As for power, if you have a wife and/or kids, a PDP-11's power
> consumption is not even above the noise floor in your electric bill.
> (Unless your trying to do it with RA disks!!)
>
> bill
Out of curiosity how much power do these wee beasties consume?
___________________________________
The plate on the back of my 11/93 says 345 Watts. That's about a fifth what your
wifes hair dryer draws. Or slightly more than 3 100 watt light bulbs (which your
kids leave on all over the house all the time!!)
bill
I run a similar PDP-11/83 system 24/7 on a BA23 in a Pedestal stand. It has two 2MB memory boards, an Emulex UC07 connected to two SCSI2SD Cards emulating two RD54s and two RA92s, and a DELQA-T running RSX11M+, DECnet and Johnny Billquist;s TCP/IP and it draws 100-105 watts on my UPS.
I also run a Simh PDP-11 on a Raspberry Pi 3 as an adjacent node and it is much faster, much quieter, but not quite as much fun.
Mark Matlock
> From: Jim Stephens
> I just ran across a sale on epay by a guy who thought you could pull
> the processor chip off the board and sell each in separate auctions.
There are a lot of idiotz out there.
I ran into one who'd removed a group of boards from (probably) an -11/40, and
then scrapped away the rest of the machine (including an RK11-D backplane).
I took _great_ pleasure in informing him that the stuff he'd scrapped had
been worth several times what the boards he had 'saved' had been worth.
Noel
> From: Raymond Wiker
> Steve Jobs ... was also a stickler for perfection and largely unwilling
> to make compromises.
Absolutely; and that's a large part of the reason for the success of Apple.
His products were just really well done.
It's also, I think, a big part of the causality for another Apple
characteristic: their push for closed systems. The thing is that Steve wanted
to make the user experience as good as possible (another hallmark of Apple
stuff) - and when the 'system' includes pieces being independently sourced
>from multiple entities, it's hard to make that happen - there will be
glitches, etc. So that's why he usually wanted to bring the entire thing
inside the Apple envelope.
> So, Steve Jobs ... should get some of the credit for the fact that
> we're not all running Windows on variations of crappy PC hardware.
I think that's not accurate; Linux may not have a large user base among
non-technical people in the laptop area, but it does show that there are other
alternatives. And when it gets to smart-phones, of course, things which are
neither Apple nor uSloth are the majority there, no?
> From: Chris Hanson
> What the Apple folks saw and what was implemented for Lisa and then
> Macintosh were vastly different.
I don't agree with the "vastly". (Having said that, I salute the Lisa/Mac
people for doing a very good job of producing a excellent user interface.)
The changes in the interface (menu bar, etc) are not that large; they are
mostly minor refinements to the basic image/pointing-based interface
pioneered by Xerox.
The biggest improvement, IMO, was not in the details of the window system, but
that everything used a common user interface - and the lack of that on the
Alto was not planned, but more a result of the fact that the Alto was so far
into new territory, and not done as an integrated system, but as a platform
for research.
> - The one-button mouse.
Err, some of us don't see that as an 'improvement'... :-)
> If you sit someone who knows how to use a Mac in front of a circa-1979
> Xerox Alto, they'll be pretty mystified.
Yeah, but that's in good part because the Alto user interface is such a dog's
breakfast - Draw is nothing like Bravo is nothing like etc, etc. But, like I
said, that was inevitable, given the process that produced the Alto.
Noel
Hello list,
does anybody need a broken MIPS-Server? The battery leaked and corroded
the mainboard. I already cleaned it up, but it still didn't work...
Maybe somebody can fix it or use it for spare parts.
(please contact me off list.)
romanis
I've inherited an LA424-A2 printer that had been stored for a while but
now has obvious problems. Powering up 'jogs' the paper feed motor,
flashes the three green LEDS on the panel through a rapid sequence, but
then it stops with the display showing what appears to be a fault code.
Unfortunately, one of the other parts that is failing is the LCD (16
char I think) that should be showing a fault code. It appears to be "CO
<something>" but I can barely make out the "CO".
Is this LCD use a traditional byte-wide interface and can it be replaced
with one of the current crop of cheap LCD modules?
Once I can see the fault code, I can begin to determine what else is
failing, though the manual doesn't seem to be much help on error codes:
they seem to be simple state-of-operation codes.
Thanks,
Gary
I just ran across a sale on epay by a guy who thought you could pull the
processor chip off the board and sell each in separate auctions.
I couldn't find the processor from the huge number of gold scrap chip
auctions he had, but he said it (or the other) chip(s) for the board
were listed.
I think giving him the benefit of the doubt, he thought that the two
were separable like motherboards and processors are now day. Worst case
he was just an unfortunate idiot that destroyed the board.
I sent him an email telling him the value I place on it (tested) and
suggested that he think of older boards as the full components to be
kept together unless he wants to destroy the board, or knows what he is
doing breaking them up. Of course on old Qbus and the like boards, one
does have some components that are more valuable if you break up the
board, and pull "unobtainium" chips. But pulling out the KDF processor
isn't one of them in general.
I just bought a KDJ Jaws chip for a "round 2it" project to try to get it
running, as I archived a PDP11 "Hack" page indicating how to get one
running on a proto board with minimal hardware.
I don't know if you could do that with the KDF, but that isn't what this
guy is doing.
thanks
Jim
Any idea what this thing is?
https://imgur.com/a/aNFiK
Didn't come up with much of anything with Motion Control, Inc.
I did plug it in, and it seemed to come alive. I tempted fate again and
plugged a composite video source into the input, and a monitor into the
output. One pot on top adjusts the vertical sync, apparently; other than
making the colors slightly weird, the video came through more or less the
same. The other two (marked Y and Z cal) seemed to change nothing. The
switch mounted behind the pots caused the LED display to change (as seen in
the pictures), though the switch mounted closer to the right side of the
unit seemed to make no difference.
When I get done moving, I'll dump the EPROMs and get more pictures,
especially if there's sufficient interest.
Thanks,
Kyle
I have a VAXstation 3100 m38 which fails its POST due to problems with
the on board memory. I am not particularly interested in trying to fix
it myself, as I have another VAXstation which I am fond of. However, if
anyone else would like to try and repair it, it is free to a good home.
It seems as though the battery had leaked and caused some. I've cleaned
it up a bit but of course this wasn't enough to fix it.
The only condition is that you also take it with its alleged life long
partner, a working VR290 display (cables included). I'm based in
Nottingham, UK. Please contact me off list if you are interested.
Thanks,
Aaron.
Hello list,
Paul Anderson and myself are trying to figure out the available cabling options that allow to connect an RK611 controller to RK06/RK07 drives.
To my knowledge, there is the possibility to get a drive connect via:
RK611 <-> flat cable <-> cabinet transition bracket <-> round cable <-> RK06/07
The part numbers I found so far:
Flat cable: BC-06R-xx
round cable: 70-12292
or BC23Z-xx
The transition bracket's PN is 70-12415 and is the same as for RL01/RL02 configurations.
The round cable with same connectors as used for RL01/02 cannot be used for RK06/07 as not all cables are wired to the connectors. But a RK06/07 cable can be used for RL01/RL02.
Can the BC-06R also be used for RL01/RL02?
Apparently, there are also direct cable connections between RK611 and RK06/07 existing. In that case, no transition bracket is needed.
BC80M shielded: RK611 to first drive
... and the cable required to connect two RK07/07 drives:
BC17E shielded
Can anybody help us in confirming and correcting us regarding the cabling configurations
and the part numbers?
Thanks a lot for your help!
Have a nice Sunday,
Pierre
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pierre's collection of classic computers moved to: http://www.digitalheritage.de