Hi all,
I must be missing something, but I have not found a good way to
preserve a bunch of vax/vms files. I've looked at VMSZip, Gzip, VMSTar,
etc, and I must be missing something.
Here is what I am trying to do:
Before my vax finally dies, I want to take the hundred or so TK50s I
have and restore them to the hard drive and then move them to PC-land
for long term storage. This is halfway done with the tapes that are
easily readable. I now have a bunch of directories, one for each tape,
with files in them on the VAX. So the tree is only two levels deep on
the vax. The files are pretty mixed: backup files, savesets,
distributions, text files, etc. Right now the files amount to about 2Gb.
Now, the environment is: VAX 3100-30 with SCSI external. THis is where
I hooked up the TK70 (TZ30?) to read the tapes. I have network access
and can get to it via FTP and TELNET from elsewhere, namely my PC. I
also have a bunch of different SCSI tape drives, 8mm, 4mm, 9 track, etc.
So, I could transfer all the files if I could containerize (zip) them.
Do I try to Zip them somehow (what program) and FTP them, or do I just
write them to duplicate disks/tapes and throw them on a shelf, hoping I
have a machine to read them in the future?
I'm usually pretty good with this stuff, having been around the VMS
world for a few decades, but I just have this memory block, or the
blinders are on.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Joe Heck
Dear Mr
I am working on a project and I need gate level
schematic or VHDL code of any one 4bit (or a
simple)processor like AM2901 .
Description by details will be useful .
Do you have any ideas where I can find it?
Respectfully,
Amir
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Hi everyone, I would like to announce my newest project, a weekly podcast
of an excellent book on computer history, in audio format. I have received
permission from the author, Stan Veit, and his publisher to pursue this.
The first installment is now ready. My podcasts are in m4a format, but
there is a zipped mp3 version of this one that can be downloaded from my
web site.
Though I am not a professional broadcaster, announcer or reader, I have
worked hard to make this production as professional as possible. Please
give it a listen if you have a chance.
The publisher hopes to put out a new edition of the book soon. This
original edition was published in 1993. I have personally sold 250+ copies
of it over the years, as I am a big fan and I have met Stan personally.
Stan opened the first personal computer store on the east coast in New
York City, which was only the second one in the world. He was also the
founding Editor-In-Chief of Computer Shopper magazine.
Thanks very much, David
David Greelish
classiccomputing.com
The Classic Computing Podcast
Home of Computer History Nostalgia
Stan Veit's History of the Personal Computer
Audio Book Podcast
Re: " Hmmm, I've still got a few 3.5' BP drives in original shrinkwrap..."
No go. There is no demand for either the 3.5" drives or the CD drives.
Only the 5.25" drives ($192 was high, but these usually go for about $100).
Reason: There ARE USB 3.5" floppy drives, and USB external CD drives.
But, at present, if you need to read a 5.25" floppy on a PC, there is no
easy way to do it. Modern motherboards no longer even support two floppy
drives [at all, of any kind]. And laptops? Forget it.
We NEED a USB 5.25" (and I'd argue even 8") drive interface device. It
should support both 360k and 1.2MB 5.15" drives, and perhaps 8" drives as
well.
At present, the old parallel port 5.25" drives are the only option for many
people. So they will fetch absurd prices.
I have a 3.5" backpack also. And a backpack tape drive, which used a floppy
interface. I'd love to convert either/both to a 5.25" drive if you know
how.
>From the header of the assembled files:
SYSTEM ANALYZER IN-III
IN-III MACRO ASMB
IN-III LINKER VERSION 3-2 840801
IN-III MACRO ASMB. (Z80.ZILOG) VER. 1-01 830131 DATE 58.09.22
(Japanese style date, Showa 58 = 1983)
Dates to around 1983/1984. Supports the 6301, 6809 and Z80.
Thanks,
Kelly
The talk about RS-232C reminded me of another simple interface that's been
around for awhile--MIDI.
I hate MIDI cables--I mean I REALLY hate them. I trip over them, they get
tangled up in my chair and I'm afraid the dog will eat them.
I've seen a couple of wireless MIDI adaptors, but since they're low-volume
items, they're freakishly expensive. Does anyone have any ideas or
experience with a low-budget wireless MIDI setup?
Cheers,
Chuck
Hello
I was the factory rep on this product. I worked with
HP on the installtion traing video. please feel free
to reply.
bk
We will rise up on wings of gold
1Knight
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
across the screen. Specifically a trs80 model 4. Is
this indicative of a video circuitry problem or a
display problem?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Anyone got any IIci cache cards they'd be willing to consider parting with?
My indefatigable IIci (which has powered DNS, printer services and network
power services to my apartment network for going on six years now) has
burned through another one, evidenced by 1) a kernel panic in NetBSD 2) the
Chimes of Death 3) the Chimes of Death going away replaced by normal booting
when I replaced the cache card.
It seems I go through one around every two years, so it was due to eat another
one, I guess. The 32K variant will do nicely. Please respond offlist, and
thanks.
--
--------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ ---
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- When people get acupuncture, do voodoo dolls die? --------------------------
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Dave Mabry
>
> Kelly Leavitt wrote:
>
> >Here are some of the strings:
> >IN-III MACRO ASMB. (Z80.ZILOG) VER. 1-01 830131 DATE 60.
> 1.10 PAGE 1
> >SYSTEM ANALYZER IN-III VER. 2-2
> >ISIS
> >IN-IIIDIN6301
> >DINZ80B
> >
> >This was a pretty standard DS/DD 8" disk that read right in
> using a catweasel and also with imagedisk. I think it might
> have been an Intellec-III, but that is based on the repeated
> appearance of ISIS, and the fact that it is ROM source.
> >
<SNIP>
> One thing that I can say with certainty is that Intel never sold a
> development system that used double-sided 8" disks. They had a
> double-density format (MMFM, rather than MFM that most used) but they
> were single-sided. I have several Series II and Series III Intellec
> systems and none has double-sided disk drives.
I have verified that it is indeed an DS/DD image.
>
> Another observation in the above strings...the Z80.ZILOG
> isn't Intel.
> They never sold anything that supported any Z-80-specific
> systems. And
> ISIS, from Intel, was ISIS-II. Intel would not have left off
> the "-II"
> from their identifiers.
I have found references to z80 extensions for the Intellec series, however based on the DS/DD discrepancy and other clues, I must agree that this probably is NOT Intellec.
>
> Now, for my guess. This looks like possibly something from a
> competitor
> of Intel, or possibly one of the development systems from Zilog or
> National. It is possible they used an ISIS-compatible file
> format, or
> object module format. That may be what the "ISIS" is all
> about in that
> string.
I have been examining more of the disks (there are about 40 that appear to be panasonic source code). I have one that appears to be a CP/M disk with a lot of tools from "SOPHIA SYSTEMS CO., LTD.". They are an ICE developer.
60K CP/M VERS 2.2
SS-5000 SYSTEM
Did Sophia Systems make entire units, or just the software and ICE attachments?
Well, this is my first post to the list in quite a while; most of you may
not even remember me... but I have been lurking.
Now I have a problem I need help with. I have a PDT-11/150HC, the dual drive
model with 32KW and the 3 extra serial ports. It had been working fine, up
through last year, when I stored it.
I was working on another project, building a PDP-11/53 from a DECServer 550
(like Jonathan Engdahl's) when I needed to copy some floppies. I brought out
the trusty old PDT, and of course, it wouldn't work.
I am using a VT420 with DECConnect wire and shells to talk to the PDT. The
VT and wires are all known good, tested with other equipment.
What happens is that when I turn the PDT on and type the 2 "@" characters to
set the baud rate (4800), the #2 led properly goes out, the RUN led comes
on, but NOTHING comes back to the terminal. Thinking that I needed a NULL
MODEM in the cable, I put a MMJ crossover connector block between the
terminal and the PDT. Strangely, I had exactly the same results - nothing
out on the monitor - with TX and RX swapped how the heck does this happen?
As I recall, the usual response is something like "Press B to Boot". In any
event, pressing "B" does nothing either.
I have performed the self test with the lid off and modules elevated and the
result was that the first 4 LED's on the Intelligence Module came on.
This is result #17, indicating that either the DISK Controller Module or
Cable G1 has failed and need to be replaced - impossible, at least in the
case of the Disk Module. Besides, what does this have to do with no response
on the terminal?
My next step is to test the power supply and trace power to the various
modules, as per the Mini-Maintenance manual. I'm hoping that someone on the
list is more familiar with the PDT and can offer useful suggestions that
might shorten an exhaustive troubleshooting effort - I'm not really up to
it.
I have as resources 3 books, 1) The PDT 11/150 User Guide (EK-PT150UG-001),
2) The PDT 11/150 Installation Guide (EK-PT150-IN-002), and 3) The PDT
11/150 Mini-Maintenance Hardware Guide (EK-PT150-J1-002). I would very much
like to get a copy of EK-PT150-TM, the Technical manual, in print or PDF
format.
I also have the usual DVM, a Tektronix 2215 dual channel scope, and the
memories of being an electronics technician (with a radiotelephone license)
during my late 20's, a lifetime ago. I spent the last 20 years of my
so-called career as a systems programmer and am now retired.
Can someone that knows about the PDT assist me? All useful input
appreciated!
Stuart Johnson
Ssj152 AT charter DOT net
Old man, Old hobby
A mutual acquaintance of mine is trying to write a thesis and needs a
little help. He writes:
"The project that I am working on is for my Masters in Library
Information Science degree with a focus on Archiving. For my paper I
have to write a 10 to 12 page paper on a subject that involves the
preservation of something that has archival significance. So I decided
to do it on video games and what steps are being taken to preserve them
on the media that they were originally written on such as Atari and
Nintendo cartridges some of which are degrading significantly and no
longer work on the game systems they were designed for."
If anyone has any help or leads for him, or any experience archiving
ROMs/cartridges that may degrade over time and how to properly preserve
them, please drop him a line at "andrew.pacilli at simmons.edu". Your
input can shape an archivist's future :-)
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org) http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project: http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/
I've been trying to puzzle out a board in front of me, loaded with
Intel chips. The CPU on it is a 16MHz 80186 - it appears to be an
interface peripheral board for some Astro-Med product. Externally, it
has a serial port and a GPIB port. What's strange to me is that I
can't identify the parts that appear to be the GPIB buffers - a pair
of 28-pin Intel D8293s. There's also a P82C08, which I can't find any
hard info on.
So... does anyone recognize the Intel part numbers P82C08 or D8293
(yes, I know the P is plastic and the D is ceramic; it's the parts
themselves I'm curious about).
Thanks,
-ethan
Hi folks,
please take a look at this picture:
http://h316.hachti.de?gallery/tape_drive2/dscn1704_1024.jpg
More can be found here:
http://h316.hachti.de?gallery/tape_drive/http://h316.hachti.de?gallery/tape_drive2/
Who has ever seen/used/heard about/repaired this kind (similar is ok,
too!) of tape drive?
Doesn't matter if in a museum, private collection, basement, scrapyard,
heaven or hell.
Doesn't matter if long time ago or today - let me know!
Please contact me if you have seen this kind of machine before. I am
looking for EVERY trace of these machines! Every hint is appreciated.
Also things like "I have seen such a unit 25 years ago in a factory for
women's underwear which is closed since 15 years" are important. I hope
to find still some traces. These machines were very heavy so there's a
real chance that there are still some of them standing around forgotten.
That's a Honeywell 4210 7-track tape drive.
Once I've ruined three friends' backs with helping me to get it into my
first floor collection room.
And now I've got the problem that most of the electronics are missing. I
don't have a solution yet. I don't know where to start. And I have no
spares. But some documentation.
I know only one thing: I want to and will bring it back to work!
But it would be better and easier to find spare cards or a second unit.
It would also be great to get some pieces (easily exchangeable parts)
for some limited time - just to check the rest.
So please try to remember and contact me. And yes, I have asked this
before. Will do that again and again from time to time. Any luck with
that could save me weeks of work (which I actually cannot afford at the
moment).
Thanks a lot!
Best wishes,
Philipp :-)
--
You have to reboot your computer after powerfail? Haha!
http://316.hachti.de
Sorry, forgot something (see bottom of email)
--- Bryan Pope <bpope at wordstock.com> wrote:
> And thusly were the wise words spake by Jim Leonar
d
> >
> > A mutual acquaintance of mine is trying to write
a
> thesis and needs a
> > little help. He writes:
> >
> > "The project that I am working on is for my
> Masters in Library
> > Information Science degree with a focus on
> Archiving. For my paper I
> > have to write a 10 to 12 page paper on a subject
> that involves the
> > preservation of something that has archival
> significance. So I decided
> > to do it on video games and what steps are being
> taken to preserve them
> > on the media that they were originally written o
n
> such as Atari and
> > Nintendo cartridges some of which are degrading
> significantly and no
> > longer work on the game systems they were design
ed
> for."
> >
> > If anyone has any help or leads for him, or any
> experience archiving
> > ROMs/cartridges that may degrade over time and h
ow
> to properly preserve
> > them, please drop him a line at
> "andrew.pacilli at simmons.edu". Your
> > input can shape an archivist's future :-)
>
> For Atari 2600, can you not just take a .bin
> downloaded from AtariAge
> and burn it to a suitable EPROM that is then
> installed on a suitable
> cartridge PCB? AtariAge even sells everything you
> need to make your
> own cartridges. As for Nintendo, I believe they
> will be releasing
> their back catalog for play on their new console,
> Wii.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bryan
>
Thats not strictly true. Nintendo are releasing
*their* games for their old machines, such
as the SNES (aka Super Famicom in Japan), for
play on the Wii (pronounced "we" - it
apparently means "all" in Japanese)
However, there are about 2500 (perhaps more?)
SNES games of which only 100 or so are by
Nintendo.
Plus, what about the games by companies that
no longer exist, such as Psygnosis (bought by
Sony around 1999), Bitmap Brothers (ok, still
around but appear to be dead), Probe (dead),
US Gold and their subsidiary Kixx (dead) and
many others.
*** forgotten bit follows ***
I have found that some of my SNES and
Megadrive games (on cartridges) sometimes
fail to run the first time after ages (eg. a
few years) of not being used.
With the exception of one or two, they have
all worked on the 2nd or 3rd attempts. I'm
not sure why that is, but aslong as they work :)
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
--- Bryan Pope <bpope at wordstock.com> wrote:
> And thusly were the wise words spake by Jim Leonar
d
> >
> > A mutual acquaintance of mine is trying to write
a
> thesis and needs a
> > little help. He writes:
> >
> > "The project that I am working on is for my
> Masters in Library
> > Information Science degree with a focus on
> Archiving. For my paper I
> > have to write a 10 to 12 page paper on a subject
> that involves the
> > preservation of something that has archival
> significance. So I decided
> > to do it on video games and what steps are being
> taken to preserve them
> > on the media that they were originally written o
n
> such as Atari and
> > Nintendo cartridges some of which are degrading
> significantly and no
> > longer work on the game systems they were design
ed
> for."
> >
> > If anyone has any help or leads for him, or any
> experience archiving
> > ROMs/cartridges that may degrade over time and h
ow
> to properly preserve
> > them, please drop him a line at
> "andrew.pacilli at simmons.edu". Your
> > input can shape an archivist's future :-)
>
> For Atari 2600, can you not just take a .bin
> downloaded from AtariAge
> and burn it to a suitable EPROM that is then
> installed on a suitable
> cartridge PCB? AtariAge even sells everything you
> need to make your
> own cartridges. As for Nintendo, I believe they
> will be releasing
> their back catalog for play on their new console,
> Wii.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bryan
>
Thats not strictly true. Nintendo are releasing
*their* games for their old machines, such
as the SNES (aka Super Famicom in Japan), for
play on the Wii (pronounced "we" - it
apparently means "all" in Japanese)
However, there are about 2500 (perhaps more?)
SNES games of which only 100 or so are by
Nintendo.
Plus, what about the games by companies that
no longer exist, such as Psygnosis (bought by
Sony around 1999), Bitmap Brothers (ok, still
around but appear to be dead), Probe (dead),
US Gold and their subsidiary Kixx (dead) and
many others.
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Hi all,
I've had a malfuntioning magtape setup on my 11/23+ for some time and I'm
wondering, is it the card, cabling, or drive? here's what I've got:
Overland OD3201 magtape drive (works fine when the parallel port connection
is used when connected to a PC)
Dilog DQ132 pertec tape controller
Two straight-through ribbon cables, 50 pin IDC on one end, 50 pin cardedge
on the other.
J1 on card is cabled to P1 on drive.
J2 on card is cabled to P2 on drive.
When I try to perform an operation on the tape drive, it times out The
drive does spin a bit first. Rewind operations work correctly. It seems to
do this no matter how I have the card configured.
Are these cables really supposed to be straight through, or what am I
missing?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Julian
Does anyone know if the Sinclair Spectrum ever made use of RAM chips that were
known to be part-faulty as-new? This was just asked over on another mailing
list...
I recall discussions about such chips in the past on here, where manufacturers
would sell 'faulty' RAM to vendors at lower cost where only half of the
address map could store data reliably. However, I'm sure that was late 70s or
so, not the early 80s when the Spectrum existed; by then I would have thought
that the manufacturers would have had the reliability issues sorted out and
would simply dump faulty stock?
Anyone able to confirm?
cheers
Jules
--
If you've ever wondered how you get triangles from a cow
You need buttermilk and cheese, and an equilateral chainsaw
I am in possession of a Western Union teletype machine - I don't have
the exact model number with me. I would like to get rid of it and was
hoping you might have some idea as to how I can sell or relocate it.
Thank you in advance of your consideration.
Elaine Nelson
Telephone: 312.701.8010
>Did anyone happen to download "Zebra_Design.pdf" "An Outline of the
>Functional Design of the Stantec Zebra Computer"
I've just made scans available on
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/stantec in the past few days
I'm trying to locate a copy of the document which describes the Algol
compiler for the Zebra. The copy that was recently donated to CHM was has
severe termite damage.
On 10/18/06, Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com> wrote:
> Robert Feldman wrote:
> > We have a Dell box at work that doesn't even have a Centronics parallel
> > port -- just USB ports. I needed to get a USB-to-Parallel converter
> > cable to hook up the laserjet to this box.
>
> My new PC doesn't have one either, but that's no big loss as all of my
> printers are on the network in one way or another.
That's true at my place, too, but I have plenty of uses for a parallel
port on a machine that has nothing to do with printing and I'm not
happy to see that port go on modern machines.
(examples - parallel-wired LCDs on LCDproc, analog meters, etc).
Likewise, I lament the loss of the serial port on modern laptops
(still on desktops so far). I probably have some serial device
plugged into my primary desktop 90% of the time.
-ethan
I've started to read some of the disks. Does anyone recognize the following strings? I'm trying to ID the source OS for the following (it is the ROM source for a Panasonic KX-D4911 terminal).
Here are some of the strings:
IN-III MACRO ASMB. (Z80.ZILOG) VER. 1-01 830131 DATE 60. 1.10 PAGE 1
SYSTEM ANALYZER IN-III VER. 2-2
ISIS
IN-IIIDIN6301
DINZ80B
This was a pretty standard DS/DD 8" disk that read right in using a catweasel and also with imagedisk. I think it might have been an Intellec-III, but that is based on the repeated appearance of ISIS, and the fact that it is ROM source.
Any clues?
Thanks,
Kelly
Since we've been mentioned, I might as well fill in the blanks and
correct the errors.
Yes, Update, located in Uppsala, Sweden, have two DEC-2060 machines.
Both were operational when we stopped running them. The last we stopped
in 1993 or 1994 (don't remember for sure now). I believe we could
atleast get one of them back into running shape if we just had space.
But at the moment we don't. And this all is in the hands of Uppsala
University. The machines are Aida.Update.UU.SE and Carmen.Update.UU.SE.
(Not sure if the DNS is being maintaned for these right now.)
While we're at it, we also have one VAX-8650, which is operational. We
only need to turn the key, and it will boot. Normally we boot NetBSD on
it, but we can also boot it into VMS or Ultrix. (Krille.Update.UU.SE)
And someone also mentioned DECsystem-570, which is a PDP-11/70 in a
corporate cabinet. We have one 11/70 (in the old style) which also is
just a turn of a key away from running. (Magica.Update.UU.SE).
However, we do not have any KS-10 machines. I believe Stacken (the
computer club at the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden)
have both KS-10 and KL-10 machine still around. In the past they also
had a KA-10 machine, which might still be around. And I know of another
private individual who have a working KI-10 machine in Stockholm. That
is actually a tri-CPU KI-10.
As for periperials, we have:
RP07 (2)
RP06 (4)
TU77 (2)
TU78 (1)
And of course we have MSCP disks and HSCs for the VAXen and PDP-11s.
(Oh, and we have another 11/70 and 8650 in storage)
Some images and pictures (rather incomplete) can be found at:
http://www.update.uu.se/~bqt/computers.html
There should be some somewhere on Updates official pages as well, but I
can't find any right now...
Johnny
Strange question, but it directly relates to preservation of classic
computer data. My perfered brand of CD/DVD blanks are the Verbatim
DataLifePlus disks. There is no doubt in my mind that these disks have a
good long lifespan (though I do need to see about doing a data refresh on
some).
However, due to their cost, they are no longer that easy to obtain. One
source I've been considering using seems to only sell the ones that are
"InkJet Printer" ready. I have no desire to use an inkjet printer to do
this, does anyone know how safe is it to use a standard "CD Marker" on these
blanks? It seems to me that these might actually be easier to write on, and
be able to read what you've written than most I've been using.
Zane
Looking for documentation for the Dilog DU-686 Unibus ESDI controller.
Anyone have scanned references for it, or possibly just able to forward
me jumper and on-board configuration connection and set-up info?
TIA,
-scott
staylor at smedley dot mrynet dot com
Re:
"I just built a new PC, I didn't even think about ports. I personally have
very little use for Parallel ports, and am more interested in Serial ports.
I didn't even think about it not having a Serial port until I was finishing
putting the system together. At least it does have a header for a serial
port on the Motherboard, I'll just have to find a port to connect to it (as
that didn't come with the board). Oh, and the board does have a Parallel
port."
Let me guess: Asus P5B? I chose a Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 instead of the P5B
primarily for just that reason (the boards themselves are nearly identical).
The P5B uses one of the two "standard" cables. Look on
alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus about 60 days ago and you will find a
discussion of this, along with the specs for the cable (there are two
"standards" for this cable, different and incompatible, so you need to get
the right one).
I can't believe Asus' stupidity in not putting the DB-9 on the I/O shield OR
at least in not including the cable to the header.
I admit, I cut my teeth on that machine and so I continue to ask around
for remaining tidbits. My friends at Tymshare don't have bits apparently
and I wasn't around when the 940s went out the back door.
Al K. has my copy of the monitor (kernel) listing; that could be OCR'ed
but what about the executive and all the other stuff?
But the real question is: What does MUL =12525253B do?
> If anyone has any comments, please speak up.
If the contents can be identified, consider some form of checksum per file.
Eventually, as multiple copies of the same discs are found from different
sources you can verify file integrity.
If they are original distrib discs, checksums of the entire volume can be
used for disc integrity (and for simple checks for viruses on newer media)
On 10/18/06, Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net> wrote:
> I've never completely understood Black Box's business model. Some of the
> adapters and cables they sell at a premium price are simply OEM'd products
> with their own sticker/logo stuck on them. Did they offer some sort of
> guarantee beyond what the manufacturer would have offered?
If I understand their business model, they charged a premium, but what
the customer gained was a single place to go (one catalog, one vendor
to send POs to, etc), and some "big name" reassurance.
In my experience, large companies deal with small companies poorly or
not at all. If a small company comes up with a nice comms-related
widget, they can try to sell it themselves with potentially mixed
success, or sell quantities in black enclosures through Black Box and
get instant exposure when the next catalog comes out.
> I actually picked up an older but practically new serial analyzer on eBay
> this last month for about $10. Its a Datacom Technologies DataTool 5500,
> which is both an analyzer and a breakout box built into one unit. (Datacom
> Technologies either became Tempo or got bought up by them, I can't
> remember now.) I believe it only works up to 38400 baud or so, but it will
> work great for most stuff that I work with. Wish I'd had it back in the
> mid 90s though ;)
I'm not familiar with that one. We had several analyzers (HP) and
BERT boxes (bit error-rate tester?) when I worked at Software Results
making sync comms hardware - fortunately I got to take my pick when
the doors closed. I still have a bunch of that kit, and it's still
useful since most of the gear does async as well as sync.
If your analyzer only goes to 38Kbps, it's probably async only. Sync
stuff I've worked with, tended to go up to 64Kbps or even 128Kbps (if
it wasn't designed for T1-like connections).
-ethan
--- Kelly Leavitt <kelly at catcorner.org> wrote:
> I'm actually starting the archiving of the more
> than 1,500 8" disks that I have. Here are my
> intended methods. If anyone has any comments, plea
se
> speak up.
> The ultimate goal is an online searchable database
> of these disks.
>
> 1) number each diskette sequentially with date
> 2) taking a digital picture of the label
> 3) Making a catweasel image of the contents
> 4) Makine an ImageDisk image of the contents
> 5) Storing the following information in a database
> Diskette number
> Any text from the label
> System if known
> OS used if known
> Date of origin if known
> Description of contents
> if commercial software, the publisher/author
> Photo of the label
> Both disk images
>
> Kelly
>
Sounds like you'll be busy for a long time with
archiving all those disks.
Do you have any ideas what you will call the
site with the archive? Perhaps you should
announce a beta version (when it's up and
running) for us to test?
I generally cataloge my 3.5" disks (mostly
Amiga, some PC and a handful of Atari ST disks) so I
can find programs I want fairly quickly.
Having approx. 600 disks I really need to do
that, otherwise I'd be searching for hours :(
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Chris Zach needs the space,
so he's selling off his KS-10 (2020)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=011&item=320038687685
This machine was the last host to be named AI.MIT.EDU that ran ITS,
and probably the last running DEC 10 or 20 at MIT (though that might
have been MC).
It comes with an ITS disk pack (and a drive). Might also have TOPS-20.
Bidding is at $2k so far.
--akb
ps: AI, MC, and the hulk of a third 2020 which I think was BLT (Brave
Little Toaster) were part of extensive hacker rescue efforts in the
early 90s. They were schlepped out of MIT, sat at digex.net for a
while until the VC-installed managers almost junked them, then CZ
rescued them and has cared for them since. (I'm not sure what he's
done with MC, BLT was mostly just the chassis and prolly got
scrapped). In the auction photos, those small red tags next to the bar
codes are the MIT "deactivated property" tags.
Okay, it's not quite typical fodder for here, but it seems to me to be
close enough to count as on-topic.
Two friends of mine (okay, a friend and an acquaintance) have a pinball
machine. But it's sitting in a barn and they'd like to get it in the
hands of someone who'll use/appreciate it before winter hits (it's been
there for a few months, but this would be its first winter).
I've never seen it myself. Here's what I've been told:
It's a "Data East Robocop" machine. No date apparent to the person who
looked (whom I'd primed to look for a date). One piece of glass is
shattered; from the description, it sounds to me like the backglass -
the vertical glass with artwork in front of the scoring and status
displays at the back of the machine. I'm told it's also functionally
broken in some minor way, but the person who characterized the
malfunction as "minor" is no pinball expert, so I have no idea how
accurate the characterization is. I also have no better description of
the malfunction.
The machine is near Ottawa (Ontario, Canada).
So, my questions: (1) is it worth anything in its current shape, or
does the damage (and/or maltreatment) cut its value to the point where
it's comparable to the cost of hauling it away? (2) anyone have more
specific relevant questions that can be answered by someone not versed
in pinball machines or electromech devices in general?
Oh, and (3) anyone want it? :-) (I'd be tempted myself except I have
no place to put it.)
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
woodelf <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca> Wrote:
> Simon Fryer wrote:
> > Heya,
> > What ever happened to 24 bit words, or is this an easy case?
> That is 3 8 bit char's. :)
> I was thinking of Dec's machines and rememberd other brands later.
> While 24 bit computers were made, I can't think of any off hand.
> > Simon
Yes, 24 bit machines did exist. In fact before BSD, there was project Genie
which made an SDS 930 into an SDS 940 (added paging hardware) and made up a
timesharing system. It was the basis of the Tymshare corporation which was
formed in the 60's. The machine had (IIRC) 64k of 24 bit words, paged in
chunks of 4k words. The technique used what they called "relabeling registers"
on the upper 8 bits of the memory address. The software had all sorts of
things, including 'forks'. All before Unix (1969). Quite a system for its
day. It was the competition to the GE 235 (Later 635) machines that started at
Dartmouth. In the early 70's they had a whole bunch of machines in Cupertino
under one roof.
As for strings: They packed 3 to a word (usually).
Trivia: 'BRS 131B' was the system call to crash the system.
Just so you know.
--
Tom Watson
tsw at johana.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
and was I tempted. O was I tempted. I could have been
o so creative with the spelling of the first word in
the subject line...
I guess the question on many peep's mind is whether a
utilization of virtual-8086 mode could be used to
creative an emulation of something peecee-like (Tandy
2000 maybe?).
I need to do some reading. Maybe should have done it
first.
I hope this isn't off-topic :O
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Hi Jim,
What a coincidence -- we just got a lengthy email from Wayne Farmer
in the ibm1130.org guestbook, who also talked about working with
the that same Meta IV (production serial #1 in fact), at UC San
Diego, and he described working with these very microcode ROMs.
Hey, are you planning on coming to the Vintage Computer Festival
in Mountain View, CA in November? If you are it would be great
if you could bring this microcode board with you to show off
at the IBM 1130 party which will be held Saturday evening during
the VCF.
Brian
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of cctech-request at classiccmp.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:08 PM
To: cctech at classiccmp.org
Subject: cctech Digest, Vol 38, Issue 24
Send cctech mailing list submissions to
cctech at classiccmp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctech
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cctech-request at classiccmp.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
cctech-owner at classiccmp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cctech digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. German collection (was Software Archaeology) (Al Kossow)
2. Re: PDT-11/150 down (Dave McGuire)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:53:05 -0700
From: Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org>
Subject: German collection (was Software Archaeology)
To: "classiccmp at classiccmp.org" <classiccmp at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <C15A4A71.85F0%aek at bitsavers.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> It's a shame that all this went to the US
Re: "I guess this all means that RS232C has fallen into the category of
"obsolescent technology"."
Some brand new JVC DLP 1080P TV sets have a control interface (this is only
present in some of the newest, highest end models) that allows the TV to be
controlled by {presumably} a media center PC. It's RS-232. These TV sets
were only introduced this spring. Why it's not USB is beyond me, but it's
not.
Comment: - This is what preserving the history of computers is all
about. Plug forward!
Bill D
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 29
>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:05:55 -0400
>From: "Kelly Leavitt" <kelly at catcorner.org>
>Subject: 8" disk archive
>To: <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>Message-ID:
> <07028839E9A3744F87BEF27FF2CFF8E30B13FD at MEOW.catcorner.org>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
>I'm actually starting the archiving of the more than 1,500 8" disks that
>I have. Here are my intended methods. If anyone has any comments, please
>speak up.
>The ultimate goal is an online searchable database of these disks.
>
>1) number each diskette sequentially with date
>2) taking a digital picture of the label
>3) Making a catweasel image of the contents
>4) Makine an ImageDisk image of the contents
>5) Storing the following information in a database
>Diskette number
>Any text from the label
>System if known
>OS used if known
>Date of origin if known
>Description of contents
>if commercial software, the publisher/author
>Photo of the label
>Both disk images
>
>Kelly
>
> It's a shame that all this went to the US
Not all of this has gone to the US. If there is a single coordinated effort
there to save the remaining material, that would be great. I would suggest
coordinating this with Doron. There are a number of GA and DEC minis, a
System3 and System7 for example that need to be saved.
> Will I be able to get copies of all the software and/or documentation?
Do you have any idea of how much 1 1/2 shipping containers worth of docs and
software is?
I will try to make as much material as I can available, as I have been with
other things in the CHM collection, but this may literally take years to do.
I'm actually starting the archiving of the more than 1,500 8" disks that I have. Here are my intended methods. If anyone has any comments, please speak up.
The ultimate goal is an online searchable database of these disks.
1) number each diskette sequentially with date
2) taking a digital picture of the label
3) Making a catweasel image of the contents
4) Makine an ImageDisk image of the contents
5) Storing the following information in a database
Diskette number
Any text from the label
System if known
OS used if known
Date of origin if known
Description of contents
if commercial software, the publisher/author
Photo of the label
Both disk images
Kelly
Look for a swap (amateur radio) otherwise know as a hamfest. They have them
all over the place at various times of the year. I usually see big caps
that look relatively new for a decent price.
This might help you locate a swap in your area:
http://www.arrl.org/hamfests.html?dosel=1&subtype=section&selsect=MI
73 de N9QQB
At 03:31 PM 10/16/2006 -0700, you wrote:
>I've got a couple of old DEC machines which look like they could use new
>filter capacitors in the power supplies: I tried reforming the originals,
>and in some cases it worked, but there are also a few which look like
>they'll never see full capacity again.
>
>These are electrolytics, with 160,000mf/20v/24v surge and 57,000mf/50v/65v
>surge being the original values.
>
>Soooo here's my two questions:
>
>-Where would you recommend buying new ones? Anyone have a capacitor vendor
>they're particularly fond of (or particularly loathe)?
>
>-Does it make better sense to replace these with electrolytics, and have
>the same characteristics (and the same problems over time) as the
>originals, or is there some more modern cap-technology which would give
>the original's performance but with a better lifespan?
>
>I'm not up on my capacitor technology. :) Any help or suggestions
>would be welcome. Thanks!
>
> -O.-
[Computing] C++ is to C as Lung Cancer is to Lung --.sig of Thomas
Funke (thomas at gamelan.shnet.org)
--... ...-- -.. . -. ----. --.- --.- -...
tpeters at nospam.mixcom.com (remove "nospam") N9QQB (amateur radio)
"HEY YOU" (loud shouting) WEB ADDRESS http//www.mixweb.com/tpeters
43? 7' 17.2" N by 88? 6' 28.9" W, Elevation 815', Grid Square EN53wc
WAN/LAN/Telcom Analyst, Tech Writer, MCP, CCNA, Registered Linux User 385531
> As you're more aware than (probably) anyone at
> this point, software archaeology is exceedingly difficult.
The thing to do is just keep asking anyone who was connected to the industry
if they know folks like field serivce techs that were pack rats. The
companies themselves either deliberately threw it out so that they wouldn't
have to support it, or the physical assets were tossed out when companies
were sold.
The fact that the SDS 900 series library survived mostly in tact after being
given away by Honeywell in 1982 gives me hope that people may have similar
stashes somewhere.
--
Somewhat related, a CHM press release just went out with this info in it:
In support of its international collection and exhibit plans, the Museum
also announced that it has acquired an extensive collection totaling seven
shipping containers of computing objects salvaged from a crumbling warehouse
in Dortmund, Germany this month. The rescued items, along with related
documents and software, will augment the Museum?s existing 80,000-object
collection that will be used to populate the 2009 exhibit.
The historic collection from Germany was rescued from an open-air warehouse
that encompassed a physical area of about 12,000 square feet. There are 112
unique manufacturers represented, including Telefunken, Siemens, Zuse,
Olivetti and Groupe Bull. European-based manufacturers account for 50% of
the acquired artifacts and another 20% in documentation and software. In
addition to many rare computer systems, the rescued items will deepen the
Museum?s holdings of electromechanical-era objects, as well as mainframe
documentation and software.
--
The container with documentation and software should be getting here in
about a month. From the pictures, there are some very interesting things
coming. This was partly from the computer museum which closed in Achen.
Anybody have one of these? It's an electronic word processor from 1980. It
looks similar to the Epson HX-20 (microcassette drive, same "slate" form
factor, etc.), but it's just a WP, not a full computer.
Hi,
I have this CD pack - MAYA 1.0 (1998?) that I dont' need/want.
This is from Alias/wavefront - a Silicon Graphics company.
It's yours for like $5 or so.
Includes these three CDs in a case:
--MAYA 1.0 (MAYA F/X, MAYA Artisan, MAYA Developers kit)
--Composer 4.5
--Discover MAYA
It may not run on your system! Some info here:
http://www.alias.com/eng/support/maya/qualified_hardware/QUAL/maya_1_0.html
I am moving stuff out of my warehouse to storage, and am finding all
sorts of nifty
toys.
One is a rom from a pretty old mini or mainframe, which is badged
Digital Systems
Corporation. It is "alterable" much like I understand the 360/20's were
with boards
that were used to program sense arrays, and could be altered in the
field to change
the firmware.
As I mention in the web page, I have little information on it, and
retrieved it as a
close friend was downsizeing his collection of stuff many years ago. I
don't know
that he obtained it from a working machine, but we both agreed that a
packrat
like me would be better suited for it than he was, as he wanted to just
have less
stuff.
I was very fortunate to know a few that were downsizeing to me rather
than the
land fill (and am working with one now).
Anyway, maybe someone will have some comment on the company name or
logo. I apologize for the current photos, I will try to scan or get
better resolution
photos of the label and post it, or follow up this on the list.
I get nothing on any site that is of any use, as the three words that
the company
chose for itself may as well be "smith" "jones" or any word with millions or
billions of hits, and nothing recent other than companies in Japan and Costa
Rica (both unlikely to be useful)
Jim
http://jwstephens.com/rom/page_01.htm
I've got a couple of old DEC machines which look like they could use new
filter capacitors in the power supplies: I tried reforming the originals,
and in some cases it worked, but there are also a few which look like
they'll never see full capacity again.
These are electrolytics, with 160,000mf/20v/24v surge and 57,000mf/50v/65v
surge being the original values.
Soooo here's my two questions:
-Where would you recommend buying new ones? Anyone have a capacitor vendor
they're particularly fond of (or particularly loathe)?
-Does it make better sense to replace these with electrolytics, and have
the same characteristics (and the same problems over time) as the
originals, or is there some more modern cap-technology which would give
the original's performance but with a better lifespan?
I'm not up on my capacitor technology. :) Any help or suggestions
would be welcome. Thanks!
-O.-
At 12:00 -0500 10/16/06, Roy Tellason wrote:
>That was my way to do dialup for a while here until it got weird after a
>storm.
This seems to be a recurring theme in posts here. At least here in
the central US, thunderstorms are pretty predictable. I have made it
SOP for over a decade now to just disconnect classic gear from the
wall when one is known to be approaching. (I even have the family
trained to do it if I'm not around; it helps that we and our
relatives have lost several TV's, stereos, modems, etc. to lightning
strikes, so it's not just a theoretical possibility.)
I recommend:
1) Plug all of the classic gear into power strips or surge
suppressors. Plug the surge suppressors into the wall for normal use,
and shut down/unplug the surge suppressor from the wall for storms.
2) Leave commodity stuff connected, if it's convenient. DSL hubs can
be disconnected from the wall (and cable or phone line!) or can be
left connected, with the ethernet coming out of them disconnected for
duration of the storm. Cheapo modern ink-jet printers can be left
connected to the wall, but disconnected from the classic computer or
classic network. Nice Laserjet 4MP printers, etc. should be
disconnected from the wall.
3) Wireless, where practical, makes disconnecting the network easy. A
single wireless/ethernet hub, using radio to get to the
wall-connected DSL/cablemodem hub, might be a *great* way to air-gap
the whole classic network. That would reduce the storm-proofing
operation down to a single wall plug (for the power strip).
4) Exercise the same precautions for winter storms - power line
outages/restoration of power can do unpredictable things to line
voltage and frequency.
5) Do not trust surge suppressors to do the job, either on power
lines or on modem/cable lines. They help, but they have limitations.
Some a lot more than others.
6) For stuff that is really hard to re-boot, UPS's can help if they
are big enough. Disconnect the UPS from the wall and live with the
alarm until the thunder dies down (but this assumes a big battery on
the UPS, which might not be realistic).
I know server stuff that wants to be up 24/7 is hard to do this with,
but for really classic equipment, or for anything that's used
on-demand (like Roy's modem), it really seems a shame to expose it to
ESD death for want of a minute's work walking around the house and
pulling plugs.
My worst loss so far (knock on wood) has been a Powerbook 3400
internal modem board (visible damage on the board, pictures available
on request). But I've been lucky a few times.
Comments or further suggestions welcome!
--
Mark Tapley, Dwarf Engineer
(I haven't cleared my neighborhood)
210-379-4635
> Has anyone ever found any GENIE tapes or backups?
There are two sets of backups from UCB and Shell Development that have been
found. The problem is there are no surviving copies of what was on the
swapping drum, so building a runnable system has proven to be very
difficult.
The contents of the tapes need to have the personal directories expunged
before they can be released.
Unfortunately, the SDS software library that CHM was just given doesn't
contain the system software for the 940. There is one diagnostic tape and a
user utility tape.
>From going through the documentation that came with the library, it looks
like there was very little for the 940 inside SDS as far back as 1971.
This video tests the myth that you can kill a man with a Model M keyboard
and still type on it afterward: http://m.etv.cx/
Cheers,
Bryan
P.S. I have no relationship with this site other then happening to find it
while searching for "RR-Net".
> >I am looking for a DOS program to turn my computer into an answering
> >machine.
There was a dedicated ISA-bus card for the PC called "Watson" that did
exactly that under DOS. It had a character-based user-interface. It
allowed remote access to the voicemail boxes. It could also serve as a
"demon dialer", intercepting touch tone signals to do speed dialing and
other functions. The device had two RJ-11 jacks, one for the phone line
coming into the house, and the other which fed all of the rest of the
phones in the house. It could also, with optional software, be set up
as a basic AVR system. It could also serve as a 1200-baud (IIRC) modem.
I don't recall any FAX capabilities.
I have one of these around somewhere, and even the "voicemail" software
(on 5 1/4" DOS floppies), along with the documentation. I used it for
quite some time on a clone "XT"-class machine utilizing a NEC-made
8088-compatible micrprocessor. It worked pretty well, though the
biggest problem was that there was no indication at the phone that
voicemail was waiting. You either had to check it, or go to the PC to
see if there were messages.
Rick Bensene
The Old Calculator Web Museum
http://oldcalculatormuseum.com
Hi All,
There's been some interest in the kit, so here's the answers to the
questions that I should really have included in the first email... ;)
I would prefer not to have to post anything, so yes, collection is
preferred. I'm in all day most Sundays, and after 18:30 during the week.
Email me for my address and contact details.
The kit is destined for the dump and then landfill if it's not gone my
the end of the month. If you can't get to me before the end of the month
I will keep stuff, but only if you promise to pick it up ASAP. :)
I have also found the following kit to add to the freebie list...
* Wangtek 5150ES SCSI QIC internal tape drive.
* A.N.Other SCSI DDS2 or 3 SCSI internal tape drive (black).
* Grid ruggedised 286 laptop (fully working but no battery, comes with
psu) has hdd of indeterminate size and plasma screen, currently running
MSDOS.
* DEC Alpha 600au workstation (with Tru64 media).
* Sun 17" CRT (13W3 connector and converter to HD15, sony tube).
Re the two cisco 2500 routers, they are a 2501 and 2514. Each comes with
a blue cisco X.21 cable and an AUI to RJ45 converter.
Regards,
Jules.
Hi everybody,
does anybody have documentation for the RA9x drives, which goes beyond the user's guide ?
A friend of mine has several drives which are faulty and display the type of error with an error code in
the display. Unfortunately, the user's guide, which can be found online, doesn't reveal all these codes. Maybe there is a sort of maintenance guide somewhere ?
I don't even know, if DEC ever published schematics of these drives, as they appeared on the market in the very early '90s... can anybody confirm that or do schematics exist somewhere?
I'm personaly interested, too, as I'm running a SA800 and some additional stand-alone RA92 drives. So far, they have been fine, but this can change any time...
Kind regards,
Pierre
_______________________________________________________________________
Viren-Scan f?r Ihren PC! Jetzt f?r jeden. Sofort, online und kostenlos.
Gleich testen! http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/freescan/?mc=022222
Still can't find manuals. But here's what I know and maybe people can fill
in the blanks.
First info - Base model is 45711E, supposedly that designates 110+, 512k
ram, & modem. The memory drawer has a model 82981A, which googling suggests
is 128k ram addon. There's a metal shield over the chips and I don't have
the right torq bit to remove. Upon boot all the ROM ID shows BBBBBB.
First question - going into system config lets me set the memory split
between main memory and edisk. All choices add up to 896k. How does that
square with 128k + 512k?
Second info - The PAM menu shows the following application choices - DOS
CMDS, HP reflection, VT reflection, Memo Maker, Time Management, and BASIC.
However, opening up the software drawer shows the following chips in the
following locations 82863K-Reflection1 (0L), 45504K-MemoMaker/TimeMgt (1L),
82862K-BASIC (4L), 45555K-1/2-ExecutiveCardMgr (5H),
45555K-2/2-ExecutiveCardMgr (5L), 45548K-1/2-Lotus123 (6H),
45548K-2/2-Lotus123 (6L).
Second question - I assume the PAM menu selections for HP reflection and VT
reflection are handled by the single 82863K rom. I am curious why the
Executive Card Manager and Lotus123 don't show up in the PAM menu?
Misc. questions - The built in battery is obviously dead and won't hold a
charge, as the unit won't run at all without the AC adapter. Every time I
boot up though, it asks to reformat the A drive due to memory loss. More
importantly, it has lost the date/time and system config settings
(memory/edisk split for example). I'm curious if the date/time and config
settings are kept by a different battery I may need to replace, or if all of
the above is maintained by the single battery. I will have to hunt up a new
battery.
This 110+ is a really nice box! I'm quite fascinated by the built-into-rom
HP terminal emulator (dumb terminal emulation won't do) as well as VT
terminal emulator and serial port, all in a small package! Sweet!
Thanks for any pointers!
Jay West
> I was able to get copies of the Tandy 2000
> manuals for what is
> going to be a pretty challenging emulation project that I've
> undertaken.
> Since I don't have a 2000 system I was wondering if someone
> on the list who
> has one would be able to make copies of the BIOS ROMs from
> their machine.
> The BIOS/boot software is contained in two ROMs at locations
> U47 and U48.
> U47 is the "odd" rom and U48 is the "even" rom.
>
>
>
> Thanks again.
Rich:
I have a running 2000 here, that I can transfer files from. The 2000 does not have a BIOS like a PC. I believe the internal ROMs are just a POST and a boot strap, and the rest of the PC like BIOS is on the MS-DOS boot disk. I have been relayed this information by someone that used to develop and debug the 2000 for Tandy/Radio Shack.
Do you know a way to dump them? I guess if I knew their starting address and length I could use debug. I also have Microsoft's Assembler for the 2000.
Kelly
PS I still owe you a phone call about the 2000s. I have one that I don't need, but it doesn't work. My suspicion is the power supply, but I've taken no time to verify this. This unit includes keyboard, HD controller, 10 meg drive and one or two 720k floppies, depending on the unit.
All:
I was able to get copies of the Tandy 2000 manuals for what is
going to be a pretty challenging emulation project that I've undertaken.
Since I don't have a 2000 system I was wondering if someone on the list who
has one would be able to make copies of the BIOS ROMs from their machine.
The BIOS/boot software is contained in two ROMs at locations U47 and U48.
U47 is the "odd" rom and U48 is the "even" rom.
Thanks again.
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Lead engineer, Altair32 Emulator
Web site: <http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/>
http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
Web site: http://www.altair32.com/
/***************************************************/
I'm trying to organize my PDP11 setup in a neat and tidy fashion, and I'm
wondering, aside from the DEC transition panels which would be ideal, what
sort of multi medium transition panels are there that I can attach things
like multiple RS232 ports and SCSI connectors, etc to?
The idea I'm after is something akin to the keystone patch panels, but with
things like full RS232-DB25 that just attach with a plate or something, much
like the DEC panels. Anyone seen anything like this?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Mark Firestone
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 7:05 PM
> To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Oregon Software Pascal/2
>
>
> Anyone know what happened to Oregon Software.... or where to find
> Pascal/2 for RSTS/E. I want it for my PDP emulator...
> because it is the
> language I learned to program with.
>
> None of that String bollox, real men use Array[1.80] of Char;
I have it for Xenix on the TRS-80 model 16, but I don't think that helps much.
Kelly
Hi All,
I'm afraid that I no longer have the room to keep either my DEC VAX
4000/705A or my DEC AlphaServer 2000. Both are in working condition.
Please note that the Vax is DSSI, not SCSI and has no disks, but does
netboot NetBSD/VAX nicely. It also has an internal DSSI DLT (unknown
condition as I have no tapes).
====
Hardware specs
====
VAX 4000/705A (aka Legacy+)
NVAX CPU (45 VUPS), 256Mb RAM, DSSI, no disks. Running NetBSD/VAX 1.5
ALPHA SERVER 2000 (aka Sable)
Dual 21064 200MHz CPUs, 196Mb RAM, SCSI RAID, 6x 4Gb HDD. Running Tru64
5.x
====
Both machines come from when I used to work at Racal. The Alpha comes
with media and documentation. The VAX doesn't.
I also have a couple of cisco 2500 routers up for grabs too.
Thanks,
Jules.
P.S. my "nospam" email address is real...
> From: woodelf <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
> I think the thing that killed BCD computers is thae lack of
> BCD memory addressing.
Some BCD computers had BCD memory addressing.
Also BCD instructions, though full binary data for
masking.
Roger Holmes
In a plastic bag at a local thrift I found a Tomy TP1103 blue/white
controller, but I can not find anything on using google. Anyone know what
system(s) this model works with? Thanks in advance for your help.
I've assembled a basic PDP-11/53ish machine from parts. The CPU is
>from a DECserver 550, converted back into an 11/53 by EPROM swaps.
It has an RQDX3 and cable management board, and a Seagate ST-251
(40 MB MFM) drive. This is all installed in a BA213.
So far, I haven't managed to get a load device working. I have an
RX50, but it seems unwilling to work. I'm trying to format the disk.
Jonathan Engdahl describes a trick to bootstrap XXDP utilities using
vtserver:
http://home.alltel.net/engdahl/xxdp.htm
Vtserver does its magic, ODT-ing in the loader, and transferring the
modified ZRQCH0 binary (from XXDP 2.5). At this point, the machine
seems to hang:
@p
Opened xboot.dd read-write
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr EOF2
45Boot from vt(0,0,0) at 0177560
: vt(0,0,1)
Opened ZRQCH0 read-write
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr EOF2
Boot: bootdev=06401 bootcsr=0177560
I have to cycle power to regain control.
Help please. Has anyone else ever tried this? Thanks,
De
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=190038705808
I'm actually quite interested in it, but it would be a bit of a trek to
pick it up. Is there anyone down there that wants this, or better still
collect it and bring it about half-way up the UK so I can meet them?
Gordon (with not enough weekends and evenings to drive the length of the
country, sadly).
On Oct 13, 2006, at 2:32 PM, woodelf wrote:
> So how many people have a working 24 bit computer on *this* list
> at home or in storage? I may end up building a 24/12 bit design
> ( the PCB layout and hardware design is my problem ) but designing
> a schematic is not.
I unfortunately don't have it (I had a chance, but didn't have a place
to put it), but in high school, the school had a 24-bit computer.
Quite an interesting machine. It used 8K-word magnetic drum memory.
There were two complete redundant CPUs, each with their own 8K drum.
There was a "shared register" between the two machines that could be
used for inter-CPU communication. The machines also shared a very
interesting
I/O system that was housed in a large cabinet. The I/O system consisted
of a Current Loop interface for an ASR-33 teletype (as well as paper
tape reader control), an interface for a wide-carriage IBM output
typewriter (individual typebars, not a Selectric-style device), and a
large number of digital input and output ports, a number of programmable
counters (to be used as interval timers), along with a bunch of A/D and
D/A channels.
There was also a BCD real-time clock which kept track of the time of day
in hours/minutes/seconds, and also toggled a bank of flip flops at
various rates which could be polled (no interrupts existed on the
machine) to track time in various increments (1/2, 1/4, 1/8 and 1/16-th
second intervals, if I remember correctly). There was also a set of
thumbwheel numeric input switches which could be read, which, if I
recall correctly, was 6 digits long, BCD encoded. The machine was all
transistorized. No ICs anywhere.
The machine was made by 3M Corp. (Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing). It
was a process control machine. Its original use was as a natural gas
pipeline pressure monitoring and control system by Northwest Natural Gas
Co. in Portland, Oregon. After it was retired, it was donated to our
high school.
When I started at the high school, one of the drums had failed, so one
CPU was inoperative. But, the other worked well.
It was a two address machine, with operand address, and next instruction
address. Addresses were of the form block/track/sector as the drum was
organized. The instruction set was pretty simple, there were five bits
in the opcode. There was an accumulator (24 bits), and a "B" register
which could be used for temporary storage. The accumulator and B
register were discrete registers, not located on the drum. Master
timing for the machine was generated by a pre-written clock track on the
drum, so all operations of the machine were synchronized with the drum
rotation. Some kind of phase locked loop or the like was used to keep
the drum rotating at a consistent speed (I think it was 3,600 RPM). The
instruction set documentation had a "for optimum programming" section
for each instruction, which provided formulas for the operand address
and next instruction address to minimize the access time for the
instruction. Typically, the operand address was the current address +
3, and the next instruction address was the current address + 6. Using
these formulas would mean that the operand would be under the head after
the instruction was fetched and decoded, and the next instruction would
be under the head when the operation was completed.
There were no index registers or base registers or anything like that.
Addressing tables and such had to be performed by instruction
modification, e.g., load an instruction into the accumulator, increment
(or add 3 for optimum programming) to the operand address, store the
accumulator back over the top of the instruction, then execute the
modified instruction. Made list processing, stacks, and the like rather
tedious.
Each CPU was in a "drawer" about 8 to 10 rack units high. The drum was
located in the center of the chassis, with circuit boards (which, IIRC,
were about 7" long, and 5" wide) plugged into a backplane in the shape
of a "U" around the drum. The two CPUs mounted in a small rack one atop
the other.
Controls for the CPU were simple. STOP, START, CLEAR, and LOAD. Clear
cleared all of the working registers, and set the program counter to
Block 0/Track 0/Sector 0, and halted the machine. Stop halted the
computer after the execution of the current instruction was completed.
START began program execution. LOAD put the machine into a hardwired
loader that would allow address/data pairs to be loaded into the drum
>from the paper tape reader on the ASR-33. The address and data were
expected in octal, with a space separating the address and the data.
These controls were momentary pushbuttons, with the START, STOP, and
LOAD buttons lit to indicate when the machine was running, halted, or in
LOAD mode. Five indicators would show the opcode of the current
instruction. I seem to recall that it was possible to
single-instruction step the machine by putting the machine into STOP
mode, then holding the STOP button down when pressing the RUN button at
the same time, but this memory could be incorrect.
There was a two-pass assembler called SOAP that could be loaded from
tape, then the source run through the paper tape reader twice, with the
resulting object code stored on the drum. SOAP was pretty big, though,
about 4K resident, which meant that you couldn't write anything much
larger than about 4K in size with the assembler.
I had spent time at the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry (OMSI) on
their "Straight 8" PDP-8 System, and had learned FOCAL. I decided to
try to write FOCAL on the 3M machine. I actually got to it to the point
where small programs could be entered, edited, and executed. It did
integer math only (24 bit), as floating point simply wouldn't have fit.
When a line of code was entered, and the RETURN key hit, it would take
about 1.5 seconds for the line to be parsed, error checked, and stored.
This machine was not very fast. I wrote quite a few programs for this
machine, including a blackjack game, tic tac toe, an alarm clock (you'd
enter the time on the thumbwheel switches, and when the time came along,
the teletype would ring the bell).
Never got the IBM output typewriter working. It had mechanical problems
(probably needed a thorough cleaning and lubrication). After I
graduated from high school, the machine didn't get much attention.
Someone tried powering it up at one point, and the drum in the still
operating CPU failed..bearings went bad, and (fixed) heads crashed. The
school eventually moved to a new building two years after I graduated,
and that's when I had the opportunity to take the machine, but I had no
place to put it, nor any way to move it. It was rather large (and
heavy).
The cabinetry was all painted a dark blue color. A white formica table
top sat on top of the two CPUs in their small rack, and on top was a
console with the real-time clock (using incandescent displays that had a
GE-47-style lamp that shined through a piece of film that had the digit
on it, which projected the digit on the a satin-finish plastic display
screen). The clock was not made by 3M, but by someone else, was about 6
rack units high, and had pushbuttons to manually advance the hours,
minutes, and seconds. It was implemented with transistor logic,
connected as ring counters for each digit. Also on this panel was the
six-digit thumbwheel numeric entry device.
The IBM typewriter sat to the right of this panel. The controls for the
CPUs were mounted on the front plate of each CPU drawer. To the left of
the CPU drawers was the large cabinet that housed all of the I/O
circuitry. It was crammed full of transistorized modules that plugged
into a massive backplane.
Each CPU had its own power supply, as well as the I/O cabinet, and the
realtime clock. Each CPU needed a 20A 110V circuit. The I/O cabinet
needed a 30A 110V circuit. The clock, IBM typewriter, and Teletype had
their own 20A 110V circuit.
I've been unable to remember the model number of this machine. I recall
that it was 4 digits long. At one time, I had a big binder which
contained a bunch of documentation for the machine, including the
instruction set information, some information about the I/O subsystem
programming, and also complete schematics for the CPU. I've searched
and searched for it, and can't find it -- so I think that it must have
been lost or accidentally tossed in one of many moves.
I've searched high and low on the web looking for any references of any
computers made by 3M, and have found nothing. My guess is that they
didn't made computers for a very long period of time. My recollection
is that the date on the documentation was 1965, but not sure of this.
Anyway, probably a whole lot more here than anyone cares about, but it
is my hope that perhaps someone out there may recall a machine like this
made by 3M.
Sure had a lot of fun playing with that machine. Learned a great deal
>from it. The mainstay computing at our highschool was an HP timeshare
system (initially, HP 2000C, advancing over the years to a 2000C',
2000F, then 2000/Access) which were accessed by dial-up ASR-33
teletypes. A "closed" BASIC environment, which was great, but no
machine-level programming. I learned a great deal about "how computers
work" from the old 3M machine.
Thanks for letting me spew out all these memories.
Rick Bensene
The Old Calculator Web Museum
http://oldcalculatormuseum.com
Hey folks. Does anyone have a Ferguson Big Board that they might
be interested in unloading? I drooled over their ads in BYTE when I
was a kid; I'd love to have one now. I have a pair of 8" drives
sitting here just waiting for one.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Cape Coral, FL
I have a PDP-11/23 for sale with the following componets in three 4-
foot racks:
Pictures: http://www.schnitz.com/pdp/
Rack 1:
RL02
PDP-11/23
RL-02
The stuff sitting in front of the rack isn't related.
Rack 2:
Colorado Video Digitizer
Chroma Keyer Decoder Model 4706
Bosch unit
Another video-related piece of equipment below that
There's some wire-wrapped board sitting it the empty space below
that. I'm not sure if it's a part of the system, or if I just stuck
it there to save space. i'll pull it out tomorrow and take a look.
Rack 3:
Memory (possibly some other stuff mixed in there too, but the black
units are primarily memory)
Power Supply
Fan
Also included:
Cabinet of RL02 cartridges. I recall at least one of the tapes was
labeled "System" and something else. I can write down what they're
all labeled, if it makesa difference to anybody.)
Very large drawing tablet
The fellow I bought this from told me it was used to do computer-
generated graphics in the '70s and that it cost his company a quarter
million dollars. I think it's depreciated since then. I bought it
several years ago, but never did anything with it. It sat in his
basement, then it sat in my garage. He told me it was working when
decommissioned, but that was some time ago and it's utterly as-is.
He also said it uses the same memory (behind the black panels) as in
the Apple II.
I bought a milling machine last week and need the room, so I'd like
to see it go relatively soon. I'm in York, PA.
I also picked up some HP-85B's at an auction last week. I only
wanted two, so the rest are for sale. They came out of storage at a
very nice lab and look like they're in great shape.
Also available from the same auction is a system configured as follows:
HP 9144 (tape drive)
HP 7957B (hard drive)
HP A-Series Controller 3065ST (board tester?)
Make offer.
Tom
--
Apple I Replica Creation: Back to the Garage
By Tom Owad, Foreword by Steve Wozniak
About the book: <www.applefritter.com/replica>
OSNews Review: <www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=10085>
I'd like to echo Henk's thanks for the discussion. I too am learning
>from this as I'm actively working on a /34a and looking at a dormant
/70.
Interestingly the /70 has an M9312 in 1AB _before_ any of the
processor boards and an M9302 (as expected) at the end of the Unibus.
Thanks,
John
>
>Subject: Re: Tandy 2000 Floppy Drive Replacement
> From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>
> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Fred Cisin wrote:
>> > The Tandy 2000 uses a 720K 5.25" drive. DSDD 96tpi.
>> > Matsushita (Panasonic, Shugart, etc.) 465
>> > Tandon TM100-4
>> > Teac 55F
>> > etc.
>> > SOME 1.2M drive could work. They need to be jumpered to 300 RPM, "low
>> > density" recording current, etc.
TEAC FD55GFV jumpered for fixed speed.
>>
>On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Marvin Johnston wrote:
>> Second, IIRC the speed and "low density" recording current are set with jumpers.
>> What is the etc.?
>
>Ready v Disk change (pin 34)
>termination
>drive select
>maybe motor on w/drive select
>
>> I might add that when connecting a standard 360K drive, the light comes on and
>> stays on, and the drive continues to spin when a disk is inserted. This gives me
>> the impression that there may be something wrong with the disk controller for
>> the Tandy 2000. The cables for the 2000 are straight-thru, so I rejumpered the
>> drive to the first drive (D0 of 0-3 or D1 of 1-4.) And yes, I checked and double
>> checked to make sure that pin 1 on the motherboard matches pin 1 on the drive!
Connector on drive upside down. Drive runs on power up with light lit, doesnt
step (may recal on power up depending on drive). NOTE: if the connector is
inverted any media inserted is erased for whatever track the head sits at
(write enable is active).
>DECMATE II Soft-Sect. CP/M
DECMATEII (and III) was a RX50 (SSDD 80tr) ~400k
Though one later option was RD31(st225 20mb) or RD32 (ST251 40mb)
hard disk with RX33 (FD55GFV). DECmateII treated the FD55GFV as
a single platter RX50 (single sided) unless teh firmware
was above a certain rev. DECmateIII knew RX33.
>DEC Rainbow
Most DEC machines prior to VAXmate used RX50 a dual
drive of 80tracks single sided and about 400k each.
>DEC Rainbow MS-DOS V2.05
Again, RX50 though RX33<teac FD55gfv> could be fitted.
RX50 remained the "Corperate" floppy drive till VAXmate.
There were a few products that used otehr drives but
usually from the start. For example Robin (VT180) used
either SA400L or TM100s (40 track single sided DD).
Allison
While doing some moving today of items to storage I found that Power
Macintosh G3 (Blue and White) tower
(family M5183) had both support feet broken. Does anyone have a extra set of
these, that they are willing give or sell real cheap? Email me off list
please. Thanks John
Sounds like you have the Floppy Cable backwards.
Try plugging it in the other way around.
You have Pin 1 and pin 40 flipped. A constant light and spinning motor is the usual symptom of that.
Another way to get data off that machine is to use LapLink V and a Serial LapLink Cable. There were several work-alikes to LapLink like FastMove and others.
You should be able to buy LapLink cables rather cheaply these days.
Al
Phila, PA
----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Marvin Johnston
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 8:46 PM
To: ClassicCmp
Subject: Re: Tandy 2000 Floppy Drive Replacement
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Fred Ciscin wrote:
> The Tandy 2000 uses a 720K 5.25" drive. DSDD 96tpi.
> Matsushita (Panasonic, Shugart, etc.) 465
> Tandon TM100-4
> Teac 55F
> etc.
>
> SOME 1.2M drive could work. They need to be jumpered to 300 RPM, "low
> density" recording current, etc.
First, what other machines used a 5 1/4" 720K drive? I've been looking
through
the stash, and so far I haven't found anything.
Second, IIRC the speed and "low density" recording current are set with
jumpers.
What is the etc.?
I might add that when connecting a standard 360K drive, the light comes on
and
stays on, and the drive continues to spin when a disk is inserted. This
gives me
the impression that there may be something wrong with the disk controller
for
the Tandy 2000. The cables for the 2000 are straight-thru, so I rejumpered
the
drive to the first drive (D0 of 0-3 or D1 of 1-4.) And yes, I checked and
double
checked to make sure that pin 1 on the motherboard matches pin 1 on the
drive!
Thanks!
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Fred Ciscin wrote:
> The Tandy 2000 uses a 720K 5.25" drive. DSDD 96tpi.
> Matsushita (Panasonic, Shugart, etc.) 465
> Tandon TM100-4
> Teac 55F
> etc.
>
> SOME 1.2M drive could work. They need to be jumpered to 300 RPM, "low
> density" recording current, etc.
First, what other machines used a 5 1/4" 720K drive? I've been looking through
the stash, and so far I haven't found anything.
Second, IIRC the speed and "low density" recording current are set with jumpers.
What is the etc.?
I might add that when connecting a standard 360K drive, the light comes on and
stays on, and the drive continues to spin when a disk is inserted. This gives me
the impression that there may be something wrong with the disk controller for
the Tandy 2000. The cables for the 2000 are straight-thru, so I rejumpered the
drive to the first drive (D0 of 0-3 or D1 of 1-4.) And yes, I checked and double
checked to make sure that pin 1 on the motherboard matches pin 1 on the drive!
Thanks!
I am playing around right now with a Tandy 2000, but it has no floppy drive. THE
HD works fine, but I'd love to get the information off the HD, and that is
difficult right now :). I tried a couple of standard 360K/1.2MB drives before
Googling around. Does anyone have any information about what can be used as a
replacement drive?
Interestingly, the information I've seen indicates that the Tandy 2000 runs a
modified version of MS-DOS 2.11 but the version on this machine is 2.0.
I'm picking different pieces of various leftover /34 systems to make mine. I
have a question about the regulators in the back of the /34's ba11k.
Exactly what regulators are required as a minimum for a /34 that is just a
dd11-pk with no expansion? Assume just a processor, one memory board, RL11
controller, one DL11W... nothing heavy. I have one ba11 with regulators in 4
positions and one with regulators in positions 1-3. However, one had a RK11D
which I'm removing, one had a DD11-DK addition which I won't be using... and
I would prefer to remove regulators that won't be used so they can sit on a
shelf as spares and not be powered up all the time.
I've looked in the 11/34 user manual as well as the ba11k technical manual
and I can't seem to put together this info. Can someone point me in the
right direction?
Jay West
Don wrote....
> The issue is there are two different aspects of the UNIBUS that are being
> terminated:
Aha. Now that makes sense! Thank you :)
What that means to me then is that in the /34 the 9302 should only be
plugged in to a the AB unibus out slot and NOT in a MUD slot, otherwise, you
get a funny smell I bet :)
So what about the 9312 in the /34 then. I assume it can only (no matter HOW
it's jumpered) be put in a MUD (AB) slot, never in an AB unibus slot (Unibus
in or Unibus Out). ??
Then, this of course brings me back to my dearly beloved (sarcasm) /45. In
that machine, the cpu doesn't terminate anything from what I understand,
hence the 930 at the front in slot 1AB. I assume in the /45 then, you CAN
put the (appropriately jumpered) 9312 in the last slot (unibus out), and
that you don't put another 930 in that slot and put the 9312 in a prior AB
slot. Is that all correct?
Thanks so much!
Jay
actually we are both wrong, the macro was used to make the call external if needed. The near declaration was required to tell the assembler what addressing to use. If the label was in the module being assembled, then the assembler knew what size to use.
-----Original Message-----
>From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com>
>Sent: Oct 12, 2006 4:07 PM
>To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>Subject: Re: MSDOS Source code leaked
>
>On 10/12/2006 at 3:34 PM Steve Thatcher wrote:
>
>>invoke is a macro that allows for handling small code model versus large
>>code model...
>
>The INVOKE macro cited merely declares the target of the call to be NEAR if
>not already defined.
>
>By the time MASM 6 (aka ML) came out, extended INVOKE was well internalized
>into MASM--and allowed parameter passing (as well as simplified segment
>definitions, procedure prototypes, procedure-local labels and a host of
>other worthwhile features). But this was just a formalization of what many
>programmers were already doing via macros.
>
>Cheers,
>Chuck
>
>
Hi,
I posted this to the rescue list but have had no response :<
So, I'll try again, here...
------
I've been trying to move my various peripherals into
611-type cases. Hopefully, get things a bit better
organized.
These stack nicely with ~12" (WIDE SCSI) cables to
daisy chain from the OUT of one to the IN of the next.
But, some *other* cases aren't quite as well-behaved.
For example, stacking anything atop a 711 case requires
a slightly longer cable to tether the 711 to the 611.
Likewise, a 622 (?) needs a "cable stretcher" to span
the gap to an adjacent 711/611/etc.
Did Sun make *slightly* longer wide cables? Like 18"?
Obviously, I want to use short cables to keep the chain
as short as possible...
And, can anyone suggest a good source for the ~12"
and similar cables?
Is there anything else I should be wary of?
Thanks!
--don
> From: "Evan Koblentz" <evan at snarc.net>
>
> http://stores.ebay.com/Computer-Marketing-Services
>
> I found some interesting things to buy, but then saw the prices... not only
> are they ASTRONOMICAL but the seller lists almost every item, even ordinary
> keyboards, as "Very Rare"... I wanted a Canon X-07 and a Toshiba T100 but he
> posted them at $299 and $399 respectively. What the hell!?!?!?
Okay, I got curious to see if he was selling anything. Checking all of his
listings going back to those that closed a month ago, not a single item has been
sold. This starts to restore my faith in the human race again :). I didn't check
to see if they had a website and if they are using Ebay as inexpensive
advertising to divert people to their website.
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=ViewListedItems&useri…
http://stores.ebay.com/Computer-Marketing-Services
I found some interesting things to buy, but then saw the prices... not only
are they ASTRONOMICAL but the seller lists almost every item, even ordinary
keyboards, as "Very Rare"... I wanted a Canon X-07 and a Toshiba T100 but he
posted them at $299 and $399 respectively. What the hell!?!?!?
My lord, that's a HUGE wad of code for something as simple as
MS-DOS... How the HECK can an OS that fits on a floppy with room to
spare have 20 megs of ASM source. Does the wad include the tools that
M$ ripped off like Doublespace and the like?
invoke is a macro that allows for handling small code model versus large code model...
located in dosmac.inc
; call a procedure that may be external. The call will be short.
invoke MACRO name
.xcref
IF2
IFNDEF name
EXTRN name:NEAR
ENDIF
ENDIF
.cref
CALL name
ENDM
.xcref invoke
-----Original Message-----
>From: Bryan Pope <bpope at wordstock.com>
>Sent: Oct 12, 2006 2:35 PM
>To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>Subject: Re: MSDOS Source code leaked
>
>And thusly were the wise words spake by Jim Leonard
>>
>> woodelf wrote:
>> > How do we know it was not cross-assembled?
>>
>> A quick poke at the code shows stuff in the .asm like "invoke (routine)"
>
>Don't you mean PEEK? ;)
>
>
>> so there must have been something going on. I'm not familiar with
>> "invoke", rather CALL and the like.
>>
>
>Cheers,
>
>Bryan
>
>P.S. And don't worry, I'll be here all week...
>
TSIA :)
I was skimming through the 11/34 manuals, and some confusion about the
termination of that system made me re-read through the M9312 manual.
Something doesn't seem right and points to me not understanding something. I
seek enlightenment from the list.
As I've understood things, you have to terminate both ends of the unibus.
Let's say you're dealing with an 11/34 with no expansion backplanes (ie.
just a DD11-PK). According to the 11/34 manual you put the M9302 terminator
in slot 9AB. That makes sense, it's the unibus out. All the other AB slots
are MUD (except slot 1AB, and we'll get to THAT in a moment). So about that
other end of the bus now! The manual states you need a M9301
bootstrap/terminator just after the processor (typically, it may be further
down if you have the FP and/or Cache options). That also makes sense to me,
gotta terminate that "near" bus end. I had a M9302, but I didn't have a
M9301. I wondered if I could use a M9312 in place of the M9301. So...
I skimmed the M9312 bootstrap/terminator manual, and sure enough, it
definitely talks about being able to use the M9312 instead of a M9301 in a
processor that "has bus termination built into the cpu such as the 11/04 &
11/34". It even says that you must set the jumpers on the M9312 to remove
it's termination capability, because in these specific processors the cpu
provides bus termination. Ok, great. I can use my M9312 in place of the
M9301 long as I jumper it as described. But... now wait a second! This gives
rise to my first question. If the cpu is providing termination, and if you
are going to use a M9312 on the near side you have to "jumper off" the
M9312's termination ability... then WHY is a M9301 called a "bootstrap
TERMINATOR". It must NOT be a terminator, just a bootstrap rom card. Right?
It seems to me that if the cpu is providing the termination on the near end,
that it is always doing so. Not JUST when you pull out the 9301 and put in
the 9312. What gives there?
That gives rise to my second question. IF the cpu is providing unibus
termination on the one side... why can't you jumper the M9312 to provide bus
termination and just put it in slot 9AB? You would get the other end (unibus
out) terminated AND get your boot roms as well. This way the M9312 would
replace both the 9301 AND the 9302. A few people I mentioned this to said
you can't do that. But given the above... it seems logical. What's the scoop
here?
Clarification is much appreciated!
Jay West
>Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:07:29 -0700
>From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
>Subject: Re: What the hell -- CRAZY prices
>To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>Message-ID: <200610111407290781.63264317 at 10.0.0.252>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>On 10/11/2006 at 3:27 PM Jeff Walther wrote:
>
>>After the auction, the high bidder had the gall to email me to tell
>>me that he sells items of the type I'm interested in and that I
>>should visit his store.
>
>This is the reason that I use "sniping" on ePay--waiting until the last
>second or two to place a bid.
I did, in fact, use snipeswipe on that auction. But he had a higher
bid in place than my snipe. Like I wrote, it wasn't losing the
item, that didn't surprise me as my bid was low. It was being
emailed by this guy who clearly didn't want the item, he was just
outbidding others so he could turn around and charge them more money
that it would have cost them if his sorry chemical composition was
disassociated.
Jeff Walther
>Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:27:38 -0400
>From: Ray Arachelian <ray at arachelian.com>
>Robert Borsuk wrote:
>> The interesting thing is that he will list items for bidding, then if
>> they don't sell he will relist them at a higher price.
>> He does eventually sell things so I guess it encourages the high prices.
>I've seen this kind of behavior before. It seems to be a new business
>model.
>
>It works by listing and relisting the same items, or opening it as a
>store and listing them always. Whenever anyone sells a similar item
>that competes with the store, that store bids and buys the item, then
>relists it at the higher price. Even if they don't win those items,
>they'll at least drive up the prices for them to be in range with what
>their store is selling, thus driving up the expected price for that item
>in the market.
>
>The end goal is to be the only source for a set of items, and to be
>always available. The high price of the items justifies their cost of
>doing business (space, ebay fees, buying competing items, etc.) but of
>course screws the buyers. In the long run, supposedly, they wind up
>making more money by being the only source.
>
>That's what you're seeing.
I think I experienced this first hand within the last year.
I bid on a Fujitsu magneto-optical drive. Ah, here's the URL still
on my Snipeswipe page
<http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=8786740987> .
I was willing to go to about $16 (with shipping it would have been
closer to $30).
After the auction, the high bidder had the gall to email me to tell
me that he sells items of the type I'm interested in and that I
should visit his store. Of course, he sells MO drives for well over
$100.
So this creature outbids me and then tries to turn around and sell me
the same item at a higher price. If I had been willing to pay more,
I would have bid higher.
I can't point out some way in which this behaviour is morally wrong,
but it is certainly irritating.
Jeff Walther
Make them an offer. There seems to be group of sellers that list things at
prices that would have been apropos for a depot repair kind of outfit before
eBay existed looking for the "OMFG I have to have that part" hit, but are
more than willing to listen to deals offline.
Ken
I don't know about the timeline of Silent 700s, but I seem to have a few of the
bulkier ones in my garage (near San Jose, CA) complete with cassette tape
drives if anyone wants to "take them off my hands".
I even have a manual somewhere. I've also got some of the smaller ones (with
built in acoustic coupler) but I'll probably keep that one (unless offered some
$$$). If interested, contact me off list.
They were introduced in the 70's (75/76?) as I remember. If you had your Bell
103 modem (I have one of those, another story), they were pretty neat things
for "offline" editing of text files. Not exactly a vi editor, but better than
paper tape (that's not saying much).
Pretty reliable as a "hard copy" (thermal printing) terminal. Now days, you
can use thermal FAX paper in them and it works OK. Great to hook up to your
DP-8 or something of similar vintage.
Just a few facts.....
--
Tom Watson
tsw at johana.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Is it just me, or is it now impossible to solder properly with "lead free"
solder and "lead free" flux?
Is there a decent make of flux available (like you used to get in those
little round metal tins, and is nicotine brown in colour), rather than that
utterly useless white water-based stuff?
Also, while I'm ranting, the white rubbish flux I bought (to try to get a
recalcitrant wire soldered up) has more warnings than I've ever seen on any
product except peanuts before. Is it my imagination, or is it actually more
dangerous than the stuff it's replaced?
Grrr
Adrian Vickers.
(PS: This has nothing to do with terminals - I was fabricating a new battery
pack for an Epson PX-8, due to the terminal expiration of the original)
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.13.1/469 - Release Date: 09/10/2006
Hello Jesse,
I do not longer collect them, the museum is defunct. I will forward
your message to the classic computer collectors list, by CC.
Thanks,
Patrick
TO CC members: please contact the gentleman "Jesse Bunch" directly if
you have an interest in the below described equipment. The pro380 as I
recall is quite a nice box and the 350 is nothing to sneeze at.
Thank you,
Patrick
SpiriTek1 at aol.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 9 DEC PRo 350's and 380's plus color and mono monitors for them,
> cables, boards, even one unit mounted on the stand with wheels. Do you
> have any interest in these? I am in Silver Spring, MD. I got these
> over 10 years ago when I used to buy computer eqpt from Federal Govt
> auctions and resell eqpt.
>
>
> 301-910-7858
Hi folks,
today I digged out some PDP11 modules. I wonder what I can do with them.
A Plessey-labeled Unibus Box with 11/34 front panel (the simple one) is
still waiting to be picked up by me or put to scrap...
Ok, what I found:
* DEC M8265+M8266 (11/34A CPU), M9301 bootstrap/terminator
Question: Is that enough to get the machine going? Do I need anything
else (except memory and a kind of tty interface)? What about the "parity
controller" which I don't have?
* Plessey PM-DC/11 "status control", P/N 700485-100C
Plessey PM-K11 "disc control", P/N 700490-101E
Plessey PM-K11 "data control", P/N 700475-100B
Plessey PMDC/11 "bus control", P/N 700470-100B
These are four quad wide boards. I have no clue what they are/where good
for. No connectors. Some DIP switches.
If anyone could help me out with some information and/or docs - would
be great.
* Plessey PM-DC1100, P/N 703380-100H
This hex wide board looks like an Unibus SMD disk controller.
If it's that I am VERY VERY VERY interested in information about that.
At the place I found the parts there is still an SMD drive....
It has three 26 pin ribbon connectors and one 60 pin connector.
* Plessey memory board (?!), P/N 701830-100G
Some information about that would be great. If anyone has something to
share....
Ok, if anyone can help me.....
All the stuff is available to anybody urgently needing it.
Good night,
Philipp :-)
Hello guys,
thanks alot for your answers. Unfortunately, I hadn't time yet to read the articles but I'll sure do that as soon as it's the case.
To answer the question where I'm situated; I live in Germany. Lawers around here try to find possibilities to gain money by pointing out websites
in wwhich law stuff my be broken in any way. It's absolutely rediculous and I don't want to have to pay a thousand euro jsut because a picture had
been used without getting a permission for example.
But from what you've been pointing out, it seems that it's not a problem to use some logos in the given context.
And the context after all is purely educational / historical. So I guess that it shouldn't be a problem.
I dont think that there will be issues the my ISP.
Nethertheless, is it necessary to ad something like "Alll logos are trademarks of their owners bla bla..." ?
Anyway, my site will be up soonish, I'll post a comment as soon as it's the case, as I'd like to get your opinions about it.
Thanks,
Pierre
> Chuck Guzis wrote:
> > On 10/10/2006 at 6:37 PM Jim Leonard wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, but he's not using the marks for any sort of financial gain or
> >> libel, so again, he should be fine.
> >
> > In fact, trademark fair-use guidelines are much more liberal and
> > straightforward than those of copyrighted material. "Fair use' in
> > copyright is a mare's nest situated in a minefield.
>
> Surely it's all academic given that we don't know where the original poster
> lives (they didn't say) - won't the copyright law vary wildly from country to
> country? I suspect that the law which applies is the law in the site owner's
> home country, which we don't know.
>
> *generally* I'd say that putting up a bunch of logos for non-profit use should
> be fine - it's not like it's doing the company any harm, or releasing
> information into the wild which isn't already readily visible elsewhere. About
> the worst I'd expect is a polite letter once in a blue moon along the lines
> of: "our logo has changed; please take the old one down and replace it with
> the new one".
>
> As I said though, I'm sure each country's laws differ, and given the global
> nature of the 'net the ones which apply are probably those for the site
> owner's home country (or possibly the country in which their site's ISP is
> based, if different)
>
> cheers
>
> Jules
>
>
> --
> If you've ever wondered how you get triangles from a cow
> You need buttermilk and cheese, and an equilateral chainsaw
_______________________________________________________________________
Viren-Scan f?r Ihren PC! Jetzt f?r jeden. Sofort, online und kostenlos.
Gleich testen! http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/freescan/?mc=022222
Not exactly, but I can get close (I worked for TI ... in fact in the printer
division). They were introduced in the early-1970's ... I was using second
generation models in 1977. By 1989 (when I joined TI), I'm pretty sure that
they had been discontinued, but they were still in widespread use, and were
still being supported.
Barry Watzman
Watzman at neo.rr.com
***************
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:32:57 -0400
From: "Evan Koblentz" <evan at snarc.net>
Subject: Timeline of Silent 700 models?
To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <002501c6ed07$79196820$6401a8c0 at DESKTOP>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Per the subject line .... does anyone know of a thorough list of all TI
Silent 700 terminals and the years of introduction?
Hello All
I'm still looking for help with the second rescue attempt in Georgia and
need either 182 donors of $10 each or 1820 at $1 each. I would like to get
to these items before winter really gets here, so please if you can spare a
$1 (one buck) send it to the Houston Computer Museum, 15827 Thistledew
Drive, Houston, TX 77082-1432. Cash or a check will do. Again the first trip
was a great success and many thanks to all donors for that rescue.
www.housoncomputermuseum.org
Thanks in advance to all,
John Keys
Hey all,
just a question: I'm working on a website which presents my collection of classic computers.
On the left side, there will be a navigatio bar with the company names and the respective modes.
I'd like to directly use the logos (images) of the brands in order to represent their names.
Could I run into to difficulties doing that? E.g. a company asking me to remove it or otherwise being confrontated
with law issues ?
For those who run a website? What are your experiences?
Thanks for any hints.
Regards,
Pierre
_______________________________________________________________________
Viren-Scan f?r Ihren PC! Jetzt f?r jeden. Sofort, online und kostenlos.
Gleich testen! http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/freescan/?mc=022222
I've tried manually searching the archives, but I can't find any references...
Was there someone who would be able to read 3 DECtapes for me? Two of them are
>from PDP-11 RSTS systems. The third has sources from ancient UNIX (circa 1974)
possibly 4th or 5th edition.
Thanks in advance!
-scott
staylor at smedley dot mrynet dot com