Hi guys,
The parts for my soldering iron finally arrived this morning, thus I
spent the day playing with solder paste and SMD stencils. I've got one
working DiscFerret built on a 0J28 board, using the same 2C8 FPGA and
Cypress RAM chip I used on the previous two prototypes.
The key difference here is that this unit is RoHS-compliant, built
entirely with lead-free parts, and was assembled using a modified Argos
mini-oven. The extent of the modifications? I installed an eCAL E6C PID
controller and a Crydom EZ480F18 solid state relay. After a few hours
spent reading the "concise operator's manual" for the PID controller, I
finally got the Kester Pb-free and SnPb profiles loaded, and the thing
is as happy as a pig in muck! (Oh, it turns out Multicore RA15 and 318LF
work fine with the Kester profiles... for anyone who cares).
Here's the Hardware Overview I've just written:
http://www.discferret.com/hardware/
And, for the impatient, here's the 1280x712 photo of the very first
DiscFerret:
http://www.discferret.com/hardware/discferret_pcb.jpg
This board has been allocated the serial number "GB0K1801", which
decodes as:
GB: "Great Britain", i.e. "Made in England," of course :)
0: 0 years after 2010
K: 11th month, i.e. November
18: 18th day of the month
01: First unit built on that day
The plan is to clear out my stocks of 2C8 FPGAs, which should (in
theory!) leave me with six saleable units in total, based on the stock
of parts I have available.
Tomorrow should be fun. It took me four hours to make this one board. If
I can scrape together enough table space, I should be able to
paste-and-place three or four boards at the same time, then oven-bake
them in turn (which takes 5-10 minutes a piece). The fun part is, as
always, clearing up all the solder bridges :(
--
Phil.
classiccmp at philpem.me.uk
http://www.philpem.me.uk/
I'm in the process of restoring a Motorola MEK-6800-D2 evaluation kit.
The kit was adapted and has its RAM on a separate board through an
EXORciser backplane.
After putting everything together and verifying that all looks good,
I've applied +5V from an ATX power supply. The '-' prompt appeared, the
JBUG monitor program is working and I even dumped the ROM and some
EPROMs over the cassette port and decoded them on a PC :)
So far so good, but to do anything cool I need the RAM board going. The
problem is that this (custom wire-wrapped board) is using 16 MCM4116
chips. They need also -5V and +12V. Ok, these are available on the ATX
power supply but I'm affraid of doing anything stupid that might blow up
something.
What would you check before applying these additional power levels ?
I've been verifying a bit with an ohm meter that the -5V and +12V leads
are not by accident connected to anything they shouldn't but not sure if
that's a good way.
I also read in the datasheet that you need to apply -5V before the
others and removing it after the others. How would you do that ? I was
thinking on having the -5V and GND permanently connected. So after
switching on the power supply it will have -5V right away. Then manually
connect a additional cable having GND, +5V and +12V. On power off do
the reverse. Is that a good idea ? Not very handy but if it works I'll
live with it.
Thanks for any advice,
Wim.
--
hackbox dot be slash museum
> They had non-multiplexed addresses I think. Later DRAMs had multiplexed
> address inputs. of course. Was there a good reason for this other than to
> save package pins?
I wouldn't call it a necessity but the RAS/CAS/refresh coordination
works out very nicely when address inputs are multiplexed in this way.
So much so that I can't think of a DRAM since the 4116 that hasn't used this
scheme.
SRAM's almost always have the concepts of "row" and "column" select
internally but rarely is it obvious from the outside.
Tim.
Totally off-topic .... it's 3:20am EST here and I need to test something
on my new headset .... anyone awake so I have someone to call for the
test? (Please reply off-list. evan at snarc.net)
Thanks.
Folks,
Before I send a DEC R400X expansion box to the recyclers does anyone
want the RF31s contained within? There's 5 plus a single DSSI variant
of the RZ26. All are in the later pluggable backplane type enclosure
and I need to know by next tues (23rd). Shipping isn't a problem as
long as you pay for it :)
Cheers
--
adrian/witchy
Owner of Binary Dinosaurs, the UK's biggest home computer collection?
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk
Tony writes:
> Tim writes:
>> Having worked with 1103's I would argue that by modern standards
>> Even the "cream of the crop" were little above floor sweepings.
> Was it that a lot of new 1103s were DOA, oe what there a problem with
> them fialing in use, or what?
> The reason I ask is that I have several old HP calculators full of 1103s,
> and AFAIK all are original (and gettign on for 40 years old). So far,
> otuch wood, I've not had any problems with the RAM in these machines.
How many hundreds of 1103's are in each HP calculator? :-)
In the early minicomputer 1103-based memories (say 16Kbytes, so
128 1103 chips) it was, um, optimistic to expect a lot of stability.
In the bigger "supermini" systems (say 128 Kbytes, so over a
thousand 1103 chips) ECC was a necessity and continual scrubbing
helped a lot with stability - but that was a lot of work and power
consumption just to brag that you had semiconductor memory,
and the advantages over core were not all that obvious.
I'd expect that smaller systems probably didn't have ECC or scrubbing
but also didn't have high expected uptime. Were 1103's in the HP 9830?
I had a couple but they usually worked fine enough that I never had
to go rummaging through the insides.
My feeling is that in the 1103 era (which preceded my direct
involvement but I inherited several 1103-based systems), DRAM chips
were not quite ready for prime time. By the time the 4116 came
along things had settled down and a lot had been learned from
the 1103 and DRAM really was ready for prime time.
Tim.
Hi,
I don't know if this tread is still valid, but I have such a mouse with
a blue cover and white buttons. The mouse was especially made in this
color combination for our long gone firm. It's a quadrature mouse but I
have a special developed serial interface card for it too. It served to
couple the mouse to a Digital PRO350/380 (personal PDP11) computer.
Regards,
Hugo
My request was apparently a little hazy.
The machine I refer to is a Packard-Bell 486SX running DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.1
By "legacy machine" I meant a machine that was "slightly behind the times". 8D
Thanks,
Kurt