Yes, I went through the exact same thing...
I couldn't find anything under MS-Windoze which would get the CD directly.
It helps to have a dual-bootable machine with MS-Windows and
Linux/NetBSD/FreeBSD/whatever
I rebooted my machine under Linux and just do the "dd" command
dd if=/dev/cdrom of=vms.img
(which you probably already know about).
Then I copied the resulting file to a FAT-mounted drive and after that,
I rebooted the machine under MS-Windows and the file was readable under
SIMH on Windows. That file can the be burned onto a regular CD-R,
shipped off to your friend (I'm assuming here that everybody has all
of the correct & legal software licenses), and your friend can use
the CD-R from Windows...they don't need to dual boot.
I don't think there is any way for SIMH on Windows to read the CD
directly, you need the intermediate image file first.
Thomas Dzubin
Anyone know of a source for PDP-11/R20 bulbs? I have a few
burnt out ones...
See www.parse.com/~pdp11/
Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
-RK
--
Looking for Digital Equipment Corp. PDP-1 through PDP-15 minicomputers!
Robert Krten, PARSE Software Devices +1 613 599 8316.
Realtime Systems Architecture, Consulting and Training at www.parse.com
I've been doing a lot of finicky CAD work recently, and my hand is really
starting to hurt from gripping the mouse tightly for fine control. I'm
looking for a larger mouse (according to one site that sells various sizes
of mouse, I'm between a "large" and an "x-large" hand size) that I can lay
my hand more or less flat on top of (maybe with a couple of finger loops,
so you don't have to grasp it constantly) and ideally with a small
multi-button keypad of some kind on top. Is there such an animal out
there (aside from the Space Mouse guys' $500 products) that might have
these features? Suggestions welcome.
Hello All,
I am trying to put together a bio of the Visual 1050 for old-computers.com
and I need a couple of photos of the system for them to accept submission.
Can anyone help me out? I've googled myself out with no luck.
This is the info I've been able to compile so far. Any additions
appreciated. Thanks.
> - Model Name: 1050
> - Brand : Visual Technology
> - Manufacturer: Visual Technology, Incorporated 540 Main Street,
Tewksbury, MA 01876
> - Country: USA
> - Announce date: July 1983
> - Release date: 1984
> - End of production date: 1987?
> - Built-in software or language: Visual 1050 Utility Manager, DR C-Basic,
DR-CP/M MAC & SID, DR-GSX (graphics extensions), DR-Graph, Wordstar with
mailmerge, Multiplan (spreadsheet), TTY-1050 (communications).
> - Keyboard: Keytronic 65-02335 93-key ASCII (incl. numeric key pad & 17
function keys)
> - CPU: Z80A
> - CPU speed: 4mhz
> - Coprocessors: none
> - RAM: 128Kb (bank-switched)
> - Video Processor: 6502-2
> - Video RAM: 320Kb (32Kb x 10)
> - ROM: 8Kb
> - Text resolutions: 640x300 (80 x 25)
> - Graphical resolutions: 640x300
> - Number of colours: mono
> - Monitor: Tatung MN1213P31AU, 12" hi-res, green phosphor
> - Sound: none
> - Size: CPU - 5"h x 17"w x 17"d Monitor - 12"h x 12"w x 13"d (all
approx. dim)
> - Weight: CPU - 15 lbs Monitor - 10 lbs (all approx. weight)
> - Connectors: video, keyboard, serial, parallel & winchester ports
> - Built-in storage media: 2 - 400Kb, 5 1/4", SSDD, 96tpi, floppy disk
drives (TEAC FD-55E) with optional 10Mb external Winchester hard disk drive.
> - Operating system: Digital Research (DR) CP/M Plus (CP/M, Version 3)
> - Power supply: 75 watt, switching @115/230 VAC
> - Extensions:
> - Price: $2700
> Sho 'nuff, but don't feel bad; lots of people
> only think of 64K Z80 CP/M systems like the
> classic Z-2 when they think of Cromemco
I was aware Cromemco had some sort of 68000-based systems with "real"
Unix later in the game. But having only heard rumors I never guessed
they used an '020, and didn't realize they had System V and all those
goodies. Glad to learn of it, and all those firsts.
By contrast, I was well aware of the many CPU options from CompuPro
(Godbout) including the CPU-68k, which I used, and the 32016, which
I'd still like to find someday...
Somewhere around here I have some S-100 Journals (I think that's the
name) that I found on the newsstand in the late 80's. Be interesting
to see what was being listed besides 386s and Concurrent DOS.
--Steve.
I have an ODEC line printer ( I think a 300 LPM ). I received it in 1985 but
never used it. I think it has been used very little. I would like to sell
it. Is there any market for such a printer?
to:
Here's a cool website about the 2068 with pictures of
the old Zebra (Portugese) Disk Systems.
http://www.timexsinclair.org/
Enjoy!
I had fun reading these articles...
I still have half of a disk system here, and my friend
Tom in NJ has the other half I'm sure I can grab from
him some time...
Al
I have a PDP-11/10 (a.k.a PDP-11/05) which I am attempting to bring back to
life. It was placed in storage many years back, and appears to be in good
condition. I am at the point where I can enter programs from the front panel
and execute them (core memory and processor appear to work). I have a LA36
hooked up as the console to the SLU. I think the TS03 tape drive may work,
and I am in the process of cleaning a RK05 disk drive and disk pack.
My question is, what am I looking for in order to load RT-11? Is RT-11
easier to install via tape, or am I looking for a bootable disk pack?
At this point, I am not looking for specifics, I need to know what is the
general means to bootstrap RT-11 onto a PDP-11. This exercise is a
precursor to getting a PDP-11/20 up and running.
I would also like to know if one of the PDP-11 emulators would assist me to
learn what I need to do in terms of bootstrapping a system. I have used a
PDP-11 10+ years ago, but never needed to bootstrap a system.
Thanks for any assistance.
--barryM
Forget the Univac III, get yer Cray now:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3403082724
What the heck is going on here? Next thing, we'll find out the ENIAC was
secretly hidden away in some building on North Base.
--
Jeffrey Sharp
Many profuse thanks to everybody that rounded up information for me about
TELEX ttys.
I'm in a bit of an embarrasing situation-- after getting this nice Model 32
WU tty,
tsting it out, finding out it works perfectly, I finally realize -- I don't
have any space for it!
My SWL area is very small, already full, plus no easy way to get the TTY
down the steep narrow stairs to my lair.
So I've reluctantly put it up for auction on eBay. Interested folks can see
it at:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3010656618
You could do a lot worse than to have a shiny , sleek, and well-working
Model 32 TTY.
Thanks for reading,
George
Hi,
Below is a post I sent about 3 years ago on some transputer boards that I
received which I didnt know what they are. Well, I finally got some answers
(nothing is late in this hobby)....
Vytal LTD designed the B020 graphics board and the VTM 301 Vector Tram board
(as well as the VecTram) which was licensed to INMOS to be sold.
The VTM 301 is a pre-cursor to the IMSB420 VecTram module and was the 1st of
many production runs. It is not software compatible to the IMSB420. The
underside of the tram is where the DSP processor is inserted...
The IMSB020 graphics board was also designed by Vytal LTD...
The Paradise 1/A was designed by T2SL and is a SCSI Tram. I finally found
information on this and scanned the documentation and posted it on the web.
The link is
http://www.classiccmp.org/transputer/documentation/t2sl/Paradise-1.doc.
Yes, it is in microshaft format, but I will soon change that. Now on other
transputer stuff I recently aquired like a prototype RS232 to Transputer
link board from INMOS...
Cheers,
Ram
**********************************************************************
Hi,
I picked up several transputer based hardware including
a B020, B008 and several trams including 2 SCSIs trams
and an ethernet tram. Among the collection, I found 2
wierd looking ones. One is a tram and the other I got
no idea how to use it.
The Tram is a size 4 tram and has the following labels:
T2SL
Paradise- 1/A
It contains what looks like an IDE connector and
has the following chips:
INMOS IMST222C
LOGIC L54C80JC-4
and two INMOS IMS1620S55 ICs.
The other card has an IMST800D-G20S chip
and has the following on the board:
VYTAL VTM 301
Copyright VYTAL LTD 1989
On the underside, it has a socket for another
transputer chip (maybe??).
Oh, there is another board too. It is also a size
4 tram and has a T805-G30S and the board is
>from INMOS. There is a label on one of the IC
chips (written using a pen, so might not be
reliable) "B417-17 SE006".
Also, the B020 graphics card has no SIMMs on it.
Does anyone know what type of SIMMs I can use.
Finally, I got an ethernet tram without any cables.
What type of cable to I need to use it. It is an IMSB421
tram. The SCSI trams would probably use standard
SCSI cables. Am I right. Thanks for you help.
Ram
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
Well, I finally got around to working on my Novas again, and the first thing
on my list was to replace the burnt out bulbs on the front panels. I started
with my Nova 2. Several months ago I bought a bulb at Radio Shack to try out
and today I soldered it on to the Nova 2 front panel PCB. It worked, the
light lit up very brightly when the machine was in the RUN state (it was the
RUN light that I replaced). The light is *very* bright. It also gets warmer
that the others do, but it is a smaller bulb. It also seems that all the
other lights dim when it comes on, but IIRC, they always did that when the
machine was in the RUN state, before I replaced any bulbs.
Anyway, I wanted to double check before I replaced all the lights and make
sure of the voltage level. Does anyone know what that is? I don't have much
Nova 2 documentation, and the Nova 1200 documentation I have doesn't list
that information.
--
Owen Robertson
> I tested a Viking QDT with RT-11 and a 1 gig HD. Of course, I could only use
> the first 30 megs. This one is destined for a BSD machine anyhow.
The Viking QDT and RT-11 can address a lot more of a HD than 30Mb. For
example V5.3 supports 8 partitions (8 * 30 = 240MB), newer versions support
more. I can't remember off the top of my head how much as I'm running a
newer version, but I'm using 100Mb and 200Mb HD's under RT-11.
The QDT is a great board, on my /73 I've got a Plextor 8x CD-ROM, DEC TLZ06,
and two PC Removable disk trays (for easy swapping of HD's) hooked to one.
I've successfully run RT-11, RSX-11M, RSX-11M+, and RSTS/E on this setup.
I was originally using 100MB and 200MB SCSI disks, I now use 2GB 7200RPM
Seagate Barracuda's.
> I got the QDT for $45 on eBay. Someone put it up with a buy-it-now of $45.
> Someone tipped me off, and I got there first. It pays to keep a sharp eye on
> eBay. I just bought a KDJ11-SD off eBay for $5. This is a nice one: rev -09
> CPU, 18 MHz, 1.5 megs RAM. Other recent eBay steals: RQDX3 for $10, DESQA
> for $8.50.
Nice, it shows I've not been keeping a close enough eye on eBay.
Zane
----------------Original Message-----------------
From: "Philip Pemberton" <philpem(a)dsl.pipex.com>
Subject: WTD: AMD or Intel 80387 Math Coprocessor IC
Hi all,
I'm trying to track down a 387 math coprocessor IC for an old 386-based
Linux box that's going to be doing a bit of numbercrunching for me. Has
anyone here got an AMD or Intel (AMD preferred) 387 coprocessor rated at
40MHz (-40 part number suffix) that would work correctly with an AMD
Am386DX-40? No, before you ask, the 386DX does *not* have a built in
mathco - the 486DX was (IIRC) the first DX-series chip with a built-in
coprocessor.
Thanks.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you're not in a hurry, I've got a couple here; as noted elsewhere, I don't
think Intel made any at that speed in the good old days and IIRC they were
all second-sourced. The two that I have are a ULSI and a Cyrix, both 40Mhz,
and both on boards using the AMD 386 DX-40..
I think you were also looking for a riser board to allow mounting ISA cards
horizontally; might be able to help you out there as well, but would need
exact dimensions. Finally, I haven't forgotten about the other stuff you & I
were talking about, the PPT punch, reader and tape and the small footprint
386 boards, have just been dealing with a lot of other crap in the last while.
Will be in touch ASAP,
mike
----------------Original Message----------------
From: "Steve Jones" <classiccmp(a)crash.com>
Subject: Cromemco 68k System 100 on eBay
Looks like most of a 68k-based Cromemco on eBay.
...
I hadn't realized anyone had put a 68020 on the S-100 bus...
----------------------------
Sho 'nuff, but don't feel bad; lots of people
only think of 64K Z80 CP/M systems like the
classic Z-2 when they think of Cromemco, not
the professional UNIX-V systems that gave DEC
et al a run for their money in the later days,
especially after Cromemco merged with Dynatech
in December 1986.
To quote from one of their ads listing their
technical contributions, they:
-Named the S-100 bus
-Developed the first micro that used the Z-80
-Developed the first multi-user micro
-Developed the first UNIX-like OS for a micro
-Developed the first micro using a Winchester HD
-Developed the first micro with 16MB RAM and
50MB HD for less than $50,000
-Developed the first colour graphics micro
-Developed the first micro addressing >64 KB RAM
-Developed the first UNIX V micro
-Developed the first micro capable of IBM RJE
-Developed the first intelligent I/O interfaces
with separate microprocessors on the I/O boards
-First adapted mainframe I/O channel processor
concept to a micro
-Developed the first micro that could auto-boot
from ROM
-Developed first micro with auto-baud console
-Developed first micro capable of self-programming
an EPROM
-Developed first micro with error correcting RAM
-Developed first computer capable of sync'ing to
a TV signal and overlaying computer & TV images
Considering all that, I'm surprised how rarely I
read about them here.
Sorry to say we scrapped a number of CS-100/300/400's
a few years ago before I discovered this site (and
considering the time I've wasted scrolling through
the garbage lately in digest mode there are times
I've regretted that I did find it). Mind you, when
I offered some of the older CS-1/CS-3 and Z-2's here
a while ago, no one wanted to pay the shipping from
Toronto, so it probably wouldn't have made any
difference; fortunately Dan Cohoe, another crazy
Canuck, is going to take them off my hands.
However, I might still be able to lay my hands on
some documentation and software for the 100/300/400
models, so if someone here grabs the one on eBay, I
*might* be able to help (no promises, though).
mike in Toronto
Are any of the DECUS 12 bit SIG newsletters online? I just found parts
of two of them in my attic (#39 - March 1980 and #40 - Summer-Fall-Winter
1980) and they have some interesting comments about TU-58s and 12-bit
machines.
It's interesting considering the recent activity regarding TU-58s and
emulators. According to (I think) Jim Van Zee, formerly of Laboratory
Data Systems of Seattle), being able to send a break is critical for
reliable operation of a TU-58 (and gives the exact reasons). The M707
and the M8650 cannot do this without modifications (but he does describe
the mod to the M707 and says that it can be done to the KL8E (M8650) but
not the KL8EJ (M8655) or KL8A).
The author goes on to describe a handler he wrote for OS/8 - a non-
system handler. It adds "DTU0" and "DTU1" of 682 OS/8 blocks. He also
writes that it is impossible to write a system handler without an
external circuit or ROM code (a-la 8K TD8E + ROM) to calculate checksums.
His hardware solution is 4 chips grafted onto an M8650 (one of which
is an Intel 8748 microcontroller!)
Additionally, he mentions a virtual TU-58 server written for the VAX
by Jim Gladden, and describes a submission to DECUS of a non-TU58
serial line device handler for the VAX (ASCII files only) that *may*
be submission number 8-921 (my handwritten notes in the margin).
So... if anyone wants to hang a TU-58 (physical or virtual) off of a PDP-8,
we have somewhere to start.
-ethan
> From: acme(a)ao.net
>
> > But, as-is it wouldn't pass FCC regulations.
>
> Not to doubt your word, but what is your source for
> that information? I've had several conversations
> with George Grimm (President of Timex Computer
> Corp.) and he never mentioned a problem with the
> FCC.
I have to say that it was anecdotal and repeated in
every review of the machine I have ever read.
In that day, FCC regs were the big talk about all
sorts of computer equipment.
It was also said that one of the reasons the TRS-80
Model III was created was because the Model I wouldn't
pass FCC regulations as a home computer.
Many PC Clones had problems with the FCC also.
Used to be when you bought a clone you asked:
Does it have an FCC ID?
Does it run Lotus 1-2-3?
Does it run Flight Simulator?
Usually, in that order.
So no, I have no hard data to back that up.
But, the inside of the TS-2068 is shielded and the
Spectrum isn't.
> I would be interested to see photos of the
> prototype. Do you have any Web space you can post
> photos to?
Yes, but they'd be diappointing. Basically, it looks
exactly like a British Spectrum but it has an American
RF converter in it.
No discernable difference on the outside.
> Mind if I ask the company name?
Not at all, it was: Zebra Systems, Inc.
www.zebrasystems.inc
I did most of the tech support, and wrote most of the
manuals and some of the advertising. It was a fun
job...
We did Timex, Coco (I also worked for Specrrum
Projects before coming to Zebra), Amiga and Atari-ST.
Zebra was a sister company to Alpha Products and
Colorware (Tim Jenison of Amiga Video Toaster fame. In
fact, he prototyped the toaster on a Coco.)
Regards,
Al
In a message dated 2/26/03 7:21:26 AM Pacific Standard Time,
rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com writes:
> Correct, XEROX made a model 8/16 that had two CPUs, one 8 bit and 16 bit. I
> THINK one was a Z-80 and the other was a 8086 but I'm not sure any more. I
> used to have the docs for an 8/16 and I've been looking for one but haven't
> managed to find one yet.
>
>
Xerox made a couple of 8/16s. I have one of the 8086 second CPU boards for my
Xerox 820-II. I was going to install it till a house fire melted the 820.
The original 820 came with dual 8" floppies or an 8" floppy and an 8"
harddrive and ran CPM. It was a spendy little computer for its time. Then
they fit Dual 5 1/4" floppies in an external case, came out with a low
profile keyboard and the add on 8086 Board. They called it the Xerox
820II-8/16.
IIRC the design was taken from the Z80 Big Board which was a popular kit at
the time. It was mounted flat, underneath the CRT and looked much like a
terminal.
At the time the IBM PC came out the Xerox design was hopelessly outdated.
They redesigned the case to a rectangular shape with a separate monitor ala
the IBM PC. They used dual 5 1/2" half height floppies oriented horizontally.
I never saw an actual one but IIRC they used the same Big Board coupled with
the 8086 board that was in the 820 and sold it as the Xerox 8/16.
It ran CPM, CPM-86 and MS-DOS ( IIRC to 2.11). However it was not IBM
Compatible, and did not have IBM graphics.
By the time it was ready the bottom had fallen out of the crossover market. I
don't think Xerox sold any commercially. A liquidation company sold the
remainder for about three years. I doubt they sold many, I bet most were
scrapped for the drives.
The Xerox 820 II was my second computer system and still one of my favorites.
(The first was State Surplus Litton 1251 that I bought for $25.00) I have had
almost all of the various models of the 820 go through my hands over the
years. Besides my original melted one I still have another packed away with
all it's SW. Someday it will run again.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
> From: Patrick Finnegan <pat(a)purdueriots.com>
>
>
> Umm, actually, 'no'. The cable has pins removed to
> change drive selects, and the drives don't have any
> method of setting the drive selects. So,
> swapping the position of the drives changes what
> drive they are. The LED on the front of the drive
> confirms that.
If you're that sure. It sounds like you just have bad
boot disks.
Remember, a Model IV needs a boot disk with the Model
IV ROM file on it or else it won't boot properly. It
will only boot CP/M+ for the Model IV without this.
This *MAY* be why you're having a problem booting
stuff..
> Is there an easy couple line program I could type up
> in basic that using INP() and OUT() to test the
> drive controller to see if it can read from
> the disk? I _could_ read the tech manual I have,
> but I tend to be lazy when it comes to re-inventing
> things that other people already have done.
I don't think so. It might be possible, but I don't
know how to do that.
> One last thing, if it matters... it seems my machine
> was upgraded to 128kB RAM. Is is possible that the
> machine has bad memory that shows up when booting
> from a disk but not when starting up basic?
If the problem is in the first bank, maybe...
I used to use a simple program to test RAM in the old
days...
I think this will work (If I remember it correctly)
10 A = Mem (0)
20 Print A;" ";
30 gosub 10
What happens here is that the program puts the return
for the gosub on the stack and reduces the RAM by a
few bytes each iteration.
If there is bad ram, the computer will crash.
If not, it will eventually end with an out of memory
error.
Contact me off list. Maybe I can somehow make you a
disk you can boot.
I could probably set up my Coco with a Disk Copy
program to copy the disk.
If my Model I were working, I could use SuperUtility
to make you a bootable disk.
I'm looking for a Model III or IV locally to play
with.
Anyone in Philly have one they'd part with?
I'd certainly use it to help Pat out as a start...
I might have something to trade for it you'd want
(like a 56k Modem for a PC or a low capacity PC IDE
Drive?)
Regards,
Al
> From: Patrick Finnegan <pat(a)purdueriots.com>
>
> I recently picked up a TRS-80 model 4, that seems to
> have problems with its floppy drives.
>
<Snipped>
>
> I tried swapping the floppy drives, and that time I
> got a "Diskette?" prompt if there was no disk in
> the drive, and pressing any keys didn't cause
> anything to happen. If I put a disk in the
> drive, the machine never displays anything, and
> then after 10-20 seconds, the drive light goes out.
>
> I tried connecting only one drive at a time, with
> the same results. If I connected a 1.2MB floppy
> that I had laying around (a Teac FD-55GFR-149-U),
> it did the same thing as if the drives were swapped.
Ok, a quick primer about TRS-80's and Floppy drives:
Unlike IBM Drives, TRS-80 drives are usually hard
jumpered for specific positions (Not always, but
internal drives are..)
What most people in the PC world don't know is that
floppy drives have an addressing scheme similar to
Master/Slave jumpers on hard drives.
They can be set to positions 0, 1 ,2 or 3. And the
last drive in the chain needs to be terminated (like
SCSI Drives).
For external drives, the drives are set to all
selects, and pins are pulled from the drive cable to
determine what position they are in. If you notice on
IBM Floppy drive cables, there is a twist between the
A: and B: connector. That twist brings the select from
the 0 drive to the 1 select pin. All IBM drives are
set to position 1 (second position).
I don't think a 1.2 mb FDD will work properly on a
TRS-80 Model IV for two reasons. The 1.2mb drive is
much more like an 8in drive than a 5.25in drive. And
transfers data at a higher rate.
Unless the drive can autoswitch to the slower 360k
data rate, it won't work on the controller.
And if you did get it to work, it has a different
Tracks per inch capability than 360k / 180k drives.
However, assuming your problem is with the floppy
drives, and not the diskette you are trying to boot...
A 360k XT Style floppy will work fine, and once you
get it booted, a modern OS like Newdos 80, L-DOS,
MultiDos, etc... Will allow you to use both sides of
the drive for 360k storage.
You can even use 720k 3.5 drives in the same way.
I know for the Model I, LNW made a Disk Doubler Board
that worked with 8in drives, and so would accomodate
1.2mb drives. I don't know if such a disk controller
was ever made for the Model IV.
If you have a PC with 360k Drive, you should be able
to run a TRS-80 Emulator and use a disk image of an OS
to make a bootable floppy in 180k or 360k format.
Let me know if I can help you in any way with this.
The Model I/III/IV was my first machine, and I'm
pretty sure I can remember a lot of info regarding it.
And I still have all my books and disks in my closet.
Regards,
Al Hartman
http://www.geocities.com/alhartman
Join the Macintosh Emulation List...
http://www.topica.com/lists/Macemulist
"It is the soldier, not the reporter who has given us
the freedom of the press. It is the soldier, not the
poet, who has given us the freedom of speech. It is
the soldier, not the campus organizer, who gives us
the freedom to demonstrate. It is the soldier who
salutes the flag, who serves beneath the flag, and
whose coffin is draped by the flag, who allows the
protester to burn the flag."
-Father Dennis Edward O'Brien, Sergeant, USMC
> From: "Fred Cisin (XenoSoft)" <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
>
> Yep
> The earliest 1.2M drive that I saw (before the AT)
> was a Mitsubishi 4854? I was told that it had had
> been designed for the explicit purpose of replacing
> 8" drives. It did NOT also have a "360K"
> mode.
>
> I also heard a rumor (probably not true) that "When
> Microsoft was writing the DOS and AT BIOS support
> for 1.2M drives, they thought that IBM had
> decided to release a model with 8" drives".
Cool info! Thanks!
> Hmmm. mixing single density sectors and double
> density sectors on the same track?
No, but one could replace the boot sector with the
correct density boot sector when copying the disk to
make it boot on one system or another. It may have
been Vernon Hestor's other OS. V-DOS I think it was
called.
It was a cut-down Multidos he wanted to market to game
manufacturers.
> This'll make your day,...
> I had an LNW. (also a Lobo expansion interface, a
> PMC81, etc.)
I never saw a Lobo Max-80, though I had a few friends
who bought the Mapper board from them to run CP/M on
their Model I's.
> Most of that stuff, I sold cheap at VCF (which is
> run by your buddy Sellam).
He made a comment to me a month or so ago that
indicated he at least KNEW what an LNW-80 was...
Oh well..
An ex-employer (and former LNW Dealer) had several
that he trashed. I found out when I called him to ask
if he would sell or trade any away...
Bummer!!!
Thanks for the cool info!
Regards,
Al
> From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
>
> Try re-seating the 'ribbon cable' between the CPU
> board and the disk controller PCB _at both ends_. I
> would estimate that over 50% or disk problems on
> M3s and M4s come from this cable!
You're right about this. It all starts to come back to
me... *Grin!*
This was one of the first things I'd do when a machine
came in with disk controller problems.
I'd also remove the cable totally and clean the
connections with a pencil eraser and possibly some
alcohol.
Mostly, I'd just use the eraser.
Tin to Tin connections would often get oxidation.
Jerry Pournelle used to talk about something called
Stabilant-21 that worked well to keep this from
happening.
This stuff worked great on Model I keyboard to E/I
cables (I soldered on the infamous Gold Plugs on mine.
and made a gold and shielded cable besides) and floppy
cables.
But since the behavior changes when he moves the
drives, it sounds like his "0:" drive is bad.
Regards,
Al Hartman
On Feb 27, 16:50, Megan wrote:
> >I'd remove the CXA16-M serial
> >multiplexers, which I don't think any normal PDP-11 OSs support,
>
> I believe the CXA16s are DHV-like interfaces, RT supports DHVs.
Wel, that would make sense. Easy enough to check by running RT11 with
the correct driver. If so, I stand corrected.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
From: Robert Borsuk <rborsuk(a)colourfull.com>
Date: 02/27/2003 10:39 AM
> Woohoo,
> Timex guys on the list. I can ask a Timex (sort of ) question now.
Hmmph. I've been on this list for years :>)
> I have an A&J MicroDrive (Stringy Floppy - The next big thing to rule
> the world) that I don't have any information on. I would love to use
> it with my T1000. It was almost complete in the box. Interface, drive,
> cable, even some new stringy floppies still sealed. Does anyone have a
> manual for this thing? I've poked around online but haven't seen too
> much.
Okay, I have the manual and will be gled to scan it and send it to you.
HOWEVER -- there are some things you should know . . .
First, it will never work with a TS1000 -- only a TS2068.
Second, these things came in two versions -- "A" and "B" -- and the different
versions use physically different tapes, so make sure you have the proper
tapes before wasting any time with it.
Third, these things are the most unreliable form a data storage I have ever
encountered (see the classiccmp thread a couple of years back titled "World's
Crappiest Mass Storage Device" or similar name). Typically, the tapes have
a useable lifespan of less than five hours. Then they break. (This is not
due to my having one faulty drive -- I've owned several and seen more and
they ALL suck!). If you do find a tape that lasts, inevitably the media
goes south (no longer readable) and your data goes with it.
The drives are "cute," and nice for a collector to have, but completely
unreliable.
Later --
Glen
0/0
Hi, I got a call to rescue not too old yet classic equipment. DEC
AXP 3000 and 2600 (?) systems. And some HP9000 K class thing. Plus
StorageWorks RAID stuff. 3 full height cabinets and 3 half height
cabinets, 4-8 monitors and some tape backup boxes. It sounds like
there will be nice stuff among it, yet I am getting into trouble
with my garage space.
I have an MTI StingRay cabinet to kill for making space. This is
a storage system with CI connectors. MTI make. I have taken all
the functional parts out of the cabinet, but the cabinet needs to
go soon. Since I am probably getting blessed with StorageWorks
stuff, I may be have some leftovers. Need to check when I see
the new stuff.
Anyone have a HP9000 K class and runs NetBSD, or one of those
Mach kernel based BSD lite systems? That's what I'd like to
try with the HP9000. It seems quite cute. Although I may part
with it for a VAX 4000-500 or better side-table VAX.
cheers,
-Gunther
--
Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D. gschadow(a)regenstrief.org
Medical Information Scientist Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
Adjunct Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Medicine
tel:1(317)630-7960 http://aurora.regenstrief.org
From: Al Hartman <alhartman(a)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Check out this TI99/4 on eBay
Date: 02/26/2003 7:42 PM
> > From: "TeoZ" <teoz(a)neo.rr.com>
> >
> > My first computer was a timex 2068 and learning to
> > program on chicklet keyboards sucks.
>
> But.. Those were pretty nice computers...
Still are :>)
> Originally, it was intended to be an American Version
> of the 48k ZX-Spectrum Computer.
>
> But, as-is it wouldn't pass FCC regulations.
Not to doubt your word, but what is your source for that information? I've
had several conversations with George Grimm (President of Timex Computer
Corp.) and he never mentioned a problem with the FCC.
> I have a U.S. Prototype of the Spectrum, a Microdrive
I would be interested to see photos of the prototype. Do you have any Web
space you can post photos to?
> The company I worked for in the 80's even made a
> drawing program similar to MacPaint for it, called
> TechDraw, A Spectrum Emulator Cartridge, Disk System,
> Terminal Software (for the Timex Modem), and lots
> more...
Mind if I ask the company name?
Later --
Glen
0/0
Hi folks:
This is a summary of input from many people, manuals, and prior notes of
mine. The initial question was of the differences between the standard
Teletype 33, and the version provided for DEC systems. But I have also
added some sundy stuff as well.
Let me know of any corrections/additions.
Standard Teletype "Private-wire" ASR-33 (aka M33-asr):
------------------------------------------------------
- The right side module is the CCU (Call-Control-Unit). The "private-wire"
version is for current-loop operation, and has a blank top plate.
It is normally configured for 20-mA (but can be jumpered for 60-mA).
- The paper tape reader is also called a TD (Transmitter-Distributor),
a legacy term from early Teletype days.
- The "standard" tape reader has a 3-position lever:
START/STOP/FREE.
- An optional "auto" tape reader has a 4-position lever:
START/AUTO/STOP/FREE.
In the AUTO position, the reader can be commanded on/off remotely.
The DC1 (XON) and DC3 (XOFF) control characters are used as start/stop
commands for the auto tape reader. Since XON/XOFF chars are used today
as software-handshaking flow-control characters, you want to disable
software handshaking if you are connecting to a PC.
- There is a little circuit board mounted in the pedestal stand which
provides power for the tape reader. In later 3300-series machines,
this was finally built into the CCU.
- from Jack Hart:
The Model 33ASR with the "Auto" TD feature had a different
TD control/power board underneath the machine in the back. It
had a relay that was controlled by either the momentary "AUTO"
switch or a stuntbox contact on the printer. There was another
feature controlling the TD when the 33 was configured for TWX.
When a connection to the the other end was established, the
distant machine's answerback would trip and then send
an "X-ON" to start the tape at the calling machine. The X-ON
was actually programmed onto the end of the answerback drum sequence.
Sometimes the modem itself would send the contact closure to trip the
TD based upon seeing the RS232 Carrier Detect and/or
the RTS/CTS leads change states.
DEC LT33 (DEC-modified ASR-33):
-------------------------------
- The CCU is a standard private-wire current-loop (blank plate).
- Has an 8-position connector (mate-n-lock/molex?) with 6 pins populated.
Two wires for transmit loop, two for receive loop, and two for
reader control. Can be wired for full-duplex (two loops), or
half-duplex (rx and tx wired in series to one loop).
- Uses the standard tape-reader (3-position lever: START/STOP/FREE)
- The pedestal has a small circuit board with the control relay .
(and reader power supply as well?) (and DEC interface cable?)
There are a couple of cables connecting it to the CCU.
- from Jim Haynes:
There was a 6-wire cord and they were full duplex; two wires for
transmit, two for receive, and two for reader control. They didn't
use the X-on X-off characters for reader control. The CCU was just
a plain private line blank plate. What I can't remember for sure
is how the reader worked. I'm pretty sure they let the distributor
step the reader, and just had a relay to enable/disable it. Seems
like I remember a reed type relay. I guess there was a power supply
in the base for the reader step magnet in any kind of ASR. No doubt
the printer loop current was 20ma - no reason to use 60 when you can
use 20. I don't know if the keyboard used a 20ma loop or if it just
used the thing as a dry switch. But you'd probably want 20ma or so
in it to be sure the contacts are kept clean.
- from Jack Hart:
The DEC Model 33's has a simple circuit board attached to the
Call Control which was operated by the computer (I think the
computer would send a contact closure to the board on two leads
or maybe it sent a voltage to the relay...I never used it).
That board had a reed relay which was in series (or was it parallel?)
with the switch on the (standard) TD. It couldn't use the
"auto" TD since it wouldn't be able to stop the TD. The computer
actually turned the TD on and off with the contact closure.
The Model 33 usually had a six-wire straight Molex-type of connector
for the DEC interface. I think the keyboard contacts were on one
pair, the selector magnet driver input on the next pair and then
the TD control relay on the third pair.
- John Francini provided this:
http://www.chd.dyndns.org/pdp8/
It includes:
- Teletype Model 33 Line Set wiring printouts
- DEC LT33 Teletype Modifications Print Set
- some scanned 33 manuals are at:
http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/pdp8/
Gil's Random M33 notes:
=======================
CCU (Call-Control-Unit)
-----------------------
The right side module is the CCU (Call-Control-Unit). Here is my limited
knowledge on the interfaces available; the 33s all have some version of
CCU, it's just a matter of which one.
The most common CCU (I presume) was the simple interface to a 20-milliamp
dc loop (or 60-mA) for "Private Wire Service." This one had a blank panel
on top and a LINE/LOCAL knob sticking out the front of the case. This is
the model that usually got hooked up to computers or to dedicated lines.
Then there was a "Computer-I/O" CCU, which had six square buttons sticking
out the top (at the front), plus a power button above those. It had a
bunch of TTL-logic-level signals as well as a current loop, I believe. One
of my 33 manuals discusses this one (others do not) -- it says it has a
20-pin connector, with a bunch of signals that look to be TTL-level. I
have not heard of anyone owning one of these computer-i/o units.
The "TWX" (Teletypewriter Exchange) machines had a CCU for
"Switched-Network Service," which used an external "dataset" (modem) that
mounted in the stand, and connected to a conventional telephone line, using
FSK tones for communication. These had either a rotary dialer or
touch-tone keypad for dialing the phone number, a speaker at the front, six
round buttons sticking out the top at the front, four more button/lights up
in the middle of the panel, and an optional way-cool auto-dialing card
reader. My M33 is a Western-Union-branded TWX machine that has a UCC-3
CCU, with the touch-tone dialer and a 101D modem in the stand. I think
almost all computer modems can talk to this M33 modem, when they fall back
to the lowest standard (Bell 103?). I think these may have been a
moderately-common machine.
There was also a UCC-39 CCU which had a built-in modem (but still connected
to an external line interface of some sort), and had six square buttons
sticking out the top. I think this was used for TWX service also. I don't
know how common these were.
Then there was a CCU for "Circuit-Switching Service," which apparently
refers to "Telex" service, which used a network of private lines. This CCU
had a rotary dialer and four round buttons. This is found in Model 32
(baudot) sets, not Model 33 (ascii) machines. The dialer is not for
telephone calling -- the unit connects to a special neutral or polarized DC
wire line system, and the dialer pulses the line to call a station. It is
operationally similar to TWX machines (that used a modem on the phone
lines), but it used a special dc line network and central switching system.
Interfacing -- Data Format
--------------------------
Baud: 110
Data bits: 7
Parity: Even, or Mark
Stop bits: 2
Flow-ctrl: None
As I understand it, most 33 keyboards generated even parity (but early ones
used bit-8 always marking). If you have a terminal emulator set for
8-data/no-parity, the chars will have bit-8 high when the parity bit is
marking (for half the chars typed on the 33 keyboard) -- bit-8 high is
non-standard ascii, and the terminal may display ibm-extended chars or
something else.
I believe bit-8 is ignored by the 33 printer, so you should be able to send
chars to the 33 when the terminal is set to 7-data/any-parity, or
8-data/no-parity. However, 1-stop bit may be a problem for the 33 to keep
up with streaming data. Also, you don't want flow control set to xon/xoff
if your 33 has the special option for an auto-tape-reader (it would have
the 4-position lever, not 3-pos).
Interfacing -- Private-Wire current loop
----------------------------------------
The transmitter loop output is effectively a series connection of the
keyboard and tape reader sections (via the rotating distributor).
Electrically the TX loop looks just like series switch contacts.
The receiver loop input connects to the an electronic circuit, and is
polarity-sensitive. It is usually configured for 20-mA, but can be jumpered
intenally for 60-mA operation. I have used it with a 30V loop supply, and
am told it runs fine down to a 12V loop. The max voltage for the loop is
unclear -- I have seen 45V and 70V listed as the max (I'll stay at 30V to
be safe).
For full-duplex operation, the TX and RX lines connect to two
externally-powered loops. For half-duplex operation, the TX and RX lines
connect in series to one externally-powered loop.
There is an internal loop supply, but it is used in local mode only, so
that the keyboard can drive the receiver.
I have some schematics for rs-232-to-current-loop converters at:
http://www.vauxelectronics.com/gil/tty232/
Interfacing -- TWX dataset (modem)
----------------------------------
For TWX machines with a dataset (modem), you should be able to connect to
it (at 110-baud) using a 300-baud computer modem. 300 may be the lowest
rated modem standard, but they pass anything up to 300-baud, as they are a
simple fsk (freq-shift-key) design, using two tones for tx (mark/space),
and two tones for rx (mark/space). The definition of which freq-pair is
tx, and which is rx, determines which end is "originate" and which is
"answer."
Paper Tape Readers
------------------
The "standard" tape reader has a 3-position lever, labeled START/STOP/FREE.
An optional "auto" tape reader has a 4-position lever, labeled
START/AUTO/STOP/FREE. In the AUTO position, the reader can be commanded
on/off remotely. The DC1 (XON) and DC3 (XOFF) control characters are used
as start/stop commands for the auto tape reader. Since XON/XOFF chars are
used today as software-handshaking flow-control characters, you want to
disable software handshaking if you are connecting to a PC.
There is a little circuit board mounted in the pedestal stand which
provides power for the tape reader. In later 3300-series machines, this
was built into the CCU.
3300-Series
typewheel/keyboard for "latest" ASCII code, variable customer-activated
options (auto/manual tape punch, auto CR/LF function, even-parity
keyboard...), and included, as standard, various features that were
previous options (paper-low/out sense, DC1/DC2/ENQ/EOT function contacts,
end-of-line space suppression...). My manual shows that they have a
one-piece cover, so the tape reader/punch didn't look added-on -- but I
think early 3300 units had original covers (separate covers for the reader
and punch, like the classic asr). The 3300 CCU (Call-Control-Unit) for
"private-wire" service (20-mil loop) also included the power supply for the
tape reader. Earlier 33s had this little board mounted in the stand.
Longevity
----------
The M33 (and the baudot M32) were designed for light-duty use. They did
not heat-treat parts, adjusted some things by bending parts... The 33/32
just seems to wear out after a while -- someone said about 1500 hours of
runtime will be about it. The elapsed-hour counter in my 33 says 1495, so
I should have a good 5 hours left! Your unit may or may not have an
elapsed-hour meter, since it was an option.
Before you spend big bucks on ebay
----------------------------------
A Model 33 has a four-row keyboard (not including the space bar).
A Model 32 has a three-row keyboard (not including the space bar).
The 33 is ascii, and the 32 is baudot.
You cannot (prctically) modify a 32 into a 33.
Documentation
-------------
There is a 2-volume desciption/adjustments manual set, and a third parts
manual -- the three manuals are often on ebay for $20-$40.
Schematics are harder to find. Also check these sites (scroll down):
http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/pdp8/http://www.chd.dyndns.org/pdp8/
Lubrication
------------
**DO NOT** use WD-40, since it gums up over time. I use 3-in-1 oil for
light lubing, 30W motor oil for heavier needs, and lithium grease for gears
and cams. Some folks don't even like 3-in-1, and will use a 10W for light
stuff.
Supplies
--------
For paper tape, check out ebay or:
http://www.westnc.com/teletype.html
Note that the paper-tape for the ASR-33 should be 1" wide, oiled paper.
Non-oiled paper or mylar tape will wear your punch pins (so I'm told). The
7/8" or 11/16" paper tape for baudot machines will not work at all.
For standard roll paper, check out ebay or:
http://www.westnc.com/teletype.html
For sprocket-feed paper, you have to special order paper that is 8.5" wide,
with the holes on 8" centers. Sprocket-feed machines are pain in the ass,
since standard teletype roll paper (or letter sheets) will not feed
through, nor will the commonly-available "continuous-form tractor-feed"
computer paper which is 9.5" wide, with tear-off sprocket holes. I have
located a special-order paper at Office-Max, which is indeed 8.5" wide
sprocket-feed, 3500 fan-fold sheets to a box. But this is a "green-bar"
computer paper -- I have not found white or buff. I did find an unusal
ROLL of sprocket-feed paper once.
For platen refinishing, check out:
http://www.techspray.com/1612info.htm
Teletype used the same ribbon for most of their machines, apparently the same
one used in old Underwood manual typewriters. Newer replacement ribbons
are nylon and only lightly inked so they don't last as long, but they work
fine. I found a decent $3 black ribbon at Staples: Dataproducts #R3300
(replacement for Okidata ML80/82/84/90 printers).
SMD (Selector Magnet Driver) Board
----------------------------------
I found un-soldered power resistors on the selector-magnet-driver board in
my 33 -- it's a shi**y pcb design, with no thermal considerations at all.
I have run across another fellow with the same problem. I repaired it with
heavy buss wire and solder. This board amplifies the 20-mA input to
500-mA, for driving the typing mechanism magnet (solenoid).
I took some large gauge non-insulated buss wire, and tack soldered several
sections of it to the traces from the hot resistor pads (to the next
component along the trace). After it was tacked in place, I twisted the
wire around the power resistor leads and soldered it, then soldered all
along the trace to bond the wire -- this left a nice big mound of
solder/wire extending away from each of the power resistor pads. This
beefed up the mechanical strength, and added some thermal mass to help pull
the heat away from the big frickin' resistor leads.
Stuff I need
------------
My 33 is a sprocket-feed machine that uses 8.5" wide paper, with the holes
on 8" centers. I'd like to find fan-fold paper in white, buff, or even
green-bar. I'd also be interested in rolls of sprocket paper.
I could use a copy stand for a 33 (or 32).
Also, this TWX machine uses a touch-tone dialer and dataset (modem). It
has the UCC-3 version of the 33's CCU (call-control unit), with a
touch-tone keypad, and connects to an external 101D dataset. I need to fix
the dataset. I have the standard 33 manuals, which have simplified
schematics and some theory on the UCC-3 CCU. But, full schematics would
let me check things properly.
Does anyone have a manual/schematic on the UCC-3?
Does anyone have a manual/schematic on the 101D?
How about the more-common 101C?
Does anyone know the difference between a 101D and a 101C?
thanks,
gil
;-----------------------------------------------------------
; vaux electronics, inc. 480-354-5556
; http://www.vauxelectronics.com (fax: 480-354-5558)
;-----------------------------------------------------------
From: "Fred Cisin (XenoSoft)" <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
> A minor complication with using DS drives, at least
> as external, . . .
> Didn't Radio Shack used pin 32 for drive select 3?
> Isn't that "side select"?
Yes, they did. I don't remember for sure, but I think
that on a Model I, you could only use 3 drives if you
decided to use Double Sided Drives.
On a Model III/4, it didn't matter as you could use
two internal and two external double sided drives
without problems (I think...).
It's been a while, and my memory is fuzzy on this one.
I used to use one DS/DD 40tk as Drive 0:, and two
DS/DD 80tk drives as 1 and 2 on my Model I when it ran
my BBS.
I had an LNDoubler in it, and always meant to get 8"
drives to get 1.2mb each instead of 720k.
I never did do that.
Now, I could put 1.2mb drives on with that, I guess.
You could boot from any size media that the controller
would support, you'd just have to make a boot floppy
on the correct media, as the drive settings were
contained in the boot sector of the disk.
On a Model I, the boot sector ALWAYS had to be Single
Density, no matter what the rest of the disk was.
That was the main difference between the Model I and
III. While they both had DD capability (the Model I
equipped with a Doubler), the Model III required a
Double Density Boot Sector.
I think that one of Dos'es (MultiDOS I think) would
boot on both machines as long as the Boot sector was
the correct type. I know one of the Dos'es could do
that.
I REALLY have to find my dream machine... A complete
LNW Model I or Model II (Team) computer...
Regards,
Al Hartman
I need some manuals for the Chips & Technologies Super386 chipset for a
client. I am aware of the Programmer's Reference Manual from a web site
of the company that produced it, but I have not found any title for the
hardware reference. Either would do, the hardware manual would be
preferable.
Anyone have the manual(s), or at least a title? Any dated reference would
be good.
This is for a client so there will be money involved if you find it for me
;)
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
What the government can and will do is contained in two phrases: "Manifest
Destiny," and "Eminent Domain."
The first, Manifest Destiny, was the political doctrine which told everyone
it was God's Will that we (Americans) posess, occupy and exploit all the
lands between the two native shores of the North American continent.
(Canada: ya lucked-out!).
The second, Eminent Domain, says that, if you have it, and the government
wants it (usually land, but has been applied to inventions as well), they
*can* offer you a 'fair price' (usually a paltry pitance), but they can
otherwise take what they want from you "in the name of the greater good" --
or, how I lost my farm to an unused interstate freeway (San Jose, Ca).
> If the local police can do it, I would guess the federal government
> must have some provision that allows them to do what they must,
> when they must, also.
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
>From: Ethan Dicks <erd_6502(a)yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
>To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
>Subject: Re: resurrecting a PDP-11/10
>Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:20:54 -0800 (PST)
>
>--- Fred Flintstone <iamvirtual(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for the assistance to date!
> >
> > Actually, I have a second M7800 card installed on the PDP-11/10 machine.
>
>That's handy (and it ends the speculation if you have two SLUs or not ;-)
>
> > As far as memory, there are two 16kw core systems installed on this
> > machine.
>
>Nice. That should serve nicely. Wish my 11/05 was that well equipped
>(but it's in the short box).
Yes, I guess I should call it a 11/05. despite what is clearly printed on
the console.
> > I am needing to know what I am looking for to get RT-11 running. What
> > did DEC call their install tapes? eg. Is the
> > "RT-11 V03B BIN MT9 1/2" tape the boot/install tape?
>
>It certainly seems like the distribution tape, but it's not clear to
>me that you have a bootable tape there. If your TS03 is working
>and you enter in the TS bootstrap and you get text, then it is
>bootable. Dunno where you'd find install instructions for v3, though.
>It's *possible* that there is a second tape that you boot first, one
>with either an MS or MT boot block on it. It's also possible that there
>is a boot papertape. Again, that's before my time (I got started with
>RT-11 v4 on floppy).
This tape is actually the first of two tapes. At this point, I don't know
if I have any bootable media.
> > Is RT-11 the easiest O/S to get installed?
>
>Yes!
>
> > I want to get to a point where I
> > can verify the hardware is all running.
>
>RT-11 or XXDP (DEC's low-level diagnostic monitor) are the way to go
>for that. With 28KW of core (not all of the upper card can be used
>due to the I/O page, you don't have a lot of OS options. 2BSD is
>out, as are recent versions of RSTS and RSX-11. Don't remember what
>the requirements for older OSes are off the top of my head.
>
> > As far as media devices, I have 3 x RK05, 1 x TS03, 2 x RX01, 1 x TU58.
>
>Nice assortment. Have you checked any of your diskettes or disk packs
>for labels that suggest they might be bootable?
Both systems have RK05J disks in addition to the three RK05 drives. I
presume the disk packs contained within the RK05J drives are most certainly
bootable, but I have no idea how they were generated, etc. The drives and
disk packs are dusty and I am learning what I need to do and at the same
time, not destroy the hardware along the way! I have read the recent thread
on cleaning RK05 and disk packs and I will be attempting this.
If I get the RK05J disk cleaned and ready to go, and toggle in the bootstrap
and the disk loads, do I need to manually start the O/S at some location? I
believe the M873YA Bootstram ROM is capable of booting the RK05, but I don't
know what would need to be done next (I believe 773010 will boot the RK05)
> > I am trying to decide what will be moved to the PDP-11/10 from the
>11/20.
> > The goal is to have the PDP-11/20 up and running. Getting the PDP-11/10
> > is just a step along the way.
>
>Are you trying to get something historically accurate or just something
>runnning well enough to be interesting? How much core do you have in
>your 11/20? That might help drive the answer. If you want to run RT-11,
>you'll need a storage device on the 11/20. It could be the RX01. If
>you want to toggle in a long bootstrap, it could be the TU-58 (but floppies
>are easier to find than TU-58 cartridges, and can be reformatted for the
>RX01 with an 8" drive and modern to semi-modern computers).
>
>-ethan
I want the PDP-11/20 to eventually be historically correct but with a full
load of options :-) The ultimate goal is to run adventure and Star Trek on
it using the LA36 terminal. ie. the quintessential time-wasting use of a
mini-computer ;-) Of course the blinkenlights and tape operating has to be
part of it too!
It is interesting that my 10 year-old son asks to play Star Trek on my
MicroPDP-11 rather than the full-motion flight simulator on the PC.
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Just for the sake of asking:
What is a "real computer?"
What are its power requirements?
What are Its space requirements?
What is its storage capacity? How?
How many calculations per second?
What I/O processes?
What I/O media?
Y'see... I once met a "real computer" -- I think, and used the darned
thing for over two years.
It was in a big concrete building, way up north (almost to Santa Claus). It
occupied the entire basement of a large, windowless, cubical concrete
building, and generated enough heat to warm the whole place during some
pretty harsh winters. Its power requirements on a day-to-day basis kinda
rivalled Spokane...
Its base mainframe measured 60' x 120', had 30 dumb-terminal workstations in
its ops center, serviced 120 remote terminals in the building, networked 35
outlying remote stations, but could boast only 1MB of memory, and could
handle maybe 3000 calculations per second while in pre-emptive time-sharing.
It was idiosyncratic: Though end users tended to interact with it via
attached light pens and keyboards, it also had some of the very first
"touch" screens -- it only gave up the time-slice when it wanted to...
You talked to it through both mag tapes and punch cards. If you fed it a
nice, neat stack of punch cards, it literally vomited "hash" back at you.
If you attempted the same program with 18" 'high-speed' reel-to-reel mag
tapes, it fed you back spaghetti. There was often electrical arcing between
user screens and light pens, and I hate to think of the number of monitor
screens replaced on the 'touch screens' when some user thought calibration,
or 'a little harder' meant putting a knuckle or two through the screen...
And we won't even go into the horrid monsters at the end of each corridor
know as "batch printers..."
It that a "real computer?"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of
> vance(a)neurotica.com
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 5:42 PM
> To: Philip Pemberton
> Cc: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Trivia Question
>
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Philip Pemberton wrote:
>
> > Eric Smith wrote:
> > > That's quite a sad definition of "real computer". Any one of my
> > > PDP-8 or PDP-11 systems, even the wimpiest, is much more of a "real
> > > computer" than any PC compatible will ever be.
> >
> > What, even if said PC is a K6-II/400 running Linux? I've got two PCs
> running
>
> A PC running Linux is not a real computer.
>
> Peace... Sridhar
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
I noticed an auction on eBay for a KZQSA-SA SCSI controller and I was
wondering (silly me) if it could be used with RT-11. I know that RT-11 is much
older than this board, but I was hoping someone had written a driver for it.
If the KZQSA isn't compatible, I'm open to suggestions as to what SCSI QBUS
board to get to use in an 11/53 (similar to the machine described on Johnathan
Engdahl's site), and if known, where I might get such, hopefully at a decent
price - not $799 like on eBay!
Thanks,
Stuart Johnson
> From: "TeoZ" <teoz(a)neo.rr.com>
>
> Do you still have a 2068 and addons for it?
No. Nothing that I'd like to sell...
Check www.zebrasystems.com
Stewart still has printers, some books and maybe some
2068 software.
Otherwise, check eBay and flea markets.
Sorry.
Regards,
Al
On Feb 27, 9:35, McFadden, Mike wrote:
> Wandering through the local surplus I found a decserver 550 in a full
height
> rack.
>
> It had the following boards in it.
>
> 4 X CXA16-M M3118
> 1 X M3127
> 1 X KDJ11-SD M7554
>
> Bulkheads, power supply, and cables
>
> I read somewhere that it could be converted to a 11/53 with a minimal
> effort. How much trouble?
Well, it will never be exactly an 11/53, since it's in the wrong box,
but you can make it effectively equivalent. I'd remove the CXA16-M
serial multiplexers, which I don't think any normal PDP-11 OSs support,
but the DESQA should be OK; it'll look to any OS just like a DELQA.
You'll need to change the two boot EPROMs on the KDJ11 board. The
standard boot ROMs for a microPDP-11/53 are 23-261E5 and 23-262E5. You
might get lucky if you type either of those numbers into Google ;-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
From: TeoZ <teoz(a)neo.rr.com>
Date: 02/26/2003 5:02 PM
> Too bad Timex dropped out of the computer buisiness, I liked the 2068. Still
> the C64 owned the game market and I ended up getting one a few years later.
> At least I learned to program on the 2068 since I had only a few titles for
> it.
Timex made some really bad choices when pursuing the US computer market.
Instead of simply producing a US version of the Spectrum (for which there was
already a ton of hardware and software available) they redesigned the TS2068
(nee TS2000). The resultant machine was (IMHO) far superior to the Spectrum,
but the delays, R&D expenses, and incompatibilities put Timex Computer Corp.
out of business.
The *up* side of all this was that an entire cottage industry was spawned to
support the orphaned TS2068. Users had their choice of several robust
FDD interfaces, serial and parallel i/o, tape storage devices, and other
peripherals, some of which is still sold and supported by the original
manufacturers.
Just last night I obtained a TS2068 with a full size keyboard, CGA video
output, and RS-232 all built into the unit.
So, while I agree that it's a shame Timex didn't hang in there, I've gotten
a lot of benefit from all the creative juices that were flowing around the
TS2068 during the mid-eighties.
Later --
Glen
0/0
Holy ugly 70's colors, Batman!
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
Just curious... did anybody else watch the History Channel last
night, 7:00PM Eastern Time. The Modern Marvels episode was about the
creation of the internet. Rather fascinating to me (who learned some
things), and kinda neat to put faces to names...
Not to mention the pictures of the old, err, classic computers and
terminals...
--
--- David A. Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
> From: Patrick Finnegan <pat(a)purdueriots.com>
>
> Aparently, the Drive 0: is bad. Replacing it with
> the 1: or an IBM-branded Tandon drive from an IBM
> 5150 PC, it seems to try to boot from the disk. No
> disk in the drive (or the disk upside down) yields a
> "Diskette?" message on the display. A disk placed
> right-side up, which should be bootable, gives no
> messages on the display after power-up or reset.
> However, with a disk inserted, the drive light (and
> motor) turn> off after approx 7 seconds.
Ok..
Take a look at your "1:" drive. Near the connector you
should see a socket with something that looks kind of
like a chip in it.
But, it will have 4 metal bridges and three will be
broken. On your "0:" drive the first one will be in
place and 2 - 4 will be broken.
On the "1:" drive, the first, third and fourth should
be broken and the second bridged.
If you swap these between the two drives, you ought to
be able to turn the "1:" drive to a "0:" drive.
As for your IBM drive, it is probably jumpered for DS1
("1:" drive). If you can find the jumpers on the logic
board, move the jumper from DS1 to DS0 if you'd like
to try to use that as the "0:" drive (leaving the "1:"
drive as-is).
Let me know if that helps you.
> I tried using a boot disk that I got with the
> machine, and a fresh one from a .dsk file of LS-DOS
> 6.3.1H from Tim Mann's web site, using Tony's
> trsfmt and diskdmp. The image works with xtrs too,
> so I'm fairly confident that it should work when
> stuck on a floppy.
Sounds ok to me...
Regards,
Al
Greetings Programs.
The time has come to unload the few CBM and PET machines I forced them to
save.
There is a Philadelphia PA USA area project that takes donated computers and
fixes them up for needy families. In the process we have collected some "old
computer stuff"
Beyond the 700 old 386 computers I talked them in to throwing out they still
have some other oldies tucked away. There are several CBM and PET computers
as well as Apple + bell and howell black apples and some TI peripheral
expansion units waiting for someone to take them away and make a donation to
the project.
Please see our website for details on the project. www.teamchildren.com and
please direct any email relating to this offer to childrensproject(a)go.com
and if you are anywhere near the Philadelphia area you might want to stop by
to take a look around. My 4 year volunteering with the project has put PILES
of classic stuff in my basement.
Please check out the website. Take a trip with a Uhaul if you want a few
hundred 486's :)
end of line.
> From: "TeoZ" <teoz(a)neo.rr.com>
>
> Their improvements included more memory, a sound
> chip (yamaha?) that was incorperated into the later
> spectrums anyway (just different location) and
> built in joystick ports.
Yes, as well as Composite Video Out available on the
expansion port.
And don't forget the Cartridge slot!
> It was more bang for the buck compared to what the
> c64 costs during the same time. Timex also was
> going to make a disk system addon, did make a 1200
> baud modem, and some other stuff before they pulled
> the plug. No software meant a dead system.
The Spectrum was actually a bigger system in Britain
than anywhere else, being a home-grown system.
A disk system WAS made, but Timex in the U.S. never
marketed it.
We got a number of them from Timex in Portugal at
Zebra Systems and sold them for awhile. They were very
nice, and styled just like the 2068.
Timex Portugal sold 2068's a while longer (as they had
a lot of them in stock).
I really wanted us to sell them with 5.25 or 3.5
drives. But Timex was stuck with tons of 3" Amdek
drives and made it so attractive for us that we went
with those.
The bad thing for our users was that media was scarce
and expensive. Though nothing stopped them from adding
on their own external drives of any type. (not 1.2 or
1.44mb)
> Even if they didnt make the 2068 non compatible with
> the spectrum the british market and US market were 2
different thing.
Yes, but there was so much more cool software for the
Spectrum, and as you note... Very little for the 2068.
A Spectrum emulator solved that, however.
And people would call us constantly about the Twister
card so they could run ZX-Spectrum Microdrives. The
Interface One for the Spectrum also added serial
ports, which helped people run faster modems than the
1200 baud Timex Modem.
> Not having a disk drive available, and limited
> graphics and sound limited how usefull the machine
> was for games.
Yes. And not having a standard parallel port for
printers other than the 4" thermal printer wasn't so
good either. But, who really wanted to type long
documents on that keyboard anyway..
> I think they only made 20,000 units or so, and they
> get close to $100 on ebay for one. Mine is here
> somewhere and I did keep the original box (20
> years of dust and all)
I don't know how many were made. Your number sounds
like a good ballpark. Though Timex Portugal kept
making them. The made a 2048 and a TX-2068 which was
more like a Spectrum.
We were working on our own "Twister Card" at Zebra
Systems. It would have incorporated the Spectrum
expansion bus, a Spectrum Emulator, a Kempston
compatible Joystick port, Composite Interface, and an
RGB Interface.
We never got it to work properly though.
Which was a shame. If we had completed it, I think it
would have been the best expansion item in the US
market.
Regards,
Al Hartman
Wandering through the local surplus I found 2 Shugart full height 8" model
801 floppy drives. They look pretty dusty. They are not in an enclosure.
Does anybody want me to pick they up, you tell me the price I should offer
and you pay shipping. I'll pack them for free.
Thanks
Mike McFadden
m m c f a d d e n @ c m h . e d u
Right. Went up almost $350 in the last 25 seconds. As to the 2 bids by the
same guy, he was probing (albeit rather strongly) the winner's higher proxy
bid -- you can see this if you look at the times the bids were placed.
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Mahoney [mailto:brianmahoney@look.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:06 PM
To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Check out this TI99/4 on eBay
bidding history is a tad suspicious. 163 to 400 to 500 (last two by the same
guy).
If we were to address human rights abuses, we're one of the tops when it
comes to abusing, and rationalizing and perpetuating (almost said
"defending") those abuses. Its core to our government, core to our economy,
and core to our infrastructure. We Americans are reared to be the most
amazingly arrogant, sanctimonious, and prudish creatures on the planet, even
after repeated bloody noses on the global stage have shown us that isn't the
way to go. Sure, we have superb resources, technology and production.
However, at the core, we're still human -- no one of us innately better than
a Kurdish shepherd. We still want to think we are though, but where does
that kind of attitude get us?
Cheers...
Ed
San Antonio, Tx, USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of
> vance(a)neurotica.com
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:40 PM
> To: Chad Fernandez
> Cc: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Let the witch trials begin! Re: OT: Re: Going OT Re: (no
> subject)
>
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Chad Fernandez wrote:
>
> > > It *is* about oil. If it were about human rights and "weapons of mass
> > > destruction" (most of which aren't), why aren't we going after
> > > mainland China, North Korea, some of Europe, and *ourselves*?
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
I only cut my teeth on these back in the 70s... I kept boxes
of disks from that era.
Thanks to Eric and you for chiming in with some information.
The conversation is reminding me of what I used to know off the
top of my head...
The connector is probably a DC37. I guess I didn't pay enough
attention to it when I was looking earlier. If someone has a
file available that would be great. I can spend the time to ohm
it out, but I had hoped the doc existed in a ready format.
Erir reminded me of the SD controller on the I/O board and I
will connect a drive to that one tomorrow and see if I can at
least kluge something together just to test the SD section. I
know the rest of the system is fine.
I have the Ball Brothers display doc if anyone is interested
and I am in the process of picking up some more of the hardware
data.
A copy of Kermit for both SD Intel and SD CP/M would probably
be my best bet. Can I send disks to you Dave to get copies and
include money for costs?
Let me know. Thanks.
regards, Steve
>--- Original Message ---
>From: Dave Mabry <dmabry(a)mich.com>
>To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
>Date: 2/26/03 5:57:31 PM
>
Oh boy! Hey Joe! Another one!
>
>Hi Steve,
>
>Welcome to the Intel Development System adiction.
>
>If you have a double density drive in your 225, that would normally
mean
>you have the double density controller board set plugged into
the
>Multibus and cabled internally to the built-in Shugart 801 drive.
While
>the drive is capable of reading/writing single density, the
double
>density boardset from Intel is NOT. For the MDS Intel only
made
>single-density boardsets and double-density boardsets. There
wasn't
>anything that Intel made, supported under ISIS-II, that could
read both
>densities on one drive. It was possible to have both single
and double
>density drives in one MDS, but they were separate drives and
separate
>controllers.
>
>Check again on the external connector. I seem to remember it
being 37
>pin D-type connector. But I can check again. I have the documentation
>for what signals are where and can type them in, but I'm hoping
that
>someone (Tony, Joe?) might already have that in a file.
>
>I can help you with software if you need anything for ISIS-II
and/or
>CPM-80 for that machine. I have Kermit configured so that makes
it easy
>to transfer files to/from a PC and then send them in e-mails.
>
>Let me know what you might want.
>
>Dave
>
>Steve Thatcher wrote:
>> Hi all, I got my Intel MDS225 working today, but I only have
>> a single double density drive on it. I seem to recall that
it
>> would read single density, but you accessed by a different
drive
>> specifier. I can't seem to find one bit of documentation on
the
>> ISIS command at home. Does anyone have a summary page they
could
>> scan and send?
>>
>> I am also looking for the 50 pin connection wiring so I can
connect
>> a drive externally.
>>
>> It was fun booting up ISIS-II version 4.2 and seeing the prompt
>> come up. I also had a CP/M 2.2 version that booted perfectly!
>>
>> best regards, Steve Thatcher
>>
>> .
>>
>
>
>--
>Dave Mabry dmabry(a)mich.com
>Dossin Museum Underwater Research Team
>NACD #2093
Und vy shut ve uz zis "Blowfish?" I sot zat PGP vas ze better enkriptshun,
nicht war?
Cheers!
Ed
San Antonio, Tx, USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of "Philip
> Pemberton" <philpem(a)dsl.pipex.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 4:52 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Trivia Question
>
> Jim Battle wrote:
> > I've had the discussion with workmates about the following scenario.
> > If the German forces had access to a single 5150 IBM PC back in 1940,
> > would the war have ended very differently? I think it would have.
> "Who needs zis Enigma vee haff developed? Vee shall use Blowfish to
> encrypt
> our messages!"
>
> Later.
> --
> Phil.
> philpem(a)dsl.pipex.com
> http://www.philpem.dsl.pipex.com/
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
Oh? I thought their only major drawback was in their heavy water
experiments. A nice scientific CAD setup for modelling the molecule might
have put them years ahead of us...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of "Eric
> Smith" <eric(a)brouhaha.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 5:19 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Trivia Question
>
> Jim Battle wrote:
> > I was thinking more along the lines of computing ballistics,
>
> Computing ballistics would have been some help, but nowhere near enough
> to change the outcome.
>
> > and advancing their nuclear program.
>
> Their "nuclear program" had serious defficiencies that wouldn't have
> been solved by more computing power.
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
>I noticed an auction on eBay for a KZQSA-SA SCSI controller and I was
>wondering (silly me) if it could be used with RT-11. I know that RT-11 is
>much older than this board, but I was hoping someone had written a driver
>for it.
There never was a driver written for it, at least not by DEC. If I
had had the documentation, I probably would probably have tried it,
since I did lots of handler work.
In fact, if someone has clear and complete documentation for it, and
a board to play with, I would not be adverse at trying my hand at it.
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | email: mbg at world.std.com |
| | |
| "this space | (s/ at /@/) |
| unavoidably left blank" | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (DEC '77-'98) | required." - mbg KB1FCA |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of Mail List
> <mail.list(a)analog-and-digital-solutions.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:17 AM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Let the witch trials begin! Re: OT: Re: Going OT Re: (no
> subject)
>
> > > This country was founded by Christians. They may have had some odd
> > > customs, and they may have made some things "law" that were really
> > > tradition, but thats no reason to reject everything "religious", such
> as
> > > the principles that this nation was founded on.
>
This country was founded by Christians. They may have had some odd
customs, and they may have made some things "law" that were really
tradition, but thats no reason to reject everything "religious", such as
the principles that this nation was founded on.
America was *NOT* founded by Christians. I'm very tired of hearing that
drumbeat. The founding fathers, if anything, were DEISTs, and/or
ceremonialisyts, and well knew the inherent dangers of including or even
nodding to support any one religion over another in this country and its
government - something our modern-day right-wing Christian brothers and
sisters either don't know or won't learn.
A state religion here would indeed be as dangerous to US national growth and
development as is has proven all over the middle east. Remember: prior to
1979, Iran didn't have either a "state religion," or a theocracy. Now it
does. Was there an improvement?
Cheers...
Ed
San Antonio, Tx, USA
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of Mail List
> <mail.list(a)analog-and-digital-solutions.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:17 AM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Let the witch trials begin! Re: OT: Re: Going OT Re: (no
> subject)
>
> > > This country was founded by Christians. They may have had some odd
> > > customs, and they may have made some things "law" that were really
> > > tradition, but thats no reason to reject everything "religious", such
> as
> > > the principles that this nation was founded on.
>
> America was *NOT* founded by Christians. I'm very tired of hearing that
> drumbeat. The founding fathers, if anything, were DEISTs, and/or
> ceremonialisyts, and well knew the inherent dangers of including or even
> nodding to support any one religion over another in this country and its
> government - something our modern-day right-wing Christian brothers and
> sisters either don't know or won't learn.
>
> A state religion here would indeed be as dangerous to US national growth
> and development as is has proven all over the middle east. Remember: prior
> to 1979, Iran didn't have either a "state religion," or a theocracy. Now
> it does. Was there an improvement?
>
> Cheers...
>
> Ed
> San Antonio, Tx, USA
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Chad Fernandez wrote:
>
> > You honestly believe that the governmant controls what CNN, MSNBC, FOX,
> > etc. put into there news casts?
>
Actually, our government controls *access* to who and what gets into
the news. Today, news isn't about Edward R. Murrow or Walter Cronkite. Its
about money, looking good, keeping up the ratings, and, just occasionally, a
slanted nod to what's going on in the world. "Truth" went the way of the
wind with (maybe before) Kennedy...
Cheers!
Ed
San Antonio, Tx, USA
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
Since we're on points like this one, does anyone out there remember the the
first shots of the '86 Challenger disaster? One chase plane scene showed
for about 1/2 a day on CNN, as if it were normal and planned, then simply
disappeared. It *hadn't* anything to do with the SRBs... Did anyone see?
Does anyone remenber? Off list responses preferred...
Cheers!
Ed
San Antonio, Tx, USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of chris
> <cb(a)mythtech.net>
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:26 PM
> To: Classic Computer
> Subject: Re: Let the witch trials begin!
>
> >It never made it to CNN or MSNBC.
>
> MSNBC's web site also altered a story the other day regarding Osama bin
> Ladin and Iraq. The first release made mention that bin Ladin was calling
> his people to kill Hussein. Then, when the US held a press briefing on
> the same topic, and tried to make it sound as if bin Ladin was in cahoots
> with Hussein, MSNBC suddenly altered their story, removing the reference.
>
> No explination to the change. Could have been an error, could have been
> an oversite, could have been a request by someone... could have been
> anything. Point is, the story took a change to reflect the US governments
> desired position on the topic, and they just pretened it had always been
> that way.
>
> Humm... does Winston Smith work for MSNBC?
>
> -chris
> <http://www.mythtech.net>
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
The Macintosh port of C64View, a freeware cross-platform Commodore 64 image
viewer, has been updated. This new version features drag-and-drop operation
and improved UI, as well as correcting OS X compatibility bugs and introducing
a new Classic version for 68K Macintoshes and non-Carbon Power Macs. It
preserves the Mac-specific converter capability, allowing you to convert your
Commodore images into PICT files for import to your favourite Mac application.
C64View's DOS version is also still available, and is compatible with Win32
as well as DOS 5.0 and up. You can capture the DOS version screen in Windows
to export images, or use your favourite screen-grab TSR.
C64View supports KoalaPainter, Doodle!, 8K bitmaps (including Flexidraw and
Print Shop Screen Magic) and 1K colourmaps. Sample images are included.
Download from
http://www.armory.com/%7Espectre/cwi/c64view/
C64View is freeware.
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- All wiyht. Rho sritched mg kegcaps awound? ---------------------------------
>The earliest 1.2M drive that I saw (before the AT) was a
>Mitsubishi 4854?
>I was told that it had had been designed for the explicit purpose of
>replacing 8" drives. It did NOT also have a "360K" mode.
I still have some M4854 drives that are in use to this day! My *first*
computer that I saved up for was a Pulsar Electronics Little Big Board
system (Z80 - 64K, STD bus, 8" drive interface, CP/M 2.2) The neat thing
was that I had dual 5.25" M4854 drives that provided 2.4Mb online while all
of my friends had dual 360K drives.....
Anyway, I digress,
The M4854 was an 8" drive replacement. Motor speed was ?300? rpm, not the
usual 360rpm with the 5.25" drives. The hardist thing about it was that it
did not have a 50pin connector.
Doug Jackson
Director, Managed Security Services
Citadel Securix Pty Ltd
Level 1, 10 Moore St
Canberra ACT 2601
Ph: (612) 6290 9011 Fx: (612) 6262 6152 Mob: 0414 986 878
Web: www.citadel.com.au
Melbourne - Sydney - Canberra - Brisbane - Hong Kong - Atlanta
Any pricing or time figures contained within this email are indicative only,
and have been provided for planning purposes only. Please request a
quotation from your sales representative prior to undertaking any work.
CAUTION - The information in this message may be of a privileged or confidential nature intended only for the use of the addressee or someone authorised to receive the addressee's e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify postmaster(a)citadel.com.au. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Citadel Securix.
Feel free to visit the Citadel Securix website! Click below.
http://www.citadel.com.au
Got a few new items at auction today:
1- hp 660LX no ac adapter and batteries are down so can not test it.
2-IBM PowerPC tower Risc6000 C10 not tested yet.
3-Sun Field Engineer Handbook Volume II pretty cool stuff in it. Covers
these architectures: Sun-3, Sun-3x, Sun-386i,
Sun-4, Sun-4c, Sun-4m.
4-hp 5314 A Universal Counter with manual.
5-hp 5381A 80mhz Frequency Counter with manual.
6-Fluke 1900 A Multi-Counter.
7-Datapulse model 201 Data Generator.
8-Sun UltraSCSI external with 9gig HD in it.
9-hp Apollo
And some mousepads, Analog cards (4), and other goodies I have checked out
yet.
All,
yep, it's me again. The 4000 VLC started and ran perfectly. I left
it on for about 8 hours as a burn-in test. When I came back, it was
(apparently) still running - but the VT-320 it was talking through had
died. Arrgggh. I've done a little investigating, so hopefully I won't need
quite so many exchanges to get this one going.
The external symptoms of the VT320 were: no display; when power
switch is on, the LK201 lights flash about once a second. No other sign of
life. I turned it off, unplugged it, and opened it up. The power supply
board at the side has an output indicator LED which also flashes about once
a second.
I turned it off, unplugged the power supply board from the
mainboard, and turned it on again. In this condition (which I'll call
"unloaded"), the output indicator LED comes on and stays on. In addition,
the pins on the output connector go to more or less their correct voltage,
as determined by labels on the mainboard at the other end of that connector
harness:
Labelled Ground 5V 12V 18V
Actual Ground 6.5V 12.5V 22V
The power supply has a big (10-pin) transformer inside a cage (with
some other components) on it. The transformer seems to divide the circuitry
in two, inasmuch as only the "Ground" traces seem to go to both sides. On
the input (upstream, plugs into wall) side, there is a network connected to
a UC3842N IC. Google led me to a spec sheet for that, which calls it a
"Current-mode PWM Controller". The spec sheet also has a "typical
application" schematic for an "Off-line Flyback Regulator" which looks to
be at least somewhat similar to the upstream side of the power supply,
though I have not traced the latter out well enough to be sure yet.
There are also several large electrolytic capacitors on the input
side of the power supply.
Possible signs of trouble are there, in the form of scorch marks on
the PWB around two power resistors (? They have what looks like a powder
blue ceramic exterior, are marked 120 Ohms +/- 5% and ?? (maybe 47 Ohms),
and are much bigger than most of the resistors on the board).
In the "loaded" condition, the resistor with the worst scorch marks
around it (R523, as marked on the circuit board) has 0V across it, with a
small spike upward (as shown by the needle jerking on my analog VOM) each
time the output LED flashes. In the "unloaded" condition, my VOM shows 15V
across that resistor, and it gets pretty warm pretty fast.
Questions for the group:
1) Have I got good evidence that the fault this time is actually on the
power supply board, and not a pull-down on the mainboard, as it was on the
VAX 4000 VLC?
2) Is there a good way (without use of an ESR meter, which I haven't got)
to isolate which component is bad, or should I just replace the capacitors
on suspicion?
The power supply, at least, looks very easy to work on. Nice big
components, circuit board is only 2 layers (front and back) and not very
many traces on the component side, and the traces are exposed and easy to
get to in its operating configuration.
I'm being careful around the 120VAC (rectified to 160 DC in the
unloaded condition).
Thanks in advance for any help you can give me!
- Mark
> From: "TeoZ" <teoz(a)neo.rr.com>
>
> My first computer was a timex 2068 and learning to
> program on chicklet keyboards sucks.
But.. Those were pretty nice computers...
Timex did make an incredible goof with those...
Originally, it was intended to be an American Version
of the 48k ZX-Spectrum Computer.
But, as-is it wouldn't pass FCC regulations.
So, they redesigned the computer to do so, and decided
to "improve" it. Designing out most compatibility with
the Spectrum in the process.
With a set of Spectrum ROMS in a cartridge, and a
"Twister" card (to convert the expansion edge back to
the Spectrum version), one could use Spectrum Hardware
and software on it.
There were third party keyboards for it also, and when
Sinclair was bought out, the company that bought it (I
can't remember the name), made better versions of the
Spectrum with built in Microdrives or Cassette Player,
and a better keyboard.
I have a U.S. Prototype of the Spectrum, a Microdrive
interface and drive, and the Timex of Portugal 3inch
Disk Drive System (which also turned it into a CP/M
Computer).
A nice computer for the time if you tricked it out a
little.
The company I worked for in the 80's even made a
drawing program similar to MacPaint for it, called
TechDraw, A Spectrum Emulator Cartridge, Disk System,
Terminal Software (for the Timex Modem), and lots
more...
Also, fun days...
I hope to spot one at a flea market to have one again.
I still have my ZX-81 though.
You can still get kits for the ZX-81, and some books
and software from www.zebrasystems.com
Regards,
Al Hartman
Ok, I got my PDP-11/34 mounted in its rack and have started to audit
jumpers, switches, etc. I am being cornfused by the M9312 bootstrap
terminator module.
First, I'm confused about what version of the module I have. My 11/34 user's
manual (EK-11034-UG-001 '77) talks about a -YA, -YB, and -YF version of the
board. My M9312 manual (EK-M9312-TM-003 '81) talks only in terms of
bootstrap ROM part numbers. The DIP switch references in the two documents
conflict, even differing on the switch settings necessary just to boot into
the console emulator.
My M9312 has no -Yx designator and has only one bootstrap ROM installed
(756A9 for RK03/05/05J or TU55/56). The M9312 manual seems to make the most
sense in this case, so I've been believing its side of the story. However,
the DIP switch settings on my M9312 have me puzzled. Here they are:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
ON ON ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF ON ON
This doesn't correspond to anything in either manual! According to the
manual I'm trusting, this says to start executing at 765406 (in the console
emulator ROM). It needs to be 765020 (with diags) or 765144 (without diags).
Supposedly, the machine was functional when it was decommed, so my first
instinct is to assume I am (or the docs are) wrong somewhere. However, its
previous owner (another collector) was not able **IIRC** to get a register
printout at power-up. So maybe the DIP switch is pointing to someplace that
isn't a valid entry point. I don't have access to the complete M9312 print
set, which would list the ROM contents.
Should I reset the DIP switch to say 765020?
--
Jeffrey Sharp
>From: blstuart(a)bellsouth.net
>
>In message <3E5D4EA2.5080309(a)aconit.org>, Hans B Pufal writes:
>>Unlike BASIC, PAF was designed so that its
>>key words could be easily changed to different languages and on the fly
>>during one progam, a feature I have not seen in any other language.
I thought I'd mentioned that it is not entirely true that
no other computer language can be converted to another language.
Not being a natural language, Forth, can easily be converted
to any standard text type language and there has even been
efforts to convert to Chinese( not text type ). Since Forth
has its own rules on noun/verb/object order, the language
that it uses is not important.
This is unlike most languages because most use complex precedence
rules( LISP being another exception ). One can not fully overload
the + operation in languages like 'C' because it would end up
looking like +( a, b ) instead of a + b.
I know of at least one German Forth and work in progress on
a Chinese Forth ( issues are mainly entering and displaying
characters ). Both of these can be source files loaded
>from an English ( or other language ) Forth to completely change
the Forth. One can even have both at the same time and switch
back and forth. Heck, One might even have three languages or
more to select from. One's imagination is the limit( and real
memory).
Dwight
>
>At the 1981 National Computer Conference (US), Grace Hopper told
>a story about the A0 compiler she and her collegues did on the
>UNIVAC. Part of the motivation for this program was to settle
>the question of whether a computer could write a program for
>itself. So the thing we now understand to be a programming
>language was made as close to a natural language as they were
>able to do at the time. Every statement consisted of a subject
>a verb and an object followed by a period. (You can probably
>begin to see how this work influenced the development of COBOL.)
>Anyway, to demonstrate the flexibility of this technique, they
>had both English and German versions. However, since it was a
>US military sponsored project and since it was rather soon after
>WWII, the German version caused a minor freak-out on the part of
>some of the military brass. It was quickly shoved in a corner
>and was lost in the mists of time.
>
>Brian L. Stuart
Hi,
I am looking for a Datapoint Mini computer from around the 1980-1983 timeframe.
Any chance you have one or know of anyone else I might try?
Thanks,
Debbie
If anyone is interested. I have two brand new LA36 Decawritter II's
for sale. I personally took these off their shipping pallets sometime
in the late 70's or early 80's. They look absolutely new. Original test
printout and manuals are still with them. They have been stored
covered all this time.
Ed
Albany, NY
w2uv(a)arrl.net
Hi all, I got my Intel MDS225 working today, but I only have
a single double density drive on it. I seem to recall that it
would read single density, but you accessed by a different drive
specifier. I can't seem to find one bit of documentation on the
ISIS command at home. Does anyone have a summary page they could
scan and send?
I am also looking for the 50 pin connection wiring so I can connect
a drive externally.
It was fun booting up ISIS-II version 4.2 and seeing the prompt
come up. I also had a CP/M 2.2 version that booted perfectly!
best regards, Steve Thatcher
Hi pat,
I too just picked up a model 4. I didn't get any disks but mine says "Disk?" when I power it up. I opened it up and mine is a basic 64k machine with two SS disk drives. The drives in mine are made by Texas (somebody), Texas Peripherals maybe? I checked and they're 40 track SS drives. I believe these are the original disk drives for the M4 but I've been told that they will support 80 track and DS drives. But I don't know if you had to patch the BIOS and/or OS to do that.
Joe
At 10:38 PM 2/25/03 -0500, you wrote:
>I recently picked up a TRS-80 model 4, that seems to have problems with
>its floppy drives.
>
>The machine is a base Model 4 with 64KB of ram (I think - haven't yet
>taken the EMF shield off the mainboard), and no peripherals attached.
>When I powered it up the first time, with or without a disk in the
>(bottom) drive, it displayed "Cass?" on the screen, and then I could press
>enter to that and the "Memory size?" prompt, and get a basic prompt.
>
>I tried swapping the floppy drives, and that time I got a "Diskette?"
>prompt if there was no disk in the drive, and pressing any keys didn't
>cause anything to happen. If I put a disk in the drive, the machine never
>displays anything, and then after 10-20 seconds, the drive light goes out.
>
>I tried connecting only one drive at a time, with the same results. If I
>connected a 1.2MB floppy that I had laying around (a Teac FD-55GFR-149-U),
>it did the same thing as if the drives were swapped. Yes, I realize that
>the drive probaly wasn't going to work, I just wanted to see if it did
>anything.
>
>Also, the disk I used was supposed to be a TRS-DOS (bootable) disk, but
>it's possible that they've gone bad after so many years. Are the disks on
>the Model 4 recorded so that I can read them on a PC (IE 48/96tpi MFM,
>compatible with the NEC D765)? I'd like to know if I can make backup
>images and/or see if the disks work on another machine.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Pat
>--
>Purdue Universtiy ITAP/RCS
>Information Technology at Purdue
>Research Computing and Storage
>http://www-rcd.cc.purdue.edu
In a message dated 2/26/03 3:20:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, vcf(a)siconic.com
writes:
>
> I said it's US$3,000 for a 40 footer. It's actually US$3,000 for a 20
> footer from the west coast of the US to Europe.
It was about $5000 to ship a 40 foot container of scrap from the Pacific NW
(Tacoma was the cheapest IIRC) to Taiwan or Indonesia when we were doing that
in the mid 90s. We had to make sure there was more than 45,000 pounds in it,
that was the break even point for shipping.
>
> Speaking of which, if anyone in Germany or beyond has something big in the
> US that they want to ship and can get it to Oakland, California, soon then
> let me know because Hans is shipping a bunch of stuff back to Germany but
> doesn't have enough to fill a container yet.
>
What a great way to get something heavy to Europe.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
Sorry, I gave some wrong information regarding the cost to ship a
container overseas.
I said it's US$3,000 for a 40 footer. It's actually US$3,000 for a 20
footer from the west coast of the US to Europe.
Not bad if you have a lot of scheisse to ship.
Speaking of which, if anyone in Germany or beyond has something big in the
US that they want to ship and can get it to Oakland, California, soon then
let me know because Hans is shipping a bunch of stuff back to Germany but
doesn't have enough to fill a container yet.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
In a message dated 2/26/03 1:46:26 PM Pacific Standard Time,
classiccmp(a)crash.com writes:
> I hadn't realized anyone had put a 68020 on the S-100 bus, or is that just
> a 680[01]0 in a PGA?
Yes, They made a 68020 and that system appears to be one. I had a similar
System One in a wood cabinet that came with the 68020 CPU, 2 2meg memory
cards and some custom video cards. It came with the docs. All S100.
I have since passed it on to another collector from the list. It is
interesting to note that the one I passed on and this one in the auction are
both located in Washington State. They must have had a good Cromemco dealer
there.
They are not the same System Ones. Cabinets are different.
It is a nice system.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
PS No connection with the seller...
From: Erik S. Klein <classiccmp(a)vintage-computer.com>
Date: 02/26/2003 11:23 AM
> TeoZ Said:
>
> " The Timex 2068 was released in 82 or 83 when the Vic20/c64 had proper
> keyboards."
>
[snip]
> all "Q"s. It seems that Commodore had to rush to get their Christmas
> orders filled and they ended up cutting a few corners.
>
The C64 and TS 2068 were both released that Xmas season, and Timex Sinclair
lore has it that the Timex machine was initially called the TS2064, but when
Commodore announced the C64, the 2064 was changed to 2068 in order to sound
bigger and more powerful :>)
Later --
Glen
0/0
Looks like most of a 68k-based Cromemco on eBay.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3403398810&category=1479
I hadn't realized anyone had put a 68020 on the S-100 bus, or is that just
a 680[01]0 in a PGA? Looks like I could find out if I could get to this
page:
www.dantiques.com/computers/cromemco/100300.htm
But my ISP has a routing problem that prevents me from reaching them.
I've used the Google cache, but that doesn't get me the pictures. Oh
well, maybe by next week this'll be fixed...
No connection to the seller, just curious. And still looking for a job,
or I'd consider bidding on this thing.
--Steve.
cctech-request(a)classiccmp.org schrieb am 26.02.2003:
>
Oh boy, thatone previously was supposed to go privat...
one thousand sorries to all of you.
Frank
cctech-request(a)classiccmp.org schrieb am 26.02.2003:
>
>----------<snip>-----------
>Message: 11
>Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 01:23:21 +0100 (CET)
>From: "Fred N. van Kempen" <waltje(a)pdp11.nl>
>To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
>Subject: Available: various DEC monitors
>Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
>All,
>
>Available as of right now, various DEC color monitors of
>the 19" and heavy kind. VR and VRT series. Obviously
>for pickup only, in the Hilversum-Amsterdam area in
>The Netherlands.
>
>What's left by next week will be scrapped - I need the
>space for machines.
>
>Cheers,
> Fred
>----------<snip>-----------
>
Hallo Fred,
Ik zoek een of twee VRT17-HA/H4 of VRC21-HA/H4 (72Hz-refresh) voor mijn DEC3000
systemen, heb je zoiets? Zoja, kan ik het bijvoorbeeld zaterdag ophalen, ik rij
morgen naar Nederland.
Wat anders, heb je al faciliteiten om manuals te scannen? Ik heb wel het een en
ander bij te dragen, maar zonder automatische papier-feeder op de scanner word
je gek. Ik kan evtl. wel het een en ander meebrengen.
Er zijn intussen heel wat websites met dokumentatie. Ken jij een algemene lijst
die verteld welk dokument reeds gescant is, en waar zich dit bevind? Of wou jij
juist zoiets gaan samenstellen?
Ok, ik hoor het wel,
groet,
Frank
PS
een mailaccout op www.pdp11.nl is heel erg cool....
Evenin' all.
Uploaded tonight for your viewing pleasure, just over 60 pix of the
HP1000's that Tim found & saved a few weeks ago, now parked lovingly (erm)
in my shed...
http://classic-micros.com/hp1000
(Note to Hans: I *know* I've not put the picture sizes in the img tags, I'm
just too darn lazy, OK?)
:)
Anyway, a brief tale of what happened this last w/e...
On Saturday, I picked up the 3 terminals & assorted other tapes, plus the
disc controller from Tim, thus completing the rescue. Back to the shed for
some well deserved tinkering time :)
A long poke around in the manuals convinced me that:
a) I have no docs for the F-series machines :( They're all for the A700...
b) There was no system installation guide :(
Thus thwarted, I decided buggrit, I'll carry out the cardinal sin, and just
power the things up anyway. Fortunately, a kindly sysadmin had labelled the
tape drive connectors, so they could be applied to the correct slot. Not so
with the MUX cable; and besides, the other end of the MUX seemed to be
missing anyway (i.e the DeMUXer). So, my total experimentation with the
F-series was limited to pressing buttons on the panel and getting the
blinkenlights to blinken. Which they did in a most satisfactory manner, I
might add. Efforts to do anything with the tape drive were also effectively
thwarted; I did manage to get a tape loaded, and the "on line" light to
blinken (well, "come on" would be more accurate"). No amount of pressing
front panel buttons would make them spin on their own, however.
Ho hum.
So, I tried the A700, which at least will talk to a terminal.
Unfortunately, it won't listen to the terminal, so there's something a bit
fishy going on there as well. That boot screen was as far as I got.
Ho hum ^ 2.
So, I made do with loading a disc (dunno where to plug it in to the 1000,
though, so can't load anything from it, even if I knew the correct
pushenbutton sequence).
Questions/requests arising:
1) Does *anyone* here know anyone (or IS someone) who is/was a sysadmin (or
related/married to same) of an F-series HP 1000? If so, can you/they render
any help?
2) Does anyone have access to a set of F-series manuals, especially
installation reference manuals? If so, are they in electronic format; if
not, can you/they bear to part with them for at least as long as it will
take me to scan them?
3) Has anyone got a suitable demuxer? (8-port, takes centronix plug & has 8
D25 socket outputs)
Cheers y'all.
--
Cheers, Ade.
Be where it's at, B-Racing!
http://b-racing.com
Hi Brian,
I have seen on this site http://www.classiccmp.org/
that you are looking for a HP 16C.
If you wish, I can send you a PC emulator of HP 16C.
Regards, Vincent.
cctalk-request(a)classiccmp.org wrote:
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:46:22 -0600
>From: Jeffrey Sharp <jss(a)subatomix.com>
>To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
>Subject: OT: FreeBSD (was: "Real Computers")
>Reply-To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
>
>Well, here's my OT post for the month.
>
>On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, Philip Pemberton wrote:
>
>
>>I'll try FreeBSD when I've got a spare few hours to download the ISO
>>image.
>>
>>
>
>You might find it easier to install by FTP. It's simple: download two floppy
>disk images, dd 'em to some 3.5s, and reboot. Then install as normal, except
>choose FTP as the install media. It isn't lightning-fast, but you also only
>download the data that you need instead of an entire ISO.
>
>ObClassicCmp: FreeBSD makes a great OS for running classic computing tools
>like SIMH.
>
>
>
>>Slackware is quite stable, probably because Slackware have a "We're not
>>going to hack the Kernel, nor are we going to use any fancy packaging
>>systems or init scripts".
>>
>>
>
>I've heard many people say that Slackware is the most BSD-like of the
>Linuces. Of course, that was on Slashdot, so it must be true.
>
>
I'd recommend going with 4.7 rather than 5.0 since the 5.0 is pretty
much the developer relese for the folks working on the non-stable
version...
Anyone who gets the Simh VAX emulator to use ethernet on FreeBSD will
have my undying gratitude.
There's going to be a 4.8 soon (my box auto-builds weekly from the
4.x-STABLE tree and now is calling itself 4.8-PRERELEASE.)
Bill
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 Frank Arnold <fm.arnold(a)gmx.net> wrote:
> cctech-request(a)classiccmp.org schrieb am 25.02.2003:
> >From: <chu(a)verizon.net>
> >To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
> >Subject: Help with my PDP 11/73
> >Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:36:31 -0800
> >
> >I have gotten my PDP 11/73 to
> >start up and go through an initialization
> >script for RSX-11Mplus. However, I do not
> >know any uids/passwords, so I cannot
> >login; I can only watch the script go by.
> >I am able, while the script is running, to break
> >into MCR and run commands like PDP and DMP.
> >I am able to dump in octal
> >some of the files like [0,0]001054.DIR;1.
> >Does anyone know where the user names/passwords
> >are stored? My memory says that the maybe
> >they are not encrypted? Is that so?
>
> The passwords are stored in a file [0,0]RSX11M.sys if I recall it correctley.
> Should be a rather small file, just pip it to the printer to see it, it should
> be an ASCII-file.
> I think that after version 3.2 of rsx11m passwords were encripted, before that,
> in plain text. Copy this file to some other media and delete it from your
> system disk, After a new cold start you should have an open system. with RUN
> $ACNT you can create new user-accounts if you desire.
This should probably be in an FAQ for RSX.
1. The passwords along with all account information is stored in
LB:[0,0]RSX11.SYS
2. The file is not an ASCII file.
3. Passwords in RSX11M are not encrypted, while passwords in RSX11M+ are.
4. (and this is the important one) to break into an RSX system:
When the system boots, abort the startup script.
(If it asks for the time, press ^Z, if it just runs ahead, press
^C and type ABO AT. (the period is *not* optional)).
Run $ACNT, which is the account managing program.
Change password for a system account (anything with a group number
<= 10)
Reboot, and then log in.
A small explanation:
When the system boots, the console terminal is privileged.
The startup script normally finished by logging out the console.
If you stop it before that, you'll remain logged in at a
privileged terminal.
This can be regarded as a security problem. Normally it wasn't,
since people are not supposed to have access to the console
terminal of a computer. It's locked away inside the computer hall.
If you want to, you can protect yourself against this exploit,
but noone does.
Johnny
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt(a)update.uu.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Lawrence --
Most likely the manual you have is for the Xerox 16/8.
Later --
Glen
0/0
> Basicly it was the CP/M system ported to the Intel
> CPU. Along with the Zenith, the DEC Rainbow used it
> (and CP/M-80, CCP/M, MSDOS). TMK both had dual
> x80 and x86 processors. I also have a binder put out by
> Xerox which has Digital Researches original manual
> CP/M-86 Programmers Guide, so possibly Xerox had a
> machine that used it. It's dated 3rd edition, January 1983
> I believe the OS is still available out there, possibly on
> Tim Olmsteads old site now run by Gene Buckle.
>
> Lawrence
>
>
> On 25 Feb 2003, , Tillman, Edward wrote:
>
> > Hmm... Would anyone be willing/able to explain the CP/M-86
> > OS to me -- either on or off the list? I'm still new enough
> > that DOS was my world until Windoze came along...
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Ed
> > San Antonio, Tx, USA
From: TeoZ <teoz(a)neo.rr.com>
Date: 02/25/2003 11:18 PM
> Its funny to me how a computer with a crappy keyboard like that model is
> worth so much more then the better later version with a proper keyboard. The
> computers I collect actually get used so if I ever wanted a Ti it would be
> the one with the nicer keyboard. My first computer was a timex 2068 and
> learning to program on chicklet keyboards sucks.
Yeah, well, for those of us who started with a ZX81/TS1000, the TS2068
keyboard was a big step up :>)
Later --
Glen
0/0
IBM PC-DOS 3.30 could support 4 partitions, one Primary and 3 Extended. The
primary partition is limited to 32MB. Extended partitions can be divided
into a number of logical drives, each limited to 32MB. What limits the
number of ligical drives (beyond the disk capacity) is the availability of
drive letters: the primary partition is assigned to Drive C: (unless you
have more than two floppy drives), and the logical drives get letters from
D: through Z:. By my calculations, with all 24 hard drive letters assigned,
the limit is 768MB.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ethan Dicks [mailto:erd_6502@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:39 AM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: SCSI cards
--- Geoff Reed <geoffr(a)zipcon.net> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that msdos 3.11 supported multiple partitions :)
It does. I have a PS/2 Model 30 (ISA) with a 50MB RLL drive replacing
the original IBM IDE-ish drive. Two partitions under MS-DOS 3.11, one
30MB, one 20MB.
The problem is that there is a small number of partitions possible
(I don't recall if FDISK works the same way under 3.x as it did later),
certainly no more than 4 primary partitions. DOS 4.x came out (as bad
as it was) before 200MB drives were common. By the time "everybody"
was buying "larger" drives, DOS 5.0 was out, solving several problems
with historical baggage.
> also if I had a SCSI controller in the beastie I'd probably go on the
> quest for rainbow Venix :)
Hmm... I would expect you'd need a Venix driver for it.
If you _really_ wanted a challenge, you could port Minix to the Rainbow.
Sources are available. Writing a Minix driver for the FDC might be
interesting (not sure how much suitable documentation exists).
-ethan
cctech-request(a)classiccmp.org schrieb am 25.02.2003:
>From: <chu(a)verizon.net>
>To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
>Subject: Help with my PDP 11/73
>Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:36:31 -0800
>
>I have gotten my PDP 11/73 to
>start up and go through an initialization
>script for RSX-11Mplus. However, I do not
>know any uids/passwords, so I cannot
>login; I can only watch the script go by.
>I am able, while the script is running, to break
>into MCR and run commands like PDP and DMP.
>I am able to dump in octal
>some of the files like [0,0]001054.DIR;1.
>Does anyone know where the user names/passwords
>are stored? My memory says that the maybe
>they are not encrypted? Is that so?
>
The passwords are stored in a file [0,0]RSX11M.sys if I recall it correctley.
Should be a rather small file, just pip it to the printer to see it, it should
be an ASCII-file.
I think that after version 3.2 of rsx11m passwords were encripted, before that,
in plain text. Copy this file to some other media and delete it from your
system disk, After a new cold start you should have an open system. with RUN
$ACNT you can create new user-accounts if you desire.
Frank
Hmm... Would anyone be willing/able to explain the CP/M-86 OS to me --
either on or off the list? I'm still new enough that DOS was my world until
Windoze came along...
Cheers
Ed
San Antonio, Tx, USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of acme(a)ao.net
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 4:13 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Floppy drive for Zenith 100
>
> From: Vintage Computer Festival <vcf(a)siconic.com>
> Date: 02/20/2003 7:58 PM
>
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 acme(a)ao.net wrote:
> >
> > > > OR you can get a copy of MS-DOS 4.00 and patch it to run on the
> Z-100.
> > >
> > > Jeez, Joe, now I'm really gagging. MS-DOS on a Z-100? Yuck.
> >
> > The Z-100 was intended as a dual OS machine. You had the best
> > (presumably) of both worlds: CP/M and MS-DOS.
>
> Sure -- that's how I set mine up, but to me, running MS-DOS on it makes it
> too
> much like a run-of-the-mill PC, whereas running CP/M-86 gives it more of a
> "vintage" flavor. Make sense? (I'm not feeling very articulate today)
>
> Later --
>
> Glen
> 0/0
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
Anyody know anything about a Lambda Compudialer 729? It looks kind of like a desktop calculator but it's actually a phone dialer. It's not the automatic dialer advertised by those telephone SCAMMERS Compudial. This dates from 1979.
Joe
I Don't know that it is, or at least don't know if the system will
acknowledge its full capacity. CPUs and RAM were pretty small then, and the
BIOS didn't like being pushed for more than 320k. Before asking if the
system can handle it, you might wanna look into the BIOS, and see if *it*
can handle it.
Cheers...
Ed
San Antonio, Tx, USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of "Hurd,
> Kenneth Steven CIV" <kenneth.hurd(a)navy.mil>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 8:58 AM
> To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Floppy drive for Zenith 100
>
> Hello,
>
> Do you know if it is possible to install a 1.44MB floppy drive in a
> Zenith
> 100?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Ken.
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
> >I just wish I could find the SCSI controller that a German company made
> >for the DEC Rainbow. it'd be nice to pull the 20 meg HD out and drop a
> >500 meg SCSI in it's place :)
>
> Wow! Is this documented? That *does* sound cool. Though I'm not sure just
> how long it'd take to defragment... :-)
> How did it work with the OS's, which were limited to disk sizes nothing
> like 500 Meg?
> - Mark
That's a valid question, how big of an drive will the OS's on a Rainbow
support? I'm guessing you might be limited to 30MB, even if you've a bigger
drive in the system. IIRC, CP/M and old versions of DOS only support up to
30MB.
Zane
Hey,
I was wondering if someone could help me ID this card. I found this board
in an old Macintosh IIx at a swap meet... When I opened up the case I saw
this big (about 12 inches long and 4 inches wide) BLUE board plugged into
one of the NuBus slots. It has two large chips on it with the markings
Xilinx XC2018-70 PC84C. There is only one port on the card that looks like
a 9 pin VGA or serial port. It has a hand written serial number (1570156),
and a part number of 10008 Rev#2. There is only one sticker on the card
that says "1990 LTI; All Rights Reserved; Ver DPDII 52290H"
Does anyone have a clue? Since the board is blue, I figured that its
probably a prototype of something, maybe a video card?? Thanks in
advance...
--Rob
> I was wondering if someone could help me ID this card. I found this board
> in an old Macintosh IIx at a swap meet...
> Does anyone have a clue? Since the board is blue, I figured that its
> probably a prototype of something, maybe a video card?? Thanks in
> advance...
if it isn't video, possibly a token ring card? I'm sure somebody made them...
cheers,
Jules
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
>from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Hi Gene,
> That's just amazing. I never knew the demand for those things was that
> high. I wish the guy that was doing the IDE controllers had entered
> production. :)
I think a lot of people, "personal users" too, are getting tired of struggling
with RD-5x drive unreliability, and/or want the larger storage capacities
they could obtain with SCSI
Best Regards
At 11:00 PM 2/23/03 -0800, you wrote:
> > I took a look at the CTP dealer listing index, and the current listed
> prices
> > for UC08's run from a low of $300 to a high of $750 Out of the 12 listed
> > that have prices showing, the average is $511.25
> >
> > There was a UC07 recently on eBay in the UK that sold for GBP 252.00
> > (currently approx. US $397.91 )
> >
> > EMULEX UCO7 Q-BUS SCSI CONTROLLER FOR DEC
> > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&item=2307510324
> >
>
>That's just amazing. I never knew the demand for those things was that
>high. I wish the guy that was doing the IDE controllers had entered
>production. :)
>
>g.
John, my repeated attempts to get some type of resolution for that CDROM
you received in November have met with no response to date from you.
Please contact me by March 10th.
I'm looking for payment of the agreed-on fees or the return of the CDROM
drive.
Thank you,
Frank Helvey
--
==== M O N T V A L E S O F T W A R E S E R V I C E S P. C. ====
Clayton Frank Helvey
President
Montvale Software Services, P. C.
P.O. Box 840
Blue Ridge, VA 24064-0840
United States of America
Phone 540.947.5364
===================================================================
To Marvin and Mail List...
You both make correct deductions...
I like this list, and have a lot more fun conversing
about Model I TRS-80's and Tandon Floppy Drives than
wasting time trying to answer drivel, point by point.
And I want to remain welcome on this interesting list.
So, the troll can say or do whatever he likes. Being a
troll, I can now ascribe any posts from under the
bridge to it's proper value.
There's been some news on the Amiga Emulation front.
It seems that on http://www.umilator.com , Bernd Meyer
may relent on his decision never to release Umilator
(A 68k Amiga Emulator that runs on a Linux Kernal
using some technology Bernd created for UAE-JIT, and
some new stuff... Supposedly the fastest and most
compatible emulator ever written.).
He requires a certain number of people to commit to
buying it, as there will be some legal battles with
the people who claim to own Amithlon, which is a
similar project that Bernd wrote code for.
It seems that one person has decided he is the founder
and creator of the software (but only contributed some
minor code that by all reports is buggy and feature
incomplete), and the distributor also claims to own
the software as well.
So far, nobody has been able to substantiate either
paries claims, and Bernie will have to defend his
right to market a product that shares little common
code (some of the code is GPL, so Bernie is free and
clear to use it. And unlike the other parties, Bernie
has a legal licence from Amiga to include their IP in
his product.), doesn't use the same name, and has
significant rewritten code and new features.
But intimidation and threats by these parties have
kept Bernie from releasing it, as he doesn't have the
financial depth to defend a suit in Germany from
Australia. Nor, the desire to be put through all the
stress of a suit.
I guess, he's changed his mind about the stress. And
decided that if the project could generate enough
money, he'd defend his rights to market it on
principle.
So, if you want to see Bernie be rewarded for his
excellent work, and people who want to keep his
product from ever seeing the light of day get their
due for their selfishness, go take a look and register
in the poll for people willing to buy the product once
available.
Supposedly it's done and can be released. Bernie is
just waiting for enough committed buyers so he can be
sure he won't lose his shirt with the court costs when
all the frivolous suits get filed.
I posted that not only would I buy it, I'd also
contribute to a legal defense fund.
Sorry for the long message, hope this of more interest
to the list than troll droppings..
Regards,
Al Hartman
(Macintosh Emulation List Host)
http://www.topica.com/lists/MacEmuList
My Homepage
http://www.geocities.com/alhartman
Enlightenment means taking full responsibility for
your life.
- William Blake
With my contemplation of purchasing a new Sony Picturebook, I was wondering:
What was the first portable computer that weighed less than 1Kg?
[[I'm assuming that it'd be older than 10 years, so it should be ontopic...]]
Any pointers appreciated! :-)
Thanks,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
Hmm... Gagging? I ran DOS 2.x and 3.x in the USAF on everything from
Z-100s to Z248s. A bit sloggy by current standards, but they ran...
Cheers!
Ed
San Antonio, Tx, USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of Joe
> <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:21 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Floppy drive for Zenith 100
>
> At 04:49 PM 2/20/03 -0800, Sellam wrote:
> >On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 acme(a)ao.net wrote:
> >
> >> > OR you can get a copy of MS-DOS 4.00 and patch it to run on the
> Z-100.
> >>
> >> Jeez, Joe, now I'm really gagging. MS-DOS on a Z-100? Yuck.
> >
> >The Z-100 was intended as a dual OS machine. You had the best
> >(presumably) of both worlds: CP/M and MS-DOS.
>
> You forgot to include CPM-86.
>
> Joe
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
In a message dated 2/24/03 3:36:36 PM Pacific Standard Time,
ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk writes:
> 'TTL Bipolar 500-gate Master Slice LSI' gate array, set up as the
> HDA sequencer for the 2351 Eagle drive. According to the manual for that
> drive, this chip handles the sequnce control of the spidle motor and the
> generation of machine status information.
>
Thanks for the help Tony. These chips might have had some value when I got
them (early 1990s) but I bet they are scrap now. I wonder how many Eagles
2351 and Super Eagles 2361s that are left working.
If anyone is maintaining Fujitsu 2351 Eagles and needs some, please contact
me off list at Innfosale(a)aol.com. I am intending to dispose of these soon.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
I've posted some pictures of the IBM digital demo unit at <http://home.cfl.rr.com/rigdon14/ibm/>.
Any info on using it would be appreciated.
Also posted is the schematic of the TH-1, "one shot" using the 2D21 tube (SCR with a pilot light!).
Joe
Hello,
I picked up an HX-20 years ago, and have finally some time to play with it.
I have a couple questions that perhaps one of you others out there with an
HX-20 could answer.
HX-20 Background:
Cream Color, Cassette Module, NO 16K expansion, HP HEDS-3000 barcode
reader, barcode ROM installed, labeled in Pen BARCODE Z.
Everything seems to work fine. I am trying to get the BARCODE ROM loaded. I
have read all the EPSON docs on their support site. Have not been able to
locate a BASIC tutorial online though.
Questions:
1) Should the installed ROM (NOT a module but inside the HX-20) show up
automagically in the menu?
2) If not, how to I go about loading it into memory?
3) Thoughts on the easiest way to interface the HX-20 to a Win box or
anyone tried a terminal program and a Palm?
TIA
ChriS
>> Wasn't that chip used in the Tandy TRS-80 Model 100 machines.
>I thought the M100 uses the 14412 chip...
Yep, You are right.
>>
>> I remember playing with the Band Pass filters to convince the
>>TRS-80 to work
>> with CCITT tones, instaed of the Bell tones that were used in
>>USA. That was a while ago
>IIRC, the 14412 didn't demodulate CCITT tones reliably at 300 baud. The
>better-designed UK modems that used this chip at all used it for the
>modulator only and used something like an XR2211 for the demodulator.
Ahh, That explains why it was allways fussy about signal levels. The data
sheet said that it could do it, and I had to alter the level of the
BELL/CCITT pin.
- doug
CAUTION - The information in this message may be of a privileged or confidential nature intended only for the use of the addressee or someone authorised to receive the addressee's e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify postmaster(a)citadel.com.au. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Citadel Securix.
Feel free to visit the Citadel Securix website! Click below.
http://www.citadel.com.au
cctech-request(a)classiccmp.org schrieb am 25.02.2003:
>Subject: PDP-11/04 on Ebay - whats wrong with it?
>Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:27:37 +1100
>From: "Kane, David (DPRS)" <David.Kane(a)aph.gov.au>
>
>Hi,
>
>
>A PDP-11/04 on ebay
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&item=3403225
>748&rd=1
>
>I have to start by stating I am in Australia. Our dollar might have
>crept back up to a smidgen over 60 cents US today, but the opening bid
>on the PDP will still be considerable, then add international shipping
>and ooooooh ouch. But despite all that I am still toying with the idea
>of bidding on the item. I do need a little assistance before making a
>definitive decision. For those unaware the item was listed before
>recently but was passed in unbid. I did not get interested last time
>since the description did not list a CPU card, and the seller did not
>reply to an enquiry regarding a CPU card. I notice that this time there
>is a CPU card listed (M7263). My quandary is over the seller's comment
>that the "Unit powers up and reads 0002777" although the pictures have
>it reading 000277. My worry is that the unit is severely broken. Can any
>take a stab at guessing what might be wrong, is it possibly just the
>lack of a boot device (floppy of hard disk)?
>
>
The lack of boot devices is certainly one reason, but I dont see any memory in
that machine either. The seller advertises a Plessey PM1116, a 16 kw module,
but it's not in the machine.
If you compare the photos, you will see different board-configurations, so they
are actively playing with what to take out and what to leave in.... :-((
This is a very bad sign in my eyes, as they say that they cannot test. If thats
true, why do they swap the modules around ?
Also the far-end unibus-terminator is missing, pointing to a canibalised
backplane and/or expansionbox. Will you be able to find that terminator?
Without that the machine will never run.
Anyway aske a detailed list of all the included modules from the seller.
Further this machine will weight some 50 - 60 kg. At the same weight and thus
shipping cost you can get an 11/34. Thatone will be a lot more fun, as it will
allow you a bigger selection of os's.
The 11/04 is limited to 28 (31 with a trick) kwords of memory, has no memory
management and will therefore never run the bigger PDP11 SW-packages.
If I were to decide, I would leave thisone where it is now, too uncertain at
the probably huge cost of shipping. You better stick to a system that hasn't
been altered after its decommisioning. Its always better if you can talk to the
people that were previousley using the maschine you get, although this happens
seldom.
Finalley, look at the selles feedback, (which is realley good) he's selling
just about anything from anywhere. Don't expect any expertise on the item sold.
Frank
cctech-request(a)classiccmp.org schrieb am 25.02.2003:
>From: "Robert F. Schaefer" <rschaefe(a)gcfn.org>
>Subject: Re: TU58 Emulation (was: M9312 Bootstrap Questions)
>Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:02:56 -0500
>
>> Frank Arnold wrote:
>> > I hope you can boot anything else, do you have a DL11-W? You could use
>> > this with a PeeCee emulated TU58 for diagnostics ect.
>>
>> Two questions.
>>
>>First, has anyone here emulated a TU58 successfully in software? I searched
>>through the archives and found lots of posts that say "you could" and none
>>that say "I did". If it's doable, what software should I use?
There is a true SW-emulation at:
http://www.not-compatible.org/PDP-11/programs/tu58sim.html
Someone else has done another simulator as well, but don't remember it now
>You might want to take a look at
>http://www.sparetimegizmos.com/Hardware/TU58_Emulator.htm.
Thats a nice HW-emulation, is much faster as the real tape...
Frank
Max,
Great! Thanks!
Joe
At 12:56 PM 2/25/03 +0100, you wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Joe wrote:
>
>>Yes, that's the item but I'm pretty certain that he's wrong about it being
>a
>> field engineer's test set. A couple of list members have tracked down
>several
>> of these but no docs yet.
>
>Hi
>
>The diagrams of the plugglable units should be available at:
>http://www.piercefuller.com/collect/ibmpu/
>
>Max