Hi, Ade.
On Jan 18, 12:55, Adrian Vickers wrote:
> It's not *quite* as bad as all that, it uses 2114's. Although they're not
> made of unobtainum, they ARE made of "rareium" (or R@RE!ium on eBay -
> probably the *WOW* *L@@K* isotope, knowing my luck :).
Good! If it *is* a RAM fault, and you can't find one at a reasonable
price, let me know. I think I still have a small number spare.
> AFAICT, these are version 1 ROMs. Every socket is filled, and they're all
> MOS6540s.
Drat. Let's hope it's not a ROM fault. Sadly, my copy of "The PET
Revealed" with its mostly-legible (!) circuit diagrams, shows the later
board with 2332s. But I do have a copy of the MPS6540 pinout somewhere.
> Harrumph. Guess which one it has...
>
> Still, I've no fear of making carriers, etc. - albeit time constraints &
> lack of equipment will make it tough right now - at least until I can get
> my MicroMAT going.
>
> >The good news, though, is that I have a
> >chicklet-keyboard 2001-N as well, and if necessary, I could probably do
a
> >ROM dump for you (though IIRC it used to be on the 'net somewhere). I
> >wouldn't need to move more than a few hundreweight of stuff to get at it
> >;-)
>
> That might be cool (and *snap* about the tons of stuff, although having
> seen your little collection I think you do have rather more to shift
about
> than me!). However, let me try out the RAM swapping & chip re-seating
> first, and if that doesn't fix it, then we'll look into EPROMs &
suchlike.
OK. Give me shout if you want me to start burrowing. Or come and pay a
visit...
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Jan 18, 13:28, Adrian Vickers wrote:
> Turned out to be dead simple; yet another blown 2114.
>
> I figured the chip @ $0400 (i.e. the start of BASIC) was faulty, seeing
as
> how the machine wouldn't take a single line of BASIC. So, I swapped the
> appropriate bank out to another bank - and presto! BASIC worked again.
Good!
> Having done this, I then swapped *one* of the two chips (according to the
> schematic, there are two chips for each $0400 block of memory - why is
> this?)
A 2114 is 1K x 4 bits wide, so they're used in pairs to make bytes.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>From: "Dennis Eldridge" <bones(a)northrock.bm>
>
>It's always fascinated me how people have such strong opinions of one
particular drive manufacturer over another. Commonly one will say that they
have a certain make of drive and it's never failed them and they've tried this
other one and they're dying left and right, etc. ad nauseum.
>
>I come at this issue from the perspective of a field service engineer and
subsequently independant consultant. The fact is that, particularly with IDE
drives, no matter the manufacturer, it's purely the luck of the draw whether one
is blessed with a good production run. I get the feeling that, to cut costs,
Hi
I would say it is true in general that the luck of the draw is
the case but having worked for a computer manufacture, I can
tell you that at least one manufacture produced a line of drives
that were pure junk. Most of the drives would not last a 36 hour
running period ( well, not most but about 30% ). This is way
beyond luck of the draw.
Being a system manufacture, we worked with the drive manufacture
on resolving the problem. It was never resolved to any useful
level. We finally switched manufactures but it cost us a lot.
The fact is that there are lemons out there, by design. The
Segate 225's had a stiction problem that wasn't solved until
the end of that products line. The drive we were having problems
with were 2 and 4 gig drives. These had a servo information
corruption problem ( that by design would always fail over time ).
Dwight
most manufacturers have the QC people working a couple of days a week, and even
then they're not exactly the best paid position in the sweatshop. The same goes
for cars - you just find the one you're psychologically comfortable with. No
bearing on statistical reality, but to the buyer that manufacturer's product
will always be superior, and faults will be more tolerable than those of the
manufacturer who's product is "in the doghouse" for whatever reason.
>
>As for Dell going the way of PacBell, etc., well I can only say we've got what
we asked for. We wanted cheap computing, we got cheap computing. If they
raised their standards and correspondingly their prices, we'd run like heck to
the next guy who offered their system for a couple of quid less. If you want a
rock-solid system with total manufacturer's support and guaranteed uptime and
all that jazz, you'd have to shell out over $50,000 plus support contracts, etc.
Just like in the old days of some of the larger systems we discuss on this
forum. Just my $12.34 (Like everything else here in Bermuda, my opinion has to
be shipped here and customs duty paid <grin>).
>
>With apologies for the rant,
>
>Dennis (not Miller :-)
Antonio Carlini <arcarlini(a)iee.org> wrote:
> The VIC can
> be disabled by "patching" the NVAX in some dynamic way (presumably
> non-reversibly or at least only reversible in an obscure way).
I assume the NVAX microcode was patched via its PCS facility by the boot
firmware, not by making a different NVAX die with different microcode I hope,
right? If so the abomination is to be reversed by reflashing the boot ROM with
non-hobbled firmware (stolen from a friend with a non-hobbled machine). They
had flash ROMs like all other NVAXen, right?
MS
Antonio Carlini <arcarlini(a)iee.org> wrote:
> The mainboards are the same (i.e. a KA50 *is* a KA52 etc.)
Wow! I thought the CQBIC was not populated on the KA50.
> and there is a console test that switches the identity
> back and forth.
Hmm. I do not suppose that this identity flag can be permanently stored
anywhere other than in the firmware flash ROM. I'm sure DEC wouldn't want
people to suddenly discover that their machine shape-shifts when the NVRAM
battery is disconnected. So does this console test actually erase and reprogram
a sector in the firmware flash ROM, or is the change only in effect until the
next power cycle?
MS
On Jan 17, 20:19, Brian Chase wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Zane H. Healy wrote:
>
> > It's not just on a system like that. Earlier this week I got my first
SGI
> > system, a nice little O2. It's about the crappiest of the O2's, but
it's
> > still a *very* nice UNIX workstation. I thought that it was doing OK
at
> > surfing until yesterday when I wanted to check something on gamespot,
it
> > absolutly crawled to a halt trying to render the pages (well the
browser
> > did, the rest of the system was nice and responsive). I swear it took
close
> > to 10 minutes to get to the third page (the one that had the data I was
> > curious about).
Wow, that must have been some page! I use an O2 at work, and it's
generally pretty good -- but some versions of Netscape are definitely "less
good" than others. It's worth trying to get a recent version, or as an
alternative, I think some versions of Mozila do pretty well.
Make sure the O2 has plenty of memory. Adding 128MB made a huge difference
to mine.
> > I think I'll now run the browser on my Linux box and retarget it to the
> > SGI's desktop (at least until I get an Octane).
>
> I'll wait to get an Onyx. Actually, the Origin 2000s are quite lovely,
> too. They're still really off topic for this list.
Yes, though so is an O2, really. Actually, an Origin2000 won't run
Netscape much better than an O2 unless there's quite a discrepancy in the
processors. My Origin2000 (8 x R10K @ 180MHz) can be outdone (for
Netscape) by a fast R10K O2. And of course most O2000s have no display.
But if I use an old Indigo Elan for the display, it speeds up
dramatically, compared to using other displays.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>> just checked mine again and it's 25-ANC13-1000049
>>
>Mine is 25-ANC13-1000034, and Rob O'Donnell said his is 25-ANC13-1000038.
well if Rob's was the last then they obviously didn't do a very good job of
numbering things :-) Unless Rob's was the last one released by Acorn, but they
all sat in storage for a while...
> Do either of you think you have a Disc 1 for it?
no discs at all I'm afraid :-( hence why I was asking about whther there's a
sensible ftp site to put them on so if a working set can be collected at least
they can be archived somewhere (the same goes for manuals really, but scanning
those would be a major pain I expect!)
that used to be the problem - the hardware used to get thrown out but discs
would lie around on shelves until someone did a bit of spring cleaning now and
then; they would have been trashed seperately and maybe straight into a bin in
the office :-(
cheers
Jules
(who has too many systems that don't work for lack of necessary discs :-)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
>from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> > (Jumping on my horse again, making Ultrix run on VS3100 M76
> would take a
> > screenful of code. I have the source if anyone wants to
> take a stab.)
> I have the Ultrix V4.50 source tree [no comment] and will be
> porting it to
Ugh. Make that V4.20, obviously. Development is done on my V4.5 box..
Shitty thing is, that I probably will also have to run a 4.2 system as
a second-step system for bootstrapping, and I dont have a 4.2/vax tk50
or cd set.
--f
With Tony et al as my inspiration, I have recently started to learn
electronics. I've been at it a couple of days, and tonight I just had the
"aha!" for how high-pass and low-pass filters work. I haven't come across
anything yet that has me completely stumped, but if I do, is it appropriate
to ask newbie questions about electronics here?
I'm supposed to *answer* questions like that, but I just don't know.
Typically, I call electronics conversations as on-topic because they are
directly relevant to operating classic computers. Newbie questions, however,
are more indirect. For another example, we'll help someone with a Windows
program that somehow makes his/her classiccmp go, but I doubt we'll bother
to teach a person in-list how to double-click. Is electronics any different?
--
Jeffrey Sharp
To be honest, if I found a Lisa 1 for 10 bucks I wouldn't accept $1,000 for
it.. I'd sell if for maybe a couple hundred, or preferably trade it for car
parts/minicomputers/etc. I really wouldn't feel right about getting $1,000
>from another collector for something I got for so little... Now a reseller
on the other hand...
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Unless you can find some new old stock you may be
out of luck.
CW Industries makes the IDCs in the same
style but are darker blue than T&B Ansley.
See: http://www.cwind.com/
DigiKey lists them in catalog B022 on page 18.
I have one, unused 25-pin D female connector with
strain relief that you are welcome to.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey H. Ingber [mailto:jingber@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 4:17 PM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: T&B Ansley IDC connectors
Does anyone know where I can aquire the T&B ansley "light blue" IDC
ribbon cable connectors that were used by MITS?
Googling reveals that Tyco purchased this line of connectors in 2001,
but I can't find any mention of T&B Ansley on their web site.
Thanks,
Jeff
Interesting problem. I remember when I was fixing IBM PC's back in the mists of time we opened up an old 5MB Seagate drive and managed to get it spinning - with our fingers! It continued working quite reliably thereafter for quite some time, IIRC.
However, there was another drive we tried that one, but it turned out it had suffered the worst drive crash in history - the RW head was literally *buried* in the disk, as if someone had taken a hammer to it. But it was a completely sealed unit beforehand.
If you're desperate, you may try prying it open and twigging the platters. But it may well be more than just the stickies - my experience of late has been that drives are much better protected from that occurrance.
Best of luck with that!
Dennis
>To be honest, if I found a Lisa 1 for 10 bucks I wouldn't accept $1,000 for
>it.. I'd sell if for maybe a couple hundred, or preferably trade it for car
>parts/minicomputers/etc. I really wouldn't feel right about getting $1,000
>from another collector for something I got for so little... Now a reseller
>on the other hand...
On the Lisa 1 topic... I just found out tonight that I in fact DID used
to own a Lisa 1... I had always thought my only Lisa's were 2's and
MacXL's (of which I have none any more).
I was showing my brother my copy of Collectible Microcomputers, and he
looked at the Lisa pictures. He said he always thought the double
openings on the Twiggy disks were cool. I asked when he had seen one, and
he said that the first Lisa we bought had those drives.
I just about started crying. I could stomach the fact that all my Lisa
2's and MacXL's were either traded in or thrown out... but to now know
that a Lisa 1 was also scrapped... it just kills me.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
-----------Original message---------------
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:06:29 -0800 (PDT)
From: Brian Chase <vaxzilla(a)jarai.org>
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Maxtor drive goes under
Reply-To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Philip Pemberton wrote:
> Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
> > The drive we were having problems
> > with were 2 and 4 gig drives. These had a servo information
> > corruption problem ( that by design would always fail over time ).
>
> Guess that rules out Kalok then. They bit the big one in 1994, way before
> 2GB and 4GB drives started appearing...
I'm going to guess Micropolis. Those drives were absolutely crap.
-brian.
---------------------------------------------
And then there was JTS...
Other than Kalok and JTS, the only drives I consistently had problems
with were the old ST-200 series Seagates. Mind you, they ran 24/7 for several
years, but ultimately all (4 or 5) developed the stickies. Always embarrassing,
because the systems were only shut down by me doing some kind of
maintenance or mods, the old "but it worked fine until you touched it"
syndrome. Fortunately, all they needed was a little prying & twisting with a
small screwdriver on the spindle to free them up, and remarkably, they
worked fine again with no problems or errors (to my great relief, and until
the next time I shut them down). No problems with the old miniscribes
though, still have a box full, all working, and no unusual failure rates with
Micropolis either; it really is a matter of personal experience, not very
meaningful statistically.
And Philip, I'm going to write you directly about that paper tape stuff as
soon as I sort it out; promise!
mike
My bad, forgot to say that you should choose the "inactive hardware product
descriptions" box and then type 5322 in the "product number" box... The
general search works too, for example type in System/3.. I was amused by the
"System/3 Law Enforcement System".. must have been for a pretty small cop
shop!
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
I recently picked up two Ampro computer cards. I think they're PC/104 cards but I'm not positive. Your A60707 is the CoreModule XT Plus (CPU card). The other board is the MiniModule FSS, which is Floppy/SCSI/Serial controller. Does anyone have manuals for them? Ampro has a website but there's nothing on there about these cards and Ampro tech support hasn't been any help beyond id'ing the cards.
Joe
Does anyone know where I can aquire the T&B ansley "light blue" IDC
ribbon cable connectors that were used by MITS?
Googling reveals that Tyco purchased this line of connectors in 2001,
but I can't find any mention of T&B Ansley on their web site.
Thanks,
Jeff
Jim Strickland <jim(a)calico.litterbox.com> wrote:
> Which one was the M76?
Umm, the one that says "VAXstation 3100 M76" on the front. I'm not sure how
else to specify it. It scribbles KA43-A on the console on power-up.
MS
> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:48:13 +0100
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Mac SE/30 accessories availability?
> From: Adrien Farkas <freddy(a)kotelna.sk>
> Reply-To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm owner of Mac SE/30 (asked regarding broken CRT tube a while ago).
> Can aynone supply me with a list of accessories that can be inserted
> into the slot? www.apple.com didn't help me very much, and the only card
> I saw is 10base2/10baseT ethernet. are there any videocards for se/30?
> or some other equip?
>
There definitely are video cards of several sorts that will work in that
slot - some dedicated to use with specific monitors (ie: Radius); there's
one which provides gray-scale functionality on the SE30's internal monitor.
Check out <<lowendmac.com>> for info on all old Macs - in detail. I don't
recall anything other than accelerators, Enet cards and video cards that
were made for that slot but I could well be wrong.
Seth Lewin
Thanks for sending 'em Bob, but I already have the Tech Manual here.
Also, my home-brew email client throws out attachments (and html code ;>)
Glen
0/0
From: Feldman, Robert <Robert_Feldman(a)jdedwards.com>
To: Glen Goodwin <acme(a)ao.net>
Subject: RE: Re: Osborne OCC1
Date: 01/13/2003 2:09 PM
> Attached is a ZIP file with two JPEG images that are scans of pages from the
> Osborne 1 Technical Manual that relate to the PS and wiring. They might be
> useful to you.
>
> Bob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: acme(a)ao.net [mailto:acme@ao.net]
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:03 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Re: Osborne OCC1
>
>
> From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
> To: Glen Goodwin <acme(a)ao.net>
> Subject: Re: Osborne OCC1
> Date: 01/08/2003 7:55 AM
>
> > I recently had an OCC-1 that blew something in the PSU. That odd thing
> was
> > at it kept working! I wasn't really intersted in it so I gave it to Glen
> Good
> > . I expect that he'll troubleshoot/repai
> > r it soon.
>
> Okay, Joe, I get the hint ;>) I'll take a look at it this weekend -- should
> be
> a quick and easy fix.
>
> Later --
>
> Glen
> 0/0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------_=_NextPart_000_01C2BB23.FD2CA5E6
Antonio Carlini <arcarlini(a)iee.org> wrote:
> Just to nitpick but although the UV3100-80 is indeed
> based on the Mariah chipset, the UV3100-85 and
> UV3100-88 are both NVAX-based IIRC. The -85 has the
> NVAX VIC disabled by the console during initialisation.
> I forget whether the -88 was slugged in the same way or not.
Thanks for filling us in on the dirty secret. I thought DEC learned their
lesson with VS II/RC. (Suddenly everyone needed a replacement BA23
backplane...)
DEC is still my favourite hardware vendor of all time, but this artificial
hobbling of hardware is a real black eye for them. Think about hobbling the
(perfectly standard and generic) KA410 SCSI port to only one TK50Z drive, or
the "strategic decision" to make VS3100 M76 run only VMS and not Ultrix.
(Jumping on my horse again, making Ultrix run on VS3100 M76 would take a
screenful of code. I have the source if anyone wants to take a stab.)
MS
Or equiv (Tandy had them as PC-2 or something, iirc).
The goal of my classic collection is to get one of every computer I've
programmed over the years. One of the first computers I programmed was a
PC-1405 (actually, I can't remember the exact model).
I found one of these in a pawn shop. By brother "stole" it. I found
another. This was my one classic computer that was helluva useful. So
useful I took it with my places. And, well, I've just lost it. I've
checked eBay and there are a few Sharp Pocket Computers, but W@W L@@K @
T3H PR1C3Z! Buy it now for "only" 300 USD!
http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3000156764&category=15030
So, does anyone here have one they don't need and/or would be willing to
let go for a reasonable price?
-Philip
On Jan 17, 20:02, Jules Richardson wrote:
> just checked mine again and it's 25-ANC13-1000049
>
> have lost the original post from the person who had the last unit to see
where
> that fits into the scheme of things. :-(
Mine is 25-ANC13-1000034, and Rob O'Donnell said his is 25-ANC13-1000038.
Do either of you think you have a Disc 1 for it?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Came across this on eBay. No bids yet:
PLANAR ELT320 FLAT PANEL TERMINAL w/ EXTRA'S
THE ELT320 IS AN ALPHANUMERIC VIDEO TERMINAL WHICH IS FUNCTIONAL COMPATIBLE
WITH THE DEC VT320 TERMINAL AND ALSO INCLUDES NUMEROUS ADDITIONAL ADVANCED
FEATURES. THIS TERMINAL CAN OPERATE ON-LINE TO A HOST SYSTEM OR THE HOST
CAN BE PUT ON HOLD SENDING YOUR INPUT INTO PAGE MEMORY OF THE TERMINAL. THE
TERMINAL STORES DATA RECEIVED FROM THE HOST, UNTIL YOU PUT IT BACK ON-LINE.
AS IS THE CASE WITH ANY OTHER EMULATOR, THE ELT320 HAS SOME MINOR VARIANCES.
THIS PACKAGE INCLUDES:
PLANAR ELT320 FLAT PANEL TERMINAL MODEL # ELT320-P1
PLANAR SERIAL CABLE
INSTALLATION AND USER'S GUIDE
$19.99 opening bid, $14.00 S/H
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=11218&item=2301790285
Bill
> Zane H. Healy wrote:
>
> > There was at least one video card made for the SE/30, I've got one in mine,
> > and I've got a SCSI-to-Ethernet adapter for network access.
>
> I remember the first Mac I used back in '89 was an SE/30 with a
> grey-scale (8 bit) card made by RasterOps. It had a grey-scale monitor
> to go with it too. That was when the Apple LaserWriter had more RAM than
> the machine that was printing! Aaah, the smell of ozone.
>
> Simon
I'm pretty sure the video card I have is colour, however, I've only actually
hooked it up once, and that was years ago. What can I say, I got the SE/30
for it's small footprint and fast[1] processor, I didn't care that it had a
video card in it, I needed the ethernet more.
Zane
[1] Of course fast being relative to the app, and at the time my primary
system was a PowerMac 8500/180. Still the SE/30 with MS Word 5.1 makes a
great word processor!
Hello,
I'm owner of Mac SE/30 (asked regarding broken CRT tube a while ago).
Can aynone supply me with a list of accessories that can be inserted
into the slot? www.apple.com didn't help me very much, and the only card
I saw is 10base2/10baseT ethernet. are there any videocards for se/30?
or some other equip?
Cheers,
--
freddy
...for more info 'finger freddy(a)kotol.kotelna.sk'
On Jan 17, 17:26, Philip Pemberton wrote:
> pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com wrote:
> > I finally remembered to check mine. It's 23-ANC13-1000034. All Acorn
> > retail product serial numbers of the era are of that form. The 25
> > tells where it was made, ANC13 is the product code, the rest is a
> > serial number, which always starts at 1000000 for production systems
> > or factory prototypes. So my Archimedes 310 is 27-AKB10-1000002, my
> > 440 is 27-AKB20-1000614, and my A3000 is 27-AKB01-1000028.
> Now that's interesting. My Master 128 carries the serial number
> 01-AMB15-0053025. Which means I've either got the -946975th machine to be
> made by Acorn, their labelling kit malfunctioned, or my M128 is the
53025th
> Master 128 to leave Acorn's factory. Ah, well. At least it hasn't got the
> serial number 13...
I wrote "of the era". Your Master predates ARM systems by a few years. My
oldest Beeb is 0000672. And will the ***** who borrowed it please return
it, if you're reading this?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Jan 17, 8:01, Philip Pemberton wrote:
> BTW, does anyone know what the small raised bar on
> the EPROM sockets is for?
The early cartridges were made with a form of low exteaction force sockets
-- a kind of poor man's ZIF, designed to make it easier to extract the
ROMs. You've probably got those. You put a small screwdriver blade in,
against the bar, and twist (only when there's a chip in the socket!!)
> BTW, has anyone got a spare BBC Master Series User's Manual? The one that
> covers the Master 128?
It's called the Master Series Welcome Guide. No, I'm not parting with mine
just yet :-)
> I'd also like to find out what ROMs the
> ROM cartridges will accept - I've used 27128s and 27256s, anyone know if
> anything else will work?
AFAIR, 2732s should work, 2764s certainly work, and then up to 27128 is
officially supported. You can use 27256s and *possibly* 27512s if you
program them appropriately.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Jochen Kunz <jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de> wrote:
> Sorry, no. The m76 has a Rigel.
Yes.
> Looks so. It seams to support only NMOS-VAX (VS2k), CVAX (VS3100
> m30/38/40/48) and maybe SOC. I think SOC is the CPU in the VXT2k.
Yes, VXT2000 has SOC. Last night I finally downloaded the whole VXT software
and ran strings(1) on the VXTEX image, and I see mention of three machines:
VS2000, VT1300, and VXT2000. VT1300 is the CVAX-based KA42-A, the same system
board as in VS3100 M30.
Fred N. van Kempen <Fred.van.Kempen(a)microwalt.nl> wrote:
> It might run on the 3100-M38, although I believe
> that's a "non" 3100, too.
VS3100 M38 differs from VS3100 M30 (which is the same hardware as VT1300 except
for the latter lacking the mass storage controller board) only in speed (M30
has 90 ns cycle time giving you 2.8 VUPs and M38 has 60 ns cycle time giving
you 3.8 VUPs). VS3100 M30 is KA42-A and VS3100 M38 is KA42-B. The difference
between the two boards are a different crystal oscillator, KA42-B has chips
rated for higher speed, and a byte or two in the ROM is twiddled.
> I would assume that they kept the CPU
> support library as small as possible, meaning only the generic series
> of machines they "sortof" intended the VXT software set for, i.e. the
> 2000, 3100 and alike systems and their hardware features (as needed.)
This is all true, but I'm still wondering about VS3100 M76. Although it has a
different CPU chip (Rigel), other than knowing about its SID code, supporting a
different CPU chip entails nothing more than slightly different cache control
and machine check handling. In every other way VS3100 M76 (KA43) was designed
to be a direct successor to earlier models (KA42). In particular all hardware
other than the CPU chip, i.e., what the bulk of system code is concerned with,
is absolutely unchanged.
But the million dollar question remains: what will the existing VXT boot image
do upon detecting SID top byte equal to 0B? Will it scream and give up, or will
it treat it as a VS3100/VT1300?
> Yup, it's basically some "NanoVMS" kernel, with minimal runtime and a
> VMS DECwindows subset.
Are you sure it's based on VMS and not Ultrix? Doing strings(1) on the VXTEX
image showed a few bits that bring Ultrix to mind.
Of course any Ultrixisms would not be in M76's favor, as DEC had the stupidity
to make Ultrix not run on M76, almost artificially I have to say. Having a copy
of the Ultrix V4.20 sources has given me the pleasure (and disgust) of seeing
just why. Its CPU type determination logic simply assumes that everything with
a Rigel CPU must be a VAX 6400! So when you try to boot it on a VS3100 M76, it
goes looking for XMI... If that logic were tweaked to treat KA43 as KA42, it
would have probably worked. (And if someone added a couple dozen lines to the
KA42 code to handle Rigel/KA43 machine checks and cache ops, it would have
worked solid.)
> Which means (methinks..) that it most likely
> wasnt stripped from its GPX and SPX(+) drivers.
Not most likely, but absolutely certain. VXT2000 video *is* SPX, so it has to
have the SPX driver. VT1300 was color, so it had to have some add-on video
board, and I think it was GPX, not SPX. Oh, and it works on VS2000, which would
certainly have GPX and not SPX. So both GPX and SPX drivers are most certainly
there. The only concern is that if the real DEC VT1300 indeed had GPX and not
SPX, would it accept a VS3100 with SPX. It should unless some asshole
artificially blocked the SPX driver in the VT1300 configuration. (But the
latter possibility seems unlikely given how they even supported VS2000.)
> Dang! Now you got me curious. I have all three (2000,M38 and M76) so
> will set them up tonight or tomorrow and see what they do.
I would greatly appreciate a test on VS3100 M76. I want to put together my own
VXT X terminal and I'm inclined to do it on a VS3100 rather than VXT2000
hardware. If I could use an M76 instead of M30 or M38, it would be great.
MS
>>I just checked - mine's S/N 0184 according to the label where the cable comes
>>out. If that started at 0 I guess they made a few...
>
>Hmm. That sounds like the PSU serial number. Mine is 0119. I have another
>white
>sticker on the underside o the box itself, full number
>25-anc13-1000038. (Which matches the format of the computer serial numbers.)
sorry - my mistake. I saw the s/n label and figured that was the main number
for the whole unit.
just checked mine again and it's 25-ANC13-1000049
have lost the original post from the person who had the last unit to see where
that fits into the scheme of things. :-(
cheers
Jules
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
>from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
In my quest to cover every aspect, to think about every permutation of what
ClassicCmp *could* be in the future, I have yet another question to ask
ClassicCmp subscribers: What if ClassicCmp were a weblog, in the style of
Slashdot or Kuro5hin?
I know many of you hold /. in disdain for whatever reason. I am not talking
about emulating the /. culture; I'm speaking only of its infrastructure,
purely in terms of being a web app for thread-based discussion.
The basics, as they apply to ClassicCmp, are:
- Posting and reading of messages would be doable from a web browser. An
email interface could be developed, but it wouldn't be the primary
method of participation.
- You would have an account with a username and password.
- Your account would be used for other features on the site, such as
access to a data archives, using to a buy-and-sell arena, or
moderating others' posts.
Right away, I see several benefits:
- Members can participate from any computer with a web browser. Even lynx.
- Anonymity and privacy can be more well-respected. The 'sender' of a
post is your username, not your email address. A system can be
implemented where another member can discover your email address only
after you give them permission to do so.
- Moderation could be less the subjective task that it is now, and more of
a distributed, many-eyes process. Imagine if you could vote on a post's
on-topicness on a scale of 1 to 5 (1=off-topic, 5=on-topic). Imagine if
you could set a minimum viewing level to screen out posts that were too
far into the OT side of the spectrum.
- There's no worry about HTML, attachments, wierd character sets, spam,
virii, or cctech moderation delay.
- Your inbox receives less clutter. You spend less bandwidth on mail.
- With thread titles on the front page, casual web visitors will be more
tempted to subscribe.
- It scales well as more members join and start posting.
- The forum *is* the archive.
- Features you want can be added in code, quickly. The current setup is
great for turn-key mailing lists and such, but it is tough to extend.
The bad points I see are:
- It's a huge change from the status quo. We may lose some members.
- Some people may find mailing lists more comfortable. Of course, an email
interface to the weblog could be developed.
My opinion: It's a good idea that I can implement in just a few months.
What is your opinion? Let's answer this one in-list, please.
--
Jeffrey Sharp
See below.
Reply-to: gwilson188(a)earthlink.net
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 16:54:06 -0800
From: glwilson <gwilson188(a)earthlink.net>
To: donate(a)vintage.org
Subject: FW: Potential Donation
I had to change my account due to a trashing. Please resond to
glwilson00(a)earthlink.net.
Thanks!
Gloria
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gloria Wilson [mailto:gloriawlsn@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:12 PM
> To: donate(a)vintage.org
> Subject: Potential Donation
>
> I have a Mac Color Classic, with all the originial manuals and software,
> one owner, in mint condition. It has the original 80MB HD, and 12MB ram,
> of which 10MB is recognized by the OS. It has an external 45MB GCC
> 40Ultra Drive, SCSI I interface, also in working order. I also have a
> Bernoulli Transportable 150MB RCD (removable cartridge disk) unit, with
> several functional RCD's. That was the precursor to IOMEGA Zip drives, but
> reliable enough for Military use. It interfaces with either Mac or Dos
> SCSI I. If there is any interest, please let me know how to proceed.
> Gloria Wilson
From: Jeffrey Sharp <jss(a)subatomix.com>
Date: 01/15/2003 11:56 PM
> Surely anything that can run a mail client can run lynx...
False. The two systems I use for email do not support VT-100 emulation (AFAIK)
hence no Lynx on my email machines (the Kaypro 10 which I'm using to compose
and send this message, and a Zenith Z-100).
Glen
0/0
>D'Oh! I thought the Mac TV was a stripped-down Mac with AV in and AV out, in
>fact I recall seeing something on a website somewhere about a prototype Mac
>similar to what I have described. It was all-black with a plastic front
>panel and a metal top cover, not too unlike a Grundig GDS100 "SkyDigibox"
>digital satellite receiver. IIRC the machine was a Mac with custom boot
>ROMs, so it wouldn't run Mac OS. IIRC the hardware was near totally custom,
>too so swapping out bootROMs was not really an option. Oh, and the ROMs were
>on SIMMs. Again, IIRC...
Sounds like you are describing the Apple Set Top Box. A wonderfully
useless peice of hardware.
This box does in/out as it is a sort of cable TV tuner/interactive TV
device. But, as far as I know, there are no functional units in
existance. I think this is due mostly to the fact that they needed to be
connected to a special "server" of sorts to do anything. Mine powers up,
and does nothing from there (I can get a quick pop of audio on occasion,
but nothing more). I have heard rumor that some have gotten a blue screen
to be displayed, but really every one that I know about does the same as
mine... powers on and sits doing nothing.
The intent of them was to make an interactive TV unit for schools and
other groups. They never made it past the testing stage, and it would
seem that although a good number of the boxes made it into the public,
the server unit to make them do anything did not.
And these boxes I would think are also PAL compatible, at least mine has
SCART connectors on the back. They are covered by Do Not Remove stickers,
but the connectors appear to be there anyway.
I think Tom Owad had some info on them onhis AppleFritter site. If anyone
knows how to get one to do something, I'd be interested to hear... and if
anyone wants one, for a while there was someone selling them on eBay,
opening bid of $9.99, and I think most were closing with no bids. (I got
mine at a garage sale for $5... some poor kid went off to college, and
his mother was selling off everything he had, tons of old toys, baseball
cards, and odd computer parts. I'm sure he was NOT happy when he came
home for break!)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
---------------------Original message-------------------
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:25:57 -0600 (CST)
From: Doc Shipley <doc(a)mdrconsult.com>
To: Classic Computers Mailing List <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Reply-To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Sellam,
Sometimes you just need to shut the fuck up.
I generally just delete and move on, but it gets to me. This mailing
list is not your personal relief valve. The fact that you have a
keyboard really *doesn't* entitle you to insult at will.
Grow up, man!
Doc
---------------------------------------------------------------
Whoa! What'd he say? Ya shoulda copied the offensive remarks.
mike
--------------------Original message------------------
From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
Subject: Re: About Electronics Questions
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:36:13 +0000 (GMT)
Reply-To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
<snip (of some wonderful sarcasm!>
e.g.:
Cleaning-plastic(a)classiccmp.org
Love it!
More seriously, one of the great things about classiccmp is that it _is_
one list, and all sorts of loosely-related discussions go on here. I've
learnt a lot from threads about machines that I am not particularly
interested in...
-tony
-------------------------------------
Couldn't agree more!
I'm on the digest list, and download several times a day to read my
email off-line. If I have time, I read the entire digest and have indeed
learned a lot from posts I wouldn't normally be interested in and often
skip over when I don't have time.
Let's not get too fussy about what's OT and what's not. Actually,
except for the recent digression about muscle cars, it's been pretty
civilized lately; thanks guys (and gals, although the ladies have
never been a problem :)
And while I'm at it, I'd like to sincerely thank Tony for all the useful
tips and information he's given us; as he mentioned, he often takes
considerable time to look things up, and we should all show our
appreciation. Also to Don Maslin for his generous help with
obscure disks, Grumpy Old Fred for a lot of his tips, and everyone
else who's taken a little extra time and made an extra effort to
help us all out in some way. Thanks, guys (and gals)!
But if there's a way to strip the HTML from the double-format messages,
that'd be a good thing.
mike
On Jan 15, 22:40, Rob O'Donnell wrote:
> At 17:05 16/01/2003 +0000, you wrote:
> > > > ARM Evaluation Kit
> >
> >I just checked - mine's S/N 0184 according to the label where the cable
comes
> >out. If that started at 0 I guess they made a few...
>
> Hmm. That sounds like the PSU serial number. Mine is 0119. I have
another
> white
> sticker on the underside o the box itself, full number
> 25-anc13-1000038. (Which
> matches the format of the computer serial numbers.)
I finally remembered to check mine. It's 23-ANC13-1000034. All Acorn
retail product serial numbers of the era are of that form. The 25 tells
where it was made, ANC13 is the product code, the rest is a serial number,
which always starts at 1000000 for production systems or factory
prototypes. So my Archimedes 310 is 27-AKB10-1000002, my 440 is
27-AKB20-1000614, and my A3000 is 27-AKB01-1000028.
A in ANC says it's Acorn hardware (S for Acornsoft), N for the BBC Micro
series of machines (M for Master, D for Compact, K for Archimedes, E for
Econet, etc), C says it's a processor peripheral (A for model A, B for
Model B, F for peripheral, etc), 13 is a model code.
The third letter and the first digit change for variations, so a Model B is
ANB02, with disk interface factory fitted ANB05 (IIRC), Master 128 is
AMB15, and so on. A Domesday system or "BBC AIV System" (a Master 128 plus
interfaces, trackerball, LV player and disks) is AVC11.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I've just run over probably 100-200lbs (45-90kg) of Motorola VME cards...
>from 68010 processor cards, to memory, and I/O cards. Now, there's not
chance I would want to hold on to these, so I'm wondering if anyone else
is interested in some of the cards. I can't guarantee anything now, just
tell me if you're interested or not. I'll try to get some cards to
whoever is interested.
I haven't looked at the cards much yet, so I don't exactly know what's
there for I/O and memory cards. There might also be a power supply or two
and maybe an intact backplane bus card (the few I saw were snapped in
half).
Pat
--
Purdue Universtiy ITAP/RCS
Information Technology at Purdue
Research Computing and Storage
http://www-rcd.cc.purdue.edu
I certainly hope that classiccmp does NOT go the direction
of a browser based forum... I don't know about others, but
I don't like having to use browsers to read newsgroups. I
prefer reading and responding to individual messages through
mail. Also, I'm not always at a machine at which I can run
a browser... Finally, even at some of them which do, the
software can't handle the overhead of browser pages and the
system freezes...
Please keep it as it is... (just my $.02)
Megan
I believe Sellam was cursing at a Maxtor drive a couple months back, and
now I know why.
The 60GB ATA/133 DiamondStar in my Power Mac 7300 (connected through a Sonnet
Tempo Trio) this evening made several hiccup-like noises and the computer
froze up. On the next power cycle, it didn't spin up and just sat there and
clicked. I suspected stiction (well, I prayed it was stiction) and tried
reorienting it and a few gentle taps. On the next power cycle, it didn't even
click anymore and made occasional soft grinding noises, and now it doesn't
even do that.
So, I'm typing this on my Power Book 1400, which I guess will be my desktop
system for the time being.
Any suggestions for ways to get it to spin up, one last time? Anyone know
what happened? I thought it had been a power problem because it made some
sounds like this a few weeks ago and replacing the power cable did seem to
cure it, but I'm mystified as to why it would die so fast. The drive was not
especially hot and it has plenty of ventilation.
I guarantee you my next drive will not be a Maxtor.
Sorry for the OT -- just looking for any desperation suggestions before I
make a new hard drive platter wall clock.
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- Son, God's going to use you. Until He does, take this pill. -- Mark Lowry --
On Jan 16, 18:31, Tim Myers wrote:
> That looks a lot like the old Prestel Viewdata terminal I used to have.
> 1200/75 baud modem, I believe it was badged by Royal Bank Of Scotland
> for their Prestel banking service.
It's the father of that terminal. The BoS terminal is a badged successor
and is quite a lot smaller, about the size of a Sonclair Spectrum, and blue
in colour. BTW, I expect you mean Bank of Scotland, not Royal Bank.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> > ARM Evaluation Kit - yep - that's the one. I do have various discs and
> I can copy the six disks for you, but as I mentioned in previous post, my
> Disc 1 has a corrupt track.
is there some sort of ftp site or something for BBC stuff that disk images
could go on? It'd be nice if they were archived somewhere so they (hopefully)
won't get lost!
how big is a track? trying every possible permutation of bytes you'll get a
working disk eventually ;-)
> Most of the Acorn add-ons came in the same housing. All the Second
> Processors (6502, Z80, 32016) and the Universal Second Processor box (so
> you could use Master Series upgrades like a Turbo, Master 512 80186 CoPro,
> or the Scientific), Teletext Adaptor, Prestel Adaptor, IEEE Interface, and
> probably others.
hmm, the Z80 and IEEE units both ring bells - could have been either one of
those (or both).
I'm feeling a little motivated to wade through all my junk and see what I have
got now, plus have a look at the serial number of the ARM box...
> :-) In my earlier reply, I was thinking of rather older Ferranti
> computers. At least a decade older, maybe two...
ha ha - thought you probably were. I don't know much about the history of
Ferranti unfortunately.
cheers
Jules
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
>from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Does that fact that I'm in Australia rule me out?
I could probably do with a couple of interesting 8-bit ISA cards for an Amstrad PC-20 I want to mod. Do you, in fact, does anyone have one of those old hard-drive-on-a-card things that still works?
And possibly a sound card might be interesting for the second slot. Again, something big would be cool, as the cards stick out of the case on the PC-20. LAPC-1?
Or maybe a big RAM expansion card. I used to have an old 1MB Expanded Memory RAM card for my first XT. Was there ever a processor upgrade card for 8-bit ISA?
TIA, Chris J.
> Norm wrote:
>
> I have a bunch of, I believe, XT parts available. For example ISA
> hard disk
> controllers, serial port and parallel port boards and cables
> available for
> trade. Drop me an email it you are looking for something specific.
See:
http://helmies.org.uk/images/cap_comp.jpg
Then come up with an amusing/apposite caption :)
Bonus points for anyone who can identify the make/model of machine she's
actually using. HINT: this photo was published circa. 1983, and is almost
certainly British.
--
Cheers, Ade.
Be where it's at, B-Racing!
http://b-racing.com
>>Would that be traction or stationary ?
>> Rich Stephenson
>Don't leave out steam engines as in steam locomotives, railroad
equipment...
>Will J
Will,
If you happen to have Dish Network satellite service, I highly recommend
two shows on RFDTV
Classic Tractors and Trains and Locomotives. Nothing like a good dose of
steam to make you feel better.
Rich
>For instance, everyone take Mickey Mouse and do something with it: make a
>new cartoon, introduce new characters based on him, write new stories,
>draw him in porn, etc. If thousands of people did this and disseminated
>it over the web, Disney wouldn't be able to do anything about it but turn
>to the courts. The courts would have a mess on their hands because the
>only recourse would be to shut the internet down. It could force the
>issue. Maybe. It's an idea.
You really think the courts won't try to shut the internet down? Have you
not been following the RIAA and the MPAA's battle over P2P sharing...
that is EXACTLY what you are saying to do. Violate copyright on a massive
scale, and see what they do... the DMCA and other crazy laws are what
they do.
The real solution is for someone to grow a brain, and revise what is
determined as needing a copyright. I personally have no objection to
Disney keeping MM in their control. They still actively develop new stuff
using the character. I think it is quite fair for them to have exclusive
control over MM (and other things). But what needs to be done is revise
copyright, so things that are in use (and REALLY in use) can be
protected, and the rest of the stuff that has been abondoned will go
public domain.
This way, the junk the companies don't actively use or care about, can be
opened up for others to take advantage of, rather than being caught up in
the middle of the wars over the handful of stuff that is still used and
desired to be protected.
And that's all I will say on this about to be wildly out of control topic.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
I'm just putting this out there, because I feel like it.
I got my copy of Michael Nadeau's "Collectible Microcomputers" book in
today. I have to say, I think it is well worth the price. The pictures
alone were worth the $30. I bought mine directly from him (something I
like to do when possible anyway... in the hope that it puts an extra
dollar in the author's pocket)
I spent a solid hour going thru it today at lunch. Just a basic skim over
it (well, ok, an hour's worth of skimming), and I just found it to be a
great memory kick. So many computers that I forgot about that I had at
one point either seen, played with, or heard of. I was also kind of
interested that in my basic scanning, it struck me that an odd number of
small computer companies were from New Jersey... weird (or maybe the NJ
ones just stood out to me more).
I also enjoyed reading the details about how some of these things came
about, and of course, like any junky, just reading the specs on each
computer (and looking at the dates these things were released). It is
mostly a field guide, so if you are looking for a story book, this ain't
it... but if you are looking to see a pretty decent list of computers,
specs on them, and many many pictures of them... ya can't beat it. Think
of it as the computer geek's version of a bird watchers guide book.
Its also just a great book to open at random, and thumb thru. Makes it
good "kill a few minutes waiting" book.
So this is my basic positive review for the book. I just wanted to give
an opinion other than Sellam's. (Nothing against his opinion, but I try
to watch where reviews come from, and when someone says something is
worth buying, and they are also selling that item... I take that into
consideration when I give their review weight).
If anyone hasn't bought it, and was waiting to hear other opinions, well,
you now have mine... I like it... its getting a prized spot in the
magazine holder in my bathroom (yes, that is a good thing... I do all my
best reading on the can).
My wife on the other hand hates it... I have done nothing but whine all
night to her about different computers I now want to track down and get.
She has already threatened to hide the book on me.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Hi Jeffrey et al:
Forgot to empty my mailbox, it filled up and I missed
a few digests; with the previous system I could retrieve
the missed messages, but am apparently too dense to
figure out how with the present system. Help?
mike
Any nitwit can understand computers, and many do.
- Thodor Nelson, Computer Lib & Dream Machines.
I have a bunch of, I believe, XT parts available. For example ISA hard disk
controllers, serial port and parallel port boards and cables available for
trade. Drop me an email it you are looking for something specific.
Thanks Norm
This story just came out:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030116/ap_on_hi_te/unera
sed_hard_drives_10
"So, you think you cleaned all your personal files from that old computer
you got rid of?
Two MIT graduate students suggest you think again.
Over two years, Simson Garfinkel and Abhi Shelat bought 158 used hard drives
at secondhand computer stores and on eBay. Of the 129 drives that
functioned, 69 still had recoverable files on them and 49 contained
"significant personal information" - medical correspondence, love letters,
pornography and 5,000 credit card numbers. One even had a year's worth of
transactions with account numbers from a cash machine in Illinois. "
I expect that more people/companies will resort to smashing the hard drives
of computers they get rid of :(
> > ARM Evaluation Kit
I just checked - mine's S/N 0184 according to the label where the cable comes
out. If that started at 0 I guess they made a few...
I found the IEEE 488 interface too, which I also seem to have a polystyrene box
for but no cardboard, manuals or disks. Curious. (no S/N or label of any kind
on that, and I didn't feel like opening the case. I expect they made thousands
of those anyway)
No sign of the Z80 box I may of had, but it might be up in the loft.
cheers
Jules
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
>from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
That looks a lot like the old Prestel Viewdata terminal I used to have.
1200/75 baud modem, I believe it was badged by Royal Bank Of Scotland
for their Prestel banking service.
Caption could be "The houswife of 1999 will use a computer rather than
the telephone to gossip with her chums"?
Tim.
Hi folks,
I wonder, does anyone know what VAXstation CPUs does VXT software run on? VXT
software runs (of course) on the VXT2000 X terminal box, but can also run on
many regular VAXstations. It officially supports KA42 (VS3100 M30/38/40/48) in
order to provide a software upgrade from VT1300 to VXT2000 (VT1300 is a KA42
without local mass storage and with a different badge on the box), but I have
also heard (turned up in Google search) that it'll run on a KA410 (VS2000) as
well. This last point makes me think "hmm, it must be fairly generic, I wonder
what other VAXstations can it run on?" Specifically I wonder whether it would
run on a KA43 (VS3100 M76). I'm willing to bet that it'll handle the SPX video
board just fine, as the video in the real VXT2000 is an SPX clone, but I'm
concerned about how it would handle the Rigel CPU. VS3100 M76 was certainly in
existence when VXT2000 was designed and the VXT software was written, but did
they include support for it in the released code or not?
MS
Hullo fellow classiccmp enthusiasts; I'm in the process of clearing up
some 'never started' project space, and have put my TRS80 Model IV find
>from a few years ago up on ebay. I had intended to make the system a
serial terminal, but it doesn't have a serial port and I never got around
to buying one. I then thought of gutting it and making it into a modern
PC. I was talked out of wrecking working vintage hardware just for the
case.
The neato thing about this TRS80 is (what I was told to be through usenet)
the Corvus Omninet Network interface, aka Network 4 board; this is a
diskless client for the network. Unfortunately I have no documentation,
software, or proof, that it actually is Corvus Omninet, so take my
commentary with a grain of salt. My limited probing on the inside of the
system did not show any boards with the company name on them, for example,
but I did not break open the shielded board area for a closer look (see
pics).
If this in fact was a real Omninet client system, you would also need a
server or controller and the software to run it; again, from word of
mouth, I was told it was likely a x86 or the like with a hard drive in it
and the Omninet interface on it.
On the auction page you will find a load of nicely sized pictures for it,
and perhaps another TRS80 enthusiast will be able to determine if I was
told correctly or not about the network.
Here's the auction link:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2301561688&category=1247
Here's the thread archived on google groups here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&th=740c326f7620…
Interesting tidbits from the above thread, thanks to "Frank Durda IV":
"Corvus Omninet and Network 4 are the same beast. Tandy bought Omninet
chipsets and made their own boards for the Model 4 and 1000HX/EX
computers. The educational operating system that Tandy sold for use with
Network 4 was written by a guy in his garage (living in the northwest as I
recall)."
"Omninet/Network 4 are trunk networks, more like Thinnet Ethernet in
topology. (Some people came up with repeater/boosters that allowed
non-daisy-chain wiring for Omninet/Network 4, but that is an extension of
the basic design.)"
"The underlying signaling in Omninet/Network 4 is differential, which
means unshielded twisted pair works great (even using RJ11 plugs for
interconnects work fine), but Tandy decided they would make more money by
selling shielded wire and making you use those irritating wing-nut
connectors. Tandys choice also meant that if you had one computer in the
lab plugged into an outlet with a hot neutral, Tandys wiring scheme would
promptly blow-out all of the machines on the network the moment you
plugged that one computer in since they tried to share a shield ground via
the shielded cable. This happened fairly often, and 30+ computers would
simultaneously make Bing-Pop-Zing sounds as the tops blew off integrated
circuits inside the case, followed by burning smells. Later, Tandy
included an outlet tester with the installation kit and recommended its
use..."
AAAAAACCCKKKKKKKK! The horror!
No burning smell from this one, however. This system was bought from a
store in Sunnvyale, CA called 'Weirdstuff' that takes old computers and
resells or strips them for their valuables. Wierdstuff is a cool store,
check them out if nothing else to visit a blast to the computer and
electronics past. They had a stack of these TRS-80 Models IVs at the
time. They had been there for some time in the warehouse. Some of the
systems had Tracking ID tags talking about 'Fremont School District',
which is an area in Silicon Valley. My guess is they were traded or given
away to make space for a more modern setup and weirdstuff ended up with
them.
Hope you liked all the background on it. I love collecting these old
'puters and hope to pass it on to someone equally enthusiastic.
L
At 03:09 16-1-2003 -0500, Chad Fernandez wrote:
>Jeffrey Sharp wrote:
>> In my quest to cover every aspect, to think about every permutation of what
>> ClassicCmp *could* be in the future, I have yet another question to ask
>> ClassicCmp subscribers: What if ClassicCmp were a weblog, in the style of
>> Slashdot or Kuro5hin?
>
>It sounds like you are talking about a web board type thing. Please NO.
> There are a few that I read from time to time, but they are a pain to
>navigate, and email is so much easier! Web boards are what non-computer
>people tend to use, in my opinion. I wish the various truck boards I
>read were mailing lists!!!!
I totally agree with Chad. If classiccmp were changed into a web board format,
I would leave. Thanks to the mail list format, all messages are delivered to
my computer when they are sent, and I can look through them at my leasure.
I do not have to go and check if something new and interesting has appeared,
because all messages will be on my computer already. Mail is push and web board
is pull, and pull is unneeded work when push is available in my opinion.
Reading email is much easier to do than reading a web board, for the boards
I have seen you have to do an unbelievable amount of mouse clicking or other
interaction with your computer to see the messages, a lot more than you would
have to with your email program. For people already bordering on RSI problems
this is not a good thing. Also you have to wait on the server for each message
to appear, more waiting time than you would have from your mailer. And you have
to be online all the time to read the board, and with mail you go online, get
all the messages, and disconnect again. Over here in Europe local calls are
not free! Reading classiccmp online would soon be too expensive.
Please keep the mailing list format. It is fast, simple, and easy to use.
There are enough tools available to deal with the unavoidable spam.
Kees.
--
Kees Stravers - Geldrop, The Netherlands
http://www.vaxarchive.org/http://home.iae.nl/users/pb0aia/cm/
I just happened to run across your archived messages from last November when
searching the 'net for something else. I'm not quite sure from what I saw
exactly where the messages were posted. That sure brings back memories!
I still have the old files from Glacier Peak Rainbow sitting on a hard drive
(it's not like the old days when I was worrying about exceeding the space on
a 10 or 20 MB hard drive). There are about 640 files in 22 MB. I could burn
CDs for anyone interested.
Gary Stebbins
former Glacier Peak Rainbow sysop
Likewist, no caption, but I bet the houseplant is long gone. (So is the
telly, and the wallpaper!)
Doug Jackson
Director, Managed Security Services
Citadel Securix
+61 (0)2 6290 9011 (Ph)
+61 (0)2 6262 6152 (Fax)
+61 (0)414 986 878 (Mobile)
Web: <www.citadel.com.au>
Offices in Melbourne, Sydney, Canberra, Hong Kong, Boston
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dr. Ido [mailto:drido@optushome.com.au]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:17 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Caption Competition (bit OT)
>
>
> >http://helmies.org.uk/images/cap_comp.jpg
> >
> >
> >Then come up with an amusing/apposite caption :)
> >
> >Bonus points for anyone who can identify the make/model of
> machine she's
> >actually using. HINT: this photo was published circa. 1983,
> and is almost
> >certainly British.
>
> No witty caption, but it looks like a Tandata TD1600 viatel/prestel
> terminal. Used to have a stack of them here, couldn't think
> of any use for
> them so they were stripped for parts over time.
>
>
CAUTION - The information in this message may be of a privileged or confidential nature intended only for the use of the addressee or someone authorised to receive the addressee's e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify postmaster(a)citadel.com.au. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Citadel Securix.
Feel free to visit the Citadel Securix website! Click below.
http://www.citadel.com.au
>From: "Brian Chase" <vaxzilla(a)jarai.org>
>
>On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Philip Pemberton wrote:
>> Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>
>> > The drive we were having problems
>> > with were 2 and 4 gig drives. These had a servo information
>> > corruption problem ( that by design would always fail over time ).
>>
>> Guess that rules out Kalok then. They bit the big one in 1994, way before
>> 2GB and 4GB drives started appearing...
>
>I'm going to guess Micropolis. Those drives were absolutely crap.
>
>-brian.
>
>
Wow! The man is psychic!
Dwight
>http://helmies.org.uk/images/cap_comp.jpg
>
>
>Then come up with an amusing/apposite caption :)
>
>Bonus points for anyone who can identify the make/model of machine she's
>actually using. HINT: this photo was published circa. 1983, and is almost
>certainly British.
No witty caption, but it looks like a Tandata TD1600 viatel/prestel
terminal. Used to have a stack of them here, couldn't think of any use for
them so they were stripped for parts over time.
On Jan 16, 19:08, Hans Franke wrote:
> Hmm. To me the screen layout looks quite like a Teletext page.
> I have no idea how this service was called in the UK (The name
> Viewtext pops up, but I'm not shure). These are data pages,
> transmitted via 'invisible' lines, 'between' or 'below' the
> picture (As a bunch of other information also is).
That's Videotext (generic term) or Teletext (name used by the BBC and ITV).
> Now, back to the picture, what realy puzzles me is the keyboard.
> The service is strict one way, you could only select a page, and
> a regular remote is all you need.
> Of course it could be the British equivalent of our (CEPT based
> BTx system, a early online service to be used on a 1200/75
> connection with pages, made in a way to be displayed on you
> telly. But then the picture layout would be quite different.
> That service hat a quite more apropriate set of graphic
> elements.
Latterly, BTX did use different graphics, using a sort of "shift out" mode
for "high" resolution but the original Bildschirmtext was the same as the
UK's PRESTEL and French MiniTel services (generic term Viewdata), which use
the Teletext character set and graphics. Those were truly interactive
dialup services. Prestel (which predates BTX) offered information pages,
news, electronic mail, downloadable software, etc.
It became quite popular in the UK in the early 1980's and the price of
adapters fell rapidly, especially with the advent of the BBC Micro and
similar machines which could use cheap modems, and the promotion of the
MicroNet 800 service (microcomputer news, bulletin board, and telesoftware,
starting at page 800) and services like Viewfax258 (guess which start page)
and the popular MicroGnome (anyone remember Bob Clark?). Page numbers
could be up to 9 digits, and each could have 25 sub-pages so there was room
for a lot of information (I probably still have statistics somewhere, as I
had an Information Provider account then). There were even several
bulletin boards which used Viewdata protocols, and commercial services too.
The main travel agents' service was a private Viewdata system, several
stockbrokers and financial institutions used one, and the Open University
had one.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Jan 16, 13:21, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
> >From: pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com
> >
> >On Jan 15, at various times, Jeffrey Sharp wrote:
> >
> >> In my quest to cover every aspect, to think about every permutation of
> >what
> >> ClassicCmp *could* be in the future, I have yet another question to
ask
> >> ClassicCmp subscribers: What if ClassicCmp were a weblog, in the style
of
> >> Slashdot or Kuro5hin?
> >
> >I have to add my vote to the many others who've said "NO!!!"
> >
> >> - Posting and reading of messages would be doable from a web
browser.
> >An
> >> email interface could be developed, but it wouldn't be the primary
> >> method of participation.
> >
> >I would hate that.
> >
> >> - You would have an account with a username and password.
> >
> >Right, I need another username/password (likely with different rules to
all
> >the rest) like I need another hole in my head :-)
> >
>
> ---snip---
>
> I see no particular advantage to using a browser for the
> use of this group. If one looks at the attempts with something
> as global as news groups, we would be quickly trashed with
> hundreds of "Please fix my PCee" stuff from those that have
> little interest in classic machines.
For those who weren't there, that was exactly what happened to
alt.computer.hardware.homebuilt. Skipping over the long tale of woe, the
upshot was that a new, moderated, group was created (comp.arch.hobbyist).
Sadly, that sees little traffic as the interested parties seem to have
moved to greener and more diverse pastures altogether (some of them, to
this list).
I hope we don't try to be an elitist mailing list, but lets not invite
trouble.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Jan 16, 21:14, John Honniball wrote:
> Adrian Vickers wrote:
> > See:
> >
> > http://helmies.org.uk/images/cap_comp.jpg
[...]
> > Bonus points for anyone who can identify the make/model of machine
she's
> > actually using. HINT: this photo was published circa. 1983, and is
> > almost certainly British.
>
> I think it's a Prestel adaptor made by Tandata. I had one, somewhere,
> in the original polystyrene packaging.
Yes, I was about to say Tandata or Tantel when I read this.
There are still services that use Prestel/Viewdata protocols -- I spent
ages writing a Viewdata terminal emulator for X-windows a few years ago, so
I could use online banking from my Unix box. Still in use today :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> I expect that more people/companies will resort to smashing the
> hard drives of computers they get rid of :(
the local computer recycling place here won't actually take in any machines
with hard drives intact (from companies or individuals) unless said persons can
prove that the drive(s) have been 'professionally wiped' - whatever that means.
The recyclers are worried about being sued by the very companies / individuals
that they got the machines from in the event that any data falls into somebody
elses' hands.
PC clones form 99% of the stuff coming in, but it's a shame that when the odd
bit of exotica does come in it is without any disks and essentially useless
without a copy of the OS and a suitable drive (and the knowledge to install
said OS). I understand the RAM usually gets pulled if it's anything remotely
useful and the rest goes straight to the metal recyclers (I talked to them
seperately and they crush everything immediately)
cheers
Jules
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
>from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
>If anyone wants to send me info, I'll volunteer to collect and put it
>up on my website (I won't put email addresses or other incriminating
>evidence unless you want me to :-)).
OK, reports from the UK:
I have one:
http://www.corestore.org/pdp-12.htm
She had two sisters, at the Burden Neurological Institute. I collected
another one along with it, which I immediately passed on to... a person
involved with a certain UK 'used DEC' trader, for his personal collection.
No names, no pack drill...
The third machine there was retained for a number of years, it was still
required to be fired up occasionally to read old LINCtapes. It was promised
to me, I called religously every few months... 'no we're still using it'...
until the fateful day last year I called 'oh we got rid of that a few months
ago, we gave it away to someone else who was interested since you hadn't
called in a while...'. Bugger.
Asked if they would put me in touch with this chap, as he had got a large
quantity of spares with it, including a complete CPU/memory 'gate' - enough
to build a fourth machine if he had had a rack etc. - thought it would make
sense to pool resources. Said they would ask him for permission to put me in
touch, he adamantly refused... secretive collectors, bah humbug.
So that's three in the UK. Four, with the addition of the Science Museum /
CCS example. Most are probably working or near-working, mine has some things
to fix, been in storage for years.
Now, I would be interested in a list of pdp-15's...
Mike
http://www.corestore.org
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>From: pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com
>
>On Jan 15, at various times, Jeffrey Sharp wrote:
>
>> In my quest to cover every aspect, to think about every permutation of
>what
>> ClassicCmp *could* be in the future, I have yet another question to ask
>> ClassicCmp subscribers: What if ClassicCmp were a weblog, in the style of
>> Slashdot or Kuro5hin?
>
>I have to add my vote to the many others who've said "NO!!!"
>
>> - Posting and reading of messages would be doable from a web browser.
>An
>> email interface could be developed, but it wouldn't be the primary
>> method of participation.
>
>I would hate that.
>
>> - You would have an account with a username and password.
>
>Right, I need another username/password (likely with different rules to all
>the rest) like I need another hole in my head :-)
>
---snip---
I see no particular advantage to using a browser for the
use of this group. If one looks at the attempts with something
as global as news groups, we would be quickly trashed with
hundreds of "Please fix my PCee" stuff from those that have
little interest in classic machines.
If we made it a closed group, like it is now, we'd still have
the problem that even with current technology, many of us are
bandwidth limited on how we use the web ( minor problem for me ).
I can't think of any real advantage of going to some web
based system and it would surely remove many from our group.
DON'T TRY TO FIX WHAT ISN'T BROKEN!!!!
Dwight
On Jan 15, at various times, Jeffrey Sharp wrote:
> In my quest to cover every aspect, to think about every permutation of
what
> ClassicCmp *could* be in the future, I have yet another question to ask
> ClassicCmp subscribers: What if ClassicCmp were a weblog, in the style of
> Slashdot or Kuro5hin?
I have to add my vote to the many others who've said "NO!!!"
> - Posting and reading of messages would be doable from a web browser.
An
> email interface could be developed, but it wouldn't be the primary
> method of participation.
I would hate that.
> - You would have an account with a username and password.
Right, I need another username/password (likely with different rules to all
the rest) like I need another hole in my head :-)
> - Members can participate from any computer with a web browser. Even
lynx.
> Surely anything that can run a mail client can run lynx...
Browsers are much more cumbersome and slow than any sensible email client.
And run on fewer systems. I sometimes use older systems for which there
is no web browser, not even a text-based one, but there is a mail client.
And using a browser require you to be online to read, which is not so good
for those of us who use dialup. It also makes it harder to save individual
messages. I often do that with mail; it's much harder to keep copies of
web pages sensibly.
> - Anonymity and privacy can be more well-respected. The 'sender' of a
> post is your username, not your email address. A system can be
> implemented where another member can discover your email address only
> after you give them permission to do so.
You could also do that with mail. I'd prefer that wasn't implemented,
though see below. Sometimes it's more appropriate to respond directly to
someone, off-list.
> - There's no worry about HTML, attachments, wierd character sets, spam,
> virii, or cctech moderation delay.
You could do most of that with email filtering too. In fact, it would be
nice, in my opinion, if we did filter out the HTML (and the HTML portions
of multipart/alternate messages, which we seem to have had more of
recently).
> - Your inbox receives less clutter. You spend less bandwidth on mail.
Actually, most people would spend *more* bandwidth on a website, because
going back to a previously-viewed message would typically reload the page.
More importantly, there are a lot of dialup users here. With a website you
need to be online all the time you're reading, rather than slurping down a
chunk of mail (as my system does a few times a day) to read offline. Less
importantly, my system can do an early-morning mail fetch just before the
end of the cheaper-rate nighttime period, and the mail is then there for me
to read when I'm sufficiently awake (ie after two mugs of coffee) a little
later (daytime call rate).
> - It's a huge change from the status quo. We may lose some members.
Including me :-)
Returning to the idea of having both email and a website, isn't the website
essentially an extension of the existing archive (possibly more
sophisticated)? I agree it's good to have both, but let's keep the mailing
list as the primary and the archive as, well, an archive.
> The trouble with MUAs is getting some way of either (a) serving
> mail folders to remote locations or (b) serving the login session to
remote
> locations. Both of those are doable (IMAP, SSH) but can be a pain to set
up
> for some users. Then there's the problem of ensuring you have the right
> software at the remote location (IMAP-capable email client, SSH client).
In
> some cases (e.g. student lab, internet cafe on vacation), you can't count
on
> that. In nearly every case, you *can* count on some form of web browser.
I disagree. Most ISPs run either IMAP or POP3 (or both). I have yet to
see an Internet cafe, or attend a conference with 'net facilites, where I
couldn't read my email. *Replying* to the list might be a problem in a few
cases, but most ISPs (at least, most I'm familiar with here) operate some
kind of authentication system so that users away from their normal location
can still send mail (eg replies) from Internet cafes and the like.
> On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, JP Hindin wrote:
> > It surely can't be hard to have the mailing list archival software
munge
> > eMail addresses...
>
> Not at all. But messages delivered to subscribers aren't address munged.
You
> can look at the headers of this message and get my email address. I don't
> think it's a big deal, but someone else might.
Fair point. I don't mind my address being in the headers either, and in
fact I prefer them to be there so people can email me directly, but if some
do and some don't prefer that, perhaps we could set some preference
per-user so that their submissions are/not munged. Some list manager
software has that facility built-in.
Summing that lot up, if the list were changed to become primarily
web-based, I'd vote with my feet -- albeit with great regret -- but I have
no objection at all to enhancing some of the mail facilities and providing
additional methods of access and/or additional services.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hi Tony(Duell),
Yes indeed the term 'hacker' was used in the original form as it was
created back by MIT
students in the 60s. It was an honorable title.
Murray--
I would be interested in buying XENIX, or trading for something. I would
have replied to your email, but I read these forums on the web interface,
so your email didn't appear there, and I don't have it delivered.
If anyone has copies still availible, please email me:
justin(a)raspberrytea.com
BTW, whats true about the number of manuals/disks, etc, etc.
Anyone have good resources on capabilities? does X compile on it?
support for video. I assume it doesn't work, but then I've seen stranger
things.
Thanks!,
Justin
From: Sellam Ismail <foo(a)siconic.com>
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Mike Ford wrote:
>
> > I love this logic, the price on ebay a place where all the traditional
> > requirements of willing buyer, willing seller, and open market are met,
> > isn't valid because its too high. No the acceptable price is the price you
> > once saw in a scrapyard after years of digging through the place 3 times a
> > week and have never seen since.
>
> Pasta tastes good with marinara.
?????
Glen
0/0
In a message dated 1/16/2003 2:00:16 PM Eastern Standard Time,
philpem(a)dsl.pipex.com writes:
<< 2GB and 4GB drives started appearing...
To this day I refuse to touch Kalok drives, not that there's many of them
left. And if this bloody Seagate 52520 in my webrouter clunk-clicks once
more it's getting swapped out! $DEITY, this thing is almost as loud as the
Kalok was when it failed. Speaking of which, has anyone got a Kalok drive in
their collection? Dead or alive? >>
Ive got one. A 20meg one I think and it worked when it was put away. very
noisy though. Looks cheap.
Macro Assembler, Xenix, 8086/8088 Primer, Mac Repair, and early version of DOS
To those of you who have sent email expressing interest in 1 or more of the
above, I have not forgotten - I have not had time to respond, yet - hope to
shortly
On Jan 15, 18:44, Keys wrote:
> At Goodwill I got a book titled BIT BY BIT An Illustrated History of
> Computers by Stan Augarten for 25 cents and it has lots of great pictures
> and stories in it.
That's a good book. I got my copy for 50 pence several years ago.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Jan 15, 22:43, Jeffrey Sharp wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> > With email I can read CLASSICCMP on anything, with a Web-board, I'd be
> > limited to a modern computer.
>
> Surely anything that can run a mail client can run lynx...
Not necessarily. My older Acorn machines can read and send mail but
there's no web browser that will run on them. I wouldn't be at all
surprised to find that's also true of some other older systems that people
here might use.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>Just out of interest, can a Mac TV output PAL video and operate off 230V
>(UK
>mains voltage)? I'd love to get one (and get it to do something useful),
>but
>they don't seem to have appeared in the UK market yet.
>OTOH, I *do* have a VCR that can operate as an NTSC->PAL converter...
I can't say for 100% sure, but I would say that most likely, yes, it will
work.
Most Mac's could handle dual power IIRC (either auto detecting, or via a
switch on the power supply), and Apple's other TV Tuner cards can input
NTSC, PAL, and SECAM, you just select which one you want in a preference
for the TV Viewer application. So I would guess the MacTV will do it as
well. You will need a connector to convert from a screw on F connector,
to a PAL connector, but that should be easy to come by.
But, a note, you ask can it OUTPUT PAL, if you really mean output, like
use the tuner in the MacTV, and run it to a VCR or another TV, then the
answer may be no, as I don't think the MacTV output anything. You
connected the antenna or cable to the Mac, and watched TV directly on the
Mac screen. You could toggle between TV viewing or Mac (and IIRC, watch
TV in a 1/4 size screen on the Mac desktop as well). But all viewing was
done directly on the Mac itself.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
It's always fascinated me how people have such strong opinions of one particular drive manufacturer over another. Commonly one will say that they have a certain make of drive and it's never failed them and they've tried this other one and they're dying left and right, etc. ad nauseum.
I come at this issue from the perspective of a field service engineer and subsequently independant consultant. The fact is that, particularly with IDE drives, no matter the manufacturer, it's purely the luck of the draw whether one is blessed with a good production run. I get the feeling that, to cut costs, most manufacturers have the QC people working a couple of days a week, and even then they're not exactly the best paid position in the sweatshop. The same goes for cars - you just find the one you're psychologically comfortable with. No bearing on statistical reality, but to the buyer that manufacturer's product will always be superior, and faults will be more tolerable than those of the manufacturer who's product is "in the doghouse" for whatever reason.
As for Dell going the way of PacBell, etc., well I can only say we've got what we asked for. We wanted cheap computing, we got cheap computing. If they raised their standards and correspondingly their prices, we'd run like heck to the next guy who offered their system for a couple of quid less. If you want a rock-solid system with total manufacturer's support and guaranteed uptime and all that jazz, you'd have to shell out over $50,000 plus support contracts, etc. Just like in the old days of some of the larger systems we discuss on this forum. Just my $12.34 (Like everything else here in Bermuda, my opinion has to be shipped here and customs duty paid <grin>).
With apologies for the rant,
Dennis (not Miller :-)
I have a PDP 11/60 available in Houston. It is untested and in an
unknown state. There are just the two main components out of the
cabinet with cards (I don't know what all cards are in there) and the
two power supply units. Also have a front panel control. I'm being
force to get rid of these as soon as possible. If nobody wants them
I'll have to take it to the scrapper. Hopefully there is someone out
there that can take these and make good use of them.
-----
"If you want to see it, see into it directly;
but when you stop to think about it, it is
altogether missed."
"When the mind is free of any thought or judgement,
then and only then can we know things as they are."
David Williams - Computer Packrat
dlw(a)trailingedge.com
http://www.trailingedge.com
> > I have a 200Mhz 6400 tower. Pretty nice machine,
> except that it lacks
> > ethernet. I've got it running MacOS 8.0, and until
> recently, I also had BeOS
> > on it. Runs both really well. Has a built in
> subwoofer for incredibly rich
> > sound. My main complaint: Other than adding RAM or
> PCI cards, upgrades are
> > nearly impossible with that impenetrable case.
There was a recent article in MacAddict that a model
of PCI Ethernet Cards from D-Link has MacOS 9/X
drivers.
I've bought several and they work great!
And they are 10/100...
Model number is DFE-530TX+, I've bought them for under
$20.00US
Give it a go!
Regards,
Al Hartman
(Macintosh Emulation List Host)
http://www.topica.com/lists/MacEmuList
Enlightenment means taking full responsibility for
your life.
- William Blake
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
I have to agree with most of what I've read here. Though I'm very new to
your list, I'd really much rather it stay an e-mail list.
To do otherwise, puts me in mind of the the bulky and cantankerous mail
groups in MSN (Hotmail) or Yahoo - lotsa spash and excess drivel, but much
less bang for your buck. Further, you'd lose the spontenaiety.
For folk who have trouble picking out the thread they want to follow in the
lists, they can always configure their e-mail clients with topic folders
(yeah, even older e-mail clients like Eudora or Juno; and for those even
older, echo/netmail offline readers!). That puts the onus back on the
participant, and not on an often overworked administrator or moderator. As
an ex-BBS sysop (1.387.57, 1991-1997), that's a position I can well
apreciate.
Cheers!
Ed Tillman
Store Automation Tech Support Specialist
Valero Energy Corporation
San Antonio, TX; USA
Phone (210) 592-3110, Fax (210) 592-2048
edward.tillman(a)valero.com <mailto:edward.tillman@valero.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of Paul
> Thompson <thompson(a)new.rr.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:39 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: ADMIN: What if ClassicCmp were a blog?
>
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Zane H. Healy wrote:
>
> > Email is a fast, sleek and lowbandwidth medium. Web-boards, on the
> > otherhand are cumbersome and time consuming. With email I can read
> > CLASSICCMP on anything, with a Web-board, I'd be limited to a modern
> > computer. If this were to happen, I can guarentee a lot of people would
> > leave.
>
>
> --
>
>So I should offer the guy something like 10 bucks for it and then offer it
>to the list for like 30 or, that way I can make some money to send to VISA
>and someone who loves Macs will be happy and it won't get junked, in other
>words. Please don't flame me for wanting to profit, but I'm seriously broke
>and need to pay Chris Kennedy/Visa/my parents/go to college/get gas/fix my
>power steering/pay J. Darren Petersen/etc. I think a $20 profit is fair, as
>I already spent time finding it, gas getting there, and would spend money
>obtaining it as well. Thoughts?
Yes... if you can snag it for $10, and small profit is worth you time,
then by all means, do it.
And if it works and/or is relatively complete, let me know... I'll buy it
>from you.
My overall point before wasn't that you should NOT buy one, just that you
should not pay a high price expecting that you will get an even higher
price for it later... but if you can get it cheap (like $10), you can be
assured you will get some kind of profit on it. There is nothing wrong
with making a profit on things... I just didn't want you to get burned
thinking that the MacTV was going to get Lisa 1 like prices, and so you
ran out and paid $100 for one expecting to resell it for $1,000.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:33:17 -0600, you wrote:
>><HOPE> Shouldn't be too hard to find </HOPE>
>>since it's doing nothing. If it had flaky bits or words or pages,
>>different story, but absolutely dead can only be a few things.
>
>Ya, like a broken core sense wire!
Fortunately that is not the case. All 64 X, 64 Y, sense and
inhibit lines have the correct resistance.
I found fairly quickly that B MEM ENABLE was leaving its source
but not getting to the core amps. I couldn't find the presumably
broken wire on the backplane so I ran a jumper but still no
function. (It's normally high all the time, so a disconnected TTL
input is usually 1).
this is somewhat depressing that the backplane may have reached
end-of-life, if bad wirewraps are starting to show up. It is over
thirty years old...
Now READ and WRITE are pulsing to the selectors. Unfortunately I
don't have a current probe to check out the R/W currents and
waveforms. Guess I could put a .1 ohm resistor in the line which
would give a 32 mv signal on the 320 ma pulse.
-Charles
I'm having to get rid of my collection due to losing the space it's
housed in. The PDP-11/73s have already gone on Ebay, as has the
Transputer kit. Next to go is my PDT11/150, you can find it here
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&item=23016
11053&rd=1.
I never got round to playing with this machine, and I know very little
about it, I hope someone can give it a good home.
Tim.
I'd be interested in hearing about HP 1000 Lab Automation systems as well,
since my HP-1000E (2113E) was originally part of of.. 3353E I believe.
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
Hans,
Likely just another case of Germans doing something better (IMHO), much like
DIN versus SAE horsepower. I did know about the R+M/2 method for American
gas, and you can get 100 octane here, just not easily in my state.. In
California, some 76 stations sell 100 octane.
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
>Would that be traction or stationary ?
> Rich Stephenson
Don't leave out steam engines as in steam locomotives, railroad equipment...
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
I must be due for finding something damned cool then, since I gave my -2065
to Eric as I couldn't rescue it... No way would I let that hit the dumpster!
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> What is your opinion? Let's answer this one in-list, please.
on the car front, I go through www.triumphstag.net which was initially set up
as a web interface to the mailing list, but has slowly evolved into something
more like what you describe for classiccmp.
sounds like that's the sort of thing you'd need as the mailing list is still
the primary means of communication but the website adds the registry, 'for
sale' list and other odds and ends.
The web interface to the mail gateway does have the odd problem now and then,
with some posts occasionally turning up twice - drop Dave (who runs the site)
an email as he should be able to shed some more light as to why!
I think I'd still use the classiccmp mailing list for emails, but it'd be nice
to have somewhere to store information (as mentioned in another post to this
list) and be able to search archives etc.
by the way, I'm never seen all the HTML and base64 junk on the Stag list that
seems to come through to classiccmp - it must be filtered out somehow in which
case it'd seem sensible to look into how to do that for this list! :-)
(and if you could filter out my yahoo automatically-added .sig that's be good
too ;-)
cheers
Jules
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
>from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Please see my point-by-point comments below...
Cheers!
Ed Tillman
Store Automation Tech Support Specialist
Valero Energy Corporation
San Antonio, TX; USA
Phone (210) 592-3110, Fax (210) 592-2048
edward.tillman(a)valero.com <mailto:edward.tillman@valero.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of JP Hindin
> <jplist(a)kiwigeek.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:08 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: ADMIN: What if ClassicCmp were a blog?
>
>
>
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Jeffrey Sharp wrote:
> > Right away, I see several benefits:
> > - Members can participate from any computer with a web browser. Even
> lynx.
> And right now members can use any eMail client, even elm or
> mutt... They're just as common, right?
>
[Tillman, Edward] Web browsers are slower, crankier, and more of a
hassle than any email client, including the older ones...
> > - Anonymity and privacy can be more well-respected. The 'sender' of a
> > post is your username, not your email address. A system can be
> It surely can't be hard to have the mailing list archival software munge
> eMail addresses... It seems to be doing it now okay. Where's the problem?
>
[Tillman, Edward] If the person really wants that kind of privacy,
why is he/she here? From my admittedly short-lived perspective, this list
is a rather comfortable coming-together of professionals and hobbyists,
experts and laymen who like what they do, and want to share their
information and resources openly. Putting it all behind the proverbial
firewall would most assuredly kill it.
> > - There's no worry about HTML, attachments, wierd character sets,
> spam,
> > virii, or cctech moderation delay.
> You can't attach eMails to the list can you? (How do you attach a worm
> therefore?). As for HTML and character sets, its a small inconvenience
> honestly - not that many posters use it, after all.
>
[Tillman, Edward] Moderation delay *can* be a good thing. What's
the issue?
> > - Your inbox receives less clutter. You spend less bandwidth on mail.
> Instead you spend it on all the extra HTML markup on web page posts?
>
[Tillman, Edward] If folks want less clutter in their inboxes, they
can darned well configure their email clients with topic folders (rules...),
as I do both at home and at work. That way, the list downloads directly to
its folder, leaves my inboxes clean, and is in a tight package when I'm
ready to read it... Almost all email clients, regardless of age, allow
that.
> > - It scales well as more members join and start posting.
>
[Tillman, Edward] As an email list, directly configured into user
defined topic folders, this isn't even an issue.
> With a fine MTA (qmail anyone?) you can do alright, but I agree, a slick
> mod_perl style web interface probably scales "better".
> However, as my friend always used to say, when we are so logged with
> traffic that we have scaling issues - well that will be a good day indeed
> to know we are that popular, and dealing with it will be a joy.
> (He was a Buddhist, what can I say)
>
[Tillman, Edward] Buddist, huh? Maybe that's why all this is
working so well...? (snickers!, smiles!)
> > - Features you want can be added in code, quickly. The current setup
> is
> > great for turn-key mailing lists and such, but it is tough to
> extend.
>
> What kind of extra features?
>
[Tillman, Edward] Ditto... (?)
> This is just my two cents; I would rather not move to such a style of
> list. I think classiccmp is wonderful the way it is.
> Feel free to pick bones out of my retort.
>
[Tillman, Edward] Hehehe... I kow how you feel. Sysops, Admins
and Mods always wanna experiment, and sometimes, we even do it right. I
discovered a long time ago, to my chagrin when I lost over 100 users on a
BBS: If you have a good thing, don't mess with it.
> JP
>
> Acrobat 4 can import up to 50 files at once. So if you have
> scanned to 50 individual TIFFs you can import them all in
> one go (it's not that speedy though!). I expect that
> Acrobat 5 can also import, but I could never find the
> right menu ! What it can do (which 4 and earlier could not)
> is spit out a PDF file as individual G4 compressed TIFFs.
G4 compression is pretty poor. I really like DjVu format instead of
PDF. It uses much better compression technology (JBIG2 for bitonal
black/white and fractal compression for color images) and gives better
legibility as well. Check out the free, open source tools for creating
and viewing it at http://djvu.sourceforge.net/, and the free-beer
Windows and Mac viewers at www.djvu.com.
For DjVu examples, see some of the newer documents on my TRS-80 page,
http://www.tim-mann.org/misosys.html
I think Acrobat 5 may also have JBIG2 compression, though earlier
versions didn't, so if you have that, you may do about as well as DjVu
for bitonal (aka "line art") scans. People trying to view them will
need an up-to-date version of the Acrobat reader too, of course.
--
Tim Mann tim(a)tim-mann.org http://www.tim-mann.org/
So I should offer the guy something like 10 bucks for it and then offer it
to the list for like 30 or, that way I can make some money to send to VISA
and someone who loves Macs will be happy and it won't get junked, in other
words. Please don't flame me for wanting to profit, but I'm seriously broke
and need to pay Chris Kennedy/Visa/my parents/go to college/get gas/fix my
power steering/pay J. Darren Petersen/etc. I think a $20 profit is fair, as
I already spent time finding it, gas getting there, and would spend money
obtaining it as well. Thoughts?
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8 is here: Try it free* for 2 months
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
I personally would hate/loathe/despise any web-based Krep, since I (and a
very small minority of others) read my mail in ASCII using Pine under a
Unix Shell account, and I ain't plannin' on a-changin' it.
Although there is something to be said of the Wikiwiki scenario... it
seems to bridge the User Interface gap well. Of course I can't speak as
to it's Admin or Secure aspects...
Cheers
7-Bit John
Wanna grab a shuttle pod and take a spin? I'm sure we can find an ol'
486/33 computer to run the thing...
Cheers!
Ed Tillman
Store Automation Tech Support Specialist
Valero Energy Corporation
San Antonio, TX; USA
Phone (210) 592-3110, Fax (210) 592-2048
edward.tillman(a)valero.com <mailto:edward.tillman@valero.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of "Eric
> Smith" <eric(a)brouhaha.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 6:20 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Cc: 3sdiarftt02(a)sneakemail.com
> Subject: Re: RE: M100 Keys Sought
>
> >> Should I bet on the galaxy?
> >
> > No keys.
>
> Are you certain? It has on occasion taken me 15 minutes to find keys
> just around my house. I'd expect that verifying that the M100 galaxy
> has no keys would take one heck of a long time.
>
>
>
>
Ed Tillman
Store Automation Tech Support Specialist
Valero Energy Corporation
San Antonio, TX; USA
Phone (210) 592-3110, Fax (210) 592-2048
edward.tillman(a)valero.com <mailto:edward.tillman@valero.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of "Dwight K.
> Elvey" <dwightk.elvey(a)amd.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:33 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: M100 Keys Sought
>
> >From: "Fred Cisin (XenoSoft)" <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
> >
> >> > Is that the Samsung M100 phone?
> >> > Or the Lotus Elan M100?
> >> > (I doubt that you have the M100 spiral galaxy for sale)
> >
> >On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Scarletdown wrote:
> >> I'll sell you the Large Magellanic Cloud for $50,000, and throw in
> >> the Small Magellanic Cloud as a bonus. :)
> >
> >Sorry.
> >Much as I'd love to add it to my collection, I'm having MAJOR
> >problems with storage space - I had to hand over most of my
> >collection to Sellam, just due to lack adequate space.
> >(space is NOT expanding)
> >
> >
>
> Hi
> EPA might complain. Super nova 1997A has been spewing
> out a lot of radio active waste. Since this is part of
> it, shipping may also be an issue.
> Dwight
>
[Tillman, Edward]
In that case, maybe a small lead-lined box? or ball? Wonder what
kind of safety features came with Orion's Belt? After all -- that big ol'
galaxy in that itty-bitty ball...
Cheers!