Hi folks,
I am currently modifying my Teletype ASR33 into a LT33 according to the DEC
specifications to work with my PDP-8/L. Does someone know what is a
Thyractor (GE 6RS20SP4B4) ? Some kind of voltage clamping device ?.
How could I make one, using, for instance a pair of thyristors or a pair of
zenner diodes ?
Many thanks,.
Philippe Sonnet
Just spent the early afternoon trying to adjust my one working (out of 3)
teletypes
to print a decent imprint. New Ribbons, Clean Type Cylinder, Good Impact
Pad.
still just getting a very light (almost unreadable) character on the
page...
Any ideas????
> >>>>> "curt" == curt <@ Atari Museum" <curt at atarimuseum.com>> writes:
>
> curt> You should also consider if you want a Unibus system (even
> curt> numbered) or a Qbus system (odd numbered) ..
>
> Huh? You can't deduce the bus type from the parity of the model
> number.
>
> 11/03, 23, 73, 83 are Qbus
> 11/04, 05, 10, 15, 20, 35, 40, 45, 55, 60, 70, 74, 84 are Unibus
>
> paul
>
>
Actually that would be the "modulus 2" not parity.
03-even 23-odd 73-odd etc...
> Indeed. Judging the two Over-The-Top connectors, the CPU
> must be the 11/34A, because it has installed the floating
> point _and_ the cache option.
> The only worry about this configuration is the condition of
> the TU10. The capstan roller in the top of the TU10 tape
> drive can be bad. The rollers in both TE16's of mine have gone goo.
> The rubber ring that clamps the mounted tape can be worn too,
> but I have heard a story that, if the ring is not to bad, you
> can revitalise it in warm water. I've never done that (yet) though...
I don't have the $900 to rescue this (I'm not sure I even have the
mortgage this month), but if it goes unbid (how likely is that?) I'm
going to contact the seller and see if we can work something out. The
11/34 was my first PDP contact (in college) and I have yet to own one. I
have two great loves (both unfulfilled), an 11/34 and a DG
Nova/Eclipse/MV.
Before I go insane, can someone tell me the magic key sequence used to
get into the mnemonic debugger at startup on Apollo machines?
(Specifically a 425t, but I expect it's the same sequence on all
flavours)
I managed it - once, after much random tapping, and thought it was a
simple double return that did it. Made the mistake of rebooting so I
could move the machine to a more useful position, then discovered that
it *wasn't* a double return.
Nothing in the manuals (install / owner's guide, anyway) saying how to
do it - they only mention how to do it from a machine that's already
booted into the OS.
The machine's sitting there trying to load across the network when it
can't find an OS on local disk, which I don't want it to do - I've put
an empty disk in there *because* I want to install an OS on it from
local tape. There must be some way to interrupt it in order to get into
the debugger. Grrr!
(I could pull the token-ring board, but I have a feeling it's trying to
boot across the onboard Ethernet anyway, not token-ring, so it wouldn't
help)
Maybe if I leave it long enough (like, more than the 20 mins I've given
it already) it'll time out...
cheers
Jules
> > epay's got a lovely 11/34(prob a or c) two rack system
> going for 880$
> > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&it
> em=5178288415&rd=1
> > looks like tektronix test system - the cpu box looks fully
> > loaded possibly with the fp11 and or 11/34c cache board, 2RLs
> > and a DEC 9 track tape drive, controllers, semi ram., two
> > short racks.
> > you should be able to squeeze these into a single tall rack
> > if you're careful.
> > Should run Unix V7 quite nicely!
>
> Oh the temptation! It's 2 hours away from me (no shipping).
Indeed. Judging the two Over-The-Top connectors, the CPU must be
the 11/34A, because it has installed the floating point _and_ the
cache option.
The only worry about this configuration is the condition of the
TU10. The capstan roller in the top of the TU10 tape drive can be
bad. The rollers in both TE16's of mine have gone goo.
The rubber ring that clamps the mounted tape can be worn too,
but I have heard a story that, if the ring is not to bad, you can
revitalise it in warm water. I've never done that (yet) though...
- Henk, PA8PDP.
> Gee... lets just completely overlook the Apple Mac Portable
> and mention
> the Powerbook 100 instead... The Tandy 100 could've gotten
> a mention,
> even the Atari Portfolio could've gotten a mention too.
>
> Its times like this, you want to roll those mags up and shove
> it up the editors arse !!! ;-)
Magazine writers are Journalism and English majors. They are one
paycheck away from "would you like fries with that?" The relentless
drumbeat of deadlines makes them desperate to fill their little part of
the magazine with anything that sounds good, or it's fry grease for
them. After a while they begin to believe their swollen ego.
It's not just computer mags, look at all the hopelessly simplified (or
wrong) psychological advice given in women's magazines.
> epay's got a lovely 11/34(prob a or c) two rack system going for 880$
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&it
em=5178288415&rd=1
> looks like tektronix test system - the cpu box looks fully
> loaded possibly with the fp11 and or 11/34c cache board, 2RLs
> and a DEC 9 track tape drive, controllers, semi ram., two short racks.
> you should be able to squeeze these into a single tall rack
> if you're careful.
> Should run Unix V7 quite nicely!
Oh the temptation! It's 2 hours away from me (no shipping).
After reviewing the last month's messages on the cctech archive web
site, thought I should introduce myself.
I'm racing up to 63 - wish it went slower, but that's life.
My first computer was in the Army in 1960 - an analogue manual input job
on a mortar tracking radar. That was at Ft. Monmouth; after that, I was
transferred to Restone Arsenal, Alabama and trained on the "Jukebox".
It was a vacuum tube computer with a fixed disk main memory used in
targeting the Redstone Missile. (I think it was made by Autonetics, but
45 year old memories aren't reliable.)
Right after learning the Jukebox, was transferred to the Pershing and
trained on a transistor drum memory targeting computer made by Martin
Marietta in Orlando. It was exciting, learning all this "new"
technology. Transistors were just getting accepted for mil spec programs.
We even had a class from RCA for something they called Integrated
circuits - the first commercial family of ICs. Was RTL. I still have
the data sheets they gave us some place in the garage.
After Uncle Sam, I went to Minneapolis to work for Control Data. That
was mid-1963 - was trained on the 160-A and 1604. At that time, CDC
didn't make its own peripherals, so we used IBM 523s, 088s and Ampex
tape units. The first 160s used Ferranti paper tape readers (with
thyrotrons) and Teletype punches. The typewriter was a model B IBM with
a Soroban encoder.
A few months later, Normandale Ops came up with the 606 tape units,
followed by the 405 card reader, 415 card punch and 350 paper tape
reader. More equipment to learn and support.
They also repackaged the 160 in an industrial cabinet and called it the
8090. A smaller division called IDP (Inductrial Data Products) created
a tiny 8 bit version called the 8092 for some telecommunication systems
they were doing for ARPA. Used teletypes and 101 Bell modems. (Some
arguments abput it being the first PC like computer.) They also sold it
to a company called Rabinow who made the first commercial OCR scanners.
(Biggest customer was the IRS - who had a policy of auditing anybody who
worked on their equipment.)
Since I was a customer engineer in the Minneapolis area, I had to
support all of these new products. I started a new way of life - new
product training every few months, then working on the buggy new
products from the prototype on.
Eventually, I logged more than 5000 hours of class room training on CDC
and other vendors products! All the CDC peripherals, plus IBM for unit
record, Ampex tapes, Analex printers, Holly Printers, Bryant Drums, IBM
1311 and 2311 disks, flexowriters, Selectrics, Teletype readers,
punches, Model 32, 33 and 35 I/O printers, Bell 101 and 301 modems, etc.
As CDC grew, they bought out other computer operations. So those of us
in the field were also expected to support the Bendix G-15, RPC-4000,
LPG-30, etc.
It seemed inpossible to stay current - there were just so many systems
coming out. For example, in 1964, I had training on the 6600. And a
few months later, trained on the 3600. Said training consisted of weeks
in the classroom followed by working on the assembly line debugging the
systems after they were built.
One bright light manager even had the idea to save money by using us to
support software since we were already in the field. That way, his
programmers didn't have to deal with customers. It didn't take long
for this brainstorm to crash; but a bunch of us were also trained on the
software, especially the 3300 MSOS and MOS.
Over the next 12 years, I stayed in field support, first as an engineer
then Tech Support. Was moved around constantly: Atlanta; Huntsville;
Houston; The Hague, Holland; London, England; Detroit; Mississauga,
Ontario Canada.
At this point, I left field support and was in R&D on a machine called
the Star-65. It was to be a smaller model of the Star 100. The
development was in Canada (Mississauga). When the Star was killed, we
did a rush program called Cyber 170, CDC's first all IC machine.
After 4 years in the lab, I longed to get back to the field side, so
transferred to Oklahoma City and worked on the Magnetic Periphersals'
14" cartridge drives. Then the 8" Lark; the 940X floppies; and finally
on the 5" inch Wren series.
After 23 years at CDC, I hired on with Fujitsu and moved to Silicon
Valley. Managed a group of enginers who supported the peripheral
products at OEM sites, primarily Sun and Tandem. My area was disks,
tapes, MOs, printers and scanners.
Fujitsu faded away, so after 8 years I moved over to Quantum. Again
working on disks. Supported all the top 10 OEMs, but primarily Apple
and Compaq. It was a matrix style company, so I was also on new Product
Teams, getting new drives through the qualification process. Most of
these were SCSI-2 and SCSI-3 3.5". Though we did have one 5.25" called
the BigFoot. (A infamous legend in its own right.)
Finally, a chance came up to get away from hard drives. I joined
Philips and managed a group supporting their OEM customers using
Philips CD and DVD recorders and media. This was sheer joy - new
technology with fun applications. The design work was in Eindhoven,
Holland and Hasselt, Belgium so there were some great trips. Initially,
the manufacturing was in Gyor, Hungary which was also a fabulous place
to visit.
Even had to set up lab full of Xboxes and test all the new games to see
that they worked on the DVD-ROM!
Eventually, Philips exited the designing and manufactuing end. All that
is left is a small sales force. The rest of us in the Sunnyvale group
scattered. And now some of us old timers are relaxing and thinking of
the past. Time for grand children and travel.
It was fun being on the cutting edge for 45 years. I miss it. Need
something to keep my mind busy.
---------------------------------
So that's it for the classic side. Except to add that I saved all of
the manuals on equipment I worked on. Eventually, I had to thin them
out and dumped a lot of the wire lists, software manuals, periperal
manuals, SPAM boxes and general papers. Excepting the
160-A/8090/8092/5101 systems. I always loved them, so kept all the
hardware, software, listings, tapes, cards, etc. I think I still have
schematics of every computer I worked on, but my garage is a solid mass
of books and electronics. Before I can retire and move, it has to
shrink by 90%. So I've been looking for a home for it.
---------------------------------
I always wanted to have a home system, so in the late 60's I designed a
TTL 160-A. There were already several amateur computer groups active -
ACS was the most productive. They had a newsletter out that had several
designs using TTL and DTL. One used some DEC modules.
And then came the famous Radio Electronics article on the Mark 8. It
was a great milestone - a real home computer. I promptly sent off for
it. Bought an 8008, for $160! But we had started our family that
year, so hobbies were put on hold. 30+ years later, 4 kids are
raised, through University and raising their own families. Time to play
again.
I still have the virgin Mark 8 PCBs. In fact they are still in the box
they came in! Along with all the components, bought new and never used.
I would occasionally pick up micro computers and PCs as they came out,
but most are now long gone. I kept a few just because they were small:
Kim, Sym, Ebka, PAIA, MicroProfessor, etc. I think I still have all the
manuals and software too.
I dumped the TRS-80s, Amigas, Ataris, and early PCs. There is still a
little of SWTP 6800 stuff left, including some of the TV Typewriters.
And most of the assembly manuals. I also keep most of the books,
magazines and newsletters from that era.
But my PDP-8s are in the Oklahoma City landfill, along with all the
discarded CDC manuals, and half a dozen other minis of that era. At
that time, I made a little money on the side by rebuilding Teletypes.
When we moved, my spare parts and extra 33s went to the highest bidder:
$100 for 10 machines and several hundred pounds of spare parts.
The calculator collection went too, sadly. I had two working Friden
130/132s. I still mourn their loss.
I had picked up a lot of data manuals, parts and ICs, but also dumped
them at OkCity. And then started again in California. But it wasn't
organised collecting so there is only a hodge podge of products and
books filling the garage. Promised my wife I'd clean it out this year, a
chore I'm really dreading
-----------------------------
I apologise for the long message. Some other people not on the list
will also get this.
Billy
> I'd like to include a PDP in my collection, but not sure what
> to go for? My requirements would be
>
> 1) It has to be a 70's design
> 2) It needs to be reasonably compact
> 3) I'd like to run something 'unix like'
> with a c compiler as an option.
> 4) My budget is not huge <$1000
>
> Any recommendations?
I'd vote for the 11/23, mostly because it was the last of the 70's
(1979), they were produced in large numbers and are compact. Most were
built with the (then) brand-new RL02 drives. The design continued for
many years and lots of DEC and non-DEC boards are available for neat
things like MFM drives large ammounts of memory.
I have one I got for free, exactly as pictured here with VT101 and LA36
DecWriter-II printing terminal...
http://research.microsoft.com/~gbell/Digital/timeline/1979-2.htm
The link says Microsoft, but it's Gordon Bells page.
==========================
Richard A. Cini, Jr.
First Vice President
Wachovia Capital Finance
1133 Avenue of the Americas
30th Floor
New York, NY 10036
(212) 545-4402
(212) 840-6259 (facsimile)
Does someone have this available as a PDF?
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Eric Smith
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:43 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Good description of Apple ][ disk controller
I wrote:
>> You want the book "The Apple II Circuit Description", or "The Apple IIe
>> Circuit Description", by Winston Gayler.
Sellam wrote:
> While that's a good book, it has nothing on the disk controller. See
> my previous message for a better selection.
Oh. I suppose I must be hallucinating when I look at this copy in
front of me. The table of contents lists chapter 9 as being "The
Disk Controller". And pages 9-1 through 9-45 seem to give a detailed
explanation of how it works. But I guess this must just be a
particularly strange side effect of the drugs that I'm not taking.
>> The bits shift in from the right, and there's no counter. The only
>> way you can tell that the complete "nybble" has been read is that the
>> MSB of the shift register is set.
> How...lame. There's a specific number of cycles that it takes to assemble
> an 8-bit byte.
No, there aren't. The disk drive operates asynchronously to the
computer, and motor speed variations of both the drive that wrote the
disk and the drive that's reading it affect it a lot.
> Why can't one just go off this timing to determine when a
> full byte is read? And if this is possible, then does that mean that one
> can really store a byte that doesn't have the MSB set, and subsequently
> read it back?
Not reliably.
> I see. And this is where I'm confused. Beneath Apple DOS shows diagrams
> that indicate there's a clock pulse between every data bit. So either
> that diagram is wrong, and there are no clock pulses,
The authors of Beneath Apple DOS had no clue whatsoever as to what was
going on at that level, so they apparently just assumed that it worked
the same as other disk controllers in that regard.
There are no clock bits. That's the whole point of GCR.
Fortunately they understood the higher-level stuff, so the rest of
the book is much more accurate.
> According to my reading (in Beneath Apple DOS), you can only have *one
> pair* of consecutive zeros in any one byte, but it was not clear if that
> was a hardware constraint or an artificial constraint to pare down the
> number of "legal" values.
Artificial constraint. The hardware (w/ the 16 sector state machine)
can deal with any nybble that has the MSB set, and no more than two
consecutive zeros.
Eric
> Nice. We've got one of those 4631 hardcopy units, but nobody with any
> knowledge about them (is there any particular Tek they're supposed to be
> used with?)
>
I used a 4052 many years ago with the dual floppy. I think the 46x1 devices
are all compatible. The one 4611 that was around back then printed a
different size image than the 4631's.
They should work with a 4010-1 or later storage tube terminal. They also
has 613 monitors that they would also work with.
I have a 4631 sort of. I purchased is as that and thats what the plate
says but somebody put the 4632 video interface board in it so I can't
use it with my 4010-1. Anybody have a junk 4631 I could get the board
from? Or a 46x1 they don't want?
>any way to get the consumables for these. I recall some special roll of
>paper, plus a liquid fixing material. didnt they come out wet?
>
The 46x1 used dry silver paper which was exposed by the single line CRT in the
hard copy unit then developed with heat. The I think the 3m 7?? silver paper
will also work. Tek number may be 006-1603. The stuff has a shelf life
so you probable won't get good copies with the old stuff from ebay etc
I haven't been able to try my out of date roll. I don't know if anybody
still makes the paper but a new roll used to be >$100. It was also used
for microfiche printers.
My Tektronix magnetism is still working. Yesterday I got a call from one
of my sources to tell me that they had a new load of stuff but they added
that they thought it was all "crap". Went out there anyway and they first
thing that I found was a Tektronix 4052 computer :-). Dug a little further
and found a Tektronix 4631 Hardcopy unit and two Tektronix 8" disk drives
:-) :-) :-)
AFIK this is the first set of disk drives that anyone has ever found for
a 4052 and only the second set of disk drives for ANT 405x computer.
Eveything was in surprisingly good condition. One key had been knocked
off the keyboard but I found it in the pile and it didn't look like the
keyswitch was broken. I didn't find the interconnecting cables but the 4052
uses a regular GP-IB cable to talk to the master disk drive and a straight
through cable to connect the two disk drives. I haven't looked to see what
the hardcopy unit uses.
Joe
> John Keys wrote:
> It must be the area you live in, I have gotten Sun's, Next's, Vax,
> HP's, AS400's and missed on some SOL's plus a few other
> S100 systems at my local Goodwill.
Getting ready to move to wherever John Lives.... which would be????
Now that I have the time, I would love to restore a 160-A. I'm in the
market for CDC systems or parts of that vintage.
Any one on this list have any of the computers, paper tape equiment or
typewriter? Numbers like 161, 162, 168, 169, 350, 8090, 808X,etc.
I know that the Museum in Mountain View has one, but they have indicated
they are not ready to restore it yet.
Any one know where there are some other dealers or individuals who might
have these systems?
Billy Pettit
>>> You want the book "The Apple II Circuit Description", or "The Apple IIe
>>> Circuit Description", by Winston Gayler.
>> While that's a good book, it has nothing on the disk controller. See
>> my previous message for a better selection.
>Oh. I suppose I must be hallucinating when I look at this copy in
>front of me. The table of contents lists chapter 9 as being "The
>Disk Controller". And pages 9-1 through 9-45 seem to give a detailed
>explanation of how it works. But I guess this must just be a
>particularly strange side effect of the drugs that I'm not taking.
Um .. don't really want to get into a discussion on your drug habits or
what visions they may be causing you .. but what edition of the book do
you have? - Mine (first edition, first printing -- 1983) Has only chapters
1-8 (no 9) and makes no mention of the disk controller... [I looked when
Sellam first asked for information]
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
I was given a book the other day called "inside out" Microsoft - In Our Own
Words. have not read it yet just turned few pages, anyone on the list have
this or read it? John
I got the following via email a bit ago:
---[ SNIP ]---
I'm trying to fill out a display that I am organizing for a local museum.
I need the following:
Apple I. Apple II, IMSAI 8080, ALTAIR, Mark-8, IBM 5100, HP 9830, Arkay
CT-650, Minivac 601, SIMON. (They do not have to be working.)
Any help you can give me in acquiring these PCs will be appreciated.
Thanks, Jim
---[ SNIP ]---
Jim is collecting for the Anderson County History Museum and can be
reached at jc3435NOSPAM at charterNOSPAM.net - removing the obvious.
Some of what he's looking for is improbable, but some is more common.
--
Erik Klein
www.vintage-computer.comwww.vintage-computer.com/vcforum
The Vintage Computer Forum
A "DDD Alignment System" is an alignment system using a "Digitial Diagnostic
Disk(ette)"
The DDD is a very special diskette that has various tracks and sectors
recorded on the disk intentionally misaligned. By knowing how the disk was
made (which sectors were misaligned, in which direction, and by how much),
and by seeing which sectors can and cannot be read, the exact alignment
status of a drive can be tested without an oscilloscope or any other test
equipment. All that you need is the DDD disk and a software program that
matches the disk and the disk controller of the target system.
Dysan made these, and perhaps others did also. I have some here for 8" and
5.25" drives.
They are good for checking the alignment, but they are kind of useless for
actually adjusting it if it's off. However, my recollection is that they
ALSO have the analog "cats eye" tracks on them for alignment with an
oscilloscope.
Re-sending as error reported:
Sorry if you got it twice.
Hi ,
Thanks for your answer.
I should now have a disk with the system and PIP (I don't know whether it
would boot though, I haven't tested it yet)
Anyway I was looking at how I could use PIP to transfer the data but I only
managed to find some examples Using the AUX: connector which I think is CP/M
3 (+) and not 2.2 which is the version on the 820.
Do you know more on how I can use the PIP command ?
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dwight K. Elvey [mailto:dwight.elvey at amd.com]
Sent: 16 March 2005 23:04
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Cc: Sarno, Giuseppe [MOP:GM15:EXCH]
Subject: Re: Xerox 820 documentation.
>From: "Giuseppe Sarno" <gsarno at nortel.com>
>
>Hi I own an Old Xerox 820 machine,
>Can anyone help to find documentation for it ?
>Also is there a way to download programs onto it using the
>serial/parallel port ?
>
>I have seen some info at
>http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctech/2002-September/002642.html
><http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctech/2002-September/002642.html>
>but I couldn't find more.
>
>Thanks.
>
Hi
You didn't mention if you have a disk that boots and
has PIP under CP/M on it. If you do, you can transfer information as ASCII
like a BASIC source program or even transfer .COM files by first converting
them to .HEX files and then using DDT on the 820 to move them to .COM files.
If you are attempting to bootstrap with no disk, you'll have to check with
others. One may be able to do it if it has a built in debug monitor. Of
course, on can always write some of ones own code and replace one of the
internal EPROMs. It is not as impossible as it sounds. You just have to
explore a little. Dwight
>Charity shops in the US are increasingly not carrying computer goods,
>mainly because if they end up being unsaleable crap they have to pay high
>disposal fees.
The one that used to be near me didn't sell computers because of support
issues. They started out selling them, then found that no matter how much
they marked it "all sales as is and final", people would come back and
ask for support getting the machine to work correctly.
So they started tossing the computers that were donated, and selling the
rest of the items that came with it (monitor, keyboard, mouse, cables,
printers, software, speakers... anything but the CPU itself).
Alas, they don't exist any more, the owner of the building felt a
Salvation Army store wasn't the right "image" for his property... so he
kicked them out. I was sad for a while, but now a japanese resturant is
going into the building, so I'm happy again.
(now if I can just find another goodwill type store in the area to start
visiting)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
H guys,
Couple of weeks ago, I was contacted by a guy who said he had seen my site,
and has an "Black Apple" (Bell and Howell edition of Apple II for schools)
that he would like to sell. Says condition is "unknown", and that the monitor
does not work. From correspondance with him, I have determined that he has the
main unit, two drives of which one is B&H label (no boxes for the hardware),
the dead monitor, no docs, and "lots of software" which is all copies except
for one original boxed game.
Said I was one of several people he had contacted, and asked for a "bid" -
I responded by asking him for a price - he said $150, which I thought was
high, and considering that I would have to ship it here (US -> Canada), I
said "thanks but no thanks", and asked him to let me know if he lowered his
price (because I would like to have a B&H Apple in the collection again)...
He's left me on his mailing list, and since than has reported that he had
an offer for $500, then $1000, and this morning he says he has an offer for
$2000. I corresponded with him again and he says:
>ok right now got offer for 2000 from people in uk. have 2 different people
>in uk that want it for good money.
This seems completely ludicrous to me --- I know B&H Apples are considered
desirable by some, but $2000 (and shipping from US->UK)!!!
???
Smells like a scam... (?)
Whats a B&H Apple worth these days?
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
Jim:
No, not at all...the timing is off. I think that the Inside Out book
was keyed off of Microsoft's 25th anniversary, while Andy's book came out in
December. Incidentially, Microsoft was founded as a partnership on September
5, 1975.
A search on Amazon reveals that the publication date of "Inside Out"
was September, 2000 while "Revolution in the Valley" has a publication date
of December 1, 2004.
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Leonard [mailto:trixter at oldskool.org]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 11:24 PM
To: rcini at optonline.net; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic
Posts
Subject: Re: Book inside out
Richard A. Cini wrote:
> Yes. I'm about 2/3 the way through. I read in-depth the contributions from
> names I recognize; the others I skimmed. I find the typography and layout
> hard to read -- like Wired magazine when it first came out. I like the
> stories from the early days.
Is there any indication that this book is a reaction to Andy H.'s Apple
book?
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org)
http://www.oldskool.org/
Want to help an ambitious games project?
http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at
http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
Well, unexpected by me anyway. I've built a data sep circuit
>from that schematic I asked for advice on earlier. Works like
a champ. I tied the circuit into a piece of ribbon cable so
that I could pretty much attach any drive I wanted to try with
it plus still be able to keep my OSI more-or-less unmodified
and use the original drive. The drives I am using are a pair
of Toshiba FDD 5451s. After testing each drive individually,
I attached another IDC card edge connector to my setup and
tried again. Nothing worked! Not only did it not work, it
trashed the diskette I was testing with. Went back to one
at a time and everything worked again. After a good bit of
trying to figure out what was wrong, I discovered that the
+5 volt pin in the power connector I was using for the #2 (B)
drive had pushed out of the nylon plug so that the drive was
unpowered. Having either of the drives unpowered on the cable
caused the other drive to screw up. The two drives cooperate
just fine when both have power. I don't remember ever seeing
this kind of problem before... I seem to remember having unpowered
drives hanging off of cables with no ill effects. I guess that
some of the signals (write gate for instance) must be getting
pulled low by the unpowered unit. Is this normal floppy
behavior and I'm just remembering wrong?
Thanks,
Bill
Heard back from the Goodwill spokeswoman. Obviously she doesn't know much
about our hobby, but she sounded genuinely interested.
Here's what she had to say, as published in this week's Computer Collector
Newsletter...
--------------------------------------------
>> WELCOME TO THE COMPUTER COLLECTOR NEWSLETTER
>> W: http://news.computercollector.com E: news at computercollector.com
>> Vol. 4, #12: March 21, 2005: News/opinion, tidbits, classifieds
>
> This week's issue:
> 1. Goodwill stores
> 2. Custom Apple II games
> 3. Amiga East 2005
> 4. Slide rule retro
>
> ****************************************
> We really want to hear from you! What's unique about your collection?
> What article topics should we explore? What crazy experience did you
> have with a vintage machine, now or when it was new? Please tell us
> what is on your mind at news at computercollector.com.
>
> ****************************************
> NEWS & OPINION
>
> Recently there's been discussion of finding vintage computers at
> Goodwill stores, via the classiccmp.org's cctalk mailing list. How
> can we as collectors ensure that significant items aren't disposed of?
>
> Goodwill Industries International, the umbrella organization for 200
> independent agencies, does not set master policies for the operations
> of its 1,874 stores in the U.S., 75 in Canada, and one online (the
> address is http://www.shopgoodwill.com, but it's up to each store to
> determine which items are posted). About two-thirds of the stores
> accept computers, although there is no master list of which stores
> specifically. The only way to find out is to contact the stores --
> information is at http://locator.goodwill.org and (800)664-6577.
>
> But what can computer collectors do to salvage, say, a pre-release
> prototype of an IBM 5100? "Shop early and shop often" is the approach
> taken by collectors of most sorts, spokeswoman Christine Bragale
> noted. Bargains for computer collectors are especially likely to be
> found at the Goodwill Computer Works stores in Santa Ana, Calif.
> (http://www.ocgoodwill.org/computer_works/index.html) and Austin,
> Texas (http://www.austincomputerworks.org/contact.html) -- the Austin
> location even has its own computer museum slated to re-open in May.
>
> Store managers are generally alert for valuables, at least since
> someone found an original Picasso etching in a $3 throwaway pile a few
> years ago, Bragale said. "The donations attendant who had sorted it
> saw a broken frame and a picture of a nude," hardly something Goodwill
> would normally carry, she explained. Luckily that was noticed in time
> and sold at auction, she said. Vintage computer hobbyists are
> encouraged to volunteer for sorting duty at their local stores.
>
> ***************************************
> BOOKS FROM THE CCN STAFF:
>
> >> Buy your copy of "Collectible Microcomputers" directly from author
> Michael Nadeau: http://www.classictechpub.com. This amazing book
> includes more than 700 computers with details and pricing.
>
> >> "Computer Collector Newsletter's Guide to U.S. Computer Museums,
> 2005 Edition". Booklet examines 21 museums and includes GPS
> coordinates. It costs $6 ($10 for two), with $1 S&H per every two
> copies. PayPal to news at computercollector.com.
>
> >> Christine Finn's "Artifacts: An archeologist's year in Silicon
> Valley" is the story of the change from farmlands to high-tech. Buy
> it directly from MIT Press at http://tinyurl.com/6rllz (also see
> Christine's blog http://traumwerk.stanford.edu:3455/ChristineFinn/9).
>
> ****************************************
> This week's vintage gaming news from Armchair Arcade
> (http://www.armchairarcade.com):
>
> -- Do you remember Mystery House, the classic Apple II game from
> Sierra? Now you can play custom versions; the details are at
> http://www.armchairarcade.com/aamain/news.php?extend.277.
>
> ****************************************
> TIDBITS
>
> -- Amiga East 2005 will be held May 28-29 at the Marriott Courtyard
> adjacent to New York City's LaGuardia airport. This year is the
> Amiga's 20th anniversary. Tickets are $20 per day or $25 for both
> days. For more information please visit http://tinyurl.com/3nwzr.
>
> -- First I thought the binary wristwatches at ThinkGeek.com were the
> coolest ones around (http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/watches/6a17/).
> Then I thought the new PalmOS wristwatch from Fossil took the top
> honor (http://tinyurl.com/5canr). Now I'm into ThinkGeek's slide rule
> watch (http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/watches/74ce/zoom/). How cool
> is this!? Which would you rather have? (And will it run CP/M?)
>
> ****************************************
> CLASSIFIEDS
>
> This week's classifieds are sponsored by the Vintage Computer
> Marketplace at marketplace.vintage.org.
>
> For sale:
> 1. Full Apple III Setup:
> http://vintage-computer.com/vcforum/viewtopic.php?t=1674
> 2. Vic 20 setup:
> http://vintage-computer.com/vcforum/viewtopic.php?t=1671
> 3. Commodore 64 lot:
> http://vintage-computer.com/vcforum/viewtopic.php?t=1668
>
> Wanted:
> 1. Commodore Pet:
> http://www.vintage-computer.com/pet2001.shtml
> 2. Commodore 1084 monitor bezel:
> http://vintage-computer.com/vcforum/viewtopic.php?t=1673
>
> ****************************************
> SPONSORED LINKS:
>
> >> For more buy/sell/trade opportunities, please visit the Vintage
> Computer Forum at www.vintage-computer.com/vcforum.
>
> >> VintageTech provides services such as patent litigation support,
> prior art research, vintage computer consulting, movie and photography
> props, media and data conversion, appraisals, and sales brokering.
> Visit us: www.vintagetech.com.
>
> >> Special thanks to EvenLink LLC for sponsoring our domain name and
> e-mail hosting. Please visit http://www.evenlink.com for details.
>
> ****************************************
> HAPPY VINTAGE COMPUTING!
-----------------------------------------------------
Evan's personal homepage: www.snarc.net
*** Tell your friends about the Computer Collector Newsletter!
- It's free and we'll never send spam or share your email address
- Publishing every Monday(-ish), ask about writing for us
- Mainframes to videogames, hardware and software, we cover it all
- W: http://news.computercollector.com E: news at computercollector.com
- We're approaching 700 readers: win a prize!
Hi All,
I replaced the UBC today (I found a serviceable spare of the same version in
our works stores, last tested 1994....), and I can now key in a program,
examine it and run it.
I now need to concentrate on the PSU, before I start putting the rest of the
cards back. I must also repair my UBC, in case work decides they want theirs
back (unlikely, but you can never tell with bean counters).
Now a question, I used the light flasher program:
location contents opcode
001000 012700 mov #1,r0
001002 000001
001004 006100 rol r0
001006 000005 reset
001010 000775 br -4
and it will run, however, I don't see the data lights "chase" across the
console. If I single step, the program performs as expected, with the data
lights going across the panel (data switch in "Data Paths" position). Also,
if I run the program and halt it, the light appear at a different data bit
depending on how long I let the program run (I can continue the program and
it will move to a different bitn at the next halt). Am I doing something
stupid, or are the bulbs just too slow to display the data? (I suppose it
could be a function of the power supply fault, but I don't think it would
manifest itself in this way).
Thanks
Jim.
Please see our website the " Vintage Communication Pages" at WWW.G1JBG.CO.UK
I threw together some *really* quick pages about my Tek XD88 at:
http://www.patooie.com/comps/tek/index.html
I *think* it's all legal HTML and all the links work. No guarantee about
typos though, it was late when I wrote most of the text :-)
Off-list comments about any rendering issues are welcome (particularly
Firefox / IE users), as I've only got Opera here to test with. I suspect
I'll maybe need to incorporate stylesheet stuff so that fonts will
render reasonably consistently across platforms / browsers.
Coincidentally, I found a pile of "What's new in Computing" magazines at
the weekend from the late 80's / early 90's - I've found a few little
snippets about the XD88 line there which I'll have to scan in and
incorporate.
cheers
J.
I've got a 4 slot Neo Geo cabinet that is starting to act flaky.
It's always had problems if I put to many new games (I'm guessing the
higher bit games take more power), and now I've seen the video freak
out a couple times in the last week. The first time it looked like
it was rolling (I rushed over and turned it off so am not totally
sure. This last time I was playing a game and it shifted left and
jaggy, but then when I finished the game it popped back to normal,
and seems to have stayed that way for a while.
Anyone have any ideas? I'm suspecting it's either the powersupply,
or possibly the 4-slot motherboard.
Zane
--
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
I need some advice on finding a few expendables:
* non-lint swabs for cleaning hard disk heads. I've googled a
bunch of likely suspects, intended for the electronics industry,
of appropriate size, but does anyone use such a thing you've found
to be suitable, before I leap into the terrifying unknown (all of
$9.95's worth)? Obviiously to be dunked in 99% isopropyl.
* "Rotron Filtercoat". Sticky aerosol goo you spray onto aluminum
mesh filters to trap dust. My lab is really dusty. The rack has a
nice airbox at the bottom with noisy fan. Any suggestions as to a
replacement for this long-lost product or workalike?
Hi ,
Thanks for your answer.
I should now have a disk with the system and PIP (I don't know whether it
would boot though, I haven't tested it yet)
Anyway I was looking at how I could use PIP to transfer the data but I only
managed to find some examples
Using the AUX: connector which I think is CP/M 3 (+) and not 2.2 which is
the version on the 820.
Do you know more on how I can use the PIP command ?
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dwight K. Elvey [mailto:dwight.elvey at amd.com]
Sent: 16 March 2005 23:04
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Cc: Sarno, Giuseppe [MOP:GM15:EXCH]
Subject: Re: Xerox 820 documentation.
>From: "Giuseppe Sarno" <gsarno at nortel.com>
>
>Hi I own an Old Xerox 820 machine,
>Can anyone help to find documentation for it ?
>Also is there a way to download programs onto it using the
>serial/parallel port ?
>
>I have seen some info at
>http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctech/2002-September/002642.html
><http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctech/2002-September/002642.html>
>but I couldn't find more.
>
>Thanks.
>
Hi
You didn't mention if you have a disk that boots and
has PIP under CP/M on it. If you do, you can transfer information as ASCII
like a BASIC source program or even transfer .COM files by first converting
them to .HEX files and then using DDT on the 820 to move them to .COM files.
If you are attempting to bootstrap with no disk, you'll have to check with
others. One may be able to do it if it has a built in debug monitor. Of
course, on can always write some of ones own code and replace one of the
internal EPROMs. It is not as impossible as it sounds. You just have to
explore a little. Dwight
>$355 with 15 bids and 20
>hours remaining. The pics aren't loading for me, but the description says
>it is near mint condition. I could see it getting up to $500 before it
>closes, but $2000... I'd be surprised.
Oh yeah, and one sold last week on ebay (no drives, not tested) for
$182... so IF the guy really has an untested unit he is able to sell for
$2000... he is one lucky SOB.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
On Mar 21 2005, 22:11, Dan Williams wrote:
> I am getting an el98 cray from 1996 (I know it's OT). Anyone know
> anything about these ?. I can't wait to take it up 3 flights of
stairs
> and I might need to slowly break it to the missus. But I couldn't
> resist...
Stairs? I have a friend, not far from here, who has two EL98s and a
"small" T3E. They don't do stairs ;-) The 17" monitor on the top of
the one in this picture:
http://www.austinfs.fsnet.co.uk/machines/cray_el98.html
will give some idea of scale. That's the smaller of the pair.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hi Ian,
I have just now managed to re-establish my link to cctech-classiccmp and found you posting. My reply has already been sent. yes, I still have two PERQs that I will be getting rid of once I have got the software archived.
Regards,
Brian.
----- Original Message -----
David H. Barr wrote:
<big snip>
>>>outmoded technology, and some must needs simply wash their hands of
>>> the whole mess.
Alas, you are correct. But things can be a little better if....
a) Collectors such as those on this list make themselves known to organizations such as TheGoodwill
b) "Managers" at the various facilities at least let people know of the existance of others who would / might have an interest in the items
Not always possible...but always worth a try.
I am getting an el98 cray from 1996 (I know it's OT). Anyone know
anything about these ?. I can't wait to take it up 3 flights of stairs
and I might need to slowly break it to the missus. But I couldn't
resist...
Dan
Is it like a F30?
I have a RS/6000 running AIX with a DDS2 DAT tape and CD-ROM drive
running right behind me.
It has a 3 1/2" floppy mounted on edge in the right most position, a
SCSI CD-ROM drive mounted on edge next to the floppy, a DDS2 DAT tape
drive and then an empty position.
I'll attempt to find the manual.
Thanks
Mike
I'd just call the stores and ask: http://locator.goodwill.org/
--- Jim Leonard <trixter at oldskool.org> wrote:
> William Layer wrote:
> > - While eBay prices are to be taken as a general mix of legtimacy,
> ignorance, greed, stupidity and outright scamming, Goodwill prices aren't
> that much more 'helpful' either. Unless they have a good 'picker' doing the
> pricing, Goodwill and their ilk have a mission to sell old junk for the
> cheap. We've all had impossibly lucky finds at these places..
>
> This is just killing me: What are common names/organizations for "goodwill"
> stores? I have never once been to a goodwill place that had anything
> computer-related, only clothing for the most part. I am clearly looking in
> the
> wrong places!! Where should I be checking in my local area?
> --
> Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org)
> http://www.oldskool.org/
> Want to help an ambitious games project?
> http://www.mobygames.com/
> Or check out some trippy MindCandy at
> http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
>
Evan's personal homepage: www.snarc.net
*** Tell your friends about the Computer Collector Newsletter!
- It's free and we'll never send spam or share your email address
- Publishing every Monday(-ish), ask about writing for us
- Mainframes to videogames, hardware and software, we cover it all
- W: http://news.computercollector.com E: news at computercollector.com
- We're approaching 700 readers: win a prize!
"Jay West" <jwest at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Ugggg... sorry. It wasn't a swap partition I created in flash. It was an OS
> install partition (to install the OS FROM, not to). [...]
This is very weird, although some automated installations perform
a defect scan on the "target drive" and this will destroy the Flash.
I tend to install the OS on a RAM disk and then dd the image to the
Flash.
If your system has vnconfig(8) you can create the RAM disk very easily,
although you can get the same effect using VMWAre.
**vp
I have a "home made" light pen on my Altair.
There was an article in one of the early BYTE magazines on how to do it.
It is just a phototransistor stuck into a fat ballpoint pen body on a long wire.
The circuitry is very simple -- you adjust a threshold at which the transistor triggers an processor interrupt.
When you get the interrupt, you software reads the scan position of the monitor from a register in the video card.
The Cromemco VDM-1 allows this.
We had a very simple drawing program that read the pen position and toggled the background color of characters underneath.
-Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Tony Duell
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 6:09 PM
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Light pens?
> Okay, now my age and lack of experience is going to show: Can someone explain
> to me exactly *how* a light pen works? What is the feedback mechanism if
A light pen is beaically a small light detector (normally a
phototransistor) that detects the ligth from the screen. Since the image
on the screen is scanned (either as a raster, or as vectors), you get a
pulse from the light pne output as the part of the image that the light
pen is aimed at is being refreshed.
Typcially, on raster scan systems (like almsot all microcomputers), the
CRT controller takes the light pen signal and uses it to latch the
current video RAM address, or the X/Y coordinates, or something like
that. The latched values can then be read out by the processor.
> drawing on, say, a completely black screen? How does the computer get
It can't. Period. Any comptuer/light pen that claims to is doing one of 2
things. Either displaying, say, a 3*3 array of pixels under the light
pen, and the computer moves said pattern to keep the middle pixel under
the light pen (this is how a lot of vector displays did it -- if the
light pen posiition is 'lost' for any reason, it was typical to sweep a
line across the screen, then down the screen, to find it again)
Or more likely, the 'black' screen isn't totally black, but a very dark
grey or something. Dark enough that _you_ don't notice it, but the light
pen does
-tony
That piqued my curiousity. So I just called the Goodwill hq's media
department; they're allegedly calling me back soon. Going to seek
clarification on their thoughts about collecting/collectors.
--- "David H. Barr" <dhbarr at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Yes, it is a regional decision.
Evan's personal homepage: www.snarc.net
*** Tell your friends about the Computer Collector Newsletter!
- It's free and we'll never send spam or share your email address
- Publishing every Monday(-ish), ask about writing for us
- Mainframes to videogames, hardware and software, we cover it all
- W: http://news.computercollector.com E: news at computercollector.com
- We're approaching 700 readers: win a prize!
I think one thing everyone forgets is there are appropriate high and low
tech options for each archiving task.
Example #1
About 10 years ago one of the university medical groups decided to scrap
their old billing computer and I was tasked to come up with an archive
media. I looked at microfiche, microfilm, and paper. Cost was a
consideration. We also had a "large" dataproducts chain printer not
being used. We finally decided on paper since we knew we would be going
through 2 new billing systems in 4 years. Sorted all of the accounts by
SSN and then printed out 57 boxes of green bar and placed it all in
binders.
Advantages
It's a lot harder to loose a binder of greenbar than one microfiche.
We would have to purchase a microfilm reader and capital expenditures
were considered once a year.
We had 10 clerks that might want to find an account, parallel usage
easy.
Disadvantages
Lots of moving of binders sometimes to find the correct one, clerks just
happened to find me when they needed to move a bunch.
Nearly went deaf listening to printer.
My time was not a consideration I was equivalent to a graduate student.
Example #2
We collected thirty 12" CMSI optical disks of x-ray images from a
medical scanner, 1 GB per disk. This was the required archive media for
the system. We initially tried to move the data via thick cable DECNET
and via a coax based Thomas Conrad Network systems network. Transfer
was very slow. Decided to purchase an additional 12" drive and
interface it to our MicroVax II, the dreaded sneakernet was then
implemented. Our 9-track tapes would hold one 40 MB image per tape if
we wanted to save any manipulated images.
I offered to copy the disks from the 12" opticals to CD's however the
hospital had film and decided that was sufficient. 12" media and drives
are now long obsolete. I assume they still have the packs and no disk
drives.
Example #3
We still have 8" floppy, dat tapes, MO disks and CD's from different
medical devices. I usually try to hang on to the tape drives when for
example a mobile MRI scanner leaves. Biggest problem is that some of
the disks are not file structured in the normal sense. They are some
manufacturer's proprietary internal format. There is a standard but
it's no help to understand usage of data. What do you do about numbers,
special characters and non English characters in a patient last name?
Mike
>From: "Bill Sudbrink" <wh.sudbrink at verizon.net>
>
>Well, unexpected by me anyway. I've built a data sep circuit
>from that schematic I asked for advice on earlier. Works like
>a champ. I tied the circuit into a piece of ribbon cable so
>that I could pretty much attach any drive I wanted to try with
>it plus still be able to keep my OSI more-or-less unmodified
>and use the original drive. The drives I am using are a pair
>of Toshiba FDD 5451s. After testing each drive individually,
>I attached another IDC card edge connector to my setup and
>tried again. Nothing worked! Not only did it not work, it
>trashed the diskette I was testing with. Went back to one
>at a time and everything worked again. After a good bit of
>trying to figure out what was wrong, I discovered that the
>+5 volt pin in the power connector I was using for the #2 (B)
>drive had pushed out of the nylon plug so that the drive was
>unpowered. Having either of the drives unpowered on the cable
>caused the other drive to screw up. The two drives cooperate
>just fine when both have power. I don't remember ever seeing
>this kind of problem before... I seem to remember having unpowered
>drives hanging off of cables with no ill effects. I guess that
>some of the signals (write gate for instance) must be getting
>pulled low by the unpowered unit. Is this normal floppy
>behavior and I'm just remembering wrong?
>
>Thanks,
>Bill
>
Hi Bill
Remember, things are active low. If the terminator was
unpowered, it will pull the write gate to active ( trashing
the disk ). If the drive that is unpowered is not the one
with the terminator, it may not have been able to pull
the lines high enough. Still, an unpowered drive should
load the lines some. This is not a good thing.
Dwight
I have been looking for this information for a long time. I have
an XT that had never been initialized, now I can proceed. Up to
this point I had no success. Thank you!
Bill Degnan
>
>>
>> I just ran across this and thought it might be of interest for anyone
>> doing a low level format on a PC (not AT) type controllers. It was
>> taken from a February 13, 1989 issue of Tech Times that appears to be
>> a ComputerLand Confidential publication (this is a copy.) My usual
>> procedure was to unassemble C800:5 or C800:6 and G=????:? the address
>> that was a jmp instruction. I've never used the :800 or tried to
>> format a Xebec controller.
>>
>> *******************
>>
>> Company Debug Command
>> Adaptec -G=C800:CCC
>> DTC -G=C800:5
>> Omti -G=C800:6
>> Western Digital -G=C800:5 or
>> -G=c800:800
>> Xebec Series of commands
>> -l322
>> -l321
>> -o322 0
>> -l321
>> -o320 04
>> -0320 00
>> -o320 00
>> -0320 00
>> -0320 05
>> -0320 07 (use 17 if embedded servo dr)
>> At this point, the LED on the drive should come on to indicate that
>> the drive is formatting. When the light goes off, coninue:
>> -l321
>> -l320
>> The last entry should get 00 status back, indicating a successful
>> format.
>
>I remember that old Xebec routine. It was always a little
>nerve-wracking as you got no feedback until deep into the procedure. I
>have a file folder full of old hard drive/controller lore that one
day I
>should scan and make available.
>
>If I am remembering correctly, the Xebec controller was the one
>originally used in the IBM-XT machines.
>
>------------------------------
-- E N D --
>Just a few random comments:
>
> - 'Rare' Mac128..
Twas not my intention to bring about a argument on the value of Macs - I simply
happned upon one while looking for the B&H AppleII and used it as an example - I
can site many examples of Ebay items which have gone fairly well over what I
consider to be a reasonable value for the item.
> - While eBay prices are to be taken as a general mix of legtimacy, ignorance,
>greed, stupidity and outright scamming, Goodwill prices aren't that much more
>'helpful' either. Unless they have a good 'picker' doing the pricing, Goodwill
>and their ilk have a mission to sell old junk for the cheap. We've all had
>impossibly lucky finds at these places..
With anything as old and varied as the items we collect, price/value is really
in the eye of the beholder, and can vary all over the map. I happened to mention
Goodwill because it was the last place I picked up a Mac 128 (and it was a true
128) - Saw three of them go in a local newsgroup last year for under $20 each,
and could have used that example ... Also seen them go for much higher on Ebay ...
Very rarely do I see an item sell in local market for higher than Ebay, but very
often the other way around - I still assert that Ebay prices should be viewed
either with skepticism, or at least as a marker for the high end of the scale.
The sad truth is that much of the material that we value and collect is
considered worthless by the majority of people - many of the items in my
collection were donations, including some that I would place a decent $$$
value on - Ebay manages to reach enough people that somebody somewhere wants
it, and by virtue of the way it works, it sells at the highest price that
they are willing to pay (or at least just above the highest price that the
next bidder would have paid) - that doesn't mean that these prices are
indicitave of a reasonable average value for an item.
By the same token, Goodwill represents the lowest end of the scale (after all,
someone GAVE it to them) - the true average value for an item will probably
lie somewhere in between Goodwill and Ebay.
> - My favorite eBay canard re: Macs is the "I opened it up to have a look, and
>it's SIGNED on the back cover!!!!". Of course, they are all signed up until the
>Classic era (I think the sigs went away with the new case, but I could be wrong).
IIRC, the sigs were in the Original, Fat and the Plus, which are all essentially
the same plastics (with vents on top) - with the SE and forced air cooling, the
plastics changed and the sigs were dropped - Classics are the third style of small
mac plastics (also without sigs).
Regards,
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
Hi,
I used a PERQ 1 some time ago, and it would be
great to get one of these old machines up and
running again. Does anyone have one of these
for sale/trade/etc?
I'm based in CA but can also collect
>from the UK (I visit quite frequently).
Cheers
Ian.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
> Does anyone know of a program I can use (preferably under Linux, but DOS
> would probably work as well) to read a flux-transition level image off a
> disk using a catweasel card? I'm trying to read some 2.4MB (5.25")
> floppies from an IBM 3174 controller (using an 2.4MB floppy drive), and
> am able to read in 1.2MB floppies using cw2dmk just fine, but it doesn't
> do so well at processing the (aparently) mixed-density floppy I've been
> screwing with since yesterday. Using the "testhist" program included
> with cw2dmk, I can get information about the "unreadable" tracks, but
> cw2dmk won't process them. I'm trying to make a backup image of a disk
> so that I'm not screwed when the disk stops being readable...
If you give testhist one more argument (a filename), it will dump the
Catweasel's sample buffer to that file. That's a flux-transition level
image.
I don't have anything that will write such an image directly back to a
disk, though. You could write a program to do it by removing most of
the guts from dmk2cw. However, I don't know how readable such a disk
would be. I don't really trust a process that doesn't include decoding
the data, doing retries if it has a bad CRC, manually trying
read-postcompensation (-o flag to cw2dmk) if that still doesn't work,
and writing the data back with write-precompensation.
If this data is just MFM in an IBM/ISO-style format at a higher clock
rate, you probably can read it with cw2dmk by playing with enough of its
options. You'll need -1 and -2 to set lower thresholds between short,
medium, and long intervals (they should be about halfway between the
peaks that testhist gives you), and -l to make the DMK track length
twice as long as for a 1.2 MB disk. You may need to play with -o too,
especially if you can read lower track numbers but higher ones keep
getting CRC errors.
I'd also suggest using the highest (28.322 MHz) Catweasel clock rate for
these disks, seeing that you have a MK3. (The MK1 doesn't support this
rate.) You'll need to give 4 as the clock rate to testhist to get a new
set of peaks, and then give the -c 4 option to cw2dmk.
There's still not a way to write this image back, though, as dmk2cw
doesn't offer enough control from the command line. After you find a
set of parameters that work in cw2dmk, define a new kind_desc in kind.h
and recompile. You can then write disks that use these parameters with
dmk2cw, and more conveniently read them in cw2dmk using one -k option
instead of all the individual options I listed above.
Feel free to email me if you need more help.
--
Tim Mann tim at tim-mann.orghttp://tim-mann.org/
willisjo at zianet.com wrote:
> However, I am a tad concerned about what will happen
> to our prized hobby when such items as 9-track tapes,
> TK50s, and TU58 DECtape-IIs truly become absolute
> unobtainium.
As I have stated many times before, I believe the solution is for us to
open our own factories to make them.
MS
termination is 150 ohms (for 5.25" floppy drives) to +5vdc... one of the reasons that one drive only can be terminated otherwise the output drives can't handle the current and if there is no termination then there is not a valid logic high level.
best regards, Steve Thatcher
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Sudbrink <wh.sudbrink at verizon.net>
Ah, yes, in each of my tests, the unpowered drive was set for
DS2 (drive B) and TM (termination) and was at the end of the
cable. But, I thought that the termination was to ground?
On Mar 20 2005, 19:20, Bill Sudbrink wrote:
> After a good bit of
> trying to figure out what was wrong, I discovered that the
> +5 volt pin in the power connector I was using for the #2 (B)
> drive had pushed out of the nylon plug so that the drive was
> unpowered. Having either of the drives unpowered on the cable
> caused the other drive to screw up. The two drives cooperate
> just fine when both have power. I don't remember ever seeing
> this kind of problem before... I seem to remember having unpowered
> drives hanging off of cables with no ill effects. I guess that
> some of the signals (write gate for instance) must be getting
> pulled low by the unpowered unit. Is this normal floppy
> behavior and I'm just remembering wrong?
Usually that's OK. Is perhaps the one without power also the one with
the terminators, or do neither have terminators?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> Is the H720 the correct power supply for the TC11/TU56
> combo, as is indicated in some document I've looked at?
> I'm at work and don't have my notes. Are there other
> compatible DEC power supplies that will work with the
> TC11/TU56?
>
On a related note...any special concerns on an initial powerup of a TU-56 that has not been turned on for possibly 5+ years....??
I just ran across this and thought it might be of interest for anyone
doing a low level format on a PC (not AT) type controllers. It was taken
>from a February 13, 1989 issue of Tech Times that appears to be a
ComputerLand Confidential publication (this is a copy.) My usual
procedure was to unassemble C800:5 or C800:6 and G=????:? the address
that was a jmp instruction. I've never used the :800 or tried to format
a Xebec controller.
*******************
Company Debug Command
Adaptec -G=C800:CCC
DTC -G=C800:5
Omti -G=C800:6
Western Digital -G=C800:5 or
-G=c800:800
Xebec Series of commands
-l322
-l321
-o322 0
-l321
-o320 04
-0320 00
-o320 00
-0320 00
-0320 05
-0320 07 (use 17 if embedded servo dr)
At this point, the LED on the drive should come on to indicate that the
drive is formatting. When the light goes off, coninue:
-l321
-l320
The last entry should get 00 status back, indicating a successful
format.
If anyone's interested, I've recently updated my Star Trek page
somewhat. More BASIC versions, a little more blurb, and Java and
Z-code versions at http://www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/startrek/
As always, corrections, additions, and comments are welcome.
Anyone got a FORTH or APL version?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Mar 20 2005, 16:39, Dave Dunfield wrote:
> Couple of weeks ago, I was contacted by a guy who said he had seen my
site,
> and has an "Black Apple" (Bell and Howell edition of Apple II for
schools)
> I responded by asking him for a price - he said $150
> He's left me on his mailing list, and since than has reported that he
had
> an offer for $500, then $1000, and this morning he says he has an
offer for
> $2000. I corresponded with him again and he says:
> >ok right now got offer for 2000 from people in uk. have 2 different
people
> >in uk that want it for good money.
There's one on eBay right now, in good condition, with working drives,
at $355 Canadian with 19 hours to go. I've seen them go a little
higher. I can't imagine why anyone would pay very much more than that,
and I suspect he's not had any offer near $2000. If he had, and you'd
already told him you weren't interested at $150, why would he bother to
contact you again? Anyway, don't forget you'd pay VAT and possibly
import duty if you bought one from the States.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I figure this might be a decent place to ask..
Does anyone know of a program I can use (preferably under Linux, but DOS
would probably work as well) to read a flux-transition level image off a
disk using a catweasel card? I'm trying to read some 2.4MB (5.25")
floppies from an IBM 3174 controller (using an 2.4MB floppy drive), and
am able to read in 1.2MB floppies using cw2dmk just fine, but it doesn't
do so well at processing the (aparently) mixed-density floppy I've been
screwing with since yesterday. Using the "testhist" program included
with cw2dmk, I can get information about the "unreadable" tracks, but
cw2dmk won't process them. I'm trying to make a backup image of a disk
so that I'm not screwed when the disk stops being readable...
For those interested, it appears that "2.4MB" floppy drives are 96 TPI
just like 5.25" DS/HD drives, but they support a higher bit rate.
Here's what testhist tells me for a "normal" HD track:
mii-300:/usr/src/cw2dmk-3.4# ./testhist 0 0 0 1 2
Reading track 0, side 1...
0: 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000
8: 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000003 000001
16: 000008 000005 000002 000005 000012 000006 000010 000479
24: 003590 012073 083091 150788 000112 000013 000004 000004
<snip>
peak 0: mean 26.52101, sd 0.67534
peak 1: mean 41.56100, sd 1.04145
peak 2: mean 55.25931, sd 0.90741
drive speed approx 360.943152 RPM
MFM data clock approx 510.486128 kHz
And for a higher density "2.4MB" track:
mii-300:/usr/src/cw2dmk-3.4# ./testhist 0 0 1 1 2
Reading track 1, side 1...
0: 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000
8: 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000324 000605
16: 000579 000472 006881 107754 120911 001047 000736 000639
24: 000743 000819 000079 000019 000003 000005 000000 000006
<snip>
peak 0: mean 19.51057, sd 0.82054
peak 1: mean 33.65562, sd 1.27275
peak 2: mean 48.29739, sd 0.48487
drive speed approx 374.227723 RPM
MFM data clock approx 653.668108 kHz
I don't care so much about being able to interpret the data that's there
as much as just being able to make a duplicate of the disk which is
acceptable to the 3174 controller when this disk bites the dust.
Pat
--
Purdue University ITAP/RCAC --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
>He's left me on his mailing list, and since than has reported that he had
>an offer for $500, then $1000, and this morning he says he has an offer for
>$2000. I corresponded with him again and he says:
>>ok right now got offer for 2000 from people in uk. have 2 different people
>>in uk that want it for good money.
>
>This seems completely ludicrous to me --- I know B&H Apples are considered
>desirable by some, but $2000 (and shipping from US->UK)!!!
There is on on eBay right now, known working, although not with black
drives (but with a working Apple II drive, there are two black B&H drives
also available for $20 each in another auction). $355 with 15 bids and 20
hours remaining. The pics aren't loading for me, but the description says
it is near mint condition. I could see it getting up to $500 before it
closes, but $2000... I'd be surprised.
The $150 price he asked was probably a good price (I'd have likely taken
him up on that price). But whether he really has $2000 offers vs he is
just claiming that to make you feel bad for passing on $150 deal (and
possibly hoping you are an ignorant collector who will suddenly think the
thing is worth thousands and offer him $2500 for it).
But who knows, there has been some insane prices on things recently.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Unearthed a Sun 2/120 yesterday (CPU cabinet plus disk cabinet plus mono
screen) but unfortunately no sign of a keyboard or mouse.
Anyone know if a later Sun keyboard and mouse can be wired via an
adapter to work? We've got a couple of Sun 3 keyboards & mice kicking
around which would be enough to test the machine out at least.
Both the keyboard and mouse connectors on the Sun 2 are 6-pin RJ45-style
connectors (they're probably not called RJ45 in this case as they're
smaller, but you get the idea).
Actually, I have a feeling that the mouse on our Sun 3/50 uses the same
connector (where it plus into the back of the keyboard) so that might be
the exact right part. The keyboard on the 3/50's a DB15 though...
cheers
Jules
Anyone interested in a user guide for Microsoft Word 2.0 specially made for
GE (General Electric) ? Its basically a normal manual with 848 pages but
with a GE cover and the text "GE Business Use Only" on it.
Stefan.
-------------------------------------------------------
http://www.oldcomputercollection.com
Hi All,
Anybody able to tell me the difference between the M8728 (11/70 MOS memory board)
and the M8750 (11/750 MOS Memory board) or why DEC decided to assign 2 numbers
to it (the M8750 has this number stamped on the handle, but the board bears
the number M8728!)
Thanks,
Ed
--
edward at groenenberg.net | Collector of PDP-11's.
http://www.groenenberg.net
Unix Lives! M$ Windows is crap.
'05 GSX-R1000
I have just come into possession of a NextStation, unfortunately sans
media. Can anyone point me to where I can get iso images or CDs for this
beast? It's got NextStep 3.3 installed, but it would be nice to have a
means for recovery.
Also looking for the development environment and/or docs.
Thanks for any tips!
Steve
Awhile back I was looking for a caddy for my RRD40, but the ones I
found and received (thanks Joe) weren't for the RRD40 but for RRD42.
RRD40 takes a weird plastic-only caddy that looks like a pair of
pincers, precariously pinching a CD at the edges...(anybody who'd like
a pic can email me offlist).
Anyway, my RRD40 I discovered unfortunately was nonfunctional *sigh* :-{
The caddy with VMS7.1 was jammed inside and I had to strip the drive
down to the internal unit to extricate the caddy and CD. There doesn't
seem to be an EJECT button for the RRD40????
So after I've extricated the caddy/CD by raising the motor/spindle
clamp manual, I discovered I cannot insert/load the caddy/CD with
raising the spindle clamp. Of course I could only do that with a
topless unit...
I could only conclude that the load/eject mechanism is kaput....
Any clues anybody? Or time to look for another RRD40....
/wai-sun
p.s. I had hopes for the RRD40 to be a boot device for my u/VAXen...
Yipppeeee! The 9915B now works. My remaining worry is that I do not
know why! After removing things to allow me to check them in isolation
and then putting them back, I started providing power to the different
parts of the PSU. First the +12V supply worked, then the -5V and -12V
supplies worked, then the +6V, and finally the +5V. Every time I expected
the fuse to blow, but it didn't. So now the whole thing works fine.
The 9915A still does not work, but I have found that C45 (the thin tall
390uF capacitor connected to pin 4 of transformer T2 via diode CR12) is
shorted. That removes power to the V+ supply taking out the +6V and
the +5V supplies.
Now all I need is a replacement for C45 and I am in business.
Many many thanks Tony.
BTW the first time I looked at the 9915 motherboard I freaked out,
because the PSU is all over the place. In some cases analog components
are located right next to the digital logic. But with Tony's help and
his schematics, I managed to map my way around the board. Now when I
look at some part on the underside, I know which components are on the
other side. Like an adventure game that you have played many times and
have the layout in your mind.
Real fun.
**vp
I have two IBM Model 5150s (one original rev, and a rev b). I think I've
explored every single inch of the hardware except for light pens -- I would
really like to experiment with one and write some software that interfaces with
one. Does anyone know:
1. What light pens were available and for which PCs? (I also own Tandy 1000s,
and they have "light pen" ports too)
2. Does anyone have any light pens for sale or trade?
I've already tried googling and searching usenet -- the only references I can
find are companies selling light pens for modern machines, and tech info that
states the obvious (ie. "The IBM PC supported a light pen"... yeah, thanks :-)
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org) http://www.oldskool.org/
Want to help an ambitious games project? http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
Done completely in Flash. Pretty damn amazing:
http://myoldmac.net/webse-e.htm
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
>From: "woodelf" <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
>
>Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>
>>Hi
>> I've always been looking at using a DSP chip for this job.
>>I did expect to read parts of a track at a time and then
>>reassemble them as condensed data. Chips like the Analog
>>Devices 2181 have some 80Kbytes of onboard RAM. Although,
>>it can't all be used for storage at the same time and
>>some is needed for program space. These chips can be
>>implemented with a real minimum of outside circuits.
>>they even have a serial SPI that can be used to read
>>disk data at higher speeds. These processor run at 30 MIPs
>>plus. They can run some operations, such as data moving
>>to arrays in single cycles, including updating of pointers.
>>They can do as many as 5 operations in a single cycle.
>> The can bootstrap from simple slowspeed EPROM of FLASH.
>>One could easily connect one of these to that USB chip
>>that someone pointer to earlier.
>>Dwight
>>
>>
>>
>Look what you are doing is building a generic floppy disk controler.
>The only high speed device what you use to sync the data/clock pulses
>to the system cpu clock. The rest is software. I'd sooner use a CPLD
>designed for generic bit sampling but a PIC would also work with
>a digital data/clock seperator. Now would getting the people who do
>cat-weasel create a USB version be a better goal?
>Ben alias woodelf
>PS. What about hard-sectored floppy disks, that too may need reading
>too?
Hi
I think you are missing what I am saying. The SPI is just
a shift register that takes an external clock. It can be programmed
to automatically DMA transfer into memory. It is the perfect zero
additional logic circuit to use. You don't need to build a
data/clock separator or anything. Just sample the data.
One could even make the output SPI provide write data. These
chips are designed to load their programs from a single
flash or EPROM so the entire hardware requirement is almost
nothing.
I see others on comp.os.cpm talk about using a 50MHz variant
of a Z80. I think most miss the point. These DSP's are 30 MIPS+
not just 50 MHz clocks. They have enormous capabilities in
a relatively small package. It was like they were designed for
this project. You don't need to create a CPLD since the hardware
part is already done for you.
Dwight
Maybe a little OT, but..
I just laid hands on a Friden EC-130 calculator, and I'll be darned if I can figure out how to take the top cover off of it.
The cover *seems* to come off by sliding forward, but there are a pair of pins in the rear that keep it in place. I've tried to flex the cover enough to clear the pins, but the resistance encountered is more than I am comfortable with.
How does this thing come off?
--
---------------------------------------------
-. William W. Layer .- -. St. Paul, MN USA .-
---------------------------------------------------
-. Cheif bottlewasher, Atma-Sphere Music Systems .-
-. http://www.atma-sphere.com .-
--------------------------------
Hi All,
after a few days frustration, I have got a little further with my 11/45.
The power supplies checked out OK with respect to ripple and output, but a
couple have them have the odd VERY fast spike on them - is this normal? (I'm
using a 100MHz 'scope - I suspect they may not be visible on a slower one).
After reducing the machine to its basics, I found I could load an address
>from the front panel, but not write or examine any location successfully.
The address and data lines became active, but the processor then goes into a
pause state. I found that the MSYN line was not being asserted, and it
appears that one ic on the Unibus controller (M8106) is not providing the
correct ouput - grounding the scope probe will force the line, and the
processor completes its bus cycle (Yes the inputs to the ic are correct!).
I have found a spare serviceable UBC, so I'll try that when I next get
chance, and if that fixexs the fault, I'll repair mine.
Jim.
Please see our website the " Vintage Communication Pages" at WWW.G1JBG.CO.UK
On Mar 19 2005, 23:43, Jules Richardson wrote:
> We couldn't get it to work with any transceiver we tried (SQE test
was
> off, FWIW), whether hooked up to a hub or not - it still gave a
> complaint about heartbeat at startup and then subsequent "no carrier"
> errors (and the "Ethernet jammed" errors).
The complaint about "heartbeat" is because the interface is expecting
to see the SQE test appear a few bit times after the end of the frame.
"Ethernet jammed" might mean it's seeing a continuous jam signal, or at
least sees a jam signal when it listens to the wire to see if it can
transmit. A jam signal is what a repeater puts on the wire when it
detects a collision (and it would see the SQE test signal as a
collision). It's an alternating set of 1s and 0s that lasts 96 bit
times, as I recall (an ordinary station can also generate a jam signal
but not such a long one), and the object of that is to force everything
to see a collision and back off. Now it so happens that 96 bit times
is also the interframe gap length, so if you have a repeater with a
transceiver set to do SQE tests, it sends an SQE test starting a few
bit times into the IFG, then generates a jam which will still be there
slightly after the end of the IFG, just when the station might be
checking for carrier again. Have you got another repeater somewhere
with a transceiver on it? Or are you missing a terminator so that the
voltage is out of spec and might look like a collision?
> As said in a private mail just now though, we'd had this problem with
> our PDP 11/84 - on the advice of an ex-DEC chap, it'd only talk to
one
> of these DEC units rather than any kind of AUI-equipped hub (or a
> transceiver). On a whim we tried the same with the Sun, and it seems
to
> have improved matters.
I've had various DEC machines, like my 11/83, attached to both
thickwire and thinwire with non-DEC transceivers and never had a
problem. I do check the SQE test, though :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>
> > > 2. Does anyone have any light pens for sale or trade?
> >
> > No, but it's not hard to make one if you don't require high resolution.
> > There was at least one design in 80-micro for the Tandy 1000. There were
> > plenty of designs for the Beeb (most of them use the Honeywell 'Sweet
> > Spot' devices). Thoese were not as good as the Torch one I mentioned, but
> > they do work.
>
> There are a couple on ePay at the moment, too.
It may be worth mentioning that microcomputer light pens tend to be
somewhat interchabeable.
They need either +5V, +12V, or both as power, The actual light pen signal
is a pulse that occurs when the light pen detects light from the CRT
screen, it's almost always TTL level, and the only possible problem here
is that it's the wrong polarity, which can be trivially fixed with a
74x04 inverter. If there's a pushbutton switch on the light pen, most
likely it just grounds the appropraite wire when pressed.
DEC lightpens (at least the one on my GT40) are different. They're just the
phototransistor, the amplifier, etc, is inside the display. Microcomputer
lightpens tend to put the electronics in the pen or its interface box.
-tony
On Mar 19 2005, 21:32, Jules Richardson wrote:
> The Ethernet card may be a source of trouble. It seems to want
something
> that provides an external heartbeat - we hooked up a DEC hub to get
> around that problem, which stopped the "no carrier" messages on the
> console. However, it's still throwing up "Ethernet jammed" messages -
> and ideas what that's about?
Have you got the "SQE Test" turned on on your transceiver? You have to
turn it off if you have the transceiver connected to a repeater (which
is probably what your DEC hub is). What the SQE test does is send a
test signal after every frame, to test the collision detect circuitry,
but the repeater will see this as a real collision and will send a jam
signal.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
A friend has a large number of 3-1/2" HD diskettes with IBM Filing
Assistant files on them.
Does anyone know of a way to open and read those files so that they can be
brought in to a current database program or spreadsheet?
Jay wrote:
> Yeah, I'll give you a primer on the capacitors on the TU56.... to get
> replacements is about $70 each! For the four motor run caps anyways.
>
> I'll get to refurbing my TU56 "Someday".
I hope to bring my TU56 back to life this year too ...!
One note on the ### motor capacitors.
AFAIK there is a difference between motor *start* caps and *run* caps.
If I am wrong I would like to know, else what is the difference?
- Henk, PA8PDP.
On Mar 19 2005, 11:19, GManuel \(GMC\) wrote:
> It must be able to somehow. I have used a light pen on a Commodore 64
with a
> Graphics Program called Picasso's Revenge and have drawn on the
screen with
> it even on a completely black background. Not sure how it does it
though.
It's just a question of sensitivity. The black portions of the screen
are rarely quite black, because the electron beam is not quite turned
off. Thus a suficciently sensitive lightpen can still detect the spot
as it scans past the pen's location.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hi,
I finally got a VME Bus for me to start experimenting. I want to connect
this to my Ultrasparc 2 using my Performance Tech Sbus-to-VME controller.
Unfortunately, I am a total newbie when it comes to VME. I got a VERO-BICC
Vme chassis that apparently once held a Force CPU. There are a bunch of
connectors on the VME backplane itself. Also, how does one even set up
these guys? The chassis has 5 VME slots. I want to use the Performance
Tech as the master controlling the VME Bus? and connect 2 (or more)
transtech/inmos VME boards....
Thanks,
Ram
Here's a list of the docs that came with the INFO 2000 disk setup,
aka PerSci 277 double drive and 1070 disk controller.
I know most of this is already available online, but I can scan any
of it on request.
PERSCI 1070 INTELLIGENT FLOPPY DISK CONTROLLER 12 pg. glossy
by Robert A. Stevens
Reprint of an article from Sept 1977 /Interface Magazine/
AN ADVANCED DISC-BASED SYSTEM 4 pg. glossy
by Michael Busch and Dan Gaines
From same magazine issue
INFO 2000 DISK SYSTEM 8 pg. sales brochure
for Heathkit H8
Digital Group
All S-100 Computers
PerSci Mass Storage Systems - Specifications 2 pg. glossy
PerSci Model 70 Diskette Drive - Specifications "
PerSci Model 277 Dual Diskette Drive - Specifications "
USERS MANUAL
Intelligent Diskette Controller
Model 1070
~40 pg. April, 1978
PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS
Intelligent Diskette Controller
Model 1070 22 pg. June, 1977
WESTERN DIGITAL MOS/LSI FD1771
APPLICATION NOTE FLOPPY DISK FORMATTER/CONTROLLER
20 pg. March, 1978
Installation and Maintenance Manual
Duak Diskette Drive
Model 277 44 pg. July 1977
Logic & Schematic Diagram
Diskette Drive
Models 270/272/277 31 pg. January, 1978
Product Specification
Diskette Drive
Model 277 24 pg. January, 1978
Installation and Maintenance Manual
Duak Diskette Drive
Model 70 Series 39 pg. October 1976
Product Specification
Diskette Drive
Model 70 24 pg. January 1977
Product Specification
Diskette Drive
Model 299B 36 pg. not dated
USERS MANUAL
Dual Density Controller
Model 1170 62 pg. March 1980
Doc
PerSci, Inc.
Product Price List 1 pg. November 18, 1977
I picked up a KJ Instruments Model 506 Disk Drive Analyzer. It's a tester
for MFM drives. On the front are the data and power connectors for a
standard MFM drive, plus knobs, switches, LED displays, etc. On the back
are two DB-25 connectors.
Has anyone got a manual by some remote chance? Has anyone ever used one
of these?
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Ethan,
I wrote the post about the TI 9900 processor cards. What are the
dimensions of the cards, and how many pins? I have two ram boards that may
be similar to yours, perhaps a little older based on the RAM chip numbers
you list below (assuming smaller number means older). I have the details
of my TI 9900-related stuff on
http://vintagecomputer.net/ti/TI-990-101/readme.txt. Here is a URL of pdf
links to TI-related hardware http://computer-refuge.org/bitsavers/ti/ and
try http://www.mainbyte.com/ti99/ in the event that you have a card
originally from an expansion unit for a 99 4/a. If you can read Japanese,
this page appears to have some info as well
http://www.orchid.co.jp/computer/hardware/parts/tms9900.html
Bill
>I was going through the basement at my old place today and ran across
>some boards that I bought at Dayton a large number of years ago. They
>all seem to be RAM boards of one type or another, one marked "24K",
>the other "8K w/ECC", loaded with different amounts of TI4060 RAM
>chips (approx the same package dimensions as, say, 5101 SRAMs). I
>don't have a net connection there at the moment, and I didn't have my
>camera with me, or I'd have taken pictures to post, but I thought I'd
>start by asking if anyone knows of a repository of TI board pictures
>like some of the Qbus field guides that are out there. I could then
>do a little browsing to figure out what these are from.
>One guess is that these look like what I've been reading about on the
>list recently about the TI990(?). They look newer than the boards in
>my TI980, and a little larger than those.
>I also found what look to be like TI laptop parts - a couple of
>daughter cards that seem to be some kind of video controller, and more
>of a main board, but without a CPU.
>I have no particular use for them except as a source of parts. If
>these sound interesting to anyone here, I can do a little more digging
>and/or take down part numbers and take pictures.
>No CPU or I/O cards, sorry.
>-ethan
------------------------------
Does anyone know a true (not a homebrew hack) multitasking environment that
will run in 16K or less, preferably with available source?
I was looking at Mini-UNIX for the PDP-11 and that's something similar to
what I'm looking for, but I wondered what other alternatives there were. Any
architecture will do, but I'm particularly interested in minicomputer
architectures for this project (DG, DEC, IBM, etc., would all be appropriate).
Thanks for humouring my odd request ^^
--
---------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Floodgap Systems Ltd * So. Calif., USA * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- The steady state of disks is full. -- Ken Thompson -------------------------
I was going through the basement at my old place today and ran across
some boards that I bought at Dayton a large number of years ago. They
all seem to be RAM boards of one type or another, one marked "24K",
the other "8K w/ECC", loaded with different amounts of TI4060 RAM
chips (approx the same package dimensions as, say, 5101 SRAMs). I
don't have a net connection there at the moment, and I didn't have my
camera with me, or I'd have taken pictures to post, but I thought I'd
start by asking if anyone knows of a repository of TI board pictures
like some of the Qbus field guides that are out there. I could then
do a little browsing to figure out what these are from.
One guess is that these look like what I've been reading about on the
list recently about the TI990(?). They look newer than the boards in
my TI980, and a little larger than those.
I also found what look to be like TI laptop parts - a couple of
daughter cards that seem to be some kind of video controller, and more
of a main board, but without a CPU.
I have no particular use for them except as a source of parts. If
these sound interesting to anyone here, I can do a little more digging
and/or take down part numbers and take pictures.
No CPU or I/O cards, sorry.
-ethan
Thanks Tony for the advice:
> Fuse still blows? Remove the diode between pin 6 of T2 and the -12V line
> and the diode between pin 4 of T2 and the V+ line (RH side of sheet 1 of
> my CPU board schematic). With those lifted, the supply is reduced to a
> simple 12V one driving no load.
I did so and the fuse held. I meassured the +12V line and it gave me
close to 12V (+11.98V). I also reconnected CR13 (the one at pin 6
of T2) and got the -12V and -5V supplies as well.
Unfortunately, when connecting the other diode (CR12, pin 4 of T2), the
fuse blows.
> I'd supsect (a) a short in one of the output regulators _and_ (b) a
> problem with the current sense circuit (round U31, LM311).
Any ideas on how to debug this?
Thanks
**vp
BTW I have another question related to another 9915 with PSU probs.
What would cause the -12V supply to produce only around -5V (i.e.
the volatages on either side of the 332 Ohm resistor are around
-5V (not equal, but close).
On Mar 18 2005, 10:07, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
> >From: "vrs" <vrs at msn.com>
> >There, "run" caps are generally oil, and "start" caps are
> >generally electrolytic. The exception being the occasional
"start/run" cap,
> >whatever that is.
>
> I believe that refers to how it is used. During the start,
> it is connected to a high current coil but during run, is
> is connected to a high resistant one to create phase shift.
>
> >The original caps in the TU56 are high capacitance, and clearly
> >electrolytic. But they appear to be wired for continuous phase
shifting
> >duty. Hence some of the people on the list insisting that they are
"run"
> >caps, and that the beefier, more expensive "run" cap should be used.
>
> Most likely to make the motor run smoother, as though there
> were more phases to the AC.
Simplified explanation: In "capacitor-start, capacitor-run" motors,
which run from single-phase AC, there are two sets of coils. The coils
need to be fed with AC out of phase with each other to cause the motor
to rotate. The AC supply is fed directly to one set of coils, and
through the capacitors to produce the phase shift for the second set of
coils. To start the motor, you need lots of current and a big phase
shift, so the "start" capacitor in parallel with the "run" capacitor is
a high value. A centrifugal switch in the motor disconnects that once
it gets to some fraction of its nominal speed, and then only the "run"
capacitor is left in series with the second set of coils.
Capacitors passing AC have an impedance, analagous to resistance but
frequency dependant, so they dissipate energy proportional to their
impedance and the square of the current. The "start" capacitor is only
in circuit for a short time, so it doesn't need to be as robust as the
"run" capacitor, which will be dissipating energy all the time the
motor is running. Of course if the load on the motor is low, so is the
current, so the capacitors may not need to handle too much energy once
it's running normally.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>From: "Huw Davies" <huw.davies at kerberos.davies.net.au>
---snip---
>
>Are the risks in preemptive scheduling just ones of complexity? I guess
>that it is much harder to "prove" that this type of scheduler is going
>to to the right thing at the right time. I know that,
>for example, the scheduler for VMS has gone from a couple of pages of
>assembler
>to something like 75 pages of BLISS!
>>
Hi Huw
I think it is more about predictability. Large preemptive
systems can lock up in unpredictable ways. They are hard
to confirm as operating correctly under all conditions
since the number of permutations of conditions is so large.
This makes them dangerous for critical systems.
Most non-preemptive system are easier to find bugs because
they tend to fail right away if there is such a flaw.
Also, preemptive taskers often have to save greater amounts
of information since they may break a task at in opportune
points.
For a general purpose OS, preemptive makes sense. For
RTOS is really doesn't.
As an example of simplicity, for an embedded machine, I used
a non-preemptive tasker to run 50 pid controls, a keypad,
paper printer log and a LCD display. This was all easily handled
with a single 2MHz Z80.
Dwight
>From: "vrs" <vrs at msn.com>
---snip---
>
>What you are saying is consistent with what I see on most sites selling
>these things. There, "run" caps are generally oil, and "start" caps are
>generally electrolytic. The exception being the occasional "start/run" cap,
>whatever that is.
I believe that refers to how it is used. During the start,
it is connected to a high current coil but during run, is
is connected to a high resistant one to create phase shift.
>
>The original caps in the TU56 are high capacitance, and clearly
>electrolytic. But they appear to be wired for continuous phase shifting
>duty. Hence some of the people on the list insisting that they are "run"
>caps, and that the beefier, more expensive "run" cap should be used.
Most likely to make the motor run smoother, as though there
were more phases to the AC.
---snip---
Dwight
Does anyone have a discription of how drives are mounted in a 7012/7030 RS/6k
with the 2 front accessible 5-1/4 bays? (not the case with the card-edge
connector for narrow SCSI) I think I need some type of sled or cage, but I don't
know how it attaches or the IBM lingo for it (so Google doesn't work).
- Scott Quinn
>From: "Giuseppe Sarno" <gsarno at nortel.com>
>
>Hi I own an Old Xerox 820 machine,
>Can anyone help to find documentation for it ?
>Also is there a way to download programs onto it using the serial/parallel
>port ?
>
>I have seen some info at
>http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctech/2002-September/002642.html
><http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctech/2002-September/002642.html> but
>I couldn't find more.
>
>Thanks.
>
Hi
You didn't mention if you have a disk that boots and
has PIP under CP/M on it. If you do, you can transfer
information as ASCII like a BASIC source program or even
transfer .COM files by first converting them to .HEX
files and then using DDT on the 820 to move them
to .COM files.
If you are attempting to bootstrap with no disk, you'll
have to check with others. One may be able to do it
if it has a built in debug monitor.
Of course, on can always write some of ones own code
and replace one of the internal EPROMs. It is not
as impossible as it sounds. You just have to explore
a little.
Dwight
>From: "Eric Smith" <eric at brouhaha.com>
>
>Paul wrote:
>> all too often, priorities
>> are used to hide the fact that the builder didn't analyze the job
>> sufficiently, and simply hacked the priorities until things seemed to
>> work in test.
>
>True. You wouldn't believe how many times I've seen other engineers
>trying to set the priority of their task higher than those of other
>tasks just because they have some vague idea that their task is
>"important", rather than any understanding of actual relationships between
>the tasks.
>
>A good rule of thumb is that in the absence of a rational basis for
>one task having a higher priority than another, all tasks should have
>the same priority. Far too often a person's intuitive idea of what
>the relative task priorities should be is wrong.
>
>Eric
>
>
Hi
If it is important enough to need immediate attention,
it should be interrupt driven and not a general task.
Many confuse interrupts with tasks. I suspect this is
mostly because most preemptive systems use the interrupts
to switch task( not very efficient in a RTOS ).
Even in a non-preemptive, one can have some priority.
Management of the task queue can give similar effects.
Dwight
Hi everyone,
Well, I am finally getting around to trying to recover some 26
9-track tapes I have been holding on to for
at least 10 years. Some are closer to 25 years. I found out six of
them had no data, and a bunch more I
have been able to read and decode, including some RT-11 tapes and some
VAX SIG tapes. Sorry this
monologue won't make much sense to you non-DEC folks, but you might have
ideas on converting from 800
to 1600 BPI anyway.
Here is my dilemna. I have 6 tapes that look like they are 800 BPI, and
were most likely written on an RSX-11
system. I have no 800 BPI setup, and if I did, it would be on a VAX,
which may not be able to restore the
savesets anyway. That is because I have a few more tapes that I can
read (or at least dump) but I cannot unpack
the savesets. It would appear that the tapes were written in the early
days of VMS when the backup and restore
utilities were really RSX-11 BCK/RST derivitives, and the current BACKUP
program does not recognize
the container file as a valid saveset.
The label on the front of several tapes date them early 80's and talks
about BCK format. The dump sort of looks
like BCK stuff. The blocksize is 2064.
I've had a couple of offers to try to recover the data, but I was
checking to see if anybody was set up to easily
read and recover the data, without a lot of reconfiguration or hassle.
I'm open to suggestions. I suspect if I knew
the layout of a BCK container/saveset I could unpack them myself (except
for the 800 BPI stuff). Any ideas??
I also have an XXDP tape, labeled MSDP, which makes me think it is
bootable. It would be nice to duplicate
it, as it is not easily read to disk. The first block is 14 bytes, and
the rest look like 512 bytes.
And finally, I have a tape that is readable, is mountable under VMS and
I can copy nearly everything off of.
That is, the 400+ files up to the file that is marked HECK.BCK. That
file is 2064 byte blocks, which makes
me think it is also a BCK/RST format. Can't figure how I got it on the
end of the tape and haven't figured
out how to get it back.
Cheers,
Joe Heck
It's not-quite-on-topic but it's a well-developed evolutionary
dead-end; a platypus display. It *could* be done on old gear...
>From Tim Pozar:
Vector drawings on an o'scope using a sound card on a computer....
http://www.sensi.org/~svo/pr0nscope/
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 Bj?rn <bv at norbionics.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:36:58 +0100, Eric Smith <eric at brouhaha.com> wrote:
>
>> Ethan writes about bytes on the PDP-10:
>>> On the -10,
>>> one stores 6 6-bit characters in a machine word, and one speaks of
>>> bytes that are 6 bits.
>>
>> Not necessarily. On the PDP-10, the byte size could be anywhere from
>> zero (really!) to 36 bits. Seven bits was the most commonly used for
>> general ASCII text, with one leftover bit per word. In fact, this
>> was so common that the KS10 CPU has special dedicated hardware to make
>> the 7-bit byte case more efficient than the other supported byte sizes.
> ...
>
> A byte is the smallest INDIVIDUALLY addressable unit of data on a system.
Nonsense! Where did you get that?
The PDP-10 is an excellent example of when this isn't true.
The smallest addressable unit is a word, which is 36 bits.
A byte is, as noted, anything between 0 and 36 bits. Bytes are stored in a
word, as many as can be fitted.
To access bytes on a PDP-10, you have a byte pointer, which consist of a
word address, and a bit pointer, and byte size. So it points to the
correct word, and then you have a bitfield in that word that a nice
instruction can extract, and also move the bitfield pointer ahead the
correct amount and move on the the next word, if the next byte would not
fit in this word.
A byte is simply a convenient number of bits enough to store a character.
No explicit definition of how many "convenient" is, nor what character set
we're talking about with "character". A byte is just that. A convenient
size typ for character data.
The fact that people today seem to believe that byte addressable is the
only possible thing, along with a byte being 8 bits, is plain and simply
because they haven't seen any other.
> It was usual to speak of a character when a part of a whole word was
> extracted. I do not remember any details of the Univac 1107 (I only
> programmed in FORTRAN and Simula on it), but I think the normal character
> was six bits. I am fairly certain that was not a byte, it was extracted
> from an 18-bit halfword or a 36-bit word. A byte is something you can load
> and store to an individual address, and the hardware takes care of the
> rest. A character needs some software or firmware mapping in order to read
> or write just one of them.
Bah. A sixbit character can very well be a byte, it's just a question of
if you choose to call it that.
Byte addressable is not usable as a definition of a byte.
Johnny
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at update.uu.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
> It's not-quite-on-topic but it's a well-developed
> evolutionary dead-end; a platypus display. It *could* be done
> on old gear...
>
> >From Tim Pozar:
>
> Vector drawings on an o'scope using a sound card on a computer....
>
> http://www.sensi.org/~svo/pr0nscope/
WAY too much time on their hands :-)
Quoth Paul Koning (i think), regarding LK401 some weeks back:
>Then again, if it's a stuck key or something like that, the keyboard
>is beyond repair. LK201 keyboards are cheesy low quality membrane
>switches that cannot be disassembled or cleaned or repaired. If
>moisture ever gets in them, your only option is to scrap the board. I
>found this out the hard way.
Does the same apply to LK401 keyboards? I have one with a
non-functioning key (try resetting passwords on VMS when you can't get
a 'Z'....), and the melted-post construction seems the same. Am I best
just looking for a replacement and if so, anyone in the UK got a spare
I can make an offer for? Be nice to the moderators and contact me
off-list :)
Cheers,
Pete
--
Pete Edwards
"Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future" - Niels Bohr
>From: Saquinn624 at aol.com
>
>Coming in on this a little bit late, but if you haven't checked out the
>Library of Congress you should.
>www.loc.gov/preserv gives you a basic run down of ways to care for archived
>materials, and the NIST/CLIR puts out Special Publication 500-252 "Care and
>Handling of CDs and DVDs - A Guide for Librarians and Archivists" (e-version
>available). Other tips- gold disks, AZO dye are reputed to last longer.
>The phenomenon of failure from the outside in has interesting possibilities-
>have software write a known pattern in the outermost section of the disc and
>pop up a warning when it starts to deteriorate. Hopefully this would give
>enough time to move data to another disk.
>
>- Scott Quinn
>
Hi
This does require regular reading of the archived disk. This
is not necessarily an easy thing to do.
Dwight
Eric wrote:
> However, I don't *really* think you want to spend the rest of your
> life writing your own FPGA development software. It's a hard problem
> and there are hundreds of thousands of man-years of development effort
> in the Xilinx software. By the time you got your own software working
> for one family, that family would have long since been discontinued.
Scott wrote:
> I would suspect that while there might be hundreds of thousands of man
> hours, that there just can't possible be hundreds of thousands of man
> *years* involved.
Xilinx is putting in hundreds of man years this year alone. They have been
at it for over 20 years so their development software amounts to 1000s of
man years of work. (I was in the PLD/FPGA software development business
>from 1982 to 1997.)
>From the Xilinx Web page
http://www.xilinx.com/company/press/grounder.htm
Headquartered in San Jose, California, Xilinx is a publicly traded company
(NASDAQ: XLNX) with approximately 2,600 employees, with nearly half of its
engineers dedicated to software development.
Michael Holley
(Sorry about the last blank message)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5173766870&
It's quite overpriced, probably times 5 or times 10. I kindly and
tactfully wrote to the seller explaining this, but of course I'll
lack credibility with them.
The seller ("gold-snipper") is a recycler in Portland OR, maybe
someone could contact them and go visit?
If they're bothering to list on eBay, that's a good sign. They
know it might have some value other than by-weight. Who knows what
else they have up there.
There's a tape and an SMD interface, alarm/clock, and a lot of
memory. I'd be interested in a memory card, maybe a basic IO, on
the faint chance someone visits them, and gets a bargain on the
whole box, and wants to part it out.
Clearly it was chopped from some ssytem, there appears to be no
cables etc.
While it's missing peripherals, if someone could scrounge up a
disk or floppy system it would be a decent 1970's-era mini.
There's no shortage of software for it.
Is anyone interested in helping me do the
TU56/TC11 restoration as a "virtual restoration
project"? I know you California guys can get
together in person and meet and work on your
PDP-1 restoration. I'm stuck here in South
Carolina and don't have a face-to-face group
to interact with.
I'm going to add a projects page to my site,
and add the TU56 project under that. I've
taken some pictures of it the way it is today,
which is pretty much how it arrived, except
that I've located a couple cards that were
missing.
I don't know if anyone has ever done anything
like this remotely in a "virtual mode" before,
but the idea of a team project sounds interesting
to me. David in New York could restore his
TU56 in parallel. In my current job I work
daily with a team in India. We never see one
another face-to-face except when an occasional
developer comes to the U.S. to spend some time
learning our procedures and processes. We are
able to accomplish our goals with teams
working on opposite sides of the globe.
Several folks have already privately been in
correspondence with me and have already been
a big help. You know who you are.
If anyone's interested, let me know. The
project would have a plan that folks could
help me put together, to do things in a
reasonable and logical order. Things like
clean the backplanes, check the flip-chips,
re-form the capacitors, etc. I don't know
what would be in it for everyone else, other
than to know that you helped when it finally
spins up a DECtape and can read and write to
it as the unit is connected to one of my
PDP-11s.
Call me crazy if you wish. I suppose I've
been involved in too many group projects over
the past 20 years and this seems like a fun
opportunity to try out the group/team concept
in a different way.
Ashley