> From: Don North
> Track 0 is not used by standard DEC software
I wonder why DEC did't use track 0. The thing is small enough (256KB in the
original single-density) that even 1% is a good chunk to throw away. Does
anyone know? (I had a look online, but couldn't turn anything up.)
If I had to _guess_, one possibility would be that track 0 is the innermost
track, where the media is moving the slowest, and as a result it's more
error-prone. Another is that IBM used track 0 for something special, and DEC
tried to conform with that. But those are pure guesses, I would love to know
for sure.
Noel
So, the CHM has an RSTS-11 brochure:
http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/text/DEC/pdp-11/Digital.PDP-11…
which shows in a couple of places (front cover, page 6, 7, 10, 11) an
indicator panel which I haven't been able to identify: it's the one where
there are four full-length light rows on the left, and the lower right row
of lights is broken up in the three groups - small, large, small. (The other
indicator panel is known, it's an an RF11).
I have been searching for these panels for quite a while now, and have a page
for them:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/DECIndicatorPanels.html
_but_ ... I have never seen that panel.
I am quite sure that it is _NOT_ an RK11-C panel; although no image of such
has ever been found (I think because it was never produced - no DEC manual or
print set refers to it), the RK11-C prints show the wiring for the connector
to the indicator panel (which would presumably have been a standard DEC 19" x
5-1/4" panel of the kind documented on the page above), and from that it's
possible to predict what it would look like, as shown here:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/RK11-C_inlay.txthttp://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/RK11-C_inlay.pdf
Can anyone shed any light (no pun intended :-) on what this is?
The RF11 engineering drawings list (on page 187/188) all the inserts
available (as of that date) for the standard 19" x 5-1/4" indicator panel,
and I don't have pictures of all of them, so it's possible this is one of
them. (It's clear from the brochure that this wasn't necessarily a working
system, since it appears in a number of different configurations. So maybe
they just grabbed up a random indicator panel and plugged it in to make the
system look cool.)
One possibility is that it's a prototype that was never produced - or perhaps
it was the indicator panel for an earlier RK11 controller (although I can't
find any mention of an RK11-B or RK11-A, and the list above doesn't contain
an RK11 entry).
Anyone have any ideas?
Noel
> From: Steven Malikoff
> I have been looking but not yet found a picture of the DEC-trimmed RC11
> ... If anyone could point me to a photo of the RC11/RS64 DECdisk panel
> to be honest I don't know if it even had one?
I'm not sure it did. The list of available inserts (in the Indicator Panel
Assembly drawings, available in the RF11 prints, pp. 186-190) doesn't list an
RC11 insert, and that list does include the RF11, which is a later controller
than the RC11.
I tried looking online for RC11 engineering drawings, to see if it included
an indicator panel connector (the way the RK11-C does), but I could not find
_anything_ substantial about the RC11 online.
> From: Jon Elson
> These look VERY posed, so don't be sure ANYTHING in the picture was a
> fully working system.
Yeah, I'd come to that conclusion...
> If those panels look like something off a KA10 controller
Well, I'm not sure. Most PDP-10 gear had rows of 36 lights, which is the full
width of these 19" indicator panels (i.e. every light in a row - like the top
row of the RP11 panel, see the page for an image), and I don't see that in
this one. But I suppose I should try and round up images of 19" x 5-1/4"
PDP-10 panels, too (ISTR that there are a few).
Noel
David Bunnell and Bill Machrone of PC Magazine have passed on. They
both were involved in promoting computers in its earliest day. Both
will sadly be missed.
Murray--
I've been wondering about that one myself. ?Very odd. ?That's not the first time I've seen that either. Along with stuff that 'sells' for absurd amounts of money.
At first I though the absurd sales were attempts to manipulate the market.. but it doesn't seem worth the effort or ebay fees. ?I almost kind of wonder with some of them if something more sinister is going on.. like money laundering. ?That'd be a fairly obscure way to do it..
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message --------
From: Corey Cohen <AppleCorey at optonline.net>
Date: 2016-11-01 4:43 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: What the heck is the deal with this eBay item
https://www.ebay.com/itm/272433760795
This Helios II has been "sold" multiple times for varying amounts and then suddenly hours later appears for sale again.? I'm done bidding on this each time it appears, because if I won, who knows what I'd receive or if the seller would cancel the auction.?
corey cohen
u??o? ???o?
> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:48:56 -0400
> From: Paul Koning <paulkoning at comcast.net>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: For sale 128K Core RAM Industrial PDP 11/40 Massbus
> System
> Message-ID: <A0F4A035-0EAA-4343-87DC-86495173458F at comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>> On Oct 31, 2016, at 10:26 AM, william degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Given 128K core, wouldn't one be able to save the OS in core, no need to
>> load what would need to "get started" from a diskpak? The data would be on
>> the tape drives, and something on stand by to re-load the OS back into core.
>
> Only if the OS implements the ability to resume from a power failure without reloading from disk or tape. Few do. Perhaps some flavors of RSX, I don't know. RSTS V4A, when built with the power fail handling option, could do so. Later versions do not; they unconditionally reboot (from disk) at powerup.
>
> paul
RSX-11M and M+ did resume from power failures very robustly. I had a PDP-11/44 with batteries for the MOS RAM (and fans to cool it) with RK07 drives. I can remember testing it by pulling the power with a number of applications runnings including editors etc. The disks would yank the heads back and spin down, then when the power was restored and the drives spun up, it was like it never happened. I might see an entry or two in the error log file about a disk retry, and a user might loose a keystroke on the file they were editing but it absolutely was solid. I don't know of a single modern operating system that can do that today.
RSX-11M+ can run TCP/IP today with Johnny Billquist's BQTCP package but it dies require I/D space processors. M+ itself can run on a 11/23+ or 11/24 but it really needs more than 128KW and the lack of I/D space really limits its capabilities.
Mark
I bought one of these on eBay thinking it was the standard 37-pin
D-connector that connects to an ISA floppy controller. No, it's a 25-pin
D-connector. I can't find any references in Google aside from people
selling them. I'm wondering if it might be something like a
printer-port-connected device, in which case I'm probably out of luck
trying to find its driver.... -- Ian
--
Ian S. King, MSIS, MSCS, Ph.D. Candidate
The Information School <http://ischool.uw.edu>
Dissertation: "Why the Conversation Mattered: Constructing a Sociotechnical
Narrative Through a Design Lens
Archivist, Voices From the Rwanda Tribunal <http://tribunalvoices.org>
Value Sensitive Design Research Lab <http://vsdesign.org>
University of Washington
There is an old Vulcan saying: "Only Nixon could go to China."