Hi,
This a belated cross-post from Ottawa Freecycle.
I have a Tektronix 4107 colour graphics terminal, complete with manual
and keyboard. Free to good home, but you have to come and get it.
Jeff
>
>Subject: Re: Paper tape and 8th bit?
> From: woodelf <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:48:38 -0600
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>Chuck Guzis wrote:
>
>>
>> If you look at the preceding character, is there any correlation to the 8th
>> bit of the next one? The 8th bit just might be garbage left over and not
>> masked out.
>
>It could be binary.The driver is loaded in the top of memory, and
>seems to patch over a TTY driver. I don't have manual handy
>but it does have a bootstrap loader @ 80H I think, the first
>256 bytes to load in a hex loader.
PT and many of the 8080 micros didn't use the punch/reader (ASR33 usually)
in the same way as the PDP-8 and onter Minis. So conventions existed but
didn't always get applied the same.
It's not a bin tape, the manual has the source listing. Its a program "LIST"
of a PT 5k basic program that loads a long list of DATA nnn,nnn into memory
at an address and also pokes the output code of the program to point to VDM1
or Nominal IO depending of sense switch 8 (IN FF; ANI 80; JZ xxxx). Works on
IMSAI or Altair front pannal systems,useless for NS* (no sense sw at FFh).
I still have and use a VDM-1 in a Netronics Explorer 8085. I havent used PT
software since '76ish as I wrote a more compact minimal VT52 screen
emulation for it.
Allison
--- Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk
> wrote:
> aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> > That means there are 5 different floppy disk
> > sizes that I now know of:
> >
> > 3"
> > 3.5"
> > 5"
> > 8"
>
> Add 2" to that - someone handed us a box of them t
he
> other week. I've got a
> feeling that 2.5" existed, too (and presumably by
5"
> you mean what's commonly
> called 5.25"?)
>
hmmm, now you have me slightly confused. After sendi
ng the message I did remember the 5.25" disks (as us
ed on BBC's etc.), but I assumed that 5" and 5.25" w
ere different sizes.
what's with 2" and 2.5", wouldn't they be too
fiddly and/or store too small amount of data
to make them worthwhile?
> > 12" (used on a special Sony Laservision machine)
>
> Hmm, Philips certainly had laservision players (go
t
> one here), but they're
> optical laserdisk players, not floppy (as in
> magnetic media) at all. I'd be
> surprised if a rival company could use the same na
me
> for a totally different
> technology! I've heard rumours of a 12" IBM format
> for one of their early
> mainframes, but I don't know if that's just urban
> legend or not.
>
No legend... give me a while and I'll find a link
to a pic of a 12" disk... Robert Bernardo
(Amiga enthusiast) has been pictured with one
at a retro event fairly recently.
> cheers
>
> Jules
>
>
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
>
>Subject: Re: Paper tape and 8th bit?
> From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:40:58 +0100 (BST)
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
>>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I'm attempting to recover some software from paper-tape.
>>
>> Never actually had a PT reader in my "altair days", I fooled around
>> with magnetic tape systems (audio and 9-track), and later went to
>> the NorthStar disk system... Did a bit of paper-tape stuff with the
>> university systems, but I don't recall any real details.
>>
>> Anyway - I'm using an OP-80A which is a very simple manual feed
>> reader - you position a light over the unit and pull the tape through
>> wire guides over an optical sensor and it provides parallel data.
>>
>> This all appears to work OK.
>>
>> The tape I've been testing with is a Processor Technology "BASIC
>> VDM DRIVER" - it contains driver software for the PT VDM-1 video
>> board.
>>
>> My question - Does anyone know what they are using the 8th bit
>> for? - I get nicely readable ASCII BASIC source out of it, except
>
>Well, AFAIK few punches [1] or readers ever did anything with the 8th bit
>other than just transfer it to/from the system. So what it means depends
>on the device that punched that tape.
>
>[1] I say 'few', not none because the serial adapter board for the 4070
>can be set up to make this a locally-generated parity bit. In other words
>you can send it 7 bit characters (or 8 bit with the top bit ignored) and
>it will punch them with the 8th level an even parity bit. All
>link-selectable.
The punch and reader "dumb" devices though some did parity local that
was more exception than general practice.
>
>> that the 8th bit seems to be somewhat randomly set on certain
>> characters. If I strip the 8th bit I get what appears to be legit BASIC
>> code.
>>
>> I thought it might be parity, however this does not appear to be
In PT systems that may have been used as a "page" (VT or FF) marker.
I have the VDM-1 and the basic driver is ascii and the resulting program
load the binary driver.
>That would have been my first guess too. Normally even parity, since then
>totally blank and all holes are valid characters (the latter can be used
>to overpunch any other character, and was origianlly simply ignored by
>the system).
>
>Of course on a binary tape (true binary, not Intel-Hex or something),
>it's just anothe bit.
It's an Ascii punch of the PT basic "LIST: command. The 8th hole may
well be random trash or a particular character in memory that had the
high bit set.
>> the case - the codes 0A (00001010) and 0D (00001101) both
>> appear with the 8th bit clear - If the 8th bit were parity, one or
>> the other should have it set. Other characters always have it set,
>> for example 'T' (54) seems to always appears as (D4).
>
>Doe any character exist in both forms (with the top bit both clear and
>set)? If so, could it be something like a 'start of statement' marker or
>'start of keyword' or soemthing like that?
Easier, what is the punch pattern on the tape that corrosponds to the 8th
bit?
My tape is deeply burried since I stopped using back in '76. I know the
box it's in far enough down the stack to not warrent looking.
Allison
--- Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk
> wrote:
> aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> > That means there are 5 different floppy disk
> > sizes that I now know of:
> >
> > 3"
> > 3.5"
> > 5"
> > 8"
>
> Add 2" to that - someone handed us a box of them t
he
> other week. I've got a
> feeling that 2.5" existed, too (and presumably by
5"
> you mean what's commonly
> called 5.25"?)
>
> > 12" (used on a special Sony Laservision machine)
>
> Hmm, Philips certainly had laservision players (go
t
> one here), but they're
> optical laserdisk players, not floppy (as in
> magnetic media) at all. I'd be
> surprised if a rival company could use the same na
me
> for a totally different
> technology! I've heard rumours of a 12" IBM format
> for one of their early
> mainframes, but I don't know if that's just urban
> legend or not.
>
> cheers
>
> Jules
>
Well here's the link to the pic:
http://www.dickestel.com/vintage2005.htm
It's picture 7, taken at the Vintage Computer Festiv
al 2005. I'm not entirely sure that is Robert holdin
g the disk, but he may have taken the picture instea
d?
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Ray wrote:
> The Alpha chips were coded with EV - as in
>Electro Vlassic. :-)
That is one of those things, like VME, where the "real meaning" is
kept secret. There are several hypotheses, the other one that makes sense
is that it stands for Extended VAX (which, when you trace it out, means
Extended Virtual Address Extension [of the PDP-11], so there's still a little bit of PDP
in HP/DEC (until October...)
AXP however is known to mean nothing.
(could be a place shifting of something, e.g. VAX -> (v)AX[p]
> "I see where you're coming from - but I also know that writing a TIFF
> decoder is pretty straightforward; I wouldn't fancy doing the same
for > either JPEG or PDF (not sure about PNG, but I get the impression
that > it's pretty simple in nature)."
Noooooo!!!!!
Don't do it. The problem with writing your own decoder is that you may
not have your own set of reference images, so testing it would be
'interesting'. This is the major cause of security issues in software
at the moment. All it takes is one case where you mis-handle input, and
you have introduced a vulnerability into your application.
Unfortunately, you can't work on the basis that image data is not
hostile any more.
That's what application libraries are for. Yes, they are larger that
rolling your own, but they are also more robust.
> What I'm wondering is if one's feelings about "collectable" systems have
> more to do with the level of exposure to the internals of the hardware than
> with any intrinsic novelty of the hardware itself.
For me it really is more about the intellectual "value" in the design
than about any experiential component. To be honest, I don't particularly
like using computer to do things. I like making computers do things.
As a result, I don't run any commercial software and very little of the
other usual stuff most people run.
So what does make a machine interesting to me? There are the
architectures that I like, that make me feel an intellectual connection
to the creators. These are ones that are clean or elegant or orthogonal,
or whatever characteristic is particularly nice about it. These are
the machines like the various models of the PDP-11. On the other
hand there are those architectures that are far enough out of the
ordinary that they're interesting mostly in just how different they are.
The Intel 432 and the older AS/400s discussed recently fall into that
catagory. In some cases it's the details of the design, like the aync
PDP-10s and pretty much anything designed by Cray. Maybe it's
interesting because of its historical influence like with the GE645
or the PDP-7. So the experience of using it is one of the least
significant factors in it for me. Not to say it's negatively correlated.
Some of my fondest memories are of low level stuff on PDP-11s,
but most of the machines I'd love to add to my collection are ones
I've never had any experience with at all.
> Does this make sense? Since fewer folks are using assembly or machine
> language, does this account for the indifference to modern hardware?
For me, the "modern hardware" in the sense of PCs are uninteresting
because they fail all the tests for interestingness. The architecture
is something only its mother could love. But it's not so far out in left
field that it's interesting in its own right. While the Intel and AMD
guys have done a bang-up job squeezing performance out of a
turnip and I'm sure some of the chip level details are interesting,
the design of the overall machines is singularly boring. Now some
people might think there is some significant historical value in the
PC per se, but I've got to say I see it just as another step on a
road toward smaller and smaller devices that will eventually approach
the ubiquitous computing model Xerox talked about a while back.
I can't honestly say that I see much intellectually interesting about
the fact that it put computers in the hands of the masses. Sure it
lets more people do more with them and I can now keep in touch
using e-mail with people I couldn't 20 years ago, but I don't find
that an interesting subject of study.
It's kind of like the web. When things first started happening, one
could recognize it as basically as networked, graphical 3270. The
only thing that really seemed different and original was the fact that
now the recipient was responsible for the format of the information
instead of the producer (by virtue of HTML being a markup language
not a layout language). But then people came along and made
everything a table whether it was tabular data or not. "I don't care
how wide your browser window is; these have to be next to each
other." Then came style sheets and we lost the one thing that
was really interesting, the chance to see what would happen
with the one major change to the printing press model. So now
the web is just another mass medium driven by advertising.
It became less interesting as it became more "useful" and
"friendly."
If you've been skimming to see what the punch line is, it's
this. My question is always, "Is it interesting as an object
of study?" not "Is it interesting as a tool to use?"
As always, YMMV
BLS
--- Jim Beacon <jim at g1jbg.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
> > aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> > > I surf using my Sega Dreamcast (games console
> > > launched in 1998 in Japan, and 1999 for UK and
> USA)
> > > and I use the Dreamkey 3 (European) browser
> > > which is based on DreamPassport 3 (the
> > > Japanese browser). When altering it they
> > > left some things in, so when I reply to emails
> > > via the POP3 software they are all encoded
> > > in the Japanese character set (ISO-2022JP),
> > > as Don pointed out.
> >
> > Heh heh, that's sufficiently bonkers that I thin
k
> I can live with it ;-)
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > Jules
> >
> The only oddity here, is that opening the message
> tries to load JAVA (I have
> it for some other applets......). I guess most
> people have JAVA disabled.
>
> Jim.
>
Yeah, I have been told something like that
before. I guess it's triggered by having the
email encoded in ISO-2022JP?
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
--- Don <THX1138 at dakotacom.net> wrote:
> Jules Richardson wrote:
> > aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > ps. Any ideas why your emails to the list (and
> nobody else's) appear in a
> > larger font than normal? Not sure if it's just
> affecting Thunderbird here or
> > various other people's email clients too!
>
> ISO-2022JP character encoding
>
Sorry, I'll explain...
I surf using my Sega Dreamcast (games console
launched in 1998 in Japan, and 1999 for UK and USA)
and I use the Dreamkey 3 (European) browser
which is based on DreamPassport 3 (the
Japanese browser). When altering it they
left some things in, so when I reply to emails
via the POP3 software they are all encoded
in the Japanese character set (ISO-2022JP),
as Don pointed out.
Apologies if this bugs anyone, but I don't
have a PC, my Amiga doesn't have a modem
nor enough memory to surf the net (only has
2MB at the moment) and, whilst I can read,
delete and move emails via my mobile phone, I
can't reply to emails :(
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
--- Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/26/06, aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
> <aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > --- Chris M <chrism3667 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > --- Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > If you attempt a read larger than 8-bits on
an
> > > > odd-boundary, the 68000 traps... (Guru
> Meditation)
> > >
> > > Like a blue screen?
> > >
> >
> > No, a Guru Meditation has a completely black
> > screen with a rectangle in white/grey at the
> > top of the screen.
> > Inside the rectangle is a message a long the
> > lines of "A fatal software error has occured.
> > Press mouse button to reset", followed by
> > 2 8 digit (hexidecimal?) numbers.
>
> I think what the OP meant was functionally like a
> blue screen on an MS
> OS, not visually identical to one
Ahh, yes. I have never had the pleasure of
seeing the blue screen on an MS OS, the
computers at work generally freeze up
completely.
>
> In any case, the entire screen may or may not be
> black, depending on
> the nature and severity of the cause - with some
> errors, the entire
> screen was slid down enough to make room for the
> Guru Meditation box,
> which had a blinking red border and red text insid
e
> (red it fatal,
> yellow if not, but that was rare). There _could b
e_
> a "Software
> Failure" requester box with "press mouse button to
> reset", but that
> was _prior_ to a Guru Meditation screen, not the
> Guru Meditation
> itself.
>
> > The first one is the error code, typically
> 80000001 or 80000003,
>
> Those are examples of 68000 trap error codes...
> 80000003 in particular
> happens to be the odd address trap that started
> things off (it was
> rather common, especially if your code went off in
to
> the weeds and
> tried to execute an instruction on an odd-byte
> boundary).
>
> There were also _lots_ of error codes that could
> tell you specifics
> about what really went wrong, but unless you had t
he
> Rom Kernel Manual
> (RKM) handy or did a lot of development, people
> ignored the numbers.
>
> > but I don't know what the 2nd number represents
.
>
> Either "HELP" in ASCII (0x48454C50) or the address
> of the process that
> was running when the machine puked. It was only
> useful if you were a
> developer and used it to fire up ROMWack (an
> internal debugger) to
> sift through the remains of your process to see wh
at
> it was doing when
> something went wrong. Mostly, though, the second
> number wasn't
> particularly helpful.
"ROMWack is an internal debugger", do you
mean it's stored internally (ROM) and can be
accessed when things go wrong, or is it some
external program that can be run to see whats
wrong?
That could be useful if I could use it as I have
some games/software that sometimes causes
it to Guru, even after pluggin in my 4MB
RAM PCMCIA card to give my Amiga 600 a total
of 6MB of memory.
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
I've used a lot of different systems, but some stick in my mind as being
particularly wonderful and others are but a dim memory.
I've used DEC equipment (VAX 730 and 750), but never at an assembly or
machine instruction level--there was simply no need. Unix is unix and
everything's done in C at worst. So I don't remember much about the
hardware and have no particular fondess or aversion to a system--it was
just a box. If it broke, you called for field service; the peripherals
were likely made by someone else, so even those weren't special. They were
like my toaster--they did what they were purchased to do and when they
didn't, there was someone who would fix them. Learn the right Unix
invocation, know where to plug in the cables; after that, it's just a
matter of putting the right software on it.
On the other hand, there are many systems that I've programmed at the
assembly level and have even developed hardware for that I remember quite
well. Some of these were notably inferor to the DEC systems, but they
occupy a fond spot in my mind.
What I'm wondering is if one's feelings about "collectable" systems have
more to do with the level of exposure to the internals of the hardware than
with any intrinsic novelty of the hardware itself.
Does this make sense? Since fewer folks are using assembly or machine
language, does this account for the indifference to modern hardware?
Cheers,
Chuck
On 8/26/06, aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk <aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> --- Chris M <chrism3667 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > --- Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > If you attempt a read larger than 8-bits on an
> > > odd-boundary, the 68000 traps... (Guru Meditation)
> >
> > Like a blue screen?
> >
>
> No, a Guru Meditation has a completely black
> screen with a rectangle in white/grey at the
> top of the screen.
> Inside the rectangle is a message a long the
> lines of "A fatal software error has occured.
> Press mouse button to reset", followed by
> 2 8 digit (hexidecimal?) numbers.
I think what the OP meant was functionally like a blue screen on an MS
OS, not visually identical to one, in this case, the answer is,
"sorta-kinda-mostly", at least from the standpoint that it was the
last thing you get to see before resetting the machine.
In any case, the entire screen may or may not be black, depending on
the nature and severity of the cause - with some errors, the entire
screen was slid down enough to make room for the Guru Meditation box,
which had a blinking red border and red text inside (red it fatal,
yellow if not, but that was rare). There _could be_ a "Software
Failure" requester box with "press mouse button to reset", but that
was _prior_ to a Guru Meditation screen, not the Guru Meditation
itself.
> The first one is the error code, typically 80000001 or 80000003,
Those are examples of 68000 trap error codes... 80000003 in particular
happens to be the odd address trap that started things off (it was
rather common, especially if your code went off into the weeds and
tried to execute an instruction on an odd-byte boundary).
There were also _lots_ of error codes that could tell you specifics
about what really went wrong, but unless you had the Rom Kernel Manual
(RKM) handy or did a lot of development, people ignored the numbers.
> but I don't know what the 2nd number represents.
Either "HELP" in ASCII (0x48454C50) or the address of the process that
was running when the machine puked. It was only useful if you were a
developer and used it to fire up ROMWack (an internal debugger) to
sift through the remains of your process to see what it was doing when
something went wrong. Mostly, though, the second number wasn't
particularly helpful.
> There is also a "recoverable error", which
> gives you a Guru Meditation screen, but with
> a message similar to "A non-fatal error has
> occured. Press mouse button to continue".
> However, apon pressing said mouse button you
> can continue.... for about 5 seconds until
> the same Guru screen pops up, so you end up
> having to do a warm reset anyway!
Yeah.... typically, if you got a recoverable error, something was
likely to happen shortly thereafter that wasn't recoverable.
-ethan
Hi,
I need to get a freight/crater to pick up a
cabinet in Cincinnati OH, palletize and wrap
it so that I can have it picked up for shipping.
Can anyone recommend a company there? Could you
email me off list?
Thanks!
Brian
(this is OT: it's vintage computing stuff!)
--- Chris M <chrism3667 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> --- Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If you attempt a read larger than 8-bits on an
> > odd-boundary, the 68000
> > traps. Not the same as a halt - you are free to
> > install a trap
> > handler, but in practice, machines like the Amig
a
> > just went through an
> > error dump (Guru Meditation) when low-value CPU
> > traps triggered.
>
> Like a blue screen?
>
No, a Guru Meditation has a completely black
screen with a rectangle in white/grey at the
top of the screen.
Inside the rectangle is a message a long the
lines of "A fatal software error has occured.
Press mouse button to reset", followed by
2 8 digit (hexidecimal?) numbers. The first one
is the error code, typically 80000001 or 80000003,
but I don't know what the 2nd number represents.
If you get a coloured screen on boot-up
(eg. grey, dark grey, blue etc.) then the Amiga
has halted the self test due to a hardware
failure of some sort. You would also see the
Caps Lock LED blink a few times aswell. The
colour shown when it freezes along with the
Caps Lock LED flashing is used to work out
what the problem is.
I can post up more details if you are interested?
There is also a "recoverable error", which
gives you a Guru Meditation screen, but with
a message similar to "A non-fatal error has
occured. Press mouse button to continue".
However, apon pressing said mouse button you
can continue.... for about 5 seconds until
the same Guru screen pops up, so you end up
having to do a warm reset anyway!
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Hi Glen,
I read in ClassicCmp forum that you have operating system files for
HP1660A, but I couldn't find them in forum.
Is it possible to send me operating system files for HP1660A?
(Or to send me link which to use for thise files download)
I have to use logic analyser but there is a problem with it , which
requires device to be flashed.
Thank you in advance!
Best Regards
Gergana Buchvarova
Engineer SW Validation
Johnson Controls Electronics Bulgaria EOOD
14 Todor Aleksandrov Blvd.
BG-1303 Sofia
Phone: + 359 2 9306418
Fax: + 359 2 9306462
Does anyone within a reasonable driving distance of Poughkeepsie, NY
have any Allied-Telesyn mini-transceivers they don't need? I can throw
a few bucks into the deal to make it worth your while. Thanks.
Peace... Sridhar
I sent my original reply to that poster offlist, but since there's some
interest in this, have a look at my page at:
http://mysite.verizon.net/rtellason/w4s.html
which lists a number of parts that I have a *lot* of. Any of you folks want
some of these, feel free to contact me offlist...
--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
M Dakin
> Well, the other choice at the time was the 68000. 32-bit registers,
> yes, but it had goofy quirks all its own (didn't you halt the CPU if you
> attempted to read memory not on word boundaries or something?
On the original 68000, instructions had to be aligned on 16 bit boundaries
or you'd get an instruction fault.
The associated stupidity was wasting a bit of the branch range by NOT having
the branch target word-aligned.
> Jules Richardson wrote:
> Well if the IBM PC hadn't turned up, surely computers would have ended up in
> the hands of the masses anyway? There were plenty of good, robust, expandable
> systems with good software support worldwide at the time - all it needed was
> for society to be ready to accept 'the computer' on a wider scale. IBM just
> happened to be in the right place at the right time, and it's unfortunate that
> they'd built a turkey :-)
I agree. Whether it was Apple or IBM or Tandy or someone else, it would
have happened anyway. If I had my 'druthers though, what ended up in
the hands of the masses would have been more of a real appliance than
something to be viewed as a computer. When you get right down to it
the main differences among a game console, a dedicated word processor
and a "personal computer" are the expectations of the user. Nothing
wrong with giving the masses a toaster that can transform into a mixer.
But when you foist on them a device that they need a class at the local
community college to learn "how to use" then you've done a disservice
to both the masses and to the computer scientists.
To bring this back to the collectibility question, there have been a few
machines that seemed to be pitched in that direction. But they never
seemed to generate the momentum that "we've got these at work; I'll
buy one for home" did. A collection of those would make a nice niche
display in a computing museum.
BLS
Hey, all:
I've been thinking it'd be a good idea to buy and set aside some spare
parts for the couple of DEC machines I have around... mostly 7400-series
ICs, some switching transistors and such. It's been a while since I've
bought parts, however. What places (preferably online) have you had good
experiences with?
-O.-
Hans Franke wrote:
> Am 24 Aug 2006 11:50 meinte Don:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've a Sharp PC-1211 with CE-122 "Printer & Cassette Interface".
>> But, I'll be damned if I can figure out how to make the printer
>> *work*! It advances paper when manually commanded to do so.
>> But, I can't figure out how to get the 1211 to print *to* it!
>
> Try
>
> LPRINT "All your Printers belong to us"
I've tried PRINT and LPRINT -- in all four "modes". No luck.
>
>Subject: Re: PDP-8 /e/f/m memory
> From: "Ethan Dicks" <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:13:16 +1200
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On 8/15/06, vrs <vrs at msn.com> wrote:
>> From: "Ethan Dicks" <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
>> > OK. Is a DEC005 OMNIBUS-friendly? We used them on our Qbus COMBOARD,
>> > so that's the context I think of them in.
>>
>> Interesting question, even though I'd never design in a DEC005. They are
>> made of even more unobtainium than the regular tranceivers!
I have a selection of DEC0XX parts on hand from my days in the mill.
>Agreed. I have a few, but I used to make Qbus cards. For most folks,
>the only source is other cards.
Or plain TTL. LS241 is a good reciever for Q, U or Omnibus (Schmitt inputs)
and 74LS38 makes a good open collector driver. There are others.
Allison
So, I have an older USR Total Control system with quad V.34 modems on each
card, and prolly 12 cards in the system.
I was curious as to just what makes this sucker tick, so I pulled a card &
started looking at chip numbers...
Each "modem section" has:
an Intel 80C186 (same chip as in the Tandy 2000) - except they're rated for
20Mhz...
a TI/USR DSP chip, which is prolly useless outside of the intended use
2 each 32Kx8 static ram chips,
4 each 128Kx8 static ram chips
and lots of other 8/16-bit 74-series buffer chips & whanot.
So, *if* I can get a Dynamic-RAM -> Static RAM converter board designed for
the CoCo, I could upgrade 4 CoCo3s to 512K with each modem board.
Anyone have any use for some 20Mhz 80C186's?
Laterz,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger -- SysAdmin, Iceberg Computers
zmerch at 30below.com
What do you do when Life gives you lemons,
and you don't *like* lemonade?????????????
--- Teo Zenios <teoz at neo.rr.com> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Peters" <tpeters at mixcom.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic
> Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 3:10 PM
> Subject: Re: OT: Hotdog cooker links
>
>
> > I built a hot dog cooker when I was 9, consistin
g
> of a small piece of pine
> > (1x4 nominal), two nails, and a line-cord
> connected to 110VAC mains. It
> was
> > based on an idea I saw in a book somewhere. My d
ad
> was absolutely sure it
> > wouldn't work. It did. We disassembled it right
> after using it because of
> > the hazards of exposed line voltage and two poin
ty
> things sticking up.
> >
> > Those were the days.
>
> I recall a TV show a long time ago (some guy showi
ng
> kids how things worked)
> was showing how to cook a hotdog like that (I thin
k
> they used those small
> forks that you held corn on the cob with) and
> plugged them into 110VAC for a
> few seconds. The salty liquid in the hotdog
> conducted enough electricity to
> cook the hotdog in a few seconds. I bet that show
> never gets replayed these
> days because of lawyers.
>
>
Hmmm... the only one I know like that (that
isn't on today) was Johnny Ball Reveals All.
It was a UK show though, but was great for
learning about science and stuff... except I
wasn't really into science much back then.
(Johnny Ball is Zoe Balls (famous Radio DJ/TV
Presenter) father).
There is, of course, How 2 aswell. That show
has been running in the UK since.... well, since
I was a teenager. That makes it atleast 15
years old. Fred Dinage and erm... the other
guy still do it, but Carol Vorderman left to do
other things.
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
>"Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
>> On 8/23/2006 at 8:19 PM O. Sharp wrote:
>>
>> >I've been thinking it'd be a good idea to buy and set aside some spare
>> >parts for the couple of DEC machines I have around... mostly 7400-series
>> >ICs, some switching transistors and such. It's been a while since I've
>> >bought parts, however. What places (preferably online) have you had good
>> >experiences with?
>>
>> BG Micro has some. http://www.bgmicro.com as does Jameco
>> http://www.jameco.com. Both have been around for ages and are fine to deal
>> with.
>
Add JDRmicrodevices to that list as well.
Me I scrounged enough TTL (in tubes) to make my former collection
look pitiful. Nothing like the right part in volume to make
prototypiing easier.
Allison
>Rick Murphy <CTR> wrote:
> >On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Jerome H. Fine wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> Just thought I would ask for some help - are any text based groups
>> still available?
>
> I use freetext.usenetserver.com - read only, but good performance.
> When I want to write/reply, I use Google Groups.
Jerome Fine replies:
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!!!!!!!
I set the required access up in Netscape 7.2 and it is
functioning well. Much appreciated!!!
I thought that it might be useful for others to know
that "freetext.usenetserver.com" is available and that
it works very well over 95% of the time.
As for sending a write/reply, could you please provide
a few hints as to how Google Groups work??? Do I require
a user id / password, etc.??? Will my write/reply appear
in "freetext.usenetserver.com" in the normal manner?
ALSO, might there be any other servers which allow write
access, even it it is very limited such as a text only
post?
Sincerely yours,
Jerome Fine
--
If you attempted to send a reply and the original e-mail
address has been discontinued due a high volume of junk
e-mail, then the semi-permanent e-mail address can be
obtained by replacing the four characters preceding the
'at' with the four digits of the current year.
Hi all,
I'm offering this to listmates before posting it to ebay / VCM / etc. ...
It's a Kyotronic KC-85, made by the company which eventually became Kyocera.
Most people know it better as the Tandy Model 100, NEC PC-8201, and Olivetti
M-10. All three of those were OEM clones of the Kyotronic KC-85. I ended
up with two of these and I only need one, so one's for sale. It's in very
good condition, powers up fine with 4 standard AA batteries, and has 32K.
Nothing else is included and I'll ship it anywhere. Asking for $50 because
of its rarity and good condition.
I'll consider interesting trades for handhelds / laptops of the late 1970s -
late 1980s. Not looking for luggables. I'm specifically looking for a Sord
IS-11, Teleram T-3000, and Grundy NewBrain models AD and M. But I'll listen
to any reasonable offer.
If you're going to VCF in the fall then I can bring it there to save you the
shipping cost.
Please reply OFF-LIST to spare the disinterested masses. :-)
- Evan
Don stated
> And you have to ensure that there is *no* way the user can
>execute code *before* your interpreter/virtual machine/etc.
>gains control of the CPU. I.e., at the very least, you
>need physical control over the machine. This isnt possible
>in all cases (e.g., a consumer device!)
You can make it very difficult, though.
The X-box uses cryptographic hashes, the AS/400 uses completely undocumented (in the public sphere)
hardware instructions.
An informant has reported Will as stating
> Use an AS/400. Hackproof and crashproof.
And downright hobbyist-hostile.
(where Sun is hobbyist friendly,
SGI is hobbyist-indifferent (we really don't care if you use our machines, just don't
expect any help from us))
Time-locked loadable microcode, impossible-to-transfer licenses and sky-high license fees if you
can get IBM to talk to you. Saw a AS/400, found out about it, gave it a wide berth. Guess it must be like
the HP3000 with too much of a "black" commercial market to risk anything that would make the systems
easier to "misappropriate" commercially.
Pity, everything I've heard about them is good. And the AIX group is hobbyist-indifferent.
I love the comment about a warning sign for the computer :)! I have a perverted
sense of humor, and that fits right in :).
I've had a number of requests for scans of the Simon manual, but the problem is
one of copyrights. A number of years ago, someone got copies of the articles
>from the Babbage Institute but with the restriction they couldn't distribute it.
I've never pursued that, but I am certainly aware of it. I've got the original
Radio-Electronics issues, the subsequent reprint and scans of the reprint. I
have a better scanner now, and they need to be rescanned. Also FWIW, the
Radio-Electronics magazines have color illustrations where they are in B&W for
the reprint. Not much of a problem except the color makes it MUCH easier to
follow, since some of the signals being discussed in the text are highlighted in
red, and are not as obvious in the reprint.
The next question then is what would it be worth to provide a working unit
similar to the original (would need to use more modern relays, and the stepper
could be a problem)? Making a simple electronic paper tape reader wouldn't be
hard as there are a number of plans for a manual "pull the tape through by hand"
designs to read the tape. I would think a PIC would make for a very simple and
cheap design. Personally, I like the idea of seeing a hand wired chassis with
laced wiring, but it certainly would take some time. What about a PC board with
all of the grunt wiring done and laid out for a current relay? What would be the
price point at which it might sell?
Thanks!
> > I'm curious what the group thinks about offering a kit for
> > the Simon Computer that would include a schematic, parts
> > list, and perhaps construction instructions. For those of you
**********
>
> I probably wouldn't go for the kit (only because I've already got enough
> projects to take me beyond the year 2050) but I'd sure like copies of
> the articles. Any chance of seeing a .pdf version anywhere?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jack
**********
> I think the idea has merit BUT I think it would be better to offer
> the schematic, parts list, and perhaps construction instructions /
> copy of the articles.
> That way, the cost would be substantially lower. I'm interested in
> the design, but doubt I would ever have time to build one.
**********
> The computer uses paper tape. The reader and punch for the
> paper tape could be a mechanical problem. Also you need a
> big warning sticker -- This is a demo computer -- Do not
> attempt to download music or computer porn ---
>
>
> Rob
Hi,
Back in February someone sent me a scanned copy of the "Inkjet Printing
Products" section (chapter two, all of ten pages) of the Hewlett-Packard
1988-1989 Optoelectronics Designer's Catalog. Unfortunately I've gone and lost
the files to a dead backup CDR and it looks like I've deleted the copy that
was on my webserver too...
To the guy who scanned this for me (I think it might have been Joe Heck) -
do you still have the scans, and if so, can you send them along?
If not, can someone with a copy of this datasheet (and a scanner) please
scan chapter two for me?
Thanks.
--
Phil. | Kitsune: Acorn RiscPC SA202 64M+6G ViewFinder
philpem at dsl.pipex.com | Cheetah: Athlon64 3200+ A8VDeluxeV2 512M+100G
http://www.philpem.me.uk/ | Tiger: Toshiba SatPro4600 Celeron700 256M+40G
> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:59:07 -0700
> From: Marvin Johnston <marvin at rain.org>
> Subject: Simon Computer
>
>
> I'm curious what the group thinks about offering a kit for
> the Simon Computer that would include a schematic, parts
> list, and perhaps construction instructions. For those of you
> who aren't aware, Simon is a five bit relay computer designed
> by Edmund Berkeley. A series of articles about how the
> computer worked was published in the Oct 1950 - Sept 1951
> issues of Radio Electronics. I've thought about it, but I
> would guess the parts cost alone would be in excess of
> $300.00, and maybe considerably more. On the other hand, it
> is a really cool computer :).
>
Marvin,
I probably wouldn't go for the kit (only because I've already got enough
projects to take me beyond the year 2050) but I'd sure like copies of
the articles. Any chance of seeing a .pdf version anywhere?
Thanks.
Jack
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.5/425 - Release Date:
8/22/2006
Quoth Chris
>For what purpose now? Work with me here. As a night
>light maybe? So you can see yer way to the latrine?
Just for another slightly scary slightly unexpected aliment-electrical device. Set it up on
a thermo{stat, couple, istor) to indicate when your hotdog has reached the ideal temperature, scare
your friends or wife.
I suppose modern research could have located something more efficient or better
suited as a light source than the pickle, Digital Equipment's famous study is a bit old, but the WRL
technote is the last formal study on the subject I've seen.
Alexy said:
>Show me the VAXen.
Well there's your problem - VMS is mostly Alpha and IA64 now.
Go to your local hospital, they probably have one, the school district I work for has one, etc. etc.
The VMS beasts are mostly locked up in the back room (possibly even welded shut) serving lesser desktop clients. VMS interacts quite well with Windows. Nobody is arguing that DIGITALs "What's VMS? We haven't heard of VMS" marketing in the late '90s helped, though.
>has been tested by throwing the same volume of script kiddies at it as other
>OSen have had thrown at them you can't make any security claims based on
>relative number of breakins.
I wouldn't put too much value on the kiddies - they work by exploiting known holes and very few of them would find new ones. Look at the released security patches - that tells you more. VMS managers aren't going to stand by and let holes go unpatched for 6+ months. Look at the CERT reports. VMS is good - real good.
Came across one of your old postings. Are you still looking for an AMD
AM2900 Evaluation and Learning Kit? I have one I might be persuaded to
part with. Let me know. Thanks, Mark
*Aside from Linux*, are there any OS's with suport
for MO drives with > 512B sectors? I know older Macs
would support some of the PMO drives but I think that
required some third party support...
Unfortunately (?) W2K seems to be the only practical
option I've found :-(
Tomorrow I am turning in my pile of white elephants to the scrapyard.
Of the pile, I only managed to sell one, on Ebay, for less than scrap
value (20 bucks - oh boy...). So away they go. I figure I will hold
one, and make a last ditch sales pitch to clear my conscious.
Anyway, these Megadata minicomputers are pre-microprocessor TTL
designs, and look to be from the mid 1970s. The more I look at the
boards, they look like twelve bit machines. These are rack mount units
about 4U high. These have no fancy front panels - just blue covers
with a reset button, and two LEDs. There are comm ports on the back.
The software is contained on a board with a bunch of 1702A EPROMs. RAM
is an array of 48 2101s. I have zero docs on these.
So anyway, if anyone wants to rescue (in the true sense) this last
Megadata, please contact me TONIGHT, as I leave for the junkyard
around 10 AM tomorrow. And yes, I would like something a bit better
than scrap value...
--
Will
I take it that despite the 35+ replies, no one actually recognized
this board, or wants to make an educated guess?
BTW, in view of the apparent confusion and at least one incorrect
opinion, the non-hybrid D-sub S and P refer to female (socket) and
male (pin or plug, depending on manufacturer) _connectors_, not the shell.
Same thing for many similar connectors, such as XLR & DIN, where
the shell is normally the opposite gender of the connectors.
So, the DB25S below is the same as found on the back panel of most
of our old RS-232 terminals & systems (or a pre-USB PC printer port).
-----------------Original Message-----------------------------------------------------------------
I'm hoping someone can ID this interesting board (sorry, no pix avail).
16Bit ISA (full-length)
DB25S Connector
20pin header socket
10 pos DIP SW
10 seg green LED bar graph
3 sets of jumper pins
80186 CPU
2 x XC2064 XILINX FPGAs
Pair of IDC 7130/7140 (1Kx16 dual-port memory)
2 x 256x8 SIPPs
C8208 DRAM controller
2 x 27256 EPROMs
2 x DS1225Y BBU SRAM
2 x LH0033 Fast FET buffers (12 pin metal cans)
Misc 74LS & F glue chips
Nothing recognizable in the EPROMS or SRAMS; 1 EPROM
is blank (erased/defective?)
Ring any bells with anyone, or time to scrap for parts?
mike
I'm curious what the group thinks about offering a kit for the Simon Computer
that would include a schematic, parts list, and perhaps construction
instructions. For those of you who aren't aware, Simon is a five bit relay
computer designed by Edmund Berkeley. A series of articles about how the
computer worked was published in the Oct 1950 - Sept 1951 issues of Radio
Electronics. I've thought about it, but I would guess the parts cost alone would
be in excess of $300.00, and maybe considerably more. On the other hand, it is a
really cool computer :).
On 8/22/06, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have any
> experience with it? How is the frame rate? I really like the look
> of Sheepshaver, it looks to be just what I'm after. Didn't it
> originally run on the Amiga? ISTR, having it on my A3000.
I don't know about "Sheepshaver", but "Shapeshifter" was a Mac
emulator I used on my A3000 in 1996/1997. I even used it with SANA2
drivers to run Netscape 0.8 on the MacOS - very cool when Amiga web
browsers were quite primitive.
-ethan
Dave wrote:
> When I was in university (70s), I had a hot-dog cooker which cooked
> weiners by connecting them across the 110v AC mains. This was a
> commercially produced device.
> [snip]
Did it light up a pickle when the hot-dog was done?
On Aug 22 2006, 17:57, Jules Richardson wrote:
> Rob O'Donnell wrote:
> > At 08:30 22/08/2006, Jules Richardson wrote:
> >
> >> You know, my prototype Torch Z80 disk unit has power out at the
back;
> >> I can't remember whether the production ones were like that or
not. It
> >> had never occurred to me that someone would want to power the
machine
> >> from it!
They were all like that, including all the production ones, and the
fitting instructions explained how to *remove* the Beeb's own PSU
completely, and fit the cable to run it off the Torch disk pack. It
was not a good move on Torch's part; I've seen several Beebs completely
destroyed as a result of bad PSUs or miswiring.
A common problem was that the Z80 card is supposed to fit inside the
Beeb, on PCB mounts stuck to the case top with sticky pads. Of course,
sometimes those unstick and the Z80 card -- component side down --
falls onto the Beeb's motherboard and shorts things out. If you're
lucky, it crashes the Beeb. If you're unlucky, it shorts out the
power. This makes the Torch switch-mode detect the over-current and
shut down, and in typical SMPSU fashion, immediately try to restart.
Unfortunately the regulation in that situation isn't too good and you
often get a voltage overshoot. The Beeb's LSTTL does not take kindly
to having 9V (approx) pumped into it. I've repaired a couple that had
that happen; one of them ended up with every single IC except the NMOS
socketed and replaced. It made a nice demo unit for our workshop and
an excellent practice setting for our YTS trainee :-)
Another one is that Torch used standard 3-core mains cable for the PSU
connections, and more than one person, faced with a dismantled system,
has connected this "mains cable" to the mains.
> I'm still surprised that there were any beebs incapable of running
the Torch
> board from their own PSU though. I believe there was a change to PSU
spec at
> some point early in the beeb's life though, so maybe very early
systems
> couldn't cope.
The maximum current drawn by the Torch Z80 is nominally close to the
spare capacity of the Beeb's SMPSU, so they were playing safe in case
people had other expansions. Besides, there were still Beebs with
linear supplies around when they built the prototypes in early 1982.
Yes, there were several PSUs. The original was a black linear power
supply, and there were three variants of that (two matt black, one
glossy). One "power adaptor/converter" originally used in Model As was
so notorious for running hot in upgraded machines or Model Bs that it
was nicknamed the "adaptor/exploder", after the failure mode it
exhibited. I remember being told in 1982 that "hardly any of these
remain in the field". I wonder why.
Anyone with a linear supply was offered a free switch-mode upgrade if
they fitted a DFS upgrade, or a few other things. The original SMPSU
was quite a nice unit made by Astec. This is in a golden coloured
metal case, or frame you might say, as it's open on three sides --
which doesn't matter because it's enclosed in the plastic case. Later
Acorn had these made under license by BSR, but once again the quality
suffered. Most of the BSR units have poorer regulation and less spare
capacity than the Astec ones.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I'm planning on going up to the Livermore swapmeet again on Sunday, September 3
to browse, drop stuff off, and meet some classic computer people. If anyone buys
some stuff from VCM (http://www.vintagecomputermarketplace.com/) and wants to
save on shipping by meeting at the swapmeet, just let me know. I think the
swapmeet opens to buyers at 7:00AM and more information is available on the web
at http://www.livermoreark.org/swap/swap.html.
Is there anyone around who has datasheets for the AMD Am29300-series
chips, and wouldn't mind scanning them for me? I'm most interested in
the sheets for the Am29331 sequencer and the Am29332 ALU.
Thanks.
Peace... Sridhar
I've spent a few hours this evening transferring software from my PERQ
over the serial port at 9600 baud, and I thought I'd share them, since
there don't seem to be many games archived on the 'net (feel free to
correct me if I'm wrong on that count :).
Thus far I've archived binaries & source for:
- PERQMan (seems to be an early version, looks like a 100% clone of
Pac-Man, vs. the changed sprites & "Perq Interactive Debugger" name I've
seen in screenshots)
- Chess
- Puzzle
These are available at: http://yahozna.dhs.org/computers/software/PERQ/
These all compile and run under POS (I have D.6 running on my machine).
If I'm wasting my time (i.e. if these bits have already been archived
somewhere, let me know so I don't spend more time painfully extracting
these files one at a time over a serial link...)
There are a handful of other games and utilities (a vt52 emulator, a
Pente game, etc..) that I'll be getting to sometime later this week.
Additionally, I'm working on archiving a raw image of the 14" Shugart in
my PERQ (again, over the serial port). I've written a simple pascal
program to do the dumping and I'm doing it 10 cylinders at a time since
it takes so long :). My goal eventually is to write a PERQ emulator,
but we'll see how that turns out...
Josh
> Hmm, random thought, but does it make sense to have a list on classiccmp.org
> of what preservation work (in terms of utilities, procedures etc.) has been
> done for various machines?
This is part of my charter as Software Curator at CHM (documentation and tools)
It will be going up as part of the SCC (hopefully, with a new name soon) web site.
http://community.computerhistory.org/scc
along with a blog of the projects that I'm working on at CHM.
--
Connectivity for me is spotty, since I can't send or receive bitsavers mail at work right now.
I've got a couple of cubic feet of MULTICS manuals, here.
Should I put them in the "to be scanned" pile or the "to
be shredded" pile?
--
Check what's already been done on bitsavers.
> But, one key difference between the QNX approach and that of
>most other current OS's is the microkernel architecture.
>Instead of a BIG monolithic kernel with ALL the drivers
>installed (or, extra glue for LKM support, etc.), a microkernel
>based design treats all of these as components which can be
>plugged together. And *talk* to each other (instead of being
>invoked "from above").
Yes, you just have the IPC overhead, though.
Not sure if it's IPC or cheaper hardware, but large network operations on my Macintosh (System 10) bring the machine
much closer to it's knees than any monolithic UNIX or even VMS on a VAX 4000/200. NB - I haven't used the microkernel
based Tru64 yet.
Microkernels are neat in theory, but a well-trimmed monolithic kernel seems to do pretty well with not too much space.
I went over and checked out that Genrad 2294 tester here in
Atlanta. The auction includes equipment not shown in the picture,
namely the whole Genrad test platform itself, and the PDP-11/44 shown in
the picture. There are 4 DEC drives in the rack, plus one CDC drive
(over the CPU), the CPU box itself, and two 8" floppies.
Either I don't know the "trick" to getting the CPU box to slide out
on it's rails, or it's jammed. In any case, I couldn't get a picture of
it's guts. I do have some closeups of the exteriors of the CPU box, the
CDC drive, and one of the DEC drives. Maybe by looking at them,
sometime can determine what model they are.
I'm going to pass on the unit, as it's just too damn big for me to
put anywhere, and while they have a fork lift to load it, I have no way
to get it off.
The company bought the system while one of the Rockwell Missile
System Division buildings either closed or moved. From what I gather,
this Genrad was used in some phase of the Hellfire missile construction,
although he wasn't clear if it was the manufacturing process group or
the development group. There's also a bunch of good older test
equipment, but nothing I have any use for or don't already have.
The box hasn't been running in at least 3 years. I didn't get a
look inside the chassis, but overall it looked pretty clean, no dents or
major bashes. Seems like a damn good deal, for someone with the right
equipment to transport it.
--jc
Hi,
I'm digging through boxes in an effort to "lighten the
load". Are any of these worth keeping?
Future Domain TMC-840
TMC-850
STB Systems (no P/N... a pair of S3 *display* controllers
onboard along with a DEC DC1040F -- which I assme to
be a wide SCSI controller?)
IBM (no P/N... three adaptec AIC7880's, a PowerPC 403GA,
IBM "Viper" and "Rattler" chips. Lots of FRU numbers
but no idea which applies to the *assembly*!)
Thanks!
Hi,
This box has a little fold down door in the front
(below the half height CD-ROM/tape drive). It is the
size of a second half-height drive bay. But, I'll
be damned if I can figure out why it's there!
Behind the door there is no way that anything *could*
be installed (even if the opening into the chassis
was NOT blocked).
Perhaps this cover assembly is used for some other
product(s) which *could* make use of the space behind it?
(obviously, this isn't a material question -- just
something trivial.... why go to the expense of putting
something there that *only* serves as a place to hide the
model number, etc.?)
Thanks,
--don
I hope this qualifies for a classic computer. If not then wipe it out.
I have a Nixdorf LK 3000 and LK 3500 module that I was preparing to
put on E Bay but discovered it didnt work. Examining it I discovered
NO BATTERY, Inside there are a blue and a red wire that must have
originaly gone to a battery clip. But I dont know what size or where
it resided. I dont want to get rid of this without fixing it first.
Does anyone have any info on what the battery (pack?) looked like on
thei personal computer?
I am glad I decided to try it out because I had remembered that it DID
work. Shows what 70 years will do to your memory. I dont even
remember removing the battery pack!
--
Jim Isbell
"If you are not living on the edge, well then,
you are just taking up too much space."
Just wondering whether other collectors try to acquire
original boxes to go with their machines. I have several
original Ohio Scientific boxes that I prize as part of
my collection. Anyway, I just got a nice Koyo 9 inch
monitor (built 1979, IMSAI blue) in an IBM PS/2 Color
Display 8515 box. I know that there are a few PS/2
collectors on the list. The box is not in the best
shape, but it isn't awful either. Anybody interested in
it or should I pitch it? Located in the Maryland suburbs
of Washington, DC.
Bill
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.3/423 - Release Date: 8/18/2006
The second or third weekend in Sep;t. I might be going on a trip whhich will
take me thru N IL, parts of WI, and close to Minn/St. Paul, MN. If you have
any interest in any DEC equipment, including cabinets, disk drives, and PDP
8's, ll's or anything else, I may be able to bring it and eitaher drop off
or meet you at a mutual meeting area.
Please feel free to contact me off list
Thanks,
Paul Anderson
(217) 586-5361)
>
I have a Compaq Portable III here, worked the last time it was powered
(years ago), may or may not still work. I also have a file called
"SP0316.ZIP" that contains "SP0316.exe" which, I THINK, is a utility
(service pack) that makes the setup disk for the Portable III. However, it
needs to run on a PC with a 360k 5.25" floppy drive.
I THINK.
Just a thought on this subject -- do pretty many of these boxes have that
_fuse_ that I've seen mention of in some contexts, which would kill the +5V
to the keyboard if the old one had that bad of a cable?
Something that may end up needing to consider here, depending o how bad that
original cable was.
--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
M Dakin
I think this one is on-topic. I got a Compaq Portable III dumped on my
doorstep (more or less literally, actually), and while I don't really
collect PCs, this one's form factor fascinated me. However, it seems like
it's failing POST or its equivalent -- when I turn it on, the caps lock
light on the keyboard (literally hanging on by a few threads) blinks, then
the three lights on the front bezel and the 5.25" floppy light blink three
times accompanied by three beeps from what appears to be the power supply?,
and it just sits there, doing three beeps pause three beeps pause ..., until
I turn it off.
Nothing else spins up and nothing shows on the screen, even with me messing
with the contrast. Any suggestions, or is there a troubleshooting manual to
give me some starting points to see if I can refurbish this? Is the fact that
the keyboard is probably incompletely connected to blame?
--
--------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ ---
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Klein bottle for immediate occupancy; inquire within. ----------------------
Ray,
There is a good list of AT commands at
http://docs.kde.org/stable/en/kdenetwork/kppp/appendix-hayes-commands.html
The ATI9 will return the Apple product code and firmware version of the
modem.
Check out http://www.tidbits.com/iskm/modems.html#aa7 for the Apple/Hayes AT
commands.
-Darin
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 13:15:16 -0400
From: Ray Arachelian <ray at arachelian.com>
Subject: Anyone have an Apple Modem 1200 or 300 manual?
To: cctech at classiccmp.org
Message-ID: <44E74724.2040706 at arachelian.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I'm wondering if this was a Hayes compatible modem, and if so what the
result strings were for various commands such as just "AT" by itself,
and "ATI", "ATI0" and so on.
I'm hoping someone can ID this interesting board (sorry, no pix avail).
16Bit ISA (full-length)
DB25S Connector
20pin header socket
10 pos DIP SW
10 seg green LED bar graph
3 sets of jumper pins
80186 CPU
2 x XC2064 XILINX FPGAs
Pair of IDC 7130/7140 (1Kx16 dual-port memory)
2 x 256x8 SIPPs
C8208 DRAM controller
2 x 27256 EPROMs
2 x DS1225Y BBU SRAM
2 x LH0033 Fast FET buffers (12 pin metal cans)
Misc 74LS & F glue chips
Nothing recognizable in the EPROMS or SRAMS; 1 EPROM
is blank (erased/defective?)
Ring any bells with anyone, or time to scrap for parts?
mike
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 17:22:43 -0700, jim stephens
<jwstephens at msm.umr.edu> wrote:
> William Donzelli wrote:
>
>>> There were a lot of good ideas in the iAPX432, anybody knows, if
>>> they
>>> actually were used on any OS ?
>>
>>
>> AS/400. Properly.
>>
> can you elaborate, or point to a web page? thanks
I wasn't aware that Intel had anything to do with the AS/400
architecture :-)
The iAPX432 was an interesting Intel failure of the '80s which
provided the tools to layout subsequent Intel devices.
<http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/retrocomputing/intel/iapx432/> is a
good read on the beast.
An detailed overview of the architecture: <http://
www.cs.washington.edu/homes/levy/capabook/Chapter9.pdf>
(Part of an interesting book on Capability-Based Computer Systems - a
whole other thread... <http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/levy/
capabook/>)
I remember salivating over the chip system when it came out until I
got sticker shock.
CRC
<
I'm wondering if this was a Hayes compatible modem, and if so what the
result strings were for various commands such as just "AT" by itself,
and "ATI", "ATI0" and so on.
>
>Subject: data sheet for com5025
> From: "dwight elvey" <dkelvey at hotmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 07:45:45 -0700
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
>
>Hi
>Does anyone have a pointer to a data sheet for a com5025? I believe
>it to be a synchronous serial chip but I've not found much on the web.
>I think it is compatable with a 2652 but the only thing I can find on that
>is a 16 bit part from Philips. I don't think this is a 16 bit appliction.
>Thanks
>Dwight
>
It's a multiprotocal universal synchronous reciever/tranmitter [USYNR/T]
and it's wade by SMC and show in their 82/83 databook and later. It's
an 8/16 bit bus device, selectable.
Allison
Hi all,
I have a microVAX 3900 in a small cabinet (approx 90 cm deep, 105 cm high)
that is taking up place that I really need. AFAIK, the 3900 is in working
order,
and I have also an RF215 (?) smallish tower with some disks in it. I need to
check if you are interested. If you don't want the cabinet, you can get the
PSU and the 3900 "crate", but given their weight, I am not going to ship it!
That would get costly, but you could try to talk me into it :-)
Contact me offlist (gooi AT oce DOT nl).
- Henk, PA8PDP.
_________________________________________________________________
500 foto's per maand uploaden, GRATIS! http://spaces.live.com
Hi all,
I have a HSC70 in a small cabinet (approx 90 cm deep, 105 cm high)
that is taking up place that I really need. It's too crowdy.
AFAIK, the HSC70 is in working order, and a tech told me that it is
fairly equipped internally. I can't tell, I don't know anything of
the HSC70. If somebody is interested, I can rip boards etc, before
it goes to the trash :-( Somebody who wants the whole thing,
comes first, as I am still hoping it can have a good "life".
Contact me offlist (gooi AT oce DOT nl).
- Henk, PA8PDP.
_________________________________________________________________
Gratis bellen van PC naar PC? Download de nieuwste Messenger!
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=nl-nl
>> Do you have the POS source code? I thin I hace most of the Pascal (not
>> microcode, though) sources for one version.
>>
>I do not
several different revisions of the sources are available as floppy images on
http://bitsavers.org/bits/PERQ/floppy/pos
Marginally on-topic (?) -- the watchman is "old", and
the intended application is a "computer" ;-)
I'm looking for a working Sony WATCHman (NOT *walk*man)
for a wearable I am hacking together. Doesn't need
to be in good cosmetic shape since I will disembowel
it, regardless...
Apologies if I have *stretched* the on-topic-ness on
this one :-(
I don't suppose anyone can help, but I'll ask anyway.
I have an IBM 836 Keypunch, which is similar to an
026 keypunch but has a patch panel in a pedestal to
the left of the users knees.
It also has three 40 pin connectors on the back panel.
Does anyone know the capabilities of these? Where
can I get matching plugs? The logic levels are presumably
suitable for the relay logic within, but any idea what
actual voltages and amperages are?
After I dragged it home, I found there was not 1, not 2, not 3, but 4 MSCP
disk controllers installed in this BA213 cabinet. They are, KFQSA, viking
VIA/QTA, CQD223/M, USDC 1108. What a good day today! This is my maximum VAX
3800. My existing VAX 3900 is the minimum, by the way.
vax,9000
Previously posted:
>> Next, someone else is going to ask, "what's sex?"
> Other than the 6809 did any other computers have the memonic
> SEX - Sign EXtend?
SDS/XDS and their Sigma 7 computer (and possibly ran on some of their
other Sigma series computers?) had a hardware diagnostic program
called SEX -- which was short for System EXerciser.
-eric
Hi,
A friend of mine needs to repair the power supply of a TRS-80 Model II.
I've found a schematic but without part numbers and values! He needs to
know the type of transistor Q1, there are no markings on the case of the
transistor. I've checked the power supply of my Model II, and there are no
markings, too. The Technical Reference Manual has all schematics for the
Model II, but the schematic for the power supply is useless without
component values. Might a BU208 for Q1 do the job?
Christian
--- Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
> On 8/19/2006 at 12:49 AM Alexey Toptygin wrote:
>
> >This is computationally expensive and complicated
.
> Every time you have to
> >cross a privilege boundary you have to switch
> context, validate any data
> >going across and verify permissions. You also nee
d
> an exact specification
> >of the interface for every such interface - if th
e
> system doesn't know
> >what your DLL is allowed to do, how can it stop i
t
> from doing what it
> >shouldn't? This is why this sort of pain is usual
ly
> reserved for the
> >user-kernel interface.
>
> I don't think so. There is a subset of all DLLs
> that can be classified as
> "trusted"--they know to check arguments and the
> operation is well-defined.
> One might classify these as "friendly" DLLs and om
it
> any sort of checking.
> For all others, the calling program can specify a
> tighter degree of control
> at the expense of more overhead.
>
> Cheers,
> Chuck
>
How is the checking done? If it's purely by
name then it can easily be switched for
something much nastier without the user
finding out.
There used to be a fake "datatypes.library"
for Workbench 3 on the Amiga. Instead of
containing various datatypes functions/data
(say for JPEG's, GIF's and IFF's etc.) it was
a nasty virus.
Personally I prefer Workbench 2 and have
mine set up with my own custom icons and
mouse pointers :)
NB: For those that don't know, Workbench is
the Amiga version of Windows - or should that
be Windows is the PC version of Workbench :)
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Does anyone have documentation on the PDP-7 instruction set and hardware?
I know that the PDP-7 is a superset of the PDP-4, but I can't even find much
on what instructions the -4 supported (let alone the extended memory and
device control operations). A Google session this morning was not useful.
--
--------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ ---
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Do not innovate unnecessarily. -- "The Tick" -------------------------------
Okay,
I got the 11/34 up and running, and I loaded XXDP. It fails the trap
test. The instructions state you should examine the stack pointer
(777706) which shows it to be a value of 000470. This is supposed to
tell you the address of the Program Counter, right? So I load address
470, and the value is 000330. What instruction is failing? Am I
reading this right?
Any help, as always, much appreciated.
Thanks!
Julian
On Aug 17 2006, 20:31, Scott Quinn wrote:
> An PDP-11/03 processor, LSI-11 quad-height M7264EB (does anything
> go out over the C/D fingers, or are they just there for stability?)
I'm not sure exactly what version that is but it does supply refresh
for the memory, although only the very earliest memory boards actually
need that -- in fact your MSV11-B is the only one I can think of that
does -- and it's sometimes disabled. W4 controls that, it's inserted
to *disable* it. And that board possibly has 8K bytes of memory on it
already, which needs the refresh enabled.
Are the five MICROM sockets right at the edge of the board, or is there
some circuitry just to the left of them? The former is KD11-F, the
latter is KD11-J. Usually the former has on-board memory, usually the
latter does not. If there's a 23-003B5 chip in the leftmost socket,
you have the optional KEV11, which contains the EIS/FIS instruction
set.
You didn't mention -- or I missed it -- what backplane you have. I'm
guessing it's a "straight" backplane like an H9273. If so, what the
LSI-11 puts on the C/D fingers shouldn't matter, unless you put
something immediately below it that dislikes the LSI-11. I don't think
there's anything untoward on C/D, though, because they can be used in
"serpentine" backplanes like the H9270 used in the small BA11-M box for
small 11/03 systems.
> DHV11-A 8-line async serial
Interesting; that's a slightly later vintage than the other parts.
> RXV11 (forgot the V originally...)
That will need an RX01 (or an RX02 with the switches set for RX01
emulation) dual 8" floppy drive.
> either MSV11-B 4k RAM
This one needs the refresh control signal from the LSI-11.
> or MSV11-PL 256K ram (18-bit, but will the LSI-11 just ignore the
> extra or will it futz up?)
The 18-bit designation for the memory means that it has two parity bits
as well as the 16 data bits, and the processor will ignore that.
Actually, the MSV11-P has it's own parity CSR so some OSs might be
able to use it. It might not work because the extra address lines may
not be held at the right level -- the 11/03 only has 16 address lines
and no memory management, and it puts some extraneous signals on the
top 4 address lines -- but although the MSV11-P supports 22-bit
addressing, it also works in 18-bit systems, so it's worth trying and
it shouldn't do any harm to try it. If it does work, you'll end up
with 56K bytes of usable memory, because the top 8K byte page is
reserved for I/O.
The 16/18/22-bit designations can be confusing when you're talking
about memory, because they normally refer to the size of the address
bus and hence the address range. An 11/03 (and any CPU using an LSI11
or 11/02) has only 16-bit addressing. An 11/23 may be 18-bit or
22-bit, later processors are 22-bit. However, 16-bit and 18-bit are
sometimes used in the contect of memory to refer to the data bus width:
16 bits with, or without, two parity bits.
> Am I getting in too deep for a first-go at a PDP-11?
I wouldn't say so. It's a fairly simple machine, as -11s go. You want
to see if you can acquire some of the DEC handbooks for those systems,
such as the 1976 "Microcomputer Handbook" and perhaps the 1978-79
"Memories and Peripherals Handbook". Other useful ones are the 1982
"Microcomputers and Memories" handbook (doesn't say quite so much about
the LSI-11, though, but it does list the jumpers and etch revisions
etc), 1980 "Microcomputer Interfaces Handbook", and 1983-84
"Microcomputer Interfaces Handbook". Plus, of course, you should see
if you can get any of the engineering drawings as they too contain a
lot of useful information.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Okay,
I got the 11/34 up and running, and I loaded XXDP. It fails the trap
test. The instructions state you should examine the stack pointer
(777706) which shows it to be a value of 000470. This is supposed to
tell you the address of the Program Counter, right? So I load address
470, and the value is 000330. What instruction is failing? Am I
reading this right?
Any help, as always, much appreciated.
Thanks!
Julian
The DN discussion left me thinking about how classic computer collecting was presented to the outside world.
One of the things that stood out rapidly was that I would not recommend an Apollo as a first foray into the classic
world (I know that in this circumstance it isn't a first foray, just thinking in general).
So, I started thinking about what would be a good starter system. So far, I've come up with
Sun-3 or Sun-4 (good availability of information, easy software accesablilty (NetBSD works well, Solaris/SunOS isn't bad if you
can find it, although Sun licensing is the strictest of all the options here, with no transfers allowed). Open hardware, easy-availability
of parts and upgrades. Headers come with, SunOS 4 comes with cc.
Silicon Graphics IRISes of the ARCS era. Goodly amount of information (sgistuff.g-lenerz.de and futuretech are put out/aided/etc by
listmembers yay!!) Software is harder to come by, NetBSD isn't very well supported on these beasts and IRIX is pricy (but the license
transfers with the machine). Compilers available for 5.3, headers for 6.2 and 6.5. Parts are available readily for many classic IRISes, less
so for the biggish-iron (ultramicros? what would you call those...) machines or newer machines. High cool factor.
I ruled out IBM (non-PCs) because of software and some unusual hardware choices, DEC due to hard-to-find hardware parts on VAX and
the highly confusing mess with Alpha (play the "will my machine run VMS or Tru64" game - step right up, watch the pea...) Apollo because of
hard-to-find S/W and limited information on the net.
HP 9000 could be a contender, too. - good NetBSD support, (currently) free HP-UX, good online documentation, well-built machines.
You'll note this is pretty much limited to UNIX workstations, because of my space limitations and my assumption that UNIX will make for a
easier transition.
Any other ideas?
I have a need for this monitor. It is used on a measuring system.
It is not used with todays PC's, Mac or otherwise.
I have been looking for one for awhile.
Please contact me at following phone number
1-888-769-9017
Roger Fairman
Specialty Tires of America
1000 Don Mateer Drive
Unicoi, TN. 37692
I have a new bounty. A client is seeking an NEC ProSpeed 386 with docking
station. If you've got one then it's definitely worth money.
Contact me privately if you have one for more information.
Thanks!
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Hi,
I am desperately trying to make room here so my ASR-33 has got to go.
I'll either eBay it or ship it off for "long term storage" ;-)
In either case, I need to pack it so it will survive the
UPS gorillas.
I figured pull the mechanism off the base (is the base REALLY
worth saving??) and put it in one box (the mechanism) and
the "skin" in another. Wrap each in plastic. Shoot the
*mechanism* box full of self-expanding foam -- so everything is
encased in a conformal block of foam (the plastic wrap
preventing the foam from migrating into the mechanism itself).
And pack the skin in "cheetos" (peanuts)?
Does this sound like a safe approach? It usually works for
*monitors* but they aren't quite as irregularly shaped...
Thanks!
--don
Don <THX1138 at dakotacom.net> wrote:
TIP: An embroidery hook works wonders for fishing wirewrap wires
out of a nest without too much damage! ;-) (but you have to
find the right size hook to ensure a "good grab" on the wire)
For those of us who go back to the dawn, there was the spring hook, a
beautifully functional tool used on the relay machines. They worked great
on the thick wire mats. I still have all of mine and even today find the
spring hook to be one of the most useful tools around the shop.
Another tool I found useful was a jewelers device to hold rings for
soldering. It looks like a pair of tweezers with the ends bent out so they
can't touch. You squeeze it, stick it in the wire mat, and release. The
tension holds the wires apart. We made a bunch of copies using piano wire
and put shrink tubing over the ends.
If you get a chance, look at the 6600 or 7600 in the Museum. Seymour loved
those dense wire mats - he used wire lengths to tune his systems. If you
worked on one of his machines, you spent a significant part of your working
hours buried in wire up to your forearms.
The worst was the Cyber 170 machines. They were twisted pair 30 gauge wire
mats. If you weren't careful, the pins bent and touched. And there was
what we called "tingles". The broken piece off the end of a wire would
disappear into the wire mat and eventually short two pins out. Even more
fun, if you were tuning clocks, the power was on, so you could watch the
path of the tingle by the little sparks. Always happened on a Friday night,
of course.
One of the worst nightmares I worked on was a machine that the engineers
working on, had set their coffee cups on top of the cabinet and forgot about
them. This was before the styrofoam cups, just waxed paper. It soaked
through and dumped the coffee down into the wire mat. We tried for a few
days to fix it but finally had to scrap the entire chassis. Per the Peter
Principle, the chief suspect was later promoted to be my manager.
Billy
>
>Subject: Re: PDP-8 /e/f/m memory
> From: Don <THX1138 at dakotacom.net>
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:00:57 -0700
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>Allison wrote:
>>
>> What has this to to do with the topic at hand?
>
>If people are griping about the *possibility* of a battery
>leaking inside their gear, I contend that if you're storing
>that gear in conditions that would bring about this sort
>of problem (e.g., excessive ambient temperatures, humidity)
>then there are bound to be *other* things that are happening
>to that gear besides the potential of a battery leak.
Different topic and worth discussion.
I attack it from a different view. I assume batteries will
discharge when least desired in storage and will leak.
All my PCs that have CMOS batteries accessable have a external
(.6x2x1.5 inches) plastic box with a suitable battery placed
in it and wires to the internal battery location. I had a
bad experience early on with NiCd leakage on a board so off
the board they go. External makes for accessability without
opening the cases. It also allows me to use a battery that
is larger or better that would not fit where the orginal was.
I apply this to a my otehr systems as well, S100 toy clock
battery, MicrovaxII TOY clock battery and similar.
I agree heat and batteries generally do not get along well
and storing equipment with batteries installed is also risky.
Allison
The Toledo craigslist just posted the following for free:
- An SGI Indy with its giant, heavy monitor.
- An HP PA-RISC Pizza box machine with its heavier-than-the-Indy's
monitor.
I am not interested, but I could help someone else get them.
--
Paul R. Santa-Maria
Temperance, Michigan USA
> Firstly, this is, as I am sure you agree, not a list to provide answers
> to members questions.
Thank you for the clarification. This will save me a great deal of time in
the future not researching answers to questions.
If this list is meant to be just another wank like alt.folklore.computers,
enjoy the noise.
I am in the process of doing a major downsize in the collection. Most of what I
am getting rid of will be posted on the Vintage Computer Marketplace, probably
at the rate of 5 - 10 items per day. The URL of the Vintage Computer Marketplace
is:
http://www.vintagecomputermarketplace.com/
My real interests are in the pre 1981 era although I will be keeping a few
interesting later machines from the early 80's. What I intend to concentrate on
are the Polymorphic and Lobo Drives computers since they were made here in Santa
Barbara, and I still have enough contacts to find people who used to work there.
And of course, I'll still be working with anything *I* find interesting :).
Great News !!!!
I have received enough in donations to pay for the KS/NE trip next month on
Sept 8th. I now need just 135 more people to donate $10 or whatever amount
they can from $1 to $$$ book the GA trip to rescue those items. Remember
your donation is tax deducible and is for a great cause. Thanks to everyone
that donated to make the KS/NE trip a go. I will get lots of pictures and
hope the drive back will be smooth. Read more about the two trips at
www.houstoncomputermuseum.org
Got a few of my numbers backwards- the boards are in reality
An PDP-11/03 processor, LSI-11 quad-height M7264EB (does anything go out over the C/D fingers, or are
they just there for stability?)
DHV11-A 8-line async serial
RXV11 (forgot the V originally...)
either MSV11-B 4k RAM or MSV11-PL 256K ram (18-bit, but will the LSI-11 just ignore the extra or will it futz up?)
Am I getting in too deep for a first-go at a PDP-11? These were offered in trade for a scope, and I don't have any
other PDP stuff (it would timeshare a VAX 4200 chassis with the VAX, with a very advanced "card-pull" scheduler to
prevent conflicts).
Scott
I've started a new wiki on the Wikia Scratchpad about the exploration
of computer history through emulation and my first digital "victim" is
the PDP-8. I have the outline of a basic PDP-8 (OS/8) in SIMH started,
but I still need to flesh it out. I'll probably write my basic OS/8
tutorial tommorow, but input from more experienced fans would be
welcome. Various articles (any red link) need to be written and while
I plan on wrting most of them if need be, help from the community
would be much appreciated. Just remember that your audience is
presumably going to be curious newbies, not "old hands" who just need
a little reminder. That said I look forward to your comments and
contributions.
Main Wiki Page: http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/Computer_History_Exploration
PDP-8 Article: http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/PDP-8
Michael "Madcrow" K.
Hi Steve, i'm located in Germany, an i was responsible for INTEL from 1980
to 1986
at an Distributor.
I found your ISIS-II stuff, when i'm looking for an CrossAsm for Mostek
MK3870.
If you need something i've a lot of original INTEL Software for ISIS-II and
ISIS-III,
and also Literature - feel free to ask me
I read you have disassembled ISIS-II, - i'm interested in the source code.
Also i'm looking for an XASM running on ISIS-II for MOSTEK MK3870 an
Single Chip Controller based on the FAIRCHILD F8.
Greetings from Germany
Walter
I have the opporitunity of getting some LSI 11/2 boards (LSI 11/2 processor, some memory, serial MUX, RK floppy driver) (I think)
Couple questions: will the multiport serial work for a console or do I need a specific "console" card?
Will these boards work in a VAX 4k BA430 chassis/backplane, or will the C/D wiring and DSSI over C/D throw them off?
Just figured I'd post this out here... I have a collection of old Apollo DN
systems (3000,3010,3500,4000,4500,5500 I think sums it up) I did a little
work on porting NetBSD to and then have just never had the time to pursue.
Might be willing to part with them to someone in the New England area, since I
have monitors with some of them, and OS tapes, spare hard drives, etc.
Anyone interested, feel free to contact me... really not up for shipping
monitors around, but for someone fairly local with interest I might be willing
to do a road trip.
email reply, or to: phufnagel at snet.net
-- Pete
> Dude, I'm very interested in that stuph
Anyone who uses "dude" and "stuph" in a sentence doesn't need to have
anything other than a Linux box, preferably "modded".
Hello Everyone,
I ran across a Summagraphics MM1103 tablet. I see that there was a thread
on this list in 2004 regarding this device. Do we know the communication
protocol/format? Do we know what the 3 8-bit DIP switches inside do? Any
documentation or pointers to documentation would be appreciated.
thanks, -kurt