I have a large qty to donate to a vintage computer group. I do not want to
ship. Someone in Austin or San Antonio area want to come and get it?
I would like it gone before this Saturday.
Cindy Croxton
Electronics Plus
1613 Water Street
Kerrville, TX 78028
830-370-3239 cell
sales at elecplus.com
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> L series are combinatorial only. You (or someone who has a working one)
> should be able to figure out a logic map by either running through all
> the input permutation or putting it in a reader that will do the same
> (vs reading the fuse data).
>
> -Alan
>
> Good luck.
unfortunately I don't have a working PAL, that's why I'm looking for the jedec file
After long delay, we can finally share the location of this year's
show! Room registration is open and awaiting your reservation. We've
got a new venue this year and that means a new table layout, which
we're hard at work on and will be posted Real Soon Now. Then we can
start signing up exhibits and vendors. Look for another announcement
email when we're ready to begin.
Here are the vital accommodation infos:
WHERE: Waterford Banquets/Clarion Inn, 933 S. Riverside Drive, Elmhurst, IL
WHEN: September 14-15, 2019
HOW MUCH: We have a group rate of $109/night for single or double-bed rooms
RESERVATIONS: We have a direct link for our group code. Note that the
dates default to the entire block (Wed-Mon) and you will have to
adjust them to your needs.
LINK: https://www.choicehotels.com/reservations/groups/gw24z4
OTHER STUFF: Please make use of our group code if you're staying with
us. Every room (and room-night) counts toward reducing our venue costs
and increases the chances of being invited back next year! If you
book with AAA or another group plan, please let the hotel know that
you are attending VCF Midwest and they will credit your stay to our
block.
RESERVATIONS MUST BE MADE BY AUGUST 24, 2019! NO GROUP RATE WILL BE
HONORED AFTER THAT DATE!
Note: If the online form is not working or not giving you the group
rate, please call the hotel directly at 630-279-0700 before contacting
us!
Oh yes, we figured new location = new era = new website. Besides,
some found the old site a bit unfriendly and primitive, what with all
that green monospace nonsense, like it's some kind of old computer or
something. This new "interactive[1]" look is sure to impress.
Surely. nothing says "user-friendly" like... http://vcfmw.org
Thanks to all and we'll see you in September,
-j
[1] In that it's "not batch".
All HP fans in general and Tony in particular,
I have the exact same problem. HP98035 real time clock module
(http://hpmuseum.net/display_item.php?hw=168), plugged into a HP9825T
(http://hpmuseum.net/display_item.php?hw=171), accepts commands, reads back
all 8's. Battery is new, is charging and at the correct voltage.
Documentation says "never run the module without the battery or it would
damage the AC5954N clock chip". When I got the module it had not battery in
it, so this is what could have happened. Tony, did you eventually repair
your module or find some data on the clock chip?
Marc
List: classiccmp <https://marc.info/?l=classiccmp&r=1&w=2>
Subject: AC5954N clock chip (I think)
From: ard () p850ug1 ! demon ! co ! uk (Tony Duell)
<https://marc.info/?a=104957097300008&r=1&w=2>
Date: 2001-08-26 22:55:32
<https://marc.info/?l=classiccmp&r=1&w=2&b=200108>
[Download RAW message
<https://marc.info/?l=classiccmp&m=104961357310567&q=mbox> or body
<https://marc.info/?l=classiccmp&m=104961357310567&q=raw> ]
I've got a non-working HP98035 real time clock module (for HP9825, etc)
on the bench.
It accepts commands, it sends something back, so I think the bus
interface and microcontroller are all fine. The problems are :
The real time reads back as 88:88:88:88:88
There is no activity on the crystal connected to the AC5954N clock chip
(or at least I think it's a clock chip). Enabling the oscillator
testpoint doesn't do a darn thing (well, the control/setting latch U7
changes state so again the microcontroller is doing something). There is
no activity on any of the pins on the chip.
It is getting power (it's not a problem with the NiCd battery).
I suspect the chip. Has anyone come across it? It may be a common digital
clock/calendar chip, or at least related to one (if it is HP-custom).
It doesn't seem to be particularly designed for a microprocessor bus --
the output may be for direct driving 7-segment displays or maybe a
multiplexed BCD output to link to a display decoder/driver.
Thanks in advance for any help.
-tony
I have been scanning a few manuals and brochures related to the Alfaskop
series of IBM 3270 compatible and Uniscope 100 compatible terminals.
http://www.datormuseum.se/peripherals/terminals/alfaskop
Unfortunately very little seems to be saved regarding this series of quite
successful terminals. In total around 900.000 units were produced.
Starting with the dumb 3100 with delay line memory, to the 3500/ 3700 with
a TTL CPU and the the 4100 series with 6800 CPU and finally the 91xx series
with 68k CPU (I believe). There is a brief history on the wiki page (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfaskop)
One interesting thing with the 41xx series is that it has a general purpose
real time operating system described in this manual
http://storage.datormuseum.se/u/96935524/Datormusuem/Alfaskop/Alfaskop_Syst…
This manual refers to a SPL programming Language, and a SPL reference
manual, which I am lacking. The SPL language seems to have realtime
constructs like WAIT, DECLARE TASK, POST etc. Is there anyone that
recognize the language or is it an invention made by Datasaab back in the
days?
Another interesting feature is that the 41xx series made use of a star
coupled 300 kbit/s sort of network. Mainly to communicate with the likewise
networked floppy drive or communication controller. The terminal could be
configured to work stand alone with a floppy drive or using a communication
controller as it seems.
Depending on what it was configured for, the terminal could either run
various terminal emulations, the Alfaword wordprocessing package or even
the UCSD p-system.
It would really be very interesting to find any of this software. So if
anyone knows anything I am interested.
> From: Allison
> ODT for the two systems are very different. .. KDF-11 the ODT is part
> of the higher level code. The larger cards (11/23 and 23+) boot to
> resident (ep)rom.
Ah, no. (Well, the KDF11 CPU's can boot to EPROM, which in the -11/23+ can be
on the CPU card; the -11/23 is a dual card and has no functionality on the CPU
card except the CPU.)
The ODT in the KDF11's (and KDJ11's) is, just like in the LSI-11's,
microcode, not macro-code. From the 1982 'microcomputers and memories'
handbook, pg. 161 (in Chapter 7, "Octal Debugging Technique (Microcode
ODT)"):
"The console emulator Octal Debugging Technique (ODT)is a portion of
the processor microcode ... The console ODT implemented on the LSI-11/23,
PDP-11/23 and PDP-11/23-PLUS is identical."
and on pg. 154:
"Unlike the LSI-11 and LSI-11/2, the LSI-11/23 does not enter console
ODT upon occurrence of a double bus error"
>From which I think is quite clear that the KDF11's have microcode ODT.
Noel
A follow-up to close out something:
> OK, now a picture of the bus with no console card:
> http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/jpg/BSYN-BDAL_NoMem.jpg
[Note: image re-named, to correctly say what it's showing]
> It's a bit hard to interpret what's going on here .. The long assertion
> of BSYNC is undoubtly the CPU trying to get the console CSR to respond,
> and eventually timing out. Not sure what the short assertion following
> it is - without looking at the ucode for the ODT, there's no way to know
> what the CPU's doing.
> Even harder to understand is what the BDAL line is doing. It looks like
> it's un-asserted (0, i.e. +3V) on the falling (electrically - rising,
> logically) edge of BSYN (which would be incorrect - see above). And then
> it hops around while BSYNC is asserted, which makes no sense at all to
> me.
So this makes a little more sense now.
This is actually showing a NXM cycle to main memory (apparently to address 0),
hence the '0' on BDAL10. (The second assertion of BSYNC must be somehow
associated with the NXM.) Apparently it doesn't even try to talk to the
console card unless the memory is there OK; if it can't see the memory, it
must just reset and try again.
Here:
> http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/jpg/BSYN-BDAL_NoCon.jpg
is a system with memory, but without a console. A very similar picture, but
here BDAL10 _is_ '1', as expected.
So the original picture did in fact indicate what the problem was - had I
known enough to know how to interpret it! Schaeffer's Law strikes again!
Although I still don't understand why the LSI-11 wants to see main memory on
the bus, in order for ODT to run. ODT doesn't use memory at all; ODT on the
KDF11 CPUs will run without any memory.
Noel