test-drb September 2015

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

198 participants
312 discussions

OT: Migraine was RE: would like to find blue dg et head looking terminal to go with small ecli...

by dave.g4ugm＠gmail.com

Used to get the headaches with no visuals, but wearing the correct glasses and keeping my screen clean seems to have solved that, but since then, like Dwight, I have had a couple of attacks of the "lightening lines" and blurred vision. The eye hospital tell me that this is an "ocular migraine" and I can concour its really strange and somewhat scary especially for the first time... Dave G4UGM > -----Original Message----- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of dwight > Sent: 25 September 2015 03:50 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > <cctalk at classiccmp.org> > Subject: RE: would like to find blue dg et head looking terminal to go with > small ecli... > > I get the squiggly lines but no headache. > Strange stuff. > Dwight > > > > Subject: Re: would like to find blue dg et head looking terminal to go with > small ecli... > > To: cctalk at classiccmp.org > > From: cube1 at charter.net > > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 23:59:39 -0500 > > > > On 9/22/2015 11:00 PM, COURYHOUSE at aol.com wrote: > > > probably an artifact generated by my migraine this evening . > > > > > > > Ugh. Had some of those while I was in High School, complete with > > squiggly lines, often nausea and hours of intense pain. You have my > > sympathy. > > > > Then one day I started to get one while I was driving from home to the > > local music store. I pulled over, took a deep breath and (I kid you > > not) told myself no, you are not going to get a migraine, ain't gonna > > happen. It went away almost immediately, and I haven't had one since. > > Go figure. Almost certainly pure coincidence. [I wish that would work > > for everyone. Sigh.] > > > > JRJ >

8 years, 7 months

cctalk Digest, Vol 15, Issue 24

by mark＠markesystems.com

>> I don't know what you're looking at for the front end of this project, >> but have you considered SQLite for the database engine back end? If > >No, I would not consider it. I have experience with it on my Garmin GPS >unit. I really dislike it. Wow - I'm quite surprised at that. It is in *everything*: Android, iOS, FireFox, Chrome, - the list goes far on. Personally, I've never used it on an embedded platform, although I'm certainly keeping it in my back pocket for the time when I need an embedded database. What problems have you experienced? I have used it on PC platforms, and have been quite impressed with how robust the database structure is. It's all contained in one file, and it's an in-process library, not a server. This makes it not-as-good for massively multi-user stuff, but *much* easier to administer; no daemons to manage, and just one database file (like Access, but better). I use it for industrial automation applications, and have tested it a lot to see if I could corrupt the database. Basically, unless I deliberately mangled the container file, I couldn't get it to fail non-gracefully, even by turning of the power while writing the file. (This was not a full, rigorous failure study, but I've got a lot of them out there now, and although I get plenty of support calls a screwed-up database is never the root cause.) Just my experience... ~~ Mark Moulding ------------------------------ Message: 21 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:09:42 -0500 From: Jay Jaeger <cube1 at charter.net> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Re: Structured Fortran - was Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus Message-ID: <56032326.30504 at charter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On 9/23/2015 4:27 PM, ben wrote: > On 9/23/2015 2:39 AM, ANDY HOLT wrote: >>> From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com> >> >> ? >>> After all, languages are supposed to expose features >>> of the underlying machine to the programmer. >> >> Many believe that the purpose of languages is to HIDE (abstract) the >> underlying >> machine. > > The 60's idea that MACROS could do that seems to have faded away. > Ben. > > Yes, STAGE2 and friends pretty well faded out when LR grammars and parsers and parser generators became more widely understood and used. JRJ ------------------------------ Message: 22 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:15:10 +0100 From: Antonio Carlini <a.carlini at ntlworld.com> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Backups [was Re: Is tape dead?] Message-ID: <5603327E.3080107 at ntlworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 21/09/15 14:15, Noel Chiappa wrote: > > From: tony duell > > > In some cases it should be possible to write a machine code program > > that executes on 2 processors with wildly different instruciton > sets. > > I have this bit set that I was told (or something, the memory is _very_ > vague) that early versions of the KL-10 had this hack; the root block on > the > disk was the boot block both the PDP-10 and the PDP-11 front end machine, > and > the first instruction or two was very cleverly construced and sent the two > machines different ways. Alas, I looked in the front-end PDP-11 code (in > the > KLDCP; directory) and saw no signs of this, so maybe it was an urban > legend? > > I can't find a definitive reference right now, but I *think* that the ODS-1 disk format was first used on the PDP-11 and then later used in early versions of VMS. I *think* that it was arranged such that a PDP-11 booting and a VMS system booting could be done from the same disk by arranging for each to interpret the boot block in a way that each was happy with. Antonio arcarlini at iee.org ------------------------------ Message: 23 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:24:53 -0700 From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Structured Fortran - was Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus Message-ID: <560334C5.40102 at sydex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 09/23/2015 02:27 PM, ben wrote: > The 60's idea that MACROS could do that seems to have faded away. > Ben. It depends. One very handy method is to devise a machine architecture, complete with registers and opcodes, and write the application code in macros, creating instruction words--and then run them using a small emulator for the devised machine. After operation can be validated, re-code the macro bodies to generate native machine code instead of emulated fictitious machine instructions. A way to get certain tasks done very quickly. The C macro facility barely qualifies as such. PL/I had a wonderful preprocessor; some assemblers were similarly versatile. For example, I've used an assembler that boasted support of arrays of structures of user-defined data types. Now that was a macro facility. --Chuck ------------------------------ Message: 24 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:29:37 -0500 From: Jay Jaeger <cube1 at charter.net> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Re: Structured Fortran - was Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus Message-ID: <560335E1.4070607 at charter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On 9/23/2015 6:24 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote: > On 09/23/2015 02:27 PM, ben wrote: > >> The 60's idea that MACROS could do that seems to have faded away. >> Ben. > > It depends. One very handy method is to devise a machine architecture, > complete with registers and opcodes, and write the application code in > macros, creating instruction words--and then run them using a small > emulator for the devised machine. > > After operation can be validated, re-code the macro bodies to generate > native machine code instead of emulated fictitious machine instructions. > > A way to get certain tasks done very quickly. > Shades of SIL for SNOBOL and also STAGE2. JRJ ------------------------------ Message: 25 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:38:34 +0100 From: Antonio Carlini <a.carlini at ntlworld.com> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Backups [was Re: Is tape dead?] Message-ID: <560337FA.70404 at ntlworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 21/09/15 01:55, Jerome H. Fine wrote: > > I used the above example when I created a CD which had files to be used > with RT-11 in addition to being a normal CD under Windows. I found that > for a normal CD under Windows, sectors 0 to 15 (hard disk blocks 0 to 63) > on the CD were empty. I don't know if that area is reserved for boot > code > under Windows when the CD is bootable, but my goal did not require the > CD to be bootable under Windows. I did something very similar (or rather, used someone else's code to do something very similar) with ODS-2 under OpenVMS and ISO9660 (which is what Windows uses for CD media iirc). As you say, ISO9660 leaves the first 16 (or thereabouts) 2048 byte blocks undefined. ODS-2, on the other hand, uses them. So the code builds an ISO9660 CD and then overlays the ODS-2 structure on top. It finds the ISO9660 directory structures and arranges for them to live in BADBLK.SYS so VMS is happy enough when mounting the media. All the ODS-2 structures get packed into the beginning of the image so anything looking at the ISO9660 side sees nothing untoward. This only works well for filetypes that have no special structure under ODS-2: basically CR-LF text files and binary formats (such as PDF). I still have a CD that I built this way many moons ago. I remember reading a message in one of the EASYnet NOTES conferences (inside DEC) which more or less said that ISO9660 leaving those initial blocks free wasn't a coincidence and that DEC's representative (Andy Goldstein perhaps) had pushed for that. Antonio arcarlini at iee.org ------------------------------ Message: 26 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:57:22 -0700 From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Structured Fortran - was Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus Message-ID: <56033C62.9040804 at sydex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 09/23/2015 04:29 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote: > Shades of SIL for SNOBOL and also STAGE2. The first time I did this was for translating COBOL to a special-purpose dialect. Not a simple lexical task--it was a full-blown two-pass affair. The initial test versions of the thing were very, very slow. Once the native-code version was rolled out, it was very, very fast. Development time was pretty fast. --Chuck ------------------------------ Message: 27 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 02:36:13 +0200 From: Johnny Billquist <bqt at update.uu.se> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Re: Backups [was Re: Is tape dead?] Message-ID: <5603457D.2070703 at update.uu.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 2015-09-24 01:15, Antonio Carlini wrote: > On 21/09/15 14:15, Noel Chiappa wrote: >> > From: tony duell >> >> > In some cases it should be possible to write a machine code >> program >> > that executes on 2 processors with wildly different instruciton >> sets. >> >> I have this bit set that I was told (or something, the memory is _very_ >> vague) that early versions of the KL-10 had this hack; the root block >> on the >> disk was the boot block both the PDP-10 and the PDP-11 front end >> machine, and >> the first instruction or two was very cleverly construced and sent the >> two >> machines different ways. Alas, I looked in the front-end PDP-11 code >> (in the >> KLDCP; directory) and saw no signs of this, so maybe it was an urban >> legend? >> >> > > I can't find a definitive reference right now, but I *think* that the > ODS-1 disk format > was first used on the PDP-11 and then later used in early versions of > VMS. I *think* > that it was arranged such that a PDP-11 booting and a VMS system booting > could > be done from the same disk by arranging for each to interpret the boot > block in > a way that each was happy with. I think that is incorrect, since early VMS didn't havea boot block. The VAX-11/780 was always booted from the PDP-11, and it started with VMB. VMB was gotten from the FE, and VMB in turn understood the file system. It wasn't until the VAX-11/750 that DEC did a VAX that used boot blocks. And then, of course, the boot block is just the first block(s) on the disk. Don't matter what file system you might have... Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol ------------------------------ Message: 28 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:52:23 -0700 From: Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: DDS SETASI SC44 info? Message-ID: <56034947.1090007 at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed FYI, I've thrown up a couple of (cell phone) photos of the SC44 boards here: http://yahozna.dyndns.org/scratch/sc44/ I'll have the machine home in a few days and I'll be able to take better pictures then... - Josh On 9/23/15 2:40 PM, Josh Dersch wrote: > Hi all -- > > I just added a PDP-11/44 to my collection and it appears to have some > manner of cache upgrade; it's made by Digital Data Systems (DDS) and > consists of two cards, one hex-height labeled "SC44 SETASI" (in the > place of the normal 11/44 cache board) and a second quad-height > labeled "1051" at the end of the first backplane. The two are > connected via a ribbon cable. > > I know DDS made some seriously nice upgrades for the 11/70 but I can't > find anything on this board set at all. I'm assuming it's just a > souped-up cache but it'd be nice to know more (and docs would be > excellent of course). > > Thanks, > Josh ------------------------------ Message: 29 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:54:53 -0400 From: Paul Koning <paulkoning at comcast.net> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Structured Fortran - was Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus Message-ID: <5209997D-E793-43B2-BC93-502F921078E3 at comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On Sep 23, 2015, at 7:24 PM, Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote: > > ... > The C macro facility barely qualifies as such. PL/I had a wonderful > preprocessor; That depends on the compiler. I remember the PL/C compiler (from Cornell, running on IBM 370s). In graduate school, we were forced to use it because the instructor was also the main author of that compiler. It was used in a compiler construction class, with heavy use of macros. That seemed fine except for one fatal flaw in the macro engine design. PL/I has the notion of "source margins" -- source code is only processed between colums 2 and 72 (by default; those limits are settable). The fatal flaw was that the PL/C macro processor sat before the source margin machinery, so it had to obey the source margins in doing macro expansion. Unfortunately, it couldn't do that. A typical result of attempting to use a complex macro was a compiler crash. To cure it, you'd add or remove spaces >from the macro call and/or the macro definition -- at which point you'd get a crash or compiler infinite loop at some other macro call. After a few weeks of that, we convinced the instructor to drop this bogus piece of software and switch to a real compiler -- Pascal on the PDP-10. paul ------------------------------ Message: 30 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:06:23 -0700 From: Zane Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info? Message-ID: <032919E9-8EAB-4E9E-9E73-7CB2DD29A25C at aracnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sam Ismail used to have a DPS-6, if not more than one, but I don't think he was ever able to do anything with it. Does it have GCOS-6 installed? I worked on DPS-8's and GCOS-8 a lifetime ago. I did a little with GCOS-6, mainly assisting with moving operations from DPS-6 Mini's over to HP 9000 workstations running DPS-6 emulators. I never had any GCOS-6 doc's and my GCOS-8 doc's were sent North a couple years ago. Zane On Sep 23, 2015, at 2:44 PM, Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com> wrote: > Along with the 11/44 I also picked up a Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside > workstation; I can't seem to dig up much information specific to this > model > (a badge on the rear labels it as "Model/Index No. B01732"). I can take > some detailed pictures later this week after I've had time to clean it up > (it's very, very dirty), but it looks very similar to the DPS-6 unit > pictured on this site: > http://www.feb-patrimoine.com/projet/gcos6/gcos6.htm > > Anyone have any docs on this thing? Or fun anecdotes to share? What have > I gotten myself into with this thing? > > Thanks, > Josh ------------------------------ Message: 31 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:24:04 -0400 From: COURYHOUSE at aol.com To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Re: Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info? Message-ID: <384aea.543ed142.4334aab4 at aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" there was a nightmare! In a message dated 9/23/2015 6:20:18 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, healyzh at aracnet.com writes: Sam Ismail used to have a DPS-6, if not more than one ------------------------------ Message: 32 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:27:03 -0700 From: Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: ISO: FP11-F (M7093) for PDP-11/44 Message-ID: <56035167.3030403 at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed The 11/44 I acquired recently has a complete CPU set but no FP11-F board (M7093). I'd like to be able to run 2.11BSD (or other UNIX) on this machine, so having floating point hardware is pretty essential -- anyone have one going spare for sale/trade? Thanks as always, Josh ------------------------------ Message: 33 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:29:34 -0500 From: Paul Anderson <useddec at gmail.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: ISO: FP11-F (M7093) for PDP-11/44 Message-ID: <CACwhfuMWaZe_O=_rmZdOXJ3ufJiSpsvUKfQq86WeuvQ50H9wrg at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I've got some here. Let me find it later tonight or tomorrow and I'll contact you off list. Paul On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com> wrote: > The 11/44 I acquired recently has a complete CPU set but no FP11-F board > (M7093). I'd like to be able to run 2.11BSD (or other UNIX) on this > machine, so having floating point hardware is pretty essential -- anyone > have one going spare for sale/trade? > > Thanks as always, > Josh > > ------------------------------ Message: 34 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:48:59 -0400 From: Todd Goodman <tsg at bonedaddy.net> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: The desk has arrived - WAS: Somewhat OT: Freighting Items Message-ID: <20150924014858.GZ30683 at ns1.bonedaddy.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii * Ali <cctalk at fahimi.net> [150921 17:24]: > Well, > > In case anyone is still interested the desk arrived on Friday. The seller > did a very good job of packing it and it arrived in tact. Thanks to > everyone > for their input, tips, and bits of wisdom. BTW: If anyone is interested > you > can check out some quick pictures here: > > http://megacube.classiccmp.org/Synergetix/Synergetix.html > > The web page is very rudimentary and will be expanded. Once I get it > cleaned > up it will house an IBM 5150 A, a 5151, a 5152-002 and a Cipher 5120. > > -Ali Nice! Glad it arrived OK and was packed well by the seller! Todd ------------------------------ Message: 35 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:05:00 -0400 From: "Mike Stein" <mhs.stein at gmail.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Anyone recognize this bus/form factor? Message-ID: <D3E2DA8EFD034FC0B7CCD646F6CEE07B at 310e2> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original 68xx system, unusual (in my experience) 40-pin single row header bus. Anyone recognize it? https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-jRSv5KbuziQ/VgNYaQ5j1gI/AAAAAAAAAXY/A5k2… ------------------------------ Message: 36 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:42:42 -0700 From: steve shumaker <shumaker at att.net> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info? Message-ID: <56036322.4010901 at att.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed On 9/23/2015 2:44 PM, Josh Dersch wrote: > Along with the 11/44 I also picked up a Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside > workstation; I can't seem to dig up much information specific to this > model > (a badge on the rear labels it as "Model/Index No. B01732"). I can take > some detailed pictures later this week after I've had time to clean it up > (it's very, very dirty), but it looks very similar to the DPS-6 unit > pictured on this site: > http://www.feb-patrimoine.com/projet/gcos6/gcos6.htm > > Anyone have any docs on this thing? Or fun anecdotes to share? What have > I gotten myself into with this thing? > > Thanks, > Josh > > browse here and elsewhere for WWMMCCS history and beginnings of GCOS/DPS-6/Honeywell 6000 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worldwide_Military_Command_and_Control_System One legend that gets trotted out whenever you speak of WWMMCCS is the cookie monster that was on terminals in the Pentagon installation of WWMMCCS. As the legend goes, at random intervals, the console would go blank, operators would loose control and a message would display something to the effect "cookie monster hungry - feed me". Supposedly once you typed in one of several cookie names, the routine would release the system back to the operator. I personally know a retired AF IT manager who worked WWMMCCS and swears its a true story... Suspect you will find very little material other than what Al has - it wasn't a particularly common installed setup. Steve ------------------------------ Message: 37 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:00:46 -0700 From: Zane Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info? Message-ID: <7F9F16AF-2C5D-477C-9EA9-700E1D517C34 at aracnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sep 23, 2015, at 7:42 PM, steve shumaker <shumaker at att.net> wrote: > On 9/23/2015 2:44 PM, Josh Dersch wrote: >> Along with the 11/44 I also picked up a Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside >> workstation; I can't seem to dig up much information specific to this >> model >> (a badge on the rear labels it as "Model/Index No. B01732"). I can take >> some detailed pictures later this week after I've had time to clean it up >> (it's very, very dirty), but it looks very similar to the DPS-6 unit >> pictured on this site: >> http://www.feb-patrimoine.com/projet/gcos6/gcos6.htm >> >> Anyone have any docs on this thing? Or fun anecdotes to share? What >> have >> I gotten myself into with this thing? >> >> Thanks, >> Josh >> >> > browse here and elsewhere for WWMMCCS history and beginnings of > GCOS/DPS-6/Honeywell 6000 > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worldwide_Military_Command_and_Control_System > > > One legend that gets trotted out whenever you speak of WWMMCCS is the > cookie monster that was on terminals in the Pentagon installation of > WWMMCCS. As the legend goes, at random intervals, the console would go > blank, operators would loose control and a message would display something > to the effect "cookie monster hungry - feed me". Supposedly once you > typed in one of several cookie names, the routine would release the system > back to the operator. I personally know a retired AF IT manager who > worked WWMMCCS and swears its a true story... > > Suspect you will find very little material other than what Al has - it > wasn't a particularly common installed setup. > > Steve > DPS-8's, not 6's, and I for one don't believe that legend. Zane ------------------------------ Message: 38 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:03:47 -0700 From: Charles Anthony <charles.unix.pro at gmail.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info? Message-ID: <CANV78LRbu0e8K4-BPtacmdFdN6v--Nf9qdeNWu7vRtmpcngaLQ at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Zane Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2015, at 7:42 PM, steve shumaker <shumaker at att.net> wrote: > > > One legend that gets trotted out whenever you speak of WWMMCCS is the > cookie monster that was on terminals in the Pentagon installation of > WWMMCCS. As the legend goes, at random intervals, the console would go > blank, operators would loose control and a message would display something > to the effect "cookie monster hungry - feed me". Supposedly once you > typed in one of several cookie names, the routine would release the system > back to the operator. I personally know a retired AF IT manager who > worked WWMMCCS and swears its a true story... > > > > Suspect you will find very little material other than what Al has - it > wasn't a particularly common installed setup. > > > > Steve > > > > DPS-8's, not 6's, and I for one don't believe that legend. > > I don't know about the legend, but the cookie program originated on the DPS-8: http://www.multicians.org/cookie.html -- Charles ------------------------------ Message: 39 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:04:36 -0700 From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Structured Fortran - was Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus Message-ID: <56036844.8040006 at sydex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed On 09/23/2015 05:54 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > >> On Sep 23, 2015, at 7:24 PM, Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote: >> >> ... >> The C macro facility barely qualifies as such. PL/I had a wonderful >> preprocessor; > > That depends on the compiler. Well, IBM did have a real PL/I compiler (after all, they invented the stuff)--and later, there was an ANSI PL/I. --Chuck ------------------------------ Message: 40 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 15:43:37 +1200 From: Mike Ross <tmfdmike at gmail.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Anyone recognize this bus/form factor? Message-ID: <CAPhLQbMwe7CEQ8NY+G=DQ40mT9UV+4g406S=93jDVEXLS+xWOg at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 That's odd. I can't say for sure but... it has the feel of something that might have belonged in a terminal or keyboard... character generator or something... stab in the dark really. Mike On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Mike Stein <mhs.stein at gmail.com> wrote: > 68xx system, unusual (in my experience) 40-pin > single row header bus. > > Anyone recognize it? > > https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-jRSv5KbuziQ/VgNYaQ5j1gI/AAAAAAAAAXY/A5k2… > -- http://www.corestore.org 'No greater love hath a man than he lay down his life for his brother. Not for millions, not for glory, not for fame. For one person, in the dark, where no one will ever know or see.' ------------------------------ Message: 41 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:53:43 -0500 From: Adrian Stoness <tdk.knight at gmail.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Anyone recognize this bus/form factor? Message-ID: <CAA3rs22vN79V_-NnipY=nL0AQZiu7pJH-1k+=vs-4q3ZTC2Zqw at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 heathkit? On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Mike Ross <tmfdmike at gmail.com> wrote: > That's odd. > > I can't say for sure but... it has the feel of something that might > have belonged in a terminal or keyboard... character generator or > something... stab in the dark really. > > Mike > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Mike Stein <mhs.stein at gmail.com> wrote: > > 68xx system, unusual (in my experience) 40-pin > > single row header bus. > > > > Anyone recognize it? > > > > > https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-jRSv5KbuziQ/VgNYaQ5j1gI/AAAAAAAAAXY/A5k2… > > > > > > -- > > http://www.corestore.org > 'No greater love hath a man than he lay down his life for his brother. > Not for millions, not for glory, not for fame. > For one person, in the dark, where no one will ever know or see.' > ------------------------------ Message: 42 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:22:59 -0600 From: Eric Smith <spacewar at gmail.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Structured Fortran - was Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus Message-ID: <CAFrGgTQ8=KQ5+DWXqj_SstbnH3Pj6xRFSd-BHe4yFd=gghOUag at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Jay Jaeger <cube1 at charter.net> wrote: > An int just has to be able to store numbers of a certain magnitude. > Same with long. You do have to be able to convert between longs (and > possibly ints) and addresses (*). So, you make an int 5 digits (which > matches the natural length of addresses) and longs something like 10 > digits. You don't have to simulate anything, near as I can tell. Then > the length of an int is 5 and a long is 10 (instead of the more typical > 2 and 4). And the length of a char? It's required that all types other than bitfields be fully represented as multiple chars, not e.g. an int being two and a half chars, and a char has to cover at least the range 0..255, or -128..127, and it has to have a range based on a power of two. ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?3.6 ?1 - a byte has to hold any member of the basic character set ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?3.7.1 ?1 - a character is a C bit representation that fits in a byte ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?5.2.4.2.1 ?1 - the size of a char is CHAR_BIT bits, which is at least 8 ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?6.2.6.1 ?2-4 - everything other than bitfields consists of bytes ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?6.2.6.1 ?5 - Some data types other than char may have machine representations that can't use all of the possible bit patterns of the storage allocated; those representations are called "trap representations". The char (and unsigned char) types can't have trap representations. ISO/IEC 9899:199(E) ?6.2.6.2 ?1 - unsigned integer types must have a range of 0 to (2^n)-1, for some natural number n. ISO/IEC 9899:199(E) ?6.2.6.2 ?2 - signed integer types must have a range of -(2^n) to (2^n)-1 or -((2^n)-1) to (2^n)-1. On a decimal machine, if you use three digits for a char, you have to arrange that all your other types are multiples of three digits, with each three-digit group only using valid char representations, because accessing a char/byte out of a larger integer type is not allowed to be a trap representation, because chars can't have a trap representation. If an unsigned char is three digits with values from 0..255, an unsigned int can't be five digits. It has to be six digits, and the only valid representations for it would have values of 0..65535. It can't have any valid values in the range of 65536..999999. ------------------------------ Message: 43 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 01:23:11 -0400 From: william degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Anyone recognize this bus/form factor? Message-ID: <CABGJBuegdj6gxxuh=pfqmUkvKgvuPO-O67x-JkeMkgqJKeqpYw at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Looks like an add on or daughter board. Bill Degnan twitter: billdeg vintagecomputer.net On Sep 23, 2015 11:53 PM, "Adrian Stoness" <tdk.knight at gmail.com> wrote: > heathkit? > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Mike Ross <tmfdmike at gmail.com> wrote: > > > That's odd. > > > > I can't say for sure but... it has the feel of something that might > > have belonged in a terminal or keyboard... character generator or > > something... stab in the dark really. > > > > Mike > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Mike Stein <mhs.stein at gmail.com> wrote: > > > 68xx system, unusual (in my experience) 40-pin > > > single row header bus. > > > > > > Anyone recognize it? > > > > > > > > > https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-jRSv5KbuziQ/VgNYaQ5j1gI/AAAAAAAAAXY/A5k2… > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.corestore.org > > 'No greater love hath a man than he lay down his life for his brother. > > Not for millions, not for glory, not for fame. > > For one person, in the dark, where no one will ever know or see.' > > > ------------------------------ Message: 44 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:52:39 -0400 From: Sean Caron <scaron at umich.edu> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>, Sean Caron <scaron at umich.edu> Subject: Re: DDS SETASI SC44 info? Message-ID: <CAA43vkUFNLHRw1sbw_0hrqJpHdq0xyUcTJC_s+W5YS+=b11nGQ at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Any easy way to post pics of the top side of both boards? I can't definitively ID them but we should be able to make a good guess as to what's actually on there looking at all the major ICs... Did you just buy this? :O http://vintagetech.com/sales/Big%20Iron/PDP%2011-44/Information Best, Sean On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all -- > > I just added a PDP-11/44 to my collection and it appears to have some > manner of cache upgrade; it's made by Digital Data Systems (DDS) and > consists of two cards, one hex-height labeled "SC44 SETASI" (in the place > of the normal 11/44 cache board) and a second quad-height labeled "1051" > at > the end of the first backplane. The two are connected via a ribbon cable. > > I know DDS made some seriously nice upgrades for the 11/70 but I can't > find > anything on this board set at all. I'm assuming it's just a souped-up > cache but it'd be nice to know more (and docs would be excellent of > course). > > Thanks, > Josh > ------------------------------ Message: 45 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:56:07 -0400 From: Sean Caron <scaron at umich.edu> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>, Sean Caron <scaron at umich.edu> Subject: Re: Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info? Message-ID: <CAA43vkWd1NHC3=t6xtVOb8fg7dc1qxOO2ySh_=h1zr21-eRVnw at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Ah, so these are the vintagetech.com machines! Please take lots of pics of the DPS-8 inside and out; I've never really seen the innards of a Honeywell machine before and I'm kind of curious what their "style" looks like. Best, Sean On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Dave G4UGM <dave.g4ugm at gmail.com> wrote: > Many years ago we used them as Data Entry machines, but I have no > documents and have forgotten everything I knew. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Josh > > Dersch > > Sent: 23 September 2015 22:45 > > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > > <cctalk at classiccmp.org> > > Subject: Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info? > > > > Along with the 11/44 I also picked up a Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside > > workstation; I can't seem to dig up much information specific to this > model (a > > badge on the rear labels it as "Model/Index No. B01732"). I can take > some > > detailed pictures later this week after I've had time to clean it up > (it's very, > > very dirty), but it looks very similar to the DPS-6 unit pictured on > this site: > > http://www.feb-patrimoine.com/projet/gcos6/gcos6.htm > > > > Anyone have any docs on this thing? Or fun anecdotes to share? What > have > > I gotten myself into with this thing? > > > > Thanks, > > Josh > > ------------------------------ Message: 46 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:18:03 +1000 From: steven at malikoff.com To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts" <cctech at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Thoughts on manual database design? Message-ID: <38f04b0e735cffb635b13834dcaee682.squirrel at webmail04.register.com> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Not sure why you have VARCHARs for primary keys, why not use the conventional auto-increment int so you can dispense with the LastGeneratedArtifactID table. CREATE TABLE Manual_Artifact ( ArtifactID INT(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, . . . other fields . . . CONSTRAINT ArtifactID_pk PRIMARY KEY (ArtifactID) ) You'll also need similar type primary keys on your other tables, and also set up the foreign key constraints for your db integrity if you really want to go that far for this project. Some of those tables could be coalesced to simplify the thing - as per the inane comment from the guy in Holland (or wherever) for instance the Location and Manual_Type tables. Another thing, although MySQL is fine but for this I think SQLite might be a better choice of db. Its access methods are all in-process ie. no external dbms service to bother with, just a library to link in and the physical database is a disk file (.s3db extension). It has a much 'lighter' db footprint. Steve. ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Re: Thoughts on manual database design? From: "Jay Jaeger" <cube1 at charter.net> Date: Thu, September 24, 2015 6:52 am To: cctech at classiccmp.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > If anyone cares a draft data model is visible at: > > http://webpages.charter.net/thecomputercollection/misc/manualmodel.pdf > > (It may change as I work on the design). > > Biggest change from earlier discussions: I found no reason not to merge > the manuals/artifacts relationship table into the artifact table, and I > reduced the primary key columns down to only those absolutely necessary > to guarantee uniqueness. > > JRJ > > ------------------------------ Message: 47 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 08:39:17 +0200 From: Pontus Pihlgren <pontus at Update.UU.SE> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: DDS SETASI SC44 info? Message-ID: <20150924063916.GA32087 at Update.UU.SE> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii archive.org almost has some info: http://web.archive.org/web/19990908232518/http://www.setasi.com/DECPP.html It's a "Super Cache". Perhaps you could track down someone from Setasi? See the mention here: ftp://ftp.dbit.com/pub/pdp11/faq/faq.pages/vendors.html /P On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:40:14PM -0700, Josh Dersch wrote: > Hi all -- > > I just added a PDP-11/44 to my collection and it appears to have some > manner of cache upgrade; it's made by Digital Data Systems (DDS) and > consists of two cards, one hex-height labeled "SC44 SETASI" (in the place > of the normal 11/44 cache board) and a second quad-height labeled "1051" > at > the end of the first backplane. The two are connected via a ribbon cable. > > I know DDS made some seriously nice upgrades for the 11/70 but I can't > find > anything on this board set at all. I'm assuming it's just a souped-up > cache but it'd be nice to know more (and docs would be excellent of > course). > > Thanks, > Josh ------------------------------ Message: 48 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:02:56 -0700 From: Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: DDS SETASI SC44 info? Message-ID: <5603A020.1060000 at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 9/23/15 2:52 PM, Sean Caron wrote: > Any easy way to post pics of the top side of both boards? I can't > definitively ID them but we should be able to make a good guess as to > what's actually on there looking at all the major ICs... Yeah, I took some pictures this afternoon (a bit blurry -- it was dark and all I had was my cell phone, I'll try to get better pics tomorrow): http://yahozna.dyndns.org/scratch/sc44/ > > Did you just buy this? :O > > http://vintagetech.com/sales/Big%20Iron/PDP%2011-44/Information Yep :). - Josh > > Best, > > Sean > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all -- >> >> I just added a PDP-11/44 to my collection and it appears to have some >> manner of cache upgrade; it's made by Digital Data Systems (DDS) and >> consists of two cards, one hex-height labeled "SC44 SETASI" (in the place >> of the normal 11/44 cache board) and a second quad-height labeled "1051" >> at >> the end of the first backplane. The two are connected via a ribbon >> cable. >> >> I know DDS made some seriously nice upgrades for the 11/70 but I can't >> find >> anything on this board set at all. I'm assuming it's just a souped-up >> cache but it'd be nice to know more (and docs would be excellent of >> course). >> >> Thanks, >> Josh >> ------------------------------ Message: 49 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 01:04:59 -0600 From: ben <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Re: Structured Fortran - was Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus Message-ID: <5603A09B.3050706 at jetnet.ab.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 9/23/2015 11:22 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?3.6 ?1 - a byte has to hold any member of the > basic character set > ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?3.7.1 ?1 - a character is a C bit representation > that fits in a byte > ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?5.2.4.2.1 ?1 - the size of a char is CHAR_BIT > bits, which is at least 8 > ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?6.2.6.1 ?2-4 - everything other than bitfields > consists of bytes Bla Bla Bla ... What happened to seven bit ASCII? I think the major change in C from the OTHER programing languages is BYTE addressing. Even Pascal from what I have seen packs characters in words of some kind. That is main dividing line in how memory can be accessed. char *ptr++ vs array(foo-1) 0-99 can hold a trimmed character set and 10 digits per int. 5 chars per word sounds right on decimal machine. Logic operations would be on the digit rather the binary level. This may not be standard C but I has the early PDP 11 C feel if they I developed UNIX on decimal machine. Ben. ------------------------------ Message: 50 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:10:32 -0700 From: Josh Dersch <derschjo at gmail.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info? Message-ID: <5603A1E8.3060903 at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 9/23/15 2:56 PM, Sean Caron wrote: > Ah, so these are the vintagetech.com machines! Please take lots of pics of > the DPS-8 inside and out; I've never really seen the innards of a > Honeywell > machine before and I'm kind of curious what their "style" looks like. > > Best, > > Sean Will do. I took the boards out to inspect them tonight (they had rattled about a bit during shipment) and everything seems ok. I'll have time to take some pictures this weekend. Unfortunately, somewhere along the line someone disconnected nearly all the ribbon cables running to the boards and I've got no idea what goes where (only a couple are cohesively labeled.) This thing is going to be a project. - Josh ------------------------------ Message: 51 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 03:53:58 -0400 From: COURYHOUSE at aol.com To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Re: Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info? Message-ID: <a1cb0.44c5458a.43350616 at aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" is it a dps 6 or 8? In a message dated 9/24/2015 12:10:41 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, derschjo at gmail.com writes: On 9/23/15 2:56 PM, Sean Caron wrote: > Ah, so these are the vintagetech.com machines! Please take lots of pics of > the DPS-8 inside and out; I've never really seen the innards of a Honeywell > machine before and I'm kind of curious what their "style" looks like. > > Best, > > Sean Will do. I took the boards out to inspect them tonight (they had rattled about a bit during shipment) and everything seems ok. I'll have time to take some pictures this weekend. Unfortunately, somewhere along the line someone disconnected nearly all the ribbon cables running to the boards and I've got no idea what goes where (only a couple are cohesively labeled.) This thing is going to be a project. - Josh ------------------------------ Message: 52 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:20:02 +0100 From: "Dave G4UGM" <dave.g4ugm at gmail.com> To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: RE: Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info? Message-ID: <084601d0f6aa$3209f150$961dd3f0$(a)gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The DPS6 is a very different animal to the GE600 -> GE6000 > Level 66 => DPS300 which were as far as I know all TTL or LSI TTL.... ... The CPU was built on wire wrap boards which were around 14" or 16" square (say 35cm) and which slotted into a backplane. .. the machines had an extensive test suite which the CE ran weekly. This could vary the voltages to the logic chips.... .. when a faulty board was found they were usually repaired on-site, there was a board tester shipped with each system to identify chip level faults. .. this contrasts with the earlier H3200 we had which was fixed by board level repair.. The CPU and Memory were in separate cabinets, much like the 360/67 but Honeywell kept the same layout when moving from core (I think the GE6000/H6000 were core) on to D-Ram in the L66. The CPU number and I think the RAM start addresses were all configured on switchs, so it was possible to split a Dual CPU machine into two singles for testing. The peripherals came from MPI a joint venture with CDC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_Data_Corporation#Magnetic_Peripherals…. There are more ramblings, (not from me) here:- http://www.feb-patrimoine.com/english/gecos_to_gcos8_part_2.htm The GCOS-3 Control Cards and Abort Codes Pocket Guide DD04 Rev.0 is sat on my desk in the scanning queue... Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Josh > Dersch > Sent: 24 September 2015 08:11 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts > <cctalk at classiccmp.org> > Subject: Re: Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info? > > On 9/23/15 2:56 PM, Sean Caron wrote: > > Ah, so these are the vintagetech.com machines! Please take lots of > > pics of the DPS-8 inside and out; I've never really seen the innards > > of a Honeywell machine before and I'm kind of curious what their "style" > looks like. > > > > Best, > > > > Sean > > Will do. I took the boards out to inspect them tonight (they had rattled > about > a bit during shipment) and everything seems ok. I'll have time to take > some > pictures this weekend. Unfortunately, somewhere along the line someone > disconnected nearly all the ribbon cables running to the boards and I've > got > no idea what goes where (only a couple are cohesively labeled.) This > thing is > going to be a project. > > - Josh > ------------------------------ Message: 53 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:41:35 +0200 From: Pontus Pihlgren <pontus at Update.UU.SE> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Regarding Manuals Message-ID: <20150924094135.GB32087 at Update.UU.SE> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi I have more manuals than I really have room for. Lots and lots of VMS binders and softcover books. And now my employer is throwing out box upon box of SUN, Ultrix, tru64 and various literature. I'm trying to save what I think is useful and/or worth preserving. But It's damn hard to decide and damn hard to motivate filling up every inch of precious space. At the moment I thinking about just looking the other way and throw what is not directly useful to me. What is a collector/hoarder to do? Anyone who wants to turn up with a truck and fill with dead trees? Regards, Pontus. ------------------------------ Message: 54 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 19:44:23 +1000 From: Nigel Williams <nw at retrocomputingtasmania.com> To: cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Regarding Manuals Message-ID: <F0214D71-4B97-4CF9-9A8A-CD39406E25FE at retrocomputingtasmania.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On 24 Sep 2015, at 7:41 pm, Pontus Pihlgren <pontus at Update.UU.SE> wrote: > ...And now my employer is throwing out box > upon box of SUN, Ultrix, tru64 and various literature. Is it practical/possible to make a list of what is available and to crowd-source out to the cctalk community to check whether copies exist online or due for scanning? that might cut down the volume worth keeping. ------------------------------ Message: 55 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:51:54 +0200 From: Pontus Pihlgren <pontus at Update.UU.SE> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Regarding Manuals Message-ID: <20150924095154.GA9183 at Update.UU.SE> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 07:44:23PM +1000, Nigel Williams wrote: > > > On 24 Sep 2015, at 7:41 pm, Pontus Pihlgren <pontus at Update.UU.SE> wrote: > > ...And now my employer is throwing out box > > upon box of SUN, Ultrix, tru64 and various literature. > > Is it practical/possible to make a list of what is available and to > crowd-source out to the cctalk community to check whether copies exist > online or due for scanning? that might cut down the volume worth > keeping. It would be a lot of work. For the VMS stuff I have started indexing. I suppose I should run the list through manx at least. Having an automatic tool for that is tempting to make. /P ------------------------------ Message: 56 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:16:06 +0200 From: "Mazzini Alessandro" <mazzinia at tin.it> To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: R: Regarding Manuals Message-ID: <006001d0f6b2$06a4f570$13eee050$(a)tin.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Crying at the prospect of the waste :( (from someone that had the chance of saving just a set of X-Open manuals) -----Messaggio originale----- Da: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] Per conto di Pontus Pihlgren Inviato: gioved? 24 settembre 2015 11:42 A: cctalk at classiccmp.org Oggetto: Regarding Manuals Hi I have more manuals than I really have room for. Lots and lots of VMS binders and softcover books. And now my employer is throwing out box upon box of SUN, Ultrix, tru64 and various literature. I'm trying to save what I think is useful and/or worth preserving. But It's damn hard to decide and damn hard to motivate filling up every inch of precious space. At the moment I thinking about just looking the other way and throw what is not directly useful to me. What is a collector/hoarder to do? Anyone who wants to turn up with a truck and fill with dead trees? Regards, Pontus. ------------------------------ Message: 57 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 07:10:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Mouse <mouse at Rodents-Montreal.ORG> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Re: C out of its comfort zone - Re: Structured Fortran - was Re: Self modifying code Message-ID: <201509241110.HAA04206 at Stone.Rodents-Montreal.ORG> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > Well, there are plenty of word-but-not-byte/character addressable > machines out there, which makes life interesting for the likes of C. C is able to support them just fine, though a whole lot of C code isn't (beacuse it assumes things like "all pointers are the same size", or even more specifically, "all pointers are just memory addresses"). Such machines typically just have void * and char * occupying more space than pointers to word-and-larger types. > One thing that I've wondered about is "does the current HLL-du-juor > dictate processor architecture?"--and not the reverse. Dictate, probably not quite. Influence, certainly. > Does anyone consider a machine that doesn't implement any sort of > hardware stack, for example, a marketplace contender? I don't, for the simple reason that I don't know of any that aren't, by today's standards, ludicrously slow. If a hypothetical machine were to be released that didn't have stack support of some sort in hardware (even if just autodecrement and autoincrement addressing modes - for example, the Super-H)? I'd want to know what it had that made its maker think it worth making despite that. However, I have trouble imagining a machine on which it is difficult to implement a stack. Even the machines of old which "didn't have stacks" generally had (what we would today call) addressing modes that made it possible to implement them without too much pain. (What they usually didn't have was an easy way to get procedure call return addresses onto the stack, like one I remember hearing of whose call instruction stored the return address just before the beginning of the called procedure. While I don't know any such machines well enough to be sure, I would imagine a return stack could be maintained there by slightly complicating the procedurecall and return sequences - in this crowd, I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong! :-) /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B ------------------------------ Message: 58 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 05:35:54 -0700 From: Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Re: Regarding Manuals Message-ID: <5603EE2A.8020308 at bitsavers.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed On 9/24/15 2:41 AM, Pontus Pihlgren wrote: > Hi > > I have more manuals than I really have room for. Lots and lots of VMS > binders and softcover books. And now my employer is throwing out box > upon box of SUN, Ultrix, tru64 and various literature. > I'd like to get a set of SunOS 1.x manuals to fill out what I just uploaded to bitsavers, and any manuals for SunOS layered products that I haven't already uploaded. Hoping they still had manuals that old. ------------------------------ Message: 59 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 14:53:15 +0200 From: Pontus Pihlgren <pontus at Update.UU.SE> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Regarding Manuals Message-ID: <20150924125315.GC9183 at Update.UU.SE> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:35:54AM -0700, Al Kossow wrote: > On 9/24/15 2:41 AM, Pontus Pihlgren wrote: > >Hi > > > >I have more manuals than I really have room for. Lots and lots of VMS > >binders and softcover books. And now my employer is throwing out box > >upon box of SUN, Ultrix, tru64 and various literature. > > > > I'd like to get a set of SunOS 1.x manuals to fill out what I just > uploaded to bitsavers, and any manuals for SunOS layered products > that > I haven't already uploaded. Hoping they still had manuals that old. > I think the oldest I have seen from Sun is from 1987 or 88. Is that old enough? /P ------------------------------ Message: 60 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:16:20 -0400 From: Toby Thain <toby at telegraphics.com.au> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Structured Fortran - was Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus Message-ID: <5603F7A4.60808 at telegraphics.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 2015-09-24 3:04 AM, ben wrote: > On 9/23/2015 11:22 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > >> ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?3.6 ?1 - a byte has to hold any member of the >> basic character set >> ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?3.7.1 ?1 - a character is a C bit representation >> that fits in a byte >> ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?5.2.4.2.1 ?1 - the size of a char is CHAR_BIT >> bits, which is at least 8 >> ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?6.2.6.1 ?2-4 - everything other than bitfields >> consists of bytes > > Bla Bla Bla ... > What happened to seven bit ASCII? > I think the major change in C from the OTHER programing languages > is BYTE addressing. Even Pascal from what I have seen packs characters > in words of some kind. That is main dividing line in how memory > can be accessed. char *ptr++ vs array(foo-1) Depends on the Pascal. Apple chose (Object) Pascal as its principal systems and applications programming language for at least a decade (Lisa, 68K Mac, etc), and its memory addressing capabilities, in particular byte arrays, were equivalent to C's. Many other Pascals had similar extensions (I seem to recall Turbo Pascal did). --Toby > > 0-99 can hold a trimmed character set and 10 digits per int. > 5 chars per word sounds right on decimal machine. > Logic operations would be on the digit rather the binary > level. This may not be standard C but I has the early > PDP 11 C feel if they I developed UNIX on decimal machine. > > Ben. > > > > > > ------------------------------ Message: 61 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:06:51 -0400 From: "Mike Stein" <mhs.stein at gmail.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Anyone recognize this bus/form factor? Message-ID: <D3A61F3A56BA41069507A1E2A18B491F at 310e2> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Found a few more boards; I guess the displays, optocouplers and surge suppressors suggest an industrial system of some sort, perhaps custom or limited production. Wonder why that type of connector wasn't used more often for a bus instead of presumably more expensive edge connectors; I think I do have some (CDC?) boards that are the opposite, i.e. pins plugging into sockets on the backplane. https://picasaweb.google.com/115794482077177620188/Mystery68xxCards?authkey… ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Ross" <tmfdmike at gmail.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 11:43 PM Subject: Re: Anyone recognize this bus/form factor? > That's odd. > > I can't say for sure but... it has the feel of > something that might > have belonged in a terminal or keyboard... > character generator or > something... stab in the dark really. > > Mike > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Mike Stein > <mhs.stein at gmail.com> wrote: >> 68xx system, unusual (in my experience) 40-pin >> single row header bus. >> >> Anyone recognize it? >> >> https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-jRSv5KbuziQ/VgNYaQ5j1gI/AAAAAAAAAXY/A5k2… >> > > > > -- > > http://www.corestore.org > 'No greater love hath a man than he lay down his > life for his brother. > Not for millions, not for glory, not for fame. > For one person, in the dark, where no one will > ever know or see.' ------------------------------ Message: 62 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:00:47 -0500 From: Jay Jaeger <cube1 at charter.net> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Re: Structured Fortran - was Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus Message-ID: <5604101F.2090207 at charter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On 9/24/2015 12:22 AM, Eric Smith wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Jay Jaeger <cube1 at charter.net> wrote: >> An int just has to be able to store numbers of a certain magnitude. >> Same with long. You do have to be able to convert between longs (and >> possibly ints) and addresses (*). So, you make an int 5 digits (which >> matches the natural length of addresses) and longs something like 10 >> digits. You don't have to simulate anything, near as I can tell. Then >> the length of an int is 5 and a long is 10 (instead of the more typical >> 2 and 4). > > And the length of a char? It's required that all types other than > bitfields be fully represented as multiple chars, not e.g. an int > being two and a half chars, and a char has to cover at least the range > 0..255, or -128..127, and it has to have a range based on a power of > two. > > ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?3.6 ?1 - a byte has to hold any member of the > basic character set > ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?3.7.1 ?1 - a character is a C bit representation > that fits in a byte > ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?5.2.4.2.1 ?1 - the size of a char is CHAR_BIT > bits, which is at least 8 > ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?6.2.6.1 ?2-4 - everything other than bitfields > consists of bytes > > ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?6.2.6.1 ?5 - Some data types other than char may > have machine representations that can't use all of the possible bit > patterns of the storage allocated; those representations are called > "trap representations". The char (and unsigned char) types can't have > trap representations. > > ISO/IEC 9899:199(E) ?6.2.6.2 ?1 - unsigned integer types must have a > range of 0 to (2^n)-1, for some natural number n. > ISO/IEC 9899:199(E) ?6.2.6.2 ?2 - signed integer types must have a > range of -(2^n) to (2^n)-1 or -((2^n)-1) to (2^n)-1. > > On a decimal machine, if you use three digits for a char, you have to > arrange that all your other types are multiples of three digits, with > each three-digit group only using valid char representations, because > accessing a char/byte out of a larger integer type is not allowed to > be a trap representation, because chars can't have a trap > representation. I don't *have* to do any such thing. > > If an unsigned char is three digits with values from 0..255, an > unsigned int can't be five digits. It has to be six digits, and the > only valid representations for it would have values of 0..65535. It > can't have any valid values in the range of 65536..999999. > It does not *have* to be six digits. You seem to be supposing that I said one could/would implement ANSI/ISO C on a 1410 in native code (as opposed to some kind of binary threaded-code simulator that has been suggested). I did not. I said C, and by that I meant something presumably contemporary with the machine in its last years. I would not suggest that one would implement ANSI/ISO C on such a machine, any more than I would expect to implement current versions of FORTRAN on such a machine. Heck, there wasn't even a FORTRAN IV for the 1410. I would expect a char to be 6 or 7 bits on a 1410 - one storage character, rather than 8 (one could conceivably use the word-mark for a char bit to get 7 bits, and it would make some sense to do so, but if abused (say, by accessing an int as char [5]) could result in a wordmark in the middle of an int, which it would be good to avoid if at all possible to avoid having to move integer types to an intermediate storage location using record marks to terminate the move rather than wordmarks). An int would be 5 characters long. If one goes back to the definition of C in "The C Programming Language", then one sees a less restrictive specification the the contemporary ANSI/ISO specification. The restrictions of ANSI/ISO C came later because of things that folks tended to assume and do in their C programs because of the hardware it typically ran on, i.e., that chars were capable of holding 8 bit binary numbers. "Objects declared as characters (char) are large enough to store any member of the implementation's character set, and if a genuine character >from that character set is stored in a character variable, its *value* is *equivalent* to the integer code for that character. Other values may be stored into character variables, but the implementation is machine-dependent." (asterisk emphasis added). "Equivalent" is extremely important here, as it frees one from the notion of it having to be the exact same bit representation. It means that if you cast from char to int (access it as a value), or pass a char as a formal parameter, the int gets the value of the character as a set of bits, and vice versa. It does NOT require that the int be the *identical* bits as the char. Common practice is, of course, to use chars to store small, but still useful, integer values, in this case, -32 to +31 (6 bits) or -64 to +63 (7 bits)). Would this break some programs that assume a char can hold values from -127 to 127? Of course. Would those programs be "fixable" to the extent that they were not dependent upon machine I/O hardware and the like? Yes, they should be. ""Plain" integers have the natural size suggested by the host machine architecture". Thus one would end up with a C char type which is only slightly different from FORTRAN CHARACTER variables, but which can still store small integer values in the spirit of C. Enough already. JRJ ------------------------------ Message: 63 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:11:16 -0500 From: Jay Jaeger <cube1 at charter.net> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Re: Structured Fortran - was Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus Message-ID: <56041294.1060803 at charter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On 9/24/2015 2:04 AM, ben wrote: > On 9/23/2015 11:22 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > > > 0-99 can hold a trimmed character set and 10 digits per int. > 5 chars per word sounds right on decimal machine. > Logic operations would be on the digit rather the binary > level. On a 1410 (or 1401) 0-63 can hold the entire character set using char/int conversion instead of storing chars as their native bits, and then we have 5 digits per int as the native integer size (size of an address). 0-127 would be required to hold a character with a work mark bit, which I think one would probably want to make available at a character level, but try and avoid having them set inside of ints. Also, on a 1410 or a 1401 with the right optional features, bitwise operations (bitwise &^|) could still be carried out on a binary level without undue difficulty. As you say, logic operations (&&, ||) would presumably use int 0 and 1 - but could still be carried out on a binary level. >This may not be standard C but I has the early > PDP 11 C feel if they I developed UNIX on decimal machine. > > Ben. > Precisely. JRJ ------------------------------ Message: 64 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:23:55 -0500 From: Chris Elmquist <chrise at pobox.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Anyone recognize this bus/form factor? Message-ID: <20150924152355.GQ4403 at n0jcf.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thursday (09/24/2015 at 10:06AM -0400), Mike Stein wrote: > Found a few more boards; I guess the displays, optocouplers and surge > suppressors suggest an industrial system of some sort, perhaps custom or > limited production. > > Wonder why that type of connector wasn't used more often for a bus instead > of presumably more expensive edge connectors; I think I do have some > (CDC?) > boards that are the opposite, i.e. pins plugging into sockets on the > backplane. > > https://picasaweb.google.com/115794482077177620188/Mystery68xxCards?authkey… Those are the same connectors used on the Heathkit H8 and H89 backplanes but those are definitely not cards that plug into the backplane of either of those machines. Chris -- Chris Elmquist ------------------------------ Message: 65 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:06:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Structured Fortran - was Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1509240856460.309 at shell.lmi.net> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Eric Smith wrote: > And the length of a char? It's required that all types other than > bitfields be fully represented as multiple chars, not e.g. an int > being two and a half chars, and a char has to cover at least the range > 0..255, or -128..127, and it has to have a range based on a power of > two. > ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?3.6 ?1 . . . > ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?3.7.1 ?1 . . . > ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?5.2.4.2.1 ?1 . . . > ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?6.2.6.1 ?2-4 - everything other than bitfields > consists of bytes > ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) ?6.2.6.1 ?5 - Some data types other than char may > ISO/IEC 9899:199(E) ?6.2.6.2 ?1 - unsigned integer types must have a > ISO/IEC 9899:199(E) ?6.2.6.2 ?2 - signed integer types must have a > On a decimal machine, if you use three digits for a char, you have to > arrange that all your other types are multiples of three digits, with > each three-digit group only using valid char representations, because > accessing a char/byte out of a larger integer type is not allowed to > be a trap representation, because chars can't have a trap > representation. > If an unsigned char is three digits with values from 0..255, an > unsigned int can't be five digits. It has to be six digits, and the > only valid representations for it would have values of 0..65535. It > can't have any valid values in the range of 65536..999999. The original "challenge" just said "C". THAT is all ANSI C. K&R C did not have those limitations. If you wanted to build a C with a 7 bit short, a 13 bit int, and a 19 bit long, it was OK. Only limits were that the sizeof an int couldn't be smaller than the size of a short, sizeof a long couldn't be less than that of an int, etc. I am not claiming that I could create a C compiler for 1401/1410, but these restrictions only preclude ANSI C. Note: I am also not saying that doing so would be a good idea. ------------------------------ Message: 66 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:08:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1509240907080.309 at shell.lmi.net> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, COURYHOUSE at aol.com wrote: > is it a dps 6 or 8? I am actually sincerely sorry that you are having another migraine that causes you to press the spacebar. But, I do have to point out that it makes you sound like William Shatner. ------------------------------ Message: 67 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:55:41 -0400 From: COURYHOUSE at aol.com To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Re: Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info? Message-ID: <aaf55.450df234.4335850b at aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" pretty funny! maybe I should be fortunate enough to have his salary also!? #ed In a message dated 9/24/2015 9:08:48 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, cisin at xenosoft.com writes: On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, COURYHOUSE at aol.com wrote: > is it a dps 6 or 8? I am actually sincerely sorry that you are having another migraine that causes you to press the spacebar. But, I do have to point out that it makes you sound like William Shatner. End of cctalk Digest, Vol 15, Issue 24 **************************************

8 years, 7 months

DDS SETASI SC44 info?

by derschjo＠gmail.com

Hi all -- I just added a PDP-11/44 to my collection and it appears to have some manner of cache upgrade; it's made by Digital Data Systems (DDS) and consists of two cards, one hex-height labeled "SC44 SETASI" (in the place of the normal 11/44 cache board) and a second quad-height labeled "1051" at the end of the first backplane. The two are connected via a ribbon cable. I know DDS made some seriously nice upgrades for the 11/70 but I can't find anything on this board set at all. I'm assuming it's just a souped-up cache but it'd be nice to know more (and docs would be excellent of course). Thanks, Josh

8 years, 7 months

would like to find blue dg et head looking terminal to go with small ecli...

by COURYHOUSE＠aol.com

probably an artifact generated by my migraine this evening . In a message dated 9/22/2015 8:39:34 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, cisin at xenosoft.com writes: On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, COURYHOUSE at aol.com wrote: > I see you have one of those small reel tape drives also like we do > in our s20... what is the interface on them? what BPI ? who actually > made them? rather off-topic: is your space bar sticking? Seems like a lot of keybounce.

8 years, 7 months

Free: IBM RT Monitors near Chicago

by silent700＠gmail.com

2x IBM 5081-16 CRT monitors. 3x BNC input and output. Unknown sync rates, may be specific to RT output, may not. Assumed working but unable to test. Don't want to scrap them but can't hang on to them much longer. You pick up or arrange pickup in 60070. J

8 years, 7 months

cctalk Digest, Vol 15, Issue 24

by COURYHOUSE＠aol.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwncwOG8-HY Fun - a BBC this is your life with Shatner - ed# In a message dated 9/24/2015 2:57:43 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, mark at markesystems.com writes: > I am actually sincerely sorry that you are having another migraine that > causes you to press the spacebar. > But, I do have to point out that it makes you sound like William Shatner. SNORT!!! (I had the fun of performing his version of Common People for a while with our power-pop band - it was a real blast!) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsyNdjRX9mQ ~~ Mark Moulding

8 years, 7 months

cctalk Digest, Vol 15, Issue 24

by mark＠markesystems.com

> I am actually sincerely sorry that you are having another migraine that > causes you to press the spacebar. > But, I do have to point out that it makes you sound like William Shatner. SNORT!!! (I had the fun of performing his version of Common People for a while with our power-pop band - it was a real blast!) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsyNdjRX9mQ ~~ Mark Moulding

8 years, 7 months

Self modifying code, lambda calculus - Re: ENIAC programming

by bfranchuk＠jetnet.ab.ca

On 9/17/2015 6:50 PM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr. wrote: > > This conclusion should have been obvious to anyone thinking about > general purpose computers implemented with microcode in ROM. Are there any computers that do let you put microcode into RAM now-days. You have a lot of byte code virtual machines out there. > -- Jecel > Ben.

8 years, 7 months

Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info?

by COURYHOUSE＠aol.com

dps 8 was a phx ax big H project as I remember but new enough that I would have stored manuals rather than had them in active reference section. will keep eyes out! -Ed# In a message dated 9/24/2015 1:43:14 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, scaron at umich.edu writes: I think this anecdote is also referenced in the AFDC installation site story on multicians.org? Sounds familiar... Best, Sean On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:42 PM, steve shumaker <shumaker at att.net> wrote: > On 9/23/2015 2:44 PM, Josh Dersch wrote: > >> Along with the 11/44 I also picked up a Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside >> workstation; I can't seem to dig up much information specific to this >> model >> (a badge on the rear labels it as "Model/Index No. B01732"). I can take >> some detailed pictures later this week after I've had time to clean it up >> (it's very, very dirty), but it looks very similar to the DPS-6 unit >> pictured on this site: >> http://www.feb-patrimoine.com/projet/gcos6/gcos6.htm >> >> Anyone have any docs on this thing? Or fun anecdotes to share? What have >> I gotten myself into with this thing? >> >> Thanks, >> Josh >> >> >> > browse here and elsewhere for WWMMCCS history and beginnings of > GCOS/DPS-6/Honeywell 6000 > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worldwide_Military_Command_and_Control_System > > > One legend that gets trotted out whenever you speak of WWMMCCS is the > cookie monster that was on terminals in the Pentagon installation of > WWMMCCS. As the legend goes, at random intervals, the console would go > blank, operators would loose control and a message would display something > to the effect "cookie monster hungry - feed me". Supposedly once you > typed in one of several cookie names, the routine would release the system > back to the operator. I personally know a retired AF IT manager who > worked WWMMCCS and swears its a true story... > > Suspect you will find very little material other than what Al has - it > wasn't a particularly common installed setup. > > Steve > >

8 years, 7 months

Honeywell/Bull DPS-6 deskside info?

by COURYHOUSE＠aol.com

pretty funny! maybe I should be fortunate enough to have his salary also!? #ed In a message dated 9/24/2015 9:08:48 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, cisin at xenosoft.com writes: On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, COURYHOUSE at aol.com wrote: > is it a dps 6 or 8? I am actually sincerely sorry that you are having another migraine that causes you to press the spacebar. But, I do have to point out that it makes you sound like William Shatner.

8 years, 7 months

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
32
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb September 2015