So, what's the best short name for the pair of machines, the PDP-11/05 and
PDP-11/10 (which differ only in the nameplate)?
I have generally been calling them the '11/05's, since that's what's on many
of the extant drawings, manuals, etc - and DEC seems to prefer the '05' in
manual ID's, even when the title references both - e.g. DEC-11-H05SS-B-D is
the "PDP-11/05-S, PDP-11/10-S system manual", with the /05 mentioned first.
However, for the 11/35 and 11/40, which we seem to normally call the 11/40
(again, following DEC's lead - EK-11040-TM-002 is the "PDP-11/40, -11/35
system manual", with the /40 mentioned first), the /40 is the end user
machine.
With the /05 being the OEM machine, and the /10 end user one, we (and DEC)
seem to have picked the OEM variant in one as the 'canonical' model, and in
the other, the end-user variant.
Maybe this isn't an issue/problem, but I noticed it, and thought I'd see what
(if anything :-) others thought.
Noel
Just started working on mine - been a back-burnered project for a long
time. Unfortunately all the cables were cut when it was dismantled; I
was lucky to grab just the CPU.
Got it powered up ok - no drama there. I faked cables to the port on
the WCS which drives the console and hooked up my trust VT220 at 2400
baud. Nada. No self-test prompt; no ROM> prompt.
Maybe I've messed up the faked console cable; I'll check - already
tried obvious things like making sure Rx & Tx were crossed (it's a
three wire cable according to the schematics - Rx Tx Gnd; no flow
control). But I'd like to know more about the assorted LEDs on the CPU
boards; maybe there's a clue there if it's not getting far enough into
the self-test to display console output. There's a fair few LEDs on
the M8391. But the doc I've looked through on Bitsavers doesn't seem
to document their meanings and interpretations. Can anyone help on
that point?
Hopefully this link works:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10208521465663997&l=867897c786
Thanks
Mike
http://www.corestore.org
'No greater love hath a man than he lay down his life for his brother.
Not for millions, not for glory, not for fame.
For one person, in the dark, where no one will ever know or see.'
Hello list,
I've had this HP logic state analyzer for many years now, but never found actual use for it and thus never used it. So I decided that a new home would be more suitable for it. The analyzer comes with the option to debug and analyze 8080 microporcessors. Probes are provided, but no manual. However, there is a small command overview on the front of the keyboard.
The system completes the selftest and I did let it run for two hours yesterday. No more tests done, but if anybody wants me to do a specific test, then I can do it, provided you explain to me what to do.
Pictures are under
http://www.digitalheritage.de/other/hp_1611a/
Make me an offer via private reply. Pick-up in Bonn (Germany) or international shipping possible. However, keep in mind that the system weights 13kg (29 lbs), so shipping is not going to be cheap.
Cheers,
Pierre
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pierre's collection of classic computers moved to: http://www.digitalheritage.de
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Mark J. Blair <nf6x at nf6x.net> wrote:
> When I was debugging the connection between my VAX and tu58em on my Mac, I ended up buying an old serial protocol analyzer. Notably, I specifically avoided one with the same type of tape drive; I got one with a nice, reliable 3.5" floppy drive! ;)
HP 4952? I have two with tapes from the old days (they contain a
formatter, and we did wipe some scratch tapes for storage of our
analyzer programs, including a PU Type 2 BIND simulator that filled
the program memory, but it worked well enough for us to debug SNA BIND
sequences in the absence of a real PU Type 4).
-ethan
> From: Evan Koblentz
Now I'm triply bummed that he was sick, and didn't manage to make it to the
last VCF East.
He was one of the giants - somewhat unsung, but a giant. RIP.
Noel
We will be up for getting one to round out the HP display here
When I was in the biz they were out there but we did not sell any parts
for them,
I remember some developer friends complaining that the A version of
RTE version of the os did not have SESSION
Let us know if you have one folks even a dead one as it is a physical
display only situation
*(However if a complete setup running was to be had....that might be
fin too!)
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
The PDP-11 at the RICM says "dec pdp 11" on the system configuration paper
label on the back, and "M11 15" and "4720" on the metal tag. Unfortunately
it has an OEM front panel.
--
Michael Thompson
Would anyone out there happen to know the whereabouts of one or more
specific videos that were hosted on the Microsoft research web site maybe
10-15 years ago, starring James Gosling, where he talked about NeWS
(Network extensible Window System)?
I may even be able to dig up the URL for the video(s) when I get home, but
it's been dead for a long time now.
--
Eric Christopherson