> From: Marc Howard
> I've got an 11/40 I'm going to start working on. Problem is that there
> are two power supplies (H742 and H7420) that came with it but neither
> was mounted in the rack.
-11/40's in general only have one of those large H742x suppplies in a rack.
The documentation and prints all show only a single one - in fact, the 11/40
power harness (which is specific to the KD11-A backplane, at the CPU end) can
only attach to one. The KB11 machines (-11/45 and /70) use two, but their
harness has provision for two.
I don't know of a DEC document that lists the difference between the H742 and
H7420, but my CHWiki page for them:
https://gunkies.org/wiki/H742_Power_Supply
gives what I think is a pretty good list; any errors or missing details would
be appreciated.
> Also how is the power cabling routed (I think I'm missing this part)?
That's going to be a hassle, replacing the main harness! Especially since
production of the 8-pin MATE-N-LOK connector shells used to interface to the
H744/etc 'bricks' - part numbers here:
https://gunkies.org/wiki/DEC_standard_modular_regulators
are out of production, although some vendors have residual stocks. Hoard them
while they last!
The "PDP-11/40, -11/35 (21 inch chassis) system manual" (EK-11040-TM-002):
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/1140/1140_SystemManual.pdf
has pretty good coverage of the harness; the back end of Chapter 6 covers it
in detail. That's a lot easier to understand than the FMPS:
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/1140/PDP-1140_System_Engr_Drawings_R…
so read that before you tackle the prints.
Note that there are two different kinds of harness, depending on whether the
machine has MM11-L (-15V) or MM11-U (+20V) core memory. Unless you're
planning on using one of those, you can probably ignore that, though.
Any questions, ask here right off; we have a lot of expertise! :-) ('My'
first -11 - as in, one I was in charge of - was a -11/40. Fond mempries!)
Noel
Marc: Do you have the 11/40-specific wiring harness? Assuming that you do it's a bit tricky -- not so much mounting a given supply (aside from the fact that they are heavy and awkward to work with even when minimally populated), but because there is a very tight tolerance between them to thread the wiring harness. I've determined the hard way that you really need to install the lower one first, then the harness, then the upper one. At least for me it wasn't practical/possible to install the harness after-the-fact. There's also a bit of work involved in threading both of the AC power cables plus the pair of power-control cables (assuming that you're using a DEC power controller) via the right-side vertical rack channel -- which also interact with the power harness placement. Once everything is cabled-in-place the result is maximally compact, but getting there is not simple. Yes, the power cable wiring isn't well-described anywhere IMO. You have to stare at the puzzle-pieces for a while and "dry fit". Harness shape/stiffness helps eyeball how to fit the pieces together, but the importance of the rack vertical side-channel in making everything fit is not, IMO, made at all clear anywhere in the various documentation -- although it can be inferred from careful examination of a few graphics in various documents. The 11/40, the 11/45-50-55, and the 11/70 share the same design in this respect so documentation for one will serve you well in any of these cases.
If you can tackle the task *before* installing the BA11 chassis you'll find it easier.
If you're not using a standard DEC rack or don't have an equivalent vertical side-channel to work with then IMO you'll need to get very creative ... and the 11/40-specifics wiring harness may not work at all and you'll need to build your own. Fortunately I didn't need to explore that path ...
Good luck!
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech <cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org> On Behalf Of Marc Howard via cctech
Sent: Saturday, December 4, 2021 10:28 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Need picture of power supply mounted in 11/40 cabinet
Hi,
I've got an 11/40 I'm going to start working on. Problem is that there are two power supplies (H742 and H7420) that came with it but neither was mounted in the rack.
Could someone post/send/etc. photos of how the power supply mounts in the rack? Also how is the power cabling routed (I think I'm missing this part)?
Thanks,
Marc Howard
Power Supplies, due to their Weight, are placed at the bottom of Racks (prevent tip overs / weight distribution).
https://avitech.com.au/?page_id=366
The PDP-11/70 Maintenance and Installation Manual (EK-11070-MM-002) explains that the basic PDP-11/70 system components are located in a double cabinet as shown in Figure 1-1 of that manual.
https://i0.wp.com/avitech.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/major-assemblie…
greg
> Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 19:28:01 -0800
> From: Marc Howard <cramcram at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Need picture of power supply mounted in 11/40 cabinet
Let me get this out before the list gets shut down _again_...
There is discussion of doing a run of indicator panel inlays:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/DECIndicatorPanels.html
for the RK11-C (which is wired for an indicator panel, although as far as
I know, DEC never did the inlay).
If you're interested... you will need a standard DEC indicator panel light
panel (with flat cables with plug-in-cards on the ends). (I don't have any
insight on how to get one of those. It shouldn't be _too_ hard to make
replicas, but I'll leave that topic for the moment.)
All I am proposing to do is create the silk-screened inlay that turns a DEC
indicator panel into an RK11-C indicator panel (starting with a functional
indicator penel without the inlay).
All DEC indicator panels use the same actual light panel and flat
cables/plug-in-cards (which have one conductor per light in the light panel);
which light comes on is set by the way the backplane slots the
cables/plug-in-cards plug into are wired.
So from the prints, which give the wiring to the indicator panel slots, I
managed to work out what an RK11-C panel would look like, roughly (captions
are made up, but the light locations are accurate):
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/RK11-C_inlay.txt
Starting with that, Dave Bridgham managed to whip up a rough approcimation of
what the inlay would look like:
http://pdp10.froghouse.org/qsic/inlay-rk11-c.pdf
We had put a certain amount of work into identifying a font which looks like
the one DEC used, back when; I worked with a member the UK to produce a bunch
of blank inlays (right size/shape, with the black paint on the back with the
holes for the lights). Dave then found someone who could print the white
lettering on the front, and this is what the result looked like, on an
'RK11-F' (the QSIC with RK emulation microcode) panel:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/QSIC/jpg/RK11F-F.jpg
You can compare with an original DEC inlay (TC08, IIRC) here:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/QSIC/jpg/DasBlinken2F.jpg
That's on the same light panel, just the inlay is changed. (The lights in the
lower one are from the light panel Dave produced for use with the QSIC; it's
totally incompatible, electrically, with the DEC originals; 4 wires, IIRC, run
the whole thing (data, clock, latch and a ground), as opposed to the 'wire per
light' of the DEC originals. Looks _just_ like the originals (which Tech Sq
used to have a lot of, BITD), though.
Anyway, if anyone is interested, the next step would be to find out who all
wants an RK11-C inlay, and work out _exactly_ what would be printed on it.
Noel
>
>
> From: Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com>
> Subject: Source for DEC TC01 (and similar) bulbs?
>
> The Search Scope loop diagnostic shows block numbers going by in both
> directions so a lot of the drive and controller are working, but there's
> some glitchiness in bits 2, 5, 8, and 11 of the data so I need to trace
> that down; I hope it's not the tape head.
>
> - Josh
>
So what do bits 2, 5, 8, & 11 have in common? All bits come from the same
track on the tape head, and share some of the path to the Data Buffer.
If you wrote this tape on this system, I would try reading a tape that was
written on another machine to make sure that the problem didn't originate
with writing.
Check for a bad connection where the tape head cable connects to the G851
module in the TU55, where the G851 plugs into the TU55 backplane, and where
the data cable plugs into the TU55 backplane, and possibly the K2 relay on
the G851.
In the TC01 you could swap the G888 module in slot C22, the S205 module in
slot D05, the S205 module in slot E06, the S603 module in slot C02, or the
R123 module in slot E08, with another one to see if the glitch moves to
another bit.
--
Michael Thompson
I remember seeing this somewhere. I have done a fair amount of googling
with no luck.
I'm looking for a hand tool with a plyer like grip at the top of a shaft.
At the bottom of the
shaft there is a "foot" that, when you squeeze the grip, scissors open. The
idea being
that you slide the foot down between a daughter card and the motherboard it
is stuck in
and when you squeeze the grip, it lifts the card out of the slot. Anybody
know what this
tool is called and/or where to get one?
Thanks,
Bill S.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 9:42 AM David Bridgham via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> The inlays are mostly not done with any tools I have. I do the graphics
> with Inkscape. Rod made up the blanks with silk screening. Then I have
> the white printing done at a printshop I found who has a large, flatbed
> printer that can print white ink. I do have some ideas about how I
> might try to make up blanks with a laser etcher I have access to but at
> the moment we have an ample supply.
Cool.
> Also, I've experimented with making my own bezels out of PVC board from
> Home Depot using a CNC router. In the pictures below, the yellowed
> bezels are old DEC bezels while the white ones are ones I made. I
> figured that if we ever get the QSIC shipping and people want indicator
> panels (I hope they'll want indicator panels), I'd rather not depend on
> them ripping apart old DEC bezels to make this work.
Yes. I'd rather not demolish my only indicator panel. I was planning
on demolishing a blank (I have a few short blanks, but most people do
not)
> Anyway, I'd be most happy to have another person with more tools to help
> build bits and pieces of this stuff. I've noticed that as I gained
> access to different tools, I came up with different ideas about how to
> make things. I didn't think the laser etcher was all that useful until
> I started using it.
I have a small 40W laser etcher that I essentially haven't used since
I have had access to large-format 80-120W laser cutters.
As for tools, I can rent a 4'x8' Shopbot router at our local
Makerspace that can turn out the light blocking bar or, from your
file, the frame. We also have a local company (IC3D) that makes
cubic-meter 3D Printers and makes their own filament from pellets,
keeping costs down. The founders are friends of mine and I've helped
repair sensors on their manufacturing line. If I had an STL, I could
get a bid on what it would take to 3D print one. It wouldn't be as
smooth as a machined PVC foam milled one, but it would be strong.
With a little post processing, a 3D Printed frame may give an adequate
look. Just a possibility. I haven't worked with PVC foam much but I
understand the principle.
> Now I want to use it for everything. Turns out it
> can't quite handle 3/8" Delrin; it just melts it and makes a mess.
That sounds like a power problem. Normally, Delrin lasers quite
nicely, at least at 80W. Thick stuff is hard in any printer because
of lenses, beam diffusion, etc. We sometimes have problems with 1/2"
material of any kind in ours. I've done some stuff in 2 passes, one
high, one low (refocusing/repositioning Z axis between job runs). We
also have multiple lenses for different focal points. One is only
good for etching/surface work, and one is good for cutting 3/8" and
thicker materials. We usually use the middle one since 99% of what
goes into our laser is 3-6mm stock.
> Speaking of help, if anyone wants to review the QSIC design, I'd welcome
> that. This is by far the most complex circuit board I've ever designed.
I could take a look at it, I have some background in making Qbus and
Unibus interfaces, but how useful I'd be depends on what kind of
feedback you are looking for.
> Back to indicator panels, here's a picture showing a bit of the
> evolution of my indicator panels...
>
> http://pdp10.froghouse.org/qsic/indicator-panel-stack.jpg
>
> ... The only real thing I'd like to
> change is the gloss. Somehow, DEC's inlay is as flat as flat can be.
I did notice that. I have no idea what to recommend. AFAIK, DEC just
used an acrylic with a specific surface texture. The only stuff I can
get is like what you have - smooth as window glass.
Cheers,
-ethan
On Sun, 2021-12-05 at 12:00 -0600, Brie wrote:
>
> He may as well have just come out and said, ?It triggers me and I
> don?t like having to acknowledge that women exist in the field of
> computer history.?
>
> ? Brie
Sorry to go off topic, but I have friends and family who are veterans
or otherwise have had horrible experiences. They get triggered. What
this sentence is describing is someone getting mildly annoyed.