I also play and collect board wargames, and for those a major trading
center is rec.games.board.marketplace, although eBay is important too.
In non-eBay auctions, it's common to use a going, going, gone format,
with each step occuring after a couple of _days_ of no bids. That
seems a much more reasonable way to make sure that everybody who wants
to be heard from has the chance. I do like eBay's system of paying
just over the second highest bid, as it lets you bid once and then
wait until the end.
--Dav
david_a._vandenbroucke(a)hud.gov
Aw, that guy on the single board computers was slow... he bid a whole 11
seconds before the end! Yesterday, I had somebody come in 6 seconds before
the end (luckily he didn't outbid, but he cost me money, dammit).
We have a saying here in America... "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em". Now,
I never enter a bid until the last possible moment.
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Franke [mailto:franke@sbs.de]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 1998 10:32 AM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: ePay
Sigh.
I hate it.
Sniped just seconds before the end.
They should realy change their policy about
ending time - these (automatic) snipers are
realy not the way it should be.
Waaaaaaaaah.
Gruss
H.
sorry to use the list, but I had to cry ...
I was happy until 5 minutes ago ...
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
In the catagory of: "it must get worse before it gets better"
Starting Saturday (perhaps earlier, but the first that I noticed) eBay has
been running radio spots on the national syndicate program feeds.
As if there are not already enough (far too many) people out there with
excessive $$ to throw around...
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
Semi-on-topic forward...
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hagle [mailto:jhagle@netsync.net]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 1998 9:43 PM
To: heathkit(a)qth.net
Subject: [HeathKit] HERO Robots for sale
Hi all. I have eight of the robots and an assortment of parts. Some manuals.
In fact, at this point I am not sure of what I actually do have.
If there is sufficient genuine interest in someone purchasing it all, I will
inventory the collection and forward the info so we can negotiate a price
that is mutually fair.
Reason for sale is that I have insufficient time to do the needed work and
programming etc. The joys and perils of being self employed, I guess.
Date: 10/23/98
Time: 9:43:17 PM
John R. Hagle N2JH ex - AA2GV and WA2SXH
6534 Klondyke Road
Ripley, New York 14775 phone: (716) 736-2932
grid - FN02dg Western New York 6 meters thru 1296
---
Submissions heathkit(a)qth.net
> P.S. IMO history shows that British computer designs are often MUCH more
> sensible than their American contemporaries. They treat the computer as a
> tool to be used rather than a hunk of hardware with software slapped on later.
> Too bad history shows that British computer *sales* are LESS successful than
> their American counterparts.
Thats not only about the Brits. When it's up for sales, the
Americans are just numer 1 (maybe they had just absorbed to
many magrebinian shopkeppers/merchants :)
I heared a nice quote some time ago:
When it comes for a new product, on should place
development in Europe, production in Japan and
sales in the US.
Not so wrong at all
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
] From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)ncal.verio.com>
]
] SO how long is it before some really enthusiastic hacker creates a 3D
] emulator using a graphics engine like that in DOOM, that allows you to pop
] ...
And how long before the machine on which that emulator runs is no
longer supported by its manufacturer, and starts breaking down?
Well, I suppose by then, state-of-the-art systems will be able
to emulate *that* thing faster than the original.
Prediction: 100 years from now, pick any random business, and
dig into their computer system. You will find that at least
some of their software is "legacy code" running under an emulator
for some long-forgotten machine. And if you dig further, you
will find that at least one such emulator is itself being emulated.
Don't be too surprised if the legacy app is IBM 360 code running
under an emulator written for a Wintel x86 box, and the x86 box
is being emulated by... maybe a Java (non-virtual) machine?
Cheerful thought for the day: someday the Wintel x86 platform
will be long-forgotten. :-)
My $0.02, the original hardware pushes all of my motivation
buttons harder than an emulator could. Nostalgia, Revenge,
Education, Preservationism, Usability, Money; only usability
*might* be completely satisfied by an emulator. Of course,
the emulator pushes those buttons harder than a complete
void would.
In an odd way, an emulator could hit the Money button better
than the original hardware: although it doesn't have higher
resale value, it should be cheaper to obtain. But this was
about which you'd rather have, not which you were more likely
to succeed in getting, right? So maybe the real thing wins
on the Money button as well.
Hmm. It seems the emulator would push the motivation buttons
for when NOT to collect, better than the real hardware would:
Cost, Space, Noise, Breakdowns (for us software geeks, those
are not exactly fun), Transportation, and Spousal discord;
all the things associated with having physical STUFF.
Bill.
>> What the heck are you compiling that requires over 500M of RAM during the
>> compilation step? Netscape? I can't even conceive of something that
>>large.
well we had a Java application that ran to 1.5 million lines of code
(OK, the definition of a 'line of code' is somewhat flexible, but you
get my point), and that would chew up somewhere around 500MB in order to
build (this was about 16 months ago; my memory's hazy on the exact
amount).
luckily only about 30,000 lines of that were hand-written, we built a
code generator to do the rest :)
cheers
Jules
I found that out. I was talking to the comp.tech guy at my school last
week about getting a copy. He told me he'd be able to get me the new
version for $50.
Shows just how full of bull @#$% he is.
Although he's the same guy that gave me a Tandy 1000TL because the "hard
drive was shot". The power cable wasn't connected to it <g>
--
-Jason
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#-1730318
----------
> From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)ncal.verio.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: TRS-80 emulators
> Date: Thursday, October 22, 1998 9:14 PM
>
> On Thu, 22 Oct 1998, Jason Willgruber wrote:
>
> > Actually, Tim Mann's TRS-80 page is where I got the disk images. I was
> > going to get xtrs, but I don't have Linux (nor do I have the money to
get
> > it). I have an emulator that'll run in DOS, but won't recognise the
file
>
> Linux? Money? Heheheh. What stone have you've been hiding under
junior?
>
> LINUX IS FREEE, MAN!
>
> Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
> Ever onward.
>
> Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 09/21/98]
>
> Speaking of A-F keys, does anyone here use any of the alternative
> keyboards available for PC XTs and ATs? I'm curious if anyone has
> ever seen the IrmaKey/3270 (IIRC) keyboards. They must have something
> like 130 keys, but I have no idea how to program the macro keys.
> Anyone know?
I never saw a special keyboard for Irma. The IBM 3270-PC had a special
cable with 3 connectors. One for the 3270 card, one for the keyboard port
on the motherboard and one for the keyboard itself. The 3270 card trapped
most of the extra keys.
ISTR that Autocad had extra keypads and things that you could get for use
alongside the PC keyboard, but I have no idea how they worked. Extra port
I imagine.
Philip.