On December 15, John Allain wrote:
> I have little doubt about the appropriateness... of your response.
> Care to say when its appropriate to own three S/390's?
It's wholly inappropriate. He should give one to me.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
> Hey folks, would anyone here be able to get me disk images for OS/2
>release 3 or 4?
I thought I had OS/2 Warp v3, but it turns out there are no disks in the
box, just a manual. You can have that if you want it (cost of shipping,
unless you have some 32mb 72pin SIMMs kicking around you want to trade...
LOL)
-c
I've got a line on 'em already...that didn't take long. Thanks
anyway though.
-Dave
On December 17, Phil Schilling wrote:
> Dave,
> Probably both, which would you prefer?
>
> Phil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> [mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Dave McGuire
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:57 PM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: OS/2
>
>
>
> Hey folks, would anyone here be able to get me disk images for OS/2
> release 3 or 4?
>
> Thanks,
> -Dave
>
> --
> Dave McGuire
> St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
>
>
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
Dave,
Probably both, which would you prefer?
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
[mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Dave McGuire
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:57 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: OS/2
Hey folks, would anyone here be able to get me disk images for OS/2
release 3 or 4?
Thanks,
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
Nope, needs to be 3 or 4...thanks anyway though. I think I may have
found it.
-Dave
On December 17, Lawrence LeMay wrote:
> OS/2 2.00.1 isnt any help I assume?
>
> -Lawrence LeMay
>
> >
> > Hey folks, would anyone here be able to get me disk images for OS/2
> > release 3 or 4?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Dave
> >
> > --
> > Dave McGuire
> > St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
> >
>
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
> > > > > Well, I suppose every chip must aspire to mediocrity. :-P
> > > >
> > > > Ok... I guess it took another Mac user to see my point.
> > >
> > > Now, honestly: by the same token, what's a PPC that doesn't run MacOS?
>:-)
> > > (As I type on my Apple Network Server. ;-)
> >
> > ... a computer I would want, such as an IBM RS/6000, AS/400, or S/390 (now
> > zSeries). Mmmmm S/390 :). Now, that's BIG iron.
>
> S/390 does NOT run on microprocessors of any kind, let alone one as slow
> as PPC.
I thought Hercules could run S/390....
;)
-dq
Well, I do have a BNC male-male adapter, and some BNC cable. That
should suffice as an extension. Safer than a soldering iron... ;-)
Thanks for the link...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Michael Kukat [mailto:michael@unixiron.org]
! Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:52 PM
! To: David Woyciesjes
! Cc: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org (E-mail); NetBSD/Vax Mail List (E-mail)
! Subject: Re: DEC Cable?
!
!
! Hello,
!
! On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, David Woyciesjes wrote:
! > I've got two cables here, DEC p/n BCC17-06 and one with
! out a p/n,
! > but looks like a DEC cable. Any ideas who/what they're for?
! And can one of
! > them replace the mono video cable on my VAX Station 3100 (BC23K-03)?
!
! I don't know these cables, but as both are RGB cables, none
! of them can replace
! a mono cable. Also look at http://www.bsdfans.org/pinouts.php
! for the full
! pinout of those connectors.
!
! And additionally, DEC changed the pinout somewhen for the
! DECstations and DEC
! (Alpha) machines, maybe even VAXstation 4000 has a different
! pinout (do they
! have the 15pin connector? Don't know now).
!
! Best way would be to take a soldering iron and make the cable
! yourself. The
! other way would be a small bridge between the mono and the
! green pin to get
! the cable doing mono on the green wire. But this is a
! modification to your
! holy VAXstation, and you don't really want to do this :)
!
! And then, there is still the problem with the pinout
! difference between
! DECstations and VAXstaions. So, as your VAXstation has own
! keyboard/mouse
! connectors, a simple mono video cable would be the best.
!
! ...Michael
!
! --
! visit http://www.bsdfans.org/ Home network powered by:
! NetBSD OpenBSD FreeBSD
! Solaris HP-UX IRIX AIX MUNIX Tru64 Ultrix VMS SINIX
! Dolphin_Unix OpenStep MacOS
!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Goodwin [mailto:acme_ent@bellsouth.net]
> FYI, I think it's a "made up" holiday and just wanted to know
> what your
> thoughts were.
Well, to drive this further off topic.... ;)
All holidays are "made up." They are celebrations of this thing or that,
lots of times an event. Nobody'd have thought of having a holiday before
the thing happened, right?
The difference with kwanzaa is that it's silly/stupid because it's (AFAIK) a
celebration of racial identity which stems (IMO) from an insecurity of some
type, where lots of other holidays are silly/stupid because they're
celebrations of national identity (for instance) which stem (IMO) from an
insecurity of some type :P
Regards,
Chris (who never understood the tendency of people to want to assign
themselves to groups)
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
On Dec 17, 6:08, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> I'm not absolutely sure about such things, but, having had to sit through
the
> annual ESD classes year after year in order to maintain my cert's when I
was in
> aerospace, ISTR that the "old" TTL was ESD sensitive to a point, and I
seem to
> remember something about TTL having a threshold of 2KV for ESD
sensitivity.
> That suggests that while it's not as likely to go poof at the slightest
ESD, you
> can't "ZAP" it without harming it. Since the "ZAP" that you feel when
reaching
> for the doorknob is >50KV, typically, the 2KV would hardly be noticed.
That sounds about right to me. The instructor on my ESD classes in the
80's probably read the same books and data sheets that yours did. You
certainly wouldn't notice a few kV picked up by walking across a carpeted
room if it had a few seconds to dissipate before you touched something that
would discharge it instantly.
I remember one school who had a lot of BBC Microcomupters in the mid-80's.
All was well with them, until they had a building refurbishment, and the
micros wer moved to a new room with carpet tiles. They had endless trouble
after that, with machines resetting at odd times, misbehaving in unexpected
ways, and so on. When one finally stopped working altogether and I was
asked to look, I asked about the carpet. I suggested they mist it
periodically with well-diluted carpet cleaner to reduce static, and the
problems went away (I repaired the faulty machine -- it had a blown LS TTL
chip, which may or may not have been coincidence).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
You probably shouldn't use WD-40.... Better to use a good type of grease.
They forgot to install grease fittings.... : )
On a side note, we had a guy from IS about ready to lubricate the bearings
on a hard drive once. The situation started with a work order to repair a
"squeaking" hard-drive. The real problem was that some joker turned on the
"audible network activity" setting on an X-terminal, and it was "chirping"
every time it attempted to access the network. Some guy came in on a
different shift, and thinking he was a computer expert, quickly came to the
conclusion that the hard drive needed replacement because the bearings were
shot.
Being the budget-minded people we were, we suggested to him that rather
than replacing the expensive hard drive, we would ask the Information
Services group to send a technician to repair, rather than replace, the
hard drive. When the technician arrived we showed him the work order, and
demonstrated the "chirping" noise. He agreed with the conclusion of the guy
who write the work order that the hard drive really was at fault, and we
convinced him that he should take it to the facility maintenance people to
have them install a grease fitting on the hard drive and to "lube it up".
As he started to take the case off of the terminal we pointed out the
network activity setting. We got a good laugh out of it....
- Matt
At 10:43 AM 12/17/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>For laughs, take a look at
>http://www.help-net.com/computer%20buddies/pc911/clean_your_hard_drive.htm
Matthew Sell
Programmer
On Time Support, Inc.
www.ontimesupport.com
(281) 296-6066
Join the Metrology Software discussion group METLIST!
http://www.ontimesupport.com/cgi-bin/mojo/mojo.cgi
"One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promotional Ad
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
Many thanks for this tagline to a fellow RGVAC'er...
On December 17, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> > > > I am appalled that anyone would seriously consider putting any
> > electronic
> > > > equipment, much less antiques, in a dishwasher.
> > >
> > > I'll have to agree.
> >
> > As has been said before, what do you think manufacturers do at the end of a
> > production line?
>
> They wash them yes. They *don't* put them in a dishwasher. There is a
> hughe difference.
I dunno, man...I've only come into contact with two commercial board
washers in the past, and they were very much like dishwashers...right
down to the fold-down front door and the spinning sprayer, except the
spinning sprayers were at the top in these units.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
From: Matthew Sell <msell(a)ontimesupport.com>
>I'm offering the suggestion that people try using their dishwasher to give
>the computer the bath it really needs. I put (with the exceptions mentioned
>in previous posts) all of my boards and control panels through the wash.
>Every one of them works after drying. After 10 years of using this method
>commercially and in my hobbies, I haven't had a single failure.
Same here and I've used dishwashers for over 20 years. Dirty boards
get washed. Even if there are Dip switches or relays I wash them as
often they dry ok or are easily replaced. Often the board that didn't
work beforehand does after or it's far easier to see the problem.
>P.S. - TTL logic *IS* static sensitive, just not nearly to the extent that
>MOS is.
Correct!
Allison
! > Like I said before, don't take my word for it. Take an old,
! > dirty board
! > that you know works, and run it through the dishwasher. Dot
! > use the plate
! > warmer or drying functions. At the end of the cycle, remove
! > it, shake it
! > off, and allow it to dry for several days (hang it up). Plug
! > it back in -
! > it'll work.
!
! I this has already been mentioned, but also don't put boards
! in that have
! any sort of battery fitted or removeable labels you want to keep stuck
! on....
!
! --
! adrian
!
Course, you could always remove the labels first, put them on wax
paper, then stick them back on after drying. If the adhesive won't hold
anymore, clear packing tape, trimmed to just a little bigger than the label,
should work. And protect it too, since the label is most likely only paper.
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com [mailto:pete@dunnington.u-net.com]
> The only thing I can think of that's *designed* to do
> something like that
> is an SGI Indy; if you power one up and it can't even run the
> the code in
> the PROM, it flashes the power light (which is a two-colour LED). The
> usual cause id that there's no (recognisable) RAM at all in
> it. Probably
> not relevant to a PR1ME.
I've recently seen an indy do that because the RTC was improperly seated.
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
-----Original Message-----
From: CLeyson(a)aol.com [mailto:CLeyson@aol.com]
> I sometimes wonder just how many customers we've lost because of this.
> Also, dont get me wrong, the same should be applied to hardware design.
> We recently interviewed an electronics engineering graduate who didn't
know
> the difference between NPN and PNP transistors !! What do they teach kids
> these days ??
My guess is nothing. (Really... that's part of the reason I'm not in a
hurry to get my degree) It's not that the couldn't teach anything, or that
the "kids" couldn't learn if they tried, though, I think. It's more that
they're too stupid to know that there's more to learning than showing up
every day and reciting meaningless (to you) data.
The really sad part is that schools are accommodating this attitude by
adjusting their programs such that you really needn't (in fact, it becomes
difficult to...) learn anything.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
In a message dated 12/16/2001 5:57:45 PM Eastern Standard Time,
acme_ent(a)bellsouth.net writes:
> >> From: SUPRDAVE(a)aol.com
>
> >>Gee, a message from an AOL user with no HTML . . . imagine that . . .
harrumph, will wonders ever fuckin cease?
>
> >> Kwanzaa is NOT a real holiday.
>
> >Okay, I'll bite: why isn't it?
>
> figure it out yourself, google is around for a reason
For laughs, take a look at
http://www.help-net.com/computer%20buddies/pc911/clean_your_hard_drive.htm
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Sell [mailto:msell@ontimesupport.com]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 11:16 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: [PDP8-Lovers] Re: how to clean a PDP8/A, dishwasher?
<snip>
Wrong. One manufacturer I worked for used a commercial Hobart dishwasher
that was modified by an electronics distributer to include racks
specifically made to handle printed circuit boards. This "boardwasher" was
literally a dishwasher. Not a unique setup, either.
You say there is a huge difference. What are the differences? Every
boardwashing setup at every manufacturer I've consulted or been an employee
of used a system that washes boards using higher water pressure and
temperature than your common household dishwasher. If you are referring to
a big difference, then I guess you are right. Your dishwasher is *MUCH*
more gentle for the items being cleaned than the typical commercial
boardwasher.
<snip>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Sell [mailto:msell@ontimesupport.com]
> Sent: 17 December 2001 16:41
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: [PDP8-Lovers] Re: how to clean a PDP8/A, dishwasher?
>
> Like I said before, don't take my word for it. Take an old,
> dirty board
> that you know works, and run it through the dishwasher. Dot
> use the plate
> warmer or drying functions. At the end of the cycle, remove
> it, shake it
> off, and allow it to dry for several days (hang it up). Plug
> it back in -
> it'll work.
I this has already been mentioned, but also don't put boards in that have
any sort of battery fitted or removeable labels you want to keep stuck
on....
--
adrian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: no [mailto:oliv555@arrl.net]
> digital Alphabook. Not exactly Rare, just hard-to-find
Last I checked you could get them refurbished from Tadpole/RDI. Depending
on availability, of course, but they get them occasionally.
They still cost several thousand dollars, IIRC.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
Ben Franchuk wrote:
> "Should HTML/inline files be banded from EMAIL?" I ask.
> As of late I have turned inline viewing off, with all the
> stupid viruses around.
Thanks to AOL I can't turn this feature off :-(
Chris
On Dec 16, 9:51, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Mark Crispin wrote:
> > I am appalled that anyone would seriously consider putting any
electronic
> > equipment, much less antiques, in a dishwasher.
>
> I'll have to agree.
As has been said before, what do you think manufacturers do at the end of a
production line? Yes, a certain amount of care is required, and certain
things can't tolerate being soaked or being too hot or given too much
mechanical agitation (stress). But how would you deal with a piece of
equipment that was smoke damaged or had been left in the rain or had fallen
in a river or had been infested with vermin or had a can of Coke spilled in
it? I've had to deal with all of those and more over the last two decades,
and washing is the only way.
I don't advocate unneccessary cleaning, but sometimes it's required.
> > It may be alright to (gently!) vaccuum away dust and deteriorated foam
> > rubber, although a feather duster may be more appropriate. I would not
> > risk anything else, and certainly not insert anything (including water
or
> > alcohol) under the plexiglass shield protecting the core.
>
> Vacuum cleaning (gently!) is about the only thing I'd recommend.
Be careful about that. Allison's warning about ESD is quite real. Don't
even think about a feather duster; at least, not if it's a synthetic one.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I have a copy of the Motorola "MC68020 32-Bit Microprocessor User's Manual"
(Second Edition, 1985) that was going to be tossed at work. Anyone want it?
It's free for shipping costs (under 2 pounds) or pickup in Chicago Loop.
Email me at robert_feldman(a)jdedwards.com if you are interested. Random
drawing if more than one request by Wednesday AM.
Bob
drats!!!!
I was handling it so carfully I did not notice the bottom of
the plastic bag had been carefully opened. :^(
I guess it's no big deal now.
Are any of these magazine of interest to someone who has not
a full set? When I finish reading them they are yours for a
"sase".
nibble august 1987 v8n8
inCider december 1987
inCider april 1989
If you want them let me know. Multiple requests will be decided
based on order in my mail browser, topmost takes all.
;^)
Michael ---
Just curious, what would you do with it, use it for?
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Michael Nadeau [mailto:menadeau@mediaone.net]
! Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 7:51 PM
! To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
! Subject: Re: Another odd-ball/almost classic computer...8 yr old...
!
!
! I remember getting a press briefing on the Handbook before
! its release.
! Gateway did not manufacture the unit. I think it was made
! under contract in
! Taiwan. It was an interesting system that was not on the
! market for long.
! I'd grab one if the opportunity presented itself.
!
! --Mike
!
! Michael Nadeau
! Editorial Services
! 603-893-2379
! ----- Original Message -----
! From: "David Woyciesjes" <DAW(a)yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu>
! To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
! Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 5:10 PM
! Subject: Another odd-ball/almost classic computer...8 yr old...
!
!
! > Just found this in a box... Has anyone here ever heard of a Gateway
! > 2000 Handbook computer? It's like a palmtop/laptop computer,
! 10"x6"x1.5"...
! > using a Chips & Tech. 8680 "PC on a chip". It has the 2MB
! RAM upgrade, to
! > bring it to a whopping 3MB!
! > And would you look at that, 40MB HDD... With the null modem cable,
! > it would make a great ultra-portable terminal...
! >
! > --- David A Woyciesjes
! > --- C & IS Support Specialist
! > --- Yale University Press
! > --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
! > --- (203) 432-0953
! > --- ICQ # - 905818
! >
!
Pete - I'm forwarding this to ClassicCmp.org mail list for you. Someone
there might want them...
From: CaptnZilog(a)aol.com [mailto:CaptnZilog@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 3:52 PM
To: port-i386(a)netbsd.org
Subject: OT: Databooks
Way off topic here, but I figure that this list is probably
looked at by most of the people out there.
I have two xerox-paper boxes of duplicate Electronics
Databooks I've weeded out of my three 7' high bookcases
of databooks. Anybody out there in the vicinity of CT
(probably not worth shipping them, its a lot of weight)
interested in any databooks (to add to your collection?)?
I can provide a list if you want. Some TI DSP databooks,
and miscellaneous other stuff...
Pete
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
At 09:28 AM 12/17/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Some manfacturers did it by hand, some by machine. IBM had core stringing
> > machines during the S/360 era, for the huge stacks (about 1' by 4') used
> > in some of the storage units. They also had cores hand strung in the far
> > East, as the cheap labor was more economical than the robots.
I was an industrial engineer assigned to the Core Line in Poughkeepsie for
IBM. As the cores got small and smaller the operation became harder and
harder. We used a large screen like device with slots in it. The cores were
dropped onto the screen which was shaken so that the cores would fall into
the proper holes. Then a button was pushed and the N/S and then the E/W
wires pulled through the centers of the cores. The last part of the
operation was the diagonal (bias) wires which were threaded though by hand.
Very few individuals were capable of this last part of the operation.
Almost all of the operators were women. Men just couldn't do the fine point
work.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gene(a)ehrich.com
gehrich(a)tampabay.rr.com
P.O. Box 3365 Spring Hill Florida 34611-3365
http://www.voicenet.com/~generic
Computer & Video Game Garage Sale
I accept PayPal
To subscribe to automatic updates send a blank e-mail to:
online-garage-sale-subscribe(a)yahoogroups.com
> FYI, I think it's a "made up" holiday and just wanted to know
> what your thoughts were.
The difference between "real" holidays and "made up" Holidays
seems to be: if the Holiday was "made up" before you were born,
then it's real (like Mother's Day, which was instituted by
President Woodrow Wilson); if it was made up in your lifetime,
then it's "not real, just made up."
January 1 was "made up" into New Years Day by an act of
fiat; New Years Day used to be April 1.
I believe "Father's Day" was "made up" in the 50s...
"President's Day" was "made up" by tightwad businessmen
who wanted to combine two Holidays into one. "Washington's
Birthday" was made-up into a Holiday by people who wanted
to make a big deal out of Washington's Birthday; ditto
Lincoln.
I hope the pattern is clear... Kwanzaa is as valid
a Holiday as any.
Regards,
-dq
Last time I had horse meat was with a couple of my professors at the Faculty
Club ar Harvard. It was a regular on the menu there.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Maslin [mailto:donm@cts.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:51 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: RE: Way OT: Just say no to squirrels & Pascal question
<snip>
Where on your scale do you put horse meat? The French love it.
- don
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>would have worked out. I think it might have given the Z80 and edge.
Coming up
>with a fair and general test might be difficult.
I'd liken 6502 VS z80 as one of those depends on what you like things.
Both have stood the test of time far better than many others.
>The Z80 itself wasn't a bad CPU, but the peripheral set they built for it,
with
>its compromises in favor of the mode-2 interrupts meant that you couldn't
use
>wait-states on I/O cycles or on device chip selects to adjust the CPU to
the
I agree, most designers did too. Look at most Z80 designs out there and it
was Z80 with NON-Zilog peripherals. Mode 2 with a little external glue to
use
with non zilog was a very potent config.
>slower peripherals because it had to be looking over the CPU's shoulder to
catch
>the interrupt acknowledge and the RETI instruction. I've recently worked
this
>out by switching the clock rate during I/O and during a pending or current
>interrupt, but it's still a PAIN! What's more, it seems to require more
than
>just a PAL. Handshake logic from a 4-bit wide FIFO (16 pins) seems to be
the
>tool for keeping track of interrupts and their dismissal.
:) Me, I dont use slow Zilog peripherals. The last time I used Zilog IO it
was
the 5330 SCC that ran comfortably at 10mhz with it's own DMA. A TTL
implementation of the mode 2 interrupts made for a nice system as it could
run fast, though I never bothered with RETI, as that not required and adds
much to the logic load.
Allison
> > It was done by hand I think. Mexico comes to mind.
>
> Some manfacturers did it by hand, some by machine. IBM had core stringing
> machines during the S/360 era, for the huge stacks (about 1' by 4') used
> in some of the storage units. They also had cores hand strung in the far
> East, as the cheap labor was more economical than the robots.
The far east manufacture of core lead to a long-running joke
in the old mainframe days... the instance of it I will describe
was only one of many...
Anyway, when we'd boot the COPE (Harris) 1200 Remote Job Entry
Station (a PDP-8 clone), there would be a message that would
flash by on the console *very quickly*:
HELP! HELP! I'm being held hostage in a Hong Kong Core House!
Read this thinking "Mike Hunt" and "Amanda Huggenkiss" if you
don't (by some chance) get it...
-dq
> Matter of fact AMD was subcontracted at one point to MAKE processors for
> Intel, when demands were up and they couldn't meet market requirements - and
> many of the AMD made Intel branded chips are better than many of the Intel
> ones. I don't remember if it was the 386 era or 486 though.
iAPX286 era...
-dq
Not likely!
Sphere back then was the sloppy introduction and viewed as a
grab the money and run, ship nothing operation. I'd say it was
one of the first in the Vaproware realm. Many that ordered got
skunked as Sphere hit with a splash and really did disappear
pretty fast. They were the bad guys right up until the
World Power Scam, thats another story.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Nadeau <menadeau(a)mediaone.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, December 17, 2001 7:52 AM
Subject: Re: Hardest to Find Classic Computers
>Stan Veit's History of the Personal Computer has a detailed account of the
>Sphere's design flaws and other issues, including kits being sent out
>incomplete. Veit was a retailer who sold the Sphere when new. Veit stopped
>selling the Sphere and admits that the company might have fixed some of the
>problems after that.
>
>Do you remember the issue in which the review that the former owner refers
>to appeared? The earliest Sphere coverage in BYTE is positive, almost
>fawning.
>
>Maybe if the Sphere had been on the cover of Popular Electronics instead of
>the Altair people would have been more forgiving of its flaws.
>
>--Mike
>
>Michael Nadeau
>Editorial Services
>603-893-2379
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Loboyko Steve" <sloboyko(a)yahoo.com>
>To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
>Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 9:22 PM
>Subject: Re: Hardest to Find Classic Computers
>
>
>> I stumbled upon a link some time ago belonging to a
>> very bitter former owner of Sphere. The gist of his
>> article was that Byte Magazine destroyed Sphere with a
>> very bad review, and, that most computers of that era
>> took some hacking to work anyway (example: the "clock"
>> - and I use the term clock charitably - of the
>> original Altair 8800).
>>
>> --- William Donzelli <aw288(a)osfn.org> wrote:
>> > > Ah yeah. Good pick. That is definitely a rare
>> > beast. I've only ever
>> > > known one person who had one (I forgot his name,
>> > he used to be on the list
>> > > a few years ago). He sold it off to someone else
>> > and then got out of
>> > > collecting computers.
>> >
>> > Was that me? I have/had three, but they are promised
>> > to go out West. One of
>> > those deals that seems to be taking a very long
>> > time, mostly due to me
>> > trying to unearth it all and boxing the stuff up.
>> >
>> > Anyway, Sphere aparently was one of the early bad
>> > guys. The computers they
>> > sold (many as kits, I think) basically did not work.
>> > Unlike Altair, Sphere
>> > was trying to break into the business sector, so
>> > there really was not much
>> > of an excuse for the crapiness. They all needed a
>> > huge number of hacks to
>> > get them to function (my favorite is a a few-mH coil
>> > made of telephone
>> > wire kludged onto one of the oscillators, in order
>> > to keep the thing
>> > going. Basically, wrap some wire around a pencil,
>> > and tack solder it into
>> > place, and adjust accordingly).
>> >
>> > William Donzelli
>> > aw288(a)osfn.org
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
>> your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
>> or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com
>>
>
>
> Actually, I think that's a good suggestion, if you can find someone with
> the same ROMs. In my experience, most programmers actually do use the same
> algorithm -- one of the common CRCs. At least, all three programmers I
> regularly use do, and the checksums match the ones printed on SGI ROMs and
> a few other ROMs I have that have printed checksums.
Well, they wouldn't compare exactly- the microcode ROM sets
are serialized...
But when I disconnecte the cabinet airflow sensor, I
get an error message displayed that's not in the
VCP's Z-80 boot ROM, but is only in the microcode
ROMs. Now, whether the Z-80 is retrieving and displaying
that message, or the microcode is getting loaded and
the Prime CPU is issuing the message, who can tell?
-dq
> Possible, of course, but in the case of an Indy, the processor and PSU are
> working, and it gets only as far as the "I think, therefore I am a
> processor; I wonder if I have any memory" test in the PROM, and then
> executes a loop which controls the LED in the PSU if there's no RAM. At
> least, that's what I believe; I've not seen a detailed description of the
> PROM startup. I suppose your problem may be something similar, in that the
> CPU is running but can't do anyting useful because either it's crippled or
> some other part of the system is disfuntional. Does the CPU control the
> power supply LED(s), like it does in an Indy?
Yeah, pretty sure it does...
Interestingly, I remove dthe two 4MB boards last night-
no difference in bahavior. However, there are message
strings in the ROMs dealing with RAM problems...
-dq
From: Johnny Billquist <bqt(a)update.uu.se>
>> As has been said before, what do you think manufacturers do at the end of
a
>> production line?
>
>They wash them yes. They *don't* put them in a dishwasher. There is a
>hughe difference.
Many did as it was cheaper than the commercial version.
>> Be careful about that. Allison's warning about ESD is quite real. Don't
>> even think about a feather duster; at least, not if it's a synthetic one.
>
>ESD should never be ignored, but in the case of computer from the 60s and
>70s, ESD is really not an issue. We don't have CMOS, we have old style MSI
>TTL here... It is not ESD sensitive. You can literally zap those
>circuits, and they will work just fine.
Sorry, not so. DEC did a study in the logistics flow to see why DOA boards
were a problem. The reason was ESD even on older PDP-8 and PDP-11
modules. The test and solution was ESD procedures or all modules and
the fail rate went down significantly. Seems for TTL while ESD generally
didn't kill it it can and did damage the passivation or input protection
leading to longer term failures that were chalked up to infant mortality.
Characateristics that were often seen degraded were input thresholds,
input sink currents, output leakage for open collector and tristate devices.
With the rarity and parts availability of older machines a bit of care is
warrented if only to reduce troubleshooting time and 90 day failures.
Allison
> > PC that's got my ROM burner/reader, and read each one (if the
> > ROMs aren't too large a size for my Needham unit). I'm assuming
> > I'll see all 00s or all FFs (or maybe something like FEs) if
> > they're blown; been a long time since I've looked at popped
> > ROMs...
>
> What kind of ROMs does it use? Another possibility might be to find
> someone with the same model of PR1ME (how rare are they?) and checksum
> the ROMs & compare them...most PROM burners will generate checksums,
> but now that I think of it, PROM burner manufacturers have yet to
> standardize on a checksumming algorithm so it'd probably be useless
> unless they're summed with the same make/model of burner. :-(
My ROMs are fine; they read OK and I can provoke an error condition
that results in a message to the console, and said message string
resides in one and only one place- the microcode ROMs.
-dq
> No, I'm afraid you may have hit it on the head, and it's been the
> direction I've been leaning, that the microcode ROMs may have
> fried, but that just blows my mind. Tonight, I'll set up the
> PC that's got my ROM burner/reader, and read each one (if the
> ROMs aren't too large a size for my Needham unit). I'm assuming
> I'll see all 00s or all FFs (or maybe something like FEs) if
> they're blown; been a long time since I've looked at popped
> ROMs...
Ok, my microcode ROMs are fine, via direct observation
(dumped them to disk then ran them through my LOW7 filter
to strip the mark parity bit from the Prime ASCII. I also
verified the ROMs are OK by managing to provoke the system
to issue an error message that resides *only* in those ROMs.
> About the only other possibility is that the backplane got
> cooked, but it looks fine...
There are still some possibilities other than this, the
Primes appear to have been way-overengineered w/r/t making
sure the power is OK.
Thanks for all the suggestions, folks...
-dq
Hi,
I do cookies. It was something I did years ago{30+} to understand
all that stuff.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: John Allain <allain(a)panix.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Sunday, December 16, 2001 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: [PDP8-Lovers] how to clean a PDP8/A, dishwasher?
>> {everything about cores} -- Allison
>
>Thank-You very much for this. What's your consulting rate?
>
>> thats about it.
>
>No doubt.
>
>John A.
>
>
>
> Jim Arnott wrote:
> >
> > And what's the difference between an engineering project and Christmas?
> >
> > None. You do all the work and the fat guy in the suit gets all the credit.
> >
> > (did I read that here?)
> >
> > Jim
>
> And pay too!
Well, The Jolly Old Elf has to deal with some less-than-pleasant
happening.... the local radio stations have a Christmas song in
rotation titled "I Farted on Santa's Lap"... we should be so
lucky that the fat cats in suits would have one land on them...
-dq
> In practice the solution is to accept the fact that specs, no matter
> how much they are labored over, are for most efforts soft, and
> then describe mechanism to deal with uncertainty as part of the
> development process. Rapid prototype, stepwise refinement,
> the understanding that one cannot test their way to correctness and
> a willingness to throw at least one implementation completely
> away, coupled with small, agile teams that work with an active
> user community empirically produce more correct results in less
> time that alternative techniques.
This all sounds very familiar...
> Not like any of this is new. Brooks described this eons ago
> in _The Mythical Man Month_...
Ah, now I know why... insert <EWOK_WORSHIP_SOUND_EMOTICON> here.
I can't tell you how many managers I've wanted to strangle
using the prototype code they demanded I push into production...
-dq
> From: Ben Franchuk <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
> "Should HTML/inline files be banded from EMAIL?" I ask.
> As of late I have turned inline viewing off, with all the
> stupid viruses around.
My vote: ban 'em.
Glen
0/0
> From: SUPRDAVE(a)aol.com
> >>Gee, a message from an AOL user with no HTML . . . imagine that . . .
> harrumph, will wonders ever fuckin cease?
Well, gee, no offense, it's just that html messages are a PITA to read with
my reader, and most lists and newsgroups frown on HTML posts.
> >> Kwanzaa is NOT a real holiday.
>
> >Okay, I'll bite: why isn't it?
>
> figure it out yourself, google is around for a reason
Google certainly is here for a reason, and I can do a search anytime I
like. My reason for asking is that you had stated an opinion, and I was
curious to find out more about your stated opinion. Based on the hostility
of your reply, I'll assume I was mistaken in asking.
Sheesh, man, what are you so pissed off about? This is a friendly list.
If you are so afraid of expressing your opinions, may I respectfully
suggest that you confine them to alt.flame.niggers, where you will find a
lot of other cowards to associate with.
FYI, I think it's a "made up" holiday and just wanted to know what your
thoughts were.
Glen
0/0
>does it have a spell-checker?
ROFL... well, I assume it does... and so does the email client I use... I
just never use the spell checker... sorry, dyslexia has completely
destroyed my ability to spell a damn thing, and I (as well as most
everyone I write to) have accepted this fact, so I just don't use spell
check as often as I really should. Heck... consider yourself lucky, I
only made 3 errors in the last email (Strictly and default x2)
But just for you... I spel chekt this emial :-)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
It takes quite a bit to read one bit (the same amount to read
all the bits on one sense line).
You need to in order:
Select the specific word (or bit) and drive it with the X and
Y lines, each will be 50% plus a tiny bit extra current
needed to switch a bit. And yes that is a regulated
current or wire melting may occur! Typically it's a pulse
of several hundred milliamps.
Then at the right time after the select pulse is applied
you will see a big or smaller pulse on the sense line.
the difference between a 1 or 0(zero) is the timing and
the height of that pulse.
That was the nasty item as both timing of the XY select
pulse and the time to the read window are current,
temperature and specific to the cores used. The resulting
signal is quite small and is measured in tens of millivolts
for a core that switched and maybe a millivolt for one that
did not. Yes, the sense line does have a lot of noise!
To do that again or write a 1/0 you need to reverse or
leave the XYselect polarity. The inhibit line (for a 4 wire
core mat ) can be the sense line for write (three wire mat).
To write the opposite data you select the core via XY with
enough current to flip the core, to not write that value you
apply enough current of the reversed polarity to the inhibit
line to reduce the field(from the XY selects) in the selected
core to less than the half select value.
The basic operation of reading implicity sets all cores in the word
line to the same state. To write (a word) along a word line you
reverse the currents and also apply inhibit current on a bit by
bit basis. The end result is some cores in the word flip (reverse
the magnetic field) and those inhibited do not.
Now... if you want simpler try this...
Wind about 20 turns of wire on a nail (iron, or better yet steel).
Wind another 20 turns. We use a lot of wire to get a BIG signal.
Now if you hook a simple 1-3V DC meter to one winding and
then hook the other winding to say a 1.5V battery you should
see the meter pulse (basic transformer action). If you interupt
the connection (off on off) you will see another pulse of differing
polarity (needle will go the other way for a moment). Do that a
few times to note the reaction and then reverse the battery and
repeat. When you do that you will not the meter action indicates
a bigger pulse the first time and back to like before if you do it
again. Now the majik of core. When you magnitize something
like that the nail/washer/core takes a magnetic polarity and
holds it. If you reverse that magnetizing field you not only get
the field but also the change in magnetic polarity. That change
significantly greater. The other peice of majik is that while you
didn't measure it in that simple rig the current required to magnetize
the nail in the opposite direction is greater than if the magnetic
field in the in the nail was random(zero). This is the characteristic
called hysteresis, IE: to change a field takes more than the amount
needed to maintain or initially estabilish it.
I might have fluffed the grammer and spelling in my hurry to write
this but, thats about it.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: John Allain <allain(a)panix.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Sunday, December 16, 2001 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [PDP8-Lovers] how to clean a PDP8/A, dishwasher?
>> No need to trace, they are quite regular, you can ohm them. You still
>> need core drivers, sense amps and a dozens of diodes for current
>> steering.
>
>We were thinking what could a person do to see the output from
>just one core bit, not too much more than that... and then work up
>from there.
>
>John A.
>
> From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
> A PC floppy cable certainly wouldn't work with the Little Boards I have,
since
> they use the standard floppy disk cable, which has no twists or cuts.
Take a "modern" PC dual-fdd cable and cut off the end which has the twist
in it.
Glen
0/0
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>the "vintage-PC" chipsets were 5 MHz parts, I do believe. That still
wasn't
>rocket-fast, but it was adequate for the 4.77 MHz i8088.
Yes, and NEC and INTEL were selling 8mhz parts before then.
The "PC" was slow by contemporary standards. I'd have likend it to
building
a 2mhz z80 system in 1981, equally poor thing to do.
Allison
>> From: CLeyson(a)aol.com
>> Thanks to AOL I can't turn this feature off :-(
> Yes, you can! I have posted numerous messages to this list (and others)
> from an AOL account in the past and never sent anything but plain text.
I must have missed your posts on the subject. This geek for one would like
to know.
Chris Leyson
Ok! Ok!
I goofed - it's 1987, not 1967...
There is one small hole in the plastic (1/2" round tear)
There is an Epyx Catalog included as a supplement.
(of course all the blow in cards are inside there too)
Keith Johnson wrote:
>> I have December 1967 inCider,
>
>
> That *would* be an interesting read. Maybe it has a spread on the Univac?
>
> :P
>
> Keifer
Ok! Ok!
I goofed - it's 1987, not 1967...
There is one small hole in the plastic (1/2" round tear)
There is an Epyx Catalog included as a supplement.
(of course all the blow in cards are inside there too)
Keith Johnson wrote:
>> I have December 1967 inCider,
>
>
> That *would* be an interesting read. Maybe it has a spread on the Univac?
>
> :P
>
> Keifer
>> Thanks to AOL I can't turn this feature off :-(
>
>Yes, you can! I have posted numerous messages to this list (and others)
>from an AOL account in the past and never sent anything but plain text.
The latest version of the AOL client for windows no longer offers a way
to turn of HTML email. HOWEVER, as long as you use STRICKTLY the defualt
AOL email text settings, and NEVER do any kind of formatting, then AOL
will still send plain text and not an inline HTML message.
If you have changed the default settings, you can reset them. Somewhere
in the AOL prefs is a button to reset them to defualt values.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
On December 16, Bill Bradford wrote:
> > > I have little doubt about the appropriateness... of your response.
> > > Care to say when its appropriate to own three S/390's?
> > It's wholly inappropriate. He should give one to me.
>
> No, you've already over-filled your Cray quota; you should have to give
> one of those away (like say, the EL98, to me..) before you can acquire
> any more "big balls" hardware. 8-)
Ahh, you THINK so. ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
> From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
> > Well, most of us (except for Tony) have areas that we are not expert
in, or
>
> Whereas I'm not an expert in any area, right???
Wrong. Accept a complement, okay? ;>)
> I am strongly of the opinion that you can't teach creativity. And thus
> you can't teach somebody to be a good programmer or a good electronic
> designer. Yes, there are things that such people need to know (and those
> can be taught, but equally good programmer/designers tend to be
> interested enough to teach themselves a lot of it).
OTOH, methodology certainly *can* be taught. Unfortunately, though, either
it isn't being taught, or the student just doesn't "get it." Some of the
crap I've seen which was written by CS degree-holders has been truly
mind-boggling due to a complete lack of structure or logic in the code.
> So I don't think there's _any_ correlation (or at most a very weak one)
> between qualifications and ability as a programmer/designer.
Agreed, absolutely.
> > Should programmers be licensed? Sure makes me wonder . . .
>
> I don't think so. I've seen enough 'qualified' people who I'd not trust
> anywhere near anything I owned. I've also met a few totally unqualified
> people who I'd be happy handing a toolkit to and letting them loose in my
> workshop, knowing that they'd do no real damage.
>
> And 'licenses' almost always come from 'qualifications' :-(
A test-based license is what I had in mind, but this raises all kinds of
problems (such as who designs and administers the exam, etc.) so in the end
it is probably better that the practitioners of the craft do the "weeding
out" themselves.
Personally, I'm glad to out of programming professionally, although it
remains a favorite hobby of mine. I just got so tired of having to explain
the difference between a "string" and a "character array" to some of these
folks . . . over and over . . . I could tell stories you probably wouldn't
believe, but the memory of them is causing me to lose my lunch so I think
I'd better just log off . . .
Glen
0/0
On December 16, Bill Bradford wrote:
> > That would be something I'd be up for trying...if I can find a chunk
> > of core of low enough density to trace the wiring in. There are some
> > nice low-density planes on eBay right now, but they are priced WAY too
> > high in my opinion.
>
> I've still got these two UNIBUS core planes (H215), but they're probably
> better suited for use in a DEC system instead of being deconstructed.
Yes...I will *not* deconstruct DEC core, unless it's nonfunctional
and unrepairable.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
On December 16, ajp166 wrote:
> The older large ferrite core is easier to work with though
> much slower. The bigger cores produce a larger output
> when they switch but the cycle times are in the
> 3-5uS range. The later is helpful for demos as nothing
> is too fast.
I wonder if it would be possible (and practical) to use a
microcontroller, perhaps a PIC, to act as a core controller. Use the
A/D and D/A hardware to handle the drive and sense stuff, and do all
the timing in firmware...making it easily tweakable.
That would be something I'd be up for trying...if I can find a chunk
of core of low enough density to trace the wiring in. There are some
nice low-density planes on eBay right now, but they are priced WAY too
high in my opinion.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
>Well, I suppose every chip must aspire to mediocrity. :-P
Ok... I guess it took another Mac user to see my point.
I didn't doubt for a moment that the AMD chip was fully compatible with
any other Intel compat OS or software... just that it was REALLY REALLY
sad that they had to stamp it with windows propaganda as if windows was
the only thing out there that mattered.
-c
On Dec 16, 14:58, Gunther Schadow wrote:
> However, there are a few more issues to resolve first. The
> little 16-pole ribbon cable that has DIL chip-like plug on
> both ends that go into a chip-socket. That plug is bent and
> pins are broken off. Seems like that happnes all the time.
> Do I have to and if so how can I replace this? This cable
> runs between the backplane and, I guess, the limited function
> front panel.
Assuming you can afford to shorten the length of the cable by the amount
you'd lose by cutting off the DIL plug, it shouldn't be too hard. You can
buy 16-pin IDC DIL plugs quite easily. The quick-and-dirty way to crimp
one onto the cable is to take a piece of wood (metal is better but much
more work) and shave it so it fits neatly between the pins, and then shave
it down so it's the same depth as the pins are long. Place the cable in
the plug, insert the whole lot in a smal vice and gently tighten it up.
The piece of wood will prevent the pins from bending while you do this.
> Do I need this, is the limited function front panel needed
> at all? What's the function of the 16 lines, I assume
I don't know. If you'd asked this a week or two ago, I might have been
able to look it up in the PDP-8/A handbook I had on loan, but I've returned
it. :-( I think you do need some of the switches, but I'm not sure.
Have you looked at the print sets on some of the PDP-8 websites? David
Gesswein's page at http://www.pdp8.net/query_docs/query_all.html is a good
place to start. More specifically, follow the link labelled "244" from
there, then "245" and you'll be able to download a 1-page diagram of the
Limited Function Board.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
How can I detect end of file while reading a text file?
10 print chr$(4)"Open mytextfile"
20 print chr$(4)"read mytextfile"
30 input a$
40 rem process process process
50 if what who how then 30
60 print chr$(4)"close mytextfile"
hep me please! (trying to write a dumb line editor)
I have two NewBrain MD computers with all cables and software including
bespoke Word Processor and Database. Two Data Recorders are also included. In
addition I have a pair of different 5.25" disk drives in a single unit with
the drive controller to fit to the underside of the computer. None of the
equipment has been used for some time, but is packed in original boxes and
complete with instruction booklets. Would be prepared to discuss offers.
Area -- North East UK
Graham C
Website: grahamcarling.com
In a message dated 12/16/01 2:54:15 PM Pacific Standard Time,
rhudson(a)cnonline.net writes:
>
> Did a person string those cores with a needle and
> "thread", or was it done by machine?
>
>
My stepmother worked for Hughes Aircraft in LA assembling core memory by hand
under a microscope. She was making 4X4 panels IIRC. This had to be in the
1960s I bet.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
> From: SUPRDAVE(a)aol.com
Gee, a message from an AOL user with no HTML . . . imagine that . . .
> Kwanzaa is NOT a real holiday.
Okay, I'll bite: why isn't it?
Glen
0/0
On December 15, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> Well, perhaps the reason for all the meetings and other work you find
> uninteresting is that it's necessary to arrive at a firm specification for what
> you have to build before you go off and build it. Since the coding, compiling,
> and debugging only represent about 5% of the task, the bulk of the work has to
> happen sometime, and that's what the "other" stuff is.
Some documentation and speficiation has to happen, sure. But most
of the industry seems to have lost sight of the fact that these are
*overhead tasks* that are secondary to the job of *building
something*. It gives suits a reason to take home a paycheck...they
can shuffle paperwork and Powerpoint bullshit all they want; it
rarely contributes to the finish product.
It's not an issue of my finding it "uninteresting"...I write code.
That's what I do best. If I'm doing something other than writing
code, I'm likely wasting my time...or worse, someone else's...because
if I'm not writing code I'm probaby doing something I'm not
particularly good at.
I'm not trying to be argumentative here...though it may sound that
way, please don't take it as such.
Again I will qualify my statements as pertaining to sub-million-line
development projects, not huge multi-million line behemoths.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
On December 16, UberTechnoid(a)home.com wrote:
> Remember the (iirc) Compaq ad. Thier 286 had a meg of static ram onboard.
> The ad depicted an empty desk with two tire tracks burt into it and a
> surprised user behind.
Static RAM? Are you sure? I've never heard of static RAM in a
PeeCee. That's neat.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
From: Gene Buckle <geneb(a)deltasoft.com>
>belongs with it. Does anyone have a Series 100 box that could give me
>the measurements and connector orientation & location of the floppy
>cable?
Nothing magic. the last one I had used was from a PC.
>Secondly, I don't know what "brand" SCSI controller is built into the
>board. The SCSI chip seems to be an NCR 5830, but that leads me nowhere
>in relation to whether or not it's an Adaptec or other model controller.
>I need to know the brand because the hd formatting software needs to
>know it.
Your applying PC logic to it. It's is not Adaptec, i'ts just SCSI
(SCS1 or II) host and the NCR5380 is one of the early and common
chips used for that.
The brand applies to the "other" board, what is known as a SCSI
bridge board. Adaptec, Xybec, WD and other made them. You
need to know what board and what drive to do the formatting. If
you dont mind hacking Z80 code you can go frm an AMPRO LB
with SCSI to a smaller SCSI drive (64mb or less, or the rest will
be unused).
Allison
People on here have talked about people on eBay taking a perfectly good
working machine and selling it off piece by piece but this takes the
capacitor screwdriver, soldering iron and sucker....
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1309283581
This person? is selling 40 little plastic thingies that go under a key on
the Commodore 128's keyboard along with a spring!!!
Bryan
Excuse while I go bang my head against a wall... Did you know if you do that
for an hour you burn 150 calories?
> From: CLeyson(a)aol.com
> Thanks to AOL I can't turn this feature off :-(
Yes, you can! I have posted numerous messages to this list (and others)
>from an AOL account in the past and never sent anything but plain text.
Glen
0/0
> There's a big difference between writing code to solve problems and being
> a software engineer. Designing, coding, and compiling is only 40% of the
> battle. Hopefully you're also spending some time planning and testing.
To me planning and testing are such obviously important parts of any
development process that I didn't mention them in my original post,
assuming (I hope correctly) that most everyone on this list is as
old-fashioned as I am ;>)
> We recently interviewed an electronics engineering graduate who didn't
know
> the difference between NPN and PNP transistors !! What do they teach kids
> these days ??
I repeat, the "faculty" of the "institution" which issued this fellow a
degree should be tarred, feathered, and run out of town on a rail.
Glen
0/0
From: Gene Buckle <geneb(a)deltasoft.com>
>What is so bloody difficult about this? It's not like I'm asking
>questions about quantum mechanics or something. Keerist.
No one knows or has seen one.
>I had two questions. The one about the SCSI interface has been answered
>to my satisfaction. The second however is not only the easiest of the
>two, but seeming the most difficult to answer.
Seriously it's been about 14 years since I've seen one. It's length was
long enough to reach with neat folds. Don't know the exact number of
inches. However that FDC controller worked fine with 24 inches of
cable for another project.
>If you happen to own a Series 100 box, I'd be most appriciative if you'd
>open it up and let me know what you find out about the cable. If you
>_don't_ own one of these things, I don't want to hear from you. Period.
I bet you dont turn up many Series 100 boxes.
>I know how to build my own cables. I know what connectors are required.
>(I even have a purpose built connector compression tool!) I'm trying to
>restore this machine to _factory_ condition. Smart ass comments about
>making my own cables (while simultaneously alluding that I don't know
>what the fsck I'm doing) is not only not wanted, but just pisses me off.
>If I'd wanted to make a generic, "will do the job" cable, I wouldn't
>have asked about the original one!
The Ampro cab was not common as most bought the dry board being
cheaper and use whatever package was handy or one that met their
spec. Even my Ampro LB manuals do not specify a length!
>FYI, the machine is built for CP/M. It runs CP/M quite happily. Even
>with ZCPR3.
We know that too. I run on here.
Allison
From: Ben Franchuk <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
>I know that. That is why the early memory chips had separate in/out pins
>to emulate core memory. Everything nowadays tends to be 8 bits with
>tri-state
That might have been a factor but not a requirement. The reason back
then
was it simplified the timing and construction of the chip.
>I/O ( Grumbles here as he has a 12 bit computer and has to waste 4 bits
>out of 16 ) >BTW - some say the best way to cook a fish is in the
dishwasher.
Use four bit wide cache parts then. Or if it's EPROM do three bytes wide
and
select the odd(right 12 bits) or even half(left 12bits). There are other
schemes
to reuse loose bits!
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Franchuk <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
>
>After reading the core memory stuff I realized the what I was thinking
>about was dynamic memory (16k chips) for a 2 mhz 8080 in byte. The
>reason
>I got confused was it used the split memory cycle read-write as core
>memory.
Core is one of the few destructive readout memories used. So every
read has a following write to restore the data, often between data
read there will be a modify cycle which means new data written back.
Allison
Suggestion,
Pict the articles on the basic of historic design point like
the Core article or some significant hardware or software.
Usually that kind of article was a feature.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: John Allain <allain(a)panix.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Sunday, December 16, 2001 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: [PDP8-Lovers] how to clean a PDP8/A, dishwasher?
>> Unfortunately these scans aren't from *my* bytes...my collection
>> doesn't go back that far, as I was 7 years old in 1976...so I can't go
>> scan more of 'em. :-(
>
>I guess I can pony up and put at least one jpegged BYTE article up
>for people to see, perhaps one a month. I have no great ideas on
>how to pick the titles, however. Some kind of democratic thing?
>
>John A.
>
>
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>I'm curious about something here ... Was this particular system ever
observed to
>run as configured? I've never owned a prepackaged AMPRO box/system, so
I have
>no experience with them on which to base any guesses. With a SCSI drive
and no
>bridge, the thing should either run or not, though, and if it doesn't
there's
>probably a good reason.
Over the years I've seen two and added hard disks to them (purchased
without).
If you have the right controller and drive it's an assemble the peices
project.
Those included some of the early SCSI drives.
>I'm not in a good situation to help you out with this, at the moment,
but I
>could send you a bridge controller of the sort that the firmware is
supposed to
>recognize on its own. With that you can test the Little Board side of
things.
>The Little Board supports the Xebec controller as well as a number of
models
>from OMTI, ADAPTEC, and others. You'd have to attach an
ST506/412-interfaced
>drive that works properly at the other end, though. The Adaptec models
I've got
>are capable of either RLL or MFM, depending on which model you use and,
of
If you match the known configs it's pretty straightforward, if not you
need to go
into the bios and set up the config by hand. The latter is a bit less
obvious as
the Ampro BIOS for hard disk was done in three layers, one for the
physical
SCSI driver, then the SCSI protocal for the controller target and then
hard disk
interface. There are several added tables not normally seen in a CP/M
bios.
Those tables allow for things like assigning logical unit 3 (whatever it
may be) as drive A:. As BIOS for CP/M go it's very sophisticated.
Allison
>> > From: Gene Buckle <geneb(a)deltasoft.com>
>> Funny, the Ampro docs list all these various controllers and whatnot.
>> The software also _asks_ what controller it is going to talk to. The
>> SCSI controller is part of the LB. What would the software consider
the
>> onboard controller to be?
NCR5380! But that's half the picture. The other half is the SCSI
controller on the other end of the cable. What I meant by PC logic
is that in PCs you plug in an adaptec controller or whoever and you
need a driver specific to that controller. The AMPRO-LB has the
onboard NCR5380 which is the controller and the software specific
to that is in both the bootrom and CP/M bios.
The other peice of that that does not conform to the PC standard
is the other end of the 50pin SCSI cable is the "drive" and back then
the drive was MFM (ST225 typically) with a Bridge adaptor to go
>from SCSI to MFM and that could be done with a board made by
Xybec, Adaptec or Western Digital. Now, those bridge boards did
not behave exactly the same like modern SCSI drives so the "driver"
had an install/init that tweeked the CP/M bios to conform as well as
partition the disk for CP/M use. The CP/M Bios (and bootrom for
that fact) do not query the drive for it's config like PCs. It must be
hard coded into tables in the bios. The bridge controllers require
this info to be pushed into them before they can access the
physical drive. This is in contrast to SCSI drives that have the
tables integral to themselves.
FYI: CP/M supported only 8mb per logical drive so a ST225(20mb)
was usually partitioned into three logical drives (for ampro that would
be A, C and D). Drive B is reserved for floppy as is pseudo drive E.
Drive A(physical drive 0) is always the bootable drive and can be
either floppy or hard disk. The tables for logicla drives are limited
to 16 logical drives (A through P) by CP/M itself and if memory
serves only 10 logical hard disk partitions in the Ampro HD
CP/M bios. So any drive larger than 80mb cannot be fully
accessed. There are ways around the latter problem but
that's a different issue.
>What hard-drive are you using? If it is a SCSI drive? Is it set to
>ID=0? If so, choose either Seagate or Maxtor and give that a try.
I used a 45mb fujitsu. The boot roms expect it to be ID=0.
>> > formatting. If you dont mind hacking Z80 code you can go frm
>> > an AMPRO LB with SCSI to a smaller SCSI drive (64mb or less,
>> > or the rest will be unused).
>>
>> I've got a 20MB SCSI drive I'm trying to use. The bootrom rev tells
me
>> that it's got support for the SCSI controller. What coding has to be
>> done?
CP/M bios which is not the boot rom. The reason for that is the Drive
tables and the controller tables in the install(HDINIT) and format(HDFMT)
will not work for all but a limited subset of possible drive/controller
setups.
The only SCSI drive directly supported was the ST157N and maybe the
ST296N might work.
>If you have the proper version of the HD Utilities, you should not need
>to do any.
> - don
Only if you have a supported controller and drive, otherwise they
do not help you much.
Allison
On December 14, Chad Fernandez wrote:
> The Post Office still uses Unisys stuff, although, I think they may be
> switching to IBM. I saw the Portage (next city over) PO had new looking
> IBM stuff a few weeks back.
>
> Unisys had/has a govt. division of the company.
The post office in Beltsville, MD just switched over to that
Unisys stuff maybe 2 years ago...
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire(a)neurotica.com>
>> Not likely as the sense voltages are quite small and the slice time
>> has to just right.
>
> Well I wouldn't expect to connect it *directly* to the PIC...some
>analog jellybeans would seem appropriate.
Look at the byte article and see why something like a PIC adds little
to the task.
Allison
> I wonder if it would be possible (and practical) to use a
>microcontroller, perhaps a PIC, to act as a core controller. Use the
>A/D and D/A hardware to handle the drive and sense stuff, and do all
>the timing in firmware...making it easily tweakable.
Not likely as the sense voltages are quite small and the slice time
has to just right.
> That would be something I'd be up for trying...if I can find a chunk
>of core of low enough density to trace the wiring in. There are some
>nice low-density planes on eBay right now, but they are priced WAY too
>high in my opinion.
No need to trace, they are quite regular, you can ohm them. You still
need core drivers, sense amps and a dozens of diodes for current
steering.
Allison
Sridhar wrote...
> S/390 does NOT run on microprocessors of any kind, let alone
> one as slow as PPC.
Don't tell that to the folks at http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules/
(Of course, it depends on what your definition of "on" is).
Brian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_| _| _| Brian Knittel / Quarterbyte Systems, Inc.
_| _| _| Tel: 1-510-559-7930 Fax: 1-510-525-6889
_| _| _| Email: brian(a)quarterbyte.com
_| _| _| http://www.quarterbyte.com
On December 16, Innfogra(a)aol.com wrote:
> Found it. A very interesting issue. There are several other stories I would
> be interested in also. Thank you.
You're very welcome.
Unfortunately these scans aren't from *my* bytes...my collection
doesn't go back that far, as I was 7 years old in 1976...so I can't go
scan more of 'em. :-(
Eventually I'll beef up my BYTE collection, probably via eBay. There
are a LOT of great articles in there. Of course I do have all of the
wonderful Ciarcia books, so my BYTE collecting motivation has been
partially satisfied. :-)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
On December 16, ajp166 wrote:
> > I wonder if it would be possible (and practical) to use a
> >microcontroller, perhaps a PIC, to act as a core controller. Use the
> >A/D and D/A hardware to handle the drive and sense stuff, and do all
> >the timing in firmware...making it easily tweakable.
>
> Not likely as the sense voltages are quite small and the slice time
> has to just right.
Well I wouldn't expect to connect it *directly* to the PIC...some
analog jellybeans would seem appropriate.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
On December 16, Ben Franchuk wrote:
> > > Remember the (iirc) Compaq ad. Thier 286 had a meg of static ram onboard.
> > > The ad depicted an empty desk with two tire tracks burt into it and a
> > > surprised user behind.
> >
> > Static RAM? Are you sure? I've never heard of static RAM in a
> > PeeCee. That's neat.
>
> Yes there is some -- it is called cache.:) I suspect a sever type
> PC is more likely to have static than dynamic. I never did like PC
> marketing -- clock speed -- not memory speed used as a benchmark.
Nonono, I mean *main* memory, not cache. I sincerely doubt there
are any PeeCees in the 486-or-newer arena with static RAM for main
memory.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
>> I have some scans of an old BYTE Magazine article (July 1976 I
think)
>> that details how to build a common interface for an arbitrary chunk of
>> core. I haven't really read it in-depth but I plan to someday. I can
>> put it online if anyone would like to see it.
I'd love to see scans of this one too. I remember the article but
somehow lost it.
Allison
From: Don Maslin <donm(a)cts.com>
>It should not have a twist like a PC cable, and can be a length of
>34-conductor ribbon cable, Gene, with a 50-pin female header on each
>end. What ever length is needed.
Ah, dont you mean 34 pin? 50 pin would be the SCSI.
Allison
The older large ferrite core is easier to work with though
much slower. The bigger cores produce a larger output
when they switch but the cycle times are in the
3-5uS range. The later is helpful for demos as nothing
is too fast.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Loboyko Steve <sloboyko(a)yahoo.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Saturday, December 15, 2001 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: [PDP8-Lovers] how to clean a PDP8/A, dishwasher?
>I've looked into this too. Problems are many. It's
>definitely not a trivial project, lots of analog and
>electromagnetic voodoo, and the chips that made it
>easier are very hard to find. I've got a small
>capacity large doughnut ca. 1960 core plane from an
>IBM machine and a 4K by 16 plane from the 70's with
>very tiny doughnuts, both unused, and I'd love to
>demonstrate how it worked.
>
>
>--- ajp166 <ajp166(a)bellatlantic.net> wrote:
>> From: John Allain <allain(a)panix.com>
>> >I have a Question for the other core users out
>> there:
>> >How would I test-signal a board, for demos, that is
>> >just a core frame, IE one sacrificed from its stack
>>
>> >and sold at the e- flea market?
>>
>>
>> It's a non trivial thing to do. Core by definition
>> is destructive
>> read out memory. So to demo a core you need to
>> provide
>> the coincident current (x,y) and the
>> inhibit/write/read signals
>> with the associated timing. Both the currents and
>> the
>> timing are critical. takes a lot of stuff to do
>> that.
>>
>> Allison
>>
>>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
>your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
>or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com
From: Gene Buckle <geneb(a)deltasoft.com>
>I know I can use any length of ribbon I want. What I'd like to know is
>what it was when it was new. (and it's 34 pin card-edge connectors that
>are needed :) )
I take them off old PC floppy cables.
>The drive is a Miniscribe 8425S and AFAIK, it's set to ID 0 with the
>terminating resistors installed. Seagate or Maxtor is not listed as a
>_controller_ choice when HFORMAT is run.
Yep! It's possible to use that drive but the Ampro provided tools only
recognized drives from the era, there were many good choices in
later years.
Allison
On December 15, Ben Franchuk wrote:
> > I have some scans of an old BYTE Magazine article (July 1976 I think)
> > that details how to build a common interface for an arbitrary chunk of
> > core. I haven't really read it in-depth but I plan to someday. I can
> > put it online if anyone would like to see it.
>
> I think that was a design for the 8080 and the S100 bus.
> It was a really nice design too if I remember right. I remember
> somebody doing a core-demo on the web. I think it used a iron washer
> as the core. Since this is not high speed only the current is critical
> here.
It should be pretty easy to interface to other processors, then...
> (Boy do I miss the early Bytes -- ordinary people designing and using
> computers
> -- not multi-billion $$$ bloatware companies -- )
Yup.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jochen Kunz [mailto:jkunz@unixag-kl.fh-kl.de]
> On 2001.12.14 18:08 Christopher Smith wrote:
>
> [Sequent Symmetry S81]
> > Drives, but I can probably handle that...
> What interface SMD?
Possibly, it's hard to tell since I'm not sure what an SMD interface looks
like. I could turn it over and check but I don't know what to look for. ;)
> > I believe that the system was board-for-board compatible
> with the S27,
> The Unix-AG once owned a S27 with 8 CPUs, 80MB RAM, 7 SMD disks,
> Exabyte, ... I know where the machine is now, including a complete set
> of OS software. If you get the machine working, ask me for software.
I certainly will.
> Don't expect much of that machine. I could get only 200kB/s via the
> Ethernet, the SMD disk controller could not handle more then 700kB/s.
> (The same disks can deliver more than 2MB/s on a Sun 3/260.) That is
> real poor for such a high end beast. I was really
> disapointed. But it is
Did you get the chance to find out how performance faired when you add more
CPU?
> nice to see an old 4.2BSD UNIX derivate with AT&T universe
> running on 8
> CPUs in a SMP config.
It is amusing for me to see _any_ intel cpu running in an SMP config, and
the fact that from what I've heard, Sequent made them do it fairly well,
intrigues me.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
In a message dated 12/15/01 10:54:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
mcguire(a)neurotica.com writes:
>
>
> The scans are up at http://ti.neurotica.com/core. They're a bunch
> of jpegs. No, that wasn't my idea, I didn't do the scanning. :) I
> might try to turn them into a pdf one of these days.
>
>
Found it. A very interesting issue. There are several other stories I would
be interested in also. Thank you.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
Anyone have any of the docs for this beastie? I have one but no docs. I
have been having trouble figuring out which terminal emulation to use when
connected to it, also If someone has the docs I would be will ing to get my
scanner hooked up again to my computer and see about making a PDF of them
for posterity....
In a message dated 12/15/01 9:15:47 PM Pacific Standard Time,
mcguire(a)neurotica.com writes:
> I have some scans of an old BYTE Magazine article (July 1976 I think)
> that details how to build a common interface for an arbitrary chunk of
> core. I haven't really read it in-depth but I plan to someday. I can
> put it online if anyone would like to see it.
>
I would like to see it. I have several pieces of core.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
On December 16, Pat Finnegan wrote:
> > I have some scans of an old BYTE Magazine article (July 1976 I think)
> > that details how to build a common interface for an arbitrary chunk of
> > core. I haven't really read it in-depth but I plan to someday. I can
> > put it online if anyone would like to see it.
>
> I'd definately be interested.
The scans are up at http://ti.neurotica.com/core. They're a bunch
of jpegs. No, that wasn't my idea, I didn't do the scanning. :) I
might try to turn them into a pdf one of these days.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
On December 16, John Allain wrote:
> > I have some scans of an old BYTE Magazine article (July 1976 I think)
> > that details how to build a common interface for an arbitrary chunk of
> > core. I haven't really read it in-depth but I plan to someday. I can
> > put it online if anyone would like to see it.
>
> It Would help lots more Dave if you dug out that disk drive.
> The mv3500 is still pretty useless w/o swap space.
I've gotten to the bottom of the "staging area"...I think that pile
of drives is in my storage locker up in Maryland. I will know for
sure soon.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
On December 15, ajp166 wrote:
> >I have a Question for the other core users out there:
> >How would I test-signal a board, for demos, that is
> >just a core frame, IE one sacrificed from its stack
> >and sold at the e- flea market?
>
> It's a non trivial thing to do. Core by definition is destructive
> read out memory. So to demo a core you need to provide
> the coincident current (x,y) and the inhibit/write/read signals
> with the associated timing. Both the currents and the
> timing are critical. takes a lot of stuff to do that.
I have some scans of an old BYTE Magazine article (July 1976 I think)
that details how to build a common interface for an arbitrary chunk of
core. I haven't really read it in-depth but I plan to someday. I can
put it online if anyone would like to see it.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
On December 15, Ben Franchuk wrote:
> > > > I have little doubt about the appropriateness... of your response.
> > > > Care to say when its appropriate to own three S/390's?
> >
> > > It's wholly inappropriate. He should give one to me.
> >
> > And one to me. Then he has one, and that's somewhat less inappropriate. ;-)
>
> Why collect 390's? 360's are more impressive! :)
I suspect Sridhar doesn't have the S/390s for "historic"
purposes...Ordinarily I'd just shut up and let him say that, but I
just talked with him on the phone, he's outside of Richmond on his way
down here. I'm going to make him eat some beef while he's here. :-)
> BTW does the 390 architecture still emulate the 360's?
I believe so, yes.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
From: Richard A. Cini, Jr. <rcini(a)msn.com>
> On the negative side, a small regression error has crept in and 4k
BASIC
>will no longer run. This is not so bad because if you could run 8k BASIC
>there's no reason to run 4k BASIC.
This is broken. Since 4kbasic and 8kbasic ran on the same altairs it
suggests something in the emulator is broken.
FYI: much of MITS and Altair compatable software used input Port 0FFh
as a 8bit input (usually to configure IO).
Allison
I only needed one floppy and with the twisted end cut off
it was perfect.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Saturday, December 15, 2001 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: Ampro Little Board questions...
>A PC floppy cable certainly wouldn't work with the Little Boards I have,
since
>they use the standard floppy disk cable, which has no twists or cuts.
>
>Dick
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "ajp166" <ajp166(a)bellatlantic.net>
>To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
>Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 2:44 PM
>Subject: Re: Ampro Little Board questions...
>
>
>> From: Gene Buckle <geneb(a)deltasoft.com>
>> >belongs with it. Does anyone have a Series 100 box that could give
me
>> >the measurements and connector orientation & location of the floppy
>> >cable?
>>
>>
>> Nothing magic. the last one I had used was from a PC.
>>
>> >Secondly, I don't know what "brand" SCSI controller is built into the
>> >board. The SCSI chip seems to be an NCR 5830, but that leads me
nowhere
>> >in relation to whether or not it's an Adaptec or other model
controller.
>> >I need to know the brand because the hd formatting software needs to
>> >know it.
>>
>>
>> Your applying PC logic to it. It's is not Adaptec, i'ts just SCSI
>> (SCS1 or II) host and the NCR5380 is one of the early and common
>> chips used for that.
>>
>> The brand applies to the "other" board, what is known as a SCSI
>> bridge board. Adaptec, Xybec, WD and other made them. You
>> need to know what board and what drive to do the formatting. If
>> you dont mind hacking Z80 code you can go frm an AMPRO LB
>> with SCSI to a smaller SCSI drive (64mb or less, or the rest will
>> be unused).
>>
>> Allison
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
From: John Allain <allain(a)panix.com>
>I have a Question for the other core users out there:
>How would I test-signal a board, for demos, that is
>just a core frame, IE one sacrificed from its stack
>and sold at the e- flea market?
It's a non trivial thing to do. Core by definition is destructive
read out memory. So to demo a core you need to provide
the coincident current (x,y) and the inhibit/write/read signals
with the associated timing. Both the currents and the
timing are critical. takes a lot of stuff to do that.
Allison
Hello, all:
Just a quick announcement. Today was the official release of version 2.1 of
the Altair32 Emulator. Yeah!
It's been about four months since the 2.0 release and a lot has happened
since then. Floppy disk images for CP/M, Altair DOS and Disk BASIC are fully
functional and the Altair32 now has an integrated debugger, courtesy of Jim
Battle's Sol-20 emulation project. These two items alone took over half of
the time between releases and integrating the debugger required a major
overhaul of the 8080 emulation code.
On the negative side, a small regression error has crept in and 4k BASIC
will no longer run. This is not so bad because if you could run 8k BASIC
there's no reason to run 4k BASIC.
The next phase of the project will hopefully include some or all of the
following:
Continued code cleanup; minor fixes to IMSAI conditional
Further testing of the debugger (it's been only lightly tested with the
Altair32)
A set of Windows-based tools to manipulate diskette images (to enable people
to download programs from http://www.retroarchive.org and get them onto
diskettes)
Support for BBS software
Support for different floppy controllers/disk formats and maybe a
pseudo-floppy hard drive.
That's it for now. As always, you can check out the project at:
http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/Altair32.htm
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project
Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
/************************************************************/
On Dec 15, 12:28, Matthew Sell wrote:
> Typically, the time spent "in the water" isn't long enough to damage.
Even
> items made of steel and iron won't rust if the water is removed after the
> cycle is complete. If they sit overnight, well, that's a different story.
>
> The only production problem I saw with untreated water was with an
> electronic test instrument that had a lot of high-impedance signal
> interconnects throughout. Many signal lines ran for long distances next
to
> each other. While the design of this piece of test equipment was
> questionable, it was our duty to get it to work.
>
> The two biggest problems were contaminants from the water supply used in
> the washing process (city water - switched to using a commercial
filtration
> system), and humidity (had to paint a sealant on all of the boards).
That's a well-known problem. Some of the residues from a domestic water
supply -- especially in hard water areas -- are mildly hygroscopic, and as
a result, the boards would acquire very small amounts of moisture on the
surface, especially when exposed to a humid atmosphere. In combination
with the salts in the residue, this makes for leakage across the board,
which could easily upset very high impedance circuits.
I heard of someone who had the opposite problem. He designed a CMOS
circuit which worked fine when forst contructed, but stopped when given
anti-environment protection or was potted. He'd inadvertantly relied on
the normal leakage across a PCB to hold the unused inputs of a CMOS gate at
a particular level. Remove the leakage current and the gate stops working
properly. Solution: add the pullup resistor that should have been there in
the first place.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Dec 15, 1:32, Matthew Sell wrote:
> Here's the secrets to doing this right:
>
> 1) Do not use any detergents. NONE.
Why not? Commercially, detergents are used to remove flux. I use
laboratory detergent to clean PCBs I've made or modified. I don't use
washing-up liquid, though, and I don't use the harsher detergents sometimes
found in dishwasher detergent.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On December 15, Jim Davis wrote:
> IMHO: All software development should be performed as such:
>
> 1) Requirements - what should it do, and not do. Spin this till
> everybody
> signs off.
> 2) Prelim design - Ok, a rough outline of the design, data structures
> and control/data flow defined here.
> 3) Detailed design - Define all the modules and their function, break it
> down.
> 4) Test plan - integrate testing into detailed design, make it unit
> testable.
> a unit is somthing that has input and output and side effects, like a
> function.
> 5) Finally, coding - build modules in parallel with test code.
> 6) Unit testing - verify that modules comply with detailed design.
> 7) Integration testing - hook it all together, make sure it works, apply
> test plan developed in step 4 for fully integrated aplication.
>
> Do 1-3 until marketing decides what they want,4-7 until you find no
> errors.
>
> For safety critical, you should /have to perform statement and decision
> coverage in
> step 6 and 7 and the detailed design should have a one-to-one
> corespondence
> with the detailed design document.
Hmm, that procedure "reads" nice, but it sounds like more meetings
than actual work. But then I've been a software developer for about
twelve years, and nobody that I've worked with can figure out how I
can blow off all the meetings and not get fired...it's because I end
up writing all the code that the rest of the developers are talking
about in their meetings, WHILE they're in their meetings, and by the
time they're doing screwing around, the code is running.
Procedures are nice, but they can be taken too far. Goal-orientation
is better.
(While I'll freely admit that this approach simply doesn't work for
multi-million line applications, I should state that I generally work
on applications of less than one million lines, but generally more
than 100,000. I further state that my methods should probably NOT be
used in life-critical applications...more than two eyes need to look
at that stuff, no matter what.)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf