Would anyone know the difference between a 2100A and a 2100S? Is it just
packaging (such as, e.g., the "13246A Printer Subsystem," which was simply
a 9866A printer and a 2640A terminal duplex card that were sold together)?
Or is there something fundamentally different in the hardware?
-- Dave
> Essentially a USB version of the Catweasel???
That's exactly what it is. A flux-tranistion interface
daughter card for a fpga4fun SAXO board (USB2 chip and
Altera FPGA).
http://www.fpga4fun.com/board_Xylo.html
This is probably similar to what the Device Side Data
board is, but the intention that I have is to make the
entire design, including the tool chain and host/device
side code freely available.
The tape wizl is a multichannel preamp and A/D converter
attached to the same board.
Cost could be driven down by designing a single board, but
right now I'm only worrying about the boards needed for
tape/disc interfacing.
Link to a possible USB 5.25" floppy drive:
http://silme.pair.com/~goldman/deviceside/
--
I spoke to him at VCF, and was unimpressed by how closed he intends to
keep the HW/SW.
A USB floppy interface will be part of the fallout from the 'wizl'
development that I'm doing, though the hardware is going to be in the
$100+ range.
http://bitsavers.org/tools/wizl/diskwizl/
I'm going to spend this next quarter concentrating on developing the
wizl. Was looking back and it's been six years since I started looking
at getting an analog 7-track tape reader running, and I need to get this
project finished.
Hey All.
Does anyone have this software by chance?
Compuserv professional connection plus. Message management with forms.
Compuserv, Inc. 1988 (PC3-Mail System)
If so, it's worth some bucks to you. Please contact me directly (I'm not
subscribed and won't get replies here).
Thanks!
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
> From: "William Donzelli" <wdonzelli at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Intergraph / Clipper / HLH Orion
>
>> So noone has one of the Intergraph workstations? A pity. They were a
>> dominant player, you'd have expected some of the machines to survive!
>
>
> There are quite a few in Rhode Island at both computer groups. Even an
> Intergraph VAX, with weird disk controllers made to search for polygon
> data in hardware.
>
I still have a 2020 and a 125 from a lot I traded some time ago .
These were used as GIS systems by the government. Never got the 125 to
work because of some bug in the installation procedure. The
steel-encased Intergraph 21" color monitor was also very nice.... I
also have a lot of documentation, cd-roms, tapes and floppies.
If anyone is interested, I have Intergraph memory for sale for 2000
machines, sets of 4x4MB special Intergraph 30-pin simms; my machines
already is at the 64MB max. I've tried a long time to sell those, so
far no luck, so I don't think many people have Intergraph workstations
:) .
greetings,
Michiel
> > but what were the differences besides the keyboard?
> > They must have had similar internals.
>
> Expansion options I would think. A friend of mine in highschool had both
> the 400 and 800 units , but we only used the 800 when we had groups over to
> play Ultima III and IV. I snooped around and remember that there were card
> slots for RAM and ROM carts under the hood of the 800 but never looked in
> the 400.
>
> This site shows the expansion bays (and differences) in the 2 units:
>
> http://www.silicium.org/atari/800.htm
> http://www.silicium.org/atari/400.htm
>
> It looks like the 400 was stuck with its 16K? RAM while the 800 can be
> expanded more and it has an extra ROM port it seems.
>
> The original series was built like a tank, the XL and later models were not
> as good from what I remember.
The cast aluminum internal case was for EMI reasons. They were being extremely conservative to
the point of overkill since, at that time, the less restrictive FCC ratings specifically for
digital devices in homes weren't yet in existence. The 400 sold for US $549.95 while exactly the
same hardware (with respect to custom processors and processing power) with more expansion
capability and a real keyboard went for US $999.95 in the Atari 800. That $450 merely for more
_easy_ expandability and a real rather than membrane keyboard wasn't enough to me to justify the
additional cost, so I bought the 400 and wired up internally more memory and a real keyboard later
on (for FAR less than $450). Byte magazine did a highly complimentary two-part (IIRC) series of
articles on the powerful (for then) custom sound and graphics chips in the Atari machines. This
was what led me to buy the Atari 400 a few years before the Commodore 64 became available. Jay
Miner was the lead designer for those custom chips and he would later design the Amiga custom
chips after leaving Atari.
http://oldcomputers.net/atari400.htmlhttp://oldcomputers.net/atari800.html
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
item 150077784822
Not my auction
I post it here because the is near the end but only 8 people have viewed it!
Maybe due to bad title or bad category.
vax, 9000
Re: "What about taking an external USB 3.5" floppy drive and connecting a
5.25" drive to the interface that is being used for the 3.5" drive? It
seems like it should work."
Won't work. ALL of the USB 3.5" floppy drives that I've taken apart (over
100) are fully integrated USB devices. They are NOT a standard floppy drive
(with a 34-pin floppy drive interface) and a USB-to-floppy controller.
Hi, I have a few old Digital Equipment Corp. manuals.
If anyone is interested in them they are yours for shipping costs (I'm in Ontario, Canada).
They are as follows:
- DEC System 10 - Mathematical Languages Handbook
- DEC System 10 - Assembly Language Handbook
- DEC System 10 - Users Handbook
- KW11-L line time clock manual
- ME11-L core memory system manual
- Decscope User's Manual
- RK611/RK06 Disk Susbsystem user's manual
- DR11-C general device interface manual
- AR11 User's guide
- DL11-W serial iine unit/real time clock option maintenance manual
- DL11 asynchronous line interface manual
- RK11-D and RK11-E moving head disk drive controller manual
- Rk611/RK06 disk subsystem installation manual
- DZ11 user's guide
Thanks
________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexandre Souza" <alexandre-listas at e-secure.com.br>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: an ADM-3A cam in tod...ay
>> Mac portrait displays are presumably similarly difficult to get
>> replacement CRTs for, at least without realigning the yoke (I gather that
>> most CRTs don't like a change in orientation, although I used to run a
>> Sun colour display on its side a few years ago with no obvious
>> ill-effects)
>> For more conventional equipment I suspect that a swap is possible,
>> providing knowledge of how to tweak the old circuits with the new tube is
>> known.
>
> There is a very simple way of doing that. I though you all knew that,
> and didn't want to be redundant, but here we go:
>
> - For mac portrait displays, I don't know. But I always had run tubes
> on vertical on...ARCADE MACHINES! :D There is no problem on running B/W or
> colour tubes on vertical, trust me.
>
> - Tube swap is very simple. You can assume that if the neck connector
> fits, it will work. There are not many different tubes around, the problem
> is the yoke. On B/W tubes you just take the yoke of the fried tube off and
> put that on the new. No special alignment/convergence procedure necessary.
> Just line up the text on screen moving the yoke cw/ccw and you are set.
> For colour tubes, there are differences, here we go.
>
> - There are mainly three types of colour tubes: Mini-neck (the neck is
> the diameter of a fat finger), Low focus and High focus. Of course, I'm
> talking about inline masks. That Delta tubes (the RGB triad is a delta of
> points, instead of three lines one besides other) I've never seen that
> used in anything beyond televisions. If you have a monitor using a delta
> mask tube, forget it! The adjustments you're going to do are too difficult
> even to a profissional.
>
> - Low focus and High focus: You can see what kind is, looking at the
> tube socket or the neck end of the tube. The high focus tube has a plastic
> ring inserted on the pins, with a pin isolated from all the others. You
> can see the same in the socket. Low focus doesn't have that, the end of
> the tube has only pins, no plastic separator.
>
> - If you change colour tubes (talking about high focus and low focus),
> usually it is just a matter of changing the tube and using the same
> deflection set (yoke, convergence rings et al). E.G.: You have a monitor
> like the Amiga 1084/S which uses a philips or samsung tube, Low focus
> type, 15KHz yoke. Just buy any (!) television with the same
> chacarteristics (low focus) and change it. Yes, you can use the same yoke.
> Almost always the paramenters of the yoke are **the same**. The same
> happens for VGA monitors. Usually, all vga monitors uses the same type of
> yokes. YMMV, but this is the rule here. Please note: Yokes of 15 KHz
> monitors and 31 KHz monitors (vga and above) are NOT intechangeable. But
> the tubes ARE!
>
> - If you need to change the tube of, as an example, an EGA monitor,
> you'll not find a complete set from a television of from an old vga
> monitor, you'll have to change only the tube, keeping the deflection parts
> (yoke, convergence ring) and will have to do all the convergence procedure
> yourself. It is boring, it is hard, it is boring. But if you have no way
> to find a suitable replacement tube, there you are.
>
> Ok, too much words, here we go for a simple list:
> - If you have a B/W monitor, you can change the tube for ANY tube with
> the same neck size and that fits phisically in place. Keep the yoke from
> the old tube and put it on the new. You'll be only changing the glass
> tube.
> - If you have a COLOUR monitor, if the pixels are inline (sets of three
> bars, RGB on screen), you can change for any tube of the SAME type, paying
> attention if it is low focus or high focus. You can go some sizes above
> and beyond. E.G: A 14" monitor can use a 17" or even a 20" tube, the
> reverse is true.
> - If you have a VGA or HIGHER frequency monitor, you need a tube with
> yoke from a monitor of SIMILAR frequencies. Same as above
> - If you have a 15 KHz monitor and only have a VGA tube, and
> vice-versa, you can change THE TUBE, but will have to change the
> deflection set (yoke/convergence rings) and do all the convergence
> procedure yourself. Samsung manuals are great for teaching that, get the
> Syncmaster III service manual and be free.
>
> Any questions, feel free to write me
>
> Greetings from Brazil,
> Alexandre Souza
> www.tabajara-labs.com.br
I take it the 800 was the successor to the 400, the
1st unit my fingers ever typed on. Lol at typed on. You
needed a ball peen hammer to do any serious coding.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
http://klabs.org/history/build_agc/
Thanks to Richard Cini for the link!
No, its not a kit from me, but it is really cool! It has good potential to
become a kit! : )
Its an older link, but very cool. :)
Grant
> DEC RK03 (or workalike) I believe, looks to be in minty fresh
> condition :)
Diablo series 30 would be 2.5mb. Can't really tell from the pic of the
box, but if they are in the 20mb range they would be Diablo series 40
5440 style with one fixed, one removable. 24 sector would work on TI and
Interdata.
>> Beyond that, you can easily spend more upgrading than a faster newer
>> machine would cost you on the used market. That said...
>
> Nah, I'm just trying to figure out the Mac "culture". I want to get
> my currently unused workstation monitor on the G3 and poke around a
> bit.
Forget about OS X then, and think about the evolution of a computer from
a 128K 68000 through a G4 with a gigabyte of memory.
There are still applications that will run on the last version of OS 9
that were written for the original Mac.
Mac users would typically have many times the number of applications
than a Windows user, mostly because most had no installation
requirements other than dragging the app onto the system. Drivers and
system extensions were easily added by putting them in the Extensions
folder inside of System. The way some of them worked (patching into
system calls) sometimes resulted in system conflicts.
The biggest problem in the 68K Mac world was a holdover from the
earliest days of trying to fit into a tiny memory footprint. The
flat 68K address space was segmented to create position independent
code chunks that could move around as the system compacted memory.
Unfortunately, the data space was also segmented, so the APIs often had
64K restrictions on data areas.
PPC Macs got rid of that, and went to a flat memory model, which made
programming applications with large code/data footprints MUCH easier.
The big problem with the MacOS was there really was no architecture.
Features were tacked on, including things like two different shared
library architecutres on PPC because they evolved through two different
devlopment groups. In the end the API was a "Mactintosh Mystery House",
with dead-end APIs, and APIs that were bloated and ridiculously
over-engineered (Comm Toolbox, for instance).
Adherence to backwards compatibility really was why it was impossible
for Apple to come up with a replacement for MacOS until someone (Jobs)
finally cut the cord. This was impossible from the bottom up, no one at
the top was willing to have old applications break en mass.
Hi All,
I'm going to Philadelphia, PA for two weeks.
I collect Motorola MVME computers and I would like
to find some spares to take back to Europe.
Do You know any places near and good places even far
to find classic computer parts.
I have a weekend to spare and I have a car.
BR,
Matti.
_________________________________________________________________
Uutiset ja kasvot uutisten takaa. MSN Search, t?yden palvelun hakukone.
http://search.msn.fi
> Can someone tell me if the DEC
> RK03 was actually a rebadged Diablo 30?
RK02 == Diablo 31 with 1100bpi heads (1.25mb)
RK03 == Diablo 31 with 2200bpi heads (2.5mb)
There was also an RK01, used with the RK8 contoller
but it is not a Diablo drive.
At 22:28 -0600 1/6/07, Zane wrote:
> Of course if you want to be able to surf from this system,
>Mac OS X is pretty much a requirement. There is no modern web
>browser for Mac OS 9.
Were it not for the adjective "modern", I'd say:
http://www.icab.de/ (as has been mentioned)
http://www.opera.com/ (find Version 6.0.3 on their website)
With the "modern" it becomes a bit more debateable. They do still run, though.
--
Mark Tapley, Dwarf Engineer
(I haven't cleared my neighborhood)
210-379-4635 Dwarf Phone, 210-522-6025 Office Phone
I don't know anything about HP minis, so I don't know what to look for,
but for those on the list that have HPs and might be interested...
The main unit: item # 320060663740
The FP unit: item # 320060663048
No bids yet.
J
Hallo Paul,
Found your link in a discussion forum on
>> From: "James E Cosper" <jec at jcosper.com>
To: <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 7:00 PM
Subject: Heathkit ETA-3400 Modifications
I am searching very hard the images of ET-3400/ETA-3400 ROMs 444-24/444-51. I
would be very happy to find someone, who has these equipment and can make a
dump/punch to a file from the ROM address ranges 1400-23FF and F800-FFFF (MON>P
1400,23FFcr + MON>P F800-FFFFcr). May be you have any info for me? Many thanks
in advance and best regards from Austria
peter
peter.hofmann at chello.at
but what were the differences besides the keyboard?
They must have had similar internals.
--- cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
<wgungfu at csd.uwm.edu> wrote:
> >I take it the 800 was the successor to the 400, the
> >1st unit my fingers ever typed on.
>
>
> No, the 800 was released at the same time as the
400. 400 was the "lower
> end games computer", 800 was the "more serious"
higher end computer.
>
>
> Marty
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
> On 6 Jan 2007 at 16:40, Richard wrote:
>
> > Wasn't there some discussion recently looking for < 10 GB drives?
> >
> > There's a bunch of 2.5GB drives on dovebid right now...
>
> Quantum Bigfoot--bleah. Miserable things.
Yeah, I would'nt rely on Bigfoot drives, too. They are *very* low-cost and so is the quality and therefore reliability.
We had several of these which gave up work quite quickly.
One should try to avoid them.
Regards,
Pierre
_______________________________________________________________________
Viren-Scan f?r Ihren PC! Jetzt f?r jeden. Sofort, online und kostenlos.
Gleich testen! http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/freescan/?mc=022222
>Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 09:51:16 -0800
>From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
>I picked up another Mac yesterday--a beige 300 Mhz G3 with 256MB,
>and a 15 GB hard disk. It's also got a USB adapter plugged into one
>of the PCI slots. It's running OS 9.something. Set me back $20.
>Were Zip drives a standard part of these things?
>
>On a side-by-side with a Win2K P1 225MHz system with the same amount
>of memory, I think the WIndoze box has snappier response and has
>better video.
>
>For you Mac addicts, what do you think should be my next step in
>getting the most out of this box?
My experience with the Beige G3 is that the stock hard drives are
slow as molasses. The built-in IDE bus is only 16.7 MB/s (whichever
ATA that is) but the hard drive doesn't even perform up to that
level--at least mine did not.
Once I installed a more modern hard drive (faster media rate, i.e.
faster data from platters to heads) the machine showed a marked
improvement in performance.
Beyond that, you can easily spend more upgrading than a faster newer
machine would cost you on the used market. That said...
A faster IDE card would improve things as well. Acard makes a very
nice two channel ATA-133 card however, it will set you back about
twice what you paid for the machine.
Some years ago VST Tech sold an ATA-66 card based on the Promise
UltraTek 66 card. If you move three or four SM resistors, possibly
pull the half-size metal can oscillator (there are different versions
of the UT66 and some have the Osc. and others don't) and desolder and
reprogram the Winbond Flash chip, you can convert a cheap (<$5)
Promise UltraTek66 into a VST UltraTek66. If you care, I'll try to
hunt up the conversion instructions. The Promise cards were
apparently OEM in DELL machines or some such, so there are a bunch of
them on the used market.
The bus speed and bus-CPU multiplier are controlled by a jumper block
on the front left of the motherboard. You can change the bus speed
>from 66MHz to 75 (IIRC) or 83 MHz by moving jumpers. However, many
of the Beige G3s won't operate at 83 MHz and tests show that this
doesn't really make a big difference in performance.
The 300 MHz CPU can often be run at around 366 MHz, so you can speed
your CPU a bit by changing the bus-CPU ratio. Many folks have done
this reliably, but my experience was that it caused problems after a
while.
CPU replacements up to 1.1 GHz are also available but the
manufacturer's (PowerLogix) retail outlet (OWC, macsales.com) seems
to be out of them. See above about spending more money than a newer
used computer would cost... There's a gap in speeds between 500 MHz
and 900 MHz having to do with the version history of the PPC750.
The machine used PC66 SDRAM but PC100 or PC133 will also work. DIMM
capacities up to 256 MB are supported but some addressing modes are
not. So you need (I think) 16 chip DIMMs on the 256 MB capacity.
IIRC eight chip 256 MB DIMMs will not work or will only be seen as
128 MB. 512 MB DIMMs won't work because of limitations of the
Motorola/Freescale MPC106 memory/PCI controller/bridge.
For the things where my memory is hazy (indicated by a ? or "I
think") check the articles on G3 computers at xlr8yourmac.com.
Also, there's a link from the FAQ there to the jumper settings for
the Beige G3 motherboard clock and ratio settings.
>I don't care for the Mac monitor that came with it--has anyone tried
>hooking up a fixed-frequency SOG workstation monitor to it? I've got
>a nice HP/Sony model that might be a candidate.
Mac DB15 to VGA adapters are common and cheap (=<$4, I sell a
multi-rez model for $4 shipped in USA). If the monitor will work
with a VGA output, it should be possible to make it work on the
built-in video of the Beige G3. However, the Beige G3 and earlier
Macs rely on sense codes in the monitor cable to indicate what
resolutions are supported. When an adapter is used the sense codes
are provided by the adapter. Some adapters are fixed-resolution
coded so it's tough to get anything but the adapter's fixed
resolution out of the Mac if you use a fixed resolution adapter.
Other adapters are "universal" and have DIP switches to support many
resolutions, and one of the resolution code choices is "21"
multi-resolution".
Jeff Walther
Today I pulled out the boards in my vax 3800 and I found 7 microprocessors
besides the CVAX. They are,
2x 68000, 8096, 80186, 2x 8086, Z80.
Just a little discovery to share with you.
vax, 9000
>Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:57:06 -0800 (PST)
>From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
>> I picked up another Mac yesterday--a beige 300 Mhz G3 with 256MB,
>> On a side-by-side with a Win2K P1 225MHz system with the same amount
>> of memory, I think the WIndoze box has snappier response and has
>> better video.
>
>The beige G3 has only a Rage II+ card by default. The later Revision 2 and
>3 use Rage Pro. Thus, I think the video issue you're noticing is probably
>the accelerator. The original 300 is almost certainly Revision 1.
The video chip can be visually examined, although the "Wings" card
(AV card) may be in the way. It will have Rage II or Rage Pro (or
Rage Turbo?) printed on it. You may also be able to get this
information from Apple system Profiler in the Apple menu.
If the ROM DIMM has not been switched out, you can determine your
revision by looking at the ROM revision in the first page of Apple
System Profiler. Under "Production Information" look at "ROM
Revision". If it is $77D.40F2 then you have a Revision A ROM. If
this ROM shipped with this motherboard then you also have a revision
1 motherboard. However, the ROM DIMM is pretty easy to switch so
there's no guarantee that the machine contains the ROM it originally
shipped with and all of the ROM revisions work with all of the
motherboard revisions.
If the ROM revision is $77D.45F1 it is a revision B. If it is
$77D.45F2 it is a revision C and absent ROM swapping the machine
probably has a RAGE Pro video chip.
If you have a Rev. A ROM, then the built-in IDE channels in the
machine will only support 1 device per channel. You need Rev. B or
C ROM for two device support per channel.
You can also determine your ROM revision by looking at the Apple part
number on the two ROM chips on the ROM DIMM. However, I don't
remember the numbers. It's something like 341S0409 and 0408 is Rev.
A, 341S0494 adn 0495 is Rev. C and I've never seen a Rev. B with the
part numbers on it so I can't say, but I imagine it's 341S04xx with
xx up close to 90.
No matter which motherboard you have, switching to a B or C ROM will
enable two device support on the IDE channels.
>You might as well get a Rage Orion and I think you'll find the performance
>much better. The Rage Orion is a 16MB Rage 128 PCI card, and I know from
>personal experience that it is Mac-compatible and has good performance.
>They're pretty cheap on the used market.
Rage Orion was ATI's name for one of the Macintosh versions of the
Rage 128. PC versions of the Rage 128 won't work. (I am not
contradicting Cameron, just restating his information a bit.) It
may be possible to do a conversion from PC version to Mac version,
but I don't think anyone has ever reported a successful modification.
The Radeon 7000 works well in the Beige and the Sapphire version of
the PCI card with DDR memory is easily converted to Macintosh use.
It is also just $30 at Newegg. Simply remove the eight pin SOIC
serial flash chip and replace it with a blank ST Micro M25P10. It
should then either flash with the current Mac firmware updater from
ATI or it may require the R7000-ROM-208 version. It's been a
while. I know the latter will work. I'm not sure about the former.
Whichever way, update to the latest firmware afterwards, because
there are some Sleep issues with earlier versions.
3D driver support is only official after OS 9.2 but if you install
the Open GL 1.22 or 1.24 extensions by hand into OS 9.1 it works fine.
Jeff Walther
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Scott Quinn wrote:
> > My guess has to do with processors: i80486 binaries can run just fine
> > on Pentium+ systems.
>
> so can 8088 binaries. (With occasional exceptions that don't typically
> show up in common usage (such as PUSH SP))
> But not all Pentium+ binaries will run on 8088, or even i80486.
>
>
> There seemed to have been a cultural difference between Motorola and
> intel.
>
> Motorola would design each major generation from scratch, thus
> producing a
> much better processor, but without legacy software.
>
> intel, OTOH, would bend over backwards to try to maintain 4004
> compatibility.
We're talking about two slightly different things here, though- 68000
(while it did not have provisions for easily running 6800 code) had a
common-mode so that programs built on the 68040 could run on the 68000,
but you can also have code that requires instructions (or other things)
added on later 68000-series processors, similar to Intel (variable
286-style segments, the copy-on-write provision of the 80486, etc.).
The transition between 68000 and PPC was more like the Intel gap
between the x86 and the 960 - they are completely different processors
with no common heritage (the common heritage piece was provided by
Apple in firmware). I haven't worked with them, but AFAIK the new
embedded versions of the 68000 (ColdFire?) maintain the tradition of
working with earlier 68ks (except in a few cases).
> Chuck wrote
> On 6 Jan 2007 at 19:41, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
>
>>
>> So I don't see what's so restrictive about the Mac requirements at
>> all,
>> frankly.
>
> You're right, it's a matter of small degree. Mac OS 8 = 1997;
> Windows 95 = 1995. Intel 80486 = 1989; PPC 601 = 1992. It's pretty
> much a moot point anyway--everyone's going to be x86 by-and-by.
>
> Cheers,
> Chuck
>
My guess has to do with processors: i80486 binaries can run just fine
on Pentium+ systems.
The software probably can work just fine at 68040 speeds, but then when
run on PowerPC systems you have the emulation overhead which drops
speeds to around a IIci (25MHz 68030, think Sun-3) on a 8100/80 (80MHz
PPC601) Some companies didn't want the bother of maintaining two
versions (68k and PPC, especially after the PPC machines had been out a
year or two), so they would compile PPC only- hence the higher system
requirements.
--- John Foust <jfoust at threedee.com> wrote:
**>> snip <<**
>
> Back in late 1998, my buddy Sheldon Leemon (author
> of "Mapping the C-64")
> won the grand prize in an online sweepstakes. The
> prize was a full-size
> promotional version of the robot from the remake o
f
> "Lost in Space".
> It had been touring the USA and Japan. Doesn't lo
ok
> quite the same:
>
> http://www.robotoys.com/lis99.jpg
>
> 600 pounds, New Line Cinema valued it at $4,500.
We
> debated what we
> might do with it, never coming to any good
> conclusions. I was tempted
> to store it in my barn. He never picked it up. I
t
> sat in a shipping
> yard for months. I think it eventually started
> running up charges and
> was sent back in mid-1999. I wonder where it went
!
>
> - John
>
Urghh!!!!
Why would you want that piece of trash?!!!
Sorry, but I think it's the worst designed robot
in the history of films!
Robbie the robot (Forbidden Planet, 3 or 4 eps
of Lost In Space 60's tv series, background in
Gremlins 1 (or 2?) and even in a Columbo film
>from the 70's!), Gort (Day The Earth Stood
Still), Maximillion (The Black Hole) and more
modern robot's such as Robocop, ED-209 and
Caine (all from the Robocop films), plus the
T-1000 (Terminator), are much better designed
to be menacing and/or cool looking.
When I saw the one from the Lost In Space
film (from 90's) I just laughed. To be honest,
going from the picture, it looks like a cross
between the robot's from Short Circuit and
Caine from Robocop 2.
Regards,
Andrew D. Burton
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
--- "Bryan K. Blackburn" <oldcomp at cox.net> wrote:
> Recently we have seen recreations of several vinta
ge
> computers like the
> Mark-8 Minicomputer, the Apple 1, the IMSAI 8080 a
nd
> most recently the
> Altair 8800, but wait till you see this!!!
>
> eBay item # 230051400851
>
> The effort that must have went into this project..
.!
> Detailed
> construction photos here:
>
> http://www.lostinspacerobot.com/newsletter.html
>
> I confess that I have always wanted one of these!
:)
> I have no
> connection with the seller etc. & etc.
>
My dad has got 2 plastic models from Lost In
Space. One had the giant holding a boulder
above his head with John and Don below him
and the other one was a 6" (or thereabouts)
tall model of the Robinson robot.
Not sure where they are now though.
If he had the money I'm sure he would want
the replica of the Robinson robot :)
Regards,
Andrew D. Burton
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
and I should also point out some of the screen is
reverse video, some is blinking. Anyone know what
happened to John Allain?
--- cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
<chrism3667 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> it only helps if youre going to swing by and unseat
> the 80186 from its bizarre cage. I aint touching one
> ever again. But thanks all the same Roger :)
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--- Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com> wrote:
> aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> > Why would you want that piece of trash?!!!
> > Sorry, but I think it's the worst designed robot
> > in the history of films!
> > Robbie the robot (Forbidden Planet, 3 or 4 eps
> > of Lost In Space 60's tv series, background in
> > Gremlins 1 (or 2?) and even in a Columbo film
> > from the 70's!), Gort (Day The Earth Stood
> > Still), Maximillion (The Black Hole) and more
> > modern robot's such as Robocop, ED-209 and
> > Caine (all from the Robocop films), plus the
> > T-1000 (Terminator), are much better designed
> > to be menacing and/or cool looking.
>
> Are you sure you're not talking about the T-800?
> The T-1000 is the
> liquid-metal jobbie.
>
> Peace... Sridhar
>
Ooops. Yeah, I meant the T-800 (Arnold
Schwarzenegger).
Whilst double-checking the T-number, I came
across this huge list of goof's (page is
around 200KB's):
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103064/goofs
Regards,
Andrew D. Burton
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Hey, all,
I've got mail from some guy with a bit of TRS-80 stuff available for
pickup: 3 TRS-80 computers, a TRS-80 5 Meg Disk System, manuals, flopppies,
etc. If you can rescue it, let me know. I'll forward replies to him.
He's in Stockton CA, and I've told him we can probably arrange a pick-up
and save him the hassle of shipping.
BTW, I've been slacking on this for about two weeks now, so I'll have to
double-check that the items are still available. But I wanted to send
this to the list now, rather than checking with him first and running
the risk of falling into procrastination-land again...
Cheers,
Bill.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
can you buy it in powder form? You mean you all apply
hcl to a circuit board??? Aint there a less caustic
substance for the job?
--- cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
<ploopster at gmail.com> wrote:
> Chuck Guzis wrote:
> > On 7 Jan 2007 at 10:12, Lyle Bickley wrote:
> >
> >> 1. I've only been able to buy gallon sized
containers of the 30% HCL (Muriatic
> >> Acid). That is very unwieldily to handle. A
polyethelene containter with a
> >> small "spout" (available at drugstores) is an
easy solution. Just be careful
> >> when transferring the acid from the gallon
container to the poly container -
> >> use a poly funnel - HCL is "nasty" stuff.
> >
> > Another caution--DO NOT STORE THE CONTAINER IN
YOUR WORKSHOP OR
> > WHEREVER YOU KEEP YOUR EQUIPMENT! Muriatic acid
is hydrogen chloride
> > gas dissolved in water and tends to "fume". Which
means that if the
> > cap on the container is slightly loose or the
container is cracked,
> > you'll be in for an eventual surprise.
> >
> > I kept a gallon of muriatic stored in my workshop
and thought the cap
> > was screwed on tightly (it wasn't). After about 2
weeks, I noted
> > that all of my cast-iron shop equpment was coated
with a fine
> > dappling of rust. My HCl is now stored in a
weatherproof container
> > out-of-doors. I can't imagine what such fumes
might do to the
> > innards of a disk drive.
> >
> > For a somewhat tamer substitute, one might try
sulfamic acid--a
> > powder dissolved in water and normally used for
cleaning masonry (as
> > is muriatic acid). You can often find it at
stores that deal in
> > ceramic tile supplies.
>
> You can store hydrochloric acid dilute without
worrying about it fuming.
>
> Peace... Sridhar
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
I picked up another Mac yesterday--a beige 300 Mhz G3 with 256MB,
and a 15 GB hard disk. It's also got a USB adapter plugged into one
of the PCI slots. It's running OS 9.something. Set me back $20.
Were Zip drives a standard part of these things?
On a side-by-side with a Win2K P1 225MHz system with the same amount
of memory, I think the WIndoze box has snappier response and has
better video.
For you Mac addicts, what do you think should be my next step in
getting the most out of this box?
I don't care for the Mac monitor that came with it--has anyone tried
hooking up a fixed-frequency SOG workstation monitor to it? I've got
a nice HP/Sony model that might be a candidate.
Cheers,
Chuck
it only helps if youre going to swing by and unseat
the 80186 from its bizarre cage. I aint touching one
ever again. But thanks all the same Roger :)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
no actually. I should have specified no older then a
486. For creating/dumping images and whatnot. Some
early lt floppies were just slender versions of dt units
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
actually rows and columns of blocks of ascii chars,
some blinking. To which Im greeted upon switching on a
Tandy 2000. Typically what does this indicate?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
not seemingly likely w/the current crop of usb units,
but would it be possible to get a 5.25 to work in say
an older lt w/an integral 3.5?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
In response to an offlist question, here's a bit more info on HCL use:
1. I've only been able to buy gallon sized containers of the 30% HCL (Muriatic
Acid). That is very unwieldily to handle. A polyethelene containter with a
small "spout" (available at drugstores) is an easy solution. Just be careful
when transferring the acid from the gallon container to the poly container -
use a poly funnel - HCL is "nasty" stuff.
2. Use as little acid as possible on a board/module/motherboard. Before
applying the acid I look over the board - and discover the corroded/oxidized
components and apply the acid directly to the components. The acid will flow
to other, non-oxidized components, but it won't hurt them. A toothbrush can
be used to scrub stubborn corrosion - but I've found it is rarely needed.
3. After applying the acid, rinse it off as soon as the "fizzling" stops. Use
plenty of cold water to eliminate all traces of the acid. Then use a final
rinse of distilled water.
4. I avoid putting acid on adjustable, semi-sealed components, such as
potentiometers, variable capacitors, enclosed switches, etc. If they are
badly corroded - replace them.
5. I use a hair dryer set at medium-heat/high-speed to dry the board and under
chips, etc. Drying will also eliminate any traces of residual acid that may
have been left behind. (HCL turns to a gas when it "drys out").
Cheers,
Lyle
--
Lyle Bickley
Bickley Consulting West Inc.
Mountain View, CA
http://bickleywest.com
"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"
Can't remember if I sent this- found it on a different list and I can
forward mail
> EDIT Jan,7: No one's interested into old stuff anymore? If no one
> claims them they will go in the trash real soon! It'd be a shame... If
> you're not interested in taking them all there's loads of perfectly
> working boards, IP7s, IO4s with plenty of SCSI, GTX graphic set, power
> supplies, backplanes, skins, etc, etc. Anyway let me know.
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a few older Silicon Graphics systems up for grabs if anyone is
> interested. There's three 4D Predator racks, a deskside 4D/70GT and a
> Challenge XL. All the machines are complete except for the Challenge
> which is missing the CPU and memory boards. Except for that everything
> is there. They also come with a few boxes of parts, cables, keyboards
> and such. A 17" SGI monitor is also part of the lot.
>
> Pictures here:
> http://web.newsguy.com/AlexPhotos/sgi.html
>
> Everything is free if you take them as is. If you only want boards or
> other parts, I'll charge a small fee for the packaging material and
> for my time.
> The machines are located in Montreal, Canada.
Looks like the Challenge might not have processor boards, but the other
systems seem to.
The 4D/70 is a Twin Tower
the stark reality is Im not all that confident using
the term dongle. I think they may have been called
that, but Im not sure :(. Some had dials by the way.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Hold on!!!
I have a use for FM analogue Sat RX's..
We use them for amateur television (a branch of Amateur Radio)
I'll take any you have and if they have manual tuning so much the
better!!
Rod Smallwood
Email rodsmallwood at btconnect.com
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jules Richardson
Sent: 06 January 2007 00:01
To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: not quite on topic but, classic analogue satellite tv
decoding boxes
Witchy wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I've got a pair of old UK SKY TV boxen (1997 era) that are pretty
> useless as analogue SKY TV was switched off in 2001; can the hardware
> be used for anything else or is it pretty much paperweight material?
Paperweight, I would have thought - I've never heard of them being able
to do anything 'clever' (unlike, say, some of Acorn's set top boxes
which do resemble a computer closely enough to fire up a web browser on,
talk to a few very specific hardware add-ons etc.).
I doubt there's even many useful components that can be salvaged as
it'll likely all be surface mount stuff and big shiny screened silver
boxes inside.
cheers
Jules
try something less potent. Testors, 2 part epoxy,
gorilla glue, Goop...
--- cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
<compoobah at valleyimplants.com> wrote:
> Has anyone had success fixing the plastic "alloy"
that Sun uses in
> their cases?
>
> MEK and cyanoacrylate turn it into a mushy grainy
mess.
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More may come up, but here's the list for now
1x DEC DSSI tri-link connector 12-39921-02
Used to connect DSSI busses to beasties like HSD controllers.
1x either a Sun SPARCstation 5/110 256MB or a
Tatung COMPstation 20 (SPARCstation 20 clone) 1x SM40, 128MB RAM.
This is being posted to: TekScopes, HP, TestGear, and CCTech lists.
Fellow techies,
I'm going to have a day or so of opportunity to do some serious scrounging in the southern California region, specifically around Anaheim and vicinity, coming up in May of this year.
Being that I haven't been near the area since 1993, I could really use some pointers on who's who in the electronic surplus arena that would be worth a look. My primary interests are in test gear (usually RF and telecommunications, but I keep an open mind), specialized hand tools for connector crimping (both mil-spec and commercial), and "legacy" telephone equipment from the Bell System/Western Electric heyday.
So... Let the suggestions fly! ;-)
Thanks much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech do/t c=o=m
"If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with surreal ports?"
Ok, not _everything_ but rather an incredible simulation!
I've managed to amass quite a bit of vintage-ish computer hardware that
I haven't got much use for any longer -- I figure that someone out there
can make better use of this stuff than I currently am. All of this
stuff is free, unless otherwise noted -- I just want this stuff _gone_.
At the moment I realllly prefer local pick-up (in the Seattle area)
since I don't have a lot of time to be shipping stuff out. Unless
otherwise noted, the items are in working condition (or were the last
time I used them).
A lot of these are listed sans RAM/hard disk/keyboard -- I have a lot of
extra parts lying around and if you need one I'm happy to throw it in
for you, if I have suitable spares.
Some of these I don't remember all of the details of offhand (just did a
quick perusal of my inventory), so if you have specific questions or
need clarification, let me know and I'll figure it out for ya...
And of course, since this stuff is free, you get what you pay for --
I've tried to do my best to be honest about the state of the below junk,
but I haven't used some of it in years so I make no guarantees.
Thanks!
Josh
The items are as follows:
Computers:
- Apple Network Server 700/200. 200Mhz 603 PPC, 128mb of ram, CD-ROM,
tape drive, and a number of empty drive trays. Notable as the only
Apple computer made after the original Mac that doesn't run MacOS.
Makes a great Linux/NetBSD machine, or if you have a copy of AIX 4.1 for
it...
- SGI Octane, 200Mhz R10k, 512mb ram, no hard disk (or tray,
unfortunately...). Cabinet is slightly scuffed in front.
- SGI Indigo2, 250Mhz R4400, Solid Impact video, unknown RAM (fully
populated). No hard disk (or trays... sigh...)
- 2x Sun Sparcstation 10, framebuffer, 40Mhz CPU, sans RAM & hard disk.
- Sun Ultra 5, 266Mhz UltraSparc.
- Sun Ultra 1, Creator 3D video.
- Sun SparcServer 670MP. 4x40Mhz, 64mb RAM (huge, good for an anchor,
ballast, scrap iron, or if you have a lot of Sun VME boards...).
CD-ROM, 2.0gb hard disk w/SunOS 4.1.4 installed. Missing rear cover,
and missing wheels on bottom, which makes it fun to move.
- 2x HP Apollo 715/75 -- not working, no ram, no hard disk, missing 1
CPU in one of them. Listing this just in case someone needs parts...
- HP Apollo 735, 24mb ram (I think...), no hard disk.
- HP Apollo 700, no hard disk.
- Zenith luggable PC (no idea on the model, the label sticker on the
back is unreadable). 2x5.25" floppy, 8088, 640k ram (all you'll ever
need.) Missing keyboard, but takes standard XT keyboard.
- Intergraph TD-310. Dual PPro-200Mhz, no RAM.
- Sony "ViewSystem" VIW-5000. Is it a 286 PC? Is it a Laserdisc
player? No, it's both! I have no idea what this was intended to be
used for, but it sure is weird. And large. And free!
- Apple G3 "All-In-One". 233Mhz G3, built in 15" CRT, no hard disk.
Will run OS X 10.3, with some trickery.
- Apple Powermac 8100/80av. Ugly as sin, but has 233Mhz G3 upgrade in
PDS slot, which evens that out a bit.
- PowerComputing PowerBase 200.
- Unknown portable X-Terminal w/plasma display. No power supply or
peripherals. I have no idea if it works.
- Network Computing Devices X-Terminal.
Misc parts:
- Big box of 386, 486, and Pentium motherboards & expansion cards
(serial/parallel/ide combo cards, video, etc...). Most have CPUs, and
ignoring the inevitable CMOS battery failures, should still work fine.
- Mac IIfx motherboard, sans RAM and ROM simm. Works, but ROM simm is
missing.
Monitors:
- Intergraph Intervue 20". Multi-frequency (not multisync), works at
standard VGA frequencies, higher resolutions are at specific frequencies
only, and are somewhat oddball. If you have a Matrox video card, their
"Powerdesk" drivers have special support for this monitor, which makes
using it under Windows quite easy. Works fine under X with specialized
timings.
- Radius Portrait/15 Pivot. 15", portrait/landscape. Neat.
- Mag 17" monitor. Works OK most of the time, but screen sometimes
randomly changes width. A fun weekend project for someone!
Printers & Peripherals:
- HP Laserjet II. Non-working, but probably easy to fix (has trouble
pulling paper out of the tray, otherwise works fine last time I tried
it). Needs new toner cartridge.
- TRS-80 DMP-120 printer, unknown condition, but seems complete.
- HP PaintJet. Very early inkjet printer. Worked the last time I used
it, no idea if you can still buy ink for it...
- Kodak Photo CD burner (external SCSI box). This is a standard 2x CD-R
drive, as far as I know...
Other, sort of OT, but sort of computer related:
- Sony LDP-1000A Laserdisc player (hey, it has an RS-232 port on the back!)
- Pioneer LD-V4200 Laserdisc player (also w/RS-232 port)
I have 3 or 4 RL02 drives I am parting out. I also have Q-bus, Unibus, and
> PDP8 controllers. If you have any interest, please contact me off list.
Thanks, Paul
Bob,
On 1/6/07, Bob Brown <bbrown at harpercollege.edu> wrote:
> I'm not fortunate enough to have any real hp-2000 class hardware to
> play with, but this evening I hooked an old ADM3A that I picked up a
> while back (on someone's curb) to my linux pc which runs vmware,
> which runs windows-NT which runs SIMH which runs my emulated HP2000
> (mickey.ath.cx)....
>
That sounds like the arrangement I usually have, to run things. ;-)
But you do know you can compile and/or run SIMH on Linux directly,
without the slowdown of Windows NT and VMWare in the middle, right?
If your distribution doesn't support compilation easily, I'm sure
someone on the list would compile it for you if need be. :)
> So, while I don't have the back-end hardware, I can sit at a nice
> classic terminal, running at 9600 baud (I may step it down to 300
> baud just for memories), and play with my emulated hp.
Sounds like loads of fun! I did the same thing, albeit with a Wyse
terminal and a SIMH emulated VAX, until I'd gotten a real VAXstation
bootstrapped using the same emulator. :-)
Josef
--
"I laugh because I dare not cry. This is a crazy world
and the only way to enjoy it is to treat it as a joke."
-- Hilda "Sharpie" Burroughs,
"The Number of the Beast" by Robert A. Heinlein
> One thing I didn't expect is the involved model and OS requirements
> for various bits of software. I thought that the idea was that one
> didn't have to engage in the upgrading game on a Mac like PC people
> do. From what I've seen thus far, if anything, the Mac world seems
> to be almost worse in that respect.
I assume by this you're referring to the particular constraints of
running a particular OS on a particular hardware configuration. Just to
put it into perspective, the first beige G3 was introduced in 1997, but
the Public Beta was not released until 2000 and OS X 10.0 not until 2001.
The hardware issues that affected OS X didn't become apparent, then, for
several years. These were originally OS 8 machines, after all.
--
--------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ ---
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Honk if you're illiterate! -------------------------------------------------
I am interersted in buying some thermal paper for a Hewlett Packard
printer. Can you give me any help? My email at home is btu68 at aol.com.
Billy T.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reminder: E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure.
Do not use e-mail to send us confidential information
such as credit card numbers, changes of address, PIN
numbers, passwords, or other important information.
Do not e-mail orders to buy or sell securities, transfer
funds, or send time sensitive instructions. We will not
accept such orders or instructions. This e-mail is not
an official trade confirmation for transactions executed
for your account. Your e-mail message is not private in
that it is subject to review by the Firm, its officers,
agents and employees.
--------------------------------------------------------------
regarding the monitor issue, been there done that. If
the G3 uses the same sense-pin scenario as earlier
macs. then a dongle and a bnc cable will put u in biz
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
I'm taking a straw poll here.... how many folks are interested in obtaining
a Prime 50-series computer (in general, not a specific model) for their
collection?
I'm not really wanting to count anyone who thinks "yeah, I'd take one if it
showed up on my doorstep for free". I'm more interested in a rough count of
people who want one enough to actually drive a ways, or pay shipping plus
"token" amount, etc. Someone who would seriously pursue one if it became
available to them.
If you meet that criteria, let me know!
Jay
...and Macs only put out video as theyre set to, at
the cable-vid card junction. Youll need a doohicky to
initialize it 2 a proper vid mode 4 such a display.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
...and Macs only put out video as theyre set to, at
the cable-vid card junction. Youll need a doohicky to
initialize it 2 a proper vid mode 4 such a display.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
ugh and here I was thinking someone sent him a fat
Mac. WS monitors work readily with even the oldest Mac
IIs w/an appropriate card. Never did it with a G3 but.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
there's currently 10 on eBay right now. 9 of which are
>from the previous seller (the one that banged out at
$1,926). Is the guy dopey? How could he reasonably
expect to get that money for each when he dumps them
all on the market at once??? I would think it would
make the most sense to spread them out.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
I aint got the link handy, but its searcheable. At
about a buck still I think. The catch - either the
monitor or the unit is defective. Currently still a valu
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
My two new Onyx machines are almost naked! One has a top, side and
front skin. The other has a top skin only.
So, I am looking for skins for the box so that I can make them pretty.
The Challenge/L machines use the same enclosure, so the skins from
those can be used.
Can anyone help me out?
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
Cleaning out things and came across 40+ tubes (24/tube) of TTL 5400
Quad Nand Gates (Mil version of the 7400). Free for postage.
Here's your chance to build your computer from scratch :oD
CRC
>Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:43:12 -0500
>From: Brad Parker <brad at heeltoe.com>
>Jeff Walther wrote:
>>
>>Additionally, the Outbound Laptop is an interesting beast in that it
>>uses 2.5" IDE hard drives. This is the first Macintosh to use an
>>IDE device by many many years. I don't think any Apple Mac used
>>them until the Quadra 630 and its performa and LC cousins.
>
>Perhaps true, but there were macs with 3.5" st-506 drives long before
>that.
There may have been Apple machines with ST-506s but unless my memory
is much worse than I hope, there was never a Macintosh with an
ST-506. Unless you're thinking of the "Macintosh Hard Disk 20"?
But looking through old emails, that has a Rodime Model 552 drive
inside with a mysterious 26 pin interface, not an ST-506.
>Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:26:08 -0800
>From: "Billy Pettit" <Billy.Pettit at wdc.com>
>I'm not familiar with the Outbound Laptop. What was the model number?
Outbound was a company. So they were producing non-Apple
Macintoshes by scavenging Apple ROMs from Apple machines.
The model number in this case is the Laptop Model 125. A very cool
machine with four SIMM sockets devoted to a "silicon disk"--that is a
dedicated RAM Disk. You could install up to 16MB in there--at
least. I have not tried 16 MB SIMMs yet.
The keyboard was detachable and had an IR interface. It also had a
trackbar ("isopoint") at the bottom of the keyboard. A ?-bus (not
PS2, not ADB that other one used on PCs (required an ISA card) with a
round connector) mouse could be plugged into the keyboard if one
preferred a mouse. Additionally, using the optional SCSI adapter,
the Laptop could be "docked" as an accessible SCSI device on any
Macintosh with a SCSI interface.
>I do know that I was supporting Apple at Quantum in early 1994 and qualified
>an IDE 2.5 inch drive for their laptops.
The Laptop 125 was around as early as February 1990. I'm not
certain exactly when it was first released. It pred-dates the
Powerbooks. So, e.g. the cool SCSI docking feature was available on
an Outbound, long before it was a feature on the PowerBooks.
Jeff Walther
Brent Hilpert wrote:
>
> .... I'm familiar with
> core-rope ROM (or at least one version of it) from attempting
> to make a reader to dump the contents of a Wang calc
> microcode ROM, but the AGC version sounds like the
> address-decoding/word-selection is done differently (..need a
> diagram).
Speaking of Wang Calculator ROM's, I've recently built a fixture that
I'm successfully able to read Wang 700-series ROMs with. It's
unfortunately a non-automatic system...toggle switches and TIL-311 HEX
displays (can automate it later), and am in the (slow) process of
dumping a known good Wang 720C ROM. The ROM strobe signal timing is
very tight on the 700-series ROM...off even a little bit on the timing
(pulse width), and the readout gets real inconsistent.
Also trying to write a microcode execution engine in Perl to run the
code, but there are lots of interesting timing considerations that
require deep digging into the schematics (which is something that I have
little patience for...basically, I'm not very good at it) in terms of
the timing of all of the register transfers in the machine. On the
surface, it looks simple, just a basic 10-phase non-overlapping clock
(shift register), but there's a lot of combinatorial logic that derives
a lot of weird timing from the basic clock phases.
So far, my attempts to execute the code I've extracted so far lead to
execution of illegal instructions (all zero ROM locations), or infinte
loops, and the code execution doesn't seem to make much sense. There
are also some microcode instructions that aren't documented, and having
to dig through schematics to figure out what they do. Wang is also
famous for purposefully putting errors into published schematics to
throw off competitors who would use such schematics to reverse-engineer
how the machines work. So, some of my problem could be that the
schematics are not necessarily an accurate representation of the actual
logic.
Still some tinkering to do. Still, I'm very sure that the fixture to
read the ROMs is working perfectly. All ROM locations return consistent
results, and other than the emulator running into all zero ROM content
(there are quite a few "unused" locations in the ROM), all of the
instructions decoded thus far are "valid" in terms of the allowed values
of the various microcode fields.
The Wang 700, 500, and 600-series machines all used this style of ROM,
so, in theory, the reader (other than hardware pinout variations and
subtle microcode field diffrences) should be able to be tweeked to read
the 500 or 600-series ROMs without too much work.
The main goal of this is to be able to capture the microcode images for
as many of the Wang calculators that use this type of ROM as possible,
as this technology is really unweildly to troubleshoot and repair (and I
have some ROMs that are known bad that I want to try to be able to fix),
and also because the genius of Harold Koplow (now deceased) is buried in
that microcode. I want to preserve as much of it as I can (and maybe
figure out how he made these machines do what they do) as a legacy to
him.
Rick Bensene
The Old Calculator Web Museum
http://oldcalculatormuseum.com
The Sphere-1 micro, the first personal computer, was created and built
here in Utah. The creator, Mike Wise, died from complications of
diabetes in December of 2004. However, one of his long-time business
associates Arnold Grundvig of A-Systems is still around.
<http://www.a-systems.net/company.htm>
I talked with Arnold on the phone and he says that Mike regaled him
with many stories over the years about the Sphere and so-on. I was
interested in interviewing Mike for a short peice about that early
piece of Utah computing history. Arnold has agreed to be interviewed
for such a purpose instead.
So if any of you have questions about the Sphere or that period of
microcomputing history, please email them to me off-list and I will
collect them together with my own questions, conduct an interview and
post the transcript.
If any of you know any "old timers" that are getting on in years, it
might be a good idea to conduct a recorded interview (don't rely on
notes! record it!) to capture some of the "oral history" that will be
lost when they pass on.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
While not exactly computer directly related, since the silly box does have a
computer in it, I'd thought I'd ask here.
I've got an old TV Character generator, a Laird CG7000 to be exact. It has a
nice standard 5 pin DIN connector on the front panel for its "keyboard". Now
to me this looks just like a standard AT type keyboard, but alas it does
nothing unless I beat on the keys then something might show up. Would anyone
know what type of keyboard they use for this silly thing. It is a bit old, and
I suspect it might be an XT (not an AT) keyboard (which are different). I'm
going to attempt to trace out the connections to figure it out, but if someone
on the list has a clue, it would be helpful to me.
Not wanting to clog things up further, a response off list if probably the
best.
Thanks.
--
Tom Watson
tsw at johana.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:48:11 -0800
From: "Billy Pettit" <Billy.Pettit at wdc.com>
Subject: Missing Bits
-------------Original Message:
<snip>
Recently, I've been trying to write up some of those experiences and found
that I have almost nothing on a lot of the companies.
<snip>
And one that is driving me crazy, a company that supplied Ada systems to the
military. Was first based in Mt. View, then moved to San Jose into one of
the old Amdahl buildings. I can visualize the people and systems but can't
remember the name. Getting old sucks.
I'd love to hear about anyone's experience with any of these companies and
especially if any documents or hardware survived. And I'm especially
interested in ARIX. It was a very unusual company, and obliquely mentioned
in the 6 part TV series on Silicon Valley.
Billy
-----------Reply:
I worked with an Arix system years ago, and I think at least one person up
here in Ontario has one; I sent him whatever Arix documentation I had left a
while ago.
Dave Dunfield might know better if they're still around and who has them now.
mike
Al Kossow wrote:
Did you mean Arete? We have one, and it ran a version of Unix called Arix.
------------------------------
Billy wrote:
My memory is that the first few times I visited them, the company name was
Arix. That was changed to Ar?te after some of the notoriety caught up with
them. I'd love to meet somebody who worked at the location on Zanker road.
There were things happening there that are unique in the industry. Does
anybody on this list remember the room painted black?
Billy
I have some more stuff to get rid of now. There are:
3 Vaxstations
Some Amstrad CPC's
Manuals I don't have equipment for :
Tektronix 475 oscilloscope calibration and diagram supplement
la120 letter printer programmer ref guide
tektronix 475 oscilloscope service manual
beckmen industrial circuitmate 9020 osilloscope operaters manual x3
cosser instruments model 3122 oscilloscope operating manual
cosser instruments model 3100 oscilloscope operating manual
cosser instruments model 3102 oscilloscope operating manual
some vt100's with no keyboards
Lots of sparcstation IPC's
Apart from the manuals anything not picked up will have to be skipped.
Stuff not so free. I would like some cash for, anything sensible will
be accepted. Would also accept storeage of other items for a year or
two ;)
vax 4000/500 with external 10x external drives (all with scsi->dssi
convertors) (in half rack)
vax 4000/705A with external 5x dssi drives. (In standard case)
Dual head octane with 1gb memory.
vaxstation 4000/90.
The stuff is located in Soho at the moment. It could move to Kent if
not picked up soon.
Thanks
Dan
Govliquidation.com doesn't exactly have the best descriptions,
pictures, or search engine, but it does have lots of interesting stuff
popping up there from time-to-time.
Because its such a pain to find things on there, when I stumble across
something that someone here might find interesting, I post a note with
the lot link.
Does anyone find this useful?
Does anyone find this annoying?
If its more annoying than useful, I'll stop giving y'all a heads up on
these items.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
Hello folks,
I've got a pair of old UK SKY TV boxen (1997 era) that are pretty useless
as analogue SKY TV was switched off in 2001; can the hardware be used for
anything else or is it pretty much paperweight material?
Ta,
--
adrian/witchy
Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UKs biggest home computer collection?
Chuck Guzis wrote:
To be certain, some errors/additions are deliberate; Rand McNally
generally sprikles a few non-existent landmarks in their maps;
Google satellite maps have "watermarks" that can be very confusing.
I spied what looked to be clearing on some of my forested land and
hiked to the very spot and found--trees, just like everywhere else.
It took some conferring with a USGS employee to discover that what I
thought was a clearing was a rather subtle watermark (viewed in just
the right way, you can make out a "Go".
Cheers,
Chuck
-------------------------------------
Billy wrote:
It also happens closer to home in our mutual field. In the 1970's, CDC was
working hard on Russian alliances. They had to prove that Russian
technology was as advanced as the products CDC wanted to ship. (The old DoD
guideline.) So they bought some Russian 8080's and tested them.
Everything was going good until they decapped the chip. Inside, under a
microscope, they found an image of Mickey Mouse's head in the metal layer.
Of course, put there by Intel engineers to spot copy cat reverse
engineering. The Russians hadn't caught up in technology; they had bought
masks under the table and made complete ripoffs.
I know other IC vendors use similiar tricks to identify their IP. One I
have seen is an entire section of circuitry that has no outputs - like the
old famous write only logic. And it has been faithfully copied by several
Asian suppliers.
Billy
Anyone know where D-shell connectors first appeared on equipment?
Interesting thread going on in a local group at the moment about why SCART [1]
sockets are so horrible and nasty (prone to breaking pins, difficult to line
up, prone to falling out etc.) and why something better, like a D-shell
connector, wasn't chosen instead.
Thing is, SCART was apparently first used in consumer A/V equipment in 1977,
which probably means it was thought up in the mid-70's. Edge connectors and/or
circular DIN connectors were probably more common on computer equipment of
that time, but were D-shell types around by then too?
[1] For the non-Europeans, SCART is common on all A/V equipment in Europe and
provides component RGB (as well as composite) interconnect between devices,
along with stereo audio channels, sync lines, remote device standby control etc.
cheers
Jules
According to the docs, by sending a special escape sequence you can
download a program into the DECmate I over the serial terminal line.
Has anyone done this? I have a DECmate I with no floppy drives
although it has the interface card for the drives.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
Does anyone have a machine with an Clipper RISC cpu in it?
Wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergraph_Clipper> says that
only two companies ever used the Clipper (from Fairchild) were Intergraph
and High Level Hardware. HLH I never heard of before; Intergraph I
know of because they're big in CAD and GIS markets. Ah, WikiP says
that HLF was UK firm that made the Orion. Anyone got one?
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
Just rescued one of these units from Craig's List. It's waiting for me a a friends house in Richmond, VA. Anyone know much about these? I think they're just a rebadged Northstar Advantage.
It has a bunch of software and a manual or two.
There doesn't seem to be a lot of information on these on the web. I did see the information at Dave Dunfield's site, and the disk archive there. Any manuals that have been scanned? I didn't see the Advantage line at bitsavers.
Thanks for any help,
Kelly
A long time ago I was involved with licensing databases
(of new and used car price books-- e.g. Edmunds, Kelley Blue Book,
etc.)
They had the custom of salting the data with a few deliberate
errors so that in the event of an infringement suit,
they could prove that their data had
been copied by the infringer, rather than independently created.
I can't say whether the same purpose applies to schematics,
but it just might be.
Brad
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <459D59AD.3087.22DE923 at cclist.sydex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To be certain, some errors/additions are deliberate; Rand McNally
generally sprikles a few non-existent landmarks in their maps;
Google satellite maps have "watermarks" that can be very confusing.
I spied what looked to be clearing on some of my forested land and
hiked to the very spot and found--trees, just like everywhere else.
It took some conferring with a USGS employee to discover that what I
thought was a clearing was a rather subtle watermark (viewed in just
the right way, you can make out a "Go".
Dan's message about his Prime made me go glance at the Prime FAQ, and I
noticed these few lines:
* Prime had operational prototypes of the entire Toons system running
in the lab when it was cancelled.
* After the meeting to announce the closing of Prime, engineers
returned to the lab and continued working on booting Primos on
the Toons system. They were successful.
The Toons hardware was the next generation, in development when Prime went
under; I hadn't realised that it was essentially operational though. Does a
complete example was ever rescued and now exists either in a museum or in
private hands?
cheers
Jules
There were two Orions in
the Computer Science machine room when I went to York, and I know where
both went -- to a collector just along the road from me.
--
Did either still have the original 2901 based processor?
Apparently most HLH machines were upgraded to Clippers CPUs
I have seen a TV program on the one they built.
It was beautifully made in brass and steel and what's more it worked!
The program said he did not finish it because he simply ran out of
money!
Rod Smallwood
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of John Honniball
Sent: 04 January 2007 21:15
To: On-Topic Posts Only
Subject: Re: Purposefully fudged schematics
woodelf wrote:
> To get back on topic about babbage's drawings, from what I read it was
> mechnical design that could not be produced with 18th century
> mechanical enginering.
I thought the Science Museum rebuild showed that it could be built with
19th century engineering? They deliberately didn't make it any more
accurate than Babbage could have, and they only found a couple of minor
difficulties. One was that it was too hard to turn the handle, so they
geared it down.
Surely something that, if Babbage had finished the Difference Engine,
he'd have done himself?
--
John Honniball
coredump at gifford.co.uk
>I'm seeing a few messages where the text being replied to isn't quoted
>(anything from Al and Billy Pettit it seems, but there have been
one or
>two others) other than a separating line beneath old and new text
We're both using the web interface to the list to quickly scan the msgs
then doing cut/paste to compose replies.
The big problem with doing this is it loses the thread info in the
mail header
so they don't thread.
I'm seeing a few messages where the text being replied to isn't quoted
(anything from Al and Billy Pettit it seems, but there have been one or two
others) other than a separating line beneath old and new text, making it
confusing at first glance (particularly where the actual line and reply might
be off the bottom of the screen).
Am I alone in this? I just wondered if it's something broken within my email
client (Thunderbird) and it's stopped rendering what it thinks is quoted text
properly for certain classes of messages.
99% of messages are fine though, and either get displayed with quote
characters or displayed with a solid coloured line to the left of the quoted
text. If it's just me I'll try and find the cause though; if it's not I'll
just put up with it :-)
cheers
Jules
> In article <B9639BAE3F34504E83FEEDD71D4AFB460A660A at mail.bensene.com>,
> "Rick Bensene" <rickb at bensene.com> writes:
>
> > [...] Wang is also
> > famous for purposefully putting errors into published schematics to
> > throw off competitors who would use such schematics to reverse-engineer
> > how the machines work. [...]
>
> Wow, I'd never heard that story before. Interesting!
>
> How many other companies did this back when schematics were pretty
> much leaving the machine laying naked in front of you?
This is a very old practice. Some of Babbage's drawings had
intentional errors. As I recall, he drew some parts in mirror image.
The group that did the difference engine reconstruction in London
ran into this. And the practice wasn't new when Babbage used
it.
BLS
Chuck, found this tangentially while attempting to find more about the
parametron, as per Dwight's message.
The Elliot 803 used core logic with solid-state amplifiers.
(Apparently core logic received more practical use than I thought, as well.)
Some description:
http://www.tech.port.ac.uk/staffweb/andersod/CCS/ShowPage.php?Page=19
Another description with diagram:
http://www.sli-institute.ac.uk/~bob/elliott803.htm
While it is AC-coupled, perhaps it is not what you were looking for, though.
The logic signal propagation still takes place in discrete, clocked, time
steps as opposed to continuous wave propagation, if that is an adequate
description of the distinction.
I just received my first SGI "iron" -- an Onyx Reality Engine 2 250
MHz.
However, the power connector is not your standard style of connector.
It has three prongs, arranged horizontally:
----
---- ----
I'm guessing that this implies it needs more than the rated 15A for a
standard outlet.
Any ideas where I can obtain the correct cord? Searching for "power
cord" on the net just returns too many hits...
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
The Prime I got back in April is on ebay again. I am moving to
Australia for a year or two. I don't think I'd get it over there as
hand luggage. It has been stored in my spare room for 6 months so it
is in good condition. The item no, is 150077818268
Dan
Jules Richardson Wrote:
I'm seeing a few messages where the text being replied to isn't quoted
(anything from Al and Billy Pettit it seems, but there have been one or two
others) other than a separating line beneath old and new text, making it
confusing at first glance (particularly where the actual line and reply
might
be off the bottom of the screen).
cheers
Jules
--------------------------------------------
Billy wrote:
In my case, it is because I reply using a copy from the web site. To keep
the number of emails down, I only receive digests. Yet often, I want to
respond to a message without wading through the digests. So I copy off the
web site, trim off the excess and comment below.
I'm active, more or less on 75+ elists. And when they get active, it means
100's of emails a day. So reading and responding is very selective. For
example, have you noticed how much activity there is on this list this week?
It's like everybody is rested up and full of piss and vinegar.
At the other extreme, some lists generate almost nothing. The paleobotany
list averages 8-10 messages a year. Some of the science fiction lists are
cyclical going from 100+ a day to 1-2 day and back again over a couple of
months.
Billy
On 25 Dec, 2006, at 10:28, cctalk-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
>
> 1) Recordings of 2nd generation (or even before, if they exist)
> mainframes making tunes. There are a few recordings out there, and I
> may be getting some help from CHM for more.
>
There some are old recordings of my 2nd generation mainframe at :
http://ict1301.co.uk/13010520.htm
I also have a fuller set of 33 files in .aiff format which the files
on the web site were derived from.
These were recorded from audio cassette tapes which are about 30
years old but
seem to sound the same as I remember them.
The programs to make the music is on punched cards and the card
reader is currently
unreliable and I don't want to risk the card decks reading them in as
I only have one set.
The sound came from the built in speaker, which is pulsed once for
every two conditional
branch instructions.
I used to write pen plotter drivers for the Macintosh and there were
some plotters made by Watanabe
(later renamed GrafTec) which were suitable for music. The x and y
axes were driven by noisy stepper
motors. The speed was programmable and when drawing a large circle
you could hear the stepper motors
make a rising and falling tone as the angle changed. That is, drawing
a 45 degree line the two motors
worked at the same speed, and when drawing a horizontal/vertical line
only one motor would be working
For angles in between the tone would vary depending on the angle. The
slower cheaper plotters made
a grating sound but the faster more expensive ones were very melodic,
though I never got around to
programming them to make music myself, I would not be surprised if
somebody did.
Roger Holmes
Richard wrote:
> Does anyone have a machine with an Clipper RISC cpu in it?
Intergraph's Interpro series (such as the 225) had both a Clipper and
an 80186, and could run CLIX as well as MS-DOS. IIRC, when running with
the 186, the Clipper is programmed to act as an FPU! These machines were
unusual for their time. The keyboard and mouse plug into the monitor,
and the configuration system is mouse-driven. I'm not sure if it's in ROM
or loaded from a reserved part of the hard drive. Their keyboard has a
hard disk access LED and a bunch of extra keys.
These machines seem to have been used mainly by government contractors,
and they're not terribly common, but there are certainly some in the hands
of collectors.
-- Adam
>
>Subject: Re: back to the AGC, was Re: TTL 7400's Available
> From: Brent Hilpert <hilpert at cs.ubc.ca>
> Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 01:29:50 -0800
> To: General at priv-edmwaa05.telusplanet.net,
> "Discussion at priv-edmwaa05.telusplanet.net":On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>Allison wrote:
>
>> >(And it confirmed that the AGC was constructed from a single gate/IC type.)
>>
>> That statement I believe is in error. While the logic used was RTL and a
>> single family type the logic elements for that family by the mid 60s were
>> more diverse than just a two input NOR. My junkbox contains parts from
>
>There are now two, perhaps three, sources from the period that indicate it was
>a single gate/IC type: a dual 3-input NOR in 10-pin flat-pak. Read the
>document Chuck ref'ed above (although there do seem to be some
>mis-rememberings in there such as LCD instead of EL displays). I'm well aware
>of the state of RTL/IC development at the time, but high-reliabiliy design
>doesn't necessarily correlate with whats current in the rest of the industry.
>Keep in mind the design started years before 1967/8. The IC spec sheets are
>dated 1965.
Around early '66 a friend that whose father worked for Grumman and NASA
gave me several of the 10 pin flat packs with info. They were indeed
3input NOR but, he also provided a RS-FF in the same package. They sat
in my collection for years until they were lost in a move.
Shortly after that a neighbor that worked for Airborne and he brought me
an engineering junk box that contained fairchild uL9xx parts galore plus
a lot of aerospace qualified transistors. It was then I started
working on understanding logic and how useful those RTL parts were.
As to displays LEDs were indeed available in the mid 60s though they
were not bright and the only color was red. I also have Burroughs
Nixies from then and a 40 character selfscan from the era. I'd never
seen EL used in anything other than backlight. There was also VF (vacuum
florescent) displays as they were easily driven with available transistors.
One of the problems then with transistors was low (usually less than 60V)
breakdown voltage and most common devices were more like 25V. That
complicates drivers for HV displays. Though for a price there were a
lot of things available than were new or low volume.
Allison
My friend and I have come across a large stock of working ZX-81
computers that are missing keyboards. And a stock of others with bad
keyboards.
These are a lot from a former Sinclair Repair Center.
We'd like to get these working 100% again for sale along with the
remainder of the ZX-81 kits from Zebra Systems.
BTW... Stewart only has a couple hundred left, and when they're gone...
that's it!
Does anyone know of a source for these keyboards, or know of a company
that could make them up?
I have some samples and a schematic of the matrix so this shouldn't be
impossible.
We also have a cache of spare parts (Z-80's, ULA's, RAM chips, etc...)
for these units.
Also, we have a large collection of vintage New Old Stock TTL parts. We
are inventorying what we have now, and will post a website with part
numbers and quantities available.
They've been well stored, and seem to be in great shape.
We also found a small stock of Relays, and other parts. Those will be
listed on the site as well.
It's fun playing with a ZX-81 again. I dug out my TS-1000 and found it
didn't work anymore. When we opened it, we found that the Z80 had a bent
pin. And over the years it stopped making contact with the contact in
the socket due to movement of the parts and corrosion.
Once we bent the pin straight and reinserted the Z80, it came up like a
champ!
And... We also got my Coco III fixed. It came up with a pink screen. We
desoldered the 68B09 and put a socket in it's place. I stole a 6809E
>from a Coco 2 and popped it in. Voila!
It now works!
Computers in the old days were a lot more fun!
Al
Phila, PA
> To get back on topic about babbage's drawings,
> from what I read it was mechnical design that
> could not be produced with 18th century mechanical
> enginering.
That's often been conjectured, but, as usual, reality is somewhat
more complicated. Most other craftsmen probably couldn't have
produced what he designed. Along the way, he invented new
techniques of fabrication and management as well as computation.
However, he probably could have built it. He did build a small
version that operated as he intended. And part of the reason for
the construction project at the Science Museum was to determine
if the materials and tools of the time could have built the machine.
In the end, much of the reason he never built a full version of his
designs was that he was too much the stereotypical engineer.
Almost nobody except Ada could get along with him and he made
a number of enemies among those who would fund his work.
The money situation led to a dispute with his primary craftsman
who walked out with all the custom tools they had made. Then
as he was considering his options, he realized that he could
improve his design many fold and so dropped his efforts on the
difference engine in favor of the analytical engine. Even with that
machine, he kept stopping his efforts to realize it because he
was sure that he could build his new design faster than he could
finish the work he had started on the previous version. As I recall,
there were over 40 different designs for the analytical engine by
the time it was done, and he had never built a full version of any
of them. After his death, his son did assemble a small version
of one of the designs for the mill including some parts that
Babbage had already fabricated before his death.
There's no question Babbage was ahead of his time in many
ways. But he was also understood the materials and tools
well enough to design a machine that he felt confident he
could actually build.
BLS
>Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:00:41 -0600
>From: Mark Tapley <mtapley at swri.edu>
> Last OS *my* 68000 Mac Plus has run is MacOS 7.1. MacTracker
>claims 7.5.5, I can't dispute that as I haven't tried it but I expect
>it might not do much good (no RAM left for applications). Same is
>claimed for the Mac SE and Classic and PowerBook 100. MacTracker
>doesn't report the Outbounds (Jeff?) but since (I think) they used
>motherboards from the above systems,
The Outbounds used motherboards designed and built by Outbound but
with Apple ROMs installed which were scavenged from Apple Macs.
I can't speak to the Notebook series but the Laptop (a much cooler
machine, IMHO) will not run past Mac OS 7.0.1. However, this is a
limitation in Outbound support.
In order to use the Outbound Laptop Model 125 one needed to run a
system installer application from Outbound after installing the stock
Apple System. The Outbound installer definitely puts some code on
EEPROMs living in the Outbound Laptop. It may also do some
modifications to the System file, but I'm not sure about the latter.
It also installs some custom Outbound inits (control panels and
extensions, now days), for things such as power management and the
trackbar control.
Outbound went under before or pretty simultaneous with Apple
releasing 7.1 so the Outbound installer was never modified to support
7.1.
The required modification could be very simple from a programmer's
point of view but I've never been willing to invest the time to
figure it out. I'd have to develop the skills to interpret 68000
machine code in the Mac OS environment and for the Mac Plus-ish
hardware and figure out what's going on and that seems like a
daunting task when there are so many hardware projects around.
Still, if there are any 68000 savvy programmers out there interested
in taking a hack at it, it would be cool to get the Outbound Laptop
past OS 7.0.1. The jump to 7.1 would be very nice.
Additionally, the Outbound Laptop is an interesting beast in that it
uses 2.5" IDE hard drives. This is the first Macintosh to use an
IDE device by many many years. I don't think any Apple Mac used
them until the Quadra 630 and its performa and LC cousins.
Anyway, the Laptop only supports up to an 80 MB drive. I suspect
that it just has parameters for four drives stored in the installer
(20, 40, 60 & 80) but I don't know for certain. It would also be
very nice to hack the thing to support larger hard drives.
Have you tried to find 80 *MB* hard drives these days? Of course you
have; this is the CC list. It's a pain. I had a line on a place
in Florida with fifty or so in stock for about $40 each but didn't
have the money at the time and now they're gone who knows where.
Sigh.
Anybody have the modified Macsbug application? The Outbound Laptop
required a patched version of Macsbug.
Also, the Outbound Laptop was meant to dock with it's host computer
(the desktop from which the ROMs were taken). There was a card that
installed in the host and provided teh connection to the Outbound.
I've never managed to find one of these cards. I envision Pluses
and SEs going to scrap or being sold without the owners ever
realizing this very rare card is installed. Scrap is especially
likely because a Mac with the docking card installed won't boot up
unless the Laptop is docked (ROMs required). So the host machine
would appear "broken".
Jeff Walther
Jeff Walther wrote:
Additionally, the Outbound Laptop is an interesting beast in that it
uses 2.5" IDE hard drives. This is the first Macintosh to use an
IDE device by many many years. I don't think any Apple Mac used
them until the Quadra 630 and its performa and LC cousins.
Jeff Walther
---------------
I'm not familiar with the Outbound Laptop. What was the model number?
I do know that I was supporting Apple at Quantum in early 1994 and qualified
an IDE 2.5 inch drive for their laptops. It was one of the Blackbird
series, 160 if I remember correctly. Was made in Taiwan by Tatung as an
ODM. For a disk drive engineer, it was an unpleasant machine - the drive
was mounted above the CPU chip, dumping all the heat into the drive.
Quantum could never get it to meet Apple's temperature requirements with
this handicap. When Apple pushed hard, Quantum canceled the program and got
out of the 2.5 inch business - no way could they be profitable with those
temperature specs and Apple's pricing structure.
Billy
Dave Dunfield wrote:
The MOD8 was also known as the "GNC8" (Great Northern Computers),
and a later version used an 8080 processor (MOD80).
Any other MOD8/GNC8/MOD80 owners or interested parties out there?
Regards,
Dave
----------------------
I had completely forgotten about the MOD-8. I lived in Mississauga 1972-76
working at Control Data. We had an after hours club and the MOD-8 was just
coming out. So I know I have some of the documentation. The boards are
another matter. One member bought the complete unit and we reverse
engineered and made sets for our selves. So if I have anything left, it
would be knock offs. And I think I traded them before I left Canada.
Anyway, when I come across the documentation, I'll send it to Al and make it
available to the list.
I've got some 1702's around the house. How many do you need? Any
preference on colour? White ceramic or the later black with the foggy
window?
Billy