Hello all, if you've got a VAX 11/750 in running order, please could you contact me directly (I want piccies of specific bits of your VAX to help me getting mine running.)
I've been through all the docs and bits I received with the VAX, and i've got a big box of TU58 tapes, ranging from VMS install 3.1 to 5.2, VAX Fortran, and a few tapes marked TU58 Demo, or some weird filesystem names (i'll remember them later), or "Property of DEC".
I've also found a board marked "Property of DEC, Do not Remove", and discovered how hard it is to fit two- and four-finger cards into a six-finger backplane.
From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
>
>> What software
>> was there, that you could install and use?
>
>A "TOY" computer comes with software. With a REAL computer, you have to
>program.
No, A TOY is somthing for playing with. An APPLIANCE is a computer that
comes with software that might be useful. An example of such an APPLIANCE
is a sad affair as it could be a useful computer if you could program it.
Allison
.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com]
> Did he also think that the 68000 was a copy of the 8086?
I didn't ask, but probably. I imagine every chip is a copy of
the Pentium, in fact. How would MS-DOS run otherwise? We all
know that even the Great Bill Gates wasn't able to make his
Wonderful Windows Operating System function without MS-DOS, so
it must certainly be impossible for anyone else. ;)
Those ENIAC guys are just lucky that Bill Gates was around to
give them a copy of MS-DOS when they needed it!
No, I'm not exaggerating; yes, I did say he was a "programmer."
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> From: Christopher Smith
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Woyciesjes [mailto:DAW@yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu]
>
> > Any tips, tricks, or other hints? Maybe something I missed? How
> > about other options for getting this puppy running?
>
> I used an RRD42 to install SunOS <something> on a SPARC IPX. It
> had a strange problem where the install program would see some problem
> with the drive and abort. If you re-ran the install program a second
> time, it would complete fine. You might watch out for that.
>
> Also, some versions of Solaris *hate* non-sun drives, and won't
> boot from them. I don't know which ones, right off.
>
> Chris
>
Okay, I'll keep that in mind. I'll be installing the Solaris 8 Binary-Only
deal...
--
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
Thanks a MILLION to all who have donated parts and/or money so far to get a
separate dedicated classiccmp server. Many of the components are in (still
missing a few critical things), but I'm still waffeling on whether to put in
IDE hardware mirroring (and if so, whether to do it with a motherboard that
supports this or an addin ide raid card). Decisions decisions.... if anyone
still wants to donate to the cause, my paypal id is jwest(a)classiccmp.org
On a different note - something I have been considering and wonder if people
would like it or use it. I would like to put up a problem tracking system
for all classic OS's. This would be off the classiccmp.org website, where
anyone could put in a problem they have run into with a particular classic
OS - be it a suspected bug, compatability issues, etc. An administrative
type (volunteers who want to watch the section for a particular OS) can come
in and post an answer, resolution, workaround, etc., or mark the problem
report as "user error", "known defect", etc. This database easily supports
someone searching for a list of problems, issues, etc. For example - "show
me any entries for getting a cdrom to work on RT11", or "show me any
problems with crashed BBL on HP21xx", or "what are all the known defects in
{your favorite operating system here}". All accessible to the public via a
simple web interface.
You can think of this as a totally free hobbyist support mechanism open to
the public. However, keep in mind that it is NOT meant to be used as a
"discussion" forum. The very nature of the software used for the system
prevents this from happening (ie. it's not meant to replace the classiccmp
mailing list in any way). Just another way to find out if the problem you're
beating your head against is a known bug. I have been looking at BugTrak,
but am starting to lean towards the gnats system with the www.gnats
frontend.
Any thoughts?
Jay West
Just found this:
www.adflip.com
a huge archive of print advertising covering many
decades.
Entering 'compter' into the search box returned hundreds of ads,
starting with a full page National Geographic spread for the IBM 604 from
1951... many many other vintage systems from the 70s are there too, many
with prices.
Cheers
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Woyciesjes [mailto:DAW@yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu]
> Any tips, tricks, or other hints? Maybe something I missed? How
> about other options for getting this puppy running?
I used an RRD42 to install SunOS <something> on a SPARC IPX. It
had a strange problem where the install program would see some problem
with the drive and abort. If you re-ran the install program a second
time, it would complete fine. You might watch out for that.
Also, some versions of Solaris *hate* non-sun drives, and won't
boot from them. I don't know which ones, right off.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
It's not my auction, and I wish I was close enough to investigate
further. The auction says he has 3 pages of components that he'll fax
to a potential bidder.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2019918462
Chad Fernandez
Michigan, USA
Tony,
Second processors _are_ hard to find. The 6502
and Z80 ones are just about possible to find. The
32016 and ARM1 ones are very rare.
I've got a few of the Torch Z80 and Torch 68000 type
along with an 80C286 board that fits internally to the
BBC.
I have no documents or software for any of these and
both the 68000 and 80C286 boards have had nearly
all the socketed chips pulled.
Any ideas where I can get info and/or software for
these.
Lee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This email is intended only for the above named addressee(s). The
information contained in this email may contain information which is
confidential. The views expressed in this email are personal to the sender
and do not in any way reflect the views of the company.
If you have received this email and you are not a named addressee please
delete it from your system and contact Merlin Communications International
IT Department on +44 20 7344 5888.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
> From: Bill Pechter
>
> > Anyway, to my point... This is off-topic, so taking it off-list is
> > appropriate I believe... I have a Sun Ultra1 Creator. (170E, Open Boot
> 3.1,
> > 128 MB RAM, 4 GB Quantum, 1 GB Conner, floppy disk... old 19" Sun color
> > monitor, type 5c keyb, optical mouse w/proper silver pad!) Well, now
> that I
> > finally got the Creator framebuffer replaced, it's time to load Solaris.
> > Except that all the CD-ROMS I have aren't even seen by the console...
> And I
> > tried the sector size jumper both ways.
> >
> > --
>
> try to describe the scsi bus and termination.
> do a probe-scsi and a probe-scsi-all...
>
> let me know what that does.
>
- Termination was tried both ways on the CD drive. The 2 HDDs are
SCA-80, and it looks like those are in the middle of the chain. probe-scsi
shows _only_ the 2 HDDs, never the CD. probe-scsi-all will have to wait
until I get home from work...
> Great machine... I've got some Sun Parts if you need them including an
> external disk and cd.
>
- Hopefully the DEC RRD42 will work, like people say it should. Could
that external CD be mounted in the Ultra1? I'd hate to clutter up my desk
_more_... :)
> Plextor and Toshiba CD's and CD-R's have worked for me on them.
> The old 2x toshibas are $3.50 at www.compgeeks.com.
>
> My Teac's also have the 512 byte jumper as do IBM's.
>
- None of which I have...
--
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
This may be an off-topic post, but Chris is nuts for old HP laser
printers and old Macs! A 2 hour drive, out of the blue, during the week,
just for two printers... Well I guess that fits just about everybody on this
list though...
Anyway, to my point... This is off-topic, so taking it off-list is
appropriate I believe... I have a Sun Ultra1 Creator. (170E, Open Boot 3.1,
128 MB RAM, 4 GB Quantum, 1 GB Conner, floppy disk... old 19" Sun color
monitor, type 5c keyb, optical mouse w/proper silver pad!) Well, now that I
finally got the Creator framebuffer replaced, it's time to load Solaris.
Except that all the CD-ROMS I have aren't even seen by the console... And I
tried the sector size jumper both ways.
- Matsushita CR-503-B Compaq spare...
- Smart 7 Friendly CD-R 4012
- Apple CD300 plus (found the Sun CD list that said these didn't work
afterwards)
I have a DEC RRD42 external CD drive here at work that I'm gonna
"borrow" this weekend.
Any tips, tricks, or other hints? Maybe something I missed? How
about other options for getting this puppy running?
Thanks to Sridhar and DaveM for trying to help last might...
--
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
> ----------
> From: Chris
>
> >> 1 HP LaserJet IIID, w/ duplex
> >Covet covet.
> >
> >*sigh* I'm in Qu?bec.
>
> That is sitting in the back of the van sitting in my driveway :-)
>
> In the morning I will see what it's status is (Dave believes it works,
> but doesn't know 100%... worst case, I will probably canabalize my LJ 2
> to get the IIID running)
>
> Sorry, had to rub it in (isn't often I have toys others want)
>
> -chris
On Apr 25, 18:20, Bill Pechter wrote:
> > On Apr 24, 21:05, Bill Pechter wrote:
> >
> > > Isn't it a bit much to call XXDP+ an OS.
> > > DECX-11 is closer... XXDP's pretty dumb.
> >
> > I've always thought of XXDP as the OS that DECX-11 runs under.
> More like the program loader for the OS... 8-).
>
> At least CP/M had better editors available than XXDP...
Yeah, you mean EDLIN :-) TECO in XXDP is not my favourite editor!
I'm slightly puzzled by what you say about DEC X-11, though. My exposure
to it and XXDP is only in the form of the diagnostics available to end
users and third-party service organisations, and I suspect there's more to
it than that. The reason I think of XXDP as the OS and X-11 as the, well,
application in a way, is that all I see are the X-11 modules to run build
and series of tests, whereas XXDP includes the monitor, system handlers etc
(as well as the diagnostic programs and utilites, of course). To me,
that's the OS.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
At 02:08 PM 4/25/02 -0500, you wrote:
>I had a cop-rogrammer at one point who insisted that MacOS was based on
>MS-DOS. :)
>Needless to say, he didn't rogramm very well, and was fired eventually.
>Chris
Copro-grammer fits.
carlos.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Carlos E. Murillo-Sanchez carlos_murillo(a)nospammers.ieee.org
>From 1981-1992 our Honeywell Multics (120V 60Hz) was attached to the
grid (240V 50Hz) via an motor/alternator set which was about 6' (long) x
3' (high) x 2' (wide).
Doug.
6bits was the "byte" size for the PDP-8 (swap acc halves).
9bits was the byte size for the PDP-10, I believe IBM360 and CDC6600
12 bits was link-8, PDP-8 and PDP-12 (likely others).
9/18 the pdp7 (first home of unix).
-----Original Message-----
From: Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner <spc(a)conman.org>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, April 22, 2002 12:34 AM
Subject: Re: Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers (was: OT email response format)
>It was thus said that the Great Ben Franchuk once stated:
>>
>> Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner wrote:
>>
>> > As for using non-8 bit byte based CPUs? Not really; I don't think
I've
>> > ever even come across any 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 60 or 66 bit systems
>> > *anywhere* and I'm one of the few programmers I know that's even
*heard* of
>> > such CPUs. Most programmers I suspect are only aware of the x86.
>> What computer systems did you have in mind?
>> 9 bit ????
>> 12 bit ????
>
> I might have gotten a bit confused there. I know of systems that have
had
>9 bit characters, and some that have 12 bit address spaces but I'm sure
that
>if there were indeed, such things as a nine bit or twelve bit computer,
>they'll be mentioned soon enough 8-/
>
> -spc (But I do want to say the PDP-8 was a 12 bit system for some reason
... )
>
>
>
Thanks for this first info. The scanner does not bear the Plustek name or
logo, but their web site lists a "Scan Plus Color 3000" (possibly color variant
of mine), for which they still have a driver. The bottom of my scanner has a
label on it with two checkboxen, "ScanPlus Gray 300" next to the checked and
"ScanPlus Color 3000" next to the unchecked one, so obviously the used at
least the same housing.
Unfortunately, they only describe setup procedures for parallel port
scanners (which have a second connector for the printer cable) and USB scanners, so
I'm still lost as to which kind of interface I need to connect mine.
I had already found and downloaded the files from the Italian site.
Sincerely yours
Arno Kletzander
Arno_1983(a)gmx.de
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
On April 21, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> You can get the same software for UNIX, if you don't mind the $250K pricetag.
> You won't get the source code there, either, of course, but I doubt you'd
> expend 200 man-years developing a piece of software at your expense and then
> give away the source code. If you did, your shareholders would tar and
> feather you.
Most of the software in use in the UNIX world is free. Of course
there ARE commercial packages, but...with very few exceptions, for
every commercial package there's at least one free one that does the
job as well or better. It's possible that I'm preaching to the choir
here, but one of the common misconceptions that really bugs me is the
notion that "unix == expensive", when in reality it's just the
opposite. (The same goes for "pc vs. real computers" in the "I use a
PC because I can't afford a Sun or an Alpha" case...)
> People like the software for FPGA's and CPLD's because it's either free or
> under $100 US. There are so many high-quality 805x compilers that are
FPGA and CPLD stuff are some of the exceptions that I mentioned in
my paragraph above. For that stuff we're pretty much stuck with
Windows due to the shortsightedness of the vendors. There's nothing
we can do about that at this point, as far as I can tell. :-( I curb
that problem by using Windows (under an emulator of course) ONLY for
the stuff that I can't run under a real OS.
> "freeware" or "shareware" that I can't see any reason one would want one of
> the $2000 types, unless he was convinced he could make his work easier by
> spending that money. If people would keep after the producers of the
> purportedly faulty software, it would get fixed. Vendors of shoddy software
> rely on the fact that people buy their products under the mistaken notion that
> it will do their work for them, knowing that, when the end-user finds out it's
> not so, he'll be too embarassed to complain that the product doesn't work any
> better than the comparable freeware product.
I agree 100%. Needless to say, we're trashing this compiler after
this project. :-) The fancy GUI is nice, but frankly I can be more
productive with xemacs and make.
> There is a demo version of nearly every high-cost ($2000 isn't that high, btw,
> though the Windows environment has made it so.) Get a comparable product for
> UNIX, and you'll get no improvement, nor will you get source. All you'll get
> is a bigger bill.
Not necessarily...I've used at least four FREE 8051 C compilers under
UNIX, nearly ten years ago! $2000 *is* high, when most of the 8051
compilers I've used cost $0.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "Mmmm. Big."
St. Petersburg, FL -Den
Hi Richard,
> were not great, but at least they were adequate. Frankly, if one
> considers the competition, the Commodore people picked the video
> toy market to
> play in rather than the home computer market, because they
> couldn't compete
> with Apple and Radio Shack, though they attempted to compete with
> RS' low-end.
So just what is it that classifies the C64 as a "toy" computer ? When
it was released, it was far more capable than the existant Apples,
Ataris & Radio Shacks (& a damn sight cheaper too).
Indeed, out of all the machines then in production, which one still in
use now is still capable of (more or less) doing what modern machines
can ?
cheers,
Lance
----------------
Powered by telstra.com
Dear colleague
This letter is to remind you that if you are interested in submitting a
chapter for our forthcoming edition "Science, Technology and Education of
Microscopy: an Overview" the deadline for submitting them is JUNE 30, 2002.
Please note that a first list of accepted proposals/chapters has been also
posted on the Call for Papers' website:
http://www.formatex.org/micro2002/callforpaper.htm
For any enquiry or suggestion, please contact us.
Best wishes from Spain.
J.A.Mesa Gonzalez
Formatex Secretariat
A.Mendez Vilas
Physics Department
University of Extremadura
Avda. de Elvas s/n
06071 Badajoz
SPAIN
E-mail: amvilas(a)unex.es
Editor
> -----Original Message-----
> From: R. D. Davis [mailto:rdd@rddavis.org]
> reliable and less troublesome. One of them told me that there was no
> difference between BSD and Linux, and he firmly believed that BSD was
> based on Linux! Another one insisted that I switch to M$-Word from
I had a cop-rogrammer at one point who insisted that MacOS was based on
MS-DOS. :)
Needless to say, he didn't rogramm very well, and was fired eventually.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
Hi All again.
I have to say the Vax I got last week has been heaps of fun, picked up a
couple of bits for it today, like about 20 backup tapes (unfortunatly not
TK50 tapes) And a Nice VT420 Terminal.
Anyway decided to let VMS wait for a little before I try and learn this
odd but interesting system, (I am going to be joind decus so I can get new
VMS media as the machine didn't come with any) so I have had a look at the
other avalible OSes that are avalible for the VAX.
A quick question was ULTRIX ever avalible for the uVAX 3100/80?
The two "free" operating systems that seem to be avalible for the 3100/80
are NetBSD and OpenBSD (there seems to be a version of linux but it seems
to be quite imature.)
I now have had a play with both (and If anyone ever needs a hand setting
up either of these just give me a yell.)
The NetBSD install was realy easy, I booted the vax via the network, and
then did a [ctrl] + [z] and then using ftp pulled the .tgz files to the
vax and installed the os from the local hard drive. The only issue was
that the NetBSD install was sparse to say the least, and after compiling a
couple of things (which was quite slow, but no where as slow as my first
linux pc ;) I decided to give OpenBSD a go.
OpenBSD is great, still it doesn't have all that I want, but has a lot
more than NetBSD. The install is a little hairy in places, and it took me
a while to configure the FreeBSD i386 box I am using for a boot server
(the OpenBSD net boot process is a little differnt that NetBSD) but the
install went painlessly.
To sum up, and sorry if this is a little off topic. If anyone is looking
for something other than VMS to run on their Vaxes, I would reccomend
OpenBSD over NetBSD.
I Hope I havent bored you too much....
Benjamin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com]
> Have you noticed some of the really odd structures in the
> DIRectory of the
> early Mac formats?
> (linked list table (MICROS~1 calls theirs a F.A.T.) made up of 12 bit
> entries!) Could that be coincidence? No. just a severe shortage of
> competent systems programmers resulting in a number of programmers and
> ideas in common.
Atari's TOS wasn't based on MS-DOS either, and it used the exact
same filesystem.
To answer your rhetorical question, actually, I hadn't noticed.
I did notice that it was significantly different from ODS-2. :)
Perhaps I need to be more clear here -- this guy really thought
that somewhere underneath the Mac GUI, there was a copy of MS-DOS
on every Macintosh. He had nothing to offer as proof, except that
no computer could possibly function without it. (I'm really
serious here...)
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
This set includes the circuit boards reproduced (actually produced-retro)
>from the original plans, and the front panel with lettering, and the red
lens. I purchased these directly from the man who produces them and he has
assembled a number of Mark-8's in the past and is very knowledgeable on their
assembly. He includes an excellent CD with reprints of the original Radio
Electronics articles and his own very helpful notes. Here are a couple of
pictures:
http://www.classiccomputing.com/mark8.html
Here is more info:
The First Hobbyist Computer!
The remarkable Mark-8 computer was described in the July 1974 issue of Radio
Electronics. A landmark in computer history, it was the first hobbyist
computer. At this point in time, most engineers didn't, or couldn't believe
that a real computer could be constructed with the new fangle Intel chips.
But Jon Titus proved them wrong with the affordable Mark-8 computer. The
Mark-8 is a .5 Mhz 8008 based computer that preceded the Altair 8800 by about
6 months. The 8008 was Intel's first 8 bit processor and was developed along
with the world's first processor, the 4004. Only plans and pcb boards were
available from the creator, Jon Titus, everything else had to be provided by
the builder.
More on the CD from the creator:
Also included is a CD that I put together containing a copy of the original
Radio Electronics article and supplemental 47 page construction article; a 50
page manual I created detailing my experience and hints debugging this
computer (with many photos and full scans of completed boards); aboueers
informed before Byte came out, its a treasure chest of historical information
about the Mark-8 and other early computers, the January 1975 issue is
especially interesting, this is when the Altair was introduced)
I paid $180 for this set and I have come to realize that I do not have the
talent needed to do the precise soldering, testing, etc. and there is the
task of locating the remaining parts for the computer. This is over my head I
believe, so I want to pass these on to someone else. $150 plus shipping, an
excellent deal. Don't miss your chance to build this classic kit.
Best,
David Greelish
Classic Computing
www.classiccomputing.com
"classiccomputing" on eBay
>> 1 HP LaserJet IIID, w/ duplex
>Covet covet.
>
>*sigh* I'm in Qu?bec.
That is sitting in the back of the van sitting in my driveway :-)
In the morning I will see what it's status is (Dave believes it works,
but doesn't know 100%... worst case, I will probably canabalize my LJ 2
to get the IIID running)
Sorry, had to rub it in (isn't often I have toys others want)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Doug:
> Never had a problem with Debian, other than its name...
> Is it an acronym for something?
It's rather lame, but:
"Since many people have asked, Debian is pronounced 'deb ee n'. It comes
from the names of the creator of Debian, Ian Murdock, and his wife, Debra."
<shrug> :)
However, you can get Linux-based Debian distributions such as "Corel", "Storm",
"Progeny", and such. The Debian package system and architecture is not tied
explicitly to the official Debian project (and debatable policies) alone.
Chris:
> the Debian people have better things to do with their time than debate,
> argue about, and perhaps eventually fix it.
This is possible, but if you offered a reasonable and serious rebuttal to
their policy (or portions thereof), I would doubt that anybody would think
twice before taking it into consideration. In other words, if you have
something to say, it would help to tell it to the people who can do something
about it! :)
--
Ryan Underwood, <nemesis at icequake.net>, icq=10317253
This has been spoken for..
--
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
> ----------
> From: David Woyciesjes
>
> This reminds me... I have here an Applied Engineering AEHD 3.5"
> External disk drive for Apple Computers. But the machine it's from is long
> gone.
> Who wants it? Say, $20 for me to pack it and ship it out.
>
> --
> --- David A Woyciesjes
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Erlacher [mailto:edick@idcomm.com]
> They are toys, since they didn't have a disk interface in
> them. They, in
> fact, if your description is correct, needed a toy interface
> to talk to
> another toy interface that talked to what was probably a
> smarter computer that
> had a disk interface in it.
That pretty much describes commodore disk drives, yep. The
point, though, is that they plug directly into an interface
that's already on the machine, so we would get into the sticky
discussion of how "directly" a drive must be handled. Require
too much of the logic to be in the computer, and suddenly an
external IDE disk wouldn't count.
As an aside, I've heard of interesting things being done with
the disk drive "computers," though I can't think of any off hand.
They spoke a pretty simple serial protocol, too, such that you
can basically plug them into other systems (Intel Linux machines,
at least) and build simple applications to talk to them, and they
handled all of the complexities of disk I/O, so that the CPU didn't
need to -- so there are good points to them.
That being said, if I understand your other post properly, once
the drive is there, you would possibly not consider it a toy
any more, whether the drive is external or not, and regardless
of how it's driven. Or am I way off?
Would you also have considered 9-track tape "mass storage" for the
time?
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
We're cleaning here, and got some stuff being tossed.
Free, Come pick it up...
12 old modems - Gandalf LDS125 (?)
about 12 (?) dozen tape reels. 12" diameter. They're in 4 15" monitor
boxes...
2 HP LaserJet IID, with duplex
1 HP LaserJet IIID, w/ duplex
some long comms(?) cables
old Epson line printers
old DeskJet printers
CSU/DSU
more to come...
I can hold some of the smaller things, but there is limited space in my
garage.
E-mail me directly...
--
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
Peter,
I've had this concern myself and have even made processor choices based
on my fear of the hand prototyping of BGA parts.
Would you please give us a synopsis of your experience and tips hand
assembling BGA parts, including tools, temperatures, etc. ?
--tnx
--tom
At 12:46 PM 4/25/02 -0700, you wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Jos Dreesen wrote:
>
>> Allison wrote:
>> >
>> >almost impossible for the home builder ... and only the odd few (Tony?
:-)
>> >
>> > Impossible? How?
>> >
>> Open any GSM phone and look at the components....
>> There is NO WAY a hobbyist (not even Tony ( sorry chap !)) will be able to
>> handle 200-300 pin BGA packages, with 0.8 or even 0.5mm pitch.
>
>Nonsense! I do 388 pin BGAs for protos all the time with nothing but a hot
air
>gun...
>
>BGAs are easier than fine pitch QFP to solder (though difficult to salvage if
>done wrong...)
>
>Peter Wallace
>
>
>
>
On April 22, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> Most of the people I've met who use UNIX/LINUX in their home-computing
> pursuits do it because they've nothing better to do. You may not fit that
> model, but these guys figure out ways to make their computers more secure,
> more complicated to use, and often have to type for several minutes to find
> out whether a copy of a file on their local hard drive is available on that
> other box down the wire. When my machines are all turned on, I can do that in
> less than 15 seconds, and that long only because I can't remember the file
> name.
This is the one of your trolls that I think I'll ignore.
> I just want (1) for my computers to act in concert to present me with a
> convenient interface and (2) for them to work as expected. They seem to do
> that most of the time. In recent years my cars have been more reliable than
> my computers, but that wasn't the case some years back when I used Detroit
> iron. When my computers become as reliable as my telephone, which may happen
> not because the computers get better but ... then I'll be happy enough, I
I suppose I'm more demanding than to accept my computers working as
expected "most of the time". My computers are much MORE reliable than
my telephone. But then, I don't use PeeCees, and I don't run Windows.
I suppose it's just an issue of personal/professional standards and
expectations. If I had a hammer that randomly jumped off of my
workbench and flew through a window, I'd throw it in the trash and get
a better hammer. I did exactly that with my computer a very long time
ago.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "Mmmm. Big."
St. Petersburg, FL -Den
On Apr 24, 21:05, Bill Pechter wrote:
> Isn't it a bit much to call XXDP+ an OS.
> DECX-11 is closer... XXDP's pretty dumb.
I've always thought of XXDP as the OS that DECX-11 runs under.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> From: Andy Holt <andyh(a)andyh-rayleigh.freeserve.co.uk>
> > Nowadays You typically have to deal with distributors - little
> > problem for the experienced, but an obstacle to newcomers
>
> what about JDR, JAMECO, BG and a long list of suppliers that take
> small orders and credit cards?
Great for processors, logic gates, linear chips, etc... DigiKey
I do lots of business with (well, in the past).
But try finding:
cross-bar switch
telco line interface
bond-out version of a processor
caller-id decoder
and any other number of specialized chips...
-dq
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dwight K. Elvey [mailto:dwightk.elvey@amd.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 12:39 PM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: .I.P. for D.I.Y.
>
>
> I get a kick out of the fact that he made the electrodes
> in the shape of the old atom symbol they used to use in
> the advertisements. Does anyone remember the name of the
> little cartoon character that the GE advertisements had
> for the atom?
> Dwight
>
>
Reddy Kilowatt!
************************************
If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the
delivery of this message to the addressee, please note that this message may
contain ITT Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you may not
copy or deliver this message to anyone. You should destroy this message and
kindly notify the sender by reply email. Information contained in this
message that does not relate to the business of ITT is neither endorsed by
nor attributable to ITT.
************************************
> From: Doc <doc(a)mdrconsult.com>
> :
> You're calling the entire DECstation 5000/2xx line "products intended
> for the toy market as opposed to one intended to be seen as a computer",
> since they have no internal mass storage.
I guess he thinks Sun 3/50's are toys too. Sigh.
Al.
> The floppy port one was called the Hard Disk 20 (Hard Drive 20?? damn, I
> always screw that up). You are right on the SCSI one (20SC). And there is
> a 2nd product that I am aware of Apple made for the floppy port. An
> external 400k floppy drive. They may have made other external floppies
> for the Mac that use the floppy port as well (800k maybe, but I don't
> think they made a 1.44 external)
>
> There were of course other floppy drives made for floppy ports on the
> IIgs, but I don't know if that is the same functionality, so I don't know
> if those could have been used on the Mac.
I used to own an external 400k drive, sold it about 10 years ago
along with the old 400k internal drive they let me keep when I
had my Fat mac upgraded to a 512Ke.
Yes, Apple did make an external drive, ISTR is was called UniDrive
but that was also what they called the single plastic 5.25inch drives
for the Apple //e, according to Sellam... So I think Apple may have
goofed and used the name twice. However, these were not Superdrives,
IIRC, they didn't support 1.44MB, only 800MB.
When I first saw it, the sounds it made were like a little hard
drive, or so it seemd at the time.
Third-parties also made external drives; I have one such beast,
can't recall the maker, but I think it has both autoeject in
addition to the quite visible and accessible front-panel eject
button.
-dq
From: Bryan Pope <bpope(a)wordstock.com>
>
>O. :( What about this other store I just found on the net called "Active
>Electronics"? They have a stores located in Woburn and Cambridge?
Yep another resource.
>I am looking to get a soldering iron plus double-sided copper clab boards,
>chemicals and dry-erase (I can't remember the exact name) to draw the
>circuit.
U-blew-it is good for that. The marker pen for hand drawing etch directly
is
the ever popular Sharpie (sanford) permanent marker. They are avalable
in many widths and work just fine for resist.
For the Iron look for a low cost temperature controlled iron, it's worth the
price
and usually they have fine tips or can have an assortment of tips.
Allison
From: Andy Holt <andyh(a)andyh-rayleigh.freeserve.co.uk>
>Nowadays
> You typically have to deal with distributors - little problem for the
>experienced, but an obstacle to newcomers
what about JDR, JAMECO, BG and a long list of suppliers that take
small orders and credit cards?
> The edge speed of modern logic is so high that WW is unlikely to work
WW works just fine. I've done it and actually WW if done right sometimes
exceeds PCB!
> In fact even PCBs now need designing using UHF techniques for the same
>reason
If your going that fast. Then again I did a UHF transverter using dead bug
(NO PCB) just recently and it works very well.
> SMT devices - and almost everything nowadays is only available as such -
Yes, all the really neat new stuff is. However PICs, Amtel cpus, and good
old
74xxxs stuff is widely abailable in dips.
>are best handled with an expensive soldering station (and BGA devices need
>even more expensive equiment).
BGA is the extreme and likely more than a trivial project use.
> Documentation - though nowadays typically easier to obtain - is often
>oversimplified.
Maybe, maybe not. For the stuff I do, and have done, it's pretty decent.
I've been doing it for over 30 years so I do know the world has changed.
Buying fast logic in 1970 to make a 50mhz freq counter was difficult, now
it's a gimme.
> Programming devices often needs (one or both of) expensive hardware or
>extremely expensive software.
If your programming GAL, FPGA, and the like, yes. Eproms no problem.
Then again I've met some that wanted a high end FPGA to do what I can
do in a handful of diodes and a few transistors or less.
>I stand by the "almost impossible" statement above.
You go in expecting defeat and you will be defeated. I just finished
building a PLL system with 100hz resolution at 42mhz in a 1.5inch
cube. No exotica, most parts bought from JDR catalog at reasonable
prices.
>The one main exception to this black picture is the single-chip flash
>micro - such as the PIC family or the 8051 derivatives. But working with
>these is more like computer programming than hardware design.
Maybe but with the right mindset these are increadable resources. They
allow one to use programmed micro where you needed a dozen chips
or more before.
Allison
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Underwood [mailto:nemesis-lists@icequake.net]
> That's fine, and it's your choice, but please remember that
> since you are
> "staying away from the Debian community", you are using a
> system that is the
> product of others' hard work, and not contributing. If you
Well, eventually I'll write my own OS, but until then... ;)
> don't wish to
> assist the project, IMO you shouldn't be shooting flames and
> labels around
> when you're dissatisfied with the outcome.
Not trying to shoot flames anywhere. I'm just voicing my
objection to the naming convention. If I thought it was a
serious problem, I would, as you suggest, bring it up with
the Debian group.
> be better brought up to the Debian project itself. That way,
> we can be
> aware of views that diverge from the popular "Debian user"'s
> view, in order
> to attempt to provide a better system for all. I mean, yeah,
Since it's a cosmetic thing, and has no impact on usability, I've
largely tried to ignore it so far. The system is technically not
harmed by it.
> it's great
> hearing praise and honors from people who love Debian, but we
> can't improve
> upon our system when all we hear is what we've done right,
> and when the grumpy
> ones :D post their opinions elsewhere so the larger Debian
> developer base never
> sees them.
Rest assured that if I ever see Debian make a big technical
mistake, I'll be the first to let them know. ;) The "name thing,"
while it annoys me, isn't really worth bothering Debian about.
> Dig? This isn't a flame or a reprimand, it's simply a
> suggestion. If you
> disagree, that is fine. I'm just looking out for my operating system.
I don't disagree, but I believe that, being a purely syntactic problem,
the Debian people have better things to do with their time than debate,
argue about, and perhaps eventually fix it. I'm sure they wasted enough
time (several seconds at least ;) changing the name the first time, since,
IIRC, the old Debian distributions were "just Linux."
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> That's the pragma behind it, it's not giving into Stallman's demands and
> such, it's just a choice behind the user and developer community that "This
> is how we want to present our system as installed by default." They're not
> twisting anyone's arm.
Never had a problem with Debian, other than its name...
it always either parses as "of or having to do with Debbie", or
I hear "Denebian" as in "Denebian slime devil".
Is it an acronym for something?
-dq
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Douglas H. Quebbeman [mailto:dquebbeman@acm.org]
> Yes, Apple did make an external drive, ISTR is was called UniDrive
> but that was also what they called the single plastic 5.25inch drives
> for the Apple //e, according to Sellam... So I think Apple may have
> goofed and used the name twice. However, these were not Superdrives,
> IIRC, they didn't support 1.44MB, only 800MB.
Wow, and on a 3.5" disk too... :)
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ethan Dicks [mailto:erd_6502@yahoo.com]
> These days, my personal criteria is "no ethernet == toy" (for
> stuff made
> after 1990) The iOpener or Audrey as shipped is a toy; add
> USB Ethernet
> and it graduates to "potentially useful tool".
So dual FDDI just isn't good enough for you? :)
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> Nowadays You typically have to deal with distributors - little
> problem for the experienced, but an obstacle to newcomers
Usually, I could just call up the chipmaker/partmaker and ask
for a few enegineering samples. When a 10MB Irwin QIC drive
stopped working, I probed the adress line on the thing's Z-8
(yes, Z8) processor; there was no change, so I figured it was
toast. Called up Zilog (this was 1987), asked for one, got two.
Pull bad chip, insert new chip, got working Irwin drive.
More recently, though, you have to develop a relationship
with a rep from the local distributer (Hamilton-Avnet,
Meunier, Graham, etc).
WORST CASE was Mitel; I needed parts for a mini-PBX I
designed and then never built. I had to buy this guy
*two* martini lunches before i got my parts. Still it
was a bargain...
-dq
> I get a kick out of the fact that he made the electrodes
> in the shape of the old atom symbol they used to use in
> the advertisements. Does anyone remember the name of the
> little cartoon character that the GE advertisements had
> for the atom?
Hmmm... nope, though I do recall the REMC mascot,
"Reddy Kilowatt", with a lightening bolt for a body...
-dq
> The entire world has voted. The name is "Linux", not "GNU/Linux".
I'm not preaching Stallman. What I said is that the better part of the Debian
community has chosen to give GNU credit in the system. You can disagree
with it, and that is fine! The world+dog does not have to think Stallman
is the icon of open source. Go ahead and edit your /etc/issue if it's that
big a deal.
At the risk of being a pedant, Debian is not a Linux operating system; it
is designed to be a universal operating system, that can use any Unix-like
kernel at its core. Debian is being bootstrapped on BSD and Hurd currently.
The core of Debian is GNU system utilities and the Debian policy and package
system, which is why the kernel name is prefixed by Debian and GNU.
Redhat, Mandrake, etc don't bother, because they are Linux systems, and ONLY
Linux systems. They will never be anything else, thus "Redhat Linux" and
"Mandrake Linux" are fine titles; they indicate what the system aspires to
be.
That's the pragma behind it, it's not giving into Stallman's demands and
such, it's just a choice behind the user and developer community that "This
is how we want to present our system as installed by default." They're not
twisting anyone's arm.
--
Ryan Underwood, <nemesis at icequake.net>, icq=10317253
From: Christopher Smith <csmith(a)amdocs.com>
>People buy peesees for one of four reasons:
>
>They favor them -- usually because they've never seen anything else.
>
>Their friend-who-knows-everything-about-computers likes them (yeah...)
>
>Everybody else is doing it
>
>They don't know that anything else exists
Reason #5: It's a large market and compatability is handy for many reasons.
You don't have to like it but if you have a PC even a slow one it can be
very
handy. It doesn't mean you must pitch over to microsoftism either as there
are enough non- M$ tools that seem to work ok on the base winders.
As to buying a PC... why? People are giving away P166s and thats enough
to do most anything if a decent disk is installed. I figure if I spend more
than
the price of a new modest sized disk I've overpaid for my PCs. Of course I
don't do the games or heavy graphics that want cpu up the wazzoo or other
resources.
Allison
> > What you label "garbage" are the very attributes that many
> > Debian members
> > hold dear.
> Probably exactly why I stay away from "the Debian community,"
> so to speak.
That's fine, and it's your choice, but please remember that since you are
"staying away from the Debian community", you are using a system that is the
product of others' hard work, and not contributing. If you don't wish to
assist the project, IMO you shouldn't be shooting flames and labels around
when you're dissatisfied with the outcome.
That is just my weak and unfounded opinion; but I just feel that instead of
venting your disgust on other unrelated mailing lists, these issues would
be better brought up to the Debian project itself. That way, we can be
aware of views that diverge from the popular "Debian user"'s view, in order
to attempt to provide a better system for all. I mean, yeah, it's great
hearing praise and honors from people who love Debian, but we can't improve
upon our system when all we hear is what we've done right, and when the grumpy
ones :D post their opinions elsewhere so the larger Debian developer base never
sees them.
Dig? This isn't a flame or a reprimand, it's simply a suggestion. If you
disagree, that is fine. I'm just looking out for my operating system.
--
Ryan Underwood, <nemesis at icequake.net>, icq=10317253
I didn't catch the posting that seems to have started all this, but ignorance
never seems to stop anyone *else* from stating an opinion, so here's mine :-)
A few years back I spent a little time working for a small company whose primary
focus was Unix system software. They did some Windows work, and this was their
eventual downfall because they were bought out by McAfee who didn't have a clue
what to do with the Unix stuff and weren't interested in finding out.
I was the last remaining employee of the original company. For most of the last
year of its operation I did pretty much all the system administration,
lightweight hardware maintenance, bug fixing, and many of the enhancements to
the two Unix products that had been the mainstay of the company. I forget
exactly how many machines we had and exactly what they ran, but it was something
like:
Hardware OS Notes
======== == =====
HP/Apollo 700 HP/UX 9.x
HP/Apollo 700 HP/UX 10.01 + 10.10? dual boot
DEC Alpha 2000 (?) OSF 1
Motorola Mxxx Motorola Unix v.X forgotten machine
Motorola Myyy Motorola Unix v.Y & OS version names
SUN Sparc 5 Solaris 2.5.1
SUN SLC Solaris 2.5.1
SUN 3/60 SunOS 4.1.1
IBM RS6000 AIX v.X & v.Y forgotten versions,
dual boot
Intel SCO Unix
Intel Dynix
Intel ?nix more memory loss
I am missing a couple of machines and maybe one more OS. Before I started with
the company I had never even heard of some of these variants. The point of all
this is that the same code base built on ALL these things. Sure, we had a
"portability" library of our own to make it easier, there was a fair amount of
#ifdef stuff, and we had to tinker with GNU autoconf to get the builds smooth,
but I could manage ALL of it. We used Emacs and gcc/gdb on all the machines,
and a freeware distributed backup package (Amanda) to run complete backups of
everything automatically (well, OK, I had to change the tapes manually). Of
course, with the network applications that typically come with Unix (telnet,
ftp, NFS, X Windows, etc.) I could sit at my own desk and get at every machine
conveniently and run a parallel build on all the machines. That would have been
completely impossible with the Microsoft (bundled) products available at that
time.
Now, I've watched people trying to do software development on Windows systems
over the years, and I've done a little myself here and there. Every time there
is a new service pack or OS release there are wailings and rendings of clothes
on all sides. New licenses have to be bought for compilers, new versions of the
network backup client have to be purchased, very often a whole new machine has
to be bought, the sys admins have to do all sorts of black magic to get the new
machines to "play nice" with the old ones on the network, and a whole new set of
OS idiosyncracies has to be mastered. I have never observed anything similar in
Unix development shops (well, OK, the more organised ones, anyway). Oh, and
even *less* upheaval takes place in VMS shops BTW, but VMS has other problems.
So:
1. it is perfectly possible to write highly portable software, and once the
initial portability setup is done the rest is not particularly hard.
2. there is a great deal of very useful "free" software for Unix out there in
net land, much of which you would have to pay big $ for on Windows
3. there is NOT very much "business" software (word processors, spreadsheets,
contact management etc.) for Unix because the kind of people who write free
software aren't generally very interested in "business" stuff, and the kind
of people who write commercial software don't think there is much of a Unix
market for it (since they priced themselves out of it a while back).
4. if I were developing software for "back end" applications (servers,
networking, etc.) I would certainly do it on Unix in preference to Windows,
and in this respect the market mostly agrees with me.
By all means use Windows for your office work. That's about all it's good for,
and on the whole it does it fairly well.
Bob Bramwell Snail: 60 Baker Cr. NW | If I die in war you remember me;
ProntoLogical Calgary, AB | If I live in peace you don't.
+1 403/861-8827 T2L 1R4, Canada | - Spike Milligan (1919 - 2002)
From: Bryan Pope <bpope(a)wordstock.com>
>And thusly Allison spake:
>>
>> From: Andy Holt <andyh(a)andyh-rayleigh.freeserve.co.uk>
>> >I'll agree - but perhaps the main reason is that modern components are
>> >almost impossible for the home builder ... and only the odd few (Tony?
:-)
>>
>> Impossible? How?
>>
>
>Well, we are kind of spoiled here with the "You-Do-It" Electronics store in
>Needham. :)
Feh! U-blew-it, home of the high priced spread. However they exist and
are handy at times. The ham/electornics fleas are handy as mail/email
order outfits.
Allison
Hi all,
a former teacher of mine dug this feed-through scanner out of his storage
for me. It has a slider pot for brightness and a button labeled "Eject", a
power light (green) and an error light (yellow), builtin power supply with on/off
switch and IEC inlet. Then there's a female Sub-D-25 connector...unlabeled.
How does that connect to the computer? Did it need one of those proprietary
interface cards? (We found one in another box, but we're not sure whether it
is for this one.)
Did already about an hour of googling, but no definitive results...Any hints
appreciated.
Greetings from Germany
Arno Kletzander
Arno_1983(a)gmx.de
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
>From: Doc <doc(a)mdrconsult.com>
> An easy way to spot a Microsoft/Intel patsy is his tendency to present
> his own [generally incredibly narrow] viewpoint as immutable fact.
> Doc
--------
Well, the evidence of this latest waste of time & bandwidth seems to
contradict that, since with one possible exception, all the people presenting
those truly incredibly narrow viewpoints have been non-MS/Intel users.
Despite being called morons, brain-damaged, biz'droid lusers, etc., with
intelligence in the gutter, apparently those of us who do manage quite well
to do our jobs & accomplish what we need/want using MS OSs & apps on
PCs value our time more and respect diversity & other peoples' choices
more than to get dragged into this childish & ridiculous name-calling
'discussion'. I for one am quite content to let other people use whatever hardware
or software they like, are supplied with, can afford, are comfortable with,
whatever, and when there are problems as there inevitably are with any
hardware and software, I enjoy the challenge and satisfaction of getting
past those problems, not to mention the income it provides.
But it's reassuring that there are people out there who'd rather insult their
clients/bosses or quit than work with MS/PC stuff; less competition and
more opportunities for those of us who actually respect our clients and
enjoy helping them and the organizations we work for accomplish their
goals.
And unlike some people on this list,
<snip> Jeez, Dick. I can't believe you dragged me back into this. <snip>
we don't all salivate whenever Richard rings his little bell.
Hard to remember sometimes that the intelligent majority is silent at times like
this (except for me, of course :-)
mike
>From: "Ben Franchuk" <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
---ship---
>>BTW Nuclear fusion on the small scale in a interesting hobby for the
>man who has done everything.
>http://www.mathematik.uni-marburg.de/~kronjaeg/hv/fusor/construction/index.…
I get a kick out of the fact that he made the electrodes
in the shape of the old atom symbol they used to use in
the advertisements. Does anyone remember the name of the
little cartoon character that the GE advertisements had
for the atom?
Dwight
In a message dated 4/25/2002 12:21:52 PM Central Daylight Time,
dquebbeman(a)acm.org writes:
> > The floppy port one was called the Hard Disk 20 (Hard Drive 20?? damn, I
> > always screw that up). You are right on the SCSI one (20SC). And there is
> > a 2nd product that I am aware of Apple made for the floppy port. An
> > external 400k floppy drive. They may have made other external floppies
> > for the Mac that use the floppy port as well (800k maybe, but I don't
> > think they made a 1.44 external)
> >
> > There were of course other floppy drives made for floppy ports on the
> > IIgs, but I don't know if that is the same functionality, so I don't know
> > if those could have been used on the Mac.
>
> I used to own an external 400k drive, sold it about 10 years ago
> along with the old 400k internal drive they let me keep when I
> had my Fat mac upgraded to a 512Ke.
>
> Yes, Apple did make an external drive, ISTR is was called UniDrive
> but that was also what they called the single plastic 5.25inch drives
> for the Apple //e, according to Sellam... So I think Apple may have
> goofed and used the name twice. However, these were not Superdrives,
> IIRC, they didn't support 1.44MB, only 800MB.
>
> When I first saw it, the sounds it made were like a little hard
> drive, or so it seemd at the time.
>
> Third-parties also made external drives; I have one such beast,
> can't recall the maker, but I think it has both autoeject in
> addition to the quite visible and accessible front-panel eject
> button.
>
Apple called their drives Unidisks, at least for the // family. There was
also an apple 3.5 drive, but was only for the mac I think. There was some
compatibility notes on what drives went with what.
I once had an external Laser 800k drive that worked with either the Laser128
or mac.
>I think there was exactly one product from Apple that plugged into
>the floppy port - a 20MB disk that required strange drivers. I
>don't recall the part number, but when Apple came out with a 20MB
>SCSI disk, they called it the "20SC" or something similar (IIRC)
>to distinguish it from the older product.
The floppy port one was called the Hard Disk 20 (Hard Drive 20?? damn, I
always screw that up). You are right on the SCSI one (20SC). And there is
a 2nd product that I am aware of Apple made for the floppy port. An
external 400k floppy drive. They may have made other external floppies
for the Mac that use the floppy port as well (800k maybe, but I don't
think they made a 1.44 external)
There were of course other floppy drives made for floppy ports on the
IIgs, but I don't know if that is the same functionality, so I don't know
if those could have been used on the Mac.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>You couldnt chain a floppy drive off the HD20 though.
You sure? I seem to recall that at one point I had two HD20's chained
with a 400k floppy at the end (for 3 devices hanging off the floppy
port). This was probably on my Mac Plus, as that is the machine that saw
the most use of my HD20's.
But I could be remembering wrong (I am at least almost 100% positive that
I had two HD20's chained at one point)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
> > I guess talking to my self and jerking violently and twitching is ok
> > then after 20 years in the biz...
>
> No IRIX in the mix?
IRIX in morning, sysadmins take warning...
IRIX at night, hacker's delight.
<Shudder>
-dq
For those of you just catching up to this, the stuff has all been
either tossed or claimed.
--
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
> ----------
> From: David Woyciesjes
>
> This is the whole list. The room has to be emptied _today_, so I can
> bring stuff home with me, if you want to get it later in the day. I'll try
> to take home any of the smaller unclaimed stuff to store.
> Again, everything is in unknown, untested condition; as-is.
> Let me know by around 5:00 pm eastern time...
>
> > ----------
> > From: David Woyciesjes
> >
> > We're cleaning here, and got some stuff being tossed.
> >
> > Free, Come pick it up...
> >
> > 12 old modems - Gandalf LDS125 (?)
> > about 12 (?) dozen tape reels. 12" diameter. They're in 4 15" monitor
> > boxes...
> -1 box is probably taken...
> > 2 HP LaserJet IID, with duplex - Taken?
> > 1 HP LaserJet IIID, w/ duplex - taken?
> > some long comms(?) cables
> > Epson line printers
> > CSU/DSU
> > --
> >
> And here's more stuff...
>
> 2 Topaz Powermaker UPSs
> 1, maybe 2 Datability Vista terminal servers
> 1, maybe 2 Delnis
> Digital DECRepeater 350
> DeskJet 500
> DeskJet Plus
> VT220
> VT420
> Radius 21" (?) monchrome monitor
>
> --
> --- David A Woyciesjes
> --- C & IS Support Specialist
> --- Yale University Press
> --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
> --- (203) 432-0953
> --- ICQ # - 905818
> Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
> Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
>
>
> From: Chris
>
> >I think there was exactly one product from Apple that plugged into
> >the floppy port - a 20MB disk that required strange drivers. I
> >don't recall the part number, but when Apple came out with a 20MB
> >SCSI disk, they called it the "20SC" or something similar (IIRC)
> >to distinguish it from the older product.
>
> The floppy port one was called the Hard Disk 20 (Hard Drive 20?? damn, I
> always screw that up). You are right on the SCSI one (20SC). And there is
> a 2nd product that I am aware of Apple made for the floppy port. An
> external 400k floppy drive. They may have made other external floppies
> for the Mac that use the floppy port as well (800k maybe, but I don't
> think they made a 1.44 external)
>
> There were of course other floppy drives made for floppy ports on the
> IIgs, but I don't know if that is the same functionality, so I don't know
> if those could have been used on the Mac.
>
> -chris
>
> <http://www.mythtech.net>
>
This reminds me... I have here an Applied Engineering AEHD 3.5"
External disk drive for Apple Computers. But the machine it's from is long
gone.
Who wants it? Say, $20 for me to pack it and ship it out.
--
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
In a message dated 4/25/2002 10:46:00 AM Central Daylight Time,
mythtech(a)mac.com writes:
> >I think there was exactly one product from Apple that plugged into
> >the floppy port - a 20MB disk that required strange drivers. I
> >don't recall the part number, but when Apple came out with a 20MB
> >SCSI disk, they called it the "20SC" or something similar (IIRC)
> >to distinguish it from the older product.
>
> The floppy port one was called the Hard Disk 20 (Hard Drive 20?? damn, I
> always screw that up). You are right on the SCSI one (20SC). And there is
> a 2nd product that I am aware of Apple made for the floppy port. An
> external 400k floppy drive. They may have made other external floppies
> for the Mac that use the floppy port as well (800k maybe, but I don't
> think they made a 1.44 external)
>
> There were of course other floppy drives made for floppy ports on the
> IIgs, but I don't know if that is the same functionality, so I don't know
> if those could have been used on the Mac.
>
>
The hard drive was called an HD20. I have a mac 512k that uses it. About a
fast as a floppy drive, but at least it held 20megs worth.
You couldnt chain a floppy drive off the HD20 though.
Douglas H. Quebbeman said:
>
> IRIX in morning, sysadmins take warning...
> IRIX at night, hacker's delight.
Hey, I actually like IRIX quite a bit! :)
Granted, if I wanted to run an Internet server, I would probably
reach for one of my Sun slabs running NetBSD, but my desktop UNIX
workstation sitting next to me here is an Indigo2!
I love SGI hardware -- I have a ton of Indy, Indigo, and Indigo2
systems that I run as UNIX workstations around the house, and I
have not yet found a window manager that I prefer over 4Dwm.
All my SGI machines are superbly reliable, although security can
get to be a concern sometimes.
16 CDs? That seems really strange -- I tend to throw almost the
entire system on my machines (drive space willing) and it takes
maybe six or seven for 6.5.0...
Kind regards,
Sean Caron
--
Sean Caron http://www.diablonet.net
scaron(a)engin.umich.edu root(a)diablonet.net
I will shortly be making some copies of the CD images from:
ftp://ftp.trailing-edge.com/pub/cd-images/
that I have downloaded and wish to offload from my hard
disk drive. I have verified each of the 2 RSX-11 and the
1 RT-11 images against the MD5 values in the file MD5SUMS
and they are the same. In addition, after I copy the image
on my hard drive to the CD, I will verify them against their
respective images in their hard drive files. To do so, I
will be using RT-11 and BINCOM (with some of my own
modifications which allows me to also verify block 65535
at the end of each RT-11 partition). Since there are a
maximum of 20 RT-11 partitions on each CD and each
BINCOM run takes me less than 30 seconds, the whole
comparison can be done in less than 10 minutes - which
will probably be about the length of time it takes to make
the CD copy in the first place.
Since there might be a number of individuals who can't
download at a reasonable speed (even with DSL it takes
about 12 hours each at about 30 KBytes per second as
compared with about 3 KBytes per second on a dial up line),
I am prepared to make additional copies (Tim Shoppa
no longer seems to have the time to do so) and make
them available at my cost of about $ US 1.50 (for media,
label, envelope and shipping carton - the media portion
is less than half of that total) plus postage.
By the way, for myself, I would VERY much appreciate
being in touch with all individuals who have a copy of the
RT-11 Freeware CD V2.0 so that we might exchange
information about RT-11. Tim Shoppa felt that he might
be violating privacy concerns if he made the names, of those
who ordered the CD, available. I don't see it that way, so
if you want your name to be known along with the other
individuals (or not as the case may be - i.e. restrict that
you have a copy of the RT-11 CD to ONLY specified
individuals such as possibly just myself) so that you can
receive interesting information about new developments
in RT-11 and the status of the operating system, then
PLEASE contact me so that we can share information.
Also state if you want to be known to the entire group
of just to specified individuals.
PLUS, as for TSX-PLUS, I am going to try again to knock
at the door of S&H to see what they may consider for
hobby users.
Sincerely yours,
Jerome Fine
--
If you attempted to send a reply and the original e-mail
address has been discontinued due a high volume of junk
e-mail, then the semi-permanent e-mail address can be
obtained by replacing the four characters preceding the
'at' with the four digits of the current year.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ethan Dicks [mailto:erd_6502@yahoo.com]
> I think there was exactly one product from Apple that plugged into
> the floppy port - a 20MB disk that required strange drivers. I
> don't recall the part number, but when Apple came out with a 20MB
> SCSI disk, they called it the "20SC" or something similar (IIRC)
> to distinguish it from the older product.
I used to have an Apple disk that plugged into the floppy port. 20M
as you say, but it booted directly, so it must not have been too
"strange."
> That having been said, I would question how much Apple "discouraged"
> people from using the SCSI port on the Mac Plus. There may have
> been an alternative and Apple may have pushed it over third-party
> disks, but once the stock of strange disks ran out, presuming
> the Mac Plus was still being made, I doubt Apple would continue
> to urge people to ignore the SCSI port.
So you're saying they probably wanted people to use their disk over
what SCSI disks were available? It wouldn't surprise me.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris [mailto:mythtech@mac.com]
> I know I never increased my drinking, smoking, cursing and profuse
> consumption of potato chips, coffee, or cola because of
> playing games on
> an Apple II.
Nor did I, though, I already consumed more than enough potato chips
and cola.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com]
> > > constitutes a "toy", even in the most general of terms.
> > I'd say anything that runs windows primarily. *duck*
> To be defined as a "TOY", doesn't it have to be FUN?
You have a point, but just because it isn't _my_ idea of
fun to watch an hourglass cursor spin, set through a boring
install procedure every couple of weeks to coax the machine
into performing better, all the while spending more money
on hardware and software "necessities" that fix bugs in the
system the should have never appeared, and worrying about my
email client transferring "viri" around...
Well, that doesn't mean that it's not somebody else's idea of
fun. It obviously must be; just look at the healthy user base
they've got.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Truthan,Larry [mailto:truthanl@oclc.org]
> What is a Dec 3000 model 500? Has a cd rom. and a SCSI port
> out the back.
> Looks Like an Alpha Processor system. What OS? Peanut 2.2? on
> handwritten CD.
Well, VMS, of course. :)
It will also run those other OS's ;) (The OS Formerly Known As OSF/1,
NetBSD, that kind of thing...)
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> At 09:50 PM 4/24/02 -0400, Doug asked:
> >
>
> >
> >Where will I buy water wetter?
>
> E-bay.
>
> >Where will I buy Nitonol wire?
>
> E-bay.
>
> >Where will I buy flock paper?
>
> E-bay.
>
> >Where will I buy cheap assortment of lab glassware?
>
> E-bay.
>
> >Where will I buy an ultrasonic cleaner?
>
> E-bay.
>
> >Where will I buy a good Chinese microscope?
>
>
> E-bay.
> >
> >and so on...
>
> Take a guess!
Joe-
I am not rich enough to be able to take E-Bay into the
bathroom with me... Having an Edmund catalog kept me
>from having to resort to National Geographic... ;)
-Douglas Hurst Quebbeman (DougQ at ixnayamspayIgLou.com) [Call me "Doug"]
Surgically excise the pig-latin from my e-mail address in order to reply
"The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away." -Tom Waits
GNATS is a pretty good bug tracking system (we use it here), easy to search
etc too.
What would be really useful IMHO is a means to sort the classiccmp archives,
since a great many "FAQs" are answered there somewhere... finding the answer
isn't that easy though :-) Googling for whatever I'm looking for and
including "classiccmp" in the search list is the best I've come up with so
far, anyone found a better way?
BTW if nobody's working on a searchable archive I'd be happy to take the
work on?
Cheers
Al.
I spotted this in the CPM news-group. It looks like a good deal for somebody.
From: Gerald Pine <gdpine(a)pacbell.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
Subject: Liquidating collection of CPM (and some other) machines
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 59
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.101.253.40
X-Complaints-To: abuse(a)prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr13.news.prodigy.com 1019533029 ST000 32.101.253.40 (Mon, 22 Apr 2002 23:37:09 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 23:37:09 EDT
Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com
X-UserInfo1: [[PAPDCAOXW[B^LX@JJDM^P@VZ\LPCXLLBWLOOAFQATJUZ]CDVW[AKK[J\]^HVKHG^EWZHBLO^[\NH_AZFWGN^\DHNVMX_DHHX[FSQKBOTS@@BP^]C@RHS_AGDDC[AJM_T[GZNRNZAY]GNCPBDYKOLK^_CZFWPGHZIXW@C[AFKBBQS@E@DAZ]VDFUNTQQ]FN
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 03:37:09 GMT
Xref: cyclone.tampabay.rr.com comp.os.cpm:20184
Hello,
I have sold cpm machines from my collection to several of you in the
past. I am finally running out of time to disperse my collection of
machines before my house is officially sold to its new owners. The
machines are in La Grange, Illinois, a southwest suburb of Chicago. My
wife is going to include whatever is not left in a garage sale that she
is holding next Saturday (the 27th or whatever date is a Saturday about
then--no calendar in front of me). If someone can pick up the machines
before then, or have a friend pick them up, they can be had for a VERY
attractive price. In fact, we'll let you name what you think is
reasonable. The more you take, the cheaper the better we'll like it. I
don't want to dumpster these if I can avoid it, and I doubt that the
local thrift store will be interested in them. Among what I have are:
Multiple Osborne I's --at least one I know is working. Some have
developed glitches sitting around for the last few years, and I think
that they could easily be made to work, but no guarantees. I do have at
least boot disks for most, but you might have to sort through some
diskettes to pick them out. Take them all and your job is easier.
Multiple Xerox 820-II's: 1 dual 8-inch floppy, 8-inch hard drive; 1
dual 8-inch floppy. 1 dual 5 1/4 inch floppy; some home made 8-inch
drive cabinets. Have software (much) for these, and even have one
pretty complete set of manuals and original diskettes, including a
technical manual, CPM and operating manuals of various types, and MS-DOS
manual, a CPM-86 manual, a graphics manual, wordstar, and probably some
that I'm not remembering. I'd like to get a few bucks for the manuals
especially.
A Sanyo MBC-1000(?) not sure of the number, but it is a single floppy
drive Z80 machine with boot disks and some software that I've
transferred. Almost new condition.
An Altos 580 and an Altos 8000: The 580 is in fine working condition
with CPM and MPM system disks and some software for CPM that I've
transferred from other formats. The 8000 needs a new power supply.
A Mac LC-II. Machine was working, but keyboard stopped responding
except for click noise. Haven't had time to diagnose it.
A Data General 1 portable MS-DOS machine (8086 or 8088, not sure
which). Works and comes with expansion docking station and external 5
1/4 inch drive. No software for docking station, unfortunately.
A Vic 20 with lots of goodies.
A TI-99. Not sure what;s with it.
A Columbia PC, PC compatible luggable, similar to Compaq original
portables.
A IBM XT with hard drive and CGA monitor.
4 Televideo terminals, 3 925's and a 950. Also one copy each of service
manuals and several operating manuals.
A Sperry terminal.
An Apple IIc with color and monochrome monitors and lots of software.
Wordstar 4 for CPM and for MS-DOS in original boxes.
SuperCalcII for Osborne.
Lots more software, getting too tired to list.
Send me your email address and I'll give you details about where it is
and how to arrange to see it. Please help me to keep from dumpstering
this. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to pack and ship it, so
local pickups only.
Gerald Pine
> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:35:26 -0400
> From: Roger Merchberger <zmerch(a)30below.com>
> :
> [no room on the puny 6G HD for Linux, tho... it's fully Linux certified as
> well...]
LOL, you're kidding, right? :-) If not, contact me off list and I'll be
more than happy to forward instructions for installing a very useful Linux
setup onto an even punier 420Mb hard disk!
Cheers,
Al.
> Thanks a MILLION to all who have donated parts and/or money
> so far to get a separate dedicated classiccmp server.
> ...
> Decisions decisions.... if anyone still wants to donate to
> the cause, my paypal id is jwest(a)classiccmp.org
Ok, I will truncate the last digits in my account for you.
- Henk.
> >Ethan Dicks wrote:
>
> > > By the way, for myself, I would VERY much appreciate
> > > being in touch with all individuals who have a copy of the
> > > RT-11 Freeware CD V2.0 so that we might exchange
> > > information about RT-11. Tim Shoppa felt that he might
> > > be violating privacy concerns if he made the names, of those
> > > who ordered the CD, available.
> > I can appreciate Tim's discretion, but I don't mind it being known
> > that I ordered a copy from him.
>
> Jerome Fine replies:
>
> Is that OK just for myself or among others who are like minded?
> If the latter, then RT-11 announcements will be sent to all 4 or 5
> of you at the same time - makes it easier. I think Tim said he sold
> about 40 of the RT-11 Freeware CD, so many more names to go.
I did also buy a copy of RT-11 (1 CD) and RSX11-M (2 CD's) from Tim.
- Henk.
On April 21, Richard Erlacher wrote:
>BTW, when the NEXT boxes first came out, we had a few of them sitting around
>for people to look at and play with. I personally was not impressed. They
>were EXTREMELY low on gigaflops per picobuck and, aside from the OS, I don't
>remember any applications that didn't have the same look and feel as a small
>mono-MAC costing ~1/10 as much.
Finally gored my ox - but it's on-topic! Yee-hah.
Nice things created on NeXT systems:
* the WWW (or rather the html protocol underlying it) by Tim Berners Lee
(sic?).
* Mathematica - though probably is not useful to the work you do, it's
indispensable to some of mine.
* Zilla, the fore-runner of most of the distributed-computing,
grid-computing, commodity CPU projects buzzwording around today.
Distributed as an example application on NeXT 3.3 and used to crack several
outstanding mathematical compute-intensive problems.
* Attached sound and graphics files in email. Hmm, maybe this is not good.
Basically, a lot of the computing technologies you now rely on first
appeared on NeXT systems. They may not have impressed you then, but they
should now.
You are right about the Flops rating - that was only a bit higher than
Macs/PC's and well behind Sparc's, Alphas, etc. But Flops/dollar is not the
best metric of a general-purpose computer. If you think it is, buy yourself
a used (Sony) PS/2 and we'll all be happier. For many kinds of work,
developer time to a working solution is the dominant metric, and NeXT was
very near the good end of that scale.
>The problem with these machines, as borne out by the market, is that they
>weren't what the home user wanted.
Quite right - the home user wanted applications, rather than the ability to
develop applications, and the corporate user wanted Flops - which meant
Suns and Alphas. There were not enough developers to float the market for
the hardware. But note, the NeXT company did *not* fail - it successfully
moved its software to Sun, PA-Risc, and x86 platforms, where it maintained
a serious business niche until it eventually was bought out by a higher
volume hardware player - Apple. The same software is now the
second-best-selling (? am I right in claiming this?) OS on the planet.
There's a NeXT on my desk at work right now, running Mathematica and perl
tasks, websurfing, backing up my portable .... its utility (to me) exceeds
that of any Windows machine I've seen.
Count me in with James Rice - if you see a working NeXT of any sort under
$20 or so, and *particularly* if you see a cube hooked up to a color
display, I'd take it most kindly if you'd notify me, or at least someone on
the list. It ain't junk to everyone. Best contact for me is at the above
email address.
- Mark
>> > An easy way to spot a product intended for the toy market as opposed to
>> > one intended to be seen as a computer, is that the disk drive interface
>> > is external.
>I would propose that the label "toy" might be suitable for machines that
>have external disk controllers _and_ an external network interface
Woah... my PS/2 is a 'real' computer?
It has internal storage (built in DVD drive, and 2 user upgradable RAM
slots), AND has built in network interfaces (2 USB ports on the front
which can be used for connecting 2 PS/2's together, and a proprietary
expansion slot on the back for the recently released network/modem
connector for connecting your PS/2 to the internet.. which I would
classify as built in, since it connects to the single body unit, and was
intended pretty much for this network box, and really is more of an
optional part).
Glad to know I didn't spend $300 on a toy.
Oh... and the GameBoy is a real computer to. It has built in storage
(game card slot), and built in networking (head to head port).
I could probably go on with more examples... I could even narrow it down
to ones that have built in floppy drives (to fade off the non "disk"
drive concept, although I think claiming to need a floppy drive excludes
an awful lot of other legit storage mediums, like all those systems that
only use tape). There is a V-Tech kids learning "computer" that comes to
mind that used 3.5" floppies (although, it might have lacked the required
network port, but I think it had a serial port, but probably didn't
support a "network" protocol).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
In case anyone is interested, the Apple-1 sold for $14,000, right at the
reserve price.
A low number by my estimation, but respectable considering the overall
circumstances.
:)
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
>The same software is now the
>second-best-selling (? am I right in claiming this?) OS on the planet.
Actually, recent reports say that more copies of OS X are selling off the
retail shelves than Win XP... so looking at best *SELLING* OS, one might
argue it is the #1 best seller. (of course, XP beats it out by a long
shot when looking at most copies moved when included in bundles with the
computer... but again, one could argue it is the computer you are buying
then, and not the OS)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>In the early days, 1980 and earlier, people got their low-end computers, e.g.
>Commodore Pet, TRS-80, minimally equipped APPLE, etc, into the house under
>the
>guise of being able to do useful works with respect to the household ...
>generically referred to as "balancing the checkbook" but not limited to that.
>They were seldom used for that. They were tools for self-amusement/abuse,
>often leading to increased drinking, smoking, cursing, and profuse
>consumption
>of potato chips, coffee, cola, or whatever.
Um... do you per chance believe Apple is a satanic company because of
'Darwin'?
I know I never increased my drinking, smoking, cursing and profuse
consumption of potato chips, coffee, or cola because of playing games on
an Apple II.
I did however increase my use of "Whatever", but I blame that on the 70's.
And I didn't start the self abuse for another few years.... hey, I was
only 7... how young should I have started?!?
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
I am looking for info on a National Semi 4916944-2 memory IC in
a 16-pin 0.3" DIP package. I am assuming that it is some variant
of the 4164, but am not sure.
--tnx
--tom
> I'm seeking a source for the specifications for 7-track tape
> heads. I'm thinking what I really need is just the mechanical/
> physical specifications... that leads me to the second part..
OK, a quick session with my calipers confirmed the spacing is the
same as 7 track instrumentation recorder heads (which are weird
two stack things with every other track on a separate head)
http://jcs.mil/RCC/files/xappxd.pdf for details.
>from that spec:
track width .050" +/- .005
track spacing .070"
track tolerance +/- .002
track number
1 (reference) .000
2 .070
3 .140
4 .210
5 .280
6 .350
7 .420
EXCELLENT IDEA!!!!
Maybe with time there could be systems for classic hardware, languages
& applications as well.
I've just about had it with the increasingly inane signal/noise ratio here and
would very much welcome a place to just find or be a resource when I don't
have the time or inclination to be amused or irritated.
My C$0.02 worth.
mike
---------------Original Message------------
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:53:13 -0500
From: "Jay West" <jwest(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: new server status and RFC on problem tracking database for all classic OS's
I would like to put up a problem tracking system
for all classic OS's. This would be off the classiccmp.org website, where
anyone could put in a problem they have run into
I'm working on restoring an old 64k IBM PC and I'm putting a Quadram card in it but my driver files are corrupted. Can someone send me a copy of the files?
Thanks,
Joe
On Apr 24, 13:13, Bill Pechter wrote:
> A yes... That explains my current state of mental health:
>
> Alliant Concentrix (4.2 BSD)
> Coherent (v3, v4)
> Concurrent/Perkin-Elmer OS/32
> Concurrent Xelos
> Concurrent RTU
> DEC RT11
> DEC Vax/VMS (v2.x, 3.x, 4.x) OpenVMS 7.1
> FreeBSD (v1.x, 2.x, 3,x, 4.x)
> HP-UX (v9.x)
> IBM AIX RS6000 (v3.2,4.1.x)
> Linux (Red Hat, Mandrake, Caldera, Slackware, SLS, Suse)
> SCO/Caldera Open Desktop/Server, SCO/Caldera Unixware 2.x, Xenix86)
> SunOS4.x
> Solaris2.x,7,8
> Pyramid OS/X
> Pyramid DC/OSx
> Unix System III (UnipLUS
> Unix System V (Release 0,2,3,4)
Mine is approximately
BSD 2.11
BSD 4.3
Vax/VMS 5.something
RT-11
RSX-11M
RISC OS (Acorn, not MIPS RISCOS)
Acorn MOS
CP/M 2.2
NeXTStep 3.3, OpenStep 4.2(?)
Solaris 2.3, Solaris 7
Linux (Slackware, RedHat)
IRIX (5.3, 6.5)
Windows NT (OK, I know, but it's only used to decode or print Word docs)
Those are the ones I've used recently. If you want to count the others
here, there's AIX, other Windows, OS/8, 7th Edition Unix, XXDP, and too
many more to remember.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Thanks to a pointer from Doug Q. I now have a brand new
Cipher 7 track head assembly. I had thought this was
just going to be the head, but it is the whole tape
path, with a date code of Jan, 1976.
Does anyone have a mid-70's Cipher 9 track that I could
get to attach this to?
My original thought was to put what I thought was just
the head onto a 9 track transport, but since this is
already aligned, it would be MUCH better to put it
onto the drive it was designed for.
I will be on the road for the next few weeks, so if
you have one and are near SLC, Denver, St Louis, Dayton,
Chicago, or Buffalo, I could pick it up.
I got this URL for an article in Scientific American that seems
appropriate for this group :). The last paragraph reads:
"Evidently, the something-for-everyone model epitomized by Heathkit and
the Amateur Scientist column can't compete anymore. Specialized sources
and Internet newsgroups cater to each skill level. But much of the
mentoring and serendipity that the diverse community of amateurs offered
has been lost. It is hard not to regret its passing."
http://www.sciam.com/2002/0502issue/0502scicit4.html
> From: Derek Peschel <dpeschel(a)eskimo.com>
> It has been my mission for some time to bring a BBC Micro back from
> England. I would need some way to adapt British plugs to US sockets
> and convert the voltage
Why not just make a PS to fit?
> and I would also need a PAL monitor.
PAL to NTSC converters are available for < US$100. Please reply off-list
if you need pointers. I fixed a friend up with one and the results were
excellent.
> Yes, I could bring a montior back from
> England along with the computer. I'm not sure if I want to do that.
Absolutely not recommended due to the chance of damage en route.
Glen
0/0
What is a Dec 3000 model 500? Has a cd rom. and a SCSI port out the back.
Looks Like an Alpha Processor system. What OS? Peanut 2.2? on
handwritten CD.
I am a digest subscriber.
Sincerely Larry Truthan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Wright [mailto:dtwright@uiuc.edu]
> Heheh. I run a bunch of IRIX machines used for scientific
> computing :) It's
> really not so bad, if you ignore the more horrifying examples of
> brain-deadness (what? 16 CDs for an OS install?!...)
One of the great mysteries of the universe is the ability of
windows <insert some version number here> to take up more
space than IRIX once installed, but only fit on one disk. ;)
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
>From: "Hans Franke" <Hans.Franke(a)mch20.sbs.de>
>
>
>Now, a real neat example did come to my mind: Isn't MS like
>one of these 500 parts for 49.95 tool boxes at K/Wall-Mart ?
>You realy get the oddest bits you ever seen and a good selection
>of tools - tools where each single one costs you 20 bucks if
>you buy them at a tool store. Now, would a serious craftsman
>ever buy and use this 49.95 tool box ? No. He'll rather spend
>ten times the money on a tenth of the tools to buy exactly the
>quality he needs for his job.
>
Hi
Having made the mistake of buying the $49.99 tools
in the past, I can tell you that you should have bought the
$250.00 set from a good source. The sockets split open,
the Philips screwdriver points rounded and damaged the screws
and the ratchet busted without even using a cheater.
It had a life time guarantee. I found the replacements just
as useless. Worse still, the plating from one of the replacement
sockets peeled up and slashed my hand.
It is better to have tools that don't break or damage
your hardware than to have guaranteed junk.
Dwight
Hello all:
I've got a problem finding some parts and I'm hoping
someone on this list can help me out.
I'm looking for a DSH32-YA second synchronous serial
card option P/N 54-17230-01, and especially it's cable
P/N 17-02298-01.
These go with a DSH32-BA combo controller module for
the MicroVAX 3100 Model 20E systems from DEC.
Please email or call me at the number below if you've
got the -YA module and the cable, or just the cable.
Thanks,
Frank Helvey
=====
= M O N T V A L E S O F T W A R E S E R V I C E S P. C.=
Clayton Frank Helvey, President
Montvale Software Services, P. C.
P.O. Box 840
Blue Ridge, VA 24064-0840
Phone: 540.947.5364 Email: msspcva(a)yahoo.com
============================================================
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
http://games.yahoo.com/
> It was thus said that the Great Douglas H. Quebbeman once stated:
> >
> > The interesting thing is that so much of Letwin's book contradicts
> > a magazine article by IBM's Ed Iaccabucci, where Ed described
> > a dynamic linking mechanism that worked exactly like the one in
> > Multics. So at one point, *early* on, there were divergent path
> > of development for OS/2, that ended up coalescing into one, the
> > wrong one...
>
> Would you happen to remember the magazine and when?
It was around 1987, and it was one of those controlled-
circulation magazines, many of which are excellent and
not mere advertising rags...
"Mini-Micro Systems" may have been it... whatever it was,
it underwent a name change while I was subscribed, and I
have been searching for the article since about 1990.
I've thought about asking Ed personally, but he's a
corporate big-wig now, possibly succumbed to PHB disease,
and so on...
The article galvanized me into buying OS/2 1.0 (Zenith
version). I was *very* disappointed when I got the docs
on programming the system, and discovered I'd once again
suffered from bait-and-switch...
-dq
In a message dated 4/24/2002 2:52:50 PM Central Daylight Time,
erd_6502(a)yahoo.com writes:
> Right... remember "OS/2 for the PS/2 - half an OS for half a computer"?
>
> -ethan
>
>
>
ah, but those of us who use both know that that couldnt be further from the
truth.
From: Christopher Smith <csmith(a)amdocs.com>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Douglas H. Quebbeman [mailto:dquebbeman@acm.org]
>
>
>"Enhanced" MINIX FS -- I actually got a copy of FIPS, and broke the
>disk into two partitions. The linux part was slightly larger than
>10M, with five for swap.
My first pass was Minix2.0 {very fast on a 386/16 with 5mb) and
used that to download Linux. The first linix install frm CD was on
a 8mb 486slc/25 with an 80mb IDE disk. The current Linux toy is
486/133 with 16mb and a 2.1mb disk from the Caldara Openlinux
2.3 CD. Most of the bells and toys are installed and it's big but
useful. A bare bones install still fits on a small disk with useful
room if you forget all the packages and Xserver.
Allison
>From: "Tom Uban" <uban(a)ubanproductions.com>
>
>I am looking for info on a National Semi 4916944-2 memory IC in
>a 16-pin 0.3" DIP package. I am assuming that it is some variant
>of the 4164, but am not sure.
>
>--tnx
>--tom
>
>
Hi Tom
This is most likely a OEM number. What machine did
it come out of? It looks like it might be a HP number
or something. A lot of places have their own part numbering
system that several manufactures will make labled parts
for them. You may need to check what parts were listed
for that application.
Of course, if the power lines are correct, you can always
try the part you think it is.
Dwight
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> > >
> > > > such as when Bill Gates said, "The 80286 is brain-dead." ?
> > >
> > > Did he really say that? I can't imagine what he'd have meant. Perhaps he was
> > > mad at the Intel folks.
> >
> > Yes, he did.
> > Also, Gordon Letwin (author of OS/2 at Microsoft) compared mode
> > switching of the 286 to having to shut off your engine to change gears
> > on the freeway.
>
> Interesting you bring up Gordon Letwin...I picked up a copy of his book
> _Inside OS/2_ last Friday at the annual library book sale. I haven't
> started to read it yet, so I hope it was worth the $1 it cost me.
OS/2 is/was a nice OS, but it embraced some architectural flaws
that persist in Windows and are part of of makes Windows a sucky
operating system. Gordon is obviously very proud of his many
pronoucements in the book, such as his belief that GPF indicates
a program bug and your program must therefore be terminated.
GPF is just a fault condition, and can be programmically used
to implement OS features. What OS/2 and Windows call dynamic
linking isn't dynamic linking at all, for example.
The interesting thing is that so much of Letwin's book contradicts
a magazine article by IBM's Ed Iaccabucci, where Ed described
a dynamic linking mechanism that worked exactly like the one in
Multics. So at one point, *early* on, there were divergent path
of development for OS/2, that ended up coalescing into one, the
wrong one...
-Douglas Hurst Quebbeman (DougQ at ixnayamspayIgLou.com) [Call me "Doug"]
Surgically excise the pig-latin from my e-mail address in order to reply
"The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away." -Tom Waits
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Douglas H. Quebbeman [mailto:dquebbeman@acm.org]
> My first Linux box was a 40MHz 386-DX (AMD) with 4MB of RAM and a
Mine was a 16Mhz 386SX, with 3MB of RAM. (One SIMM, and a strange
XMS ISA card from a slightly older system. :)
> pair of 40MB Seagate ST-251s... downloaded a piece at a time from
Single 40MB IDE disk.
> the UNC sunsite onto floppies and installed from them I used the
Softlanding from a local BBS... ;)
> UMDOS filesystem, since the machine normally booted into DOS 5;
"Enhanced" MINIX FS -- I actually got a copy of FIPS, and broke the
disk into two partitions. The linux part was slightly larger than
10M, with five for swap.
> I used LOADLIN to load Linux (still do on my workstation at home).
Used LILO.
> My first kernel build took 27 hours. After a series of builds,
> I think I got the total build time down to about 16 hours.
I don't remember, actually, I used to start them running, and just
leave them. Never build a kernel on that machine, though.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> > From: Pat Finnegan [mailto:pat@purdueriots.com]
>
> > For a more suitable install, I can easily install everything I really use
> > (between X windows and a few apps, gaim for IM, kernel source so I can
> > recompile my kernel, gcc and related stuff) in 1G or less of space.
>
> I'll go with the "or less." I have personally put Linux, X11, GCC, a few
> apps, etc, along with a swap file (that worked very slowly) on 60MB of a
> 95MB zip disk.
My first Linux box was a 40MHz 386-DX (AMD) with 4MB of RAM and a
pair of 40MB Seagate ST-251s... downloaded a piece at a time from
the UNC sunsite onto floppies and installed from them I used the
UMDOS filesystem, since the machine normally booted into DOS 5;
I used LOADLIN to load Linux (still do on my workstation at home).
My first kernel build took 27 hours. After a series of builds,
I think I got the total build time down to about 16 hours.
Eventually, I copied that system to a single 120MB Seagate IDE
drive and ran that on a 486 for a while. One day, on a whim,
I brought that drive into work and installed it in a 233MHz
Pentium (one).
Kernel build time: 15 minutes.
;)
-Douglas Hurst Quebbeman (DougQ at ixnayamspayIgLou.com) [Call me "Doug"]
Surgically excise the pig-latin from my e-mail address in order to reply
"The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away." -Tom Waits
> For some time now, the gaming console market has been where the real
> technological advances in consumer/PC computers have been made. Most PC
> users in the business world could get along just fine with a '386 if the OS
> and software weren't so bloated now.
>
> Bob (who is still trying in vain to get MS WinWord to behave and who uses a
> WordStar clone on the HP palmtop he carries)
The secret to making this work is pretty simple... you just need to
drop back to Word for Windows 2.0... it's fast, stable, and even has
VBA (albeit they called it WordBASIC back then).
-dq
This has been taken...
--
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
> ----------
> From: David Woyciesjes
> >
> >
> Which reminds me. I have an Emulex "UC07/08 distribution panel" sitting on
> my shelf here. Anybody want it?
>
> --
> --- David A Woyciesjes
>
Hi All,
Eric is plannng on arriving here at about 5 PM on Thursday the 16th and leaving the next day to go to Jacksonville (he has a dinner date there that night). Therefore I'm planning on having the JunkFest on Friday morning. Glen has already aggreed that we can hold it at his store in west Orlando. I know it would be better if we could hold it on a weekend but it didn't work out.
I was also thinking of trying to get everyone together and going out to dinner on Thursday evening. That would give us some time to chew the fat before the junkfest. I'm not planning on anything fancy, just someplace where we can all pile in and sit around and talk.
Let me know what you think.
Joe
>Date: 20 Apr 2002 08:43:56 -0000
>From: Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com>
>To: Joe Rigdon <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
>Subject: travel plans
>
>The plan has firmed up a bit. I expect to arrive in Orlando on Thursday
>May 16 at 4:51 PM, on American Airlines flight 244 from Los Angeles.
>
>I'll depart for Jacksonville on Friday the 17th. It looks like I'll
>either take a bus which departs Orlando at 3:30 PM, or a train that
>departs Orlando at 3:53 PM.
>
>I'd like to figure out the travel and accomodation details. I hope you
>won't think me too rude if I ask whether I might be able to sleep on the
>floor at your place. I'll have an Aerobed with me. However, if that's
>not convenient for you, don't feel pressured; just let me know of an
>inexpensive motel nearby.
>
>Mapquest says that you're about 22 miles from the airport. Do you know
>if there is any shuttle service that will get me to your place (or to the
>motel)?
>
>If it's not too much trouble, could you please measure the outside
>dimensions of the IBM 5100? I may be able to borrow a suitable transit
>case, but I need to make sure it will fit.
>
>Best regards,
>Eric
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Finnegan [mailto:pat@purdueriots.com]
> For a more suitable install, I can easily install everything
> I really use
> (between X windows and a few apps, gaim for IM, kernel source so I can
> recompile my kernel, gcc and related stuff) in 1G or less of space.
I'll go with the "or less." I have personally put Linux, X11, GCC, a few
apps, etc, along with a swap file (that worked very slowly) on 60MB of a
95MB zip disk.
I'm sure I can do better, too...
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> Windows 2 was what they shipped so you could run Excel, which had grown
> popular on the MacIntosh, on the PC/AT. That's where much of the prejudice
> against "smartdrv" came from, since that first release didn't work very well.
> I don't think there were many other app's for it.
Windows 2.0 came to me bundled with my Microsoft Mouse
(the Dove Bar version with the steel rollers).
As far as apps, Micrografix Draw was somewhat popular;
but you're right, there weren't many...
-Douglas Hurst Quebbeman (DougQ at ixnayamspayIgLou.com) [Call me "Doug"]
Surgically excise the pig-latin from my e-mail address in order to reply
"The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away." -Tom Waits
I got an help for some IMS board , hope that someone here have an
answer
>Subject: Thanks for files
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
Just want to thank you for making the old manuals and image files
available on http://oldcomputers.dyndns.org/public/
I found things here (like the IMS information) I have been hunting for
years. I am still looking for documents etc for some other IMS S-100
boards dating from around 1980-84:
- A862 Z80 CPU
- A930 Floppy Controller
- A821 Winchester Controller
- A1100 Winchester Controller
- A1021 64K RAM
You don't by any chance have files for these, do you? :)
Best wishes,
Arlen Michaels
arlen.michaels(a)sympatico.ca
===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE===================
Thank you @ classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org . I like this group.
PLease answer only to
arlen.michaels(a)sympatico.ca
Thanks
Greetings from
Fritz Chwolka - Duisburg
/ collecting old computers just for fun at www.alterechner.de \