At 04:55 AM 12/16/2008, you wrote:
> > The 1101 256 byte static ram.
>
>No, not this either.
>
>Hard to find, these 1101s, but not impossible.
Bought 200 of those from unicorn for $2 each. If I were mean and
fought with Rob I could probably get lower prices...but he treats me good. ; )
They charge the same amount for the Altair 1MCS memory chips, 2101 or
2102s, I forget...
> A friend of mine just came across a couple of Intel 8008
> chips. Apparently, some ebay sellers think they're solid gold.
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260099837541
>
> As far as we can tell, that's what Mel has.
>
> Anyway, I told him I'd try to find out what it's
> actually worth and whether anyone here is willing
> to pay whatever's reasonable.
>
> He also has some later 8008s without the gold cap.
They are relatively rare, but they aren't even close to being _THAT_ rare. I'm talking about his asking price. I bought one three years ago from a fellow collector of CPU chips for _$20_ that had some markings worn off and was scratched. I opened it up to photograph the die (a hobby of mine):
http://diephotos.blogspot.com/
I've haven't even seen rare versions of white ceramic 4004 ICs in perfect condition go for anything close to his asking price. I've seen a complete, mint condition MCS-4 (4004) chip _SET_ go for something close to $1K.
Hi,
Ist definitely a RS422 interface, and ist the 4-wire version. You have two
lines for sending data (Tx+, Tx-) and two lines for receiving serial data
(Rx+, Rx-). Its a +-5V differentially signalling technique to get high speed
on long lines and archive better noise immunity.
With best regards
Gerhard
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] Im
Auftrag von cctalk-request at classiccmp.org
Gesendet: Sonntag, 21. Dezember 2008 19:01
An: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Betreff: cctalk Digest, Vol 64, Issue 52
Send cctalk mailing list submissions to
cctalk at classiccmp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cctalk-request at classiccmp.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
cctalk-owner at classiccmp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of cctalk digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: PDP-8 on FPGA project & where is Hans Pufal? (Pete Turnbull)
2. Re: PDP-8 on FPGA project & where is Hans Pufal? (Tony Duell)
3. Re: Timekeeping (was Re: Sherwood Micro CPU/100) (Tony Duell)
4. Re: Timekeeping (was Re: Sherwood Micro CPU/100) (Tony Duell)
5. New USB Mod Ms available from Unicomp? was Re: USB Model M
(Paxton Hoag)
6. CBM 8000 VideoCD? (Ethan Dicks)
7. list of nordisk data books and floppy disks (Bert Thomas)
8. Re: Engelbart's mouse / 40th anniversary (Andrew Burton)
9. oregon software tape (Al Kossow)
10. Re: 8008 chips (Andrew Burton)
11. any idea what this schematic is? (Ray Arachelian)
12. RE: oregon software tape (Ian King)
13. MS WinWord 6.0 32-bit (Liam Proven)
14. Re: PDP-8 on FPGA project (Philipp Hachtmann)
15. Re: any idea what this schematic is? (Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ)
16. RE: any idea what this schematic is? (dwight elvey)
17. Re: any idea what this schematic is? (Ethan Dicks)
18. Re: Rockwell PPS-4 info (was 8008 v. 4004...) (John Robertson)
19. Re: Rockwell PPS-4 info (was 8008 v. 4004...) (Chris Elmquist)
20. Re: USB Model M (G?ran Axelsson)
21. FDOS for Fluke 1720A (Jim Temple)
22. Re: any idea what this schematic is? (Ethan Dicks)
23. Re: Engelbart's mouse / 40th anniversary (Lyle Bickley)
24. Re: any idea what this schematic is? (Alexandre Souza)
25. Re: any idea what this schematic is? (r.stricklin)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:55:58 +0000
From: Pete Turnbull <pete at dunnington.plus.com>
Subject: Re: PDP-8 on FPGA project & where is Hans Pufal?
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <494D31AE.8010306 at dunnington.plus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 19/12/2008 15:53, der Mouse wrote:
>> Your code above does not result in latches. It results in D type
>> flipflops!
>
> What's the difference? As I've learned to use the words, D-flops
> _are_ latches. Have I mislearnt?
They're not quite the same thing, though a D-type flip-flop is a kind of
latch. There are other types of flip-flops, such as T, RS, and JK types,
usually edge-triggered. In a D-type, the active clock edge causes the
output to change to match the input, and having changed, it stays that way,
even if the input changes while the clock is still at the same level.
The transparent latches that are commonly just referred to as "latches"
(eg in data books, where you'll find some devices referred to as latches and
others as flip-flops to distinguish them) are level-sensitive, and the
output tracks the input (including changes) while the clock is at its active
level.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:10:04 +0000 (GMT)
From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
Subject: Re: PDP-8 on FPGA project & where is Hans Pufal?
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Message-ID: <m1LE6H9-000IxyC at p850ug1>
Content-Type: text/plain
> > Your code above does not result in latches. It results in D type
> > flipflops!
>
> What's the difference? As I've learned to use the words, D-flops
> _are_ latches. Have I mislearnt?
As I understand the terms, a D-type flip-flop is edge-triggered, a latch (or
more exactly a transparent latch) is level-operated.
What I eman is that for a D-type flip-flop, the output (Q) is set equal to
the input (D) a short time after the rising edge (say), of the clock signal.
At all othter times Q does not change state, no matter what D does. So if
clock is held high all the time, or held low all the time, Q will never
change.
But with a transparent latch, then if the clock (sometimes called the enable
input) is in one sate (say high). then the output (Q) tracks the input (D).
When the clock input goes low, then Q is held in whatever state it was in as
the clock input went low.
A simple example of the differnce. If you take a D-type flip-flop and
connect the output to a NOT gate and the output of that back to the D input,
then you get a divide-by-2-circuit. Feed in a regular clock at one frequency
and the Q output will toggle at half that frequency. But if you do the same
thing with a transparent latch, you get something that oscillates at a
frequency determined by the propagation delays when the clock is high. In
other words the output is somewhat unpredicatable, it's certainly not a
square wave at half the frequency of the clock signal.
-tony
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:12:55 +0000 (GMT)
From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
Subject: Re: Timekeeping (was Re: Sherwood Micro CPU/100)
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Message-ID: <m1LE6Jt-000J12C at p850ug1>
Content-Type: text/plain
> Hi
> You should also consider building a free pendulum clock reference.
If I ever get a supply of circular tuits, then that's something I have long
considered making... Even a single-pendulum (non-free) synchronome would be
a fun thing to build
> I've considered adding one to my grandfather clock.
> These were used as references until the quartz oven references
> replaced them.
I am told that a free paenddulum in a vacuum chamber (to remove the errors
due to air resistance, often called 'barometric errors', since the air
resistance depends on the barometric pressure) actually has a better
long-term stability than most quartz crystals.
-tony
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:16:07 +0000 (GMT)
From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
Subject: Re: Timekeeping (was Re: Sherwood Micro CPU/100)
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Message-ID: <m1LE6N0-000J1gC at p850ug1>
Content-Type: text/plain
> One can calculate the angles if you first draw a line for local noon
> and use the following equation to calculate each hour line from that
> noon line.
> =20
> X = hour lines angle ( each hour is 15 degrees ) Y = 90 - Latitude
> angle
Called the 'Colatitude' in some books.
> Z = Angle on plate that is level to the ground from noon line
>
> arctan( tan(X) / cos ( Y ) ) = Z
>
> At least I think I did the trig right.=20
I beleive that is correct, However, it gets more complicated if you want to
have a vertical-ish dial plate (say on a wall) that is neither truely
vertical (it 'reclines') and which doesn't face any of the cardinal compass
directions (it 'declines').
-tony
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:10:33 -0800
From: "Paxton Hoag" <innfoclassics at gmail.com>
Subject: New USB Mod Ms available from Unicomp? was Re: USB Model M
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID:
<ded268c40812201310p460cd9c8v494ffd0e2de9cd9b at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Right here: http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/cabdetmin.html
>
Thanks for the link as I need some cables too. I bought a dozen Model Ms
>from a local community college garage sale. They were complaining about how
much noise they made. At 50 cents apiece I bought all they had.
I noticed that Unicomp, the site mentioned above sells new Buckling Key
keyboards With USB built in for $69.
http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/cus101usenon.html
These are the people that bought the Keyboard parts business from IBM.
It looks like they are trying to keep the model M and continue to supply the
market.
Paxton
--
Paxton Hoag
Astoria, OR
USA
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:48:18 -0500
From: "Ethan Dicks" <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
Subject: CBM 8000 VideoCD?
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID:
<f4eb766f0812201448k53b19a99g664320f673290d44 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi, all,
I was bouncing around looking for SuperPET info and ran across this
page (again)...
<http://members.tripod.com/~petlibrary/vcdpage.htm>
Unfortunately, the address on the page is no longer active, so it's
not possible to request a copy of the video. Did anyone on the list
ever get this?
-ethan
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 00:12:18 +0100
From: Bert Thomas <bert at brothom.nl>
Subject: list of nordisk data books and floppy disks
To: General at lekkervaren.nl, "Discussion at lekkervaren.nl":On-Topic and
Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <494D7BD2.3000108 at brothom.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
If you need access to one of these, contact me an urge me to make a
deal. Keep pushing, as pushing raises priority with me.
Books:
NOTIS-BG User Guide
NOTIS-RG New functions in the E-version
NOTIS-DS User's guide
Introduction to ND Office Systems
The SPRINT User Guide
Documentation Catalogue
SINTRAN III Real Time Loader
Dialogue-UNIQUE-II User Guide
Operator Environment User Guide
NOTIS-WP Brief Introduction
User Environment Reference Manual
NOTIS-WP Reference Manual
COSMOS User Guide
User Environment Reference Manual
SINTRAN III Utilities Manual (3x)
ND-110 Instruction Set
The Database System SIBAS II ND User Manual
SIBAS II Operator Manual
NOTIS-DS Introduction (2x)
Sintran III Real Time Guide
NOTIS-DS Supervisor Guide (2x)
ACCESS User Guide
File Manager Introduction (2x, one in shrink-wrap)
NOMIS Norwegian Medical Information System
SINTRAN III COMMANDS Reference Manual
SINTRAN III Monitor Calls (2x)
Symbolic Debugger User Guide
Examples for NOTIS-RG Version B
SINTRAN-III Release Information K-version
NOTIS-TF Macro Guide (new in shrink wrap)
BACKUP User Guide (3x)
SINTRAN III System Supervisor
Operator Environment User Guide
ND-110 COMPACT Operator Guide (contains several quick reference cards)
SINTRAN III User Guide
BRF-Linker User Manual
NOTIS-TF User Guide
User Environment Library Routines
NOTIS-RG Reference Manual
Test Program Description for ND-100/ND-110
ordner with following description:
course program
the supervisor's responsibility
Handbook of Useful information
examples of LOAD-MODE etc.
telefix customer information
miscellaneous materials
MEDITEBS (in dutch)
bunch of unknown listings
a document with information on SCSI on ND
ACCESS DBA manual
NOTIS-TF text formatter reference manual
partly dutch presentation with general user info
SINTRAN III Timesharing/Batch guide
some dutch documentation on MEDITEBS
datasheets of several ND products, such as software packages, computers
and accessoiries
Floppies:
(each floppy or set of floppies contains a few pages of information)
SINTRAN III K GENERATION 312 CONF.D VSX, 2 disks (2 sets)
PATCH-SIN-K-5400 (2 sets)
SINTRAN III Configuration Program
SUBSYSTEM PACKAGE 32 BITS FLOATING FORMAT
SINTRAN III VSE/VSX Utility Programs
ACCOUNTING System for SINTRAN III
BACKUP-SYSTEM
X-MESSAGE
TELEFIX FILES FOR USER SITES
SUBSYSTEM PACKAGE II
VTM terminal tables
USER ENVIRONMENT (3 disks)
TEST PROGRAMS FOR ND-100/110
TEST PROGRAMS FOR ND-100/110/120 (2 disks)
JEC job execution control
ND-10634A MEMORY TO FLOPPY
NOTIS-WP FOR ND-100 (4 disks)
SIBAS-II for ND-100 (2 disks with pretty much the same label)
ACCESS FOR ND-100 (dito)
NOTIS-RG for ND-100 norwegian
NOTIS-DS for ND-100 (3 disks)
NOTIS-DS for ND-100 48-bit floating point (3 disks with pretty much the
same label)
NOTIS-BG-for ND-100 norwegian version 32 bits fl
NOTIS-BG-for ND-100 32 bits fl
NOTIS-BG-for ND-100 (business grafics) 32 bits fl
PR for ND-100 (Norwegian version)
BRF-Linker for ND-100
SINTRAN III MONITOR CALL Pack.
SPRINT Spooling System (3 disks)
MEDITEBS specials
Mass Storage Utilities
OPERATOR ENVIRONMENT (4 disks)
Disk Restore (3 disks)
TESTPROGRAMS FOR ND-100/110/120 (2 disks, both labeled PART 1 OF 2)
UNIQUE-II SIBAS for ND-100
UNIQUE TEXT SYSTEM
UNIQUE-II SIBAS ND-100 (hand-written label)
SOFTWARE KEY DISCETTE
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:22:17 +0000 (GMT)
From: Andrew Burton <aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Engelbart's mouse / 40th anniversary
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <567206.77758.qm at web23406.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Thanks for the photo's. That must have been an interesting event.
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
--- On Sun, 14/12/08, Marcin Wichary <mwichary at gmail.com> wrote:
From: Marcin Wichary <mwichary at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Engelbart's mouse / 40th anniversary
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Date: Sunday, 14 December, 2008, 9:24 PM
Here are my photos from the event, for those interested:
http://flickriver.com/photos/mwichary/sets/72157610918709769/
(48 photos in total. Scroll down to see more.)
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:15:00 -0800
From: Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org>
Subject: oregon software tape
To: classiccmp at classiccmp.org
Message-ID: <494D8A84.8080002 at bitsavers.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
did anyone on the list buy this tape?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120348714966
I got the earlier version, and it is a source tape. I'm trying to
find out if the other one was as well.
fscking eBay now hides the buyer's ID.
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 02:17:52 +0000 (GMT)
From: Andrew Burton <aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: 8008 chips
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <346678.75570.qm at web23407.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Awesome pictures. It's seriously impressive how these chips must be made and
designed.
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
--- On Tue, 16/12/08, William Blair <wbblair3 at yahoo.com> wrote:
They are relatively rare, but they aren't even close to being _THAT_ rare.
I'm talking about his asking price. I bought one three years ago from a
fellow collector of CPU chips for _$20_ that had some markings worn off and
was
scratched. I opened it up to photograph the die (a hobby of mine):
http://diephotos.blogspot.com/
I've haven't even seen rare versions of white ceramic 4004 ICs in
perfect condition go for anything close to his asking price. I've seen a
complete, mint condition MCS-4 (4004) chip _SET_ go for something close to
$1K.
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:01:22 -0500
From: Ray Arachelian <ray at arachelian.com>
Subject: any idea what this schematic is?
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <494DB182.1050106 at arachelian.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
http://flickr.com/photos/spaceageboy/3117272956/sizes/o/
Would this be the interface between the Lisa and the Mac as related here:
http://folklore.org/StoryView.py?project=Macintosh&story=Shut_Up.txt&sortOrd
er=Sort%20by%20Date&detail=medium&search=shut%20up
> Unfortunately, there was one small snag. We were using the Lisa as the
> development machine for writing the software for Macintosh, and we
> hadn't yet reached the point where the Macintosh could run
> stand-alone. The Macintosh needed to be hooked up to a Lisa, in order
> to download software from it. But the Lisa group was writing all of
> its own applications for Lisa and didn't want Microsoft to see a Lisa.
> They made us promise that we wouldn't let Microsoft see the Lisa.
>
> We finally came up with a solution where we'd use a twenty-five foot
> cable and keep the Lisa in a different room that the Microsoft guys
> weren't allowed to enter. I would start up the programs on the Lisa in
> the other room, and Bud Tribble would operate the Macintosh. I would
> usually run into the main room to see their reaction.
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:24:43 -0800
From: Ian King <IanK at vulcan.com>
Subject: RE: oregon software tape
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <FF6AB92D97A23A409701CDBF66F03FCD2A56ED9D at 505fuji>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
eBay's greed will destroy its empire. At least, it's always worked that way
before....
________________________________________
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On
Behalf Of Al Kossow [aek at bitsavers.org]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 4:15 PM
To: classiccmp at classiccmp.org
Subject: oregon software tape
did anyone on the list buy this tape?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120348714966
I got the earlier version, and it is a source tape. I'm trying to
find out if the other one was as well.
fscking eBay now hides the buyer's ID.
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 04:33:35 +0000
From: "Liam Proven" <lproven at gmail.com>
Subject: MS WinWord 6.0 32-bit
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID:
<575131af0812202033o14e4e811r2071a9316e71d48f at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
This is somewhat off-topic for here, but I don't know where else to ask.
Way back in the early days of 32-bit Windows - I know, 5min ago by
local standards - MS did a 32-bit version of Word and Excel for users
of MS Office 4 on Windows NT 3. I used to have copies - on floppy -
but I've lost them. No idea where to get replacements now, but I would
really like to be able to use Word 6/32 again. It was a great WP, and
by modern standards, tiny and very fast.
Anyone still have a copy, or can suggest where to look or ask?
--
Liam Proven Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 Cell: +44 7939-087884 Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat: liamproven at aol.com MSN/Messenger: lproven at hotmail.com
Yahoo: liamproven at yahoo.co.uk Skype: liamproven ICQ: 73187508
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:43:55 +0100
From: Philipp Hachtmann <hachti at hachti.de>
Subject: Re: PDP-8 on FPGA project
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <494DC98B.2070108 at hachti.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi,
>>> You can emulate that in std_logic with a single driver driving an "H"
>>> (the "pull-up"), and everyone else drives either "0" or "Z".
>> Yes. You can write that. But the synthesis tool - if it eats that -
>> will generate
>> many ORs... So avoid it. In the company I have worked a bit for, MANY
>> constructs
>> were simply forbidden. Thinks like Z, H, L in std_logic are suspicious
>> :-)
>
> What you say is true for FPGA-internal signals but the output drivers
> _can_ be switched to high-impedance.
> The open-collector driver you were asking about originally can be
> emulated by assigning "Z" directly to the IOB, switching it to high-z.
> That will only work if the signal you use is routed directly to the IOB
> => use only in top level entity to be sure.
Yes, of course... IOBs can also be controlled "manually" using the output
enable...
The discussion was about the on-chip (!!) wiring of the OMNIBUS. the
original OMNIBUS is an
open collector thing.
Ph :-)
--
http://www.hachti.de
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:00:30 +0000
From: Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ <gordonjcp at gjcp.net>
Subject: Re: any idea what this schematic is?
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <494DDB7E.8070901 at gjcp.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Ray Arachelian wrote:
> http://flickr.com/photos/spaceageboy/3117272956/sizes/o/
It's a serial port.
> Would this be the interface between the Lisa and the Mac as related here:
>
>
http://folklore.org/StoryView.py?project=Macintosh&story=Shut_Up.txt&sortOrd
er=Sort%20by%20Date&detail=medium&search=shut%20up
Hmm, the 1981 date suggests that it would a bit early for the Mac, and
the layout of the PCB suggests an Apple II card...
Gordon
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:42:28 -0800
From: dwight elvey <dkelvey at hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: any idea what this schematic is?
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <COL107-W372B6A51D022349E27EB43A3EE0 at phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi
Looks like RS422 interface.
Dwight
----------------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:01:22 -0500
> From: ray at arachelian.com
> To:
> Subject: any idea what this schematic is?
>
> http://flickr.com/photos/spaceageboy/3117272956/sizes/o/
>
> Would this be the interface between the Lisa and the Mac as related here:
>
>
http://folklore.org/StoryView.py?project=Macintosh&story=Shut_Up.txt&sortOrd
er=Sort%20by%20Date&detail=medium&search=shut%20up
>
>> Unfortunately, there was one small snag. We were using the Lisa as the
>> development machine for writing the software for Macintosh, and we
>> hadn't yet reached the point where the Macintosh could run
>> stand-alone. The Macintosh needed to be hooked up to a Lisa, in order
>> to download software from it. But the Lisa group was writing all of
>> its own applications for Lisa and didn't want Microsoft to see a Lisa.
>> They made us promise that we wouldn't let Microsoft see the Lisa.
>>
>> We finally came up with a solution where we'd use a twenty-five foot
>> cable and keep the Lisa in a different room that the Microsoft guys
>> weren't allowed to enter. I would start up the programs on the Lisa in
>> the other room, and Bud Tribble would operate the Macintosh. I would
>> usually run into the main room to see their reaction.
>
_________________________________________________________________
Send e-mail faster without improving your typing skills.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_speed_12
2008
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:53:00 -0500
From: "Ethan Dicks" <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: any idea what this schematic is?
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID:
<f4eb766f0812202253w17bc738ax5777071e99444f6b at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:42 AM, dwight elvey <dkelvey at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
> Looks like RS422 interface.
>
>> From: ray at arachelian.com
>>
>> http://flickr.com/photos/spaceageboy/3117272956/sizes/o/
>>
>> Would this be the interface between the Lisa and the Mac as related here:
>>
>>
<http://folklore.org/StoryView.py?project=Macintosh&story=Shut_Up.txt&sortOr
der=Sort%20by%20Date&detail=medium&search=shut%20up>
I don't know what the bus in the Lisa looks like, but the interface
end, the bit that Dwight identifies as an "RS422 interface" will hook
right up to a Mac (but I'd have to check to see if their DE-9 pinout
matches the DE-9 serial pinout of the 128K/512K Mac board). The
"Lisa-Mac Interface Card" legend at the top certainly suggests that
it's a schematic for the card from the story. The circuit appears to
be what one would need to add a Mac-compatible serial port to _some_
machine.
-ethan
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:43:24 -0800
From: John Robertson <jrr at flippers.com>
Subject: Re: Rockwell PPS-4 info (was 8008 v. 4004...)
To: General at invalid.domain, "Discussion at invalid.domain":On-Topic Posts
Only <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <494D2EBC.6080609 at flippers.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Tim McNerney wrote:
> Thanks for the lead on the Rockwell PPS-4.
> Does anyone know where I can find architectural info on it,
> and/or a die photo? It seems to be quite rare, and there
> is almost no information about this chip [family] on the web.
>
> --Tim
>
>
I have information in PDF format for the PPS-4 as used in Gottlieb and
Recel Pinball games in the 70s. This covers the CPU, PIA and Keyboard
chips. No architectural or die photos though.
John :-#)#
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:54:18 -0600
From: Chris Elmquist <chrise at pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Rockwell PPS-4 info (was 8008 v. 4004...)
To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <20081220185418.GH31448 at n0jcf.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Saturday (12/20/2008 at 08:48AM -0700), bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca wrote:
> Chris Elmquist wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I got the year wrong. It was approx 1978. Less cool then but
still
>> not bad. Meatloaf was still bad.
>
> Umm you don't wait several years to eat Meatloaf.
This one you would have wanted to. Imagine a pale grey colored ring
about 10" dia with 3" dia hole in the middle. Wasn't a browned bit of
meat on it and not enough ketchup in the world to make it go down. I
think we learned then that a microwave is not for "browning".
--
Chris Elmquist
mailto:chrise at pobox.com
------------------------------
Message: 20
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 00:29:42 +0100
From: G?ran Axelsson <axelsson at acc.umu.se>
Subject: Re: USB Model M
To: General at acc.umu.se, "Discussion at acc.umu.se":On-Topic Posts Only
<cctech at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <494D7FE6.1090008 at acc.umu.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Alexandre Souza wrote:
>> I have a small uC device that I made that uses an FTDI USB->TTL
>> converter. I wish USB was as straight-forward as you describe. I'm
>> currently running into problems when transferring, very quickly, some
>> data from the uC to the PC. The problems are related to overrunning
>> the PC, where the PC isn't scheduling reads from the device fast
>> enough to prevent drops. At least interrupt-based I/O can "demand"
>> attention from the cpu at any time, where USB is at the mercy of
>> being scheduled.
>
> I do that at 921kbps and had no issues.
I have just finished a project with a PIC32 (MIPS32 core) working as a
voice codec and talking to a linux PC over the USB buss. We got it up to
310 kBytes/s and not dropping a single package during hours of running.
The communication on the PIC side is solved by constantly polling the
USB bus to catch every event.
We had problems with package dropped every ten seconds or so but we
traced it back to a iproute cache flush that the kernel was doing.
The USB bus is fast but with standard hardware it isn't hard to get the
speed up. If you have problem with overruns, check if the PC is doing
some periodic maintainancy or there are any other devices using the bus.
Sorry for being a bit OT but just to add a bit of nostalgia to my post,
my next hobby project will be a transputer link to USB interface.
:-)
/Gvran
------------------------------
Message: 21
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:15:15 -0500
From: "Jim Temple" <jetemp at insightbb.com>
Subject: FDOS for Fluke 1720A
To: <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <000301c96322$ba111790$2e3346b0$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello,
Saw your post and thought I would ask about the software and manuals for the
Fluke 1722A controller. Do you still have them? Did you get them to
Bitsavers?
I'm interested in obtaining the above software.
Sincerely,
Jim Temple
Louisville, KY.
------------------------------
Message: 22
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 02:00:47 -0500
From: "Ethan Dicks" <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: any idea what this schematic is?
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID:
<f4eb766f0812202300p2d920340t1bc9334693265968 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Gordon JC Pearce MM3YEQ
<gordonjcp at gjcp.net> wrote:
> Ray Arachelian wrote:
>>
>> http://flickr.com/photos/spaceageboy/3117272956/sizes/o/
>
> It's a serial port.
Yep.
>> Would this be the interface between the Lisa and the Mac as related here:
>>
<http://folklore.org/StoryView.py?project=Macintosh&story=Shut_Up.txt&sortOr
der=Sort%20by%20Date&detail=medium&search=shut%20up>
>
> Hmm, the 1981 date suggests that it would a bit early for the Mac...
Not sure about the date, but that's only two-ish years before I seem
to recall seeing an article about the Mac in "Byte" (1983).
> ...and the layout of the PCB suggests an Apple II card...
I completely disagree. The location of the power and ground pins on
the schematic are where the Apple II has the address and data buses
(plus +12V, on the wrong pin for the schematic). Additionally, the
signal names /VMA, /VPA, and E are usual names for MC68000 buses (or
perhaps the 6809), not the 6502. Plus, suggestively, but not
conclusively, the card form factor doesn't look to me to be something
for the Apple II (the card is too tall compared to the width the
fingers are drawn at).
I'm reasonably certain that A) it's not an Apple II card, and B) it's
a card for some 50-pin-bus 68000 machine. It might as well be the
Lisa as anything else, but that could be confirmed by cross
referencing the listed bus pins with Lisa documentation.
-ethan
------------------------------
Message: 23
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:16:11 -0800
From: Lyle Bickley <lbickley at bickleywest.com>
Subject: Re: Engelbart's mouse / 40th anniversary
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>,
"Marcin Wichary" <mwichary at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <200812202316.11632.lbickley at bickleywest.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Marcin,
On Sunday 14 December 2008, Marcin Wichary wrote:
> Here are my photos from the event, for those interested:
> http://flickriver.com/photos/mwichary/sets/72157610918709769/
>
> (48 photos in total. Scroll down to see more.)
Great photos! Thanks for posting them...
Cheers,
Lyle
--
Lyle Bickley
Bickley Consulting West Inc.
http://bickleywest.com
"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"
------------------------------
Message: 24
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:46:51 -0200
From: "Alexandre Souza" <alexandre-listas at e-secure.com.br>
Subject: Re: any idea what this schematic is?
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <126b01c96340$757f8d00$46fea8c0 at DeskJara>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
>> http://flickr.com/photos/spaceageboy/3117272956/sizes/o/
I don't know which computer was used but:
- It is a serial card
- It has a 50-pin card edge connector (Lisa, maybe?)
- It has RS-422 line drivers (so, it seems to be connected to a
Macintosh)
- It is NOT an apple // card, although having 50-pin card edge connector
(I tried to reverse the pinout but got also no good result)
- It is NOT an apple //e expansion card, that one you put on the
80-column slot. Even reversing the pinout
So, it is probable it is used in a Lisa or a Macintosh XL (same
machine?)
Greetings from Brazil
Alexandre Souza, PU1BZZ
------------------------------
Message: 25
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 00:51:44 -0800
From: "r.stricklin" <bear at typewritten.org>
Subject: Re: any idea what this schematic is?
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <62F98EEF-A14E-4CF5-9BCF-90EBF9A0DE93 at typewritten.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
On Dec 20, 2008, at 11:46 PM, Alexandre Souza wrote:
>>> http://flickr.com/photos/spaceageboy/3117272956/sizes/o/
>
> - It has a 50-pin card edge connector (Lisa, maybe?)
I'm not sure what the mystery is. It fits a Lisa, and was used to
download software to the early prototypes of the Macintosh.
http://www.digibarn.com/collections/diagrams/early-mac-interfaces/index.html
The earliest Lisa prototypes had 50-pin edge connectors for the I/O
expansion cards. Sometime between 7/81 and 2/82 the Lisa got the pinch-
fit, 56-pin edge connector for I/O expansion cards that it eventually
shipped with. The collection of diagrams at DigiBarn (from which the
flickr image was nicked) shows this evolution pretty clearly.
ok
bear
End of cctalk Digest, Vol 64, Issue 52
**************************************
> The seller sounds like he would care too
He doesn't..
I've emailed him several times with questions about specific items
or if he has the other bits of things that he listed, and he has
never had the courtesy to reply.
He does let me know when I've waited too long in his option
to pay him, however (I try to group lots together to save on shipping).
I have identified the buyer of the other tape.
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:57:08 +0100 (CET)
From: Christian Corti <cc at informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
Subject: RE: USB Model M
<snip>
what should I say... don't trust them.
...
IBM has never called the keyboard model M
<snip>
Christian
----------Reply:
Really? Odd, mine all say IBM in big letters on the front and back,
and "Model M" quite clearly on the back (M2 on the newer ones).
I wonder; do you suppose someone else printed that on there?
Maybe they're counterfeit...
Can I trust what *you* say?
;-)
Or did I misunderstand something?
m
Do you know where i can get a manual for the Science Fair electronic project kit #
28-247?
I would like to give it to my son for Christmas so a manual would be great.
Thanks
Ron
http://flickr.com/photos/spaceageboy/3117272956/sizes/o/
Would this be the interface between the Lisa and the Mac as related here:
http://folklore.org/StoryView.py?project=Macintosh&story=Shut_Up.txt&sortOr…
> Unfortunately, there was one small snag. We were using the Lisa as the
> development machine for writing the software for Macintosh, and we
> hadn't yet reached the point where the Macintosh could run
> stand-alone. The Macintosh needed to be hooked up to a Lisa, in order
> to download software from it. But the Lisa group was writing all of
> its own applications for Lisa and didn't want Microsoft to see a Lisa.
> They made us promise that we wouldn't let Microsoft see the Lisa.
>
> We finally came up with a solution where we'd use a twenty-five foot
> cable and keep the Lisa in a different room that the Microsoft guys
> weren't allowed to enter. I would start up the programs on the Lisa in
> the other room, and Bud Tribble would operate the Macintosh. I would
> usually run into the main room to see their reaction.
Recently Al Kossow purchased from me an evaluation copy of Turbo Pascal
which was previously evaluated by science fiction author Jerry Pournelle
for his columnin Byte Magazine. With Al's permission, I have reproduced
the text of the letter that came with that copy.
---BEGIN QUOTE---
Borland International
4807 Scots Valley Drive
Scots Valley, California 95066
(408) 438-5400
Telex: 172373
Mr. Jerry Pournelle, November 14, 1983
Science Fact and Fiction
(address censored)
Dear Sir,
Thank you for your interest in our company and especially in our new
product, Turbo Pascal.
I have enclosed the following versions of Turbo Pascal:
1. CP/M 80 on 8-inch SSSD disk for Z80 based systems.
2. CP/M 85 on 8-inch SSSD disk and 5-1/4 inch IBM PC.
3. MS DOS 1.1 version for the IBM PC on a 5-1/4 inch disk.
We have already verified that this version runs on the following
computers: IBM PC, Eagle PC line, Columbia PC, Compaq PC.
4. Test version for the IBM PC using the 8087 math co-processor.
Note that this is only a test version.
We will be very pleased to answer all the questions you might have during
your evaluation
I would like to meet you in person and maybe COMDEX Las Vegas would be a
good oportunity. But my plans for COMDEX Las Vegas are not finalized yet.
Therefore the easiest thing would be for you to let me know where you will
be staying so that we can eventually arrange a meeting.
Sincerely yours,
(signature)
Philippe Kahn
President
P.S. You will find in this shipment the package that our customers
receive for $49.95. We feel it is a good buy!
ENCLOSURE
---END QUOTE---
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Hi, all,
I was bouncing around looking for SuperPET info and ran across this
page (again)...
<http://members.tripod.com/~petlibrary/vcdpage.htm>
Unfortunately, the address on the page is no longer active, so it's
not possible to request a copy of the video. Did anyone on the list
ever get this?
-ethan
There was a blurb just now on the radio (CBC) about Engelbart's development of
the mouse, including an audio recording of his presentation of it at a
conference in 1968.
That was nice, but weird/annnoying is that the reporter referred to it as a
"discovery". Is it not possible to invent anything anymore? Is everything, and
everything that will ever be in the future, an already-existing concept waiting
out there in some alternative universe of the imagination, just waiting to be
"discovered" by the mind of somebody?
Or did I miss a debate about the semiotics of "discovery" vs. "invention" in
the public discourse somewhere along the way?
It's nice to be humble about achievements and acknowledge that developments are
built upon other developments and don't occur in isolation but isn't this
taking it a bit far?
This is somewhat off-topic for here, but I don't know where else to ask.
Way back in the early days of 32-bit Windows - I know, 5min ago by
local standards - MS did a 32-bit version of Word and Excel for users
of MS Office 4 on Windows NT 3. I used to have copies - on floppy -
but I've lost them. No idea where to get replacements now, but I would
really like to be able to use Word 6/32 again. It was a great WP, and
by modern standards, tiny and very fast.
Anyone still have a copy, or can suggest where to look or ask?
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884 ? Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat: liamproven at aol.com ? MSN/Messenger: lproven at hotmail.com
Yahoo: liamproven at yahoo.co.uk ? Skype: liamproven ? ICQ: 73187508
Hello,
Saw your post and thought I would ask about the software and manuals for the
Fluke 1722A controller. Do you still have them? Did you get them to
Bitsavers?
I'm interested in obtaining the above software.
Sincerely,
Jim Temple
Louisville, KY.
> Right here: http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/cabdetmin.html
>
Thanks for the link as I need some cables too. I bought a dozen Model
Ms from a local community college garage sale. They were complaining
about how much noise they made. At 50 cents apiece I bought all they
had.
I noticed that Unicomp, the site mentioned above sells new Buckling
Key keyboards With USB built in for $69.
http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/cus101usenon.html
These are the people that bought the Keyboard parts business from IBM.
It looks like they are trying to keep the model M and continue to
supply the market.
Paxton
--
Paxton Hoag
Astoria, OR
USA
On Wed, December 17, 2008 3:05 pm, Brent Hilpert wrote:
> There was a later PPS-4/1 single-chip version. I don't know how popular
> this
> stuff was but I wonder if there aren't more PPS-4 systems buried in
> equipment
> and appliances from the period than is commonly known. (I have wondered,
> for
> example, what the 70's-era Amana Radarange microwave ovens used for
> control.)
Umm...mechanical timers.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Ian King <IanK at vulcan.com> wrote:
> Well, it did. My nine-year-old daughter has a hard time with me telling her it's "a quarter to nine" when it is, in fact, 8:42. The convenience of rounding is something I'm working to help her appreciate. There's a practical side, too: when I'm trying to get her ready for school in the morning, she'll cling to the useless fact that she has "three more minutes" before it's time to go, during which she can supposedly write a sonnet, create a work of art, and find her socks, shoes and a suitable coat. 'Perception of time', indeed.... -- Ian
>
> [*] I remember the consternation the transition from analog to digital clocks
> caused in the mid-70s. Many people seemed to have difficulty with it and were
> somehow concerned that it might 'change our perception of time'.
I just watched the Quartz Clock episode of "The Secret Life of
Machines", and there was a bit in there about that - the animated
character was trying to figure out how late he was to the opera by
"doing the math" in his head about what time his digital watch showed
and when the curtain would rise on the performance. He gave up with
his sums and asked another animated character what the time was on her
analog watch - he quickly saw the minuscule number of degrees
difference between now and they and understood how late he was.
It used to be a big deal to learn how to tell approximate time when
learning foreign languages, but perhaps now that quartz/electric motor
analog watches are inexpensive (certainly compared to a mechanical
watch), knowing that it's "half past ten" or "ten to eleven" will
become fashionable once again.
My first watch was a "cheap" ($15?) digital LED watch, c. 1978. I got
a Timex mechanical watch for a graduation present a few years later,
but I guess I gave it more of a licking than it could stand, because I
remember tearing it apart less than 5 years later (because it didn't
work, not just to see what was inside). I don't really miss the
Timex, but I miss those glowing red digits.
Much more recently, someone got me a modern BCD/binary watch from
ThinkGeek. I like it, but I've been reading binary clocks since they
were popular when I was a kid. I remember trying to find a binary
clock kit between about 1982 and 1992 and they just couldn't be found
anywhere. That pendulum has certainly swung the other way (pun
intended).
Now if I could just find where I stashed my 4000-series CMOS and ~100
LED clock from the late 1970s that I picked up at a St Vincent
DePaul's a couple of years back - I need to find which of the 30ish
chips has a bad gate and consider replacing the LEDs with new,
non-age-dimmed ones. It's a pretty neat clock, made in Indiana (can't
remember where right now), and has a couple of concentric rings of
LEDs to simulate analog hands. It mostly worked when I got it home,
but there's a stray "ghost" hand that comes and goes as the time ticks
around the face.
So many ways to tell time in the modern era. This is a huge change
>from a few centuries ago, when a marked stick was close enough.
-ethan
Thanks for the lead on the Rockwell PPS-4.
Does anyone know where I can find architectural info on it,
and/or a die photo? It seems to be quite rare, and there
is almost no information about this chip [family] on the web.
--Tim
DSDD floppy disks work fine, but I don't believe that you can buy them anymore.
I think the Cat only uses 265K of disk space, and will format them if required.
Steve.
--- On Thu, 12/18/08, Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com> wrote:
From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
Subject: Canon Cat: what density 3.5"?
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 8:04 PM
What type of 3.5" floppies are people using in their Cats? Would off-the-shelf
double-density suffice? Any special preparation required?
--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
? Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Nuclear war would really set back cable. -- Ted Turner ---------------------
Going to recycle - Tandy MMPC Model 10. Looks like a pretty plain 486sx
desktop. Does anyone want it or parts of it? Reply off-list to "martinm"
at the domain "allwest.net". I'm in the US at 82930.
Thank you,
Martin Marshall
Someone on comp.os.cpm pointed this out. I don't recall anyone doing so
here. http://www.radioshackcatalogs.com/. Mmm... Fond memories of when
Radio Shack didn't stink.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> The earliest I have seen so far is a
> Sherwood FM tuner ca. 1977 that uses an RCA 1802 (e.g.
> http://atlanta.craigslist.org/ele/927622156.html).
Bit of trivia. That tuner was designed and built in Milwaukee by a
company that a friend of mine worked for. At the time, several of
his friends built units up from leftovers from the production run.
The TrackStar has been claimed. I working out who's on first.
Thanks,
Martin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Marshall [mailto:martinm at allwest.net]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 9:48 PM
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts; The Rescue List
> Subject: Free for Cost of Shipping: Diamond TrackStar 128K - Apple II
>
>
> Here's one that I'll never get around to:
>
> Diamond TrackStar 128K board for PC, PC/XT, Tandy 1000 SX.
> This is an add-in board to run Apple II, etc software on a
> PC. In original box with original 5 1/4" disk and everything
> that I could scarf off the net in 2001 - 2002. Has cables, etc.
>
> Free for shipping. Please reply off-list to user "martinm"
> at domain "allwest.net".
>
> Thank you,
> Martin Marshall
>
I co-manage a gaming center in the mall up here in Cheyenne, Wyoming.
I've started setting up a couple older computers around the store as
some sort of mini-museum, to try teach the kids that there was indeed
something before Halo and WoW.
My latest setup is a Power Mac 5500/225, with copies of the old Carmen
Sandiego games, and Oregon Trail, and all those other fun things I
grew up on. Only problem is that the computer has 48MB of RAM, when it
could take up to 128MB, assuming I can lay my hands on the right
sticks of RAM.
Which is the point of this message! If anyone has a couple of 64MB
DIMMs (LowEndMac says the computer wants it in a 60ns EDO flavor), I'd
be much obliged if we could work out some sort of deal. If there's
something one of you are looking for, I'm sure we could figure out
something. I'm sure I have at least a gigabyte of the stuff somewhere
in St. Louis, but that's enough hours away that it's not worth it at
the moment. Thanks, folks!
~Matt
Here's one that I'll never get around to:
Diamond TrackStar 128K board for PC, PC/XT, Tandy 1000 SX. This is an
add-in board to run Apple II, etc software on a PC. In original box with
original 5 1/4" disk and everything that I could scarf off the net in 2001 -
2002. Has cables, etc.
Free for shipping. Please reply off-list to user "martinm" at domain
"allwest.net".
Thank you,
Martin Marshall
What type of 3.5" floppies are people using in their Cats? Would off-the-shelf
double-density suffice? Any special preparation required?
--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
-- Nuclear war would really set back cable. -- Ted Turner ---------------------
Hi all --
Got myself a Seiko UC-2000 ("Wrist Information System") w/UC-2200
keyboard/terminal. The UC-2000 is a souped-up digital watch with a
dot-matrix display, and the Keyboard unit is basically a computer that
uses the watch as a display. (So it's more or less like the old
Sharp/Casio BASIC programmables, only it uses a watch for a display
instead of something built-in...)
But the watch itself is _also_ a small computer -- one can upload small
binary programs from the Keyboard unit to the watch. From the little
information I've been able to find, it has 2k of RAM, 7k of ROM, and a
4-bit CPU running at 32kHz (yes, kHz). Does anyone know anything about
the CPU? It'd be fun to write some little programs for this (assuming I
can work out how to get them transferred over...)
(See http://www.pocketcalculatorshow.com/nerdwatch/fun2.html for a brief
description of the UC-2000 and others in the same family...)
Josh
Hi,
as someone might remember, I've got some Zilog System 8000 equipment and
over the last days I've started resurrecting it.
I thought - maybe someone feels interested in the story as well ;)
2 days ago I've built my "custom" frontpanel (just a transition solution)
with the remaining stuff I had at home. The "original-like" push button I
tried to get in my local electronic distributor was out of stock. So I
reused an old circuit board, 11+40 ohm resisitor to get the needed 51 ohm
and so on... ;-) The final version will contain the "original-like" push
buttons, the LED banks and so on. It will be mounted then at the same
position where the original panel sits. When it is then hidden behind the
front door it will look nearly like the original one. At least, thats the
plan. Until then:
http://pics.pofo.de/gallery/v/S8000/Repair/P1070180.JPG.htmlhttp://pics.pofo.de/gallery/v/S8000/Repair/P1070181.JPG.html
After this was done, I've used an old PC-AT PSU for supplying the
required power to the backplane ("POWERFAIL" cable ignored):
http://pics.pofo.de/gallery/v/S8000/Repair/P1070182.JPG.html
And then put back all together, huck up a nulmodem cable to my PC and -
yeah The firmware got loaded and the usual START message was printed:
http://pics.pofo.de/gallery/v/S8000/Repair/P1070183.JPG.htmlhttp://pics.pofo.de/gallery/v/S8000/Repair/P1070186.JPG.html
Pressing the NMI/START switch on my glamorous frontpanel brings up an
immediate FATAL ERROR:
S8000 Monitor 1.2 - Press START to Load System
P
*** ERROR #0000
*** FATAL ERROR
[
Reading the hardware ref. manual - this means no external RAM - of
course, I still don't have the 1MB dynamic memory board. :(
Connecting the WDC board to the bus leads to a non-startable system
having the BUSACK LED on the CPU board permanently on - probably the WDC
is broken and spams the system BUS... But at least this was my first step
which was done OK I guess ;)
--
Oliver Lehmann
http://www.pofo.de/http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/
I got a Tektronix 4111 terminal taking space in my house..
I think it needs a 'better' home, it powers up and all the eprom sockets are
filled up but further ..?
It's complete with keyboard and no manuals..
It's for a small drinking fee or trade for HP-stuff + shipping of cause.
I live in the Netherlands (Europe for the people on the other end of the
cable)
Please react off-list..
-Rik
I've got a large number of Mac II's and IIx's sitting around. None of them
post (I believe due to dead batteries which I understand is common to them).
Most of them are fairly yellow but intact. Is there any interest in these
for parts/whatever? I also have some IIci's in similar state
In this 1959 Popular Mechanix report of HECK--RCA's "Home Electronic
Center Kid", the following is mentioned:
"To speed up the working of electronic computers which assist in such
discoveries, the RCA lab recently devised a memory storage plate
smaller and thinner than a four-cent postage stamp. It has 256 tiny
holes in it and can keep a million facts on file and produce them in
any combination or alone in milli-seconds."
Does anyone have any additional information about this device? Was
it ever commercially deployed?
(A couple of interesting asides: Note the "Roomba" in the photo and
the description of the about-to-be-produced RCA Nuvistor--and what
appears to be a raised floor in the exhibit. And the ghastly
"contemporary decor"--could orange shag wall-to-wall carpet be long
in coming?)
Cheers,
Chuck
Over the past four years I've been taking the digests, pulling down the archives and saving them, in the hope that I'd find time to read and perhaps participate. Never found time.
Gotta get this out of the way first: some of you may recall that I was Don Maslin's friend, that I promised to rescue the software archive, and that his widow made that impossible. A mutual friend queried me about this recently, and I have to say that so far as I know, Don's archive rests in his garage, untouched. SAD!!!
This year I lost another computer addict friend who participated in the early days of the Z80 (and before that as one of the Non-Linear Systems bright lights) - Bill Bailey. Our Old Farts group is getting smaller.
I wonder - are there any warm bodies here in San Diego still interested in the old computers we created over 30 years ago? If so, I'd sure like to talk with them. Perhaps reconstitute the Dina-SIG I founded some 20+ years ago as a local activity for celebration of the early personal computer, idea and information exchange, and good fellowship over good beer!
Anyway, I intend to try to drop in here daily and join in the daily conversations.
Regards,
Vern Wright
San Diego, CA
> Send cctech mailing list submissions to
> cctech at classiccmp.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctech
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cctech-request at classiccmp.org
>
>
> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:54:52 -0800
> From: "Michael" <michaelgreen42 at comcast.net>
> I've got a large number of Mac II's and IIx's sitting around. None of
> them post (I believe due to dead batteries which I understand is common to
> them). Most of them are fairly yellow but intact. Is there any interest in
> these for parts/whatever? I also have some IIci's in similar state
The Mac II and IIx require a working battery in order to trip the power
supply. However, the IIci does not. It will power up just fine with a
flat battery, because the power supply provides a 5V trickle, which the
motherboard makes use of.
So any IIci which does not power up has other issues.
All those machines are at or past an age where the surface mount
electrolytic caps should have leaked corrosive goo all over the logic
board. A good cleaning at the least would be a good idea, to prevent
further damage. Usually any damage from the leakage is not too hard to
repair with careful examination and judicial use of wire wrap (or other
tiny wires) and solder.
The IIci's logic board power-on circuitry is particularly susceptible to
this damage because four of the larger caps (47uF) are sitting on the
portion of the board which contains the power-on circuitry. So a common
symptom of capacitor-goo damaged IIci's is an inability to power up.
Where are you located? Shipping plays a large part in whether there will
be interest. The II and IIx are beasts which would cost a lot to ship.
The power supply in the IIci was also used in the IIcx, IIvi, IIvx, Quadra
700, Centris 650, Quadra 650 and PowerMac 7100. So at the least, you
should find some interest in the IIci power supplies.
Jeff Walther
Steven Hirsch <snhirsch at gmail.com>
>On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, William Blair wrote:
> >
> > Quote from same forum, different thread: "I think the iAPX432 and Nx686
> > are the most wanted cpu in the collectors community."
>Are you serious? Were the Nexgen chips really so rare?
Nx586 are pretty common. Nx686 aren't, as it was never released beyond
the sampling stage before AMD picked up Nexgen and released it as the K6.
At 12:00 -0600 12/17/08, Michael wrote:
>I've got a large number of Mac II's and IIx's sitting around. ...
... err, around where?
Hard drives, memory, etc. in place?
KB, mice, monitors, etc?
--
- Mark 210-379-4635
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Large Asteroids headed toward planets
inhabited by beings that don't have
technology adequate to stop them:
Think of it as Evolution in Fast-Forward.
This is an interesting post on Google Blogspot:
Jean Bartik: the untold story of a remarkable ENIAC programmer
Jean Bartik: the untold story of a remarkable ENIAC programmer
This guest post was written by Kathy Kleiman, who discovered the ENIAC
Programmers 20 years ago and founded the ENIAC Programmers Project to record
their stories and produce the first feature documentary about their work. More
at www.eniacprogrammers.org. ? Ed.
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/12/jean-bartik-untold-story-of-remarkab…
> > Rarest Intel chips in no particular order (from a CPU
> collector forum; posted in 2005; nobody disagreed):
> >
> > X8008
> > G8008
> > C4040 Purple
> > C4040 Left Ground Strap
> > 8080B
> > 8080-8
> > 8008
> > 8008-1
> > MC8080
> > C4004 W #5 & Ground Strap
>
> Has someone unearthed a bunch of i432s? Any reason they are
> not on the list?
Quote from same forum, different thread: "I think the iAPX432 and Nx686 are the most wanted cpu in the collectors community."
A few weeks ago, some people in here were talking about putting network
cards in IBM PCs or XTs or something...
As it happens, I ran across a box of 3com 3c503 network cards (AUI and
10BaseT ports, 8 bit ISA card).
If anyone wants one, lemme know, I'm asking $5+shipping, and I'll have
the box with me at Dayton if you want to harass me about them, then.
Pat
--
Purdue University ITAP/RCAC --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
> An NCR 3400 is available in Cary, North Carolina. See
> below. Please respond to the original sender.
Some of the NCR line was actually the old AT&T line. I think
this might be one of them.
Based on a response to my note about having PS/2 keyboard routines that
can output parallel ASCII, I thought I'd mention that I took some time
these past few nights to clean up my PS2Encoder project. The original
project supported:
* converting AT and PS/2 keyboard data into parallel with strobe
* Capturing CTRL/ALT/DEL keystroke and triggering active low output
upon receipt.
* RS232 output
* Hobbyist friendly 28 pin .300" DIP package layout
I've added the following features:
* Removal of crystal requirement. While the code can be compiled
for one, it is no required for operation
* CAPS LOCK works (I have not gotten the code that updates the LED
to work yet, but the interface adjusts to uppercase)
* Ability to configure interface via keyboard itself
* Ability to set parallel strobe to be active low or active high
* Ability to set ENTER to send CR or CRLF
* Ability to set inter-char holdoff from 0 to 2550uS, in 10uS increments
* Ability to set BS to send either BS or DEL
* Ability to set RS232 speed (2400,4800,9600,19200,38400)
* Ability to save settings permanently in EEPROM
The code is available (or will be, as soon as I post it) under GPL (v2),
but I'm wondering a few things:
* Any other features folks might find handy? I can't promise things
(someone suggested full keyboard mapping, which I am still
thinking about. It's not a technical issue per se, more a user
interface one), but I can try
* Anyone interested in a programmed IC for $20.00 (shipping in US
included)?
Jim
--
Jim Brain, Brain Innovations (X)
brain at jbrain.com
Dabbling in WWW, Embedded Systems, Old CBM computers, and Good Times!
Home: http://www.jbrain.com
From: Paul Koning <Paul_Koning at Dell.com>
Subject: Re: 8008 chips / RAM's
Jos> ...The i4004 is a controller, at least to me, because it is
Jos> dependent on a specific set of supporting ciruits (4001,40002
Jos> and 4003). The 8008 is much more general purpose.
I would make the distinction on the basis of what you can do with it.
A college classmate of mine built a 4004 based microcomputer in 1974
that was a general purpose machine, just as the early 8008 basd
micros. I would certainly call his creation a microcomputer, not a
controller. It certainly was hairy -- about 100 chips on a large
wire wrap board.
paul
Sure, I could imagine agreeing that the 4004 was a "controller," but these are just names. It is still a microprocessor, just that it had a very convenient bus architecture that let you connect RAMs, ROMs, and I/O with no "glue logic." It is certainly true that the bus interface of the 8008 was more general than the 4004, but this meant that the 8008 required dozens of support chips just to build the most minimal system. Peripherals and memory each required decoders to partition the bus address space, whereas the 4001 and 4002 had built-in decoders. It is worth noting that eventually the 4008, 4009 and then the combined 4289 came along to allow the 4004 (and the 4040) to interface to standard memories (static RAMs and e.g. 1702 PROMs). Alas, the 8008 didn't last very long, whereas the 4004 had a 15-year manufacturing run, even as the space of 8-bit microprocessors exploded and surpassed the meager 4004 in capability. The 8008 was originally purpose-built to be a terminal controller and then released for general use.
People make a big deal about the first-this and the first-that, but then what happens is no-one can remember the second-this and the second-that. Can anyone remember what the second commercial, customer-programmable microprocessor to hit the market? The 8008 came out in 1972. Were there others introduced that year? I know that the TMS-1000 was right around that time.
--Tim
Hi everyone,
I'm having some difficulty in finding relatively old PC hardware of a
certain vintage. I'm looking for a 486 class machine and a machine of P100~
performance. Only caveats are must be ISA/PCI and have some room for
peripheral cards. I can pay a token amount and collect in the NW UK. Any
leads, please drop me a line.
Thanks.
Stuart.
ACCRC Sealed-bid Auction Update for 2008-12-16
Many people asked about the functional condition of some of the items
in the ACCRC sealed-bid auction, and some asked for the configurations
of some of the higher-end systems. So I took the time last night to
test each machine and below is a summary of the functional status of
each machine in the current lot. In summary: nearly all the machines
tested work just fine.
Also, several people had problems logging in, changing their password,
or creating an account. All of these problems should be fixed by now.
If you continue to have any issues logging in or creating an account,
please let me know ASAP and I will address the issue immediately.
FYI, the closing time for this auction is this Thursday, December 18,
at 12:00PM PST. There's still plenty of time to update your bids (if
warranted).
The next auction lot will be posted by this weekend, with a target
date of December 19 (this coming Friday). More good stuff is on the
way, so don't blow your wad all at once.
Functional Summary of Current ACCRC Sealed-bid Auction Lot
"GOOD" means the unit powers up and displays video (if applicable).
"NLS" stands for "Non-Linear Systems" (see below for explanation).
## Item Condition
-- -------------------------------- ---------------------------------
1 Olivetti Divisumma 24 Calculator Untested; needs funky power cord
2 HP1000 Model A900 Powers up; see below for config.
3 Apple Silentype Printer Unable to test (needs int. board)
4 Lagamarsino Totalia 6341 Calc. Untested; needs funky power cord
5 Kaypro 4 GOOD; NLS; drv. B latch is broken
7 Kaypro II GOOD; NLS
8 NEC PC-8201A GOOD
9 Kaypro 2X Does not power up
11 TRS-80 Model 4P GOOD
12 Kaypro 2 GOOD; slight video warping
14 Kaypro 1 GOOD
15 Non-Linear Systems Kaypro II Withdrawn (see notes below)
17 Osborne 1 Power cord cut; cannot test
18 Apple Silentype Printer Unable to test (needs int. board)
19 Apple //c Untested (no power brick)
20 IMSAI Z80 No attempt made to test
21 Osborne Executive GOOD; slight video jitter
22 Osborne 1 (Gray) GOOD
23 Osborne Executive GOOD; slight video jitter
25 Osborne Executive GOOD
26 Kaypro 4 GOOD; brightness is over-driven
27 TRS-80 Color Computer 2 Unable to test (no video cable)
28 Magnavox Odyssey 4000 Beeps; video untested; ~GOOD
29 Access Portable GOOD
30 TI 99/4a Expansion System Unable to test
31 TI 99/4a Didn't bother to test
32 Tandy 200 GOOD
33 TI Silent 700 Does not power up
34 Tandy 600 Powers up; scrambled video
35 Atari 800XL & 1050 Untested (no power brick)
36 Sony SMC-70 Powers up; need video cable
37 Macintosh 128K GOOD; see updated description
38 Macintosh (Original) GOOD; "Sad Mac" = 0F0002
39 Altos 8600 Powers up; HD sounds sick
40 Famicom Clone Unable to test
41 Canon Cat GOOD
Additional notes on certain machines:
Kaypros - Kaypro Corporation originally started out as "Non-Linear
Systems, Inc.", changing its name after the success of their Kaypro
computer line (their initial claim to fame is bringing to market the
first digital voltmeter; see Wikipedia for more details). Early
Kaypro computers were labeled as being made by "Non-Linear Systems".
In my opinion, these early machines are more rare and valuable than
the later "Kaypro" branded machines. During the course of my more
detailed inspection, I realized that several of the Kaypro machines
carry the "Non-Linear Systems" branding. "NLS" in the condition
column above indicates a "Non-Linear Systems" branded machine. The
item descriptions on the auction page have been updated to reflect
this new information.
The "Non-Linear Systems Kaypro II" (Item #15) has been withdrawn
because it was determined that it was already sold. I apologize
profusely for this.
Osborne Executives - the "slight video jitter" indicated might be a
side effect of the drive motors when the unit is seeking a boot disk.
HP 1000 Model A900
------------------
The configuration of the HP 1000 A900 is as follows:
A900 CNTRL STOR
A900 SEQUENCER
A900 DATA PATH
A900 CACHE CTRL
A900 MEM CNTRL
MEMORY 3 MB
MEMORY 3/4 MB
HP-IB
8 CHAN MUX
BB
PARALLEL
HP-IB
As noted above, this machines powers up, but no other information
about it's functional condition is known.
IMSAI Z80
---------
The configuration of the IMSAI Z80 is as follows:
CompuPro CPU-Z (Z80 processor with 1985 date code)
Cromemco 32K ByteSaver
Fulcrum Static RAM (?)
Fulcrum Static RAM (?) [second board]
Digital Research Computers RAM (?)
Godbout System Support 1
Morrow Disk Jockey/DMA (floppy disk controller)
Morrow HDC/DMA (hard disk controller)
IMSAI MIO (Rev. 2)
CompuPro Interfacer 4
No attempt was made to power on the IMSAI. This is pretty much a
project machine, though it's in good enough condition that an
experienced hobbyist should be able to get it booted with a couple
hours of tinkering. It's a good starter machine for a noob.
Please contact me if you have any further questions about any of these
items.
Best regards,
Sellam Ismail
Proprietor
Vintage Computer Festival
An NCR 3400 is available in Cary, North Carolina. See below. Please
respond to the original sender.
Reply-to: terry at eurosoftinc.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:45:59 -0500
From: Terry Stanfield <terry at eurosoftinc.com>
To: donate at vintage.org
Subject: NCR system 3400
We have an old NCR system 3400 here in our office that I would be very
sad to send to the dumpster. Would you be interested?
Unfortunately we are on the east coast.
Thanks,
Terry Stanfield
Eurosoft, Inc.,
1628 Old Apex Road
Cary, NC 27513
(919)468-3003 ext 223
http://www.eurosoftinc.com
---
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
All this talk of CPUs got me back onto thoughts of homebrew CPU design, which
has been a stalled project of mine for the last year or so.
So, has anyone come across a good online resource which compares vintage CPU
instruction sets? It'd be useful to see what 'core' instructions* were most
common back in the day and use that as a basis for my own homebrew effort; I
think I can probably rustle up things like hardware multiply and divide, but
really don't want an all-singing solution. KISS and all that. :-)
* My hands-on knowledge is pretty much limited to Z80, 6502, 68000 and x86,
and it'd be nice to go a little further back in time - but hopefully without
having to download and digest many different databooks!
cheers
Jules
>
>Subject: Re: 8008 chips
> From: "William Donzelli" <wdonzelli at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:28:41 -0500
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>> I have a bag of 35 NOS type "MF1103P" dated 722x, 18-pin plastic DIP, gold-plate
>> pins, made by Microsystems International Ltd. (a briefly-existent Canadian
>> chip maker). I believe these were 2nd-sourced 1103's, as MIL also made an
>> MF8008 and MF1702.
>>
>> I also have a gold-capped C8008. One idea would be to make a period-style
>> 8008 system with all of it.
>>
>> If I sell them can I retire to Monte Carlo instead?
>
>You could probably get a nice plane ticket.
>
>There is a "missing link" Intel RAM that many chip guys lust for. I do
>not recall the number - 210something.
The 1101 256 byte static ram. Later there would be the 2102 (1kx1) and
2102 256x4 that were important to small computeres.
The 1103 was dynamic and while cheaper it was also hard to work with
due to refresh and interface needs.
Allison
>
>If I look thru my records I can probably remember, but I have too many
>things to do right now.
>
>--
>Will
>
>--
First, I know approximately nothing about old Intel chips, so forgive
any incoherence.
A friend of mine just came across a couple of Intel 8008 chips.
Apparently, some ebay sellers think they're solid gold.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260099837541
As far as we can tell, that's what Mel has.
Anyway, I told him I'd try to find out what it's actually worth and
whether anyone here is willing to pay whatever's reasonable.
He also has some later 8008s without the gold cap.
Doc
On 12/15/08, Keith <keithvz at verizon.net> wrote:
> William Donzelli wrote:
> > > ...Why dont people collect i1103's ?
> >
> > They do. Some of the early RAM fetches HUGE money. Multiple hundreds
> > for some of the real raries.
>
> Tell me about it. I've been looking for 1Mx4-bit 20-pin DIP DRAMs for
> years. The closest I've come is some 26/20-pin surface mount.
I have, too... I need 4 of them to upgrade my Rejuvenator in my Amiga
1000 from 1M of CHIP RAM to 2M of CHIP RAM (that and a "Fatter Agnus",
but those aren't as difficult to find as the RAM itself).
<http://amiga.resource.cx/manual/Rejuvenator_AgnusInstall.pdf>
It's never been critical, so I've never bothered, but with the Sprit
InBoard and the Starboard on the side (w/StarDrive SCSI interface), it
would be a nice boost.
Worst case, if I ever did start using my A1000 and really, really
wanted it, I suppose I could cobble a daughter card up that would plug
into the RAM bank on the Rejuvenator, but that's a lot of work for a
very optional upgrade.
-ethan
-ethan
> I wonder if a really workable counterfeit could made from
> other than a different chip with new paint? Hopefully that won't
> happen, but with this kind of money involved who knows.
There are discussions of this in CPU collector forums often. If the price is high enough, it's well worth it (to thieves). China appears to be a significant source for counterfeited chips, mainly "Engineering Samples," "Prototype" and "Confidential" supplementary-marked chips. And I can imagine that somewhere along the line, there were a whole bunch of ICs with exactly the same external appearance as the 4004 that could be remarked. If the buyer doesn't functional check the chip or open it up for die inspection, who'd know other than the thief who sold it?
There is a DEC system module (PDP-1/4/5/6 era) in this lot,
as well as several Control Data modules of the sort used
in the 1604 and 160A. These are nice display pieces, but I'm
well-stocked on both accounts, so I'm going to pass on this
one. With 6 hours to go, the price is at $5 with no bids.
--Bill
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270315494162
Lot of 8 Vintage Circuit Boards - 1960s
System is in excellent condition overall and comes with several books and
even some software.
http://cgi.ebay.com/RARE-Altos-580-10A-Computer-ORIGINAL-DOCS-AND-SOFTWARE_W
0QQitemZ120350775271QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item120350775
271&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=72%3A1234|66%3A2|65%3A12|39%3A1|240%3A131
8|301%3A1|293%3A1|294%3A50
Hi everyone
As a 4th year computer engineering student with a part time job, I
definitely have too much time on my hands, so I've been thinking about
doing something like building my own computer. I remember playing with
the 68k SBCs back in my assembly class, so I thought something from
that family might be an interesting choice. It's ambitious, but
ideally I'd like to do 16/32 bits and a few megs of memory.
Have any of you built something like this? I'm looking for links to
project pages, shared experiences, and advice on what processor to
use. Reminiscence is welcome too, if you have fond memories of such a
thing :)
Thanks
John Floren
--
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
Rarest Intel chips in no particular order (from a CPU collector forum; posted in 2005; nobody disagreed):
X8008
G8008
C4040 Purple
C4040 Left Ground Strap
8080B
8080-8
8008
8008-1
MC8080
C4004 W #5 & Ground Strap
ISTR that the 441000s were used in some of the RAM expansion boards for the HP
laserjet Series II printers as well as some of the EMS memory expansion boards.
I probably have a stash of them around here in boards, but it would also
probably take a day of looking to find them :).
> > > Not 411000s - those are 1Mx1s unless I'm quite mistaken. I have a
> > > small pile of those. What I need (as mentioned in the subject line)
> > > is 1Mx4, perhaps known as 441000s, perhaps by other numbers; and I
> > > agree with Keith that they are uncommon in DIP format...
>
>Subject: Re: Commodore PET RS-232
> From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>
> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:22:39 -0800 (PST)
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Dave Caroline wrote:
>> should be a way/was a way to use the 6522 VIA chip it will need
>> translation to rs232 levels though
>
>Does anybody here remember a thread from last month called:
>Re: RS232 voltage level converter box
>
>(trying to figure out what a board with 1488s and 1489s was for)
>
DEC had boards like that for going from TTL to RS232 as modules and
for current loop (TTY) to RS232 or the other way around. There were
a lot of "things" that often had oddball interfaces like Ham radio
tranceivers that could be driven by computer but only had serial TTL.
Allison
tiggerlasv at aim.com wrote:
> I don't have a source for MMJ cables,
> but I do have a US/Domestic source for MMP's
> (the offset modular connectors). . .
>
> http://www.gruber.com/GruberInd/pg.asp?FeatureID=38
>
> They are .14 / each for flat cable, and .41 / each for round cable.
> Last I checked, they don't ship internationally.
>
>
> There are two different styles of DecConnect cables;
> both inverted, and not inverted.?? The only difference
> of course, is that one connector is flipped on one end.
Correct. And excellent info.
> When used with genuine DEC adapters, one?style worked
> for printers (DCE), and the other style worked with terminals (DTE).
Um. No. :-)
Both printers, terminals and computers are DTE.
DTE means data terminal (or terminating) equipment, while DCE means data
communcation equipment. A typical DCE is a modem.
DEC was one of the few companies that actually got this right, and made
cables and connectors that actually followed the standard (well, until
the switched to MMJ anyway, which was a standard of it's own).
If just every computer manufacturer had read the specs, the world would
have been much nicer, but what can one expect from companies who just
didn't put in the effort because of money and lockins (most anyone), or
just was too big to even bother (IBM).
The other company I know of who was pretty good at actually following
the RS-232 standard is HP.
> Back in the early 90's, our office used uVax 2000's,
> connected to VT220's. along with various printers,
> connected using DEC MMJ <> DB25 adapters.
> You couldn't simply swap the DecConnect cables
> because of the inverted MMP's on some of the cables.
> All of our cabling and adapters were unmodified DEC products.
Well, which adapter worked was obviously based on which cable you had. :-)
You still got four combinations, two of which would make you happy.
Johnny
Everyone has seen old monitors/terminals with text clearly burned into the screen, or a grid of fuzzy boxes where the character cells line up, wear from many years of use and abuse. While graphic color tubes can and do develop screen burn (the Macintosh menu bar, and Windows taskbar being commonly found etched into discarded color monitors), the burn-in problem seems more prevelant on older, monochrome tubes.
I use a fair number of old monochrome monitors, and a couple of terminals I use every day. Yesterday, I accidentally left a computer and it's monochrome monitor running unattended for about four hours (I forgot to shut it off/got distracted). When I returned, I carefully examined the areas where text had been on the screen, and could not detect any burn-in, although I can tell that the left side of the display has an oh-so-faint browning to it. Now, I am almost positive that this was there all along, after all - this thing lived a hard life before I found it. But, it got me thinking, how long does text need to be on the screen to burn into a monocrhome tube? Four hours doesn't seem like enough time - otherwise every PC monitor would have the WordPerfect ruler burned into it.
I did some searching, but of course, could only turn up things relating to modern plasma screen TV's, which apparently suffer similar degredation from use.
Were there any studies conducted, or actual ratings for picture tubes like this? The sort of tubes I'm referring to are standard monochrome CRT's, like the ones used in terminals and monitors in the early 80's.
On a similar note, I was playing with a system test utility program for the Commodore PET. It tests the RAM and ROM, loops continuously and displays the test results and running time on the screen. The Commodore PET also uses this sort of monochrome picture tube - and unlike most other machines, you can't shut off just the screen and leave the computer running. So, this test program alternates every second or so between normal and inverse video modes. Now, since the screen is flashing, it shouldn't damage the phosphors - since it is my understanding that the phosphor burn phenomenon isn't so much the phosphors wearing out, but related to them being constantly excited, and therefore heating up and darkening. Is this correct thinking? While I don't plan on running this test for extended periods of time, I do wonder about it's potential effect on the screen, if any.
It's interesting to see what's already burned into screens though, it gives an insight into what the computer used to do. I have terminals with logon promts burned into them, menu systems, and at least one with a dire confidentiality warning permently etched into the tube. I've got a Monitor IIe with "Apple //e" burned into the top - clearly someone left the computer on without a disk in it for a very long time to get that clear of a burn in.
So, like I said, I just got curious about the whole thing, and figured I'd see if anyone else knew more on the subject. Obviously, I always try to be careful and shut things off when I'm not using them, but, you know, mistakes happen.
-Ian
[I tried to send this before, but I don't think it went out. My
apologies if you're seeing this a second time.]
According to my reading, the Burroughs B5000 and Manchester Atlas were
both Harvard architecture machines, and the GE-645 was von Neumann. Am
I correct in my interpretation?
Peace... Sridhar
What options are there for adding an RS-232 port to a Commodore PET? The computer's user port has a different pinout from the C64 (although it uses the same connector), and the port doesn't have the serial output signals the 64 does. Therefore, the quick and dirty hacks that worked great on the 64 to provide serial won't work on the PET.
What communications options exist/existed for the PET, aside from Commodore-produced IEEE-488 modems? Does the ROM include routines to handle such communication, like the C64, or would software need to be created for a particular interface? Is there a teminal emulation software available for the PET?
I have an 8032, and an 8050 disk drive - but of course, the 8050 is completely incompatible with nearly everything else - serial communication would be a big help.
This is new territory for me - the C64, I know. The PET... I'm learning :)
-Ian
John Floren wrote:
> Well, I wasn't thinking the MC68000 processor exactly, just something
> from that family. I *do* have some experience with FPGA, so I'll
> consider doing that as well.
So check google/wiki for Minimig. It is an amiga 500 clone with a real
mc68000 cpu and all peripherals in an FPGA.
Seems to be a lot of fun.
Cheers
Mark Haysman wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The X2 class capacitors fail, causing that smoke.
That seems the most likely cause to me. I don't think I've ever seen a
transformer in a switchmode supply go into meltdown. Not that shorted windings
can't happen, but it's a very uncommon failure IME...
cheers
Jules
Actually, Nolan and Ted Dabney's first foray in to video games. The two designed and built it together.
Always amazes me how Nolan's PR over the years has effectively wiped Ted's contributions, and in some cases sought to rewrite history.
Marty
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Graham" <witchy at binarydinosaurs.co.uk>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 11:26:13 AM GMT -06:00 Central America
Subject: Re: The first video game
On 13/12/2008 15:14, "Liam Proven" <lproven at gmail.com> wrote:
> I never knew there was a coin-op Spacewar!
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/13/tob_computer_space/print.html
Yep, it was Nolan Bushnell's first foray into video games but didn't get too
much money because it was too complicated for the 'average' user. From my
own Atari page:
" Whilst working at Ampex (creators of the first practical video recorder no
less), Nolan Bushnell had already created an arcade video game based on
Spacewar, which was a game written by Steve Russell in 1961 for the PDP-1
>from Digital Equipment. Nolan's version was called Computer Space and it was
being distributed by Nutting Associates. However, it wasn't as popular as
he'd have liked (he said you had to read the instructions, and people didn't
have the patience!)"
--
Adrian/Witchy
Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator
Www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UK's biggest private home computer
collection?
Wirth was at Stanford at the time and there is a Stanford Tech Report
that gives the grammar and usage of Algol W.
I presume everyone knows the joke; Wirth is call by name in Europe and
Call by Value in the US.
IMHO (but of course), the significant contribution of 'W is Call by
Reference and Call by Result.
>
>Subject: Re: Bootstrappable language
> From: "bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca" <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:27:12 -0700
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>Dave Dunfield wrote:
>> You don't need register to register operations to support a C compiler.
>>
>> Can you provide any details of your architecture and instruction set?
>>
>> It might be feasable to make a port of my Micro-C toolset to it... If
>> not, it might be feasable to make a port of "C-flea" a virtual machine
>> I designed specifically to support Micro-C (I've supported some pretty
>> weird architectures by employing C-flea).
>>
>The architecture is like I said before a stretched PDP-8, with a
>512 byte direct addressing range and more compleate set of alu operations.
>I am exploring the idea that 18 bits is still the best size word size
>for a small
Have you lookd at DG Nova? Sounds like your traversing that same path.
>computer or digital controller. The extra opcode bit is used to
>support word &
>byte sized operands, compared to the that of a 8 bit micro. The two more
>address
>bits negate the loss of byte addressing and give a bit more room for a
>resident
>OS rather than swapping core in and out.
>
>Using CPLD's also gives me the feel that a 18 bit simple cpu like my design
>could have been developed as microchip computer similar to 6800 or 6502
>chip set around the time the Z80 was developed. Using 48 rather 40 pins
>as packaging a 18 bit cpu with front panel support could have been
>developed.
>
>A) Cpu chip. B) Swr/data/address bus display support chips . C)
>data/byte swap buffer.
>
>> Micro-C is a very small, but reasonably powerful dialect of C - For an
>> example, refer to the ImageDisk sources on my site ... ImageDisk and all
>> of it's utilities are compiled with the PC version of Micro-C (as are my
>> simulators, transfer tools and pretty much all of the other DOS based
>> tools I've posted).
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> Btw: If you haven't written an assembler yet, let me know - I've got a
>> universal table driven assembler generator which I developed to rapidly
>> produce assemblers for many of the later architectures I supported.
>>
>>
>Unlikely it will work , I have 9 bit bytes.
>I have hacked, Jones's PDP 8 assembler to cross assemble for me.
>Once I get the the single PCB board built later next year, then I
>will consider porting Micro-C. I plan to only have about 64Kb +
>bootstrap EEPROM, IDE interface and a two 6850 uarts
>along with a front panel. I am not sure yet if the IDE interface will be
>16 or 9 bits wide yet.
>
A table driven assembler can produce anything.
Also a stack based language or even C can have the anythig stack related as
multiple instructions only code efficientcy suffers and code size.
An alternate way to go is a small emulation engine written in assebler to emulate
a easier to compiler for virtual machine (P-code).
The IDE can be 9 bits as the upper 8 (or less) bits are only used for data and a
non required ops. I've done that for 8bits to simplify the interface and the
only cost is 50% of the data space was not used, a minor nit as I had 500%
more than needed.
Allison
I see one response saying that they predated the electronic stored program computer by about 40 years. Perhaps, I wasn't around that early.
But I recall a GE installation at a university of the late 1950's that had the raised floor that became standard in the 1960's. As were a couple of IBM 7xxx systems.
OTOH, a 650 I knew in 1957 was on concrete, as was a 1401 as late as 1967.
Cabling was an issue, cooling the other. The 1401 was in a well-air conditioned room, and the cabling was OVERHEAD!! Damn cheaper than raised floor. Until the large systems of the middle 1960's required cabling be out of the way, it was as much a matter of convenience as anything else - you need to be able to truck trays of cards, paper, tapes in and out, and cables made that a problem.
I'd be interested in the turn of the 20th-century-raised floors. Must make a note to look that up.
Vern
--- On Tue, 12/9/08, William Donzelli <wdonzelli at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: William Donzelli <wdonzelli at gmail.com>
> Subject: Raised floors
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Date: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 6:08 PM
> Here is an aspect of computer history not yet touched - when
> did the
> industry standardize on the 2 x 2 raised floor? Certainly
> they were
> common in the 1960s, but were they standard in the 1950s?
>
> --
> Will
>>>>>
> So, has anyone come across a good online resource which compares
> vintage CPU
> instruction sets? It'd be useful to see what 'core' instructions*
> were most
> common back in the day and use that as a basis for my own homebrew
> effort;...
Have a look here:
http://www.ourcomputerheritage.org/
Around 40 machines from 1950 to 66.
17 machines from Elliott, 11 Ferranti, 3 Leo, 4 English Electric, 2
BTM and 5 ICT.
For me the Elliott 900/920 series is particularly interesting, 4 op-
code bits, a B line modifier and 13 address bits. I worked on
compilers for this before writing one for the Zilog Z8001 to replace
the 920 ATC. The language was Coral 66, and Algol 60 derivative for
real time computing.
The 900 had no OR,XOR or NOT instructions, but it did have a negate
and add instruction, and if you had a word in memory holding the
constant -1, then a negate and add -1 could be used to do a NOT. From
this and the built in AND instruction could be built the other bitwise
logic operations.
There is no subtract operation either which meant that the order of
evaluation had to be changed around within the compiler to use the
negate and add instead.
The other conditional jumps had to be constructed from jump zero, jump
negative and unconditional jump.
Increment but no decrement.
No stack, no immediate operands, an accumulator (A) and a right side
extension (Q) and a B register which could be used to modify any
instruction allowing access to all 256k memory words (though only 128k
of program).
No carry flag so multi word arithmetic was hard work, including
software floating point, thankfully built into hardware in the 920ATC.
My other personal interest is the ICT 1301 which is memorable for
having no program counter, in being 4 bit parallel, 12 digits serial,
having no indexing instructions and being programmable purely in
decimal. Even core memory is decimal, if you try to execute a non
decimal digit the machine would stop at instruction fetch. If you
directly hand key an instruction with a non decimal digit in the
address field, the core memory will not respond (the CPU sees a zero)
and stop the machine with a parity error unless parity checking has
been turned off.
Hello,
A little while ago I bought a "new" 10ft MMJ cable from That Website.
Today I came to use it and discovered it was a crossover cable. So, my
question is where can I buy a straight MMJ - MMJ? 10ft would be fine,
longer perhaps better, and ideally a UK source.
Whilst on the subject of DEC, I'm also looking for an ethernet card for a
PDP 11/53 and perhaps a TK drive (assuming that if on power-up the drive
wheel just spins continually and you can't lift the handle, the drive is
broken).
Cheers,
Andrew
----------------
Andrew Back
a at smokebelch.org
is it likely I'd be able to read disks from this system on one of the following (all equipped w/8" floppy drives):
IBM System 23/Datamaster
Canon AS-100
NEC APC
Subject says it all :
I need to replace the floppy drive in my Lilith.
The floppy PCB is so crappy that further repairs are pointless,
PCB traces fall off whenever a soldering iron comes with smelling distance.
Willing to pay reasonable amount, location Switzerland
Jos.
Spotted on ebay...
DEC H-500 computer logic trainers.
I thiink it is a reasonable price and there is the chance to make an
offer. Front panels look PDP-8 vintage.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=200279483013
No connection with the seller, just spotted what I hope is an interesting item.
Pax
--
Paxton Hoag
Astoria, OR
USA
A new version of my Wang 2200 emulator, version 2.1, was just released after a three year
snooze:
http://www.wang2200.org/emu.html
This version runs on Win XP/Vista, PPC OS X, or i386 OS X. Full source code is included.
The big changes are support for large format disk geometries due to emulation of the
intelligent disk controller protocol, 2200B mode, the ability to print directly to the
parallel port, and a massive code clean up.
Release notes:
http://www.wang2200.org/emu/relnotes_2.1.txt
Hi everyone
As a 4th year computer engineering student with a part time job, I
definitely have too much time on my hands, so I've been thinking about
doing something like building my own computer. I remember playing with
the 68k SBCs back in my assembly class, so I thought something from
that family might be an interesting choice. It's ambitious, but
ideally I'd like to do 16/32 bits and a few megs of memory.
Have any of you built something like this? I'm looking for links to
project pages, shared experiences, and advice on what processor to
use. Reminiscence is welcome too, if you have fond memories of such a
thing :)
Thanks
John Floren
--
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
-----REPLY-----
Hi! If you are interested in home brew computing you are welcome to join us
on the N8VEM home brew computer project. It is currently Z80 CP/M based but
if you would like to explore 6800/6809/68k designs you could design your own
SBC and reuse the peripheral board designs we have already.
There is an SBC, an ECB backplane, an ECB bus monitor, and an ECB
prototyping board available now.
There have been 68k based ECB designs in the past although I am not an
expert in how those work. As long as it uses +5, GND, Address, Data, and a
variety of control bus signals it should work though.
A Disk IO board (IDE and NEC765A FDC) and a Terminal Replacement Board (uses
VGA monitor & PS/2 keyboard) are in the works.
Several builders have projects as well such as a USB & network peripheral
(!) which allows running CP/NET.
There is another builder with a project that allows wireless serial
communications and numerous interfaces to relays, etc. That same builder
made an AT keyboard interface and a 20x4 LCD display with NVRAM controller.
In short, you could focus on your 68k SBC design while leveraging the
peripherals and standard bus components already available.
Take it for what it's worth. You can contact me offline if you'd like more
information. There are photos, schematics, PCB layouts, ROM images, parts
lists, BOMs, and bunch of other stuff on the website. The PCBs are all $20
each. Good luck with your project!
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
http://groups.google.com/group/n8vemhttp://n8vem-sbc.pbwiki.com/
The Alameda County Computer Resource Center (ACCRC) is forced to liquidate
its computer museum due to the current economic climate. The VCF has been
contracted to auction off the ACCRC museum to raise needed funds for their
non-profit operation.
I have put up the first batch of machines at the following URL:
http://www.vintage.org/special/2008/accrc/
In order to use the system you must have a VCF Community ID. Getting one
is simple: just following the links and prompts when you visit the site
above and read the instructions.
I have been cataloging the hundreds of items in the ACCRC museum and will
be putting up auction lots weekly until the collection is dissipated.
There are still many items to go (with lots of duplicates) so check back
every week to see the latest batch.
All items are offered as-is. Functional condition is unknown unless
specified in the item description. For more information about a
particular item, please contact the VCF and your inquiry will be answered
as soon as possible.
Winning bidders will be notified at the close of the auction (see below
for closing time). In the event of a tie bid, the winning bid will be the
one submitted the earliest. Upon receiving a winning bid notification,
payment and pick-up at the ACCRC facilities in Berkeley, California, is
preferred. Payment from winning bidders is due within 72 hours after the
close of the auction. Non-payment will invalidate your high bid and the
item will automatically go to the next highest bidder (no exceptions).
Upon request, items will be packaged and shipped at bidder's expense plus
a $25 handling fee. Payment in the form of cash, money order, or PayPal
(in that order) is preferred. Personal checks will be accepted on the
condition that they first clear the bank.
All items must be sold. No reasonable offer will be refused. Your
purchases will go towards supporting an organization that over the years
has provided nearly 20,000 refurbished computers to needy organizations
and individuals worldwide. 100% of the proceeds of this auction will go
directly to the ACCRC (minus the handling fees, which are covering my
time...barely).
Please contact me DIRECTLY with any questions you might have of any of the
items. I'll be happy to get more notes and photos on particulars items of
interest from inquiring bidders.
http://www.vintage.org/special/2008/accrc/
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:51:25 +0100 (CET)
From: Christian Corti <cc at informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
Subject: RE: USB Model M
I think this is not the classic IBM keyboard we're talking about. *The*
classic keyboard has the part number 139140x where x differs from country
to country.
This is what's on the label of my keyboard (a rather new one, the oldest
one I have dates from 1987 and came along with my 8550-021). There's no
IBM logo on the bottom, only the oval grey logo on the top left.
1391403 55-0749972L
1386716 EC 528557 EC 528693
1992-06-23
MANUFACTURED IN UNITED KINGDOM
(C) IBM CORPORATION 1985
PRINT BUILD TEST INSP
14A 60A (sig.) (sig.)
Christian
PS:
The US version of the keyboard is the model 1391401.
-------------Reply:
Probably no point in arguing with someone who, because his
particular keyboard does not say "Model M," therefore insists
that "IBM *never* called the (Model M) keyboard a Model M."
Presumably even if I sent him a picture of one of my 1391401s
plainly labelled "Model M" he would not be convinced any more
than he is by others on here and the extensive Wiki entry.
Oh well...
Here's another batch of things that I don't have time to play with. Same
deal as before -- tell me you can come and collect them from Crawley,
the sooner the better. Most of these are easily obtainable, so they will
go to landfill if they aren't claimed.
Sharp MZ-700
2 x Amstrad CPC 464, one boxed and clean, the other with the inevitable
cracked cassette cover
DEC Letterwriter 100
DECserver 200/MC (DSRVB-A)
2 x Commodore Amiga 500
Acorn Electron and games
TI Silent 700 (the enormous briefcase one with acoustic coupler)
2 x DEC TK50Z drives
2 x Commodore 64
Motorola EXORterm 155 -- no keyboard with this.
AVID video editing unit and the BBC micro that it was used with
I've put photos of some of these on Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/frixxon/
Paul.
I picked up a nice little HP Omnibook 600C from someone here on the list, and after a few minutes of playing with it the hard drive decided it did not like its new home. Hey, no worries, stuff happens. It's a PCMCIA hard drive, so I plugged a CF card into a PCMCIA adapter and voila!, I have a new C: drive. But unfortunately, when the disk did its swan dive it took with it all the custom drivers and such that HP loads on it. That may explain why I can't get apparently simple things to work. So, does anyone have one of these machines or its startup disk, and are you willing to share? Thanks -- Ian
Title says it all... I've been looking for one of these for awhile.
Picked one up off eBay awhile back but it was totally trashed (though I
now have several spare batteries & accessories if I ever find a working
one...)
Anyone have one for trade/sale?
Thanks,
Josh
I'm cleaning house a bit. I have four IBM Model: WD-280 2.5" hard
drives. The interface is not IDE nor SCSI. I once managed to
Google up a page with an extensive listing of 2.5" drives (laptop
service company?) which indicated that the interface was something
else, the name of which I no longer remember.
Anyway, I have no use for these. If you do, email me, pay shipping
and they're yours. If I do not hear from anyone in one week I will
dispose of them.
Two of them are still factory sealed. A third one's bag is opened
but the drive passes a non-electrical inspection. The fourth one
has an ominous rattle coming from inside as if the head arm is
swinging around loose. If you do not want the fourth one, I am
happy to ship only three.
Other markings on the drive include:
P/N 06G6449
FRU P/N 95F4708
MLC C99714
I hope someone has a use for these unusual drives.
Jeff Walther
At 22:26 -0600 12/10/08, bfranchuk wrote:
>Any good leads as am still looking for a small boot strapable langauge
>here. Tiny C will not work
>as my instruction set does NOT have register to register operations. I
>plan to have a wopping
>48Kb system as that was BIG memory 1975 ish.
At 12:00 -0600 12/11/08, Jim Battle summarized:
>Ben you have said these three things in this thread:
>
>(1) "Any good leads as am still looking for a small boot strapable
>langauge here."
>
>(2) "Tiny C will not work as my instruction set does NOT have
>register to register
>operations."
>
>(3) "I could do Forth but it would be slow as I have no
>auto-incriment registers and wound
>need to use memory variables."
Ben (?), I note that on:
http://www.altair680kit.com/index.html
or more specifically,
http://www.altair680kit.com/manuals/Altair_680-VTL-2%20Manual-05-Beta_1-Sea…
Grant Stockly refers to "VTL-2" from Gary Shannon and Frank McCoy.
The manual says it requires 768 bytes to implement on a 6800 (which
has, admittedly, a pretty flexible instruction set, including good
stack operations).
Not knowing anything more about your system or the language than what
I've posted above, I still suggest it might be worth a look.
--
- Mark 210-379-4635
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Large Asteroids headed toward planets
inhabited by beings that don't have
technology adequate to stop them:
Think of it as Evolution in Fast-Forward.
Hi Vern!
Certainly Don was always happy and joyful to help out in any
way he could with the contents of his archive and his ability to
make odd-format floppies for any CP/M user. If you ever get to
the archive, you'll find several dozen floppies (Compupro and
VT180) that I sent his way.
In the 1990's I was encouraging him to make disk images and
make them publicly available. Tools at the time were teledisk etc.
He was worried about copyright issues
with a massively public on-the-net archive, he said.
Tim.
At 22:26 -0600 12/10/08, Tony wrote:
>Of course paper has the advantage that ... it withstands a
>hot soldering iron a lot better than any computer does :-)
Hm. I assume this refers to soldering iron settings below, as Ray
Bradbury would put it, "Fahrenheit 451"?
--
- Mark 210-379-4635
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Large Asteroids headed toward planets
inhabited by beings that don't have
technology adequate to stop them:
Think of it as Evolution in Fast-Forward.
All,
I'm looking for a final accurate answer.
When the Apple II's came out, the keyboard had a power-light that looked like a lit up key at the keyboard's lower left corner, below the shift key.
Apple II+'s had a power-light that was (nearly) flush with the case.
See these for comparison:
http://www.vectronicsappleworld.com/ads/ads/appleii/howto2.jpghttp://www.computercloset.org/apple2Plus.htm
The question: Did Apple ever produce II's with this flush-power-light keyboard?
I know the II and II+ lines were sold concurrently, so it doesn't
surprise me if, for a time, the hardware was identical. All I've read
(and which sounds definitive) the only initial difference was the
ROMs. See the 1980 price list mid page two: http://www.barse.org/blog/archives/apple1980pricelist.pdf . In time, the II+'s motherboard's did go through changes
Other, slightly related info
It has an Apple II 16K model #: A2S0016.
The motherboard is a Rev 4, which, if I understand it correctly, was used for both II and II+'s.
The silkscreen on the MB near the "apple computer inc" text (above ROMs) says 1978.
The manufacture date code (handprinted on MB corner near slot 0) is 7928-- 28th week (mid July) 1979.
It has the AppleSoft/Auto-Start ROMs, but these were available as an upgrade. (The previous owner also added memory to 48K plus a language card).
Oh yeah, the previous owner lost the lid!!
All this is consistent with it being an Apple II. BUT one kicker is that the keyboard has a (nearly) flush power light that are used in II+'s.
Thanks,
Scott
bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca wrote:
> Any good leads as am still looking for a small boot strapable langauge
> here. Tiny C will not work
> as my instruction set does NOT have register to register operations. I
> plan to have a wopping
> 48Kb system as that was BIG memory 1975 ish.>>
>
Your best bet is to write a byte-code interpreter in your native
instruction set. If your architecture Turing-equivalent it doesn't
matter what operations are missing. Tiny Basic, UCSD Pascal, Logo,
Java, Scheme and lots of other languages have been implemented this
way. Sure, this might be slower than a "native implementation," but you
can always bootstrap a native compiler later if you have the time.
Byte-code interpreters typically run faster than "regular"
interpreters. If you can find it, I would recommend UCSD Pascal. It is
a full-featured language (structs/records, etc.). I ran this on the
Apple II in about the amount of memory you have.
Hello,
My entire classic computer website is down for exceeding my monthly bandwidth allotment. I exceeded 60 Gigs in 2 weeks.
Can anyone recommend a good host? I need 150+ Gig/month bandwidth.
Thanks!
Steven Stengel
http://oldcomputers.net
I'd like to try and get a Kennedy tape drive (9600) up
and running and wondered if anyone had any advice or
possible interface cards?
The unit is complete and appears to be working, I have
two 50 pin connectors on the back, and the ribbon cables
to IDE connectors. This is the PERTEC interface I'm assuming?
I'm ultimately wanting to connect this to a PDP 11, but
initially it would be good to connect this some how to a
regular PC.
Are there any cards available to do this? I do have older
PC's (this is vintage computing after all) ie with ISA
slots which I'm guessing would be required.
Anyway, any pointers/leads appreciated.
Thanks
Ian.