If anybody is interested in building? Jorge Hoppe's Uniprobe, I have some PCB's available. I made a few extra to keep the price down. Price is $40 ea shipped in the CONUS. These have Silver fingers rather than Gold but should still hold up well. Build information is on Retrocomp.
Brian.
> From: Holm Tiffe
>> The "--list" command to 'dd' gives a whole bunch of stuff:
> aha:
> $ dd --list
> dd: unknown operand --list
I was talking about the program I had mentioned in the previous email, "dd
for Windows". The "--list" command to it produced that long list of devices
(the list you edited out of the reply), so it definitely works there.
> Nobody in a PDP11 is interested what Windows thinks about partitions.
Understood, but in my previous email I had given an example using a uSloth
partition:
>> dd-removable if=UnixRoot of=\\?\Device\Harddisk2\Partition0 count=4872 seek=131072
so when your reply mentioned "partitions" ("You have to have an already
existing parition structure on the disk") it was natural to assume you meant
those - especially since there was a plausible reading of your comment
involving them (i.e. 'does "dd for Windows" only work on a disk with an
existing uSloth partition structure on it').
> Most of the PDP11 SCSI Controllers could build two or more PDP11 disks
> out of one physical device. That is what I meant with partition in this
> case .. There is some logical information on the device, you simply
> don't get the entire raw device on the pdp as you possibly think.
That's a good point, and perhaps there's no existing way to write a SCSI disk
>from a Windoze box in a way that the PDP11 SCSI controllers can grok. I don't
know enough about how they work to answer that.
> Tapes have no such restrictions
Right, but one has to have a tape drive; the OP may not.
Noel
Hello,
I'm in the process of cleaning and hopefully restore to operation of a DEC
R80.
The unit has some minor sign of corrosion, however it's VERY dirty, even
inside the hood.
The filters are obviously to be removed and replaced, as they are
disintegrating.
Also foam parts between the boards must be replaced.
Aside from obvious parts, there's something that should be replaced /
cleaned inside the HDA (foams, filters or rubbers), which could damage the
disk permanently in case it's turned on after decades if not "cured" before?
Anybody has some good pictures of the HDA inside, after cover removal?
Thanks
Andrea
(Credit the Quotas thread for prompting this.)
Did anyone ever use process accounting? Did they actually bill
departments (funny money)?
I was always intrigued by process accounting, but never had a use for it
myself.
I guess I can thank process accounting for causing the discrepancy that
Cliff Stole tracked down that became The Cuckoo's Egg. :-)
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
Hi
??? Well I now have a bootable SCSI drive on my 11/93. Its not RSTS/E
(yet) but it is RT 11 and reliable.
Its a bit baseline but it runs.
So next up was to see if we could get the RQDX3 to co-exist with the
SCSI controller.
I switched the base address to 160336 and it does not stop the SCSI
drive booting as DU0.
Had the RQDX3 been on the normal base address I think you would get the
HD as DU0 and the two halves of an RX50 as the next two drives.
But what happens to the RX50's when you move the RQDX3 to 160336 ?
Rod
--
Hi,
I fired up the 8/A tonight and the TU56's are failing diags. I want to
format a tape for scratch use but I can't find the MAINDEC that does this
(along with flipping up the backplane switch.
Can someone refresh me on the proceedure?
Thanks,
Marc Howard
>
> Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 21:21:43 -0700
> From: Marc Howard <cramcram at gmail.com>
> Subject: How to format Dectape (TC08 + TU56)
>
> Hi,
>
> I fired up the 8/A tonight and the TU56's are failing diags. I want to
> format a tape for scratch use but I can't find the MAINDEC that does this
> (along with flipping up the backplane switch.
>
> Can someone refresh me on the proceedure?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marc Howard
MAINDEC-08-EUFB should work on both TC01 and TC08 controllers.
--
Michael Thompson