> From: Mattis Lind
> The H744 is a buck converter. You can read about buck converters here:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_converter
Wow, that was incredibly hard to read; no clear and simple explanation of the
basic concept of how it works, before getting into the details!
If I understand it correctly, it stores part of the incoming energy of a block
of current in the field around the inductor; later, switches change state to
create a loop that includes the inductor, and it uses the stored energy to
cause electrons to flow around the new (temporary, because of the switch)
circuit. Is that about right?
The H744 manual doesn't really talk much about that aspect of the circuit's
operation (at least in terms of 'we use this trick to get all the energy out
of the incoming current flow'); it just describes the stuff around the coil as
"an LC filter". It says "This type circuit is basically only an averaging
device", which I wouldn't say is really on point - that would describe my
(incorrect) prior description as well as the correct one.
And just to make it even more confusing, it says "most of the input voltage is
absorbed across the emitter-collector of Q5", but I looked, and Q5 is tiny,
and I eventually figured out that that only applies to the +15V needed to run
the voltage regulator.
Noel
Anyone have advice on making thermite? Ingredients, sources, proportions?
The internet seems to think that just using aluminum powder with ferric
oxide is relatively hard to ignite, and that some manganese dioxide would
help with that.
Without spending too much time shopping, it looks like I can get:
* aluminum powder, 5 micron, 2 lb for $34
* ferric oxide, 10 lb for $27
* manganese dioxide, 1 lb for $39
Oh, one thing I forgot to include:
> a lot of the incoming power in that 30V AC has to be thrown away, in
> producing +5V.
So, if my understanding is correct, the 'switching' H744 really isn't much
better than a classic linear supply. It still wastes a very large amount of
the input power, and it still has a massively heavy transformer in it. Yes?
So I wonder what exactly the advantage was in going to the switching approach?
Yes, it keeps the output voltage steadier then a pure linear supply could -
but I'll bet there are analog approaches that can do the same. (They'd need
something that can produce a steady reference voltage, but the switching
approach needs, and has, the same thing.) Maybe the main output transistors
are happier being full-on or full-off, or something like that?
Noel
> From: Eric Smith
> That's way too good for these *&#$ing ST3000DM001 drives, and won't
> provide anywhere near enough sense of satisfaction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxm_qpKh7Jw
'Nuff said.
Noel
So there's something about the H744 I'm not sure I understand; hopefully those
with more analog-fu will set me straight if I'm confused.
This supply runs off 20-30V AC. It takes the input AC, rectifies it, and runs
it through a cap to filter out the ripple. What's next is that it's an early
switching supply; i.e. the electronics inside switches that newly-created main
DC off and on very quickly to keep the output voltage at around +5V.
However...
My understanding is that, without using a transformer (which creates an
independent circuit loop - more below), there's no way to increase the
_amperage_ out of circuit over what's fed into it: since amps are
electrons/second, the electrons/second out more or less have to equal
electrons/second in, since one can't easily 'create' electrons - at least, in
normal electonic gear! (Transformers, by creating a whole new circuit loop,
can 'create' more electrons/second in the new loop; since they tie the 'out'
of the new circuit back to its 'in', they can recirculate the 'extra'
electrons.)
And to the extent that the output is at lower voltage, the energy differential
has to be dumped; hence the huge heat sinks - a lot of the incoming power in
that 30V AC has to be thrown away, in producing +5V. Right?
My (possibly confused) understanding is that later switching supplies take the
incoming 60Hz wall AC, transform it to a higher frequency, run _that_ through
a transformer (which can be a lot smaller, since it's at a higher frequency,
and the higher the frequency, the smaller the transformer you can use - hence
the use of high frequency AC in airplanes, to allow use of smaller - and thus
lighter - transformers). That then turns out a massive amount of amps in the
output loop (since with a transformer, energy out is roughly energy in, modulo
resistive losses; and with constant power, if V goes down, I goes up).
So the losses are a lot lower - N amps at 110V in produce ~20N amps out at
+5V. (Well, depending on all the losses, ~20.) And the whole works is a lot
lighter, to boot.
Did this programmer get all that analog stuff correctly?
Thanks!
Noel
Hi all,
I've got an VME Bus sized CPU or GPU Board out of ebay a while before,
it is equipped with 4 pcs of AM29203 Slices and an AM2910A Sequencer.
It sems to be a german Product.
The Sticker on one of the DIN 96 Connectors states:
GE2149G206 WNr. 10488 Grund- Baugruppe
Does anyone know what it is or where is it coming from?
Kind Regards,
Holm
--
Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe,
Freiberger Stra?e 42, 09600 Obersch?na, USt-Id: DE253710583
info at tsht.de Fax +49 3731 74200 Tel +49 3731 74222 Mobil: 0172 8790 741
I will soon have a teletype model 35 all cleaned up and running
Why like is some suggestions for something I can put in the base and
emulate an HP 2000 or even in modern 2100 my goal is nothing serious I'd
love to be able to do HP basic and find the version of Star Trek I think
that was the name of the game just show I can demonstrate the friends how
cool these machines were.
If I could have my dream come true the emulator would be on a little SBC
running Linux t
Or even a simple OS that upon being powered up it would display login or
was that log on on the teletype pretty much having the coat hard-coated but
still having an area for saving files.
Thanks and thanks for all the previous assistance members of this group of
this list have given me
On 20 September 2018 at 23:20, Eric Smith via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Anyone have advice on making thermite? Ingredients, sources, proportions?
>
NIST SP 800-88 Rev. 1? There is some milspec about sanding the
platters that actually specified what grit to use but I do not
remember the title.
N.
My SIMH resists anything but Adventure, I am working through a Fortran IV. I think you break from the loop and confuse the machine using i. That with some error checking:
.TYPE FLOAT.FT
????? DO 50 X=1,100
????? F = FLOAT(X)
????? G = SQRT(F)
IF (G) (11,11,90)
11 WRITE(4,75) G
75 FORMAT(H 5,ERROR)
90?? H = ALOG(F)
????? WRITE(4,99) F,G,H
99?? FORMAT(' ',E12.6,E12.6,E12.6)
50??? CONTINUE
WRITE(4,100) F,G,H
100?? FORMAT(' ',E12.6,E12.6,E12.6)
????? END
My for fortran IV book and I are the same age,LoL
Jonathan Engwall
engwalljonathanthereal at gmail.com
On September 19, 2018, at 11:10 PM, mark--- via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
Hi Kyle
Just out of interest I ran this on VAX Fortran (Compaq Fortran 77 6.6-201) and I think got the results expected:
$ type for004.dat
1.000000 1.000000 0.000000
2.000000 1.414214 0.693147
3.000000 1.732051 1.098612
4.000000 2.000000 1.386294
5.000000 2.236068 1.609438
...
98.000000 9.899495 4.584968
99.000000 9.949874 4.595120
100.000000 10.000000 4.605170
However, I am no Fortran expert!
Regards, Mark.
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk <cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org> On Behalf Of Kyle Owen via cctalk
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 11:44 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Floating point math in FORTRAN IV on PDP-8
At VCF MW this past weekend, I was playing around with an FPP8/A stuffed into a PDP-8/M with a fan removed. This hex-wide two-board set will happily work in a quad-wide backplane, as it needs no signals that an 8/A would otherwise provide.
I wanted to benchmark the FPP8/A with the software emulation that FORTRAN IV supposedly does. Mind you, I also don't have an EAE in mine, so software emulation for integer multiplication/division would also be used.
I tried running a simple program to print some natural logs and square roots, which ran quite well with the FPP8/A in place.
Without the FPP8/A...all of the results were wrong. Significantly. Negative numbers in many cases. No clear pattern as to what it's doing.
Would anyone be able to try my program on some other real hardware (or another emulator) to verify? With and without EAE would also be desirable.
I'm not sure how to disable the EAE in SIMH, else I'd try that too.
Here's what SIMH looks like with my program:
PDP-8 simulator V4.0-0 Current git commit id: d35b8725
sim> at rk0 disk2.fortran.rk05
sim> b rk
.TYPE FLOAT.FT
DO 50 I=1,100
F = FLOAT(I)
G = SQRT(F)
H = ALOG(F)
WRITE(4,100) F,G,H
50 CONTINUE
100 FORMAT(' ',F12.6,F12.6,F12.6)
END
.R F4
*FLOAT/G$
1.000002 1.000002 0.000000
2.000002 1.414215 0.693147
3.000002 1.732053 1.098614
4.000002 2.000002 1.386296
5.000002 2.236070 1.609439
[snip]
98.000001 9.899495 4.584968
99.000000 9.949874 4.595121
100.000023 10.000008 4.605171
.
Much appreciated,
Kyle