Hi All
The Last UA auction, I picked up about 9-10 old IBMXT/and clones
upgraded 5150 ?. I don't collect any 8088 machines, I simply wanted
these for the MFM drives/cables. Most of the machines had been lying
around for ages in somebody's dusty wherehouse and some were missing
power supplies, etc, so I made no attempt to resucitate any of them
before canabalizing.
After taking them apart. I have all these parts for the taking. Just pay
the postage. I would prefer someone to take the whole lot. Any items
left unclaimed goes to the dump.
I can check any of the cards or boards for certain chips or info If you
need me to.
So here is what I have:
8088 MB's
64K/128K rom, 8088-fujitsu '81 8087-2 intel '80 8 isa slots
64k/128k rom 8088-2-fujitsu '81 vacant 8087 socket 8 isa slots
64K-256K 8088 -intel '78 '81 8087 -intel '80 '81 5
isa slots
64K-256K D8088D -NEC vacant 8087 socket 5 isa
slots
64K-256K 8088 -intel '78 '83 vacant 8087 socket 5 isa
slots
UNKNOWN 128k ?? sab8088 -SIEMENS '86 8087-2 iNTEL '84 8 ISA SLOTS
(appears to be missing some mem chips. ie.empty sockets)
80286 MB's
256K/512K system board CG80286-6 C cpu C80827-3 intel co-p 6 EISA/2 ISA
slots
PC/XT cards
Full Length (13")
[2] AST Six Pak Plus
DATA Translation Inc io card (50 pin)
[2] Black and white/Parallel Card
TIC mono/Parallel card
AST MegaPlusII
Hercules Mono/Parallel card
Color Graphics card/no name/ has IBM chips 9pin and RCA jack
WD Floppy and MFM HDD controller (EISA ?) IBM #62X1133
Serial/Parrallel Card?? Has 2 banks of 6- 30 pin simms
(high Byte on right and Low byte on the left)
Fixed Disk (MFM) /Floppy disk controller (EISA)
TECMAR Graphics Master video card 9pin and RCA jack w/toggle switch
Serial Parralel Card ? JRAM-3 Tall Tree Systems
has a oscillator chip and a Mostek 8507 chip and appears (I can barely
read it...JLASER-1 Tall Tree Systems
1/2 Length (9")
[3] Floppy Controller 16.0MHZ oscillator and NEC D765AC
[3] Floppy/Serial Controller/Game controller HAve 3.5 v 350mah
battery
MFM HDD/Floppy Controller EISA WD 1988
Mid length (7")
Modul r Circuit Tech MCT HDC MFM/Floppy Controller
Short Cards 5/12-6 inches
WD Floppy /MFM HDD controller [4]
Serial Parrallel Controller [3]
Serial Parallel Controller I/O card V 2.0 Winbond Chip
GP1B Card
Ethernet t-base 10
50Pin i/o card
Cheers
Tom
>> > Actually, Linux will run on an 8086, nowadays, completely without
>> > memory management as an embedded OS :)
>> >
>> > I vaguely remember seeing a page about running Linux on the Tosh
>> > 1000 :)
>>
>> That's the ELKS project, which promptly went inactive as soon as they
>> got something cobbled together. A much better bet for running *nix on
>> 8088 hardware is Minix.
>
>Or early Xenix. But my Altos 8086-based machine that runs ancient Xenix
>is very proprietary, with (I believe, though I haven't got any 'deep'
>technical specs for it) supplimentary hardware for memory protection.
I have Xenix running on the Nabu 1600. This is an 8086 processor with 512k
or RAM, four serial TTYs, and a custom MMU board which provides memory
protection and management features Xenix will NOT run with the MMU board
removed. Early QNX however does run without the MMU (as does CP/M-86 and
MS-DOS) - QNX is one of the smallest somewhat *nix like OS's that I've
seen run on a bare 8086.
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
All:
Does anyone have a copy of Adaptec Toast or other CD recording
software for the System 7 Mac (68k-based) that's not tied to a specific
recorder (i.e., not OEM)? If so, please contact me off-list. Thanks.
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project
Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
/************************************************************/
Hello All,
I am in the process of scrapping out my Telecom gear. I have some LA 120's and other Dec boards that I will be listing. The printers are not very economical to ship, so my thoughts are that there may be some interest in the parts. If that is the case, please let me know.
A year or so ago, the folks next door talked about wanting to sell their Dec inventory, test fixtures and prints. Although I did forward all of the info to them, I don't think they did anything with the information. If there is still any interest, please let me know.
Thank you.
Phil
>From: "Joe R." <rigdonj at cfl.rr.com>
>
> Does anyone have any information about this part? I've been told that
>it's a high performance microprocessor. I found it on what looks like a hex
>size DEC card made by Spectra Logic Corp. I found a picture of one on the
>net but it's not very good.
><http://www.cpushack.net/gallery/showimg.php?file=/chippics/AMD/29K/AMDAM291
>16DC.jpg>
>
> Joe
Hi
I might have a manual someplace that has it in it. It
was a single chip combination of a number of 2901's in one
package. I think it had a 2910 as well. I forget if it
was 4 or 16 2901's. Still, basically an extension of the
2900 bitslice family.
It will be some time before I can dig into my piles to find
a book on it. Anyway, it was still considered part of
the bitslice family and not a uP.
Dwight
Looking for some DEC stuff for my private collection... New Mexico, Texas,
Arizona area preferably:
Any BA23 chassis (these could probably be shipped)
Actually, BA123/213 would work too
Any H9642 racks
Any SDI drives (RAxx)
Any working RD54s
9-track tape drive--any make that can be connected to a VAX,
i.e. Kennedy would work, though a TU80/TU81/TU81+ would be
ideal, as I already have the controller.
KDA50 disk controller
Any of the following: DELQA/DEQNA, RQDX3, TQK50
Contact me off-list if you have any leads.
John P. Willis
http://www.thefairchildchronicles.com/
=====
Evan's personal homepage: www.snarc.net
*** Tell your friends about the Computer Collector Newsletter!
- It's free and we'll never send spam or share your email address
- Publishing every Monday(-ish), ask about writing for us
- Mainframes to videogames, hardware and software, we cover it all
- W: http://news.computercollector.com E: news at computercollector.com
- We're approaching 700 readers: win a prize!
>From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk
---snip---
>
>I'm a bit worried by your choice of film. To me, 800 ASA is a fast film,
>which will have coarse grain. I normally preder something slower than
>100ASA. And then there's the issue of developing and printing it. These
---snip---
There is a 1600 Pan--something_or_other that Kodak makes
that is also fine grain. I've used it to make C size blowups
of astro pictures. It is hard to find but it is available.
Most places I went would tell me that it was only use by
professionals and they didn't carry it. I wish I could
remember that name.
Dwight
I suspect that it might be very well be a corruption of the story
about Randy Cook's easter egg in TRS-DOS, that showed up in NewDOS
prior to NEWDOS80. That one really DID exist. RS, in TRS-DOS 2.3,
changed "Randy Cook" in the easter egg to "Tandy Corp". It was
invoked by running a boot file as if it were a program, with one
of the master paswords, and pressing 'J'? and 'N'? while it was loading.
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at xenosoft.com
------------------------------
That's funny, because the first time I heard the story a few years back, it
was a lawsuit between AT&T and SCO over the rights to unix. (Or was it
MicroSoft and Xenix...???) Should this discussion be moved to the urban
legend mailing list?
--T
Jam the computer...trash every lethal machine in the land! -- Timothy Leary
> I suspect you may have to put the camera on a tripod (or equivalent
> means of keeping it fixed) and take something like a dozen
> pictures and
> then digitally average them, to get the equivalent of a long exposure
> with a slow film.
>
Little bit of a problem with that logic...you would want to "accumulate" or "sum" the light from shorter exposures to simulate a longer one, not "average". And if the light is low enough you could end up summing a bunch of "0"'s in any case....
OK, at a mere OCT 20 years I think I'm the youngest on the list - I
started out playing around with NIBBLES.BAS on my dad's business 286
Vectra laptop (he worked in Shipping at HP), I can't really remember
when, but I was young - around three years old. When dad got his 486, I
played extravagant amounts of Commander Keen 4. Started writing tiny
programs in the library at school on the 386 there when I turned 7.
I have fond memories of lending my dad's HP95LX and playing with it,
especially after he got his 100LX. The 95LX was confiscated by my school
and subsequently lost by the teacher, and the 100LX was broken by my
baby stepbrother who tripped over the charger... and gave me two
HP50LX'es...
Had a fascination with 1980s computers like the Commodore 64, sat in the
basement typing BASIC games off the "Learn BASIC" book when I was around
10-11. I think I was about 12 when a friend of my mom's lent me a
machine with Visual BASIC - and I did some very... BASIC stuff with that
too, but rapidly started getting a hold of things
At age 14 I sort-of got a job setting up Windows XP machines for a local
gaming place, where I met Bj?rn Vermo, investor, cctech mainframe guru
and list member, and his girlfriend, Debbie, who told me about the
Informatics library and the books there. I managed to navigate my way
there, and was shocked to find a PDP-7 in the atrium. I did not know
much about big iron back then, so it was a great opportunity to learn a
lot more. And learn I did - I subscribed to this list (first cctech
digest, then cctech, then the full cctalk - addictive :), started
getting into Linux, learning to code a Real Language, learning about
electronics, and classic computing, etc. I found it remarkable how much
one learns when one completely ignores school!
Now I just recently got my very own PDP-11, which I with the help of
gordonjcp over IRC fixed :)
My dream job is working at a museum, maybe even starting a separate
computer museum (which Norway, with a very interesting computer history,
IMHO really needs, but that's another thread :)
Hell, I'd be a building super if they let me use a 360/91 as the
furnace :)
--
Tore S Bekkedal <toresbe at ifi.uio.no>
Does anyone else on the list collect mousepads? If so, what is the size of
your collection and do you specialize? I was just looking over some the
oddballs I have in my own collection which is over 600 pads (with a number
of dups. included) and still growing. I collect all types such as those put
out by computer companies, business of all types, pads with liquid/floaters
inside of them, really oddball ones like the mousepad telephone sold by
Sharper Image, odd shapes, and ones that are true artwork done by real
artist (on commission) and children that are cancer patients. JohnK
Very cool. Got it working. It's a clever device that sits between
the terminal and computer. It simply bidirectionally and
transparently passes characters terminal <--> computer, but can
pattern-match text from the computer and send text to the computer
in response.
I'm so advanced here, I don't even have to type in the date and
time, a MACHINE does it for me! Imagine the time savings!
[booting the disk from the virtual console]
!100033L
FILENAME?
MAPPED NOVA 3 RDOS REV 6.60
DATE (M/D/Y) ? 3 05 2005
TIME (H:M:S) ? 00 36 51
R
Isn't technology wonderful?
I now have FORTRAN IV actually working now. I did previously make
FORTRAN IV "HELLO, WORLD" run, using the TYPE command, since I had
troubles with FORMAT, but it turns out the troubles successfully
using FORMAT and WRITE were actually problems with the math
library functions. I rebuilt the fortran library with the hardware
mult/div and it all works.
So I found an RDOS KERMIT program source. It's actually the output
of some RATFOR, for FORTRAN 5, but hopefully I can get it to
compile on FORTRAN 4.
My problem is more contemporary.
The kermit source text is on my "terminal" linux laptop. I'm using
minicom. I need to do
XFER/A $TTI KERMIT.FR
on RDOS to input the text, but minicom blasts the text out too
fast. I solved this problem in another world at another time by
writing a "text upload" that dynamically watched for character
echo and self-paced; is there anything like this around?
I guess I could hack something up in Perl, to simply delay 25mS
per character, or something; or extract the CPU card and set the
console speed to 300, bu sheesh, the source is 68,798 characters,
I have to debug fortran4 vs. fortran5 issues as it is, I don't
want to chase down dropped single characters at the same time.
Is there any linux tool to do this sort of console-bootstrap
thing, or a way to coerce minicom? (Delay after newline is
useless, tried that, even 999 mS.)
On Mar 4 2005, 10:56, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
> I think many don't realize the damage that can happen
> when the group becomes a "Please fix my PC" group.
> I watched this happen to a news group that had too many
> people that tolerated such off topic post. From Jim's own
> words, he thought that this was a general computer
> group. It is not.
[ snip ]
FWIW, I'm in complete agreement with Dwight, and well remember the
newsgroup he means, having used it from 1994 until its eventual demise.
Actually, it's still there - but has become an alt.fix.my.pc group.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Anyone having any contact with Fred or Ed, or who can possibly get a
message to either of them - it would be a Good Thing for either (or both)
of them to get in touch with me ASAP..
Thanks!
Cheers
John
Quoting from the Wired article:
"A new book tackles modern computers in a uniquely hands-on way -- by
getting the reader to build a replica of one of the most famous personal
computers of all: the Apple I."
"Apple I Replica Creation: Back to the Garage by Tom Owad explores the
architecture of modern digital computers through the process of building an
Apple I replica for about $100."
Wired News,
http://wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,66742,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_3
"The book focuses on the basic knowledge of digital electronics required to
understand how the computer does its most basic work. Many diagrams and
photographs illustrate specific tasks or functions.
But the book is not simply a cookbook directing readers to "insert tab A
into slot B." It attempts to teach the fundamentals of digital computer
design along the way.
The "Digital Logic" chapter, for example, which can be downloaded as a
sample chapter (.pdf), shows how to build "and," "or" and "not" gates from
resistors, diodes and LEDs.
Owad said building microcomputers is within many readers' grasp, if they
have the appropriate guide.
"Apple I Replica Creation attempts to be that guide," Owad said. "
The Woz himself wrote the Forward to the book.
-T
[Authors] "90% of everything is crap" --T. Sturgeon "111% of crap is
everything" --L. Wall
--... ...-- -.. . -. ----. --.- --.- -...
tpeters at nospam.mixcom.com (remove "nospam") N9QQB (amateur radio)
"HEY YOU" (loud shouting) WEB ADDRESS http//www.mixweb.com/tpeters
43? 7' 17.2" N by 88? 6' 28.9" W, Elevation 815', Grid Square EN53wc
WAN/LAN/Telcom Analyst, Tech Writer, MCP, Cisco Certified CCNA
In which environment?
Powered up Phaeton, from both SysV and Aegis the user-look was
//{system_name}/directory/directory/file
maybe underneath it's different, but that's what "pwd" and "wd" show
Rock On
-Scott Quinn
vrs writes:
>> At 09:26 AM 3/4/2005, Jim Leonard wrote:
>> >You could make a case that CP/M was modeled after Unix, but we won't go
> there :-)
>>
>> Never! RT-11, maybe.
>
> I always thought both were modeled after OS/8 :-). (Which was, in turn, a
> souped up DMS.)
>
> Vince
>
It was originally written by Tim Patterson of Seattle Computer Products, as
86-QDOS (Quick and Dirty OS). The initial purchase by Microsoft was for
$15,000 IIRC, but full rights to the OS were purchased later for a larger
sum. Patterson was originally planning on including multitasking, but did
not due to time constraints. The OS gained tree-structured directories and
I/O redirection/pipes (< > >> |) in 2.0 (inspired by UNIX), and a major
rewrite for 5.0 (I believe this rewrite was largely the work of Charles
Simonyi, but could not be sure).
Tim Patterson was hired by Microsoft for a period of time.
John
John P. Willis
Coherent Logic Development
I am curious about what is in the HSC70 but the the door is locked and
the key is lost. There should be a PDP11 and several HD's inside, at
far as I know.
I think people on the list might know how to open the door without a
key or force. The lock is not the round cylinder type found on a vax
4000.
Thanks.
vax, 9000
> I thik one of the old HP plotters would "sing" a song using the motors,
> given the proper power up sequence.
>
In the '68-70 timeframe I heard an amazing rendition of the Barcarole
on the tape reader of an HP 2115 using the pinch roller solenoid with a
punch card inserted as a resonator. However, the best use of music on
computers was done by a friend who received special treatment from the
Cyber operators after playing Charge on the high speed chain printers
at the end of his job. Since he didn't advance the paper the printing
effectively cut the paper causing the next several jobs to make an
squirel's nest out of the insides of the printer.
CRC
> 9000> I am curious about what is in the HSC70 but the the door is
> 9000> locked and the key is lost. There should be a PDP11 and several
> 9000> HD's inside, at far as I know.
>
> 9000> I think people on the list might know how to open the door
> 9000> without a key or force. The lock is not the round cylinder type
> 9000> found on a vax 4000.
>
> Is it a flat key lock? If so, that would be the "other" standard key
> that DEC used. I think it's a three pin lock -- you should be
> able to
> pick it with a paperclip.
>
> Alternatively, a drill will do wonders.
>
And I have always used C-4......
-----------Original Message:
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 07:54:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Vintage Computer Festival <vcf at siconic.com>
Subject: Re: Re installing XP on Sony
The point is that if I went onto a PC mailing list and asked someone to
help me troubleshoot my Commodore 64, I would probably be ignored,
possibly even laughed off, and rightly so.
So, even if it were true, which in my experience it isn't, does this mean that
we have to be equally rude and condescending?
Actually, in my experience the people on the PC & other lists I'm on tend
to be quite helpful with off-topic questions if they can, or (nicely) suggest other
resources if they can't.
I would have thought that especially this list would be more mature and polite
(as indeed many people here are, although they tend to be rather quiet).
I always have to remind myself that there are a lot of other people on
this list who don't say anything unless they actually have something
useful to contribute.
We have a very special mailing list here with a specific character, which
is of great value to people in this hobby. If we allow really common,
unextraordinary PC maintenance issues to be discussed any old time someone
wants to bring them up even though there are an infinite number of tools
and resources available only a few clicks away, we'll lose that unique
character, and subsequently most of the people who currently inhabit this
space who are valuable resources for the hobby.
Well, actually I correspond with several people who used to be on this list and
have/are valuable resources who have unsubscribed because of the amount of
irrelevant garbage and the "attitude" on this list; I doubt that the occasional
PC-related topic would have bothered them. I went through my email files from
before I unsubbed a year or so ago to find people with whom I have unfinished
business, and quite a few people who used to be useful contributors seem to no
longer be heard from now that I'm back...
It would be interesting to know how many actually unsubscribed, and why.
Every person who unsubscribes because of the way they're treated or the amount
of junk on this list is a lost potential resource.
Folks have used the list in the past to ask PC related problems, but that
has been in situations where they have already exhausted all other
resources, or they are in a serious pinch and needed immediate
information, and they always explain this. This has been a rare occurence
as most people respect the character of the mailing list and its members.
Jim's issue could've been answered after 5 minutes of Googling.
So what? I ask and get asked lots of questions of/by people, and I've never
said or heard "Don't bother me, look it up on Google!"
As to the "character" of this list, it appears to be a place where you can talk
and ask questions for days about just about anything, cars, guns, what have you,
ignoring pleas to "finally get off this OT topic," as long as it's not about what
many if not most of us actually have sitting in front of us, a PC-compatible,
maybe even (God forbid) running a Microsoft product. Are you really afraid
that if we do answer the occasional OT but computer-related question that
we'll suddenly be deluged?
Can't we (at least some of us) be a little nicer, especially to "outsiders" who
may not be aware of our anal attitudes, or would that totally destroy the
"character" of this list?
mike
Hello everybody,
I own a Honeywell H316 computer and I am looking for other people who
also own Honeywell x16 computers.
At the moment I know only two other people with H316 computers, one of
them with a working one and the other with a strange-behaving one...
I also have some software for my machine:
- FORTRAN IV + library (with source code)
- DAP-16 assembler (with source code)
- memory and cpu test programs etc.
- some loaders (with source code)
It would be interesting to get more software. A basic interpreter would
be really great!
I am also perfectly equipped for paper tape backup/copy and generation.
I am further looking for peripherals, spares, cpu options, docs etc.
Simply *everything* x16 related...
Who is Will Jennings? It seems to be a bit complicated to contact him.
He has posted an interesting message a few years ago. Saying that he had
have saved a lot of H316 CPU stuff. Where is he? how to contact him??
There is also a small website where I document my H316 activities:
http://h316.hachti.de
With best regards,
Philipp :-)
On Mar 2 2005, 20:25, Christian R. Fandt wrote:
> I have a set of five RX50 floppies which contain various service
tests. I
> have not yet discovered what machine/CPU these work upon. Could
anybody
> point me in the direction of how to interpret the seven-character
part
> numbers? All have a copyright date of 1983. They are as follows:
>
> CZUFDB1 (disk part # BL-T540B-M1 "USER TESTS")
> CZXD1B1 (disk part # BL-T541B-M1 "FIELD SERVICE TESTS 1")
> CZXD2B0 (disk part # BL-T542B-MC "FIELD SERVICE TESTS 2")
> CZXD3B0 (disk part # BL-T565B-MC "FIELD SERVICE TESTS 3")
> CZXD4B0 (disk part # BL-T583B-MC "FIELD SERVICE TESTS 4")
>
> Are these some version of XXDP? They came with the MVII and
MicroPDP-11/73
They're the standard XXDP disks that came with a microPDP-11 -- they
were probably supplied with your microPDP-11/73 when it was new.
They're no use for a VAX.
Aren't these the same disks you asked about last May? I posted a
listing of the directories then.
There is a manual for XXDP, but I don't have it (unless it's buried in
my microfiche somewhere, which I don't think it is). However, I put my
notes and extracts of the help files on my web page a long time ago,
and you can still find them here:
http://www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/PDP-11/XXDP.pdfhttp://www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/PDP-11/XXDP.ps
(same contents, just different file formats).
Those will allow you to work out what most of the files do. There's
also a partial list at
http://starfish.osfn.org/rcs/pdp-11/xxdp/xxdp25_notes.txt
Al and Henk had a discussion some time ago about scanning the documents
(program-specific instructions and listings) for each of the
diagnostics. Each one is normally known by a name like ZRQBH0, or more
often just ZRQB, where the first letter refers to the processor type,
the next 2 to the device, the fourth to the test number. The last
letter and digit are the revision and patch level -- so ZRQBH0 is to
run on any processor ("Z"), to test some part of an MSCP disk system
("RQ"), test "B" -- actually it's the formatter for an RD51 or RD52 on
an RQDX1 or RQDX2 controler (ZRQC is the corresponding formatter for an
RQDX3). It's therefore slightly unfortunate that Al indexed his by a
different scheme, but not too hard to find what you want (if it's in
his archive). Look at
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/XXDP/
for some scans. The initial "C" on some of the names refers to the
media it was supplied on. It's not really part of the name. Henk has
summaries of some that are relevant to his interests, on his web page
at
http://www.pdp-11.nl (see the menu entry for XXDP on the left)
which are fine to get you going, but many of the disgnostics halt on
varous errors, and you often need the listings to see what caused the
halt, or to do more than simple tests.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> Jay wrote about a DL11:
> If I exam 776500, I get a 200,
> but anytime I store a value and read it back, there's all
> zero's in the data register.
I will dig up my notes getting characters in and out a M7800
in my 11/35 resurrection using the front panel several years
ago.
This is also an advice: make notes of *everything* you do on
a system, no matter how trivial at this time. Changing a wire,
trying some toggle in tests on the console, behaviour, measured
voltages on pins, etc.
If problems occur later you can go back and do all tests from
your notes. That's why I can write my tests with the M7800 when
I get home (in a few hours from now).
- Henk, PA8PDP.
These are a few of my notes.
Console board: 2 versions. M7800 and M7800-YA
M7800:
Xtal = 4608 kHz, has 1448/1449
jumpers: A3,A4,A5,A7,A9
open: A6,A8,A10
base address = 776500
baudrate = 1200 Bd.
M7800-YA:
Xtal = 1152 kHz, no 1448/1449 (20mA current loop only)
jumpers: A0,A7
open: A4,A5,A6,A8,A9,A10
base address = 777560 (console)
baudrate = 1200 Bd.
console registers:
RCSR 777560
RBUF 777562
XCSR 777564
XBUF 777566
Hit the key "1" of the keyboard
If RCSR contains 0200 it means that a character is received.
To check this:
1) set the SR to 777560.
2) press LOAD ADDRESS --> the ADDRESS LEDs show 777560
3) press EXAM
4) the DATA LEDs show 000200
RBUF should contain 061 (ASCII "1").
To check this:
1) set the SR to 777562.
2) press LOAD ADDRESS --> the ADDRESS LEDs show 777562
3) press EXAM
4) the DATA LEDs show 000061
Load 065 in XBUF --> the screen should show a "5".
Operation:
1) set the SR to 777566.
2) press LOAD ADDRESS --> the ADDRESS LEDs show 777566
3) set the SR to 000065
4) press DEP
Simple test of the CPU.
1) set the SR to 777570 (the switch register address).
2) press LOAD ADDRESS --> the ADDRESS LEDs show 777570
3) set the SR to 000777 (this is BRA . branch to myself)
4) press START
The ADDRESS LEDs show 777572.
CONSOLE LED is off, RUN, BUS, PROC LEDs are on.
When you press HALT, CONSOLE LED goes on.
- Henk, PA8PDP.
> Looking for some DEC stuff for my private collection... New
> Mexico, Texas, Arizona area preferably:
>
There is a massive collection up for grabs right in Dallas. It was mentioned here on the list recently. I would love to get in on the deal [for the PDP-8 stuff specifically], but the distance, size of the total lots, etc make this look impractical.
FWIW: I was talking with the owners of the collection about a year ago. At that point they did not want to sell, but were suffereing major cash problems, these apparently have become "fatal". As far as I can tell (based on some long phone calls) the equipment has been fairly well treated.
>From: "Steve Jones" <classiccmp at crash.com>
---snip---
>
>
>So, what else have we got out there for file/directory path
>separators? We've got DEC's "DEVICE:[DIR.SUB]FILE.TXT;1" and
>uhm... actually, I can't think of the conventions for any others
>at the moment. Can anybody think of any interesting ones? I
>can't remember what DomainOS did, but I remember it striking me
>when I learned of it. Mainframes? RTOSes?
>
>--S.
Hi
The Polymorphics DOS uses <disk>dirname>filename.ext or
<disk>dirname>subdir>filename.ext .
It is funny in that the file names and directory names can
be up to 32 characters but the extention is only 2 characters.
If using the disk name, it can only be 8 characters.
They also had subdirectories from the start. This DOS is like
most of the older ones in that it one had to PACK every now
and then to recover deleted disk space. Since it was created
before DOS, I wonder where it got its roots?
Dwight
Tha Altair32 Emulator uses sounds for feedback (all disable-able) for the
switch clicks, drive door, disk head movement (load/unload/step) and system
fan spin-up, run, and spin-down. And, no, I don't run the fan noise for the
whole time :-)
I have some of the same problems as Jim in that the sounds disappeared on my
development machine (Windows 2000 and Visual Studio .NET 2003) when I
upgraded from Visual Studio 6 to .NET. I believe that the sounds work on
machines other than mine, though.
Oddly enough, every once in a while, the sounds will appear, but only
briefly, before disappearing again.
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Jim Battle
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 1:39 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Altair32 Emulator "Easter Egg" idea
John Foust wrote:
...
> I've always thought that emulators should come with much more familiar
> sound effects, like the sounds of keyboards, disk drive doors
> opening and closing, floppy steppers engaging, fans, tapes turning, etc.
> That's all part of the memory we're savoring and preserving, no?
My Sol-20 emulator has sound effects. There fan startup and running
noise, the floppy disk door opening and closing, floppy disk head
stepping, floppy motor start and stop, and disk friction noise. Since
the real keyboard makes enough noise on its own I don't see what would
be added by having fake keyboard noise too.
http://www.thebattles.net/sol20/solace/solace.html
When I recorded the sounds I first used a dynamic microphone but the
coil picked up more RF hum than anything else. An electret mic fixed
that problem. It took a while to splice the fan sounds so they would
loop nicely. The head stepping sound is of it stepping one track, but
it does a fairly good job even when there is fast head stepping.
One other thing I have done is to emulate the music card -- just a
single pole RC lowpass filter hooked up to the S-100 INT* line. The
"MUSIC" program would take a score and compile it into a program to
toggle the INT line to produce polyphonic music -- although the notes
aren't very well tempered as they get higher in frequency. It is pretty
impressive that it works as well as it does:
http://www.thebattles.net/sol20/d-minor.mp3
I recently upgraded PC's and now my own emulator doesn't run right and
the sound comes out only when I'm using the debugger. I guess it is
about to time spin a revision on the emulator.
>From: "Vintage Computer Festival" <vcf at siconic.com>
---snip---
>
>We have a very special mailing list here with a specific character, which
>is of great value to people in this hobby. If we allow really common,
>unextraordinary PC maintenance issues to be discussed any old time someone
>wants to bring them up even though there are an infinite number of tools
>and resources available only a few clicks away, we'll lose that unique
>character, and subsequently most of the people who currently inhabit this
>space who are valuable resources for the hobby.
---snip---
Hi
I think many don't realize the damage that can happen
when the group becomes a "Please fix my PC" group.
I watched this happen to a news group that had too many
people that tolerated such off topic post. From Jim's own
words, he thought that this was a general computer
group. It is not.
While this group tends to wonder off topic every now
and then ( I'm partly guilty of some of it ), it is
still one of the best resources for general information
on what we like to term as classic computers. We have a
general 10 year rule. Although, we are seeing many PC's
getting into the time frame, it has not shown up as a major
collectable area. Question on fixing a MFM drive would
be on topic partitioning XP is not.
The primary purpose is to keep from having things fall
into day-to-day computer operational problems. As Sellam
says, this is not the right place for these. While there
are many on this list that see little harm in fielding
such off topic questions, I doubt they have seen a group
destroyed as I have. For those that defend him, I doubt
you realize that this group can be quickly destroyed by
such sympathizes.
When I step off topic ( and I have a few times ) I have
no problems or animosity towards those that chastise me
for doing so.
If Jim feels that there is little purpose to this group
because we are unfriendly to question about using XP,
maybe he has an incorrect understanding of what this
group is chartered for. I would like him to remain in the
group if he has interest in older classic machines. If
he doesn't then he is right to leave but there should
be no hard feelings as it was just a mistake that is
quickly rectified.
Dwight
PS
Sorry about my Reply-To. I don't directly control this.
"John Allain" <allain at panix.com> wrote:
> These articles say that Kildall's CP/M easteregg appears in DOS 1.0 or so.
> Has anyone here actually run the proof for themselves?
I have a version of MS-DOS 1.0 (running on an 8086 that is NOT PC-compatible)
(A Japanese machine called Samurai with dual 8" floppies).
So if somebody can tell me what the "CP/M easteregg" is, I can try it
out.
**vp
Back in '73..'75 an "enterprising soul" wrote a complete "symphony" for a PDP-8. Made use of the various shounds available on our system, primarily (IIRC), the 6 TU-56 Drives (12 tapes), System Console, Line Printer, 4 ASR-33 and 2 DecWriters....
>> Back in '73..'75 an "enterprising soul" wrote a complete
>> "symphony" for a PDP-8. Made use of the various shounds
>> available on our system, primarily (IIRC), the 6 TU-56 Drives
>> (12 tapes), System Console,
>> Line> Printer, 4 ASR-33 and 2 DecWriters....
>
> Ooh, do tell more. What did it sound like? Any recordings available?
>
> --
Alas I know of no recordings, and to be honest I can not remember the tune itself. What I do remember [this was a school district computer]:
1) Having a heading from listening to Bill K, and Erich F "tuning" the program
2) Mr. "C" [music director] coming down and spending hours critiquing!
cswiger <cswiger at widomaker.com> wrote:
> All I want to know is who decided to use \ instead of / for
> directory separators (warming up the tar and holding feathers).
'/' was already taken up for the command line switch introducer character
(not '-' since CP/M and DOS were originally inspired from the culture of
DEC OS's rather than the UNIX culture).
MS
> All I want to know is who decided to use \ instead of / for
> directory separators (warming up the tar and holding feathers).
>
Dont know "who" but the alleged "why" was to avoid confusion in parsing (switches used "/" [same as DEC,CP/M] rather than "-" ala Unix.
On Mar 3 2005, 22:16, Richard A. Cini wrote:
> I had an idea for an Easter Egg within the Altair32 Emulator. I
> remember a story that you could run a certain program on the Altair
and hold
> an AM radio next to the Altair and you would hear music. IIRC, the
song was
> "Daisy" as was played in 2001: A Space Odyssey.
>
> Does anyone (1) have this program in source and/or binary and
(2)
> can someone make a high-quality WAV file of it for me (since I don't
have an
> Altair)?
Sounds (sorry) like a good idea. The inspiration for HAL singing
"Daisy" when he was lobotomised by Dave Bowman in "2001" was that Bell
Labs had demonstrated an IBM 7094 "singing" "Daisy" in 1961. Bell Labs
were doing research into vocal-tract modelling; John Kelly had wired a
speaker to one of the output bits and he and Carol Lochbaum[1]
programmed the vocal, with Max Mathews, who was pioneering digital
music, did the accompaniment. The whole thing was programmed onto
magtape, read back once complete and "played" through the speaker. The
recording they made was also once available on an album called "Music
>from Mathematics".
I'm sure there used to be an article on the web about it, though I
can't seem to find it right now, though I have found references to some
of the Bell Labs reports and tapes:
http://www.mindspring.com/~ssshp/ssshp_cd/ss_btl1.htm (about 2/3 down).
What I can find, though, is a digitised copy of the recording they
made, which I downloaded, so I've put it on my website for you:
http://www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/daisy.aifc
I also have an MP3 version, which isn't much inferior (and much
smaller!):
http://www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/daisy.mp3
There's an updated, unaccompanied, somewhat shorter, version from later
work (text-to-speech project) at Bell Labs:
www.bell-labs.com/project/tts/languages.htmlwww.bell-labs.com/project/tts/daisy.aiff
[1] sometimes mispelt "Lockbaum"
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> The p70 was MCA, had one 32-bit and one 16-bit slot.
> This meant... You could insert a full System/370 CPU!!
>
> Imagine that, a VMS portable...!
>
> --
> Tore S Bekkedal <toresbe at ifi.uio.no>
Isn't VMS from D|I|G|I|T|A|L| and *MVS* from IBM?
Or had IBM also a "VMS"?
BTW, what do the letters stand for (inbotb abbreviations)?
- Henk, PA8PDP.
> Jay wrote about a DL11:
> If I exam 776500, I get a 200,
> but anytime I store a value and read it back, there's all
> zero's in the data register.
I will dig up my notes getting characters in and out a M7800
in my 11/35 resurrection using the front panel several years
ago.
This is also an advice: make notes of *everything* you do on
a system, no matter how trivial at this time. Changing a wire,
trying some toggle in tests on the console, behaviour, measured
voltages on pins, etc.
If problems occur later you can go back and do all tests from
your notes. That's why I can write my tests with the M7800 when
I get home (in a few hours from now).
- Henk, PA8PDP.
Before you guys start to laugh at me, I would like to itemize some.
1. The original IBM PC 5150/5160 MB
2. The HP 100LX, 200LX palm PC
3. The original Nexgen pentium class PC
4. The IBM "butterfly" 486 laptop
5. You name it
cheers,
vax, 9000
I have a 7445A at home...anyone know the key sequence?
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of William Donzelli
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 9:00 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Altair32 Emulator "Easter Egg" idea
> That machine also had a very nice Calcomp plotter. I miss plotters.
I thik one of the old HP plotters would "sing" a song using the motors,
given the proper power up sequence.
William Donzelli
aw288 at osfn.org
The adorned "Daisy" is pretty neat!
Does anyone have the original 8080 code used by Dompier at the Homebrew
meeting?
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Pete Turnbull
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 6:17 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Altair32 Emulator "Easter Egg" idea
On Mar 3 2005, 22:16, Richard A. Cini wrote:
> I had an idea for an Easter Egg within the Altair32 Emulator. I
> remember a story that you could run a certain program on the Altair
and hold
> an AM radio next to the Altair and you would hear music. IIRC, the
song was
> "Daisy" as was played in 2001: A Space Odyssey.
>
> Does anyone (1) have this program in source and/or binary and
(2)
> can someone make a high-quality WAV file of it for me (since I don't
have an
> Altair)?
Sounds (sorry) like a good idea. The inspiration for HAL singing
"Daisy" when he was lobotomised by Dave Bowman in "2001" was that Bell
Labs had demonstrated an IBM 7094 "singing" "Daisy" in 1961. Bell Labs
were doing research into vocal-tract modelling; John Kelly had wired a
speaker to one of the output bits and he and Carol Lochbaum[1]
programmed the vocal, with Max Mathews, who was pioneering digital
music, did the accompaniment. The whole thing was programmed onto
magtape, read back once complete and "played" through the speaker. The
recording they made was also once available on an album called "Music
>from Mathematics".
I'm sure there used to be an article on the web about it, though I
can't seem to find it right now, though I have found references to some
of the Bell Labs reports and tapes:
http://www.mindspring.com/~ssshp/ssshp_cd/ss_btl1.htm (about 2/3 down).
What I can find, though, is a digitised copy of the recording they
made, which I downloaded, so I've put it on my website for you:
http://www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/daisy.aifc
I also have an MP3 version, which isn't much inferior (and much
smaller!):
http://www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/daisy.mp3
There's an updated, unaccompanied, somewhat shorter, version from later
work (text-to-speech project) at Bell Labs:
www.bell-labs.com/project/tts/languages.htmlwww.bell-labs.com/project/tts/daisy.aiff
[1] sometimes mispelt "Lockbaum"
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Just a follow-up:
Turns out that the problem was with the way the cards were installed in the
Q-Bus. The mixed Q22/CD-serpentine backplane doesn't allow you to insert a
Q-Bus card in the C/D slot of row 3. moving the three dual-height cards to
the left hand side of the backplane fixed the problem and allowed the system
to complete its tests and boot successfully.
Thanks once again
Thanks to all.
The system now boots (at least partially) into VMS 5.1:
7..6..5..4..3..
Tests completed.
Loading system software.
2..1..0..
VAX/VMS Version V5.1 Major version id = 1 Minor version id = 0
..
PLEASE ENTER DATE AND TIME (DD-MMM-YYYY HH:MM)
PLEASE ENTER DATE AND TIME (DD-MMM-YYYY HH:MM) 04-MAR-2005 03:04
$! Copyright (c) 1988 Digital Equipment Corporation. All rights reserved.
The VAX/VMS system is now executing the system startup procedure.
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 4-MAR-2005 03:06:19.27 %%%%%%%%%%%
Logfile has been initialized by operator _OPA0:
Logfile is SYS$SYSROOT:[SYSMGR]OPERATOR.LOG;762
%LICENSE-I-LOADED, DEC FORTRAN was successfully loaded with 50 units
Now all that remains is to get Quasijarus onto some TK50s so I can
run the One True UNIX.
Thanks again for your patient help!
John
> Nico de Jong wrote:
> > It could be interesting to know the age"spread" of thist list
> > contributors, and how long we've had the computer virus under
> > our skin.
Born in 1966, started with 4K chicklet-keyboard PETs at the downtown
public library in 1977 (none of my schools to that point could ever
afford a computer). Had a friend with a Quest Elf around the same
time frame, so jumped from 100% BASIC to mixed assembler/BASIC pretty
early on. Saved up half the money for a PET 2001N-32K (still have it)
in 1979. Got first computer job at 15, programming a prototype C-64
(s/n P00002008) for Bruce & James Software, "Wordvision 64" demo.
They went on to release Wordvision for the PC before going bankrupt.
Wrote kids games published by Reader's Digest Software until that
company folded when Reader's Digest terminated their kids software
line. Picked up a PDP-8/L at the Dayton Hamvention, in the meantime,
starting a long association with DEC computers. Turned that
association into a career with Software Results Corp, making
HASP/3780/SNA COMBOARD protocol engines based on the MC68000, first as
hardware technician, later as System Manager, finally as lead
programmer. Got my first taste of UNIX there, in 1984. After a few
minutes on a VAX-11/750 w/2MB of RAM and 2xRK07 (28MB) running 4.1BSD
(that I now have in my quonset hut), I *knew* that UNIX had a future.
I've spent the past 20 years doing UNIX and VMS administration and
programming to different degrees at different places. Started
dabbling in Linux with the 0.9 kernels, whenever they added native
(non-patched) SCSI support. Did first Slackare install in mid-1992
>from a huge stack of numbered floppies.
Just got back from a year at the South Pole running a neutrino
telescope (AMANDA) for the University of Wisconsin, that depends on
two dozen Linux machines, and a dozen VME crates to collect, archive,
and forward gigs of data per hour. It's been one of my favorite jobs
of all time, not just because of the location, but because I got to
use all of my admin and electronics skills I've been building for my
entire career.
John Willis <willisjo at zianet.com> wrote:
> Back panel:
>
> There is a toggle switch. Two settings. One with an empty circle with a
> dot above it, and one
> circle with a dot in the center. It is set on the empty circle with the
> dot above. (down position).
This is the halts disabled position. Set it to dot-in-the-circle (halts
enabled) and it should give you the >>> prompt.
In the halts disabled position is attempts autoboot. I assume that the
hang you are seeing is the result of autoboot not succeeding / looping.
Setting the dot in the circle will disable autoboot and give you the console;
you can then check your system out manually.
MS
I have been playing around with a collection of old Flip Chips that I
have and put together a VC8/I compatible scope controller for my PDP8/e.
You can find a page about it here http://www.chd.dyndns.org/pdp8/VC8/
The only reason this was possible was because I had two 10-bit D/A
converters (A618), the rest of the modules are pretty common.
Thanks to David Gesswein for some test programs.
-chuck
Here's the output from the system when connected to a terminal:
KA630-A.V1.3
Performing normal system tests.
7..6..5..4..3..
No dead-sergeant prompt >>>
It used to also have 2..1.. and then go to the >>>
John Willis <willisjo at zianet.com> wrote:
> system would actually begin its power-on tests (F...E...D...C... etc.),
> however, it hangs at 3. From what I could find in DEC documentation,
> this is a "spurious interrupt" problem,
3 is _NOT_ an error, it just means that the system reached the >>> prompt at
which you can give it commands like which device to boot from. Connect a
terminal to the console port to interact with the console.
MS
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 21:37:57 -0800, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
> I'm one of the lucky ones, all of my main PDP-11's have SCSI
> adapters. However, only one of my two -8's (/m & /e) have a disk
Lucky bastard! :-)
Either you've had a windfall, or you're now less an arm and a leg...
> controller, though I've not found time to get either -8 fully running
> :^( One thing that really worries me is that the days of being able
> to get new SCSI disks that will work with a PDP-11 are coming to an
> end, if they aren't already over. One of the vendors that is very
> good with getting 3rd party disks to work with VMS has reported that
> the new U320 drives don't sync down to Narrow SCSI right.
Wow. That has happened already?... bummer
> What I'd really like to see is some sort of MFM HD emulator. That's
> something that would be of use to more than just us DEC users. For
> those of us that would use it with DEC HW, something that would
> emulate a RD51-RD54 would be great for those OS's that expect a
> specific HD type.
To fantasize further:
- device end either SCSI/U320/SCA or IDE/SATA
- bus end (Qbus or Unibus) emulates the largest type of a family, i.e:
RD/RD54, RL/RL02, RX/RX02, RK/RK07, same for RP, and the rest
I think the hardware part is the easiest. The stumbling block would be
the emulation layer in order for applications to run unchanged int the
various DEC OSs..
/wai-sun
John Willis <willisjo at zianet.com> wrote:
> system would actually begin its power-on tests (F...E...D...C... etc.),
> however, it hangs at 3. From what I could find in DEC documentation,
> this is a "spurious interrupt" problem,
3 is _NOT_ an error, it just means that the system reached the >>> prompt at
which you can give it commands like which device to boot from. Connect a
terminal to the console port to interact with the console.
MS
Hello all,
I purchased a MicroVAX II about a year ago. When I went to
the office where it was sitting, the original owner, a former
DEC field service engineer, and myself powered the machine up.
VMS came up successfully; no problems there. The system is in
a BA23 rackmount chassis, and contains a MOB Systems quniverter,
to connect it to a BA11K Unibus chassis via two large ribbon
cables. The system contains also the following boards:
M7658 - 16-bit parallel I/O with DMA and block mode functions
M3104 - DHV11-A 8-line asynchronous DMA MUX
M7651 - 18/22-bit DMA general purpose parallel interface
Also, a TQK50 TMSCP controller and an RQDX3 ST-506 MSCP controller.
The system has for drives an RD54 fixed disk and a TK50 tape drive.
Anyhow, once I got the system home and cabled everything back according
to the notes/pictures taken of the original installation, the system
would not come up, and the DC OK light on the front panel would not
light. I checked and re-checked the cable connections, re-seated all the
boards, still no-go.
Realizing I would not need the Unibus chassis, as it contained no cards
other than the one needed to connect it to the uVAX II's Qbus, I removed
the Qbus part of the quniverter. This solved the DC OK problem, and the
system would actually begin its power-on tests (F...E...D...C... etc.),
however, it hangs at 3. From what I could find in DEC documentation,
this is a "spurious interrupt" problem, and the docs gave no clue as to
how to go about tracking it down to any specific part of the system.
I have tried pulling all the cards except for CPU and memory, to no avail.
I tried installing the RD54 in a VAXstation 2000. It boots VMS successfully
when installed in that system, so I know the drive is good.
Unfortunately, I recently moved and could not keep the BA11K due to
space constraints, so I have since parted with that chassis.
I'm completely stumped at this point. Any suggestions?
Thanks much,
John Willis
Don't suppose anyone's come across anything that'll attempt to fix a
corrupt .Z (Unix compress) file, have they?
I've got a 40MB compressed tar archive here, but uncompress barfs after
the first 23MB - it'd be nice if there was a way of skipping over the
duff bits if possible and reading *something* from the last 17MB!
cheers
Jules
But if you do:
If you have the time and interest to wander out to York U on a Friday
morning: I've been asked to make a presentation there.
My theme (if I don't wander too far off the subject) is "Computer
hobbyists of the 70s and 80s" - mostly from a Commodore user
perspective, of course. It runs about an hour.
This is in connection with a computer museum at York; a bunch of older
computers (including lotsa Commodores) will be on display.
A little more information can be found at:
http://www.cs.yorku.ca/museum/events/events.htm
(gosh, I think they must have retouched my photo). And the YorkU
host, Zbigniew Stachniak, says:
>> Since our history of computing lecture series event is open to anyone,
>> you are, of course, free to bring with you anybody who is interested
>> in your lecture.
>
>
So come along if you have time and inclination (like the guy who
leaned his grandfather clock agains the wall), and we'll all revise
history together. :-)
--Jim Butterfield
Jim "the other Jim" Brain.
--
Jim Brain, Brain Innovations
brain at jbrain.comhttp://www.jbrain.com
Dabbling in WWW, Embedded Systems, Old CBM computers, and Good Times!
In case anyone is interested:
CJOH news in Ottawa is running a segment on local collectors
of classic computers. The camera crew was here this afternoon,
and they visited Mike K's on sunday.
It will air as a segment on the "Tech Now" section of this Sunday
6:00pm newscast (March 6). Local Ottawans can tune CJOH directly,
anyone with ExpressVu (Canadian satellite) should be able to
get it on channel 196 at the above date/time.
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
The PDP-1 Restoration Project is still far from complete, but we hit
a major milestone tonight. When we last tried to run Spacewar,
the sun and player ships would not display correctly, though the
starfield and torpedos seemed to be fine. We ran the DEC instruction
diagnostics and they failed on the shift/rotate test, though all
the diagnostics had passed a few months earlier.
This week we wrote a more specific diagnostic program and determined
that left shifts and rotates of the I/O register were not doing anything,
though right shifts and rotates of the I/O register were fine, and all
shifts and rotates of the accumulator were fine. After a little study of
the print set, we identified two system modules that could cause the
observed behavior. We tried replacing one of them, a 1607 pulse amplifier.
After replacing the 1607, our own diagnostic and the DEC diagnostic
both passed. Some of the team wanted to go home without trying out
Spacewar, but the rest of us nagged until they gave in. We loaded it,
and it ran correctly.
Spacewar on the real Type 30 display with long persistence phosphor
is a thing of beauty!
Some of the tasks remaining to be done:
* build new Spacewar control boxes
* continue repair/testing of Soroban console typewriter
* adjust Type 30 display to factory specs (linearity is poor)
* adjust paper tape reader sensitivity/threshold
* diagnose & repair suspected flaky memory "module" 0
* voltage margin checks, run all diagnostics
* install new belt and test BRPE tape punch
Eric
>From: "Eric Flanzbaum" <elf at ucsd.edu>
>
---snip---
>Given what others have posted in this thread about the Cat, I'm under the
>impression it is basically a editing machine (with some fancy features
>built-in), along with a back door into Forth. Almost a glorified word
>processor, if you will.
>
>Was there much (if any) 3rd party software developed for it -- which
>expanded beyond its native capabilities?
>
>
Hi
Not that I know of but there are others that might
have more information on this. From my playing with
it, you can not directly execute code from the disk.
Even to run Forth, you have to select the code from
the screen before it will execute. This isn't hard
to do but not the same as running a program on the
disk.
There might have been some way to do it but the
Cat only seems to use the disk for text storage.
Once in Forth, I believe one can take over the machine
and treat it like a normal processor. I'm sure
there must be a trap-door in there someplace to
load code from disk but I've not explored what
can be done from Forth, other than, when I first
got it, to look through the memory to determine where
the ROM images were.
I do know one of the fellows that wrote code for
it and I've been meaning to pick his brain some
time. For the curious, it is a great machine. There
is so much in there to explore. and even a way
to do it ( Forth is like a super monitor ).
Dwight
Ron Hudson wrote:
> sounds to me like emacs is to lisp as cannon cat is
> to forth, at least to some extent.
It does have that ring to it, huh?
Given what others have posted in this thread about the Cat, I'm under the
impression it is basically a editing machine (with some fancy features
built-in), along with a back door into Forth. Almost a glorified word
processor, if you will.
Was there much (if any) 3rd party software developed for it -- which
expanded beyond its native capabilities?
Does anybody know why my list subscribtion has been cancelled?
I wasn't receiving any messages since February 26. Now I have subscribed
again. But I don't know what happened.....
Philipp
You seemed to have left out a few words so I thought I might help
a little.
>From: "Jim Isbell, W5JAI" <jim.isbell at gmail.com>
>
>No, this is NOT a PC support list, it is a general list for computer
^
classic
>talk which is what my post is. If you need to be "on topic" go to the
^
not
>cctech list.
>
>
Hi
This is an un-moderated "clasic computer" list that
tolerates some off topic post. Also, it is self
regulating in that many off topic post may be
flamed. Members should refain from posting replies
to post that, if allowed to continue, damage the list
in general. Even when they know the answer.
I'll admit that I've not always been
able to stop myself but many times I have.
What to do with Windows XP is way outside of topics
covered under clasic computers. The worst of it
is that this list most likely has only a small percentage
that are up on dealing with XP. Most just use it
only when needed and for nothing else.
We are not trying to turn you off towards the list
but help you realize that there are better places
to handle your particular problem.
Dwight
On Mar 3 2005, 10:03, Tom Jennings wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2005, Pete Turnbull wrote:
>
> > Probably because Jules' mailer is inserting an unecessary
"Reply-to:"
> > header (pointless, since it's supposed to be used only when you
want
> > replies to go to somewhere other than the "From:"), and then
mailman is
> > applying the principle of "least modification" and *appending* the
> > classiccmp address, rather than replacing the one Jules' mailer put
in.
> >
> > I've noticed this with posts from one or two other listmembers.
>
> I think Jay's right -- mailman may have changed, but it's not
> necessarily incorrect. There are few subtleties involving
> To:/Reply-To: processing but it's one of those things a lot of
> MUAs make configurable. Pine's "reply-always-uses-reply-to" in
> feature-list, for example.
I'm not suggesting there's anything wrong with mailman -- in fact,
applying "least modification" is The Right Thing. You are only allowed
one "Reply-to:" line per message, and mailman is quite properly not
discarding existing information. I just don't think any MUA should
create a "Reply-to:" if it's the same as the "From:" or "Sender:". As
for Pine using "Reply-to:" for replies, that's what the RFCs say you
*should* do if a "Reply-to:" is present; it's purpose is purely to
override the "From:" when replying.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>From: "Eric F." <elf at ucsd.edu>
>
>The recent death of Mr. Raskin has me Google'ing around for information
>about his Canon Cat machine.
>
>Even prior to his passing, I have always thought it a sweet looking machine.
>
>Does anyone of this list own a Canon Cat? If so, do you use it for any sort
>of regular everyday work? And what's your personal impression of the machine?
>
>Is it even possible to use it in the context of today's work demands (i.e.,
>for email)? Or is a proper network interface & appropriate software the
>limiting factor here?
>
>
Hi
I have a Cat. There are some companies that still use
these as editing machines. That is why they seem to be
missing from the collector group in general. I got mine
>from Al Kossow. I had to replace the lithium battery in it
but it otherwise works OK.
I'd love to get some information on the memory and I/O
mapping. It expects to use particular printers so it would
be nice to rewrite the driver to work well with my 3SI.
I could imagine that if I were doing a lot of writing
for college or writing a book, I'd find the editor a real
advantage.
It has one other nice feature. One can write out a formula
and it will give you the answer. It is kind of like having
a spread sheet in your text.
Of course, if you know the secret key sequence, you can
bring it into the Forth mode. From here, you can access
the inner machine as well. You can write Forth code and
execute it in the text as well. It then becomes a spread
sheet plus at that point.
Still, it is primarily a text machine in black and white.
I talked with Jeff about two years ago. He definitely
had interesting ideas about computer interfaces. He
didn't think much of the mouse. Besides being the major
source of carpal tunnel syndrome (sp?) it is a real time
waster for most applications.
The machines code wasn't completely written in Forth
but Jeff does attribute the quick software development
and the fact that there were no errors found in the released
version to using Forth in the creation of code.
Forth tends to make a person do incremental testing as
the code is written. This often helps to produce error
free code in the final product.
Dwight
I dug into some of the complaints that people on cctech weren't getting any
posts, except from me. Here's what happened.
Remember that cctech is 100% moderated. Nothing goes to it without moderator
approval. The moderators are behind ;) I just checked and there's a few days
of messages in there. I'm sure this will get caught up soon enough.
In addition - why are cctech people getting posts just from me? Well, see
above, PLUS, I set my own subscription to cctech to not require moderation.
Thus, any posts I make go straight to the users without an approval step. I
did this because sometimes when I send out notices like "I'm taking the
server down for a while", cctech users don't get them immediately like
cctalk users do, due to moderation. So by setting my cctech subscription to
no moderation, cctech people would get my notices immediately. The downside
of this, in hindsight, is that it looks REALLY squirrely to the cctech
people. They get a string of my normal posts, and them some time later,
possibly a day or so, when moderation occurs, they get all the other posts I
make. Problem solved.
I think what I'm going to do about this is change my personal cctech
subscription back to requiring moderation. That way cctech people won't see
the odd out of order behaviour. Then I'll create an additional "admin"
subscription for myself that doesn't require moderation. I'll then try to
remember to use that "admin" subscription to send out list notices and
things will be more sane for cctech people.
Regards,
Jay West
The following are available, but with a request.
Two clean TI DS10 (TI-990 era) disk packs. I've been charged
by a friend with finding a good home from them, which I think
means someone from this list trying to keep a TI-990 in good
order. The catch is, we'd like to get any recoverable data
off of these disk packs.
My friend is a board member for the TRAC Foundation. TRAC is
"an interpretive, recursive, string-based, macroprocessing
language with no compile step" invented by Calvin Mooers
starting in 1959. Going to www.tracfoundation.com one finds
that "entire subroutines can be inserted, or deleted, from
a running procedure, thus massively changing the behavior
during runtime." Whoa! Imagine changing a sort routine half
way through a long running job...
The reason I mention TRAC is that there's a chance one
of these packs has important/useful information about the
TRAC language, and my friend would really appreciate it if
the new owner could check for and recover anything that's
on these.
That's the only catch - we want whatever can be read from
them. And whoever wants them would need to pony up for
shipping and handling, or come collect them near Boston, MA,
USA. I can try to scrounge up a suitable box, but the packs
might have to go through the UPS Store too.
So, preference will be given to the person who stands the
best chance of recovering data. I can wait a week to see
what responses come in.
Thanks,
--Steve.
On Mar 2 2005, 22:50, der Mouse wrote:
> In passing, on the "whom to reply to" thread, this message came in
with
> a header
>
> > Reply-To: julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk,
> > "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> > <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
> I noticed this when I tried to reply and saw both addresses in the
To:;
> upon checking, I found that Reply-To:.
>
> How it got that way, of course, is a different question.
Probably because Jules' mailer is inserting an unecessary "Reply-to:"
header (pointless, since it's supposed to be used only when you want
replies to go to somewhere other than the "From:"), and then mailman is
applying the principle of "least modification" and *appending* the
classiccmp address, rather than replacing the one Jules' mailer put in.
I've noticed this with posts from one or two other listmembers.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Does anyone have the microcode source code for the
PDP11 native instruction set on the LSI-11/2/WD chips?
it purportedly provided with the LSI-11 WCS option (KUV-11 -M8018)
The descriptions I've found in documentation located on bitsavers
say the the kit included the microcode assembler/linker
tools as well as the full ' 11 source .mic code for reference.
Meagan? Alternate anyone have info on reading out the WD PMOS roms?
I've got 3x working M7264 LSI-11/2(quad height) with all the MICROMs loaded as well
as a M7270 LSI-11 (dual height), they all run RT fine. Anyone know
if you can just swap the MICROMS to make a WD Pascal Microegine?
Would be a good set if you already have an 11/23, 11/73 looking to complete the set.
Open to interesting trades.
Heinz
I'm in contact with two gents who worked on TI-990's back in
the 80's. Since this platform doesn't get a lot of traffic on
the list, I thought I'd share their recollections of working
on these systems.
======== Gentleman N
[ Referring to the pictures/links posted a few days ago of a
[ TI-990 in L.A. ...
The disk drives for this computer is actually a pair of drives in one
enclosure. One removable and the other "fixed" internally. They both
have the same capacity (5MB I think).
The funky terminal is just that. It's a great monochrome terminal with
addressable cursor and it is fast for its day when compared to
VT52/VT100s.
The OS seemed decent from what little I used it but I never did any
programming with it. In 1986 I helped out Bryan with an old client in
Honolulu who had a rack mounted version with three DS10's where two of
the unit (four drives) had failed with head crashes (don't move packs
between drives after those funny scrapping sounds begin). The service
guy had the system already repaired and I helped get the their
accounting system going again. I went back 1987-89 and wrote a new
version running on i386/AT&T Unix System V Release 3 so they could have
more modern hardware.
It was a nice system...but not an IBM 1401 (or CDC 8090)!
========
======== Gentleman A
Wow, that's a (nice) blast from the past. And to help connect the dots,
I am a friend of Bill's who handed over a customer with one of these for
Bill to provide software support.
I had a 2 person company (sales guy and me) that developed business
applications for a chain of radio stations, and we needed a system that
we could resell 1) quickly; 2) with no cash upfront; 3) that was
reasonably powerful for a multi-user terminal based application.
This was around 1980, and we talked to all the usual suspects, DEC, Data
General, HP, maybe Wang... It's been a while. Anyway the TI folks
basically sold us a machine and delivered it, no cash down, 120 days to
pay, lots of support, etc. I had the thing in my living room of my
bachelor-pad apartment for a few months of development and testing, then
we delivered it to the client.
The application was in Fortran (is that correct Bill?), but I remember
writing a few little assembler tools and twiddling a few bits here and
there. Once we delivered it to the customer my access was somewhat
limited to bug-fix and enhancements during evenings and weekends, so I
didn't get to play with it as much as I would have liked.
The coolest thing I remember from the OS was a near real-time display
of in-memory processes. Sort of a graphical version of 'top' mapped
onto physical addresses.
========
Two interesting articles:
- http://tinyurl.com/63yx9 (cnet)
- http://tinyurl.com/6y6rb (computerworld)
=====
Evan's personal homepage: www.snarc.net
*** Tell your friends about the Computer Collector Newsletter!
- It's free and we'll never send spam or share your email address
- Publishing every Monday(-ish), ask about writing for us
- Mainframes to videogames, hardware and software, we cover it all
- W: http://news.computercollector.com E: news at computercollector.com
- We're approaching 700 readers: win a prize!
On Mar 3 2005, 13:49, Jules Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 13:09 +0000, Pete Turnbull wrote:
>
> > Probably because Jules' mailer is inserting an unecessary
"Reply-to:"
> > header (pointless, since it's supposed to be used only when you
want
> > replies to go to somewhere other than the "From:")
>
> Possibly fixed now :-) (we'll see when this hits the list...)
Yep, that's fixed it :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hi Bill,
Any chance of your making binary copies of your
working disks available? That would be a boon to the
rest of us OSI owners.
Dave
--- Bill Sudbrink <wh.sudbrink at verizon.net> wrote:
> Well, since my C4P-MF has been rock solid stable
> since I
> fitted the new power supply and cleaned the drive
> head,
> I've been going through a bunch of 25 (and more)
> year old
> diskettes to see just what I have.
>
> Lo-and-behold!
>
> On a diskette simply labeled OS65D 3.2 (not
> originally mine,
> acquired I don't know where), I found really nice
> machine
> code implementations of Space Invaders and
> Asteroids! You
> don't usually see machine code programs on OSI
> diskettes, the
> OS was too crude to have a simple binary loader.
> Diskettes
> usually have BASIC programs, with maybe a couple of
> USR$
> sub-routines in data statements. To load and
> execute the
> programs, you have to EXIT from BASIC into the
> sub-monitor and
> then load the diskette tracks into memory one at a
> time. Once
> you have it loaded, then you GO to the starting
> address. I
> think that these programs might have been originally
> intended
> to be loaded from cassette tape. Fortunately, the
> diskette had
> two BASIC programs, each of which PRINTs the
> instructions for
> loading the machine code programs. I'm really happy
> about this!
> People usually see OSI boxes running rather slow
> interpreted
> BASIC programs. These two programs show just what
> an OSI box
> can do. There is no attribution for the Asteroids
> program, but
> the Space Invaders is copyright 1980 by Michael
> Kincaid.
>
> Can't wait to show these at TCF!
>
> Bill
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Jules Richardson declared on Saturday 26 February 2005 03:03 pm:
> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 22:02 +0800, Wai-Sun Chia wrote:
> > Born 1966 (age 39).
>
> Most people start at zero ;-)
???
1966 + 39 = 2005. That's the current year, unless during my intoxication
last night, I built a time machine and sent myself back 1 year in
time. :) However, that seems somewhat unlikely.
Pat
--
Purdue University ITAP/RCS --- http://www.itap.purdue.edu/rcs/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
>From: msokolov at ivan.harhan.org
>
>Vintage Computer Festival <vcf at siconic.com> wrote:
>
>> This is not your fault. As you may recall, we had this discussion about
>> half a year ago, and it boils down to people not configuring their e-mail
>> clients properly to obey the reply-to directive in the e-mail headers of
>> the list messages.
>
>No, that is not the problem. Since I read my mail with full headers using
>a very "raw" MUA that does *nothing* behind my back, I see what actually
>happens is this: most list messages arrive with Reply-To: set to the list,
>but some arrive with Reply-To: listing both the list and the author.
>
>Since the Reply-To: header is tweaked by the mailing list software, I can't
>see how it can behave so inconsistently. Since I am a hard determinist
>when it comes to computers, the only rational explanation I have is that
>there must be some differences in the headers of messages before they reach
>the list that causes the list software to process them differently. But
>of course in order to pin the problem down, one must see the messages in
>their original form prior to alteration by the list software, which I cannot
>do as a mere subscriber, only Jay or other list staff can do that.
Hi
I just sent myself a message. The only thing I see is that
the reply-to field has my email address in it. The list server
must be simply appending the CCTALK address to what is there.
I don't control that part of my mail tool so I annoy Sellam ;)
Dwight
>
>MS
>
>P.S. One thought: when I was designing my own mailing list management software,
>I implemented a feature by which a list can accept posts from non-subscribers
>with moderator approval. I implemented it so that it set Reply-To: header
>to both the list and the author on those approved outsider posts, on the
>reasoning that the author should see replies but won't see them on the
>list because he is not subscribed. I don't know anything about the software
>Jay uses for this list, but there is a chance that its authors followed
>reasoning similar to mine and the posts arriving with Reply-To: set to the
>list and the author come from non-subscribers approved by moderators.
>
Thanks to a lot of generousity from a lot of folks, the purchase of the new
hardware has been covered as of 1:06pm CST.
Thanks! I'll cut a check to the vendor today.
Jay
Don Hills wrote
>The original diskette design was for a microcode load device for an
>IBM mainframe. I recall there was an IBM Journal of R&D article about
>it, I'll see if I can find it
I happen to have the 25th Anniversary issue of the IBM Journal of Research
and Development, Sept 1981.
There is an article on page 701.
The IBM Diskette and Diskette Drive
by J. T. Engh
The diskette and diskette drive have had a major influence on data
processing. They provide a low-cost, compact, high-performance solution to
the need for a reusable magnetic medium and have largely replaced the
punched card in many applications. Early applications were simple
program-load functions. Today these have expanded to a wide range of medium
exchange, information storage, and data processing applications. This paper
examines the history of the development of these products within IBM. The
discussion includes some of the alternatives considered and some of the
problems encountered during these developments.
You can find it on the IBM Research site
http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd/255/ibmrd2505ZE.pdf
My business card was in the book with an email address of
uw-beaver!entropy!dataio!holley
Michael Holley
Next question - anyone think of a good reason why a lot of old tapes I
have containing tar archives seem to hit read errors at around 7.8MB
into the tape?
--
That is the first time the tape reverses direction.
You should always 'retension' the tape before trying to read it
mt -f /dev/st0 retension works under most unix systems.
This runs the tape out, and rewinds to BOT.
If the tapes are old, there is a high probablility the tensioning belt
in the cartridge is going
to break. Keep a few new donor carts around to salvage the belts out of
Be EXTREMELY careful when changing a belt to not damage the tape (it is
very easy to damage
since it is quite thin)
I have a set of five RX50 floppies which contain various service tests. I
have not yet discovered what machine/CPU these work upon. Could anybody
point me in the direction of how to interpret the seven-character part
numbers? All have a copyright date of 1983. They are as follows:
CZUFDB1 (disk part # BL-T540B-M1 "USER TESTS")
CZXD1B1 (disk part # BL-T541B-M1 "FIELD SERVICE TESTS 1")
CZXD2B0 (disk part # BL-T542B-MC "FIELD SERVICE TESTS 2")
CZXD3B0 (disk part # BL-T565B-MC "FIELD SERVICE TESTS 3")
CZXD4B0 (disk part # BL-T583B-MC "FIELD SERVICE TESTS 4")
Are these some version of XXDP? They came with the MVII and MicroPDP-11/73
systems that I got as part of The Great Haul back in July 1998, but there
is no indication who they go to.
I stumbled across something about deciphering those CZX-type numbers a
while back but did not retain the URL (naturally, now that I need to use it).
Thanks much.
-Chris F.
NNNN
Christian R. Fandt, Treasurer
Antique Wireless Association, Inc.
Jamestown, New York USA
email: cfandt at netsync.net
Electronic/Electrical Historian
URL: http://www.antiquewireless.org/
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:12:41 +0100, Nico de Jong <nico at farumdata.dk> wrote:
>
> Yes. The discussion is not about bytes, but about card images.
> A card image (apart from some special ones like 96 bytes and "stubs" of
> about 30 bytes) is 80 bytes. Furthermore, the lowest sectorsize that could
> be formatted on a 3740, was 128 bytes. As there are 73 "user adressable"
> tracks with each 26 sectors, there are only 1898 sectors. And as the
> discussion is about card images, there is only room for 1898 cards, unless a
> technique called spanning is used.
The original diskette design was for a microcode load device for an
IBM mainframe. I recall there was an IBM Journal of R&D article about
it, I'll see if I can find it.
3740 DE (Data Entry) format actually had the option of 80 or 128
characters / "columns" per record. The basic 3741/3742 data entry
station only did 80 characters per record, although the diskette
sectors were always 128 data bytes. You had to order the optional
feature (a plug-in ROM card) to support 128 characters per record.
Track 0 was housekeeping and index. Tracks 1 to 73 ware data. I still
have my 3741 alignment diskette. It has eccentric tracks, and there
was a built-in ROM routine on the 3741/2 station to read a full track
and display the sector addresses in binary. You adjusted the head
alignment to get two areas of good IDs and two areas of bad IDs. The
binary display was unusual, it actually displayed what looked like a
capital "H" with additional horizontal bars for each 1 bit. "00" hex
looked like "H", "FF" hex looked like a solid block,, "18" hex looked
like a square-edged digit "8" etc.
>
> > IBM's 3740 data entry station put its stamp of approval on the
> > floppy. The 3740 format is still the de facto interchange medium
> > within the industry.
> This is worth a whole new topic, as I happen to know a bit about that (I'm
> running a service bureau for media conversion)
>
> > ...
> > IBM's design for the 3740 was very conservative. At the time, IBM
> > believed that floppies would be used for the batch entry of data.
> That is correct; the 3740 family came to be rather big, eventually ending up
> with the 3749(?) data entry station, where one could use DSDD floppies with
> a sector length of 1024. IIRC, it could accommodate 6 segments per track,
> ending up with 8 x 1024 x 73 x 2 = 1.1196.032 bytes
>
> > The full-sized floppy was designed to hold the same amount of
> > information that 3,000 punch cards would hold - the maximum of
> > what a single keypunch operator could do in a day.
> See discussion on "spanning"
>
> Nico
>
>
The recent death of Mr. Raskin has me Google'ing around for information
about his Canon Cat machine.
Even prior to his passing, I have always thought it a sweet looking machine.
Does anyone of this list own a Canon Cat? If so, do you use it for any sort
of regular everyday work? And what's your personal impression of the machine?
Is it even possible to use it in the context of today's work demands (i.e.,
for email)? Or is a proper network interface & appropriate software the
limiting factor here?
> I'm not a collector, but I have run into a type that
> you might not have seen... oriental rug mousepads.
> There's the Mouse Rug, but that's a fake -- just an
> oriental pattern printed on a plain old mousepad.
> But there are also woven rug type pads, which are
> far nicer.
> I got mine from oldcarpet.com.
Yup - got me one too. Still using it at this moment. I picked it up at a
Las Vegas Comdex convention some 7-8 years ago.
The main reason I purchased it was the fact that it claimed to
automatically clean your mouse. In fact, printed on the backside of it is:
"Automatically Cleans Your Mouse"
I don't remember ever having to clean my mouse since. (And yes - I still
use a mechanical mouse with said mouse ball. Haven't gone optical yet.)
>From: "Vintage Computer Festival" <vcf at siconic.com>
>
>On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Tom Jennings wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
>>
>> > If I then try to DIR the disk the head backs up a track or so but can't
>> > seem to recalibrate to track 0. The head vibrates as if the drive is
>> > sending the signals to the stepper to retract the head but it only manages
>> > to move back a track or so each time I issue DIR. If I do it enough it
>> > eventually gets back to the stop position but it still gets sector errors.
>>
>> Wrong step rate! Poke a new on eint othe chip, or does it use the old
>> table of junk INT 13h used to supoprt?
>
>Um, I'm not sure. I'm not sure I understand the question either. This is
>a standard ISA IDE+floppy controller. Should I try an older one? Or hook
>this up to an oldr PC from the 1980s?
>
Hi
There is a table that one stores the step rate
for the drive. You need to alter the value for
slower drives, like your 8 inch. I forget where
is it but it is in that lower area someplace
( 40:xxx or something ). It isn't a problem
of the controller. It should work with any controller,
you just need to find the table and change it.
It has been a while since I've fiddle with it
to make my drives step with less noise ( and wear ).
Dwight
Just grabbed an ASR-33 on ePay.....LOCAL so no shipping damage (except what I induce).....
Since I dont carry my reference manuals with me, can anyone post the "proper" size for the hold-down bolt(s)??????
I want to pick this up on the way home this evening....
I wonder if there is some incompatibility when reading 60MB
tapes in a 150MB device.
--
I've read hundreds of 60 meg tapes on 150 meg drives.
What probably has happened is the end of the tape where the direction
reverses either has been damaged
due to the tape being slightly sticky with age, or there is now a pile
of oxide and binder where the direction reversed.
Whoever developed serpentine transports apparently never thought about
the problem of oxide and binder
shedding as the tape ages (or gets sticky). You end up with gunk on the
head, which deposits itself on the
tape when the head reverses direction.
Since the real size of a QIC tape block is 512 bytes, you might try
reading 512 bytes at a time to keep the drive
>from trying to form a larger block near the far end of the tape out of
parts from the forward and backward tape
directions. This also minimizes the data lost if a block can't be
recovered. The down side is it can slow transfers
down a lot.
>From: "Tom Jennings" <tomj at wps.com>
>
>>> From: "Tom Jennings" <tomj at wps.com>
>>>
>>> Unlike film, you can'y simply open the shutter and integrate the
>>> image over time arbitrarily. CCDs are extremely noisy; silver
>>> nitrate (etc) it's at atomic scale.
>
>On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>
>> Actually, once compensated, CCD's have much more
>> dynamic range than film. They can be used to integrate
>> over long periods of time ( usually cooled ). They
>> have issues but don't confuse poorly compensated
>> camera's with the ability of a CCD.
>
>I realized astronomical cameras for example use CCDs, most
>definitely cooled, for very long integrations, but the context of
>the conversation implied hand-held, non-cooled, ordinary, cameras.
>I wasn't slagging CCDs or holding chemical film on high (though
>would that be out of character for this list? :-); just wanted to
>point out things aren't simply linear like that.
Hi
It really depends on the actual CCD. I have one that
I use un-cooled but it is a low noise CCD. I have
used it for 5 min exposures. There is a static drift
that is different on each pixel. I compensate by
subracting the dark current field. This is not noise
but would look like noise when used in an uncompensated
photo. If one can make a dark field time exposure of
the same length of time, one can subtract that and
get a much better image, without cooling.
Dwight
I downloaded this and am using it with a LA100 instead of a teleprinter - the artwork is keeping the kids quiet (at least the bits I'll let them look at). I might even get the old Creed 7B teleprinter out and see if I can get it to run!
Jim.
Please see our website the " Vintage Communication Pages" at WWW.G1JBG.CO.UK
Having received some of these in the mail, what's the best way of
imaging them onto modern media?
I hooked up a 150MB SCSI QIC drive to my Linux PC, and it seems to be
able to pull data off them happily (even though they're only 60MB).
However the tapes contain multiple archives which I'm not too used to
handling, plus the archives aren't in any format known to Linux (so I
guess dd is the tool for the job there)
So, is it just as simple as making sure the tape's rewound, then keeping
on issuing: dd if=/dev/nrst0 of=archive01 (with a different output
filename each time) ? As nrst0 is a non-rewinding device, I assume the
tape will be left at the start of the next archive on the tape after
each dd command?
Or is it more subtle than that and the archives aren't necessarily back-
to-back? Do I need to be issuing some sort of mt command inbetween dd
commands to make sure the tape's positioned at the start of the next
archive each time?
cheers
Jules
>From: "Tom Jennings" <tomj at wps.com>
>
>Unlike film, you can'y simply open the shutter and integrate the
>image over time arbitrarily. CCDs are extremely noisy; silver
>nitrate (etc) it's at atomic scale.
>
>
Hi
Actually, once compensated, CCD's have much more
dynamic range than film. They can be used to integrate
over long periods of time ( usually cooled ). They
have issues but don't confuse poorly compensated
camera's with the ability of a CCD.
Dwight
Vintage Computer Festival <vcf at siconic.com> wrote:
> This is not your fault. As you may recall, we had this discussion about
> half a year ago, and it boils down to people not configuring their e-mail
> clients properly to obey the reply-to directive in the e-mail headers of
> the list messages.
No, that is not the problem. Since I read my mail with full headers using
a very "raw" MUA that does *nothing* behind my back, I see what actually
happens is this: most list messages arrive with Reply-To: set to the list,
but some arrive with Reply-To: listing both the list and the author.
Since the Reply-To: header is tweaked by the mailing list software, I can't
see how it can behave so inconsistently. Since I am a hard determinist
when it comes to computers, the only rational explanation I have is that
there must be some differences in the headers of messages before they reach
the list that causes the list software to process them differently. But
of course in order to pin the problem down, one must see the messages in
their original form prior to alteration by the list software, which I cannot
do as a mere subscriber, only Jay or other list staff can do that.
MS
P.S. One thought: when I was designing my own mailing list management software,
I implemented a feature by which a list can accept posts from non-subscribers
with moderator approval. I implemented it so that it set Reply-To: header
to both the list and the author on those approved outsider posts, on the
reasoning that the author should see replies but won't see them on the
list because he is not subscribed. I don't know anything about the software
Jay uses for this list, but there is a chance that its authors followed
reasoning similar to mine and the posts arriving with Reply-To: set to the
list and the author come from non-subscribers approved by moderators.
It seems that the duplicate posts fall into two categories...
1) People who were subbed to both lists, and had one of them set to "no
email". This wouldn't be a problem, except during the member migration it
lost the "no mail" setting. So, please check if you are subbed to both
lists, and set one or the other to have the "no mail" flag.
or
2) This one seems to be what is hitting a few people. I am not sure why this
is happening... but for some people when I get an email from them and I hit
"reply", the "to:" address shows their email address AND the list. So I'm
actually responding to both places and that's why they get two emails. At
this point I'm not sure if my own laptop has started doing something
squirrely so that hitting reply picks up the list address AND the senders
address, or if it has something to do with the list software, or if it has
something to do with the senders setup. But anyways, it just dawned on me
that more than a few times when I've hit reply to a post lately, I get the
original posters address and the list address, both in the "to" box. Odd.
I'll watch for it to happen again.
Jay
On Mar 1 2005, 7:20, Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Ethan Dicks wrote:
>
> > Agreed... I have an Olympus D10 I picked up a couple of years
ago...
> > one important feature is that it has an external trigger input for
a
> > "bulb". I used it to take pictures of the Aurora Australis
> >
(http://www.penguincentral.com/cgi-penguincentral/pix.cgi?target=2004)
>
> Man, I have got to get me down to Antarctica some day. I'm sure this
is a
> really stupid question, bit is that greenish glow really what it
looks
> like in real life? Amazing!
Yes, though the colours vary, and aren't static. Take a look at
AuroraWatch, especially the gallery:
http://www.dcs.lancs.ac.uk/iono/aurorawatch/
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Just got the invoice today for the classiccmp hardware upgrade.
Intel D845GVSR P4 motherboard - $61.00
Intel Celeron 2.0ghz - $70.00
Copper Pentium heat sink & ball bearing fan - $26.00
36" 80pin IDE cable - $4.00
Missouri Sales Tax - $9.22
Total - $170.22
Cost of not having to worry about that damn system locking up constantly -
Priceless :)
If anyone wants to paypal to help out... the paypal ID is
jwest at classiccmp.org
Thanks!
Jay