
> > I am author of TI-81, TI-85 and TI-86 drivers for MESS
> > (http://mess.emuverse.com) multiemulator. What version of rom do you
> > have in
> > your TI-86 ? I was able to found only version: 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 and
1.6. If
> > it is
> > diffrent I am also interested in image of this rom.
> >
> > Krzysztof Strzecha
> >
> >
> >
> >
First of all, I'm lagging far behind with my mail reading, and I don't think
I've managed to thank those who provided me with the necessary help for
cracking my VAXstation. Now I'm fumbling around in VMS. What a queer system,
I'm totally lost, but some manual reading will probably provide necessary
orientation.
Anyway, thank you, Jochen (?) et al.
Now, I've got three functioning VMS 5.5 disks. And we've got a MicroVAX 3100
without system disks. Would it be possible to just connect one of my spare
disks to the SCSI bus on the ?VAX or would the system crash and burn when it
couldn't find any graphics hardware and perhaps not the exact same peripheral
systems (these are disks from a VAXstation 3100, so they're close relatives)?
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
"Real life is full of idiots, and tons of ads. I don't see how IRC is any
different, other than a lot more people want to have sex with you."
-- m3000
To whom were you replying? I'd posted about looking
for an LCD screen for my Sharp laptop a while back...
Unfortunately for me, mine has suffered fragmentation
(it's physically cracked). Replacement is the only
option...
-dq
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Spence [mailto:sspence@avimages.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 7:43 PM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: LCD repair
>
>
> Don't know if you found the problem with your lcd yet but I
> am a tech on
> such and if you carefully fub the glued ribbon cables feeding into the
> lcd panel sometimes this corrects those lines otherwise you
> might get it
> repaired by one of the online lcd repair shops.
>
> Steven Spence
>
Free, available immediately, in suburban MD just inside the I-495 beltway:
Over a thousand used 8-inch floppies, mostly in plastic storage boxes, mostly
with CP/M filesystems and SW. Also, some Shugart 8" floppy drives, very
similar to the SA800 but requiring a little bit wider mounting space.
Email me at "shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com" if interested. First to set up a
pick-up time this weekend gets them all (no picking and choosing, you take
them all!)
Tim.
Free to whoever wants to pick it up. I'm in suburban MD, just inside
the I-495 DC beltway:
Free Apple //c
Free Apple II+
Free Apple Disk II drives
Free random Apple docs and magazines
Please E-mail me at "shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com" if interested. First
person to set a definite pick-up time for this weekend gets them.
Tim.
On Friday, September 21, 2001 9:56 PM, Paul Thompson
[SMTP:thompson@mail.athenet.net] wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Dave McGuire wrote:
>
> > On September 19, Chuck McManis wrote:
> > > So does anyone have a preferred way in which they organize all
the
> > > many
> > > hundreds of bits of stuff you need when you are keeping older
> > > computers alive?
> >
> > For storing stuff in boxes...I avoid cardboard nowadays...I've
> > been
> > replacing them with those plastic "tubs" that one can purchase at
> > discount stores. They last longer, are waterproof, and more
> > stackable. They've also considerably cut down on the dust level in
> > the house.
>
> I have an Army surplus ammo case for my spare hard drives (filled
> layers
> of bubble wrap.) The thing is airtight and actually hisses from the
> pressure change when opened after being kept closed for some time.
>
> I ran out of room in it and turned out some of my smaller capacity
> drives
> to normal storage.
>
>
> --
Good idea. Myself, I use cases from IBM procs. Take the spacer foam
out, fit
8 standard HD. For laptop drives leave the foam in, fit 20.
Jim
So does anyone have a preferred way in which they organize all the many
hundreds of bits of stuff you need when you are keeping older computers alive?
--Chuck
Hello, all:
For those interested, I hit a major milestone this evening. After a
momentary flash of brillance (which come too few and far between I'm afraid
:-)) I made some minor tweaks to the code relating to diskette images. Then,
I loaded up an image of CP/M 2.2 for the Altair and fired it up. Well, don't
you know it works! I got CP/M to boot on the emulator!!! I now have to try
Altair Disk BASIC and Altair DOS.
It's dog slow and for some reason I can see CP/M console output but it
doesn't appear to receive console input. So, I'm stuck at the "A>" prompt. I
guess it's time to slow the front panel updating again or try to optimize
the processor code.
I feel a 2.1 release coming...
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project
Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
/************************************************************/
> Absurdly Obtuse wrote:
>
>Is it possible to put a Laserbus PCI Hose from an AlphaServer 8400
in my
>VAX 7000? The concept boggles the mind. Also, does anyone know
where I
I don't know what the differences are between the TurboLaser
bus (as in the AS 8400) and the Laserbus (on the
VAX 7000/DEC 7000).
If it works you will have the pleasure of writing some
VAX drivers for PCI. Don;t forget that some LSB modules
had Alpha-only firmware: I presume they had carnal
knowledge of Alpha MMG data structures which
are different on VAX. So just because it does not
smoke when you drop it in the slot does not
mean it is useful!
>can find TXXX XMI/BI, EXXX Laserbus, and other reference numbers
for
>boards?
For VAXBI, VAXft and XMI you can start here:
http://www.stmarks.pp.catholic.edu.au/vax/
There are various "field guides" dotted around the
net that cover Omnibus, Qbus and UNIBUS.
I've got a list somewhere of LSB and FBUS
stuff. Is there anything specific you
wanted?
Antonio
Tony Duell wrote:
> I've not come across it, but if it stops with registers and
> the ALU, I don't think I'd call it a 'good book'.
>
> A CPU can be divided into 2 parts. The Data Path (registers, ALU, the
> multiplexers between them, etc) and the Control (instruction decoder,
> microcode + sequencer, condition logic, etc)
True, I don't recall covering much in the way of control logic - only
very basic stuff like telling the ALU whether to add or subtract, plus
implementing a few flags like zero and carry. Once we got to that stage
they threw us at the 29xx series to look at microcoding, which was all
the rage at the time.
Unfortunately I've lost most of my college notes now, I guess I've moved
too many times :-/ I've been looking for a replacement for the Thewlis
book - can you recommend any which cover CPU logic from the basics of
how to build registers out of gates up to instruction fetching & decoding?
I'm also very keen to get hold of a book covering the bitslice processors
(29xx), any ideas? I can't imagine there's anything left in print now, but
with an author/title or ISBN I might be able to track down a second-hand
copy.
-al
Hi,
I'm looking for information about an author (and
a series of magazine articles he wrote in the early
70's concerning analog computers) by the name of
D. Bollen.
The articles might have been published in "a popular
English `do it yourself' electronics magazine called
something like Practical Electronics".
Does anyone have a near complete collection of
Everyday Practical Electronics (EPE) Magazine? Maybe
the magazine has an author's index. Can anyone think
of the name another similar magaazine that fits this
description?
I've been told that these articles contain the
"Full details" of my C180 english analog computer.
Regards,
--Doug
P.S. If you CC me then I don't have to wait until
tomorrow for your reply. :)
=========================================
Doug Coward
@ home in Poulsbo, WA
Analog Computer Online Museum and History Center
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
=========================================
> > Okay, you've got a 35 VUP system (VAX 7610), a 32 VUP system (VAX 6610),
> > and a 6 VUP system (VAX 8700).
> Don't forget that VAX 4000 in the 19" rack (P2100253.JPG) and that nice
> BA215 (P2100244.JPG behind the plotter), what ever it contains.
I missed the 4000 due to the shadow and the BA215 as I didn't scroll all
the way down. More nice toys.
> > However, it looks like you are missing the power controllers.
> And the disk, tape, ... subsytems of the 8700?
>
> Sridhar, Brian you both are crazy. Absolutely nuts. And I have to say
> that I like people like you very much. ;-)
As someone that cares for an 8820 at work, I really think the 8700
is nuts, but fun.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
I've had great luck in the past few weeks using a
new tool called 'tsgui' that can be found on Aminet
and the usual Amiga-related sites.
It writes an Amiga volume as an HDF file, the format
now supported under emulators such as WinUAE.
My remaining Amigas (an A2000/040 and an A4000/030)
always had Ethernet cards with TCP/IP and NFS. Using
the freeware SOSS NFS server on my PC, I can see
the PC's hard disk on the Amigas. 'tsgui' wrote each
volume across the network.
WinUAE wants sectors and surfaces as if from an
Amiga 'mountlist' in order to understand the geometry
of the HDF hard file. A tool called 'MakeMountlist'
made that easy when the systems (such as the A4000)
didn't use old-fashioned mountlists.
Once loaded into WinUAE, it easily mounted my old volumes.
One tweak to the startup-sequence to map my old volume
WinUAE's default volume names, and suddenly I was booting
into my exact A2000/040 environment in WinUAE.
WinUAE can also mount points on the PC's file system
as Amiga volumes, making future archived file retrieval
quite easy.
- John
! >Isn't the SE an 030 Mac? The Plus is only a 68000.
!
! No, the SE was an 8mhz 68000 just like the plus. The SE was
! basically a
! newer plus (it had a built in HD or 2 800k floppies, ADB, an
! expansion
! slot, and a newer ROM). Later the SE was upgraded to having the
! SuperDrive (not the NEW superdrive that apple has recycled
! the name for,
! but rather the original 1.4mb drive that could read MFS, HFS,
! DOS, and
! ProDOS)
Properly known as the 'Macintosh SE FDHD'. Yep, I got one of these, running
OS 6.0.7, 50MB HDD, and 4MB RAM...
! There WAS an SE/30 that was a 16mhz (33mhz?) 68030... it was
! basically an
! SE, but with the faster processor and 8 simm slots rather than 4... I
! think THAT is the Mac you are thinking of.
Yeah, the SE/30 is a 68030, 16MHz; with 68882 FPU and 0.5K of L1 cache! Have
two of these, OS 7.1 and 7.0.1...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Don't know if you found the problem with your lcd yet but I am a tech on
such and if you carefully fub the glued ribbon cables feeding into the
lcd panel sometimes this corrects those lines otherwise you might get it
repaired by one of the online lcd repair shops.
Steven Spence
I've been looking at info on the Internet, and I have gotten confused. A
lot of places say that the DEC VT525 can do color graphics, whereas some
places say it can only do text. Is there a DEC color graphics (ReGIS and
Sixels) terminal that can accept a PS/2 keyboard?
Peace... Sridhar
On Sep 21, 9:18, Alan Pearson wrote:
> Unfortunately I've lost most of my college notes now, I guess I've moved
> too many times :-/ I've been looking for a replacement for the Thewlis
> book - can you recommend any which cover CPU logic from the basics of
> how to build registers out of gates up to instruction fetching &
decoding?
> I'm also very keen to get hold of a book covering the bitslice processors
> (29xx), any ideas? I can't imagine there's anything left in print now,
but
> with an author/title or ISBN I might be able to track down a second-hand
> copy.
Amongst my collection I have "Microprogrammed Systems Design" by J S
Florentin.
After some preliminaries, it explains the design of two (fictional)
machines, a simple one (not unlike a PDP-8) and then a more complex one
(not unlike a PDP-11) using Am2900 series and TI 74AS888/890 chips. It
has a large section on the sequencers in the middle, then microprogramming,
and ends up with RISC and other VLSI devices (including later AMD and TI
bit slice families). It may still be in print; I'm sure I've seen copies
recently.
It's published by Macmillan, ISBN 0-333-54250-9 if you want to look for it.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
This has been a good week. If all continues to go well, I will have
procured the following hardware for the use of my buttocks:
VAX 7000-610
VAX 6000-610
VAX 8700 (hopefully to eventually become n 8800)
2 VAX 4000/700A's
4 Partial VAX 4000/500's (Need chassis/backplanes)
DECserver 700
VT340 (yay! finally! thanks, dave!)
IBM S/390 G1
IBM 3990 ESCON-attached DASD controller
IBM Shark RAMAC 2TB DASD Server
IBM 5155 Portable Personal Computer
Apple //e w/1 Drive
SGI Onyx RealityEngine2
SGI IrisVision Microchannel (!)
DPT EISA Caching SCSI
EISA 10/100 Ethernet
2 Kingston MCA RAM Expansion Boards
Plus I got to hang out with Dave McGuire, Brian Hechinger, Brian's
daughter Avalon, Jeff Hellige, and a bunch of other random cool people.
Pretty good week, I think.
Peace... Sridhar
Is it possible to put a Laserbus PCI Hose from an AlphaServer 8400 in my
VAX 7000? The concept boggles the mind. Also, does anyone know where I
can find TXXX XMI/BI, EXXX Laserbus, and other reference numbers for
boards?
Peace... Sridhar
I am in contact with a fellow near Buena Vista, Colorado, who has a TRS-80
Model IV with some system disks and manuals. He wants it to go to a good
home. You pay shipping and packaging costs.
He has no e-mail address and would not like to publish his phone number,
so please e-mail me and I'll pass the info along to you.
In the inevitable event of multiple responses, preference will go to those
local to him (local being inside Colorado).
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
"Blair J. Miller" wrote:
> I have an 86 if you want me to create a ROM image of it... but you'll
have
> to instruct me on how to do it... I have the serial link cable.
>
> Blair
>
Hi
I am author of TI-81, TI-85 and TI-86 drivers for MESS
(http://mess.emuverse.com) multiemulator. What version of rom do you
have in
your TI-86 ? I was able to found only version: 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.6. If
it is
diffrent I am also interested in image of this rom.
Krzysztof Strzecha
"Bill Sudbrink" <bills(a)adrenaline.com> said:
> I brought this up some time ago, but never
> got a satisfactory answer...
>
> When I use the above combination (regardless
> of CPU board), while the system in general
> works fine, the deposit/examine functionality
> of the front panel stops working. Somebody
> said they knew of a fix, but then never posted
> anything else. I've looked at the schematics
> (I have them for both items) and can't for the
> life of me see anything that would conflict.
>
> Any help greatly appreciated.
Here is some of the IMSAI front panel gottas:
MWRITE pin 68 - This signal needs to be generated
by one source and one source only. It is generated
by the IMSAI front panel (by a deposit) so make
sure this signal is disabled on the CPU board when
used with the IMSAI front panel.
PROT & UNPROT pins 20 & 70 - The IEEE 696 standard
says that these pins will be at ground. Some
motherboards ground these lines. But grounding
these pins on the IMSAI front panel will disable
the front panel. To fix this, cut the traces,
on the front panel, right at edge connector
pin 20 and 70.
Data Out Bus - When the IMSAI front panel does
a deposit operation, it expects the the data
on the Data In Bus to be reflected on the
Data Out Bus. Some later CPU boards disabled
the Data Out Bus to cut down on bus noise
especially above 2MHz.
Regards,
--Doug
=========================================
Doug Coward
@ home in Poulsbo, WA
Analog Computer Online Museum and History Center
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
=========================================
> Here is a link to a Compaq web site that lists VUP ratings:
Those aren't VUP ratings. It isn't even accurate, since the
heading is "VAX system performance comparison--performance listing"
and there are Alpha systems mixed in.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
On September 20, Geoff Reed wrote:
> You know.... every time I see For Auction and rare in the same sentence, I
> want to flog the author with a coho salmon....
Kinky.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
This is semi-ontopic since I'm building the system to emulate a PDP-10.
Anyway I just got a pair of Intel D810EMO motherboards for free. I plan to
add a DIMM, CPU, small HD, and a PS. Probably won't even bother with a
case as I'd like to save space.
Anyway, it's been a long time since I had much to do with PC's I've got the
following questions.
Is a Pentium III 800EB and a 800B processor the same thing?
Can a Mac USB keyboard (from my G4/450) be used on a PC?
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
Does anyone have a copy of CP/M TEX (preferably for CP/M-86)?
The manual is available form the usual places, unfortunately the binary
is not.
Thanks,
--
Steve Kostecke <steve(a)kostecke.net>
> > There are some inaccuracies, though. For instance, the /90 and /90A
> > are shown to have the same TPS, but the /90A is faster. The numbers
> > for the /90 and /90A are also wrong as far as I can tell (the numbers
> > more closely match what I first posted rather than what I determined
> > experimentally).
>
> One remark here. The TPS numbers not always seem to be "logical". Please
> notice,
> that a lot of the benchmark is influenced by the I/o & disk system. So a
> faster CPU not always
> has a better TPS number. You can see it many times if you really look
> into it.
That's true, but the /90A has quite a bit more cache, which should
influence the TPS rating.
> And, the 4000/90 & /90a are workstations. So TPS is not of so much value
> to this ...
>
> > There's also a lot of holes in the list.
>
> So fill them ;-)
I was planning on doing that in the next few days. Standardizing will
take a bit of work, though.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
Hello Salo,
> is there any 3 BNC -> 5 BNC cable out there? maybe that would
> solve my problem.
I have never seen anything like this. While it is easy enough
to join two or three signals ( Software Integrators and Mirage,
the makers of Fixed Frequency Video Cards for PC's used to
do it by soldering a couple of resistors on the back of their
video cards, one from H to green, and the other from V to green,
taking care of sync type, while frequency timings were still taken
care of in their customized video bios's ), it would be way beyond
my ( practical only, and limited at that ) level of knowledge
to know how to strip the sync signals off the green line, and
individually separating them at that, to properly make that signal
into a separate sync video signal.
Sincerely,
Bennett
salo wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:41:17PM -0400, Info from LSI wrote:
> > If you don't mind experimenting, under the hood, and can do so
> > without electrocuting yourself, I believe on the left side of
> > the monitor you will find some adjustments, some of which might
> > be labeled, horizontal frequency, horizontal phase, horizontal
> > size, horizontal center, etc. You might try tweaking some of
> > those and seeing if that stabilizes the image.
>
> i tried these already. some little changes occur but nothing big and nothing
> which could indicate better state - just change. i do not think this is the
> way it will work.
>
> i am not familiar with so old monitors (i was 10 and knew nothing about any
> other hardware than PC and 8bits at the time it was constructed ;)) is there
> any 3 BNC -> 5 BNC cable out there? maybe that would solve my problem.
>
> > Or you might try a 5 BNC variety Sony multisync, just hooking
> > up R, G, and B.
> >
> > or if you have a multisync with a HD15M pigtail, I have hooked
> > these up by coming out of computers with BNC video out by
> > connecting to a BNC to HD15 cable hooked up so that the BNC's
> > are to the computer, then used a HD15F-HD15F gender changer to
> > join the BNC to HD15 cable to the monitor's HD15M pigtail.
>
> yes, i could use another monitor, but i want to use this one.. it is looking
> fine and i do not want to throw it out :(
>
> > Just some experimental options to possibly try.
>
> thanks anyway
>
> regards,
>
> --
> -- salo <salo(a)Xtrmntr.org> ASCII Ribbon campaign against /"\ --
> -- <salo(a)silcnet.org> e-mail in gratuitous HTML and \ / --
> -- Microsoft proprietary formats X --
> -- http://Xtrmntr.org/salo.pgp / \ --
Hi:
I came across on of these and don't know exactly what it is. It doesn't
look like any OScope that I've ever seen. Any HP gurus out there that
recognize it?
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project
Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
/************************************************************/
> At 12:08 PM 9/20/01, Emmanuel replied to my question with :
> >http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/Hardware/Machines/DEC/vax/sections.html
> >;-)
>
> (the VAX hardware reference), however this reference is unreliable when it
> comes to VUPs ratings.
> Eric has confirmed that it was correct on the ones I asked about, we
> already had the 4000/100 vs 4000/90 vs 4000/700 discussions :-)
There are some inaccuracies, though. For instance, the /90 and /90A
are shown to have the same TPS, but the /90A is faster. The numbers
for the /90 and /90A are also wrong as far as I can tell (the numbers
more closely match what I first posted rather than what I determined
experimentally).
There's also a lot of holes in the list.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
I just received about 80 HP Cassette tapes today, and have no idea what
these things might be used on or for. They appear to be about DC-100
size and have names such as "64850-10005 Z8 asm/lnk", "64815-10002 68000
Pascal Compiler", "64816-10005 Z8001/2 Pascal Compiler", "Z80 Emul/Asm",
etc. Anyone have any idea of what machine these things might be used on?
> > > > The VAXstation 4000/90 is a 42 VUP system and the VAX 4000/400 is a
> > > > 16 VUP system, so you aren't doing too bad. I seem to recall the
> > > > VAX 4000/700A is about 40 VUPs and the /705A is about 45-50 VUPs.
> > >
> > > The VAX CPU Summary lists these numbers:
> > >
> > > VS4000/90 32.8 VUPS
> > > 4000/700a 40 VUPS
> > > 4000/705a 45 VUPS
> >
> > The numbers I have are from DSN, and the 42 VUP rating for the 4000/90 feels
> > right to me.
>
> The "VAX CPU Summary" numbers above are their SPECint92 numbers, NOT their
> VUP rating. I'm glad to finally see VUP ratings for these systems. Eric, I
> don't suppose you've also got any kind of full list from DSN? If not do you
> happen to have info on the VS4000/90A and /96?
I have the full list available from DSN, but it isn't complete. I can't post
it here, though, due to it being copyrighted, but I can post VUPs for requested
systems from the list, if you ask.
The numbers above are the VUPs. The DSN listing for the /90 and /90A are off
by 10. I got ambitious and ran some more tests. The /90 is 32-33 and the
/90A is 38-39. The VAX 7730 systems at work are 150 VUPs.
What's interesting when reviewing the list is to see how the bus architecture
impacts the VUPs on identical CPUs. For instance the 7610 is 35 VUPs but the
6610 is only 32 VUPs.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
Hello Bill,
The URL is ...
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1277142640
Sincerely,
Bennett
Bill Bradford wrote:
>
> Please ! Let me know the auction number as soon as it goes up.
>
> Bill
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 06:19:14PM -0400, Info from LSI wrote:
> > Hi Bill,
> >
> > I don't mind putting my VAXstation 4000/60's, "box
> > only", up on eBay, starting at $1.00, under their
> > "Auction for America" program where eBay donates the
> > selling price to the NYC WTC Disaster Fund. 8 Mb on the
> > board. Both checked to power up and generate video output.
> > You scrub the magic marker markings off the front which
> > is easy to do with isopropol alcohol and comet. However,
> > regardless of how eBay wants to run that program, packaging
> > materials ( low cost because I get them wholesale ) and
> > shipping costs ( low cost because I ship FEDEX Ground at
> > the FEDEX Center ) would have to be covered, else buyer
> > picks up. But with "buyer picks up" terms, it should sell
> > dirt cheap.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Bennett
> >
> >
> > > Speaking of which, anybody know where I can get a decent desktop
> > > VAX to play with again? VLC or better...
> >
> > > Bill
>
> --
> Bill Bradford
> mrbill(a)mrbill.net
> Austin, TX
Hi, a TU81+ (9-track tape drive, the latest and best that
DEC came up with) is up on ebay with only 17 hours to go. It
is in St. Louis. So, Buckaroo may want to get it. I think someone
should drop in a bid on it just so it is not lost in the
dumpster. I have already two of those outstanding (still need
to actually go and get them.) The TU81+ works nice with a
VAX 6000 or a UNIBUS vax. Not sure the smaller 4000s have
an interface, they probably do. The interface is the KLESI
on the BI bus (it's actually a UNIBUS adapter with the
TU device driver right on the same card and no way to
connect more UNIBUS.)
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1275105774
-Gunther
--
Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D. gschadow(a)regenstrief.org
Medical Information Scientist Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
Adjunct Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Medicine
tel:1(317)630-7960 http://aurora.regenstrief.org
Hi Bill,
I don't mind putting my VAXstation 4000/60's, "box
only", up on eBay, starting at $1.00, under their
"Auction for America" program where eBay donates the
selling price to the NYC WTC Disaster Fund. 8 Mb on the
board. Both checked to power up and generate video output.
You scrub the magic marker markings off the front which
is easy to do with isopropol alcohol and comet. However,
regardless of how eBay wants to run that program, packaging
materials ( low cost because I get them wholesale ) and
shipping costs ( low cost because I ship FEDEX Ground at
the FEDEX Center ) would have to be covered, else buyer
picks up. But with "buyer picks up" terms, it should sell
dirt cheap.
Sincerely,
Bennett
> Speaking of which, anybody know where I can get a decent desktop
> VAX to play with again? VLC or better...
> Bill
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 at 13:40:10 "r. 'bear' stricklin" <red(a)bears.org> wrote:
> I do, in fact, have several releases of DG/UX on both QIC tape and CD-ROM.
> I'd be interested in trading a copy of one for a dump of the NVRAMs. I can
> tell you how to get the dump, too.
I'm just catching up on my Classic Computer reading...
I've got four DG AV 4300's sitting in the next room. Each of them has a QIC
tape drive. I got them without documentation and I haven't had time yet to
even boot them up.
If someone has instructions on how to break into root I'd be happy to try it
out, and/or if there's a way to read the NVRAM without booting the OS I'll
be happy to try that, too.
BTW, I'd love to trade the 4300's for classic HP gear...
Cheers,
Dan
www.decodesystems.com/wanted.html
Hello Salo,
> btw. i have another problem. i have Sony GDM-1601/8 monitor
> (shipped by Data General with own logo) connected to my AV 530
> with graphics card by 3 BNC RGB cable made from standard 50ohm
> coaxial cables (i know there should be 75ohm ones, but i just
> wanted to try it). i am not sure if 3 cables are enough because
> that monitor has 5 BNC connectors (2 additional ones for horizontal
> and vertical sync). i tried to find any docs but without success
> (no info about 1601/8, just 1601 and 1601/6). problem is that
> picture on monitor looks like with higher frequency than monitor
> can handle or without some sync, lines are shifted to each other
> and it is shaking a bit. i hoped that sync on green was enogh but
> now i am not sure. graphics card i have is some data general 8
> B/P GRAPHICS CARD shipped with that AV 530 (monitor was probably
> used with another machine).
> any help will be appreciated.. thanks
If you don't mind experimenting, under the hood, and can do so
without electrocuting yourself, I believe on the left side of
the monitor you will find some adjustments, some of which might
be labeled, horizontal frequency, horizontal phase, horizontal
size, horizontal center, etc. You might try tweaking some of
those and seeing if that stabilizes the image.
Or you might try a 5 BNC variety Sony multisync, just hooking
up R, G, and B.
or if you have a multisync with a HD15M pigtail, I have hooked
these up by coming out of computers with BNC video out by
connecting to a BNC to HD15 cable hooked up so that the BNC's
are to the computer, then used a HD15F-HD15F gender changer to
join the BNC to HD15 cable to the monitor's HD15M pigtail.
Just some experimental options to possibly try.
Sincerely,
Bennett
> > > > > Actually that rack contains two VAX 4000/700As.
> > > > Ahhhh! I get jealous reading that. The 4k VAXen are quite nice and the
> > > > 700A has around 33VUPs. My best VAXen are a 4k400 and a VS4k90.
> > >
> > > The VAXstation 4000/90 is a 42 VUP system and the VAX 4000/400 is a
> > > 16 VUP system, so you aren't doing too bad. I seem to recall the
> > > VAX 4000/700A is about 40 VUPs and the /705A is about 45-50 VUPs.
> >
> > The VAX CPU Summary lists these numbers:
> >
> > VS4000/90 32.8 VUPS
> > 4000/700a 40 VUPS
> > 4000/705a 45 VUPS
>
> The numbers I have are from DSN, and the 42 VUP rating for the 4000/90 feels
> right to me.
Maybe the /90 is 32 VUPs and the /90A is 38.8, which would make sense if the
list on DSN is off for both system. What leads me to believe the DSN listing
is in error now is I just ran a test program on a /90, 90A, /400, and /500,
and the numbers for the /90 and /90A are way off from what I'd expect if the
ratings from DSN are correct. I'm going to run some tests this weekend to
try to get better numbers.
I wish the original DEC test program was available.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
Hi,
does anyone know where Brian Chase is? He dropped from my
radar screen about two months (or more?) ago. He used to
live in Bloomington, IN, not far from me, and we had
hauled the VAX 6420s from my workplace in spring this
year. He wanted to check out some job opportunity in
California, and then he was never seen again. Does anyone
have more recent information? His Web site still exists,
without any news however.
thanks,
-Gunther
--
Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D. gschadow(a)regenstrief.org
Medical Information Scientist Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
Adjunct Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Medicine
tel:1(317)630-7960 http://aurora.regenstrief.org
Doug Coward <mranalog(a)home.com> wrote:
> PROT & UNPROT pins 20 & 70 - The IEEE 696 standard
> says that these pins will be at ground. Some
> motherboards ground these lines. But grounding
> these pins on the IMSAI front panel will disable
> the front panel. To fix this, cut the traces,
> on the front panel, right at edge connector
> pin 20 and 70.
I'm thinking that some CPU boards expect the front panel to ground one
of these signals when the panel is putting something on the data bus
via the panel connector (and the CPU board should therefore use the
data bus on the panel connector instead of the one on the
motherboard). Maybe I am confusing this with some other signal?
I ran into this in 1989 with a CCS Z80 board and no-name chassis
with apparent 696 motherboard. Took me a while to figure out why
it wasn't coming up.
-Frank McConnell
Hello, all:
Work on the Altair32 emulator is progressing and I'm up to getting
the floppy controller code working, but I've run into a snag.
Has anyone ever used this controller? Does anyone know if it has a
BIOS or something *other* than the 256-byte bootrom? I disassembled the
bootrom that I borrowed from the Elena Altair simulator and it seems to
reference addresses outside its execution range.
Thanks.
Rich
==========================
Richard A. Cini, Jr.
Congress Financial Corporation
1133 Avenue of the Americas
30th Floor
New York, NY 10036
(212) 545-4402
(212) 840-6259 (facsimile)
Huw Davies [mailto:Huw.Davies@kerberos.davies.net.au]
> systems. All of these systems used either a PRO-350 or PRO-380 as the
> VAXconsole. Later (when all the PROs were used up?) the console was
> replaced with a uVAX-II and the systems renamed 88x0 (for
> x=1,2,3 or 4 CPUs).
Actually, the Nautilus family underwent
a slight redesign (or possibly a major redesign)
and became the Polarstar family. This was the
VAX 8810 (1 cpu) through to the VAX 8840 (4 cpu).
Up to 2 CPUs per cab, max 2 cabs for a full
system. The system bus was renamed from
NMI to PMI (and presumably underwent some changes).
The PRO console was replaced with a MicroVAX II.
There was some confusion about the 8700 and 8800
machines and so they were (IIRC) renamed
VAX 8810-N and VAX 8800-N. I never saw one
of these so I don't know whether they were
real VAX 8700 and VAX 8800 or whether they were
a VAX 8810/VAX 8820 but with a PRO console (
or even a MicroVAX II console!).
The maintenance manual for the Nautilus
series was online at
http://208.190.133.201/decimages/moremanuals.htm
but that seems to have slipped two months
backwards in a time warp and all that
has vanished! I've never seen a similar
manual for the Polarstar series, but I
have seen the corresponding lists of modules
and they did look quite different to Nautilus
IIRC.
Antonio
jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de wrote:
>There is the 8600 (aka 11/790) listed as a SBI machine.
That's correct. It was going to be known
as the VAX-11/790 until someone changed
their mind (it was very late, so they had
plenty of time to play with the name!).
>There is no reference to the 8700.
The VAX 8700 is a single processor VAX 8800.
>The 8800 is listed as:
> Basically an 8550 processor in a bigger box with space for
additional
> processors to make it into an 8820 or 8840
No. The Nautilus family started out as the
single processor VAX 8700 which could have
a few more (or many more, I forget) cards
added to become the dual processor VAX 8800.
The VAX 8550 was a VAX 8700 in a (big) cab
that could *not* be upgraded to a VAX 8800.
The VAX 8500 was a VAX 8550 with microcode
deliberately slugged to slow it down.
This was soon followed by a microcode update
that removed the NOPs ... *all* 8500s were
supposed to be upgraded and the machine
was renamed the VAX 8530.
The processor(s) live(d) on the NMI bus
(Nautilus Memory Interconnect, I assume).
The I/O bus was the VAXBI. This is in
contrast to the VAX 8200/8300 which came
out at the same time and used the
VAXBI as their system bus as well as
teh I/O bus.
>The 8550 is listed:
> XMI processor/memory backplane with VAXBI I/O
XMI is wrong ... it's NMI. The VAX 6000 series
was the first family (IIRC) to use the XMI.
>So I assume the "base" machine is the 8550. In a biger chasiss it is
>named 8700 and with a second CPU the 8700 is called 8800?
Yes, that's a good summary but
don't forget the runt of the litter,
the VAX 8500 (which rapidly became the
VAX 8530).
Antonio
Bill Pechter wrote:
> Actually much of the 11/780 microcode is in rom.
> The stuff loaded from RX01 is mostly bug fixes to the rom code.
> The patches went into the Writeable Control Store board.
The VAX-11/750 did the same thing (IIRC the
first microcode patch required a large number
of roms to be changed by field service ...
the control store was redesigned to allow
patchable code a-la 780).
> The 11/785 went to completely RAM loaded microcode.
> The 11/780 did have an optional second User Writeable Control Store
> board.
In one or other of the DTJ articles, the
development of the MicroVAX II is described.
They used the VAX-11/730 with new microcode
to simulate a MicroVAX II: the 11/730
was *completely* soft.
Antonio
> At 10:53 PM 9/19/01 -0500, Eric wrote:
> > but I can post VUPs for requested systems from the list, if you ask.
>
> Ok, what are the VUPs rating of the
> MicroVAX 3400, 3500, 3800, and 4000/200 (KA640, KA650, KA655, and
> KA660)
Here there are, plus a couple of extras:
System VUPS
3200 2.7
3300/3400 2.4
3500/3600 2.7
3800/3900 3.8
4000/200 5.0
4000/300 8.0
4000/400 16.0
4000/500 24.0
4000/600 32.0
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
> >So I assume the "base" machine is the 8550. In a biger chasiss it is
> >named 8700 and with a second CPU the 8700 is called 8800?
>
> As far as I recall, the first two products were the 8700 and the 8800, the
> only difference was the number of CPUs (one and two respectively). There
> were two slower implementations (8550, 8530) that were both single CPU
> systems. All of these systems used either a PRO-350 or PRO-380 as the
> VAXconsole. Later (when all the PROs were used up?) the console was
> replaced with a uVAX-II and the systems renamed 88x0 (for x=1,2,3 or 4 CPUs).
The 8700/8800 used a Pro-350 or Pro-380 as the console. Later, DEC renamed
them the 8810 and 8820. Later on DEC introduced a new 8810 and 8820 that
were different and could be upgraded to an 8830 or 8840. Unfortunately
they aren't compatible and this leads to problems when you need to get
repair parts. You need to be specific on whether your 8810 or 8820 is
a -N or not. I can't remember whether the -N is the newer model or not.
The easiest way to tell is whether your system has a Pro or a MicroVAX II
as the console.
When DEC introduced the newer models they really should have used a new
model number or renamed the older models the 8710 and 8720.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
> > Actually that rack contains two VAX 4000/700As.
> Ahhhh! I get jealous reading that. The 4k VAXen are quite nice and the
> 700A has around 33VUPs. My best VAXen are a 4k400 and a VS4k90.
The VAXstation 4000/90 is a 42 VUP system and the VAX 4000/400 is a
16 VUP system, so you aren't doing too bad. I seem to recall the
VAX 4000/700A is about 40 VUPs and the /705A is about 45-50 VUPs.
> > That thing that looks
> > like a BA215 is actually an external DSSI cabinet full of disks.
> Ahh, I know that. I got such a thing with my MV4k200...
>
> > I now have craploads of 2 GB DSSI disks.
> I know people that would kill for 2GB DSSI disks (and a KFQSA). ;-)
I would rather go with a QBUS SCSI or HSDxx controller. Once I find
one I"ll get rid of my DSSI disks.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
On September 19, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> My memory is that the parts were interchangable in hardware (presuming
> the speed was OK) but the performance was better at a given speed
> for the 68882 over the 68881. I never did any rendering on my Amigas,
Yup. I've replaced many 68881s with 68882s in Sun3/50 and /60
machines when I was doing lots of raytracing with them back in '90 or
so.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
On September 19, Eric Dittman wrote:
> Maybe the /90 is 32 VUPs and the /90A is 38.8, which would make sense if the
> list on DSN is off for both system. What leads me to believe the DSN listing
> is in error now is I just ran a test program on a /90, 90A, /400, and /500,
> and the numbers for the /90 and /90A are way off from what I'd expect if the
> ratings from DSN are correct. I'm going to run some tests this weekend to
> try to get better numbers.
The CPU Summary lists the /90A at 38.5.
> I wish the original DEC test program was available.
Me too. :-/
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
On September 19, Absurdly Obtuse wrote:
> > Very nice toys. I have a MV4k200 in a BA215. A very handy QBus VAX and
> > it is nice to work on the BA215. No finger breaking and flor crawling
> > like on the flor stand BA23.
>
> This one is an even nicer toy. This one is two 4K/700As in a rack. That
> thing on the floor is an external DSSI box. There is one more like it in
> the rack.
You're welcome, fanboy.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
> > The VAXstation 4000/90 is a 42 VUP system and the VAX 4000/400 is a
> > 16 VUP system, so you aren't doing too bad.
> The VS4k9 is around 24 VUPs. It compiles quite exact twice as fast as my
> 4000/60 that is rated at 12 VUPs. I have seen many confusing ratings for
> the VS4k90. It is a nice desktop machine. Especially as mine has 128MB
> RAM. But it is a joke to that VAX7650. Damn. I would sell my grandma
> for that machine. ;-)
I have a couple of VAX 7730 systems at work. They're pretty nice, and
they each have 2GB of RAM.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
> > > The VAXstation 4000/90 is a 42 VUP system and the VAX 4000/400 is a
> > > 16 VUP system, so you aren't doing too bad. I seem to recall the
> > > VAX 4000/700A is about 40 VUPs and the /705A is about 45-50 VUPs.
> >
> > The VAX CPU Summary lists these numbers:
> >
> > VS4000/90 32.8 VUPS
> > 4000/700a 40 VUPS
> > 4000/705a 45 VUPS
>
> The numbers I have are from DSN, and the 42 VUP rating for the 4000/90 feels
> right to me.
The "VAX CPU Summary" numbers above are their SPECint92 numbers, NOT their
VUP rating. I'm glad to finally see VUP ratings for these systems. Eric, I
don't suppose you've also got any kind of full list from DSN? If not do you
happen to have info on the VS4000/90A and /96?
Zane
> > > > Actually that rack contains two VAX 4000/700As.
> > > Ahhhh! I get jealous reading that. The 4k VAXen are quite nice and the
> > > 700A has around 33VUPs. My best VAXen are a 4k400 and a VS4k90.
> >
> > The VAXstation 4000/90 is a 42 VUP system and the VAX 4000/400 is a
> > 16 VUP system, so you aren't doing too bad. I seem to recall the
> > VAX 4000/700A is about 40 VUPs and the /705A is about 45-50 VUPs.
>
> The VAX CPU Summary lists these numbers:
>
> VS4000/90 32.8 VUPS
> 4000/700a 40 VUPS
> 4000/705a 45 VUPS
The numbers I have are from DSN, and the 42 VUP rating for the 4000/90 feels
right to me.
> > I would rather go with a QBUS SCSI or HSDxx controller. Once I find
> > one I"ll get rid of my DSSI disks.
>
> Get rid of 'em in my direction, please. 8-)
Okay, when I do you've got first shot.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
On September 19, Eric Dittman wrote:
> > > Actually that rack contains two VAX 4000/700As.
> > Ahhhh! I get jealous reading that. The 4k VAXen are quite nice and the
> > 700A has around 33VUPs. My best VAXen are a 4k400 and a VS4k90.
>
> The VAXstation 4000/90 is a 42 VUP system and the VAX 4000/400 is a
> 16 VUP system, so you aren't doing too bad. I seem to recall the
> VAX 4000/700A is about 40 VUPs and the /705A is about 45-50 VUPs.
The VAX CPU Summary lists these numbers:
VS4000/90 32.8 VUPS
4000/700a 40 VUPS
4000/705a 45 VUPS
> I would rather go with a QBUS SCSI or HSDxx controller. Once I find
> one I"ll get rid of my DSSI disks.
Get rid of 'em in my direction, please. 8-)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
On September 19, jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de wrote:
> > The 8700 and the 8600 are very different machines. The 8700 uses
> > VAXBI, and is mounted in a chasiss similar in size to that of the
> > 8600. I don't think there's any XMI in there.
> >
> > Incidentally, the 8700 can be turned into an 8800 by plugging a
> > second CPU card set into the machine.
> Hmmm. I got confused by:
> http://www.de.netbsd.org/Documentation/Hardware/Machines/DEC/vax/sections.h…
>
> There is the 8600 (aka 11/790) listed as a SBI machine.
> There is no reference to the 8700.
> The 8800 is listed as:
> Basically an 8550 processor in a bigger box with space for additional
> processors to make it into an 8820 or 8840
> The 8550 is listed:
> XMI processor/memory backplane with VAXBI I/O
>
> According to http://anacin.nsc.vcu.edu/~jim/mvax/vax-perf.html the 8k
> VAXen, except the 8600, are pure VAXBI, no XMI. XMI came with the 6k
> VAXen.
The only 8K machines that I have personal experience with are the
8200, 8250, and 8350. They're definitely all pure BI machines...the
CPU and memory are BI cards. The 8700 has BI busses for I/O but the
CPU (made up of multiple large boards) is definitely *not* BI.
> So I assume the "base" machine is the 8550. In a biger chasiss it is
> named 8700
I've never seen the innards of an 8550, but I can tell you that the
8700 processor is several very large non-XMI boards...maybe six boards
in all, about twice the size of XMI boards, that use ZIF connectors
similar to those used in XMI and BI.
The VAX CPU Summary lists both the 8550 and 8700 as 6 VUP machines.
> and with a second CPU the 8700 is called 8800?
Yes, I can confirm this.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
To all those that wanted to see the pictures of Brian Hechinger and I
unloading a truckload of IBM S/390 and DEC VAX equipment (you know who you
are), the pictures are up on
http://www.users.cloud9.net/~sridhar/mainframe/
Peace... Sridhar
> On September 19, jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de wrote:
> > BTW a stupid question: What is a 8700? Is it SBI based like the
> > 11/78[05] and 86[05]0, or is it XMI / VAXBI like the 85x0 or 6k VAXen?
> > I asume that a 8700 is a 8600 in a biger enclosure?
>
> The 8700 and the 8600 are very different machines. The 8700 uses
> VAXBI, and is mounted in a chasiss similar in size to that of the
> 8600. I don't think there's any XMI in there.
>
> Incidentally, the 8700 can be turned into an 8800 by plugging a
> second CPU card set into the machine.
The 8700/8800 systems were changed in designation about half-way through
their production. The 8700 became the 8810 and the 8800 became the 8820.
There was also another set of 88x0 systems that were different internally
in that they could be upgraded to more CPUs. All to confuse the customer,
I guess.
Does the 8700 have the VAX Console?
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/