Hey all, the past couple of weeks I've been working on compiling a
list of all known Lisa software, and trying to determine if it was for
the 1 or 2, if it ran on Office System, XENIX, UniPlus, etc. and the
dumped status of each title. If anyone's got any tips or pointers, let
me know and I'll get the list updated.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1STG0Le_8dMHRLf026x6YfXzRQm2hD0igeZV…
I have a VT525 that I couldn't turn off. I took it apart and there's
an adapter that connects the metal rod off the button on the front to
the power switch inside. The adapter has crumbled and it feels like
it was wax but it may have just been some plastic that has severely
deteriorated.
Before I try to work up some kind of replacement, has anyone already
designed a 3D-printed replacement? I don't have a 3D printer but do
have a friend that could print one for me. Otherwise, I'll see if I
can come up with something.
--
Eric Dittman
Hello,
I have a question about 9 track tapes and block sizes.
What I know is that tape is subdivided in files by means of marks, and each
file is subdivided in blocks of equal size.
Programs like tar use a specific block size to create files on tape.
However files can have different block sizes like bootloader file,
installation dumps and root file system copy on 2.11BSD.
Now suppose you find and unknown tape you want to preserve: using dd you
could easily 1:1 copy tape files to hard disk files using a SCSI drive and
Linux.
But: how you know which block size is on the tape?
Thanks
Andrea
All,
I've been delving into ancient IBM PC-DOS... 1.0, 2.0 and have landed on
2.10 as the experience I'm going to hang out with for a while. It's
stable in QEMU and 86Box and I am able to run MASM 1.0, 2.0 and Pascal
1.0 and 2.0.
86Box is more true to old-school boxes, but qemu runs on my Mac, so I
like using Qemu. But, Pascal seems to prefer 86Box, it prints weird
characters in qemu w/writeln(), which is annoying, but I'm doing more
assembly and BASIC at this point, so Qemu's emulation is sufficient.
What I've got working:
IBM PC-DOS 2.10 - seems to be working fine in both (installed to fixed disk)
IBM Macro Assembler 1.0 and 2.0 - seems to be working fine in both
(installed to fixed disk)
IBM Pascal 1.0 and 2.0 - hokey in both, tricky about the floppy being
present, regardless of debug fix, and doesn't like QEMU.
QEdit 2.1 - works great in both (installed to fixed disk)
I found some good books on BASIC, Pascal, and Assembly:
Albrecht, 1990. Teach Yourself GWBASIC. (covers later BASICA sufficiently)
Pardee, 1984. The Waite Group Pascal Primer for the IBM PC. (Great book)
Metcalf and Sugiyama, 1985. Compute!'s Beginner's Guide to Machine
Language on the IBM PC & PCjr. (Excellent book)
Lafore, 1984. The Waite Group Assembly Language Primer for the IBM PC &
XT. (Wordy, but good)
Pretty much everything I've programmed works fine. Graphics stuff is
better in 86Box where I can control the monitor that's attached, but no
complaints.
Some questions I have related to the exploration:
1. I'm curious if there are other folks out there doing similar stuff?
2. Most of the Assembly examples use DOS interrupt 21 for output. Is
this typical of assembly programs of the time, or did folks use other
methods?
3. I was able to find a lot of 5150/5160 and other manuals, but I
couldn't find an IBM Macro Assembler 2.0 manual (there are plenty of IBM
Macro Assembler/2 manuals, but those are for OS/2, not DOS). Does anyone
know where I can find one online?
4. In y'all's view, what are the significant differences between IBM
PC-DOS 2.10 and it's brother MS-DOS 2.x?
5. I'm thinking of moving on to 3.3 at some point, in your view, what
are the advantages?
6. I'm happy to post here, but if y'all know of a more appropriate
venue, please suggest it?
Thanks,
Will
--
GPG Fingerprint: 68F4 B3BD 1730 555A 4462 7D45 3EAA 5B6D A982 BAAF
> From: Chris Hanson
> There's an MXV11-B (M7195) on its way to me. :)
Wow, you've got a really good fairy god-mother!
I've been trying to buy one on eBait for some time now (in part to have one
to take a photo of for the CHWiki), and no luck - they always get bid up into
the sky. And here someone has one for you!
Life is unfair!
Noel
The making of this computer? perhaps explain why I never had someone wander in and talk about designing or building a MOTOROLA MINICOMPUTER ....Ed#
On Monday, October 5, 2020 Bill Degnan via cctalk <billdegnan at gmail.com; cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:10 PM Al Kossow via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
> On 10/4/20 11:13 PM, Josh Dersch via cctalk wrote:
>
> > Just made a minor breakthrough; a random usenet post suggested that the
> > MDP-1000 was just a rebadged General Automation SPC-12, and so it is.? I
> > suspect the internals of the unit I have (which is badged as an
> "MDP-6650"
> > on the rear) are a bit different than either the MDP-1000 or the SPC-12
> > (and I'm no closer to finding answers to my IC identification questions),
> > but it at least gives me another avenue to explore...
> >
> > (Bitsavers has a few items:
> > http://bitsavers.org/pdf/generalAutomation/spc12/)
>
> https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/search/?s=spc-12
Is this a case of not being able to find the correct TI or Motorola IC
guide or is there something unique / OEM about this one?? I do have some
late 60's early 70's IC guides of these manufacturers that I can check,
original bound paper copies.? Please advise.
Bill
More mysteries while poking at the MDP-1000. Spent some time this evening
working out the rest of the signals on the power harness (I suspect inputs
for an LTC circuit and a "power good" signal, as well as something
connected to a relay on the backplane, probably related to power control).
There are a lot of unidentifiable ICs on the main CPU logic board and on
the backplane, mixed in with bog-standard 7400-series TTL. Curious if
anyone has any ideas, as my searches and perusal of datasheets/databooks on
Bitsavers have turned up nothing. These are all TI-manufactured ICs, 1969
manufacturing dates, with "SN48xx" and "SN63xx" part numbers (a few omit
the "SN" prefix.) I'm wondering if these are just standard 7400 ICs with
special codes; for example there are several SN4816's near the edge
connector for the I/O bus, where a 7416 might (?) make sense, and from some
basic probing and following traces I think the pinouts make sense.
(Everything's conformal coated so it's a real bear to beep things out...)
Any ideas?
Thanks again,
Josh
5.25" SMD drives
From: David C. Jenner <djenner_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Tue Jun 24 19:28:00 2003
I have complete docs (User's Manual and Reference Manual, both
very long) for both of the Seagate drives (the manuals cover
both). And a stock of the 1.2GB drives, including power supply
and cables. And QD33 Qbus adapters. I'll be glad to entertain
offers for these offline, especially trades for PDP-11 equipment.
Dave
---
wonder if
- he is still on the list
- still has the manuals