test-drb

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

101090 discussions

Start a nNew thread

'Home' computer: Definition

by manney＠nwohio.com

Is VAXen the plural of VAX ? Why?

28 years, 5 months

ROM Archive

by rcini＠msn.com

Sam and William: Here's what I think so far (which isn't much <g>): 1. Record format: open (depending on software for EPROM programmer); S-records, Intel Hex, binary. 2. Submission & storage: UUEncoded image file e-mailed to "repository"; ROM/EPROM chips sent by snail mail and returned. All submissions should have as much info about the source computer as possible (board revisions, date of mnaufacture, etc.) 3. Requests & withdrawls: by e-mail to those with programmers; by mail for those supplying their own chips; e-mail request with no chip sent. 4. Cost: nominal (cost of postage and EPROM). How does this sound so far?? ------------------------ Rich Cini/WUGNET - ClubWin Charter Member (6) - MCPS Windows 95/Networking ------------------------------ What format would these images be? S-records? William Donzelli william(a)ans.net ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 10:40:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)crl.com> To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu Subject: Re: Computer Documentation Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970625103943.740O-100000(a)crl2.crl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, Richard A. Cini, Jr. wrote: > As far as ROMs are concerned, maybe we can start a "ROM Archive" > database/repository. Members with EPROM programmers could make copies of > known-good ROMS from various machines at the request of other members. Good idea. I think someone's thrown this out before. Anyone want to volunteer to coordinate? > As far as Copyright concerns, I don't think that there are any. First, many > of our target companies are out of business. Second, we are not selling these > chips (and the software contained therein) in a commercial sense. Third, > they're being used as a one-for-one replacement for defective firmware. I view > it like a diskette: I own Norton Utilities with a bad disk 1. My friend also > owns Norton Utilities, and he makes me a copy of his disk 1. Both of us have > valid software licenses because we both bought the program. It's like > preservation of matter. Let's put it this way: if you don't tell anyone, I won't. Sam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer, Jackass

28 years, 5 months

'Home' computer: Definition

by allisonp＠world.std.com

> Of course you could go to work on a Ferrari BUT would you? (and is a > Ferrari a "goto work car"?) If work is a race car driver, it might be. ;-) Assuming it's not outclassed. Allison

28 years, 5 months

DOS 2.11 software (fwd)

by manney＠nwohio.com

I can help...I have lotsa "old" games (MDA/MGA/CGA) -- mostly shareware. Please tell him to contact me. ---------- > From: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu > To: Manney > Subject: DOS 2.11 software (fwd) > Date: Saturday, June 28, 1997 1:59 PM > > > > OK guys, here is a request I got, maybe someone can help this poor guy! > Thanks, > > Les > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Sat, 28 Jun 1997 08:26:19 -0400 (EDT) > From: KenpoKidJB(a)aol.com > To: more(a)camlaw.Rutgers.EDU > Subject: software > > hey, i went to your web site, but didn't find what i wanted. i'm looking for > dos 2.11 programs that will run off of a 3.5" floppy. most specifically, i'm > especially looking for games. any kind will do, but even more specifically, > i'm looking for text driven adventure games, as my kaypro 2000 LCD screen > doesn't do very well with graphics!! so, let me know what you can do for > me.. i really appreciate it. > Jeremiah >

28 years, 5 months

Plus/4 Cartridges

by foxnhare＠goldrush.com

RE From: Jeff Hellige <jeffh(a)unix.aardvarkol.com> Subject: C= 16 & Plus/4 cartridges > For the first time since I actively started collecting old systems and > the software and peripherals, I finally came across some program > cartridges for the C-16 & Plus/4 today. They came from a guy who does a >flea market each weekend and who keeps an eye out for 8bit stuff, and he >picked them up with me in mind. They are 'Strange Odyssey' and 'Jack >Attack'. Anyway, my question is, since these are the only ones I've >ever run across, other than the cartridge that shipped with the C-16, >were there many made for these machines? > Jeff jeffh(a)unix.aardvarkol.com Sounds like two from a set an electronics secods outlet was selling... The set had 8 carts, Jack Attack, Strange Oddesy, Plus Calc, Plus Script (plus/4 verions of easycalc and easyscript), and some others I can't remember or locate, total of 8 carts. I think that might have been the bulk of the U.S. release for the Plus/4. Of course in europe the Plus/4 went many years of popularity with many companies supplying games (just check the net you will find lots if information, though many of the games are PAL mode, *sigh*) Larry Anderson -- -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- Visit our web page at: http://www.goldrush.com/~foxnhare Call our BBS (Silicon Realms BBS 300-2400 baud) at: (209) 754-1363 -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-

28 years, 5 months

'Home' computer: Definition

by allisonp＠world.std.com

> For the sake of discussion in this list, and computer hobbyists in > general, I would like the world to know that I define 'home computer' as > any machine that you can: > > * Comfortably fit through your door... > * Doesn't test the load limits of your target floor... > * Power and run without tripping your main breaker... > * (most importantly) Have fun restoring and working with... in your > home Great loved it! What I'd pointed out before is many of the PDP-11s were in the same space and competing for the same percieved market as the PC. While some -11s were large like the 11/70 with RP06/7 disks and wanting a cooled computer room. most were at must one rack and a disk systems that were more modest in size. The systems I refered to as desktop were: LSI-11/03 (floppy based in short rack 28" tall) PDP-11/23+ (in 40" tall rack with RL02 removeable disk and floppy) PDT-11/130 (slow tape but it was only vt100 sized!) PDT-11/150 (Late 70s early 80s) not large at all. (also called breadbox) PRO350 and later 380 Microvax I/II (ba23 pedestal) VS2000 (box slightly larger than DECMATEIII) VS3100 (aka pizza box) These happen to be DEC systems but IBM, HP, DG were all out there too with desktop sized or desk side minies in disgusise. All very collectable and also useable! Allison

28 years, 5 months

PROMS

by kyrrin＠wizards.net

Tim Shoppa wrote... Date: Sat, 28 Jun 1997 06:26:54 -0800 (PDT) From: Tim Shoppa <shoppa(a)alph02.triumf.ca> To: classiccmp(a)u.WASHINGTON.EDU Subject: Re: Archiving & other news Message-ID: <9706281326.AA21254(a)alph02.triumf.ca> Content-Type: text >Does this include 1702A's and 2704's? Checking my wall chart, it doesn't look like it right away. However, I will check with Data I/O's web site (they have an online device support lookup). -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272) (Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)wizards.net) http://www.wizards.net/technoid "Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."

28 years, 5 months

USING classic machines

by cerebral＠michianatoday.com

At 08:59 AM 6/27/97 BST, you wrote: >> I do use my old machines now and then, but if anyone here has never ran a >> modern MAC or PC, they have NO idea what is bieng missed. web pages in full >> photo quality color, realistic games, PPP connections, Realaudio etc. I am > >I have used 'modern' PC's (well, at least pentiums with 16 MBytes RAM, >SVGA card, etc), and I know I'm not missing _anything_ by sticking to >classic computers. Let's go through your points. > What I mean is that we must realize that there is only so much you can do with classic computers. after all, if they were the best than why we have faster and better? >'Web pages in full photo quality colour'. Well, I access the web to get >information, not look at pretty pictures. Most of the information I want >is _text_, or at least monochrome graphics (things like IC data sheets). >So I don't need 'photo quality colour'. And if I did, I could easily find well at the moment you dont need it, but its nice to know that you can see it when you need it. >a classic system that could display them. Evans and Sutherland, Grinnell, >Ramtek, I2S, PPL, etc all made high-res colour displays that make most >PC's look like toys. And you can pick one up second-hand for less than an >SVGA card + monitor. SVGA a toy? I used many an apple ][ + and C=64 with 80 col RGB monitors, and I can take only so much eyestrain. sharp graphics make your eyes feel good... also I would like to clarify somthing. I am not a billy gates follower. I despise his efforts and his software. and winsucks 95 is a laugh!!<G> but the issue is machines, and if you run Linux, as I do, that pentium will spring to life! so the PC is not the greatest machine, but if you run software that was properly written, (i.e. not from microsuck) you get fantastic results, that is why I like my commodore 64, it can do alot on 1 MHZ. >'Realistic games'. I don't play many games, but I'll agree that modern >games running on modern hardware do _look_ a lot more realistic than the >text+block graphics we had on home computers 15 years ago. The problem is >that IMHO (and YMMV) the old games are just more fun to play. That's a >personal judgement, though. I have an Atari 2600, and the best racing game is from Acivision called Enduro. >'PPP connections' Oh come on. I've run a PPP client on an _XT_. No problem >at all. I'll happily believe they're available for other old machines as >well. well we all believe, but sadly, this does not always work that way. I have an XT too, and yes you can load a packet driver, but then 640K is not big enough except to run telnet or ftp from. I use my XT as a file server... >'Realaudio' I assume that's some audio standard for modern machines. But Realaudio is a standard, but it is an INTERNET standard for sending LIVE SOUND from any web server. it has many uses, and the fun part of it is that I live in Indiana, and when I lived in St Petersburg FL, there was a good radio station there that I loved, and through Realaudio I can now listen to it here. and this is not just for PC's, it runs on MACs, UNIX Linux, and most Sun machines. >we had good quality audio on PDP11's (thanks to a little board from 3RCC) >in 1976. It's not exactly hard to add a DAC and a DMA engine or even a DSP >to a lot of classic computers (and classic computer != cheap home micro so >there's easily enough RAM space for a reasonable length sample). to me, a PDP11 is WORLDS apart from classic HOME computers, If I had the fortune of actually owing a PDP11, I would use it extensively..... :) also about enough ram space...NOT! I have some software for the C=64 that plays back digital sound files. with the stock 64K of ram, I can hold a 6 second clip. with the 1764 ram expansion with 512K of ram, I can hold a 60 second clip, but no longer than that. >What I'd be missing by going to a modern machine would be : >Documentation. Since I don't just run prepackaged software and plug in >prebuilt hardware, I need good technical manuals. They just don't exist I programmed in BASIC, and that is fun, and I tried 6502 assembler, and almost had a working interrupt handler going, but my brain fried, the opcodes are easy, but remembering memory addresses when deprived of caffeine is hard! the interrupt handler was for a terminal program that I was writing that utilized a 6551 UART in a commodore 64. I love hacking old hardware! and it also had interupt driven multitasking, as in this terminal, you can use the modem and play .sid music files at the same time! that was fun!! now I program in C, and if you do it right, you can make any machine dance to your beat. >for most modern machines >Repairability. I can fix classic computers with no problem at all. Just I have never had any hardware failures in ANY of my machines so far (knock on silicon), with the exception that I accidentally cooked a 6526. >try getting a custom chip for a PC motherboard. And don't tell me to >replace the motherboard - if the PC is a few years old I'd probably have >to replace the CPU and memory as well. that is just the ticket. A brand new 486 motherboard cost $90. with it you get real functionality. I know some who will pay twice that for a doorstop... actually, you can get a decent modern PC together just by scrounging computer shows and bargaining for parts. assembling a system from scratch with old parts is very fun and rewarding. and the reliablity rate for modern chips is very high. in fact the monitor or hard disk probably will die before the motherboard will. also I am speaking of those who NEVER touched anything new, and passing judgment. if you tried the new stuff, and hate it, that is fine, but I can't stand those who never tried it then saying it sux.

28 years, 5 months

A little guidance - TI Xenix

by chemif＠mbox.queen.it

At 23:55 28/06/97 -0500, you wrote: > >WAHOO! I am in as Root! And I ain't gonna tell you what it was! > >Now, anyone know what the Streaming Tape Drive device is called? >I can boot with this (an old Adaptec SCSI board) installed. I have the TI 1300, and the device was called /dev/rct0 you should have the "help" command available, try also with ? and the topic. >I also have 2 CB811 cards but only one seems to come up with a light, >the other one just flashes? > *** CB811 -- (C) Copyright 1986 Computone Systems, Inc. > (C) Copyright 1987, 1988 Texas Instruments Inc. > >I can not boot with either or both of these installed. I haven't tried >real hard, maybe the console port changes with these in. But I also don't >hear all the beeps if these are in. I guess you are using built-in vga card and keyboard connected directly in the machine, instead of using "tty0a" port of the CB811 with a vt 100 as console. This, usually, make the difference. >Here's my last bootup record >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Sat Jun 28 23:11:07 > *** CB811 -- (C) Copyright 1986 Computone Systems, Inc. > (C) Copyright 1987, 1988 Texas Instruments Inc. > >Can't find any CB811 boards >Texas Instruments print screen v1.01 >SPA initialization complete >Streaming cartridge tape v2.00[A] (int=3,dma=3,base=00000220) >Irootdev 1/40, pipedev 1/40, swapdev 1/41 >JKL0L1L2L3disk[W] drive 0: cyls = 918, heads = 15, secs = 17 >nswap = 5610, swplo = 0, Hz = 50 >L4maximum user process size = 8655k >L5MNOPmem: total = 8064k, reserved = 4k, kernel = 1088k, user = 6 >Sat Jun 28 23:11:08 >972k >kernel: drivers = 4k, 0 screens = 0k, 600 i/o bufs = 600k, msg bufs = 8k >QRSTUVWXYZdisk[W] drive 1: cyls = 918, heads = 15, secs = 17 >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >I have looked and can not find any docs on the CB811's or the Tape Drive >8-( 8-( 8-( > >Anybody know anything about either of these????? I will try to ask my old TEXAS suppliers and let you know Riccardo ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Riccardo Romagnoli,collector of:CLASSIC COMPUTERS,TELETYPE UNITS,PHONE AND PHONECARDS I-47100 Forli'/Emilia-Romagna/Food Valley/ITALY Pager:DTMF PHONES=+39/16888(hear msg.and BEEP then 5130274*YOUR TEL.No.* where*=asterisk key | help visit http://www.tim.it/tldrin_eg/tlde03.html

28 years, 5 months

Error Condition Re: Re: 'Home' computer: Definition

by jpero＠mail.cgo.wave.ca

Subject: Home computer: Definition My opinions and to disgress; "Home Computer" term is invented by corporations to supposely help define their markets and totally miss it all the time because users needs is usually higher than their corporates' computers by factor of 1.5 to 2. At same time tries to pull off a coup on "home" users by selling stripped down with loads of cut corners and oft-nonstandard parts machine at horrible prices. Case in point: PCjr. PCjr and orignal 2 piece PS/1 (sold at 1000 bux cdn but you get no HD in it, introduced 1990's but users right away dumped them by pallets barely 2 years after. Yuk!) Side note: I traded few things to get this PS/1 2011 and used it for a while but sold it cheaply to a user who have modest needs than I. (for me, I can't manage well without hard drive attached even all the down to XT but not for apple II's their floppy drive is very fast enough to forgo hd, very impressed but at that time too expensive for my taste but now they are so cheap now.) So there was a bad taste to this name "home computers" in general. Similar types of computers did well in many areas but happened to lack important areas that killed it. Ironically, better to build DIY similar capablies 386, 80mb, 1mb, desktop/mono vga and still easily interchangable than that darned PS/1 2011 models. When I read about many machines and few "home computers" as called toys but I was mistaken when I saw and heard that "toy", boy, they're mistaken and I was taken too for a while! Indeed they were used for anything within their capablies so I accept anything that has CPU in it at same time useful and expandable should be decent computers, no more or less. :) C64, PET's, apples and such has just right stuff to keep users happy. In closing, corporations always underestimate "home" users. But now they are not pushing this word and crippled machines anymore, now selling them in general to any users execpt for corporations who needs turnkey system just to do very specific jobs like weak machine strictly for WP use, alphas for servers and heavy graphics, fast processor for programming but that is getting blurred that most users can afford them and can put them in their homes. Ok, now I could respond to yours... :) > I've seen a couple of posts in here that declare, in very firm terms > indeed, that machines like the MicroVAX and PDP's are not "home" computers. Suppose, Digital did not cared a whit and cut prices on that and we would be sure many would have one in home if they're small enough and easy on power requirements. Linux is there now and NT can be run on alphas but bit late and cost is fast appoaching to affordable levels where getting a pentium pro machine is not only option. > > For the sake of discussion in this list, and computer hobbyists in > general, I would like the world to know that I define 'home computer' as > any machine that you can: > > * Comfortably fit through your door... > > * Doesn't test the load limits of your target floor... > > * Power and run without tripping your main breaker... > > * (most importantly) Have fun restoring and working with... in your home! > > Which just goes to show that such terminology is so relative, there's > little point in debating it. Why waste the bandwidth over something as > trivial as a difference in wording? > > (No, I'm not trying to start a flamewar; I posted this because I'm > concerned that the current thread regarding 'home' computers may erupt into > one!) > > Caveat Emperor!

28 years, 5 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb