I have a sizable quantity or tooling for sale or trade including :
circular blades, mostly Levin, 1 1/4 d, 1/4 arbor from .008 to 03 and
probably others.
drill bits- Levin. 13mm, .0028" etc.and 15 tubes only some labeled, B & D,
Cleveland decimal sets, Precision twist and other companies sizes 60
through over 100 or so..
Morris taps and dies, 0-80 through 0000-160, about 20 sizes.
Most are new, but a few might be used.
If you have any interest, contact me off list.
If there enough interest I'll try to make a detailed list. They
are a pain for me to work with, but cheap to ship.
I also have larger size taps, die , and bits up to 1 1/2 or so, I think a
#3 or #4 Morse taper
Thanks, Paul
The first implementation was done for the 7090 by McCarthy (hence CAR and
CDR --- Contents of Address Register and Contents of Decrement Register).
If you want to see a tiny implementation then look for the PDP-1
implementation done by L Peter Deutsch. There's a book chapter and then I
found this report:
http://s3data.computerhistory.org/pdp-1/DEC.pdp_1.1964.102650371.pdf
Hi,
Jon wrote:
> I have 15 pieces of memory SIMMs for the Challenge M series
> (funny, seems like there should be an even #). Pics here :
>
> http://pico-systems.com/images/SGIChallenge.JPG
A Challenge M is basically a server variant of an Indigo2.
What you have looks like memory for a Challenge L or Onyx.
Dennis
"Spectre" is one of two notorious bugs of modern CPUs involving speculative execution. I rather doubt that VAX is affected by this but I suspect others here have a lot more knowledge.
paul
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: coypu at sdf.org
> Subject: VAX + Spectre
> Date: September 17, 2019 at 5:32:42 AM EDT
> To: port-vax at netbsd.org
>
> So, this is a bug report:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86811
>
> GCC would like to know if VAX needs Spectre-related work.
> Are any of the VAXes ever made capable of speculative execution? the
> first tech for doing it was in 1967, so not entirely far-fetched.
I have a Naked Mini, where are you located?
I couldn't see your images.. not sure if my vcfed account is still good.
So I don't know what you have.
/P
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 09:31:09AM +0000, Roland via cctech wrote:
> Hello,
> I was wondering if anyone has a Computer Automation Naked Mini.
> I have these boards and I have no clue what to do with it. So if anyoneis interested please let me know. Pictures are in this vcfed topic:
> http://www.vcfed.org/forum/showthread.php?68302-Computer-Automation-Naked-M… interested in swap with omnibus material...
>
> Regards, Roland
I have two Naked Minis, possible unused, That I would love to find a home
for.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 4:31 AM Roland via cctech <cctech at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
> Hello,
> I was wondering if anyone has a Computer Automation Naked Mini.
> I have these boards and I have no clue what to do with it. So if anyoneis
> interested please let me know. Pictures are in this vcfed topic:
>
> http://www.vcfed.org/forum/showthread.php?68302-Computer-Automation-Naked-M…
> interested in swap with omnibus material...
>
> Regards, Roland
>
Correction!? IBM 704!Jack-----------------------------------------------------Jack HarperSecure Outcomes Inc2942 Evergreen ParkwaySuite 300Evergreen, Colorado 80439303.670.8375 Officewww.secureoutcomesinc.com for Product Info.
-------- Original message --------From: Jack Harper <harper at secureoutcomes-hq.com> Date: 10/2/19 13:36 (GMT-07:00) To: Lars Brinkhoff <lars at nocrew.org>, "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>, Bill Degnan via cctech <cctech at classiccmp.org> Cc: Bill Degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com> Subject: Re: LISP implementations on small machines Hello List -That jives with a conversation I had with John McCarthy before he died.He said that he and friends began the LISP 1.5 (really 1.0) implementation on the IBM 709 - and we both agreed that the idea of LISP running in an enormous pile of vacuum tubes was and is amazing:)Jack-----------------------------------------------------Jack HarperSecure Outcomes Inc2942 Evergreen ParkwaySuite 300Evergreen, Colorado 80439303.670.8375 Officewww.secureoutcomesinc.com for Product Info.-------- Original message --------From: Lars Brinkhoff via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Date: 10/2/19 07:42 (GMT-07:00) To: Bill Degnan via cctech <cctech at classiccmp.org> Cc: Bill Degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com> Subject: Re: LISP implementations on small machines Bill Degnan wrote:> First full version 7090 and then a version was ported tot he PDP-1> that was less powerful.? This is straight from the LISP manual on> site.Which LISP manual is that?The LISP I Programmer's Manual from 1960 says IBM 704.? It also says "aversion of LISP I is being prepared for the IBM 709".http://bitsavers.org/pdf/mit/rle_lisp/LISP_I_Programmers_Manual_Mar60.pdf
Correction!? IBM 704!Jack-----------------------------------------------------Jack HarperSecure Outcomes Inc2942 Evergreen ParkwaySuite 300Evergreen, Colorado 80439303.670.8375 Officewww.secureoutcomesinc.com for Product Info.
-------- Original message --------From: Jack Harper <harper at secureoutcomes-hq.com> Date: 10/2/19 13:36 (GMT-07:00) To: Lars Brinkhoff <lars at nocrew.org>, "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>, Bill Degnan via cctech <cctech at classiccmp.org> Cc: Bill Degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com> Subject: Re: LISP implementations on small machines Hello List -That jives with a conversation I had with John McCarthy before he died.He said that he and friends began the LISP 1.5 (really 1.0) implementation on the IBM 709 - and we both agreed that the idea of LISP running in an enormous pile of vacuum tubes was and is amazing:)Jack-----------------------------------------------------Jack HarperSecure Outcomes Inc2942 Evergreen ParkwaySuite 300Evergreen, Colorado 80439303.670.8375 Officewww.secureoutcomesinc.com for Product Info.-------- Original message --------From: Lars Brinkhoff via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Date: 10/2/19 07:42 (GMT-07:00) To: Bill Degnan via cctech <cctech at classiccmp.org> Cc: Bill Degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com> Subject: Re: LISP implementations on small machines Bill Degnan wrote:> First full version 7090 and then a version was ported tot he PDP-1> that was less powerful.? This is straight from the LISP manual on> site.Which LISP manual is that?The LISP I Programmer's Manual from 1960 says IBM 704.? It also says "aversion of LISP I is being prepared for the IBM 709".http://bitsavers.org/pdf/mit/rle_lisp/LISP_I_Programmers_Manual_Mar60.pdf
