Time for //GS monitor repair! :oD
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/64631297/1.jpghttps://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/64631297/2.jpg
I fixed my monitor and a friend's one. But both needs replacement of
flyback transformer. His can be fixed with a new focus divider, but mine was
already repaired (and the guy did a very poor job). Maybe anyone here knows
a source of replacement flyback transformers for this monitor. This is the
Applecolor RGB monitor, A2M6014, mitsubishi-sourced.
Thanks!
Alexandre Souza :o)
---
[this message went out Friday to the N8VEM-S100 list but may have some
interest on CCTALK too. We are at 50% to enough S-100 80286 CPU board
pre-orders for a "production" PCB order. There are a few of the S-100 6502
CPU V2 boards left but the stack is shrinking fast.]
Hi
Some really great news today! Yahoo!
First, the S-100 6502 CPU V2 boards arrived! Yay! I will be sending them
out to those who pre-ordered first thing!
Second, at long last (assuming no more changes) the S-100 80286 CPU board
finished trace route optimization! This board is almost old enough to vote
it has been optimizing for so long. I am very happy to see it finally
emerge out of the basement computer. It is ready for "production" so if you
would like to get one or more of these exciting new S-100 80286 CPU boards
please do the new usual pre-order. I will set aside your board so you get
them right away!
Yay! Good news Friday!
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
Hello.
I have a Zetaco SCZ3-2 board, probably a SCSI controller for Data
General machines.
This board seems to be in good shape, but unfortunately two square
sockets (for microprocessor I think)
are empty; anyway I could try to find a suitable replacement, if I only
knew what kind of IC is needed for.
I didn't find also any documentation or information about it.
Anybody has such board or could supply some info?
Thanks
Andrea
The seller is willing to send internationally, including EU and Brazil J
They will use your shipping number if you have one, or add freight costs to
the PayPal invoice.
Any customs fees, etc will be responsibility of the recipient.
Cindy Croxton
Electronics Plus
_____
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3392 / Virus Database: 3222/6641 - Release Date: 09/05/13
I hate to let this go, but it just takes up too much space in my living
room
Its a PacMan Cocktail Arcade Table, monitor has been rebuilt, light
bulbs replaced
Has a Ms. PacMan board in it. But is fully operational
Can Deliver to ECCC/VCFMW if Paid for in advance
Hi, the jack your looking for is MMJ. Looks similar to RJ but different.
Regards,
Daniel,
Sent from my iPad
On 07/09/2013, at 1:00 AM, cctalk-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
> Send cctalk mailing list submissions to
> cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cctalk-request at classiccmp.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cctalk-owner at classiccmp.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cctalk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle (David Riley)
> 2. Re: Wanted: DEC VT11 with VR14/VR17 (Paul Anderson)
> 3. Re: Wanted: DEC VT11 with VR14/VR17 (Paul Anderson)
> 4. Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle (Jan-Benedict Glaw)
> 5. Re: Looking for software archive for "DRAM Camera"
> (David Ryskalczyk)
> 6. Re: SAA5070 Datasheet (Tony Duell?) (Tony Duell)
> 7. Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle (Tony Duell)
> 8. Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle (Tony Duell)
> 9. Re: Wanted: DEC VT11 with VR14/VR17 (Tony Duell)
> 10. Re: SAA5070 Datasheet (Tony Duell?) (Alexandre Souza)
> 11. Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle (David Riley)
> 12. Re: SAA5070 Datasheet (Tony Duell?) (Peter Corlett)
> 13. Re: FS: 1200 baud external modem (Tothwolf)
> 14. Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle (Tothwolf)
> 15. Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle (Tothwolf)
> 16. Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle (Tothwolf)
> 17. Teletype Corp. motors (Jules Richardson)
> 18. Re: Wanted: DEC VT11 with VR14/VR17 (Richard)
> 19. Re: PNG image decompression (Andrew Burton)
> 20. Re: Wanted: DEC VT11 with VR14/VR17 (Paul Anderson)
> 21. Re: Toshiba CD-1000C Cartridge Tape Drive (Paxton Hoag)
> 22. Shameless push: HP 82231C Viper board on ebay (Rik Bos)
> 23. Looking for some basic, older tech... (Jonathan Katz)
> 24. Rare opportunity for IC chips dating back to the 70s; these
> are NEW (Cindy Croxton Electronics Plus)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:46:27 -0400
> From: David Riley <fraveydank at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle
> Message-ID: <F6678946-DB72-48FD-B637-B53DD092AE0D at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> On Sep 5, 2013, at 11:02 AM, emanuel stiebler <emu at e-bbes.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> probably a stupid one, but we have so much fun here discussing the
>> right nomenclature of connectors ;-)
>>
>> I'm looking for the right jack/receptacle for a lk201 keyboard for an
>> keyboard adapter.
>>
>> so, is this a "RJ11 6p4c"?
>
> I believe (though I could be wrong) that it is a 6P4C, but not
> technically an RJ11 (that refers to not only the plug style,
> but also the wiring scheme; in particular, RJ11 specifies 6P2C,
> while RJ14 specifies 6P4C, but neither of them are necessarily
> RJ-anything).
>
> If you're trying to buy the plugs, though, you probably want
> to search for RJ11 because that's what most stores sell them
> as (just like you want to search for "DB9" serial plugs when
> you really want DE9 plugs).
>
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:04:43 -0500
> From: Paul Anderson <useddec at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Wanted: DEC VT11 with VR14/VR17
> Message-ID:
> <CACwhfuOd_wzDBDRfuHX1w8C_nbGvBEW-r_sXoCfwKZ64gqamjQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I have extra VT11s, but I'm also looking the VR14 or 17. I have a VR12 but
> I think it might have to get hacked to use on the VT11.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm looking for a DEC VT11 and a corresponding VR14 or VR17 monitor.
>>
>> For those who are not familiar with them, a VT11 is a vector refresh
>> display processor for a UNIBUS PDP-11.
>>
>> It consists of three hex-height modules M7013, M7014 YA and A320, a
>> custom VT11 backplane for these modules, an associated VR14 or VR17
>> monitor and cables from the modules to the monitor.
>>
>> VT11 Graphic Display Processor
>> <http://manx.classiccmp.org/details.php/1,3136>
>>
>> VR14/VR17 CRT Display Monitor User's Manual:
>> <http://manx.classiccmp.org/details.php/1,3271>
>> --
>> "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <
>> http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
>> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
>> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
>> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:11:51 -0500
> From: Paul Anderson <useddec at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Wanted: DEC VT11 with VR14/VR17
> Message-ID:
> <CACwhfuPHRVrNit1wqH2txJfvZho79YmwawJDdkbTk41o3H5jCg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> By the way, the M7014 and M7014-YA are only different in that the -YA has
> on board terminators, I think.
>
> The VT!! backplane is the weirdest unibus backplane I ever saw. It's a 4
> slot backplane with 3 hex boards in it, plus unibus in and out. Be very
> careful installing it. Think about it...
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Paul Anderson <useddec at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have extra VT11s, but I'm also looking the VR14 or 17. I have a VR12 but
>> I think it might have to get hacked to use on the VT11.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm looking for a DEC VT11 and a corresponding VR14 or VR17 monitor.
>>>
>>> For those who are not familiar with them, a VT11 is a vector refresh
>>> display processor for a UNIBUS PDP-11.
>>>
>>> It consists of three hex-height modules M7013, M7014 YA and A320, a
>>> custom VT11 backplane for these modules, an associated VR14 or VR17
>>> monitor and cables from the modules to the monitor.
>>>
>>> VT11 Graphic Display Processor
>>> <http://manx.classiccmp.org/details.php/1,3136>
>>>
>>> VR14/VR17 CRT Display Monitor User's Manual:
>>> <http://manx.classiccmp.org/details.php/1,3271>
>>> --
>>> "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <
>>> http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
>>> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
>>> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
>>> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:49:36 +0200
> From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl.de>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle
> Message-ID: <20130905184936.GF3218 at lug-owl.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> On Thu, 2013-09-05 09:02:44 -0600, emanuel stiebler <emu at e-bbes.com> wrote:
>> I'm looking for the right jack/receptacle for a lk201 keyboard for an
>> keyboard adapter.
>>
>> so, is this a "RJ11 6p4c"?
>
> I think it's 4p4c. However, the jacks are built so that a "smaller"
> plug will even fit into a larger jack, so a 6p6c (RJ11, RJ12, RJ13 and
> some more) will also work.
>
> MfG, JBG
>
> --
> Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw at lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481
> Signature of: Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf
> the second : f?r einen Freien Staat voll Freier B?rger.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:03:53 -0400
> From: David Ryskalczyk <d235j.1 at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Looking for software archive for "DRAM Camera"
> Message-ID:
> <CAB3bDi6yiL1DYm4iG0bAZds=-XM0Wre4mgri5MQSSyTd4_jcAg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> A quick google and I found it here:
> ftp://moscoso.org/pub/electronics/cookbook/video/index.html
> ftp://moscoso.org/pub/electronics/cookbook/video/kuckuck.zip
>
> --Dave
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, All,
>>
>> We've talked about using a 4116 or 4164 for an image sensor, as was
>> done in the days of yore when CCD image sensors were exotic and
>> expensive, and I've tracked down some info (beyond just the Ciarcia
>> Circuit Celler articles in BYTE Sep/Oct 1983), but several forum posts
>> and a Russian webpage or two point to "kuckuck.zip", which I can't
>> find online nor via archive.org.
>>
>> One former location:
>> http://www.vampyr.msk.ru/electroniks/kuckuck.zip
>>
>> Did anyone on this list happen to snag a copy? The oldest reference I
>> found to it was on a robotics forum in 1997. The newest is around
>> 2007, with a mention that other links to that file were dead even
>> then. My best guess from browsing archive.org is that the file was
>> there until 2008. It's not there now, and archive.org didn't keep a
>> copy of it.
>>
>> I decided to go digging because I did the "decapped 4116" in an Apple
>> II, 30 years ago (I still have that DRAM on my pads of ancient chips),
>> and a friend of mine has recently delved into retrocomputing on the
>> Apple II and I was telling him tales about hardware hacking the Apple.
>>
>> Thanks for any assistance in tracking this down,
>>
>> -ethan
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 19:49:42 +0100 (BST)
> From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: SAA5070 Datasheet (Tony Duell?)
> Message-ID: <m1VHecm-000J4cC at p850ug1>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
>>
>> Hi, I dont have , or cant find as I thought I did have it, the actual data
>
> Yes, the data sheet was not published in the common data book that
> included the rest of the teletext IC chipset.
>
> I thought I had the data sheet somewhere too. Doubtless it will turn up
> sometime.
>
>> sheet but I do have the Mullard Technical publication, M81-0001, "LSI
>> circuits for teletext and viedata THE LUCY GENERATION" and this has a
>> circuit diagram which shows the pinouts of the 5070 if this would help?
>
> That does sound useful. If you have it electronically, or can scan the
> page(s) with the SAA5070 pinout, could you send it to my other account at
> tony_duell at yahoo.co.uk
>
> THnaks in advance.
>
> -tony
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 19:55:01 +0100 (BST)
> From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle
> Message-ID: <m1VHehu-000J4dC at p850ug1>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
>>
>> Hi all,
>> probably a stupid one, but we have so much fun here discussing the
>> right nomenclature of connectors ;-)
>>
>> I'm looking for the right jack/receptacle for a lk201 keyboard for an
>> keyboard adapter.
>>
>> so, is this a "RJ11 6p4c"?
>
> No, it looks like a 4p4c to me. The first digit gives the number of
> 'positions' (the maximum number of contacts there could be), the second
> gives the number of contacts actually fitted.
>
> It's not an RJ-anything (just as the 10baseT ethenet conenctor is not an
> RJ45, it's an 8p8c, nothing more). RJ11 (or whatever) implies a
> particular set of ocnnections for telephone wiring. This can never be
> right for a keyboard.
>
> -tony
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 19:58:29 +0100 (BST)
> From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle
> Message-ID: <m1VHelG-000J4eC at p850ug1>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
>>
>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 11:02 AM, emanuel stiebler <emu at e-bbes.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> probably a stupid one, but we have so much fun here discussing the
>>> right nomenclature of connectors ;-)
>>>
>>> I'm looking for the right jack/receptacle for a lk201 keyboard for an
>>> keyboard adapter.
>>>
>>> so, is this a "RJ11 6p4c"?
>>
>> I believe (though I could be wrong) that it is a 6P4C, but not
>
> It looks narrower than a 6p housing to me... I would check. If yoy are in
> the States, the common telephone plug is a 6p2c or 6p4c. If it looks
> narrower than that, it's a 4p4c.
>
>> If you're trying to buy the plugs, though, you probably want
>> to search for RJ11 because that's what most stores sell them
>> as (just like you want to search for "DB9" serial plugs when
>> you really want DE9 plugs).
>
> Over here they are often listed as 'FCC68' connectors. I am not sure what
> FCC regualtions part 68 actually specifies, but I assume that's where the
> name comes from.
>
> -tony
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:04:08 +0100 (BST)
> From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Wanted: DEC VT11 with VR14/VR17
> Message-ID: <m1VHeqk-000J4fC at p850ug1>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
>>
>> By the way, the M7014 and M7014-YA are only different in that the -YA has
>> on board terminators, I think.
>
> One version of one of the boards (M7014?) had the GT40 firmware ROMs on
> it too. nybble-wide PROMs, I forget how big (256 locations?). All the
> boards had the positions for these ROMs, you can solder them in (or fit
> sockets) if you wnt to. There may be some bufferes to add too, but it's
> fairly obvious.
>
> I can't rememebr about bus termination, if it was an option, it'll just
> be a load of resistors to add I think
>
>>
>> The VT!! backplane is the weirdest unibus backplane I ever saw. It's a 4
>> slot backplane with 3 hex boards in it, plus unibus in and out. Be very
>> careful installing it. Think about it...
>
> Unibus In is in the normal place, Unibus Out is below it. So if it's the
> last backplane in the syustem there's no problem, just put in the M920
> jumber as usual and an M930 terminator in the slot below it. If it's the
> last backplane in a cabinet, that's no problem either, again fit the M920
> as usual and plug the Unibus ribbon cable going to the next box into the
> Unibus Out slot under the M920. But if it's in the middle of a box, you
> ahve to run a cable from the Unibus out slot to the Unibus In of the next
> backplane.
>
> -tony
>
>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Paul Anderson <useddec at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I have extra VT11s, but I'm also looking the VR14 or 17. I have a VR12 but
>>> I think it might have to get hacked to use on the VT11.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm looking for a DEC VT11 and a corresponding VR14 or VR17 monitor.
>>>>
>>>> For those who are not familiar with them, a VT11 is a vector refresh
>>>> display processor for a UNIBUS PDP-11.
>>>>
>>>> It consists of three hex-height modules M7013, M7014 YA and A320, a
>>>> custom VT11 backplane for these modules, an associated VR14 or VR17
>>>> monitor and cables from the modules to the monitor.
>>>>
>>>> VT11 Graphic Display Processor
>>>> <http://manx.classiccmp.org/details.php/1,3136>
>>>>
>>>> VR14/VR17 CRT Display Monitor User's Manual:
>>>> <http://manx.classiccmp.org/details.php/1,3271>
>>>> --
>>>> "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
>>>> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
>>>> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
>>>> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 16:39:28 -0300
> From: "Alexandre Souza" <alexandre.tabajara at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: SAA5070 Datasheet (Tony Duell?)
> Message-ID: <06537B162ABB4E6692D88C7470937C30 at desktaba>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
>
> There are only 4 pages of info, but here it is...(sent to Tony)
>
> ---
> Enviado do meu Motorola PT550
> Meu site: http://www.tabalabs.com.br
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony Duell" <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
> To: <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 3:49 PM
> Subject: Re: SAA5070 Datasheet (Tony Duell?)
>
>
>>>
>>> Hi, I dont have , or cant find as I thought I did have it, the actual
>>> data
>>
>> Yes, the data sheet was not published in the common data book that
>> included the rest of the teletext IC chipset.
>>
>> I thought I had the data sheet somewhere too. Doubtless it will turn up
>> sometime.
>>
>>> sheet but I do have the Mullard Technical publication, M81-0001, "LSI
>>> circuits for teletext and viedata THE LUCY GENERATION" and this has a
>>> circuit diagram which shows the pinouts of the 5070 if this would help?
>>
>> That does sound useful. If you have it electronically, or can scan the
>> page(s) with the SAA5070 pinout, could you send it to my other account at
>> tony_duell at yahoo.co.uk
>>
>> THnaks in advance.
>>
>> -tony
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 16:02:23 -0400
> From: David Riley <fraveydank at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle
> Message-ID: <3BD92993-C255-45A6-8A7F-CF96B3BB8DC3 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Sep 5, 2013, at 2:58 PM, ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
>
>>>
>>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 11:02 AM, emanuel stiebler <emu at e-bbes.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> probably a stupid one, but we have so much fun here discussing the
>>>> right nomenclature of connectors ;-)
>>>>
>>>> I'm looking for the right jack/receptacle for a lk201 keyboard for an
>>>> keyboard adapter.
>>>>
>>>> so, is this a "RJ11 6p4c"?
>>>
>>> I believe (though I could be wrong) that it is a 6P4C, but not
>>
>> It looks narrower than a 6p housing to me... I would check. If yoy are in
>> the States, the common telephone plug is a 6p2c or 6p4c. If it looks
>> narrower than that, it's a 4p4c.
>
> Given what everyone has said, that's probably true, though I thought
> the jack was wide enough to accomodate a 6P plug (the ones that are
> actually attached to the keyboards are 4P, though). I have quite a
> few in my basement, but I can't go down to look just now.
>
>>> If you're trying to buy the plugs, though, you probably want
>>> to search for RJ11 because that's what most stores sell them
>>> as (just like you want to search for "DB9" serial plugs when
>>> you really want DE9 plugs).
>>
>> Over here they are often listed as 'FCC68' connectors. I am not sure what
>> FCC regualtions part 68 actually specifies, but I assume that's where the
>> name comes from.
>
> Fascinating... that's probably the most useless specification I've
> seen in a while, considering that most Europeans have no need to
> know a damned thing about FCC regulations.
>
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:05:19 +0100
> From: Peter Corlett <abuse at cabal.org.uk>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: SAA5070 Datasheet (Tony Duell?)
> Message-ID: <20130905200518.GA11954 at mooli.org.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 04:28:27PM -0300, Alexandre Souza wrote:
>> In 17/11/2011 Tony Duell asked for the datasheet of SAA5070. Did yo got it,
>> Tony? I'm looking for it too.
>
> There's a little bit of information on pp. 166-169 of this PDF that I found
> rattling around:
>
> http://abuse.mooli.org.uk/1982_Signetics_MOS_Microprocessor_Data_Manual.pdf
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:05:48 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: FS: 1200 baud external modem
> Message-ID:
> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1309051448130.4802 at brioche.invalid.domain>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Charles wrote:
>
>> FS: one "BSR 1207" external modem. New in the (very old) box. I assume
>> it's 1200 baud. Runs on 120 vac. Can send pic to interested parties. $5
>> plus shipping (probably around $3-4, it's light) from US zip 65775.
>
> Going from my modem doc archives, I think this modem was made by
> Capetronic and is a model MD1207. I'm pretty sure you are correct about it
> being 1200 baud. In fact, if you search down for 1207 in this list you'll
> find it listed:
> http://cd.textfiles.com/pcmedic/main/referenc/text/modem_s.txt
>
> BSR (Birmingham Sound Reproducers) had remarketing division that in the
> mid to late 1990s would buy low end and nearly obsolete computer upgrade
> type parts (cdrom drives, sound cards, modems, etc) which would rebrand
> them with their red BSR logo and then sell them via mail order out of
> computer magazines (Computer Shopper, etc). I still have a proprietary
> interface single speed caddy-type cdrom drive and 8-bit ISA
> interface/sound card that someone I knew purchased from them in the 1990s
> who was under the impression at the time that it was a modern
> "Soundblaster" card and fast 4x cdrom drive. He got a few years use out of
> it before it was replaced with a real Soundblaster and much faster IDE
> interface cdrom drive.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:12:27 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle
> Message-ID:
> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1309051507000.4802 at brioche.invalid.domain>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-09-05 09:02:44 -0600, emanuel stiebler <emu at e-bbes.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm looking for the right jack/receptacle for a lk201 keyboard for an
>>> keyboard adapter.
>>>
>>> so, is this a "RJ11 6p4c"?
>>
>> I think it's 4p4c. However, the jacks are built so that a "smaller"
>> plug will even fit into a larger jack, so a 6p6c (RJ11, RJ12, RJ13 and
>> some more) will also work.
>
> No, generally one should not use a smaller modular plug in a larger
> modular jack. Most plugs do not have relief slots next to the outermost
> contacts and the polycarbonate plug body will permanently deform the outer
> contacts in the modular jack. This happens a lot with 8P8C (RJ45) jacks
> that people attempt to plug phones into that use 6P4C, 6P2C, etc (RJ11)
> plugs.
>
> There /are/ a few 6P type modular plugs out there that do have relief
> openings that will somewhat fit 8P8C jacks, but they are very uncommon.
> The plug fit is still loose and it isn't something the modular plug
> standards (from Bell System) ever really intended.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:18:39 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle
> Message-ID:
> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1309051518280.4802 at brioche.invalid.domain>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, David Riley wrote:
>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 11:02 AM, emanuel stiebler <emu at e-bbes.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> probably a stupid one, but we have so much fun here discussing the
>>> right nomenclature of connectors ;-)
>>>
>>> I'm looking for the right jack/receptacle for a lk201 keyboard for an
>>> keyboard adapter.
>>>
>>> so, is this a "RJ11 6p4c"?
>>
>> I believe (though I could be wrong) that it is a 6P4C, but not
>> technically an RJ11 (that refers to not only the plug style,
>> but also the wiring scheme; in particular, RJ11 specifies 6P2C,
>> while RJ14 specifies 6P4C, but neither of them are necessarily
>> RJ-anything).
>>
>> If you're trying to buy the plugs, though, you probably want
>> to search for RJ11 because that's what most stores sell them
>> as (just like you want to search for "DB9" serial plugs when
>> you really want DE9 plugs).
>
> That's pretty much the gist of it. I had to push very hard to get the
> RJ11, RJ45, etc stuff corrected on Wikipedia but eventually prevailed. The
> main argument had been that "well, /everyone/ calls them RJ11, RJ45, etc",
> however in the end, there was plenty of documentation on the misuse of the
> RJ (Registered Jack) nomenclature.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:51:24 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: dec lk201 keyboard plug and receptacle
> Message-ID:
> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1309051519060.4802 at brioche.invalid.domain>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Tony Duell wrote:
>>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 11:02 AM, emanuel stiebler <emu at e-bbes.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> probably a stupid one, but we have so much fun here discussing the
>>>> right nomenclature of connectors ;-)
>>>>
>>>> I'm looking for the right jack/receptacle for a lk201 keyboard for an
>>>> keyboard adapter.
>>>>
>>>> so, is this a "RJ11 6p4c"?
>>>
>>> I believe (though I could be wrong) that it is a 6P4C, but not
>>
>> It looks narrower than a 6p housing to me... I would check. If yoy are in
>> the States, the common telephone plug is a 6p2c or 6p4c. If it looks
>> narrower than that, it's a 4p4c.
>>
>>> If you're trying to buy the plugs, though, you probably want
>>> to search for RJ11 because that's what most stores sell them
>>> as (just like you want to search for "DB9" serial plugs when
>>> you really want DE9 plugs).
>>
>> Over here they are often listed as 'FCC68' connectors. I am not sure what
>> FCC regualtions part 68 actually specifies, but I assume that's where the
>> name comes from.
>
> The Registered Jack system/standards came out of Bell System and was used
> to replace the hard-wired system for their phones. The FCC adopted the
> Registered Jack standards into Part 68 as part of the later deregulation.
> This was well before any sort of IEC adoption of these modular connectors,
> although it looks like Wikipedia currently gets that partly wrong. Sigh.
>
> Technically a 4P4C "handset cord" plug doesn't even have a Registered Jack
> designation, since RJ11, RJ14, etc only apply to the telephone interface
> itself, but that didn't stop people from calling them RJ9, RJ10, RJ22,
> etc, similar to people calling 10P10C plugs RJ50.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:03:16 -0500
> From: Jules Richardson <jules.richardson99 at gmail.com>
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Teletype Corp. motors
> Message-ID: <5228F194.5040002 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
>
>
> I found a small pile of boxed NOS Teletype corp. motors in a junk store
> earlier:
>
> small, p/n 177870 (115VAC, 3250rpm at 60Hz)
> small w/reduction gearbox, p/n 193958 (115VAC, 110rpm at 60Hz)
> medium, p/n 319392 (115VAC, 1725rpm at 60Hz)
> medium dual-shaft, p/n 337286 (115VAC, 3600rpm at 60Hz)
> medium with frame, capacitor & thermal reset, "28F motor
> unit" (3600rpm at 60Hz)
> medium dual-shaft, p/n 195801 (115V, 3600rpm at 60Hz)
> large, p/n 159739, marked as "unit motor 28C"
>
> There are a few dates which place them around the late 1960's / early
> 1970's. There's a wiring diagram in with the "28F motor unit" which claims
> to be for "CXB-1 and MU43 motor unit".
>
> Any ideas what equipment they were for? Model 28 machine, perhaps, given
> the 28C and 28F references...
>
> cheers
>
> Jules
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:22:40 -0600
> From: Richard <legalize at xmission.com>
> To: cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Wanted: DEC VT11 with VR14/VR17
> Message-ID: <E1VHh0i-0001LD-KW at shell.xmission.com>
>
>
> In article <CACwhfuOd_wzDBDRfuHX1w8C_nbGvBEW-r_sXoCfwKZ64gqamjQ at mail.gmail.com>,
> Paul Anderson <useddec at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I have extra VT11s, but I'm also looking the VR14 or 17. I have a VR12 but
>> I think it might have to get hacked to use on the VT11.
>
> We talked about it on the phone, but I never got any pictures or a price.
>
> The ball is in your court.
> --
> "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 22:38:17 +0100
> From: "Andrew Burton" <aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: PNG image decompression
> Message-ID: <004501ceaa80$44836280$2efdf93e at user8459cef6fa>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bryan Pope" <pet4032 at gmail.com>
> To: <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 3:36 AM
> Subject: Re: PNG image decompression
>
>
>> Sorry I can't help you with the PNG decompression, but I think it is
>> very cool that you are working on a new Amiga game! Do you have a
>> website for the work-in-progress details?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Bryan
>
> Apologies for the slow reply...
>
> I have just finished (as of Tuesday 3rd Sept) the ASM code to decode 16
> colour images produced by Personal Paint (Amiga). I have started adding code
> to decode 16 colour images from MS Paint - which shouldn't take long as all
> the hard work decoding the IDAT data has already been done :)
>
>
> Here's a link to a page where all the latest info regarding my game will be
> displayed.
>
> http://www.aliensrcooluk.com/mysite/glists/my_amigagames2
>
>
> You can find a list of new Amiga games on the English Amiga Board too:
>
> http://eab.abime.net/amiga-scene/68891-amiga-games-wip-released-index.html
>
>
> Mine isn't listed their yet. Once it is playable I shall ask them to add it
> to the list :)
>
>
> Regards,
> Andrew B
> aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 20
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 17:15:51 -0500
> From: Paul Anderson <useddec at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Wanted: DEC VT11 with VR14/VR17
> Message-ID:
> <CACwhfuO16pevQN5bwxnsDnEBTS3scgpqP3cf0=2+dSEDHxzdqw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Sorry Richard, that was 2 or 3 surgeries ago.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> In article <
>> CACwhfuOd_wzDBDRfuHX1w8C_nbGvBEW-r_sXoCfwKZ64gqamjQ at mail.gmail.com>,
>> Paul Anderson <useddec at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I have extra VT11s, but I'm also looking the VR14 or 17. I have a VR12
>> but
>>> I think it might have to get hacked to use on the VT11.
>>
>> We talked about it on the phone, but I never got any pictures or a price.
>>
>> The ball is in your court.
>> --
>> "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <
>> http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
>> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
>> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
>> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 21
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:04:14 -0700
> From: Paxton Hoag <innfoclassics at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Toshiba CD-1000C Cartridge Tape Drive
> Message-ID:
> <CAL2B=mH-RopS6kXSdwZr_kw3g4-L-bwcCp8khqF5QBF+Sed0eQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
>> Has anyone come across one of these before and more importantly (to me!)
>> has anyone any data sheets or a manual on the tape drive.
>>
>> The drive has a Toshiba label on it saying "Cartridge Tape Drive MTH 0551
>> F001 Model No. CD-1000C" and has a direct drive capstan.
>>
>> It looks like a 1/2" Cartridge Drive and it was used on the Data General
>> Desktop Generation E6270 drive. I can find no mention of it on the internet
>> so far!
>
>
> I had a couple of those go through my hands. I really liked them although
> they were not successful.
>
> The hard drives were 15 meg and it would take two modules. I would be
> surprised if the tape drive was larger than 30meg.
>
> Looking forward to pictures.
>
> Paxton
> --
> Paxton Hoag
> Astoria, OR
> USA
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 22
> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:16:50 +0200
> From: "Rik Bos" <hp-fix at xs4all.nl>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Shameless push: HP 82231C Viper board on ebay
> Message-ID: <001201ceaae1$d5558c00$8000a400$(a)xs4all.nl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I placed one of my Viper boards on epay, it includes manuals and software.
>
> Item: 370891646638
>
> I also placed some HP-41 Application Pac's on epay
>
> Petroleum Fluids
>
> Navigation
>
> Math
>
> Stat
>
> And others
>
>
>
> Some items are auctions other fixed price.
>
> For fixed price items I'm always open for reasonable offers.
>
>
>
> -Rik
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 23
> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:07:21 -0400
> From: Jonathan Katz <jon at jonworld.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Looking for some basic, older tech...
> Message-ID:
> <CAEOZr+3-bQ-8qXdCqqr5m5YY1ksP7eHLuqAA3pn=i0MX4VNARQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> All,
>
> I'm working on my STEM outreach project, and I need some "props." These
> items can be broken, as they're supposed to be passed around and examined
> by elementary-school aged children.
>
> I'm looking for the following...
>
> Punch Cards (used, unused, scrap, etc.)
> 8" Floppy
> Paper Tape(?)
> Sextant (long shot, I know. I'm reaching out to some pilots I know.)
>
>
> --
> -Jon
> Jonathan Katz, Indianapolis, IN.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 24
> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:23:39 -0500
> From: "Cindy Croxton Electronics Plus" <sales at elecplus.com>
> To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Rare opportunity for IC chips dating back to the 70s; these
> are NEW
> Message-ID: <01ad01ceab15$10224f70$3066ee50$@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> One of my recyclers has provided me with an Excel spreadsheet of IC chips
> that date back to the 1970s.
>
> All are NEW.
>
> She is willing to sell in small quantities to end users, and will accept
> PayPal for payment.
>
> Prices are by offer, there is no set pricing. Please be fair, since this is
> an experiment to see if she will let me offer other old stuff out to the end
> users.
>
>
>
> Please email me at sales at elecplus.com if you want the spreadsheet.
>
> I will include instructions for contacting her directly.
>
>
>
> Cindy Croxton
>
> Electronics Plus
>
> _____
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.3392 / Virus Database: 3222/6641 - Release Date: 09/05/13
>
>
>
> End of cctalk Digest, Vol 121, Issue 6
> **************************************