>
> From: Pontus Pihlgren <pontus at Update.UU.SE>
> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 08:46:33 +0100
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:55:41PM -0800, Zane Healy wrote:
> > What kind of PDP-11's did VAX 8000's use as Consoles, and what
> > did their console software consist of.
> >
>
> That depends, models 8600 and 8650 used an 11/03 with RX
> floppies (ours has an RL drive too). I'm not sure about the OS,
> I bet it is RT11.
>
> The other models didn't have a front end AFAIK.
>
> /P
>
>
The 8650 at the RICM has a T-11 PDP-11 chip on the L0201 CSL board. The
BA11 chassis holds the Q-Bus for the CSL board and includes a M8061 RVL12
RL02 Disk Control for the RT11 boot disk.
The 8600 Console Specifications Manual is here:
http://manx.classiccmp.org/mirror/vt100.net/dec/ey-4818e-dx-0001.pdf
--
Michael Thompson
1978 satellite returns to Earth orbit, still live - but NASA no longer
has transmitting/receiving equipment old enough to communicate with
it.
http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2014/02070836-isee-3.html
There might be potential for a CCmper to save the day on this one! :?)
--
Liam Proven * Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk * GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com * Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 * Cell: +44 7939-087884
On 2014-02-08 10:00, allison<ajp166 at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> On 02/08/2014 03:06 AM, Zane Healy wrote:
>> >On Feb 7, 2014, at 11:46 PM, Pontus Pihlgren<pontus at Update.UU.SE> wrote:
>> >
>>> >>On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:55:41PM -0800, Zane Healy wrote:
>>>> >>>What kind of PDP-11's did VAX 8000's use as Consoles, and what
>>>> >>>did their console software consist of.
>>>> >>>
>>> >>That depends, models 8600 and 8650 used an 11/03 with RX
>>> >>floppies (ours has an RL drive too). I'm not sure about the OS,
>>> >>I bet it is RT11.
>>> >>
>>> >>The other models didn't have a front end AFAIK.
Pontus misremembers. Our 8650s (two of them), just like all 86x0
machines have an RL02 drive for the FE.
> I don't think that was right. By time the 8600 arrived the 11/03 was
> in retirement. IF memory serves it had a dedicated T-11 for console.
>
> The T-11 was a single chip version of the PDP-11 and the board
> used would likely have been Falcon (T-11 Qbus SBC).
Correct in that it is a T-11. Wrong in that it don't use a Falcon. The
FE in the 86x0 is a dedicated board inside the 86x0 cabinet. And then
two cables goes out to a Qbus backplane from there. The FE on the 86x0
machines are indeed running just a plain RT-11. And the Qbus only have
an RLV12 controller and nothing else.
As others have noted, other machines in the 8000-family used other
consoles. There was PRO-380 based ones, and uVAX II based ones. But even
newer have no FE at all.
The VAX-11/780 was the machine with an 11/03 and RX02 floppies (or was
it RX01?) for the FE. It ran a more dedicated system on the FE, but it
might have been based on some RT-11 was well, not sure.
Johnny
Wikipedia cites someone as saying..."Looks like a cross between a World War
II field radio and a shrunken instrument panel of a DC-3"? Yes, but who
says you need to be pretty to be a classic computer.
For those who might be interested. Contains a shot of it running an
external monitor at the end.
http://youtu.be/m_FufKMd-lU
Hi all,
I have a working IBM 5120 (BASIC version / type-model 5110-3) along with
its 5103 printer.
I want to part with it and am wondering where would be the best place to
put it up for sale, auction, ... or just find someone who would take care
of it. What is it still worth? I once saw someone trying to sell one on
Ebay for $3000 but that was way too high... but I read somewhere else that
someone was willing to pay $800 for it...
As it is a heavy machine ("desktop" but about 50kg) it is not easily
shipped and I am living in Belgium...So the main issue would be how to find
someone local (even in the neighbouring European countries) who would be
willing to pick it up. Or could it be shipped internationally?
I thought it was a quite rare but is this correct?
Any ideas? Thank you,
Dani
At 05:16 AM 2/7/2014, Bob Vines wrote:
>Can OS/8 run on pre-OMNIBUS machines, i.e., anything other than the
>PDP-8/E, /M, /F, or /A? The DECmates use OS/278 (and WPS 8/278 &
>COS-310) instead, but what about the pre-8/E machines?
OS/8 will run on any 8 family machine with at least 8K of memory.
You'll need 12K for some devices (those with 2 page system handlers).
Some device handler writers didn't think about pre-8/E machines, and
use instructions like BSW that aren't in pre-omnibus 8s. Those devices
won't work.
The VT-278 uses serial port hardware that doesn't behave like a real
KL8E so needs OS/278 to work properly. Other than that, there's really
not a huge difference between OS/8 and OS/278.
-Rick
Slower than planned but I have now released the MFM emulator code
and updated the MFM reading code. Needs more testing but it
seems to work.
http://www.pdp8online.com/mfm/mfm.shtml
Next to test with will be my VAXStation II assuming I can figure out how to
run it.
I'm also staring on the PCB design to replace my wirewrap board. A couple
of questions for people interested. Two people have said they are
building wirewrap/protoboards themselves.
1) Gold edge fingers increase the board cost. Would people prefer a cheaper
board with .1 headers like my wirewrap board that will need non standard
cables or proper edge connectors for the drive emulation?
2) It might be possible to make the board emulate two drives. The
system would have to be setup to use daisy-chained control cable since the
board will only have one control connector and two data connectors. The second
data cable would have to be .1 header. Is this enough interest to people
to be worth trying to do?
> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:32:13 -0600
> From: Kyle Owen <kylevowen at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Booting OS/8 on a PDP-8/E from a PC
[snip]
> I've got a few spare locations in the handler. I'll look into the DP278 and
> see what I can do.
I hope one of my DECmates has the DP278!
[snip]
> Also, I had considered a handler version that operates on address 03/04 by
> using some clever escape sequences, much like AT modem commands. You'd need
> to use it with a special terminal program, or modify the server to output
> non-handler messages to a pseudo-TTY that another terminal emulator is
> connected to. This way, *anyone* with a PDP-8 that has just one
> asynchronous serial card can boot OS/8!
Can OS/8 run on pre-OMNIBUS machines, i.e., anything other than the
PDP-8/E, /M, /F, or /A? The DECmates use OS/278 (and WPS 8/278 &
COS-310) instead, but what about the pre-8/E machines?
I'm looking forward to trying your sofware with my -8/E or /A!
Bob