Does anyone know of a good [available online] UFS filesystem technical
reference (which also covers cylinder grouping, i.e. not the original
'fs')? Google's not turning up much other than a couple of overviews that
are really too high-level.
cheers
Jules
But the 1701/1702 accepts separate chroma and luminance portions of ntsc, right? I bet the Amiger don't put that out.
I have a busted 1702, keeper, and a 1084s on ebay. If anyone needs it, bust a move.
------------------------------
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 12:58 PM PST Alexandre Souza - Listas wrote:
>
>> Duh, thanks, I'd forgotten about the standard composite output on the
>> RCA jack. I was thinking I needed to use the DB23 connector. Nevermind.
>
> You'd better use the db23, the amiga image deserves RGB quality.
>
> If you have a Syncmaster 510, 710, 910 or a LG M1721A, or M1921A LCDs, you can connect 15KHz RGB directly to the VGA input, and it works.
Yeah, I am rebooting after changing the partition table and I am being
careful to "zero" the device before trying to run fdisk. A "real" Seagate
ST125N is working in the same test setup, so it is possible for it to work,
but I have no good way to see the exact SCSI protocol exchange with the
ST125N to see what the difference is.
Thanks,
Wayne
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <
cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Cc:
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:01:21 -0500
Subject: Re: FW: lost emails on SCSI to IDE/SD converter project
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Andrew Lynch <LYNCHAJ at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> The only anomaly I have observed is that DOS 6.22 FDISK reports "No space
>> for DOS partition on drive" when I try to use it to create a primary
>> partition.
Is he rebooting after changing the partition table under DOS 6.22? It's a
known
thing. You can't create the partition and use it right away.
DOS did change, so it's not surprising it "works the way you expect"
under DOS 3.3. DOS was full of "well _this_ sucks! Why did they
do that?" moments back in the day. You might be experiencing one
now.
-ethan
IBM 370/138 front panel : 4900$
The sad part is the original wiring has been gutted and a silly LCD
screen&computer has been stuck in it.
321051214549
http://www.ebay.com/itm/IBM-System-370-Model-138-Mainframe-Operator-
Control-Panel-1974-/321051214549?ru=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fsch%
2Fi.html%3F_sacat%3D0%26_from%3DR40%26_nkw%3D321051214549%26_rdc%
3D1&nma=true&si=RgBCBl627pizsXRcJnGCtT2Mxe4%
253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557#ht_784wt_0
Hi,
I'm looking at the schematics for some old DEC boards, and
I'm having some trouble locating datasheets for the old
parts.
I know, for instance, that the SDA-6 was a matched pair of
transistors, and equivalent to the 2N2060. I can get a
datasheet for the 2N2060 (nd pretend it's a datasheet
for the SDA-6). But what about the other SDA-n? In
particular, at the moment I am looking for a datasheet
for the SDA-5. All I know so far is the pin-out, and that
it was a matched pair of NPN transistors. (Oh yeah,
and the DEC part number was 15-01857.)
Similarly for diodes. I know a D662 is equivalent to a
1N945, but what the heck are the parameters for a
D007?
Any pointers to old data books or whatever would
help.
Thanks,
Vince
--
o< The ASCII Ribbon Campaign Against HTML Email!
Hi all,
I was checking out all the documentation I had scored from Camiel and found
that the space needed to store the VMS 4.0 and 6.0-6.2 documentation is more
than it is worth to me.
So it needs to go.
Pickup in the Netherlands only.
For pics;
http://home.ls-al.eu:8000/log/index.html?id=2013012101
re,
reiche
Anybody on this list have an Apple M0110 keyboard with cable, or just the
cable, that is close to Croatia? I have a fellow there that really wants
one, but the shipping is too high from the US.
Cindy Croxton
_____
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2890 / Virus Database: 2639/6049 - Release Date: 01/21/13
Hi
?
Another quick update on S2I project editted for privacy and brevity.? More progress yesterday and really great news.? Still developmental obviously but am actively looking for additional test cases to shake out the firmware.? Old PC/XTs with?SCSI controllers and the early Macs seem like the logical starting point but there could be others.? Unexpected bonus is some interaction with SCSI-2 but that's out of scope for the project.? If someone gets it working then that's great but not the primary objective.
?
If you want to help with compatibility testing you'll need a serial terminal or PC running along side to capture the diagnostic message stream.? That maybe a useful feature in its own right being able to peer into previously hidden SCSI command interaction stream.
?
Please contact me at LYNCHAJ at YAHOO.COM if you have more questions or want more information.? Better yet S2I is a discussion topic at N8VEM mailing list.
?
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
Subject: [N8VEM: 15431] Re: SCSI2IDE Progress
To: n8vem at googlegroups.com
Date: Monday, January 21, 2013, 11:42 PM
Hi Folks,
Another quick progress report on SCSI2IDE. ?I got a decent amount of time to work on it this weekend and now have all basic functionality working. ?The firmware now reasonably emulates a SCSI 20MB hard disk. ?On both of my test environments, I am able to partition, format, read/write, and boot DOS 3.3.
I am now at a point where I would like to solicit help with compatibility testing. ?I'm sure it will be a bit rough at first, but I need feedback on other platforms. ?Please refer to the Wiki folder:?http://n8vem-sbc.pbworks.com/w/browse/#view=ViewFolder¶m=SCSI%2…. ?You can download the firmware in the file S2I Firmware.zip. ?There is a page with more detailed information called S2I Status. ?It is easy to build the firmware and there is a pre-built ROM in there if you don't want to do a build.
The one warning is that it is currently very slow. ?I have gobs of diagnostics being spit out to the serial port (necessary evil while we work through compatibility) and there are many code optimizations I have not yet bothered with.
There is still a long way to go, but it is awesome to finally see this board doing what it was intended to. ?:-)
Thanks,