Hi, I don't know if this is of any use/interest at all, but I have retrieved
an old/early copy of RT-11 Basic (V01-05 18-JUL-73, DEC-11-LBACA-A-LA1)
modified to run under V6 Unix, if anyone has any use for such a thing.
I also have a DEC MACRO-11 which runs under V6 Unix, which generates .rel
files; there is a 'bind' (written in BCPL) which is a linker which reads .rel
files. (There is a BCPL compiler, written in BCPL, to compile it.) Then there
are two command 'relld' and 'ldrel' to convert back and forth from .rel to
a.out.
Noel
I recently obtained Sony portable model - NWS-1250 from Japan.
There is a bottom label "AC 100V", however the PSU has 100-120V and
220-240V label.
The exact PSU model is Sony 1-413-548-11.
Is it safe to plug it in 220V AC or to wait the arrival of step-down
transformer ?
The other problem is that the disk has been wiped. Does anyone have NEWS-OS
CISC version media ?
Best regards,
Plamen
Doug! We would like a scan of your dad's certificate!
We have an ongoing collection on this computer at SMECC
1955 Honeywell computer business was originated from the Datamatic
Corporation, founded in Newton MA, as a joint-venture by Raytheon and
Honeywell, to produce large-scale computer systems. Raytheon sells its 40% interest
to Honeywell in 1957.. 1957 Installation of the first Datamatic D-1000
to Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan.
Honeywell Datamatic 1000 uses 3 inch wide tape
we have a 3 inch very very heavy reel and the 30 something track tape
drive head.... could this someday be the start of the ultimate DIY tape
drive build and tape recover?
see more on this computer here... and we have modules for this tube
computer we need to photo and more stuff to scan and add.
http://www.smecc.org/honeywell_datamatic_1000.htm
In a message dated 1/29/2017 1:27:26 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
billdegnan at gmail.com writes:
On Jan 28, 2017 8:51 PM, "william degnan" <billdegnan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 28, 2017 8:40 PM, "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 01/28/2017 05:12 PM, Douglas Taylor wrote:
> > > I have a certificate that my father was given in 1957 for training on
> > > a Honeywell Datamatic 1000 computer.
> > >
> > > Here is a summary of this 'advance' in computer technology from the
> > > ACM:
> > >
> > > The DATAmatic 1000 (D-1000) is a high-capacity electronic
> > > data-processing system designed specifically for application to the
> > > increasingly complex problems and procedures of present-day
> > > business. The system incorporates significant new systems techniques,
> > > as well as several basically new component developments. One of the
> > > outstanding features of the D-1000 is its ability to feed information
> > > from magnetic tape into the central processor at a sustained rate of
> > > 60,000 decimal-digits per second, and to deliver data after
> > > processing back to magnetic tape at this same rate. The operational
> > > speed of the central processor maintains full compatibility with the
> > > high speed of information transfer. Consequently, the difficulties
> > > caused by programs which are either tape limited or processing-time
> > > limited do not arise in the majority of commercial applications of
> > > this system.
> >
> > Doug, you can probably re-live part of your dad's experience. There
are
> > some Datamatic 1000 manuals on bitsavers:
> >
> >
http://bitsavers.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/pdf/honeywell/datamatic_1000/
> >
> > Big, wide tape reels.
> >
> > --Chuck
> >
>
> I am pretty sure I have the first print of that manual, but I thought
Datamatic was a pre-Burroughs machine not Honeywell...I am not home to
check, if you'd like me to I can Monday. That's the base 10 system,
right? I also have some orig decimal counter tubes IIRC too. I suppose
that all qualifies as pretty rare. Or I am confusing with a different,
similarly - named system.
> Bill
Yup I must be mistaken. Nevermind I'll check when I get back to my office
B
Thanks Guy!
Mystery solved!
I will put this note in with the memory stick..
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 1/28/2017 6:00:46 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
ggs at shiresoft.com writes:
At one time IBM was the largest manufacturer of memory and consumed *all*
of
it internally (e.g. for IBM products). At the time all of IBM?s ICs were
in
the ?aluminum? cans unless they needed more exotic cooling.
In the PS/2 days, we ended up using some IBM produced memory because we
could
get a better internal transfer price than buying out in the market because
the
various IBM fabs had a bit of excess capacity and wanted it used.
TTFN - Guy
> On Jan 28, 2017, at 11:44 AM, COURYHOUSE at aol.com wrote:
>
> The talk of PS2 memory brought something back to me I have in a
drawer
> here...
>
> ps2 memory - with weird square silver IBM Circuit packaged memory on
> the stick.
>
> What is the story on this? was IBM making it's own memory chips or
just
> repackaging them into
> their silver square packaging?
>
> Now I will have to dig these things out.
>
> Thank Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
>
The talk of PS2 memory brought something back to me I have in a drawer
here...
ps2 memory - with weird square silver IBM Circuit packaged memory on
the stick.
What is the story on this? was IBM making it's own memory chips or just
repackaging them into
their silver square packaging?
Now I will have to dig these things out.
Thank Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
Re:
> From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com>
> I believe that ANSI refers to them as "partitions", IIRC, defined by a
> special page in the MODE_SELECT command. Each partition has its own EOD.
>
> Using the MODE_SENSE code page 11h will turn up information as to a tape
> bing multi-partitioned.
As it happens, they (partitions vs. set marks) are different concepts.
A DDS-1, -2, -3, -4 can be either a single unpartitioned tape *or* it can
have precisely/exactly/only two partitions.
(I didn't check newer DDS standards)
Completely separately from any discussion of partitions: a tape basically
consists of entries of type "Data" (user data) and "Separator Marks".
The standards (e.g., ECMA-139 / ECMA-150 / ECMA-170 for DDS-1, ECMA-198 for
DDS-2, ECMA-236 for DDS-3, and ECMA-288 for DDS-4) specify:
"In this ECMA Standard, there are two types of Separator Marks
which are referred to as Separator 1 and Separator 2.
Some other standards, e.g. those which define an interface
between a tape drive and a host computer, use the terms "file mark"
and "set mark" to denote Separator Marks.
It is recommended that Separator 1 be equated to file mark
and Separator 2 be equated to set mark.
("file mark", of course, is also referred to as an EOF (End Of File))
I knew DDS-* drives were insanely complicated, but after reading parts of
the standards, I now realize I was grossly underestimating just how
insanely complicated they are!
SDLT-1 supports "set mark" (and they're called that, not "Separator Mark 2"
:), but not partitions.
DLT-1 and Ultrium-1 support neither "set mark" (nor multiple kinds of
separators) nor partitions.
Stan
(ECMA = European Computer Manufacturers Association)
ISO/IEC 17462 = ECMA-288
Hi all,
I?m working on an RK11-C, and need to repair a couple of components that are flown between backplane pins via crimp terminals that slip directly onto the wire wrap pins. I?m having trouble sourcing these connectors, probably because I don?t know the correct terms to search under. Anybody have a suggest?
cheers,
?FritzM.
I have a carton of old 1S/2D floppy diskettes here. I used them 28 years ago
to make backups.
I have no use for them, and I have no idea if they still work.
They will need to be formatted. There are in boxes of 10. A few might be
2S/2D.
FFS to a good home.
Cindy Croxton
Electronics Plus
1613 Water Street
Kerrville, TX 78028
Thanks all for getting me going.
I cheated at first with a real Maxtor 20 GB hard drive, and Alexadre's suggestion to FDISK with just a few cylinders, and that worked.
Now, going to a CF card, same plan, no errors with FDISK, FORMAT C:/s, and I can see command.com is there if I boot from a floppy.
I am able to read/write to the CF just fine, copy to it with /V and all OK.
It will not boot from XTIDE, and I get this error.
I read that some CF will not work.
Can you recommend ones that do, and I will go get one.
They one giving me trouble is:
Sandisk Ultra II, I have had it for years in the junkbox.
SDCFH-2048 is what XTIDE reports.
Will a new, current CF fix the problem?
Enlighten me on what boot menu callback means.
Thanks,
Randy