Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brian Roth <abacos_98 at yahoo.com>
I did a quick look at the Eng drawings and while the power
controller is 3 phase it looks like the fans
are single phase. Not sure whats going on inside the power
controller yet. I'll be tearing into this in a couple
of weeks so if anyone has experience with the conversion, speak out.
I know its been done.
The power controller is REALLY simple, very much like the PDP-11
EPO controllers, just bigger. So, there is a voltage sent out
on a 3-wire cable, and if you break two of the wires at the end of the
chain, all units power off. The other wire powers up all units
on the string. Just a little unregulated power supply and some
relays. I think there's an airflow sensor in the blower plenums
that breaks the EPO chain if a blower stops.
Jon
> >>> None of my links are working anymore. Just gives a 503 error. I
> >>> need me some disk images.
> >> Apparently no one has heard from Dave in a while.
> >
> > Oh man. Here we go again
>MUCH more important,
>Is Dave OK?
Dave is alive and (mostly) well.
Sorry Guys, I just don't have much time to participate in the list
these days. I do browse through the threads every month or two
using the web archive.
I've not taken my site down - it is hosted on Classiccmp which
does seem to be having a few problems as of late - today I am
getting notices that "the site is unavailable due to maintenance
or capacity" - I'm guessing the latter, because hit reload a
couple of times and it will come up (I had the same issue reading
the list).
Regards,
Dave
--
dave12 (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
(dot) com Classic computers: http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/
The Amiga 4000 has been claimed. Many thanks to all those who inquired!
Cindy Croxton
_____
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3272 / Virus Database: 3162/6226 - Release Date: 04/05/13
----- Original Message -----
> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:41:14 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>
...
>> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:31:39PM -0700, Fred Cisin wrote:
>> > I'm having a little difficulty visualizing "The World's Top
>> > Supercomputer"
>> > as being a single chip CPU on a motherboard.
>> > When did "supercomputers" become single board devices?
>> > "Put the CPU on a daughterboard"?
>
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
>> Do you really think I'm that stupid?
>
> Of course not. I acknowledge and respect your expertise.
> And, I certainly had no intention of offending you.
----- Reply:-----
Yeah, come on, Fred; just because he doesn't seem to understand the concept
of a *plural* morpheme and why using the singular to refer to hundreds of an
item might cause confusion (especially in this context) doesn't mean he's
stupid ;-)
I thought that perhaps Swedish does not have such a concept but then I saw
that he does speak of power supplieS and fanS; he even talks about making
the CPU's pin compatible, although instead of multiple pins of multiple CPUs
that seems to suggest making the (single) pin of a single CPU compatible
with something...
Fun with words, and of course as usual surprising and a little disappointing
to see how ready and eager some people are instead to see insults or
personal attacks in simple misunderstandings...
>
> Is there anybody who knows what is this old chip? And where to try to find
> it?
I've seen 733Wxxx house codes on Xerox chips before, but hav never seen
the equivalents list.
>
> If it help what I know is that it used to do somenting like shift data
> register or Serial Shift Registers.
>
> It has a TTL level signal on its pins, it has 14 pins. You can see it named
> U1 in the centre of this schematic:
> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/zqhgar4g7ib5j4z/Xerox820_FDC_Schematic.pdf>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/zqhgar4g7ib5j4z/Xerox820_FDC_Schematic.pdf
>
>
>
> Some pins are labelled on a schematics with:
>
> 1=D1, 2=D2, 3=D3, 4=D4,
>
> 10=A1, 11=A2, 12=A3, 13=A4, 14=A4,
>
> 15=ChipEnable (left to GND),
>
> 7=GND,
>
> 14=+5Vcc
Wait a second. You said jsut now it has 14 pins, and you give a signal
for pin 15. Does it have a top cap or something :-)
More seriousyl, if it's actually a 16 pin IC, I would guess it's a
programmed 74x188 (open collector) or more likely 74x288 (3-state output)
PROM. That's a 32*8 bit device that goes udner a variety of other
numbers too, like 18S030. Fiffernt manufacturers had differnt programming
algorithms, but the all work the same way in-circuit (in read mode).
The pinout is :
1 : D0
2 : D1
3 : D2
4 : D3
5 : D4
6 : D5
7 : D6
8 : Gnd
9 : D7
10 : A0
11 : A1
12 : A2
13 : A3
14 : A4
15 : CE/
16 : Vcc
This could match your device, A4 is tied high (so only useing the second
half of the ROM) and only the first 4 data lines are used.
Of course the problem for you, I guess, is that a blank chip of the right
type is of little use to you. You need to konw the contents (looks to be
16 4-bit words in your case). You could copy it from a working device fro
the same type of machine, but other than that uou have some designing to
do...
-tony
**************************************
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
> A little stupid.. I know about the rules for appending an S in the right
place, I just
> can't seem to master them.
> > I thought that perhaps Swedish does not have such a concept but then
> > I saw that he does speak of power supplieS and fanS; he even talks
> > about making the CPU's pin compatible, although instead of multiple
> > pins of multiple CPUs that seems to suggest making the (single) pin
> > of a single CPU compatible with something...
English has inconsistent rules, and freely breaks them.
It seems to have more IRREGULAR conjugations, declensions, and plurals.
Can anyone explain why the 'I' is after the 'E' in "WEIRD"?
"I disconnected the speaker on all of the computers in the lab." does not
imply that they share a speaker. Should I have said that I disconnected
the "speakerS"? or maybe "the speaker on EACH computer"?
And, in this particular example, "pin compatible" (or "pin-compatible")
is a commonly used adjective that is not plural, no matter how many pins
the device has.
The object noun in the speaker sentence is the speaker, therefore if you disconnected more than one it would be "speakers" regardless of how many computers they were connected to. Same goes for the pin-compatible CPUs - the noun is the CPU, therefore pin remains singular (even though you're talking about multiple pins on multiple CPUs). Same logic that gives us "attorneys-general" and "gins and tonic" and a whole lot of confusion.
As for weird, I just tell the students it's a weird word.
Was it Bernard Shaw that threw away the rules he considered pointless and archaic? I know about cummings and capitalization, but that does little to make his poems easier to read or more comprehensible.
Here is an article about the Microkit that came out later in 1975:
>
> > Does anyone have a COSMAC Microkit user manual? I have downloaded the
docs
> > for the COSMAC chip from Bitsavers, but there is no reference to the
> > earlier Microkit in this doc.
> I believe its on the net but not there. There is a yahoo COSMAC users
> group.
They do not have the Microkit User Manual, but there not even be one.
Found this reference to the Microkit, but it's nearly a year newer than my
system chip dates, meaning they were still selling Microkits though 1975:
http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/microcomputerAssociates/Microcomputer
_Digest_v02n04_Oct75.pdf
Bill
I've been trying to track down online documentation (manual, engineering
drawings) for this Quad Unibus card, a controller for the RX50. No luck at
all. Nada :-<. Just some references in RSX/RSTS/Ultrix marketing
documents.
Does anyone have, or know where such documentation can be found?
Also, does anyone have (or knows someone who has) a spare/loose M7522 that
they'd be willing to part with?
Thanks!
-----