Hi,
I've heard many times that he did the BASIC for the Trs-80 Model
100. At that time I think Microsoft put out pretty respectable
product [I thought so anyway].
Perhaps it makes sense that since he became strictly-management
oriented, Microsoft products have been backward, unimaginative and
often downright creepy.
Well, at least unlike the other Bill, his vices are limited to
economic pursuits. I just hope that someday soon they help to
modernize computing again. :-(
Outside of web browsers and Java, things have been pretty dull for
the last couple of years. I would say that that's okay for a
maturing industry, but there are so many helpful technologies on the
backburner right now that it's just unreal.
What was it somebody said? "The popularization of the Internet
slammed modern software development back ten years." Or something
like that.
Thomas
Rumor has it that Chuck Peddle of 6502 and Commodore PET fame will be
found walking the halls of VCF 2.0.
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever onward.
September 26 & 27...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 09/12/98]
< If you have free reign and unlimited budget, what you're doing is *NOT*
< engineering.
Ah, gak another generalization. It does take out the challenge though.
< Good engineers want to ship a product that customers will actually use;
< the greatest satisfaction an engineer ever has is seeing or hearing
< customers use the product. While it is an ego boost to hear customers
!You bet! ;) I've done a few.
< praise the product, most of the best engineering goes completely unnotic
< When was the last time you drove across a bridge and thought "Wow, the
< engineers did an awesome job on this bridge."? (At most, people might t
< "Wow, this is a pretty bridge.")
What people notice is that gee it does save me 20 minutes getting there.
A few will notice it as something to look at like Golden Gate or the
Verizanio Narrows Bridge.
< Any bozo with a EE degree could have built a computer roughly comparabl
< in capabilities to the Apple II using many hundreds of chips and costin
< thousands of dollars. A good engineer could have done it with few enou
< chips to make it affordable. An excellent engineer did it with almost
< no chips, and made it not just affordable but also elegant. Ford would
< have been proud to see it.
Go back to Good, Fast, Cheap. Innovation is the product of careful
compromize.
I'm also a pilot and In aeronautical engineering given 100hp engine of
nominal weight you can make a fast bird that can't carry anything or
a very slow one that can and everything inbetween. Somethings however
are not possible despite innovations in materials.
Allison
This is from the CP/M FAQ:
Q3: Does CP/M stand for anything?
A: (Don Kirkpatrick)
There are at least three popular answers - Control Program for
Microcomputers, Control Program for Microprocessors, and Control
Program/Monitor. The issue is clouded by authors of popular CP/M
books giving different answers. According to Gary Kildall (the
author of CP/M), in response to a direct question on the PBS show
"The Computer Chronicles" following Computer Bowl I, the answer is:
Control Program for Microcomputers. This is also consistent with
DRI documentation. See, for example, p. 4 of the DRI TEX manual.
If this is true then someone is lying (perhaps even Kildall himself).
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever onward.
September 26 & 27...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 09/12/98]
>
> Keep scouring those ham fests or swap meets. Check the web for the one
> nearest you. If its too far away, convince Dad or Mom to take you by
> mowing the lawn and cleaning up your room like you're told :)
That doesn't always work. luckily, there's one every year pretty nearby.
That's where I got my Tandy 1000 with 4 LPT ports (I don't know how they
all work, but they do, and I'm not gonna touch 'em). I was planning on
using it as the controller, and hooking up printer guts and making it work
by sending line feeds and spaces, and things like through BASIC.
--
-Jason
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#-1730318
I don't have a variac or anything and don't have the time or money to get
one, but I need to bring up an IMSAI power supply that probably hasn't
been powered in over a decade perhaps. What can I do to warm up the caps
and transformer before bringing it fully online? Anything?
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever onward.
September 26 & 27...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 09/12/98]
As you yourself said, the C128 logic board requires 9vac. But why
is this cheap one harmful for electronics?
>>
>>
>> I looked in Radio Shack, at some step-down transformers for
'traveling
>> abroad'. There is a price range, with some 'for heating appliances
>> only' (the cheapest) and the higher priced ones allow motors, and
>> the $34 ones allow electronic devices. What is the difference among
>> these units? Also, could a transformer such as in these theoretically
>> be reversed and used for step-up purposes?
>
>The very cheap one ('for heating appliances only') is probably a triac
>circuit. Like a lamp dimmer fixed at half-brightness. And that one
can't
>step up, of course. Don't use that for anything but heaters/lamps. I've
>seen the result of plugging a Mac+ into one of those, and it wasn't
>pretty. It took me a long time to rebuild the analgoue board. If the
>owner had asked me what to do in the first place, I'd have simply cut
the
>link...
>
>The true transformers can be used as a step-up unit. But owing to
losses,
>etc, you may not get the output voltage that you expect (it will, in
>general, be lower than you'd expect). But it should work.
>
>You may find it's cheaper to buy a bare transformer and add the
>case/connectors yourself.
>
>BTW, another trick which I hesitate to mention because it can casue
>damage is the following. If you _know_ it's a switch-mode PSU, and that
>the first thing it does is rectify the mains, and there's no
>line-frequency transformer to provide a startup voltage, then it'll run
>on DC, right. So give it DC at peak voltage of the 220V mains it's
>expecting - i.e. at twice the peak voltage of the local mains. Make an
>external voltage doubler to do this.
>
>I don't want to give more details, because IMHO if you can't work it
>out from that, then you probably shouldn't be doing it. Even if you do
>know what to do, examine the PSU carefully to make sure there's
_nothing_
>that depends on an AC input.
>
>-tony
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>A note in defence of the much maligned Altair while on this subject...
>May I point out the the Altair 'B' series machines were one of the first to
>provide a main transformer with a multi-tap primary to allow for adjusting
>for varying loads and local AC supply.
And by this point in time ferroresonant transformers were also being
dropped in by folks who weren't happy with the original supply, either.
Having used a large variety of S-100 boxes, far and away my favorite
power supplies are ones with ferroresonant transformers.
Tim.
I've heard that you shouldn't use high density disks in double
density drives, that the data wouldn't be reliable. Well, I just
bought a bunch of double density 3.5" disks to use with my Apple
//gs and I got to thinking about this. Is it because of the drive or
the controller? I would think it was the drive, if so, I have the Apple
SuperDrive which can read/write high density disks except I don't
have the SuperDrive controller for the //gs. Thus I'm stuck with the
800k format. Could I still use high density disks in this drive
without problems?
Thanks.
-----
David Williams - Computer Packrat
dlw(a)trailingedge.com
http://www.trailingedge.com
< One of the goals of the Apple I was to create a low cost machine.
<
< Basically I just wanted to give an apple example that not all engineers
< all of the time, want to built the biggest, and most expensive things.
< That is a bad generalization.
It indeed is a bad generalization. As an engiener myself I found it
annoying but let it pass.
Actually the rules are simple. Good, Fast, Cheap... Pick any two.
Enginering is about compromize, tradeoff and innovation. For a given
product there are often many ways to implement but more often than not
considerations at higher levels may dictate which are the best ways to
go. They are not always bad either. If your corperate strategy is
fault tolerence the hardware is likely not have extra bits, redundancy
and other things needed to make that happen. That can and is more costly.
On the other hand if you making really low cost means something else takes
precedent.
Some thins are a surprize to the uninitiated. For example fewer chips
fewer interconnections and connectors often means lower cost and to most
people surprize higher realiability. So the idea of Good, Fast and Cheap
is not as obvious as first stated.
Allison