> A scrap of paper upon which is written:
REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY bad idea.
The paper WILL be lost.
While I don't agree with the complexity Sellam has come up with
whatever you do needs to have that level of metadata in the file
itself.
The specific nasty example of this are the hundreds of Whirlwind
paper tapes the Computer Museum has. They are indexed with a part
number. They don't appear to have the index for these numbers.
>
>Subject: Wanted: Rubber drive wheel for HP 9144 tape drive
> From: Bill Richman <bill at timeguy.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 09:08:21 -0500
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
>I'm trying to help a friend locate a replacement tape drive wheel for an HP 9144 tape drive. He says that there's a hard roller inside the tape cartridge, and there's a softer (rubber?) roller in the drive that pushes against it, pulling the tape along. Apparently the softer rollers tend to turn to "goo" after many years. He's been working to recover some archived files from the beginnings of the company he works for, mostly for historical interest, and his last tape drive recently succumbed to the "goo" problem. Anyone have any replacement rollers that would be in any better shape, or any suggestions for alternatives? Thanks!
>
Line Breaks!
I just scrape off the goo and use some suitably sized tygon (Vinyl)
tubing to make a replacement roller.
Allison
Also, many tapes (depending on make and age) can
actually be so brittle that during the read the material seperates from
the transport, not a pretty sight.
--
What appears to happen is the adhesion to the previous layer of tape is
greater than to the original, and it strips the oxide and binder to clear
mylar (not a pretty sight or sound).
I have become VERY cautious when working with old floppies and tapes and
assume that I will only get one pass at recovering the data. For discs,
you want to keep the heads moving. I've crashed a LOT of disc packs by
staying on a single track too long.
So, what is the latest version of Teledisk that one can find? And what
version is preferred?
I have found versions 2.11, 2.12, 2.15, and 2.16. None of them seemed
reliable though .. some disks worked, some didn't. Like Jim, I
standardized on the Central Point Option Board. (Wish I had spares
though .. they are pricey as of late.)
For non-protected diskettes I use ditu, Linux dd, or any other sector
copier that creates a raw diskette dump. For copy protected diskettes I
use the Option Board, and Teledisk if I have the patience. All of my
cataloged diskettes have the labels scanned too.
Mike
>
>Subject: Re: Tandy T100 info
> From: John Hogerhuis <jhoger at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 17:58:44 -0700
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On 5/16/05, Allison <ajp166 at bellatlantic.net> wrote:
>> I'll have to look more at all this. However, step one is to
>> get the M100 I have up to 32k ram. Then I'll look at how secondary
>> rom socket space is used. I'd like a configuration that also has
>> ram at 0000h and maybe a OS in it. I've considered getting
>
>That has been done... I believe what you do is put a RAM in the Option
>ROM socket and bring out the necessary signals (/WE I think). Also the
>NEC 8201A and NEC 8300 are able to switch to all RAM mode with a short
>program.
I'd be surprized if it weren't already done. Way too easy. The switch
for M100 is also trivial piece of code. The real trick is to keep
the rom socket available. So the magic is to make the all ram option
a third one and software selectable.
>There was at some point in time a device called a PIC Disk that
>allowed you to run CP/M on the Model 100. It connected to the bus
>expansion port underneath the M100.
Tandy also had one that added a vidio and disk to the M100 that
used the bus connector. I have part of the manual for it.
Allison
>From: "Barry Watzman" <Watzman at neo.rr.com>
>
>Re: "But gathering together a large number of rare, desirable items
>(however subjective) into one place without a will or letter of
>intent is not "archiving". In fact it's the opposite -- items were
>taken out of circulation probably permanently."
>
>A point here that might be worth making to Don's widow is that since the
>materials in question are software archives, they can both be made available
>to the world while she still retains the physical items and library herself.
>It's not like collecting motorcycles. These items can be duplicated without
>any destruction of the originals.
Hi
I don't believe this is her issue. I suspect it is a combination
of grief, anger and ignorance. I think the main thing to do is
to let her know that she shouldn't just dump the stuff. Beyond
that, I'd guess just back off and leave her alone.
Dwight
Hey guys,
I am compiling some information for a HP-IB KnowledgeBase article / FAQ
and need some input. In order to focus my efforts and get the maximum
value from the KB, I need to know what specific information should be
included in the KB/FAQ. Some of the topics I am considering are:
* Introduction / Tutorial - Basic overview of the protocol
* Protocols - HP-IB, GPIB, SICL, IEEE-488, etc...
* Characteristics - Electrical and physical characteristics
* Instruments - Talking to instruments
* Bus Analyzers - IE HP59401A
* CS-80 disks - The CS-80 / SS-80 protocols
* Programming - Linux, HP-UX, C, assembler, other
So... I'd like to hear from anyone that is interested in HP-IB as to
what they would like to see in the KB. Please reply to the cctech list
or directly to me at steerex[at]mindspring[dot]com.
See ya,
SteveRob
>print_ary (ary, DIM (ary));
>
>void print_ary (int *aryp, int n)
>{
>
> goto skip_comma;
> for (;n;aryp++, n--)
> {
> printf (", ");
>
>skip_comma:
> printf ("%u", *aryp);
> }
> printf ("\n");
>
>}
>> I'd skip both the GOTO and the conditional and do it:
>>
>> void print_ary(int *aryp,size_t n)
>> {
>> size_t i;
>> char *sep;
>>
>> assert(aryp != NULL); /* sorry, gotta check */
>> assert(n > 0);
>>
>> for (i = 0 , sep = "" ; i < n ; aryp++ , i++)
>> {
>> printf("%s%u",sep,&aryp);
>> sep = ",";
>> }
>> putchar('\n');
>> }
>Clever. I don't like the conditional either, but you are also
>unnecessarily reinitializing sep every time through the loop. With the
>goto I avoid both the conditional and the reinit.
Given that the original example assumes n > 0 (the test is skipped on
first entry to the loop), you can accomplish this function with neither
an extra conditional, superfluous assignment, extra variables or use
of 'goto'
void print_arg(int *aryp, unsigned n)
{
int i;
for(i=0; ;) {
printf("%u", aryp[i]);
if(++i >= n)
break;
fputs(", ", stdout); }
putc('\n', stdout);
}
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
>
>Subject: Re: 2 UPS/Alarm batteries available
> From: John Foust <jfoust at threedee.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 07:43:37 -0500
> To: <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>And due to my own packrat tendencies, I have a large pile of dead UPSes
>of various sizes, along with an item on my very long to-do list
>that says "buy replacement lead-acid batteries." Any recommendations
>for a supplier in the USA?
>
>- John
There are any number of battery suppliers. APC also supplies them but
at 80$(shipping included plus return reciept for the dead ones) for
two 7AH batts they arent cheap. I expect to pay less than 26$US for
12V at 7AH new at the local suppliers, cheaper is out there.
Allison
Re: "But gathering together a large number of rare, desirable items
(however subjective) into one place without a will or letter of
intent is not "archiving". In fact it's the opposite -- items were
taken out of circulation probably permanently."
A point here that might be worth making to Don's widow is that since the
materials in question are software archives, they can both be made available
to the world while she still retains the physical items and library herself.
It's not like collecting motorcycles. These items can be duplicated without
any destruction of the originals.
Hi, all
Need to find homes for a few items. These are in Kent Washington
south of Seattle. These are mostly very large items or hard to ship.
So pick up here only or arrange for your own shipping.
1- Vax 6000 320 very good condition no real damage to the
enclosure missing the hard drives. I believe there where RA-72's
drives. Looks complete and very clean inside. Very Large,
Very heavy. 100.00
1- TI 990 A13 This does not turn on and has a bad power
supply at minimum. Has 2 hard drives with Cartridge tape drives
Model WD 800, 3 terminals, 3 or 4 boxes of manuals and tapes.
No hardware manuals, just software. Missing the side covers for
the rack. and has some damage to one of the front grilles. 400.00
1- TI printing terminal (like a DEC writer). 50.00
1- NEC APC color Computer in the original Box. Has most of
the Manuals and software. 8" floppy. Needs a Keyboard.
50.00
1- external hard drive of a NEC APC. APC H-26 unknown
condition 50.00
2- HP 7970B Mag tape drives. Both turn on, but have not
been tested. both have 1 panel on the front door that has come
loose and needs to be reglued. 75.00 ea.
1- Dec writer 3 in very good working condition 75.00
1- Fluke 1775B Printer. New, this is a Tally 1602 with HBIB
interface Dot matrix 35.00
1- HP 2601a printer. this is a diablo 630 (serial) Daisy wheel
25.00
1- DEC Micro Vax 2 with M7620 AA (Micro Vax 3), M7621a,
Non Dec memory, M7546 Tk50 board, M7555 MFM and
Floppy board. Has no Hard drives. Does have TK 50 tape.
all of the ext. panels are there. 100.00
1- Cipher 100-860 Mag tape Unknown condition 50.00
1- Tek 4105 terminal, no keyboard. 20.00
1- OutPut Tech. laser printer. Looks looks like a Laser jet 2
But prints on Tractor feed 8 1/2 x 11" paper. Works has
new Drum kit. 35.00
1- Barco 400 RGB projector Does XGA with manual. has
not been used in a couple of years. Large, heavy and Free
1- Northern Telcom SS400 Disk drive. This is a Small
roll around 8" SCSI drive with a Exabyte 2.5 gig tape
drive. unknown condition. 25.00
1- Wang PC. This is not a standard PC. Is about 24" deep
takes a special monitor. Not included. Has hard drive,
and 5 1/4 floppy. I believe I have software Disks.
Model PC-002 with Keyboard
35.00
1- Lexmark Optra S2455, laser Printer. high page count but
looks like new and works fine. Has second paper bin.
prints 24 PPM has P-port and ether net 10/100 75.00
1- NCR 1202 pc ?? this is a all in one Unit with 2 floppy
dirves. Lots of add on modules, software and manuals. No
Keyboard. 45.00
1- Toshiba Computer. I believe these where CPM
systems. Has CPU and Keyboard all in one. with
external Floppy drive. No software 25.00
- offers welcome
- please don't leave Posts here. email me at
g-wright at att.net or call.
Day time Phone
800-292-6370 or 253-854-9601
9-6 PST M-F
Thanks, Jerry
Jerry wright
JLC
Ok, to stay OT (sorry, could not resist)
it is a uhmm "special" to take a keyboard with you, but you
would certainly force respect if you took an ASR33 along :~)
- Henk, PA8PDP.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Nico de Jong
> Sent: dinsdag 17 mei 2005 15:58
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: [ZS1] RE: text-messaging versus morse code - Jay
> Leno show
>
>
> From: "James Fogg" <James at jdfogg.com>
>
> > > if you want to see the show fragment, here is a URL (8,4 Mb)
> > >
> > > http://n6tv.kkn.net/Text_vs_Morse_Leno_2005_05_13.wmv
> > >
> > > 73,
> > > - Henk, PA8PDP.
> >
> > Thanks for the link - it's great to see the juxtaposition of
> > technologies. It makes me wish I hadn't missed my
> expiration of my ham
> > license (N1QCO).
> >
> Great fragment.
> I recently saw a new product : a full size PC keyboard where you could
> attach a cell phone, obviously aimed at the text message marked...
> Hm, why not build a cell phone into an ASR33, where the modem
> usually was
> located ?
> That would allow for hardcopying txts...
>
> 73, Nico (OZ1BMC)
>
>
> Hi all,
> if you want to see the show fragment, here is a URL (8,4 Mb)
>
> http://n6tv.kkn.net/Text_vs_Morse_Leno_2005_05_13.wmv
>
> 73,
> - Henk, PA8PDP.
Thanks for the link - it's great to see the juxtaposition of
technologies. It makes me wish I hadn't missed my expiration of my ham
license (N1QCO).
> At 02:50 AM 5/17/2005, Rob O'Donnell wrote:
>>Is there any way of rejuvenating sealed lead-acid batteries or is it a
>> case of once they fail to hold a charge, they are useless? (And if so,
>> does anybody know a very cheap UK supplier of them?)
If they haven't been treated well, IE charged by a cheap, non-smart
charger or allowed to sit uncharged for long periods or othewise abused,
or if they're just plain worn out, there's really no hope for them. Sorry.
Stories abound about using capacitor banks discharged through them to
rejuvinate them, but that's all pretty much folklore with relatively
little basis in fact, except for an extremely limited range of
circumstances.
***Dispose of them properly*** they contain lead, a toxic metal. In the
US, drag them over to Batteries Plus and just drop them off, free of
charge, no questions asked, and they will be recycled properly. In the
UK...???
> And due to my own packrat tendencies, I have a large pile of dead UPSes
> of various sizes, along with an item on my very long to-do list
> that says "buy replacement lead-acid batteries." Any recommendations
> for a supplier in the USA?
There's a variety of sources, but the best deal so far is a corporate
account at Batteries plus. I pay a few bucks more for some types, much
less for more popular 12v UPS batteries, and save overall.
That's my .015 euro.
de N9QQB
>
>Subject: Re: 2 UPS/Alarm batteries available
> From: "Rob O'Donnell" <classiccmp.org at irrelevant.fsnet.co.uk>
> Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 08:50:43 +0100
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>Is there any way of rejuvenating sealed lead-acid batteries or is it a case
>of once they fail to hold a charge, they are useless? (And if so, does
>anybody know a very cheap UK supplier of them?)
>
>
>Rob
>
For the first question, NO.
The second I can not help with the UK though here they are
cheap. (USA)
One hint, I've used APC UPS's and their software self tests way to often
and kills battteries very fast, to the point of excess.
Allison
>
>Subject: mini versus micro?
> From: Saquinn624 at aol.com
> Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 01:48:51 -0400 (EDT)
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
>One thing that I have been wondering for a while is what the current
>definition of minicomputer is.
>It used to be contrasted with microcomputers, the telling difference being a
>multichip processor implementation versus a single-chip microprocessor [if so,
>are the POWER1 and POWER2 processors
>minicomputer processors?] but now, with microprocessors being used in
>mainframes (and even on-topic mainframes) is this distinction meaningless [i.e.
>should the designation "microcomputer" in its size/power context be replaced with
>something else?] and, if so, does the [whatever micro becomes]/mini/mainframe
>become a question of mass (>700 lbs mainframe, >100 lbs mini, <100 lbs [???]),
>or history (the HP3000 started life as a mini, therefore the spectrum models
>continue as minis . . .), or does the venerable minicomputer cease to exist?
>any other ideas?
>
>Scott Quinn
Minicomputer in my lexicon is any computer that DID NOT start as
a microcomputer chip. Examples: Nova, PDP-8, PDP-11 even VAX.
Those wer picked as in every case there is a Microcomputer implmentation
that came later. In most cases the Micro version is as capable or
more so as a result of developmental maturity.
Second part of that is it stops being a MINICOMPUTER when it's small
enough that a rack is not the standard mounting platform.
So age, type and mass are determining factors. The term mini came from
the '60s when computers started from filling rooms to fitting in
office corners. The concurrent event is skirts got way shorter too,
hence the name.
Allison
Any interesting suggestions?
Best wishes,
Philipp :-)
I used to set up a conversion of typewriter input to visible punches in
the paper tape. For example, a kid would type his name, the punch would
put out his name in 5x7 dot characters. Or a 6x8. They could tear it
off and take it with them.
I used a standard character generator pattern I found in a data book.
Another fun one is to use a mortgage program and have someone give the
inputs from their mortgage payments. Then have them increase the
payment by $20 a month and see the impact. (The extra money goes
against principle so it shortens the pay off time by years.)
Assembly for the visible character, Fortran for the mortgage.
Have fun.
Billy
I have several Silicon Graphics Indigo2 IMPACT workstations (free) with the
following specs
R4400/250SC (2 MB cache)
64-128 MB RAM (I think)
Solid IMPACT graphics (one is dual-head with Extreme)
No disks, but an OS can be made available.
Also have an Indy
R5000SC/150
XL-8 (Newport) graphics
at least 32 MB RAM
Sony PS.
same as above re. disks
Good Dallas units in them when I checked.
Forward to anyone who would be interested
In the Seattle area, but I can be persuaded to ship
I also have a Imperial Hemibuttload of keyboards for them.
-Scott Quinn
Anyone have a schematic for this unit? It is the Z80 version. I'm
scrapping it out but would like to see if I can use the power supply.
I'll pay for a copy of the schematics.
Parts are available if anyone wants them. Just pay postage. All I want
is the chassis and power supply.
All the PCBs are 100 pin and look similiar to S-100. Anyone have more
knowledge of this?
Billy
Later this year (depart 8 Nov 2005) my wife and I will be doing an
around the world trip ex South Australia (we'll be away 71 nights).
Whilst travelling I'd be interested in catching up with any interested
fellow collectors, particularly collectors of TRS80 and genuine IBM
stuff (but I'm not going to discriminate :-)
Our major stops will be Auckland NZ, Recife (its on the east coast of
Brazil), Miami, Memphis, San Francisco, Las Vegas, Ohio (little place
called Lewisburg which I'm told is not to far from Cleveland), New York,
London, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Berlin (and Rostock), Japan (numerous
places) and Hong Kong.
Please contact me off list if you can help.
++++++++++
Kevin Parker
Web Services Consultant
WorkCover Corporation
p: 08 8233 2548
m: 0418 806 166
e: kparker at workcover.com
w: www.workcover.com
++++++++++
************************************************************************
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee only. It may
contain information that is protected by legislated confidentiality
and/or is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you
are prohibited from disseminating, distributing or copying this e-mail.
Any opinion expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be that of the
WorkCover Corporation of South Australia. Although precautions have
been taken, the sender cannot warrant that this e-mail or any files
transmitted with it are free of viruses or any other defect.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
immediately by return e-mail and destroy the original e-mail and any
copies.
************************************************************************
>
>Subject: Re: Moore's Law/Byte magazine
> From: Patrick Finnegan <pat at computer-refuge.org>
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 11:14:54 -0500
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>I've found my copies of Jan - Mar 1988 that have the article. I could
>potentially let someone "borrow" a copy of the article.
>
I'd like to see a copy of that article myself.
Allison
>From: "jim stephens" <jwstephens at msm.umr.edu>
>
---snip---
>
>Without any information about the specifics of Don's situation, let me say
>that my wife and heirs know what my pile is, and who to call when and if
>I predecease her. If you do not or cannot take this step, your pile will face
>uncertain or sad prospects when you go.
>
Hi
I think part of the problem is that it is hard to explain
to another family member what it is that we do. I've tried
to explain to my sister inlaw once but soon gave up. It
was like trying to explain things in a foriegn language that
she didn't know. My guess is that Don may have tried to
relate to his wife what it was he was doing but for something
like this, there wasn't enough common ground to communicate.
Even for a husband and wife, there are things that never
get fully communicated. Each eventually learns to just not
push the issue if it doesn't need immediate action. The
phase " Yes, Dear " comes to mind.
Even if he did explain it to her, she may never have
understood what it was he was doing and how important it
was to him. Without the common ground to discuss such things,
it just doesn't work.
Putting things in a will is just about the best way to
try to deal with such things. Not only that one wishes
things properly handled but it is best to find a trusted
friend that you can put their name in the will so that
the family, through greed or ignorence, can't block your
wishes.
Dwight
> Hmmm ...
>
> void print_arg(int *aryp,size_t n)
> {
> printf("%u",*aryp++);
> while(--n)
> {
> printf(",%u",*aryp++);
> }
> putchar('\n');
> }
But has two calls to printf, with different format
strings. More than doubles the static string space.
Plus two complete printf call frames (bigger code)...
one being used only once.
All in the name of keeping a "structured" image.
I'm guessing this is NOT how you would code this
algorithm if you were programming in assembly
language...
gotos and other such structures are not evil - lack
of understanding of when such constructs are
appropriate (and not appropriate) is the real
problem. "Banning" the constructs just serves to
emphasize that this is not obvious to some people.
Hmmm... we seem to be sailing away from the topics
again!
Regards,
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
>
>Subject: Re: Tandy T100 info
> From: John Hogerhuis <jhoger at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:25:13 -0700
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On 5/16/05, Allison <ajp166 at bellatlantic.net> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, the usual MMU only fairly fine grained. Does any apps make use of
>> that kind of MMU and space?
>>
>
>Not yet, this is a new thing, and there's no software to take
>advantage of the full potential yet.
Not surprized as even in the S100 Z80 world where MMU and banking has
been around for a long time it was rarely used for anything but
pseudodisk space.
I've gone as far as do a memory allocation recovery systems for
to get an approach to a virtual OS. Not all the way but close.
In that case the MMU is being used for a scatter/gather
execution space allocator.
>> >Each block in the map can be marked read-only so that if you are
>> >emulating ROM with RAM or flash you get a perfect emulation, i.e. any
>> >writes against ROM don't get applied.
>>
>> Handy!
>>
>
>Handy and required... some vintage ROMs do some funny stuff writing
>against ROM for efficiency believe that it won't have any effect. But
>writing against RAM has an effect, and against flash can lock up the
>flash since it can trigger its state machine.
;) thats a bad thing! I know. :-P
>> Now I understand what it is and the basic logic inside. Like many MMU
>> based 8bitters the addition of large ram is usually to emulate disk.
>> I'm curious to see if any actually do swaping or overlay so the app
>> can access a larger space or larger data. The reason for that is
>> most cases that is rare or not even done.
>>
>
>Well the M100 uses a RAM based file system. Our MMU is a new thing, so
>any use made of it beyond emulating multiple M100 fast-switch maps
>will be by new software. In particular I'm planning a management
Not surprized for reasons stated.
>program that can set up maps and burn new ROMs to flash or set them up
>in RAM. But the spec will be freely available so user programs can get
>direct access to extended RAM. All you need to do is CLEAR enough
>space to get a 1K window and a BASIC program can start PEEKing and
>POKEing extended RAM without too much trouble. That's why we have such
>a fine-grain MMU block size.
I'm still getting used to the M100s applications and space usage.
It's a bit foreign to a CP/M, OS/8, RT-11, VMS user like myself.
I'e sone real time stuff and systems stuff for myself that used
mapped ram and rom to get around the latency of disks (even IDE).
I'll have to look more at all this. However, step one is to
get the M100 I have up to 32k ram. Then I'll look at how secondary
rom socket space is used. I'd like a configuration that also has
ram at 0000h and maybe a OS in it. I've considered getting some
larger F-Rams too. All in time.
Allison
>There's one extra local variable (char *t) which is a pointer: hardly
>expensive by any metric. If you prefer, move the i initializer inside the
>for loop construct. Same difference.
>The loop uses the same number of conditionals as any other example so far
>(including yours, which doesn't work ;)
I guess you missed my original solution - look back a few messages,
it uses only one conditional, and only one local variable, has no
superflous assignments, nor goto's.
The "clever" one in my last message was an illustation, not my
solution.
>> - In the last iteration of the loop you are stuffing the address
>> value of the constant string "%u" into the for conditional
>> (granted in any reasonable implementation this will be non-zero
>> and will evaluate to TRUE, however it seems a bit odd and not
>> completely necessary to the logic of the program).
>
>Your analysis somewhat (misses the point|is non-sequitur). The unary
>construct is the entire reason this works.
It still stuffs an address into a conditional - it works, but it's
not pretty, nowhere near the goal of "structured" (remember structured
... this is a song about structured) and not something I would ever
consider using in production code.
>> - You are reading only the first element of the array, although
>> you are adding an increasing offset to it for each iteration of
>> the loop.
>
>Perhaps this is an issue of precedence and compiler implementation, but
>the way it works (at least under gcc) is as I suspected, which is that
>counter i gets incremented after first being added to aryp. So it in fact
>iterates the entire array from start to end.
* is higher precedence than '+' (K&R page 49 - I know this from memory -
scary). If your compiler does the '+' first, it's broken.
>You had card punches? We had to cut holes into ours with exacto knives.
Actually, when I last visited the Your university museum, the Curator
showed me some "manual" card punches - little steel blocks with holes
and a pin punch!
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
I have two very nice racks available for immediate hauling. I can only
keep them for about a week to ten days until I must take them to the
scrapyard.
One is a DEC SF-200, in nice shape, both doors, with a 230V line power
converter thingy (sorry, forgot the proper name at the moment).
The other is a nice 7' tall DELL rack. It's very glamourous looking (all
black, nice shiny DELL emblem on the front) however it's missing it's
sides :( Otherwise, a very nice, solid, durable rack, though not quite
deep enough for DEC equipment.
Both of these are at my office in Livermore, California, sitting outside
exposed for a current lack of space indoors. They've been rained on
several times, but both are in fine shape, cleanable, no rust, etc. It's
still raining over in my neck of the woods (it shouldn't be but it is) and
there's more forecast in the coming days. However, it is also hot, and
the rain spells are short, so they dry out quickly. Bottom line, that's
not the limiting factor here, but my patience to leave them outside with
the rest of the crap that needs hauling to the scrapyard is.
Preference to local pickups. Will ship, but you'd better be prepared to
handle ALL shipping details and pay me for my time to put it on a pallet
and wrap it in cardboard (cardboard and pallet are free, my time is not,
and I'm not cheap).
Off-list enquiries please (on-list will be expunged with prejudice).
;)
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
>> When I was a gaffer, we had to carry our card decks
>> uphill both ways to the card punch!
> You had card punches? We had to cut holes into ours
> with exacto knives.
Exacto knives? We could only dream of having knives, we
had to chew the holes in ours.
Monty.
.
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - want a free and easy way to contact your friends online? http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>> for(i=0; i < n; ++i)
>> printf("%u%s", aryp[i], ","+(i >= n));
>
>Um, you're right, but yours does ;)
>
>(Can you spot the error? ;)
Yup - should be ((i+1) >= n)
I told you this was getting silly!
Cheers,
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
>>I finally got around to replacing the batteries on my TRS-80 PC-1 and
>>noticed that the intervening years have not been kind to the LCD
>>screen. It appears that there is liquid crystal leaking out under the
>>polarizing screen, creating what looks like black smudges on the
>>display.
> I don't think there's anything you can do about them. I noticed that all
>the PC-1s that I saw were developing that problem and that was probably
>over ten years ago. Radio Shack Quality!
Both of my PC-1's have it - but they still work!
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
>I trump thee collectively:
>
>void print_arg(int *aryp, size_t n)
>{
>
> char *t="%u,";
> int i=0;
>
> for (;(i==n-1 ? t="%u" : i<n);) printf(t, *aryp + i++);
>
> putchar('\n');
>
>}
>
>A little ugly (the compiler complains about the type mismatch in the unary
>expression) but otherwise it works without caveats (that I know of ;)
>
>I suspect someone might bum it down further...no more precious time to
>expend on this useless pursuit ;)
I'm a little confused about the definition of "trump" when used in
this case:
- You have returned to an excess of local variables, and the
extra assignment - although you have used a (more expensive)
conditional to defer it until the last iteration.
- You have returned to TWO conditionals, although you have
creatively moved them both into the for statement.
- In the last iteration of the loop you are stuffing the address
value of the constant string "%u" into the for conditional
(granted in any reasonable implementation this will be non-zero
and will evaluate to TRUE, however it seems a bit odd and not
completely necessary to the logic of the program).
- You are reading only the first element of the array, although
you are adding an increasing offset to it for each iteration of
the loop.
This really is getting silly.
So... Seen any good old computers lately?
How about them Altairs - ain't they something?
When I was a gaffer, we had to carry our card decks
uphill both ways to the card punch!
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
>> You could of course do something "clever" to make the
>> extra conditional harder to see like:
>>
>> for(i=0; i < n; ++i)
>> printf("%u%s", aryp[i], ","+(i >= n));
>
>This is why I really don't like C much :-) (Although I do insist on
>using it a lot of late...)
I'm guessing your not a big APL fan?
Regards,
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
I just came across an original HP box which says HP64000 release 3203.
It contains some manuals/docs and 2 tapes. Does anyone know what this is or
what it is for ?
If anybody wants it, its available, just make me an offer of some sort.
Ow its from 1992 btw.
Stefan.
-------------------------------------------------------
http://www.oldcomputercollection.com
Various messages compined into one - quotes are not all from the
same person(s).
>Straighten up and get serious. You used twice as much printf as
>everybody else. Have you ever seen the setup for a printf call in
>assembler?
>I wonder if even the compiler can save you from this shameless bit of excess.
Unlikely - as there are two different format strings.
>... the wrong answer being to dump out each array element followed by a
>comma, then output ^H as the final step in the function ;-)
Works poorly on hardcopy devices :-)
>Real Programmers would presumably use putc exclusively in favour of the
>more computationally expensive printf...
Naw, printf() is a simple and versatile tool, and since the code is only
linked once it's usually worth it as it's handy "all over" - besides,
printf() doesn't have to be huge - here is my CSTATS output for my integer-
only printf format routine (which is a single function that does not call
ANY other functions - all tests and conversions are internal):
Characters:
in file(s) : 2263
in comments : 733
whitespace : 620
significant : 910
Lines:
in file(s) : 97
blank/comment: 23
significant : 74
Cism's:
'{'s : 13
'}'s : 13
';'s : 47
comments : 20
74 lines and 47 statements (including variable declarations) in 13 blocks.
This is an integer-only printf() formatter (real programmers don't use FP)
written in pure C which supports the following free form types:
%c (character)
%s (string)
%d (signed decimal)
%u (unsigned decimal)
%x (hexidecimal)
%o (octal)
%b (binary)
%% (single '%')
And formatting of any of the above types in the form:
%5x <= 5 character, right justify, space fill
%05x <= 5 character, right justify, zero fill
%-5x <= 5 character, left justify, space fill
%-05x <= 5 character, left justify, zero fill (kinds useless :-)
[and yes, other format widths besides 5 are supported!]
- Codesize compiled from C for the 8086 (my Micro-C) is 688 bytes.
- Code size of comparable routine hand crafted in assembly language
for my 8051 compiler library is 437 bytes (although this adds a
new %i for strings in internal memory).
- Code size for the C-FLEA (a virtual processor I developed which is
an optimized C target) is 335 bytes.
Just because winbloat leads us to expect multi-megabyte executables and
massive libraries - it duzn't has to be so!
>> void print_ary (int *aryp, int n)
>> {
>> int i;
>> for (i=0; i<n; aryp++, i++)
>> {
>> if (i>0)
>> printf (", ");
>> printf ("%u", *aryp);
>> }
>> printf ("\n");
>> }
>
>Um, if you're anal like me, you don't want to print a comma after the last
>value, so:
>
>...
> printf ("%u", *aryp);
> if (i<n) printf (", ");
Um, the original code won't print a comma after the last value.
You could of course do something "clever" to make the
extra conditional harder to see like:
for(i=0; i < n; ++i)
printf("%u%s", aryp[i], ","+(i >= n));
This is getting silly!
Regards,
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
I finally got around to replacing the batteries on my TRS-80 PC-1 and
noticed that the intervening years have not been kind to the LCD
screen. It appears that there is liquid crystal leaking out under the
polarizing screen, creating what looks like black smudges on the
display.
I dug my less scratched up version out of storage and found the same
thing, only worse. I doubt these LCD panels are still in production.
Anyone have any ideas that might be able to alleviate the problem?
Eric
Hi Steve,
GPIB / HPIB FAQ sounds like a good idea ..
>* Bus Analyzers - IE HP59401A
If you're going to include HPIB bus analyzers in your FAQ it would be worth
looking at the National Instruments PCI-GPIB+ card. This card can be
configured as a bus analyser that captures all HPIB messages (control, data
and status) onto a controller PC with the size of the log-file limited only
by available disk space.
I've found it to be a lot more useful than the more commonly available HP
59401A analyser.
If you need any further info on this card for your FAQ then please feel free
to drop me an e-mail.
Cheers
Peter
> Since I don't beleive in using
> old systems for the recovery of old data,
Why?
(I feel the opposite, as what better system to get the data than the
system it
was designed for? I'd like to hear your opinion.)
--
Almost all of the data that I recover is done at the physical media
level. This is done either with analog to digital converters or modern
digital data separators which have better recovery characteristics than
the originals. The main reason for wanting to do this is to preserve all
of the original bit streams and error checking information.
In the case of magentic tape, it is possible to recover data from very
old tapes using modern magnetorestrictive head technology that would be
impossible to recover using the original heads, since MR heads require
MUCH less contact pressure and are much more sensitive than the originals.
While it may be practical to maintain microcomputers for this purpose
for newer media, the types of data I have been trying to recover
(mainframes and older minis) is impractical, either because the machines
no longer exist, cannot be kept running given the tradeoff of machine
ontime vs the time needed to keep it running, or that the reliablity of
the data from older controllers is worse than can be obtained from
direct low-level data aquisition.
There is also the problem of file transation and transfer even if you
can get the bits read on the original system.
The problem with using these techniques is it requires detailed
knowledge of how the data was written and information on things like
file formats. This is why there is a strong bias towards this sort of
information on bitsavers (in addition to the fact that I've discovered
this information is REALLY hard to find for pre-minicomputer systems).
This is also information that is VERY useful to people trying to write
simulators.
Scott wrote in response to:
"I absolutely concur with John's conclusion:
Academia, the elites or otherwise, saw the 'horrors' of goto and declared it
an evil that was to be expunged from any language. The toolbox was
diminished by this action in my humble opinion. Yet for us QBasic guys we
still employ it. Boy does it get one out of a jam. Mimics real life doesn't
it?"
"I regard 'goto as the programming equivalent of the adjustable spanner.
There are often better tools to use, using it wrongly can get you into real
trouble, but it's rare to find a hacker who's not used it (just as mo
hardware guy will use an adjustable spanner when there are better tools
available, but I don't know of a serious hardware hacker who doesn't have
one in the toolbox...)
-tony "
Heck, I even have an adjustable box-end wrench. *ducks*
The folks who deplore GOTO are the 'Structured Programming' folks. Who have
a lot of flavors and attempts at 'structured programming' behind
them now, and keep chugging along. It's about sociable coding, as opposed
to asocial 'solitary' coding. Which is important. But as an
over-experienced Assembly Language programmer, I got into trouble in my
'Intro to C' course because I was in the habit of writing my own functions
instead of using The Standard Library.
-scott
I'm not sure whether programming is done to benefit people or to make
machines work better. Since computers are seldom user-friendly, they were'nt
but now are easier to use thanks to GUIs,
we have to ask then was is programming for? I remember programming in a
few-line BASICs, well even further back - soldering a kit and program in
strict machine-coding - and I wanted the computer to do certain tasks. I'm
not sure these tasks were of any particular benefit done on an expensive
early computer and they were that! I could do the same thing with pen &
paper or a calculator, not spend time writing a few lines of code and hope I
didn't make a mistake!!! The calculator was programmed to work efficiently
and little or no programming was needed by me to make it work. Social coding
here is effective in the sense it solves a problem for me. The machine works
in an excellent fashion as a solitary instrument. In this case it benefits
me. Is this the true value of programming and using a 'goto' to get out of a
jam so to speak can be very effective. Works in real life, particularly
useful around Belgian horses. Can this be wrong?
Computing forever!
Murray
> Ok Al, about where do you rate yourself.
Tough question.. I have WAAAAAY too much stuff right now. I made the
decision about five years ago to get rid of all of my paper by scanning
it and donating it to the CHM. The first part mostly happened, but getting
rid of the paper didn't and now I have 10x the paper that I did five years
ago.
I have decided to dispose of a LOT of what I currently have. There is one
meta project, the preservation of documentation and software that has to
guide what I keep and what I get rid of. Since I don't beleive in using
old systems for the recovery of old data, many of the machines I have could
go.
The physical mechanisms that are necessary (like disc and tape drives) will
stay, interfaced to more modern harware.
>
>Subject: Re: Tandy T100 info
> From: John Hogerhuis <jhoger at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 13:59:50 -0700
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>The basic idea is that Remem implements in CPLD a memory management
>unit dividing the 64K address space into 64 1K blocks (actually more
>than that since the option ROM is emulated). So you can map any 1K
>block from anywhere in RAM or flash into the 64K address space any way
>you like.
Ok, the usual MMU only fairly fine grained. Does any apps make use of
that kind of MMU and space?
>For compatibility it also emulates a 256K "Rampac" which is a vintage
>external device that hooks to the I/O bus port on a T102.
unfamiliar.
>There are multiple MMU maps selectable via an I/O instruction for
>fast-switching of virtual Model 100 environments. So for example you
>can have one map with a native Forth-in-ROM, and a couple of maps with
>the standard ROM but distinct RAM portions (the latter much like the
>"banks" in a T200 or NEC 8300 laptop)
Ok, I've done this on other systems and S100.
>Each block in the map can be marked read-only so that if you are
>emulating ROM with RAM or flash you get a perfect emulation, i.e. any
>writes against ROM don't get applied.
Handy!
Now I understand what it is and the basic logic inside. Like many MMU
based 8bitters the addition of large ram is usually to emulate disk.
I'm curious to see if any actually do swaping or overlay so the app
can access a larger space or larger data. The reason for that is
most cases that is rare or not even done.
Allison
>
>Subject: Re: Tandy T100 info
> From: John Hogerhuis <jhoger at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 12:54:39 -0700
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On 5/16/05, Allison <ajp166 at bellatlantic.net> wrote:
>
>> >To see "the next level" of Model 100 mod, check this out:
>> >
>> >http://bitchin100.com/remem_project.htm
>> >
>> >2 Meg RAM and 4 Megs Flash ROM....
>> >
>>
>> That is a pretty site, shame behind all the pretty pictures it's a
>> grand set of 404s. None of the tech docs are there.
>>
>
>I run Bitchin100.com. I've been pushing Steve to get me a new set of
>documents, he moved everything around on his site that I had linked
>to.
thats understandable, just make the links "under construction" then
as we then know something is happening rather than the site appearing
abandoned.
>Right now he's deep into testing the board, so the stale data sheet
>links are indicative of nothing more than priority on getting working
>prototypes to the software developers (including me).
>
>Maybe tonight I'll get rid of the dead links.
thanks.
>In any event the important specs are summarized there on the left hand column.
I read them bit there are some ???? as to how it integrates and
is applied.
Allison
I think the places that make custom die cut decals
http://www.decaljunky.com/ may also be a good place to
make frontpanel labels, they peel off with no
background (looks like they were painted on).
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>Subject: Re: Tandy T100 info
> From: Roger Merchberger <zmerch at 30below.com>
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 13:45:31 -0400
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>Rumor has it that Allison may have mentioned these words:
>
>>I just aquired a Tandy T100, really fun little machine.
>>one of the first steps is to exten the ram (24k more is possible)
>
>Zip on over to my Model 100 listserve - you don't have to be subbed to post
>(but please note in your post if you're not subbed, so folks know to cc:
>you privately) - there's almost 200 subscribers there... ;-)
That may be handy.
>To see "the next level" of Model 100 mod, check this out:
>
>http://bitchin100.com/remem_project.htm
>
>2 Meg RAM and 4 Megs Flash ROM....
>
That is a pretty site, shame behind all the pretty pictures it's a
grand set of 404s. None of the tech docs are there.
>I only have the schematic for the 200 in paper form, and it's "buried" yet
>-- but the manuals are available in PDF form here:
>
>http://www.club100.org/library/libdoc.html
This location I'd not looked at yet. The manual from there is readable
and printable (and HUGE!).
>If you need parts, I or someone else on the list can get you parts...
>;-)
I have plenty of 8kx8 and 256kx8s, nice fast CMOS from old
386 and 486 cache memories. those will be the base of the first
upgrade (24k more ram for full 32k). The second will be a overlay
ram for the lower 32k (for those times when I want a full ram system).
Thanks!
Allison
Hello,
This is my first post on the list -- greetings! I have filled a VAXstation
4000/60 with four megabyte simms, that I am running vms on as a hobbyist
home server... unfortunately this limits me to 32 meg, and about to add
Pathworks will certainly tip her over the edge.
I was wondering if anyone had any of the 16 megabyte sticks lying around--
part number printed on the board I think is 54-19103-CA , sold in packs of
one or two as MS44-CA / MS44-DA respectively. Various other models of the
series I believe use them, though not the /96.
I would be happy to pay for shipping from anywhere; I am in (old) England.
Swap for some four megabyte modules is also possible, if someone needs them
instead! Alternatively, any pointers as to where would be good to look would
be gratefully received.
Cheers,
--
Tom Garcia | tgarcia at hivemind.org
> From: Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
> Subject: Today's garage sale findings
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> Speaking of
> which, does anyone know if they manufacture an adhesive-backed
> _plastic_ sheet that's meant to go through printers? I know I can
> pick up an 8.5"x11" paper label from any office supply place. I am
>
3M used to make a product that was a thin alunimum with a photo emulsion
on it. It worked like a blue print. Make your master on vellim, print
it using a blue print machine and develop it with ammonia.
I made many very professional looking front panels with this technique.
The 3M salesman would sell it by the sheet fairly cheap ( about
$1/square foot).
It was mounted by peeling off the back to reveal a contact glue. You
never got it off again once it was stuck on metal.
What I liked about this method was that you could cover up misdrilled
holes. The alunimum was think enough that it could cover up unused
holes with no denting. Great for covering up sloppy work.
Billy
I've been e-mailing Jim for a couple of months and haven't gotten a
reply. I found a phone number for him and tried it and found that now it
belongs to someone else. The last message that I could find from him was in
May 2003. Anybody know what's happened to him?
Joe
I've an original (excellent condition) DEC KW11-P Programmable Real-time Clock manual. The cover is intact. The doc is print-sized.
Anyone interested? Make me an offer.
Regards,
Darren Peterson
Brad Parker <brad at heeltoe.com> wrote:
> When the cable is in properly (I presume), the green led is on and the
> 'in use' just keeps flashing.
It is not supposed to keep flashing, when the drive is idle with no tape
in (like after successful power-up) the green LED should be the only one
on. It should also make a beep.
> Occationally it makes little scraping
> noises like it's trying to load the tape.
> [...]
> Is this drive dead/broken perhaps?
I would say so.
MS
I just aquired a Tandy T100, really fun little machine.
one of the first steps is to exten the ram (24k more is possible)
However..
The manual I have the schematic is nth generation and not very readable.
I'm looking for a copy of the T100 (26-3801) Schematic as the text
of the manual I ahve is readable.
Allison
I have little/no experience with tk50/tk70 and I transplanted a tk70
into a mv4000 and I'm curious about 'normal operation'
When it powers up the 3 leds all come on and then the write prot goes
out, the "in use" starts flashing and the 'handle' led (green) stays on.
I notice that if the i/o connector is in backward all 3 leds will flash
and the handle led will never come on.
When the cable is in properly (I presume), the green led is on and the
'in use' just keeps flashing. Occationally it makes little scraping
noises like it's trying to load the tape.
I did try and load a tape and found it sucked the tape in but refused to
unload it. The in-use light just flashed and flashed. I found I had to
angle the tape it a bit to get the interlock to release so I could
insert the cart.
Is this drive dead/broken perhaps?
-brad
Something that might be considered is to start the "Don Maslin Bootdisk
Software Archive" since this might be a way of addressing the needs of
everyone. Perhaps Winnie also needs to understand that *many* people
have contributed to the archive and it is *very* unlikely that Don would
have wanted "his" archive to become unavailble to the community he
supported.
>
> However, that all being said I am of the opinion after carefully reading all
> the posts on this topic that I've seen... that Winnie has no intention
> whatsoever to let go of the documentation and/or software. One could imagine
> she needs to hold on to it as something tangible of Don. One could imagine
> that based on the way some things were phrased, that she is under the
> (false) impression it is worth a kings ransom in real dollars and is holding
> off disposition because she's frantically searching for an appraiser to tell
> her what she wants to hear. I'm not making judgements here, just pondering
> the technical possibilities.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jay West
>
>
>From: "Al Kossow" <aek at spies.com>
>
> > A collector collects. A packrat accumulates.
> >
>
>Collect and accumulate are synonyms.
>
>--
>
>"Collect" in this context implies some order and method to the aquisition.
>
>Being a packrat is to gather things randomly, then to hoard what has
>been gathered.
>
Ok Al, about where do you rate yourself. I'm about 60% packrat and
40% collector.
Dwight
Just a quick note that the VCF/Midwest 1.0 date is getting pushed back
to Saturday, July 30th. It'll start with speakers at 10am, and have
exhibits open from 12pm until 5pm. As a reminder, the location is at
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
More details are up at:
http://computer-refuge.org/vcfmw
If you're interested in attending, being a speaker, or exhibiting,
please drop me an email at vcfmw at computer-refuge.org
Pat
--
Purdue University Research Computing --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
>>September and October 1985
>
>Nope that is the SB180 I have those. I'm also looking for the BCC180
>info and the BCC is not the SB.
I found a couple of references via Google that suggest that the BCC180
was covered by several articals in 1988 - unfortunately I have very
little 1988 byte - but this info may help someone else find it.
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
I reviewed the email thread about this yesterday, but wanted to give it a
little thought before replying.
First, I'd be happy to contact Winnie - possibly to try and give her a 3rd
person view of the situation so that she understands that Don's software &
docs - while not "valuable", is "valuable". As an option, I could pursue
trying to make arrangements to obtain it - perhaps there's some personality
issue between her and Vince (this is NOT a slam against Vince at all -
sometimes personalities just don't mesh, prior perceptions change, etc.).
However, that all being said I am of the opinion after carefully reading all
the posts on this topic that I've seen... that Winnie has no intention
whatsoever to let go of the documentation and/or software. One could imagine
she needs to hold on to it as something tangible of Don. One could imagine
that based on the way some things were phrased, that she is under the
(false) impression it is worth a kings ransom in real dollars and is holding
off disposition because she's frantically searching for an appraiser to tell
her what she wants to hear. I'm not making judgements here, just pondering
the technical possibilities.
I've seen the posts talking about having a museum get in contact with her.
Perhaps this would be a good thing, but again my own impression is that if a
museum calls, most people are likely to smell $$$.
So if Vince would like me to contact her, I'd be happy to - I'm pretty good
at that kind of discussion actually. My own opinion so far though is that
Vince is the best person to still pursue this, and getting another person(s)
directly involved with Winnie will only hurt, not help. Not to mention I
suspect she won't let it go anyway, at least until she hears from several
appraisers. Perhaps I could draft a letter (from ClassicCMP) explaining some
things she should consider, get the letter to Vince, and have him deliver
it. That way he's still in front, but perhaps some additional thoughts to
her may help Vince as "ammunition" or at the least give Winnie reason to
thing that Vince's ideas/comments aren't "just his", and a lot of people
feel the same way.
With regards to starting an S100/CPM repository... well... someone should
really look at all the Heathkit stuff I got. There's a room full of CPM
stuff, including several cases (case being about 1.5 foot by 3 foot) of 8"
floppies, cases of 5.25 hard sector floppies, and pretty much every piece of
software and newsletter ever released for the heathkit CPM boxes. I do not
have time to do that. But, I strongly suspect what I have would be a good
start on a CPM archive.
And of course, the ClassicCmp server exists not only to run the mailing
list, but to house documentation and software for vintage systems. There's
quite a few vintage software repositories on the ClassicCmp server (the
newest one is the TRS-80 archives) including the swtpc archives,
retroarchive, rainbow archives, bygone, and of course, a full mirror of the
#1 classic site - bitsavers.org. I believe there's about 70gb free on the
server archive drives (and enough money in the kitty still from donations to
add more disk if need be), so if a CPM/S100 repository is started, feel free
to host it there. The ClassicCmp server is well connected and well cared for
so it's a safe spot. Simply put, I'm offering to host a CPM/S100 archive
"Don's, or a new one", at no charge, forever.
Kind regards,
Jay West
At 10:57 PM 5/15/2005, Randy McLaughlin wrote:
>One group I am a member of are dealing with the Regents of UCSD, because of these talks UCSD is now posting on one of their sites the source code to some of the psystem. I am unsure if it is OK to post on other websites but the general consensus is that it was developed with public funds in a public school. Right now I have most of I.4 and I.5 sources and I am waiting for one member to send me printouts of version II source to scan and post. I have binaries for a variety of computers.
Which group is this? Which web site?
Ten years ago or so, I tried to talk to the Regents about
licensing or releasing the license, but got nowhere.
- John
Hi, ClassicCMP'rs -- I included the list in a "BCC" email but that didn't
seem to go through -- so I'm resending the message below...
-- Evan (just ignore if you get two copies... Sorry about that...)
================================================
Hello friends, colleagues, collectors, and people I've interviewed...
After about four years of work, I've finally completed the vast majority of
my PDA history research. So if you're getting this email, it means we've
communicated at some point in the recent past. Or else I just thought
you're someone who might find this research interesting.
It's all online at http://www.snarc.net/pda/pda-treatise.htm -- it is
approximately 10,000 words of nerdiness.
There will be changes. Inevitably some of you will find typos and suggest
corrections, which is the whole reason I'm posting this now at all.
FYI to the collecting community -- the majority of this draft was already
read over by Bruce Damer, Sellam Ismail, Erik Klein, and Michael Nadeau.
Hopefully they caught any blatant mistakes of mine...
All of the photographs are used with permission and all are linked back to
the original sources. The link to the story "Thank you, Beep" is used with
HP's permission.
The one thing not yet included is the massive bibliography. I'm working on
it as fast as I can.
Rest assured, the research isn't just from reading a bunch of random,
unproven web pages. There is a reason this took four years: every fact is
double- or triple-sourced. The majority of the facts here came from
personal interviews that I conducted with the first-person sources, as well
as from books, news articles, patent research, etc.
Please forward to anyone and everyone.
Please do NOT go copying stuff without asking. :)
Finally, whatever I wrote here (with the exception of typos, etc.) overrules
anything I said or wrote before. :)
-----------------------------------------
Evan Koblentz's personal homepage: http://www.snarc.net Also see
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/midatlanticretro/
*** Tell your friends about the (free!) Computer Collector Newsletter
- 700 readers and no spam / Publishes every Monday / Write for us!
- Mainframes to videogames, hardware and software, we cover it all
- W: http://news.computercollector.com E: news at computercollector.com
Does anyone know if the Intel cash offer for a copy of the Byte magazine
discussing Moore's Law is still good? In talking with friends here I
found out that I know many of the editors and journalists who worked for
the early computer magazines, including Byte. I'm told I can find about
any edition I desire from this crowd if I ask. I'm not going to try and
rip off friends, but they were interested when I mentioned it.
I also found out I know the staff of Wayne Green's magazine empire
(mostly Ham Radio stuff).
If someone can just make a comittment on this, arrangements can then be
made - it's the complete lack of any interest that's driving it's
disposition currently.
So if someone in interested, at all, in this system - write me please
and let's figure it out... I don't want to scrap the old girl any more
than you guys do. If we know that it's got a home, then the 'time element'
can be adjusted to fit your schedules.
All somebody has to say is "Yes, I want the DPS-6." and then we can
contrive wild schemes to get it transported - as long as that is the case,
then the 'execution' can be stayed.
Cheers
John
Well me and a few other folks recently "rescued" a technical manual for
the PC-8201A from Ebay. It has lots of details useful to a programmer
writing information for this machine. 257 pages.
Chapter 15 is dedicated to hardware information.
Howver, it starts with the sentence "Refer to another technical manual
about the detail specion of PC-8201A's hardware. That manual has already
been by NECHE, Chicago. Please contact with them. In this r, only most
important data is listed up."
Does anyone have a copy of the hardware tech ref? It would be useful to
us in the remem project http://bitchin100.com/remem_project.html
Also any such manuals about the 8300, 8500, and Starlet would be
interesting to me as well.
I've tried to talk to NEC directly in the past, but they say clearly
that they "have no information on these antiques." Nice sense of
history...
Thanks!
-- John.
Hello friends, colleagues, collectors, and people I've interviewed...
After about four years of work, I've finally completed the vast majority of
my PDA history research. So if you're getting this email, it means we've
communicated at some point in the recent past. Or else I just thought
you're someone who might find this research interesting.
It's all online at http://www.snarc.net/pda/pda-treatise.htm -- it is
approximately 10,000 words of nerdiness.
There will be changes. Inevitably some of you will find typos and suggest
corrections, which is the whole reason I'm posting this now at all.
FYI to the collecting community -- the majority of this draft was already
read over by Bruce Damer, Sellam Ismail, Erik Klein, and Michael Nadeau.
Hopefully they caught any blatant mistakes of mine...
All of the photographs are used with permission and all are linked back to
the original sources. The link to the story "Thank you, Beep" is used with
HP's permission.
The one thing not yet included is the massive bibliography. I'm working on
it as fast as I can.
Rest assured, the research isn't just from reading a bunch of random,
unproven web pages. There is a reason this took four years: every fact is
double- or triple-sourced. The majority of the facts here came from
personal interviews that I conducted with the first-person sources, as well
as from books, news articles, patent research, etc.
Please forward to anyone and everyone.
Please do NOT go copying stuff without asking. :)
Finally, whatever I wrote here (with the exception of typos, etc.) overrules
anything I said or wrote before. :)
-----------------------------------------
Evan Koblentz's personal homepage: http://www.snarc.net
Also see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/midatlanticretro/
*** Tell your friends about the (free!) Computer Collector Newsletter
- 700 readers and no spam / Publishes every Monday / Write for us!
- Mainframes to videogames, hardware and software, we cover it all
- W: http://news.computercollector.com E: news at computercollector.com
Someone wrote me:
> Do you really know what you're saying about Don?
> I mean, had you been to his house?
YIPES! TERRIBLE EDIT! MY FAULT! CRINGING APOLOGY!
I was made to realize I implied that somehow Don's collection fell
on him ("This is essentially what Don did...") A terrible edit on
my part.
What I meant to say was Don apparently carefully collected a huge
amount of stuff, and when he died, essentially arranged to have it
disposed of poorly, ala the train guy.
Looking at my original posting, it's a botch job edit. My sincere
apologies to anyone hurt by it.
tomj
> A collector collects. A packrat accumulates.
>
Collect and accumulate are synonyms.
--
"Collect" in this context implies some order and method to the aquisition.
Being a packrat is to gather things randomly, then to hoard what has
been gathered.
>
>Subject: Re: Tandy T100 info
> From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 22:11:43 +0100 (BST)
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
>>
>>
>> I just aquired a Tandy T100, really fun little machine.
>> one of the first steps is to exten the ram (24k more is possible)
>
>>From what I remember, the original RAM consisted of little ceramic
>substrates with 4 off 2K*8 static RAMs soldered to them. There were
>separate chip select pins for each RAM, all the address decoding was on
>the mainboard.
Yep and the ceramic carried 4x 5118 2kx8 parts.
>These modules were 0.7" (I think) wide. But it's possible, with a bit of
>careful bending, to get a normal 0.6" wide IC into the socket. You can
>put a nromal 8K*8 static RAM into the top 12 pins of each side of the
>socket (wiith pins 1,2,27,28 of the RAM haning off the end) and most of
>the signals match up. I did this in my Model 100. I then did some
>cut-n-jumper mods to get A11 and A12 straight off the address bus, to
>modify the address decoder appropriately (while still keeping the
>original 8K module in the lowest address possition), and to handle the
>power-down memory protection.
You can but it's ugly. I need a clean schematic that I can read
to manage my hack. I have 8kx8s and 256kx8s aplenty.
>I should still have notes on this, but I was working on a UK model, which
>doesn't have the intenral modem, and where different sections of ICs are
>used in some positions (what I mean here, is that if the US schematic
>shows, say, U6a as a '00 NAND gate in some position in the circuit, then
>the UK version still uses a '00 NAND gate, but it might well be U21c (the
>component references are totally ficticious here!)).
Thats why I need a clean schematic. The one I have you can't read part
or pin numbers on. Signal names are just blobs. A better schematic
and it's easy as pie.
Allison
>Speaking of which, does anyone know if they manufacture an adhesive-backed
>_plastic_ sheet that's meant to go through printers?
>
What I did when I needed to make some durable signs was use transparency
plastic, print a reverse image on them, and then used spray adhesive
to glue them down. The reverse printing lets you glue them printed side
down so the plastic protects the printing.
I picked up an HP 9000/300 w/cabinet this week that I was told works,
but know nothing (yet) about it. The 9000/300 has four modules in it;
98625B, 98550A, HPIB/RS-232/HP-HIL/Audio/other connectors, and an
unmarked module. Included in the cabinet are the HP9144, 9122C, and
92628 w/two 152 MB HDs. I wasn't able to find the RGB monitor but will
pick it up at some point. It also included the keyboard and I do have
the root password. Since I dont' really know much about HP equipment, is
this a worthwhile system to play with?
Sending it to both
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keys" <jrkeys at concentric.net>
To: "cctalk at classiccmp" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 1:38 PM
Subject: Looking for Grant Writer
> Anyone on the list a professional grant writer or have written successful
> grants for operating expenses? I need help big time to keep the museum
> going with some grant funds. If you could share a copy of a successful
> grant for operating funds it would be of great help. Thanks Reply off
> list. John
Anyone on the list a professional grant writer or have written successful
grants for operating expenses? I need help big time to keep the museum
going with some grant funds. If you could share a copy of a successful
grant for operating funds it would be of great help. Thanks Reply off
list. John
FYI...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 17:38:05 +1000
From: Michael Borthwick <holden at netspace.net.au>
Reply-To: VCF-OZ at yahoogroups.com
To: VCF-OZ at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [VCF-OZ] Monash Museum of Computing History
This new museum opened last Wednesday at Monash Caulfield. It's in
Building B and consists of several large display cases showing a
timeline of computing history including displays of minicomputers and
personal computers.
A feature of the museum is the Ferranti Sirius which was Monash's
first computer and the only one for some time. A crane was required
to lift up to the level the museum is on.
The museum would be an ideal location to organise a retro computing
get together later in year, possibly making use of the lecture theatres.
I worked on the project creating a multimedia system in the Ferranti
exhibit which incorporates an LCD TV showing a great internal
promotion film made about the computer by one of its UK purchasers.
Cheers,
Mike
Dear Community,
Free to a good home (knowledgeable collector):
Grinnell GMR270 Image Processing System with documentation
Location: Manhattan
I took some pictures of the Grinnell GMR270 and put them here:
http://134.74.16.64/wwwa/web/hardware/grinnell/
It comes with documentation and the card to interface with a PDP-11 Qbus.
It also comes with an RGB monitor. -kurt
> Nope that is the SB180 I have those. I'm also looking
> for the BCC180 info and the BCC is not the SB.
Ok, try January-March 1988.
Lee.
.
___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
>Wow, if you're that well-connected and can gain access to Byte issues,
>what I need are the Steve Ciarcia articles where he discusses the Z-180
>bases BCC180. I aquired one recently and can order the docs
>(supposedly) from Micromint, but thus far have been too cheap to do so.
>
>(anybody else with info on this single board machine feel free to chime
>in)
Do you know which issues the BCC180 articals are in?
I have a fairly complete collection of early byte from issue#1 (Sep75)
to late 83 and a few issues after that...
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
Is "energydynamics" on this list? I had the bid on the "IBM 1401 Data
Processing System Operator's Guide from the IBM Systems Reference Library.
It is dated March 1965 (major revision) with 151 pages" that ends today and
do not want to get into a bidding war with a list member. Contact me
off-list please.
>
>Subject: Re: Anyone playing with the 8x300
> From: Tom Jennings <tomj at wps.com>
> Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
> To:
> Cc: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On Fri, 13 May 2005, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>
>> I'm looking at an application of the 8X300 by
>> Signetics. This is for a hard disk controller.
>> Is anyone fiddling with simmulators for this processor.
>> It seems like someone was a while back.
>> My current application is on an Olivetti M20 not
>> a TRS80.
>
>Having written code for it (long, long ago though) its a rather
>bizarre and hard to work with chip.
>
>In the real (physical) world it was extremely expensive to write
>code for -- code was in bipolar PROMs. Maybe there were PROM
>simulators but we didn't have one, so it was burn PROM, debug with
>scope. Ouch. Yuck.
Even with a rom emulator it's nasty. I played with one I have
for a while just because. It's whole concept must have originated
to solve a particular problem and was then vended out. It's not
suited at all to general computational use.
For those interested in microprogramming and building their
own computers from the instruction set up...
http://www.homebrewcpu.com/ Follow links around for many differnt CPUs.
http://www.pjrc.com/tech/8051/ide/wesley.html This is an interesting
link as it describes how to hang a IDE disk off a 8255 PPI, worth
looking at.
Allison
Allison
Ethan Dicks asked about label sheets for front panels. In the past you could
get brushed aluminum material with a black coating that was etched away with
printed circuit board chemicals. (Kepro made it but they are going out of
business.) The front panels of SWTPC equipment used this material.
I have not found anyone who does this in small quantizes (One or two units.)
There is a fellow selling Altair front panel labels on eBay, so someone must
do it.
There is a mail order company here is Seattle, Rippedsheets.com, that sells
satin finished aluminum sheet you can run through a inkjet printer. They
sell a bunch of different types of material for inkjet and laser printers.
http://www.rippedsheets.com/inkjet/alumi.htmlhttp://www.rippedsheets.com/inkjet/whitepoly.html
I have not used it because it works with Epson printers (they keep the stock
flat.) I used FrontPanelExpress to make the back panel of my TV Typewriter.
http://www.swtpc.com/mholley/CT_1024/Restore/BackPanel.htm
Back in the 1960s and 1970s I would hand ink my panels with a Leroy
Lettering Set and spray clear Krylon on them. A lot of work but they looked
nice.
Michael Holley
www.swtpc.com/mholley
> From: Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
> Subject: Today's garage sale findings
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> Speaking of
> which, does anyone know if they manufacture an adhesive-backed
> _plastic_ sheet that's meant to go through printers? I know I can
> pick up an 8.5"x11" paper label from any office supply place. I am
>
>
>Subject: Moore's Law/Byte magazine
> From: lee davison <leeedavison at yahoo.co.uk>
> Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 13:52:02 +0100 (BST)
> To: cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>> Do you know which issues the BCC180 articals are in?
>
>September and October 1985
Nope that is the SB180 I have those. I'm also looking for the BCC180
info and the BCC is not the SB.
Allison
> Do you know which issues the BCC180 articals are in?
September and October 1985
Lee.
.
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - want a free and easy way to contact your friends online? http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
I hate to ask an ebay question *here*, but I know some people here use
ebay.
Two different browsers in the past 24 hours have complained about ebay's
server and being unable to match the security protocol (I'm guessing the
SSL negotiation failed to converge)
Has anyone else seen this? Just curious. Any idea what it is?
-brad
Way OT! So sue me.
Apparently the U.S.P.S. has issued some nerd stamps; von Neumann,
Feynman and McClintock (biology) maybe more. Released 4 May I
think.
> There is a mail order company here is Seattle, Rippedsheets.com,
> that sells satin finished aluminum sheet you can run through an
> inkjet printer.
Another method is to print the artwork for the panel out using a
laser printer, not inkjet, and then iron it on. You don't even
need to cover the finished artwork with a clear coat afterwards as
it is quite a tough finish by itself.
See this page ..
http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg/gooteepc.htm
.. about half way down, the component layout for a board has been
done using this method.
I've used draughting film, like tracing paper but heavier, as that
doesn't leave fibers embedded in the toner.
It's an easy method to try out if you have a laser printer and an
iron, best bit is if you do screw it up you can clean it off and try
again, though without solvent cleaning it off can be hard work.
Lee.
.
___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
I took some pictures of the Grinnell GMR270 and put them here:
http://134.74.16.64/wwwa/web/hardware/grinnell/
It comes with documentation and the card to interface with a PDP-11 Qbus.
It also comes with an RGB monitor. -kurt
The Palm isn't quite 10 years old yet, but at least this is cool
hand-held tech...
I have this Rand McNally Navman/Streetfinder GPS that wraps around a
Palm III, and I have lost track of which wall wart charges it up.
There is, of course, no power information molded into the case, and as
of yet, I have been unable to google any specs. Does anyone on the
list happen to have one of these, or even just know what the input
voltage is? I suspect it might be 12V, so that a simple lead can
charge it in the car, but even an examination of the innards hasn't
been revealing. I did run across a variable voltage car adapter with
the right tip set to 9V. Since I don't have many devices with that
particular tip (it's the smallest female coax connector in the
standard Radio Shack kit), I have reason to suspect that I may have
rigged this up some years ago, but I have no direct proof.
I realize I should have scrawled the power info on the back with a
Sharpie, something I will now do, once I put this thing back in
service.
Thanks for any tips,
-ethan
On Sat, 14 May 2005 17:11:52 -0400, Ethan Dicks
<ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> The first project on the drill press is entirely on-topic -
> manufacturing an ABS front panel for my Elf2K
> (http://www.sparetimegizmos.com/Hardware/Elf2K.htm). Speaking of
> which, does anyone know if they manufacture an adhesive-backed
> _plastic_ sheet that's meant to go through printers? I know I can
> pick up an 8.5"x11" paper label from any office supply place. I am
> hoping to find something that will resist water and abrasion (from
> raspy palms) better than paper. I'm also hoping to print some new
> keytops for the switches from an MSI 88/e keyboard (square, flush
> pushbuttons, with a lip and stick-on key labels). I am constructing a
> hex keypad for my Micro/Elf, and potentially for the Elf2K, and I
> don't have A-F to pick from.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -ethan
For prototypes I've had good luck printing on label paper and then
using plastic
laminate over the label. You can buy the laminate at any stationary
store. The
drawback, in my mind, is the glossy finish which detracts esthetically.
For a more professional job I've begged and scrounged laminate from
the local
graphics companies. It comes in various levels of matte and is quite
a bit thicker
than the stationary store product.
Good luck,
CRC
Hi
I'm looking at an application of the 8X300 by
Signetics. This is for a hard disk controller.
Is anyone fiddling with simmulators for this processor.
It seems like someone was a while back.
My current application is on an Olivetti M20 not
a TRS80.
Dwight
I've been contacted by someone who is looking to sell an Altair 8800.
>From the pictures the machine looks pretty nice with a very clean front
panel and no major dings on the chassis.
The seller was able to power it up, deposit values into memory and recover
(examine) those same values back.
The machine comes with the processor card, a RAM card and what appears to
be an IO card installed in what looks like a MITS 18 slot motherboard.
Pictures are available at http://www.vintage-computer.com/KGAltair.shtml
Nothing else is being offered with the computer.
He is asking for "market value" for the machine. It will be shipped from
Memphis TN. Contact me (webmaster at vintage-NOSPAMcomputer.com - removing
the obvious) for his email address, etc.
This is not my machine, I am only passing on the word for the seller. The
usual disclaimers apply.
--
Erik Klein
www.vintage-computer.comwww.vintage-computer.com/vcforum
The Vintage Computer Forum
I had a good buy on ebay. Friday night when I came home from the pub I
must of been looking through ebay and bid ?25 on a 4000/90. I only
remembered doing it when I got an email today to say I'd won. Should
do that more often.
Dan
VCF Gazette
Volume 3, Issue 1
A Newsletter for the Vintage Computer Festival
May 12, 2005
Wow! The VCF Gazette marks a milestone as it rolls in to its 3rd
year. And boy are we late. Later than usual. Very late. In fact,
I'm positive we're later than we've ever been. But my we're busy here
at VCF central. Busier than usual. Very busy. In fact, I'm positive
we're busier than we've ever been. So there you have it. Anyway, on
with the news!
In This Issue:
VCF 7.0 Wrap Up
VCF 7.0 Exhibit Awards and Photo Gallery
VCF Midwest "Lite"
VCF Inaugurates Long-Term Data Archiving Standard: FutureKeep
New VCF Website Features
VCF 7.0 Wrap Up
---------------
The 7th annual Vintage Computer Festival was held on November 6-7
at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California. It's
pretty much cliche at this point to say it was the best event yet,
but it really was! Just ask the 450+ people who attended.
The main feature of the VCF this last time around was the Maze War
Retrospective hosted by Bruce Damer of the DigiBarn. The authors of
Maze War, which is the original "first person shooter" videogame,
discussed the development of the game in the early 1970s. The Maze
War server was ported to the PC by Ken Harrenstien and a Maze War
network of three PCs plus an Imlac PDS-1D (heroically provided by Tom
Uban) was installed at the VCF, allowing attendees to experience the
original thrill of Maze War. The DigiBarn has created a terrific web
page on the DigiBarn website to commemorate this event:
http://www.digibarn.com/history/04-VCF7-MazeWar/index.html
VCF 7.0 also featured the debut screening of BBS: The Documentary, a
multi-part documentary series by Jason Scott of textfiles.com fame.
This documentary traces the history of the computer bulletin board
system, or BBS, from its origins through to its decline brought on
by the rise of the modern Internet. BBS: The Documentary is now
available for order and is highly recommended by the VCF:
http://www.bbsdocumentary.com/
The exhibits at VCF 7.0 continued their evolution towards ever more
elaborate displays, with great skill and creativity being demonstrated
by the exhibitors. The next section contains more information about
the exhibits and a link to the VCF 7.0 Photo Gallery.
We're now looking forward to VCF 8.0 to be held November 5-6. See you
there!
VCF 7.0 Exhibit Awards and Photo Gallery
----------------------------------------
The VCF 7.0 Exhibition featured another stunning set of exhibits. The
creativity of the exhibitors and their dedication to producing
displays that brilliantly showcase their prized computers while
presenting historical and educational background is simply amazing.
For all the hard work that it takes to produce the VCF, the exhibits
alone make it worth the effort.
And so, we are pleased to present the results of the exhibit awards.
Class Awards
First, Second and Third Place ribbons are awarded in each of five
classes that represent major areas of effort in computer collecting
and preservation. Judging is based on a set of criteria including:
appearance, condition, originality, authenticity, completeness, and
functionality. Additional judging takes into account the breadth of
the exhibit by assessing the inclusion of documentation and software.
Note that the exhibit categories were re-worked for VCF 7.0 to reflect
the evolution in subject matter and presentations that has occured
over the past few years.
The classes and class winners of each class respectively are as
follows:
Class A: Microcomputer
1st Place: Bryan Blackburn - Digital Group Computers
2nd Place: Erik Klein - Altair 30th Anniversary
3rd Place: Cameron Kaiser - Secret Weapons of Commodore Live!
Class B: Mini, Multi-User, or Larger Computer
1st Place: Pavl Zachary - PDP 11/40 Running Ancient Unix
2nd Place: Bob Fowler - Alpha Microsystems AM-1000
3rd Place: Stephen Jones - SDF Public Access Unix System
Class C: PDA, Handheld Computer, or Calculator
1st Place: Fritz Schneider - Curta Calculator
2nd Place: Boris Debic - Handheld Math
3rd Place: Hans Franke - Calculators of Mass Destruction
Class D: Home-brew, Kit, or Educational Computer
1st Place: Michael Holley - SWTPC TV Typewriter
2nd Place: Wayne Smith - Tiger Learning Computer
3rd Place: Larry Pezzolo - OSI Superboard
Class E: Re-creation, Emulation, or Contemporary Enhancement
1st Place: Tim Robinson - Differential Analyzer
2nd Place: Tim Robbinson - Computing by Steam
3rd Place: Eric Rothfus - Semi-Virtual Diskette
Class F: Open/Other
1st Place: Wayne Smith - Bandai Pippin
2nd Place: Michael Holley - Southwest Technical Products Corp.
3rd Place: Larry Anderson - Commodore Gold
Special Awards
Special Awards are given to exhibits based on various practical and
esthetic criteria. These accolades are intended to award exhibits
that advance the state of computer collecting and preservation.
Best Presentation: Research
Bryan Blackburn - Digital Group Computers
Best Presentation: Completeness
Erik Klein - Altair 30th Anniversary
Best Presentation: Display
Bryan Blackburn - Digital Group Computers
Best Presentation: Originality
Pavl Zachary - PDP 11/40 Running Ancient Unix
Best Preservation: Restoration
Bryan Blackburn - Digital Group Computers
Best Preservation: Obscurity
Wayne Smith - Bandai Pippin
Best Technology: Analog
Tim Robinson - Differential Analyzer
Best Technology: Non-Electronic
Tim Robinson - Computing by Steam
Best of Show
The Best of Show award determines, based on the best overall score
achieved, which exhibit deserves to be singled out for extra special
recognition.
The VCF 7.0 Best of Show award went to Bryan Blackburn for his Digital
Group Computers. Bryan walked away once again with 5 separate awards
this year, matching his performance from last year. Congratulations,
Bryan!
People's Choice Award
Finally, the People's Choice Award taps into the pulse of the VCF
crowd. Attendees are encouraged to submit a ballot naming their
favorite exhibit of the show. The exhibit that attracted the most
votes this year was Tim Robinson's Differential Analyzer, a functional
differential analyzer modeled after designs by early computing pioneer
Vannevar Bush and built entirely out of Meccano parts.
I would like to thank and congratulate all VCF 7.0 exhibitors for
contributing to yet another excellent exhibition.
We've put together a photo gallery of the exhibits to showcase the
talents and creativity of the VCF exhibitors:
http://www.vintage.org/gallery.php?grouptag=VCF70
We're already looking forward to this year's exhibits. You might want
to consider joining in the fun!
VCF Midwest "Lite"
------------------
The VCF is introducing the new concept of the VCF "Lite" event. VCF
Lite events feature all of the elements of a traditional VCF event
(including speakers, exhibitors and vendors) but the event is held on
a single day instead of across two days.
VCF Midwest 1.0 will be held on Saturday, July 30th at Purdue
University in West Lafayette, Indiana. Doors will open at 9:30am,
with speakers beginning at 10:00am and exhibits starting at 12:00pm.
The event ends at 5:00pm. Admission is $5 per person.
Exhibitors and vendors are wanted, so if you want to show off part of
your collection or want to sell some of it, register now at the VCF
Midwest website at:
http://www.vintage.org/2005/midwest/
Additional VCF Midwest 1.0 information will be posted to the VCF
Midwest website in the coming weeks, so get yourself onto the VCF
mailing list to be informed of updates as they are announced. You can
add yourself to the VCF mailing list here:
http://www.vintage.org/maillist.php
A separate announcement for VCF Midwest 1.0 with more information
about the event will be distributed in the coming days so be on the
look-out for that.
If you'd like to organize a VCF Lite in your area, please contact
Sellam Ismail at <sellam at vintage.org>.
VCF Inaugurates Long-Term Data Archiving Standard: FutureKeep
-------------------------------------------------------------
The VCF has lauched a project to create a file format standard for
imaging and archiving software from virtually any data media ever
devised, from punched cards to DVD-ROM and beyond. In a nutshell,
the intent of the standard is to allow for software stored on any
type of media to be digitally imaged in a manner that would allow the
original media to be reconstructed from the image at which time it
might be necessary to do so. The main purpose of this standard is to
provide a universally recognized standard for preserving software.
Media such as floppy disks and magnetic tape has a limited lifetime.
The physical medium will fail over time resulting in data loss. While
more durable, software stored on paper-based media such as punched
cards and paper tape is also at risk. Even ROM chips are not forever:
the bits contained within the silicon will dissipate over time,
leaving behind an empty shell. In the absence of a durable, long-term
(as in aeons), failure-proof digital storage medium, steps must be
taken now to preserve the existing base of software and to ensure it
will be available for the benefit of future generations. This
standard is being designed to provide a uniform methodology for
storing imaged media to facilitate the storage and maintenance of
large archives of software.
Other uses of the standard will be to provide a singular uniform file
format for computer emulators to use as virtual storage devices.
The design of the format is still in its initial stages, so if you're
interested in being part of this historic development, you can join
the committee responsible for devising the standard. Draft outline
notes for the standard are available on the project website:
http://www.futurekeep.org
A mailing list has been created to provide a forum for discussing the
development of the standard. For instructions on how to join the
mailing list, e-mail project coordinator Sellam Ismail at
<sellam at vintage.org>.
New VCF Website Features
------------------------
The VCF is always striving to add useful features to the VCF website.
The latest enhancements include a computer history reference library
index, a photo gallery, a VCF Gazette browsing library, and an RSS
feed.
The VCF Library is a new feature which lists hundreds of computer
history resources available on books, video and computer media. The
list is organized into relevant categories and each entry includes a
link to where that resource can be purchased on the web. Most link to
Amazon product listings, and any purchase made through links from the
VCF Library earns a commission for the VCF, so it's a great way to
support the Vintage Computer Festival! The list is constantly being
added to as new resources are identified, and we appreciate suggestions
for additional resources to add. The library is available on the
VCF website at:
http://www.vintage.org/library.php
The VCF Gazette now has its own page featuring a link to the current
issue as well as links providing easy access to all past issues. The
VCF Gazette home page is here:
http://www.vintage.org/gazette.php
The VCF periodically produces photo galleries of VCF events or items
and activities the VCF is involved with. All the VCF photo galleries
can now be viewed from one convenient location by jumping to the Photo
Gallery index:
http://www.vintage.org/gallery.php
We've also installed an RSS News feed. RSS is a mechanism based on
XML used for sharing and syndicating news or stories from sites that
generate content. The VCF's RSS feed allows VCF fans to syndicate our
news. The VCF RSS feed is provided at:
http://www.vintage.org/rss.php
Our first RSS subscriber is Kevin Savetz's Retro Roundup page, which
aggregates classic computer and retro video game news from around the
web:
http://www.retroroundup.com/
Look for more excellent features to be added to the VCF Website in the
near-term future.
That wraps it up for this issue of the VCF Gazette! Until next time...
Best regards,
Sellam Ismail
Producer
Vintage Computer Festival
http://www.vintage.org/
This issue of the VCF Gazette can be found online at:
http://www.vintage.org/content.php?id=g31
The Vintage Computer Festival is a celebration of computers and their
history. The VCF Gazette goes out to anyone who subscribed to the VCF
mailing list, and is intended to keep those interested in the VCF
informed of the latest VCF events and happenings. The VCF Gazette is
guaranteed to be published in a somewhat irregular manner, though we
will try to maintain a quarterly schedule.
If you would like to be removed from the VCF mailing list, and
therefore not receive any more issues of the VCF Gazette, visit the
following web page:
http://www.vintage.org/remove.php
P[RE|ER]SE[R]VE[RE]
;)
>I AM NOT SUGGESTING ACTION AT THIS POINT. I AM
>SUGGESTING A DISCUSSION WITHIN THIS GROUP (WHERE DON
>SPENT MOST OF HIS ONLINE TIME), FOLLOWED BY A GROUP
>DECISION TO BE IMPLEMENTED. (For that purpose, I will
>be turning on individual messages instead of the
>digest
>form in which I read this group.)
My guess would be, she is still mourning the loss of her husband. The
archive is all she has left of him. She may not understand it, but as
long as it is in her garage, she still has something to hold onto. Death
is a funny thing and makes people do equally funny things.
She doesn't want to complete the transaction, because she isn't mentally
ready to let the items go. But I also believe you are correct, eventually
she will be ready, and if someone isn't standing at the door, she will
just hire some local kid to haul it all to the trash.
I think the best course of action is to discuss the matter with someone
OTHER than Winnie, but who is going to be close enough all the time to
keep a careful eye on the items. The Debbie person may be the best
contact. Someone other than Winnie will not be in a mental state that
keeps them from wanting to let the items go. So you will have a better
chance of really pointing out the historical value of the items, and
stress the importance that they not be thrown out. That person can then
keep a careful passive eye on the items, and will know when the time is
right to press for giving them to the classic computer community where
they can be saved.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
I was contacted by someone from the Washington DC area who has an AT&T PC
6300 that they need to get rid of.
"I have an old, old AT&T PC6300 ("IBM clone") from about 1983. It has a
monitor and keyboard and all necessary cables, plus lots of vintage
software such as Quicken and PrintShop."
They also indicated that they have tutorials for a lot of the software but
that there are some intermittent display issues on an otherwise functional
machine.
Email Chad_LorenzNOSPAM at msn.com for details and to arrange pickup or
transport. (Adjust the email for spam prevention)
The usual disclaimers apply.
--
Erik Klein
www.vintage-computer.comwww.vintage-computer.com/vcforum
The Vintage Computer Forum
Not much to report except a $25 table-top multispeed drill press
(belts and pulleys, just like the big boys), and a free Atari 800 (CPU
only, no PSU, disk...) with three broken keys from the same house.
The first project on the drill press is entirely on-topic -
manufacturing an ABS front panel for my Elf2K
(http://www.sparetimegizmos.com/Hardware/Elf2K.htm). Speaking of
which, does anyone know if they manufacture an adhesive-backed
_plastic_ sheet that's meant to go through printers? I know I can
pick up an 8.5"x11" paper label from any office supply place. I am
hoping to find something that will resist water and abrasion (from
raspy palms) better than paper. I'm also hoping to print some new
keytops for the switches from an MSI 88/e keyboard (square, flush
pushbuttons, with a lip and stick-on key labels). I am constructing a
hex keypad for my Micro/Elf, and potentially for the Elf2K, and I
don't have A-F to pick from.
Thanks,
-ethan
>
>Subject: Re: Anyone playing with the 8x300
> From: "Dwight K. Elvey" <dwight.elvey at amd.com>
> Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 12:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
>Hi Allison
> It is interesting that this application didn't use
>that method of I/O addressing. All I/O devices are typical
>bus type devices. It has a ROM connected to the instruction
>addresses that selects the I/O based on the address being
>executed. They don't seem to be taking advantage of the
>read modify write I/O, either. The ports are all wired as
>unidirectional ports.
>Dwight
>
There were many ways to address IO on that beastie. The basic machine
was very unlike most micros and there was no concept of addressing
for ram in the data path. IO was almost an after thought in many ways.
But, it was fast and being very microcoded it was useful for
datain/process/dataout things that didn't require much or any intermediate
storage. There were whole clases of appications it was useful for but often
designers rather than and deal with it's peculiar implmentation just grew
their own from the ground up like the RX02 and SMS disks. It's lifespan
in the market was short due to parts like the 29116 and other faster
and more commonplace micros.
Allison
A fellow called me from Australia to tell me he has a UNIVAC drum printer
that he needs to let go of. He said it's sentimentally important to him
because apparently he acquired it and modified it so he could use it (on
what machine he did not say). He was interested in getting some money for
it if he could. I don't know the model or age.
The printer is available in the Czech Republic, where this man is I
believe moving back to. He asked that anyone interested contact his son
in the Czech Republic, whose cell phone number is +420 606 75 0654.
Please let me know if someone decides to rescue this. Perhaps one of the
more formal computer museums in the EU?
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
It loos like a Listmember has arranged to keep the DPS-6 safe from the
Hammer and Blowtorch - I'll keep y'all informed on the progress of said
rescue.
Thanks to all who responded on this. Looks like it'll be safe and
loved, now.
Cheers
John
>From: "Joe R." <rigdonj at cfl.rr.com>
>
> I found this today <http://www.classiccmp.org/hp/panels/all.jpg>.
>Anybody know what it's for? It's obviously for some kind of computer or
>computer based systems since it talks about ROM Address and the like. But
>it has some terms that I don't recognize, TU Status, Romar/Bromar, etc.
>This thing is almost three foot wide so I had to take three pictures in
>order to get closeups of the legends. See
><http://www.classiccmp.org/hp/panels/> for more pictures. BTW this is all
>of the system that I found and this is exactly the way that I found the
>panel except for wiping some dust and dirt off of it.
>
> The HP 700i isn't part of it, it's picture just happened to be on the
>same disk.
>
> Joe
Hi Joe
I'm not much help but it is a great looking panel.
Dwight
>From: "Allison" <ajp166 at bellatlantic.net>
>
>>
>>Subject: Re: Anyone playing with the 8x300
>> From: "Dwight K. Elvey" <dwight.elvey at amd.com>
>> Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 14:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
>> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>>
>>>
>>>Ah the classic first of the fast microcontrollers.
>>>I'd have to dig but I vaguely remember the 8x300
>>>as a disk controller apnote. Nasty beast to program.
>>>
>>>Allison
>>>
>>
>>Hi
>> Don't know why you'd say this, it only has 8 instructions!
>>I've got the spec posted to Al's site.
>> This controller application is a little interesting in that
>>who ever designed this board, also must have done a bitslice
>>designs at one time or another. To save a machine cycle, all
>>I/O addresses are selected by a ROM tied to the instruction
>>addressing. Normally it would take two cycles, one to write
>>the I/O address and one to transfer the data. With the
>>ROM, the address is understood by the program's execution
>>address location.
>>Dwight
>
>It's more of a sequencer or state machine with a crude ALU.
>As to those 8 instructions, looks at what the fields are
>for each one. I've done horizontal microcode and that is
>similar. Due to it's very harvard design it's not one you
>will do constans in rom much. Also the IO devices are
>really IO specific as in the address of each is coded
>into the part.
Hi Allison
It is interesting that this application didn't use
that method of I/O addressing. All I/O devices are typical
bus type devices. It has a ROM connected to the instruction
addresses that selects the I/O based on the address being
executed. They don't seem to be taking advantage of the
read modify write I/O, either. The ports are all wired as
unidirectional ports.
Dwight
>
>One use for it was an 8bit wide DSP. I have a real one here
>of the later 8x305 I2L that was a bit faster.
>
>Allison
>
>
>From: shoppa_classiccmp at trailing-edge.com
>
>> also must have done a bitslice designs at one time or another
>
>I always thought of the 8x300 as a near-bitslice processor... bipolar,
>data port, etc. While it doesn't chain together to make bigger
>wordsizes like AMD2901/Intel 3002, it really was a programmable
>sequencer very much like those bitslice parts.
>
>Tim.
>
Hi
With the way it had rotates and masking through th I/O bus,
I could see how one could sequentially chain several processors
with only a cycle per processor delay.
Dwight
>From: "Jim Battle" <frustum at pacbell.net>
>
>Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>...
>> Hi
>> The last place I worked, the processor was designed to
>> be able to optimize by doing out of order execution ( HaL
>> computer system, first Sparc64 ). They soon discovered the
>> problem when dealing with I/O. They, luckily, had a
>> sequential mode that they could switch to during I/O
>> operations that made the order predictable. You'd have
>> thought that someone in the design team might have realized
>> the problem.
>> Dwight
>
>Dwight, I'm more than a little sceptical that the architects at Hal
>didn't understand that reordering memory accesses would cause problems
>with programmed I/O. I'm sure that they put in instruction
>serialization and memory barrier instructions for precisely those
>reasons. It wasn't a matter of "luckily" at all.
The sequential mode was for boot ( and I/O ). I suspect that
the original architects understood the need but a hole team of
software fellows had no idea what was wrong. Trust me on this,
I was there and went to the debug meetings.
>
>Even before OOO (out of order) execution at the instruction level was
>practical in the 90s, there were designs that performed memory access
>reordering since the 60s, leading to some of the same issues.
>
>As a side note, I believe the first company to attempt (thought they
>didn't execute) real out of order instruction execution was Metaflow.
>Some have said that Metaflow's architectects (Bruce Lightner primarily)
>were ahead of their time, but the hallmark of good engineering is having
>the judgement to specifify something that can be built within
>constraints of practicality, not just specifying something with all the
>cool ideas you can come up with.
It would look ahead to see if it could execute anything that wasn't
dependent on something that needed a current pending calculation
or something that wasn't already in cache. Because it is a memory
mapped I/O, it didn't treat the I/O and different then data.
Dwight
Hrmm... I think maybe, =MAYBE= I can schedule a =TEMPORARY=
intervention on this. I have kin in Reno, NV, which is only about 40
minutes off. What are the dimensions on a thing like this?
Approximate weight?
-dhbarr.
On 5/14/05, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
> At 10:06 AM +0200 5/14/05, Jochen Kunz wrote:
> >On Fri, 13 May 2005 23:23:53 -0400 (EDT)
> >John Lawson <jpl15 at panix.com> wrote:
> >
> >> There is a fee DPS-6 in Carson City, Nevada, that is going to have to
> >> be reduced to scrap, unless someone can step up to the plate
> >Isn't a DPS-6 capable of running Multics?
>
> No, that would be select DPS-8 models. The DPS-6 is basically a
> Minicomputer. It runs GCOS-6 and maybe other OS's.
>
> Someone *really* needs to save this system. It can't be me for
> multiple reasons. These systems are *VERY, VERY* rare to find in
> Hobbyist hands. Since this is the system that Sellam had, I think
> there is only one, maybe two, other systems in Hobbyist hands.
>
> Zane
> --
> --
> | Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
> | healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
> | | Classic Computer Collector |
> +----------------------------------+----------------------------+
> | Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
> | PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
> | http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
>
In the next two weeks, we must dispose of the Honeywell DPS-6 mainframe -
somehow. So far two possiblities have fallen through.
Therefore, be it Known to All by these Presentments:
There is a fee DPS-6 in Carson City, Nevada, that is going to have to be
reduced to scrap, unless someone can step up to the plate, as they say,
and speak those rare words: "I'll take that..."
System will fit in a std-sized pick-up truck, forklift and loading
assistance is provided.
Sombody adopt this machine before we are forced to KILL it.
Cheers
(Hopefully Not The Grim Computer Reaper) John