I realize that there are probably very few individuals interested
in this topic, however here goes.
I am running E11 (Ersatz-11) under Windows 98 so that I can
run RT-11. It works great in almost all respects and I can even
live with this one minor problem. However, perhaps someone
might be able to suggest what needs to be fixed.
I have just acquired a CD-RW and been successful is making copies
of my files to a CD-R and over the past week a few test files to a
CD-Erasable. I am using "Nero Burning" as the software which
"writes" to the CD and while I am a bit disappointed that the write
speed to the erasables is only 2x as opposed to 16x for the WORM
media, I can easily live with that and it is not a problem. I have also
discovered how to "DUMP" to the screen any of the 2048 byte blocks
on the CD - in hex of course. And finally, I discovered how to copy
a single file to the CD starting at block zero of the CD media - or at
least I have done so with the erasable media and I hope it can be
done with the WORM media as well. The only thing I have not found
out as yet is how to copy all of the sectors written to a CD back to
a file on the hard drive so that more than one copy can be made to
more blank CDs. I doubt if that will be a problem - I just have not
even bothered as yet to try.
When I copy a single file to the CD using Nero and the "File" menu
o File
o Burn Image
o Open
o Foreign Image Settings - Block Mode 1
- Block Size (2048 Bytes)
- Image Header (0 Bytes)
- Image Trailer (0 Bytes)
o OK
o Ignore - during this test, the Image file is not a
multiple of 2048 bytes
o Write
where each "o" indicates another menu sub-level.
Nero does correctly write the file to the CD as far as I can tell -
except perhaps
for the last few blocks since the size of the image file was not a
multiple of
2048 bytes. Using C:foobar.DSK as the Image File I wrote to the CD,
then
using Nero and "Recorder"/"View Track", I can look at each 2048 byte
block
the CD to verify that the Image File Foobar.DSK was written to the CD
and
under E11 I can give the commands:
MOUNT DU0: CDROME:/RO
MOUNT DU1: C:foobar.DSK/RO
Then under RT-11, I can also give the commands
DIFFERENCES/BINARY/DEVICE DU0: DU1:/START:64./END:last-block-3
which results in a perfect compare. Under RT-11, I can also do a
DUMP/TERM DU1:/ONLY:any block including block numbers between zero and
63.
DUMP/TERM DU0:/ONLY:only block numbers 64. or greater.
NOW!! Here is my problem and the question. Why can't E11 read blocks
zero to 63.
on the CD? I can see them under Nero and DUMP these blocks to the
monitor under
Nero.
I could easily modify the MSCP device driver for RT-11 and automatically
add 64. to
every block number before I try to read it from the CD, but that would
really mean
a new device driver (CDX.SYS seems like a good name). I would also need
to
decide if that should be just for partition zero (my preference) or all
the 20 or even
21 partitions on the CD. Or perhaps, someone has already discovered the
answer
why Nero can read those blocks under Windows 98, but E11 can't.
By the way, one other solution is to just not use partition zero under
RT-11 under
E11 under W95/W98. Before I could burn my own CDs, that was the way
that
Tim Shoppa set up the RT-11 Freeware CD in any case. However, now that
I
have been able to actually read blocks zero through 63. from the CD
under Nero,
it seems too soon to give up on E11.
I suspect that a partial answer may be that Nero uses W95/W98 operating
system
calls that are not used by E11 which is essentially a DOS program. If
true, that
obstacle might be overcome if the modification to E11 is simple enough.
PLEASE!!! Can anyone suggest what the difficulty might be?
Sincerely yours,
Jerome Fine
--
If you attempted to send a reply and the original e-mail
address has been discontinued due a high volume of junk
e-mail, then the semi-permanent e-mail address can be
obtained by replacing the four characters preceding the
'at' with the four digits of the current year.
Jeffrey Sharp <lists(a)subatomix.com> said:
> On Friday, March 29, 2002, Douglas H. Quebbeman wrote:
> > http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,51274,00.html
> Suppose it *is* that bad. What are some good nations to immigrate to?
Well, I can imagine how the USA is going to end up...
- No more Linux coders from the USA - that would be a pretty big problem
given that a great deal of stuff for Linux was coded by Americans.
- No more home movies - Your Uncle Fred can't just send you his video of the
kids playing football - your VCR would refuse to play it
- No more DVDROM drives for computers (or CDROMs, or floppy drives, or RAM,
hard drives, etc) - could conceivably be used for infringement.
- Computer hoarders - people who bought loads of pre-SSSCA
Dell/Compaq/Toshiba/noname PCs and then started keeping them to themselves.
- Massive fines for nearly any computer programmer
Need I go on?
I think I'm going to stay in the UK for the time being. Otherwise, I'm
probably going to move to an island off the coast of India... Catch is my PC
would probably hate me for it...
Later.
--
Phil.
philpem(a)bigfoot.com
http://www.philpem.btinternet.co.uk/
> From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
> The first part is a false conclusion. It's safe to say that L2 is needed
> for a single-chip _2K_ machine (using a 6116 or similar), which is what
> we've been saying all along. For a single-chip 1K machine (using a
> 4118), you use L1. You've not seen one of those boards, so you've not
> seen a machine with L1 fitted.
Granted. How about:
No jumper needed for dual 2114s
L2 needed for 2K boards
L1 needed for single-chip 1K boards
Okay?
Glen
0/0
According to Wired, Sen. Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary
Committee, has put the kibosh on the CBDTPA for now.
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,51425,00.html
The article does mention that Rep. Adam Schiff (D.-California) was
drafting similiar legislation for introduction in the House.
jbdigriz
I know a lot of y'all use Yahoo Mail....
FYI to those who use Yahoo Mail.
March 29 - Tired of spam you're getting at your free Yahoo! e-mail
account? Get ready for more. Tucked inside a privacy policy change
the company made this week was notice that more Yahoo! e-mail
marketing offers were coming "even if users had formerly indicated
they were unwanted. YAHOO! GRANTED ITSELF PERMISSION to spam by
creating a new "marketing preferences" page that lets users
pick "yes or no" to specific categories of marketing pitches. The
problem is, Yahoo! set every users' option to "yes" - even if long
ago, they indicated they never wanted any Yahoo! spam.
Users who don't want marketing offers from Yahoo have 60
days to do the following: Visit the user profile preferences page at
http://edit.my.yahoo.com/config/eval_profile select "Edit your
marketing preferences" from within the Member Information section;
and individually change selections in a series of marketing
categories from "yes" to "no."
In e-mail marketing lingo, the process is known as "opt-out."
But even performing that slightly cumbersome operation is no
guarantee that Yahoo! marketing offers won't come, since the firm
reserves the right to add marketing categories at any time.
"I'd suggest re-checking periodically," writes another
mailing list poster.
Hi,
I have a PowerMac 7100/66av (almost 10 years old now) and i broke like
half the keys on the keyboard and the mouse, i was wondering if there is
any
way to do one of the following to get it up without them.
Make a disk of some sort which runs and sets up VNC and the network?
Get a MkLinux disk that sets up the network and sshd?
thanks,
torquil
On March 30, Torquil MacCorkle III wrote:
> I am VERY interested in doing something like this. I had been looking at
> building a PIC web server but that wouldnt be as fun as a whole computer. I
> was wondering if this book is available online, ebay doesnt seem to have it?
That book is pretty old...you might try http://www.bookfinder.com.
I don't think it's available online.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
On March 30, Torquil MacCorkle III wrote:
> I am interested in building a computer like this, but this seems a bit
> too much for me to tackle. Are there any other Classiccomputers one could
> build which are far simpler and don't involve 600 wires and stuff?
I have a great old book by Steve Ciarcia entitled "Build Your Own Z80
Computer". In it, he details the design and construction a very
simple, yet effective design for which most componenets are still
available. The construction of such a computer can be lots of fun,
and anyone is sure to learn a great deal about computing in general
and digital electronics in particular.
If you have any interest at all in doing this, I'd suggest pursuing
it with vigor. You'll be glad you did!
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
From: liste(a)artware.qc.ca <liste(a)artware.qc.ca>
>> That and the digital stuff has spurs off the bandwidth in all
directions
>> with it's wideband noise. Damn near ruined parts of 6M ham bad with
>> the crud they radiate.
>
>Have you seen this as a fact? Slashdot had an article in the last while
>(can't find it) about someone who'd put a spectrum analyser next to his
>wireless card and found that next to nothing was leaking into other
bands.
Then he wasn't looking in the right places.
Intermod at the site, many transmitters, CH2,4,5,7 at the same general
site plus various other services and a pot load of UHF sources.
Besides I know it's from there as my beam when pointed that way spots
spurs every 150kHz and 60KHz. Many of the local 6m set have been
trying to spot the specific source right down to the specific
transmitter.
Makes weak signal stuff pretty difficult.
Allison
From: Charles E. Fox <foxvideo(a)wincom.net>
>>
>>They are already doing a pretty good job of screwing up the broadcast
>>television industry in the US, with HDTV that no one can afford, and
>>digital tv standards that only work in a strong signal area.
>
> Regards
That and the digital stuff has spurs off the bandwidth in all directions
with it's wideband noise. Damn near ruined parts of 6M ham bad with
the crud they radiate.
Allison
On March 30, Chuck Dickman wrote:
> Another technique that I have found useful is tack soldering wire-wrap
> wire to solder pads on pad per hole perfboard. The Kynar insulation is
> heat resistant and does not shrink or burn. I usually install solder
> tail sockets and then follow with point to point wiring. Multiple wires
> per pad require some care in soldering (the wire has spring and tends to
> pull away as the solder melts). Quite reliable and efficient for someone
> skilled with a soldering iron.
I've used this technique for small stuff. It works well. I haven't
tried anything large with it mainly due to lack of opportunity, but
I'm sure I will at some point.
> For an example:
> http://www.chd.dyndns.org/sbc/68k_back_half.jpg
>
> The most dense area is about 3/4 inch thick.
Hey, that looks like a really cool SBC!
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
On March 30, Tony Duell wrote:
> > All that person needs to do is get a soldering iron, solder, some bits
>
> Do uorself a favour and buy a good temperature-controlled soldering
> station. It will make life a lot easier and do less damage. I am used to
> a Weller TCP iron (this is a very common one, at least in the UK). A few
> years back I attempted to use a friend's cheap non-controller iron, and I
> found I simply couldn't work on multi-layer PCBs with it. I went back to
> the lab where I was emplyed at the time to borrow a Weller TCP to do the
> repair...
I strongly second this! A cheap crap soldering iron (like the $7
specials that I used to by at Radio Shack when I was a kid) will
produce crap results for pretty much ANY person regardless of skill or
experience. I used a Weller TCP like Tony's for many years; it was
wonderful in every way. About 6-8 months ago I picked up a Metcal
iron (an SP-PW1-10), which is even a huge step above said venerable
Weller TCP...I recommend them very highly. Try one and you'll
understand what I mean. :-)
It really doesn't pay to use cheap soldering irons. You'll save a few
bucks, but it'll cost you parts, boards, fingers, and the fun of
soldering!
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
On March 30, brian wheeler wrote:
> > For 500 connections or more, I'd a brung in my electric wirewrap
> > GUN.
>
> A few years ago I took a hardware class at IU and we built a PDP-8 using
> PLAs, a bit of static ram, a few 74LS chips, and a ton of wire
> wrapping. There were about 600 wires in all, but luckily it was split
> across the whole semester, so it wasn't too dramatic. It was pretty
In 1985-1987 I worked at Princeton University (I think I may have
mentioned this at one point) on the Navier-Stokes Supercomputer
project at the Moody Fluid Dynamics Laboratory. I was responsible for
the Switching Board, a big board full of TTL that functioned as a big
crossbar switch between processors and memory planes. The boards in
the NSC machine were Unibus form-factor; we used the OEM version of
the PDP11/24 chassis which came with no labels and no backplane
wiring. The Switching Board was wall-to-wall 74LS series
chips...mostly 74LS244s...packed as closely as possible. If memory
serves they were 14,000 wires per board or so.
Doing that without a gun would have been...well, impossible. It was
tedious, but I enjoyed it anyway. What was especially enjoyable was
seeing the first test program running through vectors, outperforming a
uniprocessor Cray XMP on $2K worth of hardware in a desktop chassis. :)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
Does any one know disk info since I get a mismatch on boot. Is a 286 with
DOS and want to get stuff off the drive if I can pick the correct config
stuff.
Randy
Milwaukee, WI
On March 30, jeff.kaneko(a)juno.com wrote:
> Well yes, as a matter of fact, there are still many applications
> where WW is really the best way to go. As a good example, bed-of-
> nails test fixtures are typically wirewrapped. At the last
> company where I was employed, I watched a re-work girl wire up
> such a fixture (maybe 300 points or so) *BY HAND*, using a
> manual wirewrap tool.
A "re-work girl" Oh MAN where can I find one of those!!
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
>Oops I forgot to mention that the ethernet transceiver is also likely
>broken.
>
>You can't get those for $5 too can you? :)
No, you might have to actually go as high as $10 for one of those.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Dear colleague
In the very next future, FORMATEX, a technological
organization located in Badajoz (Spain), will edit a series of
books on the science and technology of Microscopy, as well as
on educational applications. This letter is to invite you to
take part of this edition, since we are searching for contributors
>from all microscopy technique and applications. Information on
the Call for Paper for this edition is available at
http://www.formatex.org/micro2002/callforpaper.htm
The book will be edited in a citeable form (ISBN)
and a copy of the book plus 25 reprints will be sent by mail to
the corresponding author.
If you are interested in contributing to this edition or have
any question, please contact us at
micro(a)formatex.org, or directly to the editor:
A.Mendez Vilas
Physics Department
University of Extremadura
Avda. de Elvas s/n
06071 Badajoz
SPAIN
E-mail: amvilas(a)unex.es
Regards
J.A. Mesa Gonzalez
FORMATEX
In a message dated 3/30/02 11:33:50 AM Pacific Standard Time,
torquil(a)rockbridge.net writes:
> Oops I forgot to mention that the ethernet transceiver is also likely
> broken.
>
> You can't get those for $5 too can you? :)
>
>
I saw one in the Lincoln City, Oregon, Goodwill for $7 two days ago.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
On March 30, Loboyko Steve wrote:
> Well, no, it isn't. Because the cost of getting a PCB
> made is less than the cost of a good electronics
> technician, I think it started to die in the late
> 80's. And, of course, its practically impossible to WW
> BGA chips, etc.
Not commonly used, or not the "latest greatest thing"? I know of
several small outfits that do lots of wire-wrapping. And I mean
*lots*.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
> From: John Chris Wren <jcwren(a)jcwren.com>
> Assuming I wanted to get a ZX-81, what would I want?
Take a stable ZX81 or TS1000 and pull off the composite video to feed a
monitor. Add a decent keyboard and bump the RAM to 64KB. You'll want a
printer and a good cassette recorder, too.
If you don't plan to add any hardware which requires a ROM, then you might
want to add NVRAM to the unoccupied 8-16K address space. A Hunter board is
perfect for this, if you can find one.
If you require hardware which could benefit from having code in ROM, then
the 8-16K space can be used by an add-on ROM.
> And are there any
> really good 'net resources for the ZX-81?
Yes! The ZX-TEAM home page is a good place to start:
http://home.t-online.de/home/p.liebert/zx-team.htm
Kai Fischer's ZX96 page shows an example of how far you can take this
machine:
http://home.freiepresse.de/befis/zx96_e.htm
Zebra Systems in NYC still sells unbuilt kits, but they are expensive:
http://www.zebrasystems.com/zebrasystems/zx81/index.html
For software, visit the University of Trondheim archive:
ftp://ftp.nvg.unit.no/pub/sinclair/zx81/
You can download the software and transfer it from a DOS-based PC to the
ZX81 using ZXTAPE and a modified PC-type parallel printer cable.
One program which is indispensable if FASTLOAD, which allows 4800 baud
cassette I/O, as opposed to the native 300 baud. This means you can LOAD a
16 KB program from cassette in < 40 seconds instead of 5 minutes.
The possibilities really are endless. My main ZX81 has an 80 MB hard drive
hung off it, which I will never come close to outgrowing. Let me know if
you have more questions . . .
Glen
0/0
Steve,
Many years ago I did the TU58 emulator that Bob designed.
An excellent and useful tool.
FYI: I also ahve a 6100 (intersil board with mods) and a 6120
based design. The old PDP-8 instruction set is most interesting
and loads of fun to write code with.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Loboyko Steve <sloboyko(a)yahoo.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Saturday, March 30, 2002 1:02 AM
Subject: "New" PDP-8
>I just completed the very nasty job of downloading the
>operating system and a few BASIC programs to my "new"
>PDP8, which is built from Robert Armstrong's design.
>It only draws about 5 watts, so it isn't a problem to
>keep on all the time, unlike others that people on
>this list might own!
>
>I made a comment to Mr.Armstrong that I removed the
>IBM logo from the drive because I didn't think it
>would work correctly with a DEC design. Strangely,
>this actually came true to a degree; I had a slow PPI
>chip that didn't get data from the drive quickly
>enough. I tried to save a dollar buying an 82C55
>instead of an 82C55-5.
>
>Pics, if interested, are at:
>
>
>sloboyko.home.mindspring.com/pdp8e.htm
>
>I wrote up this web page as a brief synopsis of
>material I found on the Internet; some may be true and
>some may not be true. I would appreciate comments,
>etc., from the experts.
>
>I would also appeciate any pointers to interesting
>software, especially large BASIC programs, disk based
>FOCAL (if this exists?), and so on.
>
>The logos on the case look OK, but if anyone a broken
>piece of case with a Digital or PDP8 logo on it, I'd
>really like to have it.
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover
>http://greetings.yahoo.com/
Hi, gang,
I received an E-mail this morning from a fellow who's looking to offload a whole bunch of older S-100 stuff for cost-of-shipping only. Said E-mail is attached below.
His area code is 914, which I seem to recall is somewhere on the east coast.
Since I'm no longer in the computer arena, outside of what I keep around to maintain my 'net presence, I figured someone on the list could give the stuff a good home.
Enjoy!
*********** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE ***********
On 30-Mar-02 at 11:35 Joe Soll, CSW, DAPA <cera(a)idt.net> wrote:
>I have a large collection of S-100 computers (mostly Compupro) and
>peripherals which I want to give to a collector for the cost of shipping
>only.
>
>The list of equipment is at:
>http://www.adoptioncrossroads.org/antiqcmp.html
>
>It's your for the asking
>
>Be well,
>
>Joe:)
>
>
>
>
>
*********** END FORWARDED MESSAGE ***********
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
ARS KC7GR (Formerly WD6EOS) since 12-77 -- kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates that it would be superior
to what I have now..." (Taki Kogoma, aka Gym Z. Quirk)
> I have a PowerMac 7100/66av (almost 10 years old now) and i broke like
> half the keys on the keyboard and the mouse, i was wondering if there is
> any
> way to do one of the following to get it up without them.
>
> Make a disk of some sort which runs and sets up VNC and the network?
> Get a MkLinux disk that sets up the network and sshd?
If you have access to another mac, you could burn a bootable CD
preconfigured with what you want, boot from it (provided you can still
use the letter C on the keyboard), and then access the Mac via VNC (or
whatever you setup on the CD).
Or, you could just check eBay, as new ADB keyboard for that computer will
likely be found for around $5. (mouse being about the same cost)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
On March 30, Russ Blakeman wrote:
> In addition to that, you'll no longer be able to get the mail from your
> Yahoo! mail via POP (I get mine into Outlook rather than using the webmial
> reader at mail.yahoo.com - this is unless you fork out some cash.
Wow...sounds like Yahoo got some suits.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
On March 29, Loboyko Steve wrote:
> I just completed the very nasty job of downloading the
> operating system and a few BASIC programs to my "new"
> PDP8, which is built from Robert Armstrong's design.
> It only draws about 5 watts, so it isn't a problem to
> keep on all the time, unlike others that people on
> this list might own!
...
> sloboyko.home.mindspring.com/pdp8e.htm
HEY! That's a really REALLY nice piece of work! :-)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
I just bought a IBM PS/2 Model 9577 today for $10. It's got some areas
of sticky sticker residue on it. Usually, I use "Goo Gone" to remove
that type of thing. A lot of times I need to let it sit and soak. The
Goo Gone tends to flow to other areas, However, which can make a mess,
and waste the stuff too. I decided to use toilet paper to control the
flow. Basically, I used a single sheet or even less, lay it over the
desired area, and soak it with the Goo Gone. The toilet paper controls
the Goo Gone by surface tension..... at least I assume it's the surface
tension between the toilet paper, case, and the Goo Gone. Let it soak,
then you can pretty much wipe the area clean :-)
--
Chad Fernandez
Michigan, USA
I just found the thread a few days ago, it looks like it lived and died
in 1998? - but I'm hoping there's still life out there. I need to
transfer cpm floppies to dos, hardsectored unfortuntely to dos
soft-sectored, otherwise there is software I could use. I have ten
years of work on cpm which I can't access, and being financially
challenged I can't hire someone to do it. What I need is a northstar
horizon that reads hardsectored 5.5" floppies, which I could borrow or
buy at a low price.
Thanks for any help you can give,
-Ron
On March 26, Huw Davies wrote:
> > > Just a note that <http://www.alibris.com/home.cfm> lists two copies of
> > > Computer Design: A DEC View ... for sale. One is $34 and one is $57. That's
> > > cheaper than Ebay by a long shot.
> >
> >I have one up for $49 with no bids right now.
> >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2011505056
>
> US$49! That's nearly $100 Aussie dollars.
>
> I know it's a good book (I have two copies, one of which I've read, the
> other I just acquired and has never been opened) but I wouldn't pay $100
> for it. In fact, I don't recall paying for either copy, they were just
> "Huw, have this book".
Heh...does that mean you'd sell yours for US$49?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
Hi,
A friend was claiming that with the UCSD P-System, one could "compile once"
and then "run anywhere" (where "anywhere" means different kinds of
computers running the P-System, not different instances of the same computer).
Was this true?
Did users commonly compile on system A and then take the P-Code to
system B and run it successfully?
I'd have thought that media incompatibility would have tended to
limit this capability.
Was any commerical P-System software sold that was a single binary,
but the vendor expected the user to be able to install/run it on
any brand/model of P-System? (Or, did vendors have to produce a version
for every platform?)
thanks,
Stan Sieler
sieler(a)allegro.com
Stan Sieler sieler(a)allegro.com
www.allegro.com/sieler/wanted/index.htmlwww.allegro.com/sieler
I received a call saying there was a few old commodores to rescue.
I called and he mentioned a couple of 64's, a vic 20 and a B128.
I pick up several boxes, when I get them open there is a Pet 4032 inside
one of them with the B128 keyboard. there is a 103 modem, and another
bookshelf worth of games, programs and a bunch of old Popular Electronics
and Radio-electronics including one with an article entitled 'Hobby
computer Main-Frames'. Lot's of extra cables a few dongles, a D9090 hard
drive, . A capture card 2 beat up 64's.
On March 29, Tony Duell wrote:
> Err, that's it. The RK07 has a solenoid that locks the head carriage when
> the drive is powered down. There it no manual parking bracket or similar.
I distinctly remember a drive of a similar form factor in which
there was a metal peg with a grab-ring on the end that you stuck into
a hole in the positioner assembly to immobilize it...am I thinking of
the RM02/03 (a.k.a. CDC 9762)?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
Osborne also replaced the electronics on the drive with their own board. My
O1 had Siemens FDD 100-5 drives.
I have the cable pinout and disk controller schematics in my copy of the
Osborne 1 Technical manual, if anyone wants a copy.
Question: the tech manual says that with the double density option
installed, the O1 could read/write IBM 40 track 8 (512 byte) sectors, Xerox
820 40 track, 18 (128 byte) sectors, and DEC 1820 DD 40 track 9 (512 byte)
sectors. Can anybody verify this (Fred?)?
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Maslin [mailto:donm@cts.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 3:48 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: RE: 5.25" floppy model numbers
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Erik S. Klein wrote:
> Before you scrap them?
>
> I'm looking for some old 5.25" drives to bring back a couple of Osborne 1s
> to dual drive status.
Be advised that the Osborne drives are not directly interchangeable with
`normal' 5.25" drives. The ribbon cable to the card edge carries drive
power as well as signals and is wired differently. You will need to
conjure an adapter to use normal ones.
- don
> Does anyone know of a good source for old floppy drives? Or better yet, a
> source for getting them repaired?
>
> Erik S. Klein
<snip>
>>Before you scrap them?
>>
>>I'm looking for some old 5.25" drives to bring back a couple of Osborne 1s
>>to dual drive status.
>
>Be advised that the Osborne drives are not directly interchangeable with
>`normal' 5.25" drives. The ribbon cable to the card edge carries drive
>power as well as signals and is wired differently. You will need to
>conjure an adapter to use normal ones.
I have an Osborne 1 that has had dead video for a while. Since it is a
spare anyway, I would be willing to disassemble the drives, and send them to
the original poster (Erik, I think?). I'd also try to save any cables,
connectors, screws, etc.
One caveat... this O1 has had dead video since I got it, so I have never
fully tested out the floppies... I suppose at some point I could have
swapped them into a working O1, but I never had the time....
If the original poster could email me off-list, we can exchange shipping
information. I will not charge for the drives, but because they're not
light, I'd appreciate reimbursement for shipping....
Thanks!
Rich B.
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk [mailto:ard@p850ug1.demon.co.uk]
> > >Anyway, I repair my PCs to component level as well..
> Doesn't everybody???
> > No.
> OK, does _anybody_ (else)?
Yes. In fact, I am at the moment endeavoring to become competent
enough with electronics to make repairs like this (especially the
simple ones). I'm not quite there yet.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:56:46 -0600 Owen Robertson <univac2(a)earthlink.net>
writes:
> on 3/29/02 12:47 PM, jeff.kaneko(a)juno.com at jeff.kaneko(a)juno.com
> wrote:
>
> >> This will require lots of work to defeat, I think, as
> >> the politicians have bought into the fantasy that a
> >> pirated copy of something conctitutes a lost sale.
> >
> > Even if it does pass, there's nothing *anyone* can do
> > about it. Everyone (who matters) will ignore it.
>
> Well I seriously doubt than anyone will go along with this,
> even if it is passed. But didn't the people who came up with
> this consult people who know something about computers
> and software?
Surely you jest. This is *LEGISLATION* remember? It has
almost nothing to do with the real world. The only people
lawmakers consult when writing legislation, are the people
who sign the checks.
> If they had, surely someone would have explained
> to them that this is: A) total shit, and B) impossible to
> enforce.
Part "A" is actually true of *any* legislation made in the
past twenty years (probably even further back than that).
It's almost a requirement.
Part "B" is irrelevant, because the whole legislative
exercise in this country is about getting re-elected, and
aquiring the money to achieve this end. Period. If
it pleases the guys who sign the checks (and if the
aforementioned checks have the requisite number of
digits), it will become law-- one way or another.
> I'm not very 'up' on intellectual property laws, but
> how can they *force* programmers, both corporate
> employees and individuals, to do this?
That's just it: They can't, at least not without
spending massive amounts of money (which we don't
have) on enforcement. It's little more than a game.
Geez, look what you've done-- now I need a beer!
After that, I think I'm going to practise my kung-fu
on this here soapbox . . . .
Jeff
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
S.F. Bay area collectors,
I assume and hope you are ahead of me on this, but:
------
From: ronfronberg(a)earthlink.net (ron fronberg)
Newsgroups:
comp.sys.next.marketplace,ba.market.computer,ba.market.computers,misc.forsale.co
mputers.workstation,ba.marketplace.computers
Subject: NeXT Laser Printers - Complete in Original Box $15
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 05:21:38 GMT
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
I have access to a large quantity of NeXT Laser Printers. The printers
are complete with all cables and trays. The printers are in original, not
their own, NeXT Laser Printer boxes. The printer condition is unknown.
The cost is $15 each. The printers must be picked up in Redwood City, CA
the first week of April, thru Friday the 5th. The printers will not be
shipped or held.
The method of payment would be by PayPal. The printers would need to be
paid for in advance.
If interested, email me at ronfronberg(a)earthlink.net by Sunday.
thanks
ron
--
ronald fronberg
650 - 366-2566
650 - 369-5665 fax
redwood city, ca
ronfronberg(a)earthlink.net
--------
contact him, not me. - Mark
Well, they could send in the police to confiscate all of your computer
equipment and software, and then not give it back until after the court has
thrown out the case, which could be a year or more. Try writing much real
software without a computer.
-----Original Message-----
From: Owen Robertson [mailto:univac2@earthlink.net]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 1:57 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: The Future End of Classic Computing
<snip>
I'm not very 'up' on intellectual property laws, but how can they *force*
programmers, both corporate employees and individuals, to do this?
--
Owen Robertson
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 11:52:46 -0500 (EST) "Douglas H. Quebbeman"
<dougq(a)iglou.com> writes:
> The End of Classic Computing, and in fact, the end
> of Computing as a hobby for almost all of us, is on
> the table in the U.S. Congress in the form of The
> Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion
> Act (CBDTPA). This insidious bill would strike at
> the very heart of this community, the software that
> keeps our ClassicComputers running, unless we or
> someone incorporates anti-pirating measures.
I say fuck 'em. Any software that complies with
this probably won't be worth using anyway. History
has proven time and again that 'anti-piracy' measures
don't work. If the 'protections' are too cumbersome,
no one will use the product. Conversely, it is also
possible to implement 'protections' that don't pose
a serious obstacle.
> Now, if that sounded inflammatory, it should. It's
> not quite accurate either. The bill will cover only
> software created from the time of the bill's passage
> and on into the future. The stuff we play with now
> would therefore be exempt.
Yeah, it looks like it's written to cover all of the
M$ crap. Don't need it. Don't want it.
> There appears to be a loophole for stuff you do that
> you never distribute. There also appears to be a loophole
> for computers that do not contain microprocessors.
RIght. 'We'll never distribute this version of Linux'
(wink, wink). It will just ram a whole bunch of
creative people underground (but maybe we'll see a
rebirth of CPUs implemented in discrete logic :^).
> But there would be a horizon coming soon. If the bill
> is passed, computers and software being developed now,
> once 10 years old, might be on-topic, but you'd be
> breaking federal law to share software.
Like I said, fuck 'em. If they come after one guy,
you know they'll have to come for about 1,000,000
other guys who are doing the same thing. There ain't
gonna be no budget for this . . .
> Sponsored by someone who must surely be certifiably
> insane, one Senator Fritz Hollings of South Carolina,
> if you want more information, see:
Certifiably insane? I don't think that's open to
debate: It's a job requirement, and has been for decades.
> This will require lots of work to defeat, I think, as
> the politicians have bought into the fantasy that a
> pirated copy of something conctitutes a lost sale.
Even if it does pass, there's nothing *anyone* can do
about it. Everyone (who matters) will ignore it.
My $0.02
Jeff
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
On 2002.03.27 22:29 pat(a)cart-server.purdueriots.com wrote:
> Also, I didn't get a keyboard
> with it and didn't see one there. What kind of keyboard does it use,
And Jochen Kunz <jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de> wrote:
> You need a special break out cable like on the DECstation 5000 2{0,4,6}0
> machines. It has a 15 pin D shell connector on one side and a litle box
> on the other. Keyboard (any DEC LK{2,4}01) and Mouse (DEC VSXXX) are
> connected to this box.
And then pat(a)cart-server.purdueriots.com also wrote:
> Does anyone have the pinout for this? Or even better, does anyone have a
> pinout for both this and a Framebuffer Console cable that works with a
> VAXstation 3200 and 4-plane mono framebuffer- a BC18P? OR should I just
> try to plug it in? I want to get some sort of confirmation that it won't
> blow up my keyboard or DEC3000 first.
I am under the impression that the same cable used for the DECstation 5000
series is also used with the DEC 3000 series of machines. Given that,
a BC18P (or BC18Z) is not compatible. Although I don't have a complete
pinout on the BC18P, I do know that pin 3 of the BC18P (pins 1,2,3 of the
BC18Z) is used for video. For the 5000 (and hopefully the 3000) the first
few pins are used for the keybaord.
And Doc <doc(a)mdrconsult.com> added:
> The kbd/mouse dongle pinouts are posted on the web somewhere. Try
> Googling "dec 3000/300x pinout" or something. I looked briefly last
> night and can't find it, but it's out there.
Having not found the 5000 cable pinout myself, I did a pinout for it some
time back. I will paste it to the end of this and we will go from there.
Mike
DECstation 5000 keyboard/mouse cable and related info
--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
---------------
The DECstation 5000 has a 15 pin (male) D connector on the back for keyboard
and mouse connections. There is a cable that plugs into the 5000 connector
and has a keyboard socket (RJ-11) and a mouse socket (7 pin mini-din) on the
other end. I am under the impression that the same cable is also used with
the DEC 3000 series of machines.
The part number for the cable is 17-02640-01.
For a keyboard, use a LK201 or LK401.
For a mouse, use a VSXXX-AA (round hockey puck) or VSXXX-GA (rectangular).
CABLE INFO
The cable pinout (from the DECstation 5000/240 manual) is:
Pin Signal Desc.
1 GND Ground (to keyboard socket)
2 KEY.TX Keyboard transmitted data
3 KEY.RX Keyboard received data
4 +12v Keyboard power
5 GND Ground
6 MSE.RX Mouse received data
7 MSE.TX Mouse transmitted data
8 GND Ground (to mouse socket)
9 GND Ground (to mouse socket)
10 NC
11 NC
12 NC
13 +5v Mouse power
14 -12v Mouse power
15 GND Ground (to mouse socket)
I have also verified the above info with a VOM.
KEYBOARD INFO
As for the keyboard, I had a couple of them open a while back (to clean
out the cookie crumbs) and traced them out somewhat. Looking into the
end of the plug on the cable coming from the keyboard.
|------------|
| o o o o |
| B R G Y |
|___| |___|
|____|
B - Black - Data from keyboard
R - Red - +12v to keyboard
G - Green - Ground
Y - Yellow - Data to keyboard
And looking into the socket on the end of the 17-02640-01 cable:
(also applies to the keyboard socket on a terminal such as a VT420)
|------------|
| o o o o |
| Y G R B |
|___| |___|
|____|
Pin
Y to pin 3 of the 15 pin D connector on cable 17-02640-01
G to pin 1 ...
R to pin 4 ...
B to pin 2 ...
I do not include pin numbers for the keyboard connector because I have
found on-line references to some of this info and in some cases the pin
numbers differ. Your mileage may vary.
MOUSE INFO
As for the mouse, you will find the pinouts below and the signals.
Please note that the pin numbers may not be the official DEC numbers.
Here again, I have seen on-line references to some of this info and
the pin numbers differ.
Looking into the plug coming from the mouse:
5 6 7
o o o
4 o === o 1
o o
3 2
1 - -12v
2 - Data to mouse
3 - Ground
4 - Data from mouse
5 - +5v
6 - nc
7 - nc
And looking at the socket on a machine or end of the 17-02640-01 cable:
7 6 5
o o o
1 o === o 4
o o
2 3
Pin
1 to pin 14 of the 15 pin D connector on cable 17-02640-01
2 to pin 6 ...
3 to pins 8, 9, & 15 ...
4 to pin 7 ...
5 to pin 13 ...
6 nc
7 nc
> Ethan Dicks wrote:
>
>--- "Carlini, Antonio" <Antonio.Carlini(a)riverstonenet.com> wrote:
>> To verify (for sure) you should have
>> the yellow LED off (self-test failed)
>> and the red LEDs below that
>> reading OFF, ON, OFF, OFF, OFF, OFF, ON
>> (which is 21 in BCD - no, I don't know why!)
>
>What doesn't make sense?
The use of BCD ... what's wrong with
good old binary! I guess they were
trying to make it easier for
the hard of counting.
Antonio
Came upon this manual and dont see I'll ever need it
This is for a Cipher M990 9 track tape drive
manual has complete schematics and maintenance info
interesting machine, has both a Zilog 8002 and a 16 bit bit-slice processor in
it...
Free for shipping costs
Peter Wallace
Mesa Electronics
I was wondering if there is a simple way of tranfering cp/m files from
the original Osborne 1 format to something a Commodore 1574 drive can
read. I see it does Osborne SSDD, but not SSSD. I'm also wondering
about downloading software of the net on my Linux box, as I can get
either a 360k or 1.2M 5.25" floppy (MS-DOS format???)
i'm open for suggestions . . don't want to do a serial poert transfer.
Gary Hildebrand
St. Joseph, MO
In a message dated 3/29/02 12:50:30 PM Eastern Standard Time,
menadeau(a)attbi.com writes:
> The classic computing hobby aside, The CBDTPA is stupid on a number of
> levels. Most electronics manufacturers are against it, for example. They say
> it will discourage innovation and slow the development of new products.
> Civil libertarians oppose it for potential privacy issues and its likelihood
> of impeding the free flow of information.
>
> By all means, contact your Congress critter if you want to express your
> opposition. I suggest, however, that you bring up some of the more high
> profile arguments against the bill as well as its impact on the hobby.
>
> The CBDTPA is not a done deal. Powerful forces are lined up on both sides,
>
OK, I just read the CBDTPA.. It'll never work even if it were to be passed
and here's why...
The act specifically says the security measures *shall not* prevent a legal
owner from making a personal copy (presumably for backup perposes,etc..). If
you can make a backup, you can trade it, etc, just like it is happening now...
The second good reason it'll never work is they can't possibly enforce it.
You can't subject other countries to US rules policies, and the act doesn't
have any provision for open source or freeware, or PD goodies. The US nor
any other country can effectively poliece/control the internet.
Thirdly, you can't use a hardware decryption because there is no feasable way
of that method working on all available platforms (and imagine the US saying
to companies that they can't make such and such a product unless they install
"our pre-approved security gizmo"), so you would have to use software..
There's no way a software encryption/decryption would work because you could
not possibly keep the code from leaking out or being reverse engineered.
Lastly (at least how I see it) the act would invariably violate freedom of
speach by dictating how and where we could express information.
-Linc.
In The Beginning there was nothing, which exploded - Yeah right...
Calculating in binary code is as easy as 01,10,11.
>From reading the Wired article, it looks like the biggest backers are the
big movie studios and record companies, so it makes sense that the bill is
clueless about open source and PD software.
Scary nonetheless.
-----Original Message-----
From: LFessen106(a)aol.com [mailto:LFessen106@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 12:29 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: The Future End of Classic Computing
<snip>
OK, I just read the CBDTPA.. It'll never work even if it were to be passed
and here's why... <snip> the act doesn't have any provision for open source
or freeware, or PD goodies. The US nor any other country can effectively
poliece/control the internet.<snip>
There's no way a software encryption/decryption would work because you could
not possibly keep the code from leaking out or being reverse engineered.
<snip>
> Mitch Wright wrote:
>
>Does anyone know how to park(lock) the heads on RK07 drives for
moving?
The RK06/RK07 User's Manual is available at:
http://208.190.133.201/decimages/moremanuals.htm
I don't see anywhere that mentions locking
or unlocking heads, but I only skimmed
through quite quickly.
Antonio
Forwarded from alt.sys.pdp8,10,&11:
(contact the originak poster, please)
From: "Betty Sparks CIRT-IRC" <bsparks(a)unm.edu>
To: <bsparks(a)unm.edu>
Subject: pdp-11 availalbe
Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:21 AM
Is there any interest in a pdp-11...maybe an e with all the associated
DEC documentation?
Also, any other group that you migh know of that would be interested and I
will send info to them
thanks Betty
--
-Douglas Hurst Quebbeman (dougq(a)iglou.com) [Call me "Doug"]
"The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away." -Tom Waits
> A friend was claiming that with the UCSD P-System, one could "compile
once"
> and then "run anywhere" (where "anywhere" means different kinds of
> computers running the P-System, not different instances of
> the same computer).
>
> Was this true?
I've never seen it contradicted.
> Did users commonly compile on system A and then take the P-Code to
> system B and run it successfully?
It wasn't likely common.
> I'd have thought that media incompatibility would have tended to
> limit this capability.
Serial ports and modems would more or less get around this problem.
> Was any commerical P-System software sold that was a single binary,
> but the vendor expected the user to be able to install/run it on
> any brand/model of P-System? (Or, did vendors have to produce a version
> for every platform?)
The Smalltalk-80 System also used an interpreter, called the bytecode
interpreter, and it was in fact common to take an application compiled
on, say, a Xerox Dorado and run it on a Xerox Magnolia, or even a
Tektronix box. I've seen references recently to an Alto version of
Smalltalk-80 2.2, so the apps crafted at XSIS (Xerox Special Information
Systems) like The Analyst(tm), might have been worked out on Altos
then run at the The Company on Magnolias.
-dq
--
-Douglas Hurst Quebbeman (dougq(a)iglou.com) [Call me "Doug"]
"The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away." -Tom Waits
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hans Franke [mailto:Hans.Franke@mch20.sbs.de]
> We all know there's only one real high level language :)
German?
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
I wrote:
> > After checking the schematic I find that there is a link. "Use L1 for
1K
> > RAM, use L2 for 2K RAM." This tells me that when a 4118 or two 2114s
are
> > used (or a 6116???) there is no need to change the jumper -- it's only
> > required when using a 2KB 2016 or equivalent.
Tony replied:
> What is this link connected to? What does it reconnect?
Ok -- I have yet another version of the schematic here, and it agrees with
the first -- L1 for 1K and L2 for 2K but does NOT specify what this means
in terms of the actual number of RAM ICs onboard.
>From looking at the schematic from the ZX-TEAM web site, I can't see how
either jumper would affect a two-chip configuration. L1 ties the single
RAM chip's A10 to +5V, while L2 ties the single chip's A10 to the A10 line
on the system bus.
Can you make any sense out of this, or is it necessary to be Clive Sinclair
in order to understand it?
As mentioned in a previous post, the 2-RAM-chip ZX81 PCBs I have at hand
have NEITHER L1 or L2 installed.
I would consider experimentally changing the links L1 and L2 and seeing if
this made a difference in the amount of RAM present, except that we're
talking about +5V and I don't want to toast any ICs, even common ones, if I
can avoid it.
Any insight you can provide will be helpful.
Glen
0/0
Anybody know what Manesa is? Is it an IBM facility? The 9577 I just
bought has sticker, and a stamping on it that says "Manesa".
--
Chad Fernandez
Michigan, USA
Hey guys,
I am working on a project to breath life back into some old hardware. I
order to do so, I need some documentation / assistance in writing low-level
routines to talk to various HPIB devices. Specifically: I would like to talk
to a HP 7978 tape drive, a CS80 compatible tape drive, or a common HPIB disk
drive.
I don't need help with HPIB protocol, I need to know the sequence of
commands (sent across the bus) to move data into and out of those devices. I
would expect to find this information in the programming manuals for those
devices but so far, have been unable to locate the docs.
If anyone can provide documentation for any of those devices or has
experience programming them, I'd appreciate the assistance.
Thanks,
SteveRob
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Somebody recently posted a fairly comprehensive list of floppy drive
model #s with their capacities & base specs. I'd like to grab a few
not-1.2M drives before we scrap them, but I've misplaced the list.
Would whoever it was be willing to repost?
Thanks
Doc
Well today I went down to one of the warehouses to look around for some
items I needed (didn't find them) and found the following items:
1. A box marked CP/M 2.2 for Commodore 64 in it was a manual and a large
black cartridge ( it has a Z80 microprocessor in it). I'm missing the
CP/M disk which contains both the operating system and some utility
programs. If anyone has a copy email me off list. THANKS in advance.
2. A green and off white plastic computer called a IQ 8300 with green
rubber keys. It has a POWER 3000 32K Ram black module about the size of
a Sinclair 1015 module. I have no Doc's or box for it and it's missing
the power supply as well. With have to do a google on this one, if
anyone has one or knows anything it let me know.
3. A Panasonic Personal Computer 32K memory model JR-200U. It's light
brown and silver in color with dark gray soft rubber keys and some dark
blue rubber keys also. It has a built in power supply with the cord
coming out the back. It also has the RF unit with so I will test it out
tonight.
4. A Sun type 5 kb missing four key caps.
5. Two HP model 9130A floppy disk drives.
6. hp 86 with 82936A rom drawer, 82937A HP-1B interface module,82900A
CP/M system module, and a 82909A 128K memory module.
7. hp 97 calculator missing adapter and battery.
All in all I had a ball opening boxes that have been packed for almost 6
years now while I was up North.
In a message dated 3/26/02 5:47:58 PM Pacific Standard Time,
ernestls(a)attbi.com writes:
> What size floppy disks does the HP 9114B drive use? Is it 720k or 1.44 meg?
>
To quote the 1988 HP Catalog "the HP9114B provides up to 710 Kbytes of
formatted capacity in a lightweight, battery-operated package. The 3.5" disk
drive reads, writes and initializes double-sided media in both single-sided
and double-sided formats.
Paxton
Astoria,
Oregon
On March 28, Gene Buckle wrote:
> > > > We all know there's only one real high level language :)
> > >
> > > German?
> >
> > No. Something even more fundamental: Bullshit.
> >
> > Peace... Sridhar
> >
> You bastard. Now I've got Cheeto bits all over my screen. Gah.
He shoots, he scores!
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
The tread about storage tube terminals reminded me that my Tek4014 is in need of
repair...
1) Is it normal that it takes up to 10 minutes to warm up ?
It takes that long on my machine before the clear button actually clears the
screen.
2) and the real problem :
The cursor, existing of a 8x8 dotgrid, often collapses horizontally, i.e. it
becomes (much) smaller.
This is, due to the storage tube technology, repeated in all characters you
then type in.
Any pointers as to where I should start ?
Jos .
Hey, been asked to sort out my folks laptop, so I know nothing of its
past etc.
I noted your thread and thought this maybe interesting,
Their email address keeps getting mail from the "mail demon" notifying
them that their mail (that they did not send) was not delivered to the
address because it contains something that could be a virus.
The mail does point out that the virus attached is called
"sm3song.mp3.scr", but the fun doesn't stop there, however easy it may
seem from this point doesn't cut it.
As I said they get dozens of these mail, and each one says a different
name;
Humour.mp3.scr, hamster.mp3.scr, sm3song.mp3.scr... the most frequently
used one is sm3song.mp3.scr.
The email account, by the way they use outlook express :-(, is set up
for two different email accounts, the one a simple POP3 account through
freeserve, and the other (that I don't understand) through something
called freezone, where their website for my mums business is hosted, and
also works as a server for her mail.
Going back to the mail demon messages; they only represent addresses
(from her contact list) who have sent her mail through the freezone
account that she has not yet replied to.
If any of this seems to be familiar to anyone please email me at
Sanity_not_vanity(a)hotmail.com
I thought maybe the virus is on the freezone server as apposed to the
laptop, also note, the virus does not seem to be doing anything
destructive, nor does it show when I do a complete scan of the hard
drives using the latest versions of PC cillin antivirus.
Andy.
> From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
> I picked one up today. This one is marked "Terminal Printer" and model
MH-4015+ but the FFC ID number says that it's made by Shinwa and it
lappears to be the same as the CPB-136. It's a dot matrix printer and it
has SIX printheads in it!
Six printheads?!? Good grief Joe, how, where, & why do you come up with
all this stuff? And how on earth do you find the time to play with the
stuff once you have it? I still haven't found the time to check out all
the stuff you gave me six months ago . . . really, how do you do it?
Glen
0/0
I have had no problem using Data tapes in my HI8 camcorder. They are the
equivalent to regular 8 mm tapes and give me 240 lines of resolution, not the
400 lines of high 8 resolution.
Mechanically I have had no problems either.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
This hex-width board was found sitting in a UNIBUS backplane. It looks like
it may have more than two PCB layers. The metal handle, where the board
number is usually stamped, is unmarked; no board number is stamped there. On
the front side, top left, is "AD413A MADE IN USA". The top middle had the
"200415-03" handwritten on it, but that has been crossed out by a marker,
and "200850-02" appears beneath it. The top right has "S/N 5781"
handwritten. There are two 50-pin BERG (maybe formatted Pertec) connectors
at the front top. On the back of the board, at the top right, is "MRX42
200255-02", machine printed. A little to the left of that is "3183",
handwritten.
Google has returned nothing. What have I here?
--
Jeffrey Sharp
The email address lists(a)subatomix.com is for mailing list traffic. Please
send off-list mail to roach jay ess ess at wasp subatomix beetle dot com.
You may need to remove some bugs first.
Hello, all:
In mid-April I'm visiting one of my company's branch offices in
Pasadena, CA . I'll only be there for a few days, but I'd like
recommendations as to nearby "computing" things to see. I already booked a
tour of the JPL (not classic but interesting enough :-)).
Any thoughts?
Rich
==========================
Richard A. Cini, Jr.
Congress Financial Corporation
1133 Avenue of the Americas
30th Floor
New York, NY 10036
(212) 545-4402
(212) 840-6259 (facsimile)
I've got what I was told is a BigBoard. Can someone check
out the picture at:
http://www.dittman.net/z80.jpg
and see if you recognize it?
Thanks.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:54:13 -0500 Douglas Quebbeman
<dhquebbeman(a)theestopinalgroup.com> writes:
> I was talking about the DEC BASIC that made BASIC famous,
> the BASIC from TOPS-10 and TOPS-20 on the DECsystem-10.
>
> > VAX BASIC V3.8-000
>
> Looks like some kind of vacuum cleaner to me...
Hey, as far as I'm concerned, it isn't BASIC unless it's
BASIC-PLUS running under RSTS/e.
Sorry, you guys resurrected and old (and very fond)
memory . . .
Jeff
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
As an aside to the current VMS discussion, does anyone know
of an equivalent to the Unix "su -" command for VMS?
Basically I'd like to be able to use my "normal" AL account
for messing about with but occasionally "su" to SYSTEM to get
at a protected file or directory. All the FAQs and manual pages
I've come across so far point to SPAWNing a new process and then
changing the privileges (eg SET PROC/PRIV=SYSPRV), which defeats
the object of the exercise since the "AL" account needs system
privileges in order to do the SET PROC/PRIV in the first place :-)
At the moment I'm using an ST running UNITERM hooked up to a
3100/30's console port so I'm stuck with just the one login session
at a time - occasionally I'd like to be able to flip over to SYSTEM
without having to mess about with logging out of AL and into SYSTEM
and back :-) Any ideas?
Cheers
Al.
From: Eric J. Korpela <korpela(a)ssl.berkeley.edu>
>It also depended upon how the virtual machine was implemented. The
>Apple Pascal virtual machine was horrible. Compiled Pascal programs
>ran slower than their equivalent in interpreted Applesoft BASIC.
I'd agree though it made it possible to run the sources on a Z80 S100 crate,
a trs-80 and an apple and moveing the code around was done with a
simple serial utility (lack of common disk format!).
The best platform other than the microengine was PDP-11, The z80
wasn't too bad (comparable to Cbasic).
Allison
I picked up one of these today from Purdue Salvage. Anyone have any
useful software for it? I might be willing to sell it if anyone's
interested. I was kinda disappointed... out of 6 or so Apple IIe's they
got in, not one had an expansion card besides DiskII, the Z-Card and a
printer interface. Still looking for a SuperSerial card so I can copy
data to it (and a copy of Disk Tools on 5-1/5" floppies for it)
-- Pat
On March 28, Jeffrey Sharp wrote:
> This hex-width board was found sitting in a UNIBUS backplane. It looks like
> it may have more than two PCB layers. The metal handle, where the board
> number is usually stamped, is unmarked; no board number is stamped there. On
> the front side, top left, is "AD413A MADE IN USA". The top middle had the
> "200415-03" handwritten on it, but that has been crossed out by a marker,
> and "200850-02" appears beneath it. The top right has "S/N 5781"
> handwritten. There are two 50-pin BERG (maybe formatted Pertec) connectors
> at the front top. On the back of the board, at the top right, is "MRX42
> 200255-02", machine printed. A little to the left of that is "3183",
> handwritten.
>
> Google has returned nothing. What have I here?
Hmm...got pics?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
My $0.02:
Grab any known good TEAC FD55 (any model).
FD55B 40 track two sided (does most all 40track formats)
FD55F 80track two sided (not 1.2m capable)
FD55G 80track two sided (does all 80 track formats plus 1.2m)
They are common and decently reliable. With one of the FD55B, FD55G
and an older 3.5" (720/1.44) that gets me most all drive related formats
save for the oddball 5.25" drives (like the 100tpi stuff).
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Doc Shipley <doc(a)mdrconsult.com>
To: Classic Computers <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:10 AM
Subject: 5.25" floppy model numbers
> Somebody recently posted a fairly comprehensive list of floppy drive
>model #s with their capacities & base specs. I'd like to grab a few
>not-1.2M drives before we scrap them, but I've misplaced the list.
>Would whoever it was be willing to repost?
>
> Thanks
> Doc
>
Just got one of these bad boys from Pudue for $20 with a RZ26L,
framebuffer card with a 3W3 on it, CDROM, 128M of RAM, KN17 CPU. Is the
RZ26 a 1G drive? And how clock speed is the proc?
I know I made out with a steal - he had no idea what it was :)
What kind of OS's are available besides NetBSD or Linux... Is there a
version of VMS or Ultrix that'll work? Also, I didn't get a keyboard with
it and didn't see one there. What kind of keyboard does it use, and can I
use a serial terminal instead?
Thanks for the help!
-- Pat
Rumor has it that Paul Thompson may have mentioned these words:
>There is a utility called persona that will work on recent versions of
>VMS which effectively works like su. You would need to install it with
>priv's in order not to be running those priv's needed to run it in your
>usual account.
>
>PERSONA.MAR, you would need to
>MACRO PERSONA.MAR
>LINK PERSONA.MAR (LINK/SYSEXE on alpha, as I recall)
[snip]
>10$:
> ; MOVAB ROUT1,M_DESC ; Done at initialization
> PUSHAL PROMP
> PUSHAL P_DESC
> CALLS #2,G^LIB$GET_FOREIGN ; Get required username
> BLBS R0,20$ ; of not OK, then
> BRW 100$ ; jump to error - message
[snip]
Is this an example of VAX/VMS assembly language?
And if so, what would a good reference be to learn it?
Thankz,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger --- sysadmin, Iceberg Computers
Recycling is good, right??? Ok, so I'll recycle an old .sig.
If at first you don't succeed, nuclear warhead
disarmament should *not* be your first career choice.
On March 28, John Allain wrote:
> Put simply:
> Anybody have any horror stories about using digital
> data 8mm tapes in a Camcorder?
> My personal belief is that they are overbuilt, if anything.
No horror stories specifically, but I do recall from when the
Exabyte 8500 came out that the tapes that were sold for data use were
the only ones that worked reliably in the 5GB drives...I read at the
time that the magnetic characteristics of the media were
different...higher coercivity I think, but I don't have specific
information.
For video use, I'd think there'd be nonlinear amplitude response at
best, but it's probably worth a try.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>There's plenty of CP/M software out there. All you need to do is find one
of
>the mirrors of the late Tim Olmstead's unofficial CP/M site.
There are several still up, The last location of Tim's site is back up.
>original MSDOS' EDLIN. The editor of choice for CP/M would probably be
>WordStar, of which there are several versions for CP/M. It does come with
an
If you can find VEDIT, that is a very powerful screen editor with TECO macro
>from the command mode.
>Select the editor you want, keeping in mind that little of this stuff is
much
>use without a hard disk, which is not "rocket science" to add, provided you
>can snag a drive of the CP/M era. IDE drives are a mite more trouble, as
are
>SCSI types, but it's all been done. The maximum size for a CP/M 2.2 (plain
IDE offers the easiest of the lot to get and interface if the board was hard
disk
impared.
>vanilla version) system is 8 MB, and you can only have as many as 16
drives,
>including the floppies.
Thats per logical drive. A larger hard disk can be partitioned.
Or run one of the CP/M clones like P2DOS, ZRDOS, SUPRBDOS
as these have 32mb or higher logical disk limits.
>My understanding is that if you have a 60 MB drive,
>you can stick all the software that was ever published for CP/M, including
>sources, on it and still have room left. Some folks disagree, but I almost
I'd agree, actually most of the good must have stuff will fit easily on a 10
to 20mb drive with room to spare. The WC CP/M CDrom was I think under
100mb and that had whole libraries of several SIGs.
>believe that. Somebody sent me a CD of CP/M stuff that purportedly
contained
>pretty much "everything" there was, and it was barely 10% utilized.
Several
>CD's have been published, but most have what amounts to multiple copies of
the
>same stuff on them, so their capacity is not representative of what you
might
>need storage-wise.
The Walnut Creek cdrom is by far the most complete and maybe 10% utilized.
It's out of print but copies can be had. For serious CP/M users and
collectors
it's a must have along with the archivers used (ark, ARC, LHA, LBR...etal).
>Another thing to keep in mind is that the BigBoard runs at just over 2 MHz
>(2.5?). I've got several but really haven't considered how fast they run
in
>the original version, because I'm into hot-rodding. The software versions
I
>have don't use mode-2 interrupts, so one wonders why the designer used
those
>awkward Z80 peripherals that do little more than ensure that you can't run
the
>CPU faster than the peripherals, even though the CPU is quite capable of
it.
>Of course, the fact that the entire board is out of the Mostek and Zilog
>app-notes might explain that.
4mhz should be doable with minor effort. faster is as Dick said hampered
by the lack of suitably fast Z80 peripherals.
Allison
Thanks for the tip, Jeff; just browsed eBay and now that I have
a better idea what KIMs & AIMs are worth, I'll have to substantially
jack up the price of the AIM stuff I'm about to send ya :-)
Sounds reasonable, doesn't it Hans? Just to balance things out...
mike <grinning>
----------------Original Message----------------
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 15:30:49 +0100
From: "Hans Franke" <Hans.Franke(a)mch20.sbs.de>
Subject: Re: SWTPc 6800 update
> > OK don't rub it in! :-/
> Rubbing it in would've been mentioning that the exact same
> KIM-1 setup I just picked up for near nothing had an identical twin
> on eBay go for $400..<g>
Somehow I get the impression that you are not a very sensitive friend :))
Trotzdem viel Spass
H.
I've got a couple of original sets as well, Version 1.1,
just in case. The 2nd disk had demo progs IIRC.
mike
-------------Original Message------------------
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 23:24:59 -0700
From: "Richard Erlacher" <edick(a)idcomm.com>
Subject: Re: Turbo BASIC (was Re: QL (was: ZX-81 Question))
I'm quite comfortable that I have the file sets, but as far as the original
diskettes ... I don't know. I recall that I've got v1.0. That was on only
one diskette, IIRC.
That will easily fit in a zip file and fly via the 'net, I'd imagine.
That will leave me some time to hunt for the originals.
Dick
> From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
> Why is size/weight important for a machine that's not designed as a
portable?
Because heavier items cost more to ship and therefore cost more to
purchase??
> And as regards price, I (and virtually everone else I know) would rather
> pay enough and get something that's useable and reliable rather than pay
> too little and get something that's useless. I know this is an
> unconventional idea these days, though :-(
You are right on here. People nowadays could care less about quality if
they can save five percent of an item's cost.
> > Granted, the QL would possibly have enjoyed more success that way, but
> > Sinclair is Sinclair.
>
> Unfortunately, he's ruined just about all of his products in this way :-(
It's true. I'm a ZX81 fan because (as another listmember quipped) it's the
most minimalistic *full system* ever. But Sinclair's products were all
plagued with cheap parts. There are plenty of stories of how Sinclair
would change designs in the middle of a production run because they had
found a part that was ten cents cheaper, or they'd found a way to keep the
circuit intact while eliminating a couple of five-cent caps.
Glen
0/0
> From: Stan Barr <stanb(a)dial.pipex.com>
> Just to confuse things further the schematic I have shows L1 pulling pin
> 19 of the 4118 up to 5V when that's installed, and no L2 at all!
> The text refers to 2x2114 or a 4118 installed in the UK version and a
> 2K option for export - possibly there are 2 versions of the board?
Damn near every one of these things I've seen has been different in *some*
way!
I'm sorting through and testing a couple of dozen right now -- more later.
Glen
0/0
> From: Curt Vendel <curt(a)atarimuseum.com>
> Back before Christmas I worked out a deal with Jeff Worley:
>
> Jeffrey S. Worley
> Asheville, NC USA
> 828-6984887
> UberTechnoid(a)Home.com
I'm sorry to learn you were ripped off. Thanks for the heads-up.
Glen
0/0
Hi,
do you know what the KA64A's self test #21 is? I have two of these
boards that just won't come up, they both stop at
#123456789 0123456789 01
which means that test #21 fails. Even when I put these boards in
a collective with 4 other KA64As that at least complete the
system self test and get me to a console prompt, I get the error
that these two boards didn't get to console mode. What could be
wrong here?
Thanks for your help!
-Gunther
PS: Frederik, those are the boards that were ment to go to
you. This is bad news. I hope it is just some nasty configuration
problem. What exact ROM and EEPROM revisions do you need?
--
Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D. gschadow(a)regenstrief.org
Medical Information Scientist Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
Adjunct Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Medicine
tel:1(317)630-7960 http://aurora.regenstrief.org
> From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
> I'm quite comfortable that I have the file sets, but as far as the
original
> diskettes ... I don't know. I recall that I've got v1.0. That was on
only
> one diskette, IIRC.
>
> That will easily fit in a zip file and fly via the 'net, I'd imagine.
>
> That will leave me some time to hunt for the originals.
Thanks again!
Glen
0/0
> From: Hans Franke <Hans.Franke(a)mch20.sbs.de>
> I think Pete is right here. there was a wire you had to add if
> you used a 4118 (or 6116) instead of the 2114s. I have to grab
> the kit documentation to veryfy this.
After checking the schematic I find that there is a link. "Use L1 for 1K
RAM, use L2 for 2K RAM." This tells me that when a 4118 or two 2114s are
used (or a 6116???) there is no need to change the jumper -- it's only
required when using a 2KB 2016 or equivalent.
> Digging thru my ZX Stuff I found an _original_ "ZX81 2-K RAM" Kit *G*
> Well, it is at least original over here, since it has been sold by ISS,
> the official distributor of ZX81 stuff in Germany.
Wow -- did you ever use the kit?
> The kit konsists of a 24 pin socket and a NEC D446C-2 RAM
I'd guess this is the same as the 2016, and that you need to change the
link to L2 for it to work.
Glen
0/0
Heads up Minnesota or those in the area. Found this filed under photo stock.
Not only was it miss categorized but the owner has no idea what it is. Four
days to go.
It looks like a Portable R to R tape drive for an early Burroughs
Computerized Accounting Machines. (Looking at the styling)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1341100641
A great collectable but it is heavy. If anyone contacts the owner I would be
interested in what interface it has in it? I am not at all interested in the
drive but I know it is fairly rare now.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 18:03:26 -0500
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> From: Jeff Hellige <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: Unix disk images and archiving
> Sender: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Reply-To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>
> >When I got my 68040 Cube upgrade kit it came with a motherboard and an
> >OD of NeXTstep 2.0, and a NeXT SIMM-puller tool. And some instructions
> >about the sequence in which to change things. All this information is
> >coming out of my occasionally fallible memory. But I'm sure that I was
> >using NS 2.0 and 2.1 long before I had a CD reader.
>
> Thanks for correcting me on that. Unfortunately, I've still
> not gotten NS 3.3 to reformat the DOS-formatted MO disks in my
> Pinnacle Sierra, even with the disktab entries that James provided.
> It appears to read them fine, as well as writing small text files to
> them, but it won't initialize them either from the Worksapce or a
> shell.
Yes. NeXTstep does not have the software drivers to build new raw
DOS file systems. Except on floppy disks, where the file structure is
much simpler. What there is lives in /usr/filesystems.
I suppose that nowadays you could attach your SCSI MO drive to a Linux
system and build a DOS file system there. There is a software package
"dosfstools".
Reading through again, if you want to reformat a MO disk from DOS to
NeXT, what I remember as the magic recipe is first to format it as a
Macintosh file system. Then you can make a NeXT-format disk out of it.
carl
>I know for a fact that the HIGH Speed card works wonderfully in a IIGS as I
>have one in mine.
Thanks, now to see if the guy has one left, and if I can afford it.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
On March 27, Jeffrey Sharp wrote:
> > let this be a warning to all to stay clear of him as he had more then
> > ample time to have squared this deal with me or return my money to me.
>
> Sorry to hear that. I hope nothing bad has happened to him. Just for the
> record, I had a successful transaction with Mr. Worley last summer. My item
> was exactly as described, well packed, and shipped promptly.
I've never done business with him, but I will say that I'd been
exchanging email with him around the end of December...he was going to
get me an OS/2 distribution that I'd been looking for. His emails
stopped abruptly in mid-conversation, and I've seen nothing from him
since, in any forum. I hope he's ok. I'm also very sorry to hear
that Curt's deal went south. :-(
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
I happen to use MS QB4.5/dos at work for test systems. This version
supports all the high level structures and variable scopes that HLL like
Pascal or C would. It's NOT a weak light weight BASIC. It does produce
fast, low ram load executeables (.exe) for dos environments and has
proven very robust and easy to use.
My beef with BASIC is especially the older versions with GOTO laden
code can easily be a bowl of long pasta to decode. However, I've seen
people do same with Fortran, ALGOL, Pascal and even C.
Allison
{my native language is ASM.}
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: Turbo BASIC (was Re: QL (was: ZX-81 Question))
>Unfortunately, the generalized tendency to "beat up" BASIC as a language
for
>micros, back in the late '70's and '80's, by those promoting the newer
>"block-structured" languages, makes people look askance at work done in
BASIC.
>I had a partner who was quite adept at BASIC programming and put together a
>very functional mail order/inventory control/accounts-receivable/payable
>package in about a week. Within a second week, consisting of probably five
>visits in seven days, he got it working very well in-situ, and our customer
>liked it so well, that he bought two computers (which we were pressed to
>provide, not being in the retail businsess) just to support his then
growing
>business.
>
>I've found basic to be a handy tool, and, though it doesn't easily support
>programming in the large, it does allow getting things done here and now.
It
>has lots of features, most of which I haven't ever been pressed to use, and
>can do anything your computer can support, up to a point. If only I had a
>dime for each time I used it to do a quick calculation ...
>
>Dick
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jeff Hellige" <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
>To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 7:28 AM
>Subject: Re: Turbo BASIC (was Re: QL (was: ZX-81 Question))
>
>
>> >You can buy the latest incarnation of Turbo BASIC, called Power
>> >Basic. It's pretty neat.
>>
>> I've been using PowerBasic since '90 or so and really like
>> it. The later versions include things that the first version, which
>> is what I have, did not. I've written fairly complex
>> database/accounting packages with it and those packages were roughly
>> 1/7 the size of a similar package written using the application
>> generator in Foxbase or similar.
>>
>> Jeff
>> --
>> Home of the TRS-80 Model 2000 FAQ File
>> http://www.cchaven.com
>> http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/lakes/6757
>>
>>
>
>
On March 27, Christopher Smith wrote:
> > I know I made out with a steal - he had no idea what it was :)
>
> > What kind of OS's are available besides NetBSD or Linux... Is there a
> > version of VMS or Ultrix that'll work? Also, I didn't get a
>
> This is the TurboChannel Alpha, right? Last I heard, NetBSD
> didn't support TurboChannel -- or was that Linux, but it's been
> a while.
NetBSD has supported turbochannel on alpha and pmax since the dawn
of time. I've run it on many 3000-series machines...it will give you
no trouble.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "...it's leaving me this unpleasant,
St. Petersburg, FL damp feeling on my shorts..." -Sridhar
> From: Hans Franke <Hans.Franke(a)mch20.sbs.de>
> Well, this would be a neat professional ZX81 setup - just you miss the
> whole fun of getting the real minimalistic ZX81. One _can_ do usefull
> stuff with just one or two KBytes of RAM. one has a real lot of fun
> by just playing around with this little plasic box in front of an old
> TV set.
Hans, I agree with you 100 percent. This is the purpose the ZX81 was
designed for: teaching people how to have fun getting the most out of the
least!
> I'd suggest an out of the box ZX81 (or Timex 1000) to start with, and
> realy trying to play with only one K ... next step could be the internal
> expansion to whooping TWO K - and oh boy, programmers dreams will come
> thru.
Yeah, I remember the first time I could write a BASIC program with more
than 40 lines of code -- wow!
> I still think tha'ts the most fun, haggling with tight resources).
Also true for me. It's still a thrill to go over a machine code or
assembly language program and be able to trim out 20 bytes!
> A professional system, like Glen tells is quite nice, but you need
> also some more knowledge about the pitfalls of a ZX. Start of with
> the fun of a simple system, and if you're a late victim of the ZX
> infection, then you'll soon expand into the ZX96 dimension.
I think this is very good advice.
> (Not a ZX fan, but I realy like to dig out a ZX80 or 81 from time to
> time just to play around with the most minimalistic _full_ system ever)
This is the best description of the ZX81 I've ever encountered!
Keep on ZXin'!
Glen
0/0
A while back someone was looking for information from this manual? I
opened a new box while at the warehouse today and took out the manual
and have it at home now. If you still need some info from it let me
know.
Could anyone please inform me of the following item:
Item: Data Processing Set, military specs
Model :1666B
Military Designation: AN/UYK64(V)2
Manufacturer: ROLM
Measurement: 2 x 3 ft
Weight: 120 lbs
RGDS/ YC
> pat(a)cart-server.purdueriots.com wrote:
>
>Subject: DEC 3000-600
>
>framebuffer card with a 3W3 on it, CDROM, 128M of RAM, KN17 CPU.
Is the
>RZ26 a 1G drive? And how clock speed is the proc?
RZ26 is indeed 1GB SCSI.
The DEC 3000-600 is a 175MHz EV4.
Memory from 32MB to 512MB.
Turbochannel. 114 specint 92.
>What kind of OS's are available besides NetBSD or Linux...
Does Linux support TURBOchannel?
I presume NetBSD does ... but I know
at least one of the free OSes does not.
> Is there a
>version of VMS or Ultrix that'll work?
OpenVMS Alpha, yes from V1.5-1H1
onwards (i.e. almost any version you
happen to have).
Ultrix never ran on these birds.
Digital Unix (now known as Tru64
but probably in the middle of another
name transition) did support them
but I have a feeling that support
was dropped in the most recent version.
And in this case they actually pulled
the support code, so it absolutely
will not work.
>Also, I didn't get a keyboard with
>it and didn't see one there. What
>kind of keyboard does it use, and can I
>use a serial terminal instead?
I guess a PC keyboard (LK451 or such???)
but I don't have any docs to hand. Almost
all of these boxes will work with a serial
console ... plug in and type
set console serial
(otherwise it switches to the
graphical console partway through
the boot and if all you have is
serial yo uthink it's died on you!!)
Antonio
VCF Gazette
Volume 1, Issue 1
A Newsletter for the Vintage Computer Festival
March 13, 2002
Hello Vintage Computer Fans! Welcome to the first issue of what
is guaranteed to be an irregularly published newsletter to keep
you up to date on the latest events and happenings of the Vintage
Computer Festival.
There is a lot going on this year. We have two major events, VCF
Europa 3.0 and VCF 5.0, and an Open House at our Oakland, California,
facility.
VCF Europa 3.0
--------------
The third annual Vintage Computer Festival Europa is being held
April 27th and 28th in Munich, Germany. If you have a chance to be in
Munich during the last weekend of April, you should certainly attend.
You'll get a taste of the vibrant computer industry and the varied
computers that were produced in Europe from over ten years ago and
beyond.
For more information on VCF Europa 3.0, visit:
http://www.vintage.org/2002/europa/
--or--
http://www.vcfe.de/
VCF 5.0
-------
As you may well be aware, VCF 5.0, originally scheduled for
September 15th and 16th, was cancelled due to the tragic events that
occured on September 11, 2001. The necessity for the cancellation
slowly became evident as events transpired over the course of the
three days following September 11th. At least three speakers were not
going to be able to attend due to the grounding of all U.S. air
traffic. It was uncertain whether more attacks would come.
In hindsight, cancelling VCF 5.0 was still the right decision to make,
as it was uncertain whether anyone would even want to come to such an
event in the wake of the tragedy. A statement was posted to the VCF
5.0 website on Thursday, September 13, informing of the cancellation,
and a message was sent to the VCF mailing list. We appreciate the
understanding we received.
Now that things have thankfully returned to normal for the most part,
it is time to reschedule VCF 5.0 for 2002. Planning is underway to
hold VCF 5.0 sometime in September. Negotiations are underway for
securing a venue in Santa Clara (our first choice) or San Jose (our
backup choice).
VCF 5.0 will be more exciting than ever this year. We plan to offer
more great speakers and many excellent exhibits, but we also plan to
expand attendee participation by adding retro-programming contests
and other events. Of course we will still have the Nerd Trivia
Challenge to vex even the most ardent vintage computing nerd. More
details to come!
VCF 5.0 will also be part of a larger smorgasbord of events which is
tentatively being dubbed "GeekWeek". The VCF will partner with the
California Extreme Classic Arcade Show, the Xtreme Games Developers
Conference, the first San Francisco International Conference of
Hackers, an Atari 30-Year Anniversary Party, and several other
accompanying events including LANtrocity and Super Auctions (coin-
operated amusement auctions). This exciting combination of events
will become a yearly mecca for geeks from all over the world to
come together and celebrate the joys of geekdom!
Information for each event can be found at the following URLs:
Vintage Computer Festival 5.0
http://www.vintage.org/2002/main/
California Extreme
http://www.caextreme.org/
Xtreme Games Developers Conference
http://www.xgdc.com/
San Francisco International Conference of Hackers
http://www.gism.net/sfich/
Atari 30-Year Anniversary Party (Atari Historical Society)
http://www.atari-history.com/
LANtrocity
http://www.lantrocity.com/
Super Auctions
http://www.superauctions.com/
VCF East 2.0
------------
Last year's first Vintage Computer Festival East, held in Marlborough,
Massachusetts, in July of 2001, was every bit as fun and exciting as
the main VCF. Five speakers, including Eldon Hall, designer of the
Apollo Guidance Computer, and eleven exhibitors, including the Retro-
Computing Society of Rhode Island who brought along a PDP-12 running
Spacewar!, provided a vintage computing retrospective for over 80
attendees.
The next VCF East is being planned for Spring of 2003. We will begin
booking speakers, exhibits and vendors in the fall of this year.
VCF Open House at the ACCRC
---------------------------
As of Fall of 2001, the Vintage Computer Festival Archive has found
a happy new home at the Alameda County Computer Resource Center. The
ACCRC is an organization that accepts donations of old computers and
electronics, refurbishes the working computers to be donated back to
schools and charities, and recycles the rest. Nothing at the ACCRC
is thrown out. Everything gets recycled! ACCRC computers are
located on every continent on Earth including Antarctica.
The VCF is busily sorting, organizing and cataloguing the VCF Archive
at the ACCRC. Shelving is being assembled, walls are being built,
and floors are being swept in preparation for the first VCF Open
House.
The VCF and the ACCRC will welcome the general public to come in and
see how we operate. There will be plenty of activities, tasty things
to munch on, and tours of the VCF Archive and the ACCRC operations
and pet programs (including the ACCRC Beowulf Cluster and KOOX internet
radio station).
The VCF is also in the process of setting up a computer museum at the
ACCRC and building facilities for our documentation and software
archive library so that it can finally be offered for use by the
general public. We're hoping to finish the remodeling effort within
a few weeks but we're still searching for needed materials. We'd like
to find recycled computer flooring to improve the floor in the area
where we are setting up the library. Might you know of where we can
get some? If so, please let us know by sending an e-mail message to
<vcf(a)vintage.org>. Any flooring donated will qualify as a tax
deductible charitable donation to the ACCRC.
Once we have the archive organized and the library completed, we'll
announce the dates for what will become the first annual VCF Open
House. We're very excited at the prospect of finally having a public
venue to share the VCF Archive on a year-round basis.
For more information on the Alameda County Computer Resource Center,
please visit their website:
http://www.accrc.org/
To listen to KOOX internet radio, visit their Screaming Streaming
Audio website:
http://www.koox.net/
If you have computer flooring to donate, or know of someone who does,
please contact us at <vcf(a)vintage.org>.
VCF on MediaTelevision
----------------------
MediaTelevision, a Canadian program that "looks inside and behind the
media process", will be airing this week a segment that they produced
on the VCF. Watch for it on a station that airs MediaTelevision's
program.
For information regarding MediaTelevision's segment on the VCF, visit:
http://www.mediatv.net/
VintageTech
-----------
The Vintage Computer Festival is proud to announce a new off-shoot for
business and industry. VintageTech provides services such as patent
litigation support and prior art searches, consulting and props for
the film and photography industry, data and media conversion, vintage
computer appraisals and sales brokering, and general computer history
consulting.
To inquire about VintageTech services or for more information, visit
VintageTech today:
http://wwww.vintagetech.com/
Classic Tech Eletter
--------------------
Michael Nadeau, long-time computer industry journalist and former
editor of Byte magazine, has launched a new newsletter that caters to
the vintage computing audience. The Classic Tech Eletter is a monthly
newsletter delivered right to your e-mail box. Each issue contains
news and stories concerning happenings in the world of old computers
and the folks who collect them.
Subscribe to the Classic Tech Eletter and see back issues at:
http://www.classictechpub.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wraps it up for this first issue of the VCF Gazette! Until next
time...
Best regards,
Sellam Ismail
Producer
Vintage Computer Festival
http://www.vintage.org/
The Vintage Computer Festival is a celebration of computers and their
history. The VCF Gazette goes out to anyone who subscribed to the VCF
mailing list, and is intended to keep those interested in the VCF
informed of the latest VCF events and happenings. The VCF Gazette is
guaranteed to be published in a somewhat irregular manner, though we
will try to maintain a quarterly schedule.
If you would like to be removed from the VCF mailing list, and
therefore not receive any more issues of the VCF Gazette, visit the
following web page:
http://www.vintage.org/remove.php
;)
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pat(a)cart-server.purdueriots.com
> I know I made out with a steal - he had no idea what it was :)
> What kind of OS's are available besides NetBSD or Linux... Is there a
> version of VMS or Ultrix that'll work? Also, I didn't get a
This is the TurboChannel Alpha, right? Last I heard, NetBSD
didn't support TurboChannel -- or was that Linux, but it's been
a while.
Ultrix? No, but you can run Digital Unix on it, or OSF/1, or
whatever its name is today.
Of course, I could be mistaken, but I believe VMS is supposed to
run very well on these. In fact, if I had one, that's what I'd do.
> keyboard with
> it and didn't see one there. What kind of keyboard does it
> use, and can I
> use a serial terminal instead?
It will either be a "normal" peesee keyboard plug, (wouldn't use
anything but a real DEC keyboard, though), or it will be a "normal"
DEC keyboard (like for the vt320, etc). Being an Alpha, it's more
likely the former, but that's an early Alpha, so check the shape of
the plug before you plug the keyboard in ;)
... and of course you can use a serial terminal. (Might, or might
not require removing the framebuffer -- it did on some older VAXen.)
Try just plugging the terminal into what looks like the first serial
port, and you'll probably be pleasantly surprised.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
Does have any info on this printer? It looks like this <http://www.morgancomputers.co.uk/bargain-products/bargain-product-info.ASP?…>.
I picked one up today. This one is marked "Terminal Printer" and model MH-4015+ but the FFC ID number says that it's made by Shinwa and it lappears to be the same as the CPB-136. It's a dot matrix printer and it has SIX printheads in it!
Joe
Yes, If you use a terminal like VT330, 340or later there is
what VMS calls multisessions. Some fo the LAT servers
also support this with more common VT220s or VT320s.
I was added late in VMS 4.mumble and later versions.
This is not decwindows which is GUI based.
What multisession allows is several virtual terminals over several
virtual circuits using one terminal and physical circuit. I use it alot.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Doc <doc(a)mdrconsult.com>
To: 'classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org' <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: More VMS
>On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Alan Pearson wrote:
>
>> As an aside to the current VMS discussion, does anyone know
>> of an equivalent to the Unix "su -" command for VMS?
>
>> At the moment I'm using an ST running UNITERM hooked up to a
>> 3100/30's console port so I'm stuck with just the one login session
>> at a time - occasionally I'd like to be able to flip over to SYSTEM
>> without having to mess about with logging out of AL and into SYSTEM
>> and back :-) Any ideas?
>
> Is there a "screen" app for VMS? Screen allows you to use "virtual
>screens" - that is have several sessions going on one terminal. You
>page through them by hotkey.
>
> Doc
>
>