I'm experimenting with setting up UUCP and Usenet on a cluster of 3B2/400s, and I've quickly discovered that while it's trivial to find old source code for Usenet (B News and C News), it's virtually impossible to find source code for old news *readers*.
I'm looking especially for nn, which was my go-to at the time. The oldest version I've found so far is nn 6.4, which is too big to compile on a 3B2/400. If I could get my hands on 6.1 or earlier, I think I'd have a good chance.
I also found that trn 3.6 from 1994 works well enough, though it is fairly bloated. Earlier versions of that might be better.
Does anyone have better Google-fu than I do? Or perhaps you've got earlier sources squirreled away?
As an aside: If you were active on Usenet in 1989, what software were you using?
-Seth
--
Seth Morabito
web at loomcom.com
Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
> Does anyone have any recommendations for a '90s era PC that has PCI and
> ISA slots? Ideally I'd like to have EISA slots too. ? At least I
> think that's what I want.
EISA is a nice-to-have, especially if you want to run multiple
interfaces (much better irq handling than ISA) and/or higher speed
stuff like FDDI, 100Mb enet, T-3/ATM, etc. Or you already have a
cache of EISA cards. That said (and this is x86 specific, because
there's a whole HPPA EISA world I don't know a lot about with all
sorts of weird stuff):
1) PCI does a better job......usually.
2) EISA motherboards, desktop machines and fun/exotic network cards
seem to be getting increasingly rare and ridiculously expensive, at
least on evil auction sites. On the other hand, 10Mb EISA ethernet
and scsi cards are chump change.
3) There are some interesting network things that just don't seem to
have ever been made for EISA. For example, I've never heard of a fibre
ethernet or HSSI card for EISA.
4) I think EISA limits you to 386 through PII CPUs (and probably PII
as a PPro Overdrive upgrade outside of a server class machine). At
least, I can't think of a P3 machine with EISA. YMMV.
5) The video card options are a bit thin on EISA. The Compaq QVision
VGA is common as dirt (and just as dumb), but outside of that the ELSA
Winner and ATI Mach32 are the only "real" graphics cards I seem to see
often. There's probably some awful TIGA boards out there somewhere.
Go PCI.
I held on to a couple of Intel Xpress machines for the EISA bus. I
doubt I'd pay the premium over a solid PCI/ISA machine.
Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
> Depends on your CPU needs, but if you're willing to settle for P2/P3 era,
> anything using the Intel i440BX or GX generally has very good ISA support.
Yeah, but didn't the GX (and KX) have some pretty serious bugs until
really late steppings? Same to a lesser extent with the NX. The BX
(and FX) however was very reliable, as I recall.
Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
> I've long had a soft spot for the Pentium Pro.
Yeah, me too. Great chip with a long useful life. I ran a couple of
Intel PR440FX based machine for years past their expiration date
because they kept up with the load and just wouldn't die.
> A LONG time ago I saw an advertisement for a system that could accept six Pentium Pros.
ALR Revolution server, probably. NCR and Corollary made 8-ways.
> I /think/ it's a Compaq Deskpro XL 560
Great machine; built like a tank. Much better quality than the
Xpress. I had an XL 6200 (200Mhz PPro) for many years and still
regret getting rid of it. Lucky you you got yours back. The HP Vectra
XU was also pretty nice.
Hello Folks.
I've listed a nice California Computer Systems S-100 computer for sale.
Details are here:
http://www.vcfed.org/forum/showthread.php?63588-California-Computer-Systems…
Thanks!
Sellam
P.S. If you're waiting on something from me, know that I have not forgotten
about you, just took most of the last month to setup and plant the garden.
I am getting back up to speed and will respond to everyone and pick up
where we left off promptly, but feel free to nudge me if you somehow fall
through the cracks and are neglected. Forgive me, and please know it is
not intentional.
WTB or? HP 150 and HP 125 and hp 120 computers especially?want large screen touchscreen II 150!
?
also looking? for? rack? mount? hp 85? ?also looking? for? hp 86? / 87
?
any product and point of sale? display materials? for? there are? ?good to sell us? too.? ?they spice up? a? display.
?
drop me? a note off list
Ed Sharpe archivist??for SMECC
?
?
?
?
?
Does anyone know if a non-HP terminal will work as the console for a HP
3000 Series 37? The power-on self-test uses ENQ/ACK to speed sense, but the
manual also implies that it will sense speed from a <CR>. On my 37, the TIC
self-test passes up to the point where it talks to the terminal, but fails to
to speed sense.
Mike Loewen mloewen at cpumagic.scol.pa.us
Old Technology http://q7.neurotica.com/Oldtech/
Can anyone tell what kind of computer this might have been connected to?
https://i.imgur.com/IC3AVCf.jpg
I googled MS8192X26-1.9-RT and found one hit:
http://www.nsn-now.com/Indexing/ViewDetail.aspx?QString=7025013480747
And then FABRI-TECH (maybe miss-spelled) gave a nice broschure:
https://archive.org/details/TNM_Fabri-Tek_Inc_-_Brochure_20170629_0325
The core memory system boxes indeed look similar.
But still no clue what kind of system this has been connected to.
What kind of system made use of 26 bits? Maybe 24 bits + check bits?
It could be flight control related since it is aviation museum that
currently have it. But the person I have contact with don't know the actual
source. Possibly flight simulation since the same guys do have several old
flight simulators.
(Retrying post with different email)
Another quick thought,
Putty ( https://www.putty.org/ )
has serial mode, and an AnswerBack for ENQ (Control-E).
You could try using that, although HPterm escape sequences will not work.
Keven Miller
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Loewen via cctalk" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> To: <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Mon 07 May 2018 09:36 PM
> Subject: HP 3000/37 console
>
>
>>
>> Does anyone know if a non-HP terminal will work as the console for a
>> HP 3000 Series 37? The power-on self-test uses ENQ/ACK to speed sense,
>> but the manual also implies that it will sense speed from a <CR>. On my
>> 37, the TIC self-test passes up to the point where it talks to the
>> terminal, but fails to to speed sense.
>>
>>
>> Mike Loewen mloewen at cpumagic.scol.pa.us
>> Old Technology http://q7.neurotica.com/Oldtech/
>>
>
(Retrying post, with different email.)
As Ed mentioned, I believe the CISC machines will need the ENQ/ACK.
I thought that speed-sense was only on the CR. But the ENQ/ACK will happen
every 80 chars sent.
I think you can wait on it because it will timeout, and continue.
Or when output pauses, you could type Control-F, as I recall.
If you cannot get your hands on Reflection (
https://www.microfocus.com/products/reflection/ )
(took me a moment to find it, now that microfocus controls it)
or Minisoft Win92/Secure92 (www.minisoft.com),
or an hp terminal, you could try QC-Term.
http://www.3kranger.com/Atmar/AICS_qcterm.shtm
Keven Miller
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Loewen via cctalk" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> To: <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Mon 07 May 2018 09:36 PM
> Subject: HP 3000/37 console
>
>
>>
>> Does anyone know if a non-HP terminal will work as the console for a
>> HP 3000 Series 37? The power-on self-test uses ENQ/ACK to speed sense,
>> but the manual also implies that it will sense speed from a <CR>. On my
>> 37, the TIC self-test passes up to the point where it talks to the
>> terminal, but fails to to speed sense.
>>
>>
>> Mike Loewen mloewen at cpumagic.scol.pa.us
>> Old Technology http://q7.neurotica.com/Oldtech/
>>
>